1990-05-15 Regular CC Minutes149
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA
MAY 15, 1990
The meeting convened at 7:51 p.m. (following the Annual Meeting of
the Industrial Development Authority and the regular Meeting of the
Community Improvement Commission) with President Corica presiding.
Councilman Arnerich led the pledge to the flag. The invocation was
given by Reverend Doug Henderson.
ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Thomas,
Withrow, and President Corica - 5.
Absent: None.
ANNOUNCEMENT BY MAYOR OF CLOSED SESSION ACTION(S), if any.
See UNFINISHED BUSINESS (90 -357 through 90 -361)
CONSENT CALENDAR
President Corica announced he had requests from the general public
to remove (90 -350) resolution concerning Tract 6226, HBI, (90 -356)
ordinance authorizing sale of surplus land, (90 -355) ordinance
prohibiting parking to facilitate street sweeping; and (90 -351)
resolution supporting Bay Bridge Toll surcharge, from the Consent
Calendar to the regular agenda. Councilmember Thomas requested
removal of (90 -354) ordinance adopting Uniform Building Code, from
the Consent Calendar; and registered a no vote on (90 -367) Bills.
Councilmember Camicia moved approval of the remainder of the
Consent Calendar. Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion, which
was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk.
REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
*90 -331 From City Manager regarding support for Assembly Concurrent
Resolution No. 121, relative to victims of pornography. Accepted.
*90 -332 From Public Works Director recommending acceptance of work
by Whiteside Construction for the construction of wheelchair ramps
at various locations, Phase 8, No. P.W. 11- 89 -23. Accepted.
*90 -333 From Finance Director submitting Investment Report for
period ending April 31, 1990. Accepted.
*90 -334 From Recreation and Parks Director recommending approval of
plans and specifications for construction of Tillman Park. Accepted.
*90 -335 From Recreation and Parks Director recommending award of
contract to R.M.T. Landscape Contractors, Inc., for construction
of Neptune Park. Accepted.
*90 -336 From Finance Director to set public hearing for
establishment of Prop 4 limit. Accepted.
May 15, 1990
150
*90 -337 From Finance Director regarding Tax and Revenue
Anticipation Notes. Accepted.
*90 -338 From Community Development regarding support for funding of
the Child Abuse Prevention Training Act (CAPTA). Accepted.
RESOLUTIONS
*90 -339 Resolution No. 11962 "Approving Parcel Map No. 5650 (447
Lincoln Avenue and 448 Marshall Way) and granting an exception from
Section 11- 3118.1 of the Subdivision Ordinance requiring
undergrounding of utilities." Adopted.
FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCE
*90 -340 Ordinance No. 2482, N.S. "Authorizing an amendment to the
Contract between the Board of Administration of the Public
Employees' Retirement System and the City Council of the City of
Alameda." Adopted.
MINUTES
Councilman Arnerich moved acceptance of the minutes of the Regular
Council Meeting of May 1, 1990, and Special Council Meeting of
April 24, 1990. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion which
was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
President Corica announced that the Appellant [Taylor Appeal]
requested the Appeal (90 -345) be continued to the next regular
Council Meeting, and the next regular Council Meeting will be
adjourned from June 5, 1990, because of Election Day, to June 7,
1990.
SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
90 -341 Beat the Backup Awards.
President Corica noted Council has been encouraging people to stop
using their cars and to find alternative means of transportation,
e.g., walking, bicycling; read the names of staff persons who
received awards; and expressed appreciation for their efforts.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
90 -342 From John Barni, Jr., Shaw & Lunt, Alameda, regarding Bureau
of Electricity and user connection fees.
President Corica noted the comments of Mr. Barni's letter; and
stated the Bureau of Electricity has responded to Mr. Barni's
concerns.
Councilmember Withrow moved acceptance of the written
May 15, 1990
151
communication. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which was
carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
HEARINGS
90-343 Consideration of Zoning Text Amendment, ZA-89-2, and a
proposed Negative Declaration to add a floor area ratio with a
design review component and associated definitions to the
residential zoning district bulk entitlement sections of the Zoning
Ordinance, and to the maximum height allowed within the R-5 and R-6
Zoning Districts. Applicant: City of Alameda. (Continued from
the April 3, 1990 Council Meeting)
President Corica explained the procedure of the hearing.
The Acting Planning Director reviewed the background of the matter,
noting that two draft ordinances were presented, one that includes
the floor area ratio [Option A] and one that does not [Option B].
The public portion of the hearing was opened.
On the call for proponents, there were none.
On the call for opponents, the following persons spoke.
Christopher Hanson, Alameda, stated if City staff believes design
review can be incorporated into its current staffing levels and if
most letters received suggested height and bulk modifications be
eliminated from the proposal, he believes it would be appropriate
to do so.
The public portion of the hearing was closed.
Councilmember Camicia stated if Council could step back from a
design review board and a floor area ratio, an architect, or an
architectural firm, could be retained that could review plans
across the board on an as-needed basis, and make determinations so
that future problems could be avoided.
President Corica stated perhaps that could be done more
economically if a staff member can do the work.
Councilmember Camicia suggested perhaps staff could come back with
a proposal to see which is more cost effective.
Councilman Arnerich stated perhaps there could be an on-site
person, and if the workload becomes too cumbersome at a particular
time, an outside firm could be called in on a contract basis for a
particular situation.
The City Manager stated a proposal and a comparison of cost of
alternatives could be provided for consideration at the same time
the budget is considered.
Councilmember Thomas commented the report notes design review of
additional projects could be accomplished without increasing staff
May 15, 1990
152
levels; and added, processing time may increase during unusually
busy periods.
President Corica and Councilmember Camicia agreed that not all
cases need to be reviewed, just difficult cases would need to be
referred on a case -by -case basis. Councilmember Camicia added
that, however, it should not be just in R.-1 districts but
across- the -board for all zoning designations.
Councilmember Thomas stated the Yorkshire property problem was the
major one in two years and there needs to be a decision as to how
much money should be expended on solving this type of problem; and
perhaps the Planning Department could suggest a solution.
Councilmember Withrow requested staff explain the approach that
would be taken if Council passed a policy with design review across
the board; or, if a policy was passed that did not include the
floor area ratio criteria.
The Acting Planning Director stated currently, design review is
required of everything, single - family homes and homes in all the
other districts; the only exception is the additions to single
family homes; and indicated the additional work can be absorbed
without hiring additional staff.
Councilman Arnerich commented that the Acting Planning Director has
clarified that the Planning Department can absorb the additional
work within the framework of the present staff without the need of
going to outside firms.
Councilmember Camicia so moved [staff's recommendation].
Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
Councilmember Thomas moved adoption of the Negative Declaration.
Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which was carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
90 -344 Ordinance No. N.S. "Amending Chapter I, Title XI
(Zoning) of the Alameda Municipal Code relating to design review,
maximum number of stories and height and building coverage."
[Option B] Introduced. (Continued from April 3, 1990 Council
Meeting)
Councilmember Thomas moved adoption of ordinance, Option B.
Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which was carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
APPEALS
90 -345 Consideration of Appeal of Planning Board decision to deny
Use Permit, UP -90 -3, to permit the conversion of a residential
structure to a professional office at 2125 Central Avenue within
the R -5, General Residential District. Applicant /Appellant: Don
Taylor for the Central Baptist Church. Continued to next regular
Council Meeting at request of Appellant.
May 15, 1990
153
REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
90-346 From Public Works Director regarding parking structure for
Park Street Business District.
* From President, Historic Alameda High School Foundation,
Inc., 2200 Central Avenue, urging consideration of a
parking structure in the immediate neighborhood to
accommodate increased parking.
John J. Leavitt, 1612 San Antonio, Park Street Business
Association, proposed using combination of public and private
means, utilizing properties of Long's, Outback and Alameda Theatre,
for a multi-storied parking structure; property owners willing to
participate in discussions; stated a four story unit could offer
500 spaces, cost estimate is $6,500 per parking space, no land
acquisitions or relocations of businesses would be necessary,
structure could be erected in 8 to 10 months; and requested
Council consider the proposal and direct staff to pursue it.
Sam Huie, President, Board of Education, 2200 Central Avenue,
pledged support of possible construction of a parking structure in
the Park Street area; stated possibly joint effort between City,
School District, and Park Street merchants could accomplish the
goal.
Gerhard Degemann, 19 Sandpiper Place, stated he endorses the
parking structure for the Park Street business area.
Don Roberts, 880 Portola Avenue, stated he supports the
recommendations of Mr. Leavitt, as it makes sense to use air space
instead of buying property; and if a version of that is not
approved, then he prefers the Public Works Director's Option 4, the
two-level depressed structure.
David Plummer, 1401 High Street, Member, Historical Advisory Board
(HAB) stated HAB is working on a master plan for a Civic Center,
for which a parking structure is an integral part, structure should
accommodate the Park Street Business District and Civic Center
buildings: Historic Alameda High School, City Hall, Carnegie
Library and Police Station; the best location to do that is the
Longs/Outback/Theatre parking areas. Mr. Plummer expressed
concern regarding cost of proposed library site parking structure,
Proposition 85 funds, and future costs for seismically upgrading
public buildings; and urged Council give more time for studies.
The City Manager stated, in response to an inquiry from President
Corica, the approximate cost of the new library structure is
$6,000,000 ($150 per square foot), and between $567,000 to
approximately $1,766,000 for accessory parking structure.
James Selby, 2146 Lincoln, President, Park Street Business
Association, suggested use of Times Way for a parking structure;
stated the report refers to a parking structure for the Park Street
Business District but does nothing for Park Street, and he does not
May 15, 1990
154
believe the proposal is a good option for Park Street if parking
meter funds are to be used for the structure.
Oscar Zeiss, Historic Alameda High School Foundation, 2200 Central
Avenue, stated the Foundation is in favor of a multi -level
structure; wants to emphasize urgency of need of parking structure
in the area, and urges Council pursue the subject as quickly as
possible.
Councilmember Thomas suggested consideration be given to tax
revenue bond financing.
The Public Works Director summarized the staff report noting most
options were in the vicinity of the Linoaks site; and Options 8
and 8a were on the Longs /Delanoy /Theatre parcel.
Councilmember Thomas stated if there is a possibility of financing
with revenue bonds, some questions need to be answered, such as how
much will the School District support the structure, how many
spaces will the District need, can the City afford both structures
[Options 1, 4 and 8, 8a].
The Public Works Director commented it appears there is need for
both structures, and added that, in the original studies, some of
the need for the High School area was not fully considered.
Councilman Arnerich stated he believes the Public Works Director is
correct; there is going to be a definite need at some point,
whether a three or four story structure.
Councilmember Thomas agreed but stated she would like a joint
committee to determine how much demand there will be and moved that
Option 8 or 8a and Option 1, concurrently, be pursued and see
whether or not the project can be financed with revenue bonds.
Councilman Arnerich stated he and the Mayor have had regular
meetings with the School District, the School Board seems pleased
with the progress and wonders if another Committee is necessary.
President Corica stated perhaps someone on staff, with expertise in
transportation, could address the financing.
Councilman Arnerich stated there could be a representative of the
City and one from the School District to address finances.
Councilmember Camicia suggested perhaps the recommendations could
be sent to the Finance Committee for review, and request the
committee to address ideas for funding the structures.
The School Board President stated he shares Councilman Arnerich's
concerns but at this point, believes he would prefer to delegate to
staff, with respect to the School District's Business Manager and
the facilities person; and added he shares Councilmember Thomas's
concerns for financing and there is a need to bring in the experts.
The Public Works Director clarified the recommendation is for three
May 15, 1990
actions,
including
continue
owners to
designate
155
1) to direct the Library architect to move ahead,
the 71 -stall parking structure; 2) direct staff to
study of Options 4 and 8 and negotiate with the property
firm up whether or not the proposals can be done; and 3)
there will be a two -phase parking plan for the Library.
Councilmember Thomas inquired whether a commitment of the 71
parking spaces is required to apply for State funding, to which the
Public Works Director answered in the affirmative; Councilmember
Thomas inquired if a different alternative parking structure could
be considered at a later date, to which the Public Works Director
again responded in the affirmative, and added, if it is within a
reasonable distance.
Councilmember Withrow moved recommendation of staff be accommodated
with the addendum that the Finance Committee be requested to work
on the financial side of recommendations.
Councilmember Thomas stated a Joint Committee is needed that
consists of AUSD, City, PSBA, and possibly Historical Advisory
persons, so that all [financing] figures can be acquired, and the
accurate demand determined; Committee can rely on the expertise of
the Finance Committee as well as the Finance Director, AUSD
facilities manager, and other staff expertise available; and
Finance coordinate.
Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion; stated coordination is
a good idea and requested the Finance Committee work with the
aforementioned groups.
Councilmember Thomas clarified the Committee will address both
structures [Options 1, 4 and 8 (8a)].
Council agreed that other entities could be included in the
Committee, and set an August deadline [for report].
The motion was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
90 -347 From Community Development Director regarding continued
operation of the Volunteers of America's Midway Center.
Stephen James, 2031 Shoreline Drive, stated the Center helps the
homeless; the need is evident.
Phyllis Marshall, 2855 Jackson Street, Homeless Task Force, Social
Service Human Relations Board, stated organizations strongly
support the Center, thanked Council and staff for work on opening
the shelter; and noted the Volunteers of America has done what it
promised and needs to be able to continue its work.
Virginia Krutilek, Alameda Homeless Network, stated the Network
supports the Midway Center.
Charles Tillman, 2415 Roosevelt Drive, in the interest of brevity,
stated "Do it" [continue the operation].
May 15, 1990
1
Herbert Von Coldnitz, 233 Brighton Court, stated the Center, from a
financial point of view, takes those who are down and out and helps
them back into society as self- supporting wage earners; and from a
humanitarian point of view, should be able to finance a place of
this type for less fortunate citizens.
Nancymarie van Praag, Director of the Center, stated she
appreciates support given to the Center; has tried to have
comprehensive program; and if people cannot be helped to help
themselves, then other agencies would need to take up the slack.
James Norman, resident of Midway Center, stated the Center is not a
place for losers; because of the City he is back on track;
without Midway some persons would be lost; Council deserves
applause; and he will help Midway in any way he can.
Tisha Stuckey, Midway resident, stated she needed a place to stay,
people at Midway helped and motivated her and she will be returning
to college in the summer, and Midway has helped her very much.
Joyce Lyon, Midway Center, stated Midway is a transitional shelter
that has helped many people, and requested support of the shelter.
Jeanette Lewis, case manager, Midway Center, stated Midway with
help of counselors, directors and members of the community, has
helped many persons find homes, jobs, and straighten out their
lives; many persons have returned to Midway to help others find
jobs, to help with children, etc.; and requested there be
continued support for people who need a place; and whatever
Council can do will be appreciated.
Larry Musgrove, Midway Center, stated the Center has given hope and
support to him and others; it is a necessary place; and it would
be a loss to the community to let Midway go.
Raymond Weikal, Midway Center,
support system people need;
rediscover hope and he now wants
Center is a supportive family;
Center.
stated Midway provides basic life
being at the Center helped him
to continue in school, because the
and requested Council support the
Rev. Doug Henderson, 118 Brighton Road, spoke in favor of
continuance of Midway Center, noting he has counseled some of the
persons at Midway; and pointed out if the Center is closed, it
would be expensive to reopen in cold weather; and stated this
Center has been a model facility for others to copy.
President Corica stated he is pleased with what is happening at
Midway Center; staff is contacting the Ministerial Association;
and he believes the churches should be more involved.
Reverend Henderson stated most of the volunteer work has been done
by church - related persons.
Councilman Arnerich expressed appreciation for the work that has
been done; stated volunteers and private donations are going to be
May 15, 1990
157
needed in the future as funds are limited and will become more
limited; and moved recommendation that Council accept the report,
appropriating $26,000, continuing support through June 30, 1990.
Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion.
Councilmember Thomas stated what is being done at Midway Center
cannot be measured in dollars and cents; the community deserves
some pride; and Volunteers of America have done a wonderful job.
President Corica stated he appreciated those speakers who have come
to say thank you.
Councilmember Camicia commended the Volunteers of America for their
service to the community.
The motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
90 -348 From Finance Director regarding Cost Allocation Plan and
User Fees Study.
Charles Tillman, 2415 Roosevelt Drive, stated his concern about the
audit and the budget; he would appreciate a reference to a
program's origin; that should be noted; and added, he believes
the program is an excellent idea.
Bill Lewis, General Manager, Bureau of Electricity, stated the
Public Utilities Board (PUB) at its meeting, directed him to speak
to Council of the Board's concern about charging the Bureau for
administrative services; but if the charges must be made, the PUB
and Bureau request Council consider that these costs are being paid
as part of the substantial transfer from the Bureau to the City's
General Funds.
Councilman Arnerich inquired if the Bureau has objections to the
garage services, to which the General Manager responded the Bureau
believes outside service should be used, because the cost would be
comparable in the open market and could be done more expeditiously,
as the City garage is necessary for the Police and Fire services;
and currently, certain work must be done outside because of certain
State requirements on Bureau vehicles.
The City Manager commented he has no problem with the Bureau going
outside for service at lower cost, and it is recognized that there
is priority for Police and Fire; he believes the Bureau should pay
for any services requested from the City, including administrative
services.
President Corica stated he would like to see a review at six -month
intervals of costs and whether or not the Bureau is getting better
service outside the City services.
Councilmember Camicia stated that even if outside services works
well for only six months, that would be a tremendous benefit to the
City; suggested this issue be left on the table, take a look at
it, and have the Finance Committee make some recommendations.
May 15, 1990
158
Councilman Arnerich requested staff's consideration of the
following proposed user fee percentages:
1990 -91 1991-92 1992 -93
Fire Department: 75% 80% 85%
Animal Shelter: 70% 80% 90%
Recreation: 60% 60% 60%
Councilman Arnerich stated his reason for wanting to keep
Recreation fees the same is because when there was an attempt to
raise swim fees several years ago, the result was lower attendance
and less money.
The City Manager stated staff could be directed to go in the
direction Councilman Arnerich proposed and staff will bring back
user fees that reflect those percentages.
Councilmember Camicia so moved. Councilmember Withrow seconded the
motion.
Councilmember Thomas stated she believes in user fees but people
expect to get something for the property taxes they pay, and there
are some services the City provides for which people should not be
charged.
The motion was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
RESOLUTIONS
90 -349 Resolution No. 11963 "Resolution of Intention to levy an
annual assessment on the Alameda Business Improvement Area of the
City of Alameda for Fiscal Year 1990 -91." Adopted.
James Selby, 2146 Lincoln Avenue, thanked Council for action taken
last year establishing the Parking and Business Improvement Area,
and requested Council approve this resolution.
Councilman Arnerich moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
90 -350 Resolution No. 11964 "Approving Final Map, Bond, and
Subdivider's Agreement for Tract 6226 (Neighborhood "A," Village V,
Harbor Bay Isle)." Adopted.
Don Roberts, 880 Portola Avenue, commended the developer for
presenting proposal for Village V which includes, as he suggested,
the names of Kate Creedon and Menora Nakayama and urged Council
direct that the names listed on the map are in fact, the names that
will be used on the streets. Mr. Roberts further noted that it is
his understanding that Kate Creedon is being honored under Creedon
Circle, which will be the first street named after an Alameda
woman; Menora Nakayama, a World War II hero and Alameda graduate,
will be the first non - Caucasian after whom a street in Alameda will
May 15, 1990
159
be named.
Councilmember Camicia moved adoption of the resolution. Councilman
Arnerich seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
90 -351 Resolution No. 11965 "Supporting SB2100 and AB3499, Bay
Bridge Toll Surcharge." Adopted.
John Scott Graham, 1728 Tregloan Court, addressed the matter of
bridge tolls and the ferry service and the funding of ferries for
East Bay cities.
Councilmember Withrow moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion which was carried by the
following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia,
Withrow and President Corica - 4. Noes: Councilmember Thomas - 1.
Absent: None.
INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES
90 -352 Ordinance No. , N.S. "Amending Chapter 4, Title XIII
of the Alameda Municipal Code pertaining to the Alameda Business
Improvement Area." Introduced.
Councilmember Camicia moved introduction of the ordinance.
Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion which was carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
90 -353 Ordinance No. N.S. Amending Title II, Chapter 1,
Article 1, Sections 2 -116 (Order of Business) and 2 -117 (Rules of
Order) of the Alameda Municipal Code pertaining to limiting Oral
Communications, General to items not on the City Council Agenda.
(Vice Mayor Arnerich)
Don Roberts, 880 Portola Avenue, stated it is important for the
public to present rebuttal information to material that has been
presented to members of the public.
John Scott Graham, 1728 Tregloan Court, stated he believes once the
City Council has passed on a subject and a person comes in late,
that person has a right to speak on the same subject.
Gerhard Degemann, 19 Sandpiper Place, stated there are many times
there is not enough time to state a case; there are times when a
rebuttal should be allowed; and requested Council leave the
ordinance as it is.
Councilman Arnerich stated there is no intent of cutting people
off; to say persons are denied the right to talk is far from the
point; since the 3- minute rule has been in operation, there are
always some persons allowed to go over the limit at the discretion
of the Chair; the intent is to condense the meeting into a
meaningful meeting where everyone can talk; recently there were
agenda items when everyone had an opportunity to talk and present
ideas, Council discussion followed and action was taken, under Oral
May 15, 1990
160
Communications and New Business, several persons came back up and
addressed subjects Council had already acted upon; matters can be
appealed; concerns can be reagendized; very few cities do not
have this ordinance; the intent is to streamline government so
everyone may speak; and he believes this ordinance promotes a more
orderly and efficient meeting.
Councilmember Withrow moved approval. Councilmember Camicia
seconded the motion.
Councilmember Thomas stated that hundreds of years ago, the framers
of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution dedicated
years of their lives, weeks, months, to government and she believes
government can work like that.
The motion was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, and Withrow - 3. Noes:
Councilmember Thomas and Mayor Corica - 2. Absent: None.
Councilmember Camicia commented Alameda citizens are permitted to
bring up whatever they want which is not true in many places; and
believes Councilman Arnerich is only trying to make things move
efficiently.
90 -354 Ordinance No. , N.S. "Adopting the 1988 Edition of the
Uniform Building Code, the 1988 Edition of the Uniform Building
Standards, and the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous
Buildings regulating the erection, construction, enlargement,
alteration, repair, moving removal conversion, demolition,
occupancy, equipment, use, height, area and maintenance of
buildings or structures in the City of Alameda; providing for the
issuance of permits and collection of fees therefor; providing for
penalties thereof; and repealing Ordinance No. 2265 New Series,
and all other ordinances in conflict therewith." Introduced.
Councilmember Thomas stated she believes there should be some
explanation of the ordinance.
The Public Works Director stated this is a change to the latest
edition of the Code; it became a State requirement to enforce the
1988 Code, which the City is doing; staff has been working on the
minimal changes to the Code; there are no major changes.
Councilmember Thomas moved introduction. Councilmember Camicia
seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
90 -355 Ordinance No. , N.S. "Amending Alameda Municipal Code
to prohibit parking at various times and locations to facilitate
street sweeping." Tabled to June 7, 1990, Council Meeting.
Paul Breitkopf, 1823 San Jose Avenue, stated the street sweeping
plan appears to be random; everyone on his block has signed a
petition to have no no- parking signs; owners should be responsible
for their own curb sweeping; the hours are between 4:00 and 8:00
a.m., cars cannot be parked on the streets and residents are
awakened at 4:00 a.m. whereas parking is not allowed near Alameda
May 15, 1990
161
High School during school hours to permit street sweeping; there
is also too much sign pollution.
President Corica noted some people were complaining because streets
have not been swept.
Lars Lind, 3260 Briggs Avaenue, stated there is great need for
on- street parking on Briggs; most cars for working people are
driven away by 8:00 a.m.; a parking prohibition after 8:00 a.m.
would allow remaining cars to be parked in vacated spaces;,
suggested review to determine which streets have greatest living
unit densities, to prioritize and coordinate street sweeping times
with available parking, as this is a City -wide problem.
Gerard Falzone, 1817 San Jose Avenue, stated he circulated a
petition on the block opposing the installation of no- parking signs
on the north side of San Jose Avenue between Union and Lafayette
Streets; 26 persons signed the petition, one refused and two were
not at home; there are too many cars to be parked on one side of
the street at a time; it is not a dirty street; and requested the
ordinance delete the reference to the north side of San Jose
Avenue.
President Corica noted there are many people who complain that
street sweepers go down the middle of the street, and it is because
the cars are parked at the curbs.
Councilmember Camicia stated it is almost impossible to determine
which blocks should be required and which should not; the
ordinance must be applied across the board.
Councilman Arnerich stated Council is trying to do something for
the residents of the community to keep the City attractive, and to
remove the litter.
Mr. Polzone noted it is two days a week and at least one time
should be in the daytime and if the people do not want it, it
should not be required.
The Public Works Director stated the non -point discharge program is
under study which is looking into the potential pollution of the
Bay from storm drain discharges and it is expected by about a year
from now, recommendations will be made and will address street
sweeping so that the materials will not get into the storm drain;
the street sweeping program adds two or three miles of locations
per year; about 2000 notices were sent out; there have been some
requests for changes; he believes some adjustments in hours can be
made, he would like an opportunity to do that; if the ordinance is
continued to the next meeting, staff can come back with some minor
changes which can perhaps accommodate all the needs.
Councilmember Withrow so moved. Councilman Arnerich seconded the
motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
May 15, 1990
162
FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCES
90 -356 Ordinance No. 2483, N.S. "Authorizing the sale of surplus
land located at Calhoun Street and Fernside Boulevard." Adopted.
John Sarni, Sr., 1380 East Shore Drive, inquired about the size of
the lot and what criteria has been used in evaluating the lot
because he believes in the past there were times the City did not
receive as much remuneration as he believes it should have.
The Public Works Director responded the land is a very small strip,
310 square feet, the price is $2000, it is not a buildable parcel
and can only be used by the adjacent property owner.
Councilmember Camicia moved introduction. Councilmember Withrow
seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
* Announcements of Closed Session actions.
President Corica reviewed actions taken at the Closed Session held
before the Regular Council Meeting of May 1, 1990 [90 -294 through
90 -297, May 1 minutes] [Labor Relations pursuant to Section 54957.6
of the Brown Act: Discussed status and gave direction to the City
negotiator; City v. Ballena Isle Marina pursuant to Section
54956.9 of the Brown Act: Authorized execution of an agreement]
President Corica announced that immediately following the May 1,
1990, Regular Council Meeting, when Council adjourned to Closed
Session, the following action was taken.
90 -357 Real Estate Negotiations concerning four parcels of vacant
land located on Buena Vista Avenue, pursuant to Section 54956.8 of
the Brown Act: No action was taken.
90 -358 Employee performance evaluation pursuant to Section 54957 of
the Brown Act: Evaluation of employee performance was discussed. No
action was taken.
President Corica further announced concerning the Closed Session
held before the regular meeting earlier in the evening [May 15] the
following action was taken.
90 -359 Labor Relations pursuant to Subsection (a) of Government
Code Section 54957.6 of the Brown Act: Further directions were
given to the City negotiator.
90 -360 Real Estate Negotiations concerning four parcels of vacant
land located on Buena Vista Avenue, pursuant to Section 54956.8 of
the Brown Act: Instructions were given to the City negotiator to
proceed with negotiations.
90 -361 DeYounq v. City of Alameda pursuant to Subsection (a) of
the legal counsel section of the Brown Act: The status of the case
was discussed.
May 15, 1990
163
90 -362 Councilmember Thomas requested a report, off agenda, on the
removal of the billboard at Winner Ford.
90 -363 Councilmember Thomas requested the Oakland Scavenger
practice of charging three months in advance be looked into by the
Rate Review Committee.
90 -364 Councilmember Camicia requested the Finance Committee to
develop a statewide marketing plan for qualified non - profit bonds,
to increase the City's revenue potential.
NEW BUSINESS
90 -365 President Corica announced that, due to a prior commitment,
he would not be attending the Open Community Forum on May 16th;
expressed various concerns regarding the Forum, Citizens for Good
Government and Alameda Times Star.
90 -366 Councilman Arnerich requested the City Manager provide
Council with status report regarding Banner Development
Corporation's proposed Neptune Plaza development.
BILLS
90 -367 Ratification of a List of Claims, certified by the City
Manager as correct in the sum of $1,048,432.62.
Councilman Arnerich moved ratification of the bills. Councilmember
Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by the following
voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Withrow and
President Corica - 4. Noes: Councilmember Thomas - 1. Absent:
None.
ADJOURNMENT
90 -368 President Corica adjourned the meeting at 11:08 p.m., in
memory of Loreme Beatie, a former Alameda City Clerk.
Respectfully submitted,
DIANE B. FELSCH, CMC
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted 72 hours in advance in
accordance with the Brown Act.
May 15, 1990