2009-05-05 5-C Power Point. Election Report Traffic Analysis
Scope of Work & Budget
Development Services, Planning &
Building, and Public Works Departments
May 5, 2009
1 Apri 121 City Cou nci I Direction
^
-Prepare Phase I summary report by June 2, 2009
-Prepare Phase II report to analyze transportation
effects, including congestion and TDM effectiveness
Traffic analysis should build on existing traffic
studies and form basis for determining additional work
Analysis should be independently funded
- Analysis should be transferable to future EIR
- Provide scope of work
- Provide cost estimate
1 Proposed Scope of Work
^
1. Use Existing Studies, where appropriate, as input to
Updated Citywide Traffic Model
2. Evaluate effectiveness of proposed TDM program
3. Report traffic results at key I/S and Gateways
4. Compare traffic effects with and without project
. Budget and Timeline
^
Budget: $55,000 -Funded by ARRA
. Schedule: Release report week of July 20, 2009
. Next Steps
. City Manager to execute Consultant Contract
immediately to keep within schedule
. Public Works will manage contract with input from
DSD and Planning
Election Report Traffic Analysis
Scope of Work & Budget
Development Services, Planning, &
Public Works Departments
May 5, 2009
Review of Existing Studies
Trip Generation Analysis Fehr and Peers - 2009:
Analyzed proposed TDM and identified trip generation
reductions. No analysis of traffic impacts.
2. Transportation Element Analysis - 2007: Developed
detailed traffic model. Will use existing traffic volumes,
regional network. Need to update land use, street
network, and TDM assumptions.
3. Alameda Landing EIR: Site focused study. Assumed
different land use and sheet network for AP.
,~ . Review of Existing Studies
^
4. Alameda Point Station Area Plan - 2008 (MTC/ACTIA)
Reviewed land use/TDMrelationship for 3 scenarios: 2005
Preliminary Development Concept (1800 HU and 9000 jobs);
Transit Enhanced PDC (1, 800 HU with TOD and 9, 000 jobs);
and 4, 000 HU with TOD and 10, 000 jobs. No analysis of
traffic ir~tpacts.
5. Alameda Point General Plan Amendment - 2003
Different land use and TDMassu~nptions.
Traffic performance indicators for new development
can not be projected from past studies because effects
are not linear with changes in land use, street
connections, and varying TDMs