Loading...
Resolution 13827CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. 3827 UPHOLDING THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY' OF ALAMEDA'S DECISION TO APPROVE DESIGN REVIEW DR04 -0113 AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PD04 -0004 TO CONSTRUCT A 6,000 SQ. FT. COMMUNITY CENTER AND FOUR DETACHED GARAGES, EXTERIOR MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING BUILDINGS, ` AND OTHER SITE MODIFICATIONS AT THE 615 UNIT HARBOR ISLAND APARTMENT COMPLEX LOCATED AT 433 BUENA VISTA AVENUE, LOCATED IN ` AN R -4 PD, NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT WHEREAS, an application was made on November 12, 2004, by Alameda Multifamily Ventures, LLC., requesting Design Review and Planned Development approvals to construct a 6,000 sq. ft. community center and four detached garages, exterior modifications to existing apartment buildings, and other site modifications at 433 Buena Vista Avenue ("Project"); and WHEREAS, the subject property is designated as Medium Density Residential on the General Plan Diagram; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located in the R -4 PD, Neighborhood Residential Planned Development Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board held study sessions on this application on December 13, 2004 and January 24, 2005 to take public testimony and comments' on the proposed design of the Project and approved the Project after a public hearing on February 28, 2005; and WHEREAS, on April 5, 2005 the City Council of the City of Alameda held a public hearing for the appeal of the Planning Board's approval and examined pertinent documents as well as the record of the Planning Board hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council makes the foliowing findings relevant to the Planned Development application: 1. The Planned Development would allow for a more effective use of the site than is possible under the regulations of the underlying district with which the Planned Development District is combined because it provides an opportunity to carry out improvements customized for large multifamily developments, such as the community center and multi -car garages, where no provisions are available in the underlying district for such facilities. 2. The Project meets the Planned Development requirements because the proposed community center and detached garages are accessory uses to the primary residential use The proposed community center and detached garages do not represent a change or expansion in use of the site The recreational uses and administrative functions proposed in the community center are uses that already exist and will be relocated on the site. The uses will be exclusively by the residents of Harbor Island Apartments and their guests. 3. The Project is consistent with the General Plan because the Project seeks to enhance the existing residential property by adding recreational amenities and upgrading the aesthetic character of the existing buildings. As a result, the Project conforms to General Plan Guiding Policy 2.4.a., which recommends maintenance and enhancement of the residential environment of Alameda's neighborhoods. 4. The Project will not have a significant effect on adjacent land uses because it will be located on a developed site, and would not result in a significant increase in traffic, pedestrian volume, or parking demand. Furthermore, there will be no adverse effects on aesthetics, open space, noise, or circulation. 5. The Project will not adversely affect parking because the complex already provides parking spaces for management and leasing functions along Poggi Street. With the relocation of those functions to the proposed community center, the parking spaces for the office use would be moved from Poggi Street to the existing parking area in front of the new building. This change of location will be beneficial to the city by reducing the frequent ingress /egress pattern generated by the existing management office at the corner of Poggi Street and Buena Vista Avenue. Furthermore, additional off - street parking spaces will be created as a result of the Project. 6. The Project will not adversely affect open space, because although the proposed community center would eliminate three picnic tables and two grills in front of the swimming pool, other picnic areas and recreational spaces are proposed in various locations on the site. The fitness room, community room and outdoor patios in the community center will enhance recreational opportunities by providing a greater diversity of activities for the residents. 7. The site is physically suited for the type of development, because the site is fully developed and the proposed community center and garages are accessory to the existing residential use. $. The site is physically suited for the proposed density because the proposed community center will be providing services to residents who are already on the site. No additional dwelling units are being created and no significant traffic demand will be generated as a result of this Project. WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings relevant to the Design Review application: 1 . The Project will have no adverse effects on persons or property in the vicinity, because the Project consists of improving amenities to residents of the complex and the process requires all construction to meet current codes and safety standards. 2. The Project is compatible and harmonious with the design and use of surrounding properties, because the exterior design of the new structures and renovated buildings incorporate common architectural features representative of Alameda's character, and when all conditions of approval are met, the Project design will be compatible and harmonious with the surrounding properties. 2 3. The Project is consistent with the City's Design Review Guidelines, because the Project incorporates elements to integrate the site with the surrounding neighborhood as well as enhancing the design of the existing buildings; therefore the Project is consistent with the City's Design Review Guidelines. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council finds that the project is Categorically Exempt under California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Section 15301 — Existing Facilities, Section 15302 - replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities; Section 15303 - New Construction of Conversion of Small Structures, Section 15304(b) - Landscaping; and Section 15061(b)(3) - Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Project may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council denies the appeal and upholds the Planning Board's approval of Design Review DR04 -0113 and Planned Development PD04 -0004 to construct a 6,000 Sq. Ft. Community Center and Four Detached Garages, exterior modifications to existing buildings, and other site modifications at the 615 unit Harbor Island Apartment Complex located at 433 Buena Vista Avenue, subject to the following conditions: 1. APPROVED PLANS. The Project shall be completed in substantial compliance with plans prepared by Axis Architecture + Design, titled "Harbor Island Apartments Design & Planned Development Review," consisting of forty-seven (47) sheets, dated February 15, 2005 marked as "Exhibit A ", on file in the City of Alameda Planning and Building Department, subject to the conditions specified in this resolution. 2. Amendments to this Planned Development approval shall be required when improvements fall within the criteria specified in AMC Subsection 30- 4.13(m). 3. Project improvements affecting electrical service shall be coordinated with Alameda Power and Telecom. 4. All Project improvements shall conform to the requirements of the 2001 California Building Standards Code and Alameda Building, Plumbing, Mechanical, and Electrical Codes. 5. All Project improvements shall conform to the applicable requirements of the Fire Department, which may include, but not limited to, the installation of Fire Sprinklers and Fire Alarms, to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief. 6. The applicants shall coordinate with the Police Department to ensure that the Project complies with public safety requirements noted in the Police Department memorandum to Planning staff dated December 7, 2004, as amended by subsequent communications between the applicant and the City, to the satisfaction of the Chief of Police and the Planning and Building Director. 7. The applicants shall coordinate with the Public Works Department to ensure that all components of the Project complies with city regulations, including but not limited to, urban runoff standards, sewer testing and maintenance, garbage disposal requirements, integrated waste requirements, 3 and improvements affecting the public right -of -way, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director and the Planning and Building Director. 8. If changes to the approved landscaping plan along Buena Vista Avenue are necessary, , the applicants shall coordinate with the Public Works Department on the review and implementation of the changes. 9. Damage to the sidewalks and pavement in the public right -of -way caused by and related to the Project improvements shall be repaired and replaced by the applicants, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. 10. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for the Project, the applicants shall submit a Construction- Phasing Plan, subject to the approval of the Public Works Director and the Planning and Building Director. 11. Demolition and construction within the City of Alameda are subject to the Construction and Demolition Debris Ordinance (Section 21- 24 -1). The Alameda Municipal Code states that all construction and debris within the City shall be collected and transported through the streets of the City by franchise or permitted hauler (Section 21- 20 -3). 12. The applicants shall comply with Alameda Municipal Code Subsection 21 -41.1, which currently requires the owner or occupant of any premise to subscribe to and pay for all integrated waste collection with the City's franchisee, for integrated waste collection services. 13. The applicants shall comply with Alameda Municipal Code Subsection 21 -41.1, which currently requires that collection of solid waste from residential areas, regardless of collection receptacle, cart, bin or compactor, be collected a minimum of one time per week (per State of California Public Resources Code (40000 et seq.). 14. Compactor Monitoring. Compactor size is limited to 10 to 50 cubic yards per the City's Franchise Agreement and sized to handle the waste generated at a minimum of once a week service with a legal gross weight of no more than 10 tons. An Integrated Waste Disposal Plan that includes the use of a compactor shall be approved by the Public Works Director prior to Certificate of Occupancy. The Plan is to be based upon the development's full capacity and a monitoring and evaluation program, with monitoring and evaluation criteria approved by the City, implemented for a minimum of six (6) months after full capacity has been reached. If the monitoring program demonstrates the Integrated Waste Disposal Plan does not meet the City standards, the City shall require a revised and approved Integrated Waste Disposal Plan be implemented within one month's notice, or the City shall have the right to implement the City's Program if, in its sole discretion, the proposed program is not or has not achieved the City's program goals and objectives. 15. Use of Trash Removal Train System. Trash removal train system must be covered, have watertight bodies designed to prevent leakage, spillage or overflow water tight and meet or exceed all requirements of the State Regional Water Quality Board and Bay Area Air Quality Management District. Failure to comply with State requirements may result in prohibition of train use 16. Construction noise shall be minimized by restricting construction activities to the daytime hours specified by the Alameda Municipal Code. The current provisions limit construction to Monday through Friday, between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m., and on Saturday between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., with no Sunday construction. 17. The proposed garages shall be used exclusively for vehicular parking only, with the exception of four garage spaces in Garage A, depicted on Sheets A0.50 and A02.18, which maybe designated for site maintenance activities, equipment, and vehicles. 18. Final plans submitted for Building Permits for the Project shall include a window schedule that specifies the proposed window material, size, type of opening as well as include a section detail of the window, to the satisfaction of the Planning and Building Director. 19. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for the Project, the applicants shall sign and record with the County Recorder's office a Landscape and Common Area Maintenance Agreement with the City. 20. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for the Project, the applicants shall provide a Detailed Landscaping Plan that is consistent with the approved plans referred to in Condition #1 to identify the specific locations of all trees, shrubs, groundcover, and pedestrian pathways on the site. The Detailed Landscaping Plan may include a phasing strategy to accommodate Project construction, subject to the approval of the Planning and Building Director. The Detailed Landscaping Plan shall also include details of the irrigation system to demonstrate compliance with the Water Conservation requirements of AMC Subsection 30 -59.3. 21. Landscaping according to the approved Detailed Landscaping Plan referenced in Condition #20 shall be completely installed prior to Final Design Review Inspection of the final phase according to the approved Construction- Phasing Plan. Alternatively, the applicant may provide appropriate bonding security at 125% of the cost of installation of the approved landscaping to ensure that the landscaping will be installed. 22. The applicants shall coordinate with the City during the implementation of the West Alameda Neighborhood Improvement Plan and related improvements when the Plan is adopted and implemented by the City. 23. All Time and Material charges for this application shall be paid in full prior to issuance of Building Permits for the Project. 24. Any new signage for the site shall be subject to a separate Sign Permit review and approval; signage for site traffic shall be subject to the approval of the Public Works Director. 25. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for the Project, the applicants shall coordinate with the Recreation and Parks Director and Planning and Building Director on the payment of the Public Art Fee for the proposed Community Center and to ensure compliance with AMC Subsection 30- 65. 5 26. VESTING. The Design Review and Planned Development approval shall expire one (1) year after the date of approval or by February 28, 2006, unless actual construction of the Project has begun within that time or, alternatively, an extension request is filed and approved by the Planning Board prior to the date of expiration. 27. HOLD HARMLESS. The City of Alameda requires as a condition of this approval that the applicant, or its successors in interest, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Alameda or its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, and employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City concerning the subject property, which action is brought within the time period provided for in Government Code Section 65009(c). The City of Alameda shall cooperate promptly, notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the applicant shall not hereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. 28. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF CONDITIONS. The applicant shall acknowledge in writing all of the conditions of approval and must accept this permit subject to those conditions and with full awareness of the applicable provisions of Chapter 30 of the Alameda Municipal Code in order for this approval to be exercised. NOTICE. No judicial proceedings subject to review pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5 may be prosecuted more than ninety (90) days following the date of this decision plus extensions authorized by California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. NOTICE. The Conditions of Proj ect Approval set forth herein include certain fees and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90 -day appeal period in which you may protest these fees and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a) has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90 -day period complying with all the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such fees or exactions. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in the regular meeting of the City Council on the 5th day of April, 2005, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, and Mayor Johnson - Councilmembers Gilmore and Matarrese 2. None. ABSTENTIONS: None. IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said City this 6th day of April, 2005. Lara Weisiger, City Cl City of Alameda