Loading...
1991-11-05 Regular CC MinutesREGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA NOVEMBER 5, 1991 The meeting convened at 7:30 p.m. with President Withrow presiding. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Lucas, and Reverend Dorothy Kimbrell gave the invocation. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Lucas, Roth, and President Withrow - 5. Absent: None. [Councilmember Camicia took his seat on the dais at 8:35 p.m.] ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTION(S) President Withrow announced that Council adjourned to Closed Session prior to the regular meeting to consider: 91-751 Wilkes v. City of Alameda pursuant to Subsection (a) of the legal counsel sectior of the Brown Act: Mayor Withrow announced no action was taken. 91-752 Segura v. City of Alameda pursuant to Subsection (a) of the legal counsel section of the Brown Act: Mayor Withrow announced no action was taken. 91-753 [NOTE: Work:rs' Compensation Claim of Johnny J. Laramie, pursuant to Subsection (a) of the legal counsel section of the Brown Act: This item was 1-.1d over to Novembem 19, 1991 Closed Session.] At the request of Mayor Withrow, the City Manager introduced Marjorie Maoris, Interim Planning Director. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Lucas moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Roth seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. Items so enacted or a,;topted are indicated by an asterisk. *91-754 Minutes of the Regular Council .Neeting of October 15, 1991, and the Special Council Meeting of October 15, 1991. Approved. *91-755 Report from President, Public Utilities Board, recommending the City Council approve the Bureau of Electricity's participation in the Northern CaA.fornia Power Agency Natural Gas Procurement Program Third Phase Agreement. Accepted. *91-756 Report from Chair, Cable Television Oversight Committee, submitting proposal to reconstitute the Cable Television Oversight November 5, 1991 33 Committee and its focus. Accepted. *91-757 Report from Public Works Director recommending adoption of plans and specifications and calling for bids for the construction of Municipal Parking Lot "D" (Northwest Corner of Webster Street and Taylor Avenue), No. P.W. 10-91-11. Accepted. *91-758 Report from Public Works Director recommending adoption of plans and specifications and calling for bids for the Main Street Bike Path, No. P.W. 12-90-18. Accepted. *91-759 Report from Public Works Director recommending an 18-month extension of time in which to complete the improvements for Tract 5603 (Otis Drive and Willow Street). Accepted. *91-760 Report from Public Works Director on Sidewalk Encroachment Permit Procedures. Accepted. *91-761 Report from Public Works Director recommending acceptance of work by Champion Motor Coach, Inc. for procurement of Alameda-BART Shuttle Vehicles (CIP-89-13). Accepted. *91-762 Report from Community Development Director recommending execution of amended agreement with Alameda County for the California Housing Rehabilitation Program for Owner-Occupied Housing (CHRP-O). Accepted. *91-763 Resolution No. 12168. "Appointing the persons nominated as Trustees of Bay Farm Island Reclamation District No. 2105." Adopted. *91-764 Ordinance No. , N.S., "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding Chapter 4 to Title XIII thereof establishing Procedures, Regulations and Fees for Filming Activities." Introduced. *91-765 Resolution No. 12169. "Establishing Film Permit Fees." Adopted. *91-766 Ordinance No. 2568, N.S., "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Article 1, Section 11-116 to Chapter 1, of Title XI (Zoning) Relating to the Establishment of Zoning Districts." (Shoreline Park) Adopted. *91-767 Bills were ratified in the sum of $1,520,949.89. AGENDA ITEMS 91-768 Resolution No. "Condemning the conduct of Representatives of, and Staff to, Metropolitan Transportation Commission, TRA Airport Consulting and San Francisco International Airport at the Metropolitan Transportation Commission Meeting held July 26, 1991." (Airport Operations Committee) President Withrow announced this item has been withdrawn from the agenda. November 5, 1991 91-769 Oral report from Fire Chief, Police Chief, and General Manager, Bureau of Electricity, regarding Alameda's mutual aid response to the Oakland Fire. (Councilman Arnerich) The Fire Chief described the Alameda Fire Department's participation in the Berkeley/Oakland Hills Firestorm; noting the equipment, including an ambulance, that were dispatched, and the activity of the firefighters, who worked diligently to overcome difficult water problems, saving many homes; the firefighters present were invited to stand and were applauded by the audience. President Withrow expressed the Council's and City's pride for their action. Assistant Fire Chief Pogue gave an overview of the operations conducted; noted 370 fire engines from all over the State responded; further described mutual aid efforts; and thanked Council for providing appropriate equipment with which to work. Councilman Arnerich discussed with the Fire Chief the Alameda County system of mutual aid operations. President Withrow inquired if regional government, as Bay Vision 20/20 envisions it, would have helped in this particular firefighting effort; and whether or not there has been formal dialogue in Bay Area fire groups regarding regional government. The Fire Chief stated he believes regional government would have helped, but other planning steps could have accomplished the same goal; regional government has been discussed but no clear direction has been given to fire administrations by their legislative governing bodies. President Withrow inquired if the Fire Chief could initiate development of what the advantages would be for a regional government that would have a contingency role in the event of a catastrophe like the firestorm. The Fire Chief replied County Fire Chiefs are meeting November 20th to address that issue at a seminar; it appears some form of regional consolidation, that would eliminate jurisdiction for fire response, would be in everyone's interest. Police Chief Shiells reported that the Police Department sent a number of officers who worked in evacuation, perimeter control and security of the area against looters; the Department has a good relationship with the City of Oakland; and described the system of mutual aid, noting the Sheriff is the mutual aid coordinator. Councilman Arnerich discussed the procedure of mutual aid notification with the Chief of Police. Councilmember Lucas confirmed with the Chief of Police that regional cooperation is already in effect; and the Chief noted the cooperation started during the 1960s and is very effective. November 5, 1991 Councilman Arnerich discussed, with the Chief of Police, how the costs of mutual aid are handled. The General Manager, Bureau of Electricity, described the Bureau's participation during the firestorm; power provided to Pacific Gas & Electric because of six transmission lines lost; the provision of Bureau personnel who operated, recorded, and maintained efficient operation of combustion turbines for about 17 hours. Councilman Arnerich stated a cohesive effort must be made by Alameda and other agencies, to continue to work together and improve the mutual aid efforts. President Withrow stated Council is extremely proud of each and every individual who represented the City in all capacities, in assisting regional neighbors. 91-770 Written Communication from Vice Mayor Castillo, City of Sunnyvale, proposing a forum to represent local government on regional issues. Councilmember Lucas stated a valid concern has been raised; cities the size of Alameda may not have any representation if some of the plans proceed; a totally elective government is not planned; she would like [staff] to prepare a resolution for the next Council Meeting [November 19, 1991], concerning fair representation in regional governments. President Withrow stated Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) at its meeting, will be making what he considers to be lobbying efforts to obtain consensus reports within the communities of the Bay Area to proceed with regional government; Council has expressed concerns; he finds no reference to leadership, few terms for accountability how Alameda can retain its value system; reference is made to governance, and fiscalization of property [taxes to regional government to disburse as it sees fit]. President Withrow noted a request was made to take control of the 27 transportation agencies and put in place a cohesive operating system; and the response was that was much too difficult. Councilmember Lucas stated, in a Bay Vision 20/20 meeting, regarding the land use plan which would take away the decision-making power of local communities to decide what they wish, the statement was made that voters cannot be trusted to make the decision, and it must be made by civil servants 7 this is a major concern; and an additional level of government will also require additional taxes. In response to Councilmember Roth's question, President Withrow stated the regional government was proposed by Assembly Speaker Willie Brown. Councilman Arnerich stated he shares Councilmember Lucas's views completely. November-5, 1991 Councilmember Lucas moved acceptance of the communication. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Councilmember Camicia absent] 91-771 Hearing to consider Rezoning, R-91-149, to change the zoning of two parcels classified as C-1 (Neighborhood Business) District to R-2 (Two Family Residence) District, located at 1609 and 1611 Bay Street, and Introduction of Ordinance reclassifying and rezoning certain properties within the City of Alameda by amending Zoning Ordinance No. 1277 N.S., that property located at 1609 and 1611 Bay Street. Applicants: Steve and Mary Jackson and Jim Thomson. The Interim Planning Director explained the background of the matter. Councilman Arnerich requested clarification that if the houses burned down, they could not, under present zoning, be rebuilt. The Interim Planning Director replied housing is permitted only if a conditional use permit is obtained fron the Zoning Administrator; the houses are shown as residential in the General Plan, therefore, the City should make the change in zoning. Councilmember Roth stated this is going to be a continuing problem: Council will need to rezone spots, and questioned if the City could produce a kind of zoning for which there is no other category, into which this type of mixed use that would be a conforming use could be placed and handled without going through a rezoning process. The City Manager stated there are many properties in the City that have other designations currently zoned differently than what the General Plan calls for, and the General Plan should be complied with; he has discussed the matter with the Interim Planning Director about proceeding on a four- to five-month process to rezone en masse, rather than one by one. Councilmember Roth stated he wants to ensure that those with residences in a commercial zone who want to utilize Commercial zoning, and others who want to maintain residential, have their choice; perhaps there should be a designation to allow them to go in either direction and not need to rezone. The City Manager replied perhaps the Interim Planning Director can determine a way to do that, or she may say that would not comply with the General Plan. Councilmember Roth stated the General Plan could be changed. The Interim Planning Director stated there is money in the budget to have a consultant come in and revise the zoning ordinance for consistency with the General Plan; some kind of provisions that might deal with non-conforming uses, is possible. Councilmember Lucas stated she would like the City Attorney involved in the question as property rights may be involved when Council changes the zoning; she has some concerns when changes are made on November 5, 1991 340 a large-scale basis. The Interim Planning Director noted property owners would be noticed even if the City initiates the rezoning. Councilmember Lucas moved introduction of the ordinance. Councilmember Roth seconded the motion. Jim Thomson, Alameda, stated this current process gives adequate voice and adequate notice; it is only with the General Plan passage that lenders are taking notice of the uses of the properties; he favors the individual application process. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Councilmember Camicia absent] * * * * Councilmember Camicia arrived at 8:35 p.m. * * * * 91-772 Report from President, Public Utilities Board, requesting approval of the Bureau of Electricity Travel Budget for the balance of Fiscal Year 1992. Councilman Arnerich stated an exceptional job was done in reducing the Bureau's travel and expense budget; and questioned the number of trips being taken in the Assistant General Manager category. William McCall, Chair, Public Utilities Board, clarified that the Assistant General Manager category includes four managers, and described the necessity of interfacing with Power Agencies, e.g., Northern California Power Agency, in order to receive power at the best, reduced rates for Alameda, which is evident in the Bureau's profits; he also is concerned about travel budgets and he will be further analyzing what other cities are doing; and the Assistant General Manager category includes three Assistants to the General Manager. Councilman Arnerich complimented the Board on the reduction of the Bureau travel budget, and commented travel must be watched. Mr. McCall thanked the Council and the Mayor, with whom he spent time in the afternoon discussing these matters. Councilmember Camicia thanked Mr. McCall and the Board, and commended them for their progress on the budget. Councilmember Camicia moved acceptance of the report. Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 91-773 Report from President, Social Service Human Relations Board (SSHRB), regarding Winter Holiday Celebrations; and a Written Communication from the Alameda Ministerial Association, urging Council not to sponsor or provide financial support for a Christmas tree lighting ceremony on public property. November 5, 1991 341 Matthew Duncan, President, SSHRB, stated he is present to answer questions on the report. Councilmember Lucas inquired if the SSHRB determined a particular site was considered suitable. Mr. Duncan replied Twin Towers United Methodist Church was mentioned. Councilman Arnerich stated if the tree is placed at Twin Towers or St. Joseph's, some group might object to having the tree at a church; he has not heard a complaint about the tree; the City needs unity, love and understanding; about 500 people, including families with their children, come and see the lighting of the tree and sing. Mr. Duncan stated perhaps some persons alienated by it, have not spoken up; he believes the extent of alienation or offense should be determined. Councilman Arnerich stated some people object to paying taxes to put up the tree; he cannot fathom what changes the tide; seems to be a small amount of people changing what is the will of the majority; it [tree lighting] is a very beneficial, community sharing, esprit de corps type tradition of the holidays. Mr. Duncan agreed, and added two ways [of addressing the issue] have been discussed: the incorporation of all religions, and the removal from connection with any religion; the risk of incorporating religions is the possibility of leaving someone out. Councilmember Roth stated today [the concern] is the holiday season [celebration], and tomorrow, it will be the invocation. Councilman Arnerich stated no stars, nativity scene or religious objects are displayed, only a tree and a sign "Seasons Greetings." Reverend Larold Schulz, Alameda, stated if City government supports the establishment of one religious festival over another, it violates the letter and spirit of governing documents of this country; he would rather resources spent on the tree-lighting go to the Thanksgiving project for homeless; and requested Alameda not sponsor the ceremony. Diane Coler-Dark, Alameda, stated a valid concern has been raised; the thinking should be about how the event could be refined to become more sensitive to people's feelings; possibly the Ministerial Association or SSHRB might work with the Recreation Department to input; years ago the Chamber of Commerce started Hometown Holiday; the word Christmas has not been used; if the tree-lighting event does not take place, businesses will be severely impacted; moving tree to a church would make the event religious; sponsoring this traditional event families look forward to, is fitting for the City. Councilmember Lucas questioned the possibility of businesses having November 5, 1991 342 the holiday lighting ceremony elsewhere; Ms. Coler-Dark replied she cannot answer for businesses, but cannot think of any other appropriate setting than City Hall steps. Phyllis Marshall, Alameda, Member, SSHRB, stated some look at the tree as a happy community event, other religions look at it as serving the Christian community; there are alternatives to show City government is not concerned with only one religion. John Barni, Sr., Alameda, stated he does not disagree with what the ministers have in mind, but believes a line is being drawn too fine and he is more in favor of the statement by Councilman Arnerich. Councilmember Camicia stated he understands the argument but things should be worked out; he was on the Park Street Business Association board the first year the Hometown Holiday was held; store owners provided cookies and cider, people then moved to City Hall for the tree-lighting; the day was very enjoyable; he would like to follow Ms. Coler-Dark's suggestion for the Ministerial Association and SSHRB to work on a solution that does not offend. Councilmember Roth agreed with Councilmember Camicia and Ms. Coler-Dark; the Celebration has been good, the City should proceed as before, make minor modification, make a commitment to find more information, try to open [the Celebration] to include everybody, and not offend anyone; the SSHRB could come back in advance of the next year [holiday season]. Councilmember Lucas stated that is a good compromise; many people in Alameda enjoy the Holiday celebration, but last year, about forty people at Temple Israel objected as they felt left out; Council should make a commitment to address the concern for next year. Councilmember Roth moved to continue with celebration plans for this year's holiday season; encouraged sensitivity to the cultural and ethnic diversity of the community; directed SSHRB to continue studying the matter. Councilmember Lucas seconded the matter. President Withrow stated the City Clerk has the charge to obtain volunteers for invocations; and requested invocation invitations be extended to all religious sects. Councilmember Roth stated he will amend the motion [to inc].ude] that SSHRB address other culturally and ethnically sensitive issues also. The motion was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Camicia, Lucas, Roth and President Withrow - 4. Noes: Councilman Arnerich - 1. Absent: None. 91-774 Report from City Manager transmitting the City Auditor's Report (No. 91-4) or Service Efforts and Accomplishments. Councilmember Lucas moved acceptance. Councilmember Roth seconded the motion which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Lucas, Roth, President Withrow - 3. Noes: None. Absent [from the dais]: Councilmembers Arnerich and Camicia - 2. November 5, 1991 343 91-775 Report from Finance Director transmitting City Auditor's Measure B Funds Compliance Report (Report No. 90-1). Councilmember Lucas agreed and moved acceptance. Councilmember Roth seconded the motion which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Lucas, Roth, President Withrow - 3. Noes: None. Absent [from the dais]: Councilmembers Arnerich and Camicia 2. [Councilmember 91-776 Report Process. * * * * Camicia returned to the dais.] * * * * from Finance Director regarding 1992-97 Budget President Withrow commended the City Manager and Finance Director for outstanding comprehensive process developed for the years 1992-97. Councilmember Roth stated he likes a five-year projection and the report is excellent. Councilmember Lucas agreed and moved acceptance. Councilmember Roth seconded the motion which was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Camicia, Lucas, Roth and President Withrow - 4. Noes: None. Absent [from the dais]: Councilman Arnerich - 1. 91-777 Report from Finance Director transmitting Quarterly Financial Report for period ending September 30, 1991. Councilmember Camicia moved the recommendation. Councilmember Roth seconded the motion which was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Camicia, Lucas, Roth and President Withrow - 4. Noes: None. Absent [from the dais]: Councilman Arnerich - 1. 91-778 Report from Chief of Police on a Police Activities League [PAL] Program. President Withrow stated he has worked with the Chief of Police over the past few months to see if interest existed in developing PAL and if the Police would be interested; he would like Council to not only accept the report but move for establishment of PAL in concept; he would like Council to allow, prior to the budgetary year starting in July, 1992, members of the community that have exhibited very significant interest in becoming involved, to learn what PAL can do so that by July 1, 1992, the program will be in effect. * * * * * Councilman Arnerich returned to the dais. * * * * * Council discussion followed regarding funding, participants, and implementation of procram. Councilman Arnerich inquired if it was the Chief's intention to start the program in January. November 5, 1991 344 The Chief of Police stated there are not enough police officers to commit one to the program immediately; there are administrative tasks to be done preliminarily; committing an officer by April or May is probably realistic; a staff person could probably be provided to the program, and, if necessary, he [the Chief] would be willing to expend the extra time to get the program started. Councilman Arnerich noted he liked, in the Chief's staff report, the observations under "Other Considerations;" believes that working with Recreation Commission and youth groups is appropriate; and let Council take care of the funding. The Chief of Police commented that cooperating and coordinating with the Recreation and Parks Department and other youth associations in town has been a chief concern and an important consideration; and must not be alienated. Councilmember Camicia inquired, since funding and the number of staff are issues, is there any way to identify a retiree from the force who might help the program, and he in turn can train someone. The Chief stated that could be a possibility, though it is important to realize that what will make this program successful is the individual who is interested in the program; if the interest is not apparent, the program will fail; his chief concern is getting the right individual. Councilmember Camicia agreed; stated a retiree could be found who would be happy to help start the program; he would like the program to start soon. Councilmember Roth inquired if the money could come from the Narcotic Asset Seizure Fund. The Chief stated he understands asset seizure funds in some cities support PAL program L; however, the City's are committed to some capital projects. President Withrow noted that CALPAL has committed $5000 seed money for the organizational development of PAL. Councilman Arnerich moved [acceptance of] the report, Council consider the fiscal restraints of the City, consider the PAL program in the upcoming budget cycle; City Manager appropriate the proper funding; refer the program to the Recreation Commission, Youth Activities Network and Youth Committee for comments. President Withrow stated he would like to have a more positive and direct motion coming from Council. Councilmember Roth stated he will second the motion if it includes the program. Councilman Arnerich stated that was his intent. November 5, 1991 345 President Withrow stated the Recreation and Park Director has been a member of the PAL organization group, and would like Mr. Catlett, or the Recreation Manager, to sit on the Board of Directors; also the Executive Directo:: of the Boys Club. The motion was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember Lucas inquired if Community Development funds could be used for the program. The Community Development Director stated she and the Chief have discussed the matter and the Police Activities League would be fundable under the public service category, as are childcare vouchers, homeless programs. President Withrow stated some cities have received grants, and hopes the community group being developed, will also actively pursue grants. 91-779 Resolution No. 12170 "Approving and authorizing execution of Interconnection Agreement between Northern California Power Agency and Pacific Gas and Electric Company." Adopted. Councilman Arnerich moved the recommendation. Councilmember Roth seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember Lucas moved adoption of the resolution. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 91-780 Resolution No. 12171 "Approving a Mortgage Credit Certificate Program for the City of Alameda and Authorizing Execution of an Agreement with the County of Alameda to Establish and Administer Said Program." Adopted. Councilmember Lucas stated a resident called her attention to the availability of this program; she understands it is very good and enables first-time homebuyers to acquire property and get mortgage tax credits so they can afford a much higher loan than they would otherwise be able to afford; and inquired about County funding. The Finance Director stated the proposal is for the County to file an application in the City's behalf to obtain an allocation of $7,000,000. Councilmember Lucas moved approval of the recommendation. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember Lucas moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Camicia seconded tho motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, 'ON-AGENDA 91-781 Jeanette Ramsey, Alameda, request(!d Council grant a waiver of November 5,1991 a B225.00 Police Department Recovery Fee. Vice Mayor Lucas requested the matter be agendized for the November 19th Council Meeting. Ms. Ramsey requested the Police Department to provide the Internal Affairs report by Sgt. O'Connell on her. NEW BUSINESS AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS 91-782 Councilmember Roth requested a report on City laws and/or policies pertaining to panhandling, loitering, etc. 91-783 Vice Mayor Lucas requested a report on how the business districts are implementing Business Neighborhood Watch Programs. 91-784 Councilman Arnerich stated the property at Webster Street and Pacific Avenue is in extremely poor condition, and needs to be cleaned up. ADJOURNMENT President Withrow adjcurned the meeting at 10:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, DIANE B. FELSCH, CMC City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted 24 hours in advance. November 5, 1991