The URL can be used to link to this page

2007-12-04 PacketCITYOFALAMEDA.CALIFORNJA SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY -- - - DECEMBER 4, 2007 - - - 6:30 P.M. Time: Tuesday, December 4, 2007, 6:30 p.m. Place: Cit Council Chambers Conference Room, City Hall, corner of Santa Clara Avenue and Oak Street Agenda: 1. Roll Call -- City Council 2. Public Comment on Agenda Items Only Anyone wishing to address the Council on agenda items only may speak for a maximum of 3 minutes per item 3. Adjournment to Closed Session to consider: 3-A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency Negotiators: Craig Jory and Human Resources Director Employee Organizations: All Public Safety Bargaining Units 4. Announcement of Action Taken in Closed Session, if any 5. Adjournment -- City Council everly +o fan, Mayor C42 -, CITY OF ALAMEDA • CALIFORNIA ° G3G1 IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL: 1. Please file a speaker's slip with the Deputy City Clerk and upon recognition by the Mayor, approach the podium and state your name; speakers are limited to three (3) minutes per item. 2. Lengthy testimony should be submitted in writing and only a summary of pertinent points presented verbally. 3. Applause and demonstration are prohibited during Council meetings. AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY DECEMBER 4, 2007 - - - - 7:30 P.M. [Note: Regular Council Meeting convenes at 7:30 pm, City Hall, Council Chambers, corner of Santa Clara Ave and Oak St] The Order of Business for City Council Meeting is as follows: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 • Roll Call Agenda Changes Proclamations, Special Orders of the Day and Announcements Consent Calendar Agenda Items Oral Communications, Non - Agenda (Public Comment) Council Communications (Communications from Council) Adjournment Public Participation Anyone wishing to address the Council on agenda items or business introduced by Councilmembers may speak for a maximum of 3 minutes per agenda item when the subject is before Council. Please file a speaker's slip with the Deputy City Clerk if you wish to address the City Council SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL 6:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CONFERENCE ROOM Separate Agenda (Closed Session) SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL, ALAMEDA 7 :31 P.M. REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, Separate Agenda PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. ROLL CALL - City Council 2. AGENDA CHANGES 3. PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS 3-A. Park Street Business Association Proclamation. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted, approved or adopted by one motion unless a request for removal for discussion or explanation is received from the Council or a member of the public 4 -A. Minutes of the Special City Council Meetings held on November 13, 2007 and November 19, 2007; and the Special and Regular City Council Meetings held on November 20, 2007. (City Clerk) 4-B. Bills for ratification. (Finance) 4 -C. Recommendation to accept the Annual Review of Public Art Ordinance. (Planning and Building) 4 -D. Recommendation to accept the Impact Fee Report for Police and Fire Services. (Finance) 4 -E. Recommendation to accept Affordable Housing Ordinance Annual Review. (Development Services) 4 -F. Recommendation to accept the Annual Review of the Citywide Development Fee and the Fleet Industrial Supply Center (FISC) /Catellus Traffic Fee. (Public Works) 4 -G. Recommendation to appropriate $17,676 in Measure B Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Funds as the required local match for accepting a Bicycle Facility Program Grant from the Bay Area Quality Management District. (Public Works) 4 -H. Adoption of Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12121 Setting the Order of Business of City of Alameda City Council Meetings. (City Manager) 5. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 5 -A. Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the period ending June 30, 2007. (Finance) 6. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON- AGENDA (Public Comment ) Any person may address the Council in regard to any matter over which the Council has jurisdiction or of which it may take cognizance, that is not on the agenda 7. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (Communications from Council) Councilmembers can address any matter, including reporting on any Conferences or meetings attended 7 -A. Consideration of Mayor's appointment to the Rent Review Advisory Committee. 8. ADJOURNMENT - City Council * * * • For use in preparing the Official Record, speakers reading a written statement are invited to submit a copy to the City Clerk at the meeting or e -mail to: lweisige @ci.alameda.ca.us • Sign language interpreters will be available on request. Please contact the City Clerk at 747 -4800 or TDD number 522-7538 at least 72 hours prior to the Meeting to request an interpreter. • Equipment for the hearing impaired is available for public use. For assistance, please contact the City Clerk at 747 -4800 or TDD number 522 -7538 either prior to, or at, the Council Meeting. • Accessible seating for persons with disabilities, including those using wheelchairs, is available. • Minutes of the meeting available in enlarged print. • Audio Tapes of the meeting are available upon request. • Please contact the City Clerk at 747-4800 or TDD number 522-7538 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to request agenda materials in an alternative format, or any other reasonable accommodation that may be necessary to participate in and enjoy the benefits of the meeting. CITY OF ALAMEDA • CALIFORNIA SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL, ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (ARRA), AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (CIC) TUESDAY - - - DECEMBER 4, 2007 - - - 7 :31 P.M. Location: Cit Council Chimers, City Hall, corner of Santa Clara Avenue and Oak Street. Public Participation Anyone wishing to address the Council /Board /Commission on agenda items or business introduced by the Council/Board /Commission may speak for a maximum of 3 minutes per agenda item when the subject is before the Council/Board /Commission. Please file a speaker's slip with the Deputy City Clerk if you wish to speak. 1. ROLL CALL - City Council, ARRA, CIC 2. CONSENT Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted, approved or adopted by one motion unless a request for removal for discussion or explanation is received from the Council/Board /Commission or a member of the public 2 -A. Minutes of the Special Community Improvement Commission Meeting of November 20, 2007. (City Clerk) [CIC] 2 -B. Recommendation to authorize the use of up to $50,000 in interest earnings to complete the enclosure of the Historic Alameda Theater Balcony Access Corridor and related improvements. (Development Services) [CIC] 2 -C. Recommendation to approve a $300,000 loan to Alameda Entertainment Associates, L.P. for rehabilitation and restoration of the mezzanine balcony in the Historic Alameda Theater and for augmentation of the Cineplex construction contingency budget. (Development Services) [CIC] 2 -D. Recommendation to accept the Annual Report and authorize transmittal to the State Controller's Office and the City Council. (Development Services) [CIC] 2 -E. Recommendation to accept transmittal of the: 1) Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2007; 2) Auditor's Agreed Upon Procedures Report on compliance with Vehicle Code Section 40200.3 Parking Citation Processing; 3) Agreed Upon Procedures Report on compliance with the Proposition 111 21005 -06 Appropriations Limit Increment; 4) Police and Fire Retirement System Pension Plans 1079 and 1092 Audit Report for Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2007; 5) Metropolitan Transportation Commission Grant Programs Financial Statements for Year ended June 30, 2007; 6) Community Improvement Commission Basic Component Unit Financial Statements for the Year ended June 30, 2007; and 7) Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Basic Component Unit Financial Statements for the Year ended June 30, 2007. (Finance) [City Council/ARRA/CIC] 3. AGENDA ITEMS 3 -A. Public Hearing to consider approval of a first addendum to the Alameda Landing Mixed -use Development Project Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, first amendment to the Development Agreement, and first amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement for the Alameda Landing Mixed Use Project to modify the Public Waterfront Promenade; • Adoption of Resolution Approving and Authorizing Execution of an Amendment of the Disposition and Development Agreement (Alameda Landing Mixed Use Project) with Palmtree Acquisition Corporation. [City Council]; • Adoption of Resolution Approving a First Addendum to the Alameda Landing Mixed Use Development Project Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and Authorizing the Executive Director to Amend the Disposition and Development Agreement (Alameda Landing Mixed Use Project) with Palmtree Acquisition Corporation. [CIC] • Introduction of Ordinance Approving Development Agreement Amendment DA -06 -0003 to the Development Agreement (Alameda Landing Mixed Use Commercial Project) By and Between the City of Alameda and Palmtree Acquisition Corporation, dated January 16, 2007. (Development Services) [City Council] (Continued from November 20, 2007) 3 -B. Recommendation to accept the Fiscal Year 2007 First Quarter Financial Report and budget adjustments. (Finance) [City Council, ARRA, CIC] 4. ADJOURNMENT - City Council, ARRA, CIC Beverly Jo so , Ma r Chair, A. e a Reuse and Redevelopment Authority and Community Improvement Commission ÷101 i Proc&zmation WHEREAS, Lars Hansson served as President of the Park Street Business Association from January of 2001 through December of 2007; and WHEREAS, during his tenure in office, and because of his efforts, the City of Alameda and the Park Street Business Association formed a strong partnership to improve the streetscape, retail mix, and maintenance of the District; and W1-(Ei:?E14S, the first phase of the streetscape was completed, planning for phase two is soon to be completed, and improvements north of Lincoln Avenue are being planned; and W1-EgEAS, the retail mix in the District has improved and diversified during his tenure as President, while the District has retained its traditional main street charm; and WHEREAS, the planning and approval for a downtown parking garage and new Cineplex, and the rehabilitation of the historic Alameda Theater were completed; and k)q-tE7A5, the leadership shown by Lars has been a driving force for all the projects and programs in the District, especially the garage, Cineplex, and historic theater project. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT 1ESOLVED, that I, Beverly J. Johnson, Mayor of the City of Alameda, do hereby proclaim December 5, 2007 LI4S 1-A!'JSSON APP'RECIArIOtJ DIY in the City of Alameda and take this opportunity to recognize Lars Hansson for his untiring contributions to our City, its residents, and the Park Street Business District. City Council Agenda Item #3 -A 12-04-07 UNAPPROVED MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY -- - - NOVEMBER 13, 2007 - - - 6:00 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:21 p.m. Councilmember Gilmore led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent: None. The Management Partners report on the workshop is hereto attached and made part of the minutes by reference. AGENDA ITEM (07- ) Workshop on City Priority- Setting Project. The agenda for the workshop was: finalize objectives and purpose statement, discuss progress reporting on highest priorities; develop procedure for adding to or modifying the work plan; wrap up and next steps. * ** Mayor Johnson called a recess at 7:46 p.m. and reconvened the Special Meeting at 8:02 p.m. * * * PUBLIC COMMENT None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 9:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council November 13, 2007 Management Partners Report will be attached to the minutes once received UNAPPROVED SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MONDAY - r- - NOVEMBER 19, 2007 - - --- 6:00 P . M . Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:10 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor Johnson -- 5. Absent: None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (07- ) Conference with Labor Negotiators; Agency Negotiators: Craig Jory and Human Resources Director; Employee Organizations: All Public Safety Bargaining Units. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that Council received a briefing from its Labor Negotiators; no action was taken. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 9:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council November 19, 2007 UNAPPROVED MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY - - - NOVEMBER 20, 2007 - - -- 7:00 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 7 :15 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent: None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (07- ) Conference with Legal Counsel -- Existing Litigation; Name of case: Chow v. City of Alameda, et al. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that Council received a briefing on the status of the litigation and gave direction to Legal Counsel to defend the City. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council November 20, 2007 UNAPPROVED MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - NOVEMBER 20, 2007- -7:30 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:52 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent: None. AGENDA CHANGES None. PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS (07- ) Presentation by the Alameda Museum regarding the Museum Business Plan. Diane Coler -Dark, Museum President, stated earnings will not have the same growth as in the past; income has been converted into certificates to offset the rent increase; thanked Councilmember Matarrese for fundraising and corporate sponsor suggestions; stated fundraising ideas have been implemented; a progress report will be presented in March. Robbie Dileo, Museum Board Member /Secretary, outlined the Business Plan. Mayor Johnson inquired whether gross revenue includes the City's subsidy, to which Ms. Dileo responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson inquired what percentage is the City's subsidy, to which Mr. Dileo responded 50%. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the fundraising drive was successful. Mr. Dileo responded very little; stated some corporate sponsors were acquired. Mayor Johnson stated the Board works very hard to earn money for the Museum; taxpayers make a significant contribution; she is very disappointed that people do not understand the need to financially support the Museum. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council November 20, 2007 1 Ms. Dileo stated that the Museum will have new Board Members soon; the Business Plan is a two -year, forward looking document; the Museum has a lot of money in the bank; hopefully, dipping into reserves will not be necessary; funds were down to approximately $2,000 in 1991 and 1992. Mayor Johnson stated people need to understand that money is needed to run a Museum; inquired whether the Museum has any plans to become accredited, to which Ms. Dileo responded in the negative. Vice Mayor Tam stated that she appreciates receiving the Business Plan; Page 20 outlines a series of activities to help generate additional funds; inquired which area would have the largest growth. Ms. Dileo responded estate sales; stated estate sales are being promoted; a big money maker is the Legacy Home Tour, which also showcases Alameda. Vice Mayor Tam stated Page 22 notes that funds have been set aside to obtain a permanent home; she has trouble understanding the line item referring to funds reserved for finding a permanent home. Ms. Dileo stated the $194,480 Edward Jones Endowment account cannot be touched and is strictly set aside for building. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether said Endowment is stipulated for a specific use. Ms. Dileo responded the Endowment was stipulated for a specific use; stated most of the money was from the Regina Stafford Estate. Vice Mayor Tam stated the Meyers House is open for three hours one Saturday per month; inquired whether the Meyers House is reflected in the expense report. Ms. Dileo responded the Meyers House is reflected in the net figures on Page 41; stated the Meyers House has a separate income statement and balance sheet; income and expenses are equal to date; the Meyers House had significant damage due to a leaky roof; the interior ceiling was damaged; window sills needed to be repaired; she does not have repair costs yet. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether statements reflect the City's operation and maintenance costs. Ms. Dileo responded in the negative; stated there was supposed to be a five percent tithing to the City every year, which was Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 2 November 20, 2007 expected to be approximately $60,000 to $70,000; the assets were devalued based on property in the Union city area. Mayor Johnson inquired whether there is a copy of the Trust, to which the Recreation and Parks Director responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson stated that the Meyers House was not intended to cost the City money; the City maintains the House; the Trust has the ability to take the House back; she is concerned that the Meyers House could be taken back and the City would not be reimbursed for maintenance costs; the matter needs to be addressed immediately; the City needs to be assured that taxpayers will be reimbursed if the Meyers House is taken back. The Recreation and Park Director stated the Trust stipulates that a certain percentage goes to the Meyers House; the Trust has a variety of benefactors. Mayor Johnson stated the Meyers House is maintained with taxpayers' money, but is owned by a private trust. The Recreation and Park Director stated the Meyers House is owned by the City; the Meyers House would revert back to the Trust only if the House is not operated as a museum or for public benefit. Mayor Johnson stated that a report is needed on how the Trust works and how much money is spent; then Council can give direction. The City Manager stated said information will be provided. Mayor Johnson stated the Meyers House should be a separate budget line item. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether there was consensus for giving direction; stated that he does not just want a report; he wants to take action on the matter; a report should be brought back to Council for discussion and disposition. The City Manager inquired whether requested information would be outside of the budget process, to which Council responded in the affirmative. The city Manager stated that the Meyers House history, status, and Trust structure would be provided. Mayor Johnson stated the matter should be brought back for Council discussion, direction, and action. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council November 20, 2007 3 Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the $164,000 [in cash and bank accounts] is for working capital. Ms. Dileo responded said money is for the benefit of the museum to go forward; stated the revenue stream is starting to stabilize. Councilmember deHaan stated that the report shows a two -year future plan. Ms. Dileo stated that writing a more forward thinking plan is difficult because three new Board Members will be appointed in January; she would like to complete projects that help the public access records better; Woody Minor kept notes dating back to the 1880's; the photographic collection consists of approximately 6,000 prints; she does not see making $100,000 per year and not needing the City's support. Councilmember deHaan requested an explanation of the Museum's role in taking on historic information. Ms. Dileo stated that the Museum and Library both have historical information; the Library has collection on Microfiche; the Museum has the actual books. Councilmember deHaan stated that the Museum took over some of the Library's assets. Ms. Dileo stated the Museum took over a lot of things from the City; there are two newspaper collections, one from the Library and a whole set from the Oakland Tribune. Councilmember deHaan stated that he would like to see the [Museum's] vision expanded further. Mayor Johnson inquired when the City's subsidy started. Ms. Dileo responded the early 1990's; stated the Museum relocated in 1990 -1991; $110,000 was paid by the Alameda Unified School District to the City to buy out the 99 -year lease that was ten years old. Mayor Johnson inquired when the Museum moved into the existing building. Ms. Dileo responded 1991; stated City grants were used to make the building suitable for the Museum. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council November 20, 2007 4 Mayor Johnson inquired whether more effort is being made to protect collections. Ms. Dileo responded items were placed on casters long ago; stated collections are on racks; plenty of effort has been put into maintenance. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Museum industry has standards for preserving collections. Ms. Dileo responded she that is not an expert; stated efforts are being made with available resources. Mayor Johnson stated on -going efforts need to be made to expand displays. Ms. Dileo stated there will be two new displays after the first of the year. Councilmember Gilmore thanked Ms. Dileo for presenting the Business Plan; stated a lot of work went into the Plan; she understands that the forward looking aspect is limited because there will be three new Board Members; she would like future reports to address expanding fundraising, the marketing plan, and membership plan; she would like to see more detailed steps on how expansion will be accomplished and how success will be measured; concrete steps need to be established for implementing ideas; Council was clear in stating that greater fundraising efforts and results are expected; educational services may be beneficial to the public but do not bring in money; rent will increase; she would like to see the Museum make an effort to contribute to the delta. Councilmember Matarrese thanked Ms. Dileo for the information; stated it is important for people to know the cost of running a Museum; the City has a role by allocating $50,000 to support the Museum; a budgetary fundraising goal needs to be assigned; Council can measure the progress against the goal; the Board should consider assigning a target for a 2008 membership drive; future updates should provide said information; tonight's discussion helps put public spotlight on the Museum so that people are aware that the Museum is here, what the costs are, and that volunteers work very hard to keep the Museum going; he would like to see the City and Museum move together as partners. Ms. Coler-Dark stated that membership has increased from 350 to over 450 over the last year. Mayor Johnson stated that it is important to establish 2008 Regular Meeting Alameda City Council November 20, 2007 5 membership and fundraising goals. Ms. Dileo stated that volunteers spend approximately 150 hours per week at the Museum; costs would escalate by approximately $150,000 if the Museum had an Executive Director and Curator. Mayor Johnson stated that other non - profits hire full -time or part - time Executive Directors to make money; sometimes it is necessary to spend money to make money. Ms. Dileo stated the Museum spent $50,000 to $60,000 on a large Museum study with no results. Mayor Johnson stated volunteers are needed, but money needs to be raised also. Councilmember deHaan stated that interfacing with the schools, Library, and City is valuable; Council is eager to see the Museum succeed; he would not like to see the City lose its history; China has 2000 years of history; the Meyers House is an important segment; it is important to make the Museum sustainable for the long run; the Museum will always have a role; Council can discuss the budget and funding allocation. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Johnson announced that the Minutes [paragraph no. 07- ] and Resolution Authorizing Open Market Purchase [paragraph no. 07- were removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Vice Mayor Tam moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.] (07- ) Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting, the Special Joint City Council and Housing Authority Board of Commissioners Meeting, the Special Joint City Council and Community Improvement Commission Meeting and the Regular City Council Meeting held on November 6, 2007; and Special City Council Meeting held on November 7, 2007. Approved. Councilmember deHaan stated that Council received an Off Agenda Report noting that $1.3 million was put into the parking structure; he would like to have said information added to the November 6, 2007 Regular City Council Meeting minutes. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council November 20, 2007 6 Mayor Johnson stated minutes need to reflect what was said at the meeting. Councilmember Gilmore stated that Page 17 of the November 6, 2007 Regular City Council Meeting minutes states "the matter is not an inappropriate item to discuss during Council Communications "; the double negative is confusing. Councilmember deHaan moved approval of the minutes with the following corrections: Page 17 ... "the matter is an appropriate item "; and Page 9... "the vote would not have been 7 to 2 ". Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ( *07- ) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,857,184.79. ( *07_ ) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Investment Report for period ending September 30, 2007. Accepted. ( *07-- ) Recommendation to accept the work of William P. Young Construction for the Ballena Bay Bridge Seismic Retrofit Project, No. P.W. 05-00-09. Accepted. ( *07-. ) Recommendation to award a Contract in the amount of $102,177, including contingencies, to Robert C. Terry, dba: Comfort Air Mechanical Systems, for the annual heating, ventilating, and air conditioning systems maintenance in various City facilities, No. P.W. 09- 07 -30. Accepted. ( *07- ) Resolution No. 14159, "Authorizing Applications to the Caltrans Safe Routes to School Program for Fiscal Years 2006/2007 and 2007/2008 and the Use of City Matching Funds for Construction of Pedestrian Access and Street Crossing Improvements near Franklin Elementary School and Wood Middle School and for Purchase and Installation of Radar Speed Signs." Adopted. (07- ) Resolution No. 14160, "Authorizing Open Market Purchase from Berendo Solutions, Inc. of Los Angeles, California, Pursuant to Section 3 -15 of the Alameda City Charter for Electronic Citation Software. " Adopted. Vice Mayor Tam congratulated the Police Chief on the grant; stated the staff report notes that the software would enhance the ability to capture data related to the Police Department's efforts to promote cooperative strategies to prevent racial profiling; she would like to have a better understanding of what is involved in Regular Meeting Alameda City Council November 20, 2007 7 the data collection. The Police Chief stated the existing software is fifteen years old and does not interface with the Records Management System; the proposed system would interface with the Records Management System and the court system throughout the State; driver's license status, warrants, etc. can be checked by swiping the license; the electronic interface would help make court processing quicker; the Police Department has collected data on traffic stops for years; the proposed software would link said information. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether said data exists or is something that the Police officer enters upon a traffic citation stop. The Police Chief responded Police officers enter data for every stop; stated information would be tracked through the electronic citation software system. Councilmember Gilmore stated the existing software is fifteen years old; she is troubled by the fact that there is only one vendor who makes the software that interfaces with the current system in a way that is acceptable to the Police Department; inquired whether there would be trouble with interfacing in the future if the existing software is replaced. The Police Chief responded the proposed software would do things that the old software does not; stated the existing Records Management System and computerized dispatch system are state -of- the -art and provide interfacing; court system interfacing is new; other vendors have not been able to interface with the court system; the citation component would interface where previous systems did not; the system is cutting edge and is beyond what other vendors are providing; the system meets all criteria and has been tried by Alameda County and City of Oakland. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the new system would be an add -on or replacement, to which the Police Chief responded a replacement. Vice Mayor Tam moved adoption of the resolution. Mayor Johnson inquired whether there would be annual costs. The Police Chief responded upgraded maintenance costs would be included in the grant. Mayor Johnson inquired what is the length of coverage under the current fee. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council November 20, 2007 8 The Police Chief responded three years; maintenance costs could be offset by other grants in three years. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether other departments have evaluated and bought into the system. The Police Chief responded Alameda County and the City of Oakland have bought the system; the court system has signed off that the system meets their specifications and requirements. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ( *07- ) Ordinance No. 2975, "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Chapter XIII (Building and Housing) by Repealing Article I (Uniform Codes Relating to Building, Housing and Technical Codes) in Its Entirety and Adding a New Article I (Uniform Codes Relating to Building, Housing and Technical Codes) to Adopt the 2007 California Building Code, the 2007 California Historical Building Code, the 2007 California Electrical Code, the 2007 California Plumbing Code, the 2007 California Mechanical Code, the 2007 California Energy Code, the 1997 Uniform Housing Code, and the 1997 Edition of the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, and by Amending Chapter XV (Fire Prevention) by Repealing Section 15 -1 in Its Entirety and by Adding a New Section 15 -1 to Adopt the 2007 California Fire Code." Finally passed. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (07- ) Recommendation to accept the improvements and release the Subdivision Bond for Tract 7170 (Marina Cove) subject to receiving a Maintenance Bond for improvements and landscaping and authorize the City Manager to execute an Amendment to the Annual Landscape Maintenance Contract in the amount of $24,000 to maintain the parking strip within the Marina Cove development. The Public Works Director gave a brief presentation. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Maintenance Assessment District amount can be adjusted to cover the actual maintenance costs. The Public Works Director responded Council adopts a budget each year; stated the amount is adjusted by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) increase. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the Clement Avenue strip includes up to the water and the backside of the shelter near the Regular Meeting Alameda City Council November 20, 2007 9 park, to which the Public Works Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the area includes up to where the park that terminates at the Fortman Marina. The Public Works Director responded the area is included if the areaa was constructed as part of the subdivision. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the budget covers staff or contractors. The Public Works Director responded the budget includes both administration cost and any work done by staff or contractors; stated landscape maintenance has been done by contractors for years. Mayor Johnson inquired whether future infrastructure maintenance is covered. The Public Works Director responded sewers are not covered because money is collected from property taxes; the Maintenance Assessment District pays for street and sidewalk maintenance. Councilmember Gilmore moved approval of the staff recommendation. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote --- 5. (07- ) Recommendation to approve re -use of the Carnegie Building as the Community Arts /Planning and Building Center, amend the Contract with Muller & Caulfield Architects to provide architectural and engineering services for design development through the construction phase of the Carnegie Restoration and Preservation Project, appropriate funds in the amount of $481,816 to execute the Contract, and authorize the City Manager to seek debt financing. The Building official made a brief presentation and introduced Rosemary Muller of Muller & Caulfield Architects and Alan Dreyfus of Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. Ms. Muller gave a Power Point presentation. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the balcony proposed for the Museum use could be constructed on the outside of the building. Mr. Dreyfus responded the idea was reviewed; stated it would be Regular Meeting Alameda City Council November 20, 2007 10 very difficult; due to the location of sheer walls, the only alternative would be an exit out of the east side, which would go down to the ground. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the exit would be similar to the Council Chambers exit. Ms. Muller responded in the affirmative; stated the exit would not look too great from the street. Mr. Dreyfus stated exterior and interior building impacts were reviewed; the interior is important, but the exterior is as well; the [balcony] proposal appeared to have the least impact on the historic fabric. Mayor Johnson stated that she appreciates the lighting issue information; the building has a lot of windows, which she had considered when reviewing different uses. Ms. Muller stated museums tend to find preserving artifacts more important than seeing buildings. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the building is not the ideal type of building for a museum. Ms. Muller responded that she is reluctantly coming to said conclusion; stated thirty years ago museums were okay with daylight; research has led to curators being more careful with artifacts; visiting exhibits will not allow paintings to be displayed if there is too much light. Councilmember Matarrese inquired how the art exhibit area [in the proposed Community Arts /Planning and Building Center] could be justified if people are concerned about paintings. Ms. Muller responded that she discussed the matter with artists and they were not concerned about art for sale being displayed for two to three months as long as the windows have film to keep out most of the ultraviolet light. Mayor Johnson inquired whether oil paintings have different lighting tolerance than wood or leather. Ms. Muller responded in the affirmative; stated the most light sensitive items are drawings on paper, watercolors and fabric, such as old costumes. Mayor Johnson inquired whether special art exhibits require Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 November 20, 2007 protection of the art, to which Ms. Muller responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Matarrese requested staff to reconcile the discrepancy between the $2.4 million price in the staff report and the $4.4 to $4.7 million mentioned in the Power Point presentation. The Planning and Building Director stated $2.4 million is the amount in the un- funded Capital Improvement Project (CIP) budget; there are different costs now that a feasibility analysis has been completed. Ms. Muller stated 25% is typically added to construction cost estimates to get the complete project cost. The City Manager stated $2.4 million was included in the CIP budget prior to the completion of the work by the architect, which provides a better estimate; the new estimate would be used to update the $2.4 million listed in the budget document. Mayor Johnson stated that the number is more refined. Ms. Muller stated there are still a lot of holes to be filled since the building has not been designed; the number is high enough that it should be okay. The Planning and Building Director summarized the staff recommendation; noted Council could direct staff to provide a financing plan prior to authorizing the contract. Councilmember deHaan stated the project itself is a restoration project trying to retain some of the City's history in a building, which is worthwhile; inquired whether Planning currently occupies 6,000 square feet and would move into an 18,000 square foot building. Ms. Muller responded the Carnegie building is 10,800 square feet. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the effort to save the building would be subsidized by Planning Department funds, to which the Planning and Building Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether taking a step to save something historic would cost more than renting or building office space somewhere else. The Planning and Building Director responded the attempt is to serve the public in a certain area; stated the larger space would Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 12 November 20, 2007 allow information from other City departments to be displayed. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether finding other functional quarters would be cheaper to maintain and renovate, to which the Planning and Building Director responded that might not be the case and would require analysis. Councilmember deHaan stated the real goal is to save the historical building and make it functional; there have been discussions about the City's commitment to restoration; the project could be done cheaper quartered somewhere else. Mayor Johnson stated Planning and Building would subsidize the historic restoration and renovation since the Department would use the building. Councilmember deHaan stated the cause is more than worthy; people just need to understand that it would be a commitment over and above in cost. Mayor Johnson stated two birds are being killed with one stone. Councilmember deHaan stated the former Children's library is another opportunity to centralize the City's office space; he requested that centralizing the City's operations be reviewed; he was hoping to see more of said vision and plan; inquired whether a different department could go in the [Carnegie] building, but the Planning Department was selected due to greater access to funding; inquired where money would come from to relocate a different department. The City Manager responded funding set aside from building permits has to be used for Planning and Building services; that she could not identify other potential funding sources at the moment. Councilmember Gilmore stated other departments have been moved into buildings owned by the City the last times there were moves; the Recreation and Parks Department was moved into a City owned building; the City is only paying maintenance and tenant improvements, which is an entirely different story than finding 8,000 to 10,000 square feet of space in the open market. Councilmember deHaan stated Councilmember Gilmore has a valid point; currently, the City occupies Building 1 at Alameda Point rent free; the City might not have said luxury at a later point in time; he would like for the City to lessen the future burden and better utilize facilities over which the City has control, such as the former Children's library. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council November 20, 2007 13 Alana Dill, Alameda, suggested the Carnegie space be used not just for art display, but also include classroom space. Marilyn Schumacher, Alameda, stated Mr. Carnegie intended his buildings be used for public uses, not just libraries; urged approval of the Community Arts /Planning and Building Center. Christopher Buckley, Alameda Architectural Preservation Society (AAPS), stated AAPS concluded that both uses would meet AAPS's suggested selection criteria of public access and historic renovation. Mike Shepard, Frank Bette Center, thanked the Council for considering restoration of the Carnegie building; thanked staff for the community involvement process; stated that he supports the Community Arts /Planning and Building Center. Debra Owen, Alameda, stated the two -story area should be used for sculpture; there are not many places to display sculpture. Mayor Johnson inquired whether there could be sculpture display at the Community Arts /Planning and Building Center, to which Ms. Muller responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson stated Muller & Caulfield's retrofit work on the building is beautiful and cannot be seen. Councilmember deHaan stated the retrofit is well hidden; inquired whether the former Children's library is 4,400 square feet. Ms. Muller responded that her firm was responsible for the connection building; she reviewed the drawing and the former Children's library is about 3,800 including the garages and lower level, which has a ceiling height of seven and a half feet. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the [former Children's library] building is on brick foundation, to which Ms. Muller responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan inquired how many people could fit in the space if it were used as an office, to which Ms. Muller responded around thirty. Councilmember deHaan inquired how many people are in the Planning and Building department, to which Ms. Muller responded forty. Councilmember deHaan stated the building would be twice the size, Regular Meeting Alameda City Council November 20, 2007 14 but would be used for more than just office space. Ms. Muller noted office space includes conference rooms, storage and other items that take up additional space. Councilmember Gilmore stated Planning currently occupies about 6,000 square feet; 6,000 square feet of office space in City Hall would be available if Planning moved into the Carnegie building; inquired which department could move into the space, perhaps Public Works or Development Services; stated the goal is to try to centralize services. The City Manager stated bringing Public Works back into City Hall was reviewed during the process; Information Technology could be moved back as well if there is enough space; Development Services is a little larger. Councilmember deHaan questioned whether Development Services could fit in the former Children's library. The City Manager stated having staff together increases efficiency; having Public Works move back was reviewed because the department is involved with the Permit Center. Councilmember deHaan stated all of the possibilities should be reviewed; the City might have to be out of Building 1 at some point. The City Manager stated a Facilities Mater Plan is on the work plan; since funding is available and the Carnegie building is not occupied, there is an opportunity to move Planning and Building into the space, restore the building, provide better customer service in the Planning and Building Department and return another department or two back to City Hall; staff does not anticipate there is enough room for Public Works, Information Technology and Development Services; staff would look for other opportunities in the future. Mayor Johnson stated the former Children's library should be reviewed; inquired whether there is extra space in the building occupied by the Recreation and Parks Department; stated that she understands the department does not utilize the whole building. The City Manager responded said issues would all be included in the analysis. Councilmember deHaan stated that he is concerned about the annual maintenance of the Carnegie; said costs would be over and above Regular Meeting Alameda City Council November 20, 2007 15 what is being incurred currently; maintaining the building will be a budget line item of a couple hundred thousand dollars per year; the question is how to relieve other burdens at Alameda Point and move forward. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he has a couple of concerns; philosophically, he does not believe Andrew Carnegie envisioned giving the City an office building; the Carnegie should not be used as an office building; form a practical point, there are too many unanswered questions regarding the building use and consolidating City services from City Hall West without reviewing all options; he inquired about an Oak Street property at one point; there were rumors about the property being for sale; he never received an answer; looking at said property should be reviewed; the Recreation building is not fully utilized; said issues should be reviewed first; his other questions are regarding financing; the project costs are almost double what was initially anticipated; questioned whether the building would always have to be used for Planning and Building if permit revenues are used to finance the debt; questioned whether tax increment can be used to pay debt service; further stated the funding source, as well as the Master Plan, should be determined first; there is an option to complete. the work regardless of use, particularly if tax increment can be used; the elevator has to be completed regardless of use; phasing would allow expensive items to be completed; the lighting information is interesting; there should be further study; the building is to important to rush to a decision at this point. Vice Mayor Tam stated that she appreciates the presentation addressing public access and the use types that have been considered; staff and the architects exercised a fair and balanced due diligence process working with the museum; deterioration will continue the longer the building remains unoccupied and not renovated; the building is a vital historical asset that needs to be preserved; the timing and available funding is a coincidence; the project cost will not decrease; the Community Arts /Planning and Building use recommended does not preclude converting to other uses if there is funding in the future; the $4.7 million estimate brings the building up to code and allows for other issues; the daylight issue is in concert with the City's green building efforts; that she supports the staff recommendation. Vice Mayor Tam moved approval of the staff recommendation. Councilmember Gilmore seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Gilmore stated projections were made regarding public access to the building; the museum's Regular Meeting Alameda City Council November 20, 2 0 07 16 projected attendance is four times higher than current attendance and is significantly higher than other museums; the projection is not comparable to other similar museums even if moving into the Carnegie would cause a large spike in attendance; the Community Arts /Planning and Building Center would provide more access for more people on a more on -going basis; the museum would double its hours to 32 hours per week; the Planning and Building Department is open 48 hours per week; she seconded the motion because of daylight and attendance issues, as well as having a funding stream for renovating and maintaining the building. Mayor Johnson stated the chart showing the Petaluma and Hayward museum visitors is consistent with the number of Alameda museum visitors. Councilmember Gilmore stated the Alameda Museum attendance might double or triple, but a four to four and half percent increase is very optimistic. Mayor Johnson stated a lot more foot traffic would come in to see the artwork in the Community Arts /Planning and Building Center. Councilmember Gilmore stated the Alameda Museum would not be precluded from having exhibits in the space from time to time. Mayor Johnson stated the exposure in the Carnegie building might encourage people to visit the museum. Councilmember deHaan stated that he is concerned about the cost and revenue stream; after going forward with $1/2 million to start the process tonight, the situation could be that the revenue stream might not fully develop; that he would like to see more foresight; he does not feel comfortable approving spending $1/2 million tonight; the action is premature; he needs more information although he supports the idea; maintenance would be a budget issue; everything must be put in proper context. Vice Mayor Tam stated the $481,000 would firm up the total project cost and availability of funding would be evaluated. Councilmember Matarrese stated the Planning and Building Director indicated that Council could direct staff to come back with the project financing possibilities, which is an important thing; the City is in a tight budget situation; the funding should be reviewed prior to spending $1/2 million on a project that the City might not be able to finance at this point in time; the building was seismically retrofitted; the Council only has partial bits of information to make a decision to spend $1/2 million and start Regular Meeting Alameda City Council November 20, 2007 17 going down a road that might not be able to be finished; what the building could be, other than a Community Arts /Planning and Building Center, has not been fully explored; people visiting the Planning and Building Department is not the same as people visiting a museum or art center; Planning and Building Department customers are there to do business; he wants to know whether the project can be financed and what it will take to finance the project before voting on anything. Councilmember Gilmore stated that the money for the architectural contract is for changes that have to made to the building regardless of who occupies the building; construction costs are not getting any cheaper; once the drawings are underway and there is a better idea of the number [project cost], the City is going to determine how to finance the project. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether spending the $481,000 is use neutral and whether it does not matter whether or not the building would be a Cultural Arts Center /Museum or a Community Arts /Planning and Building Center. The Planning and Building Director responded the same work goes into the construction plans; stated furnishing would be the only difference; the funding from permit center revenues would have to be repaid if a different use was selected. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether using said funding would require that the building be used as the Community Arts /Planning and Building Center. The City Manager responded the assumption is that the permit center funds would be used for the Community Arts /Planning and Building Center to go forward because the funds have been collected related to Planning and Building services; the proposal was to use the funds to get more detailed cost estimates and come back with a financing plan based on the cost estimates. Councilmember deHaan inquired how much money is in the permit center fund, to which Vice Mayor Tam responded $1.089 million. Councilmember deHaan stated almost half of the funding would be used for design; the building would have to be used for Planning and Building services or the funds would have to be paid back; that he wants firm financial information before moving forward. The Planning and Building Director stated if the Planning and Building Permit Center does not move forward, the funds could be reimbursed when an alternate use comes forward with funding. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 18 November 20, 2007 On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Gilmore, Tam and Mayor Johnson - 3. Noes: Councilmembers deHaan and Matarrese - 2. ORAL COMMtTNICATIONS, NON- AGENDA (Public Comment) (07- ) Musiy Rishin, Alameda, (submitted handout); requested a waiver on a parking ticket delinquent fee. Mayor Johnson requested staff to work with Mr. Rishin on the matter; stated courts allow individuals to perform community service in order to reduce fines. (07- ) Jason Ross (submitted handout) discussed foreclosures. (07- ) Diana Wong urged Council to petition Congress to freeze forclosures. (07- ) Joelle Wright, Larouche Political Action Commission, discussed foreclosures and the banking crises; urged Council to reflect on families who could be losing their homes this holiday season. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (07- ) Vice Mayor Tam stated that she attended the League of California East Bay Division Meeting on November 15; stated that Alameda is one of the two cities where home appreciation values went up; the median price for a home in Alameda is approximately $725,000; 80% to 85% of loans in Alameda are conventional loans; the foreclosures within the City have been steady; the volume of transactions has declined. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the League presentation could be provided in writing. Mayor Johnson suggested a written report be requested. (07- ) Councilmember deHaan stated there were concerns on the future direction on the Carnegie Library with regard to centralizing the City's operation; he would like to place the matter on an agenda Mayor Johnson stated that an analysis of other facilities is a good idea. Councilmember Gilmore stated that she thought she heard that the Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 19 November 20, 2007 information would be provided as part of a facilities master plan. The Assistant City Manager stated said plan is extensive and would not be ready for nine months or so; staff could work on a smaller version of the plan. Councilmember deHaan stated the primary focus is to centralize operations and downsize the footprint at Alameda Point. The Assistant City Manager stated staff could review the matter to see what it would take to relocate the uses in Building One at Alameda Point. Councilmember Gilmore suggested that the matter be placed on an agenda for further discussion. (07- ) Councilmember deHaan stated he would like to have the issue of placing liquor and smoking ads within certain distance of schools brought to Council for discussion. The City Attorney stated that the legal opinion states that Council has no control over the matter. ADJOURNMENT --- City Council There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 11:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council November 20, 2007 20 November 29, 2007 Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers: This is tol certify that the claims listed on the check register and shown below have been approved by the proper officials and, in my opinion, represent fair and just charges against the City in accordance with their respective amounts as indicated thereon. Check Numbers 204257 - 204484 EFT 438 EFT 439 EFT 440 EFT 441 EFT 442 EFT 443 EFT 444 Void Checks: 157801 151267 202089 203732 200424 G RAND TOTAL Respectfully submitted, 9:Pd Pamela J. Sibley Council Warrants 12/04/07 Amount $1,320,246.45 $6,069.70 $1,085.50 $5,877.50 $316.55 $39,993.50 $82,830.06 $150,648.96 ($68.00) ($2,542.76) ($325.00) ($78.94) ($592.50) $1,603,461.02 BILLS #4 -B 12/4/2007 CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Debra Kurita City Manager Date: December 4, 2007 Re: Accept Annual Review of Public Art Ordinance BACKGROUND On March 12, 2003, the City Council adopted Ordinance 2892, which created the Alameda Public Art Program. The intent of the program is to promote a diverse and stimulating cultural environment to enrich the lives of the City's residents and visitors and to contribute to the vitality of the City's economic development. The ordinance provides that private and municipal building projects with an assessed value of $250,000 and over contribute one percent of the building development costs, up to a maximum of $150,000, toward on -site public artwork, cultural programs, or cultural activities. The California Government Code mandates that a local agency establish a separate fund for fees, such as public art fees, paid in connection with the approval of a development project. The Code also requires a local agency to prepare an annual report that provides information regarding the amount of fees collected and expended in the fund balance at both the beginning and end of the fiscal year. This report is intended to satisfy the annual review requirement for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007. DISCUSSION In Fiscal Year 2006 -2007, the City of Alameda Public Art Program administered fees for two development projects, the Alameda Towne Centre and the Bridgeside Shopping Center. Fees generated by these projects totaled $11,750. With the inclusion of interest in the amount of $2,067, the amount credited to the Public Art Fund in Fiscal Year 2006 -2007 was $13,817. In September 2006 and May 2007, the Public Art Commission approved the public art applications for the Bridgeside Shopping Center and the Blanding Avenue Work Live Project, respectively. As of June 30, 2007, the City had not received any other public art applications for pending development projects, including Bay Ship & Yacht. In order to be issued a final certificate of occupancy, the developer must satisfy the public art requirement either by providing on -site public art or by paying an in -lieu fee. On June 19, 2007, the City Council approved the use of the Public Art Fund, as applicable, to fund grants for cultural arts activities in the City and directed staff to develop a Cultural Arts Grant Program, which could be implemented as soon as feasible to do so. Council City Council Agenda Item #4 -C 12 -04 -07 Honorable Mayor and December 4, 2007 Members of the City Council Page 2 of 3 further directed that if necessary, other City revenues would supplement the balance available in the Public Art Fund for a total grant program in the amount of $50,000 for the current fiscal year. Staff is currently working with the Public Art Commission to develop a comprehensive grant program, and the Commission has held two public workshops to date. Upon completion and approval by the Commission, it is anticipated the finalized Alameda Cultural Arts Grant Program will be recommended for adoption and appropriation of funds by the City Council in early 2008. BUDGET CONSIDERATION /FINANCIAL IMPACT For the purposes of this report, the Public Art Ordinance has no impact on the General Fund. By ordinance, funds from public art fees are held in a special fund that can only be used for eligible public art purposes specified in the ordinance. Any future actions by the City Council to appropriate funds for the Alameda Cultural Arts Grant Program may impact the General Fund. From July 1, 2006, through June 30, 2007, $1 3,817 was credited to the Public Art Fund for total ending balance of $43,385. Since July 1, 2007, an additional $40,750 in fees has been credited to the Public Art Fund, totaling $84,135 to date. Expenditures from the fund cover staffing of the Public Art Program and miscellaneous expenses such as postage for "call for artists" mailings. Attachment A describes the beginning and ending fund balances and fund activity for Fiscal Year 2006 -2007. MUNICIPAL CODE /POLICY DOCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE This Annual Review is consistent with the requirements of the California Government Code Section 66006. RECOMMENDATION Accept this report in order to satisfy the Annual Review requirement of the Public Art Ordinance. Respectfully submitted, if Cathy it odbury Planning & Building Director Honorable Mayor and December 4, 2007 Members of the City Council Page 3 of 3 By: Dou "ms's Vu Planner 111 Attachment: A. Fund Activity for Fiscal Year 2006 -07 Beginning and Ending Fund Balances and Fund Activity for Fiscal Year 2006 -07 FUND 285 -- Public Art Fund Fiscal Year 2006 -07 Starting Fund Balance 32,917.86 Revenue Administration Fees 11,750.00 Interest Allocation 2,067.49 Total Revenue 13,817.49 Expenditures Operating 3,350.40 Miscellaneous (Postage) 0 Total Expenditures 3,350.40 Ending Fund Balance 43,384.95 City Council Attachment to Agenda Item #4 -C 12 -04 -07 CITY OF ALAMEDA MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Debra Kurita City Manager Date: December 4, 2007 Re: Accept the Impact Fee Report for Police and Fire Services BACKGROUND On March 21, 1 990, the City Council adopted the Police and Fire Fee Ordinance. This ordinance serves to mitigate the impacts caused by new construction on Police and Fire services. The ordinance established the City's Police and Fire Services Fee requirements as Section 27 -2 of the Alameda Municipal Code and states that this fee is required for all new construction. The original fee was 12 cents per square foot. In 1 991, the fee was increased to 14 cents per square foot, and in February 1 995 it was increased to 15.5 cents per square foot. The Municipal Code requires that the City Council review the fee requirements on an annual basis to determine whether they are reasonably related to the impacts of new construction and whether the fee is still needed. This report is intended to satisfy the annual review requirement for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007. DISCUSSION At the time of final inspection or date of certificate of occupancy, whichever is first, the developer must pay the Police and Fire Services Fee. The ordinance provides developers with an appeal process whereby the developer may apply for an adjustment or waiver of the Police and Fire Services Fee. Award of appeals is based on the absence of any reasonable relationship or nexus between the police and fire service impacts of the new construction and the payment of the Police And Fire Fee. The appeal process includes a public hearing and a decision by the City Council. BUDGET CONSIDERATION /FINANCIAL IMPACT The Police and Fire Services Fee Ordinance has no impact on the General Fund. By ordinance, funds from this fee are segregated in a special account that can only be used for eligible purposes specified in the ordinance. City Council Agenda Item #4 -D 12-04-07 Honorable Mayor and December 4, 2007 Members of the City Council Page 2 From July 1, 2006, through June 30, 2007, a total of $77,809.15 in fees was credited to this fund. Expenditures from the account supported the debt service payments for the Police Building Remodel /Construction. Attachment A describes the beginning and ending fund balances and fund activity for fiscal year 2006-2007. MUNICIPAL CODE /POLICY DOCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE This Annual Review is consistent with the requirements of Section 27 -2 (Police and Fire Fee Requirements) of the Alameda Municipal Code and California Government Code Section 66006. RECOMMENDATION Accept the Impact Fee Report for Police and Fire Services to satisfy the annual review requirement. Respectfully submitted, elle -Ar(yf Boyer Chief Financial Officer JB:dI Attachment Police & Fire Construction Impact Fee (Fund 161) Fund Balance Analysis FY06 -07 Fund balance forward from prior fiscal year FY06 -07 as of 6/30/2007 293.96 Revenue: Police /Fire Construction Impact Fee Interest Allocation 77,809.15 Total Revenue 77,809.15 Expenditures: Transfer to Police Building Debt Service Total Expense Fund Balance end of 6/30/2007 78, 040.00 78, 040.00 63.11 City Council Attachment to Agenda Item #4 -D 12-04-07 CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Debra Kurita City Manager Date: December 4, 2007 Re: Accept Affordable Housing Ordinance Annual Review BACKGROUND On December 19, 1989, the City Council adopted the Affordable Housing Ordinance, which was created to mitigate the housing impacts caused by new or expanded non- residential construction. The fees apply to office /research and development, retail, warehouse /industrial, manufacturing, and hotel /motel construction. The ordinance established the City's Affordable Housing Unit/Fee (AHUF) requirements as Section 27-- 1 of the Alameda Municipal Code and states that these requirements can be satisfied either by the provision of housing units affordable to low and moderate income households or by the payment of an in -lieu fee. The fees remained the same from 1989 to Spring 2001. In June 2001, the City Council increased the in -lieu fee by 15 percent as an adjustment for prior inflation. The City Council also provided for an annual fee adjustment to reflect changes in construction costs. The Municipal Code mandates that the City Council review the unit/fee requirements on an annual basis to determine whether they are reasonably related to the impacts of development and whether the affordable housing units, programs, and activities are still needed. This report is intended to satisfy the annual review requirement for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007. DISCUSSION At the time of building permit application, a developer must satisfy the affordable housing requirement either by providing affordable units or by paying an in -lieu fee. To date, two developers have provided one unit each. For the first project, in 1995, a unit on Alameda Avenue was designated as affordable to fulfill the obligation of conversion of a building on Santa Clara from residential to office space. For the second project, in 2004, a unit on Pensacola Road was designated as affordable to fulfill the obligation of installing new Head Start modular classrooms at West Midway Avenue. The City monitors both units to ensure that long -term affordability is maintained. All other developers have paid a fee in -lieu of providing housing units. The ordinance provides developers with a process to apply for an adjustment or waiver of the affordable housing requirement if there is no reasonable relationship between a particular project and the City Council Agenda Item #4 -E 12-04-07 Honorable Mayor and December 4, 2007 Members of the City Council Page 2 of 3 need for affordable housing. The appeal process includes a review by the Development Services Director and the City Council, which makes the final decision. The original study utilized to establish the affordable housing requirements found that construction or expansion of non - residential development was a major factor in attracting new employees to the City, which in turn created a need and demand for additional housing in the City, and specifically for additional affordable housing. This study was reviewed in November 2006, with the conclusion that the demand for affordable housing and associated subsidies is comparable to or greater than those calculated at the time of the original study in 1989, and the City's fees are well within the limits of the maximum fees that could be supported on a nexus basis. In addition, the City's affordable housing units, programs, and activities are still needed. The City has not yet satisfied the goals established in the Housing Element for affordable housing, and the average market price of housing is beyond the reach of households at very low, low and moderate income levels. High land costs and scarcity of land available for development hinder the provision of affordable housing units solely through private action. Affordable housing rents and purchase prices remain below the level necessary to stimulate new construction, and federal and state housing finance and subsidy programs remain insufficient by themselves to satisfy affordable housing needs. The Affordable Housing Ordinance establishes a method for increasing the fee annually. The fee increase is based on the increase in local cost of construction, as reported by the Engineering News Report Construction Price Index for San Francisco. From June 2006 to June 2007, the cost of construction rose by 7.4 percent; therefore, the revised AH U F fees included in the Master Fee schedule effective July 1, 2007, were increased by 7.4 percent. The following table lists the adjusted fees by development type: Office /R &D Retail Warehouse /Industrial Manufacturing Hotel /Motel FY 2006 -07 Fee (per sq ft) $3.92 $1.99 $0.68 $0.68 $1, 007 /room Adjustment of 7.4% +$0.29 +$0.15 +$0.05 +$0.05 +$19.00 FY 2007 -08 Fee (per sq ft) $4.21 $2.14 ■ $0.73 $0.73 $1,081 /room Honorable Mayor and December 4, 2007 Members of the City Council Page 3 of 3 BUDGET CONSIDERATION /FINANCIAL IMPACT By ordinance, funds from affordable housing fees are sequestered in a special fund that can only be used for eligible housing purposes specified in the ordinance. From July 1, 2006, through June 30, 2007, a total of $158,745 in fees was collected. Expenditures from the fund supported the City's first time homebuyer programs. Attachment A describes the beginning and ending fund balances and fund activity for fiscal year 2006- 2007. The Affordable Housing Ordinance has no impact on the General Fund. MUNICIPAL CODE /POLICY DOCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE This Annual Review is consistent with the requirements of Section 27 -1 (Affordable Housing Unit/Fee Requirements) of the Alameda Municipal Code and California Government Code Section 66006. RECOMMENDATION Accept this report in order to satisfy the Annual Review requirement of the Affordable Housing Ordinance Respect WI 'ubmitted, Leslie A. Little Development Services Director By: Dorene E. Soto Manager, Business Development Division By: Rachel Silver Development Manager, Housing DK/LALJDES /RS:ry Attachment: 1. Fund 266 Affordable Housing Unit/Fee Fund Activity for Fiscal Year 2006 -07 CITY OF ALAMEDA FUND 266 AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNIT /FEE FUND BEGINNING AND ENDING FUND BALANCES FUND ACTIVITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006 -07 Beginning Fund Balance $ 398,089,35 New Revenues Affordable Housing Fees $158,745.48 Interest Allocation $ 23, 809,41 Interest Payments from Ioans $ 1,394.25 Principal Payments from Ioans $ 2,638.33 Other Misc Revenues (loan fees) $ Transfer In from Gen Fund (Mortgage Credit Certificate Program) $ 1,000.00 Total New Revenues Expenditures and Encumbrances Operating Administration Encumbrances Downpayment Assistance Loans and loan delivery Buena Vista Commons Projects First Time Homebuyer workshops, counseling and outreach Housing Website Mortgage Credit Certificate Program - payment to County Total Expenditures and Encumbrances $ 40, 334.40 $198,945.00 $140,000.00 $ 7,340.00 $ 579.90 $ 1,000.00 $187,387.47 $ 388,199.30 Ending Fund Balance $197,277.52 City Council Attachment to Agenda Item #4 -E 12 -04 -07 CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Debra Kurita City Manager Date: December 4, 2007 Re: Accept the Annual Review of the Citywide Development Fee and the FISC /Catellus Traffic Fee BACKGROUND State law requires local agencies that charge development impact fees to conduct an annual review of the fees within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year. The annual review shall include the following information: • A brief description of the fee; • The amount of the fee; • The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund; • The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned; • An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees; • An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement; • A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid, and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan; and • The amount of unexpended revenues refunded. DISCUSSION The Public Works Department oversees the administration of two development impact fees: the Citywide Development Fee (CDF) and the FISC /Catellus Traffic Fee (TF). Citywide Development Fee (CDF): Description - The CDF, which became effective in February 2001, is charged to all new construction or intensification of use. The CDF is increased annually according to the San Francisco Bay Area Construction Cost Index. City Council Agenda Item #4 -F 12-04-07 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council December 4, 2007 Page 2 of 4 Amount of the Fee — The CDF is charged based on the types of development and their location as follows: LAND USE CATEGORY West End CITY DISTRICT Northern Waterfront CDF Fees per Residential Unit Central/ East End Bay Farm !nth! Single Family — ow ensi L density Single Family Duplex Multi - Family Work/Live $ 4,017 $ 3,744 y $ 3,740 $ 2,545 — Medium density , $ 3,289 $ 2,335 $ 3,140 $ 2,066 $ 2,873 $ 1,799 CDF Fees per unit of Non - Residential Building Space $ 2,976 $ 2, 770 $ 2,873 $ 1,871 $ 3,513 $ 3,391 $ 3,123 $ 3,293 $ 3,145 $ 2,977 CDF Fees per square foot of Non - Residential Building Space General Industrial Retail $ 3.45 $ 5.21 $ 2.93 $ 4.44 $ 2.93 $ 0.72 $ 4.43 $ 1.09 Commercial /Office $ 5.00 $ 4.27 $ 4.26 $ 1.16 Warehouse $ 1.99 $ 1.69 Other Uses (Not listed above) $ 1.69 $ 0.42 1. Non - transportation Fee 2. Transportation Fee (Cost per vehicle trip generated) $ 0.80 $1,428 $ 0.80 $1,169 $ 0.80 $1,163 $ 0.80 $36 Financial Information — For Fiscal Year 2006/2007, the beginning balance of the CDF account was $1 ,333,089. During the fiscal year, $585,944 was collected and $85,156 was earned in interest. The ending balance in the CDF account is $2,004,189. An administrative fee is also collected to pay for on -going City administrative costs and to provide a reserve account for future fee updates and nexus studies. The beginning balance for the administration fee was $7,225. During the fiscal year, $20,244 was collected. Administrative expenditures for Fiscal Year 2006/2007 included: $3,020 for fee collection, receivable tracking, and informational services at the Planning and Building Department's Central Permits Office; $3,020 for annual interest allocation and end of year account balances from the Finance Department; and $4,680 for Public Works Department expenses to initiate an update of the CDF report, review project costs, and scope modifications. An ending balance of $16,749 remains in the reserve account to allow the City to complete the CDF update and nexus study. Expenditure of Fees — The CDF Program includes 54 separate capital improvement projects distributed among five categories for a total cost of $99 million, in year 2000 dollars. The categories of capital improvements covered by the CDF are public safety, v transportation and traffic safety, parks and recreation, public facilities, and administration. The projects are identified in the Alameda Citywide Development Fee Nexus Study dated Honorable Mayor and December 4, 2007 Members of the City Council Page 3 of 4 January 2001, on file with the City Clerk. Based upon the approved cost allocations, new development is responsible for 28% of the total costs. Existing development is responsible for the remaining 72 %. When a project is initiated, the City is required to fund the share of the improvement costs attributed to existing development. Until sufficient funds are available to cover the cost of these large capital projects, fund balances will continue to increase. These projects are included in the deferred CIP budget until such time as sufficient funds have accrued to cover the costs. Currently $420,000 in CDF monies is budgeted to partially fund the design of the Stargell Avenue Extension (formerly Tinker Avenue Extension). Construction is projected for Fiscal Year 2008/2009, at which time additional CDF monies will be required. Construction Commencement Date — In accordance with state law, the local agency must first determine that sufficient funds have been received to complete the public improvement before a construction commencement date is provided. Interfund Transfer or Loan -- There were no interfund transfers or loans made during fiscal year 2006/2007. Refunded Unexpended Revenues — No unexpended revenues were refunded during fiscal year 2006/2007. F1SC/Catellus Traffic Fee (TF): Description — The FISC/Catellus Development was approved prior to the adoption of the CDF and, therefore, not required to pay CDF. As part of the development's traffic mitigation measures, however, payment of a Traffic Fee is required. The Traffic Fee (TF) mitigates the transportation impacts identified in the Catellus Environmental Impact Report (E1R) for the Catellus project. Amount of the Fee — A fee of $2,674 is charged per residential unit. The amount is based upon the percentage share of Phase 1 residential 2020 trips as determined in the EIR. Financial Information - For Fiscal Year 2006/2007, the beginning balance of the TF account was $1,097,021. During the fiscal year, $45,458 was collected and $56,584 was earned in interest for a total of $1 02,042. The ending balance in the TF account is $1,199,063. Expenditure of Fees — The FISC/Catellus EIR identified 18 separate capital improvement projects for a total of $18 million, of which $1,295,804 are due to impacts from Phase 1 residential development. Phase 2 mitigations are under consideration at this time. Until sufficient funds are available from the forthcoming FISC/Catellus development and from existing West End developments to cover the cost of these large capital projects, these mitigation fund balances will continue to increase. These projects are included in the Honorable Mayor and December 4, 2007 Members of the City Council Page 4 of 4 deferred CIP budget until such time as sufficient funds become available. Currently $420,000 in TF monies is budgeted to partially fund the design of the Stargell Avenue Extension. Construction is projected for Fiscal Year 2008/2009, at which time additional TF monies will be required. Construction Commencement Date — In accordance with state law, the Local agency must first determine that sufficient funds have been received to complete the public improvement before a construction commencement date is provided. Interfund Transfer or Loan — There were no interfund transfers or loans made during fiscal year 2006/2007. Refunded Unexpended Revenues — No unexpended revenues were refunded during fiscal year 2006/2007. BUDGET CONSIDERATION /FINANCIAL IMPACT The CDF and TF provide funds to the City for the construction of specific capital improvements within the City, based on new development's proportionate share of their impacts to the required improvement. The City is required to provide funding to cover existing development's share of the improvements. These funds may be obtained from the Redevelopment Funds, grants, or other City funding sources. The CDF and TF monies received from developers are deposited into special accounts that can only be used for eligible purposes as specified when the fee was created. MUNICIPAL CODE /POLICY DOCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE This annual review is consistent with the requirements of Section 27 -3 (Citywide Development Fee) of the Alameda Municipal Code and California Government Code Section 66006. RECOMMENDATION Accept the annual review of the Citywide Development Fee and the FISC/Catellus Traffic Fee. Respe ted att ewT. Naclerio Public Works Director MTN:BH:gc By: ------Jut--bcif cu VActid-ittr.-- Barbara Hawkins It-LIS— City Engineer CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Debra Kurita City Manager Date: December 4, 2007 Re: Appropriate $17,676 in Measure B - Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Funds as the Required Local Match for Accepting a Bicycle Facility Program Grant from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District BACKGROUND The City's application for a Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) Bicycle Facility Program (BFP) grant has been approved. The goal of the BFP grant program is to "reduce emissions from mobile sources by contributing Air District funding for the implementation of bicycle facilities in the Bay Area, via streamlined processes that are cost - effective in both air - quality and administrative terms." The total amount of the grant is $43,720. DISCUSSION The grant will be used to install bicycle racks and electronic bicycle lockers at the following locations: Harbor Bay Ferry Terminal -16 Electronic Bicycle Lockers In accordance with the City's Bicycle Master Plan to have electronic bicycle lockers installed at all major transportation hubs, electronic lockers will be installed at the Harbor Bay Ferry Terminal. The recommended location for the lockers is on the southeast side of the ferry terminal waiting area facility, which will require a Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) permit amendment because it is less than 100 feet from the San Francisco Bay. The electronic bicycle lockers will use BikeLink technology, which is a secure on- demand parking system. Users pay for secure parking time just like at a parking meter. A smart BikeLink card is both the users' cash and key. Rates are typically three to five cents per hour and are charged by the minute. There are no recurring membership fees, and unused time is refunded. Cards cost $20 and have $22 rental value on them. BikeLink cards can be purchased online or from participating retailers. This is the same technology being used at the city's Civic Center Parking Structure, BART stations, and in the cities of Oakland, Sunnyvale, and Santa Cruz. City Council Agenda Item #4 -G 12 -04 -07 Honorable Mayor and December 4, 2007 Members of the City Council Page 2 of 3 Recreation and Parks Department Facilities - 16 Bike Racks The Recreation & Parks Department will install two bike racks each at the following facilities: • Veteran's Building • McKinley Park • Washington Park • Woodstock Park • Harrington Center • Tillman Park • Godfrey Park • Leydecker Park Other City Facilities - Ten Bike Racks The Public Works Department will install bicycle racks at the following locations: • Police Department (one bicycle rack) • City Hall (two bicycle racks) • City Hall West (four bicycle racks) • Fire Stations (three stations, with one bicycle rack at each station) Business Area Requests -- Five Bike Racks At the request of the Public Works Department, the Chamber of Commerce, the Greater Alameda Business Association, the West Alameda Business Association, and the Park Street Business Association were asked to assist with identifying businesses interested in having bicycle racks located adjacent to their establishment. Based on their input and feedback from a recent pedestrian and bicyclist public input survey, the installation of bicycle racks will occur in the following commercial areas: • Park Street Commercial District (three bicycle racks) • Webster Street Commercial District (two bicycle racks) The City is required to enter into a Transportation Fund for Clean Air Funding Agreement before funds can be made available for the project. Prior to the City Manager executing this agreement, however, the City's local match must to be allocated by the City Council. Honorable Mayor and December 4, 2007 Members of the City Council Page 3 of 3 BUDGET CONSIDERATION /FINANCIAL ANALYSIS The total project cost is estimated at $61 ,396. The BAAQMD grant will pay 80 percent of project cost for a total of $43,720. The City is required to provide a 20 percent match, which is $17,675. There are sufficient funds available from Measure B - Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Account. MUNICIPAL CODE /POLICY DOCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE This project is consistent with the goals, objectives and actions contained in the City's Bicycle Master Plan. These include: Objective: Multi -modal Integration Action 5.1 -- Ensure that the City -wide system is integrated into existing transit and ferry stops and services in Alameda. Objective: Support Facilities and Programs Action 8.6 — Implement a bicycle rack program in commercial districts and at public facilities. Objective: Commercial Districts Action 11.3 — Implement bike rack facility program for employees and shoppers. RECOMMENDATION Appropriate $17,676 in Measure B - bicycle and pedestrian improvement funds as the required local match for accepting a BFP grant from the BAAQMD. Respectf ly submitted, atthew . Naclerio Public Works Director W---L_ Q- By: Gail Pays Admin Tech MTN:GP:gc CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Debra Kurita City Manager Teresa Highsmith City Attorney Lara Weisiger City Clerk Date: December 4, 2007 Re: Adopt a Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12121 Setting the Order of Business of City of Alameda City Council Meetings BACKGROUND At the November 13, 2007 workshop, the City Council discussed protocols for individual Councilmembers seeking information, new policies, or projects. Other cities' practices were reviewed, and the Council indicated an interest in implementing the City of Fremont's model. DISCUSSION The City of Fremont City Council Referrals practice is: a) Any Councilmember may, prior to any regular City Council meeting, bring any matter to the attention of the City Council that is not otherwise scheduled on a City Council agenda. The matter will be placed on the agenda in the Council Referral section. The sponsoring Councilmember shall give the City Manager a brief description of the subject to be printed in the agenda, sufficient to inform the City Council and public of the nature of the referral. b) The City Council, after considering the referral, may do any of the following: 1) Take no action. 2) Refer the matter to staff to schedule as a future City Council agenda item. 3) Take dispositive action if Council finds that sufficient notice to the Council and the public has been provided by the published agenda, sufficient information has been received by the Council, and no formal published notice of a public hearing is required. City Council Report Re: Agenda Item #4-H 12-04-07 Honorable Mayor and December 4, 2007 Members of the City Council Page 2 of 2 4) The Councilmember who requested the referral has the privilege of speaking first on the item. Attachment 1 is a form for Councilmembers to use to make Referrals. BUDGET CONSIDERATION /FINANCIAL IMPACT There is no impact on the General Fund. MUNICIPAL CODE /POLICY DOCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE Alameda Municipal Code Section 2 -1.5 addresses Submission of Matters. It reads: "Before 5:00 p.m. on the Monday of the week prior to each Council meeting any City official, board, commission or other municipal body having any reports, communications or other matters for submission to the Council, shall hand the same to the City Clerk whereupon the Clerk shall arrange a list of such matters according to the order of business specified in subsection 2 -1.5 hereof, and furnish a typewritten copy of the list to each member of the Council." Compliance with this Municipal Code Section requires Councilmembers to submit Council referrals by 5:00 p.m. on Monday the week prior to regular meetings. RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution amending Resolution No. 12121 setting the order of business of City of Alameda City Council meetings. Respectfully submitted, Debra Kurita City Manager Teresa Highsmith City Attorney Ze/ — La a Weisiger City Clerk Attachment: Council Referral Form COUNCIL REFERRAL FORM (To be submitted to the City Clerk) Name of Council member requesting Referral: Date of submission to City Clerk (must be submitted before 5:00 p.m. on the Monday before the week of the Council meeting requested): Requested Council Meeting date to consider Council Referral: Brief description of the subject to be printed on the agenda, sufficient to inform the City Council and public of the nature of the Council Referral: City Council Attachment to Report Re: Agenda Item #4-H 12-04-07 Approved as to Form CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 12121 SETTING THE ORDER OF BUSINESS OF CITY OF ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS WHEREAS, Councilmembers at the November 13, 2007, City Council meeting indicated a desire to have a Council Referral section at City Council meetings; and WHEREAS, Government Code Sections 36812 and 54954.3 give the City Council direction to adopt reasonable regulations concerning the proceedings and order of business of City Council meetings; and WHEREAS, the City Council at the May 21, 1991, City Council meeting approved Ordinance 2556, establishing that Order of Business may be established by Resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council at the June 18, 1991, City Council meeting approved Resolution No. 12121, setting the Order of Business of City of Alameda City Council Meetings; and WHEREAS, it is desired that the Order of Business be amended to include Council Referral as a standard agenda item on the regular agenda. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Order of Business be amended as follows: Section 1. At the hour appointed for each regular meeting, the members of the Council, City Manager, City Attorney and City Clerk shall assemble in the designated location. Thereupon, business shall be taken up for consideration and disposition in the order established by Resolution of the City Council in the following order: 1. Roll Call 2. Agenda Changes 3. Proclamations, Special Orders of the Day and Announcements 4. Consent Calendar 5. Agenda items 6. Oral Communications, Non - Agenda (Public Comment) 7. Council Referrals 8. Council Communications (Communications from Council) 9. Adjournment Resolution #4 -1-I CC 12 -04 -07 Section 2. The order of business set by the aforesaid Resolution of the City Council may be suspended at any City Council meeting by a majority vote of the members in attendance. 1, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in regular meeting assembled on the 4th day of December, 2007, by the following g vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the said City this 5th day of December, 2007. Lara Weisiger, City Clerk City of Alameda CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Debra Kurita City Manager Date: December 4, 2007 Re: Accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the Period Ending June 30, 2007 BACKGROUND This report relates to the sales tax transactions for the period April 1 through June 30, 2007. These tax transactions are the basis for sales tax revenues received during the July 1 through September 30, 2007, time period. These transactions and resulting revenues occurred within the context of a state economy that continues to grow at a slow pace. Growth statewide slowed to 1.0% measured over the year ending June 30, 2007, compared to 1.9% for the year ending April 30, 2007. DISCUSSION /ANALYSIS Sales tax represents the City's fifth largest source of General Fund revenue. The per capita comparison of sales tax for all cities in Alameda County shows the City of Alameda as the third lowest sales tax generator at $73, with the countywide average at $147. Therefore, the City does not generate the level of taxable sales of nearby cities. The detail for all cities is shown in Attachment A. Taxable sales transactions in Alameda for the period ending June 30, 2007, decreased 0.7 percent, or $9,135, from the same quarter of the prior year. The key gains were in new auto sales (12.9 percent, or $22,558) and building materials - retail (68 percent, or $21,488). The key declines came from miscellaneous vehicle sales ( -23 percent, or $20,558) and miscellaneous retail ( -19.7 percent, or $20,314). The top 25 businesses represent 49 percent, or $581,855, of the quarter's sales transactions. The top 100 businesses represent 75 percent, or $1,043,570, of the quarter's sales transactions. City Counci Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council December 4, 2007 Page 2 of 4 A comparison of the key economic categories with subcategory detail follows: Transportation's slightly negative showing reflects mixed results from robust increases in new auto sales of $22,688 or 12.9 %, and auto parts /repairs of $1,658 or 6.3 %, offset by declines in miscellaneous vehicle sales, primarily yachts, of ($20,568) or (23 %), and used auto sales of ($5,712) or (61%). The positive gain in Food Products came from food markets increasing $16,527 or 17.5% from the prior quarter, largely offset by decreases in food processing equipment, ($6,946) or (59.7 %), and restaurants, ($6,476) or (3.1%). General Retail fell $23,094 (8.1%), largely from miscellaneous retail declining due to loss of stores and disruptions resulting from ongoing construction at Towne Center. Business -to- Business reflects declines in office equipment of ($20,081) or (17.93 %), partially offset by increases in electronic equipment of $3,561 or 14.9 %. Construction posted a large increase of $31,360 or 54.9 %, reflecting increases in building materials - retail and wholesale, as well as the introduction this quarter of a new business in the building materials - retail subcategory. Miscellaneous decreased overall, but primarily from health and government declining ($2,412) or (30.2 %). Total Sales Transactions 2nd Quarter 2007 2nd Quarter 2006 Percent Change Economic Category Total Percent of Total T otal Percent of Total -0.1% Transportation $435,230 31.3% $435,675 31.1% 0.8% Food Products $337,851 24.3% $335,097 23.9% -8.1% General Retail $263,644 18.9% $286,738 20.5% -6.1% Business -to- Business $256,160 18.4% $272,896 19.5% 54.9% Construction $88,509 6.4% $57,150 4.1% - 22.6% Miscellaneous $10,167 0.7% $13,141 0.9% -0.7% Total - Quarter $1,391,561 100.0% $1,400,697 100.0% Transportation's slightly negative showing reflects mixed results from robust increases in new auto sales of $22,688 or 12.9 %, and auto parts /repairs of $1,658 or 6.3 %, offset by declines in miscellaneous vehicle sales, primarily yachts, of ($20,568) or (23 %), and used auto sales of ($5,712) or (61%). The positive gain in Food Products came from food markets increasing $16,527 or 17.5% from the prior quarter, largely offset by decreases in food processing equipment, ($6,946) or (59.7 %), and restaurants, ($6,476) or (3.1%). General Retail fell $23,094 (8.1%), largely from miscellaneous retail declining due to loss of stores and disruptions resulting from ongoing construction at Towne Center. Business -to- Business reflects declines in office equipment of ($20,081) or (17.93 %), partially offset by increases in electronic equipment of $3,561 or 14.9 %. Construction posted a large increase of $31,360 or 54.9 %, reflecting increases in building materials - retail and wholesale, as well as the introduction this quarter of a new business in the building materials - retail subcategory. Miscellaneous decreased overall, but primarily from health and government declining ($2,412) or (30.2 %). Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council December 4, 2007 Page 3 of 4 A comparison of the geographic generation of sales tax for the second quarter of 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006 follows. It is important to note that Alameda Towne Centre has had ongoing major construction work in progress in both of the comparison quarters above. Percent Change 10.8% - 2.5% - 3.4% -4.9% - 3.5% - 4.5% -0.7% Total Sales Transactions Geographic Areas Park — North of Lincoln Park — South of Lincoln Alameda Towne Centre Webster — North of Lincoln Webster — South of Lincoln All Other Areas Total - Quarter 2nd Quarter 2007 Total $351,533 $167,564 $200,382 $92,840 $29,168 $550,074 $1,391,561 Percent of Total 25.3% 12.0% 14.4% 6.7% 2.1% 39.5% 100.0% 2nd Quarter 2006 Total $317,407 $171,808 $207,417 $97,624 $30,214 $576,227 $1,400,697_ Percent of Total 22.7% 12.3% 14.8% 7.0% 2.2% 41.1% 100.0% During the review of the previous quarterly report, the Council requested additional comparative data. This data is included in Attachment A. BUDGET CONSIDERATION /FINANCIAL IMPACT Sales tax revenues are forecast to be $4.9 million for Fiscal Year 2007 -08, representing 6% of total General Fund revenues. Receipts from July through September total $924,628, or 19% of projections; however, including October revenues, receipts are at 25 %. There are several factors, beside economic conditions, that impact the amount of revenues. Sales tax payments received in July and August are accrued for the prior fiscal year as these payments represent taxes paid or generated in Alameda for sales transactions in April, May, and June of the prior fiscal year. in addition, there is a 30 -60 day lag in the timing of sales tax receipts, and there are late payments and other adjustments that further impact the results. Staff will continue to monitor this revenue closely in Fiscal Year 2007 -2008. Honorable Mayor and December 4, 2007 Members of the City Council Page 4 of 4 RECOMMENDATION Accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the period ending June 30, 2007. Respectfully submitted, uelle- Ann `Boyer Chief Financial Officer 5a,_,,,,,, c) by: - Annette Brisco Financial Analyst JB /dl Attachment Top Five Revenues are 59% of GF Revenues Total Revenue Projected FY08: $81,832,811 II 1 Property Tax $22,330,666 • 2 Utility Users Tax $8,422,485 ® 3 Motor Vehicle in Lieu $6,660,188 • 4 Property Transfer Tax $5,749,979 ® 5 Sales Tax $4,866,500 All Other "Levies" $1 5,546,846 CI Current Services $8,411,977 ❑ Transfers In from other City Funds $8,269,558 El All Other Revenue from Other Agencies $990,157 ❑ Equipment Replacement $584,455 All Other Revenue from Other Agencies ,l % Equipment Transfers In from Replacement other City Funds �, 1 % 1O% Current Services 10% Property Tax 28% All Other "Levies" 19% Alameda Unincorp Areas Albany Berkeley Dublin Emeryville Fremont Hayward Livermore Newark Oakland Piedmont Pleasanton San Leandro Union City Alameda Countywide California Sales Tax_, 6% Trsfr tax 7% Per - Capita Comparison of Sales Tax Muncipalities in Alameda County Year -over -Year 20 2007 $0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 UUT 10% Motor Vehicle in Lieu 80/0 $800 1 City Council Attachment to Agenda Item #5 -A 12 -04-07 Comparative Funding of Services from the General Fund Total Appropriations FY08 $85,713,471 Debt, Risk Mgmt, CIP Transfers Other $3,712,595 $4,132,867 5%-\ 4% Admin & IT $7,083,444 8% Planning & Bldg $4,421,342 5% Public Works $9,499,776 11% co c 0 E Police 7-$24,185,012 29% Parks $4,217,649 5% Library $2,012,804 2% Police / Fire Pension $2,955,000 3% OPEB $1,968,000 2% \__ Fire $21, 524, 982 26% Library and Parks Total Funding LIBRARY ARPD • GF Contribution Li Special Fund 11 CURRENT APPLICATIONS RENT REVIEW ADVISORY COMMITTEE ONE VACANCY (HOMEOWNER SEAT) Jerome Harrison UNAPPROVED MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - - - NOVEMBER 20, 2007 - - - 7:25 P.M. Chair Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 7 :37 p.m. Commissioner Gilmore led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present: Commissioners deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Chair Johnson - 5. Absent: None. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY (07- ) Update on the Alameda Theater, Cineplex, and Parking Structure Project. The Redevelopment Manager gave a brief presentation. Commissioner Tam stated that BikeLink elockers are a wonderful asset; BikeLink cards are $20; rates are three to five cents per hour; inquired how long it would take to use up the $20 card. The Redevelopment Manager responded usage would determine how long the card would last; stated BikeLink is a non - profit organization; the $20 card helps cover administrative costs and provides upfront money for services. Trish Spencer, Alameda Parent Teacher Association Council President, stated that she was did not know about the winebar at the Theater; the winebar changes the type of theater being offered; Burgermister will have a full liquor license; the high school has an open campus; Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) has regulations regarding establishments that have liquor licenses within 600 feet of a high school; the issue should have been shared with the community; there should be disclosure if the mezzanine provides alcohol. Leo Baldaramos, Alameda, read an email that he sent to the School Board President regarding the winebar at the Theater; stated he is concerned about the distance [of the winebar] from the school. MINUTES (07- ) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and Community Improvement Commission Meeting held on November 6, 2007. Approved. Commissioner deHaan moved approval of the minutes. Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission November 20, 2007 1 Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. AGENDA ITEMS None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:52 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission November 20, 2007 2 CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Community Improvement Commission From: Debra Kurita City Manager Date: December 4, 2007 Re: Authorize the Use of Up to $50,000 in Interest Earnings to Complete the Enclosure of the Historic Alameda Theater Balcony Access Corridor and Related Improvements BACKGROUND The Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda (CIC) approved a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) with Alameda Entertainment Associates, L.P. (AEA) for the rehabilitation and restoration of the historic Alameda Theater, as well as the new construction of an adjacent Cineplex and parking structure on May 3, 2005. On July 26, 2006, the CIC approved an $8.8 million construction contract with C. Overaa & Co. for the rehabilitation and restoration of the historic Alameda Theater. At the time the construction contract was awarded, staff and the contractor had value - engineered portions of the restoration project, taking advantage of opportunities to redesign, substitute, and eliminate items to achieve a contract price within the CIC's available budget. Because there were no plans to re- occupy the balcony, one of the features removed from the scope of work for the historic Theater was the enclosure of the disabled access platform connecting the historic Theater balcony to the second - story of the adjacent cineplex. As part of the CIC's original scope of work, the disabled access enclosure was designed as a fully enclosed hallway with a floor, ceiling, walls, lighting, and fire sprinklers, providing an accessible path for disabled patrons and employees to the balcony from the cineplex. After value engineering, the access hallway was modified to become an outdoor platform with no enclosed ceiling or walls. Patrons and employees accessing the balcony from the cineplex, including by way of the project's sole elevator in the cineplex, will have to exit the cineplex onto an outdoor second -story platform before entering the Theater balcony. Additionally, the old, existing doors connecting the platform to the balcony were not upgraded to new sound-rated doors and would need to be replaced, if the balcony were occupied. CC /ARRAICIC Agenda Item #2 -B 12 -04 -07 Honorable Chair and December 4, 2007 Members of the Community Improvement Commission Page 2 of 3 DISCUSSION As construction is nearing completion and in light of the potential for the eventual re -use of the balcony, it is appropriate at this time to analyze the opportunity to reinstate the platform enclosure into the project. Staff recommends that the enclosure of this access corridor be re- incorporated into the scope of work for the Theater rehabilitation before the historic Theater opens for business. The completion of the enclosure before the Theater opens will enhance the seamless integration of the two buildings and eliminate any disruption to everyday Theater operations, if and when AEA pursues future balcony improvements. In addition, this work, a requirement of the CIC and Historic Theater, will eliminate the CIC's need to fund additional construction activity at the historic Theater site. The estimated cost of the enclosure is approximately $50,000. Staff proposes addi n . adding $50,000 to the Theater's contingency fund through use of the interest earnings from the CIC loan for the cineplex rather than by drawing on the Theater's remaining construction contingency fund balance. The CIC has earned slightly more than $50,000 in interest from that deposit, and these funds are not currently programmed for other CIC uses. Staff recommends that the funds be dispensed to AEA to perform the actual cost of the work, not to exceed $50,000, on the CIC's behalf, subject to the CIC's review of AEA's final cost estimates and expenditures. This arrangement will allow the project to move forward without disruption from an additional contractor on the premises. BUDGET CONSIDERATION /FINANCIAL IMPACT The use of $50,000 for construction of the enclosure of the historic Theater balcony access corridor and related improvements would be funded through interest earnings from the CIC's contribution to AEA's cineplex construction. There is no impact on the General Fund. MUNICIPAL CODE/POLICY DOCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE Alameda Downtown Vision Plan 2000 — Action B1.0 — Renovate /restore Alameda Theater. RECOMMENDATION Authorize the use of up to $50,000 in interest earnings to complete the enclosure of the historic Alameda Theater balcony access corridor and related improvements. Honorable Chair and December 4, 2007 Members of the Community Improvement Commission Page 3 of 3 Leslie A. Little Development Services Director By: Dorene E. Soto M : nager, Business Development Division By: Je ife Rei eve opment Manager DK/LALJDES /JQ:dc Attachments: 1. Pictures of Existing Balcony Access Outdoor Platform Ell INIII■111M111, } • _ � Y `uw..wrr�rrrrW{ r limmairma i•• r .i'.��'��S,[�. '3 "r$.. -• tom. _ �' - - .�;, "��r iii_._ •.K•�.�k - - - -- � F _ .. . ,. C C /ARRAIC I C Attachment to Agenda Item #2 -B 12-04-07 moldiarant CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Community Improvement Commission From: Debra Kurita Executive Director Date: December 4, 2007 Re: Approve a $300,000 Loan to Alameda Entertainment Associates, L.P. for Rehabilitation and Restoration of the Mezzanine Balcony in the Historic Alameda Theater and for Augmentation of the Cineplex Construction Contingency Budget BACKGROUND The Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda (CIC) approved a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) with Alameda Entertainment Associates, L.P. (AEA) for the rehabilitation and restoration of the historic Alameda Theater, as well as the new construction of an adjacent cineplex and parking structure on May 3, 2005. Phase 1 of the overall project consists of an eight- screen movie theater, including a 484 -seat, single - screen main auditorium in the historic Alameda Theater, excluding rehabilitation of the mezzanine and upper balconies, and seven screens in the new cineplex; 6,100 square feet of retail; and a 341 -space parking garage. Phase 11 includes the improvement and furnishing of the mezzanine balcony in the Alameda Theater as a continuation of the main auditorium, and the addition of two auditoriums in the upper balcony. Phase 1 of the project is funded from numerous public and private sources of funds, while funding for Phase 11 has not yet been identified. As specified in the DDA, the CIC is responsible for constructing the parking structure and rehabilitating and restoring the historic Theater, excluding any rehabilitation of the mezzanine and upper balconies of the Theater. The DDA obligates AEA to construct the new cineplex and to install the tenant improvements within the historic Theater using financing from the CIC and private lenders and investors. The DDA does not require AEA or the CIC to make any improvements to the mezzanine or upper balconies. As a result, the current plan for the opening of the Theater does not include public access to, or use of, either the mezzanine or upper balcony of the Theater. Over the last year, AEA developed a plan to improve and furnish the mezzanine balcony as a continuation of the main auditorium, and has pursued avenues for financing these improvements. AEA's balcony proposal envisions an adult "over 21" movie experience that would allow for service of wine, beer, and light foods, and include the following improvements to the mezzanine balcony: installation of 254 seats, custom CC /ARRA/CIC Agenda Item #2 -C 12-04-07 Honorable Chair and December 4, 2007 Members of the Community Improvement Commission Page 2 of 4 carpet to match the historic carpet design, aisle lighting, surround -sound speakers, additional sound equipment for the hearing impaired, hand rails, wheelchair seating platforms, and drapery and pipe rails for a divider between the mezzanine and unused upper balcony. DISCUSSION AEA has requested a $300,000 loan from the CIC to fund Phase 11 improvements to the mezzanine balcony prior to the opening of the Theater and to cover a portion of the cineplex construction contingency. AEA can secure private sources of funds to fully fund its construction contingency, but the private sources of funds are more expensive because of higher interest rates, and AEA cannot afford to also finance the balcony improvements using this same funding source. Whether or not the 010 loan is approved, CIC staff is confident that AEA has the financial ability to complete construction of the cineplex successfully. At the time the CIC and AEA's private construction lender closed AEA's construction financing for the cineplex in March 2007, AEA planned to finance its development impact fees and public infrastructure costs associated with the cineplex, estimated at approximately $300,000 to $400,000, through the Statewide Community Infrastructure Program (SCIP), re- paying the public financing over a 30 -year term. AEA planned on using the monies made available by SC1P to fund $1 00,000 of its budgeted $300,000 construction contingency, and $200,000 in tenant improvements necessary to re- occupy the mezzanine balcony of the historic Alameda Theater. SCIP offered long -term financing at an attractive interest rate, which would have made it financially feasible for AEA to also finance the Phase 11 mezzanine balcony improvements. Preliminary discussions among representatives of SCIP, the CIC, and AEA indicated that AEA would be eligible for SCIP financing. During more extensive discussions and evaluations after the close of the cineplex financing, it was determined that AEA would be unable to use SCIP due to the complex partnership and ownership structure underlying the DDA. As cineplex construction nears completion, AEA estimates it will still require the full $300,000 in construction contingency to cover unforeseen costs related to construction. As a result, AEA has two options for successfully completing the construction of the project: 1) Private Financing, Contingency only. AEA could borrow $100,000 in available capital from its private partners to fund completion of construction of Phase 1. Due to the high interest rate associated with borrowing these funds, it would not be financially feasible for AEA to borrow the additional funds for Phase 11 to improve and re- furnish the balcony in the historic Theater at the current time. 2) Public Financing, Contingency and Balcony. AEA could borrow $300,000 from the CIC to fund $200,000 for the necessary tenant improvements in the balcony, and $100,000 for AEA's cineplex construction contingency. The loan would be amortized over 20 years at a five percent interest rate, with the option Honorable Chair and December 4, 2007 Members of the Community Improvement Commission Page 3 of 4 that the interest be forgiven if it is repaid in full over the first five years of the loan (The loan agreement is on file with the City Clerk). Under either option, AEA will successfully complete construction of the Cineplex and install Phase 11 tenant improvements in the Theater. it may be difficult for AEA to implement the Phase 11 mezzanine balcony improvements at a later date, however, because of the disruption it would cause to ongoing Theater operations. The public financing option allows for the restoration of additional areas of the historic Theater while it is currently under construction and will enable the public to access the mezzanine balcony, at the same time allowing AEA to secure sufficient funds at affordable rate to finalize construction successfully. CIC staff recommends approving the loan agreement with AEA to facilitate the restoration of the mezzanine balcony of the historic Theater. If the loan is approved, it is expected that the mezzanine balcony improvements will be completed in time for the grand opening of the Alameda Theater. BUDGET CONSIDERATION /FINANCIAL IMPACT The $300,000 loan to AEA from the CIC would be funded by the 2003 Merged Area Bond issue from the $091,000 balance of the $2 million in funds designated, but unused for, the construction of the Alameda Free Library. MUNICIPAL CODE/POLICY DOCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE Alameda Downtown Vision Plan 2000 -- Action B1.0 — Renovate /restore Alameda Theater. RECOMMENDATION Approve a $300,000 loan to AEA for rehabilitation and restoration of the mezzanine balcony in the historic Alameda Theater and for augmentation of the cineplex construction contingency budget. Leslie A. Little Development Services Director _.) By: Dorene E. Soto Manager, Business Development Division Honorable Chair and Members of the Community Improvement Commission By: Je" ife Re eve opment Manager D KILAIJD ES /JO: ry CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Honorable Chair and Members of the Community Improvement Commission From: Debra Kurita City Manager /Executive Director Date: December 4, 2007 Re: Authorize Transmittal of the Community Improvement Commission's Annual Report to the State Controller's Office and the City Council and Accept Annual Report BACKGROUND State Law requires the Community Improvement Commission (CIC) to submit an Annual Report to the City Council, and file a copy of this report with the State Controller by December 31st of each year. DISCUSSION The CIC's Annual Report is available for review in the City Clerk's office. The CIC's annual report for FY 2000 -07 includes the following: • Independent Auditor's Report on financial statements; • Independent Auditor's Report on legal compliance; • Annual Report of Financial Transactions of Community Redevelopment Agencies (Fiscal Statement); • Housing and Community Development Annual Report of Housing Activity of Community Redevelopment Agencies; • Housing Activities Report Summary; • Blight Progress Report; • Loan Report; and • Property Report The independent financial audit for the Fiscal Year 2000 -07 has been prepared by Maze & Associates. The audit examines the CIC's compliance with State laws, regulations, CCIARRAICIC Agenda Item #2 -D 12-04-07 Honorable Mayor and December 4, 2007 Members of the City Council Page 2 of 2 Honorable Chair and Members of the Community Improvement Commission and administrative requirements including CIC policies and procedures related to record keeping, public hearings, contracting for services, use of tax increment funds and indebtedness. According to the audit, the CIC was found to be in compliance with applicable laws, regulations and administrative requirements. The fiscal statement contains the information required by Health & Safety Code §33080.5. The Housing Activities Report, describing CIC activities affecting housing and displacement, the Blight Progress Report, describing the CIC's progress to alleviate blight, the Loan Report, describing CIC loans in default or not in compliance, and the Property Report, describing CIC owned and acquired property, are attached. The Goals of the CIC's Three Redevelopment Projects are also included. BUDGET CONSIDERATION /FINANCIAL IMPACT There is no impact to the General Fund or the CIC's Budget. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Community Improvement Commission: Authorize transmittal of the Annual Report to the State Controller's Office and the HCD Annual Report to the State Department of Housing and Community Development and the City Council. City Council: Accept the Annual Report of the CIC. Res ec fjIly submitted eslie A. Little Development Services Director ti r j r By: Nanette Banks, Manager Finance and Administration Division DKILALINB /SF:ry cc: Economic Development Commission CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Honorable Chair and Members of the Community Improvement Commission Honorable Chair and Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority From: Debra Kurita City Manager /Executive Director Date: December 4, 2007 Re: Transmittal of: 1) City of Alameda Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2007 2) Auditor's Report on Agreed -upon Procedures on Compliance with Vehicle Code Section 40200.3 Parking Citation Processing 3) Agreed -upon Procedures Report on Compliance with the Proposition 111 2004 -05 Appropriations Limit Increment 4) Police and Fire Retirement System Pension Plans 1079 and 1092 Audit Report for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2007 5) Metropolitan Transportation Commission Grant Programs Financial Statements for Year Ending June 30, 2007 6) Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda, Basic Component Unit Financial Statements for the Year Ended June 30, 2007 7) Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Alameda, Basic Component Unit Financial Statements for the Year Ended June 30, 2007 BACKGROUND Transmitted herewith is the City of Alameda Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR)forthe year ended June 30, 2007. The report, intended to be easily readable and efficiently organized, provides detailed financial information by which the City Council and the public, including market analysts and investors, may assess the relative attractiveness of investing in Alameda as compared to alternative investment opportunities. Also transmitted are the auditors' reports on Agreed -upon Procedures for Compliance with certain vehicle code provisions, the report on compliance with the Proposition 111 calculation procedures, the Police and Fire Retirement System Pension Plans 1079 and 1082, and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission Grant Program for year ending CCIARRAICIC Agenda Item #2 -E 12-04-07 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Honorable Chair and Members of the CI C Honorable Chair and Members of the ARRA December 4, 2007 Page 2of3 June 30, 2007. Blended component unit reports for the Community Improvement Commission and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority are also included. DISCUSSION The CAFR report has three sections: Introductory Section: This section contains the transmittal letter from the Chief Financial Officer, which highlights accomplishments and discusses economic conditions and outlook. This section also contains awards to the City for excellence in financial reporting from the Governmental Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada and from the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers. Financial Section: This section includes the auditors' opinion letter, the Management Discussion and Analysis, and the general purpose financial and supplemental combining statements. Budget to actual comparisons by fund can be found within these statements. Year -to -year comparisons are also presented. Statistical Section: A Governmental Account Standards Board (GASB) requirement beginning with the year ending June 30, 2006, added new items to this section. It includes a number of tables concerning city operations, demographics and miscellaneous information. The CAFR and the other six reports and financial statements are on file with the City Clerk and can also be reviewed at the Alameda Free Library and its branches. After acceptance, the CAFR will be added to the Finance section of the City's website. BUDGET CONSIDERATION /FINANCIAL IMPACT The financial statements, supporting schedules, statistical tables and narrative explanations are presented to help assure that all financial data are presented in order to provide interested groups with all necessary information pertaining to City finances. These interested groups include the City Council, boards and commissions, oversight bodies, investors and creditors, grant or resource providers, taxpayers, employees and others. The City of Alameda had net assets as of June 30, 2007, of $31 3,593,645. - This represents an increase of $'17,702,738 over the prior year. Total debt increased by $'1,347,414 during the year. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Honorable Chair and Members of the CIC Honorable Chair and Members of the ARRA December 4, 2007 Page 3 of 3 The General Fund is the chief operating fund of the City of Alameda. At the end of Fiscal Year 2006107, the unreserved fund balance was $15,171 ,215. This portion is designated by City Council policy for costs associated with economic uncertainties. At June 30, 2007, the Community Improvement Commission's governmental funds reported combined fund balances of $29.1 million, of which $13.9 million is legally reserved and $15.2 million is available to fund ongoing Commission operations and projects. The Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority at June 30, 2007, had a $10.5 million fund balance, of which $8.5 million was unreserved and undesignated. RECOMMENDATION These reports are presented for informational purposes only. The City Auditor, a representative from Maze and Associates, the City's external auditors, and the Chief Financial Officer will be available at the December 4, 2007, City Council meeting to answer questions and receive ideas from the City Council as to areas it would like emphasized during the fiscal year 2007 -2008 audit cycle. Respectfully submitted, uelle -An" Boyer Chief Financial Officer JAB:di cc: City Auditor City Treasurer Maze & Associates CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Honorable Chair and Members of the Community Improvement Commission From: Debra Kurita City Manager /Executive Director Date: December 4, 2007 Re: Hold Public Hearing to Consider Approval of a First Addendum to the Alameda Landing Mixed -Use Development Project Supplemental Environmental Impact Report; First Amendment to the Development Agreement (Alameda Landing Commercial Mixed Use Project); and First Amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement (Alameda Landing Mixed Use Project) to Modify the Public Waterfront Promenade BACKGROUND On December 6, 2006, the City Council and Community Improvement Commission (CIO) approved a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) for Alameda Landing. The project, at the former Fleet Industrial Supply Center (FISC), includes up to 300 residential units, 300,000 square feet of retail, up to 400,000 square feet of office development, and approximately 11 acres of open space, including a waterfront promenade. In addition, in January 2007, the City Council adopted an ordinance approving a Development Agreement (DA) for the Alameda Landing Commercial Project and a DA for the Alameda Landing Residential Project. The DAs, together with the project Master Plan, provide the basic planning entitlements and guidelines and standards for review and approval of each phase of the project. Since securing its initial project approvals, Palmtree Acquisition Corporation (successor by merger to Catellus Development Corporation) ( Catellus), the project master developer, has been working on Phase 1 project activities. In May 2007, the Planning Board approved a Waterfront Promenade Development Plan and an amendment to the Site -Wide Landscape Development Plan (LDP). In June 2007, the Planning Board approved major portions of the retail site plan and, in September 2007, with several conditions, approved the balance of the site plan. Catellus appealed several of the Planning Board conditions on the retail site plan to the City Council. At its November 6, 2007 meeting, the City Council revised two conditions in response to the appeal and referred one condition involving a proposed compromise sidewalk treatment to the CC /ARRAIClC Public Hearing Agenda item #3 -A 12-04-07 Honorable Mayor and December 4, 2007 Members of the City Council Page 2 of 8 Honorable Chair and Members of the Community improvement Commission Planning Board for its consideration. The Planning Board approved a revised design for the sidewalk treatment for the retail centers at its November 26 meeting. DISCUSSION In addition to preparing the Phase 1 planning documents, Catellus conducted several in -depth studies on the condition of the wharf and what is required to retrofit the piers from both a structural and geotechnical perspective. Those studies, completed in August 2007, concluded that over 75% of the piers have been compromised by chloride ion intrusion that has undermined the structural strength of the wharf. The geotechnical analysis indicated that the underlying soil and waterfront embankments are subject to failure in the event of a significant seismic event. Taken together, Catellus concluded that the wharf piers could not be depended upon to withstand the vertical Toads that the current building code requires without significant structural upgrades. Preliminary cost estimates prepared by Moffat and Nichol determined that it would cost between $30 and $35 million to retrofit the wharf to accommodate the Waterfront Promenade Development Plan approved in May 2007. Since the project pro forma did not anticipate this significant cost, and such expenditure would render the project financially infeasible, Catellus approached the City with a proposal to re- design the waterfront promenade. Catellus' proposal was reviewed and recommended for approval by the Recreation and Park Commission and approved by the Planning Board on September 24, 2007, through an amendment to the Waterfront Promenade Development Plan and second amendment to the LDP. Key elements of the revised Waterfront Promenade Development Plan include retaining Clif Bar in its proposed location in a renovated warehouse; cutting back portions of the wharf 100 feet so that the public open space will be over land rather than water; providing public access down to the water's edge from those areas that are cut back to the land; reconfiguring the grand staircase to the water's edge; and enlarging the floating dock to accommodate the water taxi as well as kayaks and canoes. The Planning Board amended the LDP to account for a new landscape area where a portion of the wharf will be removed. The amended Waterfront Promenade Development Plan, as approved by the Planning Board, indicates that the warehouse in Phase 3 will be demolished and the wharf will be cut back 100 feet at that location. However, several speakers at the Planning Board Public Hearing requested that Catellus appear before the Planning Board prior to demolishing the second warehouse to confirm that it is financially infeasible to reuse the warehouse at the time of the proposed Phase 3 development. Therefore, the Planning Board added a requirement that prior to, or concurrent with, Development Plan submittal for Phase 3, Catellus will provide an assessment of the feasibility of retaining all, or a portion of, the existing Phase 3 warehouse for adaptive reuse. Honorable Mayor and December 4, 2007 Members of the City Council Page 3 of 8 Honorable Chair and Members of the Community improvement Commission As approved, the Alameda Landing DDA provides Catellus with the option to reuse both, one or neither of the warehouses. While the revised Waterfront Promenade Development Plan does not depict the second warehouse, the broad DDA language provides maximum flexibility regarding reuse of the warehouses and allows Catellus to meet the Planning Board requirement of submitting an assessment of feasibility to retain the Phase 3 warehouse without requiring a further amendment to the Alameda Landing DDA. In addition to the Planning Board - approved amendment to the Waterfront Promenade Development Plan and second amendment to the LDP, the DA (Alameda Landing Mixed Use Commercial Project) and Alameda Landing DDA must be amended to implement the revised waterfront promenade. The first amendment to the DA and first amendment to the DDA are on file at the City Clerk's Office. First Amendment to the Develo Commercial Project) menu A ' reement Alameda Landin . Mixed Use At its September 24 meeting, the Planning Board recommended that the City Council adopt an ordinance amending the DA (Alameda Landing Commercial Project) in order to clarify certain provisions to reflect the actual extent, size, and location of the wharf. Based upon Catellus' recent investigations and studies, more has been learned about the extent, size, and conditions of the wharf than was known when the DA was negotiated in 2006, and approved in January 2007. The amendment recommended for approval by the Planning Board: • Defines the extent of the portions of the wharf that the City will own, maintain and insure and which portions Catellus, or future private parties, will own, maintain and insure. The amendment provides that the portion of the wharf that will be conveyed to the City to own and maintain is limited to the waterfront portion of the wharf in the area to be developed as the public open space and does not include the inland portions of the wharf which are outside the public open space. • Defines and clarifies where a new building would be placed if a decision is made to demolish the existing waterfront warehouse currently planned for Clif Bar. • Amends Exhibit G, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, to reflect changes to previously adopted mitigation measures that were revised solely with respect to the wharf, dredging and in -water construction activities necessary to implement the amended Waterfront Promenade Development Plan and LDP. • Acknowledges that the Master Demolition, Infrastructure, Grading and Phasing Plan for Alameda Landing (MDIGP) was approved in September 2007. Honorable Mayor and December 4, 2007 Page 4 of 8 Members of the City Council Honorable Chair and Members of the Community Improvement Commission The recommended amendment is technical in nature and does not change the intent of the original DA. When the Planning Board passed its resolution recommending approval of the DA, it proposed an additional modification to the first sentence of Section 4.9.2b to reference Clif Bar by name as the tenant in the Phase 1 warehouse. Clif Bar is not a party to the DA and the City does not have a contractual relationship with Clif Bar. It could be difficult for the City to determine whether or not Clif Bar makes an election to occupy the warehouse building thereby meeting a required condition precedent in the DA. Therefore, it is recommended that the first amendment to the DA be approved without this reference to Clif Bar. First Amendment to the Dis • osition and Develo menf A .reement Alameda Landing Mixed Use Project) The proposed first amendment to the Alameda Landing DDA addresses the following issues: Wharf Re- Design The first amendment to the DDA primarily focuses on changes that support the wharf re- design. Some of the changes reference: • modified exhibits that show the new wharf configuration (Attachments 5A, 6, 7, 12) • new exhibits that: (a) depict the wharf as it currently exists (Attachment 14); (b) illustrate various scenarios for the waterfront promenade depending on retention of both, one or neither of the existing warehouses (Attachments 15A -15F); and (c) show the wharf re- design as approved by the Planning Board (Attachment 16). Other changes revise /add definitions related to the waterfront promenade to reflect the new design and its various elements and to achieve consistency in the use of terms across all of the entitlement documents. Several sections of the DDA have text modifications that support the revised and new exhibits and definitions related to the wharf re- design. Attachment 3 of the DDA, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, will be amended to reflect changes to previously adopted mitigation measures that were revised solely with respect to the wharf, dredging and in -water construction activities necessary to implement the amended Waterfront Promenade Development Plan and LDP. In addition, given the condition of the existing wharf and a desire to address future disrepair, the amendment proposes more specific language regarding upkeep of the wharf. That language that requires the CIC to include procuring property insurance, Honorable Mayor and December 4, 2007 Members of the City Council Page 5 of 8 Honorable Chair and Members of the Community Improvement Commission if it is available at commercially reasonable rates, to protect against damage to the wharf from moored vessels provisions requiring the CIC to enforce lease provisions for existing tenants berthing at the wharf; and requiring the CIC to undertake efforts, such as fencing portions of the wharf not currently leased, to prevent unauthorized berthing of vessels. Interim Covenant Modification The DDA currently provides that Catellus will work with the Navy and Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) to modify the existing interim land use covenants that preclude residential construction on the Alameda Landing site in order to build up to 300 new residential units. For the past seven months, Catellus and the City have been working with the Navy and DISC on a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA }, Amendment to the Federal Facilities Site Remediation Agreement ( FFSRA), and Clean -Up Agreement to allow for residential activity. It is anticipated that the documents will be finalized in the next eight weeks. This DDA Amendment requires Catellus to post a bond in favor of the CIC to allow the CIC to restore the property to an environmentally safe condition in the event Catellus fails to complete the environmental remediation work pursuant to the MOA, amended FFSRA and Clean -Up Agreement and causes the site to be in a hazardous condition. Existing Leases The existing DDA recognizes that the CIC has current leases that must be terminated when Catellus commences demolition and infrastructure work. The DDA also provides that if a lease is terminated at Catellus' request and Catellus does not begin work by a time certain, Catellus is responsible for lost rent through the remainder of the lease term. This amendment would strengthen the provisions regarding existing leases by requiring Catellus to submit all necessary documents for issuance of a demolition permit prior to requesting termination of leases. This change is intended to reduce the likelihood of lost lease revenue and reinforce timely commencement of demolition activity by Catellus. Undergrounding 115kV Line The DA (Alameda Landing Commercial Project), and related project approvals, requires undergrounding the existing overhead 115 kV electrical line at Alameda Landing. The DDA provides that the existing transformer, switch gear, and vault may be undergrounded at Catellus' election. After working with an electrical engineering firm that specializes in high voltage lines and engaging in several discussions with Alameda Power and Telecom (AP +T), Catellus has determined that it will cost approximately $9 million to underground the 115 kV line at Alameda Landing. In addition, for technical reasons, there is no cost savings to maintain the transformer, switch gear and vault above ground. The $9 million undergrounding cost renders the project financially Honorable Mayor and December 4, 2007 Members of the City Council Page 6 of 8 Honorable Chair and Members of the Community Improvement Commission infeasible. Therefore, Catellus has requested that the CIC and City reevaluate the requirement to underground the 115 kV line. The DDA amendment proposes a process for determining the feasibility of undergrounding the 115 kV and requires Catellus to undertake certain activities in anticipation of possible future undergrounding. This process can only be triggered if the DA, and if necessary, other project approvals, are amended at a later date so that undergrounding the 115 kV line is no longer a project requirement. The new process for determining the undergrounding obligation has three threshold criteria that must be met: (1) the CIC must secure a minimum $3 million appropriation from the Federal Office of Economic Adjustment to fund backbone infrastructure at Alameda Landing; (2) the pro forma for Phase 1 or Phases 1 and 2, if the phases are combined, of the project must show a minimum 12% Internal Rate of Return (IRR) at the time the proposed underground district is established; and 3) the City must establish an underground district from Alameda Landing west to Alameda Point (Main Street and Pacific Street) to underground the entire length of the 115 kV line in that area. If these three criteria are met, Catellus agrees to participate in the district and contribute up to $9 million through assessments for undergrounding the 115 kV line at Alameda Landing. In addition, the amendment requires Catellus to realign and replace the existing temporary above ground 115 kV poles with permanent above ground poles within the Mitchell alignment and to install conduit and substructure in anticipation of future undergrounding as part of Phase 1 and Phase 3 backbone infrastructure work. cic Funding obligations The DDA obligates the C1C to contribute $18 million in tax increment generated by the Alameda Landing project to the project to fund backbone infrastructure activities. The DDA anticipates that these funds will be raised through the issuance of Tax Allocation Bonds when the project is generating sufficient tax increment to support a bond issue. The current pro forma anticipates that bonds for the Alameda Landing project will be issued in 2012 and in 2014 -15. The amendment proposes additional language to support the ability to raise the required tax increment contribution to the project by specifying that any future Merged Improvement Areas bonded indebtedness will carve out Alameda Landing tax increment as a source of repayment and covenants that existing Merged Improvement Areas bonded indebtedness will be repaid first with tax increment revenues from sources other than those revenues generated by the Alameda Landing project. Conclusion Approval of the first amendment to the DA (Alameda Landing Commercial Project) and DDA allows Catellus to move forward with a re- designed Waterfront Promenade as approved by the Planning Board. The re- designed waterfront open space is both Honorable Mayor and December 4, 2007 Members of the City Council Page 7 of 8 Honorable Chair and Members of the Community Improvement Commission financially feasible and provides equivalent or better public benefits than those provided in the original Waterfront Promenade Development Plan. In addition, the re- designed wharf meets all of the requirements of the project Master Plan, retains Clif Bar in an existing warehouse, and addresses structural and geotechnical issues. The first amendment to the DDA also provides for several clarifying provisions for effective and efficient project implementation. Lastly, given new information and cost estimates for undergrounding the overhead 115 kV line, a potential alternative funding mechanism is proposed with respect to 115 kV undergrounding at a future time. BUDGET CONSIDERATION /FINANCIAL IMPACT Approving the First Amendment to the Alameda Landing DDA and DA (Alameda Landing Commercial Project) does not impact the City's General Fund. The proposed amendments do not increase the CIC's financial obligations contained in the existing Alameda Landing DDA but do increase the cost of the project to the C1C overall. The new requirement to provide property insurance, if available at commercially reasonable rates, to repair any damage to the wharf caused by moored vessels is a new cost that would be paid for out of FISC lease revenues, so long as tenant lease revenue is available. Subsequently, it will become an on -going obligation of the CIC. In addition, the cost of fencing the pier area, estimated at $25,000 - 35,000 will be a one- time cost to the CIC to also be paid from FISC revenues. FISC revenues are $455,000 annually. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW On December 5, 2006, the City Council certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Alameda Landing Mixed Use Development Project (a Supplement to the 2000 Catellus Mixed Use Development Project EIR) (SEIR) in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff completed a review of the proposed changes to the wharf design and concluded that the proposed work necessary to implement the amended Waterfront Promenade Development Plan and LDP would not result in any new or significantly more severe environmental impacts than the original waterfront design described in the 2006 SEIR. It was determined that an addendum to the 2006 SEIR would be appropriate to document these findings, clarify and improve the description of the proposed work on the wharf, and make any necessary clarifications or changes to the 2006 SEIR mitigation measures. The Planning Board adopted the First Addendum to the 2006 SEIR at its September 24, 2007 meeting. An appeal to the Addendum was filed and subsequently withdrawn. Honorable Mayor and December 4, 2007 Members of the City Council Page 8 of 8 Honorable Chair and Members of the Community improvement Commission RECOMMENDATION City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution Approving and Authorizing Execution of a First Amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement (Alameda Landing Mixed Use Project) with Palmtree Acquisition Corporation (successor by merger to Catellus Development Corporation). 2. Introduce an ordinance approving a First Amendment to the Development Agreement (Alameda Landing Mixed Use Commercial Project) DA -06 -0003 by and between the City of Alameda and Palmtree Acquisition Corporation (successor by merger to Catellus Development Corporation). Community Improvement Commission: 1. Adopt a resolution Approving a First Addendum to the Alameda Landing Mixed - Use Development Project Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and Authorizing the Executive Director to execute a First Amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement (Alameda Landing Mixed Use Project) with Palmtree Acquisition Corporation (successor by merger to Catellus Development Corporation). Respec +Ily submitted, site £ , Little Development Services Director By: Debbie Potter Base Reuse and Community Development Manager Approved as to Form CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AMENDMENT OF THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (ALAMEDA LANDING MIXED USE PROJECT) WITH PALMTREE ACQUISITION CORPORATION WHEREAS, on May 31, 2000, the City of Alameda certified the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Catellus Mixed Use Development Project ( "2000 EIR "); and WHEREAS, on December 18, 2001, the City of Alameda approved an Addendum to the 2000 EIR to address any environmental effects of the construction of approximately 60 additional residential units; and WHEREAS, on April 26, 2004, the City of Alameda approved a Second Addendum to the 2000 EIR to address any environmental effects of the construction of a stormwater treatment and detention pond, pump station, force main and outfall; and WHEREAS, on September 25, 2006, the City of Alameda approved a Third Addendum to the 2000 EIR to address any environmental effects of the environmental control system for the 39 -unit affordable housing project; and WHEREAS, on December 5, 2006, the City of Alameda approved the Alameda Landing Mixed Use Development Project Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2006012091) ( "SEIR ") to the 2000 EIR for the portion of the Catellus Mixed Use Development Project commonly known as the Alameda Landing Mixed Use Development Project; and WHEREAS, on December 5, 2006, the City of Alameda, pursuant to Resolution No. 14050, made certain findings and determinations pursuant to Section 33445 of the Community Redevelopment Law and approved the Disposition and Development Agreement (Alameda Landing Mixed Use Project) ( "Alameda Landing DDA ") with Palmtree Acquisition Corporation ( "PAC " ); and WHEREAS, on December 6, 2006, the CIC, pursuant to Resolution No. 06 -148, authorized the Executive Director to execute the Alameda Landing DDA with PAC; and WHEREAS, the CIC and PAC executed the Alameda Landing DDA on July 20, 2007; and WHEREAS, on September 24, 2007, the City of Alameda Planning Board approved a first addendum (the "First Addendum") to the SEIR which addresses the impacts of the proposed first amendment ( "First Amendment ") to Resolution #3 -A (City Councl ) Joint CC /ARRAICJC Meeting 12 -04 -07 1 the Alameda Landing DDA and other City actions and revises two previously adopted mitigation measures (solely with respect to the wharf and dredging and in -water construction activities) and corrects typographical errors; and WHEREAS, the First Addendum concluded that the proposed First Amendment would not trigger the need for subsequent or supplemental environmental review pursuant to Sections 15162 and 15163 of the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA ") Guidelines, and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code; and WHEREAS, on December 4, 2007, following notice duly and regularly given as required by law, the CIC and the City Council held a joint public hearing on the First Amendment and related documents, and heard all interested persons expressing a desire to comment thereon or object thereto, and considered the SEIR and the First Addendum. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council finds the proposed First Amendment to the Alameda Landing DDA to be consistent with the Business and Waterfront Improvement Project, including the Mixed Use Land Use Designation, and the City of Alameda General Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby approves the First Amendment to the Alameda Landing DDA, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk's office, subject to any minor conforming, technical or clarifying changes approved by the Executive Director of the CIC and CIC Counsel. 1 1, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in the Special Joint Meeting of the City Council and the Community Improvement Commission on the 4th day of December, 2007, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said City this 5th day of December, 2007. Lara Weisiger, City Clerk City of Alameda Approved as to Form COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING A FIRST ADDENDUM TO THE ALAMEDA LANDING MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO AMEND THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (ALAMEDA LANDING MIXED USE PROJECT) WITH PALMTREE ACQUISITION CORPORATION WHEREAS, on May 31, 2000, the City of Alameda certified the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Catellus Mixed Use Development Project ( "2000 EIR "); and WHEREAS, on December 18, 2001, the City of Alameda approved an Addendum to the 2000 EIR to address any environmental effects of the construction of approximately 60 additional residential units; and WHEREAS, on April 26, 2004, the City of Alameda approved a Second Addendum to the 2000 EIR to address any environmental effects of the construction of a stormwater treatment and detention pond, pump station, force main and ouffall; and WHEREAS, on September 25, 2006, the City of Alameda approved a Third Addendum to the 2000 EIR to address any environmental effects of the environmental control system for the 39 -unit affordable housing project; and WHEREAS, on December 5,. 2006, the City of Alameda approved the Alameda Landing Mixed Use Development Project Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report ( "SEIR ") to the 2000 EIR to address any environmental effects of the portion of the Catellus Mixed Use Development Project commonly known as the Alameda Landing Mixed Use Development Project; and WHEREAS, on December 6, 2006, the Community Improvement Commission ( "CIC "), pursuant to Resolution No. 06 -148, authorized the Executive Director to execute the Disposition and Development Agreement (Alameda Landing Mixed Use Project) ( "Alameda Landing DDA ") with Palmtree Acquisition Corporation ( "PAC "); and WHEREAS, the CIC and PAC executed the Alameda Landing DDA on July 20, 2007; and WHEREAS, on September 24, 2007, the City of Alameda Planning Board, as the lead agency, approved a first addendum (the "First Addendum ") to the SEIR which addresses the impacts of the proposed first amendment (the "First Amendment ") to the Alameda Landing DDA and other City actions and Resolution #3 -A (CIC) Joint CCIAR RAICIC Meeting 12 -04 -07 revises two previously adopted mitigation measures (solely with respect to the wharf and dredging and in -water construction) and corrects typographical errors; and WHEREAS, the First Addendum concluded that the proposed First Amendment would not trigger the need for subsequent or supplemental environmental review pursuant to Sections 15162 and 15163 of the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA ") Guidelines, and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code; and WHEREAS, on December 4, 2007, following notice duly and regularly given as required by law, the CIC and the City Council held a joint public hearing on the First Amendment and related documents, and heard all interested persons expressing a desire to comment thereon or object thereto, and considered the SEIR and the First Addendum; and WHEREAS, the CIC has determined that by amending the Alameda Landing DDA, the CIC will further encourage the productive use and redevelopment of underutilized former military base property. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the CIC, as a Responsible Agency under CEQA hereby approves the First Addendum to the SEIR utilizing its own independent judgment. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the CIC finds the proposed First Amendment to the Alameda Landing DDA with PAC to be consistent with the Business and Waterfront Improvement Project, including the Mixed Use Land Use Designation, and the City of Alameda General Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the CIC hereby authorizes the Executive Director to enter into a First Amendment to the Alameda Landing DDA with PAC substantially in the form and containing the terms and conditions and covenants as set out in the First Amendment to the Alameda Landing DDA, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk's office, subject to any minor conforming, technical or clarifying changes approved by the Executive Director and CIC Counsel. The Executive Director and Secretary of the CIC are hereby further authorized and directed to take such further actions and execute such documents as are necessary to carry out the Alameda Landing DDA, as amended by the First Amendment, on behalf of the CIC. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda in a Special Joint Meeting of the City Council and the Community Improvement Commission on the 4th day of December, 2007, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said Commission this 5th day of December, 2007. Lara Weisiger, Secretary Community Improvement Commission Beverly Johnson, Chair Community Improvement Commission Approved as to Form CITY OF ALAMEDA ORDINANCE NO. New Series APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT DA -06 -0003 TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (ALAMEDA LANDING MIXED USE COMMERCIAL PROJECT) BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ALAMEDA AND PALMTREE ACQUISITION CORPORATION, DATED JANUARY 16, 2007 BE IT ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Alameda that: Section 1. In accordance with Subsection 30 -91 of the Alameda Municipal Code, Development Agreement Amendment DA -06 -0003, a copy of which is on file in the City Clerk's office, is hereby adopted for the real ro ert p p Y generally located north of Wilver ( "Willie ") Stargell Avenue, south of the Oakland Estuary, west of Mariner Square Loop and Webster Street, and east of the United States Coast Guard housing development within the City of y Alameda, County of Alameda, State of California. Section 2. The above referenced Development Agreement Amendment DA-06-0003 shall be known as and referred to as the First Amendment to the Development Agreement (Alameda Landing Mixed Use Commercial Project) by and between the City of Alameda and Palmtree Acquisition Corporation, dated January 16, 2007, (the "First Amendment"). } Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of its final passage, subject to the execution of the First Amendment. Attest: Lara Weisiger, City Clerk City of Alameda Presiding Officer of the Council Introduction of Ordinance #3 -A Joint cc1ARRANCIc Meeting 12 -04 -07 1, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was duly and regularly adopted and passed by Council of the City of Alameda in regular meeting assembled on the day of December, 2007 by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said City this day of December, 2007. Lara Weisiger, City Clerk City of Alameda CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Honorable Chair and Members of the Community Improvement Commission Honorable Chair and Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority From: Debra Kurita City Manager /Executive Director Date: December 4, 2007 Re: Accept the Fiscal Year First Quarter Financial Report and Budget Adjustments BACKGROUND on June 19, 2007, the City Council adopted the budget for fiscal year 2007 -2008 consistent with the City Charter and Government Code requirements. This report provides information about the State budget and the slowing regional economy and their potential impact on the City's budget. It also details the recommended first- quarter budget adjustments for the General Fund and all other fund categories and presents information on General Fund revenues and expenditures through September 30, 2007. DISCUSSION State Budget and Regional Economy: In November 2004, California's voters passed Proposition 1 A, an amendment to the State Constitution intended to restore predictability and stability to local government budgets after years of State takeaways of local revenues. Although the measure prohibits the State from shifting property taxes from local governments to the State, it contains an exception that allows the State to use local government property tax revenues to help balance its budget under certain circumstances. Beginning in Fiscal Year 2008 -2009, the Governor may issue a proclamation that declares that there is a "severe State fiscal hardship" that requires the State to temporarily suspend Proposition 1A' basic protection for the property tax. The Legislature must then agree, by a 2/3 vote, to suspend the property tax protection for that fiscal year only, and it must adopt a separate statute that requires the State to repay local governments within three years. The CC/ARRA/C1C Agenda Item #3-13 12-04.07 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Honorable Chair and Members of the CIC Honorable Chair and Members of the ARRA December 4, 2007 Page 2 of 6 Legislature may not enact such a suspension more than twice in any ten year period, and the reduction may not exceed eight percent of the total amount of property tax allocated among local agencies in the previous fiscal year. The State's Legislative Analyst recently estimated that the State faces a shortfall in the range of $9 billion for the next fiscal year. With much of the State's budget committed to mandatory spending, the Governor and the Legislature have few options for balancing the budget absent an increase in taxes and a takeaway from local governments. Although the Governor will release his proposed budget in January 2008, there will be many revisions to the proposal before final passage some time next summer, and the full extent of takeaways, if any, will remain unknown. One cause of the State's budget deficit is the drop in property tax revenues as a result of the recent sub -prime mortgage market crisis. With foreclosures on the rise statewide and borrowers unable to receive loans, home sales and housing starts are slowing, and prices are failing. According to Beacon Economics, sub -prime loans are a larger problem in Southern California than in Northern California, but they are still posing difficulties for homeowners in the Bay Area; 29% of the mortgage loans in Alameda County are sub - prime, and defaults countywide are nearing record highs. Since property tax payments are not released to the City until January, it is not clear whether the mortgage industry problems are affecting property tax revenues. However, as a result of the decline in sales, the property transfer tax revenues are projected to be below the budgeted amount by approximately $1.3 million this year. This projected reduction in the transfer tax, coupled with a marginal decrease in sales tax revenues and the potential of State takeaways in the coming year, requires the City to monitor and adjust its current spending in order to avoid larger reductions in the future. Staff will continue to update the City's revenue and expenditure projections and present recommendations for corrective action and adjustments in February during the mid -year budget review. First Quarter Update: The total adjusted FY 2007 -08 budget for all City funds is $228,285,874. Attachments A through H detail, by fund category, the revenues and expenditures as of September 30, 2007. Included in the Attachments are the recommended adjustments to the current budget resulting from estimated changes in revenues and expenditures. The Attachments also reflect the intra- period changes, such as transfers between funds, and Council - approved adjustments since the adoption of the budget. General Fund Revenues: General Fund revenues for the period ending September 30, 2007, totaled $9,152,135, representing 11 percent of revenue projections at $81,832,811. This is in comparison to the same quarter in the prior year, wherein 18 percent of revenues had been collected by Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Honorable Chair and Members of the C1C Honorable Chair and Members of the ARRA December 4, 2007 Page 3 of 6 the end of the first quarter. The main sources of local tax revenues include the property tax (27 percent), utility users tax (ten percent), motor vehicle in lieu (eight percent), property transfer tax (seven percent), the local component of the sales and use tax (six percent), and a variety of "all other levies" (11 percent). The latter includes franchise fees, payment in lieu of taxes, and other various sources of income. Adjustments to revenue total $1,030,549, and represent re- appropriation of transfers from other funds to carry forward Fiscal Year 2006 -2007 annual maintenance projects, as well as a California Office of Traffic Safety grant awarded for expansion of enforcement activities aimed at reducing "Driving Under the Influence" (DUI) deaths and injuries. Details of all adjustments to the revenue estimates can be found in Attachment D, Summary of Adjustments. General Fund revenue detail can be found in Attachment B. Certain revenue sources appear below projected annual estimates. Property tax payments are received twice yearly, in January and April. There is also a 30 to 60 day lag in the receipt of several other major revenues, such as sales tax, utility user tax, vehicle -in -lieu subventions, and franchise fee payments from Alameda County Industries. These revenues are only accrued at year -end and recorded on a cash basis during the fiscal year. The cable television providers make franchise fee payments quarterly, while PG &E remits a franchise fee for natural gas on an annual basis. Transfers from Alameda Power & Telecom are remitted to the City's General Fund in ten equal installments. Finally, sales tax payments received in July and August are accrued for the prior year as these payments represent taxes paid or generated in Alameda for sales transactions in April, May and June of the prior fiscal year. A separate report analyzing the sales tax revenues appears on this agenda. General Fund Appropriations: General Fund adjustments of $4,91 1,209 for the first quarter reflect re- appropriation of $4,394,050 for capital improvement projects and annual maintenance projects approved in Fiscal Year 2006 -2007 but not completed by June 30th; appropriation of a grant awarded to the Police Department for DUI- related programs; re- appropriation for Managed Vehicle Replacement plan vehicles; management software and secure server for the Police Department's Digital Audio Recording system; re- appropriation for Police motorcycle purchases in progress from Fiscal Year 2006 -2007; the City's share of Alameda County's 2 -1 -1 Community Services telephone information and referral resource; appropriation of contributions received from the Betty L. W in je Trust for animal shelter equipment; and other adjustments. The recommended adjustments and other offsetting items are detailed in Attachment D, Summary of Adjustments. General Fund Expenditures: Year -to -date General Fund operating expenditures for the period ending September 30, 2007, are $18,782,364, representing 22 percent of the adjusted operating budget of Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Honorable Chair and Members of the CIC Honorable Chair and Members of the ARRA December 4, 2007 Page 4 of 6 $85,713,471, or three percentage points lower than the 25 percent straight -line target. In comparison, at the end of the first quarter of Fiscal Year 2006-2007, 24.9 percent of appropriations had been expended. Non - departmental expenditures include a rent subsidy to the Alameda Historical Museum and administrative support for the Social Services Human Resources Board. Additionally, transfers from the General Fund to special funds include: Library operations, $503,201; Post - Employment Benefits, $492,000; Debt Service - City Hall, $207,222; Risk Management, $202,220; and Urban Runoff $15,577. General Fund expenditures by departments are detailed in Attachment C. Special Revenue and Enterprise Funds: The summaries of revenues and expenditures for special funds and enterprise funds are provided in Attachments E and F, respectively. The majority of the adjustments are re- appropriation of funds for CIP projects approved in Fiscal Year 2006 -2007 but not completed by June 30th, as well as appropriation of developer's contributions and the proceeds of loans and bonds related to ongoing construction at Bayport, and the Civic Center Garage and Historic Theater. A summary of adjustments can be found in Attachment G. It is important to note that the timing of receipts and payments have caused some deviations from the straight -line projections. On a positive note, the City may receive $1.1 million in Proposition 16 funding for local streets and roads during this fiscal year. Staff is working to prepare a list of eligible projects and submit the necessary forms to the State Department of Finance. BUDGET CONSIDERATION /FINANCIAL IMPACT A Summary Analysis of Funds for Fiscal Year 2007 -08 is found in Attachment H. Alameda Power & Telecom and Alameda Housing are included only as memo entries. The projected General Fund balance for June 30, 2008, based on estimated revenues and expenses, is $17,943,323, representing 21 percent of Fiscal Year 2007 -2008 appropriations. General Fund Reserves Outlook: Certain identified future liabilities are expected to impact the fund balance during the current fiscal year. These estimated obligations, which are included in the table below, are the funding of the Alameda Belt Line litigation costs and other Risk Management costs totaling $1,855,401 and the application of the Fair Labor Standards Act to overtime pay currently estimated at $350,000. The litigation and Risk Management costs will be reflected in the mid -year budget amendments. The pro -forma fund balance shown below represents a reserve at 18.1 percent of current appropriations, which is below the 20 percent target by $1,804,773, and short of the 25 percent target by $5,890,448. It is important to note that the reserves are intended to allow the City to respond to Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Honorable Chair and Members of the CIC Honorable Chair and Members of the ARRA December 4, 2007 Page 5 of 6 economic downturns, State takeaways of local revenues, and natural or manmade disasters. Therefore, these funds will be a resource available to the City to address the State's actions if the Governor declares a severe fiscal hardship and invokes its the ability to borrow General Fund revenues. Staff will continue to monitor and inform the Council of the State's budget decisions. Estimated Fund Balance - 6/30/08 Less designated fund balance: Fire Station #3 Less Estimated Obligations: Estimated Proforma Fund Balance - 6/30/08 Targeted Fund Balance Range: Fund Balance Over (Under) Target: RECOMMENDATION $ 17,943,323 400,000 $ 17,543,323 2,005,401 $ 15,537,922 Pa of Current Appropriations 20.9% 20.5% 18.1% Upper value $ 21,428,368 25% Lower value 17,142,694 20% $ (1,604,773) 20% (5,890,446) 25% Accept the first quarter financial report on the results of operations for the quarter ending September 30, 2007, for all funds and approve the supplemental appropriations. Respectfully submitted, IF ells -A ' Boyer Chief Financial Officer ,tth '-g/Lieta By: Annette Brisco di Financial Analyst JAB: di Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Honorable Chair and Members of the CIC Honorable Chair and Members of the ARRA December 4, 2007 Page 6 of 6 Attachments General Fund Recap, Attachment A General Fund Detail Receipts /Disbursements, Attachments B, C Summary of General Fund Adjustments, Attachment D Special Funds Detail Receipts /Disbursements, Attachments E, F Summary of Special Funds Adjustments, Attachment G Summary Analysis of Funds, Attachment H a Q Ce E _ 2007 -08 Adopted CO 0 w 0 r 0 N7w N. r 40 CO co w 0 M M N N 40 r it w CO D) w ti N 4,197,053 0) M w GQ a) co. r 791,950 1!j`] 7,420,712 F 0 w r r w 0 7,468,642 584,455 $ 80,802,262 co co w ti f` Q) w CD 40, 48,415,361 4,421,342 8,598,593 4,211,165 ti ti w r 4) r F w 04 �7 CO 962,232 a) r. u7 u7 'I w LC) 180,500 828,888 � $ 80,802,262 v IA CO 0 w 0 r CD w r. r te Qtr 1 Amendments $ 4,213,899 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 229,633 1 co r 0 w 0 0 00 1 $ 1,030,549 $ 41,576 249,633 1 M co r ti r co 00 1 N t7 M w 0 co 1 0 0 0 w 0 r 3,532,867 175,598 I Q) 0 N w r r 0 w 4# 0 co to w 0 co co .. ti, $ 333,240 2007 -08 Amended Budgeted $ 21,823,982 i0D 0 CSw 0 M w N N 27,698,413 4,1 97,053 1,898,394 RtC) D) r 7,650,345 0 w r Tr w 00 8,269,558 584,455 $ 81 ,832,811 w M 0 w 1` te 48, 664, 994 4,421,342 CO h w G) v. 0 w Tr CD w 1. c Ti OD w ti r 552,455 N r w N 0) LO CO w (0 a) 0� w L 356,098 828,888 $ 85,713,471 CD CO w 0 00°0 ill $ 17, 943, 322 Actual vs Budgeted 0 00 r r r 0 Q) r C4 2007 -08 Actual to date $ 21,823,982 $ 9,152,135 $ 1 8,782,364 Q) N N w 0 M co Q) to Co) u7 ti w M 0) r � N r GENERAL FUND RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS PERIOD ENDING September 30, 2007 UNAUDITED FUND BALANCE - June 30, 2007 Q) CO N. w 0 N f 4,240,816 to N 0 n 0 � w r h a) 0) w (0 N 0 CD CD w 0 Or0> 308,815 to 0 CO w M r0 w r 0 Tr N w Q) Cl N. w r 136,482 $ 1,722,052 V' 0) r w P � w r N [+7 0) w C) 0� V) h r w C) w r 1,151,124 N. (D ti w sn r 135,614 ti 10 ti w 0 0 �r CO 0) 0) M i N w 10 Tt 0 w N M 207,222 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE - JUNE 30, 2008 Property Taxes Other Local Taxes Licenses and Permits Use of Money and Property Fines and Forfeitures Revenue from Other Agencies Current Services Contributions from other funds Equipmt Replmt/Depreciation [City Administration Public Safety Planning /Building Public Works Recreation Services Capital Outlay Depreciation Non- Departmental Transfers Vehicles & Equipment Replacement Debt Service CURRENT YEAR BALANCE OF REVENUES VS. EXPENDITURES PERCENT ICOLLECTED' o CO N -35.4%1 -8.5 %1 Q N. C%1 v O 0 a 0 0 o 0 0 o N r 0 a 0 0) r a N. 0) 15.4 %J a CO LO r Q r N` r c O 0 CO vi o r 0) o O O I%00 z a N. (0 N` a O O s a 0 O a 10 Cr') r a r M tr) t-- 22.3%1 v CO O () o CV Cfl co 0 O (0 co 0 O O c (3) N N o CO co r BALANCE 1 TO COLLECT I $ 17, 535, 008 1,829,956 90,556 0) N L) N. 229,454 () in CT) r (0 N- 10 r $ 22,304,877 $ 3,941,872 N` 0) r CO 4,862,655 N- 0) (0 0 N� 858,878 204,020 N` co cr) ti- r CV OD r 44,083 374,544 2,000,000 532 N co LL) CO ' 21 0,000 1,431,182 $ 23,457,597 $ 128,266 207,570 556,313 O (0 CD a 0 c7 1,310,557 1 CO (0 141,785 ACTUAL ' Q. CD co v M 0) N. N. o r 0 0) r CO 0 `� c' 0) 0) r . . 0) CO N, N $ 924,628 52,303 887,324 1,328,588 CO N. Cr 1 84,538 56,182 4,417 1 500,000 (0 CD 0) r 1 1 1 223,396 $ CO r (0 16 'd' N 36,734 92,430 1,088,440 0' (0 c) 389,443 N. 00 10 28,215 REVISED EST. co O O o N t o O AQ r 1,351,055 83,475 229,454 992,543 1,554,781 $ 22,330,666 co 1 541,500 N` to 8,422,485 1,036, 350 204,020 1,825,875 ' 48,500 374,544 2,500,000 N 261,582 ' 210,000 1,654,578 Q? Cn N. N $ 165,000 300,000 1,644,753 1,000 300 1,700,000 1 170,000 4th Qtr Adjustments C � O ta 3rd Qtr Adjustments v 0$ 2nd Qtr Adjustments 1 ' 1 1st Qtr Adjustments I I 9 I ORIGINAL EST. 2007 -08 = ' i 1 $ 18, 044, 787 1,351,055 83,475 ti LO ~ 229,454 992,543 1,554,781 (0 v CO o (0 N N 0 LO (0 oav_ V' 541,500 o) ti 0) 0) N- (0 8,422,485 v VD (0 CO r 204,020 1,825,875 o 0 10 (0 `t 374,544 2,500,000 0 LO Cv 261,582 O O o 0 cc 1,654,5781 r7 - (0 w N. N 6g o a M o0 (0 ooN- 1 0 CO m CO r 1,000 300 1,700,000 170,000 PERCENT OF TOTAL a I 27.48% a) O (GENERAL FUND RECEIPTS (DESCRIPTION PROPERTY TAXES (3100) Secured Unsecured Prior Secured I Prior Unsecured Homeowner's Exemptions Prop Tax - ERAF Prop Tax - Triple Flip SUB TOTAL - PROPERTY TAXES OTHER LOCAL TAXES (3200) 1Sales Tax Sales Tax (Prop 172) Property Transfer Tax Utility Users Tax Transient Occupancy Tax PG &E Franchise Fees Garbage Franchise Infrastructure Mitigation City Parks Fee Cable Franchise Fees 'AP &T Electricity Franchise Fees Taxi Franchise Fees AP &T Telecom Franchise Fee Hauler Franchise Fee Housing Authority In Lieu Payment in Lieu of Taxes SUB TOTAL - OTHER TAXES LICENSES & PERMITS (3300) Permit Tracking Fee Community Planning Fee Business Licenses Taxi Permit Bicycle Licenses Building Permits Encroachment Permit Fees Electrical Permits ACCT Z Z f E i E 31100 31200 vo M 31500 ooL t.s 31900 31901 -- 0 r (0 32110 1 32200 32300 1 32400 1 32500 1 32510 1 32511 1 32512 1 32520 1 32530 1 32550 1 32560 1 32570 °o CD M O ,- CO CO 33063 33064 33100 33150 33200 1 33400 1 33410 1 33500 PERCENT 1 COLLECTED' a 0 r r 25.5% 39.55% v 0 (D r o Ln o) cr) I %0'0 a co N CV 22.81%1 a co o r v r- N N o C) v. r r o in W 0) 6"-c-.) o 0 a o 0 o 0 0 v o 6 v to r N o r` r` v rn C3) r v v o o a Lo co CO %V01v BALANCE TO COLLECT CO N r D7 t- 745 $ 2,537,028 1 $ 429,204 1 127,041 1,000 54,040 to CO N .. r 0 # $ 1,593,553 1,215 c}) CV (D (D co [- 0 M - 00 0 r 6g r r CV I` r ..r 1 514 44,200 (,,378)1 o o 0 OC1 co 30,000 Cr) Cr) CD o N CV ' () d' 4 r` r N. 0) c r N O) r co o r OD 0 O 0 0 N un CO co ix) C.D CO •-- t- Cr) $ 7,341,530 ACTUAL O Q O f V! M 1 N 1 r` LO C) N I 255 co N 0 v co ( D r 6� (o 1' r` '- OD r 82,959 • o CD 0) L() r in (D co 0 00 '- te I $ 192,814 LO r N r `-� bg co C3) co Ln N t` O) C co' r N 17,211 s (D d' o C) o r • oo ti co ,-- , • I , r- Ln ( 0 N C�) 0) r r r Ca0 0 co co N 0 1 mot' r co- o cV CO o0 cr) N $ 308,815 REVISED EST. 00 O 0 0 N 215,000 0 o 0 r $ 4,197,053 $ 510,950 o o o 0 r N 1,000 70,000 O u0 v) r 0) ti N- co co ca. co I` r 6g ' 64 112,027 $ 1,898,394 1 • 0 co r 0 r s-- 44,200 1 0 o 0 (0 CO 30,000 C""3 co co C)) N N 1 o o o (0 CA xt (D r (o r- 0 o o u7 c) ,- co (0 r dui' co (c (D o o o 00 o o o r` N 4 0 LA (0 h ti tf} 4th Qtr Adjustments 1 = 0 1 3rd Qtr Adjustments $o $0 b 2nd Qtr Adjustments 1 1 6� 1 1 I 1 e 1st Qtr Adjustments _ i _ $0 O = $0 i CO Cr) co N Oi N $ 229,633 ORIGINAL EST. 2007 -08 = 0 0000 1 L{) 1 r I CV 1 , 1 0 _ r C) 0 r► C) r Nt $ 510,950 210,000 o 00 r 70,000 ' O 0)i r 0) N. 4, N. CO (O co N. r 64 ' CO- N. o CV r r V 0) DO 0 00 - • 0 CO 0 r e-- 44,200 88,000 30,000 , , 0 o`oo o (0 a) r co r 0 o 1.5 Cr) r co -00' r-� 0 (0 0 c 0 0 vi CO 0l 0 r` CV $ 7,420,712 PERCENT OF TOTAL 1 ti ,r., to ti 0 O 2.34% o N 0) (GENERAL FUND RECEIPTS DESCRIPTION Plumbing Permits Miscellaneous Permits SUB TOTAL - LICENSES & PERMITS FINES AND FORFEITURES (3400) l Violations Permit Penalties Enforcement & Appeal Traffic School Fees SUB TOTAL - FINES & FORFEITS USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY (3500) Interest Income Interest Allocation E 8 To C cC SUB TOTAL - USE OF MONEY REVENUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES Fed Grant - Pub Service Fed Grant - Othr Govt Svcs State Grant - Pub Service State Highway Maintenance State STC Reimbursement Misc Reimbursements Booking Fees Reimbursement State Grant - 4th Govt Svcs County Reimbursement - ALS Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Post Reimbursements Mandated Cost Reimb State Motor Vehicle in Lieu Park Fund Contribution Other Contrib /Donation SUB TOTAL - REV FROM OTH AG ACCT 1 NO. 0 0 cr) c) 0 0 CO CO 1 34100 1 34410 1 34910 1 34950 0 _0 L0 Cr) 1 35101 1 35300 0 r 0 Cr) 0 _) CD Cr) 1 36210 1 36220 1 36225 1 36226 1 36227 0 o N (0 CO 0 r CO (D CO 0 co CO CO 0 a) CO co 0 N L(] CO co 0 0 CO CO co 0 Cr) o CO co 0 CO 0) Co Co PERCENT COLLECTED w 0 z n a m TO COLLECT J a D 1- 0 a 0 a 0 M REVISED EST. co 0 n 0 0 N L i+ 0 .0 •r N C E N 3 .a Q L f+ 0 -a M N C a) E N 0 S a L 0 c N Adjustments a r. r Adjustments ORIGINAL EST. co 0 ti 0 0 N PERCENT OF TOTAL GENERAL FUND RECEIPTS z 0 1- a re 0 w 0 1- 0 0 a a z a) cci z w a COLLECTED ❑ N O 0 ti lPf v C'7 N v co CO ❑ ❑ ❑ cv 00 N ❑ co Lti O co N O 9 ❑ N O Lri N ❑ O N c O 1�7 N 0 O Lri N 0 O ❑ N O lf7 N ❑ 0 (O 00 v O N ❑ O O O 0 Lei N w z TO COLLECT C) co co O O O N co cv co co 0) N ti 0) 1f07 (D 10 0 1O 10 0 00 000 0) 0) N cO 0) 0 ti 0) ti co 0 co 0) 0 r N co 0 O N 1100 N CO 0) Ch N 0) Lo N N O O N C0 CO 10 CO M 00 Lo 0) cv O O O 0 M ui N 0 (0 J 1-• U r. 0 a d 0 O 0 u) CO M 0 0) co C0 O 0) N 0 N 0) 0; Lo (O N (0 d' O r N In 0) co ti 0) 0) (0 N N O c0 0 N O N r O a) N CV 0 0 M 0 r CD CD T o) N O co 1n (0 (0) 00 0') N (O c0 CO 0) 1n 00 M REVISED EST. 0 0 0 M co c) 0) 0 0 0 N co O ca OQ co O a) co O N N M O co O O O O 0) co O O 1n CD N 0 0 10 CO O O O 0 10 0 0 O 0 O ti 0) 00 Erg r co ni 10 (0 N O 0') N O O 10 1[) 00 0) O 0 0 O Lo O N 10 O O O O co M CO C'7 LS) N co N 10 0) CO N CV 0 N 07 E N 1 0 N 0 N 'D 0 trk N Adjustments 17. N N 0 E N O O O 0 O 10 0 C' ) N 0 00 0 M a) 10 00 N N N ORIGINAL EST. 0 9 ti 0 0 co 0 0) 71' O O O M O (o (0 (0 0 (O C') O N N 0) M O ti 0) O O O O 0) 0 Lo Co N 0 O C0 °O O O 0 O O 0 CO Era O O O 0 0 c0 0 00 N CO 0') N 0) O O Lo 0) O O O a) co M co 1f) 00) N Lo O O O 0 0 00 Ce O O 0 PERCENT OF TOTAL 10) M GENERAL FUND RECEIPTS CURRENT SERVICES (3700 & 39001 General Administration Annual Maintenance Revenue N 0 L.L 8 a) c w (1) 0) 0 0 co c 0_ E U i1) 8 can) z 0 0 U a Police Contract Overtime 0) c_ c co a_ c 0 0) CJ Public Works Fire - Ambulance Fees SUB TOTAL - CURRENT SERVICES CONTRIBUTIONS FR OTHER FUNDS Trsfr from CIT Trsfr from CIC -WECIP Trsfr from Low /Mod -W ECI P Trsfr from CIC -BWIP Trsfr from Low /Mod BW I P Tfr from CIC- Alameda Point Trsfr from Low /Mod APIP 0 z co N 0 Trsfr from Tidelands Trsfr from CDBG Trsfr from FISC Revenue 0) C 0 co 2 .0 T2 Q v •c_ •0 -e 0 0 0 1-� 0 6 z coo 0 C') co (0 0 0) M 0 O 0) 0) O 0) 0) co 0 0) 0) °O 0) °O 0) co O C') 0 0) co co r CO C"1 N CN CO 0 N oo C') 0 N co C') 0 co Cr) co 00 0') 0 CO Ce) CO C') C') r 00 C') r 0 ( N CO Cry N CO C') N 00 C'r) N CO M co 00 C') !07 00 C') (0 (0) Co Cr) 00 C') 0 00 0') 00 M CO CN C1) • 0 ES go t 2 DI 4 c E • E • 5 f+ 0 co PERCENT COLLECTED' 0 O O o O O a C) N- ,_ '' e N- D o cD ci N 2' ti u7 r 24.4 %I v N. Tr Lei r o O r r r 23.35 %I 0 CO r e. r• BALANCE TO COLLECT o 0 o co r r o o O N (0 r cv 0 ❑? w I` o) ' 1 848,346 228,979 F- 0) N- ao N- c) ' 1,633,328 0) r M w © cn Q i w co $ 72,232,703 C) ti at N. '. N. r. co o o co N w r• ACTUAL 30- Sep -07 ' ' 20,467 1 1 cD 0 N-. co co co v o 1--- co r 70,488 ' 526,442 $ 1,279,240 $ M to (o In z— 0 Qi 136,482 LL, M r cv u) r Dc REVISED EST. 2007-08 0 o 0 cD r r 0 00 (N co r 118,369 ' ' N Q] co co o 00 cri 0 0) a] N 449,285 ' 0 ti O7 U) r N $ 8,269,558 $ 81,248,356 $ 584,455 1 r o N M o0 w r 03 CO 4th Qtr Adjustments 1 i 11 1 1 i 0 1 1 3rd Qtr Adjustments i I 2nd Qtr Adjustments i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1st Qtr Adjustments 1 1 I _ 1 000'8 L.c.) co C0 `•) 48,998 0) O o0 $ 1,030,549 $ 1,030,549 ORIGINAL EST. CO 0 r. O N 0 00 I! (.6 i r ! 0 00 07 r Q? CO r ' 1 N- 0) 0) CO CO °rn U) N 400,287 ' O N- f` � r N N (0 (4) ' ~ u 1 N. O CO r N 00 E$ $ 584,455 N co N a co CO d} PERCENT OF TOTAL i 1 ' 1 e 0. O r %00'001. (GENERAL FUND RECEIPTS `DESCRIPTION Trsfr from Marina Cove Trsfr from Bayport SD 03 -01 Trsfr from Athletic Trust Trsfr from Public Arts Fund Trsfr from CIP Trsfr from Urban Runoff Trsfr from Golf Course Trsfr from Sewer Service Trsfr from Risk Management Trsfr from ARRA SUB TOTAL - CONTRIBUTIONS TOTAL - GENERAL FUND Equipment Replacement Depreciation 1 GRAND TOTAL - GENERAL FUND ACCT NO. 38276 38278 38280 38285 38310 38351 38601 38602 38712 38858 !Fund 119 -rl- PERCENT( EXPENDED( - 37.11%1 24.41%1 o N r- cr] CA v CD 4 N a) ci CA 24.24% 24.31 % 24.47%1 26.45% 24.07% o CD OD r N 12.48% 21.76% 15.22%1 $ 17,985,476 25.63% = e v a7 [D N 29.45 %I a v 't LO r o v o N ; o co N c) N M N in [D T o Tr ti 4 N 24.53% l BALANCE $ I- Vi N 82,474 953,396 301,808 709,109 2,41 7,832 co ti a) 00 N M CD 0+7 N7 $ 4,523,417 12, 549, 522 373,873 62,485 co (0. o N 79,842 r CD r I` to 0 N- C) 732,744 5,908,142 0 co $ 2,224,031 c co ; N 1 cD I EXPENDITURES D N 6 M $ 48,672 Q? co 0 cry 93,868 224,286 760,427 286,905 $ 1,722,052 co r CO ' 4,512,431 11 8,493 17,515 28,758 22,210 co N d3 CO M CD Ili Cr) r $ 3,581,094 coy) Q] o cry 1,075,341 44,324 1 co co 0 © co � C3 c0 1-- vt r i co al. 64 Adjusted Appropriations $ 131,146 1,261,290 a)01N CD CC7 N- 01 C] r 05 1,1 83,678 co M p {` $ 5,988,584 mc1 co CA- 0 r- r °o OD 230,424 102,052 CO 07 N $ 24,185,012 $ 13,281,671 1,038,674 6,983,483 221,154 $ 21,524,982 °o w 111 a) N cm n CS) to cc w Tr Fourth Qtr Adjustments 0$ V% $0 $o Third Qtr Adjustments $0 v rSecond Qtr Adjustments 64 First Qtr Adjustments cD 1- in r Cr7 v o o p cD ti to N. 01 cry co C] CA cv M co CD C7 RNI v o o C) r (220,154) 221,154 000`0Z $ 1 eg M iD C7 N 1 ORIGINAL APPROPRIATIONS o0 ° N. N v r Y- ti N 395,676 933,395 3,1 78,259 co 1` Ci7 co co co = 0 $ 5,988,584 CO to CD a co 0 r o C) o 230,424 102,052 0 $ 23,955,379 $ 13,262,671 1,258,828 6,983,483 o $ 21,504,982 $ 2,955,000 r LQ M Tr (GENERAL FUND DISBURSEMENTS ninistration City Council City Manager City Clerk City Attorney Finance & Information Technology Human Resources GENERAL GOVT SUB TOTAL: IPublic Safety, r. f, Police Services Bureau of Services Bureau of Operations Animal Shelter Police Contract Overtime Crossing Guards Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Othr Grant progs: OTS (DUI), JAG, COPS ervices Emergency Services Preventive Services Advanced Life Support Disaster Preparedness (new division) Police 1 Fire Pension PUBLIC SAFETY SUB TOTAL: ri 0 0 CV r o 0 r CV 0 0 0 0 0 N CO 0 CV CV N N 0 0 LC) CV J 0 r r C+7 0 CV r c) 0 CO r C) 0 Ct r Cr) 0 CT) T co 0 0 0 Lo T 0 r CV co rri 0 CV CV co 0 CO CV Cr) 0 �t CV Cr) 1 PERCENT( EXPENDED( 22.17°% - N r �o r N I = = i p N. c N O 0 CA N O C o N 12.80%1 5.26% 6.48% 15.93% 1 29.31%1 Q [D N 25.25%1 D 0 0 o 27.29% 1 23.40 %I 1 p 1 BALANCE h � j 1 M $ 3,312,531 07 r o M $ 331,837 1,880,975 2,145,910 53,366 372,049 3,202,466 i M I 1 a;°o Q� 1� - 0) r r 1,453,843 r (0 C) 50,000 u, (0 o M H:l i � 1 C) N. Liz c EXPENDITURES T:21 ai y 1 $ 943,811 N r O N I � `N Q) [+7 LO G7 $ 103,591 600,812 558,544 7,833 CO A tD o N 221,717 1 c.-) r C+'i r Lri 1 = $ 494,416 531,756 124,953 = N 1 Z' � r o = r $ 17,287,4761 1 Adjusted C � 7. N �L o $ 4,256,342 °a o T- $ 4,421, 342 I $ 435,428 2,481,787 2,704,454 rn r CO 392,725 3,424,183 ti 1� �' °' 1 N r• co co. r CD Ii7 o7 r 494,930 °o Q lob] � CO t~- N `r 1 o N °o ti Fourth Qtr Adjustments v to 1 1 1 Third Qtr Adjustments $o 0 40 1 40 1 40 Second Qtr Adjustments C. 1 40 $o : First Qtr Adjustments o$ 0 0 N 0 0 N 861,183 $ 861,183 (000`oz$) 0 o o Ci 1 40 $ 1,152,392 1 ORIGINAL APPROPRIATIONS °D ° 1� o o N $ 4,256,342 0 0 o Lei co [D $ 4,421, 342 11 $ 433,028 2,484,187 2,704,454 0) 03 r r CD 392,725 o o o C'r7 L9 N Cr) rn L-7 °Q CI o to 0 N r 1` r ea 1,965,5991 494,930 0 o o o L! j $ 4,217,649 $ 72,734,8131 (GENERAL FUND DISBURSEMENTS C •w v W otS Permit Center Planning Annual Maintenance Public Works Administration Engineering Maintenance Services Cable Television Street Lighting PW Annual Maintenance PUBLIC WORKS SUB TOTAL: on Services Recreation Parks Mastick Senior Center ARPD Annual Maintenance RECREATION /PARKS SUB TOTAL: (Operating Sub - Total '= E. Y. o rvi* r 0 0 CD 1n o N 0 r [11 0 ` c+3 N N 0 CD N 0 0 Cr) 0 r r- 0 N G 0 to r 0 o 0 Lo z 0 W a EXPENDED e CO CO 0 r 0 in tr.) N a 0 v a co ti co co 01 c.".E. 00 0 a 0 N a 00 CA r r 7 00 Lli CA 00 N 00 N ■igs 0 N e, Q 00 6 0 N d v. r F.- N a CO Cip. CO a CD 0 e O 0 ai O r r N W V m 3O- Sep -O7 0 CO 0 Or VI r 40 40 0 N CT ti co ea r a) N N Co) CO CO ti O co 0o CO C4 0 (0 0 O r (4) co ti Co r O R. r 40 CO O CD 71 CD ea co 0 co 0) 0 O I-- 0 CO CO O 0 CO O O O O v r r- co OD 01 0, r- 4- 0 0) 1- 0) tt (0 N CD 0) M CD 40 Tr LA7 0 ti 0 co cli co 40 N 0) O CD 0) CV r 00 10 N 40 F.-- 0 r r M of CO 40 EXPENDITURES v (1) v M N. CO I, r 40 v r CO M r 40 .71. 0 ca ,--. CO M Lei r C7 O N 0 O 0 r r ti CA N. v v r N N N 0 N 4} E N Cr) 10 0 N N N N 0 0 0 N d' 0 O Cn r v N N r 40 0) r Ch 0 In h C0 r 40 co v C7 (4) co v N co 40 ,r to M N >` CO r 40 N 0 a Appropriations in t N In te N 0 to 00 O O OD CA LO r CD CO Co (4) 00 0 r 00 N 4. N r N 0) CO CO C0 CO 0 00 C\1 El. N 000 co 00 0 oo 00 0 00 co 0) 0 00 N r 0 (4) O co i 1 Tr P.- ti r co 0i 40 ti (1) h in M Ili CD 40 00 O co- a) 0) 0 0 CO N CO 0 (0 LA M 40 r ci r co 00 (0 0 .c 0 0 u_ Second Qtr Adjustments i Adjustments Adjustments 1 Adjustments N N rs 0 CO 40 0 C� O O 0 ORIGINAL APPROPRIATIONS v ti 0 v N C) v. ti co 40 in N O LA 40 of 0 c0 CO CD 0 LO CD Co r cy r C0 '.4- 00 0. r 0 N 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 0 0 0 v r 40 CO CO ("1 CO O C'5 40 40 ca 0) In (0) r 40 40 N r N v a: 40 CO CO CO- 01 CO 0 co C"1 El. N 00 0o 00 0 co 00 0 00 co a7 00 O 0 O CO 0 CO C. CO h. co T CO N i0 40 ccoo r"-... N LO v co 40 00 0 O 0) 0 CO LO vi 00 en 0 CO r 40 CO N N v co 0 CO 40 GENERAL FUND DISBURSEMENTS Capital Outlay Sub -Total 0 E a 0 co 0 re 0 L cn L f+ 0 0 .0 0 Non - Departmental C 0 U 1) 0 co 1— C z 0 co E Q Cultural Arts: Historical Museum N t m C� L V N s o c 0) c ...= 0 0 co ._ 2 6- Q ca w co co Sub -total - Non - Departmental Transfers out: .0) 0) C E co 0 co LL 7 To 2 1 0 U co m 0 2 .0 J 0 E co co iR W 0 0 N c CU E v E co 0 0 EC co Sub -total - Transfers Out TOTAL - GENERAL FUND 0 E 1) co Q. IX c.3 r 0 E (.) co a c 0) E •_ W II) L 0 Sub -total Equipment Replacement GRAND TOTAL - GENERAL FUND 0) r r LL SUMMARY OF ADJUSTMENTS - GENERAL FUND ■ Department & Description Police: California Office of Traffic Safety, Selective Traffic Enforcement grant for programs reducing alcohol related deaths and (net of offsetting budget transfers of $221,154 to EL co 0 a) E co Q 0 0 E U 0 c •E Q 0 U a) 0) c U .9) 2 0 E 0 1— L i) co C 0 .u) .' 0) C 0) L 0 0) 0 a3 0) 0) 0 c 0) 0 co V) cu ca 2 0 0 0 LL. 0 0 c a) 0) 0 U E a 4- L C cLa 1– 0) L 0 0 a) c) Cu J 0 0) 0) co a. U .0) 0 CC 06 w U 0 U c 0) 0 ..g' 0 E E 0 r r N co Z 0 0 ca 0) E 0 :=C- 0 o 0 U 0) 0) E co Q 4E) U 0 0 a in 0 Human Resources: adjustment for staffing contract change transfer to HR is Initiatives: a) 2 U] Contributing funds /transfers -in for u) a) L 0) Q Q) LE) L U7) C N a"' (0 = 731) [6 J _a o' E s u) ;,T, a ui v0 •( 0 0 °� `2 Z' .a a- 0 Q a-0 a) O o E -o L L 0) CO a E 0 � 0 ITs U a) :.N a >; 0) 0• Q E v •a v E C0 .0 D ac a) 22 17) �' N 0 �' 0 U o :� -C - co 0 L c 0o -gc N 0 5 c v .- cn o �, 0 co 0 c .�. 0 IP a 0 •u) �' o c co 0 c ca 0 0 171 ,,o,T3E., 0 t f 0 o •� o a) 0 C o LZ cn 0 co .Q "0 E i 0 ❑ 0 0 a o 2 .� •— = s 0 ai 0 0 0. . co 0 0 L.L 0 a) 2 •D) a3 .0 E L cP 0- 0 0 = 0) 0 -v Tu ca Q J C .�. L iI) •L CO .0 •� V) Q) 0 0) 0) N (0 0 `C a ca 0) 0 c m o= CD a) V3 N L N co CO V) 01" :5 a' c m H a 2 -c7.)P co co 2 .= -° 0 0 a) 0 co a co ca 2 - z' v Ei N D 2 oocf)i-a. 0C9m —&5 5 3o _ 8 0 Ca .0 0 0 0 CO 0 0) N 0 0 0 u7 0) 0 CO 0 2 a CO (0 d' CO 0) 0 d' t- 0 0 0) C+) d' 0) 0 = r• N. C4 N 0) 0 10 [0 0 0 03 00 a) 0 a) 0 0 - oo o c6 c oo o oa N: 6. c6 n �t ti o a) o [Cj co co Co �t co N N ,- C N a7 0 CO �t 0 0 co Capital outlay: appropriate contributions received from the Betty L. Winje Trust for Animal Shelter equipment 4 a) E o C) co 0 EC 0) E w Re- appropriation for completion of Managed Vehicle Replacement plan vehicles CO 0) 0) N — 2 CO o C3 p M etir rvig w 0 • E ld v. a f Cli :X' CI) a co c a w E E a) a 0)4– (0 0) c L 0) o f a 0 U a). OC a) 0 � �s ' Q 1 TV a • 5 Ts 0 ❑ U � (3 a. o 8 it .0 _47) 0)) o 0 _0 f 0) o- E ac U co L o 53 o • _Cd E °) a a ( 0. c cP CD 2 CC a 0 0 0 m Total General Fund Adjustment Appropriations co co 0 0) Cti] N a 0 0 0 N CO LO r C) ■ a 0 a 0 0 0 o a r V- ......., co 00 N- N- CO CO ti c0 co N (0 o N CO LO 0 0 00 a (0 r 0 0 N r F) d' ea (0 ca a) co : (.0 0) a) N 6 > N CO a) Ct 0) 0 0 co 0 r ea PERCENT COLLECTED( 100.0 %1 0 ' f 6 I` o C6 r co .82. t--- a) t-- r L0 N N a a) Cr} 0 N 1 33.2 %1 I 0 N- N ❑ co 0 ❑ N 0 r 1 0 0 C7 0 s-- 0 N a) CD ,-- o 0 a) N- 65.0 %1 8 a CY) 16 a) I%000 L r a 0 0 o r l °100'00 o D) 0 0 6 o CN 0 CO U) r 8-- CO r r 1 I 86.5% 329.7% BALANCE TO COLLECT 1 d' c N. r 342,233 Co r CO r 1 (1,121,543) 1 i 914,798 (52,974) 1 7,480,312 1 1,545,914 183,488 7,601,654 15,926,643 1 (412) C-- CO CN u7 r a) Q 1 1 1 149,431 s. r '-' 5,053 4,881 i 1 1 , co r CO r ,- 0 r r r ACTUAL ti Q CI? M 143,566 2,773,234 N. CO N. L() 3,817 1 1,121,543 1 r r N- r .4' 103,974 1 3,715,590 1 r N r Q N r LO r 1 6) r N- I` r CO CO N. CO [ zI.s'ti 1,273 325 L6 L 82,880 r 3,012 N. I CO N 0) CD LO r Lri 2,759 947 0 r Cfl t i 1 1 83,951 Ct CO CO ADJUSTED REVENUE EST 143,566 3,491,228 500,000 20,000 1 1, 1 a) a) Q CO I r^ o, 00 r ID 11,195,902 2,053,085 185,000 (0 r 0 N 14,448, 924 165,788 4,500 0 (1).. ° r 0 (0 200 82,880 1 3,012 2,647 165,000 0 m r 6,000 0,,, LQ) to ' a) o a] CD N. co d' 4th Qtr Adjustment 3rd Qtr Adjustment 2nd Qtr Adjustment 1st Qtr Adjustment 1 43,566 20,000 (25,000) * N Cr) C6 CO d- 165,788 Q c6 co N OD 1 N r 0 C+7 1` d- CD N 0 0 0 C; CA (SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS FY2007 -08 ESTIMATED REVENUE; 1 3,491,228 500,000 1 1 1 1 1 0) a) 0 CO N r 0 0 r u, , 11,195,902 -L Q C. (0 N 2,053,085 185,000 CO r Q CO N. 6,982,000 1 4,500 C] CO. r 0 0 0 CV 1 1 1 1 165,000 Q CO e-- Q 0 CO 5,500 1 1 1 1 a] 0 N- 48,726 ID ESCRIPTION 11998 REVENUE BOND DEBT 1999 REVENUE BOND DEBT 2003 AP REV BOND DEBT 2003 AP REVENUE BOND 2003 CIC TAX ALLOC 2003A1 2003 CIC TAX ALLOC 2003A2 2003 CIC TAX ALLOC 2003B FISC /CATELLUS LAND SALE 2003 TAX ALLOC REF BW I P AFFORDABLE HOUSING ALA PT BOND PROJ FUND ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT ASSET SEIZURE FUNDS ATHLETIC TRUST BAYPORT AD 03 -1 BUSINESS & WATERFRONT CIC PROJ. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND FISC CATELLUS TRAFFIC FEE CDF- WE TRAFFIC SAFETY CDF- WE PARKS & RECREATION 1CDF- WE PUBLIC FACILITIES 'CDF- WE PUBLIC SAFETY CDF- NW TRAFFIC SAFETY CDF- NW PARKS & RECREATION CDF NW PUBLIC FACILITIES CDF- NW PUBLIC SAFETY CDF- CEE TRAFIC SAFETY CDF- CEE PARKS & REC CDF- CEE PUBLIC FACILITIES CDF- CEE PUBLIC SAFETY CDF- BF TRAFFIC SAFETY CDF- BF PARKS & RECREATION CDF- BF PUBLIC FACILITIES CDF- BF PUBLIC SAFETY CENTRAL GARAGE FUND CENTRAL STORES FUND 1 FUND# LA M CO CD C�) CO CO CD 1 328 1 201.11 1 201.13 1 201.15 CD r C N LA CO d' CO CO N CO LO av CO 1A Co 219 280 278 203 310 I r c; r r r c; M N r O C) r C 340.14 r N o 340.22 340.23 I 340.24 r C) got cA 340.32 340.33 I 340.34 e�- ' �p CI 340.42 C) ' o I 340.44 M 0 E� N 0 1` 1 PERCENT 1 COLLECTED( O a o %0'0 _I 0.0%1 c.`-'..-(= a7 ai t-- a a a r 15.6%1 'Co c co 0 0 a a 0 a r 100.0% 25.0% 25.0% o o Lri N a a I` a ,L.- co co v a 6 N a oa 1 o a d o co o 1 v T: ‘-- 1` ❑ (.) cii N o a co a o N r, v ,_--- - o -- 1 BALANCE TO COLLECT I i i 32,275 1 136,225 1 431,648 242,671 '- Cn a) vt 0 LO r 456,489 3,000 1 1 1 1 1 p) 1r r. co LC) 178,211 f` r L5 a) N 623,002 N Co of Li? N ' CD Ca co r CV Co i ' CC] c0 r Lz N v- CA c0 co a cO a CV 1- C) N. Cv c r LC) i Co a) � r r N- r N CV CLf , a LO 1 1 r k LC] r s-- CV r r 0 r 1 ACTUAL IN- O. 07 0 C) 1 1 438,278 1 I 1 I 60,254 3,317,522 0 0) co CV 393,795 I 1 95,021 18,600 195,907 59,404 98,539 00 a a) 1- Lo LO (0 rn 0) r 1 N N CV 0 N 1 1 1- r , L(] c co m 1 0 0) LC) ,-o~ N C]0 N- co r 1 0 0 CD I V) co Ln CO LO a r ADJUSTED REVENUE EST 1 1 438,278 32,275 136,225 i 431,648 302,925 3,317,522 1,782,189 850,284 3,000 1 1 95,021 18,600 783,626 L() r Co r` c N (0 L!'] 'ci a c) 670,000 N- r LC) ( r CN 1 CO CO CO o6 CV Co • 1 0 a 0 Liz -'- N 0) CO Co O co a N 0) co co CM) 0) 0 LZ'} 1 (.0 cs a O C'r) 0) Lc 0 0 a Li] r- r• . 0 a a CV 1 0 0 a 0 M r 0 0) Lf] Ln N r 4th Qtr Adjustment 3rd Qtr Adjustment 2nd Qtr Adjustment 1st Qtr Adjustment 438,278 3,067,522 0 LO a 0 C0 '-- r LC) r ti Ln O N r 0 0 0 r 0 N (SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS FY2007 -08 ESTIMATED REVENUE 1 1 1 32,275 136,225 1 431,648 LC) N 0) c\F a C+7 0 0 0 o L[7 CV a) co r CV 00 1` r 850,284 3,000 1 I i i 1 (fl CV (0 ci 00 I,- 237,615 0 LO r 0) cr) 670,000 r- r in CD r CV i Co co co co CV co 1 1 0 0 0 in t- N CO 0 C\1 a I` C10 r N. t- 06 Co c0 0 1 (0 co 0 0 (Y) cc r 0 0 0 tri f` r- 1 1 1 0 0 0 a c) r 0 0 LC, Ln N r r DESCRIPTION CFD #1 - HARBOR BAY CFD# 2 - PARAGON CIC - HOUSING IN -LIEU FEE AUSD HOUSING FUND CIC- APIP LOW /MOD INC HSG CIC- BWIP HSG 2002 BOND PROJECT CIC - ALAMEDA POINT COMMERCIAL REVITALIZATION THEATRE /PARKING STRUCTR PROJ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (CDBG) CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUND CURBSIDE RECYCLING FEE DEBT SERVICE - 84-3A DEBT SERVICE - 84-3B DEBT SERVICE - 89 -1 DEBT SERVICE - 92 -1 DEBT SERVICE - CFD #1 DEBT SERVICE - CIC SUB BOND DEBT SERVICE - JAIL FACILITY DEBT SERVICE - LIB & GOLF PROJ DEBT SERVICE - LIBRARY BOND O s co m a .._I 00 o S _›› U > !- m ❑ ZW 0 <z Q , w U w U) m W ❑ < V z W w U.1 W U7 m W ❑ Q U3 m W ❑ U Z Z W= F- ? 2 LLI ❑ ❑claw D LL Q I— ~ Z J❑<» W ❑ I— w �o DC CC u� Q m A_' Q 2 Co �� cc W '� z> < Z D W w [W W Li. _Z 0 pp 3 J H U U V3 L ❑ m wt Z= w w 1 W Q w U (1] II Q w Z¢ CL u) J J F-. U U U] LL Z_ Z 5Q ��0 0) J c 0) F- U U= U] a-. d- Z ,_ U) C7 W w J W > w cc Q _ DC ❑ U) W d co Q 0 ❑ Z ❑ LL I- u) Q 0 I FUND# 360 361 204.5 � 204.6 CD 0 N 204.4 � 205 � N. N N 227.1 CD C7 N CD r C7 P. N CO 0 et 1 460 1 832 CI Cl CO O CD CO N CD et 1 413 CA r V r N N N d' '+r' CO CO CD et N. LA CO CD h CO r N N r N co Cl N CD r N CD r ' � N CO in N N W N C7 ' W in N C?) LA N 0 N r r N PERCENT COLLECTED( t o Li) f` C11 1 i a 4 (0 i i 1 5.3 %I° 5.3 %1 CO in (D CV o C) 5.3%1 ❑ 00 r CV 1 ❑ 0 o 0 r O 1` I` r a o o 0.2 %I 0 to 1 a ti 0) r 1 o o 6 a o 6 o 0 6 a o 0 1 1 1 1 24.7% 25.9% 54.9% BALANCE TO COLLECT 1 3,563,448 r, (10, 335) co ( co r I I 1 (240) ,- 0) 0) CO (1,501) (20,128) LC) 0 [rfl �.. (3,488) 1 1 r N ° 1 0) CV 1,277,777 0 CCO 0) 07 0) i 1 t- CO co- 1 0 0 CO CO r 0 CO CO r 753,300 138,000 1 1 .►.�..__ 0 CO `� 1 1 355,256 2,194,392 29,639 rn ( ) ACTUAL N. ° w to 0 M 1 1,350,552 N- co 10,335 195,983 1 1 1 240 r co 07 coo 1,501 20,128 16,025 CO v. Co I 0) o 4t r 628,357 1 1,521 r o 1 0> co M c'J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 co M 1 1 119,744 720,608 10,361 45,053 ADJUSTED REVENUE EST 1 0 0 r 07 1 1 1 (0 (0 o CO 1 1 1 4,500 17,500 15,500 57,000 670,000 0 0 0 CO 000'91- 1 CA CO - 3,557,648 {` N- N- N r 0 Cr CD 0) 76,000 1 o 0 C r 1 0 0 m CO v- 180,600 753,300 138,000 1 1 1 1 1 475,000 _ 2,915,000 40,000 0 00 CO N 4th Qtr Adjustment 3rd Qtr Adjustment 2nd Qtr Adjustment 1st Qtr Adjustment 1 07 CO 0) r 120,000 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS FY2007 -08 ESTIMATED REVENUE 1 0 0 oo r 0) j 1 1 304,626 1 1 1 4,500 0 LO N- t- C. Lon L(i t - 57,000 670,000 0 oo En 0 M 000'9 L 1 1 3,557,648 1,277,777 Cs N N- CO 07 76,000 1 1 1 0 o° 0 CO CO r 180,600 753,300 0 00 (0 Cr) r 1 1 1 1 1 475,000 2,915,000 40,000 82,000 (DESCRIPTION XIX TRANS IMPROVEMENT FUND GOLF ENTERPRISE FUND HA SECTION 8 PROJECTS HARBOR BAY AD # - 92 -1 HOME FUND HOME REPAYMENT FUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISLAND CITY MTE DIST 84-2 ISLAND CITY MTE DIST ZONE 1 ISLAND CITY MTE DIST ZONE 2 ISLAND CITY MTE DIST ZONE 3 ISLAND CITY MTE DIST ZONE 4 ISLAND CITY MTE DIST ZONE 5 ISLAND CITY MTE DIST ZONE 6 ISLAND CITY MTE DIST ZONE 7 LEAD ABATEMENT LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION LIBRARY FUND - OPERATIONS LOW & MOD INCOME HSG - BWIP 'LOW & MOD INCOME HSG - WECIP MARINA COVE MAINT DT 01 -1 RESERVE MARINA COVE 01 -01 MARINA VILLLAGE AD# - 89 -1 MEASURE B MEASURE B LOCAL ST & RD MEASURE B BICYCLE PED IMP MEASURE B TRANSBAY FERRY MEASURE B PARATRANSIT MEASURE B CAPITAL PROJECT MEASURE B GAP FUNDING MEASURE B NEW COUNTY PROG OPEN SPACE IMPROVEMENT PARKING IN -LIEU FUND PARKING METER FUND POLICE AND FIRE - PLAN 1079 POLICE AND FIRE - PLAN 1082 POLICE /FIRE IMPACT FEES 1 FUND# N r N r 0 iD I 265.1 C17 r Cl7 235 248 265 275 275.1 275.2 275.3 275.4 275.5 275.6 275.7 268 II, r Cl) I 210 et 0 N N 0 N 276 r n N I 312 Ili r N r r N N r N Cl r N 1 215.4 1 215.5 CD . N 1. r N 1 318 C) N N N N r- 0 CO N 0 CO r CD r PERCENT( COLLECTED( ❑ C.0 L() N ❑ v o CD t " 54.7% 16.6% v o ❑ 0 LO ❑ 0 N d' 25.0% 13.0% 39.7% , o cv c i N ❑ 8 C) 29.5% 9.2% t— a 24.8%1 a co N- r N BALANCE TO COLLECT 1,434,805 F 83,758 1,157,105 155,690 5,562,054 29,300 2,053,979 798,141 144,608 131,411 517,129 1 22,991 2,671,260 285,760 394,576 4,584, 729 v M vr 0 $ 84,522,077 ACTUAL N. 0 Q CD (1) 0 M 493,195 37,500 101,242 230,874 1,598 331,301 26,650 684,660 118,882 95,392 48,589 16,571 F I CO In 0 0 119,423 605 0) 0 344,569 $ 23,843,665 ADJUSTED REVENUE EST 1,928,000 37,500 185,000 1,387,979 157,288 5,893,355 55,950 2,738,639 917,023 240,000 180,000 533,700 r 31,169 2,780,717 405,183 395,181 4,587,927 1,387,979 $ 109,451,242 4th Qtr Adjustment 3rd Qtr Adjustment 2nd Qtr Adjustment 0 i st Qtr Adjustment 0 0 1.0 N- CO 0 0 o 0 I-- o 0 0 0 C. r $ 17,290,908 (SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS FY2007 -08 ESTIMATED REVENUE 1,928,000 195,000 1,387,979 157,288 5,793,355 55,950 2,738,639 917,023 240,000 180,000 533,700 31,169 2,780,717 405,183 395,181 4,587,927 1,387,979 $ 92,160, 334 DESCRIPTION POST EMPLOYMENT FUND PUBLIC ARTS HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD WASTEWATER CAPITAL RESV REHAB REPAYMENT FUND RISK MANAGEMENT SENIOR CITIZENS TRANSPORTATION SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND SSHRB TAX ALLOC BONDS - MERGED PROJECTS TECHNOLOGY SERVICE FUND 'TIDELANDS TRUST TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND TRANSPORTATION IMP FUND TSM/TDM UNEMPLOYMENT URBAN RUNOFF WASTE REDUCTION SURCHARGE CITY WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM WEST END COMM. IMP PROJ. WORKERS COMPENSATION TRUST ■PECIAL FUNDS I FUND# 720 I 285 LD N N Cpri 0) N N_ 1� 0 CND N (DD 1. CD N' Ti. 0 ZD N C7 N 0 CI I 225 Lt3 r - Cori Tt N r N . N r i PERCENT IEXPENDED! O co or; r b Cn o N 1 O co 0 C7 I G a o .at-_,, a c o 0) O Sri G O o I J O a 0 1 1 I G o 0 1 1 1 G a 0 1 O o o ❑ co ni .f' 00 b O C J co b a o I J 1 1 b 4 cd b t0 0- r d r` (NI b a o 1 D co oo co d M CO d 0 o b r c CO - O a o u7 BALANCE r 0 O. C 7 O C'7 45,506 0) a N N CD C3) ' N t- to N 0 r ' O O CY) [r] 07 o u7 [X7 CO N N r CD CY7 0 1 a O O 1 O O O co- r 1 1 I a 0 a N r 1 1 1 O O O co- 1 0 0 0 c) co �- r .�. C) co r N- �t co Ci7 d' ' 1 1 1 0 r N u7 07 CO rn 0 N N C 7 U7 N 0 [D C) r 1 N- CO co N N N ' 0) .- CO Cn 0 r7 ,: (0 U7 r CO 0 LO CO u-] N CY) u7 N OD ■ EXPENDITURES N 0 O. ) I v c) 10,534 1 2,548,376 I 538,581 1 1 O Lo r N cD CD CD r- N- r` I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I , I I I In CO s -- r CO r N- N- co In u7 I I I 1 I O CD N ..47 07 C) a {7 L O co co r CD CCO 1 1 r co C7 .4-- �' to CD N cr) C D 1 Q 0 CO 0 dN' CO to N OD o ---.. Adjusted Appropriations 56,040 L O CO Cn ° a N N r 1 1,746,193 1 o 0 c7 vi 07 O O O N N C3) c "F r o I 0 O N I 0 0 0 co 1 I i 0 o 0 c4 1 , ! 1 O O 0 I C0 O O 'ROL 0 O O 0 0 0 C3) N- CO r� d' 1 1 1 1C) o 1n cN.(- a r C3) CD r N 037 Cif Oa r OD 1%-:. , N- co CO c o N N- ' o o o o LO LC) r- CO C7 N CD u7 r 0) C) 0 Lo flco (0 CO N- ,- it) r- N Fourth Qtr Adjustments Third Qtr Adjustments Second Qtr Adjustments First Qtr Adjustments E3-' 0 a N a O co cei O O O cJ d- N 0) CD R 0 0 0 N O 0 0 r 0 a O 0 0 0 Cfl o o o a 0 0 d0) r- V co ti 'It r` CD aD 0 co o 0 0 LC) APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -08 0 ,z1' 0 CD Cn 1 12,200,585 2,000 (o C3) r 6 r ` r 1 0 0 o N C7 i a 0 0 N OD O CO I I I 1 I I I i I I I I 1 I 0 0 0 R I I I 1 1 1 0 0 1.0 C3] r 0) Cfl N r- N C33 C3) co r N co r- r 0 o 0 C37 0) C'7 r 1 1 LO r CD r` CO N CD Ln r 0) C7 0 LO O CO CO CD N- r O r N 4 ISPECIAL FUNDS AFFORDABLE HOUSING FUND ALAMEDA REDEV & REUSE AUTHORITY ASSET SEIZURE FUNDS ATHLETIC TRUST AUSD HOUSING FUND F- 0 1 j ❑wD� �' wmw 2 u) u)Q w OD CO < ixcc 00< >- 01 F- w Q ❑ W J Q Z _ U z wE ~ 2 w >L1u)00LiwooLluyU�U D 0- 2 JwwWw� _ U 0 E. Q -- ETF- w LL U— <WUu_QwULL u) U 0 u_ Y c W Q❑ F- 0_ EL LL U U u] w �--� W Q Q LL OD J J m m D CL 0_ L.L. LL U C) W LL u) U u_ DC F- ZZZZUUUUmmDG LL U U CC 0 Of Q 0_ LL U u7 w P J — Q W J m D O LL U W Q U) J m D Q- LL U >- I- w u- <WUu U] U u_ M F- wwwwuI—LJJ(L¢`�coo_ LL U U c' 0 Y Of Q❑ 0. !L U u) w Q W J m fl LL U W -iLw Q U) J m 0 !L U W Q u) Li u_ LL U u_ C¢ U J m ❑ u U w00<< C) 1— u3 z U w Q C7 z U Z ,, < Naa ❑ U Z o p Q C�UVm<U)0 _1 J F— r ssomLU U U Z o :Q� Q D J ,r F— U U z P 0 J Q F-= aCC U U t5 0_ 6 F. N' g J N F- v j NWZ> cC CD J Q V U 0 0 IX o_ w 0 :w> o� C3 Y w❑ Q z W MO 1- .-.x m nU z - w u-I D F— z uj 0 L -ZCC"' _.. Z g F— U =❑W�'p Uy Z OD J U 0 W w W � m 0 .. 0 w❑ w- U m a m W w < a a D 1:13 C] d v o r a) o o �N� c cam a' 0 _o_oT.. J 1 v •— N COuL a] ❑ 0 ❑ a"' J . a) — Q�] CD ❑❑ L] s rn t MI c 6 o J °Qo C) 2 -0 Ca C D N 1 858 1 219 1 280 1 204.6 CO h N CO [� N 0 r M r N r r G 6 C*7 M 07 1' r r 0 p C07 C, r N p CC7 N N 0 C Tt , 07 N 0 Tr C Cr N 0 007 V. M O C Tr ) N Cr7 Tr CC M C'7 o Tr CC) et M c VI r C; CC ) C7 c N D 1` 01 O i� r C D c+7 e" r r N C.7 r e� N CA r e.: N et ti N O N N r N N CO C�7 N CD r 07 h N GC) CI C) -- v C) Tt r Tr N N "t PERCENT EXPENDED! 1 Q LO c ; r 0.o %I c:-?. a, ni co c N L) -4. ❑ CD as r ,:5-' a7 f- 88.1%1 85.7% O ° ao CD 78.1°/0 I I N CZI 25.0 %1 ❑ a) c\i r a N 0 r 13.0% 82.7% r ❑ o cc; N I %0.0 O © O o ❑ rn a? a ti CD N r ❑ c I- CO o o © 0 r 13.3%1 22.5 °I° 44.5% 23.7% a r- N N r o o 44.0%1 BALANCE N. O. CD Cl) M 1 1 1 (y) C7) C) 'd" co 830,488 847,056 1,501 ,269 407,041 tt 0) 0) N- r- 330,003 CO 0) C r 502,588 LC) N- L°_, ) co 1 655,475 325,305 r- 0 r 07 ti r 4,573,951 co N- r CY) L() co 0 r a, N r (1,933) 252,652 1,169,778 420,000 152,612 c) CO CD r LO 0 CO C'] 0.1. 3,820,058 r 99,518 co 0) CO r CO CD r i` Li3 1 a) r co CD r- nj 523,309 357,891 45,405 1 4,500 ti 0) {` a, EXPENDITURES h c ai 9 M r r I 129,313 I 415,512 1 ,238,970 94,559 2,773,234 Q r :71. -4- N 2,773,234 1,074,515 140,775 r 0, co ,:t' ,-- 108,435 261,583 51 9,938 85,740 5,797,748 co rn 92,348 I I r co CO _ 213,875 1,388,428 1 205,108 593 40,000 8,785 1 a, co O co 420,129 CO 0) r r 17,433 1 1 Cr7 r-: Adjusted Appropriations r 1 1 783,626 830,488 a) CO LO co N r 2,740,239 501,600 3,491,228 2,771,193 0 C') r co N Cr) 1,577,103 180,350 r 670,444 433,740 2,030,689 5,093,889 CD r 0) co CO r LO CO s 0 I- r 345,000 CO 0 N- 0 N- 0 CO N r d' r 152,612 r 0 CO 'tt' CD r C11 CO CO 0 N L6 1 304,626 r 40,00 r LC) 0) CO A r 3,557,648 943,438 468,989 62,838 1 O 0 L0 O 0 L0 N. Fourth Qtr Adjustments Third Qtr Adjustments Second Qtr Adjustments First Qtr Adjustments 205,444 433,740 151,486 1,205,715 6,855,990 345,000 CO 0 ti 0 N-• O a)0 CO N r r 27,612 841,980 0 0 0 0 r N E` 6- co CO 0) N C,1 APPROPRIATIONS 2007-08 r r r co ( N CO C+) CO N- l 830,488 0) CD 10 (NI CO N r 2,740,239 0 0 CO r 0 LO 3,491,228 CO a, r - f` N- N 3,235,130 C'r) 0 r N I` Liz r 180,350 r 465,000 r 1,879,203 3,888,174 Cp r 0) c6 L0 CD r CO CO 0 LO r r I r 1 125,000 r 1,325,500 5,208,486 I C.C. N CD d' 0 CO r r r LO 0) Lf) CO 1 3,557,648 943,438 438,268 60,540 r 0 L0 .4 0 L0 N. r 1 Assess Dist 84 -3A Assess Dist 84 -3B Debt CIC Tax Allo Bd Debt CIC Sub Bond Refinance Cityhail 2003 Tax Allocation Refi - BWIP 2003 CIC Tax Allocation Bond 2003 AP Revenue Bond Debt Assess Dist 89 -1 1998 Revenue Bond Debt 1999 Revenue Bond Debt ASSESS DIST CFD #1 ASSESS DIST CDF #2 PARAGON DIKE MAINTENANCE DWELLING UNIT TAX FUND FERRY SERVICES HARBOR BAY FERRY - EAST ALA/OAKLAND FERRY - WEST FISC LEASE REVENUE FUND FISC CATELLUS 1 BAYPORT FISC CATELLUS PH II /TINKER AVE FISC CATELIPROLOGIS ALA LANDING HBI ASSESSMENT DIST 92 -1 FISC CATELLUS TRAFFIC FEE GARBAGE SURCHARGE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT GAS TAX FUND GOLF ENTERPRISE FUND HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD HOME FUND HOME REPAYMENT FUND HOUSING IN LIEU HUMAN SERVICES /SSHRBIYOUTH COLLAB. LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION FUND LIBRARY FUND LOW AND MOD INC HOUSING (WECIP) LOW AND MOD INC HOUSING (BWIP) LOW AND MOD INC HOUSING (APIP) ISLAND CITY MAINT 84 -2 ISLAND CITY MAINT 84 -2 Zone 1 ISLAND CITY MAINT 84 -2 Zone 2 458 � 460 r CO Tr 462 464 465 CO CO V' CO co 832 835 � CO CO CO 860 +t-• CD CO CD h CO ' 221 r N co r N CO 621.2 CO LA N r N 256.2 256.3 313 310.1 270 I 265 � r r N r 0 CO 286 LA M N 248 I 204.5 h CO N t. r C11 Q r N N 0 N v. 0 N co CD N 1 275 r LA N N LA N- PERCENT EXPENDED Q 0o r co O co 22.2%1 4 0 00 r D 0 0 O 0) a Q O o 4 O 0 4 ❑ O o 0 0 ❑ o o D co co i ❑ L •) G r- N 4 cm LC) N ❑ �t N N.- Q cv N N 4 N r r• ❑ N 03 O CO cd D LO Liz CO Q CO CD 1' Q Lo N r ❑ u) [") O r r- r Q CD Cri Q o u7 N Q a 0 ❑ CO r D C'7 r r D CO te-- D '1r o 4 r co N w 0 Z CO rti 0 ' Q. 1n C"7 N N 0) Ln 54,259 1 521,518 250,225 0 a 0 CO T-- Co 0) • r r ' 1 - CO 0 Cy LC) '�' CO N r cv C'7 O C"7 co LO o N CO 0) 00 co LO N 0 N CO CO N r` Liz r 1 1 N r- CO- r r 0) oo t-- ' - LO N N o CO 0) r N 0) Cc CO 0) N CO 0) LC) ry N ' ' 0) N 0) a O Lo r ' N LC) LC ) ao 0) CO 't' N N. a) r= 0 o) LC) r d- N 0 CO O CD N 0) r r Liz CO d' r= ' - N r co u7 0) F - r r 0] N. 01 CO_ r- Liz r Co o r r CO co 1' ti op N LL) a o u7 cv r r CO 0 o CO CO r Vr CO N. a CO 0) 1r dt co CO N [") Co 1' co CC3 LC) CO r 00 1- CO Cr) CO 1 r Liz ,r r co N re F i- 0 Z w 0. W ti Q 1 0. y 0 c) CO N- LO 0) 2,741 1 148,482 54,775 1 Cr LC) 0 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r .1- CO C") ' a N CO c a CO o C0 O i r Co Cr) O r 0 0) LO r F - CD R. N N r r N LO N co Li) 0] 0) It N 0) co N O :t r` Liz Co 1".-- CO Cr) Lrj 0) r C ) N. CO r CO r- r Li) � Li) C) CO CO r` CO r` V' CO C3] r a a LO r` CO up N LC) 0 � CO 0 N r d' co CO 0) r 0) r r Cfw LO a N 0} Adjusted Appropriations 15,500 57,000 670,000 305,000 0 0 0 Co r 0 o o CD r- r ' ' C4 O N LO CO C\1 r N CO 0 C") CO LC ] O 1' N CO 0) 05 OD u) N CD N CO CO N r` Li) r ' ' r Cr) CO 0) 0 r OD 0 L0 r` LC) Liz a 0 O u) r CO N O (0 o O V' 0 0 o N CO ' 1 O O O 00 (N CO r 1 LO CO CO o LO CO d' LO L() r` O Li"j CD U) CO r 'xi CO CO O O O u7 OD r N CV CO N C) N 0) C\1 CO 0) r co- CO CO N r` Li) r 0) CO 0) r' op C D in 0) O C") Cr Li) O a a 0 UP r- r ti a o C") Co r 0) CO r r= 07 CO C*) u) up O r` c" } 0) N CO LD a O r- O O CD Ch C") r 1 I` LO [r7 01 LC) o Fourth Qtr Adjustments Third Qtr Adjustments Second Qtr Adjustments First Qtr Adjustments � CO a 0.1 LO Cr) N r LO LO r Q LC) o r CO ti 00 Lrj 0 0 r r r r CO CO a) 0 r- CO N- 0) co 1' CO N I` 6 CO 0 Lo O a CD Q CO r CO 00 1 r LO r 0) r 1' vi CO r- r a o CD 0) 15,500 000'L9 � 670,000 305,000 O O O a5 a O O ( r ' 1 ' 0) 00 ti .1-.. T- CD O o Cr) CD 0) 0cv co r 0) OQ oo N ~o Ln r ' ' ' N C) LC) co o LO O O CD r 0) N O O 0 .4' a O 0 v 00 ' 1 0 o 0 ov N 0) r ' L() cD CD a LC) 0) ct .4' Ln Ln h 0 L() CD LC) CD T- u C") C") o o 0 n CO r N N 0D Cl 1- Cr) N r O CD oo CO CD ui co 00 N 1-: LC) r 0) co 0) r= CO 0) 0 a) CD C] r O O O o LO r LO C0 LO co N. - 0) o r r CO r r (Ni N. LO (\1 a) N OD - r 0) O O Co o CO r ' r - LO r CO LC) co ISLAND CITY MAINT 84 -2 Zone 3 ISLAND CITY MAINT 84 -2 Zone 4 ISLAND CITY MAINT 84 -2 Zone 5 ISLAND CITY MAINT 84 -2 Zone 6 N- 0 ��w°) coF-o0 �, d 2 ❑d Z ,dWdw xx r Z 2 LU (j Z Z 2 r a 0 Z 0 Z Q W❑ >dre w LLI to Ct r Q O 2 u3 _ z❑❑❑❑❑= i 2 z ❑❑ W m W U) d< 2 -0 `OUJ v J z W m W OCOCIX u) 2 a cc W Q W 03 J U] U 8 z U m H m m W W ua u) d d WWWWWW<WWDa.dD❑WWUW�dWLuOM 2 2 CO F-- d W m W IX u) d 2 u ��Z0) W W ZS m W CC co d 2 W d 0 m W CC 2❑ u) d 2 0 0 0.. z D U❑ W z m W IX u) d 2 cc W❑❑ W L3ZZ Z Y c LL r` 0 r . z » EL u] z W C\ oo a r I z l.L _a u7 z W [n W I-- U W -- W I-u U J d Z � C) Q W U ¢ 0. a., V} z W 0 ❑ z � z 2 W W J Q z J CL Z W 2 I- a U) o_ a Z ❑ 1L 0> J m❑❑ W a W W ix s m W Et ��d� 0_ < U 0 11 Z~ W ¢ W< W m d 2 cc W W Z 2 m CI z LL� W z ot w0) �zU�z� z W W W CO d. I- z u] z d CC❑ Q= 1_ Z W : U a z u3 5 5 uw ]" O Q❑ Ozo Z 2 U F- 0W u- F- ❑ CO CC d W F-- D W >- Lk d~ U) Li W i -- rn Z 0 1L z W > — Z o !_- Q Q ua z I— F- z W 0 W 2 W ZIYQ=9_ D W W z_ z❑ ❑ ww<c z d. CO w L7 < 2 �W�W �wQw z I- U W W C 5 < 0 Q F- Q Q 2 W U~] ]]-- U tj ❑ D z I- L=L z F- u] W> W 0 2 U CO U] Z W F- m 5 X 1 275.3 1 275.4 1 275.5 1 275.6 t til f... 0 I- N r ' N. N N r [r7 LR? r N '- N N C) in N N it r N Ir) r N a) r N h r N Tr N N r O co N 0 00 r CD 1- CO Tr [r7 C") 0 N N N ti Iii 00 N r 0 N r) 0 N Ln 0 N C) Tt N N r ti N C) co CD N co Tt 0 ti CD r N C) r N 0 Lt7 el 147 r I,- r LC) M V ti N V. Tt N N r 1.1 h N PERCENT EXPENDED( c.c,' CA 1 N 23.4% W 0 z Icon) m h o a 6 in a) o a) N: o r- ef). $ 174,926,202 EXPENDITURES ti C Q. (1) 0 M 1 as i a 01 Ln Ln co $ 53,339,672 Adjusted Appropriations $ 142,552,403 $ 228,265,874 Fourth Qtr Adjustments ' 0 0 Third Qtr Adjustments , , Second Qtr Adjustments $0 First Qtr Adjustments 31,066,556 $35,977,766 APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -08 $ 111,485,847 Cr) C) r c co tV n 0) r Total Special Funds (GRAND TOTAL - ALL FUNDS 1 SUMMARY OF ADJUSTMENTS - OTHER FUNDS Fund / Purpose Appropriations 0) E 0 c a) 2 0) -0 c 0 1... 0) 0 co 0 0 0 45 cli 0 0 0 a To 0 0) 0) co 0) F•- 0 0 0 0 0 0 (6 00 00 00 00 CV 0 0 N co 0 0 C m 0) 0) 0) add projection for interest income U N 0 E N N a) C co 2 To 0 0) z co 00 0) 0 AC 0) E _ 0) C co U E .(0 0) _Q 0 0 -0 0 0) 0 0) 0) U 0 0 0 0 0 a v 0 E ❑ 4- 0 CO Z 0 0 co 0 z =o a r❑ V 0) ❑ 0) 0) E 0 4- 0 c O rz 0 L c 0 .0 U 0 ❑ L. CD ) E 0 -aa co 4- 0) .▪ 0 0 0 Z LL 0 0) cn C) ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 a L 0 0) 0 co J 0) E ca 2 J a 0 LT 0 0 .0 L 4E) v 0) 0 0 1 0) 0 0) ❑ m co v ❑) 0) E co co J 0 0) 000 v000 0 CO 0 ti 0 0 0 d' 0 CD 0 r` 0 0 0 r` v Lri ai (6 0 L5 ce3 u) r d'0 CO00,1CO V") r r` C\! r r O N 00 o co cQ o r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) Cv r� 0 1 0 0 00 co 0 C V 0 CO 0 0 0 0 CO r CD 0 0 0�ncvor`Rno0000oLooc 0)0(00 00 0 f• 00 0 Ln 07 0 (0 0 Cy 0 r` 0 0 cri c-1 CV (5 CD CO CO 0 CO CV V 0) 0) 00 1f) C'€) N r r CO re- appropriation of transfers to General Fund for continuation of prior -year projects efi w 0 J 0 w 0 z Z 1— z 2 Urban Runoff a E 2 a E 0 1� N 0 U 0 0 i- 0) 0) c co 0 co co .L 0) a E 0) Q 0 a. m Q`n 0 - 00 0 0) N 0 - 0 1() ' t CA 0 4 r- 0 —J CO 0)0V)CD0 Z ao o oi co c 0v r` 0 2 (' N 00 Tr CO CV CNI r cfl r 0 0 0 OD 0 m t v L a 1) 0 L Q CD ❑ 4-00- 0 C 03 C 4v ❑ 2 0 J C d U 0 ❑ E 2 To E co N 0 N 00 0 0) vt rn ni 0 0 Measure B Local Sts &Roads CO 00 N 00 H C)*o,mo (71) t _ E cg • r aE= • 4 al C5 c acs) 0 CO 0 00 00 LO N 0 C5 Urban Runoff 0 N 0 C0 r (n SUMMARY OF ADJUSTMENTS - OTHER FUNDS Fund / Purpose CFD #2 - Paragon Measure B Fisc Catellus Traffic Fee CDF -WE Traffic Safety Parking Meter Waste Reduction Surcharge CDF -WE Public Safety. CDF -NW Public Safety Measure B New County Program Measure B Bike & Pedestrian improvments CDF -CEE Public Safety CDF -BF Public Safety Sewer Enterprise Fund Bayport Assessment District Sewer Enterprise Fund Urban Runoff Measure B Ferry (trsfr to Alameda/Oakland ferry) Transportation Improvement (transfer to Harbor Bay Ferry) Tidelands (transfer to Harbor Bay ferry) BWIP Housing: adjust transfer to debt service 2003 CIC Bond APIP Housing Admin: adjust financial audits cost allocation _ Parking Meter: adjust cost allocation FISC /Catellus Bayport: adjust transfer to debt service, financial audits cost allocation Urban Runoff: adjust transfer to GF cost allocation Total Other Funds Adjustment Summary 1 90,475 94,000 13 000 12,000 9,831 0 0 000 coaor`c) cp cfl v � 0 C) � 0 0 (2,000) 5,030,000 50,000 — 0%-(00 Nr`,t'o LO Cr3 10 c r- CD C) A- 0 0 r-- — NONQ701 tiNd'C)C) C) CO r` N 0 LC) CO d' ( N (0 to LC) CO 0 - 7 Eft Q°o 50,000 Zr-) N U) Cl. ^ ■ CO 0) CD N h ^r� ■ Estimated Fund Balance 6/30/2008 1 CU 11 0) $ 15,165,945 2,777,378 $ 17,943,323 Co (0 0 N` ti LC 10 C7 � r a) CD r N r C7 a) 0 co CO N a) 0 co r Cr) cc N. 0 a) co r N in co t N N 00 I` N N` co CO CO N N` r 0) N CO CO r Co M CO co- CO in co N Cr) 0) r N co N N N 0) LC) N co c CO cc r N r 0 O N r 0) CO N` CD in c"7 0) N a) in C'7 00 ' t. co N CO L() .4' CO CO o r Cr) Ln as a) Ca0 0 in co as CD r- 0 o r r c LO aQ C0 114,687 1 2007 -08 Estimated Net Change .� -0 II $ (4,109,017) 228,357 $ (3,880,660) 1 s (0 LO N LO Cl. r Cp CO N- N Cr 0 0 0 N 0 CO c, N 0 0 r '- a r CO Cap N- (0 CO o 00 N` N 00 CO LO N` N N CO CO 00 V' c 0) N- Q CO Cr) CY) N` 0 CO C) r Q r 0 0 0 CD c CO CO CD N `� co CV r N a r co C CO 00 s `� (1,305,345) Expenses .-► $18,750,319 32,045 $ 18,782,364 �r 0 Vt 0) in to o N r r N 10 LC) 0 0 C. 0 N r o N N CO LO CA 0) Ln CO a3 0 r r r 0 0 0 0 Q 'Ct 0 'Cr N 0 05 N CO as CI) N CO N- O r Q 00 Li) CO Cr) r N O o 0 LC) N` Cr) C. 0 C. 0 Appropriations �► $ 85,357,373 356,098 $ 85,713,471 0 0 0 N co N` CO CO N 0 N N LO CO (0 O in 0) 0 0 0 CO Cr) 'r Cr) d' 0) Ln LC) ti a LC, co a) co a7 00 0 cr 0 0 0 0 0 0 LC) CO r in co Cr) CO CO Cr) 00 CO N N- co in LC) co 0 CO N Ca r N 0 0 a 0 0 LO r d' CO 0 N Ln CO N r N Cr) O M CO 0 N a) CO N 2,058,645 Actual Revenue $9,015,653 136,482 $ 9,152 ,135 C ) 0 Ln 'I' te LC) N` CO CD CO m0) r CO ° C' L() r N r tr- 0(r- Ln r 0 0 coNo- N CC) O a 0 N- CO CO CO (0 0 'Cr r o 0) Ln 'I 0 0 0 0 Estimated Revenue �► $ 81,248,356 584,455 $ 81,832,811 0 0 0 (4 co C, 'It CO N ° (0 CO N` N 0) N` 00 LC) 0 0 0 0 N I` co 0) �t LC) CO Y— 0 CO N N- N- N- N I` N r 0 (0 N- N C)0 co � LO I` N N Cr) CO CO r co 'd' LC) CO N N CO CO N• co in r L( CO 0 0 11) U) N r r- 0 0 0 0 Q CO r 0 0 0 0 o C) C) r 0 0 CO 0 CO r OOE`EGL Unaudited Fund Balance 6/3012007 ca General Fund Group:, $ 19,274,962 2,549,021 ! $ 21 ,823,982 01 CO ('N r 00 c0 0) 0) r LO (0 CA N- (0 r Cr) CA a) (0 CO CV 0) 0 CD r Cr) C.0 N. (=, 0) 00 r N C{) CO Cfl c0 0) N- N` N (0 N N- N .,- 0) N r LO 0 r CO CO (0 C0 Cr) LC) LO 0 CO a) N.- '-- r Lt) 0 CO LC) (''4 r CO CO N r C7 r Cr) N` r-- CO CO LC) 0 Co N 0) Cr) 0 CO Cr) 00 LO Ln CY) N CO L() 'd' CO CO 0 r 0) In 0 r CO CD N CO a) 0 N� N (0 r 0 (-4 �t 1,420,031 SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF FUNDS FY 2007-08 1As of September 30, 2007 DESCRIPTION Total General Fund Police /Fire Const. Impact Const Improvement Fund CIC -WECIP 2003 CIC Tax Alto 2003A1 2003 CIC Tax Alio 2003A2 2003 CIC Tax Alio 2003B CIC -WECIP Housing CIC -BWIP CIC -BWIP Housing CIC -BWIP Hsg 2002 Bond Proceeds CIC - Housing In -Lieu Fee AUSD Housing Fund CIC -APIP CIC -APIP Housing Alameda City Library Fund Gas Tax Fund XIXB Trans Improvement Fund Traffic Safety Fund County Measure B Fund Measure B - Local St & Rd Measure B - Bicycle Ped Imp Measure B - Transbay Ferry Z Z m LL Q LAI o N Q' CO p N LA N co N ' Q N t- N N N M N Lo N T' N N N .„.: N c co .E W 0 CD CSI 0 M CO 4- (0 11 0) 0 ti a7 0 0 0) r 0 Cfl 0 r LC) co in 0 r 0 N r N N N co 0 r CO 0 CO f`.. in r r 0 ti CO CO r r Tr r r-• N. 0) 0 0 CO LC) N CO 0) Irt LO 0 r N CO N 0 N Liz r a (1) in 0 r- CV 0D a) N 0 0 N CD 00 tw r co 1.) 0 ('*1 I` 0 ■ 0 M 0 m co 0 CO LC) r Ln r CO 0 0 CY3 0 r oo 0 0 0 N 0) 2 co .E 7 W a) cm C fa ._ 0 ru z 7 li 4- 00 CO N 07 r 0 0 T... M CO 0) 0 C3) 0 0'7 0 0 Tr- Ln in 0 0 in N- O 0 0 rn ca r 0 000 11•) 0 0 0 0 co 0 Co ✓ r L) Co N. Co a 0 0 0 0 01) .4. 0 0 0 .-1 0 0 L17 r 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 1) cv N r 0 N 0 0 0 C1) cD 0 0 co r 0 Ln r CO 0 co a) co C 0) x W 1) 0 0 0 ✓ CO C'r] 0r) 07 r 0 0) (0 0) r 0 0 N CO 0'7 0 CO 0 0 0) N 0') c7 0) Ln 0 00 0) 0 0 r Ln 0 N CD r 0 CO CO CO 0) Ln 0 LC) 0 0 f` i 0 00 ti 0 Ln CO (1) 0 r 0 CO CO 0 r 0 V M LO 0 r in 0 0 0 Lc) r N 0 0 CO CO 0) 0 r 0) r r 0 Appropriations I-3 co CO N Ln r 0 0 r CO 0 07 0 ✓ Ln 0 0 0') in 0 Tr 0 0 0 0 0 Ln ti in in 0 0 0 (0 0) 0 r 0) CO N N 07 CO N CO 0 01) 0 0 A--. c.f. 0 ti r 0 0 0 0 Ln CO r 0 ✓ 0) 0 Ln (0 r Ln CO CD 0 0 i` 0 0 0 0 1n M 0 0 0 0 0 CD in r 113 0) Ln 0 0 0 0 1) N N CO N 0 r 0 0) N 03 Ln 0 0. r 0 0 CO 0.5 CO 0 a) C a) Lt 1.—) 0 0 0 0 tr CO CY) N 0) CO 0 0) 0 r 0 a. 0 0 N. 0 r r 0 11) N 0 CO N N 1n ti N- CO C'7 CO CO 0) Ln 0) r 0 0) 0 I` ti N 0 N N r 0 r 0 r- 0 0 0) Ln Co r N 0 0 0 0 (Ni 0 0 a) a r 0 in 0 0 N 0 CO CO (0) r 0 Cf) N d' 07 r LO 0 0 0 0) CG E (0 W a) 0 a) 0) ce 0 0 0 00 co r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 Ln r N 0 0 0 0 0 LO N 0) N 0 CO N N 113 f` A-- C'') C'] CO N 0 0 CO 0) CO r N 0 r 0 0 0 0 117 00 r 0 0 0 Ln N. 0 0p 0 0 co 0) iri 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 r in 0 Ln 0 Ln in 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0') CO r Ln 0 'd" r 00 r 10 0) Cr) 0 Unaudited Fund Balance 0 0 N 0 C) CO 0 0 0 0 0 C'r) 0) 0 (0 0) LO r r co L1) N CO N N C'*) CD N CO CO r r N 0 Co ti co 0 Ln N r C'7 CO N 0 00 CD 0 0 CO 0) Ln r LO r N CCOO CO N CO 0 01 r 0 0 0 Co RI r F` 0 CY) 00 ✓ N ✓ 117 CEO 0) r N 0 'd' 0 m N N CD co 10 CO r 0 0 CO CO CO CO N r N 10 r N N CY) '1' CN-1 N 0 r SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF FUNDS FY 2007-08 As of September 30, 2007 DESCRIPTION Measure B - Para Transit S a) ' R. .TS1 5. Co 0 m 0 co 0) 2 co y 6 otS 43 co 0. u L H m a) N 0) 2 C 0 .y O .0 0 U m cu co to 2 Tidelands Fund Narcotics Asset Seizure c LL c m c 0) 3 0 C ii 0) J c c a C li L di 0) 2 c a TSMITDM Fund Commercial Revitalization 0) co cc V c L. a v LD 0 a 0 0) 1- Home Fund t9 m 0 0 0) E 0 a 0 E E 0 c ti E 0. ce 0) E s F1SC Lease Revenue Fund 0. t0 CO 2 0 1 0 co c c co 2 a .u) 0 0 L a rap CO ( L.0 CO co CO d iZ 0 Et 0) .0 a .0 E .0) IX a 1 E 0 a) CD N 0 s co C •(0) 0 a) to a Human Services CHRPO /LEAD cm C 0) ce 0 Fri L 0 cu 0) L ca t P. cn .0 m 0) IX 2 3 E co 0 L a 0) E 0) c co 2 2 com 0 N oo CI 76 2 V c v 7 0 z LL 10 LO r N CD Ili r N I r N tD r N 0) r N r N C17 N Mr N L0 N ti N r N 10 N Co N 00 N 0) N CO N r aD ID !V N uS N N 0) N (0) N r Id N co co h N CO N CD N h N N r N 1. N co E W Fund Balance co r` co c Lc) � c CO Lo LO N. 'r a N a N- CO CO r N- N LC) N c'D 10 N N- M CO LID N N. C)7 Li CO 0) N c4. LO L[ ] Ci7 LC) N N- C3) N. CO CO a CO a tt C Lft r r a C - a Cfl C r a N r Cr) N C) CO Li) CD CO CO co N CO co — II C') r N L() a CO co r 01 CD CO Cr) Lrc 0 CY] C% 1 LC7 (0 d07 M a co N CD CO L6 0 Lr) L6 C7 0) cv 0) Cn 0) Cfl N • a a a a a 0 a 0 a 0 CD 0 a o co a C) o co ▪ € v. a c) 0 co O • ,� r C r 0 .�. ii `� r N • CD , r a L0 0 a 0 N a CD CO CA 0 a 0 co 0 0 CD. 0 Lc) 0 0�� 00 N 0 a 0 a 00 a s ] CO 0 CO CD LC) d� C7 a r` C3] CV v0 (0 10 co- .1- 10 LLc) 7 Q `� c\1 W E° 0) co a a a CD CD CO 0 a 0 Appropriations CD E W Fund Balance CQ 0 a a 0 a 0 0 0 0 a Cr) a 0 CO LCD 0 CD a 0 a a 0 0 0 a 0) Co CO N 10 '4) 10 CD a a 0 a C'r] - N Liz 10 d' < L0 • r` 0 L.6 cQ (0 Ln cfl ti 0 C7 N- r Li, N. 0 r r- N' 10 a r CO CO r CO ti r N N ✓ N (.fl r CO 0 r 0) r CO L0 GO r 0 N r 0 0 CO 0 s ['r] i- a N N C0 10 r N- CD 0) 0) N 0) CO LO. r 0 '1 0 L(] r LCD LID. L0 r- a c.6 C7 r r` r` r L0 N r (D CO r` LO a a Lc) a a Liz Ln a a a Lf] a a a 0 Cfl 0 a 0 Ln CD C'7 CD a a Cfl a a a co CD a a a Lf] (0 u7 (0 a m L4 0 a a Ls) c1) CO r- C, a LO 0) Cfl LO L0 10 10 CO - N- N L0 N C) LO N r` '1 CO N N '4) 10 C') L47 N ti N C'7 07 CD d' r N r Ca 10 a c0 C) N C'3 C7 0) 0) a N 01 CO Cr CO a 110 Cfl co co ti LO a CO N cfi a CA Ln 10 0) CO a 0) r m L0 a0 N Co 0 0 OD N 0 C) a Ls) 00 Cfl N L(] SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF FUNDS FY 2007 -08 As of September 30, 2007 DESCRIPTION r N 01 LO CD N N N N N N N N N N N !V N CO CO CO CO CO CO ▪ CO 0000000 -a -v -o 'a -a •a'a tocccCCC Ui U? N U1 U) CI) fin Marina Cove Maint Dist 01 -1 Reserve Marina Cove 01 -01 e:)15 0 a li o R: ID ma Public Art Fund • o o m ,cg • 0 tm- u) . 5 c ID a� To N ▪ L •- l3 0 0 oa ID oc co coID E Dike Maintenance Fund Total Special Revenue Fund Ley It; LCi LC; LCi LO LCA iD co � co co N ti u. N N N N N N N N N N N N N ital Proiect Fund Grou CO Ea- CD EA- Ea- CO Cr) Liz N C) a0 C3) ti Tr- N CA a0 0 Cfl 0 a a CO LC] CO Co co LCj CD CD CA a co CD (0) N a a a a M a Cfl l- e'1i CO ti Cn CO LO C7 Col a a co 0) Cfl a t-- r co 0 N 0 a a 0 a a a a a 0 0 a 0 a a Ln co a N- N a a a LO ti Ctrl a N M C6 N ID CO TO 0. CO C.) co 'o L a. .pa a E 0 0. E 0. co H.B.I. 92 -1 Assessmt Dist 0 L 0 co L J 0 c L a) E 0 0. E 0 Q ID a 0 CDF -WE Public Facilities 0 r7 0 M c) r M r M CO 10) C0) co C; itt M 0 (0) Ch 0 M .a L� C co ,� c� 2 m N CO N M �� W g co LL N a r` CO CO N LO N CO LC) co C3) CO r LC) LC) CO CD 01 LC) N CO CO '1' CD CO CO r- o 0Y3 OD f` co co N CO CO N r C\I r Cr) r N- Cl") r N CD CC) c7 CD o CD co CD Tr r RI CO N LO co LC) N `1t CO CO N 03 d' co o) co N. cd t-- � CD r CD N /- `1 N. r O 07 (C) co � E 0) co Lf) f` M T` a LC} `d' N CO N. RI c r- N C7 CO LC) co- a (3.) 0 ` r r- r` Lc] co 0) LC) LD (Cl. ,- cv CO fit' CA r` LC] r- co LO LC) C3] co CD `�' 13 O? 0 N. �E -c .0 N U) 4 W Z a a O N Cn a a O O O a O o r c v a ti O a co r LO a CV O O 0 N- r OD co 0 C) a Cr) O LC) o CO CO CD C6 CD cD s-• O C3) N N. `". r 0. 0) `d' r I` CA CO N. 0) CO 1 a a Lf) LC) C i o o a -- 0 C. CC) r - 0 D CD r" %- 0 0 CD t-- `. co) a) C 0) d CL W o O O o o 0 o 0 0 0 o o o In't 0 0 0 a r- r d' r O c€) N LO a CV c) C3) r a CO c N V' co N co a r- o C) CO o, N r 0 LCD L6 r `d' 00 C3) o CO N r u) C 0 ' '` a. .-_ L a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o - co a N. O a O O O N. CY) d' a o O D O to Cfl C fl ' o Lo pi C) � co 0 N- (0- N- Tr r Cr) V' LO cm Lf) CO N LO (o r LC) co r N. co 0) N 01 a LC) .4- c6 CD CD ti r Lf c6 r N O CO N co cii co N- CO CO ..4. o Cr) co 0) CC) LC) c\ CO N z-- 0) CO N o `~1' h- CV I7 �p . c 0 0 _ 0 0) �' < w Et r 0 0 N N- C)) o r` 0) 0 0 0 0 r N- O 0 0 0) CO r cF CO Lo V' r N. LC) r CO o CD L0 N- 0) (0 L) d' N cr7 N f] N CC) C) co r o C3) N- 0) 2 0 r mot' 0) 0 Cr) `� Lt) C3) CD in 0) E Co 0) c) CD '1' LO LO CO O 0) r 0 N- o 0) 7 0) r CN N N ` 0 CV r r- r CD '1' C) 0 CO Cfl d C O CO ,0 ie C .-. B yJ Qw w� 0 0 O N N- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N- O 0 0 0 CO r d' 0 N 0 0 0 r N CO 0 CD 0 Cr) 0 LC] N. N- N 05 N Lc; r CD Lf) co a CO CO Cr) CO Lf) N- N r` LO N r` LC) CO 03 LO CO r LC) CD r N `~71 CO 0) N c) 0 a a O N. CD N. r LO Co r N 0 CO N CD c6 CO r� CO CO CO c0 N CO 0) CO C)) O CD N r- 0) Cr) CO Oo CO N- C\I 3 CC C D p) 0 C ti al a in =' .ter 'd c) 3 C co LL N `~1' O LO 0) CO N (0 N Cr) r N 0) N- 0) CD i` 0 Cr) r` 00 (0 r r Cr) LA, M (0 CC) V- r 0) f` N CA V' LC] N O CO r CO CC) CO LO N `71- o r N ti r c6 I` r` car) cr) CD N (0 co- 0) ~,t � N CD N CO CO N r CO r C11 - r C)) `� N r LO 07 Cr) r u) Cr) r- N co CC) CO N a) co LC) r` Cr) r` a Li] � N CD N- N. N CD r ` • C'') CD LC) (0 0 C)) o r r` Li" Cr) 0) r CD LO co. CC) (0 0 r CO L{7 t-= cD Ln r -c- Cr (0 NI- 0 ❑ ILL U. t.... 0 p N 4, ]- c , J i Q v) litt E 00 2 �' p ' c : ) p( ZN �. tq cn �•L Q 0 p a Ft L) u) W Ci 0 C 13 LPL :173 Ch •° > >. +� a"' .� co N LL CO 0 CO 1-1). 46 t U ," � ` ' �.; 3 .; 0 .0— 42 4-7 u —:— "•• 4.. �, `i '*' co Ce co 2 4) •-- �' o - us N N N 06 LL sli v W 0 E ca C� .0 v V L] V � V � u) 06 LL. � - CO C C Do '- __ v c3 v C L 0 d co i .0 .Q ` ca = m Y _ • o +0 .0 co m = co 0 3 H a a o. ca .� -¢ ' o I- a.�o_ wwwwitaaa`� 3zo. W Z Z Z Z W W W LL LL LL LL. Q r N V ) 0000303 03 00 afIt LL LL La. LL U. LL LL LL LL. LL LL !L LL C Q 0 C] C] C] C] C] G O O D C] C] C] C] 2 'Q LL U. c� 0 0 V 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 V H V V Q C = L CD •p ..... cv CO C� H Z U. V' r N 07 r N CI r N Co) r N N N N M M VI M '� d' 1' 1' o r to r iD in CO CD u7 c; v v o 0 o v o v o 0 o a c,,� ( o d. d• Tt v. v- vt v v. v. v. v. C'7 c) C() C~7 C) Cl C) C+7 c) Ch c) c) C ) 1 Estimated Fund Balance CO 0 CD N CD • CO I I 1,514,539 0) r F CD N A. r $ 5,603,314 42,395,683 O CO a •SI- o: N r LfD CO 119,207 CC\J C) c) 0) C5 Lo I°` IC) C) N. c i CO N CO 344,896 (7,601,946) (1,919,441) CO r".. r ° $ (8,932,512)1 CO Ili co r CO M a 0 o 3,463,115 1 [ 2007 -08 Estimated Net Change .� II w a CO r $ (2,850) a ❑) N (4,525,974) a ti co a a $ (5,254,200) coo) N r 0 (64,946) (2,145,592) (954,843) 00 $ (3,156,596) ' a a a a R n°1_ 0) Ct) CYj Expenses 4: 94,559 CO CO CO N N mot' CO r 1,301,373 108,435 261,583 co 0) (0 L N.. (0 CO $161,135 55,817 0 OD r 922,053 1,095,337 0 d' 427,071 $ 2,829,682 0 co N. CO Cr) 2,773,234 Appropriations r.r 0 CO r 0 Lt) $ 7,633,259 $ 5,208,486 10,419,329 433,740 2,030,689 5,093,889 CO r CD CO r CY) N $ 47,000 90,000 CO C3) r CO 0) 3,533,571 2,342,822 0 r r- CO 1,928,000 $ 8,954,531 1 a 2,915,000 40,000 a 3,491,228 Actual Revenue _ L� •... N.- CO N. LLO r- $ 1,987,322 $1,350,552 331 ,301 0 a (38,845) CO a0 Cfl r` 0 r- 83,951 118,882 344,569 230,874 CO r 493,195 r� 0) 0 ` 0 CO CO N N. 10,361 a 95,021 Estimated Revenue r.. 0 0 a a 0 0) 0 0 $ 4,914,000 5,893,355 a 2,030,689 5,093,889 $ 17,931,933 CO N N. (0 0) LC) C] ti 07 917,023 0) N- 0) T` CO CA r` 0) R. 0) CO r r CY] 0 0 0 (0 0N? L Cr) 0) N- 0) ' 0 0 0 0 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95,021 Unaudited Fund Balance n 0 N- 0 r.. C') CO C) r � LO._ r CO 0) (0 N r Enterprise Fund Group: ° 0 CO N- CO I. 46,921,657 8,774,343 35,120 N- 0 N 0) r $ 61 ,748,127 Internal Service Fund Group: $ 77,844 155,562 409,842 (5,456,354) (964,598) $ CO CO I` rw 0 (5,775,916) Trust & Agency Fund Group: $ 13,596 CO CO 0 0 0 6,859,322 SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF FUNDS FY 2007-08 1As of September 30, 2007 DESCRIPTION Debt Svc 2003 AP Rev Bond Total Debt Service Fund Sewer Service Fund Ferry Service Fund East End Ferry West End Ferry Total Enterprise Fund Central Garage Fund Techology Sery Fund Worker's Comp Self Insur Risk Management Fund Unemployment Insurance Post Employment Fund Total Internal Service Fund Debt Svc for 510 84 -3B Police /Fire Pension 1079 Police /Fire Pension 1082 Mastick Sr Ctr Agency Fund Debt Svc for 512 89 -1 Z D CO CD � a CO N CD t"' N t" N 0 I• 0 0 N. I` r ti r h Co h O CO 0 03 N'1 CO D 03 N CO Estimated Fund Balance 6/30/2008 I 4- i CO 11 a CO CD Cr] •cr ❑3 N M Q u r 21,286,487 1 1 000`1796` 1. 1 ,664,551 1 $ 43,496,248I $ 1 70,176,568 I 0 N Estimated Net Change .o 11 .4■ 0 (2,627,627) cn Q Lo Cti ( 1,558,503) (180,350) $ (7,506,588) $ (36,981,821) Expenses : r�r Q o) r-- r c.i. 2,773,234 1,074,515 N 6 07 co Q Q? $ 53,339,672 Appropriations - 0) r '= N. N. C\1 3,235,130 0 r-- r` ti L r 180,350 0 a o — c' - te- $ 228,265,874 $ 28,192,408 1,-. co 0 Lo r` (6 Q $ 323,209,159 Actual Revenue 0 a co co Lo cq3 - A -- 2,773,234 Q Q co c - Q r (3) M co cti te- $ 32,995,800 Estimated Revenue a. a co co Lt) C6 'd' r- 3,491,228 Q Q Co co Q $ 6,703,415 $ 191,284,053 r` 0) CO 6 Co a te- 66,920,204 $ 286,264,654 Unaudited Fund Balance N. 0 N ces co ^ CO 01 17, 731,421 21,030,389 3,522,503 1,844,901 $ 51,002,836 $ 207,158,389 SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF FUNDS FY 2007 -08 1As of September 30, 2007 DESCRIPTION Debt Svc for 513 92 -1 1998 Revenue Bond Debt Fd 1999 Revenue Bond Debt Fd Assessment District CFD #1 Assessment District CFD #2 Total Trust & Agency Fund GRAND TOTAL a c 0 0 0) Housing Authority Alameda Power & Telecom All Inclusive Total o Z n C.1 M co 1n M 00 CD Ce) co 0 CO GO r RD co