Loading...
2008-10-07 Joint 3-B Submittal' ~ 1 I , i' ~ ,'~i, ~: ~:~. F'~,I FR~~.~. r.]). Pluf'I1c~ ~:.r~:.l ~.r<il;'I~ , i'r: '1 r r,. " j Z~:.iCn T .'d -d'; ~l: Fi~rsc"",: ~U,: ~~F ..~.. ~~ ~~: .~, N_TO wF r h _l~R _8 a.l'E Sui3~1IT R~ ~S GFY~CK ETA ~._. ~~ Ttf~ 4F___ R~~u~SZ I~IY PRQP?LE i Welcome, david hawa~ ' L~GOIJT ,~ A~?A 5.~~riend~site Cheek Status ~f Request ~~533 «_View all.~n~ re,~~ests Case Numoer; 1753 Request Type, Complaint Locat~an of rZequest; 5ent,~n. iofo~l2o~s 3.b:;~4 Topic; Mayur and Counc~lmernbers>E-r.aii the Ma~~or and Caur~c~lrne~rbers My ~riglnal Request . Far Tue Aug. 7th ARRA ivleeting RE. Second amendment to SunCa? exclusive regoriatingagreement I stand in opposition to approval of tf~~is amend~rent as it is written, If this goes forward, it creates a slippery slope for . development of Alameda Point to slip cornplete1y out of Sunt;al`s ~7ands and into the hands of D.E. Shaw in New Yorl;, ~k's clear chat SunCai faas no money to fund the E~VA period, and I'm sure the operating agreement between SunCal ctnd DE Sha~~~ fQr "Cal hand ~'e~tt~~re LAC" represents a majr.~rity interest far DE Shaw, The staff report also ncres that "u.E. Shativ Dili !gave ultimate authority 1~or all decisions on behalf of the rtew venture." Stead up try SunCai and DE Shaw and push back on this ,aroposed amendment, A.nd tell SunCal that you UV~N'T keep the operat~r~g agreement canffdential~ and ~~elease ik to the public; sc~ Ala~reda . citi2ens can sae who is really callMng Lhe shots and cortro'li«g the Alameda Poir.t project. My Add~tlonal Mates ,_,.~ ~.~.,.~...~..wr.,,..., Add Ngtes ~ ~~~_,.._...,. _.....W...~w._.u Na additional notes nave been lugged. Reapanses from the Glty of Afame~a Na responses !ac~ged yet Cite n~eb siec~ ~ womtate ~~: 2C08 Comcate, Inc Re: Agenda Item #3-B Joint CC ARRA C!C Mtg 1 O-0~~o~