Loading...
Resolution 1286512865 CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. UPHOLDING THE PLANNING BOARD'S APPROVAL OF USE PERMIT, UP-96-36, FOR A PROJECT TO BE LOCATED AT 1916 WEBSTER STREET (SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WEBSTER STREET AND ATLANTIC AVENUE) WHEREAS, an application was made on October 24, 1996 by the Browman Development Company requesting two Use Permits for (1) 24- hour operation of the Walgreen's and a portion of the multi-tenant building and (2) an unenclosed (outdoor) seating for proposed food and beverage businesses. The site is composed of three parcels of approximately 3 acres. Within the site development area is a 0.10- acre parcel owned by the East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD); and WHEREAS, the application was accepted as complete on January 29, 1997; and WHEREAS, the subject property is designated as Community Commercial and Parks and Public Open Space on the General Plan Diagram; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located in a M-1-PD, Intermediate Industrial (Manufacturing), Planned Development Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the project is located within the boundaries of the Business and Waterfront Improvement Project and designated is for Commercial Uses and the West End Community Improvement Plan and is designated for Mixed Use; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board held a public hearing on February 24, 1997 to consider Use Permit, UP-96-36, and upon due consideration approved the application; and WHEREAS, an appeal was made on February 25, 1997 by Edward H. Clark to the City Council of the approval of the Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on this appeal on April 1, 1997, and has examined pertinent maps, drawings and documents; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there is no merit to the basis of the appeal based on Staff's response to the bases as set out in the Staff Report prepared for the April 1, 1997 City Council meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Council denies the appeal filed by Edward H. Clark and upholds the decision of the Planning Board to approve Use Permit, UP-96-36; and WHEREAS the City Council makes the following findings relative to the Use Permit to allow an unenclosed food and beverage area adjacent to the Pad "A" building: 1. The location of the proposed use is compatible with other uses in the neighborhood: The general area is composed of a variety of auto-oriented commercial uses, such as fast food, drive-in restaurants, gasoline stations and a motel. A linear park is proposed as part of the Atlantic Avenue Corridor Improvements and would be adjacent to the site. The outdoor area would landscaped with trees and shrubs in large pots. The outdoor area would be adjacent to an existing East Bay Municipal Utilities District wastewater pumping facility. However, based on testimony by the developer and the representative from the East Bay Municipal Utilities District, the Board determined that no odor problem exists at the site only the potential for an odor problem and therefore, no physical improvement is required at this time. The potential impact will be reduced because notice to future tenants of the Pad "A" building will be required and the developer will be required to continue working with the East Bay Municipal Utilities District on an on-going basis to accommodate upgrades to the pumping facility which would lessen the potential odor problem. Thus, the proposal would be compatible with other uses in the neighborhood. 2. The proposed use will be adequately served by transportation and service facilities: The site is served by AC Transit and provides the required amount of on-site parking spaces. All utilities are provided to the site. Thus, the proposal is adequately served by transportation and service facilities. 3. The proposed use will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity: The proposed outdoor food and beverage area will be an amenity to the neighborhood and will not affect other property. The area is located within the site, is shielded by the Pad "A" building, the EBMUD structure and the parking lot and perimeter trees, and will not be visible from adjacent public streets. A six foot high masonry or concrete wall will be installed along the south property line to shield the adjacent residential use from noise which may emanate from the unenclosed use. Gaps in existing trees along the property boundary between the residential use and the subject site will also be closed by the planting of additional trees to provide a buffer between the uses. The seating proposed for the plaza be brought indoors no later than at 10:00 pm, and the will site contain adequate refuse facilities for patrons to lessen the potential trash at the site. Thus, the proposal would not adversely affect other property in the vicinity. 4. The proposed use favorably relates to the General Plan: Use Permits must favorably relate to the General Plan. General Plan Guiding Policy 2.5.a. states a goal of "(p)rovid(ing) enough retail and service space to enable Alameda to realize its full retail sales potential." The outdoor food and beverage area would be a desirable amenity for this retail center which is currently not available on Webster Street. The area could also be considered as ancillary to the greenway. Greenway users would find seating, refreshments and shade. It would provide an additional sales opportunity, could increase the enjoyment of the greenway and thus, would favorably relate to the General Plan. WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings relative to the Use Permit to allow 24 hour operation of the Walgreen's Drug Store: 1. The location of the proposed use is compatible with other uses in the neighborhood: Some of the nearby fast food uses operate on a 24 hour basis as does the Lucky's Market in Marina Village. Thus, the proposed use is compatible with other uses in the neighborhood. 2. The proposed use will be adequately served by transportation and service facilities: The site is served by AC Transit and provides the required amount of on-site parking spaces. All utilities are provided to the site. Thus, the proposal is adequately served by transportation and service facilities. 3. The proposed use will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity: By operating on a 24 hour basis, the Walgreen's which contains a full service pharmacy as well as other retail sales items, will provide a service not currently enjoyed in the neighborhood. The volume of customers during the late evening, nighttime and early morning hours would be considerably less than during daytime and early evening hours. Therefore, the parking spaces immediately adjacent to the Walgreen's building, which are furthest from the adjoining residential complex would be utilized, thereby reducing automobile noise travelling behind the Walgreen's building in the area immediately adjacent to that complex. An eight foot high masonry wall will be constructed along the property boundary opposite the Walgreen's building to further reduce noise. Gaps in existing trees along the property boundary between the residential use and the subject site will also be closed by the planting of additional trees to provide a buffer between the uses. Deliveries to the Walgreen's will be limited to after 7:00 am and before 10:00 pm of every day. 4. The proposed use favorably relates to the General Plan: Use Permits must favorably relate to the General Plan. General Plan Guiding Policy 2.5.a. states a goal of "(p)rovid(ing) enough retail and service space to enable Alameda to realize its full retail sales potential." There is currently no 24 hour, full service pharmacy on Webster Street. Thus, the proposal would provide a new sales potential to the area. Thus, the 24 hour operation would favorably relate to the General Plan. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approves Use Permit, UP-96-36, subject to the following conditions: APPROVED PLANS 1. The project shall be constructed in substantial compliance with the plans consisting of the following eight sheets which constitute and are marked Exhibit "A", on file in the office of the City of Alameda Planning Department, except as modified by the conditions in this Resolution: a. Topographic Survey, Atlantic/Webster/Constitution Project, Alameda California, prepared by Phillippi Engineering, dated May 17, 1996, and stamped received "February 18, 1996. b. Walgreens At Alameda Site Plan, prepared by Phillippi Engineering, undated, and stamped received "February 18, 1997" and showing the existing easements. c. Walgreens At Alameda Site Plan, prepared by Phillippi Engineering, undated, and stamped received "February 18, 1997". d. Walgreens Drug Store No.000, Alameda California, prepared by Jerold L. Dougal, dated October 18, 1996, revised January 7, 1997 and. January 24, 1997, stamped received "February 18, 1997. e. Multi-Tenant Shop Building, Alameda California, prepared by Jerold L. Dougal, dated October 18, 1996, revised January 7, 1997, and stamped received "February 18, 1997". f. Walgreens Alameda Conceptual Landscape Plan, prepared by James Ferguson Clabaugh, dated October 21, 1996, revised January 9, 1997 and January 31, 1997, and stamped received "February 18, 1997". g Walgreens, Alameda, Conceptual Landscape Detail, prepared by James Ferguson Clabaugh, dated January 31, 1997, and stamped received "February 18, 1997". h. E.B.M.U.D. Building Alameda, California, prepared by Jerold L. Dougal, dated January 13, 1997, and stamped received "February 18, 1997". i. The revised Walgreens At Alameda Site Plan, prepared by Phillippi Engineering, undated, and stamped received "March 27, 1997". j. The revised Multi-Tenant Shop Building, Alameda California, prepared by Jerold L. Dougal, dated October 18, 1996, revised January 7, 1997, revised January 24, 1997 and stamped received "March 27, 1997". k. Where there is a conflict between the various sheets of Exhibit "A", the plans cited in Conditions 1(i) and 1(j) shall control. USE PERMIT 2. Walgreen's may operate a pharmacy and drug store on a 24 hour basis, seven days per week, in the building located along Webster Street. 3. Commercial delivery loading and unloading for businesses at the site shall not occur prior to 7:00 am any day nor after 10:00 pm on any day. 4. At least four refuse containers with a minimum capacity of 32 gallons be provided on the plaza adjacent to the Pad "A" building. 5. The seating proposed for the plaza be brought indoors no later than the close of the business at 10:00 pm and may not be put out earlier than 7:00 am in order to minimize loitering opportunities. 6. The unenclosed use of the outdoor seating area is approved subject to the following conditions: a. The developer shall hold harmless the City of Alameda in any litigation relating to any odor problems associated with the EBMUD pumping facility from the developer, his successors or assigns, or any of his tenants. b. The developer shall advise all tenants in the Pad "A" building of the proximity of the project to an EBMUD sewer pumping facility. c. As undertaken in a letter from Jimi Yoloye, Supervisor of Wastewater Planning, dated March 24, 1997, the East Bay Municipal Utilities District will install chemical dosing and odor control facilities at the pumping facility, either above ground or underground, at the cost of the East Bay Municipal Utilities District. The developer shall work with EBMUD to accommodate the proposed upgrades to the pumping facility which would lessen the potential odor problem. 7. The Use Permit shall be conducted in compliance with Planned Development, PD-96-3. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS 8. The developer shall comply with all federal, state and local laws. Material violation of any of those laws in connection with the use will be cause for revocation of this permit. HOLD HARMLESS 9. The City of Alameda requires as a condition of this Use Permit approval that Browman Development Company, or its successors in interest, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Alameda or its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, and employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City concerning the 1916 Webster Street Use Permit, which action is brought within the time period provided for in Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Alameda shall promptly notify the developer of any claim, action or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the developer of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the developer shall not hereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. REVOCATION 10. These Use Permits may be modified or revoked by the City Council or Planning Board, should they determine that the proposed uses or conditions under which it is being operated or maintained is detrimental to the public health, welfare or materially injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or if the property is operated or maintained so as to constitute a public nuisance. VESTING 11. The Use Permits shall terminate one (1) year from April 1, 1997, unless actual construction under valid permits has begun, or the developer applies for and is granted an extension prior to the Use Permits. G:\CC\RESO\3UP-96-36 Revised 4/9/97 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in regular meeting assembled on the 1st day of April , 1997, by the following vote to wit: AYES: Councilmembers Daysog, DeWitt, Kerr, Lucas and President Appezzato - 5. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTENTIONS: None. IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said City this 2nd day of April , 1997. Diane e1sch, City Clerk City of Alameda