Loading...
1989-02-07 Regular CC Minutes30 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA HELD TUESDAY FEBRUARY 7, 1989 89-072 The meeting convened at 7:35 p.m. (at the conclusion of the Closed Session to discuss Cheifer v. City of Alameda, Cepparo v. City of Alameda, Threatened Litigation, and the Workers Compensation case of Greer M. Hilt; and the Annual Meeting of the Alameda Sewer Improvement Financial Corporation) with President Corica presiding. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Vice-Mayor Thomas. Reverend Russell Palmer gave the invocation. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Arnerich, Thomas, and President Corica - 3. Absent: Councilmembers Camicia and Monsef - 2. MINUTES President Corica suggested that the approval of the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of January 17, 1989; Special Council Meetings of January 10, January 13, January 26, and January 31, 1989, be continued to the next regular Council Meeting as only three Councilmembers were present at the meeting. Councilman Arnerich moved to hold the minutes over to the next Council Meeting. Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 3. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY 89-073 Proclamation designating the week of February 12 - 18, 1989 as Vocational Education Week. Mayor Corica noted the Alameda Unified School District (AUSD) requested designation of the Vocational Education Week; read the proclamation; and Jacqueline Slabaugh, Career Education Consultant, AUSD, accepted the framed proclamation from the Mayor. President Corica stated Item No. 7, the report regarding possible library sites (See 89-091), has been held over to the next regular meeting so that the entire Council can be present when the subject is discussed. CONSENT CALENDAR The City Manager requested Item 1-A, the report regarding harassment/discrimination policies and procedures (See *89-074) be held over to the next Council Meeting. Councilmember Thomas made a motion that the remainder of the Consent Calendar be approved. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 3. Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk. February 7, 1989 REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS *89 -074 From Personnel Director regarding harassment /discrimination policies and procedures. (Held over to February 21, 1989 regular Council Meeting.) RESOLUTIONS *89 -075 Resolution No. 11644 "Awarding contract to Mission Property Maintenance for landscape maintenance of various locations in the City of Alameda, P.W. No. 12 -88 -21 and authorizing execution thereof." Adopted. *89 -076 Resolution No. 11645 "Awarding contract to Gateway Landscape Construction, Inc. for North Loop Road landscape improvements, P.W. No. 10 -88 -16 and authorizing execution thereof." Adopted. *89 -077 Resolution No. 11646 "Awarding contract to Wesco, Inc. for the design and bid document preparation of the Bayview Shoreline Enhancement Project and authorizing execution thereof." Adopted. *89 -078 Resolution No. 11647 "Establishing Election Precincts, designating polling places therefor and naming officers of Election for each precinct for General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, March 7, 1989." Adopted. FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCES *89 -079 Ordinance No. 2416, N.S. "Amending Chapter I, Title XI (Zoning) of the Alameda Municipal Code relating to administrative, professional and other offices, and medical and related facilities." Adopted. *89 -080 Ordinance No. 2417, N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by amending Title XVII thereof removing the traffic signal at Buena Vista Avenue and Eighth Street." Adopted. *89 -081 Ordinance No. 2418( N.S. "Authorizing acquisition of a 0.19 acre public art parcel from Alameda Real Estate Investments." Adopted. BILLS *89 -082 A List of Claims, certified by the City Manager as correct, was approved in the sum of $917,753.09. * * * * * * * * * RETURN TO REGULAR AGENDA WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 89 -083 President Corica requested the City Clerk read the February 7, 1989 announcement concerning Written Communications. The City Clerk read the announcement that, effective March 1, 1989, the cut -off date for written communications will be Thursday, 5:00 p.m., 11 days prior to Council Meetings. HEARINGS 89 -084 Consideration of an Ordinance which requires fire resistive roofs and the installation of spark arresters. (Continued from January 17, 1989, Council Meeting) President Corica explained the procedure of the hearing. The Fire Chief presented the background of the matter. The public portion of the hearing was opened. On the call for Proponents and Opponents, the following spoke: John Barni, Sr., 1380 East Shore Drive, commented in favor of certain portions of the ordinance, and against certain portions. Madlyn Murphy, 2618 Janis Circle, inquired about application of the ordinance. The public portion of the hearing was closed. President Corica stated he has no problem requiring arresters upon new construction of houses with fireplaces; believes the concept is admirable, has a problem with requiring arresters for older residents who do not use their fireplaces, and also for persons with limited or fixed income; fire resistant roof has merit, new construction requirement has merit, but requirements concerning old construction needs more study. The City Manager suggested that the phrase "operable fireplaces" could be used in the ordinance; the CDBG program, possibly, could cover the cost of spark arresters for those persons who need help. Councilman Arnerich stated that requiring the spark arresters would be an extreme hardship on people with fixed incomes and others in similar financial circumstances; he would like to see the first two sections [Sections 1(a) and 1(b)] retained and the rest [Section 1(c)] should be done on a complaint basis as needed; would like an amendment to that Section to require the arresters at the time the home is sold to a new owner; views the arresters as a high -cost item for the citizens of Alameda; and he is opposed to a mandatory requirement for spark arresters on all existing homes, which could affect existing homes that are 25 years or older, and is particularly concerned about seniors and persons out of work. Councilmember Thomas stated that a few months ago, Ryland Research predicted less fires in Alameda because of education, etc. and the City did not really need the staff that it has, but this year has been a busy one for the Fire Department and it has been necessary February 7, 1989 to call the Naval Air Station for assistance; a few year ago the City of Alameda led the way with the smoke detectors, there is money available for hardship cases, and she would like to see Alameda lead the way with spark arresters; would like this ordinance passed but as it seems there are not enough votes for the spark arresters requirement, she would like to see the item brought back, but is willing to support Councilman Arnerich in deleting Section 1(c) at this point. President Corica stated he appreciated Councilmember Thomas's comments; might consider the spark arresters if it is made a condition at time of sale. Councilman Arnerich stated it would be one more burden on the realtors to handle although he might consider that possibility. President Corica suggested going ahead with the reroofing requirements concerning fire resistant materials at this time; and that would take care of some of the problems. Councilman Arnerich stated there was no question about that. Councilmember Thomas stated she would be willing to go ahead with installation of spark arresters at the time of reroofing. Councilman Arnerich agreed that it could be done at the time the roof is replaced; he is just against mandatory spark arresters for all of the City. Discussion followed on how to amend the ordinance, during which the City Attorney suggested deletion of the words "new fireplace" from Section 1(c). Councilmember Thomas moved adoption of the ordinance with the change that the wording in Section 1(c) "All existing and new fireplace chimneys. ." be amended to: "At the time of reroofing, all existing operational chimneys. . ." Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 3. Upon consent of Council, the related ordinance was taken out of order. 89 -085 Ordinance No. 2419, N.S. "Amending Ordinance No. 2265, New Series, adopting by reference the Uniform Building Code, 1985 Edition, by amending Section 3202 (B) of Chapter 32, Section 3210 of Chapter 32, and Chapter 3703 -F of Chapter 37 and making findings therefore regarding fire protection for roofs and chimneys." Adopted. Councilmember Thomas reiterated her former motion [to adopt the ordinance with the amendment noted under 89 -084]. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 3. 89 -086 Consideration of vacation of electrical easement located February 7, 1989 34 adjacent to Constitution Way between Buena Vista Avenue and Atlantic Avenue. President Corica explained the procedure of the hearing. The Acting Public Works Director discussed the background of the matter. The public portion of the hearing was opened. On the call for proponents, there were none. On the call for opponents, there were none. The public portion of the hearing was closed. By consensus of Council, the related resolution was taken out of order. 89 -087 Resolution No. 11648 "Ordering vacation of an electrical easement located adjacent to Constitution Way between Buena Vista Avenue and Atlantic Avenue." Councilman Arnerich made a motion to adopt the resolution. Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 3. 89 -088 Consideration of Housing and Community Development Needs. President Corica explained the procedure of the hearing, and the purpose, which is to obtain citizen comments on the needs of the community. The Community Development Department Director commented on the background of the matter. The following persons spoke: Jane Jackson, 1827 Bay Station, regarding one month's rent for the homeless who are working but have no place to live. Edward J. Murphy, 2618 Janis Circle, regarding a workshop concerning affordable housing. [Also submitted letter to Council.] John Doherty, 1329 Weber Street, regarding the homeless, and transportation to grocery store in the West End. councilman Arnerich requested Mr. Doherty submit names and phone numbers of persons who do not have transportation, as he would like to follow through. John Foley, 3004 Encinal Avenue, regarding needs for food and housing, Aids, and a drug program. Lois E. Pryor, 1814 Clinton Avenue, regarding housing counseling needs. February 7, 1989 Susan Ahlquist Dutcher, 2975 Gibbons Drive, Vice President, Social Service Human Relations Board, suggested the Board's needs analysis be compared with the results of the hearing. Kenneth Kofman, 1080 Jost Lane, regarding emergency housing and child care. Virginia Krutilek, 921 Broadway, Alameda Homeless Network, regarding the various needs concerning the Network program. The public portion of the hearing was closed. Councilmember Thomas pointing out the City's grant is $879,000, an increase of approximately 4% over what was received last year; 20% goes to overhead, $160,000, with $719,000 remaining; all of the needs are important however the money received will not cover everything, but Council will do the best it can, but will need other help to meet the needs. Councilman Arnerich commented on the sincerity of the speakers; stated Council is aware of the problems, and must take a more aggressive approach and hopefully address all the concerns that were voiced. President Corica closed the hearing, noting that the hearing was for input, which has been received. 89 -089 Consideration of proposed Negative Declaration, IS- 88 -18, and proposed Rezoning, R -88 -7, for a parcel located at 1600 -1606 Foley Street from R -4, Neighborhood Residential District, to R -6, Hotel - Residential District. Applicant: William R. Pedder, Esq. for Good Chevrolet. President Corica announced the application was withdrawn by the Applicant. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 89 -090 From Cable Television Oversight Committee requesting the Council to write federal legislators requesting consideration for restoring control over Cable rates to local franchising authorities. Accepted. Councilman Arnerich stated Council should follow the recommendation and make a very strong statement that Council believes fees should be more closely watched in the future and the City should have more input. Don Roberts, 880 Portola Avenue, stated he believes the proposal is very satisfactory, and one of the reasons he proposed this to the Committee, was because of the increase in rates by United Cable, and urged Council approve. Richard Armstrong, 1626 Encinal Avenue, Consumers Against Unregulated Cable Utility Services, noted a number of related February 7, 1989 36 organizations to which he belongs, commented on information he has, and to which he has access, and offered assistance to Council in working on this matter. Councilmember Thomas made a motion to accept the report and recommendation. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 3. 89 -091 From City Manager regarding feasibility of Linoaks Motel and Portola Triangle as possible library sites. Held over - * From David Plummer and Karin Lucas, Co- Chairs, Committee to Retain the Carnegie Library, requesting full, fair, and objective consideration to retaining the Main Library in its present location and to the renovation and expansion of the Carnegie Building. President Corica announced this report is being held over to the next meeting so that the absent Councilmembers may participate in the consideration of the matter. 89 -092 From City Manager requesting ratification of the Port Authority Task Force membership and approval of the agenda for the first meeting. President Corica noted that each member of the Council has chosen a person to be on the Port Authority Task Force; and Council hopes the Port Authority will benefit Alameda financially and by enhancing the shoreline of the City. Councilmember Thomas stated she believed the City Manager was also to be on the Task Force to guide the Task Force and noted the date scheduled for meetings conflicts with Council meetings. President Corica stated perhaps the designated meeting time for the Task Force, following the first meeting, could be changed to enable the City Manager to attend; and that the City Manager's attendance at the meeting may help to speed up the process. Councilmember Thomas commented that Walter Abernathy, who has just retired from the Oakland Port of Authority is doing consulting and is very competent, and one or two hours of his time to guide the Task Force, might be well worth the cost at this point. President Corica stated Mr. Abernathy is very competent and any guidance or advice he may wish to offer would be appreciated; but if payments are required, then it would be necessary to look at the matter more closely. Councilman Arnerich stated he believes the Task Force is a blue- ribbon panel, and suggested the names should be read. President Corica noted the names of those who are to be on the panel are John Barni, Jr.; Lu Burton of Sea Land Service; Don Gehb, First National Bank; Wayne Milani, Pacific Shop; and Robert Wood, MWM Architects, Inc., and President of the Planning Board. February 7, 1989 councilmember Thomas moved acceptance of the recommendation and that the City Manager it on the Task Force. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 3. 89 -093 From Acting Public Works Director regarding status on Senate Bill 547 - Unreinforced Masonry Buildings. Scott C. Brady, Vice - President, Alameda Victorian Preservation Society, 2054 Santa Clara Avenue, stated commercial districts have many vintage unreinforced masonry buildings which should be dealt with sensitively; questioned how to identify historic unreinforced masonry buildings; noted the Society would like to see a structural engineer involved; and, on the Citizen's Committee, would like someone from the Victorian Preservation Society and suggested the names of Paul Breitkopf, Chris Buckley, Denise Rosco, or himself. Councilmember Thomas inquired if any of the four persons were structural engineers, and if he had any names to offer, to which he responded the four persons are not, suggested two names and stated he would provide other names. Councilman Arnerich requested the names and phone numbers, and possibly a background sketch on each, be submitted in writing to Council for consideration. President Corica noted the City Manager and Acting Public Works Director should also submit names of structural engineers, and Councilman Arnerich agreed. councilmember Thomas noted the position will be unpaid. Councilman Arnerich made a motion to accept the report and recommendation that Council proceed with the formation of a citizen's committee with each Councilmember appointing one member. Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 3. 89 -094 From Acting Public Works Director regarding East Bay Regional Park District's Development Plans for the beach. Don Roberts, 880 Portola Avenue, noted that the dunes in some areas along the beach exceed the 30" height requirement. Joyce Linney, 542 Queens Road, expressed concern regarding plans for development; believes the 30" dune is going to be a problem for stabilizing the sands, the plantings and fences are a preventative for erosion of the sand, and Council should look at the whole picture. President Corica commented on the erosion, and stated he has a problem with the dunes; he would like to have no dunes, so the Police can view the beach because of drug - related problems, etc.; the beach will continue to erode back to its natural state, unless there is something more permanent than sand; the only reason February 7, 1989 Alameda has sand beaches is because it was the cheapest commodity Utah Construction had that it could place there, instead of an expensive seawall. Mike Anderson, East Bay Regional Park District ( EBRPD), introduced Pat O'Brien, the EBRPD General Manager, who stated he appreciated the opportunity to provide a presentation regarding erosion control issues. Mr. Anderson compared 1982, 1983 erosion and storm damage with current beach; stated dune grass forms a wall against storm and wind erosion; have worked with City staff and discussed test plot section where the City, with assistance from EBRPD staff would experiment for possibile control of dune grass height; regulatory agencies have not approved any variation in the plan and have used the plan as a model for what should be done for erosion control at other beach sites; and noted other EBRPD representatives are present to answer questions. The City Manager used a wall drawing to note the requirements and the current considerations, and discussed the matter of fencing. President Corica stated he would like more visibility of the beach as a safety measure. The City Manager noted the dune grass is effective in holding the sand and the density of grass acts as a collector for the sand. President Corica stated he does not know why flowers and grass cannot be used to hold the sand without having dunes. Councilmember Thomas stated a seawall would block the sand; is concerned what will happen in the next few years; would like to see the sand fence moved back, a deadline on removal of the entire fence, the City Police patrolling the area instead of the EBRPD, and believes those things would help the City to live with the regional beach although the City does not have regional infrastructure to accommodate a regional beach; and whatever can be done to ameliorate the problems at this time, she will support. Councilman Arnerich noted there were three items that concern him: 1) the extension of the fence was not approved by the City and is a major visibility restriction; 2) the Chief of Police stated dunes and vegetation do create an observation problem for patrolling police officers; and 3) the contractor has not yet completed the shaping [of the dunes]; the recommendation of the Acting Public Works Director is to continue to work with EBRPD to modify the planting material so as not to exceed one foot in height above the dunes, and he [Councilman Arnerich] believes that is the direction in which Council should continue to go. President Corica stated the EBRPD is present and have heard Council's concerns; the City has had a good relationship with the EBRPD and he is sure things will be done satisfactorily, and his concern is safety. February 7, 1989 Councilman Arnerich thanked Mr. O'Brien and his staff for coming, and requested very serious consideration be given to Council's concerns about the beach, the dunes, the grass; keeping the aesthetic value, beauty, and visibility of the beach. Councilmember Thomas reiterated Council's basic concerns and further commented on the 12- foot -wide pathway. The City Manager noted the need for the fence is to stabilize the sand and if the dune grass is established within a year, the fence will then come down, or within 24 months at the most. President Corica noted the Park District has heard Council's concerns, City staff should meet with the EBRPD within a month so progress can be made. Councilmember Thomas stated she cannot support the recommendation unless the fence is out. President Corica suggested holding the matter over until after a meeting with the Park District is held, and a satisfactory arrangement has been established. President Corica stated a meeting should be scheduled with the Park District and a report be brought back to Council. Councilman Arnerich agreed. Councilmember Thomas made a motion that the matter be tabled until a meeting is held with the EBRPD. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 3. 89 -095 From Police Chief regarding Police enforcement efforts at Housing Authority Units. President Corica commented that the City has an excellent and efficient Police Department, and other cities are aware of the Police Department's efficiency. Councilmember Thomas noted she asked for this report initially, noted the number of arrests in the City's public housing areas, wonders if the arrests made are housing authority tenants and if so, whether they are being evicted for cause; and would like the Housing Commission to look into the matter. The City Attorney noted such evictions would be different from the the usual unlawful detainers based on failure to pay; and further discussed the procedure. Councilmember Thomas stated if there is a drug conviction of a named tenant or a responsible person over age 18 is living there, there should be an eviction, and the matter should be explored. Councilman Arnerich made a motion to accept the report. Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 3. February 7, 1989 0 RESOLUTIONS 89 -096 Resolution No. 11649 "Authorizing the Mayor's Fourth of July Parade in the City of Alameda and approving the route thereof." President Corica noted that one of the reasons for using the route is because the residents of a number of rest homes are able to enjoy the parade. Councilmember Thomas made a motion to adopt the resolution. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 3. 89 -097 Resolution No. "Approving Final Map of Subdivision known as Tract 5850 and accepting certain easements (Lighthouse Cove, Pulte Home Corporation, Subdivider)." Continued to 2/21/89 Council Meeting. President Corica noted that he will be voting against the three resolutions regarding Tract 5850 [89 -097, 89 -098, and 89 -099]; that the area was at one time deemed unsafe by the Oakland Airport, and although the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) deemed the area safe because of certain mitigation factors, he will disapprove. Councilmember Thomas stated she sat at the ALUC and was the only person voting no; but noting that the tiny area is surrounded by an area fully developed, it does not make sense to vote against it. Councilmember Thomas moved adoption of the three resolutions. Councilman Arnerich stated Tract 5850 is a small parcel of land that is set in a very dense area of homes and he sees nothing wrong with it at this time. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion and it was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Arnerich and Thomas - 2. Noes: President Corica - 1. Absent: Councilmembers Camicia and Monsef - 2. President Corica noted the resolutions will come back before Council at the next meeting. 89 -098 Resolution No. "Authorizing execution of agreement for construction and completion of improvements in connection with Subdivision Tract 5850 and approving bonds as to sufficiency (Pulte Home Corporation, Subdivider)." Continued to 2/21/89 Council Meeting. This resolution will be brought back before Council at the next Council Meeting. [See 89 -097] 89 -099 Resolution No. "Accepting dedication of open space easement for public park purposes from Lighthouse Cove Planned Development Homeowners' Association (Parcel B of Tract 5527)." February 7, 1989 41 Continued to 2/21/89 Council Meeting. This resolution will be brought back before Council at the next Council Meeting. [See 89 -097] 89 -100 Resolution No. "Amending the City Cooperation Agreement with Marina Village." (Continued from January 17, 1989 Council Meeting.) The City Manager noted this resolution has been requested to be held over to the February 21st Council Meeting by Mr. Parker, the principal from Marina Village. 89 -101 Resolution No. "Approving criteria for the use of UDAG loan proceeds and authorizing an amendment to the EDCA Grant Agreement." Diane Coler -Dark, President, Park Street Business Association, 2857 Jackson, stated she believes the Central Market project is fantastic; Mr. Gerber, EDCA, has produced, with a great deal of time and energy, a plan that is beneficial to Park Street; the EDCA was founded and funded for this type of product; and hopes Council is pleased with this economic development project. President Corica stated he is sure Council is pleased that something is planned for the Central Market, which has been vacant, however, he has a problem with loaning the money to someone to rent the Market; does not know if it is a type of grant that fits into this situation; questioned why those involved cannot provide their own funding. Ron Gerber, EDCA, stated one reason for using the UDAG fund is that an original intention of the UDAG program was to produce projects which generate commercial revitalization, employment opportunities and revenue for the City; the owner of the Market building is a retired grocer, not a developer, the tenant moving in is looking for a finished shell, this is to be a rehab, and this tenant will pay a high rent; he explained financing detail, noting it would be impossible to handle this project with conventional financing. President Corica stated the Market had been vacant a long time, so possibly the owner does not have a need to rent it; perhaps some vacant Park Street stores need the same type of financial assistance; he has a problem with money being put into one store which could be distributed to a lot of businesses on Park Street. Mr. Gerber responded the money is not a giveaway to the owner; loan monies repaid to the City can be recycled, if the City wishes, in loans to small businesses; federal requirements must be met and it is necessary to be sure of repayment so there will be a flow of funds back to the City; if a start -up person has no funds, there is no eligibility. President Corica discussed the matter of repayment with Mr. Gerber. Councilman Arnerich reviewed the payback and noted the return over February 7, 1989 42 fifteen years is $684,000 on the $400,000 loan; discussed the collateral and the adequacy of parking needs. Penny Stanley, 1809 Fremont Drive, stated she was excited that Trader Joe's is coming in as she has shopped at a number of their stores; Trader Joe's stores are clean, courteously run, and from a consumer standpoint, she sees no down side to having them come in. Judi Pfankuch, 982 Pearl, stated Trader Joe's would be a compliment to the City and to Park Street; is an enjoyable place to shop; and the big advantage is that Trader Joe's has enhanced surrounding businesses in any area in which it has been located. Councilmember Thomas stated she would like more detail on the lease with Trader Joe's if it has been signed; is concerned 25% of UDAG loan is dedicated to a new business rather than an existing business; would probably be happy if Trader Joe's was going into the Lucky Store building on Webster Street as there is nothing similar in that area; wonders if Council should subsidize a new big business that is not Alamedan, or work harder to put an Alamedan in the building; would like more information on the project and will not vote for it tonight. President Corica stated that, after listening to some of the speakers that have been in the stores, he believes he is changing his mind in favor of the project, but he also would like more information; if Trader Joe's has as much of an impact as it did in Redondo Beach, it would probably benefit the Park Street area too. Councilman Arnerich stated he also shares the concerns of President Corica and Councilmember Thomas; believes Trader Joe's is a new concept and would be beneficial, but as Council is discussing nearly a half million dollars, to be prudent, more time should be spent on reviewing the project; therefore, the matter should be tabled to allow time to look into the entire concept of what the owner of the store, Trader Joe's and UDAG can contribute. Councilmember Thomas made a motion to table the resolution to the next meeting. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 3. 89 -102 Resolution No. 11650 "Resolution of intention to establish a Community Facilities District and to authorize the levy of special taxes pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982." Adopted. President Corica explained the resolution. Councilmember Thomas made a motion to adopt the resolution. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 3. 89 -103 Resolution No. 11651 "Resolution of intention to incur bonded indebtedness pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982." Adopted. February 7, 1989 43 Councilmember Thomas made a motion to adopt the resolution. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 3. INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES 89 -104 Ordinance No. , N.S. "Reclassifying and rezoning certain properties within the City of Alameda by amending Zoning Ordinance No. 1277, New Series; Applicant: William R. Pedder, Esq. for Good Chevrolet; R -88 -7, that property located at 1600 -1606 Foley Street." President Corica noted this resolution was not considered as the applicant withdrew the application. 89 -105 Ordinance No. , N.S. "Authorizing acceptance of Penal Code requirements relating to the selection and training standards of public safety dispatchers." Councilman Arnerich suggested the recruitment process place emphasis on bilingual qualifications. Councilmember Thomas made a motion to introduce the ordinance. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 3. 89 -106 Ordinance No. , N.S. "Amending Title XVII of the Alameda Municipal Code to remove a no -left -turn restriction for McDonald's Restaurant on Shore Line Drive." Introduced. Councilmember Thomas commented she did not support this ordinance before because she expected the other McDonald no- left -turn request ordinance shortly but it has not yet been presented, and the ordinance before Council should be considered. Councilman Arnerich made a motion to introduce the ordinance. Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 3. NEW BUSINESS 89 -107 Councilmember Thomas stated she is concerned Council was not informed a year ago by the Bureau of Electricity that the recent 12% rate increase would be made; rates should have been phased in; the Bureau is a City department but operates as an independent company; listed a number of items about which she is concerned, including travel expense, and possible duplication of effort with the Personnel and Finance Departments; and would like a report on how to tighten controls at the Bureau, have the Bureau coordinate better with the City as a department, be consistent and utilize existing functions without duplication, and would like to know how long it has been operating in the current manner. The City Manager noted areas of coordination of the Bureau and the City through the Finance and Personnel Departments; there should be more coordination; and they do have special needs. February 7, 1989 44 President Corica stated Council should explore the matter; and he believes the City Personnel Department should be used. Councilmember Thomas stated she does not like to see any duplication especially when rates are raised 12 %. President Corica agreed. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, GENERAL 89 -108 Betty Roberts - Collins, 2609 Lincoln Avenue, submitted a letter and petition requesting a change to R -1 Zoning of Lincoln. Avenue between Broadway and Pearl Street. President Corica noted the letter will be given to the City Clerk to place on the next agenda. Councilmember Thomas commented there have been repeated requests for rezoning; public hearings are currently being conducted regarding amendment of the General Plan and some of Ms. Collins' input would be beneficial. The possibility of an ordinance to freeze the Permit issuance was discussed. 89 -109 Bill Withrow, 133 Cumberland Way, objected to Council's selection process of Meyer & Mitchell. President Corica commented on the financial advantage of the City Attorney office reorganization and commented that Council was in need of a litigator. Councilmember Thomas commented on the ethics of attorney bidding, the need of a litigator, duplication of overhead, etc. 89 -110 Don Roberts, 880 Portola Avenue, commented on what he considers discourteous behaviour of speakers while addressing Council from the podium. ADJOURNMENT President Corica adjourned the meeting at 11:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, DI .E B. FELSCH, CMC City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted 72 hours in advance in accordance with the Brown Act. February 7, 1989