Resolution 125790
CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. 12579
REAPPOINTING BERNARD F. ROBERTS AS A MEMBER OF THE
. CITY RECREATION COMMISSION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Alameda that
pursuant to Section 2-7.1 and following of the Alameda Municipal
Code, and upon nomination of the Mayor, BERNARD F. ROBERTS is
hereby reappointed to the office of member of the Recreation
a) ------ Commission of the City of Alameda for the term commencing October
- t ,
(.5 ----- 1, 1994 and expiring on September 30, 1998, and to serve until his
1-•,---
successor is appointed and is qualified.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution
was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the
City of Alameda in regular meeting assembled on the 18th day of
October , 1994, by the following vote to wit:
AYES: Councilmembers Appezzato, Arnerich, Lucas
Roth and President Withrow - 5.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTENTIONS: None.
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official seal of said City this 19th :lay of October , 1994.
2/cPx-, j
Di;ine Felsch, City Clerk
City of Alameda
CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. 12580
REAPPOINTING DAVID SILLERS AS A MEMBER OF THE
CITY RECREATION COMMISSION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Alameda that
pursuant to Section 2 -7.1 and following of the Alameda Municipal
Code, and upon nomination of the Mayor, DAVID SILLERS is hereby
reappointed to the office of member of the Recreation Commission of
the City of Alameda for the term commencing October 1, 1994 and
expiring on September 30, 1998, and to serve until his successor is
appointed and is qualified.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution
was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the
City of Alameda in regular meeting assembled on the 18th day of
October , 1994, by the following vote to wit:
AYES: Councilmembers Appezzato, Arnerich, Lucas,
Roth and President Withrow - 5.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTENTIONS: None.
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official seal of said City this 18th clay of October , 1994.
Diane Felsch, City Clerk
City of Alameda
CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. 12581
DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING BOARD'S
APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT, PDA-94-7
FOR 2060 CHALLENGER DRIVE (SOMATIX)
WHEREAS, an application was made on August 4, 1994 by Alameda
Real Estate Investments, Inc. requesting approval of a Planned
Development Amendment for 2060 Challenger Drive to permit
construction of a 3,200 square foot mechanical yard adjacent to a
26,720 square foot building in the business park portion of Marina
Village; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Board held a public hearing on the
application and considered relevant testimony, reports, pertinent
maps, drawings and documents; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Board made the following findings:
1. The Development Plan Amendment is determined to be
categorically exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City
!>7, of Alameda Guidelines for EnvironMental Review.
2. Development Plan Amendment, PDA-94-7, subject to the
CI imposed conditions, is in conformance with the adopted
General Plan of the City of Alameda.
3. Development Plan Amendment, PDA-94-7, as conditioned in
-..7731 this resolution, complies with sections of the Alameda
City Zoning Ordinance, which govern the Mixed Use
District.
A. Development Plan Amendment, PDA-94-7, is consistent
with the Marina Village Master Plan.
B. Development Plan Amendment, PDA-94-7 satisfies the
purposes of the Mixed-Use Ordinance in the context of the
Master Plan as follows:
1. Development Plan Amendment, PDA-94-7 would
provide pedestrian linkage between this parcel
and the remainder of Marina Village. However,
because of its relative location, it does not
de-emphasize the automobile, which is
considered appropriate by Planning Staff for
the proposed uses and the location of the
parcel within the overall Marina Village site.
2. There are no areas requiring special
treatment. Therefore, development of the
proposed project would not have a significant
effect on historic resources.
1
3. Open space areas would be accessible to
residents and the general public. This
Development Plan Amendment would not affect
open space areas, since there are none located
on this portion of the Marina Village
property.
4. Development Plan Amendment, PDA-94-7, would be
conducive to mutual interdependence of living,
working, shopping and entertainment. The
proposed use would be developed in conformance
with the Community Noise Ordinance standards.
C. The proposed new development in Development Plan
Amendment, PDA-94-7, would be compatible with existing
and future contiguous uses. Additional landscaping would
provide compatibility of the proposed mechanical yard
with the residential structures located across from the
site on Independence Drive.
D. Development Plan Amendment, PDA-94-7, would retain
the current vehicular and nonvehicular circulation within
the project, which is considered sufficient in accordance
with the standards of the Mixed Use District.
E. Development Plan Amendment, PDA-94-7, would maintain
adequate landscaping and screening.
4. The Planning Board has been advised that subject to
meeting City standards and requirements, the proposed
development would be consistent with the Plan for the
West End Community Improvement Project (WECIP).
WHEREAS, the Planning Board approved PDA-94-7 on September 12,
1994; and
WHEREAS, Martha Martin appealed the Planning Board's action to
the City Council on September 22, 1994; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on this
appeal, and has examined pertinent maps, drawing, and documents;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby concurs in the findings to
approve Planned Development Amendment, PDA-94-7.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Alameda hereby denies the appeal and upholds the Planning
Board approval of Planned Development Amendment, PDA-94-7, subject
to the conditions of the Planning Board as set out below:
SCOPE OF APPROVAL
1. The Scope of Approval is limited to the following items
as shown on Development Plan Amendment, PDA-94-7, "GVAX
2
Cancer Vaccine Facility" dated. July 28, 1994, consisting
of 5 sheets, marked Exhibit "A" on file in the Planning
Department. This approval amends the approval of
Development Plan, DP-85-4 and incorporates the conditions
of approval, amended as appropriate to PDA-94-7.
PERMITTED USE
2. The allowable square footage for the mechanical yard
shall not exceed 3,200 square feet.
ALLOWABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE
3. For purposes of this approval, all floor areas are "Gross
Floor Area." Gross floor area is defined as the floor
area contained within the exterior walls of the
buildings: this includes the total area within the
building shell, including corridors, lavatories,
elevators, lobbies, etc.
DESIGN REVIEW
4. This project is subject to Design Review, however shall
not require public notice, since the item has been
noticed for Planning Board review. The design elements
of this Development Plan Amendment shall be compatible
with the overall design theme for the entire Marina
Village Project. The Planning Department staff shall
review, prior to the issuance of building permits:
detailed landscaping design, detailed architectural plans
of the buildings, loading areas, trash enclosures, street
furniture, security, exterior finishes, signs and
lighting fixtures.
LANDSCAPING
5. Minimum sizes of trees shall be 15 gallons to provide
maximum screening upon project completion.
POLICE PROTECTION
6. The Design Review plans shall be submitted to 'the Police
Department for review and approval in respect to the
issues raised in correspondence from the Police
Department dated June 28, 1994.
NOISE
7. The project shall incorporate the sound attenuation
measures outlined in the two reports by Salter Associates
Inc., Acoustical Consultants dated September 1, 1994 and
September 8, 1994.
8. Prior to issuance of the occupancy permit, or
commencement of the use, an acoustical consultant to be
3
retained by the City at the applicant's expense, shall
conduct noise measurements of the equipment as installed.
These noise measurements may be conducted during the
project validation period at the same locations (935
Independence Drive and 1 Regulus Court) as the noise
measurements 'in the Acoustical Study by Salter
Associates, Inc. dated September 1, 1994. Operation of
the mechanical equipment shall be permitted only when the
operation complies with the standards of the Community
Noise Ordinance.
9. In addition to meeting City standards and requirements,
the proposed use must conform to the adopted Plan for the
West End Community Improvement Project and General Plan
policies incorporated by reference within the Plan.
NOTICE: No judicial proceedings subject to review pursuant to
California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5 may be prosecuted
more than ninety (90) days following the date of this decision,
plus extension authorized by California Code of Civil Procedure
Section 1094.6.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution
was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the
City of Alameda in regular meeting assembled on the 18th
day of October , 1994, by the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Appezzato, Arnerich, Lucas,
Roth and President Withrow - 5.
None.
None.
ABSTENTIONS: None.
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official seal of said City this 19th day of October , 1994.
Diane B. Felsch, City Clerk
City of Alameda
4
CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. 12582
REJECTING ALL BIDS FOR BOLLARD LIGHTING FOR BAY FARM
ISLAND SHORELINE PARK, DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC WORKS
MAINTENANCE DIVISION IS CAPABLE OF DOING THE WORK MORE
ECONOMICALLY WITHOUT CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING PUBLIC
WORKS TO DO THE WORK
WHEREAS, the preliminary plan and estimate for CIP #92 -20,
installation of bollard type light fixtures along the jogging path
through the Bay Farm Island Shoreline Park, was developed by the
Bureau of Electricity and forwarded to the Public Works for
completion, bidding and construction; and
WHEREAS, three bids were received and opened on September 9,
1994, all exceeding the Bureau's Engineer's Estimate and available
budget; and
WHEREAS, the Public Works Maintenance forces are capable of
doing the work more economically without contract; and
WHEREAS, Section 3 -15 of the City Charter provides that the
City Council, by four affirmative votes, can determine that the
public work or improvement in question will be performed more
economically by the City without contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
Alameda that said Council hereby rejects all bids received for
bollard lighting for Bay Farm Island Shoreline Park, finds that
City forces will perform the work more economically without
contract, and authorizes Public Works Maintenance forces to perform
the work for bollard lighting for Bay Farm Island Shoreline Park
without contract.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution
was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the
City of Alameda in regular meeting assembled on the 18th day of
October , 1994, by the following vote to wit:
AYES: Councilmembers Arnerich, Lucas, Roth and
President Withrow - 4.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTENTIONS: Councilmember Appezzato - 1.
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official seal of said City this 19th day of October , 1994.
Diane B. Felsch, City Clerk
City of Alameda
CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. 12583
OPPOSING PROPOSITION 187 ( "ILLEGAL ALIENS. INELIGIBILITY
FOR PUBLIC SERVICES. VERIFICATION AND REPORTING.
INITIATIVE STATUTE. ")
WHEREAS, the City of Alameda values the economic, social and
cultural contributions of its sizeable immigrant population; and
WHEREAS, the City of Alameda affirms that all persons should
be treated in a fair and humane manner; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 187 would require that persons suspected
of being in the country illegally be reported to the Immigration
and Naturalization Service and would require that legal status of
a person be established before public social services, non -
emergency public health care, and public education can be provided;
and
WHEREAS, the verification requirements imposed upon public
schools, universities and colleges, and health care, social service
and law enforcement agencies would impose significant
administrative costs on the state and local governments; and
WHEREAS, billions of dollars annually in federal funding for
education, health and welfare programs would be placed at risk due
to conflicts with federal requirements; and
WHEREAS, the Policy Committees of the League of California
Cities, Alameda County Board of Supervisors, Alameda Unified School
District and the League of Women Voters all strongly oppose passage
of Proposition 187 because of the detrimental impact on the health,
education and welfare systems of our State, County and City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Alameda opposes Proposition 187.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution
was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the
City of Alameda in regular meeting assembled on the 1st day of
November , 1994, by the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
Councilmembers Appezzato, Arnerich, Roth and
President Withrow - 4.
Councilmember Lucas - 1.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTENTIONS: None.
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official seal of said City this 2nd day of Novpmhpr , 1994.
Diane B. Felsch, City Clerk
City of Alameda
CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. 12584
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF STATE -LOCAL TRANSPORTATION
PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM(SB300) AGREEMENT, NO. SLTPP -5014
AND PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 004
(REPAIR AND RESURFACING OF CERTAIN STREETS, PHASE 16)
WHEREAS, on August 2, 1994, the City Council of the City
of Alameda awarded the contract for the repair and resurfacing of
certain streets, Phase 16, No. P.W. 05 -94 -09 to McGuire & Hester
for resurfacing various streets for Fiscal Year 1994 -95; and
WHEREAS, on October 25, 1994 the California Department of
Transportation provided the Public Works Department with a Local
Entity Master Agreement No. SLTPP -5014 and Program Supplement No.
004 for approval and execution, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" to
provide funding for the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City
of Alameda that the City Council hereby authorizes the execution of
State -Local Transportation Partnership Program Agreement No. SLTPP-
5014 and Program Supplement No. 004 and authorizes the City Manager
to sign the same.
*
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution
was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the
City of Alameda in regular meeting assembled on the 15th day of
November , 1994, by the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Appezzato, Arnerich, Roth and
President Withrow - 4.
None.
Councilmember Lucas - 1.
ABSTENTIONS: None.
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official seal of said City this 16th day of November ,1994.
XIL
Diane . Felsch, City Clerk
City of Alameda