2008-07-15 Special CIC MinutesMINUTES OF THE SPECIAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY- -JULY 15, 2008- -7:31 P.M.
Chair Johnson convened the Community Improvement Commission Meeting
at 11:11 p.m.
ROLL CALL - Present: Commissioners deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese,
Tam, and Chair Johnson - 5.
Absent: None.
ID /rr011000WN
(08 -37) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council, Alameda Public
Financing Authority, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and
Community Improvement Commission Meeting held on June 17, 2008.
Approved.
Commissioner Tam moved approved of the minutes.
Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
AGENDA ITEMS
(08 -38) Public Hearing to consider the Periodic Review of the City
of Alameda's Alameda Point Improvement Project Five -Year
Implementation Plan.
The Development Services Manager gave a brief presentation.
Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether any comments were received
from the Economic Development Commission (EDC).
The Development Services Manager responded no specific comments
were received; stated the EDC appreciated being kept up to date.
The Development Services Manager gave a Power Point presentation.
Commissioner Tam stated the staff report notes that SunCal would be
updating the Sports Complex Master Plan in September; inquired
whether the Master Plan would be previewed at the August workshop,
to which the Development Services Director responded in the
negative.
The Assistant City Manager stated SunCal would be having meetings
with the Youth Commission and Recreation and Park Commission in
August.
Chair Johnson inquired whether the Recreation and Park Commission
Special Meeting
Community Improvement Commission 1
July 15, 2008
would make recommendations to Council and the Alameda Reuse and
Redevelopment Authority (ARRA), to which the Development Services
Manager responded in the affirmative.
Chair Johnson stated the demand for athletic facilities has changed
since the mid 1990's.
(08 -39) Recommendation to authorize the Executive Director to enter
into Contracts with the Park Street Business Association and the
West Alameda Business Association for Fiscal Year 2008 -2009.
The Development Services Director gave a brief presentation.
Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the CIC budget increased by
30.
The Development Services Director responded the general tax
increment increased by approximately 3.50 overall; stated the CIC
budget did not increase; business associations are important to the
City as an economic development engine.
Chair Johnson stated the City does not spend money on business
promotion; grant funding allows the West Alameda Business
Association (WABA) and Park Street Business Association (PSBR) to
market City businesses.
Commissioner Matarrese stated the grants bolster business; the
General Fund budget is impacted because sales tax is generated;
questioned whether the proposed funding amount is enough; inquired
whether there is a way to quantify how the City's investment
correlates to an increase in sales tax.
The Development Services Director responded that she did not know.
Commissioner Matarrese stated said matter should be reviewed
because the General Fund is impacted by investing approximately
$225,000 [in the business associations].
Chair Johnson stated that she is comfortable with the grant funding
increase; business districts need to fund themselves; Alameda Towne
Centre pays for maintenance and other costs; PSBR and WABA spend a
lot of money on marketing and promotion; shopping centers are
required to be open for certain hours and days per week; the City
does not have the same control over the business districts; PSBR
members contribute $140,417 to their own organization; WABA members
contribute $66,700 to their own organization.
(08 -40) Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of continuing the
Special Meeting
Community Improvement Commission 2
July 15, 2008
meeting past midnight.
Chair Johnson seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
Chair Johnson opened the public portion of the hearing.
Proponents (In favor of the staff recommendation): Robb Ratto, Park
Street Business Association (PSBA)(provided handout); Kathy
Moehring, West Alameda Business Association (WABA); Patty Jacobs,
Greater Alameda Business Association (GABA).
There being no further speakers, Chair Johnson closed the public
portion of the hearing.
Chair Johnson inquired why is PSBA's Landscape and Lighting
assessment reduced.
Mr. Ratto responded the assessment was not utilized for a number of
years and resulted in a surplus, which has run out; PSBR was going
to request a 100% increase in the Landscape and Lighting
assessment; property owners are not in support of an additional fee
since the passing of Measure H.
Chair Johnson inquired how much PSBR spends on marking and
promotion, to which Mr. Ratto responded approximately $90,000.
Chair Johnson inquired whether PSBR pays the electric bill [for the
streets] through the Landscape and Lighting assessment, to which
Mr. Ratto responded in the affirmative.
Commissioner Tam stated that Landscape and Lighting assessment
income is reduced from $69,850 to $57,417; the Business Improvement
Area (BIA) income is reduced from $102,317 to $83,000; PSBR income
is reduced from $147,755 to $121,500; and the grant fund amount
would be increased from $108,020 to $111,446.
Mr. Ratto stated PSBR leaves a $20,000 cushion when event budgeting
is prepared just in case something happens; most of the $20,000
goes back into the promotion budget.
Following Ms. Moehring's comments, Chair Johnson inquired how much
WABA spends on marketing and promotion, to which Ms. Moehring
responded $71,000.
Commissioner Matarrese stated data needs to be gathered on the
correlation of increased sales tax and the City's return.
Special Meeting
Community Improvement Commission 3
July 15, 2008
Following Ms. Jacob's comments, Chair Johnson stated WABA and
PSBA's marketing, advertising, and promotion costs justify the
investment; GABA provides an excellent service to its members;
public benefit needs to be highlighted.
Ms. Jacobs stated that there is a direct correlation between
strong, healthy businesses and public benefit; GABA does not put on
public events; GABA's advertising remains consistent; a monthly
two -page spread is placed in the Alameda Sun which lists all GABA
members; GABA affords low -cost, full color advertising to any GABA
business.
Chair Johnson stated a certain percentage of grant funding should
be used for marketing and promotion; a threshold should be set.
Commissioner Matarrese stated the City receives three benefits from
PSBR and WABA: 1) street maintenance; 2) sales tax revenue; and 3)
business license tax revenue; investments should be reviewed every
year to see the correlation with the return.
Chair Johnson stated GABA's administrative costs are funded; that
she is not sure whether using grant funding for said purpose is
appropriate.
Commissioner deHaan stated GABA is a very small operation, but is
viable and important; four members would be impacted when Orchard
Supply Hardware moves into the Alameda Towne Centre; GABA's
proposed grant amount is not that monumental.
Chair Johnson stated that she does not have a problem with the
amount, but with funding administrative costs; requiring that a
certain percentage of funding be spent on marketing, advertising,
and promotion would satisfy the requirement of ensuring a return to
the public; the City does not fund the Chamber of Commerce and
Harbor Bay Business Park.
Ms. Jacobs stated one of the reasons for the inception of GABA was
to afford businesses outside the two districts an opportunity and
venue to be an association.
Chair Johnson stated GABA provides a very useful, valuable function
to its members; the question is how to ensure that the public is
getting a return; Alameda has many worthy non - profits that are not
funded; inquired whether PSBR or WABA would have any problem with
setting a 400 -50o threshold [for advertising and promotion], to
which Mr. Ratto and Ms. Moehring responded in the negative.
Commissioner deHaan moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Special Meeting
Community Improvement Commission 4
July 15, 2008
Chair Johnson stated that a requirement should be added regarding
spending a certain percentage of grant funding on marketing and
promotion.
Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion with inclusion of a
policy for promotion and evaluation for GABA [in addition to PSBR
and WABA; stated the issue is a policy decision; a return is needed
if the City invests approximately $225,000 in tax dollars; the
return can be predicated on 500 of grant funding going to
promotion; evaluations need to be performed.
Commissioner Gilmore stated the measurement [of success] would be
difficult for GABA because GABA is spread across the City.
Chair Johnson stated customer surveys could be performed.
Commissioner Matarrese stated business license fees are calculated
on gross; increased performance could be reviewed.
Councilmember deHaan concurred that an evaluation needs to be
performed.
Commissioner Tam stated sales tax revenue has been flat for many
years; a better measurement would be the return to the City;
business districts take care of the street maintenance and
advertising, which the City cannot do; she does not want
measurement tied directly to producing a business tax increment.
Commissioner Matarrese stated that business license tax and sales
tax revenues are a bottom line measurement.
Commissioner Tam clarified that the motion is to fund recommended
levels to all three business districts; inquired what would be the
threshold for advertising and promotion.
Chair Johnson responded 500; stated GABA can advise how their
success would be measured.
Commissioner Gilmore stated GABA is different from PSBR and WABA;
PSBR and WABA are spending an incredible amount of money on
advertising; GABA has never spent 500 of grant funding on
advertising.
Eric Kos, GABA President, stated that he has been GABA President
for four terms; grant funding was not provided in the first two
terms; an attempt was made to provide a public event that benefited
the community; a successful location was not available; educational
Special Meeting
Community Improvement Commission 5
July 15, 2008
roundtables are being proposed.
Chair Johnson stated that having a public event would not be a
requirement; the intent is to use some of the grant funding on
marketing and promotion; increasing membership would help.
Commissioner Gilmore stated GABA is being requested to spend $6,000
on advertising.
Mr. Kos stated most promotions are done on a volunteer basis.
Chair Johnson stated dollar amounts could be assigned to in -kind
donations.
Commissioner deHaan stated GABA could provide its own measuring
devise.
Commissioner deHaan amended the motion to include that GABA would
come back with a measuring devise showing fulfillment to their
commitment.
Commissioner Matarrese stated the motion should include that PSBR,
WABA, and GABA spend 500 of CIC grant funding on advertising and
promotion; the policy is that the City would get a return when
contributions are made to business associations and requirements
are in place.
By consensus, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 12:33
a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
Secretary
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Special Meeting
Community Improvement Commission 6
July 15, 2008