Loading...
1992-11-17 Regular CC MinutesMINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 17, 1992 The meeting convened at 7:32 p.m., with President Withrow presiding. Councilmember Camicia led the Pledge of Allegiance, and Reverend Robert Keller gave the invocation. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Lucas, Roth and President Withrow - 5. Absent: None. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS Mayor Withrow announced that Council convened in Closed Session at 7:05 to consider: 92-783 Initiation of Litigation pursuant to Subsection (c) of Government Code Section 54956.9: Mayor Withrow stated no action was taken. 92-784 Labor Negotiations pursuant to Section 54957.6 of the Brown Act: Mayor Withrow announced no action was taken. PROCLAMATIONS AND SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY, 92-785 Day. Proclamation declaring December 8, 1992, Don MacDowell Mayor Withrow presented Proclamation to Don MacDowell, President, Alameda Board of Education; and commended him for his sixty years in Alameda education as teacher, administrator, Board Member and President. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Withrow noted he will abstain on *92-787 and 92-797 reports concerning Bay Farm Island Reclamation District; and removed the following items from the Consent Calendar for discussion 92-797 report regarding Bay Farm Island Perimeter Dike; 92-798 report regarding repair of streets; and 92-799 ordinance regarding Linoaks Motel lease. Vice Mayor Lucas moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5 [with the exception of *92-787 and 92-797 on which Mayor Withrow abstained]. Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk. *92-786 Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Council Meeting of November 4, 1992, and the Special Council Meeting of November 4, 1992. Approved. November 17, 1992 *92-787 Report from the Assistant City Manager transmitting the Valuation Commissioners' Report, Operation and Maintenance Assessment Rolls, and Setting a Hearing Date of December 1, 1992, 7:30 p.m., on Bay Farm Island Reclamation District No. 2105. Accepted. [President Withrow abstained] *92-788 Report from the Public Works Director recommending Stop Sign Control at the Intersection of Court and Fillmore Streets. Accepted. *92-789 Report from the Public Works Director recommending change from Yield to Stop Sign Installation at the intersection of Fountain and Jackson Streets. Accepted. *92-790 Report from the Planning Director recommending a hearing be set for the Appeal of a Planning Board approval of Soskin Design Review, DR-92-146, for remodeling and addition at 1526 Fountain Street. Appellant: Sylvia Blumberg. Accepted. *92-791 Report from the Community Development Director recommending Reprogramming of CDBG Funds and Amending FY 1992-93 CDBG Final Statement and Related Grant Agreement. Accepted. *92-792 Report from the Finance Director transmitting Investment Report for period ending October 31, 1992. Accepted. *92-793 Resolution No. 12344 "Authorizing Application for 1993-94 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Funds for Pedestrian/Bicycle Projects." Adopted. *92-794 Resolution No. 12345 "Authorizing an Appropriation for the City's Obligation Under the Cooperation Agreement Between the City of Alameda and the Community Improvement Commission." Adopted. *92-795 Resolution No. 12346 "Stating the Administrative Policy of the City Regarding Deductions from Compensation of Employees Exempt from the Overtime Provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act." Adopted. *92-796 Bills, certified by the City Manager as true and correct, were ratified in the sum of $934.767.01. 92-797 Report from the Assistant City Manager recommending approval of Dike Maintenance Agreement for the Bay Farm Island (BFI) Perimeter Dike. President Withrow stepped down from the dais to abstain; Vice Mayor Lucas assumed the Chair. The City Manager and City Attorney also stepped down, and the Assistant City Manager and Assistant City Attorney took their places on the dais. Councilman Arnerich commended Councilmember Roth and Assistant City Manager for their efforts; and moved acceptance of the report and recommendation. November 17, 1992 Councilmember Roth seconded the motion and stated he was proud of City staff and Committee Members. The motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Roth and Vice Mayor Lucas - 4. Noes: None. Absent: None. Abstentions: President Withrow - 1. * * * President Withrow returned to the dais and assumed the Chair. The City Manager and City Attorney also returned to the dais. * * * 92-798 Report from the Public Works Director recommending acceptance of work by Gallagher & Burk, Inc. for the Repair and Resurfacing of Certain Streets, Phase 13, No. P.W. 3-92-06. Gerhard Degemann, Alameda, stated titles of reports on repair and resurfacing of certain streets should include street names. Councilmember Camicia moved acceptance of the report and recommendation. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 92-799 Ordinance No. • N.S. "Authorizing Execution of a Lease Extension for the Linoaks Motel." Introduced. Charles Millman, Alameda, stated the Lease should be based upon what the City Manager presented to the City Council in 1989; State law requires it; City should either take over the operation of the motel and start making money, or not go on with the Lease. In response to Councilmember Roth, the Assistant City Manager explained the return on investment regarding the property; and added there are no Mello Roos funds involved in the purchase of the motel. Councilmember Roth moved introduction of the ordinance. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. REGULAR AGENDA 92-800 Report from Vice Mayor Lucas regarding a Police Department Ombudsman Program. Vice Mayor Lucas stated the Mayor's Committee on Cultural and Ethnic Diversity [MCCED] proposed a Police Review Board or an Ombudsman Program be initiated; compared the two programs, noted her reasons for wanting an ombudsman program, read characteristics of a successful ombudsman program investigating nursing home complaints in Oakland; suggested trial program for one or two years to restore citizen trust in Police Department, if the program does not, then it can be reevaluated; stated she will ask Council refer the matter to Mayor's Committee for recommendations to implement the program. November 17, 1992 The Police Chief noted reasons police administrators generally oppose civilian review; numerous agencies have authority to investigate police and do so; high cost of civilian review boards; Department makes 400,000 contacts per year with average 34 citizen complaints; a good percentage of police misconduct is uncovered by police internal process; he would rather the City place funds into pro-active law enforcement and positive programs, e.g., community policing, accreditation program. Lois Workman, Vice-President, Social Service Human Relations Board, stated Board believes ombudsman idea should be explored. Elsa Bogosian, Alameda, stated she is a member of countywide ombudsman program to investigate nursing homes, ombudsman program does not have enforcement provisions but are channels for citizen comments and ideas. Responding to Councilman Arnerich, Ms. Bogosian replied County program includes a paid staff and corp of trained volunteers. Kate Quick, Alameda, stated ombudsman program has merit in terms of communication; does not see it as threatening but supportive; MCCED found police were open, gracious and professional; an independent ombudsman should be a paid professional. Richard Young, Alameda, former Alameda Chief of Police, stated number of Police Department complaints is very low; the department has a good procedure in place for investigating; he would like the proposal defeated. Angus MacDonald, Alameda, requested Council establish some form of review as soon as possible. David Plummer, Alameda, stated a police ombudsman program would only add another level of malaligned control in Alameda that the City cannot afford; described problems in Lincoln Park; and stated an ombudsman program would further tie the hands of the police force from performing in the manner and purpose for which they were hired, and urged Council think long and hard before approving such a program. President Withrow requested a report back to Council regarding enforcement of non-alcoholic beverages regulation in City parks and specifically Lincoln Park. Gerhard Degemann, Alameda, stated his confidence in the Police Department, which went through scrutiny last year; Council owes to Department the opportunity to police themselves; he cannot see, on a tight budget when cutting services and laying off people, another program that needs staffing. Jane Ehiogu, Alameda, stated she sees police harassing people; Alameda is a good City; and urged Council think about every human being regardless of nationality. November 17, 1992 Michael Ahern, Alameda, stated negative things printed about Police Department in newspaper, to a large degree, is where public perception of police comes from; supporting Department is important; and program is not feasible. President Withrow stated Council does not have any lack of confidence in the Police Department. David McIntyre, Alameda, stated a police review commission like Berkeley's does not work better than other forms of government but is a necessary form of government; is not cheap but is a needed cost item. Neil Patrick Sweeney, Alameda, stated he was with Oakland Police Department 24 years; Alameda Police Department is one of the best police departments anywhere; if another entity is created, more cutbacks will occur. President Withrow stated he has full confidence in the Police Department; most persons were talking in terms of communicating, and that is different from a Board of Review, which he opposes; believes the City needs a facilitator, a point of contact in City government away from the Police Department to provide a channel of communication, and assure responsiveness; believes so few complaints of substance will have emerged, at the end of year [Council] will find it could probably do it with a volunteer; if a lack of responsiveness, the individual could report to City Manager suggesting he look at the matter; and he [President Withrow] will not support an independent investigator. Councilmember Roth stated he does not believe the Police Department needs to be singled out; people need to go to one place for an explanation who to see in any one department, and if not happy, they can take the matter to the City Manager; Council cut two such positions out of the budget about a year ago and should revisit that [action]. President Withrow stated the facilitator should look at the whole City, not just one department. Councilmember Camicia stated the majority of complainants know the complaint process; need to make persons who are unfamiliar with the process state their complaints without any fear; and it is important to establish an ombudsman program, not a civilian review board. Councilman Arnerich stated he strongly opposes an ombudsman program, and provided reasons why. Vice Mayor Lucas stated she has great confidence in the Police Department, however, a segment of the community feel unprotected by the Department; an ombudsman is desirable for any governmental function in the City; would like the position to be called "facilitator;" and would like to try the program for a year or two. November 17, 1992 In response to Councilmember Roth, Vice Mayor Lucas stated the facilitator will have some investigative power to determine if a complaint is factual; there will definitely be no enforcement powers; and would like the Mayor's Committee to come up with how much investigation should be done. President Withrow stated the issue of investigation is sensitive, and does not think a lay person without background, training, and expertise can have investigative authority over police professionals in the City; sees the role as a facilitator. Councilmember Roth stated if Council could not do the job, how can Council expect someone appointed to do any more. President Withrow stated Council is precluded by Charter from interfering in personnel actions of the staff, however, Council can set policy for the City. The City Attorney stated a facilitator could be employed or used as a volunteer with the consent of the City Manager; the individual would have to comply with State law, the Peace Officers' Bill of Rights. Vice Mayor Lucas moved to refer the matter to the Mayor's Committee to develop a proposal and guidelines for a Police Department facilitator program, with caveat that the investigative power needs to be controlled and to obtain the advice of the City Attorney on that; and set a time limit on the program. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion, and added that the Committee should recommend a broad range of recommendations and address Council's questions tonight. Councilmember Roth stated program should be Citywide. President Withrow stated he tends to go in that direction, otherwise an individual could not be fully employed. Vice Mayor Lucas stated she does not believe a full time position is required. The motion was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Camicia, Lucas, and President Withrow - 3. Noes: Councilmembers Arnerich and Roth - 2. Absent: None. 92-801 Report from Chair, Golf Commission, requesting that City Council, by motion accept report and delegate the City Manager authority to authorize complimentary play relative to the Golf Complex. Marion Miller, Alameda, Alameda City Employees' Association, stated offering complimentary golf to people, while laying off employees, can send a mixed message to the City. Councilman Arnerich moved to accept the recommendation. Vice Mayor November 17, 1992 Lucas seconded the motion. In response to Councilmember Camicia, the Assistant City Manager noted Commissioners stated they would exempt themselves; the issue of future Golf Commissioner play was not addressed. Following Council discussion, Councilman Arnerich amended the motion to eliminate Item No. 2 of the Golf Commission's recommendations [that active members of the Golf Commission not receive complimentary play at the Golf Complex] and accept No. 1, that the Council delegate to the City Manager the authority to authorize future complimentary play relative to the Golf Complex. Vice Mayor Lucas agreed. The motion was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 92-802 Report from Chair, Economic Development Commission (EDC), Regarding Improved access to Alameda as Part of the Caltrans Cypress Replacement Freeway Project and the Caltrans ALA 880/61 Corridor Project. Al Wright, Alameda, Vice President, Park Street Business Association, stated need for easier access, better signage, and 23rd Avenue overcrossing rebuilding to allow direct access to Park Street from north and south; and urged Council initiate action on the EDC recommendation. Shirley Nelson, President, West Alameda Business Association [WABA], stated WABA is interested in having Council accept the EDC recommendations; and would like to have off-ramp going to the Webster Tube. Helen Sause, Alameda, Chair, EDC, stated the EDC has been working to improve communication with firms doing business in Alameda, and the Caltrans Project supplies an opportunity to improve access to Alameda, and urged Council vote favorably. Reverend Larold Schulz, Alameda, Member, EDC, stated improved ingress, egress, and signage, are areas of concern; Council needs to take a strong position and make matter a high priority. Gerhard Degemann, Alameda, stated his company depends on out-of- town business, and customers have trouble finding their way to Alameda; and signage is very important. President Withrow stated Preston Kelley, Area Director of Caltrans, has stated signage issue will be addressed; discussed signage within the City, noted the Mayor of Oakland is supportive [of access signage]; and he [Withrow] supports EDC initiative. Councilmember Roth moved acceptance of recommendation. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 92-803 Report from the Public Works Director recommending November 17, 1992 execution of Contract with Crosby, Helmich, Frye & Drake for completion of design work for seismic work for seismic retrofit and refurbishing of City Hall. Vice Mayor Lucas moved acceptance of the recommendation. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion. In response to Councilmember Camicia, the Public Works Director explained the background of the matter. Councilmember Roth stated that he would like the City Hall Tower eliminated from the Plans; the Public Works Director responded the Tower will be an alternate bid. Vice Mayor Lucas stated the design was agreed upon after lengthy community discussions and she would not like changes at this point; obtaining two estimates, one with the tower and one without, is a sensible approach. Councilmember Camicia stated television camera equipment should be included in the Project and Contract. The Public Works Director stated the architect is to advise whether the cameras should be included in contract or bought separately; and will be put into the project. The motion was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 92-804 Report from the Public Works Director recommending approval of Sidewalk Cafe Encroachment Permit Procedures and Conditions. Wendy Sprague, Alameda, Executive Director, Park Street Business Association (PSBA), stated the proposal is in keeping with PSBA's goal for more pedestrian oriented and vital atmosphere in downtown area; PSBA recommends approval of recommendation. Francie Farinet, Alameda, stated she owns a business in Alameda and requested Council support Permit Procedures and Conditions. Councilmember Camicia moved acceptance of recommendation. Councilmember Roth seconded the motion. The motion was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 92-805 Report from the Chief of Police regarding Cat Licensing and Vaccination Regulations; [See 92-808 for discussion] 92-806 Ordinance No. N.S., "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Subsections 7-2.1(e)(1), 7-3, 7-3.1, 7- 3.2, 7-3.4, 7-3.5, 7-3.6 and 7-10.1(c) of Chapter VII (Animal Control) Pertaining to Licensing and Vaccination of Cats." Not Introduced. [See 92-808 for discussion] 92-807 Ordinance No. N.S.. "Amending the Alameda November 17, 1992 Municipal Code by Amending Subsection 7-3.7 and Adding Subsection 7-3.12 to Chapter VII (Animal Control) Pertaining to Limitation on Number of and Confinement of Cats." Not Introduced. [See 92-808 for discussion] 92-808 Resolution No. "Amending Master Fee Resolution No. 12191 Relating to License Fees for Dogs and Cats." The Chief of Police stated the Department recommends ordinance requiring cat vaccination and licensing; the matter of the number of cats per household, and confinement of cats was discussed at a number of public meetings, however, there was no concurrence among interest groups. Carmen LaSar, Alameda Humane Society, stated she has been involved with Animal Shelter for 20 years, favors cat licensing because it means the cat received an anti-rabies vaccination; Alameda County is a rabid area, and people should not be put at risk. Thomas Cooke, Cats And Responsible Equity (C.A.R.E.), submitted petition with 457 signatures supporting vaccinating and licensing cats and restriction of cats to owners' properties; stated he supports passage of ordinance. Zahira Breedy, stated she represents C.A.R.E.; Alameda has too many feral cats; cats must be vaccinated and licensed; people should be considered who do not want other people's cats in their yards; and she has indoor cats. Joseph DiDonato, Alameda, stated he is Wildlife Specialist, East Bay Regional Park District, is concerned about feral cats; cats are primary predator of federally endangered clapper rails; urged Council vote for ordinances, and control and neutering of cats. Charles Millman, Alameda, stated about 1300 cats are being euthanized in Alameda each year; instead of killing cats, the problem should be controlled by a low cost spay and neutering clinic; if licensing is passed, the money should be used for the clinic. David Lauderback, Foes of Unfair Regulation, FUR, stated the objection to a mandatory license law is the fee which would be a burden to fixed and low income persons and does not address feral and abandoned cats; agrees to mandatory license and vaccination; the problem is too many unwanted pets and the solution is low cost spay and neuter. Diane McDermott, Alameda, stated a person who has a problem with a cat should talk to its owner; cats should not be confined; if a cat ordinance is passed, the cost should be fair and reasonable. Barbara Kerr, Alameda, stated a letter was attached to report on Humane Society's letterhead; she [Kerr] called the national societies and local society, and they had not voted to approve the November 17, 1992 letter, confinement is not policy of the national societies. Jan Henault, Alameda, stated the letter from the Humane Society is not based on a decision by the Humane Society Directors nor on a survey by its membership. In response to Councilman Arnerich, Ms. Henault replied she would like a strong program for low-cost spay and neuter; would agree to reasonable cost for licensing; and cats already are vaccinated except perhaps for feral or abandoned cats. Councilman Arnerich stated he does not believe in the confinement of cats; would like a Licensing Amnesty Program to July 1, 1993; supports [mandatory anti-rabies vaccination], spaying and neutering, $10.00 fee and 50% discount for Senior Citizens; recommends Senior Citizens 60 years of age and over, who are below the poverty line, not be charged fees; and funds generated should go to the Animal Shelter. In response to Vice Mayor Lucas, the Police Chief stated the Police Lieutenant who oversees the Shelter is working with local veterinarians to provide low-cost spaying and neutering service. Lt. McWilliams stated the result of discussions still in process, is that each veterinarian has initially agreed to donate $1000 in services. Councilmember Roth suggested a special license for cats owned for the purpose of breeding; Councilmember Camicia stated staff should develop language concerning the matter. Councilman Arnerich stated he does not agree with limitation on cats. Vice Mayor Lucas stated waiving the license fee may assist owners but will not take care of the rabies shots, spaying and neutering. In response to Councilman Arnerich, Mr. Lauderback stated a survey of local veterinarians reflects the cost of neutering a male cat ranges from $40 to $73 and spaying a female $55 to $93 and listed a number of necessary shots and tests prior to neutering; total would be $106 to $150 in Alameda; a veterinarian in El Cerrito charges $15 to neuter a male and $20 to spay a female. Councilmember Roth proposed that issues be addressed in steps; that licensing and vaccinations be first, and fees generated in six or twelve months could be used for a spay and neuter program. President Withrow noted, with funds generated, perhaps the City could hire someone to do it. * * * Councilman Arnerich moved to extend the meeting past 11:00 p.m. Councilmember Roth seconded the motion which carried by unanimous vote - 5. November 17 4 1992 nri-N „rf * * * Ms. Bass, Animal Shelter, in response to President Withrow's inquiry stated she is not aware of anyone other than a veterinarian being permitted to spay and neuter. President Withrow stated it can be done in other states; the matter should be researched and perhaps can be appealed. Mr. Lauderback noted Pet Hospitals in other cities that provide low cost spaying and neutering. The Police Chief responded staff will research the aspects of a spay and neuter program, and come back to Council at a later time. Councilman Arnerich moved that all cats be licensed in the City; an amnesty period be provided until July 1, 1993; that an anti- rabies vaccination be a pre-condition to licensing; Senior Citizens receive a 50% discount on vaccination fees and Seniors 60 years of age and over, and below the poverty level, not be charged fees; that dollars generated from the program go to the Animal Shelter; and there will be no confinement requirement, nor limitation on the number of cats one may own. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 92-809 Report from the Fire Chief regarding Volunteer Firefighter Program. Marion Miller, Alameda, stated she would feel more comfortable having firefighters who work together, rather than a Volunteer Fire Department. Councilmember Camicia clarified Council is not talking about a Volunteer Fire Department but a program. President Withrow added the program is a reserve program to supplement the basic compensated Department personnel. The Fire Chief noted, if Council accepts staff report, Council will be authorizing him to proceed with the next step, which includes discussions with firefighters' Union and a Committee so all ranks in the department can formulate the specifics. Councilmember Roth moved acceptance of the Report; stated Council desires a Volunteer Firefighter Program; staff talk with the firefighters' Union and any other interested parties; and exact specifics and bring matter back to the Council. Vice Mayor Lucas seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 92-810 Written Communication from Inlandboatmen's Union of the Pacific, San Francisco region, concerning the Harbor Bay Maritime Ferry (HBMF) Operation. W. Graham Claytor, Alameda, stated service is operated by non-union employees, City should encourage HBMF talk to Inlandboatmen's November 17, 1992 Union, and should investigate collapsed dock in San Francisco. Councilmember Camicia stated Union and HBMF have negotiated for months; and the float that collapsed was approved by the Port of San Francisco, the City of San Francisco and BCDC; both ferry services are doing very well. Brad Hansen, Alameda, commended HBMF service; stated Union wants to make an example of this ferry to show non-unionized ferries are not sanctioned on the Bay; requested riders stand to show support for HBMF; requested Council allow business run privately. Alan Garcia, Alameda, stated he heard picketers talk about importance of unionizing HBMF to guarantee high wages with other ferry companies; picketers have intimidated passengers, blocked entrance to [landing] parking lot, hit his car with signs; he has concerns for safety; urged Council act to secure future of HBMF. Verislav Omer, Alameda, stated he moved to Bay Farm Island for his children's safety and commute to San Francisco; his car was blocked, he was verbally attacked by union members; believes their acts are illegal, and urged Council provide safety. Marna Mitchell, San Francisco attorney, Alameda resident, confirmed Mr. Garcia's testimony, noted language used by union members; citizens are intimidated and threatened and Council must act immediately. Sharon Ster, Alameda, read letter from her husband stating his support for HBMF service, his bus was delayed by picketers, he requested Council not put HBMF under further hardship. Following Council discussion, the Police Chief stated police officers will be at the Harbor Bay Ferry terminal in the morning to protect citizens using ferry system; he will contact San Francisco Police Department to protect, at that end, the rights of Alameda citizens using the ferry; and Union officials will be informed as soon as possible of the complaints. In response to Councilman Arnerich, the Police Chief stated Harbor Bay Security can always assist. The City Attorney noted the Police Department can enforce Alameda Muncipal Code provisions prohibiting people from interfering with sidewalks and public access on public right-of-ways. Councilmember Camicia stated the City may also want to contact the Central Labor Council in Oakland; and a conversation between Mayor Withrow and Owen Marron, [Secretary of the Council] might do some good. Councilmember Roth moved acceptance of the communication. Vice Mayor Lucas seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. November 17, 1992 92-811 Ordinance No. 2619, N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding Subsection 1-5.3 to Chapter I, Thereof, Establishing a Procedure to Record a Notice of Violation Against Real Property for Violations of the Alameda Municipal Code." Adopted. Vice Mayor Lucas moved final passage. Councilmember Roth seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA 92-812 Angus MacDonald, Alameda, stated Alameda Police Officer Sean Lynch should be assigned a desk job, and provided Council with his reasons for suggestion. 92-813 John Convery, Alameda, stated his property at 2400 Lincoln Avenue has roof damage due to the removal of billboard steel supports; Alameda is one of a very few cities which have a no-billboard ordinance; ordinance has not been tested in the United States Supreme Court yet; Alameda took away 100% of his economic right, his monthly income from the billboards; another City ordinance prohibits more than two layers of roofing which prevents repair of the roof; and requested the Council to consider the matter an urgent one, to be taken care of immediately. Councilmember Camicia requested an off-agenda report on the [repair of roof] matter. NEW BUSINESS AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS, 92-814 Consideration of nomination of appointment to the City Planning Board. President Withrow nominated Gary Thomas. 92-815 Councilman Arnerich stated he would like the Recreation Commission to consider naming the baseball field at Lincoln Park the Bartell Field. ADJOURNMENT President Withrow adjourned the meeting at 12:13 a.m. Respectfully submitted, DIANE B. FELSCH, CMC City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted 72 hours in advance. November 17, 1992