1986-03-04 Regular CC Minutes55
REGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA
HELD TUESDAY MARCH 4, 1986
The meeting convened at 7:30 p.m. (at the conclusion of the Housing
Authority Meeting) with President Diament presiding. The Pledge of
Allegiance was led by Councilmember Monsef. Reverend Larry Nelson,
Trinity Lutheran Church, gave the invocation.
ROLL CALL: Present:
Absent:
MINUTES
Councilmembers Corica, Hanna, Lucas, Monsef and
President Diament - 5.
None
Councilmember Monsef moved for approval of the minutes of the Special
Council Meeting of January 30, 1986. Councilmember Hanna seconded
the motion which carried by the following vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Hanna, Lucas, Monsef and President Diament - 4. Noes:
None. Absent: None. Abstentions: Councilmember Corica - 1
(Councilmember Corica was unable to attend the Special Council
Meeting of 1/30/86).
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mr. Charles Tillman, 2415 Roosevelt Drive, requested Item No. 1-D,
a resolution appropriating $20,000 from the Low Income Garbage Fund
to fund City-wide refuse collection, be taken out of order for
discussion under the regular agenda. Councilmember Lucas moved for
the adoption of the Consent Calendar with the exception of Item 1-D.
The motion was seconded by Councilmember Monsef and was carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk(*).
REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
*86-094 From Chairman of the Historical Advisory Commission
regarding Masonic Temple continuing preservation considerations.
Accepted.
*86-095 From Public Works Director recommending an extension of time
for the construction of Harbor Bay Parkway Extension, Phase 3, P.W.
No. 1-85-2. Accepted.
*86-096 From Public Works Director and Fire Chief on the status of
State-mandated Fire Safety and Exit Program, Title 24, Article 7 of
the California Administrative Code. Accepted.
JU
RESOLUTIONS
*86-097 Resolution No. 10833 "Ordering changes and modifications,
Alameda Marina Village Assessment District 84-3. Adopted.
*86-098 Resolution No. 10834 "Adopting Plans and Specifications and
calling for bids for Marina Village Parkway and Independence Drive
landscape improvements, Asssessment District 84-3, P.W. No. 4-85-16,
and directing City Clerk to advertise same." Adopted.
*86-099 Resolution No. 10835 "Approving Final Map of subdivision
known as Tract 5349 and accepting certain easements and rights of
access (Heritage of Alameda, the Alameda Associates, subdivider.)"
Adopted.
*86-100 Resolution No. 10836 "Authorizing execution of agreement
for construction and completion of improvements in connection with
Subdivision 5349 and approving bonds as to sufficiency (The Alameda
Associates, subdivider)." Adopted.
*86-101 Resolution No. 10837 "Appropriating $18,000 from the
General Fund for State-mandated testing of Underground Storage
Tanks." Adopted.
*86-102 Resolution No. 10838 "Authorizing execution of lease
purchase agreement with Alameda First National Bank for Police
Department copy machines." Adopted.
*86-103 Resolution No. 10839 "Adopting specifications for law
enforcement motorcycles, calling for bids and directing City Clerk to
advertise same." Adopted.
*86-104 Resolution No. 10840 "Adopting specifications for a street
sign maker for the Public Works Department, calling for bids and
directing City Clerk to advertise same." Adopted.
*86-105 Resolution No. 10841 "Authorizing the rejection of a
single bid for Police Department handguns and authorizing the
Purchasing Agent to negotiate on the open market for the purchase of
said handguns." Adopted.
FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCES
*86-106 Ordinance No. 2272, N.S., "Amending Ordinance No. 1082,
N.S., by amending Section 6 and Subsection (0) of Section 2 thereof
relating to management of the Pension Fund and by amending Section 11
thereof relating to service retirement." Adopted.
*86-107 Ordinance No. 2273,N.S., "Amending the Alameda Municipal
Code by adding Section 5-176 to Article 7, Chapter 1, of Title V
thereof, relating to placement of business directories." Adopted.
57
RETURN TO REGULAR AGENDA
Councilmember Corica made a motion, seconded by Councilmember
Hanna, to take the resolution of appointment regarding the Civil
Service Board out of order at this time. The motion carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
RESOLUTIONS
86 -108 Resolution No. 10842, "Appointing Robert G. Guthrie a member
of the Civil Service Board." Adopted.
Councilmember Corica made a motion that the resolution be adopted;
Councilmember Hanna seconded the motion. The motion carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office to Mr. Guthrie.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
86 -109 From Joe Camicia, P.O._ Box 2233, Alameda, requesting Council
to consider banning additional fast -food restaurants in Alameda.
Mr. Camicia addressed the Council stating his concerns regarding
the number of fast -food restaurants in Alameda.
President Diament requested Mr. Camicia give his definition of fast -
food restaurants.
Mr. Camicia commented that he had only a personal definition and his
purpose was to have the staff, Council or Planning Board come up with
a workable definition.
It was noted by President Diament that there were letters from two
groups supporting Mr. Camicia's suggestion (one from the Coalition
for Alameda Neighborhoods and Litter Project Group Coordinator for
Park Street). Mr. Camicia then also submitted a letter to the City
Clerk from Monica Hove, 2961 Southwood Drive.
Councilmember Monsef requested that the City Attorney provide a
definition. The City Attorney responded that the City of Tiburon did
it in the context of litter by charging an additional business
license tax to "fast food " on the basis of fast -food takeout.
Councilmember Lucas mentioned that the City Manager is working on a
business license tax that might include a special tax for fast -food
businesses.
The City Manager stated that he expects a business license tax
proposal to be presented to the Council at the second meeting in
March.
Councilmember Lucas spoke of her belief in free enterprise; that
control of some of the bad consequences of some restaurants is needed
regarding litter as has been done by some Council action, but that
consequences have to be addressed and not the businesses themselves.
Councilmember Corica remarked that he was interested in hearing from
a cross - section of the community; that he wants to find out how many
people use the fast-food places and whether or not the community is
for them or against them.
Councilmember Monsef commented that the term fast-food restaurant
must be defined and the number located in Alameda before the issue
can be addressed.
Councilmember Lucas suggested that the Council not take action until
the business tax issue is considered by Council.
Councilmember Hanna stated that he believed this was a matter
for the Planning Board.
Mr. Camicia suggested that the Planning Board come up with a
definition that can be used.
Councilmember Corica moved that the City Attorney define fast-food
restaurants for the Council and that the Council proceed from there.
Councilmember Hanna seconded the motion. The motion was carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
86-110 From Theodore Berry, Municipal Court Commissioner, expressing
appreciation to elected City officials and City staff for their
cooperation, assistance and interest during the past two years.
Councilmember Hanna made a motion to accept the communication;
Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion. The motion was carried by a
unanimous voice vote.
86-111 From Wayne Pearce, 1136 Fontana Drive, regarding aircraft
noise and the Harbor Bay Park Project.
The Planning Director referred to the memorandum submitted to Council
from the Planning Department addressing some of the items appearing
in Mr. Pearce's letter. The Planning Department responses were
related to the approval process of the Microwave Tower. He stated
that both the FCC and the FAA approved the location of the Tower. He
further addressed the investigation regarding flight paths noted by
Mr. Pearce.
Mr. Pearce, 1136 Fontana Drive, stated that the Planning Director's
comments were correct but he was referring to the alleged lack of
communication on a lower level in the Port of Oakland and that the
Airport Manager was not aware of it until the Tower was built and now
the Airport Manager is receiving calls regarding noise. Mr. Pearce
requested that the Airport Manager be contacted before action of this
nature is taken, as well as Mr. Glenn Woodman, Airport Operations
Manager.
The City Manager stated that the Port of Oakland is always contacted,
and the Airport Operations Manager will also be contacted if it is
the desire of Council.
Councilmember Monsef made a motion to accept the written
communication; Councilmember Hanna seconded the motion and it was
carried by a unanimous voice vote - 5.
59
86 -112 From Ian R. Stuart, 31 Coleport Landing, regarding the
proposed expansion of Harbor Bay Business Park.
Councilmember Lucas stated that she believed the item had been
superseded because of the withdrawal of the application of the
expansion of the Business Park and therefore made a motion that the
written communication be accepted. The motion was seconded by
Councilmember Corica. The motion was carried by unanimous vote - 5.
86 -113 From Thomas A. Reiman, Harbor Bay Isle Owners' Association,
Inc., 885 Island Drive, regarding the Harbor Bay Isle proposed final
environment impact report.
President Diament commented that Mr. Reiman is requesting an
extension for public review on the E.I.R.
Councilmember Hanna made a motion that the communication be accepted
and explained that the previous discussion applies to this
communication also. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Lucas.
The motion was carried by unanimous vote - 5.
APPEALS
Councilmember Hanna moved that the Appeal be heard before the Hearing
regarding the Tentative Map of Tract 4495. Councilmember Lucas
seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
86 -114 Consideration of Appeal of Planning Board decision to
approve Planned Development PD -85 -3, to construct 164 single- family
detached homes on 32 x 70 foot lots on a 19.3 acre parcel bounded by
Mecartney Road, Aughinbaugh Way, Catalina Avenue extended, and
Casitas Townhouse development. Appellants: John Guidici, Elizabeth
Zackheim, Elizabeth Thomas, Peg Roberts, Rosalie McPherson, and Walt
Moeller.
The following persons spoke in opposition to PD -85 -3:
Peg Roberts, 3120 LaCampania;
Elizabeth Zackheim, 1033 Via Bonita;
David Baker, 939 Tayor Avenue;
John Guidici, 1035 Via Bonita;
Harry Cordon, 30 Crane Court;
Walter Moeller, 406 Channing Way;
Florence McConnell, 1102 Bismarck Lane;
Rosalie B. McPherson, 1128 Marianas Lane;
Fred Scullin, 1120 Chestnut Street;
George Gammell, 1065 Jost Lane.
In response to Council inquiry, the Planning Director addressed the
following concerns: 1) 4 separately -owned parcels zoned PD, 2)
concurrent landfill for both PD -85 -3 and the separately -owned
parcels, 3) potential drainage problems, 4) formula used for density
per acre, 5) noise easement, 6) recreational vehicle storage, 7)
Environmental Impact Report, 8) truck and vehicle traffic, 9)
parking spaces per unit, and 10) narrowness of streets.
Councilmember Hanna commented that he had concern regarding emergency
accesses, turnarounds at the end of cul -de -sacs, and truck traffic.
Councilmember Lucas noted that the Council has not heard from the
60
School Board regarding the school issue associated with the proposed
development , and thus must disregard the matter at this time.
The City Manager described
cities, on behalf of school
developers for the purpose
impacted areas.
Councilmember Corica stated
more involved in providing
fire stations, etc., before
maps.
a recent Court decision which allows
districts, to impose impact fees upon
of temporarily housing students in
that he would like developers to become
larger units, larger streets, schools,
Council addresses approval of tentative
President Diament stated that the plan before Council has been
reduced from what it was originally, and the developer has made a
number of concessions to make it work.
In response to Councilmember Hanna, the City Manager stated that fees
for schools could be collected at the building permit stage.
Councilmember Hanna stated if the School Task Force Committee can
make a recommendation in a reasonable amount of time to the School
Board, and the Board to the Council, the developer could participate
in the cost to improve the capacity of the school.
The City Attorney questioned whether or not the City has the
authority to impose a fee as a condition of a building permit.
The City Manager stated that Harbor Bay Isle is willing to pay for
schools to the extent that they are causing the need for schools.
After discussion of the school matter, the City Manager addressed the
fire station issue. He commented that there is a condition of
approval in Tract 4500 that the developer provide a fire house.
Councilmember Hanna stated that after considerable study of all the
material on the development, he believes the project would be
entirely acceptable to the clientele who wants to live in
that particular area. He added there will be no problems with
drainage, grading, nor the small pieces of property in the area.
Councilmember Hanna made a motion to deny the Appeal and approve the
Planning Board's recommendation, and proposed an additional
condition: a) provide a turn-around feature, to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer at the north end of street "G", north end of street
"N" and at the south end of street "I", 2) provide emergency access
to Mecartney Road from the north end of streets "J" and "H", 3)
provide a connection between streets "D" and "E" or a turn-around at
the south end of street "E", and 4) provide a through connection or a
turn-around at the west end of street "C".
Councilmember Lucas stated that she would be happy to second the
motion if Councilmember Hanna would add an additional condition that
there be no charge for resident parking. Councilmember Hanna agreed
to the additional amendment.
Under discussion, Councilmember Monsef stated that if Council votes
in support of the motion, Council is accepting the project's concept
of housing for Alameda.
61
Councilmember Hanna's motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Hanna, Lucas, and President Diament - 3. Noes:
Councilmembers Corica and Monsef - 2. Absent: None.
HEARINGS
86-115 Hearing regarding Tentative Map of Tract 4495, Ratto Farms on
Bay Farm Island. (Doric Development, Inc.)
President Diament opened the public portion of the hearing.
On the call for proponents, there were none.
On the call for opponents, Samuel Huie, 2200 Central Avenue,
addressed the Council on behalf of the Alameda School District.
President Diament closed the public portion of the hearing.
Councilmember Hanna made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Lucas,
to approve the Tentative Map with the same conditions that were
included in the Planned Development Planning Board approval and the
amendments included in the motion for the last Appeal. The motion
carried by the following roll call vote: Ayes: Councilmembers
Hanna, Lucas, and President Diament. Noes: Councilmembers Corica
and Monsef - 2. Absent: None.
RESOLUTIONS
86-116 Resolution No. 10843 "Approving Tentative Map for Tract 4495,
a subdivision of approximately 19.3 acres on Bay Farm Island, finding
said tentative map consistent with the City's General Plan and
determining that discharge of waste into sewer system will not
violate regional water quality control regulations. (Doric
Development, Inc., subdivider.)
Councilmember Hanna moved adoption of the resolution with the
inclusion of all of the conditions that were included in the previous
discussions. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Lucas and
carried by the following roll call vote: Ayes: Councilmembers
Hanna, Lucas and President Diament - 3. Noes: Councilmembers Corica
and Monsef - 2. Absent: None.
REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
86-117 From Vice Chairman of the Recreation Commission regarding
Godfrey park redevelopment.
Ken Koch, 315 Beach Road, voiced opposition to the proposed enclosed
baseball field for the exclusive use of a few.
Loretta Pozas, 318 Beach Road, opposed an enclosed
baseball diamond.
Marilyn Green, 206 Beach Road, opposed the redevelopment plan.
Councilmember Corica suggested that the baseball diamond be
developed, however, without any exclusions.
The Director of Recreation & Parks advised Council that the
Recreation Commission noted that the proposal was only a "concept."
The Director further stated that fliers were distributed to the homes
62
in the area notifying the residents of a meeting on December 4, 1985;
that residents were again notified of a Commission meeting in
February, 1986, and the homeowners were sent the material provided to
Council. After further discussion by the Director regarding the use
of other park facilities in the City, he stated that the Commission
requests Council's approval or disapproval of the concept.
In response to Councilmember Lucas, the Director acknowledged that
there would be an increase in traffic generated by the ball games.
Councilmember Monsef commented that the proposed plan does not appear
to be a long range plan; that he does not like to make any
neighborhood park exclusive for any one particular group.
Councilmember Hanna made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Lucas,
to approve the concept with the inclusion that very serious
consideration be given to the use by neighborhood children for lower
organized baseball.
In response to President Diament, the Director stated that parking is
adequate to accommodate the various teams which would be playing at
the park.
Councilmember Corica remarked that he would like to keep it as a
neighborhood park.
President Diament asked Councilmember Corica if he would be opposed
to the plan if the neighborhood children could use the baseball
diamond, to which Councilmember Corica responded he would not be.
Councilmember Hanna recommended that additional thought be given to
this part of the matter and it come back to the Council again.
After further Council discussion, Councilmember Hanna stated that
both the motion and Council's suggested alternatives be forwarded to
the recreation staff to be presented to the Recreation Commission.
On the call for a vote on Councilmember Hanna's motion, the motion
carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Corica, Hanna,
Lucas, Monsef and President Diament - 5. Noes: None. Absent:
None.
86 -118 From Public Works Director regarding the status of the Patton
Way Project.
Fred Scullin, 1120 Chestnut Street, stated he was worried about the
condemning of property along Eighth Street.
63
Councilmember Hanna advised Mr. Scullin that Phase III stops at
Lincoln Avenue.
In response to Councilmember Lucas, the Public Works Director
explained that there are plans that staff would like to project,on an
overall basis,for the rest of Phase III and present to Council.
The City Manager commented that he and the Public Works Director have
been discussing the possibility of fees. The City Manager added that
they have also been discussing participation and contributions with
developers in the West End.
Councilmember Corica made a motion to accept the report.
Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
RESOLUTIONS
86-119 Resolution No. 10844, "Creating the position of Community
Service Officer and establishing salary therefor."
President Diament inquired if the proposed part-time employees could
cite for abandoned vehicles, street sweeping parking violations, and
animal control.
The City Manager stated that at this point in time it is a pilot
program financed from the fines and forfeitures in the citation
program aimed initially at litter, business license, and code
violations.
Councilmember Corica expressed dissatisfaction with the necessity for
clerical support from various departments.
In response to inquiry from Councilmember Lucas, the City Manager
stated that the Community Service Officer could in the future enforce
sign violations.
Councilmember Corica remarked that he believed it would be very
difficult to cite.
Councilmember Lucas expressed support for the program.
Councilmember Hanna made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Lucas,
to adopt the resolution. The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Hanna, Lucas, Monsef and President Diament - 4.
Noes: Councilmember Corica - 1. Absent: None.
86-120 Resolution No. "Authorizing execution of agreement for
financial auditing services."
Charles Tillman, 2415 Roosevelt Drive, commented that an
established procedure should be determined for the selection of the
City's auditing firm and placed into the Charter. He also
recommended that the interviewing process be public.
James McKenna, 890 Union Street, stated that his firm (Kimbell,
McKenna & von Kaschnitz) is capable of doing the Single Audit Act,
reviewing the computer data processing system, and maintenance of the
City's bond rating. Egon von Kaschnitz described the firm's
background and experience in municipality auditing.
Fred Scullin, 1120 Chestnut Street, stated that he did not want to
see the City Auditor's power usurped.
Councilmember Corica commented that he believed the Council should be
presented with the three lowest bidders from which the Council can
make a choice.
President Diament stated that the proposal before Council is a
compromise situation which Council can be comfortable with.
Councilmember Corica stated that it was not morally right for the
City's current auditing firm to have reduced their bid.
In response to inquiry from Councilmember Lucas, the City Attorney
stated that he did not believe that the City Auditor had the solo
right to pick an auditing firm, however, Council should give his
recommendation serious consideration.
Councilmember Corica said that he would like to see the City go with
the local firm.
Councilmember Lucas stated that she was convinced the local firm was
qualified, and that she could not support the Auditor's
recommendation.
Councilmember Monsef expressed concern regarding the formation of the
Audit Selection Committee; specifically those members who have ties
with the bookkeeping system. Councilmember Monsef stated his support
for Kimball, McKenna, and von Kaschnitz.
(Councilmember Hanna made a motion to extend the meeting past eleven
o'clock. Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.)
Councilmember Monsef made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Lucas,
to reject the City Auditor's recommendation. The motion carried by
the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Corica, Hanna, Lucas and
Monsef - 4. Noes: President Diament - 1. Absent: None.
Councilmember Monsef made a motion to direct the City Staff to
prepare a contract for the auditing services of Kimbell, McKenna, and
von Kaschnitz. Councilmember Corica seconded the motion which
carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Corica, Hanna,
Lucas and Monsef - 4. Noes: President Diament - 1. Absent: None.
86-121 Resolution No. 10845 , "Endorsing East Bay Regional Park
District Plan for South Shore Beach Sand Replenishment Project, Phase
V.
David C. Rich, 305 Harbor Light Road, endorsed the recommendation
for beach restoration.
Mike Anderson, East Bay Regional Park District, explained the project
and recommended passage of the resolution of support.
Barbara Thomas, 1118 Paru Street, described the crime and parking
problems in the beach area.
65
Charles Tillman, 2415 Roosevelt Drive, commented on the drawbacks of
sand replenishment.
Gerhard Degemann, 19 Sandpiper Place, urged Council not to accept the
District's proposal.
Councilmember Corica stated he served on a Committee with
Councilmember Hanna which ironed out various problems, however, he
questioned the expenditure of $300,000. for sand which will
eventually wash away. Councilmember Corica stated that the City
needs to put back a seawall.
Councilmember Hanna stated that both he and Councilmember Corica do
not believe that sand is the ultimate defense, and agree that there
should be some hard device which would protect the roadway.
Councilmember Hanna explained that there should be some kind of a
test of a hard device and that the perched beach is worthy of a
serious test. Councilmember Hanna further commented that Sacramento
stated that there would be sufficient City funds remaining from the
2.4 millon dollars for a test.
Councilmember Hanna noted that the sand replenishment project will
provide some wave and erosion resistance value, and the loss of sand
will be over a longer period of time.
Councilmember Corica expressed concern regarding expansion of the
beach and increased City liability, traffic, litter, and crime.
President Diament stated that her great concern is erosion, and if
the proposed test proves successful, the City should do it.
Councilmember Lucas concurred with President Diament, and added that
the crime and traffic problems need to be addressed. Councilmember
Lucas suggested that the parking meter matter be investigated, which
would raise funds for the City.
Councilmember Monsef stated he was adverse to expansion of the beach,
and discussed the related problems.
Councilmember Hanna made a motion to adopt the resolution with an
amendment to change heavy -grain sand to medium -grain sand;
Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion which carried by the
following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Hanna, Lucas and President
Diament - 3. Noes: Councilmembers Corica and Monsef - 2. Absent:
None.
86 -122 Resolution No. 10846, "Approving Parcel Map No. 4728 for
division of property on Bay Farm Island and accepting certain
dedicated easements (ten -acre warehouse site, Harbor Bay Isle
Associates, subdivider).
Steve Brimhall, Executive Vice President, Doric Development, Inc.,
briefly explained the project.
Councilmember Hanna made a motion to adopt the resolution;
Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
66
86-128 Resolution No. 10847, "Appropriating $20,000 from the Low
Income Garbage Fund to fund City-wide refuse collection."
Councilmember Hanna made a motion to adopt the resolution;
Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion which carried by the
following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Hanna, Lucas, Monsef and
President Diament - 4. Noes: None. Absent: None. Abstentions:
Councilmember Corica - 1. (Councilmember Corica abstained because a
relative works for Oakland Scavenger Company.)
INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES
86-124 Introduction of Ordinance No. , "Amending the Alameda
Municipal Code by adding Chapter 8 to Title II thereof relating to
local preference in awarding bids for goods and service."
Councilmember
"Findings",
"Notification"
bidders.
In response,
2-823 is so
selected.
Corica stated that he believed Section 2-823, entitled
is too bulky, and that Section 2-821, entitled
should not provide a different process for local
Councilmember Lucas stated that the reason for Section
that Council will know why a local business is not
Councilmember Hanna stated that it appears the City has been inclined
to seek services from somewhere else.
President Diament noted that in the past there have been situations
where local people have had a stranglehold on things, thus it is
important to have have some kind of balance.
After Council discussion regarding Section 2-821, the City Attorney
suggested that the section be amended to read "local businesses shall
not be excluded from notice."
Councilmember Lucas concurred with the suggested amendment.
Councilmember Lucas made a motion to introduce the ordinance with the
amendment; Councilmember Hanna seconded the motion which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
86-125 Ordinance No. , "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by
amending Chapter 5 of Title I thereof relating to persons
authorized to enforce violations by infraction citations."
Councilmember Hanna moved that the ordinance be introduced;
Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion which carried by the
following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Hanna, Lucas, Monsef and
President Diament - 4. Noes: Councilmember Corica - 1. Absent:
None.
FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCES
86-126 Ordinance No. 2274i N.S. "Amending Measure A enabling
ordinance relating to rebuilding of destroyed structures."
Councilmember Corica moved final passage of the ordinance;
Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Lucas stated that she had a problem
with the team "of record," because she does not believe that the
City's records are accurate. Councilmember Lucas illustrated that
someone's building could be destroyed and permitted to rebuild
according to what is "of record" without anyone knowing that the
building has not been used as a fourplex for years.
After additional discussion by the Council on the subject,
Councilmember Corica's motion carried by the following vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Corica, Hanna, Monsef and President Diament - 4.
Noes: Councilmember Lucas - 1. Absent: None.
NEW BUSINESS
86-127 Councilmember Lucas requested that the Traffic Advisory
Committee investigate the "no parking" sign at Paden School which
prohibits parking between 7:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Councilmember
Lucas commented that vehicles are being cited when, in fact, the
school is not operating during the daytime.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council, President
Diament adjourned the meeting at 12:15 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
,67
Diane B. Felsch
City Clerk