1990-03-06 Minutes64
SPECIAL MEETING.
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA,
MARCH 6, 1990
The special meeting was convened at 7:00 p.m., with President
Corica presiding.
ROLL CALL
Present: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Thomas, Withrow,
and President Corica - 5.
Absent: None.
90-140 President Corica adjourned the meeting to a Closed Session
to consider:
a) Cheifer v. City pursuant to Subsection (a)
of Section 54956.9 of the Brown Act.
b) Trabelsi v. City pursuant to Subsection (a)
of Section 54956.5 of the Brown Act.
c) Nailah Taylor v. City pursuant to Subsection (a)
of Section 54956.9 o the Brown Act.
d) 1082 Pension Improvement Committee pursuant to
Subsection (a) of Section 54957.6 of the Brown
Act.
The Closed Session was adjourned to later in the evening,
following the Regular Council Meeting; the Closed Session
reconvened at 10:50 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council,
President Corica adjourned the meeting at 12:30 a.m.
R,gspectfully
DINE B. FELSCH, CMC
City Clerk
The agenda for the meeting was posted in accordance with the
Brown Act.
March 6, 1990
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA,
MARCH 6, 1990
The meeting convened at 7:30 p.m., with President Corica presiding.
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Vice-Mayor Arnerich. Reverend
Doug Henderson gave the invocation.
ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Thomas,
Withrow, and President Corica - 5.
Absent: None.
MINUTES
Councilman Arnerich moved approval of the minutes of the Regular
Council Meeting of February 20, 1990, and Special Council Meeting of
February 20, 1990. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which
was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
90-141 Presentation by Charles Tillman, Housing Commissioner, of an
architectural rendering of Independence Plaza to the City.
Mr. Tillman presented to Council a framed rendering of Independence
Plaza and thanked prior and present Councils, the Housing Authority,
and others for their support and work on the project.
Mayor Corica commended Mr. Tillman for his considerable efforts on
behalf of Alameda's senior citizens.
90-142 Proclamation declaring March, 1990, ARC [Association for
Retarded Citizens] Mental Retardation Month.
Mayor Corica read the proclamation and presented it to Leonard
Yacorzynski who accepted, with words of appreciation, on behalf of
the Association.
Announcement by Mayor of Closed Session action(s), if any.
90-143 Mayor Corica announced no action was taken at the 7:00 p.m.
Closed Session and Council will reconvene in Closed Session
following the Regular Council Meeting to consider:
Cheifer v. City pursuant to subsection (a) of section 54956.9 of
the Brown Act; Trabelsi v. City pursuant to subsection (a) of
section 54956.9 of the Brown Act; Nailah Taylor v. City pursuant
to subsection (a) of section 54956.9 of the Brown Act; and 1082
Pension Improvement Committee pursuant to Subsection (a) of
Government Code Section 54957.6 of the Brown Act.
March 6, 1990
CONSENT CALENDAR
At the request of John Scott Graham, Agenda Items No. I -E, report
concerning agreement with East Bay Municipal Utility District
[EBMUD] (See 90 -165), and No. 1 -H, concerning grant of easements to
EBMUD (See 90 -166), were removed from the Consent Calendar to the
Regular Agenda.
Mayor Corica also announced Agenda Item No. 1 -F concerning an
agreement with Alameda Gateway for a barge lease (See *90 -148) was
removed from the agenda at the request of staff. Councilmember
Thomas stated she would abstain from Agenda Item No. 1 -K, Bills,
(See *90 -152). Councilmember Camicia moved approval of the
remainder of the Consent Calendar. Councilman Arnerich seconded the
motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5 with the
exception of one abstention by Councilmember Thomas on Agenda Item
No. 1-K, Bills, ( *90 -152).
REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
*90 -144 From Public Works Director recommending acceptance of the
work by Collishaw Construction, Inc., for Lucious Bateman Driving
Range Landscaping and Fence Installation Project, No. P.W.
7- 89 -12. Accepted.
*90 -145 From Public Works Director recommending award of contract to
Whiteside Construction for the construction of wheelchair ramps,
Phase 8, No. P.W. 11- 89 -23. Accepted.
*90 -146 From Recreation and Parks Director recommending approval of
plans and specifications for renovation of the Lincoln Park
Recreation Center Patio Area. Accepted.
*90 -147 From Recreation and Parks Director recommending approval of
plans and specifications for construction of Neptune Park, No. P.W.
02- 90 -04. Accepted.
*90 -148 From Public Works Director recommending authorization of an
Agreement with Alameda Gateway for the lease of a barge for the
Ferry Terminal Docking Facility. [Withdrawn from agenda]
RESOLUTIONS
*90 -149 Resolution No. 11938. "Authorizing the emergency repair of
sanitary sewer and manhole at Walnut Street and Pacific Avenue,
pursuant to Section 3 -15 of the City Charter, and appropriating
$33,223.15 from the Sewer Service Fund." Adopted.
FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCES
*90 -150 Ordinance No. 2477, N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal
Code by amending Section 17 -341 of Title XVII thereof to remove the
one -hour parking zone on the west side of High Street north of Santa
Clara Avenue." Adopted.
*90 -151 Ordinance No. 2478, N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal
March 6, 1990
6 7
Code by amending Section 17-432 of Title XVII thereof to provide for
the installation of a four-way stop at the intersection of Central
Avenue and High Street." Adopted.
BILLS
*90-152 A List of Claims, certified by the City Manager as correct
was ratified in the amount of $834,847.61. [Abstention:
Councilmember Thomas - 1)
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
90-153 From Dr. Loretta Breuning, Alamedans for a Civilian
2055 San Jose Avenue, requesting consideration of an
conversion planning committee and long term planning for a
economy in Alameda.
Judy Pollard, 920 Grand Street, expressed opposition to
spending, and stated in the long run, all would profit by
or closure of the Naval Air Station (N.A.S.).
Economy,
economic
civilian
military
reduction
John Scott Graham, 1728 Tregloan Court, stated he favors base
closure.
Robert Breuning, 2055 San Jose Avenue, addressed toxic waste at the
navy base and stated citizens would be better served if the City
could control activity at that location.
Loretta Breuning, 2055 San Jose Avenue, stated the military did
their job well and now there is a shift in priorities to address
other problems; commented on retraining and restructuring programs
and proposed a representative committee to plan for possibility of
defense cuts.
Samson Buss, 1518 Union Street, expressed support for a non-biased
base closure impact study, and an economic conversion planning
committee.
Louise Buss, 1518 Union Street, expressed support for an impartial
base closure impact study to benefit the community, and an economic
conversion planning committee.
Helen Dodt, 1723 Chapin Street, stated she favored a committee to
plan for conversion of the base.
Blaise Cullen, 857 Laurel Street, commented opposition to cuts in
military spending has come from individuals who personally profit
from military spending; and spoke in favor of planned economic
conversion.
Gary Thomas, 317 Balboa Court, stated he does not support the
Alamedans for a Civilian Economy Committee (ACEC), because he
believes they have misperceptions regarding the military as a public
asset and a good neighbor, but he does support long range planning
March 6, 1990
as a contingency for the eventuality that there could be a base
closing.
Christopher Godden, 48 Maitland Drive, stated, because the decision
regarding base closure will not be made for several months, a study
now would waste time and money; noted contributions made by the
Navy to the entire bay area; clean-up of toxic materials is being
performed; and the Navy would like the support of Alamedans.
Bonny Moore, 627 Lincoln, #22, noted Navy's cooperation with Alameda
Food Bank, Homeless Task Force, and other programs, and stated the
Navy needs Council's support.
William McCall, a former Alameda Mayor, 1105 Mound Street, stated he
is proud of the base; would like Council to fight to keep the base
open; if it does not remain open, a civilian economy could be
worked out.
Rev. John Foley, 774-D Esterbrook, stated there is a cutback of
military around the world, and the sooner the possibilities of what
might happen are considered, the better preparation there will be.
Roberta Hough, 911 San Antonio, commented a conversion planning
study would allow the City's resources to be inventoried and put in
order, and decisions could be made in a rational framework.
Christine Novocel, 1327 Webster, B205, stated if there is a closure,
she would like to see retraining and more involvement with the
community; and the General Plan should contain information
concerning base closure.
Matthew Dlugozimski, 1365 Versailles Avenue, stated he came to
Alameda with the Navy, stayed because he likes the City; noted the
Navy's care in handling toxic material; noted the help of the Navy
ship and Marine helicopter during the earthquake; stated the Navy
is a good neighbor and Council should support it.
Maerose Humphries, 25 Captains, agreed the Navy is a good neighbor,
noted the base is on a study list, not a closure list; believes
Council will make the right decision; if a plan is to be done,
Council will do it now or shortly; and commented the time of peace
and freedom was obtained and encouraged by a strong military.
Bonnie Bone, Alameda, stated it is inevitable there will be defense
cuts and it is likely it will affect Alameda, therefore it qualifies
for contingency planning; and requested Council proceed with a
study and an economic conversion planning committee.
President Corica stated he appreciated the comments; believes there
should be a study but not at this time; if the base closes, there
will be several years to decide what to do with the property; he
has been told that a base that has an alternative plan in place will
be one seriously considered for base closure; there is no better
neighbor than N.A.S, it is family, has helped the City, the School
District, etc.; and the message to be sent to Washington is that
the City wants the Navy to stay.
March 6, 1990
Councilman Arnerich stated he appreciates the citizens who have
expressed themselves but requests understanding of Council's
position also.
Councilmember Withrow noted his Naval experience; stated comments
on both sides are well taken; does not believe a [base closure]
decision will be made based upon the impact on a community but on
the basis of strategic reasons, what is the best for the services;
a study of base conversion is premature; and moved the subject be
brought back to Council in July or August which should be after the
Secretary of Defense decides whether N.A.S. is actually on a list
as opposed to an exploratory study list. [Motion not considered
because of Council's consideration of issue later in the evening
under a related report from Assistant City Manager, see Paragraph
No. 90-163.]
Councilmember Camicia suggested acceptance of the written
communication only. Councilmember Withrow agreed.
Councilmember Camicia moved acceptance of the written communication.
Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
90-154 From C.A. Millman, Alameda, expressing an environmental
concern regarding the Bayview shoreline bird sanctuary project.
Laurie Anonas, 3004 Bayview, stated she opposes building of
observation platforms on Bayview shoreline beach because the logs
being used are soaked with toxic substances; odor from the logs is
offensive to neighbors and persons walking on the beach; and she
has a strong concern for children playing on the beach.
Susan M. McCormick, 1238 Versailles Avenue, requested Council
review erosion control project and propose materials safe for humans
and endangered species.
Andrew McCormick, 1238 Versailles Avenue, noted some people from
Bayview shoreline area were not present because they had been
threatened; he believes there are other ways to handle a bird
sanctuary without polluting the bay; and Alameda should make 1990
the year to start the fight against pollution.
Councilman Arnerich stated if someone has threatened people, the
names of the persons involved should be obtained and presented to
City staff for forwarding to Council for handling.
Edwin Anonas, 3004 Bayview Drive, noted he and his sons observed
hundreds of birds feeding on the mud flats; but logs were strewn
about, saturated with creosote and copper phenol, which are known
carcinogens; the shoreline should be preserved before it is too
late; cancer-causing chemicals should not be allowed; installing a
path and a few benches was the original plan, it preserves some
privacy for residents, does not inhibit view, and eases concern
about crime; Council should reassess its posture, reject use of
poisonous chemicals and the unneeded observation platform.
March 6, 1990
n
tt
Bill Kane, 2615 Bayview, President, Bayview Estates Homeowners
Association, commented the problem appears to be with BCDC; and
stated there should be some form of control within the City to
address the problem of creosote, and to determine whether more is
being used than is required.
Lois Hoffman, 2916 Bayview Drive, noted poisons, noxious odors,
cancer-causing agents and pollution cause properties to devaluate;
the City should not provide public facilities inappropriate for
public or wildlife nor allow cancer causing contaminents installed
close to private homes; concrete could provide access; the
majority of residents of the bird sanctuary bay side of Bayview
Drive are not present because they were told in a meeting which she
attended, that if they did not submit to the BCDC plan, BCDC would
put a paved path behind their back fences.
Charles Millman, 2916 Bayview Drive, stated there were notices,
hearings, input, and a plan accepted by people and City in 1987,
which was sent to agencies in Sacramento; by 1989 the plan was
changed; significant changes and additions trigger California
Environmental Quality Act and the Natural Resources Act and require
a new EIR; 118 creosote pilings and boards were left exposed until
the Air Quality Control Board required vinyl wrapping; health and
welfare of residents is threatened as are endangered species;
natural resources are being destroyed and he wants a solution.
Justin Anonas, an Alameda youth, 3304 Bayview Drive, stated "Give a
hoot, don't pollute."
Bob Johnston, 3016 Bayview Drive, stated the potential environmental
consequences of the current construction project; noxious odors put
a prudent person on alert; and there should be further study and
better review to be sure resources will not be endangered for the
next generation.
Gary Thomas, 317 Balboa Court, Board of Directors, Bayview
Homeowners Association, stated he does not like the plans in place,
believes there is a potential safety issue, and pilings should be
examined immediately.
Councilmember Thomas inquired whether there was a significant change
in between plans which should trigger another review under the
Environmental Quality Act and requested the City Attorney to examine
the issue and determine if that is required; agreed concrete would
be a better way to proceed with the pilings and stated that also
should be addressed.
Councilmember Camicia moved acceptance of the communication and
directed staff to look into both areas mentioned by Councilmember
Thomas. Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion which was carried
by unanimous voice vote - 5.
March 6, 1990
HEARINGS
90-155 Consideration of proposed issuance of revenue bonds in an
amount not to exceed $20,000,000, for the purpose of assisting KQED,
Inc., a California nonprofit public benefit corporation (the
"Corporation"), in the financing of a new broadcasting and
administrative facility to be owned and operated by KQED, Inc., and
to be located at 2601 Mariposa Street in San Francisco, California.
(joint undertaking with the City and County of San Francisco)
Councilmember Camicia stated he would abstain from making a decision
because he works for KQED, and stepped down from the dais during the
hearing.
President Corica explained the procedure of the hearing.
Regina Bryant-Fields, Brown & Wood, 555 California Street, San
Francisco, bond counsel, commented on bond counsel's role.
President Corica opened the public portion of the hearing.
On the call for proponents, the following persons spoke:
Carol Smart, 2200 Central Avenue, stated as a school librarian and
school media specialist, she favors support of revenue bonds because
KQED has finest of educational programs which assist students.
Gary Thomas, 317 Balboa Court, Finance Committee, stated the bonds
provide an opportunity to bring revenue into the City with
negligible risk.
John Barni, Sr., 1380 East Shore Drive, stated he favors the bond
issue but wants assurance that this does not affect the City's
bonding capacity.
On the call for opponents, the following person spoke:
Don Roberts, 880 Portola Avenue, stated it is his understanding
KQED's offer was accepted with no negotiations on the amount
involved; last month the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
voted to deny KQED their license renewal for Channel 32; KQED
stated they took Channel 32 off the air for technical equipment
problems but the FCC found it was taken off the air "as a means of
alleviating KQED's financial problems;" the matter should be looked
at very closely to assure the interests of the City are protected.
President Corica closed the public portion of the hearing.
Councilman Arnerich requested Anthony Tiano, General Manager of
KQED, and Regina Bryant-Fields, bond counsel, address the concerns
of the speakers.
Anthony Tiano, 500 Eighth Street, San Francisco, stated the reason
for coming to the City of Alameda was because there were some
differences of opinion with the City of San Francisco which have
since been worked out; and Gene Choy, Deputy Mayor's Office, San
March 6, 1990
Francisco is present in the meeting to answer questions.
Ms. Bryant-Fields, Brown & Wood, stated the City's credit is not on
the line in connection with the bond issue if it is approved;
approval and authorization of issuance of bonds will be sought at a
later date; the City's General Fund is not in any way obligated;
the obligee on the bond would be KQED and behind KQED would be a
letter of credit from a bank with a high rating, good reputation and
financial ability.
Councilman Arnerich discussed the amount of bonds with Ms.
Bryant-Fields.
Councilmember Thomas inquired about credit enhancement packages and
letters of credit, e.g., collateral for letters of credit, reserve
requirements, windows of liability, etc., and discussed same with
the Bank of America respresentative and bond counsel.
Ms. Bryant-Fields noted the type of information discussed is
normally provided in subsequent meetings prior to Council action.
Councilmember Withrow stated the City is not at risk and the public
hearing is not the time for a due-diligence review.
Councilmember Thomas relayed a complaint that KQED might provide
KRON program; and inquired how the bond issuance would help do a
better job of greater educational and cultural advantages.
In response to inquiries, Mr. Tiano stated 1) the bond issue would
not be used to finance any KQED-KRON arrangement, that arrangement
is no longer moving forward; 2) to provide better service to
Alameda, KQED is located in three separate buildings, to locate in
one building will provide greater and more coordinated service; 3)
buying the building over a 15-year period is less expensive than
leasing several buildings as they currently do; 4) because KQED did
not reach an agreement with San Francisco early on to look at other
municipalities, KQED contacted other cities, in addition to Alameda,
and chose Alameda because it was impressed with its staff 5) it is
anticipated KQED will begin 24-hour service which will provide
additional service primarily to the schools, because of recording
device availability.
Councilman Arnerich moved to close the Public Hearing.
Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by the
following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Arnerich, Thomas,
Withrow and President Corica - 4. Noes: None. Absent: None.
Abstentions: Councilmember Camicia - 1.
(NOTE: Verbatim transcript on file in the City Clerk's Office.)
90-156 Consideration of Police/Fire Construction Impact Fee
resolution and ordinance which, if adopted, will assess 12 cents a
square foot on new construction, including remodeling which
increases the square footage of a property.
Councilmember Camicia returned to the dais.
March 6, 1990
President Corica explained the procedure of the hearing.
Assistant Fire Chief Mike Devlin, Fire Department, reviewed the
background of the matter.
Captain William Schmitz, Police Department, addressed use of funds
generated from the fees relative to Police Department.
The public portion of the hearing was opened.
On the call for proponents, there were none.
On the call for opponents, there were none.
Susan McCormick, 1238 Versailles Avenue, agreed more Fire and Police
protection is needed in the City, but questions the approach;
stating the voters in a recent election, did not pass a Construction
Impact Tax.
President Corica closed the public portion of the hearing.
Councilmember Thomas acknowledged Ms. McCormick's comments and
responded the Interim City Attorney stated it was not necessary to
go to the ballot and it has been done in this manner upon the advice
of Council.
Councilmember Camicia moved to take the related resolution out of
order. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried
by unanimous voice vote - 5.
90-157 Resolution No. 11939 "Establishing the Police and Fire Fee
Requirements for Chapter 2, Title XX of the Alameda Municipal Code."
Adopted.
Councilmember Camicia moved adoption. Councilman Arnerich seconded
the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
90-158 Ordinance No. , N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal
Code by adding Chapter 2 to Title XX thereof pertaining to police
and fire fee requirements for new and expanded development and the
procedures therefor." Introduced.
Councilmember Camicia moved introduction of the ordinance.
Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which was carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
90-159 Consideration of proposed Negative Declaration, IS-89-11, and
Zoning Text Amendment, ZA-89-5, to Section 11-133, Section 11-137,
Section 11-1311, Section 11-1315, Section 11-1319 and Section
11-1323 of the Zoning Ordinance to permit parking lots for ferry
terminals in commercial and industrial districts, to be located in
residential districts upon approval of a Use Permit. Applicant:
City of Alameda.
President Corica explained the procedure of the hearing.
March 6, 1990
The Acting Planning Director reviewed the background of the matter.
The public portion of the hearing was opened.
On the call for proponents, there were none.
On the call for opponents, there were none.
President Corica closed the public portion of the hearing.
Councilmember Camicia moved the recommendation [to affirm Negative
Declaration, IS-89-11, approved by the [Planning] Board on February
15, 1990, and adopt Zoning Text Amendment, ZA-89-5]. Councilmember
Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
90-160 Ordinance No. N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal
Code by amending Section 11-133, Section 11-137, Section 11-1311,
Section 11-1315, Section 11-1319, and Section 11-1323 of Chapter 1,
Title XI, thereof, relating to the automobile parking lots and
ancillary facilities for ferry terminals." Introduced.
Councilmember Camicia moved introduction of the ordinance.
Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion which was carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
90-161 From Cable Television Oversight Committee submitting 1989
Annual Report.
Councilmember Withrow moved acceptance. Councilmember Thomas
seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
90-162 From Chairman, Fourth of July Parade Committee, regarding the
Mayor's annual parade.
Councilmember Withrow moved acceptance. Councilmember Camicia
seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
90-163 From Assistant City Manager recommending that staff be
authorized to negotiate a contract for a Base Closure Impact Study
and the City Manager be authorized to execute an agreement for
services, not to exceed $30,000.
Gary Thomas, 317 Balboa Court, stated, as a retired Naval Captain he
values planning, does not want to see the closures, but recommends
approval of going forward with study as a method to provide facts,
options, and recommendations should the closure become a reality.
John Scott Graham, 1728 Tregloan Court, agrees with staff
recommendation, and supports retraining for citizens of Alameda and
all employees of Naval Air Station.
Diane Coler-Dark, 2857 Jackson Street, stated Council should be
March 6, 1990
f
concerned about impact on the City budget when spending funds for a
consultant to obtain figures which may be outdated in 3 or 4 years
at which time they conceivably could be reviewed.
Richard Roth, 1417 - 5th Street, stated he is against hiring a
consultant to collect facts he knows community persons could handle;
the Economic Development Advisory Committee, which was chaired by
the Mayor, could possibly review the matter; and Council has
responsibility to make sure people understand what the impacts are,
positive and negative.
Christopher Godden, 48
are concerned about
Department of Defense
cutbacks and in the
issues.
Don Roberts, 880 Portola Avenue, stated he believes in anticipatory
management but also believes in fiscal responsibility; he believes
conducting a study at this time is premature, information would be
out of date by the time it is needed; the City may be several
hundred thousand dollars over budget and this is not the time to
spend on a study.
Councilmember Camicia moved to table the issue until a decision is
made [by the Department of Defense] and Council can revisit the
matter, if necessary. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion.
Councilmember Thomas stated a few things should be looked at
quickly, and do not require a consultant: 1) the number of
subventions to the School District for Federally-employed parents
that would be lost, 2) where the draw would be on pensions, and 3)
status of cost-of-living adjustments for retirees; and noted she
believes the study would be premature at this point in time.
Councilman Arnerich moved staff be directed to prepare a position
paper expressing Alameda's concern regarding the strategic
importance of Naval Air Station, Alameda, and authorize the Mayor to
see that this information is used to contact all our congressional
delegations and other people that are necessary to the maintenance
of the NAS, Alameda.
Councilmember Camicia stated he would not mind incorporating that
language into his motion.
In response to President Corica's question if a study was being
requested, Councilman Arnerich responded that he is not requesting a
study because it is too premature; Councilmember Camicia has made a
motion and he is inserting that "staff be directed to prepare a
position paper expressing Alameda's concern regarding our strategic
importance of the Naval Air Station;" it is not being requested that
a study be done by an outside group; and further clarified it is
his intent that staff assemble information so that President Corica
will have all facts and figures available regarding the base.
President Corica stated he has a great deal of information he has
March 6, 1990
Maitland Drive, stated if the local taxpayers
tax dollars, they should wait until the
makes a statement concerning the closures or
meantime save money for current important
accumulated that staff can write up.
Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion as modified.
The motion was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
90-164 From Fire Chief regarding awarding a contract to Pierce
Mfg./Schaible Fire Sales for Fire Department apparatus.
Councilmember Camicia moved acceptance. Councilmember Thomas
seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
90-165 From Public Works Director recommending authorization of
execution of a Second Amendment to the Agreement between the City of
Alameda and the East Bay Municipal Utility District to convey
ownership of the Bridgeway Sanitary Pump Station and Interceptor
Facilities to East Bay Municipal Utility District.
Councilmember Thomas moved acceptance. Councilmember Camicia
seconded the motion, which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES
90-166 Ordinance No. N.S. "Authorizing Grant of Easement and
Assignment of Easements to East Bay Municipal Utility District to
contain portions of the Bridgeway Pump Station Sanitary Sewer Force
Main north of, south of, and under the San Leandro Channel."
John Scott Graham, commented on the depth the sewer pipe would be in
order to allow movement by ferry boats and other vessels; and
stated the City should dredge the channel, and have deep water
surrounding the City.
Councilmember Thomas moved introduction. Councilmember Camicia
seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
RESOLUTIONS
90-167 Resolution No. 11940 "Ratifying Public Utilities Board
action in approving, and authorizing execution of, Transmission
Agency of Northern California Project Agreement No. 3 for the
California-Oregon Transmission Project." Adopted.
Councilmember Camicia moved adoption. Councilmember Withrow
seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
NEW BUSINESS
90-168 Councilmember Thomas requested consideration of a four-way
stop sign at the intersection of Buena Vista and Versailles Avenues
across from Edison School; there has been a recent accident and
parents are very concerned; the Traffic Advisory Committee
considered a sign, did not believe it was warranted, but because it
is a K-5 school, with many children attending and because of
accidents, she would like the matter reviewed again.
March 6, 1990
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, GENERAL
90-169 John Barni, Sr., 1380 East Shore Drive, stated the
three-minute speaking limit should be revoked if not adhered to, and
a limitation on certain types of businesses in an area is illegal
and should not be considered.
90-170 Rich Sherratt, 1150 Ballena Blvd., stated the Concerned
Citizens for Good Government organization will be forming a
committee to analyse the options available to the City to protect
Measure A without pursuing costly litigation, e.g., downzoning,
strong ordinances and proper planning; and will forward a report to
the Council for discussion.
Mayor Corica stated another option could be placing something on the
ballot again.
Councilmember Thomas stated Measure A is a Charter Amendment and
requested a legal opinion from the City Attorney on whether Council
can amend, reinterpret, or settle cases under the Measure,
particularly if action is not strictly in line with what the voters
passed; and requested the report be agendized.
90-171 Bonny Moore, 627 Lincoln Avenue, #22, stated the winter
shelter operation is working well, and thanked Council for their
supporting votes.
ADJOURNMENT TO CLOSED SESSION
90-172 Councilman Arnerich moved to adjourn to Closed Session.
Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5. President Corica adjourned the meeting to
Closed Session at 10:50 p.m., to consider Cheifer v. City pursuant
to subsection (a) of section 54956.9 of the Brown Act; Trabelsi v.
City pursuant to subsection (a) of section 54956.9 of the Brown Act;
Nailah Taylor v. City . pursuant to subsection (a) of section 54956.9
of the Brown Act; and 1082 Pension Improvement Committee pursuant
to Subsection (a) of Government Code Section 54957.6 of the Brown
Act.
* * * * * * * *
ADJOURNMENT
President Corica adjourned the meeting at 12:30 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
/ /
-
DIANE B. FELSCH, CMC
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted 72 hours in advance in
accordance with the Brown Act.
March 6, 1990