Loading...
1993-08-19 Special CC MinutesSPECIAL MEETING OF THE ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 19, 1993 The Meeting convened at 7:45 p.m., following a Special Council Meeting (Closed Session) at 7:00 p.m. Councilmember Appezzato led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Appezzato, Lucas, Roth and President Withrow - 4. Absent: Councilman Arnerich - 1. 93-502 Public Hearing to Consider Revenue Options. The Finance Director gave a brief history of Fiscal Year 1992-93, noting budget cuts due to the recession, and further cuts due to County charges and monies retained by the State. The City Manager noted efforts of Departments and employees to save funds; stated three areas could provide a reduction in the deficit: first, revenues; second, negotiating with ACEA and other affected unions to reduce hours one day a week for the rest of the year, and four days between Christmas and New Year's Day; and [third], one- half cent Sales Tax to be voted on at November 2nd Election called by the Governor; the only action Council may consider tonight would be on fees, taxes and special assessments. Mayor Withrow stated he would like a cost per equivalent dwelling units (EDU) for the costs of unfunded mandates and state budget impacts; and commented, taking monies from the local level and spending it on Statewide budgets, is a tax increase. The City Manager reviewed proposed fee increases, including: Planning fees; False Alarm Fees, to charge following third false alarm responded to by Police; Scofflaw, a fee charged people who have excessive number of uncleared parking citations; recreation fees set by Recreation Commission, which requires no action if Council wishes the fees to remain as set by Commission; Fire Clean Up Charge, a fee for on-site clean up following fire; Franchise Taxi Program, approved by Council August 17th; Personnel Fees for oral examinations and application processing; Business License fee on single family rentals; Payment in Lieu of Taxes, at one percent of fixed assets, on City Enterprise Funds: Sewer Service Fund, Golf Enterprise Fund, and Electric Enterprise Fund from Bureau of Electricity, commenting that one percent would produce $396,632 this year; and that Council received letters from Public Works Director noting impact on sewer service fund may require increase in the future, Chair of Golf Commission which indicates no objection to this charge; President of Public Utilities Board who indicated impact together with closing of Naval Air Station may require Bureau to adjust rates; Utility Users' Tax, raises Cable TV tax to 5 and 1/2% which is same rate as other utilities; Property August 19, 1993 3 Transfer Tax increase from $4.40 to $6.40, per $1000 transferred, is a tax on all real estate: residential, commercial, industrial, sold in Alameda; he reviewed rates of other cities; and stated Council has already taken action on Golf surcharges and they will take effect January 1, 1994. Raye Lee Thieman, Alameda, stated citizens should oppose State and County, and work toward keeping funds in the community; Transfer Tax is lower than in surrounding communities, however, Alameda imposes sewer lateral ordinance and that is a tax. The City Manager explained the State Environmental Protection Agency ordered City and private property owners to repair sewer laterals on public right-of-ways and private property due to contamination of soils and United States waters. Richard Rudloff, Alameda, supported Revenue Options A, Increase in Fee for multiple units; B, Fee for Single Family Rental Units; C, PILOT; and E, Property Transfer Tax; and gave reasons for support. Stanford Shane, Alameda, commented on new taxes; noted items he does not believe were wise City expenditures, and City of Sunnyvale's success in reducing budget. Mabel Wong, Alameda, stated she is having trouble keeping her five apartment units filled; and business license fee increase on units would be a hardship. Don Roberts, Alameda, stated Cable tax passes to consumers; revenue increases or reductions in services should nut be discussed in special meetings; and commended Mayor Withrow for representing City at Kofman Auditorium Tenth Ahniversary celebration. E. Greigo, Alameda, stated $40 [Business License Fee) is too much to pay for multiple units, particularly for persons on fixed income. President Withrow questioned charging the same fee for units rented, for example, at $350 a month, as units rented for $2000 per month. The City Manager stated that could be changed to a gross receipts basis. President Withrow stated that would be more fair. John Barni, Sr., Alameda, stated $40.00 per unit is an exorbitant amount to pay; owners' expenses have increased; and commented the government should look to cutting its expense. Linda Grant, Alameda, opposed increasing property owners' costs in these economically difficult times; and encouraged Council to look at a different way to raise revenues. August 19, 1993 324 Hadi Monsef, Alameda, stated he is speaking for his clients; income is decreasing due to vacancies, expenses are increasing, and doubling unit fees is unjustified and unfair, and in today's market, is unreasonable. * * * * President Withrow announced Council would recess to 9:15 p.m. * * * * President Withrow stated the public portion of the hearing was closed. Vice Mayor Roth stated he would like to take each item in order. Councilmember Appezzato stated he would like to make a statement concerning his position, and submitted a list of his figures to Council, and explained his proposal. He would like: one or both expense reductions pertaining to City employees, the 4-day winter holiday and the 1-day per week City Hall closure, negotiated; Payment In Lieu of Taxes [PILOT], and later, he would be willing to consider for the Bureau, a tax Council would impose instead of PILOT; Utility Tax for Cable; Planning Fees; False Alarm Fees; Scofflaw; Golf Surcharge for out-of-towners; Fire Clean Up Charges; Franchise Taxi Fees; Personnel Services Application and Exam Fees; Property Transfer Tax, $1.00 increase instead of $2.00; he will not support the Business License Fee increases in today's economy; urged the City Manager negotiate with the unions on working conditions, believes layoffs c.an be avoided if everyone cooperates, and he cannot support an increase in the recreation fees, $25,000, as these fees hit families who cannot afford them; if additional monies above $250,000 from sales tax are acquired, Council should reconsider and not impose the Property Transfer Tax increase. The City Manager stated his caveat is that Revenue Option figures in staff reports submitted, are annualized; and commented the Public Utilities Board asked in an open meeting that he remind Council that the Board requested, in a memo, that Council consider increasing Utility Users Tax by a half-percent rather than levying the Payment In Lieu of Taxes. Councilmember Appezzato stated he could support that. Councilmember Lucas stated she could support Councilmember Appezzato's proposal; the City Manager is correct that figures are annualized but there is some leeway; and she is pleased Business License Fees are omitted as they do not make sense in this economy. Councilmember Appezzato stated he would also consider a sunset law on the property transfer tax, that if the $1.00 increase is imposed and later found to be unnecessary, that Council look at terminating it. In response to Vice Mayor Roth, the City Manager stated the amount the State will take from the City is firm at this moment, however, the State did not balance last year and borrowed money against this year, so they could come in at any time and try to take more money August 19, 1993 from cities. Vice Mayor Roth stated he believes single-family [rental] units should be charged a Business License Fee, he would support a $20 fee for single-family units, and Mayor Withrow's comment on the matter; working out an equitable rate would take time, and should be looked at as a long-term goal and brought back to Council. Vice Mayor Roth stated he would like to vote on each item. President Withrow stated Council has Councilmember Appezzato's proposal. The City Manager stated he reviewed Councilmember Appezzato's figures, and excluding the issue on expenditures which would be the City facility's closure, this [Appezzato's proposal] would balance the budget for this year; and requested, if Council decides to vote on this as a package, that Council exclude any discussion, or exclude from its vote, the 4-day winter holiday or the City Hall closure because that has not been negotiated and cannot be voted on; however, Council can request stafi negotiate. Councilmember Lucas moved to approve Councilmember Appezzato's budget proposal with the caveats stated by the City Manager. Councilmember Appezzato seconded the motion. President Withrow stated he would prefer that Council go along with the recommendation of the Public Utilities Board [PUB]. Councilmember Appezzato agreed. Councilmember Lucas agreed to modify her mocior. accordingly. Following discussion concerning PILOT, and the possibility, pros and cons of raising utility taxes, Councilmember Lucas stated the amendment would be eliminated and the original motion retained. Councilmember Appezzato seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Appezzato, Lucas and Withrow - 3. Nayes: Roth - 1. Absent: Councilmall Arnerich - 1. [Resolution and Introduction of Ordinances noted below.] 93-503 Resolution No. 12445 "Amending Master Fee Resolution No. 12191 to Establish Users Fees and Charges for: False Alarm Fees, Scofflaw, Fire Clean Up Charge. Franchise Taxi Program, Filling and Dredging Fees, Personnel Fees, Firearms and Munitions Dealer License Fees, and Establishing and Amending Planning Fees." Adopted. [See paragraph 93-502 for discussion and action.] 93-504 Ordinance No. N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding Subsection 3-28-3(b) to Section 3-28 (Payment of Taxes), Division IV (Levy and Collection of Taxes, Chapter III (Finance and Taxation) Thereof, Pertaining to Payment By City Enterprise Funds of an Annual In-Lieu Tax of 1% of Fixed Assets." Introduced. [See paragraph 93-502 for discussion and action.] August 19, 1993 93-505 Ordinance No. , N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Subsection 3-58.2 (Imposition of Tax) to Section 3-58 (Real Property Transaction Taxes, Part C (Use Tax), Chapter III (Finance and Taxation) Thereof, Pertaining to Property Transfer Tax." Introduced. [Council reduced proposed tax increase from $2.00 to $1.00] [See paragraph 93-502 for discussion and action.] 93-506 Ordinance No. . N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Subsection 3-59.8 (Cable Television Users Tax), Section 3-59 (Utility Users Tax), of Article II (Taxation), Chapter III (Finance and Taxation) Thereof, Pertaining to Users Tax on Cable Services." Introduced. [See paragraph 93-502 for discussion and action.] 93-507 Ordinance No. • N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Subsection 5-4.1(H) of Section 5-4 (License Fees), of Article I (Procedures for Licenses), Chapter V (Licenses and Permits) Thereof, Pertaining to Business License Fees for Multiple Units and Adding Subsection 5-4.1(1) Pertaining to Business License Fees for Single Family Rental Units." Not introduced. [See paragraph 93-502 for discussion and action.] 93-508 Ordinance No. • N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Deleting Subsection 30-21.13 (Fees) of Subsection 30-21 (Variances, Use Permits: Procedures), Chapter XXX (Development Regulations) and Amending Section 30-26 (Fees) of Chapter XXX." Introduced. [See paragraph 93-502 for discussion and action.] 93-509 Ordinance No. N. "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Subsections 13-49.1 (Filling and Dredging Unlawful Without Permit) and 13-49.2 (Application Form) of Section 13-49 (Filling and Dredging Permit Required), Article XV (Filling and Dredging), Chapter XIII (Building and Housing) Thereof, Pertaining to Filling and Dredging." Introduced. President Withrow stated there were no speakers. Councilmember Lucas moved introduction of the ordinance. Councilmember Appezzato seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. Councilmember Lucas moved to accept staff recommendation [to establish a fee for depositii fill material]. Councilmember Appezzato seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [See paragraph 93-502, Resolution No. 12445] NEW AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS 93-510 Councilmember Lucas stated she keeps receiving calls regarding the property on Eagle Avenue; the noise and apparent drug use continues. The City Manager stated more enforcement personnel will be put on August 19, 1993 the matter. The Public Works Director stated a joint inspection is scheduled for September 7th. ADJOURNMENT President Withrow adjourned the meeting at 10:02 p.m. Respectfully submitted, 7/6 Diane B. Felsch, CMC City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. August 19, 1993