Loading...
2006-04-05 ARRA PacketAGENDA Regular Meeting of the Governing Body of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority *. * * *** ** Alameda City Hall Council Chamber, Room 390 2263 Santa Clara Avenue Alameda, CA 94501 • ROLL CALL 2. CONSENT CALENDAR Wednesday, April 5, 2006 Meeting will begin at 7:00 p.m. Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted, approved or adopted by one motion unless a request for removal for discussion or explanation is received from the Board or a member of the public. 2 -A. Approval of the minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 1, 2006. 2 -B Recommendation to Approve Sublease at Alameda Point. 3. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 3-A. Security of Historic Buildings at Alameda Point. 3-B. Recommendation to Approve a 20 -year Lease with the Department of Transportation Maritime Administration (MARAD). 3 -C. ARRA Budget Transition Planning Workshop. 3 -D. Update on Alameda Point Navy Negotiations and Land Use Planning. 4. ORAL REPORTS 4 -A. Oral report from Member Matarrese, RAB representative. 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON - AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT) (Any person may address the governing body in regard to any matter over which the governing body has jurisdiction that is not on the agenda.) 6. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE GOVERNING BODY ARRA Agenda - April 5, 2006 Page 2 7. ADJOURNMENT This meeting will be cablecast live on channel 15. The next regular ARRA meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, May 3, 2006. Notes • Sign language interpreters will be available on request. Please contact the ARRA Secretary at 749 -5800 at least 72 hours before the meeting to request an interpreter. ■ Accessible seating for persons with disabilities (including those using wheelchairs) is available. ■ Minutes of the meeting are available in enlarged print. • Audio tapes of the meeting are available for review at the ARRA offices upon request. APPROVED MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Wednesday. March 1, 2006 The meeting convened at 7:25 p.m. with Chair Johnson presiding. 1. ROLL CALL Present: Beverly Johnson, Chair of Alameda Doug dellaan, Boardmember, City of Alameda Frank Matarrese, Boardmember, City of Alameda Marie Gilmore, Boardmember, City of Alameda Absent: Tony Daysog, Boardmember, City of Alameda (Member Daysog was present for the Closed Session meeting by telephone) 2. CONSENT CALENDAR 2 -A. Approval of the minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 1, 2006. 2 -B. Recommendation to Approve the Naval Air Museum (ANAM) Sublease at Alameda Point. 2 -C. Authorize the Executive Director to execute a Grant Agreement with Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) for a $221,000 Station Area Planning Grant for Alameda Point and to Execute a Funding Agreement with the Alameda County Transportation Improvement Agency (ACTIA) for $25,415 to Provide Matching Local Funds for the MTC grant. Approval of 2 -A and 2 -C was motioned by Member Matarrese, seconded by Member Gilmore and passed by the following voice vote: Ayes — 4; Noes -- 0; Abstentions -- 0. Item 2 -B. was pulled by Chair Johnson for discussion because a speaker slip was submitted by Barbara Baack of the ANAM. Leslie Little, Development Services Director, gave a brief explanation that this item was presented to the ARRA at its regular meeting on June 1, 2005 at which time staff was recommending a short -term agreement. At that time, staff was instructed by the Board to renegotiate to extend the term of the lease and include performance requirements in the lease. The lease presented tonight for Building 77 is for 10 years with one 5 -year renewal option. Chair Johnson requested that the Board review the performance standards before moving forward with the lease. Barbara Baack of ANAM reiterated to the Board that the performance metrics in question has already been submitted by ANAM, along with the proposed lease, to the Development Services Department. Details of the performance measures were not included in Page 2 the staff report, however; so the Board requested that this item be continued to the next meeting with the performance measures included. 3. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS None. 4. ORAL REPORTS 4 -A. Oral report from Member Matarrese, RAB representative. Member Matarrese was unable to attend the meeting, so there was no report. 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON - AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT) There was one speaker slip from Richard Rutter of the AAPS. Mr. Rutter discussed the BOQ Tour he took with Member Matarrese on February 23, 2006. The tour was also attended by Chris Buckley of the AAPS, Elizabeth Johnson and Andrew Thomas of the City, and Mike Hamper of PM Realty Group. Mr. Rutter presented several photos taken of the BOQ which showed extensive vandalism and deterioration of several buildings. Security is a major problem and there needs to be better measures and more resources towards securing these buildings. Mr. Rutter made a plea that the BOQ is a good candidate for adaptive reuse, but that it has become an attractive nuisance. 6. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE GOVERNING BODY Member Matarrese thanked staff for the BOQ Tour. He stated that his purpose for taking the tour was to see for himself whether the BOQ is worth restoring, as proposed in the PDC. He expressed concern about the security of the buildings and that the BOQ has become an attractive nuisance that someone could get hurt in if we're not careful. He mentioned a previously existing security /surveillance system in the buildings. Leslie Little explained that the equipment Member Matarrese was referring to was missing or stolen. Member MatarTese's primary concern is to increase police patrol, and, secondarily, it should be discussed by the appropriate commissions and boards on whether to maintain the BOQ building or not. He further stated that it should be considered rather soon and not let it deteriorate further. Ms. Little discussed some of the strategies being developed by the Development Services Dept., PM Realty and the APD regarding increasing security. Member deHaan's real concern is assessment of the buildings that we want to retain for adaptive reuse. Member Matarrese requested that these security issues be addressed at the next ARRA meeting. Executive Director, Debra Kurita, assured the Board that the Development Services Department Page 3 and the APIA will work together as a team to identify the security issues and will agendize this item for the next ARRA meeting. 7. ADJOURNMENT Meeting was adjourned at 7 :57 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Irma Glidden ARRA Secretary Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Interoffice Memorandum April 5, 2006 TO: Honorable Chair and Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Debra Kurita, Executive Director RE: Recommendation to Approve Sublease at Alameda Point Background At the December 2004 ARRA Board Meeting, the ARRA elected to review and approve all subleases at Alameda Point with a terra of one year or longer. The proposed sublease is for one year, and, as a consequence, is before the Board for approval. Discussion The lease is between the ARRA and Event Productions for a term of one year. Event Productions conducts conference, party, mixer type events and requires the building for storage of equipment and is leasing 30,000 sq. ft. of low grade quality warehouse space (Bldg. 91) for $43,200 annually. The lease has provisions for no renewal. Fiscal Impact The rent for EVENT PRODUCTIONS is $43,200 annually or $0.12 per sq foot. Recommendation Approve the proposed sublease. Attachment ully sub esie itte Development Services Director By: Nanette Banks Finance & Administration Manager Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service Honorable Chair and Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority ATTACHMENT "A" PROPOSED SUBLEASE BUSINESS TERMS April 5, 2006 Page 2 TENANT BUILDING SIZE (SF) TERM RENT Event Productions Bldg 91 30,000 16 months $3,600 /mo. Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Interoffice Memorandum April 5, 2006 TO: Honorable Chair and Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Debra Kurita Executive Director RE: Security of Historic Buildings at Alameda Point Background The Memorandum of Agreement between the United States Government, Department of the Navy and the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority (ARRA) requires the ARRA to provide for the maintenance and security of buildings and land areas in the designated Historic District. Discussion In the past, ARRA staff worked with the Alameda Police Department to patrol buildings on a regular basis. Currently, PM Realty Group, the ARRA's property manager and maintenance staff, drive the building premises checking locked doors and windows and other security breach area to keep intruders out of the buildings. Alameda Point has two separate problems; vandalism and theft. Vandalism events in particular, increase seasonally, based upon activity events at the former Naval Air Station and the school vacation calendar. The most menacing vandalism problems are broken windows, graffiti, broken doors, roof access covers pried off, etc. Upon discovery, PM Realty Group dispatches maintenance staff to the building, or buildings, to cover windows and doors with plywood, to repair locks or place a hasp and pad -lock on an unsecured door, or secure the roof access in place. While all buildings are subject to this random vandalism, there are six large buildings that seem to be targeted more than others. These are Buildings 3, 4, 5, 16, 17 and 360. Five of these buildings are in the historic district and four are contributing structures. These buildings used to be barracks for officers and enlisted soldiers. It is difficult to detect intrusion at these buildings because of their large, meandering configurations and the existence of multiple entrances and exits. Previously, at the recommendation of the police, the ARRA purchased one Sentinel Radio Alarm for use to detect intruders in buildings. Alameda Police Department (APD) would place the alarm in a building, and if a break in occurred, the alarm would sound directly to Police Dispatch, summoning officers to a break -in in progress. The one unit has been effective in the past with apprehension of suspects that have gained access to these buildings. For an unknown reason, the unit was temporarily removed, but recently relocated by APD, and can be put back into service. This alarm unit costs approximately $3,300, and includes a radio to attach to each device that directly links to the police department. Staff will be purchasing four additional alarm systems to place in the above listed buildings and to rotate through other buildings on a regular basis. In addition, Alameda Police Department and PM Realty communicate regularly and will continue to meet to attempt to keep abreast of new issues and to seek ways to mitigate further damages. Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service Honorable Chair and Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Fiscal Impact April 5, 2006 Pg. 2 The total cost for the purchase of new security equipment and radios is approximately $15,000. Recommendation This report has been prepared in response to the ARRA Board inquiry at the February 1, meeting. Res i ectf i lIy su emitted, PB /SPINB : do Leslie Little Development Services Director *-f) By: Nanette Banks Finance & Administration Manager Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service is Preservation Officer (1999) 1' U 0 `4- cn .' cn cu 0• C) 4714 IL4 ›le 0 X c a 0 0 0 0 0 0 c. 4�3 0 0 • El 0 rrl to 0 CCU � 0 0 0 U z c,D 0 0 o 0 Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Interoffice Memorandum April 5, 2006 TO: Honorable Chair and Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Debra Kurita Executive Director RE: Recommendation to Approve 20 -year Lease with the Department of Transportation. Maritime Administration (MARAD) Background Staff has been negotiating the terms of a 20-year lease with the Maritime Administration (MARAD) since May 2002. Initially, Alameda Point Community Partners (APCP) took the lead in negotiations. The outline of the lease (term, space, new construction) was developed during those negotiations, however the process never resulted in a final agreement. In December 2003, former Deputy City Manager, Doug Yount, assumed responsibility for finalizing the long -term lease. After Mr. Yount's departure in February 2004, Development Services staff assumed responsibility to complete lease negotiations. In February 2006, staff presented the lease outline to the ARRA Governing Body. The ARRA asked for an opportunity to review the lease (Attachment 1), project cash fly - _ 1 - n - A This item was continued from the February 2006 ARRA I d to prepare a full risk assessment of the lease. Currently MARAD is leasing Pier 2 and p The rent structure is on a per ship /per day structure leaves the ARRA vulnerable if a r in .Indian Ocean, supply for military attic which is 117,400 square feet. The rent fo from the lease that lists the revenue genera Discussion/Analvsis Lease Terms The proposed terms for the new 20 -year lease iui MARAD's intensification of activity at Alameda Point. k�. e Attachment 2) . 3f $145,000. This of time (tsunami in Building 168, nt 3 is an Exhibit ints that recognize Piers: Rent is structured as a flat fee. Initially pier rent is $150,000/month for the first two years. At month 25, the rent increases 3% annually. If Pier 3 becomes available for exclusive use to MARAD, the rent will increase one-time by 3.5%. The increase is an acknowledgement of the additional pier space. If the ARRA does not choose to make Pier 3 available to MARAD, only the annual 3% increases after year two will occur over the life of the lease. MARAD leases only a portion of Pier 3. The Hornet Museum occupies the other portions of the Pier. While the ARRA maintains the option of making Pier 3 available to MARAD, MARAD strongly desires Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service Honorable Chair and Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority April 5, 2006 Pg. 2 exclusive use of all the Piers, including Pier 3. MARAD is extremely concerned about security of the piers and has received citations from the Coast Guard for security violations. MARAD believes that increased public access makes security violations more likely. Last year, the ARRA installed security fencing near all MARAD ships to limit access, however MARAD believes that having a public use, such as a museum adjacent to their operation jeopardizes the security of their ships. Warehouse: With the execution of a new lease, the warehouse rent will increase 11% to $38,000/month for Building 168 with 3% annual increases. In anticipation of the redevelopment of Alameda Point, the lease also contemplates that the MARAD Warehouse, Building 168, may need to be relocated or reconstructed to conform to future reuse plans. If this occurs, the lease sets the warehouse lease rate for a new building. The rent for the newly constructed warehouse will be $.70 sf adjusted at the time of construction to the May 2006 construction consumer price index. In addition, early in the negotiations between MARAD and APCP, an architect developed a conceptual plan for a MARAD "complex" (Attachment 4). The complex is a secure, enclosed area adjacent to Piers 2 and 3 with a space for a newly constructed 88,000 sf warehouse. If the ARRA decides never to move the Hornet from Pier 3, the complex will not be feasible and MARAD will need to adjust its security plans. If the ARRA decides to move the Hornet from Pier 3 to Pier 1, as contemplated in an earlier long-term lease discussion, the ARRA will receive additional revenue (3.5% pier increase mentioned above) and satisfy MARAD's security concerns. If the ARRA decides to move the Hornet to a location other than the Alameda Point Piers, MARAD has requested first right of refusal for Pier 1, thereby securing use to all the Piers. A lease addendum would need to be negotiated for Pier 1. The lease contains a provision that allows MARAD to audit the premises for physical deficiencies. Initially, MARAD staff planned to perform an audit of the premises after lease execution to ensure compliance with the technical requirements of the lease. As a result of the deferral of lease consideration, MARAD staff scheduled their audit and provided ARRA with their final audit report (Attachment 5 Alameda Point Layberth Facility Inspection). The ARRA will have four months from the contract execution to repair any deficiencies. The issues highlighted in the audit are minor. MARAD wants three things immediately addressed: Trash Collection, Billing for Water, and Security Fencing. In response to the MARAD audit concerns, the MARAD budget for next year includes funding for security fencing. Trash Collection costs are included in the Pier Maintenance Line Item and MARAD misunderstood how they are billed for water, so that issue is no longer relevant. There are however two large capital projects that must be funded during the life of the lease. The projects are electrical system upgrades at Pier 2 and repairs to the fendering systems at Piers 2 and 3. Current engineer estimates for pier fendering improvements are $200,000. The electrical system project estimated at $800,000, is the highest priority and can be initiated soon after lease commencement. The project can span two fiscal years to lessen the impact to the ARRA cash flow. (See Attachment 8). These improvements will make the piers better functioning and will allow the ARRA to be fully compliant with the technical requirements of the lease (Attachment 6). Dredging Dredging the Alameda Channel is an ARRA requirement in the existing lease. In the new lease, MARAD Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service Honorable Chair and Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Author y April 5, 2006 Pg. 3 is responsible to fund all dredging events. If the funds are not made available, the ARRA is not required to dredge. The ARRA will be responsible to perform annual soundings and perform dredging as needed, provided that funding is provided by MARAD. Currently, soundings are provided by the Army Corps of Engineers, as the Alameda Channel is a federal channel. To comply with these requirements, a 20 -year dredging /dragging plan has been developed by the ARRA and has been accepted by MARAD (Attachment 7). (Dragging is a less expensive method of moving the shoaled material in the channel to maintain depth.) Risk Assessment When reviewing the lease, it must be noted that General Conditions reflect the fact that MARAD is a Federal Agency, and many provisions of the lease are generally required by Federal law, rules and practice. In addition, since the underlying real property at Alameda Point is still owned by the United States and controlled by ARRA only through the Lease in Furtherance of Conveyance (LIFOC), many provisions of the sublease are also required by the LIFOC. Clause 1. Premises (sublessor optional changes to Premises) (iii) New Warehouse Building Should the ARRA or its assignee desire to move MARAD from the Building 168 warehouse, $1 00,000 will be provided as full compensation for relocation to be applied as rent credit during the months succeeding the relocation, as Warehouse Rent becomes due. Clause 4. Sublessor' s Covenant to Pay Taxes and Assessments. In the absence of an express waiver of sovereign immunity for the payment of tax assessments, federal agencies are prohibited from paying state and local taxes with appropriated funds and obligated to pay only for charges based on the quantum of services provided. The Federal government has not expressly waived immunity from paying taxes with respect to the lease between MARAD and Alameda. This provision implements the given immunity; however, because the land is currently owned by the Federal government and leased to Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority (ARRA), no taxes are currently assessed on the property. Clause 5. Sublessor's Covenant to Pay other Expenses This provision outlines required insurance, expenses and taxes. These requirements and payments are mandated and required either by the LIFOC (Navy lease includes various provisions requiring insurance on the federally -owned property) or federal MARAD regulations (e.g. Wharfinger's Liability Policy in the amount of $5,000,000 per vessel). To the maximum extent possible, all insurance requirements are passed onto ARRA's subcontractors; for example, we require our port manager to maintain their own Workman's Compensation Policy that meets the Federal and State requirements. Clause 16. Indemnification by Sublessor This provision implements the insurance requirement for damage or loss resulting from actions of ARRA, or its agents. This is standard in Federal leases and contracts and is a reasonable requirement of the Sublessee to require the Sublessor to insure against the acts which are in the control of the Sublessor. Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service Honorable Chair and Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Autho y Clause 19. Maintenance & Technical Requirement April 5, 2006 Pg. 4 Additional obligations during the term of the lease include maintenance of the piers and related property "in good order" (primarily the piers, electrical systems, water systems, moorings, cleats, bollards and deadrnen) Gross lease revenue from the lease for the Piers alone, will be $47,000,000 over 20 years. A maintenance reserve account of $70,000 annually will be created to provide for maintenance and repair of the piers, $20,000 for street maintenance, and $265,000 for piling replacement. The resulting net cash flow as presented on the attached proforma suggests that the ARRA/APCP still nets over $16,000,000 in 20 years. (See Attachment 8). Clause 38. Termination for Convenience by Sublease The Government reserves the right to completely or partially terminate a contract when it is in the Government's interest to do so. This is a standard clause mandated by the Federal Acquisition Regulations and included in Federal Government contracts and is predicated upon the sovereign nature of the Federal Government. The Regulations allow contract parties to pre - negotiate damages in the event the Government exercises its rights under this Termination clause. If the Government elects to terminate the Sublease, the language of the Sublease requires the Government to pay the unamortized costs of any improvements made to the property for the benefit of the Government. However, ARRA's damages may not include expected profits from the continuation of the Sublease. Clause 42. Termination by Sublease for other than Default Similar to Clause 38, this clause is driven by Federal sovereignty. MARAD will not agree to any lease terms that would limit the ability of the Federal government or the Congress to act in a sovereign capacity. That includes the cancellation of appropriated funds or Congressional failure to support the continuation of the sublease, or the reduction of vessels assigned to the Ready Reserve Force. The authority of executive agencies to spend appropriated funds is also limited in time, amount and purpose. This is a required clause where portions of the property may be in excess of MARAD' s needs because there is not proper purpose in maintaining premises in excess of their needs. Lastly as it relates to the unavailability of utilities, the use of the property may be limited due to the lack of utilities, and the purposes of the lease cannot be properly executed, and MARAD requires a release from the terms in those instances. Any termination other than by ARRA default will trigger the liquidated damages provision. Clause 46. Availability of Funds This is a standard clause included in Government contracts to ensure compliance with the Anti - Deficiency Act. The Act prohibits an officer or employee of the Federal government from making or authorizing an expenditure or obligation exceeding an amount available in an appropriation or fund for the expenditure or obligation. The Congress appropriates funds to be used by the Executive branch and funds for payments under this lease are appropriated on a yearly basis. The Executive branch cannot spend money that Congress has not appropriated. This clause ensures MARAD is not in violation of the Act by Clarifying that the obligations under the lease are contingent upon the availability of the appropriated funds. Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service Honorable Chair and Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority April 5, 2006 Pg. 5 Attachment 6 (Lease Exhibit H — Technical Requirement & Reimbursable Services). Attachment 6 provides full existing condition inspection details of the physical deficiencies identified in the lease. As mentioned in the staff report, two issues are major items: one the electrical system upgrades and the pier fendering. The combined estimated cost to upgrade both deficiencies will be $1,000,000 over the next two years. Minor modifications noted in the inspection will cost less than $20,000. Fiscal Impact All revenues collected from the MARAD Lease are Tidelands funds. Attachment 3 lists the revenue generated from the lease. The funds currently go to the ARRA, but at conveyance of the property these funds, while still Tidelands dollars, are proposed to be utilized by APCP to maintain or make improvements to Tidelands Property at Alameda Point. While the property will not transfer to APCP, because it is Tidelands property and the City will remain a trustee, the revenue is included in the Alameda Point Development Pro Forma to be used for Tidelands eligible activities. Recommendati Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Interoffice Memorandum April 5, 2006 To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority From: Debra Kurita Executive Director Re: ARRA Budget Transition Planning Workshop Background Last year staff outlined many of the significant challenges that lie ahead for the ARRA budge and also for the General Fund. For the ARRA budget, those challenges were specifically related to transition planning reflecting two alternative events: Alameda Point Community Partners (APCP) exercising its option to proceed with development of Alameda Point. APCP's decision whether or not to proceed with the development process was to occur in June 2005, or 2. The decision of APCP not to proceed in June 2005, and the alternative activity that would be required to develop an alternative development path for Alameda Point. One year later, these decision milestones are still unresolved and therefore still need to be considered when examining the ARRA's future fiscal plan. Discussion Last year, it was expected that if APCP elected to proceed, then the ARRA would begin to transition activities based upon concurrently processing development entitlements and negotiating a Disposition and Development Agreement with APCP. It was expected that the entitlement process and DDA negotiations would last 18 months and conclude in December 2006. It was anticipated that as of January 2007, consistent with the terms of the negotiations, the ARRA would begin conveyance of land at Alameda Point, and APCP would assume most, if not all, of the activities currently performed by ARRA/City staff at Alameda Point. These activities include property management, leasing, grounds care, planning, etc. The approved budget was based upon those changes in the ARRA operations as well as the impacts to the General Fund. Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service Honorable Chair and Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority April 5, 2006 Page 2 In the event that APCP elected not to proceed, ARRA staff would need to develop an alternative development path that could involve seeking out another developer and beginning a new negotiation process. Because of the delay in conveyance of property from the Navy, the enclosed budget is a combination of events one and two. The delay has resulted in another full fiscal year of ARRA revenue and expenditures (FY 06/07), as well as an opportunity to increase revenue to be used for municipal service mitigation. As previously proposed, with an election to proceed, the FY 06/07 fund balance became the fiscal mitigation fund to offset the transition of lease revenues to APCP and mitigate for services during the entitlement months prior to the actual development at Alameda Point. With the budget presented, the FY 07/08 fund balance would be used to mitigate the impact of the loss revenue from the ARRA to the General Fund until redevelopment of Alameda Point begins generating revenue. Fiscal Impact The proposed budget anticipates approximately $9,O15,808 in new revenue, a projected beginning fund balance of $5,108,526 and $10,907,990 in expenditures. If at the end of FY 06/07, the ARRA enters into a DDA with the developer, the projected municipal service mitigation will be $3,216,344. All of these numbers exclude MARAD revenue and expenditures. Recommendation The Executive Director recommends no action at this time. This is an informational workshop. The ARRA budget will be approved as part of the City's overall budget. Respectf ly submitted, Leslie Little Development Services Director LAL:dc Attachments: ARRA Projected Revenue/Expense Summary Budget 2004 -2017 -Par Mitigated (Approved last year) ARRA Projected Revenue/Expense Summary Budget 2005 -2017 Interim Leasing Status Report Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service y continued on page 2 0) 0 (0 0 W ti 0 v N CU N` C C "] [D E p c CC N to 0 0 0 CO CO 0 0 *- 0 *- CI 0000000010 Q to 00,r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 017 O O *- 0 T-- C) CD 0 CO fft CO Eft o0 mot' Eft 69- 0 6� 0 itr 69 69 69 69 69 %9 69 6 69 © CO 10 Eft T7 0 0 69 069 0 Li-) N 69 69 0 691 0 N a3 LC] N- N CO C3a N N CO 0 W N rr 0 If/ © O N Q) N N (0 (0 0 c N r- CO O © {*} N t• C't O r O O CU *- 0 O t-� {� £�7 co tt N 0 N N W LC) '�r N CO o N 07 O CO CD N N (0 03) CO CO 0 0 0 0) Cr) C7 N *- mot' 69 0 LC) r• r Cr] 0 0) 0) 0) C7 CO Lt7 N r CO 6a 69 C*] Ef3 CV Eft ,r.•" Eft 69- 69 LC3 Eft 69 r tY7 6g &�} Eft fft i1) (I) ift } {f} #f} CO 0 CO O c N. �t N 0D a s (21 c r-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 c 0 0 c Ca Q a a p a -:r 69 o 00 ,r co 0 Eft wcr 691 d- r• 69 69 Eft Ef} Eft Eft 69 691,69 0 r, 69 69 Cr] 0 069 069 0 0 0 (0((0 0 T-- •- 07 o r• N O to 0 0 o L () Cp •- co o ❑) ai C J c\i L() Co o *- 0 © CO ai 0* --o00 0 N N r (0 0 o ON 0) 0(0*- LO a) m r` to 0) to co N Y-- �- O (0 .- *- cr 00 69 69. T.., N c 6g -,t. r. Ea C,i 69 ,..= 69 Eft 6s. ,r 69 Eft 69 4i3 64 69 69 to c4 N of m N: to C 0) rn ti � co 69 69- tfi to ff} 4E 4+9 M ff d CO C) 0) U & C\1 1 N C ON EN EA € & b f Ea 691 69- 0 d0' 609 69 co 0 0 0 00 N 609 664 CV CV 0 ti 0 C7 N Cr) r• C3] CO CO CO 0 N LC] 0 [� O O t17 CO CO C Ct C}' L[7 LC) r-- if] N N N (0 c.6 N N co- 0 o N cr] N N CO 037 L r N7 (0 T- -,t- T-- Cr] c) N. CV c) (0 0 CC) (0 N ,I- LO CO CO i� 0) r- (0 CV W N Li] LED h *° 0 N LO N Eft CO LO (0 0 CO CO c E6 r" *-- Cr3 69 69 c,y fft _ 69 69 69 CV- 69 Eft r,,y Eft et Eft Ea EG 4f3- Eft 69 -Ea 4f} W t7 2 T2 a Ir N U- 0 LO 0 0 LL (0 E a) a. x w I V ' 0 CC ° e 0Q v_ cti CD 5 c ta '^v E W CtS N N .a c 0 PROJECTED FUND BALANCE ect Revenu rr 0 0 0I ,• 0© 0 01 © 'et. to 0 0 0© 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0©© © 0 C7 0© 0 0 0 0 0 0 001 © to co r- 0 64 69 X I 0 69- Ea &9 f 1 0 CO 0 0 0 0 te r 0 (0 0 b3 ff} E& 0 (0 64 0 0©© 0) 69 Ef3 (0 69 N N. CO 0 CS) a) to O o O O o to O N O N o O to 0 r r, C) r id= d' C0 0 LO 0 0 W T-- cs5 N t0 0 0 to N N C17 ts7 037 t0 co co 007 to to •- co O *- CO N Cr) N CD Ci) N CO N 0 0) CO rw 'r 'tr it Cr *•-- T- 0 , - N N r-•- 0 N N E9- ",r CO CD CO Et CD tC) Ili Lt7 *....- 69 64 69 69- N 69 T,,.. Eft 69 69 69 fa 69 Eft 69 69 69 6a ff} {f} ',rood r 0ooc o 'd' NC)00000ON 0 N 69 64 N- 69- Ea- 69- 691 6g N- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO CD co "4'0000000d' o (0 0D cis N O L0 0 0 0 0 to 05 CV to to to a)0,- (00to0(0ti to (0 to W N• CO *-- CD N N 10 d" N N C] C7 o C 64 64 6g 6g 69 69 Lr Eft *-- F-- r Ea Eft fft Eft ER CO LC) N N r• 0 0 0) 0 CO 0 N- N N� LC] N 00 0) 0 0) a 10 C0 CD N . CO 0 0 *- 0 ,-- •-•- �r 'tr CC] is o o N7 o N` (0 0) 1C) CD o0 0) 0 0 N• 0 N- N - 0 d. CO 0) 0) (ID dw d' CL] 0 d• CD0000CO cri, - ooca id co T-- to Eft Eft t-- r- N 0) Eft le Ea 669 fa ka 07 0) za U_ CD CD00 Q Ti' U CD CD U U CC CC CC ��CC as aCCCC ¢UUQ c c << 0 0 0 0 ted © 2.00 %) c 0 a ca 4) 0 N E c cl) a. -0 0 4) c[3 a �cc >. U CL o < eL J J -a 0 L1 _ ti L CD 0 CD 0 0 0 [4 N N 0 0 (0 02 cc cc La N 0 0 ct J J CI) Total Revenues 0E -64 ©Ea 0 0 0 10 LO) (V LC) LC) Ea Eft CO 000000000 0 0 0(00) 000 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 N. LO r r 0 0 69 0© 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N CD C7 0 0 to- 000000 t10 ((00)0)N N to ca CO LO CO CD 0 L0 0 LO *--• N d' 0 0) +- N LC) CV d' N CO C+) N 40 (JD 0 0 *- 10 r- 0 CO N 6�t 4( 69 Ea- Eft Ea 69 64} 6�r} CCVV `6't- 69 63 -- 664) fig 69 QQQQQ <QQ CC CC CC CC CC CC Cr CC [r CC CC CC CC CC 11 ¢¢¢¢¢¢d¢ 00000 0000[0N N CO ©q 0 0J 0n OFt ff? CO WI Ut n LO COST N (0 dam" N - 0 ti •+- 69 CO CO 0 07 CO L1) Eft 69 Lei o 4:17 ci 69 4f} in 0 0 0 CO CO 0000000 Lt7 000*-- N� Ea0 CT) 0C) 0 0 0 L0 CD 0 C3 *- 0 r� ©6 r- r•_ dRo co CN N CO - 0 0 C V CN 69 64 � Eft � 4 4) LL. 000 U U U U E5 Ei E5 a3a aaaa 0 ❑ C aCr 1111 0 CD 0 0 CD CC CC CC CC 1 CC: 1 < 1 < < < < < 0 G V 3 �� G R4 r y� E- E -a--. C] ). N 2 a ar U N b C 15 0 i5 2 E ❑ ° 2U = 2 ro °o CL- s 76 x .ci 0. a, c 0 c c Q3 n [i3 co ,� Li.. , Qy •� 7C v cU © t: N .❑_N .❑t N 0 al CI 03 c a U c"`n cn c c ��� •�o0 tn2 'o�Uu3 E °- Nom. ❑ C < ' D => I-- E as >_ a .-- d. trs .6 [off z-- I. c., U v a) ti €i_ �0 w� ❑- 3 ❑r I..i,. ? it. Q1 ❑] FCC �� Q `-' c L1 92 -- U QJ CC L L ° a a "�to ©� v c 0 2 0, w < E _.. J Us = o C wa u)0Z ❑ 0 NU Total Expenditures Net Impact (Rev. less Exp.) celfire at Alameda Point. Point used to free up GF d cludes GF overhead costs associated with Aiamed L1. 0 0 F 0 0 Lf'} 0 0 r_ E w t 0 C] 5 cu E� co cc ac to co c 1. N to e-- a LC) 0 0 {NZ N 0 0 0 0 r 0) 0 0 N LL 0 r- N ti et• CD OL0C7 CO CD 000Q0 Co 69N CV 1.0 n°�t oc000co cJ N tt tf" •-= O Ln o in" N co N. N. CO 0 CO O CO (0 L0 CO L0 0) (0 - CD N N ce} 63 Ee - C C f} r N - O f7 Q00000CQQ o 0 ors• -- coo oCOaoLO Q 0000 10 N 6 69 69 69 69- 69 Ems} 691 69 o 0) Ln r• <t a a EA- 0 (0 CD 7-- r- 64 0 CO CO CO 0 M 0) 0 (0 N CO N 0 Ln O O (SD CO O CO o CO N 0 0 N CD C r ] L0 in- 0 T- Q Q t r oi O Lf7 Q to (0 N co Ln T- CV Lf7 co O N Q O 7-- CO Q CO 0 CO N 71. CO N L0 d' ,- 69 0 LO r- r- ,- co L0 T-- CD N 0 CD d` 69 N F13 69 T ° 69 fig Lf7 69 r-- Q N R r-- Lf7 69 (0 f0 69 ..r 69 (0 r r -E9 Q CD 10 00 07 Q O CO C2 CO r� O O C] Q O Q Q ©1 Q O (0 O N ,1- 0 0 0 O 0 O CO d o 0 CO PI CO N 1.0 e3` 69 L0 N N 0 6+9 0 Cr) 6 , 1 0 7 © 6 9 - E f t 6 9 . 6 9 64 64 69- 6 9 1 69 C7 C7` iO t - CO 0 0 69- O 69- C) 7-- CV 69 C7 07 iii Cs) tit r c ) L11 tC] N O CO CO r O N N CD N O L0 Q 0 CD 10 c 00 CO t7 (0 0) Cr] L6 c) O N Lf0 C77 N N- Cr] (0 (0 0 - Co Cr) ti Cr] © r ,- et Lf] CO N Lf7 Cf7 O N 0)) 0 7�-- CO O © r - 0 (0 h tr tr Lf7 (0 in - (0 r N tr ,-- 69 Q L0 ,W- .-- ,- N (0 '-- CO 07 t- r Cr] 64 ,1"- E 69 N 69 69 ,-- Eft f�} 69 7-- t.= CC Et 69 €9 69 � ff- b9 ff} 69 69 O (0 07 CO N E 0 st CD N �t LO CO LO i- Lf7 (0 tr 1') 0) 07 ri CD CO d' 10 er c 69 69- (0 Q O r- 0 6©N69 o d- Q 69 - b7 N 0)) d G 69 (0 0 0 0 0 O O O o1 O Q 1, Q 1, CO 000 0 0 0 COQ 0 Q '-- QI Y- - r(0 0) 6n- 69 69 69 69 (0 in FI0 (0 C7 CD t0 h {V C7 0 (0 0 (0 O T-- d' £f- Q CO 691 CO 1, 0) O CO N CO 1, Q 17 O N N CO CO r 0 N CO- L0 CD 0 T- t7 . N i0 CO 0 N © tt 0 ,1- dQ' CO 1, rOC) CV ' d" F-- 69- CD L0 r- - T- N tr O d CD t� et 69 N 69 69 " EA 69 69 LCj } 7-- } ,,: 69 69 69 69 69 6g 6�3 F ( CO CVO CD 69 691 © r 69 EA 69 6€ 69 631 O CO o /0 N N 0 CD 0 D 7- C EA 69 69 © eN- 0, CV CO 0] • - N LD .-- .- N O Cr N CD N 0 (0 0 O CD N T- ,- N 0 ti tt co- CD ti' 07 Cr] CYD N N T•- Cr] Lf7 r-- Q ,--- CV 07 1• 07 CO 60 CD LC) r� N Lt.) (0 O N 0, 0 C�77 LCD CO LOA Cr)) d` ir- CO V' Li] CO O o �t N CO d' ,r- 69 0 t 3 T- r r .-- O O N r• to 69 € 69 69 t 69 69 EA 69 64 N LO CV LO (0 rn co Ln ()) ° it N CD CO T- CO N 0 0 C7 01 07 w- � 7-n 69 69 CO ) r ( - 6 c N L0 (0 co Ln co 00'7 0) co Cr] 69 „. 69 (n} Lt7 69- 69- 69 CD O O CO 00 O O CO 0� CO 0 0 69N CO CO C h CO- d CO- C''3 Co] LS) CO Lnf] CCOO CO 0 CO CO c0 E E Lc, 6g ff- 69 0 tr o CO N o o CV a CM N 6 00 LO ' 9 EA- CO CO CO r• r d' 07 N N r ' CO 1, Q 0 0 ■- N LO CO Cr) 07 N C'? 69 69 Lt7 69 69- 64 O Q o C7 0 0 o 01 O O O O 1, to Q o 0 O O Q CO o Q D 07 CA 07 CO N C 69 69 69 69 EA 69 69 &0 (0 0 � L0 n ,- C7 c, 69 0 69. o 7- Q (0 ff- CO 691 00 CO 'C!' r, 0 07 N CO N 0 (0 Q 0 CO N CA 07 CO (0 C) N ‘4.- C Liz N O •- O Qtr Q] N N N co' e7 in N N 10 CD 0 N O7 D r d 0 00 C0) 1.0 Lf) C\I CO 69 c\ 69 69 Q 69 (0 69 G r (0 07 07 64 r # } cs 69 69 69 64 w 0 0 o Q o 0 0 0 0 (0(0(0 (0 (0 9 6,i 69 a Q C] C7 O Q o 0 0 69 69 69 69 (0 69 69 6,1 69 C O0O© 6 LO in L7 0) © c CO N 0 CO CD IC/ N 07 (0 0 N O T- in r- N 10 (.0 O N N N et T-- fig Q L0 69 10 0 C7 0 07 L0 0 0 0 0 CO Ln r, 0 0 Q 69 O CC, CV CO 1, 0 L0 N d' C] Cr] CD O ,-- 10 CO N e3 CD Q N LO 6N- ` 669- 10 ° 669 T-' 10 0 0 0 tY L0 0690 N r- O o 0 Co 0 o N o 07 Q t0 CO 69 69 10 0 0 C7 Q 0 0U' CO 0 D0) 07 0 0 69 69 EA CD o CO 01 00 t, t, Lr3 3 ff} CO CO 0 e0.1 C CF, 0) 07 C0 ° co 66 9 9 ° L0 69 69 CV • N 03 CO (00 1- to CO 0 CO N 1.1 C Cv as co n co rn CD CO CO tf] E!} E c0 :9' CO, 69 69 (0 0 C7 d' C7 1• ■-- 0 o T-' o ,-- N o 0 0 0 0 CJ CD CA C] CO CO 0 CD LO C7 C] C7 O 0 0 CO CV CD O ,- 0 ( .-- C'7 C7 Cr) 69 (0 69 Co 0) f b9 CD 691 CD L0 69 69 69 69 64 (0 69 691 69- o 'd' (0 07 N 0 Q b9 069 0 00 (0 (0 69 co CO r t0 co 0 0o 0 co c\i. N +- O CO N ,t (0 0 (0 0 0 CO (Y] N N CD 'tt co cr7 0 co C� .- N co- (0 �r Ln O T- Q O ¶- 07 .W- .- d C7} cri CO n co Co T". T-- (0 (0 0) N N CD 0 N 07 O r, Cr] r r La a') co CO 07 N r` 07 Cr) 0 N r St' r b9 O Lo .- T- N ,- 07 Cr) 0 CO 'd` 0 N C) Cr] 69 CA d 69. c\i 69 w 69 69 69 ici tft 69 ,r-- N (0 69 69 69 69 69 69 09 69 (0 PROJECTED FUND BALANCE CO LO t- CD Q CO 0 CO C3 co 0°0,00 O C7 Co O O O CD CT) CO C] Q C] O o C70 Cf] D Q C' J 1, N N LO N O o C3) Q 0) N C�] O o 0 0 o O o CY] O 0 O Lf3 Q© O ,- r� ff} 0 0] LO CO 60 00 0 0 T- Q T- 7- D Q Q o O O O o D O ©© N CO O O O Q Q Lo CO O O T- e1: LO o0r:0r: i (0Qc c Q ©cD ro �r omm1= (0 (0 C7ON •,1- 7_- or�0 [7] u7 CO CC] 07 Q 0 N Q N N- O O- M t[] CO [D O Lf7 O t! ] T- N "Cl- O C17 ,-- CV Lf ] Cx7 Lr7 d Cr} 07 O r• Q �t CO 07 CY) CD d d CD Q Cl!R N tr N Cr] CO N Lt7 CD D © r 00 T" O CO N N 69 CO CO [� t( 'tt L0 [o Q N CO CO Cr3 T- O O CD Ct d 69 69 69 69 69 CO (0 1• Cr] .- ' r- CD CV CV C ] ,-- ,- 0 69 6[D9 69 r bN4 69 } bg 69 69 ff} 69 69 69 CD b9 69 69 0 0 U 0 CD U U EC C 0 CC CC T51 Cr CC a] 0 Cr Cr c ¢ ¢ Er C U U CC v C: 0 E, 0 tai N CL © t [0 L (Liz) CU a_ E c to ` - - - - a t.. L 0 CD 0 o Q U .a) CL�. 'a c v 0 0 ¢ CC 0 CD 0 .O Cf7 c C Cr CC a.. ? 0 [17 m 0 is ° v a D 0 > 0- o7 0 C D > 0 W a. m -a E _ a) u- L- o Z .c a) a] ro v ° 0 0 Ili 0 0 w 0 a C] CC 0 W C _1 d1 ❑U) 2CD0 J r0 ci 0 CU (30 0 C cu 0 0 a C 0 CO C v [rte 0 0 Ct$ -0 J CI] Total Revenues ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ CC CC CC C1C CC LC CC CC CC CC Cr Cr CC CC CC Cr ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ LL 000 0 0 UU 2 . 2 2 2 ro U U U o 3 3 5 0] 0 [0 v 00000 C� . U a CD CC CC CC r o: C ¢Cr¢ ¢¢¢¢ v 0) 0 C C. 0 H E 0 r) at o a. 0 =o a. �v 0 ,C L o v 0 a m ❑ t') tv 0 v0 E C� 0 a_ co , 1 N Q a_ ici 5: -15) 'ir' W o �� c `c� ¢ ©a. c a) Q 0 - w o 3 .c o TD -0 0 CD 0 �$ ' 7C 'a U' ❑] C 0 C C 0 0 avi W v 9:1) x ca i v p N o o m m r J J 0) C] w CC e o v °' o Q N Cj o� �N �C c D AI a •O c a] u� o v �, t� E a- c �-- o c ¢ E D = > > H 0- Ci7 d G7 0.'S o U U LL LL al) N [i] a?+ {1] 0) ` C77 9-- U C Q o 4] Cr CC o Cd CL c C� LL c W (tix ' c �' .0 ro tJ] U ¢ to m LS CC LL C_ 0 S < O c d -fl a �. (L] V = 0d + v 0v a] . CO LO T- N 10 N407 6g Total Expenditures Q 0 C W CO N 0 lm °' C 7 CC •_. C77 � C E used to free up GF dollars (1) Pre - Transfer this includes GF overhead costs associated with Alameda Post - transfer this is assumed to be the direct cost for police /fire at AP. 12 0 (2) Post - transfer assumes $450,000 in additional DSD project management staff INTERIM LEASING STATUS REPORT Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Signed Leases Tenant Building Number Lease /License Expiration Date Area (Sq. Ft.) Alameda Power & Telecom I 2 6/30/11 10,000 Vacant 2 61,000 Various Tenants 7 7/31/02 5,550 GRM 9 5/31/08 80,000 Vacant 11 5,000 Antiques by the Bay 13 9/30/06 4,000 Michael Johnson 13 9/30/06 12,000 The ReUse People 13 11/30/06 14,900 Navigator Systems 14 8/31/09 31,394 Auctions by the Bay 18 12/31/06 17,000 Edge Innovations 20 1/14/08 66,600 St. George Spirits 21 4/30/14 65,000 Creative Technology 22 6/30/09 66,000 West Coast Novelty 23 4/30/10 65,000 Area 51 Productions 2/28/08 40,000 Coach Specialties 24 9/30/06 26,927 Auctions by the Bay 25 Month to Month 54,450, Rosenblum Cellars 29 8/31/09 16,810 Vacant 32 7,300 Delphi Production 39 4/1/08 106,000 Bladium 40 6/30110 104,000 Pacific Fine Food 42 10/31/08 2,969 Building 43 & Associates 43 8/31 /08 10,500 Woodmasters 44 8/31/08 4,941 City of Alameda 6o 8/31/07 29,550 Nelson's Marine 66 2/28/09 28,542 Puglia Engineering 67 7/31/06 14,000 City of Alameda 76 & 134 10/31/05 58,450. Alameda Naval Air Museum 77 4/14/05 21.136 Cameron Cole 90 12/31/06 4,500 Vacant 91 42,132 Alameda Point Collaborative 92 1/31/12 88,000 Conmar, Inc. 98 9/30/06 8,200 HESCO 113 Month to Month 13.115 Vacant 115 2,968 Delphi Production 118 3/11/05 30,000 Vacant 119 4,700 Alameda Power & Telecom 162 5/31/07 51,000 Cvbertran International 163 Month to Month 10.000 Power Engineering 166 5/14/10 47,000 Nelson's Marine 167 2/28/15 55,400 MARAD 168 Month to Month 117,419 General Services Admin. 169 4/30/09 86,300 Tenant Building Number Lease /License Expiration Date Area (Sq. Ft.) Vacant 170 40,000 Bay Ship & Yacht 292 7/31/07 2,700 Container Storage 338 5/31/10 42,000 JetSMART Aerospace 398 Month to Month 27,570 Bay- Ship & Yacht 400A 1/12/07 40,000 r Antiques by the Bay 459 12/31/07 5,684 Vacant 459 5,816 Vacant 517 8,208 Auctions by the Bay 525 12/31/06 23,208 Apelon 527 12/31/07 6,000 Community Bible Church 564 Month to Month 8,600 Alternatives in Action (Home) 585 6/15/10 10 =550 Container Storage 6o8 5/31/10 8,213 Marine Sanitation Services 611 7/14/06 1,000 Jim Bustos Plumbing 612 7/31/07 4,000 Emergency Services Network 613 Month to Month 4,600 Foss Environmental /NRC 616 4/30/07 1,800 Richard Miller Photography 621 7/31/06 5,770 Nextel Communications 624 9/30/07 200 Alameda Point Storage Land Month to Month 130,680 Cingular lArireless Land Month to Month 200 MARAD Piers Land Month to Month Tristar Express Lot 393 12/31/06 53,280 AC Hornet Piers 4/14/03 Nelson's Marine Piers Piers 2/28/10 2.000 INTERIM LEASING STATUS REPORT Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Signed Licenses Tenant Building Number License Duration Area (Sq. Ft.) Alameda Civic Light Opera 35 6/1/05 - 12/31/06 2,761 ,TetSMART Aerospace 398 Month to Month 27,570 Antiques by the Bay 405 Month to Month 4,880 AC Hornet Piers 12/1/05 - 6/30/06 Porsche Club Taxiway H _ 3/11/06 - 10/28/06 Driving Dynamics Taxiway H 4/6/06 Turnkey Productions Taxiway H Month to Month Antiques by the Bay Taxiway H Month to Month Mvthhusters NWT* 6/13/05 - 6/12/06 Total 32,450 *Northwest Territory Confidential INTERIM LEASING STATUS REPORT Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Prospective Leases and Licenses Tenant Area (Sq. Building Number Ft.) Notes Pacific Maritime Assoc. NWT l 10 Acres Lease Hesco 113 82,870 Lease 5.000 35,000 Confidentiall Q � L a two RIO (1) mia (60 mmim O4- C7) C ti) m E ro cu Fir3 co ro co L.L Loon CO =nom NIL: >iiim CD bski CD 1)N CO ."(fi ■ ■ OC ce N (r) cL) U ■ - N V N X N cn ro N 0 • IC Q 'o r a� ro smo -C3 kr) a) al 0 rl • mai 4,5 U 144,0 Lin Cr 0 ,o -0 N 0 0 (1) C � � ca vi T.: 1... (0 . (1) on .61 > 7:3 0) ru -0 (t3 :3 (Um itiE a) � szu " Cl- (Us w 0 O 6 FT 4-- � :1--)..., fn O. fp (11 co o cy) ca, uE, '- jLi co mu) c D = E 2-j-i E ..c -0 41-1 .,..1 (1) 0 m L.. :1.J cm .zu c al I. ..c a) -T-1-- c u Fe 0 NI po md 0.. ox ca. m2�Q� is a • iii G (a) ca 14**44% 0 a) 1,1) U C CD co © Tu co NI -a 'ma = (1) � LL (f) 0 CI (I) CU U c: D O � � O. a • Lease Revenues N Q. 4_) "1-611 X LU • Property Management Uti 1 ities/Ma i nten -0 ra (I) U U U Cn (i) e- y-l'w%N 04J 12 la ProfE Municipal Services a) )© � it) O CO (a) tin 0o r' 0 18 Sri 11.. CI, NI N O cn = szu C = ul LI r e? CU cn LL 0 � V 3 <c: � 4....; a) u ...... n V � � V IL) axi :— .—c Q) 0 L f .4 ;;;-. ra (I) CI) E,I,FEN RI g Q4) ><I'. am * Lf) sat) c3) co co U (1) d 0 Cs F—I H H L scu Ln L.L a� (/) au (f) a� ca co L Qu or) (a co Q 0 ca 0 nV' 0 c • cu co c cc cti 0: Q c� �? o 0 0 Lin ■ • a Q ro U (1) .1-1 I. u) r.f, 7 r-- Q) -0 V N cu Q.71.2 .0 X CI) ra rt3 CU Li) co > 7:3 O � L u (r) � — 4.) • (73 (0 (f) cu CO mm0 mma CU CO �O L ro Q Initiation of debt • 0 ro mo) 0 -0 0 co 1-1 4701- a) LL O cu (1.) 7:3 U cu co • ro N N C� 0 4•J o O cp > C3) Ci) != -0 � O major capital emergency • No reserve fo ru CL CU 4.) C mmiz --'6 1..... L tin) ai) 4,--) 0 c n :1-J O. C 4..J ro 0_ 0 � � � � C N C V . N � cu v) a) co cm 4' -0 ra044) = L.... C o �n c� a� o � (a co � � t C � (1) (3) o � co, O L 1-0 TA 73 u E ...c (f) c c 0 "If) -0 0.) 4.....) 73 E 0 — ' ii: CO L.-- ti) c -1-.) a) 2 m.c = (i) ro 4. C 1 . a . ( i ) 4 - .' . - = 2 (I) 0 c .0 4- a(- _ ., c 47; = 0 0 .4.' 6.4= (I) > 0 u i=r, co (1) 0 1— %..• v) u :4-) c o. g ca. E) a) V R3 ckcu(D cL C <._ <a)(D v) o � kaiD a-=� c.n Z.% CY; a) two k.tf); (1) O.- ci < .C: U Ce (I) Q fti sc°3 i4- o O o aU cp (1) V' og 4.) Q (L) o r0 (Ks o -rn ■ ›- u. N • o� E "a"1" = o c) Lc, co 0 = *4%` E 0 q:s (0 co a. -0 N 7-1 >- V)U- CL. -t a° 0 4_, (Z3 0 Q L.9 N 0 m (I) O kip C N� Lin @ 1-1 Cli) n C) 0_ocD 1-1- (f) " 1.1.. CD CU J O�U 0 �rrrrrrrrrr two Eno (3) cu - E -I-J 0 4.) CU ..0 " ... 0. CO (f) 1.- 0 . 4-) CO < U 4-) a) a) ro (D> 1..., To (n -Po Li. 1. ..c: , „a) 4...) , v) c 14-11J 0 o' O -0 0 . oc Ti l(Ti..)) E 'L um 0.. a. -a , usi) 0 N (f) r%:4 ,--1 ro • . 1r-1 © ..0 co L.. 1,..o c co 0 C) CK3 17 c) 01 -0 c ft, fiN a) .. c >,-. a) N u... o u c � Cl. O (f) Lin of lease reven • 0 c1)U "r3 (0c 0(0 c 0 f0 ir. tax increment • two >-% Tii >. :3 .4-J .0 co 4-J — op Li) > >11" 4....) CU L.L. -0 v) L-- C C 0 Cl- C t.0 C (....) k. — ro -0 4_, 4....) 10 p1 c: ca. c Q.) c ro 0 :4-7) 03.) U L.,... = CU 4_.) L.9 ii.... 0 " (i) > (i) ca) ...4.,,, 0 c_ti 0 -0 -a 0 = -0 0) 0 th 4-) CO (f) 4-J c c _0 C: 41i--j- 4-) U -C v) ro tzu . 0 4, -C = 0 • = 4a; CU --- (I) U Li-- :4--) .11.111.15 0 rt) C Q Ca- 8 IT-1) :3 CU 4-.) (I) , u v) 4...) c 1_,- c CU > 0 0 co 1-- 4...; fa) co cti 0 c: 1-1=', 0 5 .„-- ,,, c -0 u) (/) i:...- 4,,z 4.-), c 0) ro 0 Q) ru ..=... ro ta) cu 0 ca. L-- w ic c >. -0 0 (1) E ca -o _ci _, c) c ei-N, b v) 0 zid, CD ra -0 I CD_ CU 4- " C) (1) ED 0 = ° b C" a) IC) C 41... (I) > C) la) 1:11.7i 4 >c:&)04:;A-(hu(N G) -a-) 0 c) @oo L) U 0 • • au 0.) (f) 4-) tcu v 0 a� L° &cD ›- co cu To (O ro C th) •.._ CD O C::: • (i) E M l0 (6 cL Z 713 a } 4.61 0 Z Z Z O 'd° 0 CD 14 T17 Lti cp, i co CY). Oi Cti IL6 i 0 0 cJ co' Z Z Z 0 Q i Z 116 a,) 0 L C) cv 0 0 0 0 izr 0 0 CD 0 co cr) op $2,086,664.70 $1,766,863.20 0 0 0 1-- 0 co cc< 0 Presentation eo O O (\1 I .6 Q. N CD 0 U a) 0 o a) 14-E' � U N O v U N 0 0 a� as 0 Z ?{N.. o � 0 N cr • vi a) Ucti >, cl) Go O U c 0 0 CO • 0 z .o < c1 cc 0 Q� al Z 0)D OcD (f) • cp 1, ` V 0 y) sT) 0) 71-6 •wwrrr cr) W E S 0 CC c: Q N 0 i� 7:3 V) o 0: cn co a) X N a) E • r° > = c: Env 0 a) w 4c-Da cD Memorialized cp a) U >, N O 0 C:3) U (I) "O" Cr -0 CES 0.. a� a5 C� U 2 P. o� ..,_, ca U � cz < -0 X 0 CC � 0) Q o p � 'c ›N CD -C o c -CD c\I '5 —0 cz 73 - < 2 a. a) 1— -a LA,'. 1:--ct3i -C-3 a) o ::::3 al O N 2a/ c.) L.- cn > < I-- < -8 < --fi C 0 11- cc: 2 0c: ctxo Oo Q • c75 CD 0 :2 Q a) w 0 � X 0 L z Qo 2 0" 0 0 7-11 n ..� (7) c CL ...c 0 0) 0 0 0 U 0 cr 1:3 CD U O 0 U 1"6- E a) E a a) U cs U oc: E co o w TD. cn > a) U 0 -11Ej .c (1) E O (10) EZ• (1) • E:U (1) a: 2 :4=1 3F- (1) 5 a) ai 0: W CD >.% O c: O wo mp 2007 - 2011 t 2012 - 2017 E Q 0 'T) CD CO c\J O cJ CO O C\1 4E1 cD Q O cp ci • • •