Loading...
1988-03-01 Regular CC Minutes59 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA HELD TUESDAY MARCH 1, 1986 The meeting convened at 8:05 p.m. (at the conclusion of Closed Session to discuss Syufy v. City of Alameda, and Berry v. City of Alameda, and the meeting of the Housing Authority Commission) with President Corica presiding. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Vice-Mayor Thomas. Reverend Robert Keller gave the invocation. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Camicia, Haugner, Monsef, Thomas, and President Corica - 5. Absent: None. MINUTES Councilmember Monsef made a motion to approve the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of February 16, 1988. Councilmember Haugner seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY 88-140 Presentation by the Mayor of proclamation designating the month of March as "ARC - Mental Retardation Awareness Month" in the City of Alameda. President Corica read the proclamation before presenting it to Diane Clark and Nicki Storm, who accepted it on behalf of the Association for Retarded Citizens. CONSENT CALENDAR Item No. 1-A regarding a report on the status of Doolittle Landfill project (See 88-164) was removed from the Consent Calendar to the regular agenda at the request of Charles Millman. Items No. 1-E, a Resolution regarding agreement with landscape architect (88-165) and 1-F, a resolution approving salary resolution and Memorandum of Understanding (88-166), were removed at the request of Councilmember Thomas from the Consent Calendar to the regular agenda. President Corica announced that Item 1-G regarding contract for design of Doolittle Drive is being held over. (See 88-144) Councilmember Haugner made a motion to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk. RESOLUTIONS *88-141 Resolution No. 11411 Approving execution of Letter Agreement with Alameda Hospital for sharing County oversight costs associated with EMS responsibilities." Adopted. March 1, 1988 6© *88 -142 Resolution No. 11412 "Awarding contract to Trans -Bay Construction, Inc. for construction of a new recreation building and related improvements at Franklin Park, authorizing execution thereof, and appropriating funds from the Dwelling Unit Tax Account." Adopted. *88 -143 Resolution No. 11413 "Approving acceptance of a Coastal Conservancy Grant for construction of a bicycle staging area to serve existing and future public bike trail links in Alameda." Adopted. *88 -144 Resolution No. "Authorizing the City Engineer to award a contract for design of Doolittle Drive widening from Island Drive to Harbor Bay Parkway." Held over. FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCES *88 -145 Ordinance No. 2374, N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by amending various sections of Article 1, Chapter 3, Title XI thereof, relating to rules and regulations governing the planning and subdividing of land and the filing and approval of subdivision maps." Adopted. BILLS *88 -146 A List of Claims, certified by the Interim City Manager as correct, was approved in the amount of $2,778,884.43. FILING *88 -147 Affidavit of Interim City Manager and Chief of Police pursuant to Section 17 -11 of the Charter of the City of Alameda. Approved. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 88 -148 From Stanford Shane, Tony Arruda, and Les Dronick submitting a Petition objecting to Section 13 -194 of the Alameda Municipal Code requiring real estate agents to obtain and purchase Business Licenses. Mr. Shane thanked Council for considering the license tax repeal, and urged Council to act favorably for the real estate agents. Councilmember Camicia made a motion to accept the communication. Councilmember Haugner seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember Thomas made a motion to take the resolution regarding appointment to the Historical Advisory Commission out of order. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 88 -149 Resolution No. 11414 "Appointing Paul Breitkopf a member of the Alameda Historical Advisory Commission." Adopted. March 1, 1988 61 Councilmember Monsef made a motion to adopt the resolution. Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. The City Clerk administered the Oath and presented a Certificate of Appointment to Mr. Breitkopf. 88-150 From R.E. Yandell, 1319 Burbank Street, submitting various complaints regarding his neighborhood. President Corica commented that the staff is taking care of Mr. Yandell 's complaints. Councilmember Haugner made a motion to accept the communication. Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 88-151 From David R. Walker, Chairman of the Board, Enigma Group, 1921 Schiller Street, requesting Council's assistance in securing a Federal Contract. Ian Keye, 1915 Schiller Street, stated he is concerned because 150 jobs are to be created and he does not know how the parking will be handled if the work is to be handled at 1921 Schiller Street. Councilmember Monsef stated he does not believe that the people will be at that address, but the request is to get the Federal contract. Councilmember Camicia stated it would appear that Mr. Walker needs the contract and would put the employees somewhere else, and moved to accept the communication, stating that more detail can be obtained later. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 88-152 From Dorothy Madsen, 2226 1/2 Buena Vista Avenue, regarding conduct of certain Councilmembers. Councilmember Thomas made a motion to accept the communication. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 88-153 From James Pearson, 338 Lincoln Avenue, expressing opposition to the City appealing the recent Court decision regarding the Spectator case. President Corica explained that Mr. Pearson stated he does not believe Council should appeal the suit with the Spectator; that Council is going ahead with the appeal because of the many requests from parents who have small children and are concerned about the Spectator. Following a brief discussion, Councilmember Monsef made a motion to accept the communication. Councilmember Haugner seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 88-154 From Fred Scullin, 1120 Chestnut Street, concerning the 1987 Annual Report of the Cable Television Oversight Committee. March 1, 1988 62 Mr. Scullin stated schools have not yet been wired therefore it is not possible to say, as the report does, that Cable has met its franchise commitments; and expressed his other concerns. Councilmember Camicia made a motion to accept the communication. Councilmember Haugner seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. HEARINGS 88-155 Consideration of Tentative Map 5850 for Lighthouse Cove to create six residential lots, 3600 square feet each, from a 0.63 acre parcel south of Oleander Avenue near Melrose Avenue. Applicant: Pulte Homes Corporation. President Corica explained the procedure of the hearing. The Planning Director presented the background of the matter. The public portion of the hearing was opened. On the call for proponents, the following spoke: Dick Steele, Director of Planning, Pulte Homes Corporation, Pleasanton. Larry Jones, Secretary/Treasurer, Lighthouse Cove Homeowners' Association. On the call for opponents, there were none. The public portion of the hearing was closed. Councilmember Monsef inquired how many homes were in the original Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the project, to which the Planning Director replied the original EIR was for a project called Rancho Bahia which included the subject property and some adjoining property and was for a total of 154 units. Councilmember Thomas inquired how many units have been built thus far, to which the Planning Director replied there were about 200 units considering the Silva Farms project built by a different developer plus the 40 units in the first phase of this project. Councilmember Thomas inquired if the Planning Board reviewed the EIR this time, to which the Planning Director responded that they made the finding that there would be no significant impacts using this EIR as the basis but was not certain whether or not each of them reviewed it individually. A discussion ensued regarding the standard for granting an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance as compared to the standard for granting a variance, aircraft noise impact, and traffic projections. Councilmember Thomas commented she cannot vote for this matter as the EIR was done in 1974, and there are 200 units instead of 154. March 1, 1988 63 Councilmember Camicia commented this is a 46 unit project, forty of which are built which effectively leaves a hole with mud in winter and dust in summer; no one has come to oppose this tonight; and the Homeowners' Association came to show they are in support of the six units. Councilmember Thomas stated she cannot vote for the homes to be built in the safety zone, and believes the EIR should be brought current. Councilmember Monsef stated he has no objection to adding six units to an existing forty units; his concern is trying to do the job right and if a project was previously approved, perhaps incorrectly, it should not be repeated but should be done correctly; secondly, the Planning Board did not look at the EIR for the project when it passed the 6-0 resolution; and thirdly, the lots are substandard; and before he can vote on this matter, he would like to see those items addressed by the Planning Board and then he would be happy to vote on it President Corica stated he voted against it before because it was in the safety zone, now the Airport Land Use Commission has changed its policy because of the infill policy that they recently adopted, but as far as he is concerned it does not make the area for the six homes more safe, therefore, he cannot vote for this matter, not for reasons of the EIR, but for the reason of safety. Councilmember Thomas made a motion to disapprove the Tentative Map based on findings that there is not an adequate EIR, there are no special circumstances set forth to define and allow the exceptions to the Subdivision Ordinance, it does not comply with the General Plan, the Safety Element of the General plan, nor the Combined Land Use Plan which sets forth 10 persons per acre, and specifically, the EIR was for 154 units and that has been exceeded. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and stated he had also voted no on the project previously for the safety reason. Councilmember Camicia stated he cannot support the motion because this is an issue of six homes in a development that is for the most part, built out; the net effect of the motion will be simply to delay the project to a point when the homes will be built so a lot will be lost in time, effort and money. Councilmember Haugner commented that Homeowners' Associations do not always come before Council stating they want something, usually it is the opposite and for that reason, she will not vote for the motion. Mr. Steele (Pulte Homes Corporation) suggested a continuance and stated they will waive their thirty-day period and the matter can then be sent back to the Planning Board. Councilmember Thomas inquired if they would be prepared to supplement the information, to which Mr. Steele, stated they would to the extent the City requests it. March 1, 1988 64 The City Attorney noted that if the Applicant is willing to waive time, Council may wish to consider that. Mr. Steele confirmed that he is authorized to waive. The City Attorney stated he believes the developer can waive time. Councilmember Thomas changed her motion to remanding the natter to the Planning Board . The City Attorney stated there should be a timeline on that and suggested it be remanded to the Planning Board and placed on the next agenda, to make sure it is covered by the time, and he requested a Waiver on the record, to which Mr. Steele responded a written Waiver will be provided. Councilmember Camicia stated he believes the issue is rather clear, and he cannot support this motion either. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion as amended and it was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Monsef, Thomas and President Corica - 3. Noes: Councilmembers Camicia and Haugner - 2. Absent: None. 88-156 Consideration of proposed amendment to the Municipal Code, to delete Section 11-14A5(d) of the Zoning Ordinance, Title XI, relating to parking regulations. President Corica explained the procedure. The Planning Director explained that the issue deals with parking specifically as it relates to the creation of parking lots for commercial uses in residentially zoned areas. The public portion of the hearing was opened. On the call for proponents, there were none. On the call for opponents, there were none. The public portion of the hearing was closed. Councilmember Haugner made a motion for approval of the recommendation as written regarding parking regulations in non-residential areas. Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember Haugner moved to take the related ordinance out of order; Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion, and it was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Haugner, Monsef, Thomas and President Corica -4. Noes: Councilmember Camicia - 1. Absent: None. Councilmember Camicia stated he made a mistake on the vote concerning the recommendation under the hearing. 88-157 Ordinance No. N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by deleting Section 11-14A5(d) of the Zoning Ordinance, relating to parking regulations." Introduced. Councilmember Haugner made a motion to introduce the ordinance. Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion and it was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Haugner, Monsef, Thomas, and President Corica - 4. Noes: Councilmember Camicia - 1. Absent: None. APPEALS 88-158 Consideration of appeal of Planning Board decision to approve Use Permit, UP-87-3 to allow construction of building including restrooms and maintenance area at Lincoln Park. Appellants: Daniel J. Custer and Mr. & Mrs. Michael Connelly. President Corica noted the Appeal has been held over to the next meeting. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 88-159 From President, Public Utilities Board, regarding General Manager agreement. President Corica noted this report has been held over to the next meeting. 88-160 From Cable Television Oversight Committee submitting Annual Report. The Interim City Manager commented that there was no time on the commitment for wiring of the schools and now the time frame has been agreed to. Councilmember Monsef suggested the Committee physically inspect the apartment house installations, i.e. 933 - 1001 Shore Line Drive, to observe and make a report to the Council. In response to Councilmember Haugner's question regarding whether the Committee will continue to meet on a regular basis, the Interim City Manager stated the Committee meets at least once a quarter, or on call by the Committee itself, and the next meeting is in April. Councilmember Thomas commented on the high rate of complaints, and that she is concerned about the provision of the schools' equipment. The Interim City Manager stated there is an agreement between Cable and the School District regarding that. Councilmember Camicia inquired if all of the reports have been placed in the office of United Cable to which the Interim City Manager stated they are in the City Clerk's Office, he believes they are in United Cable's office, but will check. Councilmember Haugner inquired when the large number of complaints came in, to which the Interim City Manager stated during the placement of the undergrounding. March 1, 1988 66 Councilmember Haugner moved acceptance of the report. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 88-161 From Interim City Manager providing Statements of Qualifications and estimated costs for City Manager recruitment. President Corica recommended to Council that Doug Weller, a former City Manager, (1957 - 1973), then retired, President of Alameda City Managers' Association and the International City Managers' Association and has done recruitment for the some cities, be asked to review the City Manager resumes, and that he is an experienced City Manager recruiter. Councilmember Haugner stated she has met Mr. Weller, agrees that he is professional and is aware he has done some consulting for some cities since his retirement; and questioned what his contacts are in other states to which President Corica replied that he was President of the International Association of City Managers, and has worked as consultant to the League of California Cities. Councilmember Camicia commented he would much rather hire an Alamedan if given the choice; he is concerned that it be someone with good contacts across the country; and has no problem with requesting Mr. Weller submit a proposal. Councilmember Haugner agreed. Councilmember Monsef stated that large companies have persons within the firm do the work and no such persons would be of the quality of Doug Weller. Councilmember Haugner made a motion to ask Mr. Weller submit a proposal for search for a City Manager. President Corica stated it is best to have someone who was in the business and could look at resumes in depth, and would have ability to do a background check. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 88-162 From Interim City Manager providing Statements of Qualifications and proposed costs for a facilitator to conduct a one-day Council training session. Councilmember Haugner stated there is a League of California Cities City Council/Manager Leadership Team Workshop which she would like all of Council to attend; that it would not violate the Brown Act; the total cost of the three-day workshop would cost a total of $3300 for the Councilmembers and the Interim City Manager; and requested the Council consider it. President Corica stated he did not believe that it is necessary as the meeting tonight has been proceeding very well, and everyone is getting along very well. March 1, 1988 67 Councilmember Camicia stated he believes Council should have a retreat, and moved that Council should take advantage of the League retreat. Councilmember Haugner seconded the motion. President Corica commented there are leadership classes available periodically and believes if anyone on Council believes they could benefit by it, they should. The motion failed by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Camicia and Haugner - 2. Noes: Councilmembers Thomas, Monsef, and President Corica - 3. Absent: None. Councilmember Monsef stated he has been to a training session and it is helpful but he has learned from four years on the Council, at the workshops they teach a change of attitude, that a direct and positive attitude should be taken, and it is essential for each of Council to respect each other's opinion. Marion Miller, 2043 Eagle, stated she believes Council needs help. Charles Millman, 2916 Bayview Drive, stated he would like the Council to adhere to the Municipal Code, that Councilmembers have made personal attacks on the Mayor, the Code states clearly that Councilmembers must not make personal attacks, and things would work better if the Code were followed. 88-163 From Finance Director on City's business license ordinance. Councilmember Camicia made a motion to accept the recommendation. Councilmember Thomas commented she would like a draft ordinance which she previously requested regarding the commercial business license tax, brought before Council. Councilmember Haugner seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 88-164 From Public Works Director on status of Doolittle Landfill Gas Emission Control Project. Charles Millman, 2916 Bayview Drive, stated his concerns regarding the expenditures on Mount Trashmore, and requested an audit of what has been spent. The Public Works Director stated the information can be provided to Mr. Millman. Councilmember Camicia made a motion to approve the report and recommendation. Councilmember Haugner seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. RESOLUTIONS 88-165 Resolution No. 11415 "Authorizing execution of agreement with Barrie Coate, landscape architect, to prepare street tree inventory and Master Plan." March 1, 1988 68 Councilmember Thomas stated she had removed the item from the Consent Calendar because of the amount of expenditure and would like to put this item off to budget time to see what can be afforded. Councilmember Camicia stated that trees are probably the best asset Alameda has, and an arborist provides beneficial service. In response to Councilmember Haugner's request for his input, the Public Works Director stated the program will enable the staff to do a better job of taking care of the trees, they do not have adequate information in advance of trees beginning to decline, with only two personnel to inspect 13-17,000 street trees, and opinions on how to maintain trees will also be supplied. Councilmember Monsef stated the City of Modesto has a comprehensive computer program of their trees because they care for the trees and at some point it must be budgeted. Councilmember Thomas stated she would like to review the mid-year budget adjustment first. President Corica inquired if the trees are suffering now. The Public Works Director responded that the tree crew works well on the time it has, reports are received from both citizens and staff which enable trees to be saved, but more could be saved if there was earlier information; and the program would not require additional money as it is included in the current budget. Councilmember Camicia made a motion to accept the recommendation, Councilmember Haugner seconded the motion and it was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Camicia, Haugner, Monsef, and President Corica - 4. Noes: Councilmember Thomas - 1. Absent: None. 88-166 Resolution No. 11416 "Approving Alameda City Employees Association Salary Resolution and Memorandum of Understanding. Marion Miller, 2043 Eagle Avenue, stated she hopes Council will adopt the resolution. Councilmember Thomas stated she had the item taken off the Consent Calendar so that Council could make a conscientious effort to support it; and noted that this is a five-five-and-five contract with some pay equity and there are some raises in it that are at 33.7% and retroactive for a year and a half or some portion of it and the employees deserve them, and there is a high turnover rate, and every employee should be paid what they're worth, these are not necessarily at the median and she believes the other decision made recently should be taken in this context, that all the employees are being treated individually; and Thomas moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion. Councilmember Camicia stated he disagreed with Councilmember Thomas. March 1, 1988 69 The motion was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Haugner, Monsef, Thomas and President Corica - 4. Noes: Councilmember Camicia - 1. 88-167 Resolution No. "Endorsing the Enigma Group, an Alameda business, in their efforts to obtain a Federal Contract." Councilmember Camicia stated there appears to be a time constraint regarding passing the resolution, and questioned the parking provisions for workers. Councilmember Haugner stated she would like to support a local business but has concerns. President Corica stated Mr. Walker should be contacted for more information. Councilmember Thomas suggested continuing the resolution. Councilmember Camicia so moved and Councilmember Haugner seconded the motion, which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 88-168 Resolution No. "Approving Tentative Map 5850 at old Alameda Pointe and Oleander Avenue (Lighthouse Cove), finding said Tentative Map consistent with the City's General Plan and determining that discharge of water into the sewer system will not violate regional water quality control regulations." This matter, related to Hearing 88-155, was held over. 88-169 Resolution No. 11417 "Supporting Assembly Bill 2093 prohibiting vending machine pornography in places where minors are permitted." Councilmember Thomas moved adoption of the resolution, Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion. Councilmember Camicia commented this is a part of a larger bill that refers and relates to child abuse. Councilmember Haugner stated she would like to see what happens when it comes out of the Senate Judiciary Committee and she will therefore abstain. Following a brief discussion, the motion was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmember Camicia, Monsef, Thomas and President Corica - 4. Noes: None. Absent: None. Abstention: Councilmember Haugner - 1. 88-170 Resolution No. 11418 "Calling a Special Election in the City of Alameda for the purpose of submitting to the electors an ordinance entitled, "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by adding Chapter 16 to Title III thereof relating to Fire Service Construction Tax"; fixing the date of said Election, the manner of holding same, and providing for Notice thereof; consolidating said Special Election with the Primary Election of the State of California to be held on Tuesday, June 7, 1988; and proposing said March 1, 1988 70 ordinance." Adopted. Councilmember Monsef moved adoption as amended. The City Attorney commented that there will be a minor change to include the term "medical". James Davis, 1134 Ballena Boulevard, attorney for Harbor Bay Isle, noted that the ordinance does not contain an exception or a credit for the $750,000 which will be given to the City for a Fire Station as a condition. The City Attorney stated there could be a credit put in, as was done on the dwelling unit tax. Councilmember Thomas inquired where the $750,000 figure came from, to which Mr. Davis responded that it was an amount agreed on with the City Manager as a resolution to the Planning Board condition and it has been offered in writing on several occasions and is in the process of being presented formally to the Planning Board. Councilmember Thomas noted he is entitled to a credit. The City Attorney noted the figure would not be put in, but the wording would reflect the credit. Fred Scullin, 1120 Chestnut Street, stated that Chief Quarante is getting a proper hearing and noted that homeowners or businesses already established in Alameda will not have to pay on this. John Scott Graham, 1728 Tregloan Court, stated he had received information, upon inquiry, that Bay Farm Island homes are not fire-hardened and can burn in thirty minutes, and would like to see the tax go through so the Fire Department can get what it needs. Councilmember Camicia made a motion to adopt the resolution as amended and with the credit article added. Councilmember Haugner seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 88-171 Resolution No. 11419 "Stating and requesting consolidation of a Special Election in the City of Alameda to be held Tuesday, June 7, 1988, with the State of California Primary Election to be held Tuesday, June 7, 1988." Adopted. Councilmember Monsef made a motion to adopt the resolution. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 88-172 Resolution No. 11420 "Approving participation in County-wide program for the development of senior citizen housing." President Corica commented that the newspaper stated this was the only city not in the program; but that the City was already negotiating for money to be used toward 185 units of senior citizen housing on Webster Street before the County was in it. Councilmember Thomas stated she had been concerned that the City March 1, 1988 71 might be paying a disproportionate share of the cost and not receive a proportionate share of the units, but the Senior Task Force has been helpful in stating that if at least 85 units are provided to the City of Alameda, that would be a fair share, so her questions and concerns are satisfied. Councilmember Camicia made a motion to adopt the resolution. Councilmember Haugner seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES 88-173 Ordinance No. , N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code to establish a 24-minute zone in front of 2060-2062 Lincoln Avenue." Councilmember Monsef made a motion for introduction of the ordinance. Councilmember Haugner seconded the motion. Christine Gonzales, 2626 Eagle Avenue, stated she is the property owner of 2060 Lincoln Avenue; that they provide off-street parking for their employees but neighbors have cars that do not run which are parked in front of the store for long periods of time. Councilmember Camicia stated the store is a very good addition to the neighborhood and moved for introduction of the ordinance. Councilmember Haugner seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember Camicia requested the Police Department take a look at the extended parking matter discussed by Christine Gonzales. FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCES 88-174 Ordinance No. 2375 N S . "Amending Article 4C and related sections of Chapter 1, Title XI of the Alameda Municipal Code, relating to off-street parking regulations." (Continued from February 2, and February 16, 1988 Council Meetings) Adopted. Mike Webber, 818 Lincoln Avenue, No. B, stated that if parking is to be behind businesses, it would create a greater distance for handicapped and elderly people; and inquired about how many spaces there would be for handicapped. The Public Works Director noted the State requirements are followed. Richard Roth, 1417 - 5th Street, addressed staff's responses to his questions of the last meeting; stated he is concerned about homes with 2-car garages that can only have a 12-foot driveway, if they must rebuild after a fire; is against parking at the rear of stores because it is not safe at night; that the ordinance states cars cannot be worked on in off-street parking so people cannot repair their own cars in their driveways. Councilmember Haugner stated Mr. Roth had a good point. President Corica addressed hospital parking restrictions and stated March 1, 1988 72 citizens should have the best medical facility possible and does not believe the Alameda Hospital should be held back from expanding because of parking restrictions. Councilmember Haugner noted neighbors in the area are concerned with parking even at the present. Councilmember Monsef stated the hospital should be treated as a critical institution; and believes the Council should exempt the hospital from this ordinance; and that they will submit a plan if they want to expand. Councilmember Camicia agreed with Councilmember Monsef regarding the viability of the hospital, does not want them given carte blanche, and noted that the hospital has suggested one space per 1000 gross square feet. John Leavitt, 1612 San Antonio Avenue, Board of Trustees, Alameda Hospital, stated with respect to future planning needs of the hospital pertaining to parking, CEQA [California Environmental Quality Act] has regulations for any large expansions and requires that environmental impacts of traffic and parking be addressed; and hopes Council will pass Councilmember Monsef's suggestion, realizing the hospital is a sensitive institution, and that CEQA will control any expansion. Councilmember Monsef made a motion to introduce the ordinance with the exception that Item (b)(7) regarding hospital parking requirements [under Sec. 11-14C5] be eliminated. Councilmember Thomas expressed concern regarding Mr. Roth's concerns. The Planning Director explained the driveway width is primarily a concern regarding paving and landscaping ratio in front yards and curbing remaining for on-street parking. Councilmember Thomas questioned the requirement hedge for a driveway. Councilmember Camicia commented he believed it inconceivable to have a law that demands hedges be put in, and there is a range of items that need to be cleaned up. Councilmember Thomas stated she would like to drop requirement, Sec. 11-14C7(a)2(b), and the 12-foot driveways Sec.11-14C8(f). The Planning Director suggested eliminating the maximum just specify what the minimum should be. Councilmember Thomas agreed. A discussion followed regarding hospital requirements, parking spaces behind buildings, and other details of the ordinance. Councilmember Camicia stated it does not make sense to put parking March 1, 1988 for a three-foot the hedge limit on width and 7 3 lots behind buildings because of drugs and other safety reasons, with reference to Sec. 11-14C7(b). Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion as amended through Council discussion, deleting 11-14C5(b)(7) [hospitals], deleting maximum-width requirement for driveways Sec. 11-14C8 and hedge requirement in Section 11-14C7; amending Section 11-14C7(b) by allowing parking spaces to be located between main building(s) and street frontage(s). Adequate landscaping will be required. The motion was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Camicia, Monsef and Thomas - 3. Noes: Councilmember Haugner 1. Absent: None. Abstentions: President Corica - 1. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, GENERAL 88-175 Michael D'Orazi, President, Alameda Fire Fighters' Association, addressed the Council on an unfilled Council-approved, funded Assistant Fire Chief position which has resulted in a shift running short and a morale problem, noting that there are three persons on the promotion list which is about to expire and noted the Interim City Manager is reluctant to fill the position pending the Fire Department study; and urged Council not to hold down promotions, but to allow the promotions and the hiring of the one Fire Fighter for replacement. At the request of Councilmember Camicia, the Interim City Manager responded to the questions of Mr. D'Orazi, noting that he has made contact with four additional consulting firms, will be meeting with each next week to lay out the proposal and get a response from them, and intends to get the information and a recommendation back to the Council within thirty days. Councilmember Camicia inquired if the expiration time of the promotion list can be extended, to which the Interim City Manager replied that there is provision which would enable the name to be placed on a reenlistment preference list for a year or two until the resolution of the study, but the decision has not been made and the list expires March 13. Councilmember Thomas noted that the Lieutenant's list is the one about to expire, yet there is direction not to fill the Assistant Chief's position, several positions are being filled without the promotions being given, the Fire Fighter has not been hired, and there is no replacement for persons on sick leave and one with a heart attack, and a fire engine is out of service. The Interim City Manager stated he has been discussing the matter with the Personnel Director and the Fire Chief, an option for providing additional fire suppression forces. Councilmember Thomas stated her concerns about persons who will be precluded from competing for a three year period. The Interim City Manager stated he is trying to keep options open but has chosen to wait for the results of the study to determine the positions necessary. March 1, 1988 88-176 Councilmember Camicia stated he voted no tonight on the salary resolution for the employees and in retrospect, he believes he made a mistake, because he became angry that an equation was made to the City Clerk's raise and he believes there is no connection. 88-177 Councilmember Thomas stated she has receiVed a letter from the City Attorney about the marinas, that they have been developing without permits, and failure to follow the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and believes the City should have a policy regarding CEQA compliance and requested a staff report. 88-178 Councilmember Thomas requested a report on the City Auditor's responsibilities. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 11:50 p.m. to Closed Session to discuss labor negotiations and threatened litigation. Respectfully submitted, DIANE B. FELSCH, CMC City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted 72 hours in advance in accordance with the Brown Act.