Resolution 09609CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO, 9609
ACCEPTING PROPOSAL AS MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT
(BURTON Na CROWELL, COORDINATION OF AGENCIES AND
SERVICES FOR PATTON WAY PROJECT)
WHEREAS, on February 4, 1980, this City entered into an
agreement with Burton N. Crowell for his professional services
in the coordination of agencies and services for the improvement
of Patton Way and
WHEREAS, the preparation of an Environmental Impact
Statement is now required which was not originally included in
the scope of the project; and
WHEREAS, Burton N. Crowell has presented a Proposal for
modification of his agreement with -the City to provide for his
services until completion of the EIS;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ALAMEDA that the proposal o Burton N. Crowell, Civil
Engineer; dated June 5, 1981; a copy of which is attached;
provide his services in the coordination of agencies and services
for he Patton Way ,Improvement Project until completion of the
EIS, is hereby accepted; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said proposal and this
acceptance shall constitute the modification to the agreement
entered into between Burton N. Crowell and the City on February 4,
1980.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this acceptance is approved
subject to Alameda Marina Village Associates "reimbursing the
City for said services.
Attes
Banc 4,81
Mr. Bruce. Rupp,. City. Manager
City. of Alameda
City Hall.
Alameda, CA 94051
Dear Bruce,
TMis letter is a follow-up of our discussion of:modification
of my Patton. nay Project Coordination Project with you.
At thn present time and on the -basis of out trages to this
point, I am. reasonably close to my anticipateu . budget and
.without the year's increase in. time engendered by the
•Feds.' EIS requirement, could complete the projc ct. on the
basis provided in the. contract ocluitably for both the city
and myself.•
There have been several project delays ovor which 1 had
no control. F±rst, the contractor/subcontractor dispute
with our original environmental consultant, which delayed
document one to two months. Second, the protracted Planning
Board hearing process which extended from late September,
1980 through late January, 1981, almost' four months. And
now, preparation of an EIS for the Feds. which will add a
year to the project schedule.
I would propose that my contract be modified to compensate
me on an hourly basis until the EIS is completed as allowed
for in articles 5 & 6 of my contract. I don't anticipate
.aa-heavy work load during this time. Therefore, I would
r,-
•suggeSt $50.00 per hour up to a maximum of $5000.00. After
completion of the EIS, terms would revert to those of the
original contract with an-amnended completion date as outlined
in articles 2 & 5.
I look forward. to discussing. this; matter with you and David
at your corgvenience.
SinCerP1V
ur t o n.z/N Crowell
Civii/Engliteer
BNC:lc
cc Dave Edwards
John Ervin
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution
was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the
City of Alameda in regular meeting assembled on the 15th of September, 1981,
by the following vote to wit:
AYES: Councilmen Diament, Gorman, Sherratt, Stone, and President Corica - 5.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official seal of said City this 16th day of September, 1981.