Loading...
1990-11-20 Minutes381 SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA NOVEMBER 20, 1990 The Special Meeting was convened at 6:15 p.m., with President Corica presiding. ROLL CALL Present: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Thomas, Withrow, and President Corica - 5. Absent: None. 90-791 President to consider: Labor Relations, Section 54957.6 City negotiators. ADJOURNMENT Corica adjourned the meeting to a Closed Session pursuant to Subsection (a) of Government Code of the Brown Act: Council gave instructions to There being no further business to come before the Council, President Corica adjourned the meeting at 7:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted DI. E B. FELSCH, CMC City Clerk The agenda for the meeting was posted 24 hours in advance. November 20, 1990 3 2 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA NOVEMBER 20, 1990 The meeting convened Community Improvement presiding. The Pledge Reverend Robert Keller ROLL CALL Present: Absent: at 7:34 p.m. (at the conclusion of the Commission Meeting) with President Corica of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Thomas. gave the invocation. Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Thomas, Withrow and President Corica. None. ANNOUNCEMENT BY MAYOR OF CLOSED SESSION ACTION Mayor Corica announced the following action taken prior to the regular meeting, when Council adjourned to Closed Session: 90 -792 Significant Exposure to Litigation pursuant to Subsection (b) of Government Code Section 54956.9 of the Brown Act: No action taken. 90 -793 Murphy v. City of Alameda pursuant to Subsection (a) of the legal counsel section of the Brown Act: No action taken. CONSENT CALENDAR President Corica announced John Scott Graham [Alameda], requested (90 -828) ordinance regarding contract amendment with Public Employees' Retirement System be removed from the Consent Calendar to the Regular Agenda. At the request of Councilmember Thomas, (90 -820) report from Finance Director regarding Sales Tax, and (90 -836) Bills, were removed from the Consent Calendar to the regular agenda. Councilmember Camicia moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS *90 -794 From Chairman, Cable Television Oversight Committee, submitting Public Access Studio Study results and recommending no additional studio is required at this time. Accepted. *90 -795 From Community Development Director regarding technical revisions to the CDBG Citizen Participation Plan and the City's Section 504 Grievance Procedure. Accepted. *90 -796 From Finance Director transmitting Investment Portfolio as of October 31, 1990. Accepted. RESOLUTIONS *90 -797 Resolution No. 12033 "Authorizing the Library Director to discard Obsolete or Damaged Books, Publications and Other Surplus Lending Materials." Adopted. November 20, 1990 FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCE *90 -798 Ordinance No. 2513, N.S. "Amending Title XVII, Chapter 3, Article 3 of the Alameda Municipal Code Prohibiting Parking on the West Side of Packet Landing Road North of Bridgeway Road." Adopted. * MINUTES President Corica announced the minutes of the Adjourned Regular Council Meeting of November 7, 1990, would be considered at the next Council Meeting [December 4, 1990]. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 90 -799 From Clayton Guyton, Alameda, encouraging the City Council to adopt an Ordinance requiring landlords to pay tenants interest on security deposits. * From John Barni, Jr., Alameda, regarding proposal for landlords to pay interest on security deposits and advance rents. * From Marie T. Rossillon, Alameda, expressing concern regarding Mr. Guyton's recommendation. Councilmembers Thomas and Camicia abstained from the matter due to the fact that each own rental property. Clayton Guyton, 457 Buena Vista, stated rental property is a business; and should be treated as a business, requiring landlords to pay interest in line with what they receive when depositing the money. Eraldo Grego, 930 Park Street, stated he is a small - property owner, some renters do not take care of property, State and Federal tax must be paid, and renters get rebate from the State which owners do not receive; and requested Council reject the proposal. Edward Payne, 3127 Marina Drive, stated he opposes the proposal which on the surface appears fair, however, rental property is a business, and increases in costs must pass to customer /renter, including additional bookkeeping costs; and if net operating income decreases, property value, and revenue to the City, also decreases. John Scott Graham, 1728 Tregloan Court, stated he believes renters' deposit money must be kept in a separate account. John Barni, Sr., 1380 East Shore, stated he opposes the proposal because it creates more paperwork for the landlord, separate accounts would need to be set up for each tenant, State and Federal tax forms, and transmittals for both, need to be filed, and that would cost more than the interest on the deposits; the landlord's recourse would be to increase the rent to cover the expense and time expended. November 20, 1990 384 President Corica stated perhaps the issue should be voluntary between tenants and their landlords to cooperate with each other; and suggested Council's encouragement of such cooperation might be effective. Councilmember Withrow stated if a free economy is to be retained without controls, Council cannot attempt to determine house or apartment prices; interest is part of pricing, and tenant and property owner should determine pricing; tenants should understand interest is an option for negotiation but owners price according to cost and in the long run, tenants could pay more, on a mandated basis; therefore he opposes passing an ordinance to mandate interest but would be willing to encourage identifying interest as an item for which a tenant could negotiate. Councilman Arnerich stated one problem begets another; rental property is not the only area that could become a concern at a future time, Council would not want to get in this area [of interest on deposits], e.g., some persons take trips and make large deposits months in advance on which interest is not paid; he agrees with Councilmember Withrow and [staff] report that Council encourage landlords to make every effort to work with their tenants, and so moved. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Arnerich, Withrow and President Corica - 3. Noes: None, Absent: None, Abstentions: Councilmembers Camicia and Thomas - 2. HEARINGS 90-800 Consideration of the vacation of a portion of Alameda Avenue, west of Oak Street. The City Manager stated as a result of negotiations between the City and the School District, there have been some changes requested in the related ordinance, the changes will not affect the vacation of Alameda Avenue, west of Oak Street, which can go as planned; and he has no problem with continuing the hearing and the ordinance. President Corica explained the background of the matter and the procedure of the hearing. President Corica opened the public portion of the hearing. On the call for proponents, the following persons spoke: William McCall, 1105 Mound Street, stated he favors the matter with some reservations, does not believe the City should pay for school property or vice versa; Mastick School was rehabilitated by the City for the Senior Citizens' Center; and he hopes a compromise solution can be reached without exchange of money. Rodney Hamlin, 1316 Oak Street, stated if Alameda Avenue is closed, his wife will need to park at some distance from, and walk to, their residence with their new baby, and he believes that is unfair. Barbara Rasmussen, 1611 Central Avenue, Alameda Unified School November 20, 1990 385 District School Board President, stated Alameda Avenue will make a significant difference in having a first class facility at that site and encouraged action to vacate the Avenue. Richard Thomas, 1300 Hanson Avenue, stated he favors vacation of the property because the District needs it for a first class gymnasium; understands the School District is to pay about $10,000 annually for thirty years to purchase the property, does not believe that is in the community's best interest; suggests a trade without an exchange of cash, and would like Council to reconsider its position. President Corica stated the public portion of the hearing will be left open until the next Council Meeting [December 4, 1990]. Councilmember Withrow requested further informaton on the $10,000 per year payment mentioned. The City Manager stated the tentative agreement is for the School District to contribute, an amount of money at which the District has appraised Alameda Avenue, toward a project the City is going to be working on, e.g., a parking structure in the vicinity of Oak and Central; if the project is around $3,000,000, the School District would pay the proportionate share, either as a direct contribution in cash or a portion of the debt service. Councilmember Withrow endorsed comments of Mr. McCall that the assets discussed belong to taxpayers and if commitment is to be made by the School District, the project should be beneficial to the School District; if it is a parking structure adjacent to the School District, the $300,000 might be the District's fair share; but he does not believe it proper to charge one segment of the [Alameda] family to the benefit of another segment. President Corica stated he concurs with that; does not believe money should be exchanged, the reason Mastick Senior Center has been discussed is because the School was taken in a cooperative effort in 1980, and the Center is providing great benefit to Senior Citizens, however, the City spent $1,300,000 and additional funds from volunteers to make the Center a reality; without that improvement, there would have been nothing because the School was not in good condition at the time; eleven years remain on the lease and his concern is that the Senior Citizens should not need to worry when the lease is up; more money will need to be spent on the boilers [HVAC system] very soon, at a cost of $75- 100,000; and he is looking to a trade with the School District rather than money being spent. Councilmember Thomas expressed concern that the parking structure may take a very long time to be built. The City Manager stated the goal is 15 months. Councilman Arnerich stated people should be made aware that the meetings of the City Manager, Superintendent of Schools, and representatives of the School Board and Council have been very productive; and matters will be worked out for the School District, the City and the Community. November 20, 1990 President Corica entertained a motion to continue the hearing to the next meeting. Councilmember Withrow so moved. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 90-801 Consideration of enforcing abatement of Damaged or Improper Connections on Private Property to Sanitary Sewer Basin 94G, as provided for in the Alameda Municipal Code, The Public Works Director explained the background of the matter and recommended fourteen properties be removed from the list [Exhibit A of the related resolution (90-802)]. President Corica opened the public portion of the hearing. On the call for proponents and opponents, the following speaker remarked as follows: Bob Veres, 1414 Lafayette, stated a contractor estimated $4000 to $6000 to repair external plumbing for Mr. Vehries; Mr. Vehries would like more information, e.g., when the examination was made, a copy of the City's report on his property, etc., so that there may be due process; when he receives appropriate information, he will make the necessary repairs. Councilmember Withrow inquired if the Public Works Director is confident the City has appropriately followed through, not simply working on generalities and putting the burden on citizens to come back and prove they don't have a problem. The Public Works Director responded affirmatively and reviewed the process followed, including smoke testing. Councilman Arnerich requested a list of properties which no longer apply, be supplied to Council. Councilmember Thomas inquired if Haight School is going to which the Public Works Director stated he believes the comply. Councilmember Arnerich moved [staff] recommendation [to resolution and direct staff to proceed with the Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was unanimous voice vote - 5. to comply; school will adopt the abatement]. carried by The City Clerk inquired, for clarification, whether the motion included the adoption of the amended [to remove 14 properties from the list] resolution, and Councilman Arnerich confirmed it did. 90-802 Resolution No. 12034 "Declaring Sources of Infiltration and Inflow from Storm Water on Private Property Located in the Sanitary Sewer Basin 94G to be a Public Nuisance; Ordering the Abatement of Said Nuisances, and Authorizing the City Engineer to take the Necessary Action to correct same." Adopted. November 20, 1990 387 Adopted by Council. Note motion in preceding paragraph [Paragraph 90 -801]. 90 -803 Consideration of an Ordinance amending Real Property Tax regarding Spousal and Trustee Transfers. President Corica explained the background of the matter procedure of the hearing. President Corica opened the public portion of the hearing. On the call for proponents, there were none. On the call for opponents, there were none. President Corica closed the public portion of the hearing. Transfer and the Councilmember Withrow stated he believes very strongly that the lack of a family transfer exemption was an honest error on the part of the Finance Department of the City, the Staff, and the consultant; he cannot believe it was the intent of Council that passed the ordinance, that a death tax be included; and he moved to accommodate the recommendation [to introduce the ordinance]. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 90 -804 Ordinance No. , N.S. "Amending Title III, Chapter 11, Article 1 of the Alameda Municipal Code Relating to Spousal and Trustee Transfers." Introduced. Councilmember Withrow moved introduction of the ordinance. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 90 -805 Consideration of an Ordinance to repeal Utility Users Tax on Water. President Corica reviewed background of matter and explained procedure of the hearing. President Corica opened the public portion of the hearing. On the call for proponents, there were none. On the call for opponents, the following person spoke: Don Roberts, 880 Portola Avenue, stated the State of California does not apply sales tax to food, water is a basic necessity, and he urged Council to repeal the ordinance [Ordinance No. 2501, N.S.]. President Corica closed the public portion of the hearing. Councilmember Withrow moved to repeal the ordinance [Ordinance No. 2501, N.S.]. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. November 20, 1990 388 90-806 Ordinance No. , N.S. "Repeal of Sections 3-1251, 3-1252, and 3-1253, Title III of the Alameda Municipal Code Providing for the Application of the Existing Utility Users Tax to Water." Introduced. Councilmember Withrow moved introduction of the ordinance, and Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 90-807 Consideration of an Ordinance to repeal Utility Users Tax on Cable Television. President Corica reviewed the matter and opened the public portion of the hearing. On the call for proponents, there were none. On the call for opponents, the following persons spoke: Don Roberts, 880 Portola Avenue, stated he does not believe this ordinance is appropriate, and urged Council to repeal the ordinance. Councilmember Withrow moved approval [to repeal tax], and Councilmember Arnerich seconded the motion. Councilmember not remain; Congress will Council should Camicia stated he is Cable rates have act regarding the review the matter. not so sure skyrocketed matter next the ordinance should since deregulation; year; and perhaps President Corica stated he would like to first see what is done with the regulations before considering a Cable tax. Councilmember Camicia noted Cable is charging citizens a lot money. Councilman Arnerich agreed and stated Cable will continue to do however, repealing the ordinance now would leave an opportunity bring the matter back at a later date. Councilmember Camicia commented that is true but going ahead would allow the City to put money into the bank. Councilman Arnerich inquired about the amount of revenue to be derived from the Cable Tax. of so, to now The City Manager stated the five and one-half percent tax would bring in approximately $250,000 per year. Councilmember Camicia stated there are 17 channels available for free, so Cable is a luxury. Councilmember Thomas stated she believes the rate payers will be paying the tax. Councilmember Camicia stated there is a definite line on what people November 20, 1990 389 will, or will not, pay for Television; therefore United Cable must be careful about raising rates or they will lose subscribers; he believes Cable will not raise rates if the tax is enacted and it is worth the risk to find out because the tax can always be repealed. President Corica stated he does not believe the taxpayers will appreciate waiting to see what Cable is going to do. Councilmember Camicia stated the taxpayer is not being taxed, the charge is to Cable which is making a significant profit in this community; and that would add $250,000 to the City's revenue; Cable knows the threshold in rates, Cable will not pass an immediate increase and even if they did, Council can repeal. Following further discussion on the advantages or disadvantages of going ahead, Councilmember Withrow stated he would withdraw his motion because he has become convinced by Councilmember Camicia's comments that United Cable would pay the $250,000; Cable is a substantial company and will not be hurt by $250,000. President Corica stated he believes he knows how United Cable operates and he is not waiting for a Cable company to do the subscribers any favors, and he is going to vote against the tax. Councilman Arnerich discussed the matter with the Assistant City Manager, City representative to Cable Oversight Committee, regarding the matter; and stated he would support Councilmember Camicia if the Cable company would pay the tax, but if it is passed to the taxpayer, he is not for it; and cities have no jurisdiction or authority over the setting of rates. Councilmember Withrow stated if Cable raises prices, the City should get a share of the raise and if Cable doubles the rate, the City should double the taxes on Cable. Councilmember Thomas stated when the ordinance was passed, it was on the condition it be referred to the Finance Committee, the Committee was to review and make a recommendation as to whether or not the ordinance should be implemented; and inquired what the Committee recommended. The City Manager replied the Finance Committee recommended no Utility Users Tax on Water or on Cable TV. Councilmember Camicia stated the situation now is that not everyone needs Cable in order to have access to television; therefore Cable is a luxury; Cable knows that and knows what people are willing to pay for TV and that in recession, one of the first things to go is Cable TV, and he thinks if this ordinance is allowed to stay, Cable will not raise the rates because if they do, they will lose subscribers. Councilmember Thomas stated the City does not have the power to regulate charges of the Cable company; and Cable is not a luxury to some people, e.g., senior citizens, and young couples with little children, who cannot go out at night. November 20, 1990 390 Councilmember Thomas moved to rescind the tax on Cable television. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Arnerich, Thomas, and President Corica - 3. Noes: Councilmembers Camicia and Withrow - 2. Absent: None. 90-808 Ordinance No. , N.S. "Repeal of Sections 3-1261 and 3-1262, Title III of the Alameda Municipal Code Providing for the Application of the Existing Utility Users Tax to Cable Television." Introduced. Councilmember Thomas moved ["adoption of the repealing section") to introduce the ordinance. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion, which was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Arnerich, Thomas and President Corica - 3. Noes: Councilmembers Camicia and Withrow - 2. Absent: None. 90-809 Consideration of establishment of Community Facilities District No. 2, and determination whether the Public Interest, Convenience and Necessity require the formation of the CFD and the levy of said Special Tax. (Paragon Gateway) [See (90-810) below, for discussion and action on both issues regarding the Community Facilities District No. 2.] 90-810 Consideration of.proposed Debt Issue and determination whether the Public Interest, Convenience and Necessity require the issuance of Bonds of the City for the District. (Community Facilities District No. 2) (Paragon Gateway) President Corica called for the filing of written protests regarding the matter. No written protests were received. President Corica officially opened the hearing. President Corica explained the procedure of the hearing; and requested staff and consultant make the presentation. The Finance Director explained the background of the matter. President Corica called for any protests, comments or questions from the audience; and hearing none, closed the public hearing. Councilmember Thomas inquired what the total bond limit is for Alameda, to which the Finance Director replied this [Community Facilities District (CFD)] is not computed into the debt limit for the City; the District has its own bonded indebtedness; the property is under one ownership (Paragon), and will be subject to the special tax for the entire debt issue and there are no General Fund monies being pledged for this project. Councilmember Withrow inquired what is the downside risk. November 20, 1990 391 Steven Casaleggio, Jones, Hall, Hill & White, Bond Counsel, responded there is no downside risk because of certain factors involved, which he described. At the request of Councilman Arnerich, Mr. Casaleggio further explained the lack of risk in a possible foreclosure situation. Councilmember Thomas clarified the property has one owner who has agreed to, and is requesting, the tax be levied against the property; and inquired how much the sculpture will cost, where it will be located, and if it will be a safety hazard. Scott Smithers, Project Manager, Paragon Development, Three Lagoon Drive, Suite 220, Redwood City, replied the public sculpture is part of condition of approval of mitigation measure, has not yet been selected but goes through design review process; noted the piece will be professionally commissioned; regarding the safety factor, a ten-foot landscaped, somewhat mounded, buffer between the sidewalk and the sculpture removes the sculpture from pedestrian traffic; and it will cost $30,000 to $40,000. Councilman Arnerich moved recommendation [to adopt resolutions and ordinance]. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion. No vote was taken. The recommendation to adopt related resolutions and ordinance was, by consensus, approved. Councilmember Camicia moved the related resolutions be taken out of order. Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 90-811 Resolution No. 12035. "A Resolution of Formation of Community Facilities District, Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax within the District, Preliminarily Establishing an Appropriations Limit for the District, and Submitting Levy of the Special Tax and the Establishment of the Appropriations Limit to the Qualified Electors of the District. (Paragon Gateway)" Adopted. Councilmember Camicia moved adoption. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 90-812 Resolution No. 12036. "A Resolution determining the Necessity to incur Bonded Indebtedness within Community Facilities District and submitting Proposition to the Qualified Electors of the District. (Paragon Gateway)" Adopted. Councilmember Camicia moved adoption. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 90-813 Resolution No. 12037. "A Resolution Calling Special Election. (Paragon Gateway)" Adopted. Councilman Arnerich moved adoption. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. The City Clerk opened the official ballot and announced that the ballot reflected nine unanimous yes votes. November 20, 1990 392 90-814 Resolution No. 12038. "A Resolution Declaring Results of Special Election and Directing Recording of Notice of Special Tax Authorization. (Paragon Gateway)" Adopted. Councilmember Camicia moved adoption. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 90-815 Ordinance No. N.S. "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Alameda Levying Special Taxes within Community Facilities District No. 2. (Paragon Gateway)" Introduced. Councilmember Camicia moved introduction. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 90-816 Resolution No. 12039. "A Resolution Providing for the Issuance of Special Tax Bonds. (Paragon Gateway)" Adopted. Councilmember Camicia moved adoption. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 90-817 Resolution No. 12040. "A Resolution Approving and Directing the Execution of a Bond Purchase Agreement and Approving Other Related Documents and Actions. (Paragon Gateway)" Adopted. Councilmember Camicia moved adoption. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 90-818 From Recreation and Parks Director regarding consideration of using Osborne Model Airplane Field as a Dog Park site. The Recreation and Parks Director explained the background of the matter, noting cost would be $15,000 to $20,000, for the dog park. At Councilman Arnerich's request, the Recreation and Parks Director described the Model Airplane Field area and what changes are proposed, including the proposed pathway. Councilman Arnerich stated the staff, including the Police Chief, has done an excellent job; requests went to the East Bay Regional Parks District and the Alameda Unified School District for land use, but there was no space available; and moved acceptance of the recommendation of the Recreation and Parks Director [to not provide a dog run at this time]. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion. The motion was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 90-819 From Public Works Director on funding and scheduling for new Traffic Signals. The Public Works Director explained the background of the matter noting the recommendation is to proceed with a study, with the aid of a contract traffic engineer, to summarize traffic signal program for the next few years, including priorities. November 20, 1990 393 Councilmember Camicia inquired if that is consistent with the City Attorney's recommendation; to which the City Attorney responded affirmatively. Councilmember Camicia moved the recommendation. Councilmember Arnerich seconded the motion. Councilmember Withrow stated he appreciates the report but is disturbed at the lack of positive treatment of Fernside problem; a way to mitigate the impacted condition of the Fernside neighborhood must be found. Councilmember Thomas agreed; stated stripped of residential qualities and substantially addressed in the General return the residential quality to Broadway; and if speed bumps and stop well worth doing. Fernside Blvd. has been safety; the issue should be Plan; a way must be found to Fernside, High Street, and signs will do that, they are Councilman Arnerich stated he agrees with the request of Mr. Russum, that East Shore Drive and Garfield intersection be considered, and inquired if stop signs will be installed in the interim, until stop lights can be installed. The Public Works Director replied staff will agendize an Introduction of Ordinance at the December 4, 1990, Council Meeting, as directed by Council, and the agenda item could allow for a choice of location. Councilmember Withrow moved to accept the report. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 90 -820 From Finance Director transmitting Sales Tax Quarterly Report (September 30, 1990). Accepted. At Councilmember Thomas's request, the City Manager gave a status report, noted Sales Tax increased over corresponding quarter of last year, but is lower than projected amount, reviewed other revenue shortfalls totalling approximately $1- 1,500,000 less than projected. Councilmember Withrow inquired how shortfalls compare in surrounding cities, to which the City Manager replied surrounding cities have same problems; some cities rely more on sales tax and therefore are down more, percentage -wise. Councilmember Thomas inquired what the City is doing about the problem, to which the City Manager replied departments have been requested to refrain from hiring until a plan can be presented to Council, which is expected to be presented at the next meeting. To Councilman Arnerich's inquiry if the City Manager expects recommendation of a hiring freeze until the end of the fiscal year, the City Manager responded he does not, because it would not be equitable as some departments have vacancies, while others do not. Councilmember Thomas discussed with the City Manager and the Police November 20, 1990 96 Alice Challen, Charles Tillman, and Mayor Chuck Corica] submitting the Measure have devoted a great deal of time to the City; an expert did a fine job drafting [the Measure]; proposed going with the Measure verbatim; and moved adoption [of Resolution] and placement [of Measure] on the ballot. Councilmember Withrow stated he does not believe anyone on the Council has any problem, with the concept, and that Council, Planning Board and a substantial proportion of residents are strongly in favor of density control; questioned why the Measure was held so late in the process and not cycled through the Planning Department and Planning Board, and hearings held, to insure a strong tight piece of legal work. President Corica stated the procedure is the same as followed for Measure A at its beginning. Councilmember Withrow stated the Zoning Ordinance, General Plan, and Housing Element must conform to Measure A, to withstand legal challenges; Dan Curtin, legal counsel, attorney expert in land use, recommended Council bring all policies, regulations and ordinances into conformance; the loophole of Measure A must be closed; the Measure is a minor part of what must be done to control density and manage growth; and he [Withrow] will make a commitment to campaign throughout the City in support of the initiative and Measure A. President Corica stated the Measure would take care of the exception; going through channels would be very slow; when the City settled the [Guyton] case, he realized what must be done so that no Council could overturn Measure A. Councilmember Thomas reviewed the General Plan, noting the necessity of being in conformance with the law; stated the person who wrote the Measure being considered, donated it to the City. Councilmember Camicia stated Council would be adopting the resolution; he just wants to make the Measure stronger; and questioned if staff could perhaps review and strengthen the Measure. President Corica stated this Measure is being handled the same way as Measure A; and it is what the citizens in the community want. Councilman Arnerich stated whatever comes before Council, if a person has a question, the question should be discussed; and inquired if the resolution could be adopted and the opinion of the drafter be requested regarding whether or not the word [legal] should be used. The City Attorney stated the matter could be put over for two weeks to wait for the opinion, but if that is done, the matter should not be voted on at this time. Councilmember Camicia withdrew his question regarding the word "legal." Councilmember Arnerich seconded Councilmember Thomas's motion [to adopt the resolution]. The motion was carried by unanimous voice November 20, 1990 397 vote - 5. 90-823 Resolution No. 12042. "Submitting to the Electorate of the City of Alameda at the General Municipal Election to be held on March 5, 1991, an Amendment to the City of Alameda Charter Pertaining to Local Preference Rules for Evaluating Bids or Contracts; Providing For Notice Thereof; And Proposing Said Ballot Measure." (City Council) Councilmember Thomas moved adoption of the resolution. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 90-824 Resolution No. 12043 "Submitting to the Electorate of the City of Alameda at the General Municipal Election to be held on March 5, 1991, an Ordinance Amending Sections 11 and 13 of Pension Ordinance 1079, as Amended Pertaining to Pensions to Dependents upon Death of Pensioner; Providing For Notice Thereof; And Proposing Said Ballot Measure." (City Council) Councilmember Thomas stated the change presumes the retired pensioner is a man and the survivor is a woman; she would like to have the wording to reflect both genders. John Scott Graham, 1728 Tregloan Court, made suggestions of changes he would like to see in the benefits. Councilmember Thomas requested confirmation that the matter is identical to what was negotiated for, under Pension Ordinance 1082, and the City Manager replied it is identical. President Corica commented the only reason the matter is being put on the ballot is because the Ordinance 1079 was voted on by the people and any changes must go before the voters. Councilmember Thomas stated the 1079 and 1082 Ordinances should be consistent. The City Manager agreed, and added the language is the same and the only change is to allow for the widows to remarry. Councilmember Withrow moved adoption with the incorporated recommendations of Councilmember Thomas. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 90-825 Resolution No. 12044 "Reappointing T. David Edwards as a Trustee of the Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District for a Two-Year Term beginning January 2, 1991." Councilmember Camicia moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES 90-826 Ordinance No. N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal November 20, 1990 398 Code by Adding Chapter 7 to Title XVII Pertaining to Transportation Systems Management." Introduced. Councilmember Camicia moved introduction. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 90 -827 Ordinance No. , N.S. "Amending Title XVII, Chapter 3, Article 6, of the Alameda Municipal Code Establishing Parking Meter Zones on Webster Street South of Central Avenue and on the South Side of Central Avenue West of Webster Street." (Continued from November 7, 1990, Council Meeting.) Introduced. To Councilmember Thomas's request for a report, the Public Works Director reported several hundred notices were passed out; only one phone call was received, and that one favored the meters. Councilman Arnerich moved introduction. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 90 -828 Ordinance No. 2512, N.S. "Authorizing an Amendment to the Contract between the City Council of the City of Alameda and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System." (Introduced at the October 16, 1990, Council Meeting) Adopted. John Scott Graham, 1728 Tregloan Court, suggested an early retirement with full benefits and bonus to attend school would allow for a hiring freeze and money would be saved. Councilmember Withrow moved adoption of the ordinance. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCES 90 -829 Ordinance No. N.S. "Approving Agreement with Alameda Unified School District for the transfer of a portion of Alameda Avenue, west of Oak Street." (Introduced at the October 16, 1990, Council Meeting.) Held over to December 4, 1990, Council Meeting. [See Paragraph 90 -800] UNFINISHED BUSINESS 90 -830 Appointment to the Port Authority Task Force. Councilmember Camicia nominated David Elefant to the Port Authority Task Force. Councilmember Thomas seconded the nomination, which was approved by unanimous voice vote - 5. 90 -831 Councilmember Camicia stated he has been receiving complaints about the two new parking lots and he would like a staff report whenever staff deems it appropriate. Councilman Arnerich agreed and suggested a report be made after the November 20, 1990 399 holidays [early 19913. 90-832 Councilmember Camicia requested a status report on December 4, 1990, Council Meeting agenda regarding BART shuttle service. President Corica stated he has been assured by members of the BART Board of Directors, that the BART Board would approve shuttles at the next meeting. 90-833 Councilmember Thomas stated she sits as the Mayor's proxy on the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) which was asked to find consistent the City of Alameda Airport Environ's Element; discussed, with the City Attorney, enforcement of the Settlement Agreement [of the Port of Oakland, City of Alameda, and Harbor Bay Isle], concerns regarding proposed runways; and the need for more staff to attend and assist at the next ALUC meeting [December 3, 1990]. 90-834 Councilmember Thomas reported to Council regarding the three-day weekend session with Alameda County Solid Waste Authority, noting the Lead Program; stating the Solid Waste Management Recycling Committee should be expanded to include composting, and review of the Lead Program; inquired if the City will join with the County in Waste Stream Analysis study; would like more staff support or expansion of the Committee to review matters. The City Manager noted—the Committee has requested to be part of the composting program; and the County has requested attendance at a meeting of the lead abatement program which he will attend November 21, 1990; a staff report will be submitted to Council following discussion with the new Director. Councilmember Thomas stated she would like a full report on compliance of the City with AB939; expansion of the Committee should come before Council; and she will share her information with staff. NEW BUSINESS 90-835 Appointment to the Solid Waste Management Recycling Committee. President Corica stated Cal Santare, who was senior citizen of the Committee, resigned; and he [Corica] nominated Charles Tillman as Committee member. Councilmember Camicia seconded, and the nomination was approved by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilman Arnerich moved to extend the meeting beyond 11:00 p.m. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. BILLS 90-836 Ratification of Bills. November 20, 1990 400 Councilmember Thomas questioned tax increment refund of $353,000 to Alameda Real Estate; and the Finance Director replied the refund is consistent with the provisions of the rebate of the tax increment to the properties that pay the special assessments. Councilmember Thomas discussed the tax increment refund of $350,000 to Alameda Real Estate, which is consistent with the provisions of the rebate of the tax increment to the properties that pay the special assessments; noted the term of the agreement [25 years]; and stated it is worth noting that tax increment financing sounds good at the time it is put in place, but for 25 years, a large amount of money is returned. Councilmember Thomas moved ratification of Bills [in the amount of $1,346,270.42]. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA ITEMS 90-837 Christopher Hanson, Alameda, stated he is not against Measure A but he is opposed to the process of one Council person putting the matter through without more input. ADJOURNMENT 90-838 President Corica adjourned the meeting at 11:07 in honor of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln, and noted the efforts made by military personnel in various projects for the City prior to the ship's arrival. Respectfully submitted, DIANE B. FELSCH, CMC City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted 72 hours in advance. November 20, 1990