2009-01-07 ARRA PacketAGENDA
Regular Meeting of the Governing Body of the
Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority
Alameda City Hall
Council Chamber, Room 390 Wednesday, January 7, 2009
2263 Santa Clara Avenue Meeting will begin at 7:00 p.m.
Alameda, CA 94501
1. ROLL CALL
2. CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted, approved or adopted by one motion unless a
request for removal for discussio or exDlanatioii is received from t he B oard or a member of the public.
2 -A. Approve the minutes o_fthe Regular Meeting of November 5, 2008.
2-B. Approve the minutes of the Special Meeting of November 18, 2008.
2 -C. Approve the minutes of the Special Meeting of December 2, 2008.
2-D. Authorize Negotiation and Execution of a Sublease Renewal for Mariusz Lewandowski
dba Woodmasters at Alanneda Point.
2 -E. Authorize Negotiation and Execution of a Sublease Renewal for Alameda Soccer Club at
Alanneda Point.
2 -F. Authorize the Sale of Four Boston whalers to NRC for $44,500.
3. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
3 -A. Alameda Point Update Presentation of SunCal's Draft Redevelopment Master Plan.
3 -B. VA/Navy Presentation Regarding the Navy /VA Federal -to- Federal Transfer at Former
NAS Alameda.
r 1. 11 1
,a -t..:-
4 -A. oral report from Member Matarr ese, Restoration. Advisory Board (RAB) representative
Highlights of December 4 Alameda Point R.AB Meeting.
5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT)
(Any person may address the governing body in regard to any matter over which the
governing body has jurisdiction that is not on the agenda.)
ARRA Agenda January 7, 2009 Page 2
6. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE GOVERNING BODY
7. ADJOURNMENT
This meeting will be cablecast live on channel 15.
Notes
a Sign language interpreters will be available on request. Please contact the ARRA Secretary at 749-5800 at
least 72 hours before the meeting to request an interpreter.
Accessible seating for persons with disabilities (including those using wheelchairs) is available.
Minutes of the meeting are available in enlarged print.
Audio tapes of the meeting are available for review at the ARRA offices upon request.
Present: Chair Beverly Johnson
B oardmernber Doug deHaan
Boardmernber Frank Matarrese
B oardrnember Marie Gilmore
Vice Chair Lena Tarn
2. CONSENT CALENDAR
2 -A. Approve the minutes of the Special Meeting of September 10, 2008.
2-B. Approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 1, 2008.
2 -C. Approve a Permanent waiver of License Fees for Alameda Unified School District Student
Activities.
2 -D. Authorize Negotiation and Execution of a Sublease Renewal for Building 43 Associates,
Inc. at Alameda Point.
Member Gilmore motioned approval of the Consent Calendar, seconded by Member
deHaan, and passed by the following voice votes: Ayes 5, Does 0, Abstentions o.
ee
3. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
3 -A. Alameda Point Update Review and Comment on SunCal's Development Concept
Debbie Potter, Base Reuse and Community Development Manager, summarized SunCal's
submission of Development Concept pursuant to the ENA on September 19th. During October,
SunCal presented its Development Concept to eight boards and commissions, and received
feedback. Comments received were provided in the staff report and presented to give the ARRA
an opportunity to follow -up on the comments from the boards and commissions, provide
feedback, and to hear additional comments from the public. The draft Master Plan, a more
detailed land plan, is due to on Dec. 19, and will be presented to the ARRA Board at its January
7 th regular meeting.
As SunCal has indicated, the current land plan has residential densities beyond those permitted in
Measure A. therefore, SunCal would need a vote of the people to implement its land plan. They
have until April 30, 2009 to decide to pursue a ballot initiative. Business terms between. SunCal
and the CIC is due by June 2010. There is a Council resolution of Fiscal Neutrality mandated for
base reuse, so a project proforma, an analyses of project cost and revenues to determine project
feasibility, is being prepared. Alameda Point is within the APIP redevelopment area. when
Alameda Point is conveyed, that new development will generate revenue and value, which will
result in incremental increase in property taxes paid. The project must create the value to
generate the tax increment that the CIC can then choose to invest in the project. There is no tax
increment without project, therefore it is not possible to determine which tax Increment funds, if
any, are available without completing the project proforma and negotiating a DDA, which is due
in June 2010. The CIC has made no commitment of funds to the project. Its only obligation is to
negotiate in good faith on both the land plan and public. /private partnership until the ENA
expires in June of 2010. The DDA must be approved by the City Council and the CIC; and until
the DDA is approved, it is not possible for the CIC to commit funds to the project. Under the
terms of the ENA, SunCal is paying for all city staff costs and third party consultant costs
consistent with the requirement for the fiscal neutrality that we demand.
Member Matarrese referred to the comments included in the staff report and stated that it was
important to make a distinction whether the points being raised were from the boards or from
individuals.
Pat Keliher, SunCal's Alameda Point Project Manager gave the presentation. The presentation
will be made available on SunCal's website. At the conclusion of the presentation, Chair Johnson
called all of the speakers first:
Corinne Lambden concerned about the historical relevant structures, and would life Board to
consider all options of adaptive reuse before permanently destroying there. Mary Fetherolf
thanked SunCal for the presentation and asked a couple of process questions about where to find
the financial models and assumptions of the project, and about the draft Master Plan. Elizabeth
Krase spoke on behalf of AAPS. She discussed concerns about the historic buildings planned
for demolition, stating that it's not acceptable. Doug Biggs APC has enjoyed participating in
the SunCal community process and supports SunCal's plan. Mi'Chelle Fredrick excited to see
the progress that has been made, encouraged by the plan that acknowledges the unprecedented
potential of Alameda point yet still recognizes the constraints. Diane Lichtenstein echoed what
Mi'Chelle Frederick said. Interested in how the development will happen, and would like to see
more of the integration and diversity in the types of housing and structures. Helen Sause
congratulated Member deHaan. and Member Gilmore for their re- elections. Had a request that the
city undertake an active role in developing the transit system which addresses the whole island.
Gretchen Lipow discussed fiduciary responsibility of the Alameda Point project. Nancy
Heastings from HOMES, complimented SunCal on its transit oriented design, and wanted to
know the date and review process for the transportation plan. John Knox. White requested the
ARRA really give direct direction to SunCal as to what they would life to support before the
process moves forward. He discussed that we cannot try to react to the market, we need to loop
at something that has that flexibility, and a plan we can be proud of in 50 or loo years. Arthur
Lipow discussed the poor economy and traffic mitigation issues, and suggested an alternative
of a public trust modeled on the Presidia trust that could have productive uses of the structures.
Susan Decker supports SunCa's plan and the flexibility in their process. Encouraged that it
would produce something that is truly an asset to Alameda. Michael Krueger agreed with most
of the speakers and is supportive of SunCal's plan.
Chair Johnson explained that this meeting has to be recessed in order to reconvene the PUB
meeting of earlier.
Meeting was recessed at 9:15 p.m. by Chair Johnson. All Board members agreed that Item
3 -A (SunCal's Development Concept) and the balance of the 1115 agenda be continued at a
Special ARRA Meeting scheduled on November 18, 20080
Respectfully submitted,
Irma Glidden
ARRA Secretary
UNAPPROVED
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
The meeting convened at 9:43 p.m. with Chair Johnson presiding.
Present: Chair Beverly Johnson
Boardme mber Doug deHaan
B oardmerr ber Frank Matarrese
B oar dmernber Marie Gilmore
Vice Chair Lena Tani
2. CONSENT CALENDAR
i
2 -A. Authorize the Executive Director to Execute an Amendment to Agreement with Russell
Resources for Environmental Consulting Services for Alameda. Point Extending the Term
for 12 Months and Adding $147,540 to the Budget.
2-B. Approve a one -year Lease with Two one -Year options with Makani Power for a Portion
of Hangar12.
Member deHaan motioned approval of the Consent Calendar, seconded by Member
Matarrese, and passed by the following voice votes: Ayes 5, Noes 0, Abstentions O.
3. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
This portion of the meeting is a continuation of the Regular ARRA. Meeting of 1115, which
was recessed by Chair Johnson. On 1115, all Board members agreed that Item 3 -A
(SunCal's Development Concept) and the balance of the 1115 agenda be continued at the
Special ARIZA Meeting scheduled on November 18, 20080
3 -A. Alameda Point Update Review and Comment on SunCal's Development Concept
(Continuedfrom. the November 5, 2008 Regular Meeting)
Debbie Potter, Base Reuse and Community Development Manager, provided an overview
regarding the put pose of presenting SunCal's Development Concept, which was to solicit
feedback and comments from the ARRA to move forward with the draft Master Plan, which is
due Dec. 19'
Chair Johnson called the public speakers first. Michael Krueger reiterated a point that if any
board member cannot support the plan for whatever reason, now is the appropriate time to
discuss and raise objections, and what changes need to be made. Arthur Lipow discussed his
concerns about the impact of the bankruptcies of SunCal Companies to the Alameda Point
project. Susan Decker discussed her continued support of the Plan.
The Board reminded the public that the list of questions from the last meeting on Nov. 5 has
been summarized and will be addressed this evening. Pat Keliher, SunCal's Alameda Point
Project Manager, Matthew Ridgway of Fehr and Peers, Peter Calthorpe and Peter Tagami, of
California Capital Group, were present to answer questions.
Member Gilmore stated that a key issue revolves around the feasibility of implementation and
the traffic solutions how to move people on and off the island. She discussed this as being a big
part of her comfort level with regard to whether the plan can be executed. She wants to see real
life examples of the solutions in place and working, and does not want Alameda to be the
experiment. Member Matarrese had two transportation—related points: how we are addressing
commute in the tube into China Town, and truck routes, how are we moving goods?
Matthew Ridgway, consultant from Fehr Peers, addressed the transportation issues. He stated
that traffic congestion is expected to be worse, regardless of Alameda Point redevelopment, as
moving traffic to /from Alameda Point is secondary next to the traffic moving through the tube
and the 880 corridor. one of the questions was whether the option of a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
was out. Mr. Ridgway responded `no', but is reserving the right of way to bus transit alignment.
He further discussed that the project is developer funded and funding will be sought from AC
Transit and other funding sources. Another question was regarding buy -in of other stakeholders.
Mr. Ridgway explained that they are working with AC Transit for funding issues and Caltrans on
Broadway /Jackson improvements, but there is a much larger group of stake holders, and they are
not assuming things outside of Alameda's purview.
The Board had requested a matrix be created. Mr. Ridgway prepared a draft which highlights
major differences between the three plans, the APCP plan, the wRT plan, and the current SunCal
plan. one of the major differences they realized was having an onsite school, which was carried
forward to the current AP transportation strategy. A rapid bus element was not definitive in
other plans, but in the current AP transportation strategy, it is definitive to fund a rapid bus
transit system, also proposing to fund construction and operating costs for an additional BRT line
across the whole island to the Frultvale BART station in order to increase transit use throughout
the island. A bikeshare program is being proposed; and another dramatic difference is a
progressive parking plan, which was in the APCP plan, and is carried forward to the current plan.
Shared parking, unbundling cost of residential parking, commercial fee based parking, parking
maximums, limit number of auto trips new elements included in the summary of the matrix
proposed to reduce auto trips.
Chair Johnson and Member Matarrese were concerned about the passive incentives of parking,
which did not have the effect that was intended, because other transportation hasn't been
provided. Member Gilmore discussed these unintended consequences and not being able to lure
business to site because there is not enough parking. Member del -Iaan discussed the real life
situation in Alameda, that streets upon streets are constrained because of no parking. He stated
his concern that lack of parking has not driven .Alamedans to use public transportation.
Mr. Ridgway explained that possibly parking shortages weren't in tandem with a whole host of
transportation alternatives. They are proposing to implement the transportation alternatives and
provide the level of parking that would balance with those alternatives to be effective
economically and be viable. They are trying to develop a plan that addresses all these issues.
Chair Johnson stated that if we insure other transportation alternatives were available, people
would use it.
Vice Chair Tarn discussed the City's settlement with Oakland China town over the impact of the
Alameda Point project with traffic in China Town a traffic level threshold was generated, and
the appropriate level was 1800 units. She asked Mr. Ridgway if their mitigation. measures are all
to get back to that threshold level. Mr. Ridgway affirmed, stating that they are marketing the
plan as a green development you live here because you only have one car or no car the
people that have a lifestyle with fewer or no automobiles would want to live here.
Another question addressed how the water emergency transit authority will interface and will
meet the needs for maintenance and fueling facilities, and if this can be accommodated at
Alameda Point. Mr. Ridgway explained that they have looked at the issue of relocation of the
ferry terminal to the estuary or to sea plane lagoon, but have not looked at dredging or fueling
stations; and have not reached that level of detail at this point.
.Another request from the Board was to provide examples of transit alternatives. Fehr Peers
provided a handout with information which cites several examples. Studies included comparative
analysis of transit uses among specific cities in the bay area. They are diligent in citing statistics
and research conducted nationally to reduce the number of auto trips. Regarding funds for island
wide transportation solutions, Mr. Ridgway stated that operating and capital cost are being borne
by the Alameda Point project. In response to the request to have an analysis of how many vehicle
trips this plan will create, Mr. Ridgway said that a detailed phasing plan will be included in the
Dec. 19 draft master plan.
Member Matarrese reiterated that the PDC and concept plan didn't address the issue of goods
and services moving on and off Alameda Point truck routes, etc. for commercial and retail.. He
stressed that this is a critical component that needs to be addressed.
For Peter Calthorpe addressed the next category of issues regarding adaptive reuse and light
industrial questions, and questions regarding examples of other transit oriented development.
Mr. Calthorpe gave a presentation of several examples of comparable mixed use developments,
housing over retail, live -work in other bay area cities including Oakland, Richmond, Daly City,
San Mateo, and San Jose. Alameda Point has a unique component to offer which attracts entities
to the various mixed -use elements, that Alameda Point has the ability to have a large company
"campus
Vice Chair Tam asked Mr. Calthorpe to comment on creating that buffer between the different
types of uses so there are no inherent conflicts that city councils have to deal with. Mr.
Calthorpe explained that, until you get to real industrial uses, you don't have to buffer. The
beauty of that mix, the services, parks and shops are double duty if you put a store in a
typically residential neighborhood, it won't be used but if you put it in mixed use it's used
throughout the day, a better viability and keeps folks out of their cars. we're all focused on
transit mode.
Member del -3aan asked about adaptive reuse and light industry, and the compatibility of this? Mr.
Calthorpe stated that the parcels for commercial development are not best used as light
industrial. rather as low -rise office, and some historic reuse that can be industrial; explaining that
when you invest this much in public infrastructure, the parks and transit you don't want to
dedicate land to light industrial it would be underutilization for light industrial. Member
Matarrese wanted to discuss the potential reuse of hangars.
Phil Tagami, of California Capital Group, continued the presentation by discussing adaptive
reuse of the historical district structures. He discussed the tax credits and identified the protected
historic districts. His focus is on 23 of 86 buildings identified, including the flight tower and the
dive building. In total, he was asked to study 1.3M sq. ft. of space, as well as preserving and
protecting the open space that is part of that. One of the tests of being able to restore the
buildings is to give equal attention, respect to the buildings, and early involvement is key
having the opportunity to transition and put the site into reuse Now would protect from further
decay, create use and activity, and generate more revenue. There is a demand for certain
activities and good transitional uses; now is the opportunity to have the time to become intimate
with these buildings and begin process of next phase.
Member deHaan stated that the Navy had an inventory of the historical buildings and had desires
and needs for specific ones. He asked how far we are in that process and does it relate to the 23
of 86 buildings. Mr. Tagarni stated that they are 113 of the way done and there is a lot of due
diligence that needs to be exercised. He further explained that the Navy hasn't fully processed
the application for the historic district. Clear policies and a well thought -of redevelopment effort
requires patience, due diligence, and there will be verbal sparring a challenge and constraint
that they are ready to engage in. Mr. Tagami discussed a similar situation with the Fox Theatre
in Oakland there were more reasons why you can't renovate the building versus why you can
and there's a shorter time horizon here at Alameda Point, so they are willing to explore adaptive
reuse prior to transfer and are ready to take that risk.
Member Matarrese asked whether Mr. Tagami has had discussions with the City regarding
transitional use prior to transfer and whether we are pursuing this. Member Matarrese stated that
this option was a way to get us closest to the plan without losing the assets out there, as there is
copper reining, vandalism, and no funds to secure property. Mr. Tagami said that he has
expressed this desire and that SunCal has beginnings of communication with the City. It is an
ongoing process, but they want to mind their role, focus on due diligence and underwriting, but
said that when the time is appropriate, they would be prepared to engage in that dialogue.
Member Matarrese asked if the appropriate time is now and if they are prepared to engage ill that
dialogue now. Member Matarrese expressed to the Board that they consider giving direction to
move this issue as a priority. vice Chair Tam discussed that the heavy capital makes the council
and the board reluctant to make investments for property we don't own. Mr. Tagami explained
that they often go at risk and are not asking the city to go at risk. They evaluate current
increment expense, have a good track record of delivering value, all of which requires a team.
approach. They will expend the time, energy and money. Chair Johnson asked if DSD wants to
move forward with interim adaptive reuse.
Debbie Potter explained that the key components to the partnership and business deal is the
leasing program and at what point to transition that leasing program. These discussions are
underway, and staff is interested in understanding what SunCal and Phil Tagami are proposing.
Taking over the leasing program and expanding that program, renovating and identifying what
uses can be derived from those if renovated. David Brandt, Deputy Executive Director, added
that there was also discussion of starting with restoring one building at a time.
Chair Johnson stated that there are lots of benefits to adaptive reuse prior to transfer and that we
should move forward. Member Gilmore asked how many of the 23 buildings are currently under
lease, to which Ms. Potter replied that most are not, because they are in poor condition. Member
Gilmore discussed working something out with Suncal and Mr. Tagami for taking over historic
properties that are not under lease, to rehab and get there for productive use, and the sooner the
better. Ms. Potter explained that we should continue the analysis, what they can expect for a
revenue stream, and how willing are they to go at risk for buildings we don't own. Mr. Tagami
explained that all properties need time on task; they need to take stock of the buildings, introduce
there back on marketplace. It will take lots of work, and there will be obstacles and tears shed,
but they are up for the challenge and there is no excuse not to engage.
Mr. Keliher wanted to make it clear that SunCal has not engaged staff in any kind of detail about
this particular issue, in response to Chair Johnson's request that SunCal communicate with staff
on more regular basis staff so they can have a better understanding of possibilities, and they are
not caught by surprise. Ms. Potter stated that she didn't intend to give that impression, and that
the issue just hasn't been discussed in great detail. She explained that SunCal and Tagami have
to do their deal before they can come to the City with a proposal. The Board and staff were all in
agreement that there are advantages to moving forward with rehabilitation on the structures that
can be saved, and to make it a priority to move forward on. discussions and do it as quickly as
possible.
Member Matarrese proposed that the ARRA direct staff to get into discussions with
SunCal and Phil Tagami tomorrow and bring an update back on what the discussions have
been like and what the choke points are; and this issue can be discussed as a separate
activity that runs parallel to the development. All Poardmembers agreed.
Nice Chair Tam expressed that the key to a successful project is flexibility in reacting to the
changing economic conditions. In the next decade there is some expectation that the sustained
downturn in economy will require job creation, and looking at the potential. for self sustaining for
energy level for the entire island, maybe there are some partnerships with AP&T, such as a solar
farm, or other type of renewable energy source. vice Chair Tam supports the plan, as it reflects
and captures sentiment that we've been hearing throughout the community and public
workshops. Chair Johnson stated that there needs to be discussion about the phasing of public
amenities at some other appropriate point.
FM reiterate some comments from last time including that the plan needs work on
environmental issues such as the working waterfront, which showers noise upwind. He
expressed that it's an odd place to put a neighborhood. He also mentioned not wanting to see
plans that have sidewalk dining because it's freezing cold near the waterfront and no water
play in park. He cited that there are plenty of lessons in town to learn. from, discussing the Bay
Street, Emeryville situation where there is residential over retail and the problems that come
from that type of development. Member Matarrese stated examples are all around that we should
consider, and would like the same level of detail in the final plan that has been given to
residential, given to commercial and light industrial.
Member dehaan asked SunCal about a survey that they were conducting with Alameda residents.
Mr. Kellher clarified that the survey is preliminary and is sponsored by SunCal and not the City.
4 -A. Oral report from Member Matarrese, Restoration .Advisory Board (RAB) representative.
Highlights of October 2 Alameda Point RAB Meeting. (Continued from the November
5 2008 Regular Meeting)
Member Matarrese provided a brief presentation. He discussed highlights from the ARRA
meeting of Sept. 10 The BCT gave an update and of the fiscal year and their activities, and
there were comments on the transfer of FOST for site IR 15.
5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT)
None.
6. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE GOVERNING BODY
None.
7. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting was adjourned at 11:34 p.m. by Chair Johnson.
Respectfully submitted,
Irma Glidden
ARRA Secretary
UNAPPROVED
MINUTES of THE REGULAR MEETING of THE
ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Tuesday, December 2, 2005
The meeting convened at 11:18 p.m. with Chair Johnson presiding.
1. ROLL CALL
Present: Chair Beverly Johnson
B oardmember Doug deHaan
B oardmernber Frank Matarrese
Boardrnernber Marie Gilmore
Vice Chair Lena Tarn.
2. CONSENT CALENDAR
2 -C
2 -A.. Authorize Negotiation and Execution of a Sublease for Petris Air work Industries, Inc. dba
Alameda Aerospace at Alameda Point.
This item was pulled from the agenda and not addressed. It was continued to the January
7, 2009 regular ARRA meeting. (This item was subsequently submitted as an off agenda).
3. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
3 -A. Approve the Community Reuse Plan Amendment and Legally Binding Agreement for the
Homeless Accommodation at the North Housing Parcel
This item was continued to a Special Joint Meeting of the ARRA and Housing Authority
Board of Commissioners on February 4, 2009.
4 -A. oral report from Member Matarrese, Restoration Advisory Board (RAB)
representative Highlights of November 6 Alameda Point RAB Meeting.
Member Matarrese did not attend the 1116 RAB meeting and did not have a report. He was
attending a Council meeting on 1116.
5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT)
None.
6. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE GOVERNING BODY
None.
A
Meeting was adjourned at 11:19 p.m. by Chair Johnson.
Respectfully submitted,
64k4t.", O-X&L��
Irma Glidden
ARRA S ecretary
Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority
Interoffice Memorandum
To: Honorable Mayor and
Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority
From. Debra Kurita
Executive Director
Date: January 7, 2009
Re: Authorize Negotiation and Execution. of a Sublease Renewal for Mariusz
Lewandowski dba Woodmasters at Alameda Point
BACKGROUND
The Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority (ARRA) governing Board approves all Alameda
Point subleases with a lease term greater than one year. The proposed sublease for Mariusz
Lewandowski dba Woodmasters (Woodmasters) is for five years.
nl'� CT TC3N
Woodmasters formerly occupied Building 44 at Alameda Point. In February 2008 the Navy informed
the ARRA that they would be conducting screening and testing in four buildings at Alameda. Point
and that those buildings are required to be empty for these tests. Building 44 was one of those
buildings.
Attachment A. describes the business terms for the proposed sublease for Woodmasters in a portion
of Building 43. The rent for Woodmasters is $19,896 annually, or $0.3419 per sq. ft. in the first year.
There is a 3% increase in each subsequent year. The building will continue to be used for light
manufacturing and office purposes. Building 43 is in poor to fair condition.
In accordance with the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement between the ARRA. and SunCal
Companies, this lease has been discussed with representatives from SunCal Companies and has their
concurrence.
BUDGET C FINANCIA.L INVACT
This lease will generate $19,896 in the fist year. These funds will be retained by the ARRA.
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize Negotiation and Execution of a Sublease for Woodmasters at Alameda Point.
Honorable Chair and Members of the
Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority
January 7, 2009
Page 2
Respectfully submitted,
Leslie Little
Development Services Director
r
By: Nanette Banks
Finance Administration Manager
Attachment: A. Proposed Sublease Business Terms
B. Site Map
ATTACHMENT A
PROPOSED SUBLEASE BUSINESS TERMS
TENANT
BUILDING
SIZE (SF)
TERM
RENT
Mariusz Lewandowski
dba Woodmasters
43
4480
5 yrs
$1,658 /mo.
ATTACHME NT B
Io
O
d
--G
1�1
LJ
D
i
L�
i
i
Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority
Interoffice Memorandum
To: Honorable Mayor and
Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority
From: Debra Kurita
Executive Director
Date: January 7, 2009
2 -E
Re: Authorize Negotiation and Execution of a Sublease Renewal for Alameda Soccer
Club at Alameda Point
BACKGROUND
The Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority (ARRA) governing Board approves all Alameda
Point subleases with a lease term greater than one year. The proposed sublease for Alameda Soccer
Club is for five years.
DISCUSSION
The Alameda Soccer Club leased the field they currently occupy from the ARRA five years ago. At
that time, the Alameda Soccer Club installed a new grass playing field, which included grading,
installing an irrigation system, planting the grass, and installing a fence and bleachers, all at their sole
expense.
Attachment A describes the business terns for the proposed sublease for the Alameda Soccer Club at
Homet Field. Although the rent for the Alameda Soccer Club is waived, the club shall continue to
maintain the field at their sole expense, which is estimated to be approximately $40,000 annually. In
addition to maintaining the field, they also pay for the water used, which averages $550 per month.
The field will continue to be used for adult and youth soccer. when the field is not in use, the field
will be available for the Recreation and Park Director to schedule use.
In accordance with the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement between the ARRA and S unCal
Companies, this lease has been discussed with representatives from SunCal Companies and has their
concurrence.
BUDGET CONSIDERATION l FINANCIAL IMPACT
This lease will generate approximately $6,600 in the first year to pay for water. These funds will be
retained by the ARRA.
Honorable Chair and Members of the January 7, 2009
Alameda Meuse and Redevelopment Authority Page 2
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize Negotiation and Execution of a Sublease for Alameda Soccer Club at Alameda Point.
By: Nanette Banks
Finance Administration Manager
Attachment: A. Proposed Sublease Business Terms
B. Site Map
ATTACHMENT A
PROPOSED SUBLEASE BUSINESS TERMS
TENANT
BUILDING
SIZE (SF)
TERM
RENT
Alameda Soccer Club
Hornet Field
104,544
5 yrs
Waived
ATTACHMENT B
ai
cf)
0
I
i�
X
X
X
D C
FTI
VIKING
0--
0
0 0-)
cyl N 0
0
00
0-) m
X �k
Q0 00
ED
0-)
r\j
0
SKYHAWE
00
m c
Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority
Interoffice Memorandum
To: Honorable Mayor and
Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority
From: Debra Kurita
Executive Director
Date: January 7, 2009
2 -F
WEEM :j
Re: Authorize the Sale of Four Boston Whalers to NRC f or $44,500
BACKGROUND
In June 2001 the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority (ARRA) established a procedure for
the disposition of personal property. The procedure delegated to the Executive Director the authority
to declare as surplus any item of personal property which is valued at less than $10,000 and which is
not required for use by the ARRA in the administration of its powers and duties pursuant to the Joint
Powers .Agreement between the Alameda City Council and the Alameda Community Improvement
Commission.
DISCUSSION
The Navy transfer of personal property to the ARRA included the title to two 1996 Boston whalers,
Serial Numbers BwCPA035L596 and BwCPA0336596; a 1992 Boston whaler, Serial Number
BwCPA3031293; and a 1993 Boston whaler, Serial Number BwC8222EH394. NRC
Environmental Services (NRC) uses these boats in support of port management. They have spent a
considerable amount of money to maintain the boats in warping order. NRC has requested to
purchase these boats and add therm to their maintenance program. Staff initiated a marine survey in
order to determine the value of these boats.
VRS vericlairn determined the market value 'of the boats to be $15,000 for BwCPA035L596,
$12,000 for BWCPA0336596, $18,000 for BwCPA3031293 and $8,000 for BwC8222EH394. As
part of their request to purchase these boats, NRC included invoices showing the amount they have
spent on each boat to restore them to working condition. As has been the ARRA's past practice,
NRC's prior investment in the boats was taken into account when determining the sale price of the
vessels. The attached Citv owned Vessel Repair Synopsis and New Offer shows the appraised value,
materials,, and labor required for repairs and the offer of purchase price for these Boston whalers.
BUDGET CONSIDERATION 1 FINA NCIAL IMPACT
The purchase will generate $44,500 to the ARRA lease revenue fund.
Honorable Chair and Members of the
Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority
RBCOMMENDATION
January 7, 2009
Page 2
Authorize the sale of four Boston whalers to the ARRA.'s port services manager, NR.C, for $441,
Respectfully su itted,
I'
w
Leslie Little
Development Services Director
F4
q
By: Nanette Banks
Finance Administration Manager
October 16, 2008
Re: offer to Purchase Four City Owned Vessels
Dear Mr. Ha aspen,
I would like to thank you for providing the results by the independent contract surveyor
pertaining to the City of A.la neda owned vessels. It is our intention to actively pursue the
search for a buyer of these vessels in order to help the cit-V gain the most valuable offer
Flo
available.
That being said ROES would like to offer to purchase four 4) of the vessels listed.
These are:
1996 Boston whaler, BWCPA.035L596
1996 Boston Whaler, BW PA0336596
1992 Boston whale-, BWCPA3031293
1993 .Boston whaler; B C8222EH394
While we appreciate that the surveyor conducted his appraisal given the current condition
of the four vessels mentioned we would like all parties to understand that the vessels
were in their current condition due to the substantial repair and maintenance completed
by and paid for by NRCES. We understand that based on our current contractual
agreement with the City of Alameda these vessels were available for our use at no charge
as long as they were maintained and operated at our expense. with this in mind I would
like the city to take into consideration the following:
Firstly when NRCES took over the contract from Trident Marine the vessels in question
were in very poor condition, one was not usable at all due to a bad engine. Due to the
high standards NRCES adheres to and to better be prepared to ful fill our contractual
obligation to the city and to MARAD we took it upon ourselves to bring these vessels to
a condition where they could be relied on to fulfill their purpose safer and efficiently.
Thus the survey values carne back as they did.
Secondly we went beyond the normal maintenance required and committed substantial
funds and manpower to bring them up to their current valuation. If this work were not to
have been completed the boats would not be valued as they are presently by the survey,
Lastly we continue to provide a high level of maintenance and care to these vessels
something we feel was neglected for many years previous to our taking over tile. contract
with the city-
Given the above information we would like to offer the Cite of Alameda the amount of
$44,500.00 for purchase of these vessels. We feel this is a very reasonable offer and
given that their current state is due only to our due diligence and expense we feel it is
reasonable and fair.
T have included below a synopsis of the repairs made to the vessels we are offering to
purchase and the invoices for the expenses incurred. We sincerely hope that you will
help us in completing this sale and to help the city understand why our offer is some what
lower then their current appraised value.
Respectfully Submitted
Charles Greer
CA Regional Marine Operations Manager
2
City Owned vessel Repair Synopsis and New Offer
1996 Boston Whaler, PA03SL596
Work Performed by NRCES:
0 Engine and lower unit repaired t0 make usable.
0 See attached invoices for materials purchased 4-144086 acid 91.02453.
0 Total materials to snake vessel usable; $3287.39
Appraised Value: $1 5
Materials: $3287.39
New Offer: 12,500.00
1996 Boston whaler BWCPA0336596
Work performed by NR ES
Original engine replaced due to failure.
vessel required VHF radio. None as originally received.
See attached invoice #1443 66 for $17,053. 16.
Motor and radio installation perfon ned by Nl CES.
Estimated labor cost at $45.00/hr X 2 men x 24 br s. $2160.00
Total .materials and labor to make vessel usable $19,213.16
Appraised Value:
$12
Materials and Labor:
$19,213-16
New Offer.
$9,000.00
1992 Boston whaler, BWCPA3031293
Work performed by NR S:
a Both outboards repaired due to various issues.
0 See attached invoice 4 144478 for $9017.23
Appraised value:
$18,000.00
Materials and Labor:
$9
New Offer:
$15,500.00
1993 Boston 'whaler; BWC8222EH394
Work performed by NRCES:
Engine repaired due t0 various issues.
See .attached Invoice 41444084 for 1,040.98
Appraised value_ $8
Materials and Labor: $1
New Offer: $7
Total Appraised value: $53
Total Invested. in Repairs: $35,558.76
Total Offer for POnr Boats: $44
3
uvrBOARD MOTOR
SHOP
DP14CN M 8:30AX
51AA30PM SAT 9:00AN 5:00PM
CLOSED SUNDAY
222 KENNEDY STREET OAFLANDr CA- 94606
(510-533-92'90
Work Order 11022
1x voice 144366 Reprint
12/01/200?
11022
.09:50
:25
1024,53
Year /Make
96 BOSTON WHALER
NRC ENVIROMENTAL
SERVICES Model:
IM.LPACT 21 Loa.:
21
1605YEIRRY PT
CG Nurnbe r,
lirs:
OTL SPILL A-�T TN:MARCU S
ALAMEDAt CA 94501-
Serial NO:
nWCPA033L596
V�Soel:
BF1 50/BANJ1 301378
510-719-0076 WK#510-749-1390
Warr:
INVOICE FOR WORK
PERFORMED FOR BOAT/VESSEL NEW HONDA 150\ OWNERS
INSTALL NEW HONDA 150
(T/M)
0% 00n
PO 250434
JOB #31532 INSTALL NEW HONDA, 150 AND SAVE OLD MOTOR
Part Number
Detcription List
Qt Price Ext Price
0 82 07 -1 0W3 OMFC-W
OlLflOW30 FC-W
7 6.58
46,06
SHOP
10 4 GA BAIT CAL
1 44.,50
44-50
R.B)? 15 0 AXX
HONDA 1509P 4-STR 12410,00
1 1165 800
11658.00
Stock No 4186
DANJ-1301378
06240-ZW5-U40
BOX RI's, R.
1 249-99
249.99
36452-ZW7-1 1 OAR
I-GN/STP PNL W/PGM
I 19b•99
199.99
32205-ZY6-025AH
20-WIRE MAIN HR N,
,69
1 169
106.
37250 -ZW5-01OZA
T_ACH/Hl� METER BKI
1 8706
.99
87.99
37260-ZW5-00OZA
BK TRIM METRR
1 62.69
62.69
37450-ZW5-000ZA
BK VOLTMETER.
1 18W69
18,.,69
32103-ZW7-000AH
I TRENT HARNI F AR
75.,.44
7 5 44.
MI S C RIGGING SARD
1 75.00
7 5.0 0
301947X22r4T
33C SUPR.EMF, 111024
2 68.49
136.98
58130-ZY3-015A
3X15 1/4 X 15 AL
1 162-98
162-98
Material:
12925-00
Date
Description
Ro-urs
Price
11/30/2007 216 INSTALL NEW MOTOR
16,00
1568.00
Labor:
1568-00
Subtotal., $14493-00
A,
2 2
REPAIR BILGE PUMPS
(T/ M)
0% comp
BOTH BILGE PAPS NOT WORXING
Part Numbex
Description List
Qt Price Ext price
BP0540
COUPLER REPAIR XI
1 48.00
48-00
S4-1597
RULt-A-MATIC PLUS
2 56..79
113.58
MERCURY-FREE
50-1025
RULE 500 PUMP
1 28.49
28.49
ma tear. al"
190,07
'ell
9 9_60
8002 /Z-T/OT
Mf"AT'R
uu U
orive
on m-F 8*.,3oAm
5 3 0PM SAT 9:00AM 5.*.00PM
CLOSED SUNDAY
333 KENNEDY STREET. 0AKL_kND CA. 94606
(510)-533-9290
Work Order 11022'
Invoice 144366 Reprint
12/01/2007
11022
09
50"_ 25
102453
Year/Hobe
9 6 BO STON WHALER
NRC ENVIROMENTAL
SERVICES Modell:
IMPACT 21 Loa
21
1605 PERRY PT
CG Number.:
Hrs
OIL SPILL ATTN:MARCUS
ALAMEDAf CA 94501-
Serial No:
BWCPAD33L596
Vessel e.
DF1 50/BANJI 301378
510-719-0076 WIC #51
0 -749 -1 390 warxe
INVOICE FOR WORK
PERFORMED FOR BOAT/VESSEL NEW HONDA 150\ OWNERS
w
ift 1
INSTALL NEW HONDA 150
(T /M}
0% CO
PO#250434
JOB #31532 INSTALL NEW BONDA 150 AND SAVE OLD MOTOR
Part Number
Description Llat
Qt Price Ext Price
08207-10W30MFC-W
OlLrIOW30 FC-W
7 6,58
46,06
SHOP
10 4 GA BATT CARL
1 44.50
44-50
aB_V150AKX
HONDA 15014P 4-STR 12410,00
1 11658, 00 116S8_00
Stock No 4186
BA J- 1301378
06240-ZW5-V40
BOX ICITr R.
1 249-99
249.99
36452--ZW7-1110A3
IGN/STP PAL W/PGV1
1 199.99
199.99
32205-ZY6-02SAIi
20-WIRE M7�LIW HRN
1 106-69
106.69
37250-ZW5-01 OZA
TACH/HR MIETER BK
1 8?.99
87.99
37260-ZWS-DOOZA
BK TRIM METER,�FA
1 62.69
62.69
37450-ZWS-OOOZA
BX V0=METERrFA
1 18.69
18.69
32103-ZW7-00DA14
I TPMqT HALRN., FAR
I 7S.44
75-44
1
MI SC RIGGING S=
1 75,00
75-00
301947X22FT
33C SUPREME 111.24
2 68.49
136.98
58130-ZY3-015A
3X15 1/4 X 15 AL
1 162.98
162-98
Material: 12925.00
Date
Description
x1purs
PrIae
11/30/2007 216 INSTALL NEW MOTOR
16,Oo
1568.00
Labor:
1568.00
Subtotal, 9 $14493A0
2 2
REPAIR BILGE PUMPS
(TIM)
0% CON
BOTH BILGE PUMPS NOT WORKING
Part Numhar
Description list
Q t y Price Ex Price
BPOS40
COUPLER REPAIR R1
1 48-00
48.00
54-1597
RULE-A-MATIC PLUS
2 56.79
113-58
MERCURY-FREE
50-1025
RULE 500 PUMP
1 28.49
28-49
Material:
190.07
S P A
M%
ZG/TO 3,9VJ
Work o rder 11022
Invoice 144366
Reprint
Pa
10/17/2008
11022
09- 50-26
Date
Descri
Hours
Price
11/30/2007 21
REPAIR BILG1,1 PMwfPS
1,00
98.00
Labor:
98,00
Subtotal^
$288,07
3 3
0 STEERING CYLv SALTIED UP
(T/M)
0% COT
STEERING
CYLINDER ALL SALTED UP AND WILL 'NOT COME OFF OLD
MOTOR. FRONT HELM LEAX1UG AND WILL NOT
WORK 1PROPERLY AT
HIGH
RPM
part Number
Description Li9t
Qt Pride
Ext Pr i C Q
TLHHC5345
PIVOT FRONT MOUNT
1 677,.00
677oOO.
88-6004
S FA STPR 14YD�UL 1
2 16,59
33.18
LT.
Materialz
710.18
4 4
INSTALL VHF RADIO
(T/M)
0- C
T,NSTALL NEW VRF RADIO PACE GE
Part Number
Description List
00
Qt Price
Ext Price
I
ICOM M422 VHF RAD
1 399.00
399.DD
10-2161
MOUNT STAINLESS 59-99
1 49.99
49-99
27-1500
CLAMSHELL 'VENT 1-
4.59
4.5.9
Material..
453-58
Date
Description
Hours
pr ice
12/01/2007 216 INSTALL VHF RADIO KIT
1-.50
147.00
Labor:
147-00
Subtotal:
$600..58
Date Brou In:
11/26/2007
Total Mate rz'.al:
$14278.83
Date Promised
12/17/2007
Total Labor:
$18-13,00
Date Conipleted
12/01/2007
Tax
$1249o4O
Date invoiced
12/01/2007
Total Amount:
$1 7341 Z3
W $0.00
V bky,?ad33c,sq(.
Z0 39Vc4 TO:OT BOOZ/LT/01
09: 00 5105333050 SERVICE PAGE 01105
OUTBOARD MOTOR SHOP
O PEN M-F 8 3 0AM 5 3 0PM SAT 9 O OAM 5-00PH CLOSED SUNDAY
333 �NNEDY STREET OANLAND, cA. 94606 (510)-533-9290
work order 11015 Invo'ce 144478 Reprint 08: 54t40
12/05/2007 11015
102453
NRC EN V�RQMENTAL SERVICES
1605 FERRY PT
OIL SPILL ATTN-MARCUS
0
ALAXEDAr CA 94501-
Y ear /Make,-, BOSTON WHALER
Mode 1 25 GUARDIAU Loa:
CG Number: Q 11 Hr a Ar
w
510,719-0076 WK#510,749-1390
serial No: 3031293
Vossol: 2200TXEOC/GO3948099P
Warr-.
OICE F OR W ORK PERFORMED FOR B OAT/VESSEL SZ00TXE0C/G03948099P OWNERS
CHECK OUT
(T/M)
PO#7150434 JOB #31532, LEAK TESTED
BOTH ENGINES PORT OK. FOUND
COIL LEADS MISROUTED COP,_RFCTED_
CRECKED STBD SIDE-OK ALSO
CORRECTED R OUTING OF COILS LEADS, C5ECXED GEARDIL ON BOTH.
ENGINES NEEDS TO BE CHANGED. PORT WON'T START NO SPARK TO #3
45 CYL,INDER. STBDw WON'T START
OARS LOADED UP WITH OIL+ WATER
TESZED AFTER ALL REPAIRS P�FORMED STBD ENGINE POPS OUT CF
GE AR UNDER A LOAD
Date Description
Price
11/30/2007 214 Check out
2.00 196.00
12/04/2007 21.4 WATER TEST
1.50 147-00
Labor: 343,00
2 2 ELECTRICAL
N 0%
CHECKED DA- TIER IES BOTH BAD INSTALLED 2 N.73W BAT TERIBS
REPLACED 1 NEGATIVE BATTERY CABLE TILAT WAS BAD. RUNNING LIGHTS
I; .qo p CHECXED FOUND FUSE HOLDER
CORRQID REPLACED RETE
part Number DescriptiOn
Lint Qt Price Ext Price
'EAT 4 24M-X�M HIGI-1 OUTPUT
2 89.95 179-90
SHOP LUGS /WRZ-:�-1/ 2' CABLE
1 18.00 1 B.00
54-3500 PERKO FUSE PANEL FU
1 BA9 B.99
Material-, 206,89
Da-te Descriptioxl
Hours Price
11/20/2007 221 BATT8RIES/LUGS
11,00 98.00
12/05/2007 214 'RTJNNING LIGRT8
0-50 49.00
Labor: 147,00
Subtotal, $353,89
A B AND LUSEr
3 1036 TUN
V4-V6 CARB (T/M) 0% CO
FORT ENGINE LEAK TESTED OK NO
ST A RK To #3 #4 SPARKe CHA
GEAR OIL AND WASjjFR PRESSURE
AND VA CUUM CHECK LOWER UNIT,
CHECY SyNC, AND LINK, REPLACE P
LUGS t LUBE MOTOR, LUBE STEERING,
CE R C Irr, PROP AND SHAFT, REPLACE
FUEL FILTERf, TEST RUN AND C1112C.X
SHIFT AND RUNNING TEMPERATURE.
TOROUE HEADS/
NGPAI a'3 1 SOR 1)
10/1,G1/2008 09'.'00 5105333050 SER��ICE PAGE 02/05
Work Order 11015 lavoice 14447B
Reprint Pa
ISO 1 6/2008 08:54-:40
NEXT SERVICE SHOULD BE PERFORMED AFTER ONE SEASON OR AFTER
APPROXIMATLY 100 HOURS OF RUNNING TIME
part Number Description List Qt
Price,
Ext Price
Q L78YC PAR PLUG 6
.5-72
34-32
502906 FUEL FILT 10 MIC 1
9.98
9.98
311598 WASHER 10 PR- 2
o.96
1.90
SHOP GEAROILMREASE 1
18.45
18.4S
HHHZZZ HAZARD WASTE 1
1.79
1.79
Material:
66-44
Date De s cript 14orl
Pry'ce
11/30/2007 214 �service
2,00
196.00
Labor
196,00
subtotalA
$262.44
4 1036 TUNE AND LURE V4 -V6 CARE
(T /M)
0% co
ST:BD. ENGINE LEAX TES TED OX MIECKED SPAP%Xj CHANGE GEAR OIL AND
WASHER S PRESSURE AND VACUUM CRECK LOWER UNIT, CHECK SYNC AND
LINK, REPLACE PUGS LUKE MOTOIZr LEE STEERING, CHECK PROP AND
SERFT, REPLACE FUEL FILTER., TEST RUN AND CHECK SHIFT AND
RUNNING TEMPERA's URE& TORQUE I-1EADS,
-sXT SERVICE S�IOULD BE PE ,FORMED AFTER .ONE
Nr
SEASON 0 AFTE
APPROXIMA-TLY 100 HOURS OF RUNNING TIMF,
P Number Description List Qt
P r 3. C e
Ext Price
Q L78YC SPAYZ7-r<PLUG 6
5.72
34.32
50 290 6 FUEL FILT 10 MIC 1
9.98
9.98
311598 WASHER 10 PX- 2
O�95
1,90
SHOP GEAROIL/GREASE 1
18,45
18.45
�ffzzz RAZARD WASTE. 1
1-.79
1.79
Naterialf-I
66,44
Date Deooript ion
Hours
Price
11/30/2007 214 service
2.00
196.00
Labor&
196,00
Subtotal:
$262-44
5 1078 WATER PUMP (V6 V8)
(T/M)
0% 'a O!
PORT ENGINE REMOVE AND REP LACE WATE� PUMP ASSY. CLEAN WATER
SAS SAGE S IN LOWER UNIT- TEST RUN AiqD CRUC X OPERXTING
TEMPERATURE.
part Number Description List Q4my
Price
Ext Price
5001595 KIT AY PUMP 1
77.33
77.33
Material:
77,33
PA
10/16 2003 09:00 5105-OJ33050 SERVICE
PAC-E 03/05
Work Order 1101 5 I-nvolce 1 4447 8
Reprint
Pa
10/16/2008 11015
08:54:
Date Description
Hours
pxiaa
11 214 water pvmp
2.,00
196.00
Labor;
196.00
Subtotal:
$273-33
6 1078 VIA TER PUMP (V6 V8)
(T/M)
0,% COM13
STBD- ENGINE RISIMOVE 7 ►ND REPLACE WATER PUMP ASSY. CLEAN WATER
PAS 5AQES IN LOWER UNIT- TFST RUN AND CHECK OPERATING
TEMPERATURE.
Part Number Descript-.11on List
Qty prioe
Ext Price
5001593 KIT AY,IMP�LLRR
1 41-98
41 .98
Materl"Lal:
41.98
Date De5cription
Hours
P=ice
11/30/2007 214 water pump
196-00
L 2-.00
abor:
196oOO
.0
Subtotal..
$237,98
7 3 z steer-lin
(T/M)
0% S OR
11YDRALIC STEEPING RAM HAS NICKS ON IT HELM LEAXING. WE
REMOVED RELM PAM
HAD TO USE A TORCH TO GET APART. INSTALLED NEW RAM HELM
FIL LED SYSTEM BLEED. CHANGE I ANCHOR
ON STEERING WITH A GOOD
USED ONE:
Part Number Descriptioxi Lis t
Qt Price
Ext psi ce
88-6220 SEASTAR TT -HOSES S
1 1149-99
1149.9-9
SHOP USED STEERING A14M
1 10.'00
10.00
SHOP FLUID
18..ss
18.55
Material:
1178.54
Date Description
Ho' r.9
Price
12/03/2007 214 STEERING
5.00
490.00
Labor
490.00
Subtotal,
$1668.54
lip, 4 throttle/shift
(T/M)
0 C lii
PORT THROTTLE SHIFT P%,Ms STRIPPED REPLACED WITH USED ARMS
REPLYCED STBD THROTTLE ARM WITH GCQU
USED ONE AS OLD ONE WAS
CORROIDED. ALSO REPLACED MISSING BOLT
ON POWERSEAD BASE-
STBD
tMOVED ARM
SHIFT ARM MISSING BUSHING FE
4PLACED BUSH ING
RE
COTTER PIN.
Part Xumbe-r Description List
Qty Price
Ext Price
SHOP. US�D SHIFT/THROTTLE
1 40w00
40-00
material:
40.00
Date Description
Hours
Price
12/03/2007 714 SHIFT/TEROTTLE
3,00
294.00
Labor,.
294,00
1W
Subtotal.
$334,00
9 5 A TBD ENGINE
(T M)
0% COTE-
STBD ENGINE WON'T START AS CARDS FULL
OF OIL DRAINED OUT
OJIL
5 'W
10/16/2005 09: 00 5105322060 SE PAGE 04/05
Work O de TTIVOiae 144478
rr 11015
Reprint
10/16/2008 11015
08p
RUN CLEANER IN GARBS NOW ENGTNE 5T ARTS RM FOR A SHORT PERIOD
OF TIME THEN HOR14 WENT OFF TESTED
FOUND VRO BAD INSTALLED NEW
VRO CLEANED UP C-ARBS. CHEC1�D OIL TANK, FILLED PURGE TANK*
WATER LEAY\.,TNG FROM ENGINE WE REMOVED LOWER PANS
FOUND E UAUST HOSE LEAKING WE REMOVED INSPECTED OR REINSTALLED
TIGHTENED
CLAMP RETESTED ON FLUSHER OK REINSTALLED LOWER PANS.
Part Number Description
List Qt Price Ext Price
5007089 ANODE AY
1 26,39 26.39
5004558 3007420 VRQ
1 345.00 345.00
OIL XD30 TCW 3 BULK 1/2
2 9-50 1.9.00
390,39
Date Desc=1".ption
Ho-urs Price
12/03/2007 214 9TBID ENGINE
4. 5 0 441.00
Labor: 441.00
Subtotal: $831-39
10 M PORT MOTOR
(T/M) 0-% q O
PORT MOTOR RESET LINYAat THROTTLE
PLATES. NO SPARK TO #3 #5
CHANC7ED OUT RECEPTICLES. RAN ENGINE LEAN 'POPPING HAD TO REMOVE
CARBSt D I SAS SEMBLED f CLEAN8D OUT,
REASS CABBED REINSTALLED
ADJUSTED- TIMER BAS STUCX REMCV2D FLYWHEEL CLE2�NED LUBED
TIME BASE RE INN TALLER FLYWHEEL. GROMMET LEARING ON EXHAUST
HOUSING REP 7DACED- POWERHEAD LEAKING AT BASE G2 Sl,�.ET REMOVED
POWEFJJT;AD CLEANED UP SURFACES REINSTALLED POWERREAD 'IT14 NEW
GASKET. CHECKED OIL TANK FILLED
PURG' E. RETESTED ON FLUSHER
VRO FA.T►ED REPLACED*
Part Number De8cription
List Qt Price Ext Price
5007420 KIT AYrF PUMP&LMTR
1 345400 345-00
hi I nn f 1 3-. ht
S PP 4 -ei
1 8.55 8.55
333879 GASIKETo PWHD-ADPT
1 18,..69 18.69
345586 GROMMET INSERT
1 58--14 58-14
301967 0 RING M
1 3r61 3.61
512256 -PT-N 481817-AF,44 M
3 1.67 51-01
OIL3 XD30 Tcw 3 13ULK 1/2
2 9.50 19w00
Material 45a.00
Date Description
Hours Price
12/0-3/2007 214 PORT MOTOR
12.50 1225-00
Labor: 1225.00
Subtotal: $1683-00
7 trailer"
(T/M) 0% QoLup-,
ills tall heav dut tongue jack
chan coupler on front of
traller.
Part Number Deacxiptiox
Litt Qt PrjL-C.e Ext Price
FUA256C 4 2 5/16 COUPLER
142,30 142-30
FLIED 2500 HD TCNGUE JACK
1 105.32 105.,32
41-1854 ANC iOR S RAC KLE, 3/8
2 2.60 5,,20
ki
mat tea' r mar alff 215.24 82
bU_1GPA3o3 129 �j
10/1G/2000w 09s060 5105333050 SERVICE
PACE 05/e5
Work
Order 11015
Involve 144A78
ReprInt
Pa
10/16/2008
11015
08:54:40
Date
Degcription
Hours
Price
12/04/2007 214
TFAILER
1,00
98.00
Labor:
98"00
Subtotal;
$350-82
STBD ENGINE LOWER
(T/M)
0% C
STBD ENGINE (COUNTER ROTATION) LOWER UNIT OP OUT OF
CE A
UNDER A-LOAD. WE INSTALLED -A GOOD USED
LOWER UlTIT TOOK
NEW
WATER 'PUMP OFF OLD LOWER PUT ON USED
LOWER CHANG-EID GEAR OIL
REWATER
TESTED,
Part
Number
Description List
Q t y prj
Ext Price
SHOP
USED LOWER COUNTER
1 1800 00
1800.00
SHOP
GEAROIL/GREASE
1 18.45
18.45
Material:
1818-45
Date
Description
Hours
12/05/2007 210
LOWER/RETEST
2.00
196,00
.6
Labor-.
196�.00
Subtotal:
$2014,45
nay e
Brou In:
11/20/2007
Total Material:
$4597.28
Date
Promised
12/11/2007
Total Labor, IV
$401
Date
'let 'cl i'
Co e
mp
12/05/2007
Tax-,
$401.95
Date
Invoiced
12
To tal Amount,
9G17.23
$0.00
��.eacP�a3a 3 iz
Reprint summar Of Invoice 4-*144084** 11/23/2007 h 105
Work 0.r **11016 for 102453
SRC EN'VIRCMEXTAL SERVICES Phone- 510-719,
1605 FERRY PT 0 0076
OIL SPILL ATTNs:lxlARCUS Fax: 510-749,4150
AL. CA 94501 Fax:
DON 719-0076 keven
Part Number Descript�,on Qt pric4z-� Ext Price
175158
G-2AR OIL AND LUBE
VALVE 6PK
1
20.00
2o.00
26-1040
311598
r4EAD POLE AssEM13Ty,
'WAMER
1
1
6.68
29-39
6.68
317245
10 P-K.
SPRTRG M
2
0.95
29-39
1
318395
VALVE
1
2-74
.90
2,74
512�56
512-4.78
1
PIX 481817-A-844 M
2-
..4
3.61
1.67
7.22
582365
COVER IGN CCIL M
SP PLUG LEAD Ay
1
.3-71
6-68
3.71
5841
HEMZZ
KIT AyiIGDT COIL M
3
1
12-77
36.21
38-31
Labor
HA'17JA-RD WASTR
DIAG. GET RUMNI
1�11
36-21
1.11
3 21 93 2
332369
C-1kSKET TERMST 1OPK
2
0-66
375,()o
5005440
GASIU-1,1T DRIL 10PR
THERM Ay
2
0-74
132
1.48
Labor
REPL THE
2
50-22
Labor
WATER TEST, D2LY
294-00
147-00
8ales
subtotal:
TaX (Area
1):
1022.97
Fl
INVOICE
TOTAL:
1 8, 0-li
1040■9
C l "arge to
Accourl 102453
040 ,98
00-AT
gZ2z c —x 34q--
On-the-mmter marine sales and services.
333 Kenned S [reef, Oakland', CA W606
Where f ir e professicnc(15 shop! 0 0
w"Iv. ou I boo An;-, to rskop com
whoro Ystc
Pkone 510,533,9290 Fox 510.53:3.3374
�Y
T i
f17
t o
�4
91
7%
j
4
tit L.;) 4
t
.3
.19
t
T
oil
t
Received b
X
unless Olherwisespeci W, pa of !his invoice is due or) the 156 of tka month 10110"Yin ol purc ase.Nrcho�ni vcmees Io pm 1.5% purnowh inlere5f ai oil past am balances annuol percenlo role of 161.
and all reascau to CO515 and n1lornc fees incurred in culfeaiun ot" this account, it m,-4er-iur 1-4c) refunds on insfutled P aris, special orders,
alectrica" ports, or corburclor ossem6lse5, Reloms i�uUUed io j 5%jI 6ni-IJ16
clean a. Adc6rat cmd refunded g cx>ds riusl Ee orcampanied b IN5 inya;ce No rater ;s accepip.8 agar 30 t4a from delp- of Invoice,
rr er ine so 01 services,
Were t h e professiona s hop
d Motor
Sh
4 e
0 m
Wh€ ra rise Fratessfarrrrds Shop!
,s '4
333 Kennedy Sheet, 041and, CA 9A606
lvvv w. ou [boctr d i tiolar s tiop .corr,
Phone 510.533.9290 a Fax 510,533.3374
`.r i y 1,
f r•e r y r i r' f a et 3 u r
I fi n, 9 3f3
f.y P' 4 j •1' F a j F., 9f •t Y r s i r S y ♦e_ A T? Qf'
i ii s- i "r �4.� R',� r` x .F
a 1 it �ti a
.r�.. :t r° F Z t -e Ly s_
Y tea.»...,... r r.n ..r.. y y..� _,fir.
t F rF
ti
...yam.. r f..... _,...,.a w.
tt z!
V V z
f�nC I
r 131•, 1111
,J
Recaiv.od by X F
r t r� 1 ul d a urrj}r :e. FLa&oser' agrees In f�a 1. per �nont� interes{ ir) >�l past dUla �iO yes, 431MU31 p�c'c�Ma�aa rde 0 1
s
Unless czfer.�5 E�ii, €Ystnt cl il�E ir i uv air l!t �tl� ralx
t d o ria n i le Tnc rr�d in C -06",t on al INS a= eauni, I necessary. No r i'voolled porm, spn�rsn c� rclers, lecf�'icai ;�rar4s or ccrr urelcr Lass mlalles. al urn su }ec! In l��,d ing
r,nd n!I r ,osorm6la coils ari
ch arge: All �Irlts and �eluazded gca cls must lar: �zc�mpc�tr��d �y tl,�s In< <a�ce. Igo fet:.rcrs;. �cre�t,�c� c���r days >sxn die o r.��,��.
City of Alameda
Alameda .Reuse and Redevelopment Authority
To: Honorable Chair and
Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment .Authority
From: Debra K.urita
Executive Director
Date: January 7, 2009
v
Re: Alameda Point Update Presentation of the Alameda Point Draft
Redevelopment Master Plan
BACKGROUND
On July 18, 2007, the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority (ARRA), Community
Improvement Commission (CIC), and City Council approved an Exclusive Negotiation
Agreement (ENA) with SunCal Alameda Point LLC (SunCal) for the redevelopment of Alameda
Point. The 24 -month ENA established key performance milestones, provided for reimbursement
of ARRA staff and third party costs, identified activities to be completed by third party entities,
and specified key personnel assigned to the project.
The ENA was amended in March 2005 to provide more time to complete two tasks: preparation
of the Development Concept and related documents, and preparation of the draft master plan. In
addition, SunCal was required to deposit $350,000 a quarter, and spend $117,000 a month, for
consultant costs to ensure progress on developing the required documents. The ENA was further
amended in October 2005 to allow a transfer of ownership interest in SunCal to a new entity that
is providing project financing. As part of approving the second amendment, the deadline for
submitting the draft master plan was extended 30 days to December 19, 2005.
On September 19, SunCal submitted the Development Concept and related documents, including
a business plan, infrastructure plan, draft update of the Sports Complex Master Plan, and draft
project pro forina. SunCal gave presentations on the Development Concept to eight boards and
commissions during October to receive feedback, and they presented it to the ARRA Board on
November 5 and November IS. SunCal evaluated the comments received from City boards and
commissions and the ARRA as part of preparing the draft master plan.
T7T ,qCTT .qgTC)N
On December 19, 2005, SunCal submitted its .Alameda Point .Draft Redevelopment Master Plan
(Master Plan), a Sports Complex Master Plan Update (Update), and a Business Plan for the
proposed project outlined in the master plan. In addition, the City retained Fehr and Peers to
Honorable Chair and Members of the January 7, 2009
Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Page 2 of 2
prepare a Transportation Strategy to support the land uses identified in SunCal's Master Plan.
The Master Plan and Update, along with the Transportation Strategy, are public documents.
Pursuant to the terms of the ENA, the Business Plan is a confidential document. The public
documents were posted on the Alameda Point web site www. alanheda- pint.
cons and made
available at the Alameda Free Library on Monday, December 22, 2005. All of the documents,
including the Business Plan, were transmitted to the ARRA Board members under separate
cover.
SunCal is presenting its Master Plan and Update to the ARRA Board at its January 7, 2009
meeting. Submittal of the Master Plan and related documents is a mandatory milestone pursuant
to the FICA. These documents are a further refinement of SunCal's land plan and assessment of
financial feasibility. The Master Plan addresses design principles, the land plan, transportation,
sustainability, infrastructure, and next steps. The Business Plan includes the current project pro
forma and its supporting documents.
Following the presentation of the Master Plan to the ARRA Board, S unC al will continue to
fulfill its obligations under the ENA, including supporting negotiations with the Navy for a
conveyance tern sheet, finalizing an exchange agreement for Public Trust properties, refining
the proposed land plan and project pro forma, and continuing due diligence in such areas as
historic preservation and environmental clean -up. SunCal's next mandatory milestones are a
ballot initiative deterihination, a written election to submit an entitlement application or pursue a
ballot initiative, due on April 30, 2009, and a finalized Navy conveyance terns sheet due on July
3 l 2009.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
This staff report is for information only and no action is required. Therefore, there is no
financial impact on the ARRA and General Fund budgets.
RECOMMENDATION
Receive public comment and provide feedback on SunCal's Alameda Point Draft
Redevelonnhent Master Plan.
RjAp,,AyMlly submi
Leslie
Development,,, rvices Director
I
Debbie Potter
Base Reuse and Community Development Manager
DI JLAL /DP do
Ctv of Alameda
V
Alameda Reuse and Redevelo meat Authority
To: Honorable Chair and
Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority
From: Debra Kurita
Executive Director
Date: January 7, 2009
Re: Department of veterans Affairs (VA)/Navy Presentation Regarding the
Navy /VA Federal -to- Federal Transfer at Former NAS Alarneda
BACKGROUND
In 1993, when. the Navy announced that it was closing Naval Air Station Alameda, the United
States Fish and wildlife Service (USF&W) formally submitted a request for a Federal-to -Federal
transfer of the western portion of the former base. USF &w requested a transfer of
approximately 550 acres of dry land and loft acres of submerged lands to provide a refuge for
two endangered species, the California Least Tenn and the California Brown Pelican.
The Davy and USF &w were unable to reach agreement on the terns of a Fed -to -Fed transfer
and in 2004, the Navy began discussions with the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) about
the opportunity for a Fed --to -Fed transfer to meet the VA's goal of a permanent location for VA
facilities to serve Bay Area veterans. In November 2006, the VA formally requested a property
transfer from the Navy.
The VA made a presentation to the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority (ARRA) at its
December 5, 2007 meeting. The VA proposed developing 113 acres of the 550 -acre site with a
colurnbariuzn, a community hospital that would serve the community as well as veterans, a
medical office building and a VA out patient clinic. The remainder of the site would be devoted
to protecting and maintaining the least tern colony. Since December 2007, the VA has been: 1)
wor%ing with the Navy on a Memorandum of Understanding regarding the terrns and conditions
of the proposed transfer, 2) preparing for the anticipated consultations under Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act with the USF &w, as required for Federal agencies when an endangered
species nzay be impacted by property transfer and /or development, and 3) preparing an
Environrnental Assessnnent (E-A) as required pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) to determine any environmental impacts of the proposed property transfer and/or
development.
Honorable Chair and Members of the January 7, 2009
Alan.eda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Page 2 of 3
The VA and Navy held a public information meeting on December 18, 2008, and a request was
made at that tine that the presentation be made to the Y
Board at its January 7, 2009
meeting. The presentation is for informational purposes and no action is required.
DDT Cl TON
The December 18, 2008 public information meeting was held aboard the USS Hornet and
approximately 100 people attended the meeting. The VA and Navy made a power point
presentation regarding the proposed project and answered questions from. the audience. The
power point presentation was posted on the Alameda Point web site (www.alaineda-point.com
on December 22, 2008. A shortened version of the presentation will be made to the ARRA. A
copy of the presentation is attached to the staff report.
The public information meeting was conducted consistent with NEPA. The VA and Navy
outlined the need for the project, the proposed land plan, the alternative land plans that will be
analyzed as part of the NEPA process, and the key environmental resources that will be
considered in the E.A. Several audience members asked questions and provided comments. The
VA and Navy also outlined a schedule for completing the envirom rental review for the proposed
property transfer.
The initial public cornment period Concludes on January 20, 2009. The draft EA will be
published in Spring 2009. There will be another public comment period on the draft EA, and the
final EA will be published in the Summer 2009. Staff anticipates submitting comments during
the initial public comment period requesting the VA and Navy to analyze the project impacts on
public services and facilities, particularly transportation and municipal services.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no financial impact from receiving a presentation from the VA and Davy on the
proposed Fed -to -Fed transfer of a portion of NAS Alameda.
RECOMMENDATION
This r eport for only action is required
ull
I
I
a 'b p��. T1 'Be31vd� �`+'i� S' ec r ��e- •Y y
Leslie Kittle
Development Services Director
By eb ie Potter
Base Reuse and Community Development Manager
Honorable Chair and Members of the
AIameda Reuse and. Redevelopment Authority
DI`LAL /DP.dc
January 7, 2009
Page 3 of
Attachment
I. VAJNavy Pourer Point Presentation
Presentation to ARRA 01/07/09 1
g NAS :��:do c: —d in 1937
y
Di 7F�£:sc opett�+ aL ��AS A :a eL.cx� C'��: :.S s d.�i o` by the
BsRAC
yy %i7rnmission r� qp t kg e r of f 'y �ry e
t..iLS 3 r F ed t o Fed ed Li LRE�ifoam r
F S
-a irfie ;d for ,p -)se .c k +�r.`i �5.3ge refuge, in De ber
r 03, the Navy and the ySF WS reach -o'd a
Im re in tramsf er of this real prop,,,. rt
of
Si tire the es; F�C-1 has iy�G[. e Fp�/wo kin v 4vi�t h G F t
/o
r�
famed ay�- e 3 V�S!�yrs arc i�[1d U L:cal C Gde v d'.e t Guth �r y
i[ te
n Fc;�J- to.,7• ed F `o kytr�a of
The e p C o�: C ct i.
Y a
pl�o/'■t
frorr; tI1e N avy t q VIk,
Presentation to ARRA 01/07/09 1
VHA needs in VA Sierra Pacific Network
VHA Mission
Arl��i V�.,it"f8fIs
2004 Nav makes%/Aawam of oopommi�
veterans b vidin primar
r of prope-t� at NAS Nam-eda.
Serves 1 .1 mil lio V
n eterans
N avwn ber 2004 VA Secr e.,a. v sef ?L Fbi frlcJ
of Irtent Ic, intleres�"I-,-5 acquir.ln
related medical, sur N
f, IAS
.he. orn%er� �41am
b r 2 005 'VA r=d N a vT i r7 i t ate s K s D i i,@L� t iin c w t I
Greater, Ba Area
VBA %upport Oftce,
November 2006 VA Sencretary, Ninrilsor, makes 'ormv:
Navv
VHA needs in VA Sierra Pacific Network
VHA Mission
veterans b vidin primar
VHA
Serves 1 .1 mil lio V
n eterans
State-olf�-the-all VHA Outptaderq C'Inic Ic serve
ve'Mrar-sM N-orffiem J�.ejmadln Count
related medical, sur N
NGA
VA C of to serve Vcatorans in the
Greater, Ba Area
VBA %upport Oftce,
VHA needs in VA Sierra Pacific Network
VHA Mission
(Northern Califoenia/Northern Nevada)
Se te the needs of America's
veterans b vidin primar
Serves 1 .1 mil lio V
n eterans
f..,.arle, specializ care, and
Over 300,,000 Patients
related medical, sur N
Ike
rpental he�,alth and social
Six major Medical Centers
support services. 27 Outpatient Clinics
Presentation to ARDA
I\J-% 01/07/09 2
C-3
NCA Msn
The National Cemetery Administration
h onors veterans with f inal resting pima
in national shrines and with lasting
tributes that commemorate their service
to our nation.
Source: 2000 US Census extrapolated to 2007
a
A l
a�
g.[;rvlces L urre:ltfy o 2° the 00C fld W di;` c be
Prr a :d ,-i r.-�, st i- t1 )e -aF1 P t N arneda F int2 c id +;ri;lf 1"ic 13 d e
Phr —ary e0are
Eye Clinic
Urgent �JC.��
1L
iJ�'�.�L�CL�f �''�f I"L"- -`."4 `C�� �3LrrSiii'
a I l/SuYCif. cal Subspeciaffies>
Dental
x C�S i.�
S
q P% t
•�e�i 'k'�i t�:.J An Fb �Fi. a4: r
Y L.. atory arid Radi o y
x D Iivsi a' 3 hf.�r I
DOD A�Y:k.iuie7irxv Ca e '..rflYi ;c
^G�i-
Presentation to ARRA 01/07/09 3
VHA Outpatient Clinic
Other
Space/Acrea
sitin Criteria
Considerations
Re
located "-ithiii a 30 min
Ama wit-h ,Jense
30""000 crnss
'j
5 hetjrs
VeL;�rzjarl P opulation
S jlk�-t
OPC Location Area:
to loml
49.50 115 ac.-es
"and uses
Space Ac reage
cofntrp cos'm 'C'o-unt --me
Acce s V. pu""ic
a-res
Ei. A 1 a n e, C n/
VBA
cc,�,ft:-d 4..05 6.a"t-1,14.,
Pvoid
Oft) ze
fli P ath OF airpotz,
Cq, Qand
d ue 4.`.3
15
P 05t tra-IjimatUr Stress
VV' San FFan09-5,-.e Ba,,�
s
Service Area
Other Considerations
(Catchment Area)
Ar-�� densel veneran
Co':.umbaria tnai.
9011,�-,
sUffic-ent f,,-;r at least a 40-
would serve of
weSC,hin a 175 rml� m6us ,,,f pr0 s$-m
che sa,-
Ba Area veterans
5 hetjrs
75 IT,-
-Nr -les
Fix, s`bRlt
Che'r re-,.�dence
a',alab"Rity of water and utibbes
"and uses
Space Ac reage
Re
quals f r soi-s
a-res
re.]F ri dUnns o ---pment
Presentation to ARDA
a,c IxrI% 01/07/09 4
ALI. VA FACILITIES LOCATED ON TRANSFER PARCEL
VAwou".d acouire 5.49-ar-:c- -,arcel fron, Nav Kira Feed. �o- F-ed -rap-s-er and
1 3-acre 1 e. lthe L."te wo-ft-,-'be, deve the fcz:' O-Mn
NCA GoiumbaHa Cemeter
C amm u nit Hospital with heli EU L ;2 -50, 60 s ftJ2 5 acres
VA Support Officns I Medical Offlre BuMings sq, t./2" ecries)
Other Proposed Uses
Natzire
Use e U
o Asting btmkers fol, szorage of emler s -pl-es
Alteirnative C (Aelbbteo 66
A
7
t
f'VHX
A
I WM:
3
NCA CEMETERY ON FED-TO-FED TRANSFER PARCEL
VHA OUTPATIENT CLIMC AT OTHER ALAMEDA POINT SfTE
Wk -v., o Wd a c: u i e 5 4 9 a r, r; --1 P 3 F e 1 fi, o m Na v y v a 'F; d t o- I:: e d T a i -i --,f e r
NCA Cemefery dcEv&1opear -or, 5419-acre trar--sfar 3>31rce-1
VHA Omtpale5�.,t C-Nnic E tabfis%hed a-, az AL-.me---da Point
VA Rf-, 9 ,.vm a 1 0 ff i eq �4, ou Id r rn a r. i n� 0 a
-ND corer -.-n ^i hospim, or rnedc-A, office space pmposr-4J, ',,)A,-vaWd not.
pLn-,u -o e
jn!�Has
T a `-m I m e r: s a !,,,e m, a I \f A V O;j I A rt e e ,4 0 p kj rr li, C
Of" V
arreda Point
A*
li
t een' C
A a IV pme.t.ei
yon
M�
P
IN .0 d
IA CEMETERY ON FED-TO-FED TRANSFER PARCEL
VHA OUTPATIENT CLINIC IN OAKLAND
VA kv i I d t'-qi i i j r e-, 5 4 9 -a c, r e P ,,,i rc f ro r i Na �v i a, F e d r,, e Tr s f e r
NCA Gem,---te developod o-n 549-acre �rarzY*:- w c-1
VHA Ouwaflenl- Clinic a� a lor-afion, in,
U 11
4 No cm-, mm. f3 n. tv h os;) -Ml o m e d i --a;: o face Spare P no po -ze --i:- �w a W d r, o
1 -k-
i el p�-rsu.e EUL op�,,,�rwl:fies
4 o *his 2"Iternative, VA,,vouid need "ca purcb-ase! or lease propert
Presentation to ARDA
1\1-1 01/07/09 5
1 r -Ifflc 'd b
F d A o ca t r,-i r s: f r w, o, i i I c; t t a k e, F I ej; o, 'vA. f ia d! wo; j C.
M7;a On the site.
P ro p a i iy wc� u. d r e r, a i n Nav uovinears hip �Untdl another properly
c fie4
od d b e id en U C.,
'C')n-site ractivities, Ovo-.Uld bo, -imito.-d m, -'and
d: %h, i t h t N I a v -1V c F. re ta k e, s t a t i i F, f t h,,,,, site
,)'he.- actions, a e,
VH--,',' Heq1thc-,qre arld VBA benefits services vvuuld rerna.- �-A the
(10- e'M [c),cation",
N C A C iem e� t e r Se, r v i cie, s an F'r a n c i C o B y A r e a v e t P, r a r s w o u Id
use the 'Smi Joaquiri National ;Cerrtetery ir-., 'Sama Nella, CA, lol�-ated
c 100 miles a-,,ma the Saaame Vale Nati'm'lal
C
ej
"Aj'-r a Ovate ce III etf,' r
mill 'S I ay, or 1�
M1
fdemliltv, investi cha�acterize-, and clean up
hazard-ous SUbstances
Reduce dsk to human health and the n
from past disposa" operations and spills /releases
Consistent with the Corm -,r ehensive Einvironmental
Response. Compensation and
"CERCLA
Complete necessai- environmental work and
obtaill SItel Closure, from re a
Biolo ReSOL-1-CC-S
Transportation
Hazardous Materials
Was
Geolo and Soil,$
titer Rosources
Utilities
0 D 1 Serv�ces
Land Us e
Noise
V-sua" Resmirces
Air Qualit
CUItUFai. Resource�-
Environmenta'. Juistice
Presentation to ARDA
1%-M 01/07/09 6
Initial PUbliC Comment Period (until 1120109)
Publication of Draft E (Spring 2009)
Draft EA Public Comment Period (Spring 2009)
Final E (urnmer 2009)
Public Notice of Availability and FI
(S ummer 2009)
Presentation to ARRA 01/07/09 7
R Program low
F
C}��'1l :7 a cre s
Diaoram
W est Beach V% e" -3nds 33 acres
5 's L.!,..r o se4.i E :a; '�f PSJS./ on:nn.w nt Feb 2009
S i Cit,�.� e Engi seeri g Design and I i ple, i en Re, [edy
X01 W 013
g
+•gam .:l ,.x.,.
T
i+:�'M s�
t`.- y.::v� r»t �x,� a.sy.. y� ..a�
Initial PUbliC Comment Period (until 1120109)
Publication of Draft E (Spring 2009)
Draft EA Public Comment Period (Spring 2009)
Final E (urnmer 2009)
Public Notice of Availability and FI
(S ummer 2009)
Presentation to ARRA 01/07/09 7
Presentation to ARRA 01/07/09 8
Russell Resources, Inc.
environmental management
Alameda Point RAB Meeting on December 4, 2008
Highlights and Analysis
RAB members resent: George Humphreys (outgoing co- chair), Fred Hoffman, Joan Konrad,
Jinn Leach, Kurt Peterson, Dale Smith (incoming co- chair), Jinn Sweeney, Jean Sweeney, and
Michael Jahn. Torrey
Peter Russell, the ARRA's environmental consultant, did not attend, because much of the
meeting was a year -end pot luck gathering, with few business matters on the agenda. The
information presented here is from draft meeting minutes prepared by the Navy. The discussion
below supplements the draft minutes with technical evaluation and analysis.
Rernedi ation and other field work in progress:
0 debris pile removal along north share of Seaplane Lagoon continuing
0 removal of radiologically impacted storm drain outside Building 5
groundwater petroleum rernediation system near Atlantic Avenue entrance continuing
0 groundwater treatment at IR Site 14 (former fire training area in Northwest Territory)
continuing
0 the petroleum renediation system at the southern end of the western hangar row is
continuing to extract much more jet fuel than was expected
New RAB Community Co- Chair: Dale Smith was elected RAB Community Co -Chair for 2009.
Navy presentation of FY09 protects
Sites with remedial action planned for FY09 or in progress:
o IR. Site 14 (former fire training area in Northwest Territory): Groundwater at this
site is being cleaned to eliminate unacceptable risks from indoor vapor intrusion
with residential use, even though it is Public Trust land and residential uses are
not permitted.
o IR Sites 5 (Building 5, Aircraft Rework Facility) and 10 (Building 400, Missile
Rework operations). Historically, dial painting wastewaters were discharged into
drains connected to the storm sewer system. The Navy is resuming replacement
of affected storm sewers and associated soil. A several hundred -foot segment of
radiologically impacted storm drain line is under structural supports inside
Building 5. The Navy claims structural considerations preclude removal of this
drain line while the building in place. Upon further investigation, this might be
determined not to be the case. Either the Navy must remove a portion of the
building to address this remediation now, or required cleanup must be conducted
in the future, once Building 5 is demolished.
o IR Site 17 (Seaplane Lagoon): The ARRA urged the Navy to investigate the
debris piles along the north shore of the Seaplane Lagoon for many years. The
Navy's ensuing investigation showed widespread contamination, which is now
RR1, 440 Nova Albion Way, Suite T, San Rofael, California 94903 415.902.3. 23 fox 815.572.8600
Page 2 of 3 Alameda Point RAB Meeting, December 4, 2008
December 18, 2008 Highlights and Analysis
being excavated and hauled offsite. Following completion of the storm drain line
cleanup (discussed above) and removal of the debris piles, the Navy will clean up
contaminated sediments in the northeast and northwest corners of Seaplane
Lagoon by excavation and disposal offsite.
o IR Site 26 (western Hangar Zone): The Navy has completed its first phase of
groundwater treatment to remove solvents. However, during the initial cleanup,
the Navy discovered unexpected petroleum contamination, which made the
treatment much less effective. The Navy is rethinking how to implement the next
phase of groundwater cleanup at this site. Cleanup will allow unrestricted reuse.
o IR Site 27 (Dock. Zone): This fiscal year the Navy will begin groundwater cleanup
to remove solvent contamination and allow unrestricted reuse. Pilot testing will
precede full -scale groundwater treatment.
o IR Site 28 (Todd Shipyard): Metals contamination in soil and groundwater at this
site threatens organisms in Oakland Inner Harbor. Contaminated soil will be
excavated and disposed offsite. Groundwater will be treated to immobilize
dissolved metals. The pilot testing phase is in progress. This site is already clean
enough for residential reuse, even though such reuse is not planned.
o OU -1 Sites
IR Site 6 (Building 41, Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance Facility): The
Navy will remove an oil -water separator and treat groundwater to lower
solvent contamination to drinking water standards. Although cleanup has
yet to begin, once completed the site will be available for unrestricted
reuse.
IR Site 7 (Navy Exchange Service Station): The Navy formerly operated
an incinerator at this site, which resulted in heavy contamination of soil,
primarily with metals. The Navy will excavate metals contamination, with
offsite disposal, to allow unrestricted reuse. Cleanup of petroleum in soil
and groundwater at this site is mostly completed.
IR Site 8 (Building 114, Pesticide Storage Area): Soil removal with offsite
disposal will make this site suitable for unrestricted reuse. Relatively
minor groundwater petroleum contamination is being addressed, but
closure of this issue likely will not occur in FY09.
IR Site 16 (C -2 Cans Area, Shipping Container Storage): In this area, the
Navy will remove oil -water separators, excavate pesticide contaminated
soil in the south, and lead contaminated soil in the north. The Navy will
conduct further treatment of groundwater solvent plumes one in the
south and one in the north.
Sites with remedial decisionmaking planned for FY09:
o IR Site 35 (west Housing Area): This site is the bulk of EDC -5 and includes most
of the historic residential areas.t Much of this site likely will be reused for future
residences. This site has relatively minor contamination and it will be cleaned to
allow unrestricted reuse.
o IR Site 1 (1943 -1956 Disposal Area): This "landfill" in the northwest comer of
the former base is currently at the draft ROD stage of clean -up decisionmaking.
440 Nova Albion Way, Suite 1, San Rafael, California 94903 415.902.3123 fax 815.572.8500
Page 3 of 3
December 18, 2008
Alameda Point RAB Meeting, December 4, 2008
Highlights and Analysis
The Navy has yet to respond to the ARRA s, letter concerning additional
investigation to evaluate whether the landfill is still present.
o IR Site 2 (west Beach Landfill and Associated wetlands): This landfill, to the
south of IR Site 1, is proposed to be transferred to the Veterans' Administration.
This site is the likely recipient of wastes relocated from the former IR Site 1
landfill.
o IR. Site 24 (Pier 1 and 2 Sediments): A small area of contamination under wharf
Road likely will. be rernediated by excavation and disposal offsite. Cleanup of
this site is challenging due to limited access under the road built over the water.
other sites are still in the investigation and feasibility study stages of the CBRCLA
process. These include most prominently oU -2A, which includes the former petroleum
refinery; oU -2B, the area immediately south of Atlantic Avenue, which includes heavy
solvent contamination of groundwater associated with Buildings 163 and 360; and O
2C, the area around Building 5, which also includes heavy solvent contamination of
groundwater. The Davy has conducted several removal actions and pilot tests in these
areas, but much work remains to clean up the extensive solvent contamination.
The two major petroleum sites remaining on the base are currently undergoing active
remediation one at the southern end of western hangar Row (CAA -C), and one near
the Atlantic Avenue entrance to the former base (CAA -3). Many other petroleum sites
have yet to be formally closed through the Water Board's regulatory process, but little if
any further active rernediation is expected to be needed. The closure of two such
petroleum. sites, AOC -23G and CAA -6, is needed to remove institutional controls
restricting digging from PBC -1. PBC -1 recently received a FoST (Finding of Suitability
to Transfer) determination as a prelude to transfer. PB C -1 is the site of the planned sports
complex.
Pro cyress Pie Charts
Anna- Marie Cook, the US EPA's project manager for Alameda Point, presented two pie charts
(attached) that illustrate the status of environmental cleanup at the former base.
e Alameda Point Designated Reuse: This chart shows the acreages for restricted and
unrestricted reuse for the portions of the base that have already had clean -up decisions
made for them. of the 845 acres with reuse already decided, only 100 acres have reuse
restrictions. whenever possible, Alameda Point is being cleaned for unrestricted reuse.
Alameda Point Investigation and Cleanup: This chart shows the amount of land at
Alameda Point in each stage of the CERCLA process. The acreage of the segments in the
left half of this chart approximately equals the total acreage on the first chart. These
segments are areas for which clean decisions have been made, determining suitability for
unrestricted reuse. The large yellow segment, labeled Site Investigations, is primarily
composed of the runways parcels proposed to be transferred to the Veterans'
Administration.
440 Nova Albion Way, Suite 1, San Rafael, California 94903 415.902.3123 fox 815. 572.8600
(n
CD
co
Cf)
c
ET
r-t-
C CD D
c 0-
CD
Cn CD
3 CD
0
0
CD
N X
CD
0
cr 3
CD
0-
0
0 w
CD
C
C
CD
CD 0
0 3
C:
0
CD CD
a
CD
CD
CL
CD
(n
CD
co
oo CIOE3 CD CD;:;:
Cl) "13 cD
cn
�{n 0 0 (D 5 7
0 -cn
rah
LL l
cn O-
FD 0
OF) cn
0
m
co
CD
w
0
1-1
CD
(n
co
CD
I M MEN IM 11 PEW
W 1.
co
CD
CD
CD
CL
C�
co
I M MEN IM 11 PEW
CD
(n
00
I
o c
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CL
C�
co