2012-12-05 Special CC MinutesMINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
WEDNESDAY- - DECEMBER 5.2012- -7:00 P.M.
Mayor Gilmore convened the meeting at 7:10 p.m. Councilmember Tam led the Pledge
of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL — Present: Councilmembers deHaan, Johnson, Tam and Mayor
Gilmore — 4.
Absent: None.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON - AGENDA
None.
AGENDA ITEMS
(12 -573) Recommendation to Accept the Economic Development Strategy for Alameda
Point.
The Community Development Director gave a brief presentation.
Tim Kelly and Ernesto Vilchis, Keyser Marston Associates, gave a Power Point
presentation.
In response Mayor Gilmore's inquiry about the work required to get buildings ready to
rent, Mr. Vilchis stated the need differs depending on the building; continued the
presentation.
Councilmember Tam stated some figures have to do with the feasibility of retrofitting or
rehabilitating buildings; several buildings' costs have been identified; since the City does
not have redevelopment any more, making the investments would require charging rent
way above average; the 1 -80 corridor rent is $0.41 per square foot; the City would have
to charge $0.80 per square foot, which would make rent infeasible even with long term
leases; Alameda seems to have a higher vacancy rate than neighboring cities; inquired
whether existing areas, like Park Street, Harbor Bay and Webster Street, might be
cannibalized to obtain tenants at Alameda Point.
Mr. Kelly responded Alameda Point cannot and should not compete with Harbor Bay,
Marina Village or Park Street; Alameda Point buildings are unique; tenants that are
going to select Alameda Point, such as maritime tenants, are not going to go in on Park
Street; the market has a lot of space; Alameda Point has to be marketed to tenants
looking for bulk or specialized space; the rent is lower; in regards to costs, investors are
taking on older buildings in San Francisco, Oakland, and Emeryville; the private sector
could come forward with proposals; that he believes there are a set of numbers which
work; individual buildings are pretty complex and involve electrical work, fire work and
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council 1
December 5, 2012
clean up; rent would probably need to be $0.40 to $0.50 cents per square foot; office
space, such as medical buildings, could have higher rent; tenants would not necessarily
be stolen away from another part of the City; complete renovations would not work;
hopefully, the private sector could find lower cost projects.
Mayor Gilmore stated given the numbers and the amount of commercial space in the
market right now, the City needs to figure out how to market Alameda Point's
uniqueness, which would appeal to certain businesses; not many places in the Bay
Area could host maritime businesses; however, lots of places have commercial, office,
or retail business space; Alameda has to offer something other cities cannot.
Councilmember Tam stated the maritime and nautical nature of Alameda Point is
unique; using the estuary is one way to alleviate potential traffic problems, as well as
making better use of the Ferry system; looking at the portfolio of tenants at Alameda
Point right now, with the exception of Bay Ship and Yacht, other uses and establishing a
spirits row are not maritime in nature; trying to build on existing leases through word of
mouth is being discussed; inquired whether having existing tenants talk up Alameda
Point would encourage use of the most reusable buildings.
Mr. Kelly responded that he has not been in every building; one building is more than
one million square feet; imagining what would happen in said building is difficult, but the
building would be an example of a unique property on the market; hopefully, private
investors might find a way to use the building; current tenants include: Building 14,
which has arts, Bladium, which might want to expand, Michaan's Auctions, specialty
beverage businesses, and some smaller start -up companies around the old campus;
there is quite a range of tenants; there are lots of opportunities; putting an investor and
a business together might be one way; people are being forced out of Emeryville and
other places, such as the Oakland Army Base; the film industry might represent an
opportunity.
Highlighted business in Building 14 and encouraged developing and supporting the art
community: Dean Santner, Alameda Point Studios; Adrian Seigal, Alameda Point
Studios; John Callahan, Alameda Point Studios (submitted a video: Miracle in a Box);
Byron and Cheryl Zook, Alameda Point Studios.
Expressed his support
of the plan, the multi -
pronged
approach and long term leasing for
tenants already at
Alameda Point; stated
his
company would like to establish its
presence in the City
of Alameda for the long
term:
David Mik, Power Engineering.
Discussed the importance of preserving history and having any plan include a future for
the Museum: Kin Robles, Alameda Naval Air Station Museum.
Encouraged staff be directed to hold another meeting with tenants: Doug Biggs,
Alameda Point Collaborative.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council 2
December 5, 2012
Urged the City to be more aware of the types of tenants at Alameda Point; suggested
community outreach and advertising; stated the study includes many strategies that
should seriously be reviewed and provides ways to proceed with the Community Reuse
Plan: Dian Lichtenstein, Alameda.
Expressed support of the strategy: Karen Bey, Alameda.
Suggested a brochure be created about the arts at Building 14; stated the Navy Base
attracts many people yet seems to be running away from its Naval heritage; suggested
using old nomenclature when rebranding the Base: Carol Gottstein, Alameda.
Stated the proposal is very strong but she does not quite understand the strategy
around a Request for Proposals; inquired whether space would be sold to developers,
which provides incentives; stated huge amounts of money are available if the City has
policies enabling private enterprise; encouraged community brainstorming: Amanda
Soskin, Alameda.
Mayor Gilmore stated receiving a broad range of perspectives from residents and
business people is nice; the City does not have discussions with business people often.
Councilmember deHaan inquired how adaptive reuse and renovation of buildings was
evaluated.
Mr. Kelly responded said evaluation is the recommended next step; stated Alameda
Point needs to be broken up into multiple pieces so packages can be put together; the
Council will need to address some policy issues.
In response to Councilmember deHaan's inquiry, Mr. Kelly stated the goal was not to
figure out which buildings to tear down and which to sustain; the issue is how to get
some of the buildings to a marketable, leasable space; investors would evaluate and
determine how to reposition the buildings.
Councilmember Johnson stated that she likes the approach. which makes a lot of
sense; the next step should be talking with investors to see what is needed to make
investment attractive.
In response to Councilmember deHaan's inquiry on further recommendations, the Chief
Operating Officer - Alameda Point stated the City has a lot on its plate: the
Environmental Impact Report (EIR), the master infrastructure plan, the Town Center
planning, and the zoning; the City has been focused on getting the land from the Navy;
a number of items in the budget relate to conveyance; staff will be coming to the Council
to discuss moving development forward through RFPs; the first order of business is to
get the property from the Navy.
Councilmember deHaan inquired the status of the Water Emergency Transportation
Authority (WETA) project.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council 3
December 5, 2012
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded staff is still in conversations
with WETA; stated a lease is almost negotiated; a number of environmental approvals
are still being reviewed, WETA is receiving partial funding from the federal government
and will go through a federal process similar to the City's process in terms of Section
106 and endangered species; infrastructure is being discussed as well as plans for
WETA to locate its emergency operations center on the southern shoreline.
Councilmember deHaan noted the City is getting closer to finalizing remediation; stated
marketing anything under remediation is hard.
In response to Councilmember deHaan's comments, the Chief Operating Officer -
Alameda Point stated a significant portion of the Base, about 700 acres of uplands and
1200 acres in total, including submerged land, is being contemplated for the first
transfer phase; areas would come to the City in 2019; the City still has the Lease in
Furtherance of Conveyance (LIFOC) which is a master lease with the Navy that allows
the City to continue to use and develop areas; Building 5 is not currently in the master
lease; however, if a good tenant comes, the City could approach the Navy about using
portions of the property and work around the remediation plan and schedule; there is
flexibility; the first phase transfer will be significant.
Councilmember Tam noted the four recommendations included in the report are being
done already; stated that she supports staff's recommendation to develop a process to
have a cohesive vision to deal with development clusters and to have a policy to
understand the best use of property given the remediation and types of buildings; there
should be fuller public discussion with the community; the City is already putting
together the infrastructure plan and environmental documents mandated by the
settlement agreement with Oakland China Town; having a vision, cohesion and
planning for both existing tenants and prospective tenants is important.
Mayor Gilmore stated having an understanding of other commercial and retail space
available in the market is needed in order to move forward in a cohesive manner; the
marketing report is only a piece of the puzzle; infrastructure, residential and the overall
mix needs to be figured out; support existing businesses is important because they are
going to be ambassadors for new businesses; the City should be opportunistic and
flexible if a great new use comes forward.
Councilmember Johnson moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote —
4.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(12 -574) The City Manager announced the finalists of the annual East Bay Innovation
Awards were announced and four of the 16 nominees in the entire East Bay are in
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council 4
December 5, 2012
Alameda: Deep Ocean Exploration and Research, Perforce Software, Penabra Inc. and
Saint George's Spirits; stated the finalists will be recognized at a gala event on January
31 st at the Fox Theater in Oakland.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 9:11 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council cJ
December 5, 2012