Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2008-05-06 Packet
%~ ~ ~1titi ~~ ~ ~ Fay ~~..k#~~~~~,~ CITY ~F ALAMEDA • CALIF ,,v, ~RNIA r,. =~_. ~~ ~~., .r~F~r ~ ~ ~,~9 r„ .~_~f~ ~, ~ ~yd ~~;, , ~~~ SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY---MAY 6, 2008----6;OOP.M. Time: Tuesday, May 6, 2008, 6:00 p.m. Place: Ci t Council Chambers Conference Room, City Hall, corner of Santa Clara Avenue and Oak Street ArYr~nr~a 1. Roll Call - City Council 2. Public Comment on Agenda Items Only Anyone wishing to speak on agenda items only, may speak for a maximum of 3 minutes per item 3. Adjournment to Closed Session to consider: 3-A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency Negotiators: Craig Jory and Human Resources Director Employee Organizations: All Public Safety Bargaining Units, and Management and Confidential Employees Association 3-B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision ~b7 of Section 54956.9 Number of cases: One 4. Announcement of Action Taken in Closed Session, if any 5. Adjournment - City Council Beverly hn ayor r~ ~: ~~ ~. ~ ~. ~~~~ r'4 .. ` e ~. ` ~ R(~~f CITY OF ALAMEDA • CALIFORNIA REVISED SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY CQUNCIL, COMMUNITY IMPRO~TEMENT COMMISSION CIC} , AND HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF CQMMISSIONERS ~HABOC} TUESDAY - -- - MAY 6, 2008 - - - 7:25 P.M. Location: City Council Chamfers, City Hall, corner of Santa Clara Avenue and Oak Street Public Participation Anyone wishing to address the Council/Commission/Board on agenda items or business introduced by the Council/Commission/Board may speak for a maximum of 3 minutes per agenda item when the subject is before the Council/Commission/Board. Please file a speaker's slip with the Deputy City Clerk if you wish to speak PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. RQLL CALL -City Council, CIC, HABOC 2. CONSENT CALENDAR Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted, approved or adopted by one motion unless a request for removal for discussion or explanation is received from the Council/Commission/Board or a member of the public 2-A. Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and Community Improvement Commission Meeting held an April 15, 2008. [City Council/CIC] City Clerk} 2-B. Recommendation to approve a fourth amendment to the Contract with Associated Right of Way Services, Inc. adding $10,000 to the budget for a total Contract amount of $85,040 to provide consulting services for the Stargell Avenue Extension Project. [CIC] (Development Services} 2-C. Adoption of Resolution Authorizing the Executive Director to Convey and Accept Various Easements for the Development of Shinsei Gardens Apartments at 401 Wilver "Willie" Stargell and to Facilitate Utility Infrastructure on Adjacent CIC Property. [CIC]; • Adoption of Resolution Authorizing the Executive Director to Convey by Quitclaim Deed, 2,420 Square Feet at the Former Fleet Industrial Supply Center Site for the Storm Water Pump Station to the City of Alameda. [CIC]; • Adoption of Resolution Authorizing the Chief Executive Officer to Convey and Accept Various Easements for the Development of Shinsei Gardens Apartments at 4Q1 Wilver "Willie" Stargell Avenue. [HABOC]; and • Adoption of Resolution Authorizing Conveyance of Various Easements for the Development of Shinsei Gardens Apartments at Wilver "Willie" Stargell Avenue. [City Council] Development Services} 2-D. Recommendation to approve an Addendum to the Alameda Landing Mixed Use Development Project Supplemental Environmental Impact Report; a Letter of Intent regarding property exchange by and among Palmtree Acquisition Corporation, Peralta Community College District and the CIC; and a Letter of Agreement between the City of Alameda and Palmtree Acquisition Corporation for dedication of the Stargell Avenue Right-of- Way; • Adoption of Resolution Approving a Right-of--Way Contract Between the City of Alameda and the Peralta Community College District for the Stargell Extension Project. [City Council]; and • Adoption of Resolution Approving Letter of Intent by and Among Palmtree Acquisition Corporation, Peralta Community College District, and the CIC and Authorizing the CIC to Accept the Deed to Property. [CIC] Development Services} [Continued from April 15, 2008] 3. AGENDA ITEMS 3-A. Recommendation to approve modifications to the City of Alameda Down Payment Assistance Program to include refinance mortgage recovery loans for qualified existing homeowners. [City Council/CIC] Development Services} 3-B. Recommendation to adopt Loan Guidelines for Downpayment Assistance Loan Program and Below Market Rate Ownership Housing. [City Council/CIC] Development Services? 4. ADJOURNMENT - City Council, CIC, HABOC ~,..~ Beverly Jo s M or Chair CIC an BO Revised: 5/2/08, 11:30 a.m. ~~ ~~~ {,' r, ~' ., , ~n .~~~ r k he ren~~ f~~ hT~~~~ CITY OF ALAMEDA • CALIFORNIA IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL: 1. Please file a speaker's slip with the Deputy City Clerk and upon recognition by the Mayor, approach the podium and state your name; speakers are limited to three ~3~ minutes per item. 2. Lengthy testimony should be submitted in writing and only a summary of pertinent points presented verbally. 3. Applause and demonstration are prohibited during Council meetings. AGENDA - - - - - - -- - - - -REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY--------MAYS, 2008----7:30P.M. [Note: Cou,~c~. The Order of Business for City Council Meeting is as follows: 1. Roll Call 2. Agenda Changes 3. Proclamations, Special Orders of the Day and Announcements 4. Consent Calendar 5. Agenda Items 6. Oral Communications, Non-Agenda Public Comment 7. Council Referrals 8. Communications Communications from Council} 9. Adjournment Public Participation Anyone wishing to address the Council on agenda items or business introduced by Councilmembers may speak for a maximum of 3 minutes per agenda item when the subject is before Council. Please file a speaker's slip with the Deputy City Clerk if you wish to address the City Council SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL 5:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CONFERENCE ROOM Separate Agenda Closed Session} SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL, 7:25 P.M. COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION, AND HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, Separate Agenda Regular Council Meeting convenes at 7:30 pm, City Hall, ~ C~aa~~~s , corner of Santa Clara Ave and Oak S t ] 1. ROLL CALL ~- City Council 2. AGENDA CHANGES 3. PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS 3-A. Proclamation declaring May as Older Americans Month. Recreation and Park? 3--B. Proclamation declaring May 8 through 18, 2008 as Affordable Housing Week. Development Services? 3-C. Proclamation declaring May 11 through 17, 2008 as National Police Week. ~Police7 4. CONSENT CALENDAR Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted, approved or adopted by one motion unless a request for removal for discussion or explanation is received from the Council ar a member of the public 4-A. Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held on April 1, 2008; and the Special and Regular City Council Meetings held on April 15, 2008. City Clerk? 4-B. Bills for ratification. Finance} 4-C. Recommendation to accept the quarterly Investment Report. ~Finance~ 4-D. Recommendation to set June 3, 2008 as the Hearing date to consider collection of delinquent business license fees via property tax bills. ~Finance7 4-E. Recommendation to set June 3, 2008 as the Hearing date to consider collection of delinquent administrative citation fees via property tax bills. Planning and Building 4-F Recommendation to award Community Development Block Grant- funded Contract in the amount of $96,400 to AJW Construction, Inc., and authorize a loo contingency in the amount of $9,64D for the construction of Disabled Accessible Curbs and ramp for 37 locations at Alameda Point. Development Services? 4-G. Recommendation to award Contract in the amount of $72,692, including contingencies, to Universal Building Services for Janitorial Services in City buildings, No. P.W. 01-08-01. Public Works? 4--H. Recommendation to award Contract in the amount of $205,104, including contingencies, to Enviroscapes, Inc. for landscape maintenance of median strips and special areas, No. P.W. 01- 08-02. Public Works? 4-I. Recommendation to adopt Plans and Specifications and authorize Call for Bids for Rittler Park Irrigation and Field Renovation Improvements, No. P.W. 11-07-34. Public Works} 4-J. Adoption of Resolution to Preliminarily Approve Annual Report Declaring Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments and Providing for Notice of Public Hearing on July 1, 2D0$ -Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2. ~ Public Works } 4--K. Adoption of Resolution to Preliminarily Approve Annual Report Declaring Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments and providing for Notice of Public Hearing on July 1, 2008 - Maintenance Assessment District Ol-O1 Marina Cove}. Public Works} 4-L. Adoption of Resolution Directing Staff to Take Necessary Steps to Proceed with the Dissolution of the Non-Profit Corporation, Alameda Senior Citizens, Inc. Recreation and Parks} 4-M. Adoption of Resolution Approving Continued Participation in the Alameda County HOME Consortium and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the HOME Consortium Cooperative Agreement with Alameda County. Development Services} 4-N. Adoption of Resolution Supporting Measure H, the Alameda Unified School District Temporary Emergency Parcel Tax. City Manager} 5. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 5-A. Recommendation to review Charter Amendments for the November 2008 Ballot. City Attorney} 5-B. Recommendation to consider Call for review of Transportation Commission's decision regarding proposed parking restrictions along Central Avenue to improve traffic circulation and emergency access. Public Works} 5-C. Public Hearing to consider Green Building Requirements for City building projects, Capital Improvement Projects, and public-private partnerships and adoption of a 75o waste diversion goal; • Adoption of Resolution Establishing a Goal of 75o Reduction of Waste Going to Landfills by 2010 for the City of Alameda in Accordance with the Countywide 75~ Waste Reduction Goal; • Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Chapter XIII Building and Housing? by Creating a Civic Green Building Ordinance. Planning and Building/Public Works} 5-D. Recommendation to review options for community participation in implementation of the Local Action Plan for Climate Protection. Planning and Building/Public Works 5-E. Adoption of Resolution Opposing Proposition 98 and Supporting Proposition 99. City Manager? 6. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA Public Comment} Any person may address the Council in regard to any matter over which the Council has jurisdiction or of which it may take cognizance, that is not on the agenda 7. COUNCIL REFERRALS Matters placed on the agenda by a Councilmember may be acted upon or scheduled as a future agenda item 8. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS Communications from Council Councilmembers can address any matter, including reporting on any Conferences or meetings attended 8-A. Consideration of Water Emergency Transportation Authority Community Advisory Committee appointment. 8-B. Consideration of Mayor's nomination for appointment to the Planning Board. 9. ADJOURNMENT - City Council *** • Materials related to an item on the agenda are available for public inspection in the City Clerk's office, City Hall, Room 380, during normal business hours • Sign language interpreters will be available on request. Please contact the City Clerk at 747-4800 or TDD number 522-7538 at least 72 hours prior to the Meeting to request an interpreter • Equipment for the hearing impaired is available for public use. For assistance, please contact the City Clerk at 747-4800 or TDD number 522-7538 either prior to, or at, the Council Meeting • Accessible seating for persons with disabilities, including those using wheelchairs, is available • Minutes of the meeting available in enlarged print • Audio Tapes of the meeting are available upon request • Please contact the City Clerk at 747-4800 or TDD number 522-7538 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to request agenda materials in an alternative format, or any other reasonable accommodation that may be necessary to participate in and enjoy the benefits of the meeting UNAPPROVED MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION CIC} MEETING TUESDAY- -APRIL 15, 2008- -7:27 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 7:55 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers/Commissioners deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent: None, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY X08- } Update on the Alameda Theater, Cineplex, and Parking Structure Project. The Redevelopment Manager gave a Power Point presentation. Commissioner deHaan stated that the restoration is exceptional and is quite impressive. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor/Chair Johnson announced that the recommendation to approve an addendum to the Alameda Landing Mixed Use Development Project [paragraph no. 08- ] and the recommendation to approve the first amendment to the Contract with City Design Collective [paragraph no. O8- ] were removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Tam moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.] ~*08- CIC} Minutes of the Special Joint Community Improvement Commission and Housing Authority Board of Commissioners Meeting held on March 18, 2008. Approved. X08- CC/OS- CIC} Recommendation to approve an addendum to the Alameda Landing Mixed Use Development Project Supplemental Environmental Impact Report; a Letter of Intent regarding property exchange by and among Palmtree Acquisition Corporation, Peralta Community College District and the CIC; a Right-of-Way Contract Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and 1 Community Improvement Commission April 15, 2008 between the City of Alameda and Peralta Community College District for dedication of the Stargell Right-of-Way; and a Side Letter between the City of Alameda and Palmtree Acquisition Corporation far dedication of the Stargell Right-of--Way; ~O8- A CIC7 Adoption of Resolution Approving Letter of Intent By and Among Palmtree Acquisition Corporation, Peralta Community College District, and the CIC and Authorizing the CIC to Accept the Deed to Property. Mayor/Chair Johnson announced that the item would be continued. X08- CIC7 Recommendation to approve the first amendment to the Contract with City Design Collective in the amount of $6,500 to include water color illustrations in the North of Lincoln Strategic Plan for the Park Street Business District. The Development Services Director gave a brief presentation. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether there would be one illustration or a series of illustrations, to which the Development Services Director responded a set of illustrations. Commissioner deHaan inquired how many illustrations, to which the Development Services Director responded that she did not know. Commissioner deHaan stated the process is going well; he is concerned with the 8o budget increase for the illustrations. The Development Services Director stated the Contract was sized with several options; the illustrations were bid as part of an option to the Contract. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether a water color illustration is necessary. The Development Services Director responded a computer graphic illustration would require gathering all of the parcel information. Commissioner deHaan moved approval of the staff recommendation. Commissioner Matarrese stated that having pictures is worthwhile; inquired what would not be done by taking money from another General Fund source. The Development Services Director responded the money would come from Planning Department fees, not a General Fund account. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and 2 Community Improvement Commission April 15, 2008 Commissioner Matarrese inquired what the money would be spent on if left in the Planning Department. The Development Services Director responded other studies; stated the fund is sequestered and created by the Planning Department through the fee collection process. Commissioner Matarrese stated questions need to be asked during the budget process; something will not be done if the money is used for watercolors. The City Manager stated the funds are specified for this type of work; money would not be taken away from another type of study. Commissioner Matarrese stated that explanations are needed; money equals services. Commissioner deHaan inquired where the initial $75,000 came from, to which the Development Services Director responded a line item in the CIC budget for planning studies. Commissioner deHaan inquired why the $6,500 would not come out of the $75,040. The Development Services Director responded the Planning Department assisted with money from their budget; stated the CIC did not have the funds. Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. AGENDA ITEMS None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Joint Meeting at 8:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lora weisiger City Clerk Secretary, CIC The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and 3 Community Improvement Commission April 15, 2aas CITY ~F ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Community Improvement Commission From: Debra Kurita Executive Director Date: May 5, 2008 Re: Approve a Fourth Amendment to the Contract with Associated Right of Way Services, Inc. Adding $10,000 to the Budget, far a Total Contract Amount of $85,000, to Provide Consulting Services for the Stargell Avenue Extension Project BACKGROUND The City of Alameda has been working far 11 years to design, plan, and implement the Stargell Avenue Extension Project. The Project, which includes a new fully signalized intersection at Webster Street and Stargell Avenue and an extension of Stargell Avenue to Fifth Street, is critical to the redevelopment of the City's Westside, including Alameda Landing and Alameda Point. Substantial progress has been made on the project over the past several years. The city secured $4 million in State Transportation Improvement Project ~STIP} funds; 100% drawings were submitted to Caltrans for final approval; the Alameda Landing Disposition and Development Agreement ~DDA}, which provides a funding mechanism for constructing the project, was approved; and the Peralta Community College District District} has agreed to the terms of an acquisition of the required right-of-way. Since September 2005, Associated Right of Way Services, Inc. ~ARIWS}, has provided general consulting and appraisal related services to the City regarding the property acquisition and Caltrans Right-of-Way Certification required to implement the Project. ARlvllS' original contract was amended three times over the last two years in response to changes to the scope and timeframe of the Project. The proposed fourth contract amendment will increase ARIWS' budget by $10,000, for a total contract of $85,000. The original contract, the three previously approved amendments, and the proposed fourth amendment are on file with the City Clerk. D[SCUSSI4N fiver the last several months, the scope and timeline for the Project have changed, requiring ARIvUS ~ to provide additional consulting services to the Community Improvement Commission that were not included in its previous contract amendments. These additional services and the associated increase in the contract budget are CCICIC~HAB~CIHABOC Agenda Item #2-B 05-06-48 Honorable Chair and Members of the Community Improvement Commission May 6, 2008 Page2of2 necessary in order to complete the acquisition of the required property and prepare the final Caltrans Right-of-Way Certification. ARIWS' services will include ongoing meetings, correspondence, and coordination with Caltrans; preparation of property acquisition and Right-of-Way Certification documents; and ongoing project team meetings. BUDGET CONSIDERATIONIFINANCIALlMPACT This contract amendment will be funded as an eligible project cost, to be paid by the developer, pursuant to the Alameda Landing DDA, and will not impact the General Fund. RECOMMENDATION Approve a Fourth Amendment to the Contract with Associated Right of Way Services, Inc. adding $10,000 to the budget, for a'total contract amount of $85,000, to provide consulting services for the Stargell Avenue Extension Project. Respectf y submitted,, ~ ~ f Leslie A. Little Development Services Director B Debbie Potter Base Reuse & Community Development Manager DKILALIDP:dc Cc: Associated Right of Way Services, Inc., cla Larry Castellanos CfTY of ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Community Improvement Commission Honorable Chair and Members of the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Debra Kurita City ManagerlExecutive Director Date: May 6, 2008 Re: Adopt a Community Improvement Commission Resolution to Authorize Conveyance and Acceptance of Various Easements for the Development of Shinsei Gardens Apartments at 401 Wilver "Willie" Stargell Avenue and to Facilitate Utility Infrastructure on Adjacent Community Improvement Commission Property Adopt a Community Improvement Commission Resolution to Authorize Conveyance by Quitclaim Deed 2,420 Square Feet at the Former Fleet Industrial Supply Center ~FISC~ Site for the Storm Water Pump Station to the City of Alameda Adopt a Housing Authority Board of Commissioners Resolution to Authorize Conveyance and Acceptance of Various Easements for the Development of Shinsei Gardens Apartments at 401 Wilver "Willie" Stargell Avenue Adopt a City of Alameda Resolution to Authorize Conveyance of Various Easements for the Development of Shinsei Gardens Apartments at 40~ Wilver "Willie" Stargell Avenue BAC KG RD U N D The 39-unit Shinsei Gardens Apartment project is being developed to provide replacement affordable housing units for former Navy East Housing units that were demolished. These units are part of the homeless accommodation resulting from the initial base closure process that began in 1997. The Alameda Housing Authority and Resources for Community Development ~RCD},anon-profit housing developer, are developing the project. CCICIClHABOCIHABOC Report Re: Agenda Item #2-C 05-06.05 Honorable Chair and Members of the May 6, 2008 Community Improvement Commission Page 2 of 5 Honorable Chair and Members of the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council In September 2006, the Planning Board approved the Development Plan and Major Design Review, and the City approved a third addendum to the Environmental Impact Report prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ~CEQA} related to the project. In Qctober 2006, the Community Improvement Commission CIC} executed a quitclaim deed to transfer ownership ~of the site to the Housing Authority, which allowed the Housing Authority to execute a 75-year ground lease with RCD. At the same time, the C1C and City approved resolutions to spend $4 million in local housing funds on the project. The Qwner Participation Agreement ~aPA} and other related documents between the City entities and RCD were approved in March 2008. RCD has formed a limited partnership, Shinsei Gardens Apartments, L.P, Limited Partnership}, to secure affordable housing tax credits for the project. The CiC conveyed the property known as Wilver "Willie" Stargell Avenue Stargell Avenue, formerly Tinker Avenue} to the City by quitclaim deed in March 2008. Construction plans are under final review by the City Planning and Building Department. Construction is expected to commence by June 2005. In order to proceed with construction of the Shinsei Gardens Apartments project, various easements need to be accepted and conveyed between the CIC, City and Housing Authority. At the same time, the CIC will quitclaim the 2,420 square foot storm water pump station property to the City. DISCUSSIQN The Housing Authority is the fee owner of the Shinsei Gardens Apartments site, which abuts and is situated to the north of Stargell Avenue at Coral Sea Street. Only the southern two lanes of Stargell Avenue are improved and open for use as a public street. The northern two lanes have not yet been improved to City standards for public streets and are not yet open for such purpose. The CIC owns approximately 77 acres, which is subject to the Alameda Landing Disposition and Development Agreement ~DDA}, and is contiguous to and east of the Shinsei Gardens Apartments site. The 77 acres currently includes the 2,420 square foot site of the existing Storm Water Pump Station. The Storm Water Pump Station is immediately adjacent to the Shinsei Gardens Apartments site. Catellus built the Storm Water Pump Station pursuant to the Bayport DDA. As part of the backbone infrastructure system, the City will assume long-term ownership and maintenance of the Storm Water Pump Station. The City has previously accepted the Storm Water Pump Station improvements. However, the CIC must formally convey the property to the City via a quitclaim deed. The quitclaim deed is on file in the City Clerk's office, as are the property map and easement documents, Honorable Chair and Members of the May 6, 2008 Community Improvement Commission Page 3 of 5 Honorable Chair and Members of the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council The following easements are necessary to facilitate development of the Shinsei Gardens Apartments project: ~1 } Nonexclusive vehicular and pedestrian access easements from the City to the Housing Authority and the Limited Partnership, as ground lessee, for the benefit of the project site over portions of the northern two lanes of Stargell Avenue, which have been improved to the extent necessary to facilitate use for the project until the final street improvements are constructed; ~2} Nonexclusive easements for water domestic and fire} from the Housing Authority to the City for the project site; ~3} Nonexclusive public utility easements from the Housing Authority to the City for public utilities serving the project site; ~4} A nonexclusive emergency vehicle access easement from the Housing Authority to the CIC for the benefit of certain property owned by the C1C and to the City over the project site, which together with the emergency vehicle access easement listed as #5 below, will provide the required 20-foot access to and from Stargell Avenue; and ~5} A nonexclusive emergency vehicle access easement from the CIC to the Housing Authority and the Limited Partnership, as ground lessee, for the benefit of the project site and to the City over a portion of property owned by the CIC to the east of the project site. The following easements over the Shinsei Gardens Apartments site, together with the quitclaim deed of the 2,420 square foot storm water pump station property, are necessary to facilitate utility infrastructure on adjacent property that the City will own: ~1} A nonexclusive storm drain easement from the Housing Authority to the City over a portion of the project site for an existing storm drain system; and ~2} Nonexclusive easements from the Housing Authority to the City for access to sewer facilities and the storm water pump station over a portion of the project site. The City is authorized to accept deeds and easements pursuant to general Resolution No. 5328, however the City does not have the authority to convey deeds and easements without the enactment of a resolution to authorize conveyance. Both the Honorable Chair and Members of the May 6, 2008 Community Improvement Commission Page 4 of 5 Honorable Chair and Members of the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Housing Authority and the CIC require the enactment of a resolution to authorize conveyances of deeds and easements, as well as acceptance of deeds and easements. BUDGET CONSIDERATION/FINANCIAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund to accept and convey the easements and property described above. RECOMMENDATION Community Improvement Commission: 1 } Adopt a resolution authorizing the conveyance and acceptance of various easements for the development of Shinsei Gardens Apartments at 401 Wilver "Willie" Stargell Avenue and to facilitate infrastructure on adjacent CIC property. 2} Adopt a resolution authorizing conveyance by quitclaim deed of 2420 square feet at the former FISC site for the storm water pump station to the City of Alameda. Housing.Authority Board of Commissioners: Adopt a resolution authorizing the conveyance and acceptance of various easements for the development of Shinsei Gardens Apartments at 401 Wilver "Willie" Stargell Avenue. Cit Council: Adopt a resolution authorizing the conveyance of various easements for the development of Shinsei Gardens Apartments at 40~ Wilver "Willie" Stargell Avenue. Respectful submitted, ~ ,; ~~ .~ ~ -~, r ,' i~ ~_ ~' ~r r f. ~~ f Leslie A. Little ~~~ ~ ~~ Development Services Director Honorable Chair and Members of the Community Improvement Commission Honorable Chair and Members of the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council r Michael T. Pucci Housing Authority Executive Director B eb ie otter Base Reuse and Community Development Manager May 6, 2008 Page 5 of 5 DKILALIMPIDP:dc COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION N0.08- AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO CONVEY AND ACCEPT VARIOUS EASEMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SHINSEI GARDENS APARTMENTS AT 441 WIENER "WILLIE" STARGELL AVENUE AND TO FACILITATE UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE ON ADJACENT CIC PROPERTY E 0 N 0 a a a WHEREAS, Alameda Naval Air Station NAS Alameda} closed in April y 1991 and the Fleet fndustriaf Supply Center, Alameda ~FISC} closed in o September 1998 and the United States Navy Navy} initiated the dis osition ~ p L process for NAS Alameda pursuant to the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990; and ~ c~ WHEREAS, special legislation authorised the transfer of the FISC to the City of Alameda City} independent of the NAS Alameda economic development conveyance; and WHEREAS, athirty-nine X39} unit multi-family affordable housing development ~Shinsei Gardens Apartments or the Project} is included in the NAS Alameda Community Reuse Pfan Reuse Plan} that was accepted by the City on January 31, ~ 995, after several years of public input; and WHEREAS, the Reuse Plan is a mixed-use, transit-oriented proposal that provides for an orderly transition of NAS Alameda and the FISC from military to civilian use, while advancing the community goals far new employment, economic development, environmental protection, provision of open space and preclusion of undesirable uses; and WHEREAS, a team representing public and nonprofit agencies, including current and prospective homeless service providers, negotiated a statement of policies and standards called the "Standards of Reasonableness" has amended, Standards of Reasonableness} which delineate reasonable uses of property at NAS Alameda for provision of services to the homeless, including provision of housing, jobs, economic development activity and occupancy and capital improvements; and WHEREAS, on October 5, 1999, the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority ~ARRA} formally approved a Memorandum of Understanding ~MOU}, entered into by the ARRA, the Community Improvement Commission ~C1C}, Housing Authority of the City of Alameda Housing Authority}, the City, the Housing and Community Development Department of the County of Alameda, and the Alameda Point Collaborative, Inc., which amended the Standards of Reasonableness, which MOU was fully executed on February 22, 2044; and Resolution #2-C ~1} Joint CC CIC HABOC D5-06-08 WHEREAS, in June 2000, the City certified the Final Environmental Impact Report of the Catellus Mixed Use Developmen# X2000 EIR} pursuant to the California environmental Quality Act ~CEQA} which included the Project as segment of the Catellus Mixed Use Development; and WHEREAS, the City also adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Repor#ing Program ~MMRP} to ensure tha# those mitigation measures determined through the CEQA analysis that will eliminate or reduce to an acceptable level adverse environmental impacts of the Project, are enforced and completed; and WHEREAS, on July 1l, 2000, the Navy conveyed the FISC to the City by quitclaim deed; and WHEREAS, on August 1, 2001, the City conveyed the FISC to the CIC by quitclaim deed; and WHEREAS, the CIC and the Housing Authority selected Resources for Community Development ~RCD} to develop the Project on approximately 2.5 acres located in the FISC at 401 Wilver "Willie" Stargell Avenue at Coral Sea Street Project Site}; and WHEREAS, on February 11, 2004, the City agreed to make available to RCD approximately Six Hundred Thousand Dollars x$600,000} in HOME funds, for predevelopment costs relating to the Project for financing certain predevelopment costs of the Project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to a Settlement Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2006, by and among the ARRA, the CIC, Housing Authority, and Operation Dignity fnc. Operation Dignity} Settlement Agreement}, and subject to its terms and conditions, the ARRA, the CIC, the Housing Authority and Operation Dignity entered into an lmpfementation Agreement X39 Units}, dated as of September 1, 2006 ~Impiementation Agreement} for the prospective financing, construction, management and operation of the Project on the Project Site; and WHEREAS, the Implementation Agreement implements the MOU with respect to the 39 Unit Project; and WHEREAS, on September 25, 2006, the Planning Board of the Gity approved the Development Plan and Design Review for the Project by Resolution No. PB-06-33; and WHEREAS, on September 25, 2006, the City approved a third addendum to the 2000 EIR to address any environmental effects of the environmental control system for the Project; and WHEREAS, on October 4, 2006, by Resolution No. 06-145, the CIC authorized the use of affordable housing funds generated from the West End Community improvement Project ~UIJECIP} and the Business and Waterfront Improvement Project ~BWIP} in an amount not to exceed Four Million Dollars x$4,000,000} for development of the Project; and WHEREAS, on October 6, 2006, the CIC conveyed the Project Site to the Housing Authority by quitclaim deed; and WHEREAS, on October 4, 2006, the Housing Authority and RCD entered into a Ground Lease Agreement to facilitate the development of the Project on the Project Site; and WHEREAS, on July 1, 2007, the City agreed to make available to RCD approximately Eight Hundred Six Thousand Seven Hundred Nineteen Dollars x$806,719} in additional HOME funds for financing certain predevelopment costs of the Project; and WHEREAS, on March 20, 2008, the CIC and the Housing Authority entered into an owner Participation Agreement with RCD far development of the Project on the Project Site; and WHEREAS, RCD formed a limited partnership, Shinsei Gardens Apartments, L.P. Limited Partnership}, to secure affordable housing tax credits for the Project and assigned its interests in the Project documents to the limited partnership; and WHEREAS, on March 25 2008, the closing of construction financing through California Municipal Finance Authority bond proceeds occurred; and WHEREAS, to facilitate development of the Project on the Project Site i# is necessary for the CIC to grant a nonexclusive emergency vehicle access easement over a portion of certain property owned by the CIC adjacent to the Project Site CIC Property} to the Housing Authority and the Limited Partnership, as ground lessee, for the benefit of the Project Site, and to the City; a n d WHEREAS, to facilitate utility infrastructure on the CIC Property it is necessary for the Housing Authority to grant a nonexclusive emergency vehicle access easement over a portion of the Project Site for the benefit of the CIC Property to the CIC and to the City together with the foregoing easement, the Easements}; and WHEREAS, on May 6, 2008, following notice duly and regularly given as required by law, the CIC, the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners and the City Council held a joint public hearing on the Easements and related documents, and heard all interested persons expressing a desire to comment thereon or object thereto, and considered the Easements; and WHEREAS, the CIC has determined that conveying and accepting, as applicable, the Easements, the CIC will further encourage the productive use and redevelopment of underutilized former military base property. NSW, THEREFORE BE 1T RESOLVED, that the CIC hereby approves the Easements using its own independent judgment. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the CIC hereby authorizes the Executive Director to convey and accept the Easements, as applicable, sub'ect . J to any minor conforming, technical or clarifying changes approved by the Executive Director and CiC Counsel. The Executive Director and Secreta of . ry the C1C are hereby further authorized and directed to take such further actions and execute and record such documents as are necessary to convey and accept the Easements, as applicable. ****~ I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda in a Special Joint Meeting of the Community Improvement Commission, the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners and the City Council assembled on the day of , 2008, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: !N WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said Commission this day of , X408. Lara Weisiger, Secretary Community Improvement Commission Beverly Johnson, Chair Community Improvement Commission CGMMUNITY IMPRGVEMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY GFALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO.08- E 0 N a as 0 Q a Q AUTHGRIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTGR TO CONVEY BY QUITCLAIM DEED 2,420 SQUARE FEET AT THE FGRMER FISC SITE FORTHE STGRM WATER PUMP STATIGN TG THE CITY OFALAMEDA ~ WHEREAS, the proposal for a Master Plan, General Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Development Agreement, Tentative Map, Parcel Disposition Ma , . p} City Council Resolution No. 13216 ~certify~ng the Final Environmental lm act ~ p Report for the Catellus Mixed Use Development} was approved b the Cit y y Counc~i on May 31, 2460 X2000 EIR}; and WHEREAS, the Community Improvement Commission CIC} and Catellus Development Corporation, a Delaware corporation Master Develo er p} entered into that certain Disposition and Development Agreement dated as of June 16, 2000 has amended, Bayport DDA}; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Bayport DDA, on August 21, 2001 the CIC, the City of Alameda City} and Catellus Construction Corporation CCC ~ } entered into a Construction Reimbursement Agreement has amended, CRA for .. ~ the demolition and construction of mayor backbone infrastructure improvements; and WHEREAS, on April 26, 2004, the City approved a second addendum to the 2000 EIR to address any environmental effects of the construction of a stormwater treatment and detention pond, pump station, force main and outfall; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the CRA and in accordance with the approved Master Plan, Master Grading, Demolition and Improvement Plans, and other requirements, the storm water pump station has been constructed; and WHEREAS, the City has accepted the completion of construction of the storm water pump station; and WHEREAS, a plat and legal description of the portion of the CIC propert . y encompassing the storm water pump station comprising approximately 2,420 square feet has been prepared; and WHEREAS, on May 6, 2008, following notice duly and regularly iven as g required by law, the CIC, the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners and the City Council held a joint public hearing on the quitclaim deed and related documents, and heard all interested persons expressing a desire to comment thereon or object thereto, and considered the easements and uitclaim deed q , and Resolution #2-C ~~} Joint CC CiC HABQC o5-os-os WHEREAS, the CIC has determined that by conveying the storm water pump station property to the City by quitclaim deed, the C1C will further encourage the productive use and redevelopment of underutilized former military base property. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the CIC hereby approves the quitclaim deed using its own independent judgment. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the CIC hereby authorizes the Executive Director to enter into and execute the quitclaim deed attached as Exhibit A} conveying the storm water pump station property to the City, subject to any minor conforming, technical or clarifying changes approved by the Executive Director and CIC Counsel. The Executive Director and Secretary of the CIC are hereby further authorized and directed to take such further actions and execute and record the such documents as are necessary to convey the storm water pump station property to the City. ***~* I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda in a Special Joint Meeting of the Community Improvement Commission, the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners and the City Council on the day of , 2008, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS; IN V111TNESS, UvHERECF, 1 have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said Commission this day of , 2008. Lara Weisiger, Secretary Community Improvement Commission Beverly Johnson, Chair Community Improvement Commission BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. L v u~ 0 N ~v as 0 L Q a a AUTHORIZING THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER TO CONVEY AND ACCEPT VARIOUS EASEMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SHINSEI GARDENS APARTMENTS AT 401 WIENER "WILLIE" STARGELL AVENUE °' WHEREAS, Alameda Naval Air Station NAS Alameda} closed in April 1991 o and the Fleet Industrial Supply Center, Alameda FISC} closed in September 1998 and ` ~ the United States Navy Navy} initiated the disposition process for NAS Alameda pursuant to the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990; and c~ WHEREAS, special legislation authorized the transfer of the FISC to the City of Alameda City} independent of the NAS Alameda economic development conveyance; and WHEREAS, athirty-nine (39) unit multi-family affordable housing development (Shinsei Gardens Apartments or the Project) is included in the NAS Alameda Community Reuse Plan (Reuse Plan) that was accepted by the City on January 31, 1996 after several years of public input; and WHEREAS, the Reuse Plan is a mixed-use, transit-oriented proposal that provides for an orderly transition of NAS Alameda and the FISC from military to civilian use, while advancing the community goals for new employment, economic development, environmental protection, provision of open space and preclusion of undesirable uses; and WHEREAS, a team representing public and nonprofit agencies, including current and prospective homeless service providers, negotiated a statement of policies and standards called the "Standards of Reasonableness" has amended, Standards of Reasonableness} which delineate reasonable uses of property at NAS Alameda for provision of services to the homeless, including provision of housing, jobs, economic development activity and occupancy and capital improvements; and WHEREAS, on October 6, 1999, the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority ~ARRA} formally approved a Memorandum of Understanding ~MOU}, entered into by the ARRA, the Community Improvement Commission ~C1C}, Housing Authority of the City of Alameda Housing Authority}, the City, the Housing and Community Development Department of the County of Alameda, and the Alameda Point Collaborative, lnc., which amended the Standards of Reasonableness, which MOU was fully executed on February 22, 2000; and WHEREAS, in June 2000, the City certified the Final Environmental Impact Report of the Catellus Mixed Use Development (2000 EIR) pursuant to the California environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which included the Project as segment of the Catellus Mixed Use Development; and WHEREAS, the City also adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) to ensure that those mitigation measures determined through the Resolution #2-C (3) Joint CC CIC HABOC 05.06.08 CEQA analysis that will eliminate or reduce to an acceptable level adverse environmental impacts of the Project, are enforced and completed; and WHEREAS, on July 1?, 2000, the Navy conveyed the FISC to the City by quitclaim deed; and WHEREAS, on August 1, 2001, the City conveyed the FISC to the CIC by quitclaim deed; and WHEREAS, the C!C and the Housing Authority selected Resources for Community Development RCD} to develop the Project on approximately 2.5 acres located in the FISC at 401 Wiiver "Willie" Stargell Avenue ~Stargell Avenue} at Coral Sea Street Project Site}; and WHEREAS, on February 11, 2004, the City agreed to make available to RCD approximately Six Hundred Thousand Dollars x$600,000} in HOME funds, for predevelopment costs relating to the Project for financing certain predevelopment costs of the Project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to a Settlement Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2006, by and among the ARRA, the CIC, Housing Authority, and Operation Dignity Inc. ~4peration Dignity} Settlement Agreement}, and subject to its terms and conditions, the ARRA, the ClC, the Housing Authority and operation Dignity entered into an Implementation Agreement X39 Units}, dated as of September 1, 2006 Implementation Agreement} for the prospective financing, construction, management and operation of the Project on the Project Site; and WHEREAS, the Implementation Agreement implements the M4U with respect to the 39 Unit Project; and WHEREAS, on September 25, 2006, the Planning Board of the City approved the Development Plan and Design Review for the Project by Resolution No. PB-06-33; and WHEREAS, on September 25, 2006, the City approved a third addendum to the 2000 EIR to address any environmental effects of the environmental control system for the Projec#; and WHEREAS, on October 4, 2006, by Resolution No. 06-145, the CIC authorized the use of affordable housing funds generated from the West End Community Improvement Project ~v11ECIP} and the Business and Waterfront Improvement Project ~BWIP} in an amount not to exceed Four Million Dollars x$4,000,000} for development of the Project; and WHEREAS, on October 6, 2006, the CIC conveyed the Project Site to the Housing Authority by quitclaim deed; and WHEREAS, on actober 4, 2006, the Housing Authority and RCD entered into a Ground Lease Agreement to facilitate the development of the Project on the Project Site; and WHEREAS, on July 1, 2007, the City agreed to make available to RCD approximately Eight Hundred Six Thousand Seven Hundred Nineteen Dollars x$806,719} in additional HOME funds for financing certain predevelopment costs of the Project; and WHEREAS, on March 20, 2008, the CIC and the Housing Authority entered into an Owner Participation Agreement with RCD for development of the Project on the Project Site; and WHEREAS, RCD formed a limited partnership, Shinsei Gardens Apartments, L.P. Limited Partnership}, to secure affordable housing tax credits for the Project and assigned its interests in the Project documents to the limited partnership; and WHEREAS, on March 25 2008, the closing of construction financing through California Municipal Finance Authority bond proceeds occurred; and WHEREAS, to facilitate development of the Project on the Project Site it is necessary for the Housing Authority tv convey or accept, as applicable, the following easements Easements}: ~a} Nonexclusive vehicular and pedestrian access easements from the City to the Housing Authority and the Limited Partnership, as ground lessee, for the benefit of the Project Site over portions of the northern two lanes of Stargell Avenue, which have been improved to the extent necessary to facilitate use for the Project until the final street improvements are constructed; and fib} Nonexclusive easements for water domestic and fire} from the Housing Authority to the City forthe Project Site; and ~c} Nonexclusive public utility easements from the Housing Authority to the City for public utilities serving the Project Site; and ~d} A nonexclusive emergency vehicle access easement from the Housing Authority to the CIC for the benefit of certain property owned by the CIC and to the City over a portion of the Project Site; and fie} A nonexclusive storm drain easement from the Housing Authority to the City over a portion of the Project Site for an existing storm drain system; and ~f} Nonexclusive easements from the Housing Authority to the City for access to sewer facilities and the storm water pump station over a portion of the Project Site; and WHEREAS, on May 6, 2008, following notice duly and regularly given as required by law, the CIC, the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners and the City Council held a joint public hearing on the Easements and related documents, and heard all interested persons expressing a desire to comment thereon or object thereto, and considered the Easements; and vvHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners has determined that conveying and accepting, as applicable, the Easements, the Board of Commissioners will further encourage the productive use and redevelopment of underutilized former military base property. NOVV, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Commissioners hereby approves the Easements using its own independent judgment. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Commissioners hereby authorize the Chief Executive Officer to convey and accept the Easements, as applicable, subject to any minor conforming, technical or clarifying changes approved by the Chief Executive Officer and General Counsel. The Chief Executive Officer and Secretary of the Housing Authority are hereby further authorized and directed to take such further actions and execute and record such documents as are necessary to convey and accept the Easements, as applicable. ***~** I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing Authority of the City of Alameda in a Special Joint Meeting of the Community Improvement Commission, the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners and the City Council assembled on the 6th day of May, 2008, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIaNS: IN vVITNESS, vVHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said Commission this day of , 2008. Secretary Chair E L ~. 0 a~ 0 a CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE GF VARIOUS EASEMENTS FGR THE DEVELOPMENTOF SHINSEI GARDENS APARTMENTS AT 401 WIENER "~I11iLLIE" STARGELLAVENUE 1 WHEREAS, Alameda Naval Air Station NAS Alameda} closed in • ° Aril 1997 and the Fleet Industrial Su I Center ~ p pp y ,Alameda FISC} closed ,,~ in September 1998 and the United States Navy Navy} initiated the ~' disposition rocess for NAS Alameda ursuant to th p p e Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990; and WHEREAS, special legislation authorized the transfer of the FISC to the City of Alameda City} independent of the NAS Alameda economic development conveyance; and WHEREAS, athirty-nine X39} unit multi-family affordable housing development ~Shinsei Gardens Apartments or the Project} is included in the NAS Alameda Community Reuse Plan Reuse Plan} that was accepted by the City on January 31, 1996 after several years of public input; and WHEREAS, the Reuse Plan is a mixed-use, transit-oriented proposal that provides for an orderly transition of NAS Alameda and the FISC from military to civilian use, while advancing the community goals for new employment, economic development, environmental protection, provision of open space and preclusion of undesirable uses; and WHEREAS, a team representing public and nonprofit agencies, including current and prospective homeless service providers, negotiated a statement of policies and standards called the "Standards of Reasonableness" has amended, Standards of Reasonableness} which delineate reasonable uses of property at NAS Alameda for provision of services to the homeless, including provision of housing, jobs, economic development activity and occupancy and capital improvements; and WHEREAS, on October 6, 1999, the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority ~ARRA} formally approved a Memorandum of Understanding ~MOU}, entered into by the ARRA, the Communit . Y Improvement Commission ~CIC}, Housing Authority of the City of Alameda Housing Authority}, the City, the Housing and Community Development Resolution #2-C ~4~ Joint CC CIC HAB4C O~-V~-V V Department of the County of Alameda, and the Alameda Point CDllaborative, Inc., which amended the Standards of Reasonableness, which M~U was fully executed on February 22, 2000; and WHEREAS, in June 2000, the City certified the Final Environmental Impact Report of the Catellus Mixed Use Development X2000 EIR} pursuant to the California environmental Quality Act ~CEQA} which included the Project as segment of the Catellus Mixed Use Development; and WHEREAS, the City also adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ~MMRP} to ensure that those mitigation measures determined through the CEQA analysis that will eliminate or reduce to an acceptable level adverse environmental impacts of the Project, are enforced and completed; and WHEREAS, on July 17, 2000, the Navy conveyed the FISC to the City by quitclaim deed; and WHEREAS, on August 1, 2001, the City conveyed the FISC to the C1C by quitclaim deed; and WHEREAS, the CIC and the Housing Authority selected Resources far Community Development ~RCD} to develop the Project on approximately 2.5 acres located in the FISC at 401 Wilver "Willie" Stargell Avenue ~Stargell Avenue} at Coral Sea Street Project Site}; and WHEREAS, on February 11, 2004, the City agreed to make available to RCD approximately Six Hundred Thousand Dollars x$500,000} in HOME funds, for predevelopment costs relatin to the g Prolectforfinancing certain predevelopment costs of the Project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to a Settlement Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2006, by and among the ARRA, the CIC, Housing Authority, and operation Dignity Inc. ~~peration Dignity} Settlement Agreement}, and subject to its terms and conditions, the ARRA, the CIC, the Housing Authority and operation Digni#y entered into an Implementation Agreement X39 Units}, dated as of September 1, 2005 Implementation Agreement} for the prospective financing, construction, management and operation of the Project on the Project Site; and WHEREAS, the Implementation Agreement implements the MOU with respect to the 39 Unit Project; and WHEREAS, on September 25, 2006, the Planning Board of the City approved the Development Plan and Design Review for the Project by Resolution No. PB-06-33; and WHEREAS, an September 25, 2006, the City approved a third addendum to the 2000 EIR to address any environmental effects of the environmental control system for the Project; and WHEREAS, on October 4, 2006, by Resolution No. 06-145, the CIC authorized the use of affordable housing funds generated from the West End Community Improvement Project ~VVECIP} and the Business and Waterfront Improvement Project ~BWfP} in an amount not to exceed Four Million Dollars x$4,000,000}for development of the Project; and WHEREAS, on Gctober 6, 2006, the CIC conveyed the Project Site to the Housing Authority by quitclaim deed; and WHEREAS, on Gctober 4, 2006, the Housing Authority and RCD entered into a Ground Lease Agreement to facilitate the development of the Project on the Project Site; and WHEREAS, on July 1, 2001, the City agreed to make available to RGD approximately Eight Hundred Six Thousand Seven Hundred Nineteen Dollars x$806,119} in additional HGME funds for financing certain predevelopment costs of the Project; and WHEREAS, on March 20, 2008, the CIC and the Housing Authority entered into an Gwner Participation Agreement with RCD for development of the Project on the Project Site; and WHEREAS, RCD farmed a limited partnership, Shinsei Gardens Apartments, L.P. Limited Partnership}, to secure affordable housing tax credits for the Project and assigned its interests in the Project documents to the limited partnership; and WHEREAS, on March 25 2008, the closing of construction financing through California Municipal Finance Authority bond proceeds occurred; and WHEREAS, to facilitate development of the Project on the Project Site it is necessary for the City to convey the following easements ~Easements~: nonexclusive vehicular and pedestrian access easements from the City to the Housing Authority and the Limited Partnership, as ground lessee, far the benefit of the Project Site over portions of the northern two lanes of Stargell Avenue, which have been improved to the extent necessary to facilitate use for the Project until the final street improvements are constructed; and WHEREAS, on May 6, 2008, following notice duly and regularly given as required by law, the CIC, the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners and the City Council held a joint public hearing on the Easements and related documents, and heard all interested persons expressing a desire to comment thereon or abject thereto, and considered the Easements; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that conveying the Easements, the City Council will further encourage the productive use and redevelopment of underutilized former military base property, NCW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby approves the Easements using its own independent judgment. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby authorize the Mayor to convey the Easements, subject to any minor conforming, technical or clarifying changes approved by the Mayor and City Counsel. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby further authorized and directed to take such further actions and execute and record such documents as are necessary to convey the Easements. ****~ I, the undersigned, hereby cerkify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in a Special Joint Meeting of the Community Improvement Commission, the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners and the Council of the City of Alameda assembled on the day of 2008, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: IN VIIITNESS, vVHERE~F, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said City this day of , 2008. Lora Weisiger, City Clerk City of Alameda CITY of ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Honorable Chair and Members of the Community Improvement Commission From: Debra Kurita City ManagerlExecutive Director Date: May 6, 2008 Re: Approve an Addendum to the Alameda Landing Mixed Use Development Project Supplemental Environmental Impact Report; a Letter of Intent Regarding Property Exchange By and Among Palmtree Acquisition Corporation, Peralta Community College District and the Community Improvement Commission; and a Letter Agreement Between the City of Alameda and Palmtree Acquisition Corporation for Dedication of the Stargell Right-of-Way Adopt a City Council Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Right-of-Way Contract Between the City of Alameda and the Peralta Community College District for Dedication of the Stargell Right-of-vllay and all Related Caltrans Right-of-Way Certification Documents Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Community lmprovement Commission to Accept a Property Deed from the Peralta Community College District BACKGRaUND The City has been working for 11 years to design, plan, and implement the Stargell Avenue Extension Project. The Project, which includes a new fully signalized intersection at Webster Street and Stargell Avenue and an extension of Stargell Avenue to Fifth Street, is critical to the redevelopment of the City's Westside, including Alameda Landing and Alameda Point. Substantial progress has been made on the project over the past several years. The City secured $4 million in State Transportation Improvement Project ~ST1P} funds; the City submitted 100°/~ drawings to Caltrans for final approval; the City approved the Alameda Landing Disposition and Development Agreement ~DDA}, which provides a funding mechanism for constructing the Project; and the Peralta Community College District ~~District} agreed to terms for the City's acquisition of the required right-of-way. In January 2001, the City notified the District that it was preparing an appraisal of the right-of-way as required by Caltrans and STIP guidelines for a typical right-of-way acquisition. The City, Community Improvement Commission ~CIC}, Palmtree CCIClCIHABOCIHAB4C Agenda item #2-D o~-os-os Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council May 6, 2005 Honorable Chair and Members of the Page 2 of 5 Community Improvement Commission Acquisition Corporation PAC} developer of the Alameda Landing project}, and the District have identified a procedure for the right-of-way transaction that meets the needs of the District, the City, and PAC, and complies with all applicable laws. DISCUSSIQN The Education Code allows the District to dedicate land to a city for roadway use without following the normal process for sale of surplus property. A gift of land for a roadway requires atwo-thirds vote of the governing board of the District. The Education Code also allows the District to grant or exchange property not required for classroom buildings without appraisals of the two properties when the governing board approves the exchange by a unanimous vote. Therefore, the right-of-way transaction is structured in two parts. The District will gift the right-of-way for the Stargell extension to the City; and the District will exchange a 2.3-acre remainder parcel that will be created by the transfer of the right-of-way to the City, located just north of the new S#argell roadway Remainder Parcel}, for a building at 56o Atlantic Boulevard in the Marina Village Business Park X860 Atlantic}, PAC will facilitate the exchange by paying the purchase price for the building at 860 Atlantic and assigning its purchase right to the District. The CIC will receive title to the Remainder Parcel. The proposed gift and property exchange involves the following agreements: ~} The Right-of-vllay ~R~vll} Contract is between the City and the District and provides that the District will dedicate the necessary right-of-way for the Stargell Avenue extension, approximately three acres, as a gift to the City; 2} The Letter of Intent ~L~l} and Exchange Agreement are between PAC, the CIC, and the District and provide for an exchange of the Remainder Parcel for the building at 860 Atlantic; and 3} A Letter Agreement between the City and PAC addresses collateral issues that are not captured in the RAW Contractor Exchange Agreement, Approval of the agreements is subject to formal action by the parties, including the District Board of Trustees District Board}, the City Council, CIC, and PAC. The L01 has been signed by the District and PAC. The RAW Contract, the LEI, and the Letter Agreement are on file at the City Clerk's office. ROW Contract The new intersection at Stargell Avenue and Webster Street is within Caltrans jurisdiction and will be built with STIP funds. Where a roadway project is within Caltrans jurisdiction or uses STIP funds, Caltrans requires use of its standard contract for right-of-way acquisition for the proposed project. Accordingly, the RAW Contract follows Caltrans' format. Caltrans must also approve the RAW Contract before the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council May 6, 2008 Honorable Chair and Members of the Page 3 of 5 Community Improvement Commission California Transportation Commission ~CTC}will award the $4 million in STIP funds to the City for the project. The RCV1J Contract obligates the District to convey, and the City to accept, the Stargell right-of-way. Since City Council Resolution 5325 already authorizes the Mayor to accept property deeds, the proposed resolution does not refer to the City's acceptance of the deed. The ROV1! Contract also grants the City a temporary construction easement on the District's property to build the project and describes the future access of the College of Alameda to Stargell Avenue and vllebster Street. Letter of lr~ten~/Fxcnange Agree The LCI and Exchange Agreement are between the CIC, the District, and PAC, and provide for the exchange of the Remainder Property for the building at 860 Atlantic. The L41 sets out the terms and conditions of the Exchange Agreement to be executed by all the parties. The District and PAC have signed the L41. The Agreement will provide for an even exchange of the two properties with no further compensation. It will also contain standard provisions for due diligence, escrow, and closing as described in the LEI. The CIC is parley to the L01 and Exchange Agreement because the Remainder Parcel would be conveyed directly by the District to the CIC. PAC would assign its rights to purchase the building at 860 Atlantic to the District and pay all funds necessary to acquire the property to the current owner and exchange it for the Remainder Parcel. The proposed resolution authorizes the CIC to accept the deed for the Remainder Parcel once the exchange agreement is executed. There are no current plans to use the Remainder Parcel. After the exchange, if requested by PAC, the CIC would be obligated to convey the Remainder Parcel to PAC at no cost; however, PAC would pay conveyance fees, such as escrow, title insurance, and due diligence. PAC is considering a range of uses forthe site, including mixed-use, commercial and housing. PAC would be responsible for securing entitlements for the Remainder Parcel through the City's standard planning process. LeflerA reemen! The Letter Agreement between PAC and the City addresses the City's obligations that are not contained in the R~vl! Contract, L01, or Exchange Agreement. The Letter Agreement requires the City to: 1} grant an access easement to the CIC from Mariner Square Loop to the Remainder Parcel; 2} issue a Certificate of Compliance under the Subdivision Map Act that recognizes the Remainder Parcel as a separate, legal parcel, and 3} use the acquired land for the Stargell Avenue right-of-way under the Alameda Landing DDA. ` Honorable Mayor and Members ofthe City Council May 6, 2008 Honorable Chair and Members of the Page 4 of 5 Community Improvement Commission BUDGET CGNSIDERATIDNIFINANCIALlMPACT The District is dedicating the land required for the Stargell right-of-way as a gift. Therefore there is no financial impact to the City. The District is exchanging the Remainder Parcel for the building at 860 Atlantic. The L01 and Exchange Agreement obligate PAC to pay the purchase price for 860 Atlantic and the District to convey the Remainder Parcel to the CIC. This expenditure is PAC's project cost under the Alameda Landing DDA. Therefore, there is no financial impact to the city. ENVIRGNMENTAL REVIEVIJ 0n May 21, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 13455 adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration Negative Declaration} for the Project and Findings Demonstrating that All Significant Impacts Can Be Mitigated to a Level of Insignificance. Qn February 13, 2006, the City prepared an addendum letter to the Negative Declaration, which concluded that the realignment of Stargell AvenuelState Route 260 approximately 120 feet south of the location proposed in the 2005 design plans for the Project did not require subsequent environmental review. Gn December 5, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 14047 certifying the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report SEIR}for the Alameda Landing Mixed Use Development Project Alameda Landing Project} and adopted Resolution No. 14045 Making Findings Regarding Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures, Making Findings Concerning Alternatives, Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Adopting a Statement of overriding Considerations in Accordancewith the California Environmental Quality Act for the Alameda Landing Project. The SEIR identified the Project as a mitigation measure for the Alameda Landing Project and analyzed the impacts of this mitigation measure in conformance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. On May 16, 2007, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 14092 finding, among other things, that the Negative Declaration, Addendum, and SEIR adequately analyze the impacts of the Project. The College's proposed gift of the right-of way for the Project to the City would not require revisions to the Negative Declaration, Addendum, and SEIR. The attached Addendum to the SEIR has been prepared documenting that the CIC's acquisition of the Remainder Parcel created by the gift of the right-of-way will not have any significant effects not previously addressed in the Negative Declaration, Addendum, and SEIR. There have been no substantial changes in the Project, substantial changes in the circumstances under which the Project would be undertaken, or significant new information that would cause new or substantially increased significant environmental effects, and there is no new information showing new mitigation measures or alternatives that would substantially reduce significant effects but that the project proponent declines to adopt. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council May 6, 2008 Honorable Chairand Members of the Page ~ of ~ Community Improvement Commission RECOMMENDATION City Council: 1} Approve the Addendum to the SEIR; 2} Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to execute the Right-of Way Contract between the City of Alameda and the Peralta Community College District for Dedication of the Stargell Right-of-Way to the City and all related Caltrans Right-of-Way Certification documents; and 3} Approve the Letter Agreement between the City of Alameda and Palmtree Acquisition Corporation. Community I mprovement Commission: 1 } Approve the Addendum to the SEIR; 2} Approve the Letter of Intent and authorize the Executive Director to execute the Agreement of Property Exchange by and among Palmtree Acquisition Corporation, Peralta Community College District, and the Community Improvement Commission in a form consistent with the LOI; and 3~ Adopt a resolution authorizing the CIC to accept the deed for the Remainder Parcel once the Exchange Agreement is finalized. Res ec y submitted, r Leslie A. Little Development Services Director :Debbie Potter Base Reuse & Community Development Manager Attachment: Addendum to Supplemental EIR Apri12008 SECOND ADDENDUM TO ALAMEDA LANDING MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT EIR (SCH # 2006012091) (A Supplement to the 2000 Catellus Mixed Use Development Project EIR) I. INTRODUCTION In connection with the implementation of the extension of Stargell Avenue to 'L~ebster Street ~"Stargell Extension Project"}, the City of Alameda ~"City"} proposes to accept a donation from the Board of Trustees of the Peralta Junior College District of Alameda County ~"District"} of certain real property owned by the District and necessary for the Stargell Extension Project ~"College RaW Property"}. The right-of way donation will sever approximately two acres of real property from the College of Alameda campus, creating a remainder parcel College Remainder Parcel"}. The Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda ~"CIC"} proposes to approve the exchange with the District of the College Remainder Property for certain real property located at $6D Atlantic Avenue in the City ~"$60 Atlantic Property"} ~"Proposed Exchange Project"}. There is no specific use or change in use proposed for the College Remainder Parcel at this time, but any future development of the College Remainder Parcel would be subject to compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act at such time as a specific use is proposed. II. CEQA PROCESS 1. 2001 Star ell Extension Project MND. In 2001, the City proposed the improvement, widening and extension of Stargell Avenue then called Tinker Avenue} and prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration ~"MND"} studying the environmental effects of the Stargell Extension Project. Gn May 21, 2002, the City amended the City General Plan's to include "Tinker Avenue" as a Major Street and adopted the MND and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 0n February 13, 2006, the City prepared an addendum letter to the MND, which concluded that the realignment of the Stargell Extension Project approximately 120 feet to the south of the previously proposed location did not require subsequent environmental review. 2. 2000 Catellus Mixed Use Develo ment Pro' ect EIR. Gn May 31, 200D, the City certified the Catellus Mixed Use Development Enviranmental Impact Report ~"2000 Catellus EIR"} and approved the Catellus Mixed Use Development Project ~"Griginal Catellus Project"}, which included plans for 500 residential units, some of which are currently under construction; aseven-acre site dedicated to the Alameda Unified School District fora 600-student Kindergarten-through-eighth-grade school; 15 acres of public open space, neighborhood parks, mini-parks, and waterfront promenades; and approximately 1.3 million square feet of commercial officelresearch and development ~R&D} CCICICIHAB4C Attachment to Agenda item #2-D 05-46-08 space, including supporting ground floor retail space. The 2000 Catellus EIR identified the Stargell Extension Project as an alternative mitigation measure. The City later approved a 2001 addendum to the 2000 Catellus EIR for the construction of approximately 60 additional residential units; a 2004 addendum to the 2000 Catellus EIR for the construction of a stormwater treatment plant and detention pond, pump station, force main and outfall; and a 2006 addendum to the 2000 Catellus EIR for the construction of 39 affordable apartments. 3. 2006 Alameda Landing EIR Mixed,,,,,,,Use Development Project,. EIR -,,,, A Su lement to the 2000 Catellus EIR. In response to proposed changes in the original Catellus Project, the City prepared the Alameda Landing Mixed Use Development Project EIR (A Supplement to the 2000 Catellus Mixed Use Development Project EIR} ("Alameda Landing EIR"), which identified the Stargell Extension Project as a mitigation measure. The City certified the Alameda Landing EIR as complete, adopted a Mitigation Monitoring Program, and approved a change in some of the previously approved uses in the Original Catellus Project. In evaluating the impacts of the Stargell Extension Project as a mitigation measure, the Alameda Landing EIR evaluated traffic conditions bath without and with the Stargell Extension Project and found that the Stargell Extension Project did not result in any signif cant adverse traffic and circulation, air or noise impacts beyond those of the Alameda Landing project. The City subsequently prepared a First Addendum to the Alameda Landing EIR to evaluate minor technical changes associated with the waterfront uses. 4. Criteria to Determine if Further CEpA Analysis is Required. CEQA Guidelines Section 15I62 states that, when an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a pro ject, no subsequent EIR or negative declaration shall be prepared for that project unless the agency determines on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (1} Substantial changes are proposed in the proposed project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new signif cant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (3} New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: 2 ~A} The proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; ~B} Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; ~C} Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the proposed project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; ~D} Mitigation measures or alternatives, which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. California Public Resources Code ~"PRC"} Section 21166 states that unless one or more of the conditions set forth above are met, no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report shall be required by the lead agency or by any responsible agency. Based on the record as a whole, including, without limitation, the environmental analysis contained in the record, there is substantial evidence to support a finding that the donation of the College Raw Property and the Proposed Exchange Project will not result in any of these conditions. Therefore, in accordance with PRC Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR is not required to address the donation of the College Row Property and Proposed Exchange Project. III. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED EXCHANGE PROJECT 1. Colle e Remainder Parcel The College Remainder Parcel is a vacant lot, approximately 2.2 acres in size. The prior use of the College Remainder Property was athletic fields. After the exchange, the College Remainder Property will continue to be improved with the current vegetation, landscaping and grassy f elds and may be improved with additional new landscaping along the Stargell Extension Project. The College Remainder Property will be fenced and will not be accessible to the public. There is no specific use or change in use proposed for the College Remainder Parcel at this time, and analysis of future use at this time would therefore be speculative. Any future development of the College Remainder Parcel would be subject to compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act at such time as a specific use is proposed. 2. The 860 Atlantic Property The S60 Atlantic Property is comprised of one approximately 26,000 square foot single story officellab building located on an approximately 103,000 square foot lot. The 860 Atlantic Property is designated "Business Park" on the General Plan and zoned MX Mixed Use Planned Development District}. It is also part of the Marina Village Master Planned Development ~"Master Plan"}. The 1984 Master Plan permits uses authorized in the C-M Commercial Manufacturing District, which permits Research & Developmentlofficeland light industrial uses, as well colleges. The prior use of the 86o Atlantic Property was a commercial laboratory, The College proposes to use the laboratory for classroom instruction, which is consistent with the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Master Plan. An EIR was certif ed for the Master Plan in 1979 and a final supplemental EIR was certified in 1984. The $60 Atlantic Property will continue to be improved with the current building and parking lot with minor additional exterior alterations for handicapped access if required by current law or building codes. The College may make minor interior alterations to the Building if required for the College's use for the purpose of classroom instruction. However, no expansion of the Building is contemplated. Under the College's use, traffic will be decreased as most of the students will walk from their previous classroom on the campus. As such, any traffic, noise and air quality impacts will be less than the previous commercial use. IV. CONCLUSION The acquisition of the College ROW Property was contemplated by the MND and the Alameda Landing EIR as part of the implementation of the Stargell Extension Project. The Proposed Exchange Project is a real estate transaction arising out of the implementation of the Stargell Extension Project. Specifically, the donation of the Stargell Avenue right-of way will create the College Remainder Parcel that the CIC desires to acquire from the District in exchange for the 860 Atlantic Property. The Stargell Extension Project, including the rig~at-of way dedication, was adequately analyzed in the MND and the Alameda Landing EIR. Even with the Proposed Exchange Project, there are no substantial changes in the Stargell Extension Project or the circumstances under which the Stargell Extension Project is undertaken that require major revisions to the MND or the Alameda Landing EIR due to the involvement of new or substantially more severe significant impacts. There is no new information of substantial importance that could not have been known at the time the MND was adopted or Alameda Landing EIR was certified that shows that the Stargell Extension Project will have new or substantially more severe significant impacts, or that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found infeasible are feasible or that mitigation measures or alternatives considerably different from those analyzed in the Alameda Landing EIR are feasible, but the project proponent declines to adopt them. As a result, CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163 and Public Resources Code Section 21166 do not require preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR or MND. 4 CITY ~F ALAMEDA RESOLUTIQN N~. APPROVING A RIGHT OF WAY CGNTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF E ALAMEDAAND THE PERALTA COMMUNITY CGLLEGE DISTRICT F4RTHE ~° STARGELL EXTENSION PROJECT ~ o vUHEREAS, the City of Alameda's Stargell Avenue Extension Project ~ ~ Project which invoiv s con ' ~ ~ ~ }, a struction of a new fully signalized intersection ~ ~ at Webster Street and Star ell Avenue and an extension of Star ell o g.. g ~, Avenue to Fifth Street, is critical to the redevelopment of the City's ~ ~ vvestside, including Alameda Landing and Alameda Point; and WHEREAS, Caltrans has agreed to provide $4 million in State Transportation improvement Project ~STfP} funds for the Project conditioned on Caltrans certification that the Project complies with Caltrans regulations and the approval of the ST1P grant by the California Transportation Commission; and WHEREAS, the City and the Peraita Commun'fty College District District} have reached an agreement in the form of a Right of Allay Contract under which the District will gift the right-of way necessary for the Project to the City; and WHEREAS, on May 21, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 13455 adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaratian Negative Declaration} for the Project and Findings Demonstrating that All Significant Impacts Can Be Mitigated to a Level of Insignificance. Qn February 13, 2006, the City prepared an addendum letter to the Negative Declaration, which concluded that the realignment of the Stargell AvenuelState Route 260 approximately 120 feet south of the location proposed in the 2005 design plans far the Project did not require subsequent environmental review; and WHEREAS, on December 5, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 14041 certifying the Supplemental Environmental impact Report ~SEIR} for the Alameda Landing Mixed Use Development Project Alameda Landing Project} and adopted Resolution No. 14048 Making Findings Regarding Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures, Making Findings Concerning Alternatives, Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Adopting a Statement of overriding Considerations in Accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act for the Alameda Landing Project. The SEfR Resolution #2-D ~1} Joint CC CIC HAB4C 0~-OV-oY identified the Project as a mitigation measure for the Alameda Landing Project and analyzed the impacts of this mitigation measure in conformance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. ~n May 16, 2001, the City Council adopted Resolution No. ~ 4092 finding, among other things, that the Negative Declaration, Addendum, and SEIR adequately analyze the impacts of the Project; and WHEREAS, the District's proposed gift of the right~of-way for the Project to the City would not require revisions to the Negative Declaration, Addendum, and SEIR. There have been no substantial changes in the Project, substantial changes in the circumstances under which the Project would be undertaken, or significant new information that would cause new or substantially increased significant environmental effects, and there is no new information showing new mitigation measures or alternatives that would substantially reduce significant effects but that the Project proponent declines to adopt. N4W, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council approves the Right of way Contract between the City and the Peralta Community College District, in the form on file in the City Clerk's Office, and authorizes Debra Kurita, City Manager, to execute and implement the Right of Way Contract and any other documents required to obtain Caltrans certification of the Project. ***~**~ I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in a regular meeting assembled on the day of 2008, by the following vote to wit: AYES NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS; IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said City this day of , X008. Lara Weisiger, City Clerk City of Alameda COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION N0.08- L 0 0 N ca as 0 a a APPROVING LETTER OF INTENT BY AND AMONG PALMTREE ACQUISITION CORPORATION, PERALTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, AND THE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION AND AUTHORIZING THE CIC TO ACCEPT THE DEED TO PROPERTY WHEREAS, the City of Alameda's Stargell Avenue Extension Project . ~ o Protect}, which involves construction of a new fully signalized intersection at Webster Street and Star ell Avenue and an extension of Star ell Av ~~ g g enueto Fifth Street, is critical to the redevelopment of the City's Vllestside, including ~ Alameda Landin and Alameda Point and g , WHEREAS, Caltrans has agreed to provide $4 million in State Transpor#ation Improvement Project ~STIP}funds for the Project; and WHEREAS, the City, the Community Improvement Commission CIC}, Palrntree Acquisition Corporation PAC}, and the Peralta Community College District District} have reached a tentative agreement in the form of a Letter of Intent under which: ~1} the District will gift the right-of way necessary for the Project to the City; ~2} the District will exchange a 2.3-acre remainder parcel that will be created by the transfer of the Stargell right-of-way to the City, located just north of the new Stargell roadway Remainder Parcel}, for a building at 860 Atlantic Boulevard in the Marina Village Business Park X860 Atlantic}; ~3} PAC will facilitate the exchange by assigning its right to buy 860 Atlantic to the District; ~4}CIC wilt take title to the Remainder Parcel; and ~5}the City and PAC will enter into a separate letter agreement granting an access easement to the CIC over the Remainder Parcel, issuing a Certificate of Compliance under the Subdivision Map Act that recognizes the Remainder Parcel as a separate parcel, and designating the uses of the Remainder Parcel under the Alameda Landing Disposition and Development Agreement; and UVHEREAS, on May 21, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution No. X3455 adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration Negative Declaration} for the Project} and Findings Demonstrating that All Significant Impacts Can Be Mitigated to a Level of Insignificance. On February 13, 2006, the City prepared an addendum letter to the Negative Declaration, which concluded that the realignment of the Stargell AvenuelState Route 260 approximately 120 feet south of the location proposed in the 2005 design plans for the Project did not require subsequent environmental review; and WHEREAS, on December 5, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. X4047 certifying the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report SEiR far ~ } the Alameda Landing Mixed Use Development Project Alameda Landis . g Protect} and adopted Resolution No. 14048 Making Findings Re ardin . .. g g Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures, Making Findings Concernin g Resolution #2-d ~2} Joint CC CIC HAB4C 05-06-08 Alternatives, Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporking Program and Adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations in Accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act for the Alameda Landing Project. The SEIR identified the Project as a mitigation measure for the Alameda Landing Project and analyzed the impacts of this mitigation measure in conformance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. 0n May ~ 6, 2x01, the City Council adopted Resolution No. ~ 4D92 finding, among other things, that the Negative Declaration, Addendum, and SEIR adequately analyze the impacts of the Project; and UVHEREAS, the District's proposed gift of the right-of-way for the Project to the City would nat require revisions to the Negative Declaration, Addendum, and SEIR. The City has prepared an Addendum to the SEIR documenting that the CIC's acquisition of the Remainder Parcel created by the gift of the right-of way wilt not have any significant effects not previously addressed in the Negative Declaration, Addendum, and SEIR. There have been no substantial changes in the Project, substantial changes in the circumstances under which the Project would be undertaken, or significant new information that would cause new or substantially increased significant environmental effects, and there is no new information showing new mitigation measures or alternatives that would substantially reduce significant effects but that the Project proponent declines to adopt. NOVIJ, THEREFORE BE fT RESOLVED, that the Community Improvement Commission approves the Letter of Intent, in the form on file in the City Clerk's Office, by and among Palmtree Acquisition Corporation, the Peralta Community College District, and the Community Improvement Commission and authorizes staff to draft, execute, and implement any agreements consistent with the Letter of Intent. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the appropriate officer or agent of the Community Improvement Commission is authorized to accept the deed for the Remainder Parcel. ****~* I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda in a Special Jaint Meeting of the City Council and the Community Improvement Commission on the th day of , 2008, by the following vote to wit: AYES; NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: IN VvITNESS, vIIHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said Commission this day of , 2008. Lara vlleisiger, Secretary Community Improvement Commission Beverly Johnson, Chair Community improvement Commission CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Honorable Chair and Members of the Community improvement Commission From: Debra Kurita City ManagerlExecutive Director Date: May 6, 2008 Re: Response to Current Mortgage Crisis: Approve Refinance Mortgage Recovery Loans for Qualified Existing Homeowners BACKGROUND The City of Alameda, like most of its neighboring jurisdictions, has a number of programs designed to assist first time homebuyers. The current mortgage crisis in California has created a new need to assist existing homeowners who are at risk of foreclosure. The City has recently made information about a variety of foreclosure prevention and assistance resources available to the public. Further assistance could be provided to qualified homeowners through the introduction of Refiinance Mortgage Recovery RMR} loans. RMR loans would present an innovative new financing tool through a modification to the City's Down Payment Assistance DPA} program. If approved, qualified existing homeowners would be allowed to access DPA program funds to refinance out of volatile first mortgages and into new conforming first mortgages with affordable monthly payments. The DPA program currently allows qualified first time homebuyers to borrow up to $80,000 for down payment and closing costs and is available to very low, low, and moderate-income households who are purchasing a home for the first time or who have not owned a home in the past three years. RMR loan borrowers would have to meet the same income and credit eligibility criteria as existing DPA program participants, that the introduction of RMR loans would provide a groundbreaking new tool to homeowners at risk of default and foreclosure. The change is intended to help stabilize borrowers' housing costs, and help keep Alamedans in their homes. DISCUSSION A report published in September 200?, by U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer's office details huge increases in the number of foreclosure filings in California, and a ripple effect that will lead to loss of taxable income and government budget shortfalls. Fortunately, Alameda has not been as hard hit by the foreclosure crisis as many surrounding cclc~c~HABoc Agenda Item #3-A 05-06.08 Honorable Mayor and May 6, 2008 Members of the City Council Page 2 of 4 Honorable Chair and Members of the Community Improvement Commission communities. According to data published by DataQuick Information Systems, in 2007, Alameda had 89 notices of default and 27 foreclosures, with a foreclosure rate of 1.65 foreclosures per 1,000 homes. This was one of the lowest rates in Alameda Count , Y where the median foreclosure rate by zip code was 5.98 foreclosures per 1,000 homes, and the hardest hit zip codes had over 20 foreclosures per 1,000 homes. However, this was a significant increase over Alameda's 2006 rate of 0.24 foreclosures per 1,000 homes, and there are an increasing number of households facing foreclosure in Alameda in the first quarter of 2008. The City has recently made prevention counseling resources available to assist those Alamedans struggling with foreclosure. The proposed modification to the City's DPA program provides another opportunity to assist Alameda households in danger of losing their homes. The DPA program offers loans of up to $80,000 for very low and low-income households and up to $50,000 for moderate income households that meet program eligibility criteria. If the loan is repaid within the first five years of the 15-year term, no interest is charged and only the principal is due. Stacking in year six, the loan converts to a "Shared Appreciation" loan. At the end of 15 years, the borrower must repay the principal and a percentage of shared appreciation. once a home is purchased with the aid of a DPA loan, the owners must make the home their principal residence and may not rent the property to others. Under an expanded program to include RMR loans, the loan amounts, loan terms, residency obligation, and eligibility criteria would be the same as for the current DPA program; RMR loans would be made available to existing homeowners refinancing from a high interest, volatile or predatory first mortgages that significantly increase a borrower's risk of default. Borrowers would need to be able to obtain a conforming, fixed-rate first mortgage from a reputable lender, thereby having more affordable monthly payments. The Refinance Mortgage Recovery Program Guidelines Attachment 1}more fully describe the RMR loan program parameters. RMR loan eligibility criteria would include: • Borrowers must be income qualified for the program household incomes at ar below 120% of area median income}; • Borrowers must have credit worthiness for the program minimum credit scores as established by the California Housing Finance Agency}; • Borrowers must refinance a volatile or predatory first mortgage with a 30-year fixed rate conforming first mortgage from a reputable lender; • Borrowers must reasonably be expected to afford the new monthly housing costs; • The total amount of refinancing, including a new first mortgage and the City's RMR loan, may not exceed 100°/a of the appraised value of home; and Honorable Mayor and May 6, 2008 Members of the City Council Page 3 of 4 Honorable Chair and Members of the Community Improvement Commission • Borrowers will be responsible for all refinance costs incurred in excess of X00°/0 of the appraised value of the properky. If approved, RMR loans would be available to borrowers starting in fiscal year 2008-09. Next steps include establishing relationships with first lenders willing to participate in the program, modifying DPA [oan documents and application procedures, developing outreach and marketing materials, informing the public of program changes, and amending the City's contract with First Home, Inc. to include the launch and administration of RMR loans. The City selected First Home through a Request for Proposal process in 2003 and 2006, and has contracted with First Home, Inc. since 2003 to administer the DPA program, conduct First Time Homebuyer Seminars; and provide housing counseling and otherfirst time homebuyer services. BUDGET CONS[DERATIONIFINANCIALlMPACT Funding for the DPA program has been approved from a variety of dedicated housing funds in prior years' City and CIC budgets. The proposed allocation for FY 2008-09 totals $529, ~ 95, which is enough for approximately nine loans at current Eoan amounts. Additional funding becomes available as loans are repaid. Funding is also budgeted for First Time Homebuyer Workshops, housing counseling activities, and outreach and marketing of the DPA program. The RMR loans would be made from the same 2008-09 allocation of funds proposed for the DPA program; however, additional program administration funding of $5,000 to $~ 0,000 would be required to set up and administer the RMR loan program, which would be included as part of the FY 2008-09 budget. There is no impact on the General Fund. MUNICIPAL CODEIPOLICY DOCUMENT CRGSS REFERENCE This program is consistent with the Housing Element of the General Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Modifying the DPA program is nat considered a project pursuant to CEQA Section ~ 5378.b.4, which states that the definition of "project" does not include the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. RECOMMENDATION Approve Refinance Mortgage Recovery loans for qualified existing homeowners. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Honorable Chair and Members of the Community Improvement Commission Respectfully submitted, -~ ~~ ~~ ~ -~ Les ' A. Little Development Services Director By: Donne E. Soto Manager, Business Development Division By: Rachel Silver Development Manager, Housing DK~LALIDESIRS:rv May 6, 2008 Page 4 of 4 Attachment: 1. Refinance Mortgage Recovery Program Guidelines REFINANCE MORTGAGE RECOVERY PROGRAM GUIDELINES The Refinance Mortgage Recovery Program Program} expands the existing City of Alameda Downpayment Assistance DPA} Program to assist qualified existing homeowners trying to refinance out of volatile first mortgages and into new conforming first mortgages with affordable monthly payments. The Program offers access to silent second refinance loans similar to the current DPA Program loans. Like the DPA Program, varying levels of financial assistance will be provided based on the income level of the Borrower's household. Current loan limits are up to $80,000 for household below 80°/0 of area median income and up to $50,000 for households between 80°/o and 120°/~ of area median income. The Program may be subject to administrative review and revision periodically in response to updated information. Program services may be provided through nonprofit agencies, consultants hired by Development Services Department ~DSD}, andlor DSD staff as appropriate. The Program will include required counseling and education covering, but not limited to: • Credit & Budgeting • Understanding Implications of Real Estate Loan Financing Alternatives • Foreclosure Prevention ELIGIBLE BORROWERS To be eligible for the Program, the Borrower shall: • Fall within one of the specified income ranges based upon the City's income determination procedures; • ~ Document completion of required education or counseling provided by a City approved organization; • awn and occupy a home financed by a volatile andlor predatory first mortgage that significantly increases Borrower's risk of default, as defined and acknowledged by the City; • Qualify for a conforming, fixed-rate first mortgage from a reputable fender with terms that avoid predatory lending practices; • Demonstrate that the Refinance Mortgage Recovery loan will fill the "gap" needed to ensure that the new first mortgage results in monthly payments that are affordable to Borrower; • Meet all the same underwriting criteria as for the DPA Program, including credit and affordability criteria; • Be responsible for all refinance costs incurred in excess of 100°/~ of appraised value of the property; and • Agree to continue to occupy the home as principal residence throughout the loan term. ELIGIBLE PROPERTIES The City intends the Program to be as flexible as possible. To be eligible for the Program, the Borrower must own a property: • Located within the City of Alameda; • Single family residence, including condominium, townhouse or cooperative; and • Combined loan to value of all proposed encumbrances will not exceed 100°/0 of appraised value of the property. G:IDQWNPAYIRefinancelRRGUIDELI N08.doc CCICICIHABOC Attachment to Agenda item #3-A 05-06-08 ACCEPTABLE FIRST MORTGAGE TYPES Only conforming, fully amortizing, 30-year fixed rate loans with monthly payments demonstrated to be affordable to Borrowers will be acceptable as senior loans for the Program. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE DSD will provide aasistance an afirst-comelfirst-served basis, as funds are available within each income range. The same funds currently budgeted for DPA loans will also be available for Refinance Mortgage Recovery loans. Eligible uses for Program funds will be for "gap" financing to allow Borrowers to refinance out of a volatile first mortgage and into a new, affordable, conforming first mortgage. Refinance Mortgage Recovery loan terms, including maximum financial assistance, will be the same as current DPA loans, including that loans shall: • Be deferred and due as a balloon loan after a term of 15 years; • Accrue zero percent interest ~0°/0}; if repaid within the first 5 years of the loan, only the principal amount of the loan will be due ~i.e. Shared Appreciation will not apply}; • Have no prepayment penalty; • Be due upon sale, transferor Borrower's vacancy of the property prior to 15 years; and • Convert to Shared Appreciation beginning with the 6t" year of the term. When due, the City's portion of Shared Appreciation will be calculated on a pro rata basis equal to the ratio of the City's loan to the appraised value. For example, if a Borrower owns a home appraised at $400,000, and obtains a City Refinance Mortgage Recovery loan of $40,000, the City's basis is 10°/0 x$40,0001$400,000 =10°/~}. Assuming that the home is worth $480,000 when the loan is due to the City more than 5 years after obtaining the loan, the Borrower wi I owe City the principal x$40,000} plus 10°/0 of the Appreciation x$80,000 x 10% ~ $8,000} for a total of $4 ,000. A fee equal to the City's loan set-up cost will be charged and can be paid from the proceeds at close of escrow. Funded applications will result in an agreement ,between the City and Borrower, including a promissory note and recorded Deed of Trust. MONITORING The City will periodically monitor to ensure that the Borrower occupies the property as principal residence and issue notices regarding on-going loan balance and due date. Post-loan training andlor counseling may be required to promote home maintenance and loan repayment. FAIR HOUSING & EQUAL OPPORTUNITY It is the City's policy that all aspects of this program shall be conducted without regard to gender, marital status, disability, race, political affiliation, religious creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation, or age. The City of Alameda adheres to all state and federal Fair Housing and Civil Rights laws, including the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and encourages minorities, women, and people with disabilities to seek funding. EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY G:IDOWNPAY1RefinancelRRGUIDE~IN08.doc CITY of ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Honorable Chair and Members of the Community Improvement Commission From: Debra Ku rita City ManagerlExecutive Director Date: May 6, 2008 Re: Response to Current Mortgage Crisis: Adopt Loan Guidelines for the Downpayment Assistance Loan Program and Below Market Rate Housin Pro ram BACKGROUND The City of Alameda offers two programs to assist low and moderate income first time homebuyers. The City's Below Market Rate ~BMR} Housing Program provides homes for sale at below market prices to qualified households. The City's Downpayment Assistance DPA} program provides "silent second" loans to qualified first time homebuyers to help pay for their downpayment and non-recurring closing casts. Participants in both programs obtain a first mortgage from a lender of their choice. The proposed Loan Guidelines for the two programs are intended to ensure that the first mortgages obtained by program participants are compatible with the City's programs, and that both borrowers and the City are fully protected given California`s current mortgage crisis. Specifically, the City will only accept loans that can reasonably be expected to result in affordable costs to the borrower over the life of the loan and that will not result in the borrower owing more than the sales proceeds upon resale of the home. DISCUSSION The City Council and Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda ~CIC}adopted the DPA program in 2003. Program guidelines adopted at the time stated that the first mortgage must be obtained from a reputable lender with terms that avoid predatory lending practices. To date, the City has closed 17 DPA loans, All first mortgages obtained in conjunction with the 1l DPA loans have been fully documented, amortizing mortgages. However, given the influx of new, risky lending products in the past five years, it is prudent to more fully define the types of first mortgages that would be acceptable. The Downpayment Assistance Program Loan Guidelines Attachment 1} establish the types of loans acceptable to the program: cclcrciHABOc Agenda item #3-B D5-06.08 Honorable Mayor and May 5, 2008 Members of the City Council Page 2 of 3 Honorable Chair and Members of the Community Improvement Commission • Fully amortizing fixed rate loans with terms of any length. • Adjustable rate loans with the following characteristics: o Fully amortizing o No interest-only, negative amorkization, deferred interest, principal increases, or balloon payments o Fixed rate period of at (east five years o Adjustment no more than annually after fixed rate period The program also allows for additional downpayment assistance, including deferred interest loans offered through employer down payment assistance programs and agencies such the California Housing Finance Agency ~CaIHFA} or Federal Hame Loan Bank, provided that such additional subsidies are reviewed and approved by the City on a case by case basis. Homes purchased through the DPA program contain no resale restrictions and are purchased and sold at market rates. In 2004, the City Council adopted a Citywide lnclusionary Housing Grdinance, and the CIC adopted resolutions establishing the inclusionary housing requirement in redevelopment areas. BMR homes developed to meet a developer's inclusionary housing obligation are sold with 59-year resale restrictions, which limit appreciation and ensure ongoing affordability to future purchasers. Since 2004, over 50 BMR homes have been sold as part of the Bayport development. Loan guidelines were reviewed by the CIC specifically for the Bayport project. The Below Market Rate Housing Program Loan Guidelines Attachment 2} establish the types of loans acceptable for BMR homes citywide, including in redevelopment areas. For the Bayport project, the C1C allowed a very limited number of fully amortizing adjustable rate mortgages. In the future, staff recommends that only fixed rate loans be allowed as part of the BMR Housing Program. Eliminating adjustable rate mortgages will limit a borrower's choice and may exclude some households from the BMR program; however, an adjustable rate mortgage could subject the borrower to the risk of higher, unaffordable housing costs at some point in the future and encourages refinancing. Currently, most other jurisdictions will only allow fixed-rate loans in conjunction with their BMR housing programs. BUDGET C4NSIDERATIGNIFINANCIALlMPACT There is no cost associated with adoption or implementation of the Loan Guidelines. Honorable Mayor and May 6, X448 Members of the City Council Page 3 of 3 Honorable Chair and Members of the Community Improvement Commission MUNICIPAL CGDEIPGLICY DGCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE The DPA and BMR Housing programs are consisten# with the Housing Element of the General Plan. ENVIRaNMENTAL REVIEW Adoption of Loan Guidelines is not considered a project pursuant to CEQA Section 15378.b.4, which states that the definition of "project" does not include the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. RECOMMENDATIGN Adopt Loan Guidelines for the Downpayment Assistance Loan Program and Below Market Rate Housing Program. Respe ully submitted r-, r ~,.= ~~ f Leslie A. Little Development Services Director By: Dorene E. Soto Manager, Business Development Division _~ By: Rachel Silver Development Manager, Housing DKILALIDESIRS: Attachments; 1. Downpayment Assistance Program Loan Guidelines ~. Below Market Rate Housing Program Loan Guidelines DOWNPAYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM LOAN GUIDELINES The City of Alameda Downpayment Assistance DPA} program provides "silent second" loans to qualified first time homebuyers. Borrowers obtain a first mortgage from a lender of their choice, and may use the City's subordinate DPA loan to help pay for their downpayment and non-recurring closing costs. The City of Alameda will only agree to subordinate to loan types that are compatible with the DPA program, i.e. loans that can reasonably be expected to result in affordable costs to the borrower over the life of the loan and that will not result in the borrower owing more than the sales proceeds upon resale of the home. AVOIDANCE OF PREDATORY LENDING Borrowers must qualify for a first mortgage from a reputable lender with terms that avoid predatory lending practices. All loan applications must be fully documented. MORTGAGE FINANCING The City's Deed of Trust may initially be in as low as the fourth position behind a private mortgage and up to two forms of other assistance; however, the City wilt not agree to subordinate its interest upon subsequent refinancing. Combined loan to value of all proposed encumbrances cannot exceed 100% of purchase price. Only the following types of loans are accepted for use in the program: • Fully amortizing fixed rate loans with terms of any length. • Adjustable rate loans with the following characteristics: • Fully amortizing • No interest-only, negative amortization, deferred interest, principal increases, or balloon payments • Fixed rate period of at least five ~5}years • Adjustment no more than annually after fixed rate period ADDITIONAL DOWNPAYMENT ASSISTANCE Notwithstanding the above, borrowers might be allowed to take advantage of deferred interest downpayment assistance loan programs offered through employer down payment assistance programs and other agencies such the California Housing Finance Agency ~CaIHFA} or Federal Home Loan Bank, provided that such additional subsidies are reviewed and approved by the City on a case by case basis. REFINANCING The City of Alameda DPA loan is due and payable upon refinancing of the original purchase financing. FAIR HOUSING & EQUAL OPPORTUNITY It is the City's policy that all aspects of this program shall be conducted without regard to gender, marital status, disability, race, polr'tical affiliation, religious creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation, or age. The City of Alameda adheres to all state and federal Fair Housing and Civil Rights laws, including the Equal Credit opportunity Act and encourages minorities, women, and people with disabilities to seek funding. EQUAL HOUSING CCIC~CIHAB~C aPPORTUNITY Attachment "1 to C:IDOCUME~11cdd_userlLOCALS--11TempIGVllViewerlDPA Loan Guidelines.doc Agenda Item #~-B o~-os-os BELOW MARKET RATE HOUSING PROGRAM LOAN GUIDELINES The City of Alameda Below Market Rate BMR} Housing Program provides homes for sale at below market prices to qualified households. The BMR homes contain resale restrictions, which limit appreciation and ensure ongoing affordability to future purchasers. It is the intent of the City of Alameda to approve only those loan types compatible with the BMR Housing Program, i.e. loans that can reasonably be expected to result in affordable costs to the borrower over the life of the loan and that will not result in the borrower owing more than the sales proceeds upon resale of the home at an affordable price. ENCUMBRANCES 4N BMR UNITS The total amount of encumbrance on the property amount owed} shall never exceed 144°/° of the sales price paid by the purchaser at the time of purchase. MORTGAGE FINANCING Borrowers may place up to three liens on the property first, second and third mortgages}, as long as the combined totals do not exceed 144% of the sales price. Only the following types of loans are accepted for use in the program: • Fully amortizing fixed rate loans with terms of any length. DDINNPAYMENT ASSISTANCE The City of Alameda's Downpayment Assistance ~DPA} Program is available to eligible buyers of BMR units on a first comelfirst served basis. Downpayment Assistance loans may be used as "gap financing" for those who would not otherwise be able to purchase a home, All program requirements, including credit and affordability criteria, of the City's DPA Program will apply to BMR unit purchasers. REFINANCING The above requirements apply to all refinancing as well as original purchase financing. FAIR HGUSING & EQUAL 4PPaRTUNITY It is the City's policy that all aspects of this program shall be conducted without regard to gender, marital status, disability, race, political affiliation, religious creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation, or age. The City of Alameda adheres to all state and federal Fair Housing and Civil Rights laws, including the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and encourages minorities, women, and people with disabilities to seek funding. EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY CClCIC1HABOC C:IDOCUME~~Icdd_userlLQCALS~11TemplXPgrpwiselBMR Loan Guidelines.dac Attachment Z to Agenda Item #3wB 45-4G-D8 ~'roclamation 1~V~f ~R~~4S, Alameda is a communi in which 12,300 residents a e ~0 or older ~ g make their home; and tiV~f ~R~~4S, older adults in Alameda and throw hoot the U.S. area rowin g g g population with evolving needs; and lti~f~R~~S, older Americans are valuable members of socie who are rich with experience and deserving of respect; and u1~~R~~4S, the number of Baby Boomers reachin traditional retirement a e g g continues to increase, a f act that spotlights the need for increased attention to the needs of older adults; and 1~1~f ~R~~4S, older citizens of Coda and tomorrow romise to be amon the Y P g most active and engaged older adult populations in the nation's history; and 1N~f ~R~~4S, it is the responsibility of this and all U.S. communities to work together and prepare for changing older adult populations by modernizing systems of care and providing consumers with more control over their lives; and 1~1~f ~R~~S, overall quality of life can be read enhanced when su ortive g Y pp communities help their older citizens obtain: • Evidence-based approaches to making behavioral changes that can reduce risk of disease, disability, and injury. • The tools to make informed decisions about, and gain better access to, existing health and long-term care options. • More options to avoid placement in nursing homes and remain at home as long as possible. NOW, ~~R£~OR~ B~ IT R~SOLVf1~, that I, Beverly J. Johnson, Mayor of the City of Alameda, do hereby proclaim May as OLDER AMERICANS MONT~f in the City of Alameda and independence of older Ameri s an accomplishments. ;e everyone in the community to respect the be sensitYVe and supportive of their needs and every ~ . Mai City Council Agenda Item #3-A o5-os-o~ Z~ Printed an Recycled Paler ~~p~. ~~ .. 1 17 q yl Q ~~ ~ p~q ~S T~~~(#~ ~. W}E~R~,4S, ~1'roclamation decent, safe and affordable housing is one of the basic necessities of life and is of vital importance to the health and well being of Alameda's residents; and W~f ~R~~IS, many residents in Alameda are paying over 30% of their income for housing and are at significant risk of losing their housing and becoming homeless, while others live in overcrowded, substandard, and otherwise inadequate housing; and W~f~R~y4S, thousands of units of affordable housing have been built by non-profit developers and others in the City of Alameda and throughout Alameda County and the Bay Area, and these units are well managed, well maintained and have contributed significantly to neighborhoods throughout Alameda; and W~f ~R~~IS, East Bay Housing Organizations has organized events during Affordable Housing Week to acknowledge the need for, and contributions of, affordable housing. NOW, rif~R~~OR~, 8£ IT R~SOLVf1~, that I, Beverly J. Johnson, Mayor of the City of Alameda, do hereby proclaim May 8 -18, 2008 as +4~'fORT~+4'B(.~ }fOUSING W~'t~C in the City of Alameda and call upon all residents to learn about and honor the contributions of affordable housing by participating in activities held from May 8th through M~ City Council Agenda Item #3-B 05-06.08 i~~ Printed on Recycled Paper ~1'rocCamation w~~R~~4S, Congress and the President of the United States have desi noted Ma g Y 15 as Peace officers' Memorial Day, and the week in which May 15 falls as National Police week; and 1~V~f ~R~~4S, National Police week honors the service and sacrifice of those law enforcement officers killed in the line of du while rotectin our tY p g communities and safeguarding our democracy; and 1~1~{~R~~4S, the members of the Alameda Police De artment la an essential role p PY in safeguarding the rights and freedoms of the residents and business community of Alameda; and 1~U~f ~R~~4S, it is important that all Alamedans know and understand the duties responsibilities, hazards, and sacrifices of their law enforcement agency, and that members of the police department recognize their duty to serve the people by safeguarding life and ro er , b P p tY Y protecting them against violence and disorder, and by protecting the innocent against deception and the weak against oppression; and 1ti~~R~~4S, the men and women of the Alameda Police De artment unceasin 1 p gY provide a vital public service. NOW, T~f~R~~4R~ ~~ I7' R~SOLVf~, that I, Beverly j. Johnson, Mayor of the City of Alameda, call upon all residents of Alameda and upon all patriotic, civic, and educational organizations to observe the week of May 11-17, 2008 as nr arton~t~ Douce w~tx with appropriate ceremonies and observances in which all eo le ma 'oin in P P Y l commemorating law enforcement officers, past and present, who, by their faithful and loyal devotion to their responsibilities, have rendered a dedicated service to their communities and, in so doing, have established themselves an enviable and endurin g reputation f or preserving the rights and security of all people. ~~ ~~ ~R~f ~R R~S~L]~~, that I ca11 u on all residents of Alameda to observe P Thursday, May 15, 2a48, as Peace officers' Memorial Day in honor of those law enforcement officers who, through their courageous deeds, have made the ultimate sacrifice in service to their co uni or have become disabled in the erf ormance of p duty. City Council t ~~ Agenda Item #3-C Beverly j. o on Ma r ~ 45-06-08 Z~ Printed on Recycled Paper UNAPPROVED MINUTES OF THE REGULAR OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- -APRIL 1, 2008- -7:30 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:48 p.m. Councilmember Matarrese led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent: None. AGENDA CHANGES None. PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS X08- ~ Proclamation declaring March 30 through April 5, 2008 as Boys and Girls Club Week. Mayor Johnson read and presented the proclamation to Executive Director George Phillips; Board President Burney Matthews; Program Director Mark Morales; and 2008 Youth of the Year Damara Caldwell. Mr. Matthews stated this year is the Boys and Girls Club 58th Anniversary in Alameda; the new building will be at the former Woodstock School site; the new facility will be approximately 24,000 square feet; the $10 million capital funding campaign is half way complete; thanked Council and the community for all of the support. Mayor Johnson stated that she is confident the project will move forward quickly. X08- 7 Presentation by the School Board President on overview of Alameda Unified School District budget issues. Bill Schaff, School Board President, gave a brief overview. Luz Cazares, Chief Financial Officer, gave a Power Point presentation. Mr. Schaff requested that Council endorse the proposed parcel tax at the next Council meeting. Mayor Johnson stated that a lot of the budget problems are due to the State diverting local government money to other levels of Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 1 April 1, 20Q8 government; every year students and teachers go back to school wondering which programs will be cut; she hopes that the School District has strong support for the proposed measure in June. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether Council would be voting on the matter at the next Council meeting. The City Manager responded Council would be voting on the matter at the first Council meeting in May. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether the resolution would be to support and endorse Measure H, to which the City Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the May Council Meeting date was okay with Mr. Schaff, to which Mr. Schaff responded in the affirmative. SOS- } Presentation by the Secretary of the California Department of Food and Agriculture and the Director of the Light Brown Apple Moth Program on the Apple Moth. A.G. Kawamura, Secretary of the California Department of Food and Agriculture, gave a brief presentation. Dr. Bob Dowell, Director of the Light Brown Apple Moth Program submitted handout}, gave a Power Point presentation. opponents Not in favor of aerial spraying to eradicate the Light Brown Apple Moth}: Carolina Rogers, Alameda; Stuart Dodgshon, Alameda; Chloe Ashley, Alameda; T'Hud Weber, Alameda, submitted petition}; Simi Sikka, Fremont; Stanley Schiffman, Alameda; Jane Kelley, Berkeley; Tom Kelley, Berkeley; Bernard Clark, Alameda; Helen Kozoriz, stopthespray.org; Michael John Torrey, Alameda; Mary Jane Pryor, Alameda; Victoria Ashley, Alameda; Jim Hoffman, Alameda; Rebecca Hall-Crosby, Alameda; Irma Marin-Nolan, Alameda; Cathy Kordetzky; Daria Schwarzschild, Alameda; Maria Morales, El Sobrante; Frank Egger; Constance Barker, Environmental Health Network of California; Lynn Elliott-Harding, Oakland. Council requested that the matter be placed on a future Council agenda for action. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember deHaan moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Vice Mayor Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous Regular Meeting Alameda City Council April 1, 20D8 voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.] ~*08- } Minutes of the Special Joint City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission Meeting of March 5, 2008; the Special City Council Meeting held on March 10, 2008; the Special Joint City Council and Public Utilities Board; Special Joint City Council and Community Improvement Commission; and Regular City Council Meetings held on March 18, 2008. Approved. *08- } Ratified bills in the amount of $1, 631, 590.32. ~*08- } Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding Section 3--53 Claims} to Division VIII Refunds and Corrections} to Chapter III Finance and Taxation} to Establish Uniform Requirements and Procedures Applicable to the Presentation and Processing of Claims for Money or Damages with the City of Alameda That Are Not Currently Covered by State Law or Other Provisions of the Alameda Municipal Code. Introduced. ~*08- } Ordinance No. 2978, "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Repealing Section 5-30 Filming Activities} in Its Entirety, and Replacing It with A Successor Section to Article II Permits} of Chapter V Licenses and Permits} Making Changes to the Procedures, Regulations and Related Fee Provisions for Filming Activities Within the City of Alameda." Finally passed. ~*DS- } Ordinance No. 2979, "Amending Various Sections of the Alameda Municipal Code Contained in Article I, Zoning Districts and Regulations}, Chapter XXX, Development Regulations}, Pertaining to Retail and Commercial Uses." Finally passed. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS X08- } Resolution No. 14191, "Appointing Cecilia Cervantes as a Member of the Public Art Commission." Adopted; and X48- A} Resolution No. 14192, "Appointing Andrea M. Leal as a Member of the Public Art Commission." Adopted. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions. Vice Mayor Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. The City Clerk administered the Oath and presented a certificate to Ms. Leal. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 3 April 1, 2005 X08- } Recommendation to discuss and finalize the City Council's priorities for Fiscal Year 2007-2008. Jan Perkins, Management Partners, gave a Power Point presentation and facilitated discussion. Bill Smith, Alameda, discussed finances. *~~ X07-019} Vice Mayor Tam moved approval of continuing the meeting past midnight. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. *~* Council provided direction regarding the priorities. The Management Partners report on the workshop is hereto attached and made part of the minutes by reference. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA X08- } Wu Lu, Human Rights Torch Relay; Michelle Midliff, Human Rights Torch Relay; and Connie Wang, Falun Gong, submitted handout? discussed the Human Rights Torch Relay and human right violations in China. X08- } Bill Smith, Alameda, discussed economics. COUNCIL REFERRALS None. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS X08- } Consideration of Mayor's nominations for appointment to the Recreation and Park Commission. Mayor Johnson nominated Lola W. Brown and Gina M. Mariam . X08- } Mayor Johnson stated that the City received the California Redevelopment Association award for the Bridgeside redevelopment project. X08- } Councilmember deHaan congratulated Mayor Johnson on appointment to the Water Emergency Transportation Authority; stated Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 4 April 1, 200$ the appointment is good for Alameda. ADJQURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 12:05 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act . Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 5 April 1, 2008 CITY OF ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA SUMMARY OF CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF PRIORITIES HELD ON APRIL 1, 2008 DRAFT April 2008 MANAGEMENT PARTNERS N C O R P p k g T F D City of Alameda Summary of Priority Setting Workshop -April 1, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS APRIL 1, 2008 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: PRIORITY SETTING,.,....1 PRIORITY SETTING PROCESS OUTCOMES ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ~ CITY PURPOSE STATEMENT ... ,. ........... ......... ., ~ GUIDING PRINCIPLE AND CITYWIDE POLICY OBJECTIVES ................... ~ HIGHEST CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES .............................................~.. 2 City of Alameda Summary of Priority Setting Discussion --April 1, 2008 APRIL 1, 2008 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: PRIORITY SETTING On April 1, 2008, the City Council 10:30 - 12:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers to discuss policy objectives and top priorities. Jan Perkins from Management Partners facilitated the discussion. The discussion was held in follow up to two workshops of the Council and Executive Management Team held in the fall. One workshop was held on September 11, 2007 and the second was held on November 13, 2001. The priority setting process began with staff creating work plans tv articulate the special projects of City departments and preparing an environmental scan of issues affecting the City. The Council identified policy objectives at the workshops and draft project priorities. At the April 1, 20o8 meeting, the policy objectives were finalized and the Council's top 10 project priorities identified. Priority Setting Process Gutcomes o Created a City of Alameda purpose statement o Established an overarching principle and a set of eight Citywide policy objectives o Identified the Council's highest project priorities o Created the foundation for staff reporting on priority projects o Established a Council referrals procedure for considering new activities or projects o Established an understanding of issues facing the City ~thraugh an environmental scan and discussion of strengths, limitations, opportunities and threats facing the City o Established an understanding of departmental work plans underway City Purpose Statement The following statement describes the overall purpose of the City of Alameda: The City of Alameda focuses its resources on providing services that enhance the quality of life for its residents and promote the prosperity of its business community. Guiding Principle and Citywide Policy ob'ectives J At the April 1, 2008 meeting, the Council discussed its long-term policy objectives. In addition, an overarching guiding principle was created for considering how the policy objectives will be implemented, Policy objectives are broad statements of how the City will allocate resources and what will be accomplished over the long term. They serve as the basis for departmental work plans and communicate the Council's long-term interests to the community. The frst seven policy Management Partners, Inc. ~ Ci#y of Alameda Summary of Priority Setting Discussion --April ~, 2008 objectives were created at the two workshops held in the fall and remained the same. The eighth was modified and is presented below. Guiding Principle: The Council shall consider the short and long-term casts and impacts as the Citywide Policy Objectives are implemented through projects, programs, services, or enhancements. This is to ensure that the City government is financially healthy and stable for the long term, and to provide clarity about the financial consequences of City actions. Cit ide Polic ob'ectives o Continue progress in the redevelopment of the former naval property. o Identify funding and develop master plans #or providing and maintaining infrastructure improvements. o Take measures to improve and promote the community's and city government's economic health. o Develop or update and implement land use, transportationltraffic, parking and also environmental sustainability planning strategies, tools, and documents. o Provide quality youth and senior programs, services, and facilities. o Recruit, retain, and develop a skilled and responsive workforce. o Continuously improve internal operations, systems, and management practices in order tv provide high-quality customer service o Deliver high-quality services that promote the health, safety and well-being of the community. Highest City Council Priorities The City has a comprehensive work plan with numerous projects and services well underway or in the planning process. All of them are moving forward, based on resources previously allocated, or will proceed once resources are allocated. The purpose of the priority setting discussion with, the Council on April ~ was to ascertain the Council's highest priorities. Priorities are inherently choices between competing needs. Many things are important for the City, but not everything can be done. Priorities serve as the basis for determining how resources ~e.g., staff effort, funding} will be allocated. Additionally, when priorities are clear, staff and Council understand when and how further adjustments in staff effort are made when required. After discussion, the Council's consensus was that the following are its top priorities ~nvt listed in any rank order}: • Address telecom financial issue-implement planslrecommendations • Work with the Housing Commission to develop an acquisition and development plan for expanding affordable housing opportunities using the remaining Measure A Guyton exemption • Former Navy base redevelopment-secure conveyance of Alameda Point from Navy and negotiate development entitlements with Suncal • Prepare and implement a comprehensive operation review of Golf Course operations Management Partners, Inc. 2 City of Alameda Summary of Priority Setting Discussion -April 1, 2DD8 • Monitor and review the City's budget and explore options for generating revenues or broadening the tax base to support City operations and infrastructure improvements. • Involve community stakeholders in developing a long term economic sustainabilit strate for the Cit of Alameda t Y gY Y hat includes outreach to residents and businesses and includes an assessment of revenues and costs including long term obligations identified through GASB 45~ • Transportation Element update General Plank - transportationltraffic plannin ; trans ortation master Ian ede g p p , p str~an plan; Safe Routes to Schools -implement innovative approach to encourage walklbikelcarpool to school • Renovate Godfrey Field, Rittfer Field, Lincoln Park Field; replace Krusi Park recreation building • Develop a long range plan for library service includes Measure 4 funds allocation far branch improvements; provide facility and service improvements to both Bay Farm Island and vvest End Libraries • Conduct labor agreement negotiations with public safety bargaining units Management Partners, Inc. 3 UNAPPROVED MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- -APRIL 15, 2005- -6:30 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:40 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent: None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: ~O8- ~ Conference with Labor Negotiators; Agency Negotiators: Craig Jary and Human Resources Director; Employee Organizations: All Public Safety Bargaining Units. SOS- ~ Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation; Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision ~b7 of Section 54956.9; Number of cases: One. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that regarding Labor, Council received a briefing on the status of negotiations; regarding Legal, the item was not heard. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lora Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council Ap~~l ~~, 2aa~ UNAPPROVED MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- ~-APRIL 15, 2008- -7:30 P,M. Mayor Johnson convened the Regular City Council Meeting at 8:16 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent: None. AGENDA CHANGES X08- } Mayor Johnson addressed the Resolutions of Appointment [paragraph nos. 08- and 08- A] prior to the Consent Calendar. PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS (08-- } Proclamation declaring April through June 2008 as Historic Preservation Season. Mayor Johnson presented the proclamation to the Planning and Building Director to pass onto the Historical Advisory Board Chair. X08- } Proclamation declaring April 19, 2008 as Earth Day. Mayor Johnson presented the proclamation to Bryan Gower, Dave Nederhood and Faith Rusca, Crosstown Cafe. Mayor Johnson acknowledged Pam Evans with the Alameda County Green Business Program. Mr. Gower thanked Council for the proclamation; stated Ms. Evans helped Crosstown Cafe become a certified Alameda County Green Business. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS X08- } Resolution No. 14193, "Appointing Lola w. Brown as a Member of the Recreation and Park Commission"; and X08- A} Resolution No. 14194, "Appointing Gina M. Mariam as a Member of the Recreation and Park Commission," Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions. Councilmember Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Regular Meeting 1 Alameda City Council April. 15, 208 The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented Ms. Brown and Ms. Mariam with Certificates of Appointment. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Johnson announced that the Minutes [paragraph no. 08-~ ]and the Resolution Opposing Aerial Spray Program [paragraph no. O8- ] were removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Vice Mayor Tam moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.] (08- } Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held on April 1, 2005. Councilmember Gilmore requested that the minutes be continued until the report from the consultant is available. (*08- } Ratified bills in the amount of $3,557,709.01. (*08- } Recommendation to accept and authorize recordation of Notices of Completion for Bayport Fleet Industrial Supply Center/East Housing Residential Phase 2 Public Backbone Infrastructure Haile Sewer Pump Lift Station and Sewer Pump Lift Station No. 6 improvements. Accepted. (*OS- } Recommendation to adopt Plans and Specifications and authorize Call for Bids for Cyclic Sewer Replacement, Phase 5, No. P.W. 10-06-22. Accepted. (*OS- } Recommendation to find the project categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, adopt Plans and Specifications, and authorize Call for Bids for Fernside Boulevard Bike Path and Street Improvements, San Jose Avenue to North of Otis Drive, No. P.W. 03-08-10. Accepted. (*08- } Recommendation to award Contract in the amount of $241,820, including contingencies, to RMC water and Environment for hydraulic model analysis of Alameda Sanitary Sewer Collection System. Accepted. (*08-~ } Resolution No. 14195, "Authorizing the City Manager to Submit a Request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of Fiscal Year 2008-2009 Transportation Development Regular Meeting 2 Alameda City Council April 15, 2008 Act, Article 3 Funding, in the Amount of $40, 000 to Update of City's Bicycle Master Plan and Execute All Necessary Documents to Implement the Project." Adopted. ~*08- 7 Resolution No. 14196, "Authorizing the City Manager to Submit an Application for Measure B Paratransit Funding for Fiscal Year 2008-2009 and to Execute All Necessary Documents to Implement the Project." Adopted. (08- } Resolution No. 14197, "Apposing the California Department of Food and Agriculture Aerial Spray Program to Eradicate the Light Brown Apple Moth and Supporting Legislation to Place Restrictions on the Program." Adopted. Proponents ~In favor of Resolution}: Sally Cahill; Frank Egger, North Coast Rivers Alliance submitted letter}; Michael John Torrey, Alameda; and T'Hud Weber, Alameda. Mayor Johnson inquired whether staff looked into Assemblymember Swanson's proposal. The Deputy City Manager responded the proposed resolution includes four Assembly Bills and two Resolutions; AB 2892 is pending before the Assembly Agriculture Committee; AB 2760 was considered by the Assembly Natural Resources Committee yesterday; other Assembly Bills will go before the Assembly tomorrow; San Francisco Board of Supervisors passed a resolution today opposing the spray; AB 2892 discusses bringing the matter to the vote of the people. Mayor Johnson stated that she likes the idea of a moratorium. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he would like to remove the last sentence after LBAM of the NOW, THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED; the formulation was not locked down; the Secretary of California Department of Food and Agriculture stated that workers would not be allowed in fields if this type of sraying occured; data was not gathered to establish safety; data was not presented on whether aerial spraying is effective in an urban area. Councilmember Gilmore stated the Secretary advised that the Apple Moth problem was discovered in March, 2007; by October 2007, spraying started. Councilmember deHaan stated spraying was the Secretary's preferred method; other methods are available; all options should be considered before spraying starts. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the Resolution with the Regular Meeting 3 Alameda City Council April 15, 2008 following conditions: 1}strike language in the last clause that reads ... "until the State has studied the public health implications and determined that there are no health or environments risks"; and 2} include AB 2892 in the list of bills. Councilmember Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -5. Councilmember Gilmore stated that Alameda has joined a growing list of cities opposing the spray; the State has decided to spray and can override any City resolution. Councilmember Matarrese requested that the City Attorney keep abreast of other cities that have passed similar resolutions to join any legal action. ~*08- } Ordinance No. 298D, "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding Section 3-53 Claims} to Division VIII Refunds and Corrections} to Chapter III Finance and Taxation} to Establish Uniform Requirements and Procedures Applicable to the Presentation and Processing of Claims for Money or Damages with the City of Alameda That Are Not Currently Covered by State Law or Other Provisions of the Alameda Municipal Code." Finally passed. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (08- } Public Hearing to consider a recommendation to adopt the Fiscal Year 2008-2009 Community Development Block Grant ~CDBG) Action Plan and authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute related documents, agreements, and modifications. The Community Development Program Manager gave a Power Point presentation. Mayor Johnson inquired how much money would be going to the Blight Buster program, to which the Community Development Program Manager responded $180,000. Mayor Johnson inquired whether other funding sources are available for said program since Alameda Point is on federal property. The Community Development Program Manager responded the City is passing demolition costs on through the Development Agreement. The Development Services Director stated demolition costs would be passed on to the developer once the former Base is developed. Mayor Johnson inquired whether funds would be advanced and then Regular Meeting 4 Alameda City Council April 15, 2008 go back into the CDBG funding, to which the Development Services Director responded i~ the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan stated the Action Plan has three new programs; the Alameda Point Collaborative ~APC~self-employment initiative funding is $165,000 and covers a third of the overall funding; inquired whether past services have continued support. The Community Development Program Manager responded funding depends on circumstances; stated capital projects have one-time funding. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the APC would be an ongoing program. The Community Development Program Manager responded APC funding is flexible; stated Housing and Urban Development THUD} offers a special designation which allows for greater flexibility. Councilmember deHaan stated APC funding is $125,000; inquired whether other programs would not be able to continue. The Community Development Program Manager responded the intention is to have the APC program be a start-up; stated milestones would need to be reached. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether programs that are not recommended for funding could be revisited. The Community Development Program Manager responded that public service programs would not be revisited at this time; stated any additional funding would go to direct services that are already funded. Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the hearing. Proponents ~In favor of staff recommendation}: Cynthia Wasko, Social Service Human Relations Board ~SSHRB}; Michael John Torrey, Alameda; Cherri Allison, Family Violence Law Center; Liz Varela, Building Futures with Women and Children; Sue Sigler, Alameda Point Collaborative; Franklin Hysten, Alternatives in Action; Sue Retherford, Bananas; Jim Franz, Red Cross; and Paul Russell, Alameda Food Bank. There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the hearing. Mayor Johnson inquired whether there is a criteria for allocating funds, to which Ms, Wasko responded in the affirmative. Regular Meeting 5 Alameda City Council April 15, 2DD8 Mayor Johnson inquired whether long time recipients are encouraged to seek other funding sources. Ms. wasko responded the issue has not been a problem in the past; stated the competition becomes more rigorous as funding becomes more difficult. Mayor Johnson stated that applicants should be advised to strengthen applications as soon as possible if it appears that funding will decrease. Ms. wasko stated funding is for a two-year cycle; hopefully, the economy will improve. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the funding cycle is on an annual basis; stated an adjustment might be needed if funding is decreased. The Community Development Program Manager responded funding is on a two-year cycle and is contingent on satisfactory Contract performance. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether federal funding is annual, to which the Community Development Program Manager responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson inquired whether applicants are aware that the funding is received from the federal government on an annual basis and could be lower next year, to which the Community Development Program Manager responded in the affirmative. Vice Mayor Tam stated that the SSHRB and staff have done a terrific job; non-profits make Alameda's community compassionate; she is glad that the SSHRB and staff have come up with fair and balanced recommendations. Vice Mayor Tam moved approval of the staff recommendation. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ~D8- } Public Hearing to consider an Appeal of the Planning Board's approval of a Final Development Plan, Major Design Review, Planned Development Amendment for reduced parking, and a tentative map for the construction of ten new office buildings located at 2804 Harbor Bay Parkway within the Harbor Bay Business Park in the Commercial Manufacturing and Planned Development Zoning District Regular Meeting 6 Alameda City Council April l5, 2008 ~C-M-PD}; X08- A} Resolution No. 14198, "Upholding the Planning Board Approval of Final Development Plan, Mayor Design Review and Planned Development Amendment File No. PLN 07-0061} at 2800 Harbor Bay Parkway." Adopted, and; X08- B} Resolution No. 14199, "Approving Tentative Map 9689 File No. PLN 07-0061} for the Subdivision of a 29.31 Acre Parcel into 14 Parcels fort he Development of 10 Office Buildings, Associated Parking, Landscaping and Other Improvements." Adopted. The Planning Services Manager gave a Pawer Point presentation and submitted a handout outlining three additional conditions of approval. Councilmember deHaan stated that 5,500 square feet is a good size for a restaurant and is almost twice the size of Applebee's. The Planning Services Manager stated that staff wants to provide the neighborhood with the ability to review potential restaurants; Council could consider a lower threshold. vice Mayor Tam stated the staff report notes that the existing Business Park has an overage in parking; she sees the possibility of a spill over from the ferry parking lot into the proposed development; inquired whether shared parking would be possible. The Planning Services Manager responded the Ferry Terminal parking lot capacity is 225 cars and is full on some days. Councilmember deHaan stated the Ferry capacity is at 50o and only runs during commute hours. The Planning Services Manager stated the City is not prepared to buy the property to expand the Ferry Terminal parking lot; most ferry operators want better shuttle service, which would increase ridership. Councilmember deHaan stated satellite parking and shuttle services are important. The Applicant gave a Power Point presentation. Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the hearing. Proponents ~In favor of Appeal}: Tom Lynch, Alameda; Reyla Graber, Appellant; Harvey Wilson, Residents for Responsible Development Regular Meeting 7 Alameda City Council April 15, 2aos RRD}; Patricia Gannon, RRD submitted letters}; Gerry Long, RRD; May Johnston, Alameda; Corrine Lambden, RRD submitted comments}; Michael Robles Wong, Community of Harbor Bay Isle Owners Association; Melissa Plaisance, Headlands Homeowners Association; Richard Rutter, Alameda; Annie Rutter, Alameda; Chad Otten, Appellant submitted petition}; Brenda Harrigan, Alameda; Anda Bockis, Alameda; Ewart Wetherill, Alameda; Ignacio Goyret, Alameda; Nancy Ross, Alameda; and Anna Faria-Poynter, Alameda. Opponents Not in favor of Appeal}: Art Autorino, Alameda; Mel Grant, SFX Preferred Resorts; Eric Ibsen, Alameda; John McManus, Cushman and Wakefield; Scott Newman, SRM Associates; Sandy Sidorsky, Alameda; Adam Howard, Bank of Alameda; Neil Sekhri, Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher LLP, Applicant's Attorney; Gary Fanger, Alameda; Andy Tung, Gracepoint Fellowship Church; Edward Kang, Gracepoint Fellowship Church; and Clement Chu, Cantamar Homeowners Association. Neutral: Michael John Torrey, Alameda. (08- } Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of continuing the meeting past midnight. Vice Mayor Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ** There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the hearing. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether fast foot restaurants can be prohibited. The Planning Services Manager responded the City does not have a definition of fast food restaurants. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether a definition could be established in order to prohibit fast food restaurants. The Planning Services Manager responded a definition could be established. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he is concerned that fast food restaurants create trash and drive-through traffic; a pre- construction biology survey is one of the additional conditions of approval provided tonight; inquired whether the Applicant is willing to do the necessary regulation activity if the survey finds Regular Meeting S Alameda City Council April 15, 20d$ it necessary. The Planning Services Manager responded in the affirmative; stated the proposed condition is in conformance with the California Department of Fish and Game guidelines and criteria. Councilmember Matarrese stated the site renderings do not show any trees between the walking and gravel paths and water; currently, trees are between the path and the water; inquired whether the trees would be removed. The Applicant responded in the negative; stated the public area is maintained by the Business Park; the only Shoreline Park changes would be path repaving and adding benches. Councilmember Matarrese requested that the Police Department look into speeding and running stop signs in the area; providing shuttle service to the Ferry Terminal through the neighborhoods should be explored; requested that the issue be addressed at the next AC Transit liaison committee meeting. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the access road would be closed. The Applicant responded in the negative; stated the road is required to remain open; the access road would be built to a minimum twenty-five foot width. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether any Home Owner Associations signed agreements. The Applicant responded dialogue was initiated with Home Owner Association managers in October; Bay Colony and Freeport Board representatives informed him that notices were placed in respective newsletters to advise people about the meetings; tonight's issues were not brought up at the meetings. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the Home Owner Associations signed off on approving the conditions with caveats. The Applicant responded said Associations advised that the conditions were acceptable through email acknowledgements. Councilmember deHaan stated the property is very unique and the access road is not conducive to traffic flow; the Ferry is very important; parking is approximately 90o full at the Ferry Terminal; the Ferry capacity is only at 50a; shuttle service is very important; he would have liked to have the Transportation Commission's input; things have changed from when entitlements were Regular Meeting 9 Alameda City Council April 15, 2008 established twenty years ago; traffic impacts should be reviewed; segments have been reviewed, but not the whole picture; he is very concerned with the Ferry service, which is only used during commute hours; inquired whether there is a willingness to look at another design; stated the 300 foot notification requirement is an internal problem; said notification needs to be changed for large projects; the 100 foot height limit needs to be taken off the books; further discussion is needed on the matter. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the traffic study was based on the 5 million square foot build-out. The Planning Services Manager responded two studies were performed; stated the original study addressed the 5.2 million square foot build-out; last month, an additional study was performed to confirm that the project's trip generation would not generate any significant impacts that were not anticipated in the original traffic study. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the 1995 study was related to the airport, to which the Planning Services Manager responded said study was related to airport expansion. Councilmember Matarrese stated that traffic management needs to be reviewed for the existing roads; some of the main concerns have been captured with the three additional conditions of approval; requested that fast food restaurant language be added; stated that due process has been followed; he understood that all Harbor Bay Home Cwner Associations were supposed to be notified; inquired whether said notification is required. The Planning Services Manager responded in the negative; stated all Home owner Association Presidents will receive notification for any future Harbor Bay projects. Vice Mayor Tam stated assertions have been made regarding the staleness of the 1989 Environmental Impact Report; SRM's attorneys state that "the City no longer has the discretion to take a second pass at the question of whether the project should be built due to potential impacts to wildlife, traffic generation, noise, site design and layout or ay other impacts unrelated to the narrow question of the Esplanade project' s consistency with the Planned Development Design Guidelines and conditions of approval"; efforts are being made to review all past approvals, not redesign the project from scratch. The City Attorney stated a major design review is one of the things before Council tonight; Council still has some discretion on how Regular Meeting 1 O Alameda City Council April 15, 2008 the buildings look, i.e., color and material composition; the chapter is closed on density and building height issues. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether building setbacks are already determined by the Agreement, to which the City Attorney responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson inquired whether Council has the ability to change the 10Q-foot building height limit, to which The Planning Services Manager responded in the negative. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the building setbacks could be moved back, to which the Planning Services Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Gilmore stated the project is subject to a past Development Agreement; the City wants to be known as an entity that keeps its word, just as the City would hold a developer to the letter of an agreement; bringing jobs and tax revenue to the City is good; both sides will not be completely happy because of competing interests such as setbacks, access road, and building materials; the Ferry Terminal parking is an issue whether or not the development is built; she is not sure why the Ferry Terminal parking problem should be off-loaded on the developer. Councilmember Matarrese suggested having a second directive to review restriping the Ferry Terminal parking lot; stated Bay Farm Island was designed as a fully integrated community when developed into Harbor Bay; the area was designed with bike paths and with the intention to have the area built all the way as business; the benefits provide employment of a low intensity around the edge of the Business Park; the parcel is buffered by a lagoon and trees; the houses to the west are buffered by the Ferry Terminal; the design is compatible with the other buildings in the Business Park; the closest building has the same motif; the objective is to produce an environmentally friendly construction approach that reduces carbon footprint and benefits the City; the City also benefits from diversifying the tax base; the benefits outweigh the concerns; the area has been enjoyed as open space but has always been posted as private property, and zoned as commercial property. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of upholding the Planning Board's decision [adoption of resolutions] with the following changes: 1} addition of the three conditions provided by staff regarding parking, restaurant use and biology; 2} addition of a condition to require that the transportation demand plan include how to maximize use of Harbor Bay and Ron Cowan Parkways; and 3} addition of a condition that the restaurant use prohibits a drive Regular Meeting ~ 1 Alameda City Council April 15, 2aas thru and includes a definition of fast food. Mayor Johnson stated direction can be given to staff to come up with a fast food restaurant definition. Cauncilmember Matarrese stated that he wants to have a definition that has been used someplace else and that could be used for the purpose of the proposed development. Mayor Johnson stated that San Francisco's definition should be used if said definition meets the City's intention. Vice Mayor Tam stated that she wants to make sure that the definition is consistent with part of the motion; inquired whether a fast food restaurant would be defined as a fast food chain restaurant that has more than fifteen other locations. The Planning Services Manager responded in the negative; stated the San Francisco definition would be utilized. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether restaurant or cafe hours of operation would stay, to which Cauncilmember Matarrese responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Gilmore stated hours of operation trigger a Use Permit. Councilmember Matarrese stated hours of operation trigger a Use Permit which goes through a normal public hearing process; a prohibited fast food chain would not trigger a Use Permit. The Applicant stated that Peet's Coffee could be deemed a fast food restaurant; inquired how the negotiating process would work if there are issues. Mayor Johnson stated the intent is to direct staff to add the additional language and approve the project going forward. The Planning Services Manager stated the Applicant could always come back to Council and request modification of the conditions. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether Council could urge SRM to work with the Home owner Associations to put heads and resources together to extend the shuttle throughout the residences; stated Council could require the developer to talk with said associations but not put the entire bill on the developer. Councilmember deHaan stated the restaurant location is concerning; Regular Meeting 1 2 Alameda City Council April 15, 2008 hopes are to have Ferry riders stop for a cup of coffee; Ferry riders barely make it in time to board; restaurants demand more parking; he would like to re-think having a restaurant near the Ferry Terminal. The Applicant stated attracting restaurants to the Business Park has been a real challenge; current cafes operate between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. and are struggling; the Ferry Terminal location represents a better opportunity to get traffic and be successful. Councilmember Gilmore stated Condition #30 addresses the Transportation System Management and existing shuttle service for the Business Park; inquired whether additional language could be added to reach out to the Harbor Bay Home Owner Associations in an attempt to pull resources to get a shuttle system working around the residences. The Applicant stated that the shuttle service is operated and paid for by Business Park owners; he does not have the ability to obligate expanding the shuttle service to residents; he would be happy to discuss the idea with residents in his role as President of the Business Park. Councilmember Gilmore stated that she is not requesting the Applicant to obligate the Business Park to provide shuttle service; she is obligating the Applicant to have a dialogue. Mayor Johnson stated that Councilmember Matarrese requested that the matter to brought to the Interagency Liaison Committee ~ILC~. Councilmember Matarrese stated that the Business Park is responsible for shuttle service as a mitigation of the traffic created; the residential side has no such vehicle; the matter is a City issue; the City should coordinate an effort that brings the Harbor Bay community and Business Park together to discuss shuttle service; language should be crafted to prohibit fast food restaurants such as McDonalds, Burger King, etc. Councilmember deHaan stated that the project blessing is that employees could live in the area. Councilmember Matarrese stated residents could either take the shuttle or bicycles. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the ferry terminal has bike parking, to which the Applicant responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson seconded the motion. Regular Meeting 1 3 Alameda City Council April 15, 2DD8 Under discussion, Councilmember deHaan stated the restaurant is his only concern. The Planning Services Manager stated a Conditional Use Permit would provide the ability to review the issue on a case-by-case basis. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the shuttle service issue is off the table and will be handled by the City. Mayor Johnson responded the City will work with Harbor Bay Home Owner Associations. Councilmember deHaan stated that the 100-foot height limit needs to be addressed. Mayor Johnson stated that the 100-foot height limit is a Disposition and Development Agreement issue. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam and Mayor Johnson - 4. Abstentions: Councilmember deHaan - 1. Councilmember deHaan stated that he hopes that the City will be able to review the architectural work to see if some of the buildings can be staggered; he thinks that there is room for further review. X08- } Recommendation to review Charter Amendments for the November 2008 Ballot. Continued. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COUNCIL REFERRALS None. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS X08- } Mayor Johnson announced that she attended the Mayor's Conference in January. X08- } Councilmember Matarrese stated AC Transit provided a report on the 63 line at the most recent Interagency Liaison Committee ~ILC} meeting; the changes have been made at the Encinal and Monarch end of the route; AC Transit will have to wait to Regular Meeting 1 4 Alameda City Council April 15, 2QQ$ gather data in the fall because school will be out and data would be skewed; data to analyze the re-routing decision will not be available until November or December. (08- ) Vice Mayor Tam stated that she has an ILC question related to Item 5-C; inquired whether AC Transit is looking at increasing ridership at Harbor Bay; stated having a shuttle system when AC Transit already goes to the ferry terminal seems duplicative. Councilmember Matarrese stated the City needs to talk to AC Transit about the matter; the Emery-Go-Round directly conflicted with Line 6; there was a tug-of-war that ended with AC Transit withdrawing some service from Emeryville. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether Councilmember Matarrese plans to bring up the issue at an ILC meeting, to which Councilmember Matarrese responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan stated the shuttle is already in the commercial area, which is to the City's benefit. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 1:04 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act . Regular Meeting 1 5 Alameda City Council April 15, 2008 May 1, 2008 Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers; This is to certify that the claims listed on the check register and shown below have been approved by the proper officials and, in my opinion, represent fair and just charges against the City in accordance with their respective amounts as indicated thereon. Check Numbers Amount 208763.209582 $3,351,517.82 EFT 522 $125, 942.41 EFT 523 $13,485.00 EFT 524 $76,229.15 EFT 525 $606,858.4fi Void Checks: 208637 ($5220) 208349 ($17.00) 202595 ($77.87) G RAN D TOTAL Respectfully submitted, I Pamela J. Sibley $4,173,985.77 BILLS #4-B Council Warrants 05/06/08 5/6/2008 CITY 4F ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Debra Kurita City Manager Date: May 5, 2005 Re: Accept the Quarterly Investment Report for the Period Ended March 31, 2005 BACKGROUND Each quarter the [nvestment Summary report is provided to the City Council. Attached is the Investment Summary report for the quarter ended March 31, 2005. DISCUSSION The attached investment portfolio summary report reflects the invested operatingfunds as well as the various assessmentdistrictfunds and trusteed bond funds. These investments have been made in accordance with the provisions of the City's approved [nvestment Guidelines. The City of Alameda's expenditure requirements for the next six months are more than sufficientlycovered byanticipated revenues from regularoperations and liquidity of current investments. FINANCIAL IMPACT As of March 31, 2008, the City has received 14.54 percent of the projected interest income for the fiscal year. RECOMMENDATION Accept the Quarterly Investment Report for the period ending March 31, 2005. Respectfully submitted, Ile-Ann yer Chief Financial Officer 1 ~~~ f ~ _ `+ By: Laura Gwynne Supervising Accountant JABILG:dI Attachment City Council Agenda Item #4-C o5-os-os City of Alameda California May 5, 20oS Honorable Mayor and City Council I have reviewed the City of Alameda's investment Report for the uarter endin q 9 March 31, 20oS and find that it complies with the Investment Polic established v by my office. The interest of the Council is always appreciated. Si er ly, V -.. Kevin K nedy City Treasurer KKldl Kevin Kennedy, City Treasurer Off ce of the City Treasurer 22G3 Santa Clara Avenue, Room 220 Alameda, California 94501-4477 51x.747.4$$1 Office • Fax S 10.747.4$90 • TDD ~ 10. X22.7538 City Council Attachment to Agenda item #4-C 05-o6-os 0 0 0 ~- r r ornr0c~ao w ocp~oi~ir: o rn rn ti rn~ N ,~ m ~ Y w ] O N r ~D (D (~ O r M ('] N h ~ ~ ~ d' Q J j r N oO M A N ~ ~ U 'C '~ ~ r N ~ N ~ N r Efl U +~ ~ ~ Q} ~ ~ C, O h O (D r r o ~ O ~C c+~ W N E ~~ N. w ^ o N 0~ c~ ~ O~ O N r h ~ Q~~} ~ N Q ] ~ C] N M l!7 O co O N r~ cND N r N ~ -` ~ N *'' Q~ ] N ~ Z x ro b9 00 ~ ...+ N ~ ~•- Q m ~ r N ~ ~~ ~ C a ~ ~ (4 C .~ ~ ~ ~ U m ~ ~ Z ~ a c ~.O o o w orn•-ooo N N N (~ ^ J O N O O CQ h ~ O ~ In r W W } C'7 M ~ M t- ~ Q W Z O O N O r r c~ ONO ~ } Q Z Q a W Q ~ J o• o 0 0 0 o c N O ~ ln. o . OO N ~ ~ ~ ~ O Z r +- N oO y. [L J r N In N N N O ~ ~' O ltd ~ h ~ o Q O~ O N o T ~ ~ N N~ C W O r F ~ H~} F~ J Z ~ ~ o ~~ ~ z .a ~ a Q~ } O ~ . o. o w ~ ~ O O c~ O O N ~~ O r~ ¢ U C? c7 h cp ~ W o 0 ~ N m~ ~ `~ h aoc~ ° M ~2 0 0 c V_ Z o ti~ oa ~~ ? w N ~ ~ M D .- r ~ ~ ¢ J Q O N O Cp N ~ O N h 00 O O O ^ Z ER m =} Y `~ LL ~ Q 4 ~ ~ z m ~Q z W o^ t7 w w w o d . ~ z w -~~ ~'Q o ~ ~ a J U ~ ° ° ~ o ^ cn _ ~~~ w ~ ~ o ~ a ~ ^^ ZZ ^ o Uw ^ w Z ~ W F-- 2 p U Q ~~w p Z~ ? ^- J Z ~. w ~ J o ~... w w w w wa ~ z ~ ~~z ° U Wz ~ ~-~ ~Zo ~ w ~ ^ ~ o ~ ~ g ~ ~ w~ ~ w w c~Q w ~ w w _ ~ ~ ~ wNW~wW p a ~ z~ ~ ~, ~~ ]~~ zcn~ ~ °z°z~a} ~ ~ ~? z oo ~~~ ~ ~~~~~z ~ w ~Q ~ ~~ a~ °m . ~ ~ Z ~~~~~~ z z w~ o ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ Q J ~ - J ~` o O~ ~ ~ z W ww ~ -ww W 2 2 ~ ~ W ~ U ~ O IQ-~ c p ° Q ° U ~ } ~ ~ W ^ ^ ~ w U ~ ~ ? ~ ~ ~ N. w N, }. w Q. . U {~ ~ Z z Q Q ~ r N M ~ I!~ (D . O O N r {v] U Q Z Z Qw w ~¢ g~ ,~ w 0= } ~ ~_~ U~ 0 a z w w z a~ c~ Q ~~ r o o N co 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 ~n ~n ~n o o r o o M ~n co 0 o rn o 0 0 0 0 0~ o u~ o M o O o~ M O O ('7 r 0 0 Op l17 N N O ~-- O O I` N cY] O ~} (~'} O 00 r N C'7 lf) (D fD [Q In fti (D O o I~ C7 N N CQ O 00 00 lt7 O O M f~ o O N (0 r O fi~ O O ('~ r ~" D N h N~ D P'} lf} N r N C7 '~ O C7 0~ w r~~~ *' N c+~ O O O~ r Q~ ~ f- (p Q p In to N O Cr! d' u7 r 0 0 0 h lf} h r~~ a0 t- N M N c0 r N f7 00 r~ F,, 00 00 M O O O D Q~ r cD O o0 r O u7 th N r• O O N N t~ O o0 flD tt co u7 c+? N N O q0 O r~ N ~t N rt d' cD N ch W w QO O h O~~~~ O h o N O O N h cD cD r N cA cD O N O c~ O O~ ti (~ co N h r- r~ N cri ~ N c') D N h ~] N M O N D O h O O O D ~" w O .- ~ r O t-' fQ f''} h lt7 00 r N O N O l~] d' d' l!7 N O d' w (D O N 00 00 h~ ¢J . 01 N co tt cD cD O cp O h h c0 c0 lt7 cp to O h n O cD ~ to N 01 ~ cfl O O O O r O M D r N O O~ O ¢ r h N r r r r r r- r r r- r r r r r- `-- r- w r r r r ~ ~ r~ ~r ~ h r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 0:0 o ro•o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 rn o M o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o O O v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o M o 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0o ao ui.o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o v o.o 0 0 0 0 ~ci 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w N c~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 0 o O r o t- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w ovMa~oooooooOOOVOVOO~oooONOc~oo.ooooooovooooo000 0o r: c~ ui Sri ~i ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ui o o r o of Sri ao 0 0 Sri ui o 0 0 0~ o v o 0 0 0 0 ~~ maoNrnmr•cou~oooooo~nooo~nr•u~OhO~rNN~omcooo~nohoo~nc~o~no osNco ~cocvOCOOhaoaaao~nco~nu~c~r•oco~u~rco~carnrncooornNOrrOO~no ~~ h N r r r r r r r- ~- r r r- r r r r r- r c- r r bg UN ~.-rNlnC'7C'1r(~ho~norc~rnooooaorr•roaohNc~MM~nN~~rno~ncar~co~n Z} r O cY7 N M 00 r O O N~ Op r r r p} ~ to h OQ O O O M C7 M I~ O O O O ~' In DO r r r Z Q M M w r r N N ('') C+] C7 cY] ~ ~ ~ 'ct 'ct ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ lf! L~ Lf} lf1 ~!] Ili L(7 CO (D CD C4 h h h ti ~ tl ~ J r e- r Cp (p In O O N N In 0 0~ 0~ ll~ f7 M O In N h Q1 N '~ Op O N r r O N r N~ h r N CO O (*~ fl0 ^ O O ~] O (Q ID ~ (D ~ O ch r7 h O M h O O ~ h D co 01 h ~ r~7 N c0 r t-- t-- pp r a0 O O ~ C+] c~ C+7 O ti r ~ Z C7 C7 (D N h h~ 0 0 00 fti 00 h N 0 0 0 l` h (D (D 0 0 f~ r r DO h 0 DO f~ r r r O r h ('7 } ] r r r r r- t- w r r r r r- t- r r r Y `-- r r r r w r r r r a ~- °° m ~~ w _ ~- ~' ~ w J 4 W 7 Z as ~ oo ao rn m o o ao ao ao 0o av ~ rn rn rn a7 rn rn rn rn~ rn~ rn~ rn~ of rn rn rn~ rn m~ rn~ rn rn rn rn rn rn rn o 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r r~ r •-•- r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r, r r r r r r r r r r~ i r r a a a ~° c a a~ o rn ~~ c c~~~ a a a c c m m m m a a a~>>>> ~ c~ L a~ co ro~ ~ o ro ro a~ ro a ro ro ro~~~ ~>>>~ ro ro a~ U o 0 0 o a~ ro a~ ro ro ro a ~~ Q¢¢,~~¢¢~a¢oz~~~~Q~~~~~~'?Q¢¢¢~n~v~ozzzz^~~~~~¢ ] Q ~ ~ r 0 O~ (~ ('7 ~ ~ Ln ~ r lf) (p ti 1!? N r r r N~ r In r r r r r r a ~ r r r r r ' r r r r ~ ~^ O O O O ('+) O O O O r 0 0 ~' N r r ''"" r r r r r O r O O D r r r r N r r r~ ~ O r" r r r r r ¢ W Oa O D W CQ 00 00 C~ In cD cD h Cg c4 co ~ d' ~ In cD cD cfl ~ tit t~ h h cD N O O ti u7 co h 1~ (0 cD I~ h co +!) cp ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r a r r r r r r i r r r r r r r r r r Q W ro ro m ~ ~ ro ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m cco o m c~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~i o cca ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ o ~ a~i ~ a~i ~ ~ ~ ro m 2 h- ~ ~ ~ IL ~ ~ LL O ~ '7 O ¢ LL '7 Z ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ -7 r r ¢ W Z ~ Q ~ ¢ ¢ ~ ~ Z `~ ^ O ^ ~ ~ ^ ~ U1 U¢ r r r r r r r r r r r r r r~ r r r i r r O O r r r' r' r r i r r' r' r' i r r r ~^ r r- r Q 0 0] I.() h p~ In N p 0 I~ p O D h p~ r C'? ~- C7 r r GO ~ r h r r .r h D I` I` r r 0 r lf? ] 0 0 0 0 (~ N O O O t- O ~y r N ~- O O r O O r f7 O O N crJ O M M (+r) O ('~ O N r r 'r' p r- p 0 W J o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W voooohhco cor~o~roocoOONO~c~rooc~rnNrnc~oornNc']rflOONhIti O O O O O N O a0 ~ r tt N h 00 00 t~] u7 r (+~ cp ti t^~ h N~~ ~- l` p Qi c~ O P7 O Iti O N o0 c'] 0 0 61 } 00 Op O O In O O N N ~ Q7 ~ r h t- 0 0 C7 fl0 O N C~ W h 0 t- N f~ Q7 O O (~ N l(3 O 1~ r f~ (D O I~ r (p r r lf7 N N nj N Cr} ~ ~ ~ In N ~ u7 (y? ~ 'sr '~ i.f) In In ('7 fr7 ~ ~ l~j ~ L'7 I!7 '~' l~ ~ ~ In ('~ In ~ ~ '~ 'C1' 'Kt ~ ~ ~ r ~ ('7 w \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° ~ \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° ~ ~ \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° },,, o 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oovovooooo~no~no~no~noou~O~nooOVU~N~n~nu~oo~n~nu~u~oooo~no O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o h u~ h u~ N N h u~ ~ h~ ti o N 0 ~c7 h ti N N N u7 o N N N h u~ o 0 o h 0 Oo flQ 0 0 In O O N O O 00 N 00 N cfl h c'~ N N 00 N c~ O N O N a0 00 (p cp (p N O Co cD .- c'] N u7 0 0 c'~ O r r ~f3 N N O O C7 CD ~ tt (D c+7 ~ (~ In C+] ~ ~ ~ lt] fD lf? ~ lf) lfj (Q ~ (D CD (D I!7 ~ d' ~ ~ h h (p ~ ti ~ ~ '~t ~ r ~ M ~ ti r 0 0 0 In v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v 0 GHQ O O M O r h {o O O 6? 0 0 0 ('7 Cp Co o O N ~- O O r W O cA C7 O O o 0 N O v 0 0 0 N u] O D O r o~ N O~ O {D r- r In O~ N O O O r (D O~ f~ M O r (+') ] oD Od In O O N d' C7 O (D M ~ N h lt7 t- r Cri Q r 0 In (0 N r h (D h Op 00 t~ O O h 0 o r iD f~ N N O J r N L'7 O O r N~ l{? l(} r r Q) h r (fl h O ti N N~~ D S'~ (0 00 ~ ltd '~ h o (D ~~ f~ OQ N N 0} h Q a0 C7 O O O r~ 00 N~ C'') O r~ D h N (g r (D O (D r c7 h 0 00 r N C7 ~ OQ f~ h t- r O r l'7 h (p ('') o ~ Op I~ cD its Ln cD O N u} N O u7 ('~ 00 r D N h O h O O~ O Q~ cG !~ c0 1~ Q~ O co h N N N N O m r o0 cD h Y W CO N W Q~ {p h l!'} l17 OQ 0~ r- h 00 N M O O O~ N O O In h O~ co N N 01 00 u7 O O O ti O (~ cp ~ h ° O N CD ~ (D O O N O h h h o0 l~ lf7 ~~ (o h 0 (D '[r l~j r 00 ~ (~ O O N O O 00 N O r N 0 0 In fl7 ° h N r r r w r r r r r w r r r- r r r r r r m ffl h C'7 d] w ~ ~ .-. ¢ } ~ Z W ~ C~ # 1-- J 0] N ~ Z w ~ rn Q W Z ~ ~ °z°zW ¢ m ~o a~~w w~~z Z ww~~ ~W W ~~~z pwo ~~ oZ°o oo~o ~ oo°~ ~o ~ zzZm U°U ^~ C7wwz zaw~ ~ zZwv~i Qz w ¢ Z} ~.~ UUY Y UQ ¢ YYU mY ~ ~~~Q ~Jz Um zzzQ ¢pzm m Q¢z~ aQ z .. ~NWp O0~ ¢~ ~'ww= cn =°~~ ~ ~~~° cno~ ~ fn W W ~ Z lit N C7 U7 = = W U ~ ~ W = U7 ^ >>¢ ~= a J p ~ ~ m w U w U J ~. w U U~ a w w~~ U w ~ p w z zz~zo ~UU ~w °a~~w~4~w°¢°~W WOww~~~04z~w4m~ZO IL ~' } Q,r U~ J_ J_ U~~ O Z ~ J J m^ Z^ m'~ J O o Z m m J U^ Z Z J _¢ m Z^ J m Z Z ^ UU~~ wpO ¢ OQ¢-1Z}z J',I~QZ h-}JJ¢wz}}¢U~}zQ~} O w ZZ gmmJU(7cncn~cnUmm¢0~°Q m cnm~¢QmJO~~mZQ~OmQ~ ~ w w r `U }} w ~^ w~^¢ O O m m] m m~ O m^ ~ m m O w m]] O Q m ]mom ~ ~ O U' C7Y¢¢~~Jw¢z~ z JJOacrja0'mJmZ~~DOJJQ_~u~JZ°u}aJpu~ O ¢ ¢ Z W O ] ] ~ O LI. O Q ZQ m O O L7 ~ ¢ W Q ~ ' ~ {~ ~ ° Q ¢ J J {~ ~ ¢ ¢ ¢ O ~ J ¢ ¢ O J ¢ d J J m N U] (n w UJ m U O = U U I-- ~~ U U U m~ W C7 O U ~ w w (.} C7 W~ U (] W ~ U U z z w w z Z ~ m 0~ m U~~ Q m~ m¢~~~ m J~ Q a g w m~~~ w Q~ m~ m~ w ~ oo`~~¢~~wQW~ no~Q21Z1~=z===lUi¢~nzz=W=~~=~z~n===~ ^ U ~~~~-mil-(~m~u.¢~~~~.1~~~^l~t~l~l~~lL~^~~t~C7~>><L~a^~tl~^ N m o~ N Q oaoooao~nOO~nm~no~nooO~noaoOOMOOOVOOMOaoooou~ o oMONaoNO~nhhhu~NOOOhoM.oor•oO~nooNa~o~nroOh M N~ O h r N N f` (r5 h P'? N r~ l,C~ O CO u7 ~~ N N O In h 0~ l~ r 0 C~ N O O K d' h h OQ h h (~ r N ~-- Cr} ' O O~ (D O' N O I!7 N C7 O N h r lt7 ' r O O U7 N ~ 04 ~ ~[} (D h 00 O ~ O ~ W ' O l!7 N ~ N (D N O • (D r N {~ r ~ ' lf} O (~ ~ ti O 'ct O N ~ O W w O h h ~ N 0 r O~ O h h In f''} h r h ('7 (p r 00 N r C7 N h r GO In ~ (p t- t- h Y ~ N O O O N 01 ~ N o0 u7 (D N '~ lf} r O ~ [7 lA I.() (D ' (D r O O (Q ~ t0 O N ~ l17 ~ d7 00 M ~ J t'~] ('~] O O q~ Op O ~ ~ {0 ~ 00 f~ O ~ h N N N O O O c~ o N 01 C4 00 c0 a0 00 h o0 I~ {~ s- Q j N w r w r r CV CV ~- r r r r ~ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 o rn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O v o o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 o u~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 wo~ioo~iNOOc~oooNOOOOO~ioouiaooooouio~ioooo •= Iaoc~OO~hooc~raoNhaou~~ocvoohOOOOOONOhoo~n~n M G: J cy r7 O O h L~0 o u7 ~ fD (~ h (fl O u7 h r u7 N LD O O N D r O (0 00 00 fl0 h h 00 h h !~ Q. ~ N t- r r r r {V 4V r r- i- r p 0'7 ffl O~~ N c4 CD CO N !~ h I~ O C7 a0 00 oq O N r u7 O r~ In O O O (~ h O O In N~ w r l,{) h Z} h O o o O N c0 (D c,Q h O m O O O aD N~ h I` •- N~~~ co N r~ c~ M lt7 Ct cQ cD O Y- Z Q^ 1~ CO o0 00 00 00 CO CQ GO 00 00 00 CO fl0 O O O O O O r r r r- r r L'7 f'') M ~ I.(~ fD (0 (D h f~ r r r- c^~ r r r r r ~C' r r r r r t~ ti- r r ~ LL ~ J u7 N O O N N C''} M~~ O p r (+7 r M r N N 1lj ~ l17 i.f) Cp r C'7 h r f0 h '~ N C'7 N (D h 00 N lC7 d' O O h ~- 01 (D [~ r h 00 O O r (~ h h r (p N d' ~ l[) (r} In r r N h 00 N O ~ 00 O~ h O D h C~] O D O (A ~ N O O r N O h '~ ~ u? ~~~ h~~~ GO 00 h (D h r } t" ~-- ~- r e^~ r r r r r r r r r r r r r r w r r r r r" r r r r r r r r 0^ O ~ ~_ O w N ~ ~ . J r M Q 2 ~ U Q ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~- r r r r ~e-~ r r r r r e- r N N N N N N r r r w r r r r t- r r r r r w r r r r r ~- r r r r r t- r r r r t-- r r r Ur i i i i i i i i i i i i i i r i ~ i i~ ~ i i i i i ~ i i i i i i i i z ro ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ aai aai aai m a~i a~i ~ `m m a a ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ aci ~ ~ a p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? Q Q Q Q cn cn cn cn ^ ^ ~. w ~ ~ ¢ ¢ ~ ~ g ~ z z z ~ ~ ~ o o z Z^Q~~r~roui~n~navo~iN~nc~oo~naor'-u~ oo,~~~oaoooNOO~tio W Q^ r r- r r r r r t- r O O r ~- r r M r r r r 'r" ('') C7 O M l"7 r r Cry a~~ ^w w~ g Q h h CD t!7 h 00 lp h f~ h h (D t~ h OD h 00 ~ h 00 (D h h h h~ r• r• h h oa ~ h~ h h h~ Gp o0 g^~ o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M ~ Q, L a a a~ c v~ a a L a L ~ ~ c~ ~~ c ~- ~~ c c~ C C U ~. ~~ L Q d Q w ~ ~ ~ a~ a~ m ~ m a ~ as a a~ ro ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ co ~ a ~ m ~ ~ a~ a~ ro a~ ~ ~ ~ co cu a~ =~Q^¢~cncnwO~QcncnQcn~~^-~O~g~Qgg~~LL^~^?o^~~ m ~ i i i i i i~~ i i i~ i i i~ i r i i i i~~ i i i i~~ C'7 v i i i (d o w r 0? O h O h 0 h O h O l1~ N 0 ~- r In r~ '~t (D N O S 00 ~ l!') `~? 0 r N O O N N O r r r (y r O r r r M O fir'} O O N r M O r r O r O r O O O O a rr ~ a ~~ 0 o a a v o v o 0 0 0 o v o o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a a a o o v o 0 w~ N ('7 N '~t ~ h fD D C7 00 O u7 (p OQ lf) h (p (p O r~ N N 0 lf? ~ N DO ~ h t"r] O O N O J N O CO (~ ('7 O In h f~ ~ 6] 00 r (p h r O r C~ (D O N OQ '~ f` W~ O r O N (''} cD O } O h t^7 N~ O l~ 00 h r~ r O~~ O D lQ O f7 r~ O r r~ 0 r- O O O N O f+'! ~ h ~ t'"1 ~ In ~t d' N ~ ~ t1' lA ~ si7 In ~ N c~ N ~ N lC7 i!7 ~ ~ u} u] lf} u7 c~ N ('~ to ~ p} c~ N 0 W ~ \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \ \° ~ \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° d o 0 0 o a o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~~noou~~n~no0oo~nu~u~uaooou~oNU~~nooOO~nooo~nooo~n o Z h li7 O N N N u7 In In O N h h h In LCj O h lt7 N N h 0 0 0 I!7 f` O O u7 h In O O h r W (r? N tf] r r r N N N W r OC 0~ CO h h lf7 00 N (fl r 00 O O O N CO lt] lf] h CO N In l(1 [~ N ~ cr] u7 ~ h h ~ ~ ~ '~ h u7 co {0 c~ c~ ~ ~ ~ M lf} l!} ~ c0 cD c0 In ~ ~ ~ ~ 'ct ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ M W ~ c~ccooc~NOOhocvo~oMOOC~oMOOcoooooovNOOCavOrn rn Z W~~ O O N N O lf) ltd LA N O S ID -[t7 N O O O N O C7 00 O CO O N C~ r~ 00 l!} ~ L~ (+~ r I O N O o 06 r~ O~ N~ O r In h N~ (~ In O cD N cp t.{) 00 N h N Cf} ~ (0 cfl N O S N J h (D [D ~ u7 r e- I!7 r O N h r 00 N ti h D r OD O r ti7 d] {~ M (D ~ ll~ r h O U7 N ('7 Q N z- (D N (~ N {~ h N t- (D ~ N O h N~ (0 O N (D (D h O h h a] O N *" N~ c~7 oQ O ~ 7roco~ri~icaoiairirirno~~ic~hui.=r:aocori~~ri~ai~c~o.-oc~r a~ u7 h c0 •- c0 01 0o ap u7 u7 O G7 N a0 r O M O u7 O O O O c'7 f"] Oi ~? c~ I~ N h O N c0 CO In O N ('') Q1 O CO 00 O~~ (p ~t h h O lf} h N N N O 07 d7 N o r- Op In C10 00 00 h h GQ h h O m N ~-- r r N (V i- ~ r U) w ~ ~ w o ,~ z o ~ z ~ Y J ¢ J ~ w m w w O w w w m ~~ g w ~~ w w w ~ U oooZooov ZZ Qo °z°z o00 °z ~ U Z Z a Z Z Z J U Z Z Z Z ~ aOC~~U~~~m ZZ WY ZZ YYY U ~¢Q QQQO ww --aZ ww QQQ w °z ~ 2 2 z=_= 0 w w N w= 0 ~~ ~~~ ~ Q ww~I=I UU UUUQ ~u.w ~Um w~wUUU pw•w~ww w Q cn~cOnwwwwwwZ ww~- oz^ ww~-zzz z~~w~~ ~ ~ ~ Yv,~~o zwW ~~owwwr~ooo~o0 0 0 ^^ I m m m m m Z Q J J Z J m~ J J Z m m m^ m Z Z J Z Z Z ~ Z Z Z U J J~ J J J a Z¢ Q} Q J Q Q¢} J J J Z J}} Q}} } oo¢Qa~,Qaamomm~v,maz~,mm~000O.Q~~m~~v,v,~ O m m N m m m m m m o o^^ o m o w 0 0^ m m m m m>> o>>^^^ ~aazoo~oooQaJJ~,Z~o~,~.JJ~oooa,ov,v,~v,v,zzrn a Q Q Q J J¢ J J J] a U' C? Q o O J W o {~ ~ Q J J J Q J Q Q U' ¢ Q O Q Q ~~~~ C7 0~ (~ C7 [7 0 ~. U U w m U (7 p z U U w C7 (7 (7 ~ O w w O w w m m w () J~ () J J J ~~~ J J J w I 2 ~ Z Z¢ Z Z Z¢ 2 2 2 (n Ii 2 Z Ii I I 2 N Z Z Z I I N~ 2~ (~ LL~ N ^wwc~ww~~ww~w•wu.^w~wwwww^ww~ww^>~>^~w^ ~ ~ O ti r h O ~ O (Y? l(1 f'7 ~ ' 00 OG CO ll] (D [~ I~ ~ ~ r r (~ li? 'St N CD N ~ O O r~ r p (Q {~ O O a0 r r N ~ Y ~ ~ J O O ~ N O ~ u7 (~ N f• N M N N D ~ ~ 6F1 69 ~ ~ N ~ N ~ ~ G9 f~ h ¢ ¢ ~ nj ~ nj ' M ~ b9 Ef3 r~- r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti 0~7 ~ O c~ 7 N M ~ G~0 D 00 ~ ~ (fir} r D ~ r r c'~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ O (Q ~ ~ O ~ 'ct O o~ ~ N t- e- N N N ~ W ~ ti ~ ~ ~ O N j N rj 01 (D ~ O N N O ~ ~ r r M ~ ~ J ~y 07 ~ ( Q ~[? (D ~ D D N N ~ b9 64 N t~ ~ r N bg I~ ti N ~ N c4 ~ ~ ~ N ~ ''" d ~ ~ 64 ~ Z~ Q r r {Q r O r'O h ~ O' r• ~ r N r. r r uJ' r. u~ 41 r r p r Z c~ ~ ~ i N r (D N ~ O W ~ J r r (fl r d] D~ O In ~ r OQ ~ ti O (YJ r D D ~ ~ r D t- D r O r W p O m 0 (/} N ( D O O D ~ ,N o 0 } N C7 r h M r N N 0~ i ~ ~ W . I ~ ~ J i ¢ i ~~ DO CO N 00 0 0 0 a CJ ~ O ~ a . lf7 00 . N o a O . O 00 O CO . ~ r 0 ~ . O . p r a a~ a a~ ~ a a a~ a a ~' r r r ~ -' i Q ~ o 0 0 0 r 00 t 0 o t- a r~ r o r o t- ~ 0 0 w o000 00 00 0 0000 o o O °Q~ o 0 ~ ¢ w _ C C L C ro ~ a ca ¢ C *'' ro U *'' C ~ c~ ~ C ca C .fl C ro a~ ~ C C c~ ~ ~ -~~ ~ r 'r"' ~o o ~~ ~~ ^ r r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 a o 0 0 0 o ~~~~ a ~ o 0 0 ~~~ 0 0 ~~ o ~ a ~ o ~ 0 0 0 ~~~ o ~ a o ~~ 0 W _ 0000 o000 •- 0 ovrn ooN o0 vo m r• o 0 0 0 000 ouzo ~ r• oo oo ti rn } M~~° ~ rr~~uo~ rn° om o 0 oNO (D r o O our r t- ~n O c7 O ~7 O '~t cY? u7 ~ ~ O '~i' D O D M O O O u7 lt] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ¢ 0000 ooov ti N ooo~ ooN oo u7o rn ti o o 0 0 00o otnv u~ ti oo oN ca r ~ ~oc~o (+') r r r M In ~roo ('7 ~ Cn No p r o M rn O rn O oNV r (p r o O our r r- c0 O ~o~io ~ ~i~~ ~o ~ 0 0 oMO 0 o~i ui W ~rnom r O 1ti ~ ti O~i ti O M M ~ ~ or•N In O M ao c0 ~~ r [+~ ~ d. J cN N cND ~ ~ O 0 D ~ ~~'~} 000 N N 'ct N c0 ~ p N r r- ¢ I` r O D (~ N O O O lp ~ 01 ( D ~ N ~ N ~ ~ Y ti ti O O ~ O M O N u} cg N Q? O N N O to N ~ N ~ r ~ ~ co - M ~ ~ ~ N N In f` lf? ('~ ~ ~ ~y ~ ~} ti r m Z (~ ^ Z ~ ~ .. m J J ; Wi r ¢ U; W t~ W W I .~ ~ ~ N ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ J J (~ ~ ~ W U U J (~ J (~ . J J ~k ' ~ ' ~}~~ ~ ^ ~~~ z a ~ a ~ ~ Boa (~ ~ ~ J ~Q U a~z~ w ~ n.¢w p z~ w ~, ~ ~ w ~ }~~' ~ ~ w ~ }U ~ w r ~]w] ~- ~ z w ~H~ 4.zQ ~ w2 ~ ¢ U ~ ] ~ ¢ a r U r ] ~ ¢ ~ ~ ] z Q ¢ gcn ; rn , ? U ] r n Y~~ z ~ Wiz ~ ww z ~: w z wo w z wz z ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ Q w~ YI--Q N F" ~~ ¢ W. ~ ¢ ~ ~ ~~~ ¢ ~' ~I ¢ (n Qo¢o J ¢ v~ J ~ ¢~¢ Q U H ¢o J ¢ W ~ o , J ~'~ F' N ~ n J w' ~ ~ Il J o ~~~o ~ ¢, ~z~ a ~o ~ c~ a ~ , ' o o o"'~ a ~ ~, o^ ¢ ~, z w¢WQ o w W; o ,~ wa o S a o o W o ~ ~ ~= o ` ¢ Q z~ ou,~v ~ oo ~ ` ~ ~~ ~, " w ~o~ ~ ``~ O (~ ~ J~ J J ~, Z ~ (/~ J ~ J ~ J Z J ~ J¢ ~ aw wow ~ ',Z U Ww ~, w U~ w.~w w z w W ~ U Q g ~ ~ ~ ~; ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W m Q Z Z Z ¢ Qp w m Z rn ~, ?- z ~. w. ~ ~ zcnz o ~~ zz ^ I U m m m C c U U U ~ m r m U m~ m U m m ~_~ U~ r ~ M In ~ r O O 0 O O~ ~ ~I~ O M N ~ O 0 ~ N C f7 ~ r O o ~ ~ ~ r d' O O~ O r O GO (D O N Q)i ~ 00 O ~ CD 6] M ~ O I~ O~ (V ~ r r ~ ~ ~ ~ 4A N O 00 CD l~j I~ r r O ER ~ r O W W ~ J -,-. ~ ~" r ~ ~ ~' ~ ~!) ~ N f~ O O ' " N O M t~ r ' M ltd o N ~ b9 5f} ~ ~ ' ~ I N N N ffl ¢ ] d3 r , ~ 6F} r bc} r C r M ~ ~ °a r N r O o 0 ° o 0 o ~. v. 0 o r ~ N v ~, o. ~~ h rn M ~~ n N r o ° N •v ~ o owc~ ~ °' ~ aoo~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ (V ~ r r o ti ~ ~ n o o o~ c a ~ ~ o ~ rn o W ~ .~ O O r ~ r ~ v ~ ~ c~ N o rn M ~ o 00 M ~ (D (~ ~ O ~ o O ~ J ¢ ¢ r b'} ~ ~ d3 ~ ~ N ~ 69 r N ['7 bg N N N N d9 a ] EA r ~, r ~, Z} r r r ~ r ~ ~-- r- r r r r r r r r r r r r Z ¢ r aW ~~ _ ~ J ~ ~ r r r r r r r r r t- r - O 4] O O + N O O O O O O 6) O O rn O ~ r O O Y 0? ~ c ] N 0^ ~ ~ ~ _ W ~ 11 ~ J J Q ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OQ 00 DD 0 0 0 ~ Oa Op 0 0 ~~~ ~ ~ a s ~¢¢ i i r r ~ a ~a r i ~ L ¢a i i L L L aa.a i~ ~ L L L QQ~Q i i i L L Q¢ i ~ ¢ j¢^ Oo r No r r 00 r r r 00o r r ~~ r~ Ooo' ~-- r o0 i~ w ? (~ o o ~ ~ o 0 ! ' 0 0. 'o. o. o. .o o'o' o 0 f¢ w ~~ ~ m ~ C C ro ro C C G ro ro ro C C C ro ro ro C C ro c~ 1 U Q ? ? ? t-- ~ ~ , ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ ,~ r r 0 0 t- M o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 i ~' ' I 0 D O \ \ D \ D O ~ \ O ~ O O \ \ O \ v O D ~ ~ ~ O ~ 0 O O O O O O W 0o ° ° v ° Oo o o ao N 00 o 0 0 N 000 o 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 o 0 N 0o o 0 a 0 ~ o o rr o r c ~ o Or rn oo Y~o ~ o u7 u7~s] ~~~; v ~ DOOM °~~ ~ ~~ ~ tt D O O ~ O ~ 0 0 O r r r r ~ N r , ~ r r r I ~ \ \° 0 0 \ 0 \ \° p 0 \ 0 \° \ 0 0 \° 0 \° \° . \ . 0 0 0 ~ 0 \ \ \v ~ o D O \ \ \ \° ' 00 00 o 0 Oo 0o 0o r Oo oo 0 N 000. o00 o 0 oov 00o o N r~ v D o0 00 v 0 0 i O O r r O r M O O r N O O O r O ~ O u7 in In d: ~ ~ tt) '~ co u7 ' N CO ~ ~ ti I~ ~~ ~ 'CC ~ ~ i 0 0 O ~ Q ~ 0 0 o r r r r d' r r ~ r r r I W r~ ~ ~ ~ N O O 00 p O {~ cp ovr N . N gy' p' I•rnr~ "? ap 0 c ao N J O r ~ o ~ N~ ~ ~ O O 0 r. lt7 O H O ~ CO o~ f p O M ~ i f~ ~ O r ~ j ~ r Lh ti ~ GO O O Op (fl ~ o e - O ~ O Y r O ~ o N N ~ h~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ cMD r] M N ~ O N O b4 b4 ~ 6g r- N ~ ~} r N ~ N N X19 m r ~ r b4 .-. ~ ^ m ~ ~ U ~ ~ a o ~ ~ , ~ m l,L W N ' N ¢ ~ o ~ W ~, W'~ ~ w. N ~~ w 0' cn cn ¢ cn ~ cn^^^~ cn ~ pzZ w W w ~, W : ZZ U } }. L~ Q ~ ~ W a ~ ~ ~ IL LL l1. ~ ] ~ ~ LL 11 ~ NO LL lL Q ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ W W ~ v W LL. ! ~ F- I- W IL . Z ~ ~-- W o F-- ~ W ¢ zzz cn cncn a cn ¢ rn ~ ¢ ~~ ¢ ~ ~zz ¢ m zZ ¢ Ww Z U ~w Z N ° w~~ Z UZZZ Z (~ N~-~ ^ ¢ ~f- ^ cn ~~ Q ~= w~ ¢ z pC, ¢ Owww ¢ 0 ~ww ¢ ~ ww ¢ W ~ f- ~ f]~ ¢ F- F- 0 J O m , ~ z m ~ J ~ ~,^ ^^ ~ J J, z^^ ~ ~ ^^ ~ 0 0 ¢ as ° o NQ ° Z' Q° ~ ~°~~°~ ~ ~ w~~ ° ~ °° o Q ~ as ~ w ~ w' a." ~aaa ~ ~aa ~ ~ as ~ Z W ] ~ V; ~ ~ ~ i ~ Z ~ ~ ~ Y Y ~ ~ Q ~ ~ tY J m W U~ Z Z Z U ~ Z Z U p„ Z W W U m W ¢ W ¢;¢ ¢¢ ¢ ¢¢¢ ~ m m ' U ~ ~~ ~ ~ a Wzzz W oz'z w ~ ~ ~-} ~ ~} ~ ~} Qooo Q ¢oo ~ 00 O U mm U l=Lm m r ZZ OOm .~ZZZ ¢~~~ J ¢ mZZ ~~~ ¢ ~~ ~~ ULL ~ '~' [Q 'tl ~ N ~ M r r O O M r f~ M O O M N O N ~ O p ', N ti ~ ~ tt N lf} ~ ~ ; ~y (~ M '~ N O ti ~;~ O r 'i N N r O~ d' 1~ M N ~ I Q 00 y~ ~ f~ ~[) CO N O N ~ ~ O O ~ ~.. yg h O T' O I~ lQ M O M B 'r" N CD 00 M A O, 6F} N r 00 I~ ~ I~ O i N M ~!) I O N (D f~ I~ (D ~.. M ~ ~ N N Y w ^ O O N r flC ' N N N ~ ', M fti (D l~ CO O' ti w (D O i0 O r M N N Q7 (0 f` I~ N N N pNp W N N 0 D O ~ J 00 M ' ~ f0 l~ N (r1 M D ~ +j r ljj L(} u? N 69 , 63 r ~ r fi3 ~ ~} N c ~ ~ M ~ N ~ ~ o O M r h f7 O ' Q} O. N I` ~ h ~ N N ~ ~ N O M In I~ 00 N M ~ M O O CQ CO N ~ 00 (D M ~ N i` CQ r O M 00 r N N ~- D d' ~ I~ O M~ r N (fl 00 M D N Q r f~ t.f) Gp ffl 00 N (D ~ ~ ~ ~ O f` ~ W FR Q1 I~ In ffl N ~- 00 I~ ~ I~ O N ~ I~ f~ ~D r M M N N o ] ~ J 01 cD N 0 r M N N h M I~ cD lA OG O I~ r (D c0 cD ~] r M N. t1~ O (,0 1~ f~ N N N N M p~ N O N D D O o 0 ~ (p In N f'~ M O r !(] lf'1 In ~ (fl ~ r ~ Q. ~ ~ N r M ~ 69 ~ ~ Z} r r {0 e- O D O r r r r r r r r I N, o o O ~ In r 1 l{~ ' Q ~ O M r lf) M . r' r r r Z ¢^ r CO r r r N '~ r M N ¢ M O 61 CV N W ~ J r r- ~- r O O c D D O N r r (p LD e-~ r r r~ O Q7 ~~ O d] O O H (~ M r~~ r O D r O r 0~ c- O ~- 6~ ~ ~ ~ a 0 u t ~ ti ~ } ~ r o o ri cv ¢ r r 0~ 1 ~"' ' w .,,.. ~ ~_ J J ] I Q I OQ 00 (D ~ 00 0 0 '~"' O +70 DD M cY] c0 00 00 00 ~ O O M M O O O O r 00 01 C4. O . 0 0 0 0 p~ D pp :~w L L V L aa~ a ¢¢^¢ L. L L L L L L L~ = aac~ c~ aaaa a¢~~¢¢¢a~ L ~ ~~ a ¢QQ~ L a ¢ a ¢ r r r w r r- r r r ~ ' "' ~¢~ oo~°,yo r 000000000 CO CO 00 oDOO ~ o ~ 0 i~ w o o M oo 0 0 0 0 ao ~ ao ~ M M ao 0o ao ao M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ao ~ ao . r• ~ 0 0 0 0 ao 0 00 0 ~ ~¢ w 2 ~ C C U C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C C U U C C C C U ~ ~ ~ N f0 c~ ~ c~ ~ C~~ ,~ ~ N ~ W C fD ~ N !~¢ ~ o ~ oo?~?~o ~~~~ ~/ ^ r r O ~ o D r o r' r O O '''- t- r r GO 0 o o 0 0 o ''"~ GO OD 00 D 0 0 ,~ r r r o D o ~a ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o a o J w _ o00o voao ' c~ M ooDDOOOOO o~oDOODOOO M c~ o00o o000 rn 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 } tc } l!7 r u~ ~ ~ ~!? ~t N O N l~7 O O u7 O N T O ~ ~ N N ~ 'st '~ ~ D O (~ O u7 Q O O 1~ O D N N M N cr1 N O 6] o O r r~ r O r r L~ ~ r r r ~- O O O N In Liz ~ r r r r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o00o 0000 c~ M 000oooooa ooooooaDO M o0 o00o 0000 rn 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1t7 l(7 w ~!} ~~ ttj O N O I.{) In O O In In lfj u] O d: ~ N N~~~~ o d' r O. N O O O ti 0 0 N N C7 N M N O 41 O O r r~ (y Q +r r irj l~] r- t- r r 0 N . O N N N '~ r r e-~ e- ] N r • O M~~ N ~ N t~} r' r O O M r ti• M• O D M In {~ DO N M I O M . D. N. ~. ~. 0 0 00 00 ~ ~. N N ~. ~ ~ J 00 (~ M~ N f~ C~0 r O M CO r- N N r O Ct d~ f~ m M~ r N c0 00 M O N O r I~ L!] Oq b9 W N O N ~ ~ O O ¢ ~ 6c} O ti N 64 N r 00 f~ ~ ~ D N l[) I~ I~ (D N (~ ~ N O Y O cfl N r GO N N N ti M~ cg u7 GO O h `~ ~~ O N O ti ti N N N M ~ M N N D O D o O M ~ N M L~ ~ ~ ~ N' lf3 li? ~ ~ 69 ~ r ~y o ~ N r ~ ~ 6g W m . N' W. F- Z - Z uZS ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ¢ ' (A U] (~ o M w Mi o00 ~ o N w ~ o cy o. 0. ~ 'W W W o Z ^ Z ~ U' W. ^ Z Z ¢ Z W ^ Z Z N N Z Z Z Z O W ] W W I W WI ~ W O W Z »~^ ww C7 Z ]]DO]]]]N 0 JOOO {~ ~ fI) (~ ~ (7 m ww ~ m ww~~ww~w~ ~ awww ~~~ ~ ~' w ~ a U ~~~~ u7cn j ~ ~ aa ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~: - ~ ¢¢¢ w z'' ~ w w 0 Zcn zz-z ¢ U p c nc n c nr nc nr na zZ~~zzzz~ ~ ~ U : ]'UUU ] w ] ~ ~ ~ --w- ~~ --oo----o ¢ w. N~_~w ¢ ~ t_7 ¢ ~ ¢ zz~z z ¢ zz zzzz z o~ ~w z m z ] wwzw ^ ^ ^ ¢ ~ • wwC7C7wwww0 ^ ^ z z ^ ^ ^ ^ z ¢ ~~ ~~~. ~www ~' ¢ w; ~; 0 ¢ ~ ¢ ~ z ¢ ~ J J a, U' U U ~ C7 ~ z ~ ~ ~ m ooQo ~ m oozzooooz ~ z c~¢¢¢ ~ ~ ~ r- ] aaC7a 0 ~ ~ ~~~]~~~~] o ~- . p, ~^^^ w w w 0 ~ ~ cn o z, ^ 0 v i N, aaw~aaaaLL m ¢ ¢ _ ~- Y w ~- z U o ~ YYZY Y.YWWYYYYW ~ w~~~~ U'J~gg U U Q ~ ~, a U ¢ zzoz ¢¢ ¢ U' ¢ zz==zzzz= ¢¢UU¢¢¢¢U ~' , ~'¢¢¢ ~' N a Q ^ Z m m] m W m m¢ a m m m m Q ,, W ~ ~ O 0 ~,, - ¢ ~ w U ~ Z Z lL Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ~~ _ i J, , ; ~ ~, oo~o ~ oo oooo~ M~, ' YYY (W O Q W ~ Z Z^ Z ~ Z Z~ O Z Z Z Z~ o~ } Z Z Z ¢ W Z ~_~ ULL 0000 °o NvoOOOU~~nu~oo~,o~oMCoarn,rnooo!o~no~nvMaoooOoooou~ 00 o Mru~vovr•NMO~nr~:o~corM,~~,co'~~,tic~!otic~N~ncaooM~noaou~ti O O o O O O M,~'N O O O M r r O~N~I~,N~~ 00 ~!}'NI~ ~~N M ~~O~COir- ~- f` lf} ~ l~7 d' I~ r t,A ~ Cr1 O ' r O lf7 In O (T7 ~ N ' r ' O Q1 • O I~ Iti r r N M ~ N ' ^ ' N ~ CQ ' - ' " ~' W O ~ G : . r r l I~ CO CO f~ f~ M ' CA O OD In N f~ O O N • N ' M ' O ;00.00 '~t U7 P7 ' N N 00 O I` N ~ N ~ ~ O ' u7 M t0 u} cQ I~ 00 01 N Y ~ ~ 01 ~ ~ N N (D O ~- N (D O O: N' O i M' O~ I~ (D i0 I~ r Cr1 N I O N' M O N h O~ r (y r O I.f) h ~ r r • r O r (D M 1~ lCJ CO w I!7 O O ~ M ~ ~ N O ~ ', '~" j CA l! ) CD 00 I~ ~ N 00 O N ~ N OQ ' ~ J ~g ~ (Q'O'00~~ (~ l~'U] I` ti o (Q ~',~ N'u7:CDjO O.O r''Q1'C'7ir'N,O O~u7~O M C'7 O O O u7 ~ ' ' Q j N r r r r r r' r• ~- r r ~ r r r r w' r N r r °oo °o 0 0 0 000000000ooo0ornoo~oaoooo,ovoovoooovoooo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o~o~M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~o v o 0 0 o v o v o 0 0 0 0 ° ° ° v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o u~i v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w o v o ~~ o 0 0 0 0 0 o v v o 0 o r o ~- 0 0 0 0'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N'o M o 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ rnrn rn ~ ~i~ioooooouioo.=o vi~noouiuiooo~ovooooo~io~iooco r•ooooo0ou~ti~notio~~n~roooaao~no~ ~ J a~ r ~} •o nMOu~ococ~o~ooco '~ Cfl O 00 In CD ~ ~ Ca I` O (0 ~ ~ r ~ [4 G1 O O o 07 N r r O O In O N ~'! O ti O lf] ~ __ N w ~- r r- r-- ~- r r e- ~- r r e-- r (V r r Ca ~ Z} ¢ N ~ rn r- O O C7 M M M m rn r rn v o v o 00 w ~ w 00 O N M crJ Cr1 N '$ ~ Q) u7 (D ~- ~ CO to ~ N cD (~ I~ I~ Iti OD O~ 00 r r r M ~' I~ C0 O O Cr7 C~] M O O O O' L17 00 r r^ ~- ~ ti O O O t~ (4 {p M M + ~ ' ' ' ' Z ^ r f 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ lf! ~!? l.f) !n lf d ) lt7 In CO (D (0 1~ 1~ I~ I~ f~ M CA 00 00 O O ~ W _ ~ J 11J {~ CD cD CD Cfl (A N CQ In N~ N M C~7 O N N h O N~ O N r t- N r N tt r N O O M CO ~!'} N O N c'7 M~ O iri M Cn f~ O a7 lf? I~ 0} CD O I~ ~ M 00 r r- r r CO O O C~ M M C7) ~ r OQ N ~ O ti w O ~ d M M M ~ O f~ 00 {~ N 0 0 0 1~ I~ (D CD O ti r r~ 0 qp ~. r e- O r I~ Cr1 00 O f~ O~ M O } ~ r r r t- r r r w r r r r r r r r r r r r t- r r r r r ~-- ~- ° m ~ w ~ N ? ~ w J M Q U ~ w ~ ~ ¢ z ~ O rn rn~ O O ~ t ~ C w ro 0 rn~ rn~ rn~ m rn rn o o~ rn~ rn~ rn m~ rn~ rn~ o~ rn~ rn~ rn rn rn o O o o~ O o 0 o v o 0 0 0 O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r r r r r- r r r r- ~- r r ~ i ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~~ ~ i i~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ A C C ~' ] ~ ~ ~ ' ~ Z o~~ o m ~.~ + ~ a Q1 C~ O a a a ] ] ] ] C ~ - ~, ~ C C O O} Q d U c~ Q. ro ro o ca ~~~ ~, ~~~ ro ro o 0 0 o a m o ro m ro a ro~>>>> ~ ¢QO~~Qg~g-~~ ~ ~ ¢¢¢cncncnzzzz~u.~~~¢~~-~~¢¢¢ Z ~ Q W Q^ O O Q M P7 M c0 cD lt7 ~ ~ ~ N N ~ O ~ ~ C7 lf} Lf? In lf7 C'7 lL7 lt0 O ~ In N In ti ~ ~ T' l!7 N ~ ~ ~ O O O N r ''" r r r r r O O r r r r r e- r C'') r w ,-- r r '- ~ r r r N~~ r Y r r ¢w ^ ~.,,, w ~ j w ~ M 00 0 0 O OQ cfl cD ~ tt ~ u7 cA c~ cD ~ ~ u? I~ cD ~ O O ~ cQ ~ I~ cD I` ti O u7 (D 1~ -~ u7 1~ N ti ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o v o 0 0 o v o 0 0 o O o o O o 0 o v o 0 0 0 d¢ W ¢ _ ~ ~ c o c~ ~~ c~ ~ c a~ c ~ c c~~ rn~ ~ v~ c v~, v~ ~~ c ~ t~ c ~, ~ ~, a U rn a a~ c ~ ro a~ ro ~ c~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . m o ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ a~ v ro c~ a~ ro o m ~ a~ a~ ~ c~ ~ ~~o~ ~^~~ w= U Q o c~ o ~~ ~ ~ ¢~.z¢~¢¢~z~a^~~ o~ ~ N ti ~ ~~ ~ ~, A rn o ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ O Q~~ d ro F. ~^ ~ a] O M N p 0 N O O r 0 0 r r- M C7 D O f7 O C7 M O M O N, .- ~ O~ CA ~ r- ,- O ti h O f` d O O O r N O N O r r ~° O J a o 0 \ \ \ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ „~ W O O O O O In I` h r~ Q Q {p O (p lCj O~ C'7 r (D CD O N 0? O O O N r 00 O N~ ti [~ N N 'd' f~ CO O N O w I~ Cq ('7 l(] w (+) (~ -~ h In ~ r f~ O Ci} O M O I` N 00 M O O Cn N D M M U? h I~ ~ O U7 N 0 0 CA h O O M 00 O N C'7 d7 1~ O r I~ O O O N l!7 O I~ I~ (D O ti r (D O -~ N O N 00 f~ 0 ~ M rrj N N ~ 'st c*~ ~ ~ ~t li J N ~c] cr] c'? ~ ~ d' c~ ~i ~ ~ ~ u] c+7 ~ ~ d' ~ ~ '~t e7 ~ '~t ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Z ¢ ~ 00 0 O O lfJ oo~no0u~oou~o~nooooN~u~~nou~u~~n000Ou~ou~^NU~ooo O O f` l[J lf7 I` Cn l17 ~. Ln h 0 I!7 O~ I~ N N N O N N N i!] O O O f~ O h N N N l!7 lf) N W O N ~ 0 0 M N ti M N N 00 N c4 O, N O N a0 (fl (D (D O (D (D r- N N O O M O M N r r N N N ~ ~ M ~rj O O 'd' ~ lf? M ~ ~ ~ lA O ~ ~ lf] u~ ~ (D Cfl (D ~ '~ ~ ~ ti (0 u~ h d' d' M N ~ ti ~ ~ ~ N W Z - w oo °o o0 0 o~nvoovoooovvMOrr•oomooMCOOO,oN~-oorc~cooc~ooti oooNOOOraooo~oc~ru~co~NOOrc~~~.c~o~MU~~nrnNO~n~n ~ °0 00 ° O O o ~ ~ ri r: r ~ ri of ~ o ui c~ cv ~ ~ r: oo c~ ri o ~: v ~ ~ c~ r: ~i cv o c~ cv o ao ~ oo ~ N ~ 00 ti N N N ~ W M 00 ~ ltd ~ f~ O (D I~ CO N N 0] f~ I~ (D ~ lrj w In r ~ ' j ~i7 u7 ~ r ~ M I` CD v (0 ~- (+ ) I~ O r N M ~' h ti r r r (+') ~ (p (+') O N •-- N (D f~ f~ N (D O CA CD O N h O ti O cQ I~ 00 O c0 cD ti O Q~ ti N N N O 6~ t- O c~ ti p r- M cD O O O O d7 ~ [Q ti O M M a0 O ~ O d' N c0 O : u1 ti ~ cp N N o0 u7 01 ro ti O M cc u7 ti u~ 1~ •- Co a7 c0 N ~t cD O ti N~~ O h O O,~ N r d' (D O O d] O 00 N r N O o lI7 O N ('7 O 00 O 'Cr ~ ~ O N r r^ r r r r ~r r ~- r r r ~- (y ~ r m ti M d] O N ~} W ~ ~ Z M o 0 Q wwN N~;wa ~mW m w cnu~v~cncn ~~.w w z ww w Y ~ ~. ,~ ~ wwwww oo~ ~J~oo ~~o ~ ~~-~~~- o oo oo ~ z rn Q zZ zo z o Z 00000 Z Z o J Z Z Z N W [n Z Z Z Z Z w w Y Y~ W J Y Y w Y W 0 ~ ~ a Y Y Y Y Y U U ~ ~ z o ¢ ~ ~ U cY U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢ ww¢ ¢ow ¢w W Z c n ; ¢ W ¢¢¢¢¢ ,~ W O (a ~ LWL LWL U W U J Iwi ~ W U U IWi W W~. U W W p W U U U U U ¢ N zo. ~ ~ ~~wNO~w° °~W ~ww~~QOz'w0~~z0 wwwww ~ W ~' U W W Z ~ ~ J J J J m^ Z^ m'~ J Z m m J^ Z Z J m Z^ J m Z^^ m m m m m O Z ~ Z J J ¢¢ Z o a ~ W ~ g ¢ ~ ~ } J~ Q - } J J¢ Z }~ }¢ J} Z¢ J} Z Z J J J J J mm~n~,mm¢o~o¢ m cn~¢¢mo~~m¢~om¢~oo¢¢¢¢¢ m m~n ~ ¢ ^ z Q m.am }}^^oo o~^^mmom>>om~mom~mmmmmmm Z Z J J O m J Q:1 J O a ~ LL Z a~ IY ¢ w o ~ aV?u~~Ofna~Qcnwa~a~OO ~~U U(7~aQa~~L7~Z~ » o ¢ ¢ 4¢ U¢¢¢C~ ¢QC7._.I¢¢¢ U U ~ ~ J ] Z Y U7rnmmC.}U ~W~ UUUmWUUU~WW{.}UWI-UUw~~Ut7C7(7C7 Q W w () ¢ o ~¢ ~` (~ ¢ Q m m~~ m~ m Q~ g~ m~¢¢ g m~~ g Q~ m~ m~ m m Q¢¢¢¢ W W () U J J~ J J~ J J J () ~ 2 J J J~ J J J J J 2 ^ ~ O ~ ~ ~ m N IL Il lL lL LL LL ^ LL IL lL LL LL LL ^ LL LL LL; LL ] ] 1L ; iL ^ LL lL LL ^ LL ~L lL LL LL LL LL ~no~nooo~noovooMOOOOOOMOoooooN h lt7 N O O O h 0 tY1 O O h 0 0 ll~ O Q N O O ltd r- O O h ~ 00oooou~ooo~nrn O O 00 N N r N (D O O N h ~' N r~ In O D ', lA ~~ N N O~ h O ~1? l[? w O C7 N O O K r f'7 O O l17 (D ' O I N O In N M O N h r ltd r 01 O t!7 ~ (D ~ h O' O (p r-' f'~ c7 r ('7 00 N I~ r O~ O O U7 N O O h d' N N O ~ 00 O~ N N O N O (D t- N h r~ N i0 P'] N h O '~ O N W w h h u~ M h r h~ M ', (D r c0 N w cY] N h r- 00 N r. (A - ~- r ~ (A N N ' 'r ' ~ N r O O r CD ('7 CQ O~ u7 ~ O O h' O' OQ Q7 h O N t~] h 0 (fl ' - M ~[ ~ ~# ( r O 3 ~f? ~1? (p (0 r O O (D CO O lt7 l0 O O ~ J '~t o0 h O In h N lf7 N' (0 O O M O N O (0 M O Op 00 h~ h h CV Ln O O ' r O N ~ (0 O O N iD O fD h h~ O (D O O 00 (p O ¢¢ r r (1J (~j r r r r r ~ r- r r- r r r N ] 69 , 6g 0 0 0 o a o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 0 ~ O o,o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o'a a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'0 0 0 0 0;0 o O O v O o 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 0 o v o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 woo~ioooovNaouioooooo~ioNOOOO `~ o000ooooovo~io M ~w~nhoou~~ocvoOhoooOOONOhvo~nu~ N ~noooo~nNOOOhr r ~~r~hcvo~nr•~snNCOOO~NOrmc~aocoaohhaohh " ~ coOC~hoocOCOC00oooco ~' ~~ r ~ N N r r i- r ~ ER r r r- r r r ~ ER O~c~moooooNr~ '~nrnc~~noooc~ha~rn~iN rru~ r'Mh.NOC~hCOV(,4NO a Z }' O O O O O M~ ~ h h r N '~t ~~ cD N cr1 t~7 M u} ~ cQ cD O ~ ('~] N c*) r 01 N O ti r O N h h Z Q O (1D 00 CO O O O O O O r r r r r r C7 C17 M~ l17 (D (D . (D h D r' r, N N ('] ~ In (D 00 Op 00 C7 r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r W ~ J O O r ('4 r (+~ r N lf~ I!7 '~ lf) lrj (D r t~ h r (A h '~ N M N (D h r h 00 O O r M h h r (D N~ '~t u~ M N r- r N h 00 N ~ N M O N' N' O O O QO O ti O N~ f0 Cr a7 C'7 h ('7 N W~~ (0 (p T- O N O cD ~ N O O r N O h~~ t!7 '~ ~~ h~ '~ CO 00 h O h M i0 N h~ O Op D p3 r Ct] Op O 00 } r t- r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r- r r r r w r r r r r r r 0 0 o~ ~ o w N W ~ - J r M F.. ¢ U Q O O O O O O r' r r r ti- r r r r r r r r N N N N N N - +70 fl0 OQ OQ O p p p7 O O O O (1] ~ ~V./ Z a r r r r ~- r r r r r r r r- r r r r r r r r r r r I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 ! I I 1 1 { I I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 ~. Q a a V V ~ ~ L 4 L L ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~J ~ L ~ Q. ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0~ 0~ N d d N N c~ 7 0 0 0~~ q} U U O O O O O D 0 0 0 0 ~-' ~" t- 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I ]~ a"i 0~~ p~~ ~7 V~~~ m o~ ~ c;~v~v~~^o~~~~Qa~~~~zzz~~v,ooZ ~¢az~u.¢Q^? 1 ¢ W~ Q O r ~ rN- Q p r Or ~ r~ M ~ r tom- ~ Or M M E !'~ M ''" r (~ 1 I r I ~~ r h 1~ 0 fl0 r r In r O r O o O r N O r r ¢ ~ ¢ W ~ ^~ W ~! ~~ W ~~ h (D (0 h 00 h 00 h QO c0 h h h h h h h h 00 h h h h G~0 00 O O O O O v O 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I L L C7 N (D h cD CO 1~ h [0 (D 00 h O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 D O o I I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 f ~ ¢ d ¢ w= W ~ a a L S3 G ~. L ~, c L L ~, c c o C1 ~ U ~' U L L ~ a ~ ro c~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ a c~ ~ ~ ~ a~ a~ co a~ ~ U ~ ro ~ ~nQcn~~^~O~g~¢gg~~u~^~^~o^~~ 1 *~ L c rn .c ~ c~~ L~ a ~ ~ ~ 3 ti Z ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ a~ o ~~ y" V p ~ ~ a ^ 1 I 1 I , 1 I , , 1 1 , , { 1 , , I , ~ 1 , 1 1 ho~ncvorr~r~~oNO~aou~o~Or~ooo N O r r r ti l~ O M O O N r M O r r r ~- r O r r r I 1 1 1 1 hao~~oo~~Ta~oo~ O O r i- r N r O N r N ] ~ ~ (ry U ~ • ° J W a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o v o 0 0 0 0 o v o o a o 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 00 O l!7 CD Op In h (0 (D O r N N O~~ N O~ h C7 O O N O O ~- (D h - 0 \ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 o \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (D ~ (p In O r O (0 C7 C7 ~ M a \ r J o ~` ~ t O r M (D ~ O N OQ ~ h 00 C{? O r O N M Ct ~ w O~ O O lt7 CO ('7 r f0 r- r~ O r G] 0} O N O CrJ ~ N 00 00 ('''7 '~ ~ N 00 ~ C7 O 00 O~ N N~~ ~- r N (~ r- ('7 O r N N ~ ~t U} lf? d' N M N ~ N ~ to 'ct ~ ~] ~? In lL7 C'? N ('~ t!7 ~ ('~ M N ~ M 'Kr N lL7 ~ In 1.() lrj l[7 I.f) N ~ O o a ~ ~ v o o ~ o a p 4 0 0 0 ~ o o ~~ 0 0 0 ~ v a o ~ ~n~nu~~nooo~nou~u~~noooo~no0o~no0o~n o o ~ ~~' 0 0 0 ~ a o o ~~ o ~ Z w ~ N h h h lf? ~[? O h In N N h 0 0 0 Lf? h 0 0 U7 h lf) O O h r CO 00 00 h h Ct] d] N CD r 00 0 0 0 N o0 N l0 h o0 N Rf] l0 (+'? r cD O ooo0u7lt7lf]oNO~no O O O N h N h lL7 h O N 0 l~ O O (V 00 (D o0 N M lf? r a0 c~ (D N N O O c~ M tt ~ ~ M I!7 lC1 ~ cD CO co u7 ~ 'b' ~ ~ ~ 'd' ~ ~ c~ M M cv ~ cfl r? M cp ~c] [~ ~ 'Kt' h ~ w ] Z N O [0 ('~ 0 0 (D O C7 0 0 00 0 0 0 O O O N O O c0 0 01 rn W N O lC7 rD In u7 O O O N O c~ 00 O 00 O N lt7 r~ ap l~} ~ In L'~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 c~ o o v u7 v Ln O O O O~ r O 0 0 N [4 '- ~ ~ J ¢ ~ O r u~ h N~ {g ~!] O Cp N (0 ~} 00 N h N lS7 (,Q (D N O It7 N h r O N h h 0] r 0 0? r lt? 0] h Cr1 (D ~~ r h 0 l0 N cD ~ N O h N~ iD O N c ~ iD h O I• '* ~ ~ M O CD r N N (fl 00 O O r N ~ In In r O h {p ~~ (p r 0 ~ ~ ~ , h O O N r N~ c ) op O M O O r In Cp h lrj r h 00 (Q C7 r r ('7 'Kt 0] r [~ O r 0 fD r ~ 0~7 N~ O r 0 00 op O cD N T- I.f) I.f) N ifJ M ~- h (D ~!] (0 O M N Y o o rn N o ~- cD M O l17 O O 00 u7 L'7 (+'} O O c~ h N f~ O N ov oo d~ h h 0] u7 h N t1] N (D D O N O r CO In OQ 00 00 h h 00 h h N [!7 lCJ co r h N O O O (D O N (fl O ti] h h OD Op !.f) O O OD (D O (D o r N N r r r O (fl r r r r- r ~ m ~ 69 Ln W ~ ~ L11 z p~ ~ cn° o o ~~ z ~ w o zw z~ o J z ' ~~ ww m ww ~ ~ ~ cn ~ w z m J ~~~ W www w . 00 ~~ m Q Oz~o~ m mv~Z z~-v~ o ~.~ o . oo ~ zz ¢0 zz 000 z zzz z a ~ ; ~, m ~ ~ ~ pw0~~o~~~Ozcn cn J O ww U ww w U U X~~ U U ~~~ U ~ ~Q a ~ J oo a z}~ ~ 0¢ a m? O m ww ~¢o ww ¢¢¢ w ~~~ ~ ~ ! ~JzU.mzm~aaUp O.m¢ '..o~po>> ~ ~ ~~ wwN w= m wwU1222 NcncnWcncn cn wLLw ~U wwwUUU ^wwwww w cn w 0 w H p ~ 0 . . U°~Z~~{~UO~Z(7 C7~ a~ ¢ W W W ~"' O Z ^ W W~ Z Z Z Z I- I-- W I- ~ ~ cn ~ ~ 0 z w.w ~ ~o w~w w ~ p 0 0 ~ 00 0. ~ Z 0 ~~(7cn ¢ (7 ~. } o~ Q Z w ~ ~ ~ w ~ U ~ W c~ 0 ^ J J Z J m.~' J J Z m LO m^ m Z Z J Z Z Z w ~ . I C Y I a,~ o J'~ ~ ¢ W Z o Z¢¢} ¢w;a Z ¢¢}~J~z J}}¢}} } omm~v~mm~ ~,mm~mmm°a~~m~~~nv~~ ~ ¢ ~ w _ U~ oU pz wOQUZO~-WU~ ¢ , ~ Ocn~U ~z~ ;m ~ ¢ moo^oo owoo^ mm>>o>>^^^ ^ ~ I c~ O , w ~w w¢ 0 f- ~ ~ ~ J J (n Z J O (n F.. J J (n O O o a° (n {n J V) [/) Z Z' UJ QC~c~¢oc~ woo°¢. ¢~¢¢c~¢¢oo¢ C7 C7 c~ w w m 0 o~ Z ¢ r2 ~ ' J Z 11. ¢ Z ] CL' J Z Z ~~ ¢ ~ g ~ z c ~ O ~ 0 O.w ~ O V ~ w m m w z U U ~ ~ o ocnU Q o ~ ~ ~ o ~ N ~ ~ ~ m~~~ U~~ U m~~~ ~ ~ ~ m W Z w~ ¢ W ~ ~ H U U m ~ 2~ ~ ~ Z J~~ U J Z J U ^ I22NIi2ZLL.222~ZZZ22N~2~(I~ILIiU} L L ~ o W¢W~oQ¢w JoQQ ~ L L LL LL ll. LL LL LL LL LL ] !L EL LL LL LL ~ ] LL ~ ~ LL U.. ~ cri U m ~ ¢ ~ ~ ~ U W UI ~ ~j F m c~ a av ~r •- N ~- v ca o ~ ~ c~ N ~ o ~, ao ' N o ~ ~ ~ ~ as ~ M r ~ M r 00 ~ c7 o ti? ~ Oh? O ID , ° ° ' r h O' f", M ~ cYJ `' CO M r *" o o M r h M O N I~ ~ ~ ~ ry o o c~ u~ ti oo cv, c~ ~ ~ o ao 00 ~ t- r tfj r^ Q N ~ O ' ~ i cD Lb 0 I V' ~ 00 r (fl N~ (D N 'd' CD O O r O ti] ~ '~F r? O r O tt~ o ~' D (Q O ~ M', O W N (A M~ 00 r N N r O 'tt h~ h N 00 ~ O r~ O~~ N r ~ p~p O N (D h O DO In ~ N O 00 D h r r- ', {t} r ffl I` OO r O M q' r N t0 ~ C'7 O 00 N (p W W ~ ti O N Oi r ~ ~ ('~ In h {~ N Q~ U1 O Q1 M .- 01 CA ti N Ifl N r DO h am' I~ O N h h (D 6R C17 d' r .~ O S~ O O O M~ O M O O O N ti M h cD Ln CO 01 h cD I~ i~ ~ J N N w d3 ~ r~ h N N~~ ONO N r N N N' r OMO ', M' r (D N (0 N M CM7 ~ N N N Q ~ N b9 b9 6R r" 5F} N ~ ffl ~ - ~ N r c'r1 W '~t Y^' r O cD O h (0 lf) ~ O O O O~ M O~ r~ M N O O M 0~~ I~ O O O O r ti D~ 00 O N r O M r r 0 0 C''i r h M O N I~ ~ ~- O I~ M ltd M r r O O 1~ Q] O O M O ('7 ~~ N O O M lf] f~ O N M 'a' O O CO CO Q1 w r r O N O CO (D O O f0 N '~t CD N ~ CO O 41 N O O ~ ~ M O r O O O ~ . Cl D D ~ h ~ 00 (p c') ~ CO •-~ N N '~- O d' d' h •- h In W N (0 r M 0I d9 ~ ~y '~ r- r• O N (fl {~ O ao In O O o0 CD h r s-' O r' N -` D r O M ~ r N c0 M M 01 (f1 00 N ID r O ifl (D - r I` DD O (0 N O O - d3 Q1 EA D' h In . 69 N r OO h~ h O N h h O ~ J ti O bg D M ,- !` r eM- 'S# o C''? O O N~~ CMD (''? O T CD N I~ M h (D N O D h (D f~ I` N N `'~ ifl ~ r~ h N N~ O N~ .- N N DO r O0 N r 0 0 0 0 r M N N N N - h ~ OD N - N OO M i0 ~ N M M O N u7 u7 ¢ ¢ N 6g 6F} b9 r r ~ ] d} ~ M ~ bg N r M } t- (Q r r r r r r- r r r r N 0 e-- r r (D O Ln r r r s- r r r r w r (p r r-- r r r ~- r r r N 0~ 0~ Z r r~ ~~ U7 O D O O O O M r- Q r ~ N f~ M O O N ~ W ~ J r (p 'r" r r r t- r r r- r r {p Ln r r r DD (r) O r r r r r r r r r r t-- r r r (p (A r r ~- r 11 (~ h~ z- O ~ O m O m O 6i O q) Q~ D ~ N O m O ~ [t7 D O 0} O O 0) q) D D D O cD d7 6] O cD cD 0~ 07 a] 6~ LO rn d' ~ M ~ c') -t7 N M a0 h cD (0 c0 u7 ~!? h } N in C'] f~ r d' ~ O M ¢ r r O^ I I W . I ~ N ~ ~ 6L~L r I C¢ C 00 N 00 M DD 00 CD 00 W M DD DO 00 m CO 00 00 ~ to O aQ oa DD 00 00 OD CO DO OO o0 cD O 00 O M M a0 a1 M oa d' O Q~ M rn O r O O O O O O O O O O O r O O O r N r O O O O O O O O O O r O O O M c~7 O O o o r 0 0 0 0 I 1 1 I 1 i I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I l 1 I I I ~ I I I I I 4 a L 4 L L L L L L L L ~ L L L a +~ ~ L 1,.. L L L L 4 L L L U L L L L L L L L L aro aaaaaaaaaa~ ~ aaaro m ro aaaaaaa.aaa~ aaaro c~ aaaa ~~ a~,aaaaaaaa¢¢~Q¢¢¢~,~~¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢^¢¢¢~~¢¢¢¢~~QQ~ r- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I r w r r r r r r t- r r r r t- r r r r r r r r t-' r° r t- r r r r r ti-- ~_ D O D ~^ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N a 0 0 0 0 o r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ o° o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q W D (D CO D M O O Qa 00 CO M 00 [~ ~ W OO N ltd ('+) lry M DO OO 00 O 00 O 00 00 a0 M a0 CO CO M M CD CO OO CO M f~ a0 h h ~ O O O O o O Q O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D D O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ¢ W C a C C C C C C C C C C~ C C C C V U .Q C C C C C C, C C C C U C C C U U C C C C U •-' ~ .Q ~ co m m m ca ~ c~ ro c~ c~ ~ ~ ro ro ro a~ c~ c~ ro ro co m ro m m ~a a~ ro ro c~ a~ a~ c~ ro ro to ro U~ ro ro i I I 1 ! I I I I I 1 1 r I 1 ! I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I i I I i I I I I I I Q I ^ r r r r r r r r r r r r L~ r r r r r r.. r r r r t- r r r r- r O r r r O O r r r r D r- O O CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 `~ r o 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 o v o o r o 0 o r~ v o v o r o 0 0 0 a J o a o o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N~ 0 0 0 o a O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 } ocnooo~o0ooooOc~NO~r~oNNN~n~nc~~nu~Ncn~u~ru~u~u~ooN~n+n~noo~noo r- r r r-- Q r r r r r r r O r- O M M~ O O~~~ CO O~~~~~ In ~~ ~} N N~~~~ O D fti O O O~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d' u7 O M co u~ ~ C+j r r r- 'd' (~j ~ r r- ~ r~ e- r ~ lt7 In r r ~- ~ O ~ N~~ ~,r, o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o o v o 0 0 0^ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N O 0 0 v~~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v 0 0 0 o rn o 0 0 0 0 0 o M~ o~~ o N N~~ u~ o~~ rn u~ ~~ r u~ N~ o o tf? ~ u7 lA o o u7 v o r r r r p r r r r r- r r s~ z- O M M d' O (p Ct '~ ~ CD ~~~~~~ l!7 O tC ~t N N~~~~ 0 0 h 0 0 O u7 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ u~ O Crj r7 uy ~ (+'j r r r- ~' r r .-- r r r (~j r r- l(j l(j r r-- ~ r O O N u7 u~ D O D u] pOO cD lf7 ~~ r N 0 1~ t-- O (0 ~ I` O h o f~ (D N~ O W D N r~ C4 C7 r r D 0 L'7 Y h L'7 O N h~ W ~- 0) ti M lf7 M r r M r O~ cYi O lf} h 0 0 0 O O r i` O h M 00 Ci7 ~~ N O O M In !~ OO N ('~ ~ 0 0 00 O ~ {p N~ (D N '~ M~ Cn r N O N r O N O ~- O N O O (D O O h~ CO fp (+) ~ M r CV N ~- O~ tt I` r h I.() DD J N cfl r M 0 ffl ~ O~ r h h `ct H M O OO u7 O O In O O O'~ O r N h W r- D M~ r N (0 O M O ER W N (D ¢ r O O (fl N r h 00 C1} N (fl I` ID N O CD O O (D h r r d~ O 64 O I~ l!7 ffl N r W h~ h O N h I~ (,p ] h O NEf3 O r s I~ O !'7 lC) h M CA ~] r- O O M r- d? O (D N h M {~ (D lf) 00 O h (0 f~ h ~[ O N r CI] 01 1~ N r~ 0~ CD N Cfi ('~ ~ (D M DO r CO N 'r O (D cD O r M N N N N O N fF! r r~ h N N h I.() 00 N r N N N Dd M (D ~!] N M M O N N l!] o ~j ffl fA ~ t- N M ~ ~ N ~ M m b9 ffl FR .. .-..-. W ^^ W ~ ] ~ W !-- i`- ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ W z z Z ~ w a d a lY W W W (~ (I? (~ (A U? U} V} (~ (A UJ (I) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W W W ^^^z^.^!^^^^ O^O~~^^^^~c~^^^ ^ ^^^^^>>>>^ >jW zzzpz~z;z'zzzQzzzcv~vzzzzo^~~~ J J J J J J J J J J J d~ W d a a a a W~~ Q. a s o~~~~ O W Il u, ~, ' W. IL ' u_ W LL ' lL V} W LL W ry N W W LL W ~- W W W W ~ZQ'~Q'a',~'a'W'a'W'~ U `Uf1~¢Z~~1-;~-W~~F-I-~~F- j~F-~.~~~~H~F-r~Q¢¢ F' ^W~^^~^^~^^^ (}`~~~'~- ~U?(n(A Ul(!J'U]fl~U1~(AZ~(A(nda(~fn(1)N0. N' Q --~ - r ZZZ C Z Z',Z ZZZ -~Z'Z Z~~ Z Z Z Z~~ U U U (l1 ~ fn fn ~ , (A . (!~ fA U} U} (A U} Z *-- ~- Z _ _ ^ ¢W¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢ rof-~WW a~•~'~~~~'F-~'~~W~~h-OV~I--~~I-~Q~~l-- ~ W W W W W W W W W.W W W f/),^ C I- ~!~~~~~~~~~~;~WZ~YY~W~ZZ~ZWZZ',ZZZZ~ZZZ ZZZZ w~~~ ~+ ~~u] WW W.] W,W W'W W W Z W W W C7 (~ W W W W C7 ~ I ~(!)I-~F-I-~F-UHF--~F-~t~~~ N ~ ¢ o ~QQW(~o~;^^Z^~O^',C]^O ^^^ZZ^^^OZ~UUU 0 0000000000 ¢ ~----_--------- z^~ ] ~;]]]^]]~]]] ]]]^^]]]]^o ~: o~ooo000000o wL~~z~ o00 0oooooQooozzoooozc~aaQ ~. ~~~~uQ.~u¢.~~~~~~~"ww w~d~'a~aaaa~a0aaau.waaaau.¢www Z Z L ^ ~ ^ z z 111 ~ O I I I Z I I I ! I I ~ I I I ^ © I I I I ^ O W ~~ (n {n LA U} U} (I} (1) UJ (A V) ro¢ U O O VZ F'- Y Y Y~ Y; Y Y Y Y Y Z Y Y Y W W Y Y Y Y W~¢ g Q rd J J J J J J J J J J J p~ ~ m~~ ._ (/) Z J J J ~' J W J J J J J J ...! J J J ~p ^ W Z Z Z Z' Z ZZZ Z Z Z Z Z 2 2 Z ZZZ 2 J Q¢¢ a~ W] W W W W W W W W W W p)L7 W I I Z ~¢¢ Q¢¢¢¢¢¢¢ ¢¢¢ U U¢¢¢¢ U N Z ~-~ ]¢ m m m~ m m m m'm m Z m m m~ H m m m m~ W W W IL I I I I I I I i I I I I I 1 ~-~ Z Z Z O Z Z Z Z Z Z ~, Z Z Z Z Z Z Z w? zzzzzzz}}}}~'~}~-QQ~m~oooaoooooo~ooo~~oooo~~zzz ^~ mmmmmmmmmmmm~mm~~c°~~~~~]~>>~~>j~>j~¢Q~>j~¢mmmm as (~ a {n Q} {n -- a ~ o z ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ a Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ -~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~~- v ~ ~, ~~ ~ ~ a~ LL ~ ~ ~ . ~- Q J a ~o wo ~ N Qr J M a= ~U o~ ~a ~~ d Q N .F.~ N d ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ a~ ~o Wo ~ N Q ~ J M a= r, o~ ~a ~~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m Q .... ~ I I, ~ IE ,•,~,~,•,•,• .•.•,•,• ............................................................ d) . ..... .................................. . 3 m i ` ii i J i ~.,. L ~ ' W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LL _ ~ .....'. ,'.....'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'..'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' 4i I v I i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 ., 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o ~ o ~ Cy (\J .. r r N ~-- CITY ~F ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Debra Kurita City Manager Date: May 6, 2008 Re: Set Hearing Date of June 3, 2008, for Consideration of Collection of Delinquent Business License Fees Via the Pro ert Tax Bills BACKGROUND City of Alameda Ordinance No. 2655 added Municipal Code Section 5-1.2, "License a Debt." Specifically, the ordinance provides for the collection of delinquent business license fees and charges via the property tax bill. DISCUSSIONIANALYSIS The Finance Department continually pursues collection of business license tax from owners and managers of commercial and multi-family residential rental properties who have no current business license. Property owners are notified by mail using the last mailing address shown in the County tax records and are given ample time to respond prior to sending the fins[ notices. Included with the notices is contact information written in the six languages most commonly spoken within the city. Payments are accepted through June 30. Those parcels for which licenses and fees are paid will not be placed on the tax roll. All unpaid fees will be recorded on the County tax roll on July ~, 2008. BUDGET CONSIDERAT[ONIFINANCIALlMPACT Delinquent fees will be determined at the close of business on June 30, 2008. This is the final day of acceptance of the late payments. RECOMMENDATION Set June 3, 2008, for a public hearing to consider collection of delinquent business license fees via the property tax bills. City council Agenda Item #4-D o~-os-os Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Respectfully submitted, Ju a-Ann Boyer Chief Financial officer Laura Gwynne Supervising Accountant May 5, 2008 Page 2 of 2 LG:JABIdI CITY ~F ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Debra Kurita City Manager Date: May 6, 2448 Re: Set a Hearing Date of June 3, 2408 for Consideration of Collection of Delin vent Administrative Citation Fees Via the Property Tax_Bills BACKGROUND City of Alameda Municipal Code Section Administrative Costs," allows for the collectio fines or late payment charges by means of a which the violations} occurred. RAMC} 1-7,12, entitled "Recovery of n of any past due administrative citation judgement lien against real property on DISCUSSIGN The Code Enforcement Section of the Planning and Building Department issues administrative citations for violations of the Alameda Municipal Code. ~IUhen a property owner fails to voluntarily comply with repeated requests and notices from Code Enforcement staff, an administrative citation may be issued. In some cases, the property owner is delinquent or refuses to pay the f ne, and additional citations are issued. When administrative fines have not been paid in full within 94 days of the first citation issued, the obligation may constitute a lien against the property. Property owners are notified of outstanding fees at the property address where the violations} occur by certified U.S. mail, and, if different from the property address, at the mailing address on file. Gwners are given ample time to respond before Code Enforcement sends the final notice. Those parcels far which administrative citation fees are due and unpaid as of June 30, 2448, will have a judgment lien recorded against the property on July 1, 2008. BUDGET C4NSIDERATIONIFINANCIAL IMPACT Delinquent administrative citation fees will be determined at the close of business on June 30, 2048. This is the final day of acceptance of the late payments. Should the fees not be paid, a lien shall be recorded against the real property for the administrative penalties due. The total fees due to the General Fund should these two liens be approved amount to $16,500 Attachment 1 }. City Council Agenda Item #4-E 05.06.08 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council REC~MMENDATI4N May 6, 2008 Page 2 of 2 Set June 3, 2008, for a public hearing to consider collection of delinquent administrative citation fees via the properky tax bills. Respectfully submitted, !~` ~~ Cathy oodbury Planning & Building Director ~ , By:Tim Higares Senior Code Enforcement officer Attachment: 1. Properkies to be Liened for Unpaid Code Enforcement Fees W W LL H Z W W V DC O z w W D O V D Q a z 0 0 w z w J W m H W F- W a O a a W 0 o 0 o o v o o o v o v o v o a o v v o o o 0 o v o o o 0 o a o o o o v o o o o o a o 0 O 0 o 0 0 0 o o o o v o 0 o ~ o 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ^ 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 o o o 0 ~n u~ 0 0 0 o o 0 o ~n o 0 ~ 0 w 0 w 0 w 0 w 0 w o w o w o w o `. ~n N ~• h o w o o o o v ~n N r• ~ Z r r r r r r r r r ~ ~ Q~ r w r w r r. ~r n r w ~-- ~ ~ h h ~ E~ ~-} ~ Ef} ~} ff} fF} ~} d~} ~ d~} (f} ~ ~} ~ ~} ~}} r ~ a o W w ~ Q w > > [- ~ oo o oa o ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 oo ~ r• r~ ~ ti ~• r~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ o ~ v N o U o 1 _0 o M 0 ~ ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ v ~ 0 ~ o ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ 7 Z a O N r~ D O N ~ Z W r ~ O ~ O ~ N . r ~ t` ~ o ~ N ~ ~ N ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . r ~ ~ O ~ r- r r o o 0 o rn o oo ~n 0 r r 0 o 0 a~ ~• 1` ~ Z a 0 o r r r r r o o 0 o ~ o r r r r v v o ~ c Q Q ~ Zr co oo ao N d' ~ ~ N ~ N r u~ ~D M C~ u~ I` o ~n ~ ~'r? ~ ~? M N r r r 0 0 ~-- i~ {~ M N r 0 N r 0 ao av a oo oa ov ao oo oo ~ o ao ao oo oo ao ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q o v o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ U U V V U V U U U U U C) U U C~ U U U C) - Q a Q Q Q ~ Q Q Q a Q Q Q Q Q ~ Q Q Q t~ W z 0 L oC '~ v W ~ ~ a p o ~- ~ o a ~ ~ `~ J a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ W v ~ a~ N OC ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ C a ~ J ~ (~ M N r" N W ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ Z N a o r ° o o o ~ o J d' ~ ~ a W ~ ti X a X ~ r o ~ N ~ Q o ~ ~ ~ N a ~ r o ~ o C~ City Council Attachment to Agenda Item #4-E 05-06-08 City of Alameda Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Debra Kurita City Manager Date: May 6, 2008 Re: Award a Community Development Block Grant Funded Contract in the Amount of $96,400 to AJW Construction, Inc., and Authorize a 10°/° Contingency in the Amount of $9,640, for the Construction of Disabled Accessible Curbs at 3l locations at Alameda Point and the Creation of a Ramp at the Alameda Point Collaborative Services Center BACKGRQUND The City Council authorized the solicitation of bids for an Alameda Point disabled accessible curbs and ramp project as part of the FY tool-08 Community Development BiockGrant ~CDBG}budget process. The projectwasfunded in responsetoafairhousing audit conducted by the Department of Housing and Urban Development THUD}. The project includes the installation of 3l curb cuts for disabled access at Alameda Point and the creation of an ADA-compliant accessible ramp at the Alameda Point Collaborative Services Center. DlscussloN The project was bid on December 10, 2001. To solicit the maximum number of bids and obtain the most competitive price, specifications were provided to the Small Business Exchange, which provides construction reporting, online databases, education, resources, and other services forthe construction industry. A mailing listwasalso compiled through resources from Development Services, Public Works, and Alameda Power& Telecom. In addition, a notice of bid was published through the City's website. A total of eight contractors attended the mandatory pre-bid meeting, which was held on January 24, 2008. Bids were opened on February 11, 2008. Seven contractors submitted bids as follows: Bidder Total Bid Sposeto Engineering SpenCon Construction AJVIJ Construction Vanguard Construction UUhiteside Construction Alaniz Construction Ghilotti Brothers $18,230 $94,500 $96,400 $97,700 $98,691 $124,600 City Council $1 ll ,000 Agenda Item #4-F 05.06-og Honorable Mayor and May 6, 2008 Members of the City Council Page 2 of 2 After reviewing the bids and consulting with the City At#orney's office, the two apparent lowest bidders were deemed non-responsive for failing to submit certifications required to comply with federal contracting procedures. The two companies have been informed of their non-responsive bid status. AJW Construction was the lowest responsive bidder for the construction of the disabled accessible curbs and ramp. The contract with AJVII Construction is on file in the City Clerk's Office. BUDGET CONSIDERATIONIFINANCIALlMPACT The project budget for the ramp and curb cuts is $104,410. The project will be funded through the CDBG program and will not require anysupplementalappropriations orhave any fiscal impact on the City's Genera! Fund. MUNICIPAL CODEIPOLICY DOCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE The Project Plans and Specifications and the call for bids have been prepared in accordance with the Alameda Municipal Code. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The federal environmental review for the Disabled Accessible Curbs and Ramp Project was completed. No additional CEQA review is required. RECOMMENDATION Award the contract in the amountof $96,400, toAJW Construction, authorize a ten percent contingency in the amountof $9,640, forthe Disabled Accessible Curbs and Ramp Project, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Contract for Construction and all related documents. Res ect ly ~u Fitted, .` r~ ! ~ 1 ~ Leslie A. Little Development Services Director By. Debbie Potter Base Reuse & Community Development Manager LALIDCITW:sb CITY aF ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Debra Kurita City Manager Date: May 6, 2008 Re: Award a Contract in the Amount of $12,692, Including Contingencies, to Universal Building Services, for Janitorial Services in City Buildings, No. P.W. 01-08-01 BACKGRaUND ~n February 19, 2008, the City Council adopted plans and specifications and authorized a call for bids for janitorial services in City buildings, No. P.W. 01-08-01. The project consists of regular janitorial service, at the frequency noted below, for the following ten City-owned and maintained buildings: Location Animal Shelter Central Garage City Hall City Hall West, Alameda Point Ferry Terminal, 2990 Main Street Fire Department Training, Building 522, Alameda Point Fire Station #5, Administrative offices, Alameda Point Fire Station #1, Administrative Gffices Maintenance Service Center Veterans Building Fre uenc 2 dayslweek 2 dayslweek 3 dayslweek 3 dayslweek 5 dayslweek 2 dayslweek 3 dayslweek 2 dayslweek 2 dayslweek 3 dayslweek The Police building, Main Library, and library branches are managed through separate maintenance contracts. All other remaining City buildings are maintained by the staff within the associated department. DISCUSSIGN To solicit the maximum number of bids and most competitive price, specifications were provided to 1l separate building exchanges throughout the Bay Area. A notice of bid was published in the Alameafa Journal. The bids were opened on April 3, 2008. Seven contractors submitted bids, one of which was disqualified because it was incomplete. The list of qualified bidders, from lowest to highest total project cost, is as follows: City Council Agenda Item #4-G 05-06-48 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council May 6, 2008 Page2of2 Bidder Location Bid Amount Universal Buildin Service Richmond, CA $60,516.36 Clean Innovation Cor oration Santa Clara, CA $65,416.00 Sunnyvale Building Maintenance San Jose, CA $85,955.36 Buildin Services Maintenance, Inc Concord, CA $97,896.24 Clean Net of Ba Area Oakland, CA $103,900.68 Rose's Cleanin Alameda, CA $135,816.00 Staff contacted three references provided by the low bidder and received positive feedback about the quality and timeliness of their work. Staff proposes to award a contract to Universal Building Service, for a total amount of $72,692, including a 20% contingency. A copy of the contract is on file in the City Clerk's office. As with all annual maintenance contracts, this contract may be mutually amended on a year-by- year basis, for up to four additional years, based on satisfactory performance of all aspects of this contract. If extended, the contract would be for the same terms and costs, plus an annual increase equal to the construction price index increase forthe San Francisco Bay Area appropriate to the trades associated with the work as reported in the Engineering News Record forthe previous calendar year. BUDGET CONSIDERATIONIFINANCIAL IMPACT The project is budgeted under 4295-66300, janitorial services, for $45,196 with funds available from the General Fund, and $26,896 from Alameda Point bond funds. MUNICIPAL CODEIPOLICY DOCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE This action does not affect the Alameda Municipal Code. RECOMMENDATION Award a contract in the amount of $12,692, including contingencies, to Universal Building Services for janitorial services in City buildings, No. P.W. 01-08-01. Re cull submitted, Matthew T. Naclerio lic Works Director r'' By: Pete Carrai ~-. Public Works uperintendent MTN:PC:gc CITY 4F ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Debra Kurita City Manager Date: May 6, 2008 Re: Award a Contract in the Amount of $205,104, Including Contingencies, to Enviroscapes, Inc., for Landscape Maintenance of Median .Strips and S ecial Areas No. P.W. 01-08-02 BACKG R~ U N D an February 19, 2008, the City Council adopted plans and specifications and authorized a calf for bids for landscape maintenance of median strips and special areas, No. P.W. 01-08-02. The project consists of general landscape maintenance, irrigation repairs, and weed abatement spraying at 61 locations throughout the city. The maintenance of the medians on Bay Farm Island is performed by the Community of Harbor Bay Isle owners' Association through a separate contract with the City. The proposed project also includes color plantings at City Hall three times per year. DISCUSSION To solicit the maximum number of bids and most competitive price, specifications were provided to 17 separate building exchanges throughout the Bay Area. A notice of bid was published in the Alameda Journal. The bids were opened on April 10, 2008. Seven contractors submitted bids, one of which was disqualified because it was incomplete. The list of qualified bidders, from lowest to highest total project cost, is as follows: Bidder Location Bid Amount Enviroscapes, Inc. Fremont, CA $110,919.12 Echo Landscape Castro Valle , CA $188,887.11 Coast Landscape Maintenance, Inc Napa, CA $202,602.32 Hollis Landscapin Qrinda, CA $206,593.44 Rubicon Enterprises, Inc Richmond, CA $226,970.02 Bountiful Botanicals b Lara Oakland, CA $232,413.64 City Council Agenda Item #4-H 05-06-DS Honorable Mayor and May 6, 2005 Members of the City Council Page 2 of 2 Staff contacted three references provided by the low bidder and received positive feedback about the quality and timeliness of their work. Staff proposes to award a contract to Enviroscapes, Inc., for a total amount of $205,104, including a 20°/0 contingency. A copy of the contract is on file in the City Clerk's office. As with all annual maintenance contracts, this contract may be mutually amended on a year-by- year basis, for up to four additional years, based on satisfactory performance of all aspects of this contract. If extended, the contract would be for the same terms and costs, plus an annual increase equal to the construction price index increase for the San Francisco Bay Area appropriate to the trades associated with the work as reported in the Engineering News Record for the previous calendar year. BUDGET CONSIDERATIONIFINANCIALlMPACT The project is budgeted under 439446, landscape maintenance, for$234,000 with funds available from Construction Improvement Funds. MUNICIPAL CODEIPOLICY DOCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE This action does not affect the Alameda Municipal Code. RECOMMENDATION Award a contract in the amount of $205,104, including contingencies, to Enviroscapes, Inc., for landscape maintenance of median strips and special areas, No. P.v1l. 01-08-02. Respectfully submitted, Matthew T. Naclerio Public Works Director By: Pete Carrai Public Works S per~intendent MTN:PC:gc CITY 4F ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Debra Kurita City Manager Date: May 6, 2448 Re: Adopt Plans and Specifications and Authorize a Call for Bids for Rittler Park Irrigation and Field Renovation Improvements, No. P.yy.11-41-34 BACKGRGUND The irrigation system for the playing fields at Rittler Park, which was constructed in the 1964s, is inefficient, provides inadequate coverage, and results in poor turf conditions. The topography of the field does not allow for adequate drainage, further affecting the turf conditions. Due to these limitations, the field is unavailable for sparking events throughout the year. The City Council has approved funding to renovate and reconfigure the playing field as part of the Capital Improvement Program. DISCUSSIGN The proposed project includes: 1. Removal of the existing playing fields' turf and regrade the site and provide properdrainage; 2. Installation of new sod; and 3. lnstailation of a new irrigation system, includinc water application technology irrigation controller. provision of additional topsoil to a climatologically based smart A copy of the plans and specifications is on file in the City Clerk's office. BUDGET CGNSIDERATIGNIFINANCIALlMPACT The project is budgeted in the Capital Improvement Program Project No. 44-36}, with monies allocated from the Construction Improvement Tax. MUNICIPAL C4DEIPGLICY DGCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE This action does not affect the Alameda Municipal Code. City Council Agenda Item #4-l 05-0~-0$ Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ENViR~NMENTAL REVIEW May 6, 2008 Page 2 of 2 The project is exempt from environmental review as it is an ongoing maintenance activity. RECOMMENDATION Adopt plans and specifications and authorize a call for bids for Rittler Park irrigation and field renovation improvements, No. P.W. 11-D1-34. Respectfully submitted, 4 K Y Matthew T, Naclerio Public vUorks Director ~~ ~ti By: Ed Sommerauer b.~ ~ Associate Civil Engineer MTN:ES:gc CITY~FALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Debra Kurita City Manager Date: May 6, 2008 Re: Adopt a Resolution to Preliminarily Approve the Annual Report Declaring the City's Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments and Providing forNotice of Public Hearing July 1, 2008- Island City Landscaping and Liahtina District 84-2 BACKGROUND In accordance with the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Council is required to annually appoint an Engineerand anAttorneyto preparean Engineer's Reportand adopt a resolution preliminarily that approves the report, declares the City's intent to levy and collectthe assessment, and sets a public hearing date on the proposed assessments. The resolution is required to be published at least twice in a local paper with a minimum of 45 days between the first publication of the City's resolution and the public hearing. On February 5, 2008, the City Council appointed an Engineer and an Attorney for the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District 84-2 and authorized the preparation of the Engineer's Report. DISCUSSION The Engineer's Report has been prepared in accordancewith Section 22565 etseq. ofthe California Streets and HighwayCode. A copyofthe Engineer's Report is on file in the City Clerk's office and atallAlameda Library branches. The report provides an annual budget to maintain the improvements within Zones 1 through l of Assessment District 84-2. The purpose of an assessment district is to provide for enhanced maintenance not typically performed bythe City. The Engineer's Report provides an estimate of cost by each of the seven zones see attached maps} to be addressed for fiscal year 2005-2009. The zones and enhanced maintenancework are: Zone 1 -Lincoln Avenue between Sherman Street and St. Charles Street: This zone is responsible for the maintenance of the landscaped median in the 1100 and 1200 blocks of Lincoln Avenue, including the utilities for operating the irrigation. Far fiscal year 2008- 2009, the property assessments will remain unchanged from the previous year's assessment. City Council Report Re: Agenda Item #4-J D5-D6.08 Honorable Mayor and May 6, 2008 Members of the City Council Page 2 of 5 Zones 2 and 3 -Webster Street from Central Avenue to Lincoln Avenue and Webster Street from Lincoln Avenueto Atlantic Avenue: These two zones worktogetherand fund landscape maintenance, semi-annual sidewalk steam cleaning, and seasonal bannersldecorations. In addition, the West Alameda Business Association WABA} oversees a $55,000 annual contract, funded by the zones, for daily litter and graffiti removal, cleaning of the sidewalk and other public areas, weekly mechanical sweeping of the sidewalk, and associated supplies. Assessments have remained unchanged since the early 1990s. Currently, the revenues received from these zones coveronly 53% of the total budget for Zone 2 and 4l °lo for Zone 3. As previously reported to the City Council, during the past few years the budgets for Zones 2 and 3 have used reserve funds that accrued while the Webster Street Streetscape projectwas underconstruction. Lastyear,with the supportof the WABA Board, ballots were mailed to property owners within the zones seeking approval to increase the assessments to cover the actual maintenance expenses; however, the property owners did not approve the increase. WABA does not support an increase in assessments this year, and prefers to continue to use reserves without reducing the maintenance expenses. Continuing to use the reserves in this manner can be accomplished for up to two more years. If continued for just one year, the assessments paid by property owners would need to be increased by approximately SO% in Zone 2 and by approximately 106% in Zone 3. If continued for both years, the reserves will be nearly depleted and the assessments would need to be increased byapproximately90°/° in Zone 2 and by approximately 11l°/o in Zane 3. Alternatively, maintenance could be reduced in half, but this could drastically affect the appearance of the district. Since property owners did not approve similar assessment increases in 2001, staff has analyzed alternatives that assume property owners will approve a moderate increase in fiscal year 2009-2010, with an annual inflation factor adjustment, and that reserves will be used over an extended period to allow time for the assessments to more closely meet expenses. These alternatives, however, ail require that an immediate, and permanent reduction in maintenance expenses be made. The larger the reduction to maintenance expenses, the lower the required increase in assessments. For example, a 20% increase in assessments for fiscal year 2009-2010 would require a permanent maintenance budget reduction in Zone 2 by$10,000 and in Zone 3 by$13,000. By comparison, should a 33% increase in assessments be approved, the maintenance budget would need to be permanently reduced in Zone 2 by $7,500 and in Zone 3 by $10,000. Since an increase over 20°/° could be considered significant bythe property owners, staff has established the budget for fiscal year 2008-2009 based on property owners approving a 20% increase in 2009 and a permanent reduction in maintenanceexpenses in Zone2 by $10,000 and in Zone 3 by $13,000, This reduction would require that litter removal be reduced from everydayto everyotherday, thatthe seasonal banners and decorationsare eliminated, and thatsteam cleaning be reduced fromtwicetoonce a year. To addressthe Honorable Mayor and May 6, 2008 Members of the City Council Page 3 of 5 reduction in service, businesses could be encouraged to perform the litter removal on the days that the maintenance contractor is not performing this work. Zone 4 -Park Street from the Park Street Brid a to San Jose Avenue includin areas of Webb Street Santa ClaraAvenue Lincoln Avenue and Central Avenue: Thiszonefunds landscape maintenance, semi-annual sidewalk steam cleaning, supplies, and seasonal bannersldecorations. In addition, the zone, through the Park Street Business Association (PSBA}, contributes approximately $4,000 to partially fund two, part-time employees who perform litterand graffiti removal and daily mechanical sweeping ofthe sidewalkand other public areas. Assessments have remained unchanged since the early ~ 990s. The revenues received from this zone cover l9°l0 of the total maintenance budget. Similar to Zones 2 and 3, the budget forZone 4 has been drawing on reserve funds to cover the maintenance deficit. vvhile PSBA had previously requested that a general assessment increase be considered for this fiscal year 2008-2009 budget cycle, there is concern that an increase would not be successful this year due to the current economic climate. An informal poll of the property owners has prompted PSBA to request that an increase be deferred until the fiscal year 2009-2010 budget cycle. Without a reduction in maintenance expenses, the reserves are only sufficient to cover one additional year. As with Zones 2 and 3, staff analyzed alternatives that assume the property owners will approve a moderate increase in fiscal year 2009-2010, with an annual inflation factor adjustment, and that reserves are used over an extended period to allow time for the assessments to come in line with expenses. The larger the reduction to maintenance expenses, the lower the required increase in assessments. For example, a 20% increase in assessments next year would require a permanent maintenance budget reduction in Zone 4 by $4,000. By comparison, if a 30% increase in assessments were approved next year, the maintenance budget could be restored to the full amount. Since any increase over 20°/° could be considered significant by the property owners, who have not experienced an increase since the 1990's, staff has established the budget for fiscal year 2008-2009 based on a projected 20°/° increase in assessments being approved by property owners next year and a $4,000 maintenance budget reduction. This reduction would require that steam cleaning of the sidewalk be eliminated. Since steam cleaning is typically performed after special street events, PSBA would be able to fund this work from their special event revenues, resulting in no reduction in service. Zone 5 -Harbor Ba Business Park: This zone funds irrigation and landscape maintenance costswithin the HarborBay Business Park~HBBP},including tree trimming, sidewalk and pathway repairs, and streetlight maintenance costs. The budgetforthis zone is developed in conjunction with the HBBP Association. Based on previous approval by the property owners, an automatic Consumer Price Index CPI}increase can be applied to the assessment. Honorable Mayor and May 6, 2008 Members of the City Council Page 4 of 5 The revenues received fromthiszonewill coverapproximately91°/° ofthe proposed fiscal year 2008-2009 maintenance budget. At the request of the property owners, the annual CPI increase of 2.77%, which would increase revenues by $20,240, will not be applied for the fiscal year 2008-2009 budget cycle. Staff supports this request, as annual increases have been consistently applied since 1998, CPI increases will continue in future years, and there are sufficient long-term maintenance reserve funds available to fund the proposed maintenance budget. For fiscal year 2008-2009, the property assessment will remain unchanged from the previous year's assessment. Zone 6 -Alameda Marina Villa e Commercial Areas: This zone funds irrigation and landscape maintenance costswithin the commercial areasofMarinaVillage, includingtree trimming, sidewalk and pathway repairs, street lighting maintenance, and energy costs. The budget for this zone is developed in conjunction with the Marina Village Management group. Based on previous approval bythe propertyowners, anautomatic CPlincrease is applied to the assessment. The proposed budget for this district includes an annual CPi increase of 2.17%, which increases revenues by $9,126. Zone l -1100 and 1200 blocks of Ba Street: This zonewas created atthe request of the property owners who wanted enhanced maintenance fortheelm trees along Bay Street, The revenues received from this zone coverapproximateiy 90°/° of the total maintenance budget. At the request of the property owners, the assessments are proposed to be reduced from $350 per property to $150 per property. Staff supports this request, as there are sufficient long-term maintenance reserve funds available to fund the proposed maintenance budget. For fiscal year 2008-2009, the property assessment wilt be $150 per property. Staff proposes that the City Council adopt a resolution to preliminarily approve the Engineer's Report and set the regular City Council meeting of July 1, 2008, as the date for the public hearing. BUDGET CGNSiDERATIGNIFINANCIALlMPACT The City, through the budgets of the Public Works, Golf, and Recreation & Park Departments, shares in the cost of maintaining the shoreline parkand median area within Zane 5. These costs are included within the operating budget for each department. MUNICIPAL CGDEIPGLICY DOCUMENT CRGSS REFERENCE This action does not affect the Municipal Code. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council RECOMMENDATION May 6, X408 Page 5 of 5 Adopt a resolution to preliminarily approvethe annual reportdeclaringthe City's intention to orderthe levy and colEection of assessments and providing for notice of public hearing for July 1, X008 -Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2. Respe ubmitted, _,..f-~~' Matthew T. Naclerio Public Works Director By: arge McLeanh~ ~ Public Works Co~rdnator MTN:MM:gc Attachments 1, Zones 1 through l maps . ~tM~ • I Z CC •S1~ ,~ , { ~ USYd~ ~.,, ~ < I~~~1 ~ `+ 0 K ~ 2 F:. ' Q ~ ~+ ~y4 ~~~ ~~~w4i • .a ~ o` vy~ ~"y ~lw;car r ' ~. L y u y 5 ~+ 4 vy ~ ~~ ar x1 r-• .w w ~ - !~ t 1S' Nf~'11Ic~?f{S x~~ ~~ ~t ~~ ~ o ~ ~~a~ " ~-goo ~ o ~o ~ 0 2 ~ 44 4~ - vt ~l •1a•eoo ~ ~•z La L, W~ ~ ;,~1 ~ 1 ~?~z oG-rrn ti ~, v~ ;. ~ w ~ w ~ ~ ~, n. ~ ~ ; ~ • • • ~ ao- foo 01 ,~ - . Q ~ ao-Ica ~ } ,;•~- ,~ fff Y u D0-~10 _ dD• rd}7 I • ~ ~ ti ••4 ~ ti ~ } I ~ ~ ti 4 , ~ ~ ~ ~ .• as r y ~ + ^yo~ , ~) ~ 91701 ~ r , 2 ti~~y ~ ~ ~ '~`~ 1 ~ ~i ~ ~ y t~~n 1ZT-Sly ~~ N ~I ` t ~ ``"~~ X .• V t ^; ,7x7-11 ..1 +a ~ ~ .. •f V - ~.I ~~ Ui .`r~ ~! ~ •. . ~ ~~ rrr - - ~ •~ , . _ ., , _, ~ .- ~ ~ ' _...._.~ b yr •x~~ s~7 -:: EZr0~rL0 ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ,. ~ a a a ~ n ~-{al c a '~ ~ ~ ~ C ` o,~ ~ o a o w d ., ~;a1{ a ~ 0 ~• ,• v • ti h r r ~ t o ~ V ~ d ,acv ~• n ~'aiof •a 4 a a ~ p o v o Q ~ a o C ~ •~ 3 0 4 o a C a p ~ a C D ~ ~~ ~ C ~ q •. ~ v 4 ~ a v C - Q ~ o n ~ G o o p 0 a 1 - q p a q v H a a n c a~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 , n ~ ~ o ~ ~ l ~ f ~ ~` ~ 1 ~ , ~ ~ City Council • ' ~ ~ Attachment to T • ~ ~ ~ Report Re: A enda Item #4-J .. ~.. ~._................ -........ _ . ...... ... ... .._ .... _. . _ _ ....... ...........---.._ g 05.06-08 _• ~ ~~ ' :' ' iq ~•' ~~~ ~. • ~ ~ ~ .~ • ~ : r~I~IItl~ < ,~ ' ~ ~ ,fifig ~ ~ • ~r ~ ~, ~ t ,s ~ }} • Q ,4 ~ a ~~a+ ay s - ~ Q` ~,~ ~ ti• Ott '' L~ .~ o ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ Ir ~' fl N~~f p' ~ ~.l N " ~yti •ti~.~ rt a o~ 'f~•7r'ro~r~•arx)• Fo -az~ da-ten ~r-~x~•a~r ~srs) ~ `~ b a_ ~ ~ r 4 ~~ r - is-xao , ~ A ti ~ ,ti ~ ~ z ' `e ~ r T ~ ~ ~! io-con ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ W p~ ~i - ~ti ~~ Gti~ ~ a ~ 4 . ~~ ,~-moo `' - ~oi -v~ ' . ~ ~ Y 31]N~rt~' ~7~~~~ -N~ ~ - . i Ov-roo ~ • ,,ri, a'D-Orp .~,.~, oa-caa ~•r:w ~~ ,~ ~~ ~ .~ aj ~ °~ ~ ~ ao-coo ~ , 00 •Sr'ab , • , . °Q` sae-~.-. ' • i ~ ,. ~-LX~ W-+W ~ I . ~v-rav R ~ xo-raa . as-!7v I 'ti' . . ~ cc-t'cv I •r) • ~ on-rod I ° ~ r ni ~ - +~~ p~ ~ Ors . ' ea-~av !p•71tf ' ~nN.~Jrr .7 r.r.~rd ..~ ~ i ~ .. JO-!Op ~~ w ~r. rri ~~ y oa-cra- ~I ~ ai ~ ~ c J?-fDa ~ ty ao-?rd ?~7 N ?,~ r rv 7; J .v r; .J ~ ~ . `r; ' •4'~•r • . ;'1~ti ~T' •~ • 1 • • ~ r • '~ • ~,, .1 r • ~ . I ( ~ • 4 ~• ' ' • ' . ~ r .' ''~ 1- s t ~ ,, • a~..~ :.. • ~ , • _~ ~ ~ sr _ y~r OI}~ - ~ oa-ixa Jv.~rQ p ~ a ~ ~ ~i ~; c , _~ Q e ~s- ~~ J • MI ~ ' r. ... aC-4Ip ~ ~ ! ~~ • ~ ~i cp•?•o w to-uv . • d 1 I 1 ~t ~ ~ • ' ~ aa•srv 4 4 ' ~ ~ .0 - • `~ ~-sro ' oo-~rv ~ .. ~_{~ ~ `• • ~ ZO-iC0 ~ k X11 - ' ~ rv-aza of ! .. ' vo•~ro ~ ` 11{ oa-rro ^~ 1 0! 0 -rra ' ~ rc-trv °0 '~ • •uc ~ ~ ti r ,~ .roa • •ro-oro ov-.zv ~ ~ I V Ot7-C!C ~ ~ ID•I'ZC 'f 4~ ~ • ~ 7v- ~ro ' ' ~ ~ ~ _ t . .. ~ ~• ~nNaa y ~'lrrrs rN~ng. - VV /p-+W d ~•+a N av-rfa I ~~ - • ~ • T1 _ '• _ - ~ •i ~ _. pp-rra '~ . . - ~ dl . ~ ~ • • ,~ ~ r~r•~ ~d ~ ~a-spa , ~~ ! ~ •~ • ~ i Y • q` ~ ~ ~' ~ ' 1 , I I f~ v~ pD•?tl0 ' ' ~ ~~ • ;GZD -rho - ! 1 ~! ~ ~ .• •~ 3 ~ ~~~ '' ~•r a I o 14 ~ v` I n t, ~. ~ a ~ E ~~ ~ . 0 7 cI ~ • - ' ~ o pC-7d0 I oo-r;a ~ a o 3 ~ ~ • ., a n ~ , '~ ~.,'; ~5"a;~~~~•~ k a ~ ra-c~o I' w-rzc k Jh,•a - ALA ~ ----~- • 1 ~ y i . h , _ I 1~ • - ' - 1 . ~~'Y'. . .... ~i ~•.. ~ _• ~. 'T'~'~'w•~^ •-l' 1•^ T5• i ~ ~ .•~.~~ ~ -• ..w •'•I.i •.•_'~~•• •~'•. .~ i~ , 1 S•.', l:•i ~~. ~''' ~ - 'S'. ~.~ ~ ... ~.y . ~~`°~ ~ ' •. ~ ~ i~~ • ~, ~] ,, ' z'' '~ ' (~ ^~xs yea a7Jrr~r~~lvaaj ~ ~ , Yt ~ ~INIC11 ' = K p~nl~~ ~~r 11~tM. { a ''~I,~r_. . e LCf 'a• • ~ ~ ~ GI y},.f ~. CA.CJa - ' .. .r ~t-.ay.. " of ~f ~:- ov•r+P ~ YT N ~ JT ~ a 9 i'.M ~ u z •al= 21 v0•Aa ~ ~ ~ldl cv- Qa-ol0 ~ E .I ~i I , ~ ~ +a 1 W-L!A Da-~ f ' [ .. ~• I I 'I li d 3 ~ C a a 0 00.8Gt7 ~ 0 0 ~ O •y ~ t. G I.~ •a •- ~ i l i I= r '. v V r'• T ti N h ~ ~•-la ~ p 6 C C C q ri .ti r1 ~~ r1 ry 3 10 nN 10 b O D~ ,. O C G[ D ~ a 1. G C f•~Jc ~~ w 1 ~RN~ I ~ 4 vordv ~ ~ . o I .a o °~o 0 0 ~~4 Q o ~ aa• yac 'Q'JO° 3 ~ ~ ~ ? ~ c a' ° v° a ~ ° ° ~ ° c ~. ~ f ~~ ~ ~ . ~I cap ~• ~ ~..-.~., I ~~~ a' • • rVI r0-rip ~ , -. ' ~ x . p! - as-aoD n !Q-~JLJ L9lQ-Ot0 ~` ~ O~P4 - v~ u !! w ~ ~~ - ~i 90.91G, ~ • ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ • Ia ~ S I ~v-JIC t , I a ~, a ~ to-up ° w .. rC • ~~ y 1 r. 1 d w a a ~ y d h~ y ~ Co'rDLJ l a j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' •, f ~ r ~• rd - • av-oro aa•~za ~ ~ . . , •, , Y I y ~ ~ r 9C -r!O . ' ~ i - j ! C ~ - - ~ i ~ AD-fC01 ~ - Q I • yf ~ ~~ Ja• ~av . a ~ - . r n ~ ~ • `__ ,~ ~ 7 ~ N ~ a lv,~ v . • ~ sa••oa I ' • r~~ al~ °°~ { ~ r = ' I elf ~0 LGOf ,~ • real ~ ;'a-,Ja ~o-Fov' ca• r ~1 { • p0 ..J 1'{ JO•PdO~ rt \ ;` .. ~~~, GID•r!D ~ ' ~~ Ja--ra ~ ~ . •• ~ ' ~ - ~ { ~.. - --- •. ... .5 .. ~... •., .. ... . ~ -. rt-•"+-..,. ...- ~ ...~.~-... . .-. ... r -, ,. ..r:• .~.. .... ~...~~..... .. ~ ,. ...~....~~~ _.~._. .~..}....-.....ice...... •i . l ~ 9 +~ti.• f '• r: ~• ~ • `V ~ ~ ~ ~ S = ~ ~ ~ ~ h ~. r i. ~ .~ ^^^i^ [ + f+ Mi . 4- I i[ r~ r,°'~~~ ~ JJ :'; ~ D1 a _ ~ ,~ 3 ~ { rl..I ~ x c~! w ~ ~ ~1v ~ ~ p~p ' q ~~~~~f . ~~ v l p r ~ K ~" ~ ~ ~ t ' ~ x~ ~ ~ ' a ~ ; t ~ ~ +il~~ ~~~1 ' ~ ~ O ~ 4 ~'~. ~ ' ~ "~~ ~ n ~ .. ~' I.lIE p. r~ 1 .'~ 1 1 ~ ~ ,, y Y _ ` i i~ • ~ a w ;. ~~ . ~ +1 n L ' ~ a ~J I + ~ ~ M ~ ~ i ~ r - . /~ 1 M ~ R ~ ;~ t ~,-~ ~ *~` p ~ a '~ 1 ~ ~ ~ T ~ ~ h' x . h ,• r ~~/ . ~ f e~ ~ ~~ 4 1 ti v f r ~ '+ I ~~y • ~ ' r + ' ~ ~ ~ f _ ~ ~ r• . ~ ~ '' . - ~ ~ 1' ~ , - Ir r 7 ti ~ - '~ ~ ~ ~ - r . •.~ :~;;;~ .' ., r i, r~y~~ ~q~`/ r ~ r ~ . y~'t f • i Q a on R p .. p • ~ Q p A AEI X11 ~' • O ~+ • ~ ~ r~ ~~ ~ •~ -~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ r ' ~•._~ _ x~ `~~;< c x { Q~~,~ ~' itp•s ~•'~ ' t •. ~ ~ _ • ~ ~ LI ~ x = ~ d _ ~ ~, ~ 1 ~ L .. ~ I I I Is ~ i; flll~:,.~ ~ ; ' w • ~ x ,; S. ~~~~ III !~ ,~~ ,~ • a ~i O V , • ~ Q r ? u • '~ i 4 ~ ; R q ~ ~ ~ w R ~ ~' ~ R ° 3 a ~ a ~ '~ - • ~ ti Y ~ a fl i II. ° ; d d z 4 3 0 ; ., • T N ~ a y o} a. ~ c • ~ a • ~ ~ ~ ~, _ ; f .. v ! . .~~ Old ~q ~ a o 4 ~ _ ~ ~ ~ y 'w • ' f ~ _ 4 ~~~, ~ ~ • y ~• ~ /~M• ~ _,pd~ i 1 ~ t l ~y~~e{y .. ,•\\ R ' ti•u ~ ~~ ~ 4 n _ ~ , Q r ^ ~ ~ _,~• O ' a ~ • ~ ~~,~4\~ Y ~~~•~Wr • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~~ ~ ; ' ~~~ ~ • a ~y •I . '~~ ~ ~ D ~ ~ ~ ~~ti vy ~ : a ~q ~ ~ ~ ~ =,, ~ ~,, ~ + o i o ~,~ 4 ' ~ 1 • ~ ~ + ~ ti ~ ~~_ o _ ar y 0 ~ ~ ~~y y ` 1y ~ ~t . .. 5 '' `~ l •`', •• Y [ ~ • i_~_.,. Z~ ~ , L r ~y •~ J . I ~ ~ ~ r ' r - ~ • r. ' av-~ • • ,.,,/ ,~: x , !: 4 ~`* / •~ titi1 • ~ oo•~~o ~ aa• !'. ~ ~ ~ L ~ •, F {rt ~ L ~ •. h~ ~ ~• • ,. I~i~ l Q..•~ wJ ~S '~ ~ ~;, ~ LL.~ M ~' 1 • ~,~ Lu ~ -• . ,. ~ -` ~ 1 ~ or ~ y ~ 1 ;1f R ~ r~ 1 y ~ ~l ,~ c / + /f J V f < < <al{1 ~ ~ •r r ~• 47t ~ . ~~ ~ a ~ J ~ .. ~ fyrt . q ti - ~ ~ • . tiro ~~ 1L I ~ ~ ~ ~ li/ ti 4 J ~ K• ~ ~'r 1 f~ w • ~~ ~ -~~ fi~~ rlst ~ :. ~ i ; fG ~ ~.- 1 ~ ~ rd 1~' ,~ Z r ~ ~ ~ •, ~ .~ ~ z ~,~, • J ~ .. c~ t r. ~ ~ ~'=1~; ~ KI q ~ R of F.r Ql' r • '~ V~~~ r =~Gl J1J~ ~~~1 • , '~ • ~~_ i ti~ a ..• V ti ` ~ ~ \ ` ~1 • . •~ ~~ ~.1ti~~a_ " y ~+y .I~~ti y + S ~ ~ ,y~ ~+4 •z .ti ~ ~ 1 ' r ~ • ~;. J~ • 'fC +. ~ ~ - i y' .. ~~~ ~+, - i ~~ • r M w1 R h Y ~ .~ 4 ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • `• _ t - ~ •~ • j 1 ~ ' l , ~ ~ r- ~ 9 ~ ~ 7 11~ y ~ •. •~ ~ ~ 5 ~w ~ \` • ' ~ .Y t '4 • ~. a ~ • ~- ~ arYl ~ ~~~ ~``~ L~~, • • ~ ~ ~ r • ~,r ~ yi~~~~ 4y. I~ ~ ~• ~ ii ~, ,~ Vi`i' 1 r ~~~' l A' .,',t~; • r ~;R ..~.+~r • ^~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ y - ~ ~ v~•~~ ' ~ ,, • • ' ~~~ • ~ x~' ~~~ w~ n W ~ 11r wkv~ ~~ ~ ~ "lttlrt •. a..~,~~~wta~,~~a ~ a +ki ~: .., f4yw~Orw~ ~1w+r~• ~ k ~ i7~~u r ~ ~ ~ al~~~: ~ ~ . u i = d~ rtl:.. ~! ~ ' .,11'd 1 • ~ 4 4 w~11i ,~.~r~ .ia~.7r.7rSr~ I I !f p h*Wrr~drww+ryrrwlri { k~ h"ti~~V~~rlwMtilr~FlMw~ f I ' 1~ a • iy rww~rrrrrrrr.rtirrr q~ •~R+ • ~ • Q va9q \ Oti ~::: ~ •• ~~ ~t~~ ~ A! ~r~:nn~~ ± ' es . i. , ~: a o ,~ h ~ ~~»a••a r~r~ - ~ rywr'rVw`~C\w _ • 4 r~~nwwwwhw.~1 ~ - v . .~..^... ~ ^ ~ •aa o~, . _ ~ •• '~• oaa 99 a\d~ w w 7Ca• 4dyr~;K ~~ wwwtiwttRrwrh Cwt ~ i+wrw~,r~.!•RMi~ Y "~ I ,Y~tArC ti~;1r0~ ~1~r ~ Ir :~S ~ ~ .My. ~ r ' ~ L. tN~ rJ „ • ~ r.M 7 w~ `~ w : .. ~ ~ +•~ r`' j •~a~ a ,rte , '~ iy S:Y ~1~ J~ ' ' ~ ~.1. MCI+w.~~'Rr7 I I. ~ ~ r '1rMww~ewwl~waq ~a 0 y ti..~r.wr~~1 R 4 1...~.~ ~ p 'Vl e ~ 'J ~t •y•[ c \rsooosaooar "u w ~1 ~ w!Q - ~ryryrr.•rn w ~~ ~f ~•~ 'fir '{~ ti • . , `y ~ y + , ~ a ~ e ~ • ~ r ~ ~ ~ J 1 . Q wx ti. + r ` ~ ~ ~ .~ r ~ a L ~ ~ J~r~.1~~7 r~ li V rr +~ `i \ ~ .V,/ rrrrrr~rwrr ~~ y y~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ y w . ~ V ~w ~ r' ~ ~~ ~4r?~r~w ~ww ~ ~ 4 r . C,'Z ~ w+ ~ ~f' ~ ~ 7 '~ ~ ~/ ~ ~~ ~ 0 ~~ a a V ~ ~ ,~ ~~ ~ 4 r~r7r~rar7.y~ •. C -r ~~ ~ + ~ a. w w~r+.r I ~ •• r y, r+ aw. oa\ aver r ~ti a Z~ y rr~`w+.~~r.r Z r s~ai~~aaw+av .,~, i .. } _ {~ ~ ~~` . 1 ~_, i. ~ Y M Q ~; • ~~~ . `r '*'+r,~ r r M '~ 1~ • 1' w `~ ~ r r ,(''~ l~~ .•'~~~ 4 'I 3 ` ii i!~ a • ~~`'~ •' r Y~R~rw~w..+r•yw~ j • 7 ti"'y s~ \ ;ip49\aVCgYaaVaO , 1 '.. y ~ d ~ ~ .~ + , T~ •~ . ~ 4 ` M y~ V ~ J R ~ 71 1 ~ L . U , an '~ ,4M ~ 3 ~ ~~r3..ara,,,a .a.a .- - * q ;~-~ r. 1 ~ y; ~ ~~~a•7a~0, haaaaaaaedpOT~ ~~Qa00~~Oq . ~~~ V . r 4.1769 RdZ1 shaaao0aagaa aq a a _+ 1 ~ :. ~ ++L *y,+r4r r"+~~+a~^./r1~r.~V..w lr +wf rrw ar'~~rv . Ty r ! • 1r 4.M-1+1~wn.ati~rw r~..h~i~..~Y~*rr7r\r....r~1 ~! ~ r _ ~ ~~ aoraagoo\bragaraoaaaaaoao+aq.aaovaao q q r ~ ~ +- M r r O '1{ t ~ r d ~ ti •~ r .~ ~ril1 ~~ i ~ . '1 ~ •' 7 ~ 0 ~ q w~ i ~0 ~ ~ ~I y; rir~ri ~i yi~a .;.,i rJri..irir\ •1 Q ~~k ~y y "~\~rwrrti r.r ~tiyrw~~lrl.n~ir•iw.~^'l w~1r~...y {~ • ; Q of 7r1ir•ti~r~lrwtiywti~V4rV+N+wavwr r....~ r ~ ~ r y, ..~ x~ * q~ga~raysaaaaga,~a4aataara^+a.q+aiTVirgra~~~ + a o0.~~.;y\9y\arr~r4wrgaavrgvw,•\r ... o , r. _ r1+'~.'.~y-•1w~rr"+rr/`1r4wMfv v.. ,~~=9r 1-...r~rre..v r r ~ ..rvr~Myrrr„wr.....~~www~~lr~w+, daVgw#"*'"FY ~*M .I ~ \giw4oau~~l~~rr"1~+ywaa0aO0.O;aa;rr.rb.iV\\ . . vy. * ~ as `. ry.~.. - -. .~ .~ - r `~.~` k • ,7~. ~ r ~~. ' 3• rl q ~ ~~ ' ' ~ . ~ '' ' ~~ y; yiri +~r~ y~rA r~V+• nAr~ r~ K~ ~w~rrr•`y~~~~~ti.'~'~~w~.wwW~ w~r~wyrw\~~r~M.l-w ~{ ..w~rww.W ww ~..+1y, k} , ' ~ A • -r ~ ~L~,. ~ l~~ {r ~ ~ ~ 4 , MMM~ l~~rM ~ , M~r4 Y M V Z~ ~ l {~ Q ~ ~ V ~ ~~ , _ ~ 4~ r y ~ ~ ~ ~ti ~ Y ~ ~. q s~q~~ ` ~~~;~ _ j r; ~ r~ ; t~ ~~rrr ,t + ~ ~ ~,` ~ r t ~ 'tr ` LL ~7 ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ +. ly ` ~ ~ ~ ~ .ti ~ y ~:y~ +~ ,; V t \' rti ~ ,, rr ~ V ~~ r! ~ ~ 1'rf 1 ,, l ~ ~' ~a ~ ~ ~ U ~, ~~ a~ .. ~ •.)~ Q ~ ~ ~~~n v r, u~ ~ y ~l ~ r~ , r~ 1~ ~ ` I., ~ r ` a` .,, " V ~~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ .. r 7. . ti .t 1 • y `~; y S~ ~ ~ ~ •~ ~ y ~ t + ~ `, f ~," ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m oi.+ • ~ +, r ~ •~~ ~ i ~ w r p * qI F' w ~ ~ ~~~ ~ •~ a a~~c o rC} iAi =1 '. 0 ~ ~ br h, I 4~°i~~ ~ ~1.Yri =I ~ • ~lOl „~~~~ 1 Iii. ~~ a~ • • i i i f= y ..~ i I h ~'1 . ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' - r ` ~ w ~ is r•4 ~ 1 0 :; t ~ ~ .• Y ELI ^. .. ~ ~i ~ v r ~ - ~ oti = •_ •A L u - ~ b x • r r ti ^ if V A ~. 1 ~ ~Y ~ 1 ~ w ~• ~ 4 w ~ ~ ~~ n ; ,. l nr•. XW %i • C ~ 1 ~ _ 1 • at ' tip ~ ~~~ p V ~ ti ~i ti • 0 ~ ti .. ~ C ~ 'fl ,~ . ~ ~ . .~ ., a x ~~: I ~_ ... '~ :' .. w ~ ~L J N ~ '~ n ~~/r` . q 's 0 r . .~r stir ti arl` 3 ~" til ~ Q V r 1 + k~1ti.~ ~ f 'h# ', ti n art /r , I~~r1 a a ~ -+ ~• •~ i ; a I`mo' ~ .1 ,. C ' Q L~Mr ', ~ ~ ~ ... .~.. ... __ _. _..r. ...•ii•,;„ ..~... ,.... .,. .., , ....., ~' ... ~ t '~ m "~ ': s ~ ~ ` . . ~~~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ao L ,,'' V ++{r+l~ ~~~Cyy~. K a ~ ~• # rl M r. • ~ -,r X47 Qr~ ~~~~C . ~ 4i -- • ~ } M~ ~ ti \ ~ ~ • ~s ~:` ~s^ „ _. t ~ F 1 _ . _ ' . _ ~ O! " . _ 1 I .. r-4'pJl Gr-1CG ,~ + ...~r.~.r,.,.~y Y 11 y,. ~ , . ti,p.1 J .; ~„ ~~ . "y~•o-; r ti r.. ' : 1 ~ G~ I ~ !~i .. .....r ``.~ h~ ; . •JI 1i~'rc-° 11y `~ ! _ _ r., ti ~. • -- =: JY •i •' -- •. I :.e: as-,:fc ~ ' , .. . ~~-aJp~ . , ,, • ar -: ~, ~ ~' ;F. \I • ^ ~ ~ ~ • i ~.. . -ti~.. ~ ~ .. 1. ~ .~ • ~ •. _. .:. • .: -; is ~~ - .. . r ,,. •' • r~ ~ • • r. .• w - • • ~, 1 .. ..~~. . ~ . CITY OFALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. ____~ a N ~a 0 a ~. PRELIMINARILY APPROVING ANNUAL REPGRT DECLARING INTENTION TG GRDER LEVY AND COLLECTION GF ASSESSMENTS AND PROVIDING FGR NOTICE GF PUBLIC HEARING JULY 1, 2005 -ISLAND CITY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT 84-2 U1~HEREAS, the City of Alameda the "City"} has duty created the ~ Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2 the "District"} under the ~ Landsca in and Li htin Act of 1972 Sections22500 an ' ,~ p g g g ~ d following of the Streets ~' and Highways Cade of California} the "Act"} to install and maintain certain landscaping and lighting improvements the "Improvements"}; and UVHEREAS, the City has directed the City Engineer, as engineer of work for the Dis#rict, to file an annual report in accordance with the Act, and that report is on file with the City, and shows the proposed improvements and the es#imated costs and assessments, all for the fiscal year 2008-2009. NOUV, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED bythe City Council of the City of Alameda that: 1. The report of the engineer of work on file with the City is hereby preliminarily approved and the City intends to levy assessments on the properties shown in the report for the fiscal year 2048-2009, subject to any changes that may be ordered by the City Council, 2. On July 1, 2408, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock P.M., the City Council will hold a public hearing on the proposed Improvements and the proposed assessments forthe fiscal year2008-2009. The hearing will be held at the meeting place of the City Council, in theAlameda City Hall, 2263 Santa Clara Avenue, Third Floor, Council Chambers, Alameda, California, 94501, 3. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to give notice of the hearing required by the Act by publishing a copy of this resolution twice in the Alameda Journal, a newspaperregularlypublished and circulated in theCity. The first publication shall be not later than 45 days before the date of said hearing. 4. The Public llllorks Department is directed to mail notices to ail property owners who are experiencing an increase in assessment from the 2001- 2008fiscal year, These noticeswill listthe total amountchargeable tothe district, the amount chargeable to the owner's parcel, the duration of the payments, the reason for the assessment, and the basis upon which the amount of the proposed assessment was calculated. These notices will also advise property owners of the procedures for conducting a ballot. Resolution #4-J CC 05-06.08 5. Interested persons should contact Marge McLean of the City of Alameda Public Works Department, 950 West Mall Square, Room 110, Alameda, California 94501, telephone number X510} 749-5896, regarding this hearing, the assessments, and the report. ******* I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in a regular meeting assembled on the 6th day of May, 2008, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTfCNS: IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said City this th day of May, 2005. Lara Weisiger, City Clerk City of Alameda CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Debra Kurita City Manager Date: May 6, 2008 Re: Adopts Resolutionto PreliminarilyApprovetheAnnual ReportDeclaringthe City's intention to Grder the Levy and Collection of Assessments and Providing for Notice of Public Hearing July 1, 2008 -- Maintenance Assessment District 01-01 (Marina Covel BACKGROUND In accordance with the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1912, the City Council is required to annually appoint an Engineer and an Attorney to prepare an Engineer's Report and adopt a resolution to preliminarily approve the report, declaring the City's intent to levy and collect the assessment, and setting a public hearing date on the proposed assessments. The resolution is required to be published at least twice in a local paper with a minimum of 45 days between the first notice by publication of the resolution and the public hearing. Cn February 5, 2008, the City Council appointed an Engineer and an Attorney for the Maintenance Assessment District 01-01 MAD}, in Marina Cove and authorized the preparation of the annual budget report. DISCUSSIGN The Engineer's Report has been prepared in accordancewith Section 22565 etseq. ofthe California Streets and Highway Code. A copy of the Engineer's Report is on file with the City Clerk's office. The report provides an annual budget to maintain the public improvements within the MAD. It is recommended that the assessments be increased by 2.17%, which is the Consumer Price Index CPI}for the Bay Area for the year ending February 2008. An annual CPI increase was pre-approved when the district was established, and a vote of the property owners is not required. Staff proposes that the City Council adopt a resolution to preliminarily approve the Engineer's Report and set the regular City Cauncil meeting of July 1, 2008, as the date for the public hearing. BUDGET C4NSIDERATIGNIFINANCIALlMPACT The MAD was formed to maintain public improvements associated with the Marina Cove Development. Funds not yet expended remain within this assessment district for use against future expenses. There is no impact to the General Fund. City Council Report Re: Agenda Item #4-K 05-06-08 Honorable Mayor and May 6, 2008 Members of the City Council Page 2 of 2 MUNICIPAL CODEIPOLICY DOCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE This action does affect the Municipal Code. RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution to preliminarily approve the annual report declaring the City's intention to orderthe ievyand collection ofassessments and providingfornotice of public hearing on July 1, 2008 -Maintenance Assessment District 01-01 Marina Cove}, Respectfu y submitted, Matt ew T. Naclerio Publi Works Director By: Marg clean Publi orks Coordinator MTN:MM:gc CITY OFALAMEDA RESOLUTION N0, PRELIMINARILY APPROVINGRNNUAL REPORT DECLARING INTENTION TO ORDER LEVYAND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF PUBLIC E ~ _ ~, ; HEARING JULY 1, 2008 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT ~°, DISTRICT 01-01 MARINA COVE} o ~ ~~ ~ ~, VIIHEREAS, the City of Alameda the "City"} has duly created the ~ ~ Maintenance Assessment District 01-01 the "District" r o ~ } pu suant to Chapter 3, a Article Vof the Alameda Municipal Code, and Resolution No.12417 to install and $ maintain certain landscaping and lighting and other im rovements the p ~ "Improvements"}; and ~IIIHEREAS, the City has directed the City Engineer, as engineer of work for the District, to file an annual report in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 ~"Act"}, and that report is on file with the City and shows the proposed improvements and the estimated costs and assessments, all for the fiscal year 2008-2009. NOIN, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED bythe City Council of the City of Alameda that: 1, The report of the engineer of work on file with the City is hereby preliminarily approved and the City intends to levy assessments on the properties shown in the report for the fiscal year 2008-2009, subject to any changes that may be ordered by the Council. 2. On July 1, 2008, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock P.M., the Council wil! hold a public hearing on the proposed improvements and the proposed assessments for the fiscal year 2008-2009. The hearing will be held at the meeting place of the City Council, in the Alameda City Hall, 2263 Santa Clara Avenue, Third Floor, Council Chambers, Alameda, California, 94501. 3. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to give notice of the hearing required by the Act, as that Act is incorporated in Chapter 3, Article V of the Alameda Municipal Code, by publishing a copy of this resolution twice in the Alameda Journal, a newspaperregularlypublished and circulated in the City. The first publication shall be not later than 45 days before the date of said hearing. 4. The Public Vllorks Department is directed to mail notices to al! property owners who are experiencing an increase in assessment not previously authorized by vote from the 2007-2008 fiscal year. These notices will listthe total amount chargeable to the district, the amount chargeable to the owner's parcel, the duration of the payments, the reason forthe assessment, and the basis upon Resolution #4-K CC 45-4fi-O8 which the amount of the proposed assessmen# was calculated. These notices will also advise property owners of the procedures for conducting a ballot, per the attached ballot procedures. 5. Interested persons should contact Marge McLean of the City ofAlameda PublicvUorks Department, 950VI1. Mall Square, Room 110, Alameda, California 94501, telephone number X510} 149-5840, regarding this hearing, the assessments and the report. **~**** I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in a regular meeting assembled on the 6th day of May, 2008, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: IN vvITNESS, UvHERE~F, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said City this th day of May, 2008. Lara INeisiger, City Clerk City ofAlameda CITY ~F ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Debra Kurita City Manager Date: May 6, 2008 Re: Adopt a Resolution Directing Staff to Take Necessary Steps to Dissolve Senior Citizens_Inc., aNon-Profit Corporation _ ~~ BACKGROUND On March 2, 1952, at the request of the Mastick Senior Center Advisory Board MSCAB}, the City Council authorized the formation of afive-member non-profit organization known as Alameda Senior Citizens Inc. SCI} to assist in fundraising to support the Mastick Senior Center. Members of the MSCAB believed that a nonprofit would have access to untapped sources of revenue and recommended creating a nonprofit organization. DISCUSSION Over the years, SCI has pursued various avenues to raise funds including launching the Memorial Board in 1953. The Memorial Board, located in the Mastick Social Hall, provides an opportunity for individuals to purchase a plaque to memorialize a loved one. This remains a viable fundraiser. SCI has been successful in obtaining funds from local community based organizations and has received donations from individuals to fund projects of special interest for Mastick Senior Center. In addition, SCI receives the 2°/fl Utility Users' Tax collected by the City of Alameda from individuals, 65 years of age and older, choosing to donate their savings "to be used anly for funding Mastick Senior Center Programs." The MSCAB, independent of SCI, has been committed to raising money for special programs and projects to supplement City support of~the Mastick Senior Center. The MSCAB maintains a weekly fundraising Bingo program, the Mastick Thrift Shop, and the Annual Thrift Shop Fashion Show and Spring Luncheon. In 2006, MSCAB embarked on a fundraising letter campaign which grossed $33,000 for the Center. In light of the many fundraising efforts currently in place, the officers and Board of Directors of SCI would like to dissolve their organization and requests that the revenue currently received from the 2% Utility Users' Tax be routed directly to Mastick Senior Center. City Council Report Re: Agenda item #4-L os-os-os Honorable Mayor and May 6, 2008 Members of the City Council ~ Page 2 of 2 BUDGET CGNSIDERATIONIFINANCIAL IMPACT The dissolution of this non-profit corporation will have no impact on the City's General Fund. REC~MMENDATI~N Adopt the Resolution directing staff to take the necessary steps to dissolve Alameda Senior Citizens Inc., anon-profit organization, as requested by the existing officers and directors. Respectfully submitted, ~~~ Dale Lillard, Director Alameda Recreation, Parks & Golf Operations ~f ~~ i~d~C.~ B :Jackie Krause Senior Services Manager DL:JK:bf CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. 0 N 0 ~. DIRECTING STAFF TO TAKE NECESSARY STEPS TO PROCEED WITH THE DISSOLUTION OF THE NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, ALAMEDA SENIOR CITIZENS, INC. ~, WHEREAS, the Alameda Senior Citizens, Inc. SCI}, a five-member non-profit ~ organization was formed in 1982 to assist with fundraising far Mastick Senior Center; a and WHEREAS, the only contributions SCI currently receives are donations from Alameda seniors who sign up to donate 2% of their utility usertaxes ~UUT} to SCI; and WHEREAS, SCi proposes to distribute its remaining assets to Mastick after paying for an audit and tax filing; and WHEREAS, the directors and officers of the Alameda Senior Citizens, Inc, wish to dissolve the corporation because the UUT donations can go directly to Mastick Center; and WHEREAS, Senior Services Manager has confirmed that the corporation is no longer necessary because the Mastick Senior Center Advisory Board is in charge of fundraising activities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Alameda hereby directs staff to take the necessary steps to dissolve SCI. ***** I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in a regular meeting assembled on the 6t~ day of May, 2948, b the followin vote to wit: Y 9 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSENTIONS: IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said City this day of May 2005. Lara Weisiger, City Clerk City of Alameda Resolution #4-L CC 05.46-DS CITY ~F ALA~IEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Debra Kurita City Manager Date: May 6, 2008 Re: Adopt a Resolution Approving Continued Participation in the Alameda County HQME Consortium and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the HOME Consortium Cooperative A reement with Alameda Count BACKGROUND Title II of the Cranston-Gonzales National Affordable Housing Act ~NAHA} of 1990 created the HOME Program, which provides financing for a wide range of affordable housing programs and activities that benefit low- and moderate-income households and special populations, such as the elderly and persons with disabilities. Based on current population levels, Alameda is not eligible to receive HOME funds directly. Therefore, for the past 16 years, Alameda has received funding from this program through its participation in the Alameda County HaME Consortium ~Consorkium}, The City's continued participation in the Consortium must be approved by the Council at three-year intervals and the Consortium Cooperative Agreement executed to allow receipt of future funds. The City also executes a Contract Designating the City of Alameda as aSub-Recipient of HaME Funds on an annual basis for each year in the approved three-year term of the Cansortium Agreement. DISCUSSION The Consortium members include Alameda County and seven cities in the County. (~akland and Berkeley are large enough to receive HOME funds directly and are not included in the Consortium.} Alameda County Housing and Community Development ~ACHCD} is the lead agency for the Consortium. In this capacity, ACHCD will submit applications and reports, coordinate preparation of the Consolidated Plan, maintain financial and program records, monitor compliance with HOME Program regulations, and staff the Technical Advisory Committee. To date, the City has received approximately $6 million in HOME funds. These funds have been or are being used to assist: • Public and private entities in acquiring, renovating or constructing units with affordability restrictions for 59 years; City Counci! Report Re: Agenda item #4-M 05-06.08 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council May 6, 2008 Page 2 of 3 • First-time homebuyers through the City's Downpayment Assistance programs; and • Tenant-based rental assistance. The proposed Consortium Cooperative Agreement, which is on file in the City Clerk's office, extends the City's participation in the Consortium and sets ground rules for its administration and operation in federal fiscal years 2009, 2010 and 2011. Following City Council approval, the City Manager will negotiate and execute this Agreement and separate Sub-Recipient Agreements for FYs 2009, 2010 and 2011, conforming agreements with public and private entities, and related documents, as necessary, to implement HGME-funded programs and activities. All agreements and other documents are substantially similar to those previously approved by the City Council and City Attorney. BUDGET CGNSIDERATIGNIFINANCIALlMPACT The City has received approximately $6 million in HGME funds through the Consortium, with an additional $700,000 generated through program income. Both the City and HCD receive five percent of the allocation for administration. HGME funds are required to be matched by a minimum of 25°/fl in non-federal dollars; however, City HGME funds have actually leveraged many millions of dollars in private and other public funds through pr[vate investment and grants. Match funds from past projects have included Tax Increment Low and Moderate Income Housing Funds, Housing Authority Development Funds, Developer In-Lieu Fee Payments, Affordable Housing Fees, and various grants. There is no impact on the General Fund. MUNICIPAL CGDEIPGLICY DGCUMENT CRGSS REFERENCE Participation in the Alameda County HGME Consortium is consistent with the Housing Element ofthe General Plan, ENV[RGNMENTAL REVIEW Participation in the Alameda County HOME Consortium is not considered a project pursuant to CEC~A Section 15318.b.4, which states that the definition of "project" does not include the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. RECGMMENDATIGN Adapt a Resolution approving continued participation in the Alameda County HOME Consortium and authorizing the City Manager to execute the HGME Consortium Cooperative Agreement with Alameda County and take all other necessary actions to carry out the City of Alameda's participation in the Alameda County HGME Consortium. Honorable Mayar and Members of the City Council RespectFully s miffed, Leslie .Little Developm~ t rv' es irector 7 C~_ By: Dorene E. Soto Manager, Business Development Division By: Rachel Silver Development Manager, Housing May 6, 200$ Page3of3 DKILALIDESIRS:sb CITYGFALAMEDA RESGLUTIGN NG, E L N a~ ~. ~. APPRGVING CGNTINUED PARTICIPATIGN IN THEALAMEDA CGUNTY HGME CaNSGRTIUM AND AUTHGRIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE HOME CGNSGRTIUM CGGPERATIVE AGREEMENT UVITH ALAMEDA CGUNTY r D BE IT RESGLVED that the Council of the Cit of Alam a y eda hereby approves continued participation in the Alameda Count HGME Conso ' y rtium for a three-year period fiscal years 2009, 20~ 0 and 20~ ~ } for the pur oses of p securing federal HGME funds and developing the Consolidated Plan and related documents, and authorizes the City Manager to execute the HOME Consortium Cooperative Agreement and take all other necessa actions to ry carry out the City of Alameda's participation in the Alameda County HGME Consortium. BE IT FURTHER RESGLVED that this resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. *~**** I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was dul , y and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in a regular meeting assembled on the 6th day of May, 2008, by the foflowin vote g to wit: AYES NGES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: IN UVITNESS, UIIHEREGF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said City this day of , 2Opg, Lara UVeisiger, City Clerk City of Alameda Resolution #4-M CC 45-06-08 CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Debra Kurita City Manager Date: May 6, 2008 Re: Adapt a Resolution in Support of Measure H, the Alameda Unified School District's Parcel Tax BACKGROUND Gn January ~0, Governor Schwarzenegger released a pro osed State bud et for fiscal p g year 2008-09 that reduces public school funding by more than $4 billion in order to make up for a projected $14,5 billion deficit, As a result, the Alameda Unified School District AUSD} must reduce its expenditures by more than $4 million or find another source of revenue in order to offset the Governor's proposal. Since Janua AUSD has ry~ taken steps to reduce its budget, and the Board has placed an emer enc arcel tax 9 Yp measure, known as Measure H, on the June 2008 ballot. DISCUSSION The State of California is facing at feast a $10 billion shottfall b the end of fiscal ear Y y 2008-09. As a result, the Governor has proposed deep reductions in s endin p g statewide, including in education funding. The proposed list of reductions for schools targets basic per student funding guaranteed by Proposition 98 as well as class size reduction subsidies, special education programs required under federal law child development programs, child nutrition programs, career and technical education for hi h g school students, before and after school grant programs, adult education and facilities r maintenance. In addition, the Governor's Budget does not provide a ualization aid the q , budget allocation that addresses ,nequities in school fundin and attem is to brin low- g p 9 wealth school districts, such as AUSD, closer to the state avera a in er student g p funding, According to AUSD, the Governor's proposed budget would result in a loss of 4 million ~n ongoing funding from the basic per-student funding received based on Avera a Dail . 9 Y of Attendance of students. An additional $1 million is at risk from ro osed reductions pp in categorical programs such as special education and child develo ment. AUSD has p already reduced its budget by $7.7 million over the last seven ears as a result of Y previous State budget actions and the impact of declining enrollment. Reducin the 9 City Council Report Re: Agenda Item #4N 05-45-48 Honorable Mayor and Ma 6 . y ,Zoos Members of the City Council Pa e 2 g of 2 budget by an additional $4 - 5 million would have a devastatin im act on students . g p ,the schools, and the Alameda community and could lead to school closures la off y s of teachers, counselors, and otherstaff; and elimination ofvarious ro rams. pg A revised version of the Governor's budget will be released in mid-Ma and it is uncl y, ear at this time if the Governor's proposed education cuts will be included in that n ew budget and if the Legislature will agree to those reductions and the sus erasion .. p of Propos~t~on 98, Nonetheless, given the magnitude of the ro osed reductions an p p d the need for the School District to adopt its budget prior to the end of the current fiscal ear AUSD has la Y ' p ced Measure H on the June 2005 ballot. If approved b the voters Y Measure H would levy a temporary, four-year emer enc arcel tax of 120 g Y p $ on residential parcels and 15 cents per square foot for commerciallindustrial arcels. . p Measure H contains exemptions for seniors and residents receivin su !em g pp ental security income for a disability and would raise approximate) $4.2 million er ear Y pY AUSD during the four-year term of the tax. The City and AUSD have worked together for many ears to serve their 'o' Y ~ int constituencies for the greater benefit of the Alameda community. For that reason the City Council passed a resolution in February 2008 in su ort of full fundin for pp g the schools and in opposition to reducing the Proposition 98 basic er student fundin p, g guarantee. Supporting Measure H is consistent with the City Council's rior action and p with the long-standing collaborative relationship between the Cit and AUSD. Y BUDGET CONSIDERATIGNIFINANCIALlMPACT There is no impact to the General Fund. MUNICIPAL C4DEIPOLICY DOCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE This action does not affect the Municipal Code. RECGMMENDATIGN Adopt a resolution in support of Measure H, the Alameda Unified School District's ar p cel tax. Respectfully submitted, Lisa Goldman Deputy City Manager CITY GFALAMEDA RESGLUTIaN N0. SUPPGRTING MEASURE H, THE ALAMEDA UNIFIED SCH40L DISTRICT TEMPGRARY EMERGENCY PARCEL TAX 0 N ~a v L a a vIIHEREAS, Governor Schwarzenegger released his budget pro osal for . p 2x08-09 fiscal year on January ~ o; and ~~ a WHEREAS, the Governor's budget recommends reducin education ~ ~ g funding by more than $4 biil~on in order to make up for a projected $14,5 billion ~ ~ deficit; and VvHEREAS, the proposed list of reductions for schools tar ets basic er g P student funding guaranteed by Proposition 98 as well as otherpro rams; and g WHEREAS, the Alameda Unified School District will be forced to reduce its budget by $4 -- 5 million to accommodate the Governor's bud et reductions 9 , and VvHEREAS, the Alameda Unified School District has alread reduced its y budget by $7.7 million aver the last seven years; and WHEREAS, reducing the budget by an additional $4 -- 5 million would have a significant negative impact on students, the schools, and the Alameda community and could lead to school closures; layoffs of teachers, counselors and other staff; and elimination of various programs; and WHEREAS, to offset these budget cuts, the Alameda Unified School District has placed a measure on the June 2008 ballot to lev a tem ora four- y p rY: year emergency tax of $120 per residential parcel and ~~5 cents per s uare foot q for commerciallindustr~al parcels; and WHEREAS, Measure H contains exemptions for seniors and residents receiving supplemental security income for a disability; and v11HEREAS, Measure H would raise approximately $4.2 million er ear f p Y or the Alameda Unified School District. NGUV, THEREFGRE BE IT RE50LVED, that the City Council of the Cit of Ala ~ ~ ~ ~ ,y meda supports Measure H, the Alameda Unified Schaoi Districts proposed parcel tax, ****~* Resolution #4-N CC 05-06.08 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoin Resolution was dul g y and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the Cit of Alameda in a Y regular meeting assembled on the 6th day of May, 2448, b the followin vote to Y g wit. AYES NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said City this day of , 2ppg, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk City of Alameda CITYOF ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Cauncil From: Donna Mooney SeniorAssistant City Attorney Date: May 6, 2008 Re: Recommending Charter Amendments for the November 2008 Ballot BACKGROUND The City Charter Subcommittee met after the March meeting of Council to further discuss potential changes to the Charter. The Subcommittee now seeks Council decision on which items to submit to the voters in the November election through a proposed resolution scheduled for the July ~ 5, 2008 Cauncil meeting. DISCUSSION The Cleanup, orNon-substantive, Measure At the March meeting, there was Council discussion regarding one measure for "cleanup" purposes, otherwise known as the non-substantive amendments to the Charter. A draft measure of more than 20 non-substantive changes was presented, addressing aspects such as eliminating the list of outdated salary minimums for the City Clerk, City Manager, and City Attorney, adding a provision that allows us to change all single-gender references of "his" to the inclusive "his or her," and providing flexibility forscheduling Council meetings, among others. Council also discussed several potential changes that had not been previous! . Y mentioned, among them the elimination of language in Article IX Sec. ~~E} that subjects the appointment, discipline and removal of a deputy city clerk to the approval of Council. The Subcommittee recommends asking the voters to delete that provision from the Charter for the purpose of attaining consistency with other Charter provisions. The proposed deletion of the pertinent language in Article IX Sec. 1 ~E} has been added to the "cleanup" measure. Substantive Revisions to Appear as Separate Ballot Measures A ballot measure to amend the Charter in such a way that would thane olic g p Y rather than result in mere cleanup needs to be set forth separately on the ballot. city Council Agenda Item #5-A 05-06-08 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council May 5, 2008 Page 2 of 4 Separation of the provisions eliminates the possibility that voters will be confused or misled. It avoids a situation where a voter can cast only one vote but has opposite views on the policy matters. Generally, the state constitution limits an initiative to a "single subject" for these reasons. There are other logistical constraints as well. The city attorney analysis that accompanies a ballot measure is limited to 500 words. Arguments and rebuttals are limited to 300 and 250 words. Accordingly, the cleanup measure should not incorporate items that change policy. The Subcommittee recommends selecting some if not all of the following substantive changes, to appear as separate measures on the November 2008 ballot: 1. Article lV Auditor. An additional qualification of a Certified Public Accountant license has been inserted, and a reference to the obsolete practice of holding a bond has been deleted. 2. Article V Treasurer. An additional qualification of a license as a Chartered Financial Analyst or Certified Financial Planner has been included. The duties have been modernized: to recommend, monitor and report rather than simply having custody of City money. 3. City owned public utilities established for the purpose of providing transportation are within the jurisdiction of the Public Utilities Board, under Article XII Sec. 1 ~A}. The word "transportation" is eliminated in this measure. 4. New Article XXII Sec. 13 requires a written contract when the City must pay an amount equal or greater than an amount that would be set by Council ordinance, and declares the City is not bound b an contract y y unless it complies with the requirements of the Charter. 5. Article XXVIII Sec. 5 provides that members of the Historical Advisory Board may be removed for three causes. These are being eliminated to achieve consistency among all boards. 6. Article XXlI Sec. S is rewritten to allow Council to modify the business hours of City offices. 1. Council and staff have expressed an interest in submitting to thevaters an amendment to Article III Sec. ~ 5 to facilitate expeditious City response in the event of an emergency. Two approaches are offered for further Council discussion, the first providing authority of staff to bind the City, the second requiring ratification by Council: Honorable Mayor and Members ofthe City Council May 6, 2008 Page 3 of 4 Approach A In the event of a sudden, unexpected occurrence that poses a clear and imminent danger, requiring immediate action to prevent or mitigate the loss or impairment of life, health, property, or essential public services, the City Manager or designee may exceed the sum provided by general law and forego competitive bid. Approach B In the event of a sudden, unexpected occurrence that poses a clear and imminent danger, requiring immediate action to prevent or mitigate the loss or impairment of life, health, property, or essential public services, the City Manager or designee may exceed the sum provided by general !aw and forego competitive bid, subject to ratification by Council as soon as practicable. The difference between the two approaches is that choice A allows staff to create a binding contract with the provider of labor, services, or materials. No Council approval would be necessary to obligate the City to pay above the usual $15,000 limit on staff contracting authority. Choice B allows staff to take the initial steps toward retaining the provider, and the contract would not become binding on the City until the Council votes on the matter. Staff has indicated that a practical disadvantage of choice B is that providers may be more reluctant to begin performing, or want to charge a higher price for initial work, if the City's obligation to pay is not certain until the Council votes. Ballot measures to revise the City Charter must be forwarded to the Registrar of Voters by resolution of Council no later than August 7, 2008, to qualify for the November consolidated election. Public hearings or workshops, if any, on the proposed revisions would need to be scheduled in May, June, andlor early July. For Further Discussion in 2449 The Subcommittee recommends that the remaining items previously discussed by Council should be raised with the public for continuing discussion and input. These items would not be brought to voters in November 2008. • The Mayor's compensation, at Charter Sec. 2-1.1, presently is set in the amount of $200 per month in addition to Council pay of $50 per meeting. • Council compensation is established in Charter Sec. 2-4, at $50 per meeting, • Councilmember Matarrese submitted a proposed revision to Article VII that would require the appointment of department heads to be on the advice and consent of City Council. • Councilmember deHaan seeks to amend Sec. 2-11 to read as follows: "Any incumbent of any elective Federal, State, County or local office shall be ineligible to hold any elective office or office of member of any board or commission created by the City Council or this Charter." Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council May 6, 2008 Page 4 of 4 • Councilmember deHaan seeks Council nomination of members of boards and commissions. RECaMMENDATI~N Determine the number and content of ballot measures to bring to voters. Request placement of the resolution for a ballot measure(s) on Council agenda no later than the regular Council meeting of July 15, 2008. Respectfully submitted, Donna Mooney SeniorAssistant City Attorney DMlcm CITY ~F ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Debra Kurita City Manager Date: May 6, 2008 Re: Call for Review of the Transportation Commission's Decision Regarding Proposed Parking Restrictions along Central Avenue to Improve Traffic Circulation, and Emergency,„Access BACKGRGUND Gn April 23, 2008, the Transportation Commission ETC} considered a request from the Alameda Police Department APD} and the Alameda Fire Department ~AFD} to restrict on-street parking along the north side of Central Avenue in frant of the Alameda Historic TheaterlCinepfex project to improve emergency vehicle access and traffic circulation. The TC, by a vote of five to two, did not support the proposed parking restrictions citing pedestrians safety concerns associated with the creation of an informal right-turn lane. Mayor Johnson has called far a review of the TC's decision see Attachment ~}. DISCUSSIGN In anticipation of a high level of activity in the vicinity of the theaterlcineplex, APD and AFD have requested the removal of on-street parking to enable unobstructed emergency vehicle access to the site and to allow appropriate passenger and commercial vehicle loading operations. The proposed parking restrictions included a 40-foot "No Stopping Zone," ~ 87-foot "Passenger Loading Zone," and 40-foot "Commercial Loading Zone" along the north side of Central Avenue from Gak Street to the alley located just east of the Alameda Historic TheaterlCineplex. The TC supported portions of the proposal and wanted to ensure adequate emergency access was provided. The TC was concerned that the proposal would provide an informs! right-turn lane turning onto Gak Street or into the parking structure, that could be as long as 267 feet, for motorists that drop off or pick-up patrons. This would encourage vehicles to travel quickly through this intersection increasing safety concerns for pedestrians frequenting the theaterlcineplex. The TC staff report is included as Attachment 2. The TC suggested that the curb and sidewalk be extended at the northeast corner of Central Avenue at Gak Street to create a "bulb-out" that would increase pedestrian visibility and shorten the crossing distance for pedestrians. However, while the bulb-out would enable parking to be prohibited in front of the theater, it would not provide unobstructed emergency vehicle access and would also eliminate the informs! right-turn lane. This suggestion was not supported by APD at the meeting. APD will rovide p directed enforcement for pedestrian and traffic safety, for a minimum of six weeks, as City Council Agenda [tem #5-~ 05-D6-48 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council May 6, 2008 Page 2 of 2 the public adjusts to the new conditions. In addition, a "Yield to Pedestrian" sign will be installed at the intersection. BUDGET CONSIDERATIGNIFINANCIALlMPACT Striping and signing activities are considered maintenance and are programmed in the Public vUorks Department's budget. MUNICIPAL CGDEIPGLICY DOCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE This action does not affect the Alameda Municipal Code. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEVy Based on the traffic analysis prepared for the theaterlcineplex project, the intersection will function at an acceptable level of service LOS D~ for the AM, PM, and Saturday midday peak hours in 2020, without the addition of turn lanes. The maximum number of vehicles expected to queue in the westbound direction during these periods is nine vehicles per cycle. RECOMMENDATION Consider the Call for Review of the TC's decision regarding proposed parking restrictions on Central Avenue to improve traffic circulation and emergency access. Respe Ily submitted, -~~~ Matthew T. Naclerio Public Works Director By ~~~'r~ ~~PG~r~ arty B gm n Transportation Coordinator MTN:BB:gc Attachments 1. Call for Review 2. TC Report cc: Transportation Commission CALL FAR REVlEw TO: CITY CF ALAMEDA Date: April 2S, 2008 Public Vvorks Departmen# City Hall west 950 vll. Mall Square, Room 110 Alameda CA 94501 This petition is hereby filed as a Call for Review of the decision of the: ~ Transportation Commission which: ~ Approved ~ Denied D Other (Specify) List action: Romoval of parking spaces on Central between Oak and Park Streets. at agenda item 7-B On Agril 23. 2008 (Street Address or Intersection) (Date) The basis of the Gall for Review is: a potential safety issue. (If more space is needed, please continue on the reverse side or attach additional sheets.) Beverly J. Johnson (Name) Mayor, 2263 Stanta Clara Avenue, Room 320 (Address) l4l -7401 (Telephone -Work) (Telephone -Home) AMC Section 2-5.6, Appeal of Transportation Commission Decision, provides that within ten days of a decision of the Transportation Commission any member of Council may call for a review of the decision by notifying the City Clerk. No fee is required for a Call for Review. For Off ce Use Only} Date Received Received By: Receipt No.: G:IpubwarkslpwadminlGAl Llformbooklcallforreview,doc Check: Cash: Check Number: City Council Attachment 'I to Agenda Item #5-B 05-06-08 TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION April 23, 2008 Item 7B DiscussionlAction Proposed Implementation of Parking Restrictions on Central Avenue to Improve Traffic Circulation and Access BACKGROUND At the request of the City of Alameda Police Department and Fire Department, Public worl~s Department is proposing the modification of on-street parking along.the northerly side of Central Avenue in front of the new Movie TheaterlCineplex located at 2305 Central Avenue. The proposed modifications are intended to improve emergency access and traffic circulation in the vicinity of the new Movie TheaterlCineplex and the Oak Street Parking Structure. Because of the impact of these changes on the community, the Public works Director has requested that this proposal be reviewed by the Transportation Commission. nr~c~r r~~~nN The Movie TheaterlCineplex project is anticipated to generate a significant amount of new vehicular and pedestrian traffic in the vicinity of the project. Annual attendance projections from the developer of the soon to be opened Alameda Theatre Cineplex are estimated to be between 350,000 and 400,000 customers. The summer months May through August} will re resent abo ° p ut 60 /° of that attendance, with weekends ~Fr~day, Saturday, and Sunday} representing about 65% of the total weekly attendance, Average weekly attendance is estimated to range between 5,000 and 14,000. The theater is expected to draw most of its customers from within the Cit of . y Alameda, however, there is the potential for the complex to become a regional entertainment destination. Due to this anticipated increase in the number of patrons in the Park Street area, some on-street parking adjustments and other traffic flow improvements have been requested by the Police and Fire Departments to improve vehicle flow, and to enhance emergency vehicle res once p capabilities and pedestrian safety. In particular, as indicated in Exhibit 1, both de artments P believe it is essential that traffic congestion in the vicinity of the project be addressed to revent p negative impacts on the entire Park Street area and to maintain a clear area in front of the theater to facilitate emergency vehicle access, Public works supports the recommendations ofthe Police and Fire Departments, as follows: A 40-foot long, "No Stopping Zone," effective 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, at the northeast corner of Central AvenuelOak Street intersection ixa front of the new Movie TheaterlCineplex. An approximately 1 S7-foot long "Passenger LoadinglUnloading Zone" that will extend easterly from the "No Stopping Zone" above}. A 40-foot long "Commercial LoadinglUnloading Zone" that will extend easterly from the "Passenger LoadinglUnloading Zone" tabove} to the alleyway just east of the Historic Alameda Theater. City Council Attachment 2 to Agenda Item #5-B 05.06.08 Transportiation Commission April 23, X008 Item 7B Pa e 2 g The proposed conditions are illustrated in Exhibit 2, These proposals would require the removal of 13 on~street metered parking spaces on Central Avenue between tl~e alleyway east of the theater to yak Street. Robb Ratto, executive director of the Park Street Business Association, and Kyle Conner,' developer of the Movie TheaterlCineplex project, have both been consulted and have indicated their support far these proposals see Exhibit 3 for letter from Mr. Conner}, , As indicated in Exhibit 1, the Police and Fire Departments have also requested that vehicles exiting the parking structure be required to turn right onto yak Street. Public works supports this recornrnendation as well, but as it is beyond the scope of the duties of the Transportation Commission, it is not listed as part of the action for this agenda item. BUDGET C~NSIDERATI~NSIFISCAL IMPACT No impact. The costs for the modifications being proposed are programmed into the on-going Public works maintenance budget for striping and signage. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Transportation Commission support the removal of parking and installation of a passenger loadinglunloading zone and a commercial loadinglunloading zone in front of the Alameda Theater, as described above. G:IpubworkslLTITR.ANSPQRTATt~N1C~MMYTTEESITC1~o08104230S1Central-Qak-parking.doc c;~~~D City of Alameda Matthew Naclerio Public vvorks Director 95D~Ilest Mall Square, Roorn 110 Alameda, CA 94541 Re: Alameda Theatre Cineplex Parking Improvements Dear Mr. Naclerio: APR ? q 2008 ff'LT~~,IC WOi~~ CI'I'X C)F' AI.A1V~lEDA The Alameda Theater and Cineplex project, includin the Civic Center ' g parking garage, 'rs anticipated to generate a significant increase in vehicular and pedestrian traffic in the vicinity of the project, at the intersection of Central Avenue and yak Street. As a result, the Alameda Police and Fire De artm p ents are requesting the following on-street parking adjustments and other traffic flow improvements to improve parking and trafficflow in the area: • Removal of all 13 parking meters on the north side of Central Avenue from Cak Street to the driveway on the east side of the theater buildin~ . g • Installation of a 4o-foot long "commercial loadinglunloadin zone" ello g ~Y w curb} on Central Avenue that will extend westerly from the drivewa 'ust Y~ east of theater building, • installation of an approximately 180-foot long "passen er loadin l . „ g g unloading zone ~whi#e curb} that wEll extend westerly from the "commercial loading) unloading zone" towards yak S#reet. • Increasing the length of the "no stopping zone" fired curb on the north s# } de of Central Avenue east of aak Street, from seven feet, to a roximatel pp y 40 feet. Police Departrneiat 1555 Oak Street Alameda, CA 94501 510,337.8340 +Fax 510.523.5322 Fire Departrneat 1300 Park Stxeet Alameda, CA 94501 510,337.2100 +Fax 510.521.7851 EXHIBIT 1 Letter to lUlatthew Naclerio April 14, 2008 Page Two • Installation of "No Parking or Stopping Anytime" signage on the east side of Gak Street, north of Central Avenue, in front of the Civic Center Garage to the entrance of the Long's Drugs parking lot. Installation of "Right Turn Gnly" signs at the exit of the Civic Center Garage and on the light standard on the west curb of Gak Street, direct) Y opposite the exit. Painting a "Right Turn Gnly" arrow on the pavement at the exit of the Civic Center Garage. Kyle Connor, the developer of the theater project, and Robb Ratto, PSBA executive director, have both indicated their su ort of the ro ased than e pp p p g s described above. The Police and Fire Departments are in agreement that it is essential far public safety, emergency vehicle response, and, ultimately, the success of the theater project that traffic flowthrough the area remains unimpeded, without the implementation of the listed proposals, it is likely that there will be traffic backu s p during peak hours which could affect the entire Park Street business dEStr~ct. The passenger loadinglunloading zone being requested for the front of the theater will also add to overall pedestrian safety and will provide an area for emergency vehicle response when necessary. We appreciate the cooperation you and your staff have offered in working to address these concerns. Sincerely, ~~- ~.~ vtilalter B. Tibbet Chief of Police A (~'~ Y L~~~ ~~ ~~ ~. David Kapler Fire Chief ~ ~~ Proposed Parking Changes at Central Avenue Ex~st~ng 7 feet ~~~ of Red Curb '`~.~. w.,y. ..~rF\ k ~•}•^:, ''v'K. . ~'~. M .•~'yl y, ~ tiy,.rl~~ h, ~' 4 ~ti~ ~ ~ 4' 1 ,~ti ~Ln l5, t'~u ~}4'v. .` `ti. ~~. •R~`~._ ,~ fj. ~~~ r~ r ,~ a ^~,. der r~s, frrz. ` '~ti r. z. ~ r t V~~ ~~ o 0 ;~ ~~ r ~~ .{ r; 1 ~ r~'r ~' ~1 a o LJV° I, 1 ~~+ ~ ~ i Y ~~, r ~? C f r ~~ fi!` i. i r ~ r~ ~ ~e 1J r i f ~1 1~ ~~' {fi r I '` ~ 11 !~ r ~ l.i V ~ 1:/1: / r i ~' r t1 61 U~~~~J~~~LJ r)i ~ .~ 4 '4q r~r ~, }~ •~.~ ~~ ,, install 33 feet f~~~ ~~ ~` '` P" '~ y l~ of Red curb a ,4f -w~ti ~ s~.ti. jJ 1~ ~ H 4 ~1 ~~~ t~ ~ ~yi~, ~] f~ s~ 9~ ~.. ~~h. f 187 feet of Install 40 feet of~i Loading Zone Loading Zone (Yel G:1pUbworkslLTITRANSP4RTAT~4NICOMMITTEESITC1200810423481Central-Avenue-sketch.doc r~) H not to scale EXHIBIT 2 ~~ ~ April 8, 2Q08 David Boersma Alameda Police Department 1555 yak Street Alameda, CA 945~~. Dear David, I am writing this letter to confirm my understanding, and by all means, my support of the proposed parking and traffic plan in front of the Historic Alameda Theatre and the Cineplex, bath on Central and Dak Streets. I strongly believe there should not be any parking in front ofthese buildings; instead I feel it is vital that these areas be marked with a white curb for loading and unloading. I support the recommendation that the curb is marked red and no parking at any time is allowed at the North West corner of Central for approximately 25 to ~0 feet from the corner of Oak Street. I also feel strongly the vehicles exiting the Civic Centre Parking Structure should be required to turn right as they exit the parking structure onto Qak Street. i am confident that the implementation of these policies will deliver the greatest level of safety and well being to pedestrians in the area, as well as contribute to a safer and smother flow of traffic in the vicinity. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can assist further in any way, Sincerely, ~A~~m.~u.a T~.~nT.~~, Gn.~p~~x ~ (~.~-~ ~I~~m~u~ ~nT~~-r~mm~nr ~Issoaar~, LP Managing General Partner 2~ ~ 7 C~NT~R~lL-AY~NU~E -~A~.~m.~~-a, C.~. 94SD 1 - S 10.769.21 GO /~.ax ~ 1 QJG9.21 G3 P~nc.~~m In~a.am~rion ~ 10.7 ~ 9.~ I L(TI (~4S G) www.n~.nm~u.~r-u:~.nr~.~s.com ~A VINT~I4~ -~XP~~I~Nt~ IN ST~IT~-0~=1~~1~--A~2T SIGHT ~-SOUND CITY 4F ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Debra Kurita City Manager Date: May 6, 2008 Re: Hold a Public Hearing to Consider Green Building Requirements for Cit Y Building Protects, Capital Improvement Protects, and Public-Private Partnershi sand Ado tion of a 75% Waste Diversion Goal BACKGROUND At their meeting of April 14, 2D08, the Planning Board recommended the ado tion of a . p Civic Green Building Qrdinance. The ordinance, based on the Sto waste.or model P g ordinance, would affect City building protects, Capital Improvement Pro~ects, and ublic- . 1 p private partnership projects, any of which exceed three million dollars in value. In addition, the City Council is being asked to consider a resolution formal) establishin Y g a goal of 75% reduction of waste going to landfills by 2010. Both of these measures are initial steps in the implementation of the Local Action Plan for Climate Protection. Additional ordinances will be forthcoming related to Bay Friendly landsca in , reen p99 building requirements for private development, and modification to the existin . .. g construction and demolition debris diversion ordinance. DISCUSSIGN As part of the development of the FY 47108 budget, the Waste Mana ement Authorit g y Board FNMA} approved a continuation of the pass-through fundin to member a encies . g g from Waste Import Mitigation funds through FY 09110. The estimated amount of fundin . g allocated to Alameda for FY 07105 is approximately $44,000. The WMA also a roved a .. .. pp set of five eligibility criteria for cites to continue to receive these funds in FY 08109 and beyond, and two of these criteria are formal City Council adoption of the Civic Green Building Ordinance, and the 75°/a waste diversion goal. GREEN BUILDING GRDINANCE At this time, no specific green building standards exist for the construction of ublic ... p fac~lit~es, such as City-owned facilities. This ordinance is the first in a series of text amendments to require or encourage construction using green buildin standards and g sustainable development. The recommended ordinance is similar to the ordinances adopted by the cities of Oakland, Union City, and Dublin, and is based u on the model p City Council Public Hearing Agenda Item #5-C 05-06-OS Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council May 6, 2008 Page 2 of 4 ordinance developed by Stopwaste.org. The ordinance will amend the Alameda Municipal Code to add a new Section, 13-19, Green Building Requirements for Cit y Bu~ld~ng Projects, Capital Improvement Projects, and Public Private Partnershi s, as P follows: • All new building or renovation projects that equal ar exceed $3 million in construction costs and are either owned or occupied by a City department or agency, or developed as apublic-private partnership, must meet either: a minimum Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design ~LEED~T"~ Certified rating and be so certified by the U.S. Green Building Council, or a minimum "GreenPoint Rated" score of 50 and be so verified by Build It Green. • Projects must meet as many LEED credits, ar "GreenPoint Rated" measures as practicable, and the City is required to complete and submit the LEED or "GreenPoint" checklist as a way of documenting the green building practices that have been incorporated into the project. • All covered projects must also include aLEED-accredited professional or a certified green building professional as a principal member of the desi n team . g from the beginning of the project. • The Building Gfficial or his designee shall regularly review the ro~ect p J specifications used in bidding Capital Improvement Projects to include the best green building practices. WASTE REDUCTIGN The purpose of the Uvaste Reduction resolution is to formally establish a goal of l5% reduction of waste going to landfills by 2010. Adoption of this resolution rovides . p consistency with the other member jurisdictions in Alameda Caunty and with the voter approved Charter Initiative, Measure D, to reach the 75% diversion goal by 2010. The 75% reduction of waste-to-landfill goal is one that the City of Alameda has continuail . Y strived to meet. Since 1997, varEOUS policy strategies have been put in place to achieve the goal. In 2000, the City of Alameda exceeded the state mandated 50% reduction of waste to landfills. From 2002 through 2005, the City of Alameda has had one of the two hi hest . 9 d~vers~on rates among the 15 reporting jurisdictions in Alameda County. A royal of the pp proposed resolution is a necessary first step that provides benefits beyond adherence to the 75°/° countywide diversion goal. It also provides the City an intermedia tool to ry reach the recommended zero waste strategy ~n the Local Action Plan for Climate Protection. BUDGET CGNSIDERATIGNIFINANCIALlMPACT Adoption of the Civic Green Building Grdinance and a 75°/o waste diversion oat will g allow the continued pass through of funding from Stopwaste.org. The estimated amount of funding to be received by the City for FY 07108 is approximately $44,000. Honorable Mayor and Ma 6, 2048 Y Members of the City Council Pa e 3 of 4 g MUNICIPALCGDEIPOLICY DGCUMENTCRGSS REFERENCE The Green Building Grdinance will become part of Chapter 13 of the Alameda Munici al . p Code Building and Housing. These actions are consistent with and further the goals of the recentl ado ted Local . Y p Action Plan for Climate Protection. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Adoption of these ordinances will not have a significant impact on the environment and is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA under . ~ ~ CEQA Gu~del~nes, Section 15308 -Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment as follows: ^ Section 15348 exempts actions taken by regulatory agencies to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment where the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment. RECGMMENDATIGN 1. Adopt Green Building Requirements For City Building Projects, Ca ital p Improvement Projects, and Public-Private Partnerships 2. Adoption a ?5% Waste Diversion Goal Respectfully submitted, IN Cathy W odbury Planning and Building Director ~C Marge clean Publi rks Coordinator Honorable Mayor and Members ofthe City Council ~- By; Cyn hia Eliason Supervising Planner CE:ce Attachment; 1. Planning Board Staff Report Including Attachments from 4114108 May 6, 2008 Page 4 of 4 cc: Former Members of the Climate Protection Task Force CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPaRT ITEM N~.: APPLICATION: Recommendation to the City Council to approve Green Building requirements for City building projects, capital improvement projects, and public-private partnerships- City of Alameda - 2263 Santa Clara Avenue. GENERAL PLAN: Various ENVIRGNMENTAL The project is Categorically Exempt from environmental DETERMINATION: review, pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines, Section ~ 5305 - Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment. STAFF PLANNER: Cynthia Eliason, Supervising Planner 5 ~ 0.747.6880 PUBLIC NGTICE: A notice for this hearing was published in the local newspaper. RECGMMENDATION: Find that the adoption of the ordinance will not cause significant adverse effects to the physical environment, and recommend adoption of the ordinance to the City Council. ACRONYMS: AMC -Alameda Municipal Code ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution (Attachment 1) I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2007 the Planning Board directed staff to develop a draft Green Building ordinance that would incorporate, encourage, and mandate sustainable development and augment the existing Building Code and Zoning Regulations. Staff worked with the Alameda County Waste Authority, StopUl~aste.Grg, to utilize the StopUllaste.Org model ordinance for Green Building to develop a custom City of Alameda Green Building Ordinance. City Council Attachment to Public Hearins Agenda Item #5-C 05-06.08 II. BACKGRGUND Studies conducted by the U.S. Green Building Council have estimated that the development and operation of buildings poses a significant drain on natural resources. Approximately 39°/0 of all C~2 emissions are generated from the operation of buildings, 65°/a of waste output comes from the building process, and buildings consume 71 °/o of electricity consumption in the US. In addition, StopWaste.Grg has identified that construction and demolition debris comprises up to 21% of materials disposed in Alameda County landfills. All the above activities generate considerable amounts of greenhouse gas emissions, the leading cause of global climate change. In 2006, the City Council of the City of Alameda committed to the International Council on Local Environmental Initiatives' Cities for Climate Protection Campaign and pledged to take a leadership role in promoting public awareness about the causes and impacts of climate change. In pursuit of this effort, the recently adopted Local Action Plan for Climate Protection outlines that the City should adopt sustainable development regulations and green building ordinances that would promote sustainable building design that would reduce the drain on na#ural resources. Green building design, construction, and the long-term operation and maintenance can have a significant positive effect on energy, water and resource efficiency, waste and pollution generation. In addition, green building design has a positive impact on wildlife habitat, the health, and productivity of a property's occupants over the life of the building. It can also contribute to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, improve air quality, and enhance urban sustainability. Specifically, green buildings use recycled- content materials, consume less energy and water, have better indoor air quality, and use much less natural resources than conventional buildings. Construction waste is often recycled and remanufactured into other building products. A structure constructed and remodeled with green building standards can result in significant cost savings to the property owner over the life of the project. liver the past decade, significant green building standards and rating systems have been developed to monitor progress and compliance with the ethics behind the green building movement. At the national level, the U.S. Green Building Council has taken the lead in promoting and defining commercial green building by developing the "Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design" ~LEED~TM Rating System, while in California, "Build It Green" has taken the lead in promoting and defining a statewide standard for residential green building by developing the "GreenPoint Rated" program. At this time, no specific green building standards exist for public facilities, such as City- owned facilities. However, due to their nature, most public buildings could be evaluated ' ~ TM . as commercial structures and a commercial LEER standard would be applied. An ordinance requiring City projects and public-private partnership projects to incorporate green building standards such as LEEDTM and "GreenPoint Rated" would result in the most immediate and meaningful way to promote green building in projects built as public-private partnerships, and to encourage private projects to include green buildin g elements. It is essential that the City itself, through the design, construction, operation and deconstruction of its own facilities and facilities it funds, provide leadership to both the private and public sectors to incorporate green building practices and to promote economic and environmental health in the City. The City of Alameda should set an example that would incorporate sustainable design, construction, and address the long-term maintenance and operation of buildings within the City, which can have a significant impact on the City's environmental sustainability, resource usage and effciency, waste management, and the health and productivity of residents, workers, and visitors to the City. By augmenting the Alameda Municipal Code to add a new "Section, 31-19, Green Building Requirements for City building projects, capital improvement projects, and public private partnerships", Exhibit "A" to Attachment 1 } the City would require the following: • All new building or renovation projects that equal or exceed $3 million in construction costs and are either owned or occupied by a City department or agency, or developed as apublic-private partnership must meet either: a minimum LEEDT"" Certified rating and be so certified b the U.S. Green Buildin Y g Council or a minimum "GreenPoint Rated" score of 5o and be so verified by Build It Green. • Projects must meet as many LEED TM credits, or "GreenPoint Rated" measures as practicable and are required to complete and submit the LEEDTM or "GreenPoint" checklist as a way of documenting the green building practices that have been incorporated into the project. • All covered projects must also have aLEED-Accredited Professional or a Certified Green Building Professional as a principal member of the design team from the beginning of the project. • The Building Official or his designee shall regularly review the project specifications used in bidding Capital Improvement Projects to include the best green building practices. Ill. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Adoption of a Green Building Ordinance will not have a significant impact on the environment and is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ~CEQA} under CEQA Guidelines, Section 15308 -- Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment as follows: ^ Section 15308 exempts actions taken by regulatory agencies to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment where the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment. IV. PUBLIC NOTICE A notice for this hearing was published in the local newspaper. V. RECaMMENDATION Find that the adoption of the ordinance will not cause significant adverse effects to the physical environment, and recommend adoption of the ordinance to the Cit Council. Y CITY GF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD RESOLUTION No. PB-a8-48 RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE GREEN BUILDING REQUIREMENTS FGR CITY BUILDING PROJECTS, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, AND PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS WHEREAS, The City finds that the design, construction, and maintenance of buildings within the City can have a significant impact on the Cit 's environmental .. Y sustainabil~ty, resource usage and eff ciency, waste management, and the health and productivity of residents, workers, and visitors to the City; and WHEREAS, the City finds, based on studies by StopWaste.Org that construction and demolition debris comprise up to 21°/0 of materials disposed in Alameda Count y landfills, and WHEREAS, the City finds that green building design, construction, o eration and . p maintenance can have a significant pos~t~ve effect on energy, water and resource efficiency, waste and pollution generation, wildlife habitat and the health and productivity of a property's occupants over the life of the building; and WHEREAS, the City finds that green building design contributes to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, improve air quality and enhance urban sustainabilit ;and Y WHEREAS, the City finds that green building benefits are spread throu hout the' g systems and features of the budding and the landscape, the larger SF Ba area . Y ecosystem and the community. Green buildings use recycled-content materials, consume less energy and water, have better indoor air quality, and use much less natural resources than conventional buildings. Construction waste is often rec cled and . Y remanufactured into other budding products; and WHEREAS, the City finds that green building design and construction decisions made by the City in the construction and remodeling of City buiidin s, ca ital g p improvements and public-private partnerships can result in significant cost savings to the City overthelife of the projects; and WHEREAS, the City finds that it is critical to both the economic and environmental health of the City that the City provides leadership to both the rivate and . p public sectors ~n the area of green budding; and WHEREAS, the most immediate and meaningful way to do so is to include reen .. 9 building requirements for City projects, capital improvement projects and ro'ects built p1 as public-private parknerships, and to encourage private projects to include reen g building elements; and VIIHEREAS, green building design, construction, operations and maintenance techniques are increasingly widespread in residential and commercial buildin 9 construction; and . 11VHEREAS, at the national level, the U.S. Green Building Council has taken the lead in promoting and defining commercial green building by devefo in the Leadershi . pg p ~n Energy and Environmental Design BLEED}TM Rating System which is now the nationally accepted benchmark for the design, construction and o eration of hi h p g performance green buildings, and promotes awhole-building approach to sustainabifit y by rating performance fn five key areas: sustainable site devefo ment; water savin s' .. . p g, energy eff~c~ency; materials selection; and indoor environmental quality; and UIIHEREAS, in California, Build It Green has taken the lead in promotin and . g def Wing a statewide standard for residential green building b develo in the Y p9 GreenPoint Rated program; and VIIHEREAS, requiring City Projects, capital improvement projects and ublic- r~ p private partnership projects to incorporate LEED ,GreenPoint Rated Guidelines is necessary and appropriate to achieving the benefits of green building in the City. NGV11, THEREFGRE, BE IT RESGLVED THAT the Planning Board recommends that this project is Categorically Exempt from environmental review, ursuant to the . p CEQA Guidelines Section 15348 -Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment. NG~N, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Plannin Board of g the City of Alameda hereby recommends that the City Council adopt an amendment to the Alameda Municipal Code to add a new Section, 13-19, GREEN BUILDING REQUIREMENTS FGR CITY BUILDING PRGJECTS, CAPITAL IMPRGVEMENT PRGJECTS, AND PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS as described in Exhibit "A." NGVI~, THEREFGRE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Plannin Board of g the City of Alameda hereby encourages private residential and commercial develo ers . p in the City of Alameda to use green building design, construction and o eration p whenever feasible, and hereby recommends that City staff return with a resolution for adoption by the City Council endorsing and promoting green buildin uidelines . .. g g , ensuring their availability to private developers and builders and explorin incentives to g encourage the use of green building guidelines and rating systems. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of April 2008 b the Plannin Board of Y g the City of Alameda by the following vote: . AYES: ~4} Cook, Ezzy Ashcraft, Lynch, McNamara NOES: (0) ABSENT; ~~} Cunningham, Kohlstrand ATTEST: ~~ ~~~ Andrew Thomas, Secretary City Planning Board CITY OFALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO, ESTABLISHING A GOAL GF l5% REDUCTION OF WASTE GGING TG LANDFILLS BY 2010 FOR THE CITY OF ALAMEDA IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COUNTYWIDE 75% WASTE REDUCTIGN GOAL E 0 ~a 0 L ~. a ' WHEREAS, the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 o mandated that every city and county in the state reduce the quantit of solid ~ „ ,Y a waste disposed within their 1urisdiction and disposed in landfills by fifty ercent p v by 2000, and WHEREAS, the City of Alameda has exceeded the required oal and o g achieved 68 /o for year 2005; and WHEREAS, the Alameda County Waste Reduction and Rec clin .. Y g Initiative Charter Amendment Measure D} established a Gaunt ide oal of Yw g 75°/o reduction of waste going to landfills; and WHEREAS, the Alameda County Integrated Waste Management Plan also established a countywide goal of l5% reduction of waste goin to landfills g by 2010; and WHEREAS, the City of Alameda wishes to do its part to help achieve the countywide goal of 75% reduction of waste going into landfills by 2010 b Y establishing a similar goal; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted a zero waste olic as , p Y recommended in the Climate Protection Task Force Local Action Plan, includin ., g specific objectives and implementation measures; and WHEREAS, efforts to increase recycling and composting and to reduce waste, in the residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional sectors, and efforts to incorporate other waste reducing activities can have a si nificant .. 9 positive effect on energy, water, and resource efficiency, greenhouse as g emissions, waste and pollution generation, wildlife habitat, and the health and productivity of employees; and WHEREAS, the City of Alameda has adopted a number of olicies and p programs that support this goal including a Construction & Demolition ordinance, a residential food waste collection program, an ordinance that restricts the use of polystyrene foam food service ware, a commercial rec clin Y g program, and a curbside recycling program, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED; that the City Council ado is the o ~ ~ p goal of l5 /o reduction of waste going to landfills by 2010 for the Cit of Y Resolution #5-C 05-06-08 Alameda in accordance with the countywide 75°/o waste reduction goal usin . g the ex~st~ng State of California Diversion rate methodology for measurement. BE IT FURTHER RESaLVED; that the City of Alameda Public Works Department will work with StopWaste.4rg to accomplish this goal and present strategies and programs to the City Council for consideration as needed, *~*** I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in a regular meeting assembled on the 6t~ day of May, 2008, b the followin vote to y 9 wit: AYES NOES; ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said City this ~h day of May, 2008. Lara Weisiger, City Clerk City of Alameda CITY ~FALAMEDA~RDINANCE N0. New Series AMENDING THE ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING CHAPTER XIII (BUILDING AND HOUSING) BY CREATING A CIVIC GREEN BUILDING ORDINANCE 0 0 N 0 a WHEREAS, The City finds that the design, construction, and maintenance of buildings within the City can have a significant impact on the .City's environmental sustainability, resource usage and efficiency, waste ~ p ~ management, and the health and productivity of residents, workers, and visitors ~ .~ to the City; and ~~ WHEREAS, the City finds, based on studies by Stop~lVaste.Grg that construction and demolition debris comprise up to 21°/0 of materials disposed in Alameda County landfills; and WHEREAS, the City finds that green building design, construction, operation and maintenance can have a significant positive effect on energy, water and resource efficiency, waste and pollution generation, wildlife habitat and the health and productivity of a property's occupants over the fife of the building; and WHEREAS, the City finds that green building design contributes to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, improve air quality and enhance urban sustainability; and WHEREAS, the City finds that green building benefits are spread throughout the systems and features of the building and the landscape, the larger SF Bay area ecosystem and the community, green buildings use recycled-content materials, consume less energy and water, have better indoor air quality, and use much less natural resources than conventional buildings. Construction waste is often recycled and remanufactured into other building products; and WHEREAS, the City finds that green building design and construction decisions made by the City in the construction and remodeling of City buildings can result in significant cost savings to the City over the life of the projects; and WHEREAS, the City finds that it is critical to both the economic and environmental health of the City that the City provides leadership to both the private and public sectors in the area of green building; and WHEREAS, the most immediate and meaningful way to do so is to include green building requirements for City projects and in projects built as public-private partnerships, and to encourage private projects to include green Introduction of Ordinance #5-C 05-D6.0$ building elements; and vIJHEREAS, green building design, construction, operations and maintenance techniques are increasingly widespread in residential and commercial building construction; and UvHEREAS, at the national level, the U.S. Green Building Council has taken the lead in promoting and defining commercial green building b]1 . ~ ~ TI~II developing the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design BLEED} Rating System; and VvHEREAS, in California, Build It Green has taken the lead in pramoting and defining a statewide standard for residential green building by developing the GreenPoint Rated program; and ~JVHEREAS, requiring City Projects and public-private partnership TM projects to incorporate LEED GreenPoint Rated is necessary and appropriate to achieving the benefits of green building in the City, and vvHEREAS, the GreenPoint Rated program and the LEEDT'~ rating program promote awhole-building approach #o sustainability and performance in five key areas: sustainable site design, water savings, energy efficiency, materials selection and indoor air quality. BE IT aRDAINED by the Council of the City of Alameda that: Section 1. The Alameda Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding a new Section, 31-19, which shall read as follows: GREEN BUILDING REC~UIREMENTS FGR CITY BUILDING PRGJECTS, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRGJECTS, AND PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHfPS and is hereby added to the Alameda City Municipal Code to read as follows: 13-19.1 Purpose and Intent. To promote economic and environmental health in the City, it is essential that the City itself, through the design, construction, operation and deconstruction of its own facilities and facilities it funds, provide leadership to both ,the private and public sectors incorporating green building practices. The most immediate and meaningful way to do this is to require the integration of green building in City and public-private partnerships buildings and landscapes. 13-19.2 Definitions. a. "Covered Project" means ~1 }all new building or renovation projects that equal or exceed $3 million in construction costs; and are either awned or occupied by a City department or Agency or developed as a Public- Private Partnership. b. "Green Building Compliance Official" means the Building Official or designated staff persons} authorized and responsible for implementing this Article, c. "GreenPoint Rated" means the most recent version of the residential green building rating program developed by Build It Green, City staff shall maintain the most recent version of the GreenPoint checklists and Residential Green Building Guidelines for New Home Construction, Remodeling, and Multifamily Building. d. "Initiated" means at the time of application for a building permit, e. "LEEDT"" Rating System" means the most recent version of the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design ~LEEDT""} Green Building Rating United States Green Building Council. City staff shall maintain the mast recent version of the LEEDT"~ Rating System at all times. f, "LEED Accredited Professional" means an individual who has passed the LEEDT"" accreditation exam administered by the US Green Building Council. g. "Public-Private Partnership" means any project built on city-owned land, or constructed wholly or in part with public funds, or built as a project of the City, Community Improvement Commission, or Housing Authority, h. "Renovation" means any change, addition, or modification to an existing building or structure, including, but not limited to, tenant improvements. i. "Structure" means that which is built or constructed, an edifice or building of any kind or any piece of work artificially built or composed of parts joined together in some definite manner and permanently attached to the ground, j. "Traditional Public vllorks Project" means heavy construction projects such as pump stations, flood control improvements, roads, and bridges, as welt as traffic lights, sidewalks, bike paths, bus stops, and associated infrastructure on City owned and maintained property, ~ 3-~ 9.3 Standard For Compliance. a, All Covered Projects initiated on or after the effective date of this Ordinance, shall meet either: a minimum LEEDT~" Certified rating and be so.certified by the US Green Building Council or a minimum GreenPoint Rated score of 50 and be so verified by Build It Green. All Covered Projects shall also have a LEEDT~'~Accredited Professional ar a Certified Green Building Professional as a principal member of the design team from the beginning of the project. b. Covered Projects are required to meet as many LEED credits, or GreenPoint Rated measures as practicable and are required to complete and submit the LEED or GreenPoint checklist as a way of documenting the green building practices that have been incorporated into the project. c. The Building official or his designee shall regularly review the project specifications used in bidding Capital Improvement Projects to include the best green building practices. 13-19.4 Implementing Regulations. a. The Building Official shall, within six months of ordinance adoption, promulgate any rules and regulations necessary or appropriate to achieve compliance with the requirements ofthis Section. b. The rules and regulations promulgated by the Building Official under this section shall provide for at least the following: 1. The incorporation of the green building requirements into the appropriate design, construction, maintenance and development agreement documents prepared for the applicable Covered Projects. Z. The designation of an appropriate Green Building Compliance Officials} who shall have the responsibility to administer and monitor compliance with the green building requirements set forth in this Section and with any rules or regulations promulgated there under, and to grant waivers or exemptions from the requirements of this Section, and to report to the City Council regarding green building compliance on all Covered Projects and Traditional Public Works Projects. 13-19.5. Unusual Circumstances. Compliance with the provisions of this Article may be waived in unusual circumstances where the City Council has, by resolution, found and determined that the public interest would not be served by complying with such provisions. Section 2.If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is, far any reason, held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Alameda herby declares that it would have passed this ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional. Section 3. All former ordinances or parts thereof conflicting or inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance hereby adopted, to the extent of such conflict only, are hereby repealed. Section 4. This ordinance and the rules, regulations, provisions, requirements, orders and matters established and adopted hereby shall take effect and be in full force and effect 3o days after the date of its final passage and adoption, Presiding 4fficerof the Council Attest: Lara Vlleisiger, City Clerk City of Alameda *****~ I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in a regular meeting assembled on the 6th day of May, 2008, by the following vote to wit: AYES NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: IN WITNESS, vVHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said City this day of , 2008. Lara Weisiger, City Clerk City of Alameda CITY of ALAMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Debra Kurita City Manager Date: May 6, 2008 Re: Direct Staff to Establish aPublic-Private Partnership for Community Participation in Implementation of the Local Action Plan for Climate Protection BACKGRGUND 0n February 5, 2008, the City Council adopted a resolution setting a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Goal of 25°/a below the 2005 baseline level, adopted the Local Action Plan for Climate Protection, and dissolved the Climate Protection Task Force as the members had completed their assigned duties. As part of monitoring the implementation of the Local Action Plan, the Climate Protection Task Force recommended establishment of a Sustainability Commission of at least five members to: • Monitor the implementation and progress of the Local Action Plan on a quarterly basis; • Publicize and engage the community at large on issues of sustainability; • Review the q uarterly reports prepared by staff; • Host biannual public forums to discuss and evaluate implementation of the Local Action Plan; • Advise boards and commissions on implementation of the Plan; and • Make recommendations tothe City Council regarding revisions to the Plan or the citywide greenhouse gas reduction goal. After brief discussion about creating a Sustainability Commission and the role of such a commission, the City Council directed staff to provide feedback on how a Citizens Advisory Committee can be established and how the Committee could help in the budget and priority setting process to ensure implementation of the Local Action Plan. DISCUSSIGN Since adoption of the Local Action Plan, the City Manager formed a staff "Green Team," which includes the Assistant City Manager, Public Ul~orks Director, Planning and City Council Agenda Item #5-D 45-ofi-48 Honorable Mayor and May 6, 2ggg Members of the City Council Page 2 of 5 Building Director, General Manager of Alameda Power and Telecom, legal staff, and senior staff representing the three departments. The Green Team meets on a regular basis to review work programs and budgets and coordinate City projects and activities to implement the Local Action Plan. The first quarkerly progress report on implementation of the Local Action Plan is provided as Attachment 1. Cne of the initial tasks of the Green Team was to develop ideas for the establishment of a Citizens Advisory Committee or same other body. Staff met several times with the former chair of the Climate Protection Task Force, Stan Schiffman, and former Task Force member David Burton to share ideas about how to structure a committee that would facilitate engaging the community as a whole in taking action for climate protection and in monitoring implementation of the Local Action Plan. The primary concern raised at the meetings is that, because City government activities represent only three percent of Alameda's total carbon footprint, it is imperative to get community action and change in order to meet the goals of the Local Action Plan. The search for a proper structure for the community group centered on finding a model that most effectively engages and empowers the community to organize and act independent of the city government and staff. A number of different structures were analyzed, but apublic-private partnership mode! appears to possess the characteristics necessary to operate successfully both in conjunction with, but also independently from, the City government. Public~Private Partnership: The public-private partnership model, which is being implemented by the City of Palo Alto, establishes a partnership organization where city staff, residents, and businesses collaborate citywide and engage all segments of the community in implementing sustainability initiatives. In creating the partnership, the City would act as the catalyst by convening the community and facilitating the development of a more formal structure, mission, and goals. With establishment of this community-based group, the City would participate in the partnership as another stakeholder rather than as the sole implementer of the Local Action Plan. The public-private partnership could ultimately become anon-profit organization if desirable, and become eligible for potential grant funding far a variety of sustainability initiatives. Information about Palo Alto's public- private partnership is included as Attachment 2. In reviewing options for the committee structure, the fallowing key objectives were identified: ~. Ensuring the broadest possible representation from all sectors of the community. The public-private partnership model is maximally inclusive. Since there are no formal "appointments" to the partnership, any member of the public can participate in equal status to any other member. Membership should be representative of all sectors of the community including neighborhood groups, schools, nonprofits and service clubs, businesses, and the faith community. This Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council May 6, 2005 Page3of5 would facilitate input and action from throughout the community and provide the body and the Local Action Plan with wider visibility throughout the city. 2. Maximizing available expertise. The body should include some members with specific, sustainability-related areas of expertise. A broadly constituted non- governmental body would have flexibility in inviting appropriate outside expertise to recommend potential programs and policies that could be implemented in Alameda. A community-based group, such as aprivate-public partnership would have maximum flexibility to work with outside experts to effectively accomplish the adopted climate protection goals and suggest additional sustainability measures. 3. Leveraging the City's limited fiscal and staff resources. Existing boards and commissions appointed by the City Council are both resource intensive and often limited in reach. In order to utilize City funds and staff time as efficiently and productively as possible, a committee or public-private partnership could help leverage these resources by publicizing and engaging the community at large on sustainability issues and encouraging appropriate actions at the business and household level. 4. Achieving maximum flexibility to adjust to rapidly changing priorities. A public-private partnership would have flexibility in determining and adjusting the focus of meetings and would provide maximum responsiveness to new environmental information and rapidly changing priorities. 5. Facilitating the City in its role as convener of the community, rather than as sole implementer of solutions. Given the significant environmental issues related to climate change, the entire community, not just the City, will need to take action to address the challenges. The City can be most effective if it serves as a catalyst for community initiatives. While a traditional commission would be constrained to recommend City-implemented initiatives, apublic-private group could recommend and help implement whale-community initiatives. A public-private partnership would be the most far-reaching and effective way to educate and engage the entire community in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. A public-private partnership would: • Be a grass roots-based movement, not a top down organization, driven by the needs and priorities of the community and giving the community ownership of the Local Action Plan. • Allow maximum flexibility in establishing tactical plans that are responsive to the needs and issues facing different stakeholders throughout the community, such as businesses, schools, faith groups, community action groups, and individual households. • Be nimble in responding to community concerns and initiatives. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council May 6, 2ggS Page 4 of 5 • Not be financially dependent upon City funding. As noted above, the partnership could evolve into anon-profit organization that can apply for grants, do fundraising, establish other kinds of partnerships, and have greater flexibility in directing funds to those priorities deemed most pressing by the community. In addition to the public-private partnership, staff and members from the Climate Protection Task Force reviewed several other more conventiana[ organizational forms. Traditional Commission Structure: A traditional commission structure, modeled after the Transportation Commission, Public Art Commission, or Recreation and Park Commission, could include five members appointed by the City Council, each of whom could be Alameda residents and serve for a period of two to four years, with staggered terms to ensure continuity. The responsibilities and authority of an additional City commission would require clear and concise definition to prevent overlap with those of other established boards and commissions. The Brown Act would apply to this type of structure. Therefore, City staff would be required to notice all meetings with agendas and prepare packets and minutes. Commission discussion must follow the published agenda, without the option of discussing items that have not been agendized. This structure was not chosen because it would likely focus too much on City activities that constitute only a small percentage of the total climate change problem, not posses the important grassroots characteristics of anon-governmental entity. in addition, a traditional commission would lack the flexibility and openness of a community based organization. City Manager Appointed Committee: Another structural alternative examined was the creation of a City committee that is not subject to the Brown Act. The advantages of this option include less staff time required and greater flexibility in the body's topics of discussion and action. No formal noticing requirements would apply, no agenda packets would be required, and the group could informally collaborate with staff and the City Council. In creating this type of structure, the committee would be appointed by the City Manager and report to her designated City staff. This structure was not chosen because it would necessarily be even more focused on City activities than the traditional commission structure, lack the inclusiveness of a community based organization, and potentially be duplicative of the City's "Green Team." BUDGET C~NSIDERATI~NIFINANCIAL IMPACT A public-private partnership would require an initial investment of City staff time and funds to prepare materials and advertise the partnership opportunity. Staff costs would depend on the level of staff effort required, which can be most accurately determined only after the first few meetings on the public-private partnership are held. However, during the start-up phase, the time allocated by staff from various departments for coordination, planning, implementation, and reporting could be significant. Staff estimates that the cost to prepare materials and advertise participation and partnership Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council May 6, 2008 Page 5 of 5 opportunities would range between $5,440 and $1 D,oDO, with Planning & Building, the General Fund, and Alameda Power & Telecom splitting the costs. Staff costs would decline over the next 12 months as the community-based group develops its own formal structure and as the City's rate changes from facilitator to stakeholder. MUNICIPAL CODEIPGLICY DGCUMENT CRASS REFERENCE Providing an opportunity for community participation in implementation of the Local Action Plan for Climate Protection is consistent with the Plan's second Tier ~ Initiative to "Develop amulti-faceted community outreach program to increase public awareness and participation in greenhouse gas reductions." RECQMMENDATIGN Direct staff to establish apublic-private partnership for community participation in implementation of the Local Action Plan for Climate Protection and hold the initial community meeting within three to six months. Respectfully submitted, Cathy oodbury Planning and Building Director ~ i r f. .. , :... ... .. ~. ... ._......_.._. ~, . ~~~~~ Girish Balachandran General Manager AP&T r~ I ` ~" ~ Mathew Naclerio Public Works Director Contributions by: Stan Schiffman, Former Climate Protection Task Force Chair David Burton, Former Climate Protection Task Force Member AC:cw Attachments: ~ . Quarterly Report on Implementation of the Local Action Plan for Climate Protection 2. City of Palo Alto's Public-Private Partnership cc: Members, Climate Protection Task Force W o~ a0 WZ ~o J~ a ~c ~ WZ ~W ~~ aW ~J C~ a Z 0 W 0 a W a ... J V 0 LL Z a z 0 a J a 0 J Z W t J a 0 V V a J a z N C .o C o ~ ~ _ .o ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ a a m ~ o ~ o c o o .~ o c o j 0 ] N O 'O ~ j ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ C 11J ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ J C? ~ 0} _ ~ ~ d? - Q N ~ ~ 0 ~ Q N 0 ~ N ~ ~ ~, '~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ C ` C i C L }' N C~ ~ W W W Q ~ I I I I I ~~ I ~ ~ I I r r r ~- r LL r r r r r r ~ ~ L o L a~ L 4} L ~U L o ~ (~ L o L N L a~ L a~ L.. a~ L a} 4 ~ ~ ~= ~ ~ m ~_ ~ ~ ,_ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 {sj '0 ~ .V ~ tU 0 o .~ ~ ~N ~ `c~ a ~. oo ~~ ~ ~ ~, o ]~ U cN ~~c~ ~ ~- o~ o~ .?a~ ~~ ~o N o ~~ ~ L ~° ~ .~? o o o~ ~ .~ ~ o~ ]~ ~ 0 ~~ 0 (~ ~ ~ ~a ,_ ~ N ,,..- o ~ r, O y U ~ 0 v ~ ~ .? ~ ~~ o o `~ ~' ~~ ~ a ~ ., , ` i~Q) W o .~ 0~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ N La~ N - ~ ~~ oa _ ~ ~ c ~ C~ -, ~,~ L __ ~rn ca~ 0~ ~°' ~ ~ ~'= o . ~ ~ c~~ ~ ~ ~ v ] 0 - ~ ~ c~ o~ ~~ ~ W L coo v~ mc ~ ~~~ c ~a~ ~ ~~c rno a~ c~ C7 = 'co ~ ~o No a? ~ m ~ ~ ~~ v ~ , ~.r~ ~o~ W ~ ~ c a J ~O N ~ N 4~ L~ o ~ . . Uv_ ~ c o~ ,~ o N N C ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~N o ~ - W C ~ ~ N ~ ~ ] N~ o OO ~ o o CO ~ ~ '+~~~ C L '~ ~ ._- ~]~ ~ ~ ' a ~ J U o ~ 0~ ~ ~ ] ~ 0 ~ ~ U C ~ I. ~-c Qo `~ o~ ~~ m~ o :~ ~ c~L*' o~ o .~ ~ x~ oN ,~ ~ a~ o L .` Q? ,~o i~~ V ~~ =~ L ~ ~~~ ~ ~ co ~~ m oos V ~ O~ Oi rC ~ Q~,V ' ] ~ oi ' O v ~ {a ~ ,~= ~o rsN ~c o~c~ ~~ o ~ ~=c o ooc~ ~ ~ ._ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ Epo D ~~ ao c~~ a~ ' ~~L s .o ~~ ~~ o ~~ ~~~ _o ~ v~cn ~~ ~q,y 3 ~Q ° ~ ~ N~ a~ ~ o ~`~ U ~ ~3 ? ~~ = ~~ ~ ~ .. ~~° ? o ~ o._ ~ - cd ~ ~ ~~ ~~ .~ .~ c n r N ~ o ~ ~ W ~ . ~ a~~ c ~o , = a~,~ V . a~~~ ~ ca ~~ Qc~ ~c~ a~a~ ~ ? L ~ ]~o J ~ ~~ o._ - UO ~N ~.C ~ ~ ~ ~{~U n. 'U c 0~ ~m N= ~? ~C .y ~ o ~.vU - ~.~ c~~ c~~ ~ c~~~ ~ ~cn c~~ Q= ~ ~ ~~~ a ~ _ ~ ~' D o o ~ ° ~ o ° ~ c~ ° ~ ° ~ ° ~ ° ti ° ~ 0 N 0 N a N o No o N o N o N o N o N ~ o 0 r City Council Attachment 'I to Agenda item #5-D ~5t~OG~QB N N C N N C C C Q o o Q ~ > 0 > 0 ~ ~ o °- a o , ~ ~ ~ '~" ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ o ~ .V d ~ ,V N p ~ ~ ~ Q Q ~ ~ ~ {~ N N I-' ~ ~ ~ O ~ E i r r ~ a r N N Q} .. ~_ ~ 3 ~_ ~_ Q~ L r 'n V~ /~ vJ L r r r ~ ~ o Lo +~+ {~ ~ C . ~ ~ a~ L •~ ~ C ~ Q o ~0 3 oN a cv c ~ _ Q p C o U C ~ N 4? Q p ~ ~ m m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ v _ 'cn O ~ ~ .,.~ ~ • V N L ~ = ~ ~~ ~ ~o N ~ c~ rn o C~ c o m m~ ~ ~ c n = 0 N ,~C ~ ~ ~ Cp N p r N ~ G rL {0 ~i U p ~.G G ,p ~ ~ N ,+r pY ~ ~ `~ n ~~ c p ~ V ~ Q}~ OU ~ ~ L~_ ~ p ~c ca~ o ~ C ~o C '-= - Y +~a}C c~o +~ C v _ to pN r~ _ p ~ ~ ~c~ a ~ o~~ °oa~ a~i ~~ ~~ ~ ~ _ ~ a~i a~ c rn ~ _~ ~ _ `~ •~ o~ aoi .o L '_ NN N p (~ 'v p ~.., '~7 a. N = ~ N ~ ~ ~ C p ._ ~•- C C= ~- o ~ (~ ~ cn C V o c~ ~..~ ,~ ~ ~ L V o~ L ~ ~ ~} (~ ~ L a~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~Q ~o ~o U c QU ~ N ~ ~ N Q- ~ E ~~ ,_ ~ ,C ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ti ti c °o °o °o ~ °o °o °o O N N NO N N N Z W a 0 V V a W H a C~ h- N 0 N ,` ~. a ~ 'II N ~ C C N N ° ~ ~ .° ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ,_ ~' ~ o ~ ~ :fl ~ ~ Q Q ~ c~ c~ ~ ~ ,v •V ~ ~~ '~ ~ ~ N ~ L- N ~ ~ V) ~ ~' > ~"' > ` p ~ W ~ ~ ~ V? U} W ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i O r r r r r r r r ~ L Q~ L ~ L Q~ L Q~ L cv L Q~} V ~ L Q~ ~ ° U o _ ~~ C ~ ~~ Qy via ~ 7 N~ Cp poi a o Up ~~ ~ ~ ~~o ~ a L °o ~N ~o ° m ~N ~ ~o ~~ °~ Q a~ ~ °~~ o p a ~= o L o ~^ c ,_ ~ o~~. c Q ~ ~.~ °~ 3~ oc c~ o~ ~ ° y uo o~a~ ~ ~~~ ~ ads o~ c ~ o~ ~ _ ~ ~~U ~ ~ r r `"o C ~o ~o r o ~ ~ c~ ~ 3 ~Zo Z 0 a . ~ Co ~ 3~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ C d p ~ ~ ~ L ~~ ~ V ~ ~ U _ ~ ~ ~.~ p~ ` ` ty ~-~ { ?3 ~- a~ -*y ~`~ m C om° Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O-p 'a ~ _ ~ .= U y ~ ~ ~Sc aQ ~ pLo V ~ L O N ~,= ~ C o~ ~y J ~L o ~ m'p ~~ .Cp~ ~'o° ~ ~ -a o a~~ c~ o ~r a~ co o o ~, . ~ ~ C° ~ ~ ~~ a ~ ~ o o"' o ~ a ~ ~~ ~o '~00 ~ ~ ~ ~ cvo L ~C7 o o,c~ a~ o Q ~ . a~ L~ m- ~ ~ r n aoo ~,,, . ,.... Q) ~ V +1 ~ ~ ~ {a , _, lQ L W C ~ ~ Cw ~ ~J ~ p C m ~ p ~ p o C V(~ ~ c ~ U U U~ ~o cp~ ~ ._ ,_ .- ~~ ~ Ur~ , .~ ~ ~ c ._ y- ; ~ ~~ ~~ Qm ~~a z U ~~ ~z~ 0 0 M W ao ao 0 0 0 o iv o0 ~ Q N N N N r ~ y N O r ~ r ~ r ~ r ~ N N N M w O N N C ~ N L ~ C o L L. C ~ 0- ~ N N N N o a~ a a a ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ a ~ ~ 3 3 3 ~ ~ ' W ~ Q Q Q Q ~ V .w C U .rr ,V V .w~ .V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r L ~} r L Q~ r L Q~ r L ~} r L Q~ r L Q~ r L ~ _ L 0 ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~*~''N ~~ C - Q ,? ~ c~.~ a~ . N= ~~~ o,~ Q? ~ ,N C Q C~ C.~ ~O p ~ ~ C o ~ ~ ~~ "`W ~°~` ~ ~~ ~~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :n ° o c ~ oQ ~~ ~ ^ oo ~ V ~o ~. L v~'c O ° ~~ O~,C `~~ O) ~W s ~,~ U ° °'~ ~ ~ V °~ ~~ o ~= ~ o .U ~ Q c ~ 0 N N NS W c~ ~ ~~ ~ c~ c n J 0 ~ 3 0 ~ C i6 ~¢ a. C~ ~U p0, ~' N~ V~ 0 ~~ N ~o~ ~~~ ~~ ° ~°~ m c~3 N ~o.~ " ~ ° L ~~ L eo ~y ~ c V ~ Q 0 o ~~ c ~ ~_ N ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~r °~c~ ~ >>+~ ~' Q D'C~ o 7+C+~ ~O WVNN ' O~ ~,~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ c~o~ ~ ~~ ~ ~.oo o ° ~Nc N ° ~ ~o v 7 ~~ ~ ~~ o~~ N cQN ._ ] m0 .~'~ ~ 0~ oo.m ~~~ ~~c~ ~° ~ o~,~~ 4 ~~,c i~ ~ N ~ N N `fl +~ m C V v~U ° C ~ p~y'~ '~ ° 0•' '~ N*'' o~S (~ rn~ c ~ 0) N cor N ~ c.o p N ~ r 4} L N -`~ ~~ ~ O (~ ~~` cc . o ~o~ oNO °~y QC~ ~ ~ ~~ ~_ ~ ~o C° ~ UoD~ ~ NL~ ~~ ~ p~~ ~~0'C ° ~~ ~ ,_ U ~o U ~,o~ U C ~~ ~cnoc ~ ~ ~~,~ N N ~ , Q 0 ~ ~ QU? 0 0 0 0 0 a n n a~ N r r r c~7 ~ ~ '~ L.I. W H a d O z 0 W N 0 r~ V/ J a 0 C~ N N N N C N C Q1 C N C N .0 .0 l~ ~ ~ {0 ~ Q ~ Q Q Q C c ~tS c dS o~ ~tS ~ ~ o ~ a .- o 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o _ _ U _ V V V ,- _ ~ _ _ .n = om W _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ W W W .~ .~ U .~ ,~ V .w V .~ .V N V) N .Q U~ ~ .D ~ C ~ ~. U? V) 0» L~ ~ Cl. ~ r r r r N N N r" ~ L o L a } L a~ L Q } L 0 L Qa L a~ L. Q ~ LL r ~ LL r ~ ~ ~ LL r 0 N J V C 0 ~ U C ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ oL ~ ? p o,q~ ,~ v ~ o , ,~ m ~ c ~ ~ 'C 0 ~ , (~ L ~ ~ c o .- ~~ o ~ ~ o c o ~ ~ ~, .L C . ~ , ~ ~ _ ... ~ ~ (.} L = N ` ~ ~ ~~ = L 3 lii a ~ ~ ~ L • s ~ ~ C ~ ~ .' ov, ~? ~ ~ ~ o~ ~ ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ ° co ~ o ~ _ ° ~ o ~N m V ~ ~ o ~ ~ - ~~ .~ ~ ~ ~c~ o L o .N .- ~ ,L LO °V C ~ O ~ {~ N ~ N ._ - 0 ~ ~ c C ~ ~ ~L ~° ~ O ~ c C ~ U 0 V o ~ ~ . ~7 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 -- ~ ~~ ° m C ~ 'C. N '~ W ~ c~ o c cv ~ c~ cn °~ ~c o ~ oc ~ s cn~ o~ ~ c y- ~ J U ~ ~ ~ p ~ V~ F" L ~C ~? ~ N v ~ U~ ~ WQ U~ Q ~U QE ~ 0o 0 do 0 ov 0 ao 0 ao 0 ao 0 00 0 00 0 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N L L,. L L L.. L L L ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ E E ~ F 7 ~ 3 ~ 7 ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M 0 0 v rn a OG W H a o~ a v oc 0 J a 0 The City of Palo Alto and community groups are creating the Communi . tY Environmental Action Partnership ~CEAP~ in accordance with the recommendations made by the Green Ribbon Task Force and the Climate Protection Plan. The CEAP's mission is to bring the various segments of the community together to share knowledge, build mutual understanding, leverage resources and both create and implement innovative environmental solutions. Joining the LEAP is a chance to get involved, create positive change, and have a voice in the direction taken by your community, Inaugural Meeting intentions: • Provide a general background of the issues leading up to the CEAP's creation • Introduce the CEAP concept and draft design • Gain approval & commitment on the CEAP design from participants • Choose liaisons for the segments For more information please call weedy Hediger at ~650~ 496~5gi2 or visit ~~~~~wr4~~.ty~~~p~~l~.~.lt~~~~~~~c~~ City Council Attachment 2 to Agenda Item #5-D 05.06-D8 COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PARTNERSHIP Draft Plan GENERAL STRUCTURE & VISION M1SSlon ~. The Community Environmental Action Partnership, a collaborative ci 'de ... ~ initiative, connects the various segments of the Palo Alto community to create and implement sustainable environmental solutions, Goals • Identify and implement top-priority environmental i , ' measurable ob~ectrves. • Engage each segment of the community in envir ~ , : er their needs. ~~~.~ M:+~1' • Create an avenue of communication anion a Ci an community. • Leverage resources and actions among " ~ ~ ~ ~ nts b ~.: 2 efforts. ~~ `. uus= • ~~~ 'atives that fit a e ~ ° is the an ~ ordinating • Invite expertise and Input from the communi ~`" beyond to inform, improve and ~nsp~re innovativ , : v s and progra • Track and report progress tows ~ ~ _, ~ ° - .. ~_ _ 'ves to the First Year Priorities 1. Solidify committee 2. Target Climate P 3. Segments work,.- e t actions for th- ~ .~ M- Monthl tives with unity. ort from the CEA.P to pick their Commi ; ~~`~ 'y cludes lia ~-~- ns from each of the different segments; • City go~ ~ k ent • Business ' u • Nonprofits • Home and N~° - borhood • School Community • Faith Community • Stanford • Medical Community New segments should be able to be added as we learn of them Number of Liaisons 2 per segment Liaisons commit to acting as leads for their segment and to spending the time and effort necessary to foster the implementation of chosen actions. Meetings can be attended by anyone. Community attendance and partici ation is p encouraged. Decision Makin~ocess Consensus with the fail back of substantial ma'ori J tY ~3~4~ Re ortin • Annual report of activities to the community Share report/activities with Council - on Earth LIAISON ISSUES whe ~ : ~ ~~ gives updates segment, however, they an~not make iy happening, what interest level is they R~ ~,~.~ ~ ~~ ' ~t are the b ~ rers to , ~~-~ ening • Dlssem~nate mfo;~ ~ a ~ m a , roughou ~ eir segment about the new LEAP • Communicate ,~~; ~ F ent e - s - s to the j ~ ~ ,~~ • Attend '75% o ~ ~ 'tte ' ngs ea ~ ear • Foster environmen ~ _ ~ z ~ ,: -~ ~ ., ~~ egment either through existing or new se~mer~..~~,rks Liaison Ex ectations .~~ .~ Liaisons make the commitment to be the lead for f m' are not formally selected to repress ~~~ eir segment commitments on behalf of their seg Liaison expectations: ~~ • Map their segment - who is inclu ~ ~d, 5.a .m~ ; ~,~ ~~ Liais~~I'erm Len ~~ ~~~ Sta; ~, ~ ~ .t _- terms to be' ~~.~ ~ - ha ~ ~ year, half 2 years -then move all to 2 ears Y Liaison In k ~ ~ =ions ~~, Liaisons will ~ - ~ , os ~:~'at the ~St meeting by the segments. Appointed first year and then elected by committee thereafter. Chair expectations: • Create agenda • Facilitate meetings • Coordinate information sharing between segments and committee • Facilitate the rotating responsibility for meeting minutes by a liaison CITY 4F ALAM EDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Debra Kurita City Manager Date: May 6, 2068 Re: Adopt a Resolution in ~ppositian to Proposition 98 and in Support of Proposition 99 „_ .__ ,__ ,,. BACKGRaUND In 2065, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the Kelo v. City of New Lonafon case that acquiring property by eminent domain for the purpose of economic development qualifies as a "public use" and is therefore constitutional. As a result of the Kelo decision, an initiative was placed on the November 2406 California ballot that would have severely restricted the use of eminent domain in the state. After that measure failed, its proponents developed Proposition 98, which will appear an the June 2006 California ballot. The League of California Cities, the California State Association of Counties, and other organizations are opposed to Proposition 98 and have placed a competing measure, Proposition 99, on the same ballot. DISCUSSION Proposition 98, the California Property owners and Farmlands Protection Act: Under existing law, public agencies use their police power to enact regulations governing the use of privately owned real property. These include regulations ranging from traditional zoning to nuisance regulations and conditions imposed on the new development of property. The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, the California Farm Bureau Federation, and the Cali#ornia Alliance to Protect Private Property Rights placed Proposition 98, an initiative Constitutional amendment, on the June 2008 ballot in order to limit a public agency's ability to exercise certain types of land use decisions. The initiative prohibits the use of eminent domain where the ownership, occupancy, or use of the property acquired is transferred to a private person or entity. This would end the use of eminent domain by redevelopment agencies except far public works ro'ects, pJ and it would prevent the use of eminent domain by public agencies in publiclprivate partnerships for facilities such as toll roads and affordable housing developments. The initiative also constrains government authority to implement policies that reduce property value for "a private use." The definition of private use includes "regulation of the ownership, occupancy, or use of privately owned real property or associated property rights in order to trans#er an economic benefit to one or more private persons City council Report Re: Agenda item #5-E os-os-os Honorable Mayor and May 6, 200$ Members of the City Council ~ Page 2 of 3 at the expense of the property owner," Based on this definition and other references in the initiative, it could be interpreted that the initiative's provisions would affect government's authority to enforce rent control ordinances and could affect other governmental policies. Specifically, the measure could prohibit government from enacting new rent control ordinances and enforcing existing rent control ordinances. The initiative also could prohibit government from enforcing inclusionary housing ordinances if the ordinances were mandatory and were found to "transfer an economic benefit" at the expense of the property owner. Cne of the most far-reaching provisions in Proposition 98 is the requirement that local governments or the State compensate property owners when changes in laws, rules, or regulations result in an economic loss to a property owner. Compensation could potentially be required as a result af: down-zoning, elimination of access to property, limits on the use of air space, or the approval of affordable housing projects. These actions might make the City vulnerable to claims for "damage" in the form of real or perceived loss in property values any time a law or regulation is passed to protect neighborhoods or the environment, ensure adequate water supplies, or regulate development. Proposition 99, the Homeowners and Private Proper#y Protection Act: The League of California Cities, the California State Association of Counties, and others placed Proposition 99 on the June 2008 ballot in response to the Kelo decision. In addition, the local government organizations wanted to take some reasonable action on eminent domain to prevent more extreme measures like Propositions 90 and 98. Under existing law, redevelopment agencies may acquire privately owned real property, including single-family homes, located in redevelopment project areas adopted under the Community Redevelopment Law. A redevelopment area is formed based on findings of blight as defined in the Community Development Law; property acquired may be resold to private developers for redevelopment specifically in order to eliminate blight. In California, the only existing, explicit statutory delegation of the power of eminent domain to acquire property for resale to private porkies is found in the Community Redevelopment Law. This distinguishes California from a state such as Connecticut, where the 2005 Keto case originated, that has specific statutory authorization enabling units of government to use eminent domain for economic development purposes regardless of blight findings. California has no comparable enabling statute. Proposition 99 would amend the California Constitution to prohibit the use of eminent domain by the State or a local government to acquire an owner-occupied, single-family residence for transfer to a private person. "Owner-occupied residence" is defined as real property improved with asingle-family residence, including a condominium or townhouse, that is the owner's principal place of residence for at least one year prior to the State or local government's initial written offer to purchase the property. This restriction would apply to the State and all units of local government, including redevelopment agencies. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council May 6, 2008 Page3of3 The prohibition on the use of eminent domain to acquire single family, owner-occupied residences for resale to private parties would not apply to acquisitions for a public work or improvement. A public work or improvement is defined to include what have been traditionally viewed as public facilities that may be constructed or operated as publiclprivate partnerships, such as toll roads. The limitations of the initiative would. also be inapplicable when the State or local government exercises the power of eminent domain to abate a nuisance, protect public health and safety from building, zoning or other code violations,' prevent serious; repeated criminal activity, respond to an emergency, or remediate hazardous materials. Proposition 99 contains a provision that if both Proposition 98 and Proposition 99 pass, the latter will prevail if it receives more votes. In such event, the provisions of Proposition 98 will be null and void. BUDGET CQNSIDERATIQNIFINANCIALlMPACT Adoption of the resolution has no impact on the City's budget. MUNICIPAL CQDEIPQLICY DQCUMENT CRASS REFERENCE This action does not affect the Municipal Code. RECQMMENDATIQN Adopt a resolution in opposition to Proposition 98 and in support of Proposition 99. Respectfully submitted, Lisa Goldman Deputy City Manager CITY OFALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. OPPOSING PROPOSITION 98 AND SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 99 WHEREAS, a constitutional amendment ballot measure, Proposition 98, will appear on California's June 2048 ballot; and E L 0 ~o ~a v a WHEREAS, Proposition 98 proponents want voters to believe the ' initiative is about eminent domain, but in fact the measure contains language that will eliminate rent control and other renter protections, threaten v development of public water projects, hinder local land use planning, and a im air the abilit of local overnments to rotect the environment and p Y g p .v WHEREAS, the majority of the funding to qualify this measure comes from apartment and mobile home park owners who are attempting to convince voters to abolish rent control and other renter protections, thereby jeopardizing an important affordable housing tool to protect working families, seniors, single-parent homes, veterans, and others; and WHEREAS, provisions in the initiative would also preclude the use of eminent domain to acquire land or water to develop public water projects that are needed to provide residents, businesses, farmers, and the economy with a reliable and safe supply of water; and WHEREAS, Proposition 98 is opposed by the Association of California Water Agencies and the Western Growers Association, who warn the initiative will impairwater projects to protect water quality and supply; and WHEREAS, language in the initiative will also prohibit the passage of regulations, ordinances, land use and other zoning laws that enable local governments to plan and protect communities; and WHEREAS, leading environmental groups warn provisions in the measure would impair our ability to enact environmental protections such as laws that control greenhouse gas emissions, preserve open space, protect coastal areas, and regulate development; and WHEREAS, the No on Proposition 98 campaign is represented by the League of California Cities, California State Association of Counties, League of California Homeowners, California League of Conservation Voters, California Alliance .far Retired Americans, and other leading state and local associations who oppose Proposition 9S; and WHEREAS, these same organizations are supporting Proposition 99, which will prohibit government from using eminent domain to take an owner- occupied home to transfer to another private party; and Resolution #5-E 05.06-OS WHEREAS, Proposition 99 does not contain any unrelated provisions thatwill result in unintended, harmful consequences for California; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Alameda opposes Proposition 98 and supports Proposition 99 on the June 2008 ballot. **~**~ I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in a regular meeting assembled on the 6th day of May, 2008, by the following vote to wit: AYES NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: IN vUITNESS, vVHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said City this day of , 2008. Lara vlleisiger, City Clerk City of Alameda 'L`°' r f. /1 ~ . •F ~~~~~~~, 4 WETA April 14, 2008 Mayor Beverly Johnson City of Alameda Alameda City Hall 2263 Santa Clara Avenue Alameda, California 94501 Subject: Communit Adviso Committee A ointments Dear Mayor Johnson: 1008 ApR I6 A 10~ I4 CIiY ui 11 e=ycpA CITY CLERti'S~OFFICE At its meeting of March 31, the San Francisco Bay Area Water Emergency Transportation Authority ~WETA~ Board of Directors voted to reconstitute the Community Advisory Committee ~CAC~. As you know the CAC was mandated in the original enabling legislation establishing the Water Transit Authority ~SB428-1999 to assist and advise the Board of Directors in carrying out its functions and you were the City of Alameda's appointee on the CAC. Pursuant to your suggestion at the March 31 WETA Board meeting, this letter is to request that the City of Alameda appoint a new CAC member, Redwood Ci#y Council member, Diane Howard, chairs the CAC, which meets quarterly in San Francisco. The next CAC meeting is tentative) scheduled for Wednesday, June 15, 2008 #rom 10-12 noon in the Port Commission Room, San Francisco Ferry Building, Second Floor Committee Room ~Er~barcadero at Market Streety. We do hope a representative from the City of Alameda can attend the meeting. The CAC includes a member from each local jurisdiction in which a water terminal exists or is proposed and one member representing each special district providing public water transit services. The appointments are made by the county board of supervisors and city council of each county or city in which a water terminal is located or is proposed to be located, with one member appointed by the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District. Please provide information on the City of Alameda's new appointment or alternate to the CAC, including the name, title, address, phone number and email address of the appointee. The #etter should be mailed to Shirley Douglas at Pier 9, Suite 111, The Embarcadero, and San Francisco, CA 94111 or emailed to doualasC~vrate~ran5it.or~. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, ~G2.A Shirley Douglas Community Relations Manager Cc. Christina Baines Lara Weisiger Charlene Haught Johnson Council Communication #8-A 05-05-Oa ~ '~:,.. - _ ~„ ~ fir' _ / ~~ _ ~~ ~' ~: ~, ,~~~ CURRENT APPLICATIONS PLANNING BOARD ONE VACANCY (PARTIAL TERM EXPIRING JUNE 30, 2011) Arthur A. Autorino Horst ~. Breuer Brian S. Buckingham David J. Burton Cecilia Campbell-Notar Gregg D. deHaan June A. Grant Michael K. Henneberry Eric Ibsen Jeffrey E. Mitchell Robert C. Platt Roderick L. Smith II Ronald A. Silva Albert L. Verm Charles P. Wallis John W. Knox White Noel Wise Re: Agenda Item #8-B 05.Ofi-OS