The URL can be used to link to this page

2009-07-21 Packet~~a~ ~y~~(~ ~' J ~r .:~ °,, ~}., ~, .~S ~~ l-~ .~~~~~~~-~- ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ I T Y ~ ~ A :~ A ~ ~ I~ ~, fi~ ~i ~~~ . ~y ~wr~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~ SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY ~ ~- - JULY ~1, X009 ~- ~ ~ 6:00 P.M. Time; Tuesda Jul 2~. 200 x;00 .m Place: ~i~ ~~~nGa~~ ~~~mb~~s C~n~~~~n~~ R~~m, city Hall, corner of Santa clam Avenue and Oak street. 1. Roll call ~, city Council Note ~ Counci,lmember Tam will be present va_.a teleconference from the National Emergency Tra~.ning Center, 1825 S, Seton Avenue, Emmi t sburg, MD ~ 2. Public Comment on Agenda Items Only Anyone ~ris~.ing to address tie Council on agenda items only, may speak for a maximum of ~ m.~nutes per Item 3. Adjournment to C~..~sed session to consider; 3~A, CONFERENCE WITH Z.~.BOR NEGOTIATORS Agency Negotiators, Craig Jory and Human Resources Director Employee Organi2ations; All Bargaining Units 3-B. CONFERENCE WITH. REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS ~5495~.87 Property; x.855 N, Loop Road and ~. Clubho~~se Memorial Drive Negotiating parties; City Manager and Harbor Bay Isle Associates Under negotiation; Price and terms 4. Announcement of Action Taken in Closed Session, if any 5 . Adjournment -- City Counc ~.. ~.. even J On Mayor ~~~i:~~~~~~f 'u~~~is'~ $ ~~~ ;~ ~~'; ,~ :~ ~~. j r,1 ~ ~ ~sF~ ~ ' ~ ~c~~` f~~~ ~~ `~f times .rt.sis~,~-' ~(:,,~' ~~r~~,~s;~~, CITY OF ALAM~DA CALIFORNIA TF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL: 1. Please file a speaker's slip with the Deputy City Clerk and upon recognition by the Mayor, approach the podium and state your name; speakers are limited to three ~3} minutes per item. 2. Lengthy testimony should be submitted in writing and only a summary of pertinent paints presented verbally. 3. Applause and demonstration are prohibited during Council meetings. AGENDA -~ - _ - - - - - - - - REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY------~~-JULY21, X009----7:30P.M. Note: Regular Council Meeting convenes at 7:30 pm, City Hall, Council Chambers, corner of Santa Clara Ave and Oak St] The Order of Business for City Council Meeting is as follows; 1. Roll Call 2. Agenda Changes 3. Proclamations, Special Orders of the Day and Announcements 4. Consent Calendar 5. City Manager Communications 6. Agenda Items 7. Oral Communications, Nan-Agenda Public Com~rnent} 8. Council Referrals 9. Communications Communications from Council} 10. Adjournment Public Participation Anyone, wishing to address the Council on agenda items or business introduced by Councilmembers may speak for a maximum of 3 minutes per agenda item when the subject is before Council. Please file a speaker's slip with the Deputy C~..ty Clerk if you wish to address the City Council SPECIAh MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL 6:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CONFERENCE ROOM Separate Agenda Closed Session} SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND 7:31 P.M. COMMUNI`T'Y IMPROVBMBNT COMMISSION, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS Separate Agenda SPECIAL MEETING OF THE ALAMEDA REUSE AND 7:32 P.M. REDEVELOPMBNT AUTHORITY, COUNCIL CHAMBERS - Separate Agenda PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. ROLL CALL - City Council 2. AGENDA CHANGES 3. PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS 3-A. Presentation by the Park Street Business Association on the 25~h Annual Art and Wine Faire. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted, approved or adopted by one motion unless a request for removal for discussion or explanation is received from the Council or a member of the public 4-~A. Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings held on July 7, 2009: ~Csty Clerk} 4-B. Bills for ratification,. Finance} 4-C. Recommendation to Adopt Plans and Specifications and Authorize a Call for Bids for the Alameda Harbor Bay Channel Dredging Project, No. P.W. 06-09-14. Public Works} 4-D. Recommendation to Adopt Plans and Specification and Authorize a Call for Bids for the Repair of Portland Cement Concrete Sidewalk, Curb, Gutter, Driveway, and Minor Street Patching, Fiscal Year 2009/2010, Phase 10, No. P.W. 06-09-15 . Public Works} 4-E. Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $287,420, Including Contingencies, to MDF Pipelines for the Central Avenue Sewer Rehabilitation, Pacific Avenue to Third Street, No. P.W. 05-09-13. Public Works} 4-F. Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $618,815, Including Contingencies, to Harty Pipelines for the Fernside Boulevard Sewer Rehabilitation, Thompson Avenue to High Street, No. P.W. 03--09--09. Public Works} 4-G. Recommendation to Accept the Work of Marine Express, Inc., far the Main Street Ferry Terminal Barge Maintenance Project. ~ Pub l i c Works } 4-Ho Adoption of Pursuant to Annual Fuel Alameda for City Manage Affirmative Resolution Authorizing an open Market Purchase Section 3--15 of the Alameda City Charter for the Delivery to Various Locations Within the City of Fiscal Year 2009-2010 and Authorizing the Interim r to Enter into Such an Agreement. Requires Four Votes] Public Works} 4-I. Adoption of Resolution Authorizing the Interim City Manager tp Enter into a Maintenance Agreement between the City of Alameda and the State of California Department of Transportation for the Maintenance of the Bicycle Path at the Foot of the North Side of the Bay Farm Island Bicycle Bridge. Public Works? 4-J. Adoption of Resolution Approving the Development Plan and the Time Schedule for the Sewer System Management Plan as Adopted by the State Water Resources Control Board. Public Works} 4-K. Adoption of Resolution Approving Parcel Map No. 9787 X3211- 3215 Fernside Boulevard} . Public Works} 4--L. Adoption of Resolution Authorizing the Destruction of Specified Unnecessary Records of the Human Resources Department. Human Resources} 4-M. Adoption of Resolution Approving a Revised Memorandum of Understanding Between the Alameda City Employees Association and the City of Alameda for the Period Commencing July ~., 2009 and Ending June 30, 2011. Human Resources} 4-~N. Final Passage of ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Subsection 3-28,10 Return on Investment in Enterprise Funds } of Sect ion 3 - 2 8 ~ Payment of Taxes } of Chapter III Finance and Taxation} to Reduce the Golf Fund's Return on Investment from 1% to 0.4336.3% for Fiscal Years 2006--07 through 2009-10 and Exempting the Golf Fund's Return on Investment Entirely, Effective Fiscal Year 2010-11. City Manager} 4-0. Final Passage of ordinance Amending the Community Improvement Plans for the Business and Waterfront Improvement Project and the West End Community Improvement Project to Make Technical Clarifying Changes. Development Services} 4-P. Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolution Approving Tentative Tract Map No. 8015 ~F~.le No. PLN08-0507} at the Alameda Towne Centre. Planning and Building 5. CITY MANAGER CQMMUNICATIONS Communications from City Manager} 5WA. FY 08-09 Year End 5-B. FY 09-10 Annual Budget -- Remaining Challenges A. General Fund/ISFs B. Planning/Building Fund 6. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 6-A. Public Hearing to Consider a Planning Board Recommendation to Abandon the Proposal to Establish New Zoning Provisions to Limit the Height and Size of Two-Story Residential Buildings for property located on the 3200 Block of San Jose Avenue, Adams Street, and Washington Street. Planning and Building} 7, ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA Public Comment} Any person may address the Council in regard to any matter over which the Council has jurisdiction or of which it may take cognisance, that is not on the agenda 8. COUNCIL REFERRALS Matters placed on the agenda by a Councilmember may be acted upon or scheduled as a future agenda item 9. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS Communications from Council} Councilmembers can address any matter, including reporting on any Conferences or meetings attended 9-A. Consideration of Mayor's nominations for appointment to the Youth Advisory Commission. 10. ADJOURNMENT _ Czty Council ~~~ ® Materials related to an item on the agenda are available for public inspection in the City Clerk' s Office, City Hall, Room 350, during normal business hours Sign language interpreters will be available on request. Please contact the City Clerk at 747-4800 or TDD number 522-7538 at least 72 hours prior to the Meeting to request an interpreter ® Equipment for the hearing impaired is available for public use. For assistance, please contact the City Clerk at 747-4800 or TDD number 522-7538 either prior to, or at, the Council Meeting ® Accessible seating for persons with disabilities, including those using wheelchairs, is available o Minutes of the meeting available in enlarged print ® Audio Tapes of the meeting are available upon request ~ Please contact the City Clerk at 747-4800 or TDD number 5227538 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to request agenda materials in an alternative format, or any other reasonable accommodation that may be necessary to participate in and enjoy the benefits of the meeting Q~~a1~ ~~ f! ~r~ ~~~~ ~~ III ~~ 1 ~~ r.: Fl 5\,} .'r' I. +I ~r/ A ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 .~. -w-J d. ~. ..L T 1 ~ ..~,+~ 1 J~. ~.~/ .~. A ~.d i. ~ V' .1.. R. + \ ~ f.. i S~ d ~ ~'::.y4 U ~4 _ ~~ ~ y ~~ ~~ ~ ~Y0.S f6L~ ~a' ~~`V ~`=!ht~~r~=~ SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE CTTY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY IMPRQVEMENT COMMISSION ~CIC~ TUESDAY -~ ~- ~ JULY 2I, 2009, ~ - - 7; 31. P.M. Location; fit ~~ur~~il Ch~mb~r~, City Hall, career of Santa Clara Avenue and oak street Public Participation Anyone wishing to address the Council/Commission on agenda items or business Introduced by the Council/Commission may speak for a maximum of ~ minutes per agenda item when the subject Is before the CounclllComm.isslon. Please file a speaker's slip with the Deputy City Clerk if you wish to speak, ~.. ROLE., CALL ~- City Caunc~..l, CIC 2. CONSENT CALENDAR 2-A. Minutes of the special Joint City Council and CIC Meeting held on July 7, 2009. ~Ci~y ~ounc~,~., Cz~] City Clerk 2-B , Reco~rumendation to Approve First .Amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement with Alameda Entertair~.ment Associates, L,P., Relating to the Ground Lease and Ha.storic 'theatre Lease; subordination Agreement Between the Community 'Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda, Alameda Entertain~ent Associates, L.P., and Bay ~A.rea Employment Development Company; and Authorize the Executive Director to Execute and Retard a Memorandum of First Amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement and Notice for Request of Default. CIC] ~Develapment servzces7 ~. AGENDA ITEM 4, ADJOURNMENT - City Council, CIC AGENDA Special Meeting of the Governing Body of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority ~~~~~*~~ Alameda City I-lall Council Chamber, Room 399 2263 Santa Clara Avenue Alameda, CA 9450 ~ . RILL CALL 2. CONSENT CALENDAR Tuesday, July ~~, 2009 Ivleefing will begin a~ 7:32 p.rr1. Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted, approved or adopted by one motion unless a request for removal for discussion or explanation is received from the Board or a member ofthe public. 2-A. Approve the Proposed Sale of the two Sewage Ship Waste Offload Barges. 3. REGULAR AGENDA ITEII~S None. 4. QRAL REPORTS None. 5. ®RAL CGIVIMUNICATIQNS, NaN~AGENDA ~PUDLIC C41~IVIENT} (Any person may address the governing body in regard to any matter over which the governing body has jurisdiction that is not on the agenda.) 6. C~IVIMUNICATI®NS FRGM T~fE GGVERNING D~DY 7. ADJ®URNII~ENT This meeting will be cablecast live on channel ~ 5. Notesr Sign language interpreters will be available on request. Please contact the ARRA Secretary at 749-5804 at least 72 hours before the meeting to request an interpreter. Accessible seating for persons with disabilities including those using wheelchairs} is available. Minutes of the meeting are available in enlarged print. Audio tapes of the meeting are available for review at the ARRA offices upon request. UNAPPROVED MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY - ~- - JULY 7, 2 0 0 9 W -- -- 5: O O P. M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:05 p.m. RILL CALL -- Present: Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent: None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: X09- } Conference with Legal Counsel _.. Anticipated Litigation; Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision fib} of Section 54955.9; Number of cases: Two. ~09~ } Conference Wlth Real Property Negotiators X54955.8}; Property: 1855 N. Loop Road and l Clubhouse Memorial Drive; Negotiating parties: City Manager and Harbor Bay Isle Associates; Under negotiation: Price and terms. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that regarding Legal, Legal Counsel briefed the City Council on two separate matters of potential litigation and the Council provided direction to Legal Counsel; regarding Property, the conference was not held. Adj aurnment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Zara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was pasted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda Ca.ty Council duly 7, 2Q49 UNAPPROVED MINUTES of THE REGULAR CITY CoUNCIZ MEETING TUESDAY- -JULY 7, 2009- -7:30 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Regular Meeting at 8:09 p.m. ROLL CALL -~ Present: Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor Johnson -~ 5. Absent. None. AGENDA. CHANGES None. PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL oRDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNC:~MENTS X09- 7 Presentation of Certificates of Service to Toby Berger, Commission on Disability Issues; Randall Miller, Historical .Advisory Board; Nancy Gormley, Housing Commission; Margaret McNamara, Planning and Building Board; Ruth Belikove and Dr. Alan Mitchell, Library Board; and John Knox White, Jane Lee and Eric Schatmeier, Transportation Commission. Mayor Johnson presented Certificates of Service to Toby Berger, Randall Miller, Nancy Gormley, Margaret McNamara, Ruth Belikove, and John Knox White. Ms. Belikove thanked the Council for the opportunity to serve; stated that she enjoyed serving on the Library Board. Ms. Berger stated making Alameda accessible to everyone is Wonderful; thanked the Council for support. Mr. Miller stated that serving on the Historical Advisory Board has been a positive experience. Ms. Gormley stated that she has enjoyed serving on the Housing Commission. Mr . Knox White stated, that work~.ng with staf f has been wonderful , Ms. McNamara thanked the Council for support received and opportunity to serve. Rogu~.ar Meeting 1 A~,ameda City Council July 7, 2~~9 ?~' ~C ~C Mayor Johnson called a recess at 8:20 p.m. to hold a Special Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Meeting and reconvened the Regular Meeting at 8:25 p.m. *** CONSENT CALENDAR Vice Mayor deHaan moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Tam seconded the motion, Which carried by unanimous voice vote -~ 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.] ~*09-~ } Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and Public Utilities Board Meeting, and the Regular and Special City Council Meetings held on June 16, 2009. Approved. ~*09- } Ratified bills in the amount of $4,484,975.04. ~*09-- } Transmittal of Certificate of Sufficiency of an Initiative Petition Entitled "Fire and Emergency Medical Services Minimum Protection." Transmitted. ~*09- } Recommendation to Accept the Work of D'Arcy & Harty Construction, Inc., for the Cyclic Sewer Replacement Project, Phase 5, No. P.W. 10-06--22. Accepted. ~*09- } Resolution No, 14358, "Authorizing the Filing of an Application for Federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ~ARRA} Funding for Certain Streets Rehabilitation, and Stating the Assurance to Complete the Project Buena Vista Avenue}." Adopted. ~*09~ } Resolution No. 14359, "Approving a Fourth Amendment to the Agreement from the California State Coastal Conservancy to Implement Spartina Eradication and Mitigation Measures and Authorize the Interim City Manager to Execute All Required Documents." Adopted. ~*09- } Resolution No, 14360, "Requesting and Authorizing the County of Alameda to Levy a Tax on All Real and Personal Property in. the City of Alameda as a Voter Approved Levy for the General obligation Bonds Issued Pursuant to a General Election Held November 7, 2000." Adopted. CITY MANAGER CoMMUNICATIQNS Regular Meeting 2 Alameda Ca.ty Council ~'uly 7, 2009 ~~9r } State Budget Update The Deputy City Manager provided an update. Mayor Johnson inquired whether an interest rate has been set on IoU's, to which the Deputy City Manager responded the interest rate has been set at 3.750. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the $26.3 billion [Stated deflclt is the amount at the end of the current fiscal year. The Deputy City Manager responded the $26.3 billion deficit covers an eighteen-month period. Councilmember Gilmore stated the League of California Cities has been successful in lobbying not to have property taxes taken away; inquired whether anything is fair game now, to which .the Deputy City Manager responded in the affirmative. Coun.cilmember Tam stated that she attended the League of California Cities Policy Committee Meeting; ten mayors from the largest cities in California sent a letter to the Governor stating that they would prefer the State to consider borrowing instead of straight takeaways, such as the qas tax. The Deputy City Manager stated taking gas tax money would be a problem; the property tax money would be borrowed because of Proposition 1A. vice Mayor deHaan stated the State's bond rating is BBB; two more steps down would be considered junk bonds. Council.member Gilmore inquired whether there has been any talk regarding some cities potentially going bankrupt. The Deputy City Manager responded that she has not heard anything; stated a lot of cities have passed a Resolution of Hardship. vice Mayor deHaan stated the matter is extremely concerning, particularly with unemployment hitting record highs. Councilmember Matarrese stated revenue projections need to be addressed; going with prior year plus growth cannot be done anymore; that he is disturbed that five people in the State are running the show. Councilmember Tam stated Alameda is heavily dependant on property Regular Meeting ~ Alameda City Council duly 7, 20x9 taxes; 900 of State income tax revenue comes from the top 10% income earners; the League of California Cities, California State Association of Counties, and School Board associations are meeting at a summit on July l8; the City is invited to participate. In response to Mayor's Johnson's request for an update on the County lifting up the bridges, the Public Works Director stated the County will need to review bridge operations if the gas tax is taken away; the County is compensated by the State for the Harbor Bay Isle Bridge and is compensated by the federal government for the Railroad bridge; the other three bridges are the County's responsibility; the County uses the gas tax to operate the other three bridges; the bridges would need to be left in the up position without the gas tax; the County Public Works Director initially indicated that the bridges would be up at all times, but then stated that the bridges would be up during off~peak hours; at a recent meeting with County officials, Mayor Johnson advised that keeping the bridges in the open position would be unacceptable; the City gave some Measure B money to the County for bridge operation; the County receives approximately $900,000 per year for bridge operation which could have gone to the City for special projects. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether Council authorized allocating said funds for the operation of the bridges; questioned whether the City Engineer would have been authorized to negotiate. the matter. The Public Works Director responded that he does not know; further stated the County Public Works Director drafted a letter requesting that the Army Corps of Engineers consider allowing the bridges to remain down during the late evening and early morning hours; the County thinks that a decision could take twelve months; the federal government would need to approve the requested change in operations; stated Mayor Johnson sent a letter stating that traffic congestion and emergency services would be significantly impacted and could not be mitigated; the County's attorneys are reviewing the matter. Mayor Johnson stated the Harbor Bay Isle Bridge does not have a bridge tender during the middle of the night; one commercial business needs to have the estuary bridged open; the federal government could save a lot of money by allowing less than twenty- four hour bridge tenders; that she made it very clear that the br.zdges are the County's responsibility and the City cannot help with additional funding. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the County acknowledged receiving $900,000 in dedicated funding for bridge operations. Regular Meting 4 Alameda City Council July 7, 2009 The Public Works Director responded in the negative; stated everyone specified projects to fund when Measure B was reauthorized; a decision was made by an Alameda County Transportation Authority ~ACTA7 Policy Advisory Committee and projects were selected; the County is contending that the greater County agree that fU.nding bridge maintenance is important and that the City did not provide any funding; there is no documentation to prove either way. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired what is the Coast Guard's role in controlling commerce activity during the late hours. The Public Works Director responded the Coast Guard has a very big voice which is why the County Public Works Director sent a letter; the County is trying to make the point that there are not many calls for bridges to be open in the late evening and early morning hours; the aggregate company had seven late hour bridge openings in May. Vice Mayor deHaan stated the Coast Guard was brought into the discussion in 1994; the matter needs to be revisited. Mayor Johnson stated the Coast Guard dogs not have a lot of discretion regarding waterway access; changes are needed in federal legislation; that she does not have the impression that the County pursued all issues; the County believes one option is to have Alameda pay for part of bridge maintenance and operation; the County does not have detailed information on maintenance and operation costs. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether Oakland is being asked to participate in bridge maintenance and operation costs. Mayor Johnson stated said issue was pointed out at the meeting. The Public Works Director stated the County feels that the bridges only serve Alameda. Councilmember Tam stated the County recently adopted a budget with significant cuts; the County is still assuming the gas tax funding will be received from the State. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the current County budget includes operators and bridge tenders, to which the Public Works Director responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson stated the County receives a significant amount of Regulax Meeting 5 Alameda City Council July 7, ~Q09 money from the City; Alameda does not receive a lot of direct services from the County; people need to know how much of Alameda's property taxes go to the County; inquired whether specific information can be provided. The Public Works Director responded that he will work with the Interim Finance Director; stated the County receives property and gas taxes from the City. X09-- } Sales Tax Appeal Status Report The Deputy City Manager provided an update. X09- } other Post Employment Benefits ~OPEB} Funding-Status of Validation Suit ~7~0~50, 540-30a The City Attorney provided an update. REGULAR. AGENDA ITEMS ~09~- } Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 14351, "Amending Master Fee Resolution No. 12191 to Revise Fees." Adopted. The Interim Finance Director gage a brief presentation. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired what is the Consumer Price Index CPI}. The Interim Finance Director responded the CPI for the San Francisco Bay area is 0.8%; stated the Eng~neerirzg .dews .Record's Construction Cost Index is 6.30; different indexes are used for different fees. In response to Mayor Johnson's inquiry, the Interim Finance Director stated the Recreation and Park Department fees are recommended by the Recreation and Park Commission; Affordable Housing Unit fees were not increased because of current economic conditions; ambulance fees are based upon th.e County's fee schedule. Mayor Johnson inquired whether permit f ees would be affected, to which the Interim Finance Director responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson inquired whether permit fees will be reviewed as a whole at some point; stated some fees loak reasonable if isolated, but problematic when combined with other fees required for a project. The Assistant City Manager responded the last permit fees were set Regu3.a~ Meeting 5 A~,amedaCyity Council duly 7, 2409 by a 2005 study; stated fees are reviewed continually; fees will be reviewed again during the next fiscal year. Vice Mayor deHaan stated activity becomes more concerning than anything else; staffing will be determined by fee generation once the Planning and Building Department has its own funding. The Assistant City Manager stated the City will need to be more nimble than in the past; larger projects tend to subsidize smaller projects; more money is spent on staff effort than what is received in fees; fees may need to be raised for smaller items. Mayor Johnson stated staff is spending an unjustifiable amount of time on small projects; staff cannot go overboard on small projects . The Assistant City Manager stated process changes would be reviewed. Vice Mayor deHaan stated some fees are steep, such as $676 for a sauna. The Assistant City Manager stated staff is looking at reducing the amount of regulatory activity. Vice Mayor deHaan stated current sport fees are $700; inquired whether the Recreation and Park Department is seeing the same level of activity. The Recreation and Park Director responded the majority of sport usage has been steady over the last five years; stated most fee increases are tied to balls and official costs; each year fees are reviewed by the Recreation and Park Commission. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether soccer fees recoup costs. The Recreation and Park Director responded in the affirmative; stated $35 per hour covers costs; fees have been artificially low, and efforts are being, made to incrementally raise fees. Mayor Johnson inquired what are youth baseball and softball fees. The Recreation and Park Director responded the sports field use is $5 per player; stated non-profits have the option to work off the fee through in-kind services or purchasing supplies. Mayor Johnson stated the City has to be careful not to charge too much; there are no longer park leagues; children could be priced Regular Meeting 7 Alameda City Council July 7, 2009 out of private leagues if prices are too high; recreation and sports should not be an elite activity; inquired whether there will be any change in golf rates, to which the Recreation and Park Director responded in the negative. Cauncilmember Matarrese requested that both current rates and previous rates be provided side by side along with the amount of the increase; stated permit fees are not set to make money but ensure that public and private infrastructure remains in tact; people will be encouraged to add things without permits if fees are too high; permits and inspections ensure that things are done properly. Mayor Johnson stated the three components required for installing a sauna add up to a lot of money; inquired whether total fees have been compared. The Assistant City Manager responded generally, permits are not out of line with neighboring jurisdictions. Mayor Johnson inquired whether staff costs are included, to which the Assistant City Manager responded fees are flat costs. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution. Vice Mayor deHaan seconded the motion, which carried~by unanimous voice vote - 5. ~09-~ } Introduction of ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Subsection 3-28.10 Return on Investment in Enterprise Funds } of Sect ion 3 -2 8 ~ Payment of Taxes } of Chapter I I I Finance and Taxation} to Reduce the Golf Fund's Return on Investment from la to 0.43353a for Fiscal Years 2005x07 through 2009~~o and Exempting the Golf Fund's Return on Investment Entirely, Effective Fiscal Year 2010W11. Introduced. The Assistant City Manager gave a brief presentation. In response to Vice Mayor deHaan's inquiry, the Assistant City Manager stated that Alameda Municipal Power's CAMP} Return on Investment ~RaI} would remain at 10; stated the Sewer Fund is exempt from Rat. The Interim Finance Director clarified that AMP's RoI was collected at the reduced 0.43363° rate; stated AMP's ROI would be collected at 1a in Fiscal Year 2009-2010; the City would recover the difference between the 0.43363 o and 1% for Fiscal Years 2005-200`7 through 2008-2009. Regu~.ar Meeting $ Alameda City Council July 7, 2009 Mayor Johnson stated Council made the decision to reduce the RoI for Golf but the change was not reflected in the ordinance; inquired how the Golf Course is doing. The Recreation and Park Director responded the Golf Course is doing well; stated rounds have increased; substantial savings are anticipated; numbers can be presented at the next meeting. Mayor Johnson inquired whether any formal feedback has been received from golfers. The Recreation and Park Director responded Kemper Sports is conducting a survey; stated information should be available within a month; informal feedback has been positive. Mayor Johnson stated the Golf Course condition has improved. The Recreation and Park Director stated customer service has improved also. vice Mayor deI~aan stated the Golf Course is in better shape and management has improved. Mayor Johnson stated maintenance workers are at the Golf Course on weekends. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the Golf Course is running a deficit . The Recreation and Park Director responded the deficit is not as large as originally anticipated. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether Mif Albright numbers can be provided. The Recreation and Park Director responded in the affirmative; stated numbers have been strong. Mayor Johnson inquired what is the projected deficit, to which the Recreation and Park Director responded the deficit should be half of what was expected. Mayor Johnson inquired what was the original projection, to which the Recreation and Park Director responded $700,000. Mayor Johnson inquired whether or not theft has occurred. Regulax Meeta.ng 9 Alameda City Counca.l duly 7, 2009 The Recreation and Park Director responded Kemper Sports has done a good job on inventory control; stated inventory is performed on a regular basis. Mayor Johnson inquired about past break in issues, to which the Recreation and Park Director responded window break ins have not occurred. Councilmember Gilmore stated passes were abused in the past; inquired whether a better tracking system is in place. The Recreation and Park Director responded tracking is ta.ghter; stated players are being checked. Councilmember Tarn inquired whether the Mif Albright figures would include increased water rates, to which the Recreation and Park Director responded in the negative. Councilmember Matarrese moved introduction of the ordinance. Vic„e Mayor deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote _ 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COUNCIL REFERRALS None. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS X09- } Councilmember Tam reported on two League of California Cities sessions that she attended. ~09-~ } Councilmember Matarrese reported an the East Bay Green Corridor Partnership meeting that he attended; stated Alameda is one of seven cities joining the partnership; the major reason for the partnership is to capture money aimed at green businesses; Alameda will be part of the pool which has the ability to capture regional federal dollars as well as private sector grants. X09- } Mayor Johnson thanked the 4th of July Parade Committee; stated the day was fun for Alameda. X09- } Mayor Johnson stated complaints have been received regarding vehicles parked on streets for a prolonged period of Regular Meeting ~ ~ Alameda City Council ~7uly 7, 2009 time; inquired whether anything can be done to make enforcement easier for the Police Department. The Assistant City Manager responded times could be changed to 48 hour restrictions. Mayor Johnson inquired whether a differentiation can be made regarding vehicle size. The City Attorney responded the City has an ordinance prohibiting storage of recreational vehicles and boats on City streets; stated the issue is a matter of noticing the violation and enforcement; currently, someone needs to move a vehicle an eighth of a mile after being parked at the same location for seventy-two hours; the distance could be changed to a greater amount. Mayor Johnson stated the ordinance needs to be tightened so the City is not burdened with preventing people from storing vehicles on the street. Vice Mayor deHaan stated a lot of resources are being used to play games; fines should be increased for continued violations. Mayor Johnson stated that people complain about vehicles stored on the streets for months. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 9:41 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lora Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting ~ 1 Alameda City Council July 7, X009 QTY ~~ ALAMEDA Memorandum Ta: Nonorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From; Glenda D Jay interim Finance Director Date: July 16, 2009 Re: List of 1Narrants for Ratification This is to certify that the claims fisted on the attached check register and shown below have been approved by the proper officials and, in my opinion, represent fair and just charges against the City in accordance with their respective amounts as indicated thereon. Check Numbers Amount 221042 ~ 221446 $2,571,545.29 V19010 m V19158 $105,366.93 EFT 699 $7,993.50 EFT 700 $179,102.38 ~ FT 701 $31,182.83 Void Checks: 161047 ($87.91) 201149 ($17.10) 201389 ($120.55) 204243 ($585.84) 204471 ($84.96) 212687 ($68.00) 213348 ($30.00) 221225 ($208.80) 220780 ($96.99) G RAN D TQTAL $2, 893, 890.78 Respectfully submitted, 7/~ Interim F' an e ctor BILLS #4_R Councif 1Narrants 0?121109 7/21/2009 QTY ~F AL.A~IEDA- Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Ann Marie Gallant Interim City Manager Date: July 2 ~ , 2009 Re: Adopt Plans and Specifications and Authorize a Call for Bids for the Alameda Harbor Ba Channel Dred in Pro'ect No. P.W, o6-09P~ 4 BACKGROUND Public Works staff has been working with the San Francisco Bay Area Water Emergency Transportation Authority WETA} to facilitate the integration of WETA owned vessels into the City's ferry services. On March 5, 2009, the City and WETA entered into a Bareboat Charter to allow the WETA-owned Pisces to operate on the Alameda Harbor Bay Ferry ~AHBF}. In anticipation of Pisces service,. the City contracted with CLE Engineering, Inc. ~CLE} in the fall of 200 to conduct a marine survey to determine the depth of the HarborBay FHB}Channel. DISCUSSION The marine survey identified two shallow areas near the entrance to the ferry terminal that currently restrict the operation of the Pisces to tidal conditions above one foot, Since this restriction reduces the ability of WETA boats to operate in the regular vessel rotation or to provide needed backup service, WETA and City staff agreed that maintenance dredging of the channel was needed, and that WETA would fund the project. On January 00, 2009, the City entered into an agreement with CLE to prepare the plans and specifications, acquire all permits, and prepare the necessary documents forthe dredging work. A copyafthe plans and specifications is on file in the City Clerk's office. FINANCIAL IMPACT The funding agreement between WETA and the City of Alameda includes the Harbor Bay Channel Dredging project as a task reimbursable by WETA for the actual costs, There is no impact on the General Fund associated with the project. ~itg~ C®u~r~~ii A-g~nd~ Item 4~C o~~~~po~ Honorable Mayor and July Z1, X009 Members of the City Council Page 2 oft MUNICIPAL C~]DEIPGLICY DOCUMENT CR®SS REFERENCE This action does not affect the Alameda Municipal Code, ENI~IRCNMENTAL REVIEW In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ~CEQA~, dredging at Harbor day is Categorically Exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section ~ ~304~g~, Maintenance dredging where the spoils are deposited in a spoil area authorized by all applicable state anal federal regulatory agencies, and Sections 2~ 083 and 2~ 087 of the Public Resources Code. RECCMMENDATIC~N Adopt plans and specifications and authorize a call for bids forthe Alameda Harbor Bay channel dredging project, No, P.w, 06~09~~ 4. Approved as to funds and account, a ,.......,,-~ __. Gle d D. J Inte ' Finance Director By: MTN:ES:gc CITY ~~ .~LAIVIEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From. Ann Marie Gallant Interim City Manager Dates July Z 1, X009 Re: Adopt Plans and Specifications and Authorize a Call for bids for the Repair of Portland Cement Concrete Sidewalk, Curb, Gutter, Driveway, and Minor Street Patching, Fiscal Year 200912010., Phase 10, No. P.w. 00-09r 15 BAC KG R~ U N D The City of Alameda has approximately 2G0 miles of sidewalk and about 15,000 street trees within the public right-of-way. As the trees grow and mature, site conditions, such as narrow planing strips, high ground water, soil conditions, and improper irrigation, result in tree roots raising the sidewalk, curb, gutter, and pavement area. Over the years, the City has repaired the damaged infrastructure by removing the concrete sidewalk, trimming or shaving the tree roots causing the uplift, and replacing the concrete sidewalk However, as the trees grow, the roots may continue to raise the sidewalk. The Public ~lorks Department is in the process of updating the City's Master Tree Plan, which includes a selection of fine species that are appropriate for the City's specific site constraints, including narrow planter strips. The City Council's approval of the plan is anticipated this fall, The City contracts for the permanent repair of sidewalks, curbs, gutters, and driveway approaches on an annual basis. Locations for repair are identified by resident calls and an annual inspection program. High pedestrian use areas are inspected annually, and the remainder of the city is divided into five zones, with a zone being examined every five years. Temporary repairs, asphalt fillets, or grinding are typically completed within 30 days by the Public U1lorks Department Maintenance Division. Replacement of the sidewalk takes approximatelyfourto five years depending on funding availability. DISCIJSSI~N The proposed project will replace approximately 4,000 linear feet of sidewalk. Public V1lorks sfiaff will work closely with a certified arborist to exam and evaluate the trees that have caused the sidewalk upliffi to determine the best course of action for the long-term viability of the trees, and fio minimize future sidewalk uplift. City C~unCii A~g~r~d~ Item #4~D o7-z~~a~ I~lonorable Mayor and July 21, 2009 Members of the City Council Page 2 oft The project specifications allow for the annual extension of the contract on a year-to- year basis, for up to four additional years, based on mutual agreement and satisfactory performance of all aspects of the contract, If extended, the contract would be for the same terms, and contract prices would be adjusted in accordance with the construction cost Index reported in the engineering News Record for the San Francisco Bay Area. A copy ofthe plans and specifications is on file in the City Clerk's Office, FINANCIAL IMPACT The project is budgeted far FY09-10, in the Capital Improvement Program Project No. 98202.10}, with monies allocated from Measure B, subject to approval of the FY09~10 budget. There is no impact to the General Fund. MUNICIPAL CC~DEIPQLICY DQCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE This action does not affect the Municipal Code. EN11lRUNMENTAL RE1lIEVy In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), this project is Categorically Exempfi under the CEQA Guidelines Section 15301(c), Existing Facilities. RECaMMENDATIC~N Adopt plans and specifications and authorize a call for bids for the repair of Portland Cement Concrete sidewalk, curb, gutter, driveway, and minor street patching, FY09-10, phase 10, no. p.w.06-o9r15. Respe t~~l y submitted, ,/ Matt ew T. Naclerio Public Works Director Approved as tofunds and account, ~~ len D. Jay Interi roan e Director By: Shilpa Patel Junior Engineer MTN:SP:gc cc: watchdog Committee ~ QTY ~ ~ ALAN E DA Memorandum Toe f~onarable Mayor and Members of the City Council F~rom~ Ann Marie Gallant Interim City Manager Date: July 21, 2009 Re: Award a Contract in the Amount of $287,420, Including Contingencies, to MDF Pipelines, for the Central Avenue Sewer Rehabilitation, Pacific Avenue to Third Street No~ P.w. 0509-13 gACKCR®UND Cn June 10, 2009, the City Council adopted plans and specifications, and authorized a call for bids Earths Central Avenue Sewer Rehabilitation, PacificAvenue to Third Street, No. P.w, 05~09~13~ The project will rehabilitate approximately 1,800 linear feet of existing sanitary sewer pipeline, 800 linear feet of service laterals, and ten manholes, and construct other associated work DISCUSSION To solicit the maximum number of bids and most competitive price, specifications were provided to 17 separate building exchanges throughout the day Area and the E~bid Board, A notice of bid was also published in the Alameda Journal. Eight contractors submitted bids, and the bids were opened on July 13, 2009. The list of qualified bidders, from lowestto highesttotal project cost, is: Eidder Loca~~on dad A~®un~ MDF Pipelines Pleasanton, CA $49,934 Marty Pipelines San Francisco, CA $262,844 Darc & Hart San Francisco, CA $76,424 ~1v~R, Fords Richmond, CA $~83,Z54 K ~ vtiloods San Francisco, CA $324,444 Ran er Pipelines San Francisco, CA $324,754 Fvans Brothers Livermore, CA $354,595 DScD Pipelines San Francisco, CA $396,944 city c~~nca~ ~g~nd~ ~~~m #4~E 4?pZ °I ~49 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council July ~1, X009 Page ~ of 2 Staff contacted several references provided by the low bidder and received positive feedback about the quality and timeliness of their work. Sfiaff proposes to award a contract to MDF Pipelines for a total amount of $257,40, including a 15°/o contingency. A copy of the contract is on file in the City Clerk's office. FINANCIAL IMPACT The project is budgeted as a carryover project from FYOS~09, in the Capital Improvement Program Project No. 9502}, with monies allocated from the Sewer Enterprise. Fund. There is no impacfito the General Fund. .MUNICIPAL CODEIPOLICY DOCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE This action does not affect the Alameda Municipal Code. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEVv In accordance with the California Environmenfial Quality Acfi ~CEQA}, this project is Categorically Exempt under CEC~A Guidelines .Section 15301 ~c}, Exisfiing Facilities. REC®MMENDATION Award a contract in fihe amount of $ZS7,420, including confiingencies, to MDF Pipelines, for the Central Avenue sewer rehabilitation, Pacific Avenue fio Third Sfireefi, No. P.11v. 05- 09- ~ 3. Approved as fio funds and accounfi, Glenda D. ay Interim anc irector ~,n,~ R Sys _~k~~~ ~~. ~~ ~~ rr 4 f R ~`~,~, §® "n~~r.,~ aM. ~u,w rMVNiNI~+,w ~Irr)'• ~~-Paal„`''So0 Junior Civil Engineer MTN~PS:gc ~I`rY q~' A~.AI~EDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Ann Marie Gallant In~Cerim City Manager Date: July 21, 2009 Re: Award a Contract in the Amount of $618,815, Including Contingencies, to Harty Pipelines, far the Fernside Boulevard Sewer Rehabilitation, Thom son Avenue to Hi h Street Na. P,W. 03-0909 BACKGRGUND Gn June 16, 2009, the City Council adopted plans and specifications, and authorized a call for bids for the Fernside Boulevard sewer rehabilitation, Thompson Avenue to High Street, No. P.W. 03~09~09. The project will relocate approximately 2,000 linear feet of existing sanitary sewer pipeline from the easterly sidewalk area to the street, replace 1,500 linear feet of service laterals, ,rehabilitate 13 manholes, and construct other associated work. To minimize construction impacts to the street trees along Fernside Boulevard, the sewer will be relocated from the sidewalk to the street. If street tree roots are encountered during the excavation, the contractor is required to stop work and proceed under the advice of a certified arborist and the City. DISCUSSION To solicit the maximum number of bids and most competitive price, specifications were provided to 17 separate building exchanges throughout the Bay Area and E-bid Board. A notice of bid was also published in the ~lamea~a Journal. Five contractors submitted bids, and the bids were opened on July 13, 2009. The list of qualified bidders, from lowestto highesttotal project cost, is: ~~dder I~ocafi~~n did .Am~un~ Harty Pipelines San Francisco, CA $538,00 WR Forde Associates Richmond, CA $570,600 Evans Brothers, fnc Livermore, CA $61,650 KAT Cons~ruc~ion 5acramen~o, CA $633,600 K. J. woods Cons~rucfion San Francisco, CA $788,400 city ~®~~~~~ ~~~nd~ ~t~m 4-~ 47~2'i ~09 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council July 2~, 2009 Page 2 of 2 Staff contacted several references provided by the low bidder and received positive feedback about the quality and timeliness of their work. Staff proposes to award a contract to Harty Pipelines for a total amount of $618,8 5, including a ~ 5% contingency. A copy of the contract is on file in the City Clerk's office, FINANCIAL IMPACT The project is budgeted as a carryover project from FY08~09, in the Capital Improvement Program Project No. 9502}, with monies allocated from the Sewer Enterprise Fund. There is no impact to the General Fund. MUNICIPAL CGDEIPCLICY DUCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE This action does not affect the Alameda Municipal Code. ENVIRC]NMENTAL RE1/1Ew In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ~CEQA}, this project is Categorically Exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 1530 ~c}, Existing Facilities. RECQMMENDATCnN Award a contract in the amount of$618,815, including contingencies, to Harty Pipelines, ~~or the Fernside Boulevard sewer rehabilitation, Thompson Avenue to High Street, No. P.w. 03-09-09. Approved as to funds and account, ,..~ Glend . J Interim finance Director Dy: ~~~ .,~;, ~, . ~~ ~4 Pa So Junior ngineer MTN:PSsgc CITY ®F ALAII~EaA Memorandum Toe Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From Ann Marie Gallant Interim City Manager Date; July 2 ~ , 2009 Rey Accept the Work of Marine Express, Inc., far the Main Street Ferry Terminal Bar e Maintenance Project BAC l~G Rn U N D Gn December 5, 2006, the City Council awarded a contract in the amount of $337,000, including contingencies, to Marine Express, Inc., forthe Main Street ferry terminal barge maintenance .project. Cn February 5, 2003, the City Council approved a first amendment to permanently replace the existing barge far a total contract amount of $566,000. Can June 3, 2003, the City Council approved a second amendment for deballasting and stabilising of the old barge, additional engineering of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority-owned barge modifications, modifying the Main Street gangway to meet Americans with Disability Act requirements, and replacing the storm-damaged south end of the northlsouth walkway segment for a total contract amount of $665,2 3, DISCUSSIGN The project has been completed in accordance with the contracts and is acceptable to the Public Works Department. The final project cost, including amendments, is $665,2 ~ 8. FINANCIAL IMPACT The Barge Maintenance Project is budgeted under the Capital Improvement Program Project No.'s 90-723, 90-453, 90-567, and 90-675}, with funds available from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission's Regional Measure ~ -2°/° Bridge Toll Program, and Measure B -~ Transbay Ferry funds. There is no impact to the General Fund associated with Alamedalaakland Ferry Service operations. City C®c~nCii A~~nd~ item #4~~ o7~Z~~o~ Honorable Mayor and July2~, 2009 Members of the City Council Page 2 of 2 MUNICIPAL CODEIPOLICY DOCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE The City's Ferry Service is consistent with the General Plan Transportation Element Guiding Policy 4.3.f. RECOMMENDATION Accept the work of Marine Express, Inc., for the Main Street ferry terminal barge maintenance project. Approved as to funds and account, ,~ Glend~ D. J Interim~F' a Director Ernest Sanchez Ferry Manager MTN:ES:gc cc: Watchdog Committee (ferry) c~T~ aF A~~~En~ Memorandum To: I~onorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From, Ann Marie Gallant Interim City Manager Date July 21, 2009 Re. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing an Open Market Purchase Pursuant to Section 315 of the Alameda City Charter for the Annual Fuel Delivery to Various ~.ocations within the City of Alameda for Fiscal Year 20092010, and Authorizing the interim City Manager to Enter into Such an Agreement Re wires Four Affirmative Votes BACKGRGIJND Gn April 5, 204, the City Council adopted plans and specifications and authorized a call for-bids for the annual fuel delivery to various locations within the City of Alameda for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2004, No. P~w, 03-04-04~ Gn June 15, 2004, the City Council awarded a contract to Valley Gil Company, the only bidder for this contract, in the amount of $271,423, with a contract clause that the City may mutually amend the contract for up to four additional years, This contract expired on June 30, 2009. DISCUSSION Valley Gil Company has been the City's fuel provider since 1991. Their current contract is based on a cents per gallon cost above the daily average wholesale price for the San Francisco Bay Area as determined by the Gil Price Information Survey ~GPIS~, Pad 5 Report. This is the standard arrangement used by jurisdictions throughout the Bay Area, It ensures the City is not locked into the current high fuel costs, and as prices lower the City's cast will also decrease. Valley oil Company possesses the skills, experience, knowledge, background, and certifications to perform these services. The fuel prices, as contained in its current contract with the City, are competitive' For example, the City paid $2.3G per gallon for unleaded fuel in May, while the retail price in California for the same period was $2.85 per gallon, a savings of $0.49 per gallon Valley Gil Company also has a good working relationship with the Public vlJorks Department staff and is responsive to staff's questions and concernsM In addition, Valley Oil Company has agreed to hold 20082009 prices for all of 2009-2010 as indicated below; ~~ty ~®~uncil R~pa~t R~~ A~end~ ~t~m #4~W Q7*~~-a~ Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council July 2~, ~oo~ Page~of2 far F~ Q~~~ Q ~.vca~ion Unleaded Diesel ~io~D~e~el Maintenance Service Center 3.~ Cants 9.o Cents Q.o Cents Fire Station 1 ~ 4,2 Cents ~ ~,2 Cents NIA Fira Sfiation ~ 2 ~ .5 Cents ~ ~ .5 Cants NIA Firs Station 5 NIA ~ 1.4 Cents NIA Nose, i nis pacing is one price added to the average cost per gallon as determined each Thursday by the oPIS 5 report per~:contraGt specifications. In accordance with Section 3~~5 of the Alameda City Charter, Public Works staff recommends that the City contract directly With Valley oil Company to provide t11 annual fuel delivery to various locations for an additional 1~-month period, Thee price offered by Valley oil is below market and therefore, the Cit. can urchase this y p commodity at a lower price in the open than the competitive bidding process is likely to produce. FINANCIAL IMPACT Funds far the annual fuel delivery are included in the FY o9-~ o budget under Public Works Department, Fleet Maintenance Program ~70~-5~~00}; and under the Alameda Fire Department, Emergency Services, Fuel, ail, and Lubricants Pro ram ~2~ o~ Q ~ 5~~00}, MUNICIPAL CoDEIPOLICY DOCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE This action does not affect the Municipal Code, RECOMMENDATION Adopt ~ resolution authorizing an open market purchase pursuant to Section 315 of the Alameda City Charter for the annual fuel delivery to various locations within the City of Alameda far FY 09-~0, and authorizing the Interim City Manager to enter info such an agreement requires four affirmative votes}, Respe~ lly submitted, ~' .. MatthewT~ Naclerio Public Works Director gy, ,~.~.~w Approved as to funds and account, Glenda .Jay Interim Finance Director ~~: ~~ ~~ Flavin Earrantes „ , ~~ d~ Public Works Superintendent CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO, AUTHORIZING. AN OPEN MARKET PURCHASE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3- 15 OF THE ALAMEDA CITY CHARTER FOR THE ANNUAL FUEL DELI1/ERY TO VARIOUS LOCATIONS WITHIN THE CITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 20092010, AND AUTHORIZE THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO SUCH AN AGREEMENT vIIHEREAS, on April 16, 2004, the City Council adopted plans and ~~ s ecifications and authorized a call for bids for the Annual Fuel Deiive to Variou ~. p rY s Locations within the City far Fiscal Year 2004-2005; and WHEREAS, on June 15, 2604, the City Council awarded a contract to Valley Oil Company, the only bidder; and WHEREAS, Valley Oil Company contract included the clause that the City may mutually amend the contractfor us tofauryears; and WHEREAS, Valley Oil Company cantract expired on June 30, 2009; and WHEREAS, the price Valley Oil Company provided to the city was below market in 2006-2009, and Malley Oil Company has agreed to hold the 2008-2009 prices for all of 2009-2010; and WHEREAS, Section 3-15 of the City Charter authorizes the City Council upon four affirmative votes to waive the competitive bidding process and make a contract directly with a vendor when the supplies can be purchased at a lower price in the open market without competitive bidding procedures. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Alameda, pursuant to Section 3-15 of the City Charter, the Interim City Manager, in cooperation of the Public vllarks Department, is hereby authorized an open market purchase for the annual fuel delivery to various locations within the City for fiscal year 09-10, and authorized to enter into such an agreement, *~~~~* Resolution #4-H CC M ~1 r~~ ~o~ '. f, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and reguiarfy adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in regufar meeting assembled on the 21 st day of Juiy 2009, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: 1N vViTNESS, vvi~EREC~F, f haute hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said Gity this 22nd day of July 20x9, Laravlleisiger, City Clerk City of Alameda c~TY ~F ~L~~~®~ Memorandum Top Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From; Ann Marie Gallant Interim City Manager Date: July ~ 1, 2009 Rep Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Interim City Manager to Enter into a Maintenance Agreement between the City of Alameda and the State of California Department of Transportation for the Maintenance of the Bicycle Path at the Foot of the North Side ofthe Bav Farm IslandBicvcle Bridae BACKGRQUND ~Jn December 16, 2008, the City Council adopted Resolution No~ 14291 and executed a Cooperative Agreement- between the City and the State of California Department of Transportation ~Caltrans~ to receive a ~~o,ooo grant from Caltrans. The Bay Conservation and Development Commission ~BCDC~, which required Caltrans to provide mitigation of the temporary impacts to public access that occurred during Caltrans' seismic retrofit improvements at the Posey and Webster Street Tubes, agreed that the realignment of the existing bicycle path at the foot of the north side of the Bay Farm Island bicycle bridge would bean acceptable project for the grant. Section 1, Item No, 20, of the Cooperative Agreement requires the City to operate, maintain, and manage, at the City's cost, the modified bike path, including those portions located within the existing State Highway System right-of-way. The City, through a previous Encroachment Permit with Caltrans, already is responsible for the maintenance of the existing bike path. DISCUSSIQN The Maintenance Agreement for the bike path has been prepared by Caltrans and reviewed by the City Attorney, and is acceptable to the Public Works Department, A copy of the Maintenance Agreement is on file in the City Clerk's office. FINANCIAL IMPACT The project to modify the existing bike path is budgeted in the Capital Improvement Program Project No. 90-~~?'~, with funds available from the BCDC Bay Trail Access Path fundo Maintenance of the path will continue to be the City's responsibility and will be funded by Measure B~ There is no impactto the General Funds ~~ty C®u~n~~ R~p~rt Fig; Agenda Item #~~~ 07~~~-0~ Honorable Mayor and July 21, X009 Members of the City Council Page 2 of ~ MUNICIPAL CGDEIPCLICY DOCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE This action does not affect the Alameda Municipal Code and supports the Sicycle Master Plan Project Number 5, day Farm island dike fridge Access, far reducing the sharpness of the intersection at the north side of the bridge. The project is consistent with the Local Action Plan for Climate Protection goal to encourage the construction of bicycle facilities. ENIIIRC~NMENTAL REVIEW In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), this project is Categorically Exempt under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301(c), Existing Facilities and 15304(d), Minor Alterations in Land Use. REC~MMENDATIGN Adopt a resolution authorizing the interim City Manager to enter into a maintenance agreement between the City of Alameda and Caltrans for the maintenance of the bicycle path atthe foot of the north side ofthe day Farm Island bicycle bridge. Approved as tofunds and account, ~..~ Glenda y Interim iR ance irector Y.J y k r 3: ~+~ p.... w.na~~rnn.nw.e~:,m,;a,.w~~~.n~:.:r,~..~~„„„~~.r~~.~~,~A., .,.~~.~~,,.~..::..A..~..~.. ~~ ~~,...A.,.i.~,. „~,. Ed Sommerauer Associate Civil Engineer MTN.ES:gc ccd Watchdog Committee CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION N0, AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER TO ENTER f NTO A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ALAMEDAAND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP®RTATION FOR THE MAINTAINENANCE OF THE BICYCLE PATH AT THE FOOT OF THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BAY FARM ISLAND BICYCLE BRIDGE ~~~ VIIHEREAS, the City is proposing to realign the existing bike path at the foot of the north end of the Ba Farm Island bic cle brill ~e~ and ~~ y y gr WHEREAS Cit of Alameda R y esolution No, 14291 authorized the City ~~ , ~ ~' Manager to enter into a Cooperative Agreement with the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans); and WHEREAS, the Cooperative Agreement No. 4-2123 was executed on February 13, 2009; and WHEREAS, Section 1, Item 20, of the Cooperative Agreement requires that the City operate, maintain and manage, at City's cost, the bike path, including those portions located within the existing State Highway System ~SHS} right~of-way. NOW, THEREFOR, BE IT RESOLVED that the Interim City Manager is hereby authorized to enter into and execute such maintenance agreement in a form that is acceptable to the City Attorney's Office, **~~~~ Resolution #4~l CC ~~r~~ roN I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda during the Regular Meeting of the City Council on the 21st day of July, 2009, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ASSENT: ASSTENTI~NS: IN WITNESS, WHER~F, I have hereunto set ray hand and affixed the official seal of said City this 22nd day of July, 2009. Lara Weisiger, City Clerk City of Alameda CITY 4F ALAI~EDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From; Ann Marie Gallant ` Interim City Manager Date: July 21, 2009 Re: Adopt a Resolution Accepting the Sewer System Management Plan as Adopted by the State Water Resources Control Board BACKROUND On May 2, 2006, both the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board ~RWQCB} and the State Water Resources Control Board ~SWRCB} adapted requirements for municipalities that own and operate sanitary sewer collection systems. Each .Board requires the preparation of a Sewer System Management Plan SSMP}, which the Public Works Department has prepared as an element of the City's Sewer Master Plan. As part of the SWRCB requirements, the governing body of a collection system agency is required to accept the completed SSMP. The SWRCB schedule requires that the SSMP be completed by August 2, 2009. DISCUSSION As shown in the table below, the City has completed all ofthe necessary tasks required by the SWRCB. The City Council is required to accept the SSMP as the finalized step toward meeting these requirements. A copy of the SSMP is on file in the City Clerk's office. Task Sta~u~ SSMP Development Plan and Schedule Completed Goal Identification Completed Organization Description Completed Legal Authority Completed Operation and Maintenance Program Completed Overflow Emergency Response Program Completed Fats, OBI, and Grease FOG} Program Completed Design and Performance Provisions Completed System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan Completed Monitoring and Program Modifications Completed Program Audits Completed Communication Program Completed Final SSMP Implementation. Pending the City Council Acceptance on July 21, 2009 ~-lonorable. IVlayor and Members of the City Council FINANCIAL IMPACT July ~1, 2009 Page ~ of 2 The SSMP is budgeted in the Capital Improvement Program Project No, 9410?}, with monies available from the City Sewer Funds. This is no impact to the General Fund. MUNICIPAL CCDEIPCLlCY DCC~MENT CROSS REFRENCE This action does not affect the Municipal Code. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ~CEQA}, the SSMP is Categorically Exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15306, Information Collection. RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution accepting the SSMP as adopted by the SWRCD. Approved as tofunds and account, ~~~ Glenda ay Interim F' anc irector ~y: ~~.,,. 1 ~ ~,~ I ~~ ~muucp ,~ w~ Paul Soo, Jre Junior Civil Engineer MTN.PS:gc CITY ®F ALAMEDA RESGLUTIC~N N0, APPRG11lNGTHE DEVELGPMENTPLANANDTHETIME SCHEDULE FGR THE SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN AS ADGPTED BY THE STATE WATER RESOURCES C®NTRGL BOARD WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 1367 of the California Water Code, municipalities that awn and operate sanitary sewer collection system are required to prepare a Sewer System Management Plan SSMP}; and WHEREAS, on May ~, ~OO6, the State vllater Resources Control Baard ~SWRCB}, adopted new statewide Sanitary Sewer overflow Waste Discharge Requirements 4SSCJ WDR}; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the statewide SSO WDR, agencies that own and operate sanitary sewer system must develop a SSMP and complete the SSMP elements in accordance with the SWRCB milestone schedule; and WHEREAS, the City of Alameda has developed and completed an SSMP, based on~the Regional Water Quality Control Baard ~RWQCB}guidelines; and ~IIIHEREAS, the City of Alameda Public Vvorks Department's staff is responsible for maintaining and reporting of the. SSMP elements to the SWRCB and R~IVQCB; and WHEREAS, ,the SSMP is also a part of the City of Alameda Sewer Master Plan, funded by the City Sewer Funds. NaW, THEREFGRE, BE IT RESQLVED that the City Council of the City of Alameda hereby accepts the completed SSMP as adopted by the SWRCB. ~~**~~* Resolution #4-J CC o~-~~-o~ 1, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in a regular meeting assembled on the 21 st day of July, 2009, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NC~ESe A~SENTa A~SENTIC~NS~ IN vllITNESS, 1~~lEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said City this 22nd day of July 2009, LaraVVeisiger, City Cler4c City of Alameda CITY ~]~ AL,AMEDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Ann Marie Gallant Interim City Manager Date: J u ly ~ 7, 2009 Re; Adopt a Resolution Approving Parcel Map No. 9787 X321 ~ 3215 Fernside Boulevard BAC~CG RO U N D On March 17, 2009, the City Council adopted Resolution No,14313and approved Tentative Parcel Map No. 9137, a one lot subdivision creating two condominium units. The property is located at 3211-3215 Fernside Boulevard, between High Street and Monte Vista Avenue. DISCUSSION The final parcel map has been reviewed and determined to be technically correct, and in substantial conformance with the approved tentative parcel map and conditions of approval. The site is fullydeveloped with two residential units, and each unit has its own off- street parking and landscaping, The condominiums are subjectto covenants, conditions, and restrictions that provideforingress,egress, parking, and utilitiesovercommon areas, maintenance, and repair ofcommon areas, The applicant has deposited sufficientfunds to cover charges for the reviewand a mylar copy of the recorded Parcel Map, A copy of the final parcel map is on file in the City Clerk's office. FINANCIAL IMPACT Approval of the parcel map and resolution does not affect the General Fund. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW I n accordance with the California Environments! Quality Act ~CEQA}, this project is Categorically Exempt underthe CEQA Guidelines Section 15315, Minor Land Divisions. pity C~un~il R~p~r~ R~~ A~~nda ~~~m #4~IK 07-2~~a~ Honorable Mayarand Members o~~he City Council RECC~MMENDATICN July 21, 2009 Page 2 0~~ Adopt a resolution approving parcel map no. 9787 (3211-3215 Fernside Boulevard). By: Robert Claire Associafie Civil Engineer MTN:RC:gc CITY GF ALAMEDA RESULUTIQN N~, ' APPROVING PARCEL MAP NC, 9757 l vvHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Nor 9757 was approved by the City Council per Resolution Na, 14316 on March 17, ZOOS; and ~~, p ~~ ~IH EA P r ~~ ~ , ~, ER S, a cel Map 9757 was found to be Categorically Exempt from the review under the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA ursuant to CEQA ~.;~ ~ ~ p Guidelines Section 15315 Minor Land Divisions}; and ~~ V~{HEREAS, the Public works Department has reviewed Parcel Map 9787 and has proposed a number of Conditions which have been incorporated as Conditions in City Council Resolution No. 14316, NC~w, THEREFGRE, BE IT RESC7LVED that the City Council of the City of Alameda pursuant to Section 30-81.5 of the Alameda Municipal Cade, hereto accepted and conditionally approved by the Planning Board and City Council, is hereby approved and permission given to the subdivider to recard same, based upon the findings and subject to the conditions set forth in City of Alameda Council Resolution Number 14318, ~~~~** I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in a regular r~eeting asser~bled on the 21 st day of July, 2009, by the following vote to wit; AYES NaES: ABSENT: ABSENTI4NS; IN ~IVITNESS, ~IVHEREGF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said City this ZZn~ day of July, 2009, Lara vVeisiger, City Cierk City of Alameda Resolution #4~K C~ o I ~f~r ~ IoM G[TY ~~' ~4L~46ED~ Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Ann Marie Gallant Interim City Manager Date: July 2 ~ , 2009 Re: Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Destruction of Specified Unnecessary Records ~ACKGRGUND The Human Resources Department has decreasing usable office and storage space dine to the steady accumulation of hard copy records. The proposed resolution would authorize the destruction of documents that are no longer needed by~the department. DISCUSSIGN State Gov't Code Sec. 34490 allows public entity records to be destroyed after various periods of time, depending an the type of record, as long as written approval from the City Attorney and authorization from the City Council is obtained. The Human Resources Department seeks to discard records related to recruitment .exam lists from the years 2004 through 2000. A list of the documents is attached to this report. FINANCIAL IMPACT The cost far the destruction of records is included in the FY 2009110 Human Resources Department budget. The documents should not be recycled due to the confidential nature of information that may be contained in them. REC~MMENDATIaN Adopt a Resolution authorizing destruction of the specified unneeded records. Respectfully Submitted, N Karen Willis Human Resources Director Approved as to funds and account, Glend D. Jay, Interim ~r an hector Attachment: 1) Recruitment Exam Listing Year 2004 - 2006 City C~u~Cil ~~p~rt R~~ Ag~~d~ item 4-~ ~~~~~ 4~~ REC~FTf'I'1VfEP`1T` ~X1~.M LIS°1`fI'~G YE~iE~ 20f)4 ~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~E J __ Ez~~~~~~ ~r~LE- -~ ~~~~~ED J ~L~~~ ~~T~ ~~~~~D_. 1 C 204-01 7785 Apprentice Linewarker - 1/27/'2004 ~/24/20~4 _ '204-02 6641 Dousing Specialist I 1/~/20C34 1/23/2Q04 2m4-03 4Q40 ~'olice Officer 1/1/20Q4 ( L.- ---- --- - 2(~4-f~4 4040 Police Clfficer Z/1/20f?4 7/I4/2004 ---- - 1 204-05 7'75 Journey Linewori~er 1/1/2004 12/31/2pi~4 - - ----- - - -J 204-06PT 4061 Crossing Guard (dart- 1/1/2004 12/31/2004 time /Year-Round). X04-07PT 5Q23 Golf Course Starter 1/1/2004 12/31/2004 204-~~FT 20 1 Golf Cart/Mange Crew 1/1/2004 12/31/2004 (Temp/PT) ~o4-o9p~a is~o ~X~~~tx~e ~~~asta~t i~9/2o0~ i/is~ZOO4 204-lOPR 7 10 Marketing Coordinator 1/27/20Q~4 2/3/2004 ----- 2~4-Z1 140 CATV Net~rork Engineer 2/2/20U4 2/24/20Q4 C __~ 204-12PR 1460 Adminiffitrative Techa~ician 1/26j2004 2/2/2004 - - ~ -- III - -- _ 204-13 7800 Engineering Supervisor 2/3J2004 3/5/2004 204-I4PR 1420 Management Analyst 2/17/20Q4 2/2?/2004 --- --~ 204-16PR 1430 administrative Services 3/4/2004 3/ 15/20f~4 ~ ~ Coordinator - - 204-17PR 1.408 Senior Management Analyst 3/11/2004 3/19/ 004 ----- 204-18 151.0 Intermediate Clerk 3/12/2004 3/25/2004 204-19 7560 Customer Service 4/16/2004 4/30/2004 C- - ~ l~epxesentative --- 204-20P1a 7073 Senior Utility Analyst 4/7/2004 4/13/204 ----- r .._ 204-21 7797 Electrical Helper 10/21/2004 10/28/2004 204-21P]FL Operations Maxxager 10/ 1/2004 10/ 12/2004 204-22 6670 Housing Manager 4/ 16/2004 4/27/20Q4 204-23 .7053 Adaninistrative Services 4/9/2004 4/29/2004 Manager 204-24FR 6030 Planner IT 4/22/2004 4/29/2004 204-25 7054 Engineering and Planning 4/28/2004 7/8/2004 Manager ---- ----- - 204-26 1728 Business Development 4/23/2004 8/24/20Q4 Manager 204-27 X550 supervising Librarian 4/30/2004 7/ 13/2004 ~ Thursday, June ~ 1, 249 G~~y C~~ncil A~~ach~m~~~ ~o Ag~mda I~~m #4~L R~ d7A AA 12ECf2LTIT°PJJIEN'F EXAM f.fS°fII3G Y~AET 2004 ~ E TV! 1V~ _ J ~ JAB C~17~' 1 L _ E3~.IVdI1VA.TIQIV' TITLE ~--OPEI~EI? ~ ~ CI,~SEI3 ~ ~ D~TE PUI2CgED 204-2~ 6610 Finance Manager 4/3Q/2004 8/4/2004 --- _ 204-2~ 3 35 Plazas Examiner 5J7/2~04 7/6/2004 204-30PR 1430 Admini~trati~re Services 6/4/2~04~ C/15/ 004 Coore~inator 204-31 17'?5 Pragram Specialist II ~/4r/20m4 7/6/2004 2~4-a2 ~.6ga R~~~ a~age~ ~~ is>2oo~ ~I ~se2o~4 C - 204-33 2077 Fire/building bode 7/23/2004 8/ 5/2004 Compliance Officer 204-34 7210 Senior Electrical Engineer ?/2f /2004 8/ 16{2004 r l__--- ---------- 204-35A 1420 1Vlanagement Analyst 7/2/204 7/30/2004 ~ ~ (Conca.munity Programs) 204-3 sB 140 Management ~inalyst (Small 7/2/2004 '7/30/2004 business Assistance] 204-35C 1420 Management Analyst (Base '7/2/2004 7/~~/20~4 Reuse & 1Zedev~lo~srnent) 204-36 2520 Ndaintenance esrke~° II '~/3~/20~4 $/20/2004 C -- ----- 204-37 265Q P~xblic Works Super~risor 7/26/2004 8/ 13/2004 204-38PR 4030 Folice Sergeant 7/23/2004 8/ 12/2004 804-39PT 2062 Animal Shelter Assistant 7/ 14/2004 8/ 17/2004 , ~ J 204-40PR 1570 Paralegal 7/ 16/20f14 7/22/2004 ~ 204-41 4500 Fire#ighter (Entry] 7/21/204 7/30/2004 2Q4-43PR 1470 Attministrative Technician I 7/28/2004 8/3/004 204-44 45001 Firefighter (Paramedic- 7/30/2004 8/20/2004 Entry) 204-46 7073 Senior Utility Analyst 8/ 13/2004 9/3/2p04 204-4? 2510. Maintenance Worker I 9/21/2004 9/30/2004 C 1 204-48 ?805 Data Technieia~n 10/22/2004 11/12/204 204-49 7803 Cable Technician III 10/22/2004 il/12/20(~4 204-50PR 7742 Line Superintendent 8/23/2004 x/30/2004 ~~ 204-51PT 2053 Law Clerk (Administrative $/ 18/2004 10/5/205 Assistant II) 204-52 3180 City Engineer 9/ 1/2004 10/~/20U4 C ___ 1 204-53 1770 Program Specialist I 9/1/2004 10/1/2004 2C~4-S4 2560 Executive Assistant 9/21/2 04 10/7/2004 204-55 4040 Police Officer 9/21/2004 1 /31/2004 204-5fi 3550 Supervising Librarian 9/21/2004 10/7/2004 ~ _ _ J 'Thursday, June ~ ~, 2QQ9 Pale 2 0~' 3 ~_ EY~4nl! 1~d0~ ~_.TOI~ CORE -~~4.NlINF~'~°IOY~ TI~`LE- -] C _OF~I~El~~ ~ CLOSET) J LL7~.T~ PU12~GED~ 204-57PR 7054 Engineering & Planning 10/4/2004 10/1 {2004 C_ Manager (Promo) 204-5~ 7495 Financial services 10/1~/80~4 11J~/2004 ~ Supervisor --- -- - -- ~04-5~ 7'T~9 Street Light Maintenance 10/22/20(84 Z 1/8/20 4 ~ ~ '~echnici~.n __ -- 204-60 4f~65 Police Tecl~ni~ian II 10/7/ZCt04 12/31/ZOQ4 _ __ J 204-61PR 1550 Office Assistant 10/22/2004 10/29/2004 204-62 7704 Assistant Line 10/22/2004 l Y/ 12/2004 Superintendent --- 204-63 7745 Line Working Supervisor 10/22/2004 Z 1/5/2004 204-64 4Q65 Police Techniciasp. IY 10/7/2004 12/31/2004 ~ _ _ _~ 204-65CPR 3140 Associate Civil Engineer 11/3/2004 2/1/2005 ~_ ___~ 204-fi5LDT 3140 Land Llevelopment & 11/3/20094 2/1/2CI05 L Tr~.nsportation Engineer _ 204-65PCR 3140 P1~n Check }.2eview Engixaeer 11/3/2004 2/1/2005 - ---- I - ~J 204-66P12 6655 ~-Iousing Assistance Manager 10/21/2004 IO/29/20~4 ----- ------__l 204-fi7 7320 Video 1'ro~iuction Ptrtist 11/19/2(104 12/1/2004 204-68 1?13 Development Manager 11/1/2004 2/23/2005 --- I - -~J 2~4-69PR 3075 Senior Construction 11/1'7/2004 la/30/2004 - --- -- ~ Inspector ------- --- 204-70 7160 Buyer 11/Y9/2004 12/14/2004 I 1-. - - 2Q4-71 7075 Utility 1~n~lyst 11/23/2~Q4 12/14/2004 ~04-72PR 1430 Adxaxinistrative Services 11/19/2004 12/3/2004 -- --- C --- J Coordinator-Circulation --- 2Q4-73 6040 ~lanaxer III 12/3/2004 3/4/200 s 204-74 ?440 Financial Analyst 12/2~/2~04 1/26/20f~5 204-75PT 2062 Animal shelter ~.s~istant 12/14/20Q4 1/25/2005 (M.P~II) 204-76PR 3120 Assistant Engineer 12/21/2004 12/30/2004 ~-=-- ------1 Thursday, June 1 ~, 2D09 page 3 0~ 3 E LI ~'~ ~ _ JOB CODE J ~ ~ .1ViI1~~TIC21V TITLE I I__ ~FEY~'L~ ~Lf)~~1? ~ ~_1r3~~''E P~TRtxE~ aos-oi~r 2o~i ~~i~c~~t/~.~ge ~r~~ ~n~tCe ~.oi~zoos ~.z/az~~o~s ~~5t i) ----- 2os-o2~r ~oi~ Golf ~tarte~° (Recreation 1/rl~~~s x~/~i/2~~s - ---- --- Leader II) __---- _____----- a~s-o~~r ~o~i ca°os~~ng ward-~eyief- i/L/2aQ5 ~.~>~~./2mo~ ~ 20~-~~ 4oa~~ Police Officer ~/~i/2~o~ ~/i/~~a~ -- - - - -- 205-05 ?775 .7ou~ney Liaaeworker i/ 1~~oos 4/ Z8/ZQO5 - - - ----- 205-06 6080 Supervising Planner 1/7/2UQS 3/4/2005 ~ _ _____~ 205-07 4057 Police officer 3/ 14/2005 4/ 1/20 5 - -- 205-0~ 440 Fo~ice Officer 3/ 14/005 4/ 1/2005 ~ ___~ 2C~5-Q9 'T?~i0 Systern Dispatcher 2/8/205 2/~2/20~5 -------- 2~5-1Q 461U Emergency Medical 2/18/2005 C/1S/20~15 5ervice~ Eslu~ation Coarciinator 205-11~R ?340 Stoa~ekeeper 3/30/205 5/5/2mf15 ~_ 205-13 324 Combined wilding 2/4/2 05 2/25/2~m5 ~ ~ Inspe~t~r -- _ - 2~~-i4~r ~~~i-a~ L~br~~• A~ae ~/~/200~ a/z/ZOas ~--- ---____ aos-15 iox~ D~~~ty city ~.ttorney r a/~/~om~ 4/4/zoas - ___ 2o5-I6Y''i' 2062 Animai shelter Asst (1Vitce 2/22/2005 s/ZS/2~o s Asst II) - - 205-Z?PR 1?~5 Recaanst~uction Specialist 2/23/2005 3/2/2005 ~ ~ II -Promo _ __ 205-18PT 3515 Library T'echa~iciaa 2/24/2005 ~/~/2005 ~ _ __~ 205-19PR 172SD Communitq Develo~ament 3/ 15/2005 3/22/20015 ~ 1 Program Manager ----- 205-20 7210 ~r Electrical Engineer 4/ 1/~OflS 5/ 12/2005 ---- L_________ -_._ _ 2~5-2I 7230 Electrical Engineer 4/4/2005 4/22/200 __ _~ 205-22 7260 Distribution Engineer 4/4/20015 x/22/2005 - _ --- _ 205-23PT 4081 Police Assistant Y 4/ 1/2005 6/ 15/8005 - - _ -- _~ 205-24 3140 Associate Civil Engineer 4/x/2005 3/3/2006 f I~----- ----- 205-25 4074 Public Safety Dispatches 1/1/2005 1/18/20036 ~ (Entry) _ ---- 205-25/26 40'74 PubPic Safety Dispatcher 1/1/2006 Z/1~/2000 ~0 s-2? 77$5 ~4.pp~rentice Lirae~vorker 4/21/200 5/5/2Q05 ----------- 205-2~ 7800 Telecom C3perations 6/$/2005 6/~2/~005 Superintendent - -- --- ~r~u~~d~y, Ju~~ ~ ~, ~avs ~~~~ ~ of 3 E Nf PI~~ JOB Ct~LeIEJ E NIIl~~~'I~I~T ~'ITLE ~ ~PE1~EI)~ ~LO~EY3 _~ D1~TE PURGE 20529 713o Stcc~ clerk 4J21 J2005 5 J5 J2ao5 2Q5-30 1520 Senior Account clerk 4J14J20a5 4J2SJ2oa5 _~._. 205-31 7135 I~ventc ~vntrcl clerk 4J~ 1 J2005 5 J J2Qa5 {{ l__.~. _~~.~ _. 205-3 7791 Utility ~cnstrncti®n 5 JS J2005 fi J22 J2o05 ~crr~pliance Specialist - _.__.rM ._._._.._ 205-33 1o5a Planning and wilding 4J22J2o05 sJ22J2ao5 ~ _ _._ _._.__.__~_ ~irectcr __.__..._ _._.~.~.___... .~ 2a5-34PT` 4oS2 Aninxal ~ontrcl Assistant 4J22J2aa5 7J20J2005 . . 205-35P~ 7515 I]evel~prnent ~aordinatcr 4J2S J2005 5 J5 J2oa5 ~ , _^ ~.~~.._._.._ 205w3~P1~ 4020 Felice Lieutenant 5J27J2aa5 6J loJ2oa5 1 w...I 205-37 3235 Plans E~an~iner 5 J27J2a05 2 J al2oos _..m .~mm_J 205-35 3140 Plan Checl~~ review Engineer 5J27J2o05 2 j 1 J2Da5 ~ -._.___._ 2a5w39 1775 Prcgra~n Specialist 11 6J14J2o05 1o113J2oos -~. 2D5-4D 255 Public ~Ncrks li~aintenance bJ24J2D05 7J22J2ao5 ~.~_ ~ .._....__._ `earn Leader _ 205w41P~. 7745 Line crkin Supervisor 7J21J2005 7J2SJ20o5 2D5-42~ 7250 Elec,tricalOistributi®n SJ2~J2oD5 9J1fiJZppS ~ -__..__._....~ ~"echnician __~___ 2a5-43 73 i~ ~nfcrrnation Systerr~s 1oJ3 J20os ~oJ2 i J~oos Netwark Analyst .~.__ _____._ 20544 X641 H®using Specialist I 7 J 2®J 2005 S J 17 J 2005 --.-._._ 2o5W45F~ 147D Administrative technician I 7J27J20o5 SJ3J2DO5 2a5-4~P~ 452D Fire Oaptain SJ5J2o05 SJ2~J2oD5 _..__.__...._.._...__ .__ _..._.~11 _.__._l 2o5~47F~ ~54o senior ~lerl~ ~ ~J2J2oo5 ~J1aJ2oo5 _ _ ~~ 2a5-4S 4075 ~'a,iler sJ1®J2oD5 9J2J2oo5 ~_ ~~ _.____. __ 20549 7710 Safety Officer 9 J 16 J2005 io J7 J2ao5 20550 Faso Penning and Euilding sJ2~12o05 12 J 14J2oa5 Director __._.__...~ 2o5-51F~ 3242 Sena®r Carnbinaticn~ 9 J 1 J2005 9 J9 J20a5 wilding Inspector ____~..__~._~ _ 205-52 7054 Sales and Service Supervisor 12 J9 J2DD5 2117 J2ao~ 2®5-53PZ` 2053 Librarian ~Adnzin Asst ll~ 9J 13 J2005 11 J 1 l J2aD5 205-54 7$04 fable H[eadEnd Technician 9 J 1G J2oo5 9 J3a J2aD5 20555 3175 Supervising civil Engineer 10J4J2005 3J20J2aD5 ~...~~~ ___ ._... 20556 525D Gclf Park Maintenance 11 J 17 J2o05 12 J7J2oo5 ~~ ~'crker ._.._____~..__ _.__~ 205-57 1625 Acc®unting Technician 11J17J2005 12J7J2005 Thursday, June ~.I, 20D9 Page 2 of 3 ~ZECRUITlt~lEP~IZ` EX1~,NF F.I3TING YEAY2 2005 ...~.._w._. __.._.~.._.._._ __ ~~f__...._ _._._.___.._.._._~_. _-- P~~ .~I 4r _ L~~ ,~~'~ P.~...__..~...__..._.. 2Q5~57P 1525 ~~~~~~t~n~ ~°e~hn~~~a~ _....... 1QJ~J2®q5 11/4/20Q5 .~____~.~.. ~.__m-_____ _.__~.._.~__ _~..._~_ 205-5 2510 ~a~~t~a~a~~~ ®r~~r ~ 12/9/2005 12122 J20o5 _^ 20559 2555 Public ®r~s ~ai~.tenan~e 12/9J2oo5 ~131~046 I .__..._.~.___~ scam Lcadcr _ ~ .~.._..W_~---_.__~ 2056 ~ ~QSO ~ss~sta~t ~~ty a~a~~ ~ 112/2005 ~213112ao5 ~__.___.... __......_. ._.--._-_ .. _~ _~ 205-62 16~~ disk aua~er ~ ~~~~stat~~~t~ ____ _ _~..__..._~W__ 205-63 1775 P~r~ra~ Spcclalist TI 12/14/2005 3112006 . _.~..._W..__._.___.-_...._ _ ___~ ll _mm_..__.___~..1 20564 177Q/1775 Prc~ra~ SPeclallst hll 12/9/2405 41412®0~ ~~~t~ruu~xlt~ Frcram,sj ______m._...__.__ ~._~__ 20565 2520 1Vlair~tcx~auce crkcr lI 12112005 12/22/2005 2U5p66 7791 l~'tllit~ ~austructla~u 12/'6/2005 1212Q120o5 ~~nr~plla~.cc p~c~allst _..__.~..~_~_~ ._ _____ 2a5-67PT X515 Library Z'cchmlcian (Part 12/9J2005 1J612006 _ ~~ tlrncj _..__.~._.__~_~.~ ._ Thursday, June ~ ~., 2Q09 Page 3 c~~ 3 ,. < ~L EX.~M N~ i JfC3B ~OI7E ~ ~ _ E~1VdI1V~TI0~ TI'FI.~ 1 I ~P~I~ED-- ~ ~ C~.t1~EI? _~ l ~'AZ''E ~U12GE17 ~ 206-O1PT 2061 Maintenance Assist~.n~ I z/i/2oo~ 1~/31/20~6 _ _ _ _ 206-02FT 501 FZecreation Leader II 1/1/20Q6 1.2/31/2006 ~- -- -- 206-03PT 4U~1 Crossing Guard-ff~elief 1/1/2006 12/31/ 006 -. -- ---~ 206-04FT 2063 Maintenance ~ssistan~ III 1/19/2006 5/4/2006 f l HOC-0 s 32 0 ~ Plan Ch~cl~ Engineer 2/ 1/20 6 4/ 12/20~C I 206-OFi 7133 Facilities 1V€~intenanc~ 1/25/2000 2/8/200 Warker - - 206-061 7800 CATV 'Teclanica.l ~pera~ions 2/8/2006 2/24/2006 - - - 8uperintende~at 206-Q7 '7760. System Dispatcher 2/8/2006 2/24/200 - -- 206-08 1055 Deputy City Manager 3/ 15/2006 5/ 10/2006 206-08P'R 4505 Fire 1~pparatus Operator 3/x/2006 $/11/20 6 206-09 7560 Custox~nex Sea~ric~ 6/3/206 6/23/2006 I l Representative -_ _ _ -- __ _~ 206-10 x.110 Chief of ~'olice 3/ 15/200f 4/ 14/2(?06 ---- I -- -------J X06-10F'I2 7210 Senior Electrical Engineer 1/17/2007 1/24/2007 f L--- --- --- _~ 2~fa-11PT 2053 Administrative E1ssi~tant ZI 1/27/20106 2/14/2006 r_ _ I__---- -_ ----l --- J 206-12PIZ 201.5-1013 Assistant City l~.ttorney %-TI 1/27/2006 2/2/2006 20C~13PT 401 Police 1~ssistaa~t I 2/3/2006 3/17/2006 ~ __ 206-14FT 3 s21-2 Library 1~ide I/II 2/ 1/'2006 2/ 17/20C1E _ __ _ _ 1 X06-15 6040 Planner III 3/2/2006 3/31:/2006 L_ _ ~ 206-15PR 604 Planner IIY 2/2f:/2QOfr 3/ 1/200Fa ~ ___ 206-16 1013/ 1015 Deputy City .Atty II/Asst 3/ 1/2006 4/3/2(~C16 C ~ City I-TI _ _ 206-17FR '720 Engineering Supervisor 3J1Q/2006 3/20/2006 ----- 20~-19 113q Library Darector 6/2/2006 5/31/206 ~_ _ 206-20 1410 1Ldministrative 3/22/2006 4/21/2Q06 f L_ -- 1V~anagerxaent Analyst . __ 206-21 603 Planning Services 11~anager 4/7/2006 4/20/2006 C 206-22PR 308p Construction. Inspector & 5/ 12/2006 5/26/200 Survey Supervismr ----- 2~6-23 3245 Gornbination Btaildang 4/ 12/2006 5/3/200Fi Inspector ----- - _ 206-24PR 3274 Permit Tech III 6/23/2006 6/3Q/~006 ~ _ _ 2U6-25PR 3000 P'errxait'Technician I (2 6/2/2006 6/30/006 _. --- positions) ---- - ---- 2~6-26 7775 Joarney Linewarker 5/1,9/2006 8/21/20016 Friday, Jane i,2, 2D®9 Pale 1 of 3 RECFtUf'TM~N~` EXAM I,FS'~II3G YEAR 2006 ~__ EX~sNd N(3 _ _ I _~~~ ~~DE E 1NlINATI~'B1~T TITLE ~ ~ ____OPENEI) _~ -- - - ~ ~I.OS~~ ~ ~D.I~TE P'Uk2GE3~ 20G-2fa1 7775 .Tourney I~ineworke~r 9/12/20136 12/31/2~0~ ~ _ __ 206-27 7 02 Cable Technician II 5/ 13/2~Ofs E/5/2006 ~ 206-28 114 Recreation and Park 5/1`7/2006 6j9/2006 Directa~r ---- 206-~9 6080 Supervising Flanne~ 6/28/2006 '7/ 19~~~p6 - -- 206-30PT 20 3 liBaintenance assistant YII 5/ 16/2006 7/2G/~0~6 _ ______~ 206-31 4040 Police Officer 5/ 19/2006 E /2/2006 - ---~ 206-33 4C16~ Folice Records 8z 6/23/2006 ~/25/200F Communications 1Vdanager 2Q6-34 1510 Intermediate Clerk 6/ 14/2006 6/28J20(~6 20C-35 7319 Web Technical Producer 6/7/2006 Ea/B1/2006 - -- ----- 20fa-36 3110 Assistant Engineer 6/23/2006 7/21/2U06 206-37 3110 Junior Engineer Fi/23/2006 7/21/21306 _ _ _ 206-38 6030 Planner I 6/23/20~~ 7/14/2006 l - ---J 206-39P'Y' 2053 Code Enforcement Intern 6/22/2006 7/ 11/206 -- _. ----- 206-40PT 3521-22 Library Aide I/II 7/26/206 8/ 11/2006 _~ 20C-41P12 1460 Administrative ~'ech II 8/'7/2006 8/21J200E ~ _ , 206-42 6643 Housing Specialist IYI 8/ 16/206 9/ 11/2006 -. _- 20C-43 3274 Permit technician YII (4 8/8/2006 8/24/2006 1 positions) _ --- 206-44PR 1410 Administrative 8/31/2006 x/8/2006 li/i~.nagerxaent Anagyst (Risk Mgmt) 206=45PR 1728 Redevelopment Manager 9/26/2006 10/2/2006 C---- I --J 206-46 1546 Engineering Office Assistant $/2/2006 3/15/200 ~ _ ___~ 206-47 7797 Electrical Helper 8/ 11/2006 8/ 1/2006 - _ - - _ _ _ _ 206-48 1775 Program Specialist YI 9/5/2006 1~/6/200f f L.-- - 206-49 3550 Supervising Librarian (1 or 11/20/2006 12/1~/200f C- 2) ----- -- X06-50 3550 Supervising Librarian (2 11/20/2006 12/ 15/2006 ~ ~ positions) __ 206-51 3000 Permit Technician I 8/15/2006 9/5/2006 206-52PR 4030 Police Sergeant - 2 positions 8/21/2006 10/20/2006 ~ _ _ 206-53 1670 Computer Services 9/26/2006 10/9/20~fi r ` --_ _~ Coordinator ---- __ 206-54 7704 Asst Line Superintende~at 8/3p/200fs 9/20/2006 ~ __ Friday, June 12, 2009 Pale 2 of 3 RECRUITMENT ECM LISTING YEAR 2006 ~~ ~`~} 111 ..-_--- _ .. ~ ~ .....-,-..__~......-.,.-..~ JAR ~~~~ ~ Nl~N'~4TI~ `~I~`~~ .. ..-... .. ~...,~ .~ ~-.......... ~ ..........w_--- -~~~_.....--....._.. ~,..~~ .~...~~_.._~ P~~~MI~v ~~~~.. ~ ~.~~.,~... ~ .......... ..-...~ ~Y~ W~ „..................~...~ .............~.. .. ~~ ~ ~~'~~ P~T~E~~ god-ss 1s5o C~ff'~ce ~~~~~t~nt ~ ~J3a12oa6 ..__y_ 9j22/2oa~ . ~1 206-56 3.120 ~~~~st~nt ~~.~~nccr 11/27/2DDd 4J 17/2007 ~~ .~^~.~ god-s7~P~ 7'420 ~rtY~xty cc~~~t~nt ~1 ~J2aa~ ~J2612o06 __~ ___ _ ~ 206-5~ 3s 15 ~~~r~ ~`~c~.n~~~an ~ ~ J2o/2aod ~~/ 15/2oa6 ~,___._._.~.._.._._ _..._. ..~__.___ 2a~-SPA 14D4 Principal ~~r~c~t~v~ 9/' 12 j2006 ~ j ~.~/2006 .~ ~ A~sist~nt --- _.... --m__ 2odp6oP~r 4o~i P®ixce A.ssist~nt ~ g/1s12oo6 ~oj~3J2D06 C __.~__ _^_.___-__._~~ god-61PT` 2063 N~aintcrn~ncc A~ssist~nt ~~~ 9/ ~4120D6 12/ 14/2aofi ~~~....~. 2Dfi-62PR 2555 P' N~aintcna~nce ~'ca~n~ 10/20/2006 14J27/2o0fi Leader ~Piun~bin~~ .~.~__.~___~ _____.___._..__ 20663 x.770/ 1775 Prcrarrr~. ~pecia~ist ~/~~ 1 l /' 13/2006: 12 J 15/2aa6 --- ____. 2od~64 311a Jnnicr Engineer 11/'27" j200d 4J 17r2oD7 ...__..~._.__ _...__.. ...._~ 2D6-dSPT 2051-3 Adrninistrati~e Assistance 11 j l/2DD6 X2 J3l J2D0fi __._ 2o~-66P~r N~aintenan~e Assistance ~ ~ J 1~2oa6 i2I31 j2oo6 god-67 7oD® General Nianaer - AP~`~ 1 ~.12/2a06 1 ~ J27 j2o06 god-d~ 511Q ,ecreati®n Prc~rarn 11 J27/2DOG 12/29 j2Dafi ~ ~ ~ ~a~c~dinatcr ~ ^T^ ~~m. 206-6~9PE. 6642 ~cusin~ 5pecia~list ~~ 11/gJ2DD6 11/ 16/200G ~ ~ _~~~~~-~_.._. _W~ 2a6-70 1470 Administrative ~`ec~,nician 1 ~, J 17/20ad 11126/2DD6 _ 2a6-71 3146 'Trarnspcrtaticn ~~crdinatar 11/27/20aG 12 j 19 j2DD6 2D6~73 323a Plan ~~eck Engineer 12/ 1~/20ad 4/6 j20o7 god-74 4o4D Pnlice officer 12 J2®j2oad 1/26/2QO7 206-75 4D40 Felice Officer ].2/2oJ2aad 1/26/2007 206-76 404D P®lice officer 12/2a120aG 1/26J2aa7 priday, June ~.2, ~OQ9 ~ page 3 of 3 CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF SPECIFIED UNNECESSARY. ~~. RECORDS OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT .~,~ ~,~ WHEREAS, State law permits a public entity to discard specified City records after assn e of time on written authorit of the Ci p g y ty Attorney and ~ ~~ approval of Council; and ,~ ~~ d WHEREAS, the Human Resources Department seeks to free u s ace b ,~ p p y ~ ,~ discarding specified unnecessary records older than three years as referenced in . ... ~' ~ ~ the staff report; and ~~ WHEREAS, written approval for the destruction of the records has been provided by the City Attorney. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RES®LVED that the Human Resources Department is hereby authorized to destroy the specified records. *~~**~ I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in a regular meeting assembled on the 21 st day of July, X009, by the following vote to wit: AYES NOES: ABSENT; ABSTENTIONS: IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said City this 22n~ day of July, 2009. Larallveisiger, City Clerk City ofAlameda ~esofution #4~L CC 07~~~-0~ ~~TY~ ~F ~L~~EDA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Ann Marie Gallant Infierim City Manager Date: July 21, 2009 Re: Adopt a Resolution Approving a Revised Memorandum of Understanding Between the Alameda City Employees Association and the City of Alameda for the Period of July 1, 2009 Through June 30, 2011 BACKGROUND The proposed Memorandum of Understanding ~MOU} between the City ofAiameda and the Alameda City Employees Association ~ACEA} is for the period of July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2011 The MOU is on file in the City Clerk's Office. DISCUSSION The City of Alameda labor relations representatives have met in closed session with the City Council to discuss negatia~ions with the ACEA~ The revised MCU is a result of those negotiations and falls within the parameters authorized by the City Council. In a spirit of effective and responsible cooperation, the membership of the ACEA has approved this agreement, which does not include any wage increases during the two- year term. The MOU does include same minor language modifications, revises the compensatory time benefit, and extends the current health benefits through the term of the MOU. FINANCIAL IMPACT The cost for implementation of the health and welfare benefit adjustments for FY09~10 is approximately $141,OG9 of which approximately $33,G00 is the cost to the General Fund. This cost is included in the FY09~10 budget as a projected benefit increase. The cost for implementation of health benefit adjustments for FY10111 is approximately $1Da;972 of which approximately $3G,058 is the cost to the General Fund. This cost will be appropriated in the FY10~11 budget City C~~an~~t R~p~rt R~~ Ag~nd~ item #4~~ 07~~~~~9 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Gity Council REG~MMENDATI~N July 21, 2009 Page 2 of 2 Adopt a Resolution approving the revised Memorandum of Understanding between the Alameda City Employees Association and the City of Alameda, for the period, of July ~ , 2009, through June 30, 2a1~. Respectfully submitted, . Karen Willis Human Resources Director Approved as to funds and account, ~~ ,._ ~. Glend . J Interim ina ce Director CITY GF ALAMEDA RESCLUTIGN ND. APPROVING REVISED MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETiI~EEN ' THE ALAMEDA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSC~CIATIC~N ~ AND ' THE CITYGFALAMEDAFC~RTHE PERIGD COMMENCING JULY 1, 2009AND ENDINGJUNE30, 2011 ~~ ~IVHEREAS, there has been submitted to this Council a ,, Memorandum of Understanding between the Alameda City Employees ~ Association and the City of Alameda; and VvHEREAS the Council of the Cit of Alameda ha ' y s fully examined said proposed Memorandum of Understanding, a copy of which is on file in the z~ Office of the City Clerk, and thereby finds and determines adoption of said documents to be in the best interest afthe City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Alameda that said Council hereby approves and adopts said revised Memorandum of Understanding. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the provision of this Resolution shall supersede any other resolution in conflict herewith, ~~~~~ 1, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in a regular meeting assembled on the 21st day of July, 2009, by the following vote to wit: AYES NOES: ABSENT; ABSTENTIONS IN IIVITNESS,11vHEREOF, Ihave hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said City this 22~d day of July, 2009. LaralNeisiger, City Clerk Resolution #4.~ CC o7E21-a~ CITY OF ALAMEDA ORDINANCE No, New Series AMENDING THE ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL CODE DY AMENDING ~fr SUBSECTION 3-28.10 RETURN ON INVESTMENT IN ~~~ ~ ~~ ENTERPRISE FUNDS} OF SECTION 3x28 PAYMENT OF TAXES} OF CHAPTER Ill ~FlNANCE AND TAXATION} T~ REDUCE THE ~,~ GOLF FUND'S RETURN ON INVESTMENT FROM 1°/a TO 0.43353°/a FOR FISCAL YEARS DO-07 through 09W10, AND EXEMPTING THE GOLF FUND'S RETURN ON INVESTMENT ENTIRELY, EFFECTIVE FISCAL YEARS 1011 ~E IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Alameda that: Section 1. The Alameda Municipal Code is hereby amended by amending Subsection 3-28.10 (Return on Investment in Enterprise Funds) of Sectian 3-28 (Payment of Taxes) of Chapter III (Finance and .Taxation) to read as follows: 3-2~.~o Return ~n Investment in Enterprise P'undse As permitted by Nanserr v. Crf~ of San Buena ~lefr~ura, 42 Cal.3d 117'2 X1985}, each of the city's enterprise funds, other than the sewer service fund, shall make an annual payment to the General Fund, as a return on the City's investment in the assets of the enterprise fund, of 1 °/a of the value of its fixed assets as of June 30, 2004 adjusted annually for inflation after that date in the amount of the lesser of 2a/a or the increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for the San Francisco Bay Area published by the bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, or any successor to that index. Effective Fiscal Years 0607 through 09-10, the Golf Fund's Return on Investment in its assets shall be reduced from 1 a/o to 0.43353°/a. Effective Fiscal Years 10-11, and thereafter, the Golf Fund shall be entirely exempt from making an annual payment to the General Fund as a Return on Investment Section 2. If any, section, subsection, sentence, clause ar phrase of this ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the v alidity or constitutionality of the r emai_ Wing portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Alameda hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one ar mare sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases hereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Final Passage of ordinance #4~N GC 01-21.09 Section 3. To the extent the provisions of the Alameda Municipal Code as amended by this ordinance are substantially the sane as the provisions of that Code in effect prior to the adoption of this ordinance, those provisions shall be construed as continuations of those prior provisions and not as new enactments. Section 4. This ordinance shall be in full force"and effect from and after the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of its final passage as provided in Section 312 of the Charter of the City of Alameda. Presiding Officer of the City Council Attesta Laral~leisiger, City Clerk *~~~~~ I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was duly and regularly adopted and passed by Council of the City of Alameda in regular meeting assembled on the 7t~' day of July, Zoo9 by the followin vote to wit: g AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS; IN ~IVITNESS, vvHE~EOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said City this St"day of July, ZOO9. Lara 1l~eisiger, City Clerk City of Alameda CITY OFALAMEDAORDINANCI~ N0. ~~ AMENDING THE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR THE ~~ BUSINESS AND WATf~RFRONT IMPROVEMENT PROJI~CT AND THE WEST END COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TO . ~~ti'~ ~ MAKE TI CHNICAL CLARIFYING CHANGES ~. ~' WHEREAS, the City Council originally approved and adopted the Communit fm rovement Plan for the Business and Waterfront Im rovement y p p Project the "BWIP"} on June 1 S, 1991, by Ordinance No~ 2559, as subsequently amended on December 5, 1994, by Ordinance. No. 2681, on July 6, 2000, by ~ Ordinance No. 2835, on September 19, 2000, by Ordinance No. 2844, on April 1 ~', 2001, by Ordinance No. 2551, on ,April 1, 2003, by Ordinance No. 2895, on November 4, 2003, by Ordinance No. 2910, on January 2, 2006, by Ordinance No. 2956, and on February 20, 2007, by Ordinance No. 2963; and WHI~REAS, the City Council originally approved and adopted the Community Improvement Plan for the West End Community Improvement Project the "WECIP"} an July 5, 1988, by ordinance No. 2141, as subsequently amended on January 2, 1985, by Ordinance No. 2222, on December 6, 1994, by Ordinance No, 2582, on November 19, 2002, by Ordinance No. 2889, on April 1, 2003, by Ordinance No, 2897, on November 4, 2003, by Ordinance Noe 2910, and on August 21, 2007, by Ordinance No. 2910; and WHEREAS, the Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda the "Commission"} has been designated as the official redevelopment agency to carry out in the City of Alameda the functions and requirements of the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California Health and Safety Code Section 33000 e~ seq.} and to implement the Community Improvement Plans for the Alameda Point Improvement Project ~"APIP"}, the BWIP and the WECIP; and WHEREAS, the fifth amendment to the Community Improvement Plan for the BWIP and the fourth amendment to the Community Improvement Plan for the WECIP ~"Prior Amendments"}, among other things, merged the BWIP and WECIP areas and added area formerly in the APIP to the BWIP area the "Exchange Area"}; and WHEREAS, the Commission has proposed a Ninth Amendment to the Community Improvement Plan for the BWIP and a Seventh Amendment to the Community Improvement Plan for the WECIP to clarify that the combined tax increment dollar amount limit contained in such plans do not apply to the Exchange Area ~"Amendments"}, consistent with the intent of the Prior Amendments and the provisions of the California Community Redevelo ment Law p ~Flealth and Safety Code Section 33000, of seq.}; and final Passage of Ordinance #4~~ CC a7p~1~o~ WHEREAS, the Economic Development Commission ~"EDC"} endorsed the Amendments and the Planning Board of the City of Alameda the "Planning Board"} recommended approval and adoption of the Amendments; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received from the Commission the proposed Amendments and the Commission's report to the City Council; and WHEREAS, fibs City Council and the Commission held a joint public hearing on July 7, ~OD9, on adoption of the Amendments in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, ~~~~ Santa Clara Avenue, Alameda, California; and WHEREAS, a notice of said hearing was duly and regularly published in the Alameda Journal, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Alameda, once a week for four Successive weeks prior to the date of said hearing, and a copy of said. notice and affidavit of publication are on file with the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, copies of the notice of public hearing were mailed by first~class mail to the last known address of each assesses of each parcel of land in the BWIP and WEC1P areas, as shown on the last equalized assessment roll of the County of Alameda; and WHEREAS, copies of the notice of public hearing were mailed by first-class mail to all residents and businesses in the BWIP and WECIP areas; and WHEREAS, copies of the notice of public hearing were mailed by certified mail with return receipt requested to the governing body of each taxing agency which receives taxes from property in the BWIP and WECIP areas; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the Commission's report to the City Council, the EDC's endorsement, and the Planning Board's recommendation, and has provided an opportunity for all persons to be heard, and has received and considered all evidence and testimony presented for or against any and all aspects ofthe Amendments; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Alameda that: Section 1. The purpose and intent of the City Council with respect to the Amendments is to make certain technical amendments to the BWIP and WECIP Community Improvement Plans in order to clarify that the combined tax increment dollar amount limit contained in said plans, which applies to all fans and p amendments adopted prior to January 1, 1994, is applicable to the original BWIP and WECIP areas, but does not apply to the Exchange Area that was added to the BWlP Community Improvement Plan in 24o3e Section ~. The Community Improvement Plan for the BWIP, as adopted on June 1~, 1991, by Ordinance No. 259, and as previously amended on December ~, 1994, by Ordinance No. 281, on July ~, Z004, b Ordinance No, y 2835, on September 19, 2000, by Ordinance No. 2844, on April 17, 2001, by Ordinance No. 2857, on April 1, 2003, by Ordinance No. 2896, on November 4, 2003, by Ordinance No. 2910, on January 2, 2006, by Ordinance Na. 2950, and on February 20, 2007, by Ordinance No. 2963, is hereby further amended as set forth in the proposed "Ninth Amendment to the Community Improvement Plan for the business and vvaterfront Improvement Project," attached hereto as Exhibit A and inco~parated herein and made a part hereof by reference. As so amended, the Community Improvement Plan for the E11111P is hereby incarporated by reference herein and designated as the official Community Improvement Plan for the EIIVIP. Section 3. The Community Improvement. Plan for the IlvECIP, as adopted on July 5, 1983, by Ordinance No. 2141, and as previously amended on January 2,1985, by Ordinance No. 2222, on ~ecember6,1994, by Ordinance No. 2682, on November 19, 2002, by Ordinance No. 2889, on April 1, 2003, by Ordinance No. 2897, on November 4, 2003, by Ordinance Na. 2910, and on August 21, 2007, by Ordinance No. 2970, is hereby further amended as set forth in the proposed "Seventh Amendment to the Community Improvement Plan for the Vilest End Community Improvement Project,"' attached hereto as Exhibit S and incorporated herein and made a part hereof by reference, As so amended, the Community Improvement Plan for the VVECIP is hereby incorporated by reference herein and designated as the official Community improvement Plan for the vUEC1P. Section 4. The City Council daes hereby find and determine that the clarifications made to the SVVIP and VvECIP plans by the Amendments contained in this Ordinance are technical and do not make any changes to the findings in Ordinance Nos. 2896 and 2897 adopting the PriorAmendments. Section 5. Ordinance Nos. 2141, 2222, 2559, 2681, 2682, 2835, 2844, 2857, 2889, 2896, 2897,. 2910, 2956, 2963, 2970 are continued in full force and effect except as amended by this Ordinance. Section 6. No written objections to the Amendments have been received from property owners or affected taxing agencies. Section 7. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment (Title 14 California Code of Regulations Sections 15060(c)(2), 15060(c)(3), 15378(a).) Section 8. The City Clerk is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Ordinance to the Commission. Sectian 9. If any part of this Ordinance is held to be invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance, and this City Council hereby declares that it would have passed the remainder of this Ordinance if such invalid portion thereof had been deleted. Section 10. The City Clerk will; ~~} cause a summary of the Ordinance to be published once in the Alameda Journal, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Alameda, prior to the meeting at which the Ordinance is considered for adoption; and ~2} certify to passage of the Ordinance by the City Council. Section 11. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of its final passage. _. Presiding Officer of the Council Attest: Lara Vveisiger, City Clerk City of Alameda *~*** I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was duly and regularly adopted and passed by Council of the City of Alameda in regular meeting assembled on the 7t~ day of July, ~Og9 by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ASSENT: AESTENTIONS: IN UvITNESS, WHEREOF, l have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said City this 8~" day of July, X009. Larallveisiger, City Clerk City of Alameda EXHIBIT A NINTH AMENDMENT TO THE COMMUNITY IMPROIfEMENTPLAN FORTNE BISINESSAND 11~ATERFRONT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT The Community Improvement Plan for the Business and IIIlaterfrant Improvement Project the "Plan"} originally adopted June 18, 1991, by Ordinance No. 2559, and amended on December 0, 1994, by Ordinance No. 2081; June 0, 2000, by Ordinance No~ 2885; September 19, 2000, by Ordinance No. 2844; Apri! 17, 2001, by Ordinance Noe 2857; April 1, 2008,. by Ordinance No. 2890; November 4, 2003, by Ordinance No. 2910; January 2, 2000, by Ordinance No. 2955; and February 2D, 2007, by Ordinance No, 2953, is hereby further amended as follows: 1. The second to the last paragraph of Section 502 of the Plan is hereby revised to read as follows: "Notwithstanding any other provision of this Section 502 to the contrary, as of May 1, 2003 the effective dates of Ordinance No. 2896 adopting the Fifth Amendment to this Plan, and Ordinance No. 2897 adopting the Fourth Amendment to the Community Improvement Plan of the vilest End Community Improvement Project Area, which ordinances, among other things, merged the Business and Uvaterfront and vlfest End Community Improvement Project Areas}, the number of dollars of taxes which may be divided and allocated to the Commission Pram the Original Project Area of this Plan and from the hest End Community Improvement Project Area for the Merged vIIECIPfBWIP Project Area defined below} will be Six Hundred Ninety~One Million Dollars x$091,000,000}, the total combined tax increment limits for the Original Project Area of the Business and Illlaterfront Improvement Project and the vilest End Community Improvement Project Area." 2, Except as amended in paragraph 1 above, all other provisions of the Plan remain in effect, it being understood that the purpose of this Ninth Amendment is only to clarify a technical ambiguity in the Plan, as it was amended by the Fifth Amendment to the Plan, The Fifth Amendment to the Plan, among other things, merged the Business and ~llaterfront and vilest End Community Improvement Project Areas and added area known as the Exchange Area to the Business and vvaterfront Improvement Project Area, Because the Exchange Area was added after January 1, 1994, it is not Subject to a tax increment dollar limit pursuant to Section 83333.4~a}~1 }and ~g}~1 } of the California ~iealth and Safety Code, EXHIBIT B SEl~ENTH AMENDMENT TO THE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR THE WEST END COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT The Community Improvement Plan for the West End Community Improvement Project the "Plan"} originally adopted July 5, 1983, by Ordinance No, 2141, and amended on January 2, 1955, by Ordinance No. 2222; December 6, 1994, by. Ordinance No. 26$2; November 19, 2002, by Ordinance No. 2589; April 1, 2403, by ordinance No. 2897`; November 4, 2x03, by ordinance No. 2910; and August 21, 2007, by ordinance No. 297'0, is hereby further amended as follows: 1. The second to the last paragraph of Section 11111.8. of the Plan is hereby revised to read as follows: "Notwithstanding any other provision of this Section B to the contrary, as of May 1, ZOD3 the effective dates of Ordinance No. 2896 adopting the Fifth Amendment to the Community improvement Plan far the Business and vaterfront Improvement Project 4"BWIP Plan"~, and ordinance No. 289?' adopting the Fourth Amendment to this Plan, which ordinances, among other things, merged the Business and waterfront and vilest End Community Improvement Project Areas}, the number of dollars of taxes which may be divided and allocated to the Commission from the vilest End Community Improvement Project Area pursuant to this Plan and the Original Project Area of the BWIP Plan has defined in Section 2DD of the BvUIP Plank for the Merged vvECIP1BWIP Project Area defined below will be Six Hundred Ninety-One Million Dollars ~$691,000,0D0}, the total combined tax increment limits for the vilest End Community Improvement Project Area and the Original Project Area of the Business and Waterfront improvement Project." 2. Except as amended in paragraph 1 above, all other provisions of the Plan remain in effect, it being understood that the purpose of this Seventh Amendment is only to clarify a technical ambiguity in the Plan, as it was amended by the Fourth Amendment to the Plan. The Fourth Amendment to the Plan, among other things, merged the Business and Waterfront and West End Community improvement Project Areas. However, the Fifth Amendment to the BWIP Plan also added area known as the Exchange Area to the Business and Waterfront Improvement Project Area. Because the Exchange Area was added after January 1, 1994, it is not subject to a tax increment dollar limit pursuant to Section 33333.4~a~~1 } and ~g}~1 ~ o the California Health and Safety Code. CITY ~F ALAI~~DA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members otthe City Council From: Ann Marie Gallant Interim City Manager Date: July 21, 2009 Re: Hold a Public Hearing to Consider Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 80.15 File No. PLN08p0507} at 523 South Shore Center Alameda Towne Centre} to Reconfigure Four Existing Parcels into Six Separate Parcels Located in the CA2~PD, Central Business Zoning District, Planned Develo meet Combinin District BACKGROUND The applicant has submitted a Tentative Tract Map that reconfigures tour existing parcels that make up the shopping center into six parcels. On April 27, 2009, the Planning Soard recommended approval of the proposed map A map of the location of the property, as well as the Planning Soard staff: report, and resolution are included with this report as Attachments 1-3. DISCUSSION The, Planning hoard considered the Tract Map on April 27, 2009 The proposed tract map reconfigures the existing parcel lines at Alameda Towne Centre The change in parcel lines does not change the allowable amount or intensity of development at the shopping center. The amount and intensity of development permuted is regulated by the Planned DevelopmentAmendment ~PDA} for the center. FINANCIAL IMPACT No City funds are required. The applicant, in accordance with the City's adopted tee schedule, pays the costs associated with processing this application PUBLIC NOTIFICATION A notice for this hearing was mailed to over S75 property owners and residents within 500 feet of this site and interested parties who have previously requested notification, published in the Alameda Journal and posted at the subject property. Staff has not received any public comments on this project as of July ~ , 2009. P~u~r~~ ~~~r~~g A-g~nda It~nn 4wP o~~~~og Honorable Mayor and July 21, 2009 Members of the City Council ~ Page 2 of 3 MUNICIPAL CODEIPOLICY DOCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE Municipal Code standards prescribing Planning Soard and City Council action on Tentative Parcel Maps are contained in the Alameda Municipal Code RAMC}, Section 30`13.5 ~Actian on Tentative Map or Parcel Map}. AMC, Section 30-31 defines the process of filing and City Council action regarding Final Maps. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines, Sectian 15162 -Subsequent Environmental Impact Reports, the future expansian of Alameda Towne Centre was considered in the Environmental Impact Report for the Planned Development Amendment. The proposed subdivisian is consistent with the approved entitlements for the site. Accordingly, staff finds and determines on the basis of substantial evidence in the record thatthe previous EIR fully analyzed the potential environmental effects of the project and incorporates mitigation measures to substantially lessen or avoid any potentially significant impacts in accordance with CEQA, None of the circumstances necessitating preparation of additional CEQA review as specified in CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, including without limitation Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, are present in that ~1 }there are no substantial changes proposed in the project or the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that would require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and ~2} there is no "new information of substantial importance" as described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162~a}~3}, RECOMMENDATION Hold a Public Hearing and conditionally approve Tentative Tract Map No. 3015 File No. PLN03~0507} at 523 South Shore Center to reconfigure four existing parcels into six separate parcels, subject to compliance with City of Alameda standards. ~ ~~ Sys Laura Ajello Planner I Honorable Mayor and Members o~the Cifiy Council A~~achn~ents: ~ . Tentative Traci Map 2. Planning hoard Staff Report, April ~?, 2009 3~ Planning hoard Resolution, PP~09-0~, April 27, 2000 July 21, 2000 Page 3 0 3 W'il ~~ ~ ~a'd 9r~ rs ~~ ~~ ~ ~ I I ~* I ~~ ~~I ~~ "~ tl~ ~~~ ~~~ WwI ~~ w~ ~'~~ ~,MM1.r~ I k I I I I I I I h 1 ~ ~ ~~ w o~ ~ ~~~~' I 1 /. ,``? 4Fti ~~ ~~ Pa rl (n 0 Q.' Q ro 0 N U ?~ Q ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ a r a ~ ~~ ~~~ ~Orn lJ ZUS77 ~E~a ~'~cQi o ~zU ~~~ ~ ~~Ev _~ a ~o ~~~ ~ o~~ ra us z¢¢ g a 2 tf7 ¢ v fA N US ICJ p Z f]lF W ~." U r- ~ J ~ F- ~ Q J ~ ~ -i o ~ h W~~ ~ pa ~Z~~ a W Q „ `?~-'~Q d ~ m ~i ~^." Ww~~~p W ~ c w oa ~~_ w rrZ~ ~ F- Q U Q~~'mN~ d~NpN~ U Us Q ~ Y ~i 7 F .., wZ dad ~ ~ ~ r ~ a ~N N 01 " U I~ ~_ ~ ,~ ~ d N ,~ t. xi w e ~ ,.~ U N N LLI w »w .,..... ~,». w,,.....•, H.w Hm mw. ~xn ma, ~,.,x .~., ~,.~ w.,~ ~, ~I,»v. ~ nn, ~+xn n~v e»x ._ .w.--aa .............~.~7F • I ~ . ~ ~ ~~ ~ l r _~N r'%~i ~I„Ili ~,; IG-..~ ~ 1 ~ _J ~ "~ ;V•,.:_x':~t h f"gr~I'I',lE';;i:;l;V;i;~ I~'""""""I ~.,.;,N. J l ..{~ t , v / r Y~i~' L..i•~~`i-'~'"::n; pt ~ ~ , tr... C`} k : ~~•}3~E:n ' ,~; ~-- ~ `_`~ ~ ~~~.~ \: ~::.. 7s_~~==== 3 •:a:. , ,:rl~j'. ~~11~~ X11;, 1 ~. , . ~ ~ ; ~ •~ ~,.;.. ~d~ ~ k;,';,',,' •s gal ~~, ~11 ! I ~~ z --~;, ~ 11;~, ~ ~ ~~ , ~` ~ ....lv, + a ,' ,,. ~ :$:: ~ o ::.. y. !, ', :~ 1',11 n i I~~ I T I ~I I ~I r~xn Ilr ~ y ~•,. ~` ~ I ~ +w.....'~, f ~~ 1 S}I'tlly~k ; ,, .. ;~ ~ ~~,,.~ ~~~; ~ - - ...i ~: ~'; ~ .ill '•;. d i v7~;~,:> t ~ll~k ~ ' j ~ _. ~ : :::j: ,,'fir. i t • ~::: ~.~ ~~ • i :. .,~• ~' ; -- ', • k~~' '% ~ L i' it W + I°fl ~, 17' 7k~ ~ ~:.. ~`~.^ i ~ M ' i .L `J n.-....... ~ a ~.' 'j I ~ i ; I I ~ : I .lj~~ !'TTT~ • I i w '~ 7t7. 4~ i~ $ '•i; :I !!i (i:/. /i7c, l kl ,: I~I ~ I ,'1,',~1, _ . ~:f~• I~~ ,.----' .._.I !,. I{iJfli 1. ~~'a ~~; ~"', ~' i-....~ ~ 7.}.~.ryil... ` ~ :1,1'I'~ti ._, w ~: ~( '~•' '~ ~ r ~......... ;. ; _~~.~.._._ - f. , ..., .II II I , i ~ I I i , w ~. _ .~;.' . .. ....... k ; , ~~ . I ~ ;.~ :fl l~~`]~~I'~~~~~~~~„ ~, ~ 1 ~ ~~V ~fi ~.l~, ~ ~y~...-.S 1II I~i~~ ~:~,~"S ~ :~~j l{'~!{I ~~t.t:i,1; `: ~' ;,~ •~ >, to ~41y f1::~~ ~ iii 1 W i.l ,~; s k }: v ~;9 `; `' ~ j ~: m,~ (~ Mr -' ~ iil,k~'l ~ y I ~ r a a;y,} •r. cn ~~ ~ ~ .....,~ ~~ Il~lhll~~lll,l` :.~, ~~ I ,€,',,,~ ~~` ------~ k;,l, I'i'fi~~ -;. ~_'7`~~I~~~f~f~~I~Fi~~ ~ ! ~~,~' Vr~ ~'':rv ~ ~ lkliki, ~ S I ~ i.~ 't!!.L':.,±~~~.,~~.., .ie+,iti' ~ i ,~ ~ ; ~ti~~.,.,~;~. .~ ~ ; E ;7i ~ jl 3 .... ... -r , :..... _ ... ::. I f ~::...: - ~ F _.... .E I ........ -_ .-- L ::: ; ~' I~ ~ ,, i . ,......'":'": 9'il~f~~: l: ~ Its,'' ;}' .,, '` '' `~~~-- \ ..m...,. y 1;,~ ,; n. i,~,1;,; f f ~ ~ 7 ~,. ~ I ~ I ~ I ~ I ~ r-.w, -•..~ .~ .. y ,....~.t ~ ;,~u Nmr .ttt. m« a h,.u xae ~, nn~ »we :xx urx ~`x„ .ed "'"y~~•~`~~~OA"' ~""Y .~+ccky~dr+c!r «.« aa, .:«. , x „w `~ q u ,,,, ~,,y .M' ~' ~ ti ~~ 5~~„ I a ` I' I! ~...-'.}.:.,~.:f, ~ ,., `::~. ~'~~f pry` ..................... ' .1~~~ `~' ,° ' ;.................... 4 ~,;, `'~ 2 I ~ ii ..........1.. ~ .~ . ~ ./, .!.„ !. !'>•! ~ ~ , ~ , ~.,..., III ..,, Sy~. ~ ~,1~~ . ..°+5~, :itixc?.g~?i,yA~),vtvf~a~l. ~ •~ F:. ~ ,~ „~, 3~~ ~• ~ ~'+~' ~~ ~ 4 47%~ lII ~I;:'l~ij~`,.1i%%i;t; 'f... ~ I k. 11,;1 ~ III _ 3.... ~ ,firr I I,I '~;; ~~~~5 Ny.l ;n.'..' r.... ~ I 8....Y.. 1. q~ly1 ~r+ ',I I, I - ~ ~i~ k ~li~ll I . 77C - ~::1 ~I u '~ '~ ....II... '. 111 I~ : I I I! I 1 III ~I,~ ._._ .._. I I ~''II ~ ~ ~ ;f1, !. !! ?!~~ y I J~f~f~ ~ ~~G~~,~~1~~~~~Y~~~_ t ~I ~IV ., ,, ,. ` 1 ' I ~ ~ ~~r,; :a~ '.~ !!_ J_.. _(_ !, i Ili ` - -- --- $ ~ . ............ ._.. .~~ l _ --_. ._ ~ ..... ; ,, ~J-a- i - ~ ~"" ~ II , .....: ,r L .<:~. ........ ~ ~ ~ } ,. ~ ~, rt-~ III}+i, n:~ +k aN ~~ ~p N .,y..., I 'III~ISifr I,' F~ l I, 7 1 ~ I I' !Il ~~f1i...~~< 11 `77',11`, 1 ' '~•f : -.. ~I ~ 4 ~ i~' ,~ ' ;- ~ r I x • V ~ ~ r I ~,+ ;~~~I~,~~`n~~~~.~i'~7~E i~yt! I !i !!~! l sAf;r ~ , ;w.: T ,:.. f`r~sr? _. ii1, !• i II ' ~ # ~i>{ ~I` IT~~}jl; ~l~~~h;; J~E~'j1171~1y ~ `; ~ 7' S ~ /® J~ ~~ y ,~`r ~ ti w l ,~, . S~ 1, l l k ~ 2 ~: ~~ ,,... ~~ ~ ~ I r ~, ti1 ti .. .. '~ ~, ~ F ..~- h• ~ .... $ i - a f 6 ~ii~ ~ ~S•,1~~ f l , ~: a .. ...~ Iz l1 E I5 fI,~I,~ -- - ~,, - _~~ti 1 ... , k 1 .1 ~ ._... _.._ ._,_..~ ~ , ,! , "lip '"e ~, i I„4~~`~Yl ; ~4~ I M ~ I / ~k :~" , Y /Y'Y 444 I ~ ~ I 4 y t ~ 4 ~ ~~J ~~ w c~ w z ~I , y +~}4 ~~ ~ ~ o I~ ! 4 I X~ ~ ti ~ i ~ I 4 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~,ti y 4 ~ I N` F ~ . \ ~. CI$~ C~un~~l w ' ~ ti ~ ti~ ~~#~~hm~nt ~ ~~ ~, Pubric We~r~ng ~ ~_ Z a d x W c~ z Y CK 4 0. 0 -~ Q n a ~~ Z ~o UV ~ ~~ 0.a o a G1 ~~ ~~ W ~_ ~~ ~ ~° °a No a wa a i I ~ ~" ~ I ti Z ~~ ~ ~ ?. ~ ~ °x ~~a~ ~~ ~~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~~ z ~ ~ 4 ~~N ~ Z ~ J z ~ z.~ N~ ~Iq~7 a~a ~ ~ ~~ ~~U ~ 'N W WS~Z a~~v1iU~~~m~p o~~ ~j~~6oD~~a~~~~~^~ Z~oXiz¢o~u~ p~~ayyy777777 ~aT~~`F4h~aay~F ~°.°OZa~ooce~U~gV~iw~c~~c¢7~~~~~~v~~NVi~~~33 z pp NNy~ ~~yy W W ~~VO®~'46~l~UpUQOW~C7[~7Cy.7~~~~fL ~I!]N~®e1-F~3 ~~~na~ ~~~m ~~~P ~ D 00 Q ~ I-- U ~ rti n W ~ a ~ w~rJ ~ ~u~b~ ~~N~ ~ UNNNaN U q~~Z ~~~~~o O ~ L U J ~ Q ~ ~ w ~ 4~ 1+J v~ ~ ~. ~i ~ c~ yd, O N ° t~ ° _r ......... ,. ~ . , . r i -- ...s....: r....-... ~' ~...: ~,y-------------------- + • ~~~{}~' .1 ~ ..`.. I • I ~.. I ~ ,..e'.,.;1-~--r+`~ ~' ~' ~,..~5 \1+~, 1 y5 •+ \ ~, +~ `I,~\~------~~"'"'.' 1~~~~\1~+5 II ~ kQ~lNdi lMl~gYY60111M70SYJ I Y} 5 , ' ' + } 4. `•~~ \ 5fl ` 5843 q N 6>3 ",.~.. ~1 ~ ~ I`I I ~ ~._.... .. •~ M'ormouw ~uaa at .»-- ~- 7 - L ~ G. Q (9 ~ ~ a N ~ ~ U Z U ~ ~ 1 .. g M , + w, , 1 5 ~1 i \ r r r i ~ ~ i 5 +. ` ~' ----'----`-%.-.'-,.. ~..? ~ r'7 , % 1i, d+ ; ~ i ~ rJ ~I I i' I ! ~ 1 r r ' ---- E l~ ~---- ----- ; I ~..~.~..- f ~ ~.'. i.`..,... ~~~r,'.;'..r... `.,' ; ;rr;`I J .' i :-.-.:'....l.'...! , ' , .. ... ~ •, ~ ? I ~ r '€il Inlil ,- 1WN3S17 n ONfNA40 irou,PL _ ,, G N Q N ~ ~ ~ d Q Z : M n i 1 J f l y / r --r--- -- i i f ! r r , ..., i , r / ~ ; r r r ........ :....r lr-yt 'i' j rl! f! ................... .. ~ r r r r ~ r ~ r i r i ! i 'M ' ' fr'~..-.. I~ '~• I I - '- ..+~y.:.K;~,+xr...+- :....-..w~., / rr r .r ! r I r ~ I r I I rF i I ~ r i~ ! i ` . .. ' ~ i I I ' ~ ,~ ! ~ 3"" Q 'Q Q ~ +~ ~ Q Rl 4 ~ I rl ~ ,•~`-.N:.A-_.;; -~ 'k ~ +~ ~ •~1 ~ I ~ I, ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ 1.....1..E r rig f ` i~ a j i { a ~~ ' d • I - I ;; .+',. '+, `+ •, •+1 ~, ~, ',+ , ~ +. \ \ `\ `\ `. '1 `\ \I 1. 11;- ~ '' Ir~ _-1k-.......L ~-t...i5._l. -..\ ,~ .~.. 1.a • I' i i 1. : ; I Cg ~~ ~ e ~ ~ ' ~ l } 5 i, I .1..... .'..y ..... .... II.. ' s :y-...1....1 . i` ~ ! !I j ` `S: _ y 1 ~, ~~~ I i I I I i 1 i 1 i ~ I~•.~xan.. - S::x...ve.. x.. ~ i I I I i~ J '\' 11' y+\ +' ,','+~' ~, 1' \I1 N\ 1, \Il l5 ~ 54 1l +11 ++ ~ 1 ~ I ~~, 1 ~i l N ~ I ~~ I 1 1~ _ -~ - ~OfYYd WY SS9173 r i ,I ,..; I i • ~ i, • 1.,. ,I r i' r ' ,, I i. i ! j r ri i I ~' i I j %^, j i l...d....:. ..r..: ! r r i I r r i i! I ~I i I • i~ ~ 1 J) Jj `; .I~.II_ .,rr` I r"ri.•;l...r, ...l ..l~ S ! i• !• it r I .r i _ ~~ ' rY ~ r i i it i j ~; I I i ~ ~\ ~ r ~ rs~u6un~~ ,o " I `':: i ~ li ~ ~ ~ ~• ~~ V '~'J ^'~ ....... ~. .,... ,,.., ,,, .. ::tt~-:.:mT.... r ~ .,.~ ~ .-.,,,,. r I • ;....., '...., '~ l ! ~ 1 ~1~1 I + 1 , '~ n~SnF~° ~ ~ ~ ~ f' ~'~ TI i ~ I a ~ • U~ G y y y + + , ! , 1 1 11I `+ I .....::~:.'_::', I I3 I I i U- ~ I r'~.~..., /^ ~}~ • , ~ t ' l 1' 1~ \~ 1+~' ~ ,` y • ~~ y+ ~y` }~ y 1' 1~ {A C y -• I ._.,.._..... r ~ + ,...i ::; . =`: . _..(...^ ~ y \ l +r'rl l I E i I '1 I 1 i S f ' ii. ^ ~ .... W ..~. . .. ~ t ~i l 1 ~I ~I 1 ~1 , \ + s \ 1 }. 1 \ 1 , , .+ ~~ 1 'y 1 t.r.~ I FN I , ' E I I i + 4 + 1 ~ ~~ A~1 \ ~ I + ~ 1 ~ ` 1 , + . . , , , + [ E ~I W f ~ ..; I I'If I I A191VSY! ~ lltlll3iY3~ 4~ ~ oxYlAlYA ~oa'~ ONYWiW 160Y~A6 ~ '~' I i ._...,_ ~ , ~~ i ~' .... i 1 ~' r, X I' ; r r ~ r r i i } '; ' ~ i~R ^ ~/f 1~ Ij I A ~ •I r :.~.II..~I.,:Ir.lll.r.' ! r........:~r l r r'~ ; ~ ~r t....., ~ ' _ µ r ir..l. rr I rr r,.... r .._ i i { ~ ~ W ~i ~ ~• : i ~ i,,; rri r; ; ; r, , ' ~j ~~~ I ~r~m .,._..... ~ ~ r r ~ r r r. I r'r I'! I r ; / ~ ;~.;i ~i~ ~ I~ r i i i ~i~'I ~ I ~ {{ I. o .m.. ~I' ~~ {~: i II ;`~ ~ ~ l~unsrl I ~1 ~~U~ ~! pl ..I ~~ I 1 II I ; ~ 1 °°nvY>I6xo.~oou06 I ... 1 ~' ~ L'!3 .1L CO ~ ~ ~ Ir >J ~ ~ !Q7 ~ y •\ .5 \ , ' to : ; , '~ x.l..J ~~; I, + , ~; , , _ ' a \ I 1 ..............._.....__._ _........_. \ i ....~ _.__ ~ 1. ~ .. ~3.':. ' _E~'Y~~,. ~'', ..... ' J.. ~.._ '' J... _..,.. 'RCN ,._...: ...... ............ ...........,...,....,..... -----.......... - ... ........~--------- .1 .,S , .... -K .~... t r _ ~~~~~ ~ j ~..... .~..~-~ .. ""' -~ .. ...1 - V',, lii VIII }.,~~_. .... ..... .... -_._. =.~~ .... _. • ... .. ..... L'.:.. _ ~` _.. ~ '~ = z 7 d7 ~„:..---- `a..:~w. wx ...--••,:r. ~ ••I • rw +uv ru au••ysS~• .,,,.. - ^Y;.~... - _ f ~ . .. .. -- .......... ............ ___ -- .-.......... .......... ' "" ~' 0.7 N •~-~- I ~~ u• q •^ .... ~, _ ,... ~;Yi .f ..~.. ..fit,:.. ~ ...ti.....,.......~::..:~:.... ,~.~. '~. ~~ ..~ ~ ,~r` i ~...` ~,. ,....... ~. ~. .... , ......, ~,~ ,... ..w..... • ~ ~'rc Se 'n~a~ Al" ~~ ~/i ` 31f1 PMd I , \ y I 109 p.~s uvl ~• l ~ l d ~ I ~ ~ ._f. 'V " ' Ai + 'a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ \ \ + ~ , ' w r I _. i~ I » n o ~ n l Afi t 4 l r. ,., . -•s' '- F F: ~N, , , .M~ / ~ 11 \ . l~Jl7 .~?,., _~_ < ~ , i . ~ '' .J ~ ~~, -rl~- ~ ~ -..~~k .~. ~~ ' ;:::::::~; , , .. i `• I .~.~~::,,.J .,,^.., / ~,~,~?,' ~~ ,~~~ / , 1 /~ .,Y / ~ ~ / • ~ \ I \„ '+ Ij:; I ~ ' 3 flli [8 : - ' . I ' ,. `` Q' ..+ _' 1 l Y~ .... - ,~ G•- : , . ~ ' i ,` l' r ? t ` I yk '' ~ ~ r ... I ~ f ' f I r I•t r ,. ~ ~i (, i ! ,I y..• ; r~ :.. ~.. / s ~ / i I., .i, r I i ' ~ j 1 I; i ~ I' I ~ i .!-.: r .l j !i i... ; ~ 1 ` I 1 .r ~ r'.., ~, ~ 4 1 ~ '. :f :I j,~ a ~ I'' ! 1 i ~ ~ ; rr , i ;f~f ~ ,l ~ ~ ,.•~ ~~ .. / % y +~.'',.. _, ' • ' . y , ` ~ /l~ / > ,. ~~ f r., ``~ 1 g~, ~ ~' rl~~ ~ ~' !'~ 11~~ I ; I ~'p ! kk~ ~I[ r• I j 1 it ~ Z ~ 'fl~. k ~1~~ + ' ` ,, y N1 ,y 141y s) (~r ~ ~:,Yy.l s ? f~ t k i , ~, ~ 'IrpVl~ ~ Yl~s ~ U 1 I N-' lJy~lpol~l ~ , +.5 '\\ i \ , +1 1. ~ sal k~l ~ ~ 1 . ~; ~', f f~~ / r `•.. f ~ rj I j ! f ~i~ ~ II jl~ ~ M i ~` I~ w -~,•. I n' ..~~.n~~S1~'S.'+~'S.'~ \1 5,, j 1,'+.~,\~~' ,~is ~~~ kl ~.y ~ } y ' 'J'n,, ~' f.,/~' f / ~~.....~ ~. f ~~R f I 1 1 ., k ik ~k i `~ 1 ' f , I ~ Y ~._... ; ~ + '~ + S + , ; ..,1 ., ..1...1.+~ ; -5 5 It ~ ~ r 1 , ~ i j i UI ~ i y = ,~ n I~ ~D r` ~. ~ V _.... 4 1, \, `1 + ly Ily ~1 11 SSS ~il~~ ;(~M~S ~~}' yi,'1 r, / z ~ !.~ / ? % r.~ i ~..1 i1.,,. k ~ orucYe°wr ~s '~.....1 1~ ~ 5 ~ .(y ~ 1 G I YCM J i .. r LJ ! L l J i .. ... ....................... ....... • I ti ~ w r A 1, y S ~ ~~~ ~ r .~ . r L r i ~ ~ r ~;r r r .,i _,l;l;;; .., , ;:,, III :: ~..., I ! i ~ i , , ~ ~, ~• 1 ; ; ; ' ~. , , ! ; , ~ , ~' I ~ ~' I ~_ y . ~ • ' l l l ~~ , ^~ ( 11 ~f , ~I.......' ~ ~ j ,.r i ;' j, ! , ~ 1 j ; / i ! ~i ~ l11 o ~~ !' i a;l' ' i :..• .:~ \ ~ r r ~ . r,. r•~.,~~.., 1 ,, °~ , s ~ + ~ + i1 r1 r ..,~,~...... ,~ , f Y,.,r i,. i k'+ 4;~: , ++ ~+ ; ,+',, X11 \\ ~,... }~ k~~ r.,, o,~`~/, i pp~ II I i `~.'~~`,!~?r..~~ Y~,~C~~ ~..~ ~~ r~/,•~lj:.~t i ~ ` , i • y ~' i ~ '` ..m..~, Y, ,; ~ r ,Irl ~ r +.r f ...~``"~. % /( ~! ~ h l r r ~ ~Yeisva f ~,' ~'I' \ ,C..,I.ly `i.:...5_k+ t\~....1.`,,'•, ,krk~~~: : ~''il~`'~~ t ^'", rr ~ I !~,! / rcnnA F t . y.r.,•• _,. _ f i ~ ,~, \ ~.1...~.`.. ...... '•y- ~r..1....-- 1 k l ~ ~ ~ ~, ' -,• ~ f - --~ -.~ -- ' ~ ~.....- .............~..............................--~1.. '.1 / ~ W i .... -..--..-..--::~::~::::~ --------- •~ ~ v J ~ W ~i~ ~ ~ ' /f AYA 161744 ~~ R i k1 I 1~-- I I ' i ' ~ f ~ ' ~ • ~ +I I m..._, i~ ti`° ~` W ~.4 I'~~ , , 1~ , ....~y^}fr•,.:........a,..-- •~.-- ~' T I~ I• ff ~ lxxlvr7 + ~~,.'~ ~i x---... ::......::.:.:.. ,~~ ~ -' •..._ ! ;. ,i .rf A 4 'I, ' -,1~~•~. "~`•.. r`te' '~ I I I I~.w,.~.z :.~ ................... ~ x,~ ~• • ~I ~' ; I~I'.r iiik I\vi . ~,.. ~/~' i ~ , , ~. ; ' y , , ,~ 1 '. ~ I ... I' ~ I La ~'~ rc...~ ........................ ... ~ I.I./ I: ~ Pl l~flr, I~• t~.~'.'I i ' r ~ N ,..., '. ' .........................~..~...... r ~H ~116i~., kk,.. / ly ''-rr, ``ti i ' ~ !f dRR '• LL ;..r ~/,r~ ~ .............~ j ~ I I' ~ ~ ..... ~ N ,... , i ~ k ,~ ' ~ ._ . ... , . ,.-.... , _. , ...,... ............ - - 4 „ .... ~ : 1 N I ~_. ' ... .. ~-.~..~. YY"" ' I ~. ..._ -. J......_ •.w ti .... - -. ~' ' ... - -- - ~ 11 ~ __ .• • ~ ~ ... ~ - ..i...' .~ Y .. ..::: ...: ~, ~ k 5....... ._..._..._ .......~, , . .9 84 . k l 1~f5 k9~9# x ~ , ~ „_,.... .. ,,, . .. .r .. _.~.s :....: . ...:....~...;..... ~ , ~:.:. . ~, ,. .. . - - . I ~__~._.~.~___ i I ~ } ~ ~ I ~ ,~ lrasrsrl ~ kl r~lmn ~mnu~si u - ~~,~ ° • ~ ~i f . lr,~,~JT ./j ~ ~~; ,,~ Y1NOd ,4~ kl ~~ I I ~% 1 KWOd .SV t k ~I I~~ ~ ~ l~ ~h {~ ` Ul ~I 1 '~ 4 ' 1 ~ ~ ~ ' , ~ z. .... ~- ~'~ i '~ ~ ,7~ 4 ~ 1 I i - - ` ~~ ~y '~ ~ T 1. Fl'J ~} {{ I ~ ~ ~ ~ .W..._ ~. ._- -- _..... 431n11n ~ i tl li N Vif ' ~~ • ~~ ~~ '~,' ~ ~ a I ~ li ~~ ~. ~ `d ?~ 11 ~ ~ I ~4'+ '" lwrosn i sunup OflAnd SI YI r l l k • ~ i A ~ . 4 I ~ 1~/ir '' 4'l 1 '' ' ,~ 1 ~Y kkl ~ 'k _:: ;~:•7.:r~a' ~ AYN aG IIgW M6n'gk3-HO [ H K - k, ~::s.= ___=.~ t . .~ i t ~ .i ~ j i ,~,,.~,.~_ 1 I ~ ~ k 1 .ar.F'w.•. ~ ~~ A ~ i ` ..~._ i m I ~ / ` ~ ~ _ ....~.. .rte 1 ~ I ~~~ ~ } ~ ~~ r•~y / 1aV ~ 4 \' I / 4 ~\ / ~ v/ , ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~~ y '~ n 1 ~ ~ ° , I~onorable President and April ~?, 2449 Members of the Planning Poard Page 14 of 12 The Alameda Municipal Code provides that design review staff may determine compliance with this requirement by reviewing the project for consistency with the principles and standards as articulated in the City's Design Review Manual. The project has been determined to be consistent with the Design Review Manual based on the following facts: 1r The praposed project provides an improved interface with the shoreline public open spaces and the adjacent residential and commercial properties. 2. The proposed massing and height of the buildings is compatible with the existing buildings in the center and the larger buildings are located at the center of the site furthest from the shoreline and adjacent residential uses. 3. The proposed circulation system provides improved access and convenience for pedestrians, bicyclist, transit riders, and vehicles. 4. The site includes an appropriate mix of hardscape and landscape features to provide visual interest and spaces for relaxation and user enjoyment. 5. The conditions of approval ensure that al! individual building designs are subject to Design Review approval to ensure compatible architectural styles throughout the center. Tentative Tract lVlap Findings - - - u.nwrur in ai inn awr Find'ang ~I. The proposed map is consistent with applicable General and ~pecitic Plans. The proposed map is consistent with the existing General Plan designation of Community Commercial. The Community Commercial designation is intended for a wide range of commercial uses including large format retail. The proposed expansion of retail commercial, restaurant, and parking uses would be consistent with this designation. General Plan policies support the continued operation of this facility as a regional shopping center. Finding 2. The proposed designlirnprovernents are consistent with applicable General and Specific Plans. The proposed subdivision map will not alter existing or proposed design elements included in Planned Development or Design Review entitlementsr Finding 3. The site is physically suitable for this type of development. The site is an existing shopping center. The praposed subdivision map will not require alteration to existing or proposed elements included in Planned Development or Design Review entitlementsr Physical. suitability of this site for development has been evaluated in the 2043 Mitigated Negative Declaration and the 2003 EIR. Honorable President and April 2l, 20D9 Members of the Planning hoard Page ~ of ~2 Finding 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. The proposed subdivision map will not require alteration to existing or proposed elements included in Planned Development or Design Review entitlements. The proposed density of development has been evaluated in the 2003 Mitigated Negative Declaration and the 2008 EIR. Finding 5. The proposed subdivision and its related improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or cause injury to fish or wildlife habitats. The site is lacated within a developed urban area. The property is already developed. Potential environmental effects associated with the redevelopment and expansion of the site have been previously evaluated pursuant to the requirements of CEQA. Approval of the subdivision map will not require alteration to existing or proposed elements included in Planned Development or Design Review entitlements. Finding 6. The design of the subdivision and its related improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or the use of, property within the pr®posed subdivision. The proposed subdivision map will nat require alteration to existing or proposed elements of the Planned Development entitlements, which include a comprehensive network of vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle and transit access improvements. Finding 1. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not cause public health problems. The propased subdivision map will not require alteration to existing or proposed elements included in Planned Development or Design Review entitlements. The project has been evaluated in the 2003 Mitigated Negative Declaration and the 2008 EIR and no potential adverse health effects have been identified. EN'VIRONENTAL REVIEW In 2003, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration ~MND} that evaluated the potential adverse effects of redeveloping the center and expanding it to 657,504 square feet of GLA. All required mitigations from that MND have been implemented. The project as currently proposed will not exceed 657,000 square feet. Additionally, an EIR has been prepared that evaluated the proposed expansion of the project from 657,504 square feet of GLA up to 706,650 square feet of GLA. The EIR was certified by the City Council on Gctober 7, 2008, Although the current proposal does not include an expansion beyond 657,000 square feet, where appropriate, mitigation measures have been updated and supplemented, in the EIR, the attached resolution and the mitigation Honorabie President and April 27, 209 Members of the Planning hoard Page ~2 of ~2 n~anitaring and reporting pragrarn, to address minor changes in regional standards such as air and water quality and new praject phasing plans. Feasible mitigation measures have been identified that reduce all potentially significant impacts to a less than significant level. Consequently, the praject will not have a significant adverse effect on the enviranrr~ent. PUBLIC N®T~CE A notice far this hearing was mailed to property owners and residents within 5n~ feet of this site and interested parties who have previously requested notification, published in the Alameda Journal and pasted at the subject property. Staff has not received any public comments on this praject, RECC~MI~lENDAT~~N Approve PDA o5-~OO4, Major Design Review DR05WQ0~3, nr~inar modifications to the Mitigation Monitoring Program and recommend City Council approval of Tentative Tract Map ~0~5 File N®, PLNO~a~5gl~. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED EY: REVIEWED SY: O GLAS GARRISON SUPERVISING PLANNER ,JO IG ~ANNING SERVICES MANAGER Attachments: 1. Planned Development and Design Review Resolution ~e Tentative Tract Map Resolution 3. October 1, 2008 City Council Resolution 4. July 14, 205 Planning Sward Report 5. Project Plans CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD RESOLUTION NO. PB-09-08 A RESOLUTION C?F THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 8015 (FILE NO.PLNO$-0507). vv~fEREA~, applications were rude in ~gD~ by ~l~rsch Investment Corp and its affiliate Warsch Investment Realty LLC series C requesting approval of Tentative Tract Map No. $0~5; and and I~VFIEREA, the application includes reconfguring four existing lots into six lots; 1i111~EREA~, the subject property is designated as Comaunity Cor~n~ercial on the general Plan Diagram; and ~11HEREA~, the subject property is located in a C~~mPD, Central Eusiness District, Planned Development Combining honing District; and '~vHEREA~, the Eoard held a public hearing on April ~ 3, Moog and examined pertinent maps, drawings, documents and testimony; and wHEREA, the Poard made the following Endings relative to the Tentative Tract Map: Finding ~ . The proposed reap is consistent with applicable General and pecif c Plans. EVIDENCE. The proposed map is consistent with the existing General Plan designation of Community Commercial. The Cor~rnunity Cor~r~ercial designation is intended for a wide range of commercial uses includin g large format retail. The proposed expansian df retail cor~mercial, restaurant, and parking uses is consistent with this designation. General flan policies support the continued operation of this facility as a regional shopping center. FINDING ~. The proposed designlimpr©vernents are consistent with applicable General and Specific Plans, EVIDENCES The proposed subdivision map will not alter existing or proposed design elements included in Planned Develaprnent or Design Review entitlements. I~INDINC 3. The site is physically suitable for this type of development. Git~ C®uncii At~a~~men~ 3 ~® Public Hearing Agenda l~em ~4-P 07~~~-0~ E~liDf~NCI=: The site is an existing shopping center. The proposed subdivision map will not require al#eration to existing or proposed elements included in Planned Developr~ent or Design Review entitlements. Physical suitability of this site far development has been evaluated in the 2(~D3 Mitigated Negative Declaration and the 2Q0$ EIR, FINDING 4, The site is physically suitable far the proposed density of development, EVIDENCE: The proposed subdivision map will not require alteration to existing ar proposed eler~onts included in Planned Development ar Design Review entitlements, The proposed density of development has been evaluated in the ~Q03 Litigated Negative Declaration and the ~QO~ EIR, Finding 5, The proposed subdivision and its related improvements are not likely ~o cause substantial environmental damage ar cause injury to fish or wildlife habitats, I~ViDEN~E: The site is located within a developed urban area, The property is already developed, Potential environmental effects associated with the redevelopment and expansion of the retail floor area of the site have been previously evaluated pursuant to the requirements of GE~A. Approval of the subdivision map will not require alteration to existing or proposed elements included in Planned Development or Design Review entitlements. Finding ~, The design of the subdivision and its related improvements will not conflict with easer~ents, acquired by the public at large, for access through or the use of, property within the proposed subdivision. E'ViDEN~E: The proposed subdivision map will not require alteration to existing ar proposed elements of the Planned Development entitlements, which include a cornprehensive network of vehicular, p+~destrian, bicycle and transit access improvements. Finding ~', The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not cause public health problems. EVIDENCE: The proposed subdivision map will not require alteration to existing or proposed elements included in Planned Development ar Design Review entitlements, The project has been evaluated in the ~OD3 Litigated Negative Declaration and the X403 EIR and na potential adverse health effects have been identified, 'I~f-fEREA~, the 13aard determined tf~at the proposed subdivision of this developed land loos not have the potential to cause physical changes to the environment that could result in adverse impacts to the environment. Pursuant to CI~~A guidelines Section 15305, no additidnal environmental evaluation is required; and THEREF'~RE BE IT RESOLVED thatthe Planning Board of the City of Alameda recommends that the City Council approve Tentative Tract Map No 8D~5 File No. PLNDB~D~a?} subjectto the fallowing conditions: C~Na~T~~NS C~NDITI~NS APPLICABLE TQ THE TENTATIVE MAP ~. AutoCAD cd-rom copies of the Tentative Tract Map shall be provided to the City Engineer. C~NDITI~NS APPLICABLE PRIER T~ THE APPR®VAL ~F THE FINAL MAP BY THE CITY Ct~~JNCIL ~, The final neap shall conform to the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, Alameda Municipal Code regarding Real Estate Subdivisions Regulations, Planning Board and City Council Tentative Map Resolutions applicable to the Final Map, and shall be acceptable to the City Engineer and Planning Director. 3. All easements shall be shaven an the Final Map including private streets ingresslegress access easements, surface drainage runoff, and utility easements for the benefit ofthe property owners. 4. Mylar copies of the recorded Final Map shall be provided to the City Engineer. AutoCAD cd-ram copies of the Final Map without signatures} shall be provided to the City Engineer, 5, The subdivider shall post a refundable cashier's check in the amount of $5DD ~~[ gg per final map sheet} to guarantee that a Mylar copy of the recorded .Tract Map is provided in the form approved by the City Engineer. ~. The applicant shall defend with counsel reasonably acceptable to the City}, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Alameda, its Redevelopment Agency, the Alameda City Planning Board and their respective agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action,, ar proceeding including legal costs and attorney's fees} against the City of Alameda, Alar~eda Redevelopment Agency, Alameda City Planning Board and their respective agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul, an approval by the City of Alameda, the Planning and Building Department, Alameda City Planning Board, the City of Alameda Redevelopment Agency or City Council relating to this project. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action Qr proceeding and the City shall cooperate in such defenses The City may elect, in its sole discretion, to participate in the defense of said claim, action, or proceeding. NOTICE, No judicial proceedings subject to review pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section ~ D94.~ may be prosecuted more than ninety X90} days following the date of this decision plus extensions authorized by California Code of Civil Procedure Section ~ 094~~ NGTICE. The conditions of project approval set forth herein include certain fees and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code section 6~02g ~d} ~~ }, these Conditions constitute written notice of ~i statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations and exactions. The applicant is hereby further notified that the 9oaday appeal period, in which the applicant ray protest these fees and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code section ~60~g ~a~ has begun. If the applicant fails to file a protest within this 9g~day period complying with all requirements of section ~~C~~g, the applicant will be legally barred from later challenging such fees or exactions. The decision of the Manning Eoard shall be final unless appealed to the City Council, in writing and within ten ~~ g} days of the decision, by filing with the Manning and wilding Department a written notice of appeal stating the basis of appeal and paying the required fees. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duCy and regularly adopted and passed by the Planning Eoard of the City of Alameda during the Regular Meeting of the Planning hoard on the ~~th day of April, X009, by the following vote to wit: AYES; ~7} Kohlstrand, E~zy Ashcraft, Autorino ,Coop, Cunningham, Lynch, McNamara. NOES: (0) ' ~'ti ~ 1 ATT,EST.~ 1 r ,~ r"h ,1 I f ~--M Andr~vu Thomas, ~ecret~ry. City of Alameda. Plannin hoard g CITY OF ALAMEDA RESGLUTIUN N0, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 8015 (FILE NO.PLN08-0507) AT THE ALAMEDA TOWNE CENTER. WHEREAS, applicationsweremade in2805 byHarsch Investment Corp and ., ~ its affiliate Harsch Investment Realty LLC Series C requesting approval of Tentative ~` ~ Tract Map No. $0~5; and w~~ , WHEREAS, the application includes recanfiguring four existing lots into six _ ~~ lots and Y ;~ E r r \\\ WHEREAS, the subject property ~s designated as Community Commercial r ~p ~~ on the General Plan Diagram; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located in a Cat-PD, Central Business District, Planned Development Combining Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board held a public hearing on April ~ $, 2009 and examined pertinent maps, drawings, documents and testimony; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board held a public hearing on April 27, 2009 and examined pertinent maps, drawings, documents and testimony; and vIJHEREAS, in recommending approval of the application, the Planning Board attached a condition requiring compliance with certain requirements of the Public Works Department priorto consideration of the project bythe City Council; and v11HEREAS, these requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board adapted Resolution PB-09-08 recommending that the City Council approve ofi the proposed Tentative Tract Map and the Planned Deveiopmentzoningamendment; and WHEREAS, the City Cauncil held a public hearing an July 2~, 2009 and examined alt pertinent exhibits, documents and testimony; and WHEREAS, the City Council has madethefollawingfindings relevanttothe Tentative Tract Map; Finding The prop®sed neap is consistenfi v~ifh applicable General and Specific Plans. The proposed map is consistent with the existing General Plan designation of CammunityCommercial, TheCommunity Commercial designatian is intended far a wide range ofcammercial Resolution #4-P CC 01-21-Q9 uses including large format retail. The proposed expansion of retail commercial, restaurant, and parking uses is consistent with this designation. General Plan policies support the continued operation of this facility as a regional shopping center. Finding 2. The propased designli~npr®vernents are consistent with applicableGeneral and Specific Plans. The propased Subdivision map will not alter existing or proposed design elements included in Planned Development ar Design Review entitlements. Finding 3. The site is physicallysuitablefor~histypeof development. The site is an existing shopping center. The proposedsubdivisionmapwill not require alteration to existing or proposed elements included in Planned Development ar Design Review entitlements. Physical suitability of this site for development has been evaluated in the X003 Mitigated Negative Declaration and the 2008 EIR. Finding 4. The site is physically suitable f®r the proposed density of development. The proposed subdivision map will not require alteration to existing or proposed elements included in Planned: Development or Design Reviewentitlements.The propased densityof development has been evaluated in the 2003 Mitigated Negative Declaration and the X003 SIR. Finding 5. The proposed subdivision and its related improven~entsare not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or cause injury to fish or wildlife habitats. The side is located within a developed urban area. The property is already developed. Potential environmental effects associated with the redevelopment and expansion of the retail floor area of`the site have been previously evaluated pursuant to the requirements of C~QA. Approval of the subdivision map will not require alteration to existing or proposed elements included in Planned Development or Design Review entitlements. Finding ~, The design afthe subdivision and its related improvements will not conflict with easennents, acquired by the public at large, for access through or the use of, property within the proposed subdivision. The proposed subdivision map will not require alteration to existing or proposed elements of the Planned Development entitlements,which includeacomprehensive networkof vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle and transit access improvements. Finding ?. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will notcause public health problems, The proposed subdivision map will notrequirealterationtoexistingorpropasedelements included in Planned Development or Design Revie~ventitlements. The project has been evaluated in the 2gg3 Mitigated Negative Declaration and the 2aQ8 ElR and no potential adverse health effects have been identified. VvHEREAS, the City Council determined thatthe proposed subdivision ofthis developed land does not have the potential to cause physical changes to the environment that could result in adverse impacts to the environment. Pursuant to CEC~A guidelines Section ~ 5305, no additional environmental evaluation is required; and THEREFQRE DE IT RESQLVED that the City Council of the City of Alameda approves Tentative Tract Map Na. 84~ 5 File No. PLN~8~g5O7} at the Alameda Towne Centre to allow the subdivision into six parcels subject to the following conditions; C~NaT~~NS APPL~CA~~LE PR~ORT~ THE~PPR~VALOF TI°~E FINAL SAP ~YTHE CITY G4UNC[L 1. The final map shall conform to the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, Alameda Municipal Code regarding Real Estate Subdivisions Regulations, Planning hoard and Gity Council Tentative Map Resolutions applicable to the Final Map, and shall be acceptable to the City Engineer and Planning Director. 2. All easements shall be shown on the Final Map including private streets ingresslegress access easements, surface drainage runoff, and utility easements for the benefit of the property owners. 3. Mylar copies of the recorded Final Map shall be provided to the City Engineer. AutoGAD cd-ram copies of the Final Map without signatures shall be provided to the City Engineer. 4. The subdividershall pasta refundabiecashier's checkintheamountof$54o ~$~oD per final map sheet} to guarantee that a Mylar copy of the recorded Tract Map is provided in the form approved by the City Engineer. 5. HQLD HARMLESS, The applicant shall defend 4with counsel reasonably acceptable to the City}, indemnify, and bald harmless the Gity of Alameda, the Gity Gouncil, the Redevelopment Agency, the Alameda City Planning Soard and their respective agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding including legal costs and attorney's fees} against the City of Alameda, Alameda Redevelopment Agency, Alameda City Planning Soard and their respective agents, officers ar employees to attack, set aside, void or annul, an approval by the City of Alameda, the Planning and wilding Department, Alameda City Planning Eoard, the City of Alameda Redevelopment Agency or City Council relating to this project. The City shall promptly notifythe applicantofanyclaim, action orproceeding and the City shall cooperate insuch defense. The Cityrnayelect, in its soledi_scretion, to participate in the defense of said claim, action, or proceeding. NUTICE. No judicial proceedings subject to review pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure ,Section 1094.5 may be prosecuted more than ninety X90} days following the date ofthis decision plus extensions authorized by California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 NOTICE. The conditions of project approval set forth herein include certain fees and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020 ~d} ~1 },these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement ofthe amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations and exactions. The applicant is hereby further notified that the 90~day appeal period, in which the applicant may protest these fees and other exactions, pursuant to Governr~ent Cade Section 66020 ~a} has begun. If the applicant fails to file a protest within this 90wday period complying with all requirements of Section 66020, the applicant will be legally barred from later challenging such fees or exactions. ~~~*~~ I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda during the Regular Meeting of the City Council an the Zest day of July, 2009, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: IN II~ITNESS, ~1t1HER~~, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said City this 2Znd day of July, ~o0g. Larav!leisiger, City Clem City of Alameda CITY QF ALA~EDA Memorandum To. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council from: Ann Marie Gallant Interim City Manager Date: July 21, 2009 Re~ Hold a Public Hearing to Consider a Planning hoard Recommendation to Abandon the Proposal to establish New Zoning Provisions to Limit the Height and Size of Two-Story Residential Buildings for Properties Located on the 3200 black of San Jose Avenue, Adams Street, and Washington Street DACKGRC~UND In 2007, a group of 47 property owners in the vicinity of Fernside boulevard and Washington Street submitted a petition to the City Council asking the City to consider imposing more restrictive limitations on building height, floor area and the location of second stories in their neighborhood. After the City Council directed staff to evaluate the proposal, staff held two community meetings to gather input from the residents At the meetings, community support for imposing additional zoning restrictions on these properties was mixed, and the residents on Madison Street submitted a new petition requesting that their street be removed from the proposed zoning district. 4n April 27, 2009, the Planning Board held a public hearing at which most of the speakers spoke in opposition to changing the zoning regulations for these properties. After hearing from the public and considering the various options presented by staff, the Planning board unanimously recommended that the City Council not change the zoning limitations on building height, floor area and the location of second stories zoning standards in the neighborhood. The Planning Board also directed staff to amend the Citywide Design Guidelines to incorporate some of the design guidelines that were developed for the rezoning proposals to assist in future design review applications. DISCUSSIGN In 200?', concerned residents submitted a petition to the City Council requesting the Council to direct Planning and building staff to design an ordinance that would ensure that specific sections of the City of Alameda Guide to Residential Design would be enforced. To accomplish this, the petition specifically requested that maximum allowable building height be reduced from 30 feet to 20 feet, allowable second story floor area be limited to X00 square feet, and that second stories be limited to the rear half of the house. City C®unci~ Pub~~~ H~arin~ A~~nda It~r~ fi~A a7~Z~~o~ Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council July 2~ , 2009 Page2of6 After the City Council initiated the study, Planning staff held community ~ meetings an January ~17, 2008, and April ~, 2009, to gather input from residents. Approximately 25 people attended each meeting. Among the attendees there was little consensus concerning the need for additional regulations or the approach that should be taken if new regulations were to be imposed on the neighborhood. Specifically o The majority of all residents agreed that the original proposal submitted by the petitioners, which would have made the construction of second stories infeasible in most cases, was overly restrictive. The majority of residents did not want an outright ban on two-story buildings. ® Many residents agreed that some of the two-story homes approved in the neighborhood were not well designed. ® Although seven out of the 21 households on Madison Street signed the original petition, at the community meeting residents of Madison submitted a petition signed by over 90 percent of the property owners requesting that their block be removed from the proposed zoning overlay district. As shown in the map below, the removal of the Madison Street properties leaves only 63 properties the shaded blocks} within the area that would be affected by the revised regulations. within the current study area of 03 properties excluding Madison Street}, there are seven two-story dwellings and two vacant lots that are large enough to support new single-family residential development. An application is pending that requests approval of a new two-story home on one of these two lots. There are six existing two-story houses an the south side of Madison Street which, although no longer in the proposed overlay district, would abut the rear yards of properties within the overlay district. Existing two-story buildings and vacant fats are shown on the following .. ~~~~ ... . .... ... ~,, .. ~~~r~ .~r~~:~~ ~~ .,, . .. . .. ~~ { .. ~,, .. ~ . 1d4~~~h~1~~~14~ 1 ~:7 ~_( ~ " "'~ page . [ d 7 j~h"yw ~~~~~~ ~~ Althou h the stud area consists 9 y ,~ .. ~ ~~` predominantly of single-story ranch .1 ~ -~~~ ~~ ;:~ .. .. ............ style homes there are a number of .~" ., ~~~~~ ,. . .,, ; ; other architectural styles in the area. ` ~ v,, ~~~ Y"y' within the study area, some homes are constructed on low profile foundations where the first floor is only a few inches above natural grade. Uthers are built two to three feet above grade. Common building types include L-shaped, rectangular and rectangular with cross gable roof. Second stories are located at the rear of homes and on the front of homes. In some cases, the second story covers the entire first floor, Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council July 21, 20og Page3of6 Exlstin One and Tw~~~~r ~uildln s ~~~ '!E4# y .- y 5y ~ ~k 1 ~~~ ~ ,,,,,.. ,E .,.. .,.. ,. ,. .. ~ : ~. ~: ~- ~, .~: Common examples of existing single-story buildings and different types of two-story design are shown below, p Design a ed, ,,,, ~ Rectan ular with Cross-Gable Roof Honorable Mayor and Members o~ the City Council Rectan ular~Corner Lot Planning ~®ard C®nclusi®ns: July 21, ~00~ Page4ot~ Second Stor on Rear Upon reviewing the architectural character o~ the area, the design of some of the newer homes in the area, and discussing the issues with the community, the Planning Soard concluded that: The rezoning o~ the area was not in the best interests o~ the property owners and residents within the area. Since many of the ~3 property owners and residents in the area wished to have the protections and the rights that are enjoyed by all other property owners within the R-1 Zoning District in Alameda, there was not Second Stories at Rear and Front Second Sto on Front Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council July 21, 2009 Page5of6 sufficient support within the area for imposing additional restrictions and limitations on these 43 properties. The area will continue to see reinvestment and improvements as property owners expand their homes or build homes on the few remaining vacant parcels, and the City should encourage and support reinvestment in the community. The concerns articulated by the original proponents of the rezoning are design problems that should be resolved through improvements to the design review process, not changes to the zoning regulations whereas the City of Alameda's Design Review Manual provides extensive guidance regarding additions to Craftsman and Victorian homes, the manual does not provide detailed guidance on how to design an addition on a "mid century" or "ranch-era" home. Given these conclusions, the Planning Eoard recommended that the City Council: . Reject the proposal to change the zoning regulations for the 63 properties. 2, Direct staff to develop amendments to the Design Review Manual to improve the design review process for "mid century" or "ranch-era" homes. ~n the second recommendation, the Planning Board made a point of stating that the amendments to the Design Review Manual should be considered within the overall Planning & building Department's work program and prioritized as appropriate given all of the other important initiatives on the program. The Board also acknowledged that the draft guidelines already prepared were a very good start, and not a lot of additional work would be needed to incorporate these guidelines into the manual. A copy of the draft "City of Alameda Ranch Zoning Overlay Design Guidelines" is Attachment 1. FINANCIAL IMPACT There is no financial impact from denying the rezoning request. The funds for amending the Design Review Manual would be allocated from the Planning and Building Department's Community Planning Fee account. MUNICIPALCODEIPCLICYDCCUMENTCRC~S REFERENCE The Municipal Code requires that the City Council make specific findings to approve a zoning amendment: 1}that the amendment maintains the integrity of the General Plan; 2} that the amendment is in the best interests of the community and supports the general welfare of the community; and 3} that the amendment is equitable. The Planning Board was not able to make the necessary findings to recommend the zoning amendments. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ENVIRgNMENTAL RE1/1EW Jufy 21, 2009 Page 6 of 6 Establishment of the proposed zoning overlay district would place additional limitations on the expansion of existing buildings and on the design of new buildings. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15054 and 15305, the proposed changes to existing development standards would not have the potential to cause significant adverse environmental effects and are exempt from environmental review. Rejecting the proposed zoning overlay would represent a continuation of the existing regulation and would not be considered a "project" under CEQA. RECGMMENDATIGN 1. Hold a public hearing and reject the proposal to establish new zoning provisions to limit the height and size of two scary residential buildings for properties located on the 3200 block of San Jose Avenue, Adams Street, and 1lvashington Street. 2. Direct staff to develop amendments to the Design Review Manual to improve the design review process for "mid century" or "ranch~era" homes Respectfully submitted, ~~-- David Srandt Assistant City IVlanager Approved as to funds and account, .: f ~^'+~+rvd~ LL Glen . J Interi ina ce Director By: Andrew Tho am s Planning Services Manager Attachment: 1. Draft City of Alameda Ranch Zoning Cverfay Design Guidelines ~ ~ ~~ 1 ~ RAG a ~4,: X? My, ,-^~ .~ ~ ~. ~ ~~ ~` ~ ~ F t~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ r a „, IF' ~~ t ~~ ~ ~ ~` a~ ~ r ~` i a ~~~ ~z,: , t ~~. i .~, .. ~ c '- i -"'.,?, ~ ~ ~ ~ a: E~;~ ~~ ,s __~ ,~ , `,~ I~it ~~ `~4` 3 ~ V~x~~ ~ ~ i ~~ ~a I f ~d` Gl l ~.~:.. ~"k~~ a 7r~~~Ili C 1 f~l ~" Fk~~~~`. ` ~u +~"~~ '~ '~Mf ~ f ~. ;~^ ~~ ^~L { ~ ~ '.. J ~ S t ~~ ~ 15` ` H 14 ~ jjtt 11 lt~r(iJ ~~ ~ ^ 1~%(7~ I ~ ~,A ~ j ` ,~II v n~ ~~d~~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ t~"={ t~ •.. ~.~, ~ tl ; ~~ n q ~` a .~ ~ ~ ~"'. !~, h M ,~ ' i ~~ rr~~a~a~~~~i ~~,, >F '':~ v ~~. ~ ~;~ :I ~" f i N ~.. u P ~h~a Ci$y C®un~i~ ~A~~a~h~~n~ t~ Public H~ar~ng Agenda 1~~~ 6-A 0 0 ro ~ ~ c~ ~ as ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ •~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ o ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ °' o :~ c o ~ c~ .~.,~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ro ~ ~, ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ._ c~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~a as c~ .~ ,~ .~ ,~ ~. U .; D -+.. ~-- ~-. ,~ Q U U v u x 0 u j N H Z W F Z O V LL W J m Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~} ~ ~ N V (~ ~ ® ~ ~ . ~ Q? ~ ~} ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ U (~ ~ `~' ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ .~ 4= ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ fU o .N ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ , a~ ~ D (~ *~" ~ ~ °~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~l ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ X N ~ ~ p ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~- O 0 ~ ~ ~w ~C1 ~ U ~. o ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ C = ~' U t/) ~ N ® ~ G ~ ~ ~ ~S ~ ~ ~ 0 N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a s ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~, ~ ~° ~ o U) II. Q ~ N ~ ~ .~, ('~ ~? ~ ® ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ o N .~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~~~~ N ~ N ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ o .~ "- o ca ~ ~ ~. ® ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ o U .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ Ctl Q ~ ~ ~ Q U U ~ . . E ~ s ® ~ o ~ C7 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ [~ ~ ~ f~ .~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ p 1 U (U N (13 !~ ~ q} ~ ~ ~," ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ C 0 0 0 0 0 c~ ~ o .~ ~ .~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N C) ,j ~., 0 ~1 ~~~ ~~~. Q U N U C Q~ ~... ~~ .d 4.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ Q '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ N ~ C ~ ~ N ~ U N ~ {~ ~ O N ~ U U ~ ~ ~ ~ C7 ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. , ~- ° s ~ ~ ~ L.. . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ U "CJ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - {~. 7, ..G Q? '~ ~ -~ .D ~ O ~ ~ ~ © .~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ r~ ? ~~ p c ~ d.. ~ "C ~ Q . ~+ ~ ©. v ~ Q p V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ """ N Q1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , N N L D. ~ ~ ~ ~ d Q ~ o ~ ~ o U ~ c ~ ~ ~ j ~ U c~ o o ~ ~ m ~ ~ -~ ° U ~ ~,. N ~ ;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ff9 cl) O , N 0 T3 ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' G dJ: ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ "C7 C d ~ © ~ 0 ,N ~ ~ ~ C U U ~ "~ U ,N ~} ",~ ~ U -~ a .~ ~ N. ~ ~L c ~, v ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ Q .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ S1 .~ ti , ..Q '"- U ~ C Cn ~ C ~ U ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ Q9 E!? C7 ~ ~ ] ~ Q) ~ . 0? I.EJ ~ ~ ~ ~} ~ .w ~ G Q} ~ ~3 ~ N ~ G (C1 ~ (j} U C CCCi +a ~ C d} q ~ i ~ N ~ ,~', U ~ ~ ~ ~ U 4. N ~.. ,~ ~ U N ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ L ~ p G d „~ N +a ~ Q -~ U fl.. ~, ~ W ~ ~? ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~° ~ a '~, ro o c ~ ~ N ~ Z a ~ ~ `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ aC ~ ~ ~ ~ aXi c s .~ ,~ 0 ~.. :~ U U U W v ~n C~ a~ ca .~ U ~+~, ~ e "U ~ (U Vj Q ~ ~ U? .. ~ ~v~'~ ~~~` ~~~ ~ v ~~~~~~~~ ;~~~.~ ~ ~~.~ro~~~ro~ ` ~, ~~~~oo~a~o w~ ~~' ~ ~ ~c,~ ~~~ ~.~ as ~ ~^ ~r v ~ ~ ~ ~ V z ~ ~ ~~~~o~ ~ ~- ~~~ ~n ~a v ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. m ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ p~ ~ -~ ~ ~ ® a ~ v ~ ~ ur ~ ~ ° N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ® ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ n a~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ c , a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ c~ ~ a ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ,N ~ o ® ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ o :~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ t D ~ N ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ m Q .~ ~ ~ C ~ ~. . ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ® N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ U ~ ® ~ '~ o ~ }' ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~lJ LL n ~ .~ (!~ ~ .~ U `~ ~ c~ ,~ ~ ~ U ~ N ~ Q~ ~ _ ~ ~~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q) © ~ 03 ~ ~ N (U ~ ~ ~ ~ •, ~ ~ Q U Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 , ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (~ G N ~ ~ ~ ro .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ro ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ m ~ ~ ? ~ Q ~ ° ~ ~ ~ o `~ ~ ~ a ~ cv ~ ~ ~ ® ,~ ~,. ~ o `~ ~ ~ ~ o ca ~ .m o U ~ ~ V ``.~ ,, 0 U t~ c~ 0 a ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ .. .~ ~ .. ~ ~ c~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ro ~ .~ ~ d. ~ V ro C77 . a, ~ ~ ~} ~ ~' ~ ~ Q N ~ ~ ,~ ~ ( ~ Q ~ ~ N ~ . C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ .~ U) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~= ~ N ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~? ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ai ~ (~ N ~ . _ ~ U ~ ,'~ ~ ' o ~ .,M, ~ ~ ~ ~} ~ ~ ~ ca ~ cam/] .~ (7 ~ U ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ U (? N ~ ~ N ; ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ f-- ~ ^ , I- ~ ~ ~ ~( ~ D ~..1 .~ --p~-- ..1,. 0 ~.. 0 U a U x 0 Q~ -~. U ~~ ,~ ~..'~~ ,,ftft .~ nV / ~p~q W `ry~1 ~~p( W .. \V ^+ yy~~yyqq W ~ ~/J ~/~ ~ `V ••`~ U '~~-' ~ N Q} ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C7 ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ U ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o 0 o ~ m ~ N ~~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ °~ ~' '~ ~ ~ ~ ® d ~ ~ ~ ~ .~. ~ ~+- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ n .~ ~ ~ (~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~,~ p ~ ~ ,~ .~ ~ °~ ~ •+-~ ~ C ~ '~ ~ {~ .® N U ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ® ~ ~ ¢, s~ f,~. ~ ~o ~, ~ ~' ~ .~ o ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ .E ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~°~~~' . o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~..~ v ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ c c~ ~ r~ o ~ ~ (~ U ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ cU ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ;' ~ U 0 U U ~ ~ ~ ~~~Q ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ .N ~ ~ .~ ® ~ a~ ~° ~ ~ = N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U Q C ~ ~ (~ ~ ® ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1. .~ ~ ~? ~- N a 4~ U ~_ ~N L 0 ro L m c 0 v N N N V U {13 c a c o~ 0 U W~yyyy W1 N 0 0 s., I~ U `; (C! :: ~ ;~ ~. ~~ a~ L c 0 ;~ t~ ~1 t~ N U [) +, 0 0 ,v~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ a ~ ~ cU U ~ o ~ ~ U „~ C O ~ " ~ ~' ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ O U C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ° v ° ~ ~ ~ o 0 ~ ® ~ o ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ U {~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ {~ (~ ® N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ U n ~ ~ ~ [~ {Cf t~ _ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ m ~ W cn ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 I~ ('~ ~ ([3 Q (~ ~R , ~~`'~x w ~rnrn ~V~qF 1L S. ry~ V I~ VJ N U c~ ~.. c ca f ~, s1 d S]. +~r ~. t ro a c 0 U .~ 0 0 a~ u x w 0 C .~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ,~ a ~. ~ t~ .~ o ~ ~ ~ ~s ~ - ~,~, ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ d ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ tl~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ] N ~ ~? (~ Q `~ ~ ~ ~ ~. n ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ a ~- as ~ ~ ~ .~ va U? o ~. ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ i~ 0 ,~ pYp~ ~. //L~ pWp~ .~.,7 IV •~^^' '~ m~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ N c~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~.. QJ ® ~ p ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ro o ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ cNa ~~ a ° ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ 'ZJ ~ N ~ N ~ ~ o - ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ® ~ ~ o ~ ~~ o ~ ~, ~ ~ ~~`~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ U ~ ~ ~S ~ ~ C ~ ~ .~ ~ m - - c ', a ro Q ~ .~ ~ i~ ~~ ~ ~, U ~ U d ~ Q7 ~j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~U 0 ~ ~ ~~ ~ c ~o ~~ ~ ~ a ~~ ro~ ~ Q ~ ~ C N N ~ `~ o ~~ ~~ a~ L ~~ ~N ~B ~~ o~ ~~ G N ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ {~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ c!J ~ ~ _ N QJ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a -~ ~ ~ ~ N `°"' ~ D ~ N ~ U1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ a~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~, ~ -~ ~, ~ o ~ ~ o c~ ~ ~~~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ a~ ~ - - v - a (U ~'.• ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ „~ b `, ~ t0 v I ryWry b~dn ~ I . ~ ~ F ~ ~ ,:. ~ ~ e ~ '' y~¢.~ ~q N .. VVVVV ~I/~ ~ ~ I ~ ,_^ u J •~ ' ~I . v M 1 V ^ ' ~Wq i ~ ~ ~ ' ~' - ~ V ©~ l~ I~ ~, ~~~ <<~ .~ o .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ro ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ ©'c ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ o ~ ~, ~ ~ _ c~ C ~ ~- G ~ ~ ~ I~ ~_ ~ ~ d ~ ~ N ~{~ ~ N 't= ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ (7 ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m - - l~ ~ ~ ~ ..~ ~ U z3 "= ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ .N .N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, o ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N U ~ ~- ~,. c ~.~'~ o ~~ ~ ~ ~- ~ d° N t~ C .Q a r~ V QJ X 0 ~. -H.. W ~~'~;iu,~., ,`~ ,44,x`, n. W p~~ ~ppvy'q~~ 4/ ~ d--~ ~ ~~ X ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~_ ~ ~_ - ~ .. ~ ..aL :S' ~1 A•.~ ~' ~, .. p~+~ I ~~ : '. k . id ~ ~ •. y,... ~ r' ~ ~ g ~ W ~ ~ ~ '~'"' ~ ~ - - ~: ~` ro ~~ ~.e ~ N ~ _ ~ ,'~e ,per ;~ (~ ~ .~ ti ,~ ,~, LCS --.I~ -® _ " . CJ (~ ~ Q~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ LN ~ x C~ U9 ~ ~, ® ~ ~ O (~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ Q ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~p o ~ N l1J ~ ~ N ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ( O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . N N ~ ~ D ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~! ~ ~} ~ U ~ C ~ ] ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C7 N C~ N ~ ~ ~; . ~ p N `~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ .~ U ~ v3 f~S ~ C ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~ U U ~ ~ o o as ~ sa .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ua ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ® ~ Q? ~ U Q} _ ~ Z3 ~ ® U ~3 ~ Q? ~ U ~ .- ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ (~ w ~ 2 ~~~ . i5 ~ M ~. ~ I~ ,_ a ~la~ /~vryl ~ 7 r 5. .. ... V _N p~pqqq~ V! 3 3 ~V1 ~{/ i . "`' ^. ,_.. J o _ va ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ® .~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .,~ ' N U ~ ~ t ~ ~ N ~ N ~ ~ ~ D7 ~ ~ g ~ U ~ ~.. (U ~ ~ ~ ~° ~ - N Z3 o cn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , U z3 ~- c ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ U ~ ~ N ~ 0 ~ ~ `fl ~ `~3 ~ ~ ~ ® ~ f~ d ~ (U {~ - °~ (~ ~ ~ © ~ ~ Q ~ ~ Q ,, ~ ~ N ~ U ~ .~ U7 ~ Ca ~ .~ • ~ U I ~ ® N ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ® o to pp ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , q w~ ry L3a Ll o tJp nq ~V ~y J !Tq V ,~„~ ~ n ' r ~.1w o _ J ,... i~w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y}~{ U l ~8q ~ P ® ® ® P P 1':~ - ~ L ~ ~ ~ f I~. f '.,. ry V ~ ' VU ; CT O ~~.. ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~? ~ 'r3 ~ ftl ® ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ .~ a~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ v; v ~ m .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ro ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~~ r ~ ~ o N ~ ~ 0 (~ U U N o ~ ~ ® „ °~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ U ~ ~ ~ '~} ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N ~ ~ ~ e ~ V ~ -~ N ~ ~~ ~ ~ U ~ -~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ _ o N ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (~ C} '~ o ~ . ~ o ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ,~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , N Q} N N 0 s.. p~ ~ s... ~ ~ ~3 ~ ~ {~ '~ ~ Q' ~ ~ '~ ~ _ n5 L v ~ e v ® ~ U .~ 0 U u ~w n~ W ~jv~v ~a~ W '}^Y ~ry~~7 V t~7 N C N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~q ~ ~ .~ O .~ ~N ,~ N '~» ~ ~ U C~,. ~"' a. ° ~~ ~~ m `~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~® ~ ~ ~ - N U '~ O ~" ~i L U N N N D S1 0 a ;. ;; ~I - ,, '~F .~ ~.1~~~ ~=i -_^ ~ ~ ~ ~ N 'L ~ ~ , M :' 0 ~ ~ ~ ~u ~~fi^~.~ 1. I V+ ~ ~~" {~ r: ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ___ m c~ U ~ ~ :,:. ~ ~° - ~ ~ _ } b N . ,. o .~ . ~~ - aa ~~ a ~ ~~~ ro ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ j b B 0 ~ ~; ~ {rj ~ . cU N ,1! .~ ~ ~ ~ i ~~ ~ ~. N C~7 0 c U ~~ ~`, '~ a~ :~ ~_~ U ':C '~ ;U G ~~ ~~ ..- _!~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~oN ~' 0 •~ ~ ~ ~~ N ~ ~ ~ s~_.,' IO ~ ~ N ~ ~~ ® ~ ~ ~ .N ~ o~ ra .~ Nc~~ .L ~~~ ~ ;~N~ ~ ~ .~ ~~ ~ ~~~ "°' ~_ N ~ ~_ N_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ ~ .~ a~ .~ a~ 0 s "~ m a~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ a a~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ q ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ O ,~ ~ ~ al (Cf _ ~.~',, ~ ~ ~7 {/) LCD :..` O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~- ~ ~ `~ ~. ~ to ~ o .~ '~ `~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ;~ °~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ro ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ m s 0 (~ vI C1 I U C ., 0 ~.. a~ ~.. .~ 0 U U x ~1.J 0 .~, ~~ 6 w "~ 9a ~ .x" 5x ~ v,~ ~. ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 1~ ~`" ~~W M 2 u ~v.5{y w^ ~h4 `~.- ^` h. AMY li ~r b~ d ~ I~:f ' ~~:~, 0 .,~ ~.,. ~~ x. ~ ~ ,r J# ~~ $~ i ; ^~~ ~[ .... ... .. M~ Y '. ,.. ~ ~r.. _. -.. ~'. ~ _~ ~~ 4 t ~ S ~~~ L~Nd o a~I RYAy; (~ ~~ ~ ~ ,, ~y Y ~ d k ~, ~ ~` ~ P ~u M` ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~. ~~Wr .~ ~~~~~ L W ~ ~ ~,:' J Ka.4 ~ ~`~` ~~ U ~ ``~ t^~n (W„ Vttppf 4~ lR[W' W r~ ~~ Q U '~ ~n ~u 0 ~.. a~ -~_ J ~~~ ~ ~ ) a~ .~ m a c~ N W Z J W O 7 ~- ' j~~ f 3" t ~ "„~fR. y, ~.uauiH Lk y.4 d "!I~ t'1 ~~ ~~'~,. i~ ~ ~ `S" p.8 K. ~~z~ ~ ~ ~ lox .,..V s t~ } y M ~ "~ '~~ yy ~, i ~ w. ~ ~ . " ~ N ~ YY 't F y ^I ~"M.~~W'4 ~~li. ~" .,. ~,~ .A ^~wNal\ iyy ~' !L':V'x. ~ e~.~"~.~.. ,~. .xti 'Vw~y~'.~«.="~^~.N' ~'~~r`^~wr ~ ~ ,. u F "4 +~ .,.i~ dAr,'~. ~ 4 ,,, .,:. ", ~°~ v .~ y~, -, ter- ~'~ e 'g ~ ~" ~ G. ~ } ~~ ~``~ " wry ,~.~^ z t. p~ t' "€ v r i ~~ .... , e ~i. ,r ! .. ~ ! N ~ A+ ~r .~VwsµW 9~ ~A i' i ! ~: J ' f~ '~1' ~ S ..i~ Paz+.~ .SSr 1 ~4~.„y ~ dww~wW+aa~( ' ~' ~ ~. is d a Ls 7 ~, ' ~ F ~: ~C t ~ ;NSA, ~ r ! ~ ~[w~y ~ .. 1 ~ ?~, €a~ r fly ~~.~,R !~ ~'~yy,.. r, V y~N ~~ L ~An~ ~ ~ ~~h py, fk~ ~~'~ ~~ , T~R'µ~ ' ~G~~ G 4 R t "w. ~ .4 r ~ w y 3 ICY rl 'F ~ ~~ ! ~ ~ ~ ^~... a a, f ~ ~N i~ ~ "f^ ~^ar n c ~ k~u r r ~~ A `A ~ xy " 'rr b K, r~ "~`4 ' } ~ .. 1,. t ~ ,y~~ ` a gym'; "r vrk .. ~r f, r » , W y ~ ~?K ~ 1Fil "`.."~ ~ r a ~ ~ " y Y ~ L Fro- ~ ! j ~ A~ { ~Y;~~~a i ~ i~4 ~~~M~ ~ ~ T '.~~SCw a r ,nw ! '~'~ Sys, <, ~:~t R r«~ ~~: ~~ ~ ~ '"fix pv 6. t i. +.,, .. sa: Fl, ~k~'''tt r„ ~ ' SW~ ~ ~ ~c . ~" \~ o fS~' ~ n~ ~ F` ~ k y ~ ~~,y~ ~N t ,~ k r~~, ~ ~a ~ r ~e U ~~~t i. e : a y a ! r~ t T '~ i ~'+ ;~ ' ~ ~, ~ ~? ~^ ~ . C3 1 d r x ' ~ ~ ~" ~ ~,~ ~ _ ~ ~/~ ~ ~ ;~ ~~' ..fir ~~,' E~ ! l~~zk~ ~ '~5.. t ~ ~.i "'~ ~yv ~c'~,".. ,~, ~ ® ~ ~~ ~. y .,} ~r~ C y '~ r. >>.._.r. ~ N^ `mac. ~~"~N ~~ ~~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ny 3 ~ ~ o a ~ c v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ .~ ~ o ~ `~ ~ ~~~' ~ ~ o ~ ~ a ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ v _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Lll ~ ~ ~ MJ vrJ L V V! ~~ Q w ~rr i a U Q) ~~ X1..1 W .,.~ '~ , ~" ~M.~ ~' ... .~, ! -~~ ~.,.~-w, ~'::: r ml.. W J W ~J !!~' M7M!I_M~I i ~ i~.,~ ' ~ ~ v n , W. I. N N U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ © i~ ~~' ~ ~ ~ 4J ~ ~ a., ~ ~ +~ ~ ..1 re 1 V ~ ~ W }}(( ~ I ~ / y 1. ~ ~/ 4V TW •.,, ~ "~~. ~~ ~\~~ ~ ~ 4 r .Mr .., ..~ ~. ~.. ...~ -. ~ Q * ~ Ate'' W 0 ~ 1LV~ wf1 ro c~ ru 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ p~ o ~ ~ . ~3 N Q .C = ~ C N ~ ~ 0 Yti. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o Z ~ c~ ,` rn "'~ ~ ~ e ~' ' ~ o o ~~~ ~' , ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ N . , ro ~ ~ .~ a . ~, ~:...._ ~ ---'C ~ Q .~ ~ N roro._. `~: ~. ~, a '~ _~ t ~~ 4.. W '~ a~ cron ~ ~ ~ ~ v ro Q ~ N ~ ,~ C ro Q C ,N ro N b o ~ ~ ~ s ~ e ca ~ ~, ro ~' ~ ~ ro ~. o ° `~ ro ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ v~i o' 0% o ~ ~ , ~ ~ `~" o °c ~" 'o~ o ~ ~ o ro ~ c o ~ ~ ro N ~ ~ ~ N .G N C j N ~ C „G ~ (~ Q N N . C O ro N t~ ~ E o ~ '~ ~ D X N U N ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e U .~ w Q "~+. V h~h+ w 0 Q rn N .~ N U ~ , ., .'~ ,~p~~ ~. r" a p ~ x:337 ~ o ~ ~ ti ~ ~ ~ °~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , -~ ,~ ~ ~ o ~ ky (J ,~ Vj i , ~, ~~~ F~ ~~. ~y~]} Fad i N x , ~:~ ~ J g ~• Yt .. Z 1 J~ s~ J 9 S• ~'N~ t ~ ~~ 7n'°u t ;~ ~~ ~ 1 0 ~ ~, ~~ajp~ ((fi~r( h ( ~ ~ ~~" ## t ' CC fi _ { ~~ '~'"~+' '~'3`,cx' ~ ~ I' y'~ v`~j" ar ~ r ~ ~{ k, ~ ~ `~S 4u f t k s, ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~#1 FN ~ r w_ f ~,gy~~~ f~ ~ ~ ~' ,~ 1 `x~rj$r~ 3 ~ ~ 1.~~~ '~'"~ R ~.~ "'~ +'~r~ 'gY~~.y~y. ~ ~ R ~ j i g; .~,. Sf N ~~1~ •"~P I.~. . , ~, F k3 W ,t f I i, E.~ ~~ E ar r, .. ~ i ~ t : ~ 2. #' ,µ f ~:~ ~ ~ = a ~ ~ ~ 1 v 6 »€ ~ r }. s ~' i },~'~ ~~ 1,~ ~ 1 ~ jF 1 s '~ ~ fi. U " ' ~' 9 i ~~~~ Gt€fi 1 ~ F 4' I~' ~ ° QJ L.. ,, ~. z ~, F „ . 1 y 3~ 9 ~~ y~SH '.. ~'~ ~ itNt ~~ $ i kyy~k~~ ~~~ ~ y ~1~ ~ ``~' ~,nr a~-'~ A n~A'~.i ,~ J,. k ;~ ~ f ~^ ;. v ~ ~'$ l~. {j ~ '~x ~'~ ~. 91 ~ (. lg i 'a~ ~:: ? ~~a ~. Fyr'?... Jai ~ I``.l ~ ~'~° ~ ~x „!~ ~ fyyy3 ~ ~~ ~%% d ~ F ~ ~~~ I . i 1 ~7, p ,`~"~"`~ +' ~}F.~ II ~k.. ~y. ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ir ~. ~ ~ hf M'~k ~~ ~`., ~ ~i ~ ,1 ~ ~ "{'., L ~ a~» ^s~.~ I 77 .~.,,d pay N~, ~ ~ 1}'~, la i f ~ f 1 ~ ~, .:~ ;3' a r'~ .Pa .-~c.~'~a~4 ~4S7.i. r S ii ~fi /„ l ~' If E v s ~ T.: F~~ ~ '~ ~~~~~7` - 4 ~'~ ~ yr, ">r? , 3 -»~y': ~:, ~ `~ p ~ ~. N } ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ i~ ~n` ~ ~~C~aa t~'I:j~~~~5~~~~~~3tr~~3~~3~ .."a ._ .. ~ I,:~ .~" ~` .r ~ ® ,~ nq {qq~~~ tk ~ ~ v ~ ,~ ...,cw E~ ~1 a s1y~ }I Yj ~~ !.~ ~~_ ~ .. ~ 1 ~, xl ~l ~{ I H~ ~ rf~~ W ~ ii ~~{}1fk ~ . Mry f ~~ t ~~ J 3 1 i ff ~ ~~ ~~ H ~ is o z ~ Tr 1 ` ~ ~ ~ . Al ~ 1~' ~ ~1 ~,. ~1 ~ 1, i) 1 y~i 1 4 ~ I ~ G ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~'~ .~qa t i ~ YAi,. ~ gt~`°~5 i ~ ~~ y~ {. _ [ ~ t'~. 4 u a I 1 ; r ~t~ s F~'' i~ ~ ~ ~r? r I ri ~ ~ a 1 ~~ ~ * ~ t ~i ~u~ ~ ,r { ~' ' s ., i ~ , ~ r~W s ~. ~ ~ ~ f I , ~ ~ _ ~~ 1. ~, ' i ~ ~ ..1 i ~: ~ ~ ~. a~ ~ ~ f 1 ~i z $ i ~ '~ ~ ~ 14. Via. ~a , 1 I i ~.°. ~ ;~ ~ € ~ ~~ I k~ ~ a t ~ ~ ~; f ~ ~_ '~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , # ~' ~ ,~~ ~ ~, Eby ! ~" ~ U ~ ~ ~. O t/~y ~ ' ' ' ~ ~I ~~ ~ IPA ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~fl~ ~~ t ~W; ~ ~ ~ t'. ~1 (I ~l ~ ~.~ ~ r ~ n~ 1 V ~ ' U~ tip./ o 'w' 1 ;; , ~ ~, X3'1 C37 ~ C1 ~ j, 1 "'~~ ~ ~ ," ~ G _ ~ _ n+ ~ , ~q _ _ ~~* A" r. , ~ '' w ; ~ .~ C~ W .~ /~''''~~ -V Q W ~~.J 0 W -r-. Q U ,~ ~. 0 .~.. 4-~ ^F,. ~~ 0 U u c v _.. a~ u w U +~. N U_ N Q 1 1 ,~ ,: ~ ". q} C N .~ ~3 CURRENT APPLICATIONS YOUTH ADVISORY COMMISSION EIGHT VACANCIES (Six full terms expiring 8/31/1 l; two partial terms expiring. 8/31/10) Hannah Bowman, Incumbent Melina Cohen~Bramwell Jordan Flores, Incumbent I~iara N. Heath Valerian Lee Trent Liu And uli S astry, Incumbent Bhaani Singh, Incumbent Angela Sterling Vick, Incu~~nbents I~e11ey M. Villa Re~ Agenda Item #9-A 07-21-09 `U~APPROV'ED MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION ~CIC7 MEETING TUESDAY-- JULY 7, 2009- -7:27 P.M. Mayor/Chair ~~ohnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 5:00 p.m. ROLL CALL ~- Present: Councilmeders/Commissioners deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor/Chair Johnson _ 5. Absent: None. MT~~~rrm~c Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of the minutes. Vice Mayor/Commissioner de~-~aan seconded the motion, Which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number. ~*09--_ CC/*09- CIC} Minutes of the Special Joint CIC and Housing Authority Board of Commissioners Meeting and the Special Joint City Council and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority and Annual CIC Meeting Held on June 16, 2009. Approved. AGENDA ITEMS X09- CC7 Public Hearing to Consider the Community Improvement Commission's Report to the City Council, Recommendations of the Planning Board, Recommendations of the Economic Development Commission, and All Evidence and Testimony for and Against the Proposed Ninth Amendment to the Community Improvement Plan for the Business and Waterfront Improvement Project and the Proposed Seventh Amendment to the Community Improvement Plan for the West End Community Improvement Project; Introduction of ordinance Amending the Community Improvement Plans for the Business and Waterfront Improvement Project and the West End Community Improvement Project to Make Technical Clarifying Changes.; and X09- CIC7 Public Hearing to Consider Hearing All Evidence and Testimony for and Against the Adoption of the Proposed Amendment. Mayor/Chair Johnson announced that redevelopment law requires the hearing to be conducted following certain rules and conducted the hearing accordingly. Mayor/Chair Johnson opened the public portion of the hearing. Special Joint Meeta.ng Alameda City Council and Community Improvement Comma.ssion duly 7, 2009