1988-11-15 Regular CC MinutesCi
m 2
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA
HELD TUESDAY - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVEMBER 15, 1988
88 -717 The meeting convened at 7:33 p.m. (at the conclusion of a
Closed Session to discuss Seavers v. City of Alameda, Seeterlin v.
City of Alameda, and Workers' Compensation claims of Officer Susan
Seavers; and the Community Improvement Commission meeting) with
President Corica presiding. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by
Councilmember Camicia, and Rev. Douglas Henderson gave the invocation.
ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Monsef, Thomas,
and President Corica - 5.
Absent: None.
MINUTES
Councilman Arnerich made a motion to approve the minutes of the Regular
Council Meeting of November 1, 1988, and the Special Council Meeting of
October 31, 1988. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion and it was
carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
CONSENT CALENDAR
At the request of Councilmember Camicia, Item No. 1 -M (See 88 -745), a
resolution authorizing CDBG Grant Agreement with Operation Sentinel -
Eastbay for Fair Housing and Housing Support Services for Fiscal Year
1988 -89, was removed from the Consent Calendar to the regular agenda.
At the request of Councilmember Thomas, Item No. 1 -E (See 88 -742), a
resolution regarding a service contract with George Hills Company, Item
No. 1 -F (See 88 -743), a resolution regarding service agreement with
Gates, McDonald & Company for claim administration, and Item No. 1 -H
(See 88 -744) a resolution guaranteeing matching funds for Bike Lane
Account Projects, were removed from the Consent Calendar and placed on
the regular agenda.
Councilmember Camicia moved approval of the Consent Calendar with the
exception of the Items noted in the preceding paragraph. Councilmember
Monsef seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk.
REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
*88 -718 From City Manager on meter -free parking ten days before
Christmas. Accepted.
*88 -719 From Finance Director on City's Investment Portfolio as of
October 31, 1988. Accepted.
*88 -720 From Recreation and Parks Director recommending Council accept
completion of Roof Repair Project at the Mastick Senior Center.
Accepted.
RESOLUTIONS
*88 -721 Resolution No. 11592 "Calling General Municipal Election to be
November 15, 1988
held in the City of Alameda on Tuesday, March 7, 1989; consolidating
Special School District Bond Election with the General Municipal
Election; establishing election precincts; fixing number of election
officers on the Board of Election for precincts; fixing compensation
of election officers and designating hours of voting." Adopted.
*88 -722 Resolution No. 11593 "Authorizing purchase of easements to
contain electrical facilities required within Underground Utility
District No. 8." Adopted.
*88 -723 Resolution No. 11594 "Authorizing application for grant funds
from the Trail Grant Program under the California Wildlife, Coastal and
Park Land Conservation Act of 1988, for pathway around Doolittle
Landfill." Adopted.
*88 -724 Resolution No. 11595 "Approving the Application and the
Project Agreement for History and Archaeology Grant Funds for City Hall
seismic strengthening, preservation and restoration project from the
California Wildlife, Coastal and Park Land Conservation Act of 1988."
Adopted.
*88 -725 Resolution No. 11596 "Adopting plans and specifications and
calling for bids for traffic signal construction at Broadway Street and
Buena Vista Avenue, No. P.W. 10- 88 -18, and directing City Clerk to
advertise same." Adopted.
*88 -726 Resolution No. 11597 "Adopting plans and specifications and
calling for bids for the pruning of City street trees in various
locations in the City of Alameda, No. P.W. 11- 88 -19, and directing
City Clerk to advertise same." Adopted.
*88 -727 Resolution No. 11598 "Authorizing the emergency repair pump at
Bridgeway Sanitary Sewer Pump Station pursuant to Section 3 -15 of the
City Charter, funded from the Sewer Service Fund." Adopted.
FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCES
*88 -728 Ordinance No. 2408, N.S. "Reclassifying and rezoning of
certain properties within the City of Alameda by amending Zoning
Ordinance No. 1277, New Series; Applicant: City of Alameda, R -88 -5,
the properties located at 1323, 1327, 1331, 1339, 1341 (A,B, & C),
1345, 1349, 1351, 1353, 1355, and 1357 Park Avenue, and 2414, 2415,
2416, 2417, 2418, 2419, 2420, and 2421 Marti Rae Court." Adopted.
BILLS
*88 -729 A List of Claims, certified by the City Manager to be correct
in the sum of $1,383,046.95.
* * * * * * * * **
RETURN TO REGULAR AGENDA
HEARINGS
88 -730 Consideration of amending inspection and plan checking fees for
services rendered by the Fire Department.
November 15, 1988
President Corica announced the procedure of the Hearing.
The Fire Chief explained the background of fee structure, noting that
there has been no revision of fees for nine years and a revision is in
order; a few fees are being lowered and the rest raised, according to
actual cost.
The public portion of the hearing was opened.
On the call for proponents, there were none.
On the call for opponents, the following person spoke:
Richard Roth, 1417 - 5th Street.
The City Manager stated it is important to note that some fees are
decreasing after nine years; also, just as there is an increase in
prices in stores, the cost in government has increased.
Councilmember Thomas commented the fees are lower than those charged in
neighboring communities; the fees are being correlated with service
provided; and there will be a capital replacement program for
equipment such as the 37- year -old fire truck.
Councilman Arnerich stated everything has gone up, people want good
services, Council is looking forward to funding things that are needed,
can't continue to operate with 37- year -old vehicles; these fees and
proposals are fair, and are below average of most cities.
Councilmember Monsef agreed with Councilmembers Arnerich and Thomas
that Council imposes fees because the cost of services has risen; the
City is running efficiently but the cost of service must be covered.
President Corica agreed, and stated if there
an inspection was not made and there were
would certainly be a public outcry.
Councilmember Camicia stated the amount
increase of $10,000 this year, $75,000 next
third fiscal year; and this is worth doing.
Councilmember Camicia made a motion to accept the report and take the
related ordinance out of order. Councilmember Monsef seconded the
motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
88 -731 Ordinance No. 7 N.S. "Amending Fire Code Permit Fees as
established by City of Alameda Ordinance No. 1929, N.S." Introduced.
Councilmember Camicia made a motion to introduce the ordinance and
Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion, which was carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
were a catastrophe because
no funds to do it, there
involved is a projected
fiscal year and $95,000 the
APPEALS
88 -732 Consideration
Use Permit, UP- 88 -19,
Ordinance to permit a
Encinal Avenue in
of Appeal of Planning Board decision to approve
as required in Section 11- 1315(e) of the Zoning
satellite dish antenna in the rear yard at 1626
an R -4 Neighborhood Residential District.
November 15, 1988
Applicant /Appellant: Richard Armstrong.
President Corica explained the procedure of the Appeal.
The Planning Director explained the background of the matter.
Richard Armstrong, 1626 Encinal Avenue, stated Planning Department has
found the noise generated when the antenna turns is .within the
guidelines set by the City and is almost non - detectable and should no
longer be an issue; a neighbor has set forth false information,
stating the antenna is at her bedroom window when it is 40 feet from
the bedroom window and 50 feet from the family room at an angle of 45
degrees; the alternate location mentioned by the Planning Department
and his consultant are entirely different; the present location has
been determined by experts as the only acceptable location possible;
the City suggests limitation of the source of his viewing to 60 to 75%
of that available to what the City refers to as reasonable, and
questioned what is reasonable about 75 %; this has been tested in the
Courts with severe penalties; stated that the rules set forth in the
Clayton Act, the Sherman Act, the FCC Preemption Rule, and the First
and Fourteenth Amendments are all in his favor.
Councilmember Thomas inquired what the difference is between the
-Planning Board location and the expert's location, to which Mr.
Armstrong responded there were three consultants altogether, and he
detailed the positioning and the reasons for such choice.
Councilman Arnerich inquired why Mr. Armstrong did not get a
[building) permit when he first put up the antenna, to which Mr.
Armstrong replied the consultant he hired was an expert in this field,
and he accepted the word of his consultant that no City ordinance could
be in affect with the federal preemption ruling in affect.
On the call for opponents, the following person spoke:
William Hargraves, 1629 San Antonio Avenue, stated Mr. Armstrong has
shown disregard for the City's ordinance and his neighbors' health and
welfare; his [Mr. Hargraves] family has suffered while the hearing
process has been taking place; and noted that the rest of his points
have been previously well - documented.
Councilman Arnerich inquired of the City Attorney where Mr.
Armstrong's rights actually stand.
The City Attorney stated the FCC adopted a regulation which they claim
preempts; the law provides a dual test, first it is necessary to have
a safety or aesthetic purpose and secondly, to not unreasonably
interfere with reception; believes the ordinance on its face, meets
the federal standards; the difficult question of fact is whether or
not the limitations imposed are unreasonable.
Councilman Arnerich inquired regarding the applicability of two cases
cited in the report by Brown & Finn.
The City Attorney responded that Euclid v. Ambler is the Oliver
Wendell Holmes opinion that launched land use regulations as reasonable
under the Constitution, and the Supreme Court has expanded on zoning
for the past fifty years, and noted that the states which were
November 15, 1988
326
referenced, have very restrictive implementation and, regarding this
issue, do not apply in California, and further discussed regulations
with Council.
Councilmember Monsef inquired about the legality of the City's
ordinance, to which the City Attorney replied the ordinance was written
in an attempt to comply with the FCC requirement that the aesthetic and
safety issues be balanced with the reception desires of the owners;
believes it is valid on its face, and it must be validly applied.
Councilmember Monsef stated the ordinance is a law of the. City and
should be followed; he does not see in the record that the Planning
Board made an unfair conclusion so he is willing to uphold the Planning
Board decision.
Councilman Arnerich suggested possibly waiving the building permit fee.
President Corica stated Appellant did not get a permit, and if Council
stays with the Planning Board decision, then everything should remain
intact.
Councilmember Thomas stated she would be interested in hearing if there
are any channels that would not be available if Planning Board
decision is upheld], to which Mr. Armstrong replied that he would lose
access to most channels of interest to him, including those which carry
hockey games, eastern University programming, and religious channels;
and he gets over 200 channels now.
President Corica inquired if Mr. Armstrong would be disposing of the
antenna if it had to be moved, to which Mr. Armstrong stated he had
not considered what he might do; and added that an antenna is not a
structure.
Councilman Arnerich made a motion to uphold the Planning Board
decision. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried
by unanimous voice vote - 5.
REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
88 -733 From City Manager on possible funding source for Strategic
Planning.
The City Manager amplified the report, presenting alternatives, and
noted Dr. Coe was present to answer questions if necessary.
Donald Roberts, 880 Portola Avenue, was opposed to a facilitator but
with the compromise, believes it should be workable.
William Withrow, 133 Cumberland Way, stated he supports the
recommendation of the City Manager, does not know the consultant but
believes her credentials are impressive, and looks forward to working
with her.
Diane Coler -Dark, 2857 Jackson Street, spoke in favor of Dr. Coe's
proposal and recommended acceptance of the City Manager's report.
Fred Scullin, 1120 Chestnut Street, stated just because some money has
been spent on a project does not mean it is necessary to go ahead with
November 15, 1988
it; and discussed the composition of the Strategic Planning Committee
and the appointments made by Council.
Bonny Conner, 163 Seabridge, stated the Committee came in with
individual ideas and opinions, and believes total funding should be
done by the City, and that if citizens are expected to perform for the
City, they should be assured Council believes in the project.
President Corica stated he was not comfortable with the Arthur Young
Company, he will not support proceeding if Arthur Young Company is to
go ahead with it; stated Mr. Scullin's comments are well taken,
perhaps the composition of the Committee should be rethought, and
Councilman Arnerich should have an opportunity to appoint members of
the Committee.
Councilmember Camicia inquired if the money pledged for the Committee
would still be available if the plan does not go ahead with the Arthur
Young Company, to which the City Manager stated he called those who had
made the commitments and they are still willing to go ahead.
Councilmember Monsef stated the issue is not who does the work, but
that the job be completed; the document that results will be a helpful
guideline for the staff and Council; noted Dr. Coe's proposal had not
been forwarded to Council when she first presented it; he will support
the project, would like the City Manager's proposal accepted and would
like Councilman Arnerich to appoint Committee members.
Councilmember Thomas stated Dr. Coe's bid had been previously withheld
[1987], stated there are committees and task forces working on many
aspects of City needs and planning; does not believe the City should
bear the whole load; she believes some persons are on Committee for
self - serving purpose, rest of citizens fine; recommendations are a
good compromise and believes Council should go ahead.
Councilmember Camicia stated it had been decided at the beginning that
there would be an out -of -town facilitator chosen so that there would be
an independent voice, and that is why Dr. Coe was not considered.
Council further discussed the composition of the Committee, the Arthur
Young Company, and the Committee appointment process.
Councilman Arnerich stated City Manager has made an outstanding report
with four proposals for discussion; Council does not have money for
more studies; planning concerns City, school district and business
community and should be a joint effort; City provided $39,500 and
should accept the $20,000 offered from educational and business
communities; he will appoint some members to the Committee; and moved
to accept the hiring of Dr. Barbara Coe for the sum of $19,850 to
complete Phases II and III. Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion
and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
President Corica introduced Dr. Coe to the audience; and Dr. Coe
expressed her pleasure at being selected, and stated the previous work
would be a useful part in completion of the strategic planning.
88 -734 From City Manager on status of Webster Street area development
plans.
November 15, 1988
Richard Roth, 1417- 5th Street, stated he is in favor of recommendation
of City Manager extending the boundaries of the improvement district.
Councilmember Camicia made a motion to accept the report and
recommendation; Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion.
Councilmember Thomas stated she does not believe it goes far enough; a
specific plan is needed to develop one specific area.
The City Manager commented a plan involving retail mix, etc., has been
noted; the first approach presented in the report is to expand the
West End Community Improvement Project Area and the second is for
revisions to the Zoning Ordinance to achieve controls; and if Council
wants that developed for the area, then specifics can be presented to
Council.
President Corica stated he believes Council should move in that
direction and believes it is worth a try.
Councilmember Thomas stated she believes it needs to go further; some
problems such as with Harsh Development, ousting of long -term tenants,
should be considered.
President Corica stated perhaps the Strategic Planning Committee could
consider the matter.
Councilman Arnerich made a motion to accept the recommendation of the
City Manager; Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion and it was
carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
88 -735 From Acting Public Works Director on status of Alameda City Hall
rehabilitation plans, Design Development Phase.
President Corica stated the restoration of the City is not high on his
priority list but it is in process.
The City Manager explained the background of the matter, noting that
the first two phases have been completed and the structural drawing and
tower schematics have been submitted to Council.
The Public Works Coordinator expressed appreciation for the work of the
Historical Advisory Commission and the Building Committee.
President Corica stated he would like a clock in the tower.
Councilmember Thomas inquired if the Carnegie Building is going to be
vacated; and will the reuse of that building be considered in
conjunction with the remodeling of City Hall.
The City Manager responded the adaptive reuse of the Library Building
has been considered and the mezzanine on the second floor would be
adaptive to other uses; and discussed possible alternatives in the use
of the fourth floor of City Hall and the reuse of the Library Building.
Councilmember Thomas discussed location of Council offices.
Councilmember Camicia made a motion to accept the report and
recommendation. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was
November 15, 1988
carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
88 -736 From Finance Director regarding General Fund balance.
The City Manager stated he requested the Finance Director recommend a
fund balance (reserves) to be maintained, and that the Finance Director
has indicated he would recommend 25 percent of the operating fund.
Councilmember Monsef agreed with having reserves, and would like a
mathematical formula for an adequate reserve for the City.
Councilmember Thomas noted that the Finance Director is leaving City
employ, thanked him for the considerate and capable assistance he has
given, and wished him well in his new position.
Councilman Arnerich inquired about the amount of the Fund balance, to
which the City Manager replied that, with a $28,000,000 budget, a
fourth of that would be $7,000,000.
Councilmember Monsef made a motion to accept the report. Councilmember
Camicia seconded and the motion was carried by unanimous voice vote -5.
88 -737 From Community Development Director regarding prepayment of UDAG
Loan (Marina Village).
President Corica explained the prepayment would provide less return,
than on a longer period of time, but the money will be in hand for
deposit in the bank.
Councilmember Camicia made a motion to accept the recommendation.
Councilmember Thomas stated she would like a comment on the next step
regarding the Pilot Retail Incentive Zone mentioned in the report, and
what community input there would be; to which the Community
Development Director stated the next step would be to come back to
Council with detailed recommendations including community input.
The motion was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
RESOLUTIONS
88 -738 Resolution No. 11599 "Submitting to the electorate of the City
of Alameda at the General Municipal Election to be held on March 7,
1989, an ordinance entitled "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by
adding Chapter 16 to Title III thereof relating to Police /Fire Service
Construction Tax;" providing for Notice thereof; and proposing said
Ordinance." Adopted.
President Corica commented the last time this was on the ballot, it was
for one -half percent on new construction, for which a majority voted,
but not a two - thirds majority; now, one percent is requested, expanded
to include the Police Department.
Councilmember Camicia inquired what is the projection after five years
when the City has reached the end of its construction phase, and there
will still be much more money needed to accomplish the financing needs
listed.
November 15, 1988
3 1
The Fire Chief replied this measure will help to solve the financial
needs, and other measures, such as the fee schedule, will help in an
ongoing way.
Councilmember Monsef made a motion to adopt the resolution. Councilman
Arnerich seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote
- 5.
88 -739 Resolution No. 11600 "Approving Vesting Tentative Map 4499
located at Seaview Parkway, Tralee Lane and Dublin Way, finding said
Vesting Tentative Map consistent with the City's General Plan and
determining that discharge of water into the sewer system will not
violate regional water quality control regulations (Harbor Bay Village
IV Associates, subdivider)." (Tabled at the November 1, 1988 Council
Meeting) Adopted.
President Corica noted the background of this matter.
Councilmember Thomas inquired where the clean -outs for the sewer
laterals are, to which the Acting Public Works Director replied they
are at the property line.
Councilmember Camicia made a motion to adopt the resolution.
Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
88 -740 Resolution No. 11601 "Consenting to inclusion in the Alameda
County, County Service Area for Bridges." Adopted.
The City Manager explained the background of the matter, and noted the
County has agreed to enter into an agreement with the City which
prohibits the County from levying fees on Alameda residents without the
prior consent of the City.
Councilmember Monsef inquired if there is any indication the City of
Oakland will not approve, to which the City Manager responded Oakland
has requested the same kind of assurance the City has in the form of an
agreement.
Councilmember Thomas inquired if the County is still asking the City of
Alameda to do something about the Emergency Medical System (EMS), to
which the City Manager stated there had been some concern but the
County Administrator has written the City a letter that the County will
not be asking for Alameda to be included in their paramedic system.
Councilmember Camicia made a motion to adopt the resolution.
Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
88 -741 Resolution No. 11602 "Authorizing execution of agreement with
Alameda County for inclusion in the County Service Area for bridges to
provide for operation and maintenance services for the three estuary
bridges." Adopted.
Councilmember Monsef made a motion to adopt the resolution.
Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion and it was carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
November 15, 1988
88 -742 Resolution No. 11603 "Authorizing execution of amendment to
service contract with George Hills Company, Inc. for liability claims
adjusting and administration." Adopted.
Councilmember Thomas stated her recollection was that before the Risk
Manager was hired, the City was going to go out for bid.
The Risk Manager stated she contacted three firms and all three
declined because they did not have a client base in this area; and
that she does communicate with the George Hills firm daily.
Councilmember Thomas stated one of her concerns was that there would be
a different price based upon the fact there would be a Risk Manager.
The Risk Manager stated she has assumed a larger role in handling some
of the claims, and the City is gradually phasing out the George Hills
Company.
Councilmember Thomas made a motion to adopt the resolution.
Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion and it was carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
88 -743 Resolution No. 11604 "Authorizing execution of amendment to
service agreement with Gates, McDonald & Company for claim
administration of the self- insured Workers' Compensation Program of the
City and Bureau of Electricity." Adopted.
Councilmember Thomas, who removed this resolution from the Consent
Calendar for discussion, stated her questions have been answered, and
moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Monsef seconded the
motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
88 -744 Resolution No. 11605 "Guaranteeing matching funds for Bike Lane
Account Projects." Adopted.
Councilmember Thomas stated she has no objection to applying for the
grant but just has an objection to superceding the role of the Advisory
Board [Recreation Commission] and if the matter could be bifurcated,
she would feel better about it; to which the City Manager responded
staff would solicit the Commission's opinion prior to accepting the
funding and proceeding with the project; noted there are two
applications; and he would like approval so staff can proceed with the
application.
President Corica stated the application must be made to receive any
money, and Council can discuss the matter later.
Councilman Arnerich agreed.
Councilmember Monsef moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember
Camicia seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote
- 5.
88 -745 Resolution No. 11606 "Authorizing execution of CDBG Grant
Agreement with Operation Sentinel - Eastbay for Fair Housing and
Housing Support Services for Fiscal Year 1988 -89." Adopted.
Councilmember Camicia inquired what the 700 units of service noted in
November 15, 1988
the grant, refer to and the cost involved; to which the Community
Development Director noted that refers to 700 inquiries fully
processed, for approximately $17,400 at about $70 each.
Councilmember Camicia stated he could not vote against this, because
there is an incredible need, however it makes him uncomfortable to vote
for something this expensive and this unclear; that he would be more
comfortable if there had been an action plan submitted on how they were
going to make their service known to the community.
The Community Development Director stated she could submit changes to
the Grant Agreement and see if the amendments would be acceptable.
Councilmember Camicia suggested that Item 4.a. of the Grant Agreement
be changed.
Councilmember Camicia made a motion to adopt the resolution, and change
4.a. from quarterly performance reports to bi- monthly. Councilmember
Thomas seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES
88 -746 Ordinance No. N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code
by amending Section 15 -6210 thereof relating to rates for collection of
garbage and refuse and prescribing method of collection." Introduced.
President Corica stated he will be abstaining as he has a son who works
for the Oakland Scavenger Company.
John Barni, Sr., 1380 East Shore Drive, inquired if this is a rate
increase or not, and the method of collection.
The City Manager responded there was a review of the rates but it was
decided the rates would remain the same.
The Finance Director stated Oakland Scavenger does the billing and
collection, and will stay at the current level for another year.
Mr. Barni expressed his dissatisfaction with Oakland Scavenger's
required prepayment of bills, charges for vacant apartment building
units, and no discount provision for apartment building owners in
Alameda.
The City Manager stated he had noted the concerns, will review them
with Oakland Scavenger, and will report back to Council.
Councilmember Camicia
Councilmember Monsef
following voice vote:
and Thomas - 4. Noes
Corica - 1.
made a motion to introduce the ordinance.
seconded the motion and it was carried by the
Ayes: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Monsef
: None. Absent: None. Abstentions: President
88 -747 Ordinance No. N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code
by amending Section 17 -442 thereof establishing a signalized
intersection at Broadway and Buena Vista Avenue." Introduced.
Councilmember Monsef made a motion to introduce the ordinance.
November 15, 1988
Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion and it was carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
Councilmember Thomas inquired if the traffic light will eliminate the
traffic crossing guard, and if so, would the guard be placed elsewhere,
to which the Acting Public Works Director stated it will eliminate the
guard and the guard will be relocated.
The motion was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCES
88 -748 Ordinance No. 2409 N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code
by adding Subsection (w) to Section 11 -14B13 thereof relating to Drug
Free Zone signs." Adopted.
President Corica noted the amended ordinance has been received for
consideration; not as any signs would be needed but there would be
signs at entrances to the City.
Councilmember Camicia moved the amended language [alternate ordinance].
Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion with the stipulation that some
of the language be deleted from the signs as there is too much verbiage
in it to read while in traffic; Councilmember Camicia agreed.
Councilmember Monsef inquired if the sign could be changed to state a
drug free City rather than zone, and for line 3 to contain the word
"community" instead of zone.
Following a brief discussion regarding wording, President Corica
suggested the amended ordinance be introduced and then the verbiage on
the sign could be worked on by the City Manager with Council.
The motion was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
NEW BUSINESS
88 -749 Councilmember Thomas noted compensation received in the
neighboring communities by other mayors and members of councils;
stated that certain functions expected to be attended by Councilmembers
cost in excess of $300 per month, yet Council is paid $100; believes
it should be put on the ballot to see if the voters of the City would
consider giving the Council a pay raise to what a general law city
would get, which in this case would be $600; noting that
Councilmembers work 20 -40 hours a week and the Mayor works 50 -60 hours;
discussed salary of treasurer and auditor.
President Corica reviewed the amounts of money being paid to
Councilmembers in neighboring cities with less population but paid in
excess of Alameda; stated at one time treasurer and auditor had full
time jobs; now there is a finance officer; believes those two jobs
are outdated and that should also be put on the ballot.
Councilmember Thomas requested a resolution that places on the ballot
the filling of Council vacancies with candidates receiving the next
highest votes at the last Municipal Election.
Councilmember Monsef commented at the time the amendment was made to
November 15, 1988
334
give Council $100, the amount had a much greater value then than now.
Gerhard Degemann, 19 Sandpiper Place, stated he had suggested a raise
for Council 2 or 3 years ago, believes Council needs more compensation
and should be reimbursed for costs to represent the City of Alameda.
Charles Tillman, 2415 Roosevelt Drive, stated the last raise was in
1977, and he believes the City should raise each Councilmember to $250
per month, and other cities are going up to the $600 category.
John Scott Graham, 1728 Tregloan Court, stated he is in favor of the
Mayor and Councilmembers receiving a raise to $600 or more; in 1938,
the wages of the lowest [paid] City worker was $60 per month, and
Council was paid $50; he suggests City Charter be changed so that
Council should not only be paid $1 less than the lowest paid City
worker, but there should also be a cost of living clause so that it
will not be necessary to keep requesting a change.
Councilmember Thomas discussed the use of general law, and the City
Attorney commented the City has adopted the State law with respect to
bidding and a number of other items.
Councilman Arnerich suggested the City Manager report to Council
regarding the three proposals as discussed tonight.
Council agreed by consensus to direct staff to schedule for
consideration at the next Council Meeting the following proposed
Charter amendments: 1) Council compensation as provided by General Law
(Sec. 2 -4); 2) deletion of the offices of City Auditor and City
Treasurer (Sec. 2 -1), or salary reductions for same (Sec. 2 -4); and,
3) filling of Council vacancies with candidates receiving the next
highest votes at the last Municipal Election (Sec. 2 -7).
88 -750 Councilmember Camicia requested a staff report at the next
Council Meeting regarding the creation, by ordinance, of a Finance
Commission.
88 -751 Councilman Arnerich requested stronger enforcement of parking
regulations in areas with flush curbing.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 10:50 p.m.
ectfully submitted,
DINE B. FELSCH, CMC
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted 72 hours in advance in
accordance with the Brown Act.
November 15, 1988