Resolution 09613CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. 9613
ACCEPTING PROPOSAL AS AGREEMENT (BLACK & VEATCH,
DEVELOPMENT OF A PRELIMINARY FINANCIAL PLAN AND
REVENUE PROGRAM FOR THE CITY'S SEWER COLLECTION
SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED BY TH E COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA that
the proposal of Black & Veatch, dated July 17e 1981, a copy of
which is attached, for services relating to the development of
a financial plan and .revenue program for the sewer collection
system in the City, is hereby accepted; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: that said proposal and this
acceptance shall constitute the contract of the parties hereto.
Attest;
C
City of Alameda
2263 Santa Clara Avenue
Alameda, CA 94501
ViA',31"E
tIr
PIERCE CESIISCULIAD S
DUDSSIN t, N D YEN DIEII
JD' FE I-ANON AC-IISISCIATINIS
Jfl/ & ASSOCIATES
July 17, 1981
PUF<L1C WORKS oF:tt'T. File 9612
CITY OF ALAMEDL.
A tSen tion : lttr . Bill Norton
Director of Public Works
Gentlemen:
Attached herewith is a brief scope of or and budget estimat(i for services -
relating to the development of a financial plan and revenue program for the
sewer collection system in the City.
The estimate of time to complete the work is 45 days after receipt of the
information required of the City. The work as proposed uses a cost
reimbursement basis of compensation plus a fixed profit as shown on the
attached form 5700-41. The estimated total price of the work is $5, 142.
After review, if it is your desire to authorize the work, please sign below
and return one complete copy to this office. Please call if you have any
questions.
Very truly yours,
& VEATCH
e,attlrence C. Rug:.--iar
',flan a ger
Approved by:
CITY OF ALAMEDA
Please respond to:
B & V — P.O. Box 4247
Walnut Cr.eek, CA 94596
(415) 944-5770
7,-1501 No Broadway
1/d nut Creek, CA 94596
' (41b) 937-9010
Date
W & WI 5850 Shellmound St., Suite 100
Emeryville, CA 94608
(415) 428-2351
EXHIBIT Ael
CH OF 1 stst,ttJ1DA
SCOPE OF ADD! alsi A •!!!).1.•:.:Wyri CES
Purpose and Sc.ope
The purpose of these additional services is to provide a preliminary financial
plan and revenue program for the City of Alameda.
Scope of the work for Alameda will include the follov,fing:
1. Review applications of funds and sources of revenue for sewer-5. in
past two years. Community staff to develop budget projections tbr
FY 81-82 through FY 86-87..
2. Survey methods of financing se_wers. Give advantages and disad-
vantages of each.
Assuming a sewer us-er charde: .and connection fee were to be
• adopted, recoil-if-Fend method. of calcuiation consistent with local,.
state, and federal regulations and guidelines„
4. Prepare! rate schedule which vould be applicable to FY 81-82 through
FY 86-87.
5. Attend two meetings with respective agency staff to review progress
and obtain comments.
6. Provide District with ten copies of draft report and twenty-five
copies of final report.
Time for Completion
Draft copies of the preliminary report will be available within L5 calendar
days after Notice to Proceed. Final preliminary report will be completed
within thirty days after receipt of final comments from District and Alameda.
Agency Responsibilities
Al C d a or the [District 1 furnish the foHowir •• information to the
Consultant:
A. AM financii31 Teo o ds, budget proectjuns' dHJ udits of the sewer
utility's financial• operations; operational statistics; facility inventories,
descriptions, and maps; reports of other consultants; available records
of custorilers served and v,talter sales; and such other data as may be
available and may be useful in the studies outlined.
B. • A schedule of major improvements to the sewer system facilities
anticipated dur t'ne study period, including gene.r. d de( riptions
of each item of irt[;over ent, estimated construction costs, and
anticipated dates of construction.
C . F'".01:: „,...‘,../ (-.i i ro.!c 1., I cyn orl s kJ c h tro,i:J 1 e r s ...1.s IV:o3 tyi-ieci a or L..)ktrict considers
:744) ropriz.ft c,....! .....,.1 1 (-1 e x ID t.:oirii I I a ara r•aa,..1.i:raa,i of 1-.)r- cari al.i :;.--aa,1 oy I i ra.:`,1 nol!:7; a nd
r(.1.2.k..irts to .1.)..koloAtit t h e, t i ;Tre hit C 0:::',.1).1 e t 4.)11. (I.:A t
COSI (AttitA PRICE SUSAMSARY EACAttASAUSI FOR SUE/CURT ESSUAAATS UtADEAZ EPA CIA,' UTS Acts: sic
(SC(' tr3 yy;1",", b""'/OTY," E No. 15S- TACt-Ast
A PART1-GENERAL
1
4.
The hestshore Consultants !lay 26, Ilteri
0 F 5 '-Z ,''', viC h T
t cfo Black & Veatch Prel iminary financial plan
P.O. Box 424.7 and revenue program for
1,4ai1 ut Creek, CA 94596 Alameda '. .
7. Di E CT LABOR (Specify .1,1 ,r ce,rugoriec)
H-COST SUMMARY
ES-n- HOURLY ESTIMATED
MATED
HOLYRS 1 RATE
Professional 110
Technical
-
8 i
CI erica) 1 0
COST
-15 1.980.00
72.00
cs60,00as
TOTALS
DIRECT. LABOR TOTAL: - e
, IN 'DIP E C. T C.OSTS (5.7,11l7 irtstiresut suit pool a) PAYE BASE
9. OTHER DIFIELT CDS S
8. TRAVEL
(1) TRANSPORTATION
(2) PER DIEM
INDIRECT COSTS TOTAL:
ESTIMATED
C S
1.915 .s 7e.„11?,,.00 k 1,975.00
ESTIMATED
COST
s
300 mi @ .22
TRAVEL SUBTOTAL:
EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS, SUPPLIES (Speci(,r categories) QTY
eproducton - 35 copies
C. SULICONTCACTS
stftic ONTRACTS SUBIOTAL.:
EQUIPMENT SUBTOTAL.:
ESTIMATED
COST
280.00
280.00
EST IMAT ED
COST
nm4y-y-
d. 01 3 3 1 N (Specif) crnegerier0
0 T HE R SUBTO TA L.:
c. 017 IRECT COSTS TOTAL:
101"A L ESTiMA1 ED COST
I. PROFIT
S. 7074L F'RICE
E PA F arm 000-41 (2-76)
ES1IMATED
COST
346,,00 L
70ct
5 142 00
PAGE 1 OF 5
,
E. CMPLItTOR'S. CATALOG L. ISTi FT. H OTI SE [STIR f. S. IT RE14 CAA01 ES
iv; clic 1 pTice i
PART - PF JCE 5
MARKET
(
PEGCE(S1
5
PART IV -CERTIFICATIONS
14. CON-FRAC-10R
144, HAS A FE 5KRAL AGENCY OR A F EDERALLA CERTIFIED ST ATE OR LOCAL AGFNGY PERFORMED ANY REVIEW OF YOUR
A CCOIJN-rS OR RECORDS I N CONNECTION WITH ANY 0 THEP, FEDERAL GRANT OR CONTRACT WITHIN THE PAST 1 0 1 ' fKON T
nr YES [7 NO (11 "Yers" 4ive oK.ne nddree-5 c.rld telephone number of reviewir,g off. T.49
Defense 'Contract Audit Agency
302 Vest Lexington
2nd Fl oor , Room 232
Indepta'idence, MO 64050 Phone: 816/371-6213
4?) ...THIS .F.T.WARY CONEORY:F. WITH THE FOLLOWING COST PRINCIPL KS
11 CFR 1-15.2 and 1-15.4
4c.
This proposal is submitted for use in connection with and in response to (1)_
request for services dated 4/7/81 . This is to certify to the best of my knowledge
and belief that the cost and pricing data summarized herein are complete, current, and accurate as of
(2) January 1, 1981 and that a financial management capability exists to fully and accu-
rately account for the financial transactions under this project. I further certify that I understand that the
_ .
suba.greement price may be subject to downward renegotiation-and/Or recoupment where the .above cost and
pricing data have been determined, as a result of audit; not to have been complete, current and accurate as
of the date above.
(3)
DATE OF EXECUTION
SIGNATURE OF PROPOSER
Lawrence C. Rugaard
TITLE. OF FRoPcSER
5. REVIEWER
____ - _ _ • .... —___ .... —. _—__—___ ..-
1 certify that I have reviewed the cost/price summary set forth herein and the proposed costs/price appear
acceptnble for subgrecinent award,
.4
SIGNATURE OF REN/tExER
OATS OF EXECUTION
16. EPA REVIEWER 111 .pplic,b1c)
- -
DATE OF EXEC'JTION
5 PA F orm 570041 7-76)
Er_oject _
_ -
TITLE OF REVICWER
SIGNATURE: OF REVIEWER
TITLE OF RExIE.x.ER
PAGE 2 So 5
Under�igncd, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution
was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the
City of Alameda in regular meeting assembled on the 15th of September, lgOl,
by the following vote to wit:
AYES: Councilmen Diament, Gorman, Sherratt, Stone, and President Corica
NOES: None,
ABSENT: None.
. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set thy hand and affixed the
official seal of said City this l61h day of September, 1981.