Loading...
1986-12-02 Regular CC Minutes274 REGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA DECEMBER 2, 1986 The meeting convened at 7:40 p.m. (at the conclusion of the Housing Authority meeting) with President Diament presiding. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Monsef. Reverend Wilfred Hodgkin gave the invocation. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Corica, Hanna, Lucas, Monsef and President Diament. MINUTES Councilmember Hanna made a motion for approval of the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of November 18, 1986. Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. CONSENT CALENDAR Fred Scullin, 1120 Chestnut Street, requested that Item 1-B, regarding the Cable Oversight Committee Annual Report be removed to the regular agenda. Councilmember Monsef moved for adoption of the Consent Calendar, with the exception of Item 1-B. Councilmember Hanna seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk. CONSENT CALENDAR REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS *86-683 From Chairman of the Historical Advisory Commission regarding rehabilitation of City buildings. Accepted. *86-684 From Public Works Director recommending acceptance of the work by Monterey Mechanical Company for Willow Street/Whitehall Place Sanitary Sewer Pump Station Modification and Force Main, P.W. No. 4-86-8. Accepted. *86-685 From Public Works Director recommending acceptance of the work by Gateway Construction, Inc., for landscape improvements, Parcel 3, Parcel Map 4507, Harbor Bay Business Park Assessment District 84-4, P.W. No. 7-85-22. Accepted. *86-686 From Public Works Director and Fire Chief regarding the status of State-mandated Fire Safety and Exit Program, Title 24, Article 7, of California Administrative Code. Accepted. 275 RESOLUTIONS *86-687 Resolution No. 11059. "Designating the week of December 14 - 20, 1986 as 'National Drunk and Drugged Driving Awareness Week." Adopted. *86-688 Resolution No. 11060. "Approving Parcel Map 4890 for division of property within Harbor Bay Business Park on the southeast side of South Loop Road, permitting recording thereof, and finding said Parcel Map consistent with the City's General Plan." Adopted. BILLS 86-689 A List of Claims, certified by the City Manager as correct, was approved in the amount of $784,486.61. RETURN TO REGULAR AGENDA WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 86-690 From President, Oakland Scavenger Company, 2601 Peralta Street, Oakland, regarding merger of Oakland Scavenger Company with Waste Management, Inc. (Held over from October 21 Council meeting.) President Diament noted that the Refuse Rate Review Committee has met; they still have some questions and have asked for additional material from Waste Management Incorporated and will be asking Price Waterhouse to review the matter; and, in the meantime, the services will be continued by Oakland Scavenger. Councilmember Monsef questioned whether or not the City will have the right to accept or not accept the transfer of the franchise agreement, to which the City Manager responded that it is one of the questions that the Refuse Rate Review Committee will be investigating. Councilmember Hanna made a motion to accept the communication. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 86-691 From David L. Collins, Assistant Secretary, Alameda Marina Village Associates, 1150 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 100, requesting Council's consideration of the facts outlined in his letter regarding Neptune's Galleon's sign, and reconsideration of liberalizing provisions for off-premise signs. Councilmember Hanna moved acceptance of the communication. Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion and it was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Hanna, Lucas, Monsef, and President Diament - 4. Noes: Councilmember Corica - 1. Absent: None. 276 Councilmember Hanna made a motion that the related resolution be taken out of order. Councilmember Lucas seconded the notion. Councilmember Corica commented that both parties involved were present and he questioned the Public Works Director regarding the present signs being unacceptable. The Public Works Director noted that once the amendment to the sign ordinance is approved, and the lease agreement is approved, the City will work with both Neptune Galleon and Marina Village to come up with an acceptable sign; that Mr. Perreira is agreeable to the way the lease agreement has been written and he will work with the City for a sign acceptable to all parties; and that the present sign will be amended. Councilmember Corica commented that perhaps Council might be acting too hastily and asked if Mr. Perreira was satisfied with the size of the sign, to which Mr. Perreira responded he was. Councilmember Lucas asked if the introduction to the sign ordinance amendment would be agendized for the next meeting, to which the City Attorney stated it must go to the Planning Board first, and the matter under discussion can be handled on the basis of the lease alone. RESOLUTIONS 86-692 Resolution No. 11061 "Approving lease of ninety-six square feet of property with Marina Village Associates for off-street directional signs." Adopted. Councilmember Hanna moved for adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember Lucas made a motion to refer the proposed amendment to the Planning Board. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion, and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 86-693 From Richard and Peggy Williams, Alameda Coffee & Tea Merchant, 2306 Central Avenue, urging Council to acquire the property at the north-east corner of Central Avenue and Oak Street, and convert it to parking for Park Street businesses. Councilmember Hanna Councilmember Lucas unanimous voice vote 86-694 From Ray L. taxis in Alameda. made a motion to accept the communication. seconded the motion and it was carried by - 5. Lillywhite, 1227 Ballena Blvd., regarding Charles Tillman, 2415 Roosevelt Drive, noted the problems of taxi cab service in the City response time, lack of cleanliness, and difficulty in communication. 277 President Diament commented that the Police Chief has requested more stringent requirements. The City Attorney commented that he has drafted provisions to ordinance, at the request of the Police Department, allowing the City to cite taxicab owners for failure to maintain their vehicles during the year. President Diament directed to the replied that could and, regarding the the Mastick Senior questioned whether complaints should be Police Department, to which the City Manager be an appropriate place to register complaints scrip program, complaints could be directed to Center where that program is coordinated. Councilmember Lucas stated she would like to know if there is a history of complaints about cabs under the taxi scrip program and wants to know the record as to response time and other problems, to which the City Manager stated staff would report. Councilmember Hanna noted that the staff is reviewing the matter and will be bringing the results to Council. Councilmember Monsef made a motion to accept the communication. Councilmember Hanna seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 86 -695 From Doris Ung, 1021 Island Drive, expressing objection to the decision regarding establishing underground utility districts. Councilmember Corica commented that Public Works Director's report noted that it is the property owner's responsibility to underground and the City or the Bureau would assist, but it was the Councilmember's intention that the Bureau extend the construction right up to the house, while they were present to do the undergrounding, so that cost would be kept down. The Public Works Director stated that the property owners were allowed a choice of using the Bureau's contractor, their own contractor, or even digging the trench themselves (with inspection); that the cost would be provided to the property owners in advance to enable them to decide which way they wished to go and to use .the method that might even be less costly than the Bureau contractor. President Diament commented that the report of the Public Works Director also noted that a neighborhood meeting would be held at the appropriate time, and that Mrs. Ung has made some helpful suggestions. Councilmember Hanna made a motion to accept the communication. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 278 86 -696 From Bill Kane, 2615 Bayview Drive, regarding committee service concerned with aircraft noise and airport problems. President Diament noted that Mr. Kane is a pilot and has had experience with airport problems. Councilmember Lucas suggested Council propose to the Project Coordination Committee that Mr. Kane be a member of the Committee along with Ms. Eichten - Alioto; and that staff contact Mr. Foster of the Port of Oakland regarding the appointments. Council agreed that Mr. Kane's name should be proposed for the committee. Councilmember Monsef made a motion to accept the communication. Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 86 -697 From Henry Woon, 3536 McSherry Way, regarding airport traffic problems over residential homes in the Heritage of Alameda project area. President Diament noted this is a matter of a homeowner's concern that his home might not be up to acoustical standards of the area. The City Manager noted homes constructed in that area were required to meet rigid criteria in terms of construction to avoid noise problems, and that inspectors are rechecking to be sure something was not inadvertently overlooked. Councilmember Lucas requested Council receive a copy of the report of the results of staff's investigation. Councilmember Hanna asked if an acoustical consultant has been contacted, to which the City Manager responded that staff is asking Council for authority to solicit proposals. Councilmember Hanna moved that staff be given the authority, Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember Hanna made a motion to accept the communication Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 86 -698 From Tom Fox, Council Member, City of Emeryville, 2449 Powell Street, requesting local support to permanently light the Bay Bridge. Councilmember Lucas mentioned that a Times -Star article notes that Council Member Fox has withdrawn his request from his City Council. 279 President Diament stated she has not received any withdrawal. Councilmember Hanna made a motion to accept the communication without any recommendation. Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. HEARINGS 86-699 Hearing regarding the acquisition of property located at 2305 Central Avenue. President Diament noted that the persons representing Mr. Delanoy have asked that their time be extended in which to speak. Councilmember Lucas made a motion to extend the time. Councilmember Hanna seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. The City Manager explained the background of the matter, noting that the particular location was identified in the Park Street Revitalization Plan as an excellent location for potential additional public parking; and that it is not currently utilized, therefore it does not remove a business or residence. The public portion of the meeting was opened. Fred Scullin, 1120 Chestnut Street, questioned the use of the word "necessity" in the related resolution. On the call for proponents, the following spoke: Gertrude Wood, 1247 Sherman Street, Chairman of the Library Board. Diane Coler-Dark, 1528 Park Street. (Ms. Coler-Dark also presented a map and a petition in favor of the acquisition to Council.) On the call for opponents, the following spoke: John Barnard, 1134 Ballena Blvd., attorney for property owner. Council addressed the issue of whether or not the site would be considered for a new library. The City Manager stated that the purpose at the present time is for parking. Councilmember Corica noted that he was going to propose the matter be held over until Council meets with the Library Board. Following additional comments, Councilmember Lucas stated that Council is talking about parking, and when the resolution is addressed, Council should eliminate the reference to "public building." The City Manager stated the City condemned property for the 280 Police Administration Building and the Employees' Parking Lot, and that the question is whether the City is held to using the properties for those particular purposes only. The City Manager added that the property under discussion is necessary for public parking, and if Council wishes to use it for another purpose, it may. Councilmember Hanna inquired of Mr. Barnard if he was aware that condemned property allowed significant tax advantage to a property owner, to which Mr. Barnard replied he had no information on the subject. Peter N. Delanoy, 1624 Harrison Street, property owner. Dorothy Madsen, 2226 1/2 Buena Vista Avenue. Larry Patton, 1020 San Antonio Avenue. The public portion of the hearing was closed. The City Attorney commented that there may have been a mistaken impression as to the legal standard involved; that this is not a judicial hearing where evidence is decided; that the purpose of a resolution of intent is to create a presumption of necessity; and "necessity" means "necessity to accomplish your goal", not "necessity" in the colloquial sense. Councilmember Hanna noted he has talked to school faculty and businesses in the area; that Council has discussed related matters many times, and that parking in this area is a necessity. Councilmember Corica stated that condemnation bothers him and asked if double-decking of the City parking lots has been considered, to which the City Manager replied that it has and that it would cost approximately $10,000.00 per space, with a cost of a half million dollars pursuant to a quote of four years ago; but the subject property would be at $7000.00 per space, and the time to have it ready would be very short. Councilmember Lucas stated that, City Hall lots could be done, the the parking is needed for the Park Historical High School and for the President Diament commented that established. even if the double-decking of location is not good, because Street businesses, the Alameda Library. the need for parking is well Councilmember Corica inquired if plans were underway to also find parking for the Webster Street area, to which the City Manager replied that there have already been meetings with representatives of the West Alameda Business Association, and entered into discussions with them about locating an on-street parking area; it was acknowledged that resources were limited and that an attempt would be made to find an area that was available for leasing in a primarily underutilized location, such as an abandoned or underutilized building or other area, or 281 possibly the area between Haight and Lincoln Streets that the Council had identified as part of the redevelopment plan and that also would require condemnation. Councilmember Monsef noted that there is a tendency to talk about things and never move on them; traffic and parking are the two major items talked about in the City; and sometimes it is necessary to go ahead with condemnation even though we don't like it, and he will therefore support the acquisition of the property. Councilmember Lucas made a motion to take the related resolution out of order. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Hanna, Lucas, Monsef and President Diament - 4. Noes: Councilmember Corica 1. Absent: None. 86-700 Resolution No. 11062 "Resolution of Necessity authorizing the acquisition of certain property for the construction of a public improvement, namely, the Civic Center Expansion Project, finding that public interest and necessity require the proposed project, that the location thereof causes the least private injury, and that the subject property is necessary for the proposed project." Councilmember Lucas made a motion to adopt the resolution with one amendment, that the resolution state "for parking spaces," and eliminate the words "public building." Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by the following roll call vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Hanna, Lucas, Monsef and President Diament - 4. Noes: Councilmember Corica - 1. Absent: None. Councilmember Monsef stated that there were a number of school children waiting for Item No. 17 regarding the crossing guard, and he made a motion the matter be taken out of order. Councilmember Corica seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 86-701 Resolution No. 11063. "Amending the Salary Resolution by authorizing an additional school-crossing guard position." Rev. Wilfred Hodgkins, 1036 College, representing Otis School PTA, expressed concern for children who must cross High Street, which is an extremely crowded and busy street, and asked for support of a crossing guard. Patricia R. Almason, 1635 Buena Vista Avenue, commented she supported a crossing guard for the Edison School, and added that she started campaigning for one when she saw a child almost get hit by a car at Broadway and Buena Vista. Heather Wong, Vice President of the Student Council at Otis School stated she was present to support the crossing guard. 282 Kimberly Finnicum, Student Council Secretary, stated she was present to support the need for a crossing guard for Otis School. Joy Sherratt, stated she was a member of the Student Council and was present for support of a crossing guard. Heather Wong and Kimberly Finnicum read a statement requesting Council to recognize the need for a crossing guard, and noting there had been a meeting of students at the school. They presented to Council a petition which had been signed by all students in the school. Barbara Thomas, 1118 Paru Street, commented that she found it difficult to cross Broadway in a car and believed that children should not be required to walk across Broadway without a light or a crossing guard. President Diament noted that the recommendation is that a crossing guard be assigned at the intersection of Fillmore and High Streets; that one be assigned to the intersection of Broadway and Buena Vista Avenue, and that the crossing guard location at Atlantic Avenue and Poggi Street be deleted. Councilmember Hanna made a motion to adopt the resolution. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. APPEALS 86 -702 Appeal of Brian S. Rodriguez, Eric J. Rodriguez, and Dana R. Rodriguez regarding tree removal at 1501 -05 Sixth Street. Dana Rodrigues, 1505 6th Street, also representing his brothers who, with him, own the properties at 1505 and 1507 6th Street, stated it was a waste of the City's time and money to take down the tree; that it is healthy and adds aesthetic value. Councilmember Lucas stated she had looked at the tree; it seems healthy; that perhaps only a tall van could not park under it. Councilmember Lucas made a motion that the appeal be upheld. The Public Works Director stated there is a potential danger of trucks hitting it, evidence that it has been hit, that the tree is in good condition; and that the City is only considering removing it to prevent liability to the City in the future. Councilmember Corica suggested the tree be shaved in order to allow clearance. The Public Works Director noted that the tree could be damaged by cutting. 283 Mr. Rodriguez agreed that would be acceptable to him. Councilmember Monsef seconded Councilmember Lucas' motion to uphold the appeal and leave the tree. President Diament commented she was concerned about the liability of the City. Councilmember Hanna inquired what other problems the City has had, to which the Public Works Director stated the City has had claims in other areas where vans and trucks have hit low trees, and branches have been knocked off trees; and that in this case, it is not a branch that is hanging, but it is the trunk that is leaning and therefore could cause severe damage to delivery trucks and other vehicles. President Diament commented that she could vote for the motion if the tree could be shaved sufficiently. Councilmember Lucas agreed to amend the motion. The motion was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 86 -703 From City Manager submitting results of Traffic Pattern Survey at the South Shore Shopping Center. Barbara Thomas, 1118 Paru Street, stated she was concerned that the survey might not be an accurate reflection of actual shoppers due to the hours and locations at which surveys were taken; that the Harsch Development information presented to Council showing that 50% of the charge slips at Mervyns were signed by Alamedans appears to be more accurate. The City Manager commented that the hours selected were times when volunteers were available. Fred Scullin, 1120 Chestnut Street, commented on the percentages and other details of the report, noting that 38% of the shoppers use Park Street; and questioned why the survey was being made. Councilmember Lucas commented that the Council requested staff to work on the problem because there have been many complaints from Park Street residents regarding the traffic. The City Manager added that one of the objectives in the budget this year adopted in July, 1986, suggested that more empirical data along these lines be developed relating to traffic generators in the community and this process began as a result of that objective along with pursuing the studies referred to this evening. Councilmember Lucas made a motion to accept the report and authorize staff to continue with plans to conduct the survey at 284 other locations within the City. Councilmember Hanna seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 86-704 From the Public Works Director regarding preparation of final plans for City Hall renovation work. The Public Works Director explained the matter which included structural changes, interior changes, the concerns of the Historical Advisory Commission, and the seismic bracing. Councilmember Lucas inquired if the City received a Grant for Historic Preservation, whether the City would be permitted to cover the barrel vault ceiling, to which the Public Works Director responded that it is not yet known what they will require; and that no response is expected until February. David Plummer, Chairman of the Historical Advisory Commission addressed Council regarding the barrel vault ceiling in the Personnel/Finance area, and requested Council to, at least, obtain a drawing for it. Councilmember Lucas said she would like to follow the advice of the Historical Advisory Commission. Mr. Plummer said an arched diaphragm would present alternatives but a flat diaphragm would not. Councilmember Hanna inquired where the money would come from, to which the City Manager responded it can be (1) saved from operating revenues, (2) borrowed, perhaps through bonds, or (3) possibly Federal Government funds may be available. Councilmember Hanna inquired, if the State approved a grant, how long would they hold it, to which the City Manager replied they would probably hold it for a year. Councilmember Hanna stated he would support the additional money involved in an alternate set of plans so they would at least be available whenever funding could be arranged. Councilmember Lucas made a motion to accept the report and recommendation and additional money for design work to include an alternate plan for the preservation of the barrel-vaulted ceiling over the Finance/Personnel area. Councilmember Hanna seconded the motion and it was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Hanna, Lucas, Monsef and President Diament - 4. Noes: Councilmember Corica - 1. Absent: None. Councilmember Corica said he voted no because he believed the average man on the street is not interested in how the City Hall looks if it costs a great deal of money. Councilmember Hanna stated the City should probably do something about the structural reinforcing of the building and inquired if 285 there were time estimates on that, to which the City Manager said the cost estimates would be close to $750,000.00; that when the structural work is done, the walls, and floors must be torn out, and basically the building must be opened up, and therefore, that is the time to replace old plumbing, old wiring, and patchwork telephone lines; that the building is durable but must be refurbished at some point. 86-705 From Cable Television Oversight Committee submitting an Annual Report. Fred Scullin, 1120 Chestnut Street, commented that he believed the report was skimpy and should not be accepted. The City Manager noted that Ordinance 2240 separates the responsibilies of the Oversight Committee, to monitor the franchise and to report on overall operation because they believed that listing activities would be duplicating the information submitted in October. Councilmember Hanna made a motion to accept the report. Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. RESOLUTIONS 86-706 Resolution No. 11064 "Authorizing the filing of an application with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for allocation of Transportation Development Act Funds for Fiscal Year 1987-88." Adopted. Councilmember Hanna made a motion to adopt the resolution. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was adopted by unanimous voice vote - 5. INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES 86-707 Ordinance No. N.S. An interim ordinance prohibiting and suspending issuance of building permits for construction on certain properties that are inconsistent with proposed zoning (Fernside and Gibbons). James Stonehouse,- 2990 Northwood Drive, stated he has a signed contract for the purchase of the property for professional office space, and which he believes is compatible to the neighborhood; that he presented the "idea" to the neighbors, including Mrs. Carbone, and they were not opposed, and he asked that Council not introduce the proposed ordinance. Councilmember Hanna asked Mr. Stonehouse what the probability is that his plans will be completed, to which Mr. Stonehouse stated that he had a 60-day cancellation clause to see if architectural plans and City requirements can be met. 286 Councilmember Hanna inquired if Mr. Stonehouse could let Council know if he will cancel, to which Mr. Stonehouse stated he would. Councilmember Hanna commented that the matter could be tabled until Mr. Stonehouse informs Council of outcome. Councilmember Corica stated he agreed but would like wording added as follows: "or such time as any member of the City Council wishes to put it back on the agenda." Antoinette Carbone, 3121 Fernside Blvd., stated she believed Mr. Stonehouse's plan is acceptable to her and the neighbors approached, but that if his plans cannot be carried out, then they would like continuation of the rezoning. Councilmember Hanna made a motion to ask the Planning Board to hold the matter in abeyance, and that the Ordinance be tabled. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember Corica commented the handling of the matter was a good example of Alamedans working together to improve a situation of concern. John Barni, 875 Island Drive, commented that C-1 zoning would still require a Use Permit and therefore require a hearing. FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCES 86-708 Ordinance No. 2312 "An interim ordinance prohibiting exemptions from parking requirements of up to fifty percent (50%) of existing buildings or changes in use which would require less than fifty percent (50%) more parking." Councilmember Hanna made a motion to approve passage of the Ordinance. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 86-709 Report on Planning Board consideration of proposed Traffic Management Initiative Ordinance. Fred Scullin, 1120 Chestnut Street, stated that the matter was being handled in a rather hasty fashion. Larry Patton, 1020 San Antonio Avenue, stated that the initiative ordinance is very confusing and difficult to read. President Diament noted that the initiative was turned in today. Dorothy Madsen, 2226 1/2 Buena Vista Avenue, commented that the voters are going to vote in April on the initiative and that they 287 don't want a lot of money spent; that they don't want $50,000.00 spent on a consultant. The City Manager stated the sum will not exceed $5,000.; staff is not suggesting that $50,000.00 be spent. Peg Roberts, 120 La Campania added objections to spending $50,000.00. President Diament commented that apparently the citizens were not aware that the recommendation is against spending the $50,000.00. Barbara Thomas said she is glad the recommendation is against spending $50,000.00, and suggested that any study of the ordinance be given to the traffic committee for review, and if the Planning Board is to come up with an alternative ordinance, they should be allowed to do their job. Councilmember Corica stated he thought the Committee was to study traffic, not to come up with an alternative Ordinance. President Diament stated that was not the charge to the Committee. Ccuncilmenbcar Lucas asked for an update on what the Committee is doing. President Diament replied that the last meeting was discussion and choosing a consultant but tomorrow the consultant will address the committee on how to look at traffic systems management and talk about what other cities have done. The City Manager stated he believed the matter went to Planning Board because it was an initiative ordinance that would amend the General Plan, and, at that time, it had not qualified for the ballot so there was some question about whether the Council would take action on their own to put it on. The question is back before the Council to consider that undertaking additional studies contemplated by the Planning Board at their last meeting woiuld be at a cost of approximately $50,000.00. The City Attorney stated the history is that initially, the people asked Council to put it on the ballot and the Council had to place it before the Planning Board, before it could be adopted. When, the proponents come in with their signatures, they may again request Council adopt it and it may still be necessary to consider it. Councilmember Corica made a motion that the Council direct the Planning Board to take no further action at this time. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion, and commented that he would like to see Council put the ordinance on the ballot. 288 Councilmember Lucas stated she would like to find out from the City Attorney, when Council will have to act on them, as to whether Council will put it on the ballot, or enact the ordinance. The City Clerk noted that it would be either the first or second meeting in January that it would come before Council in the form of a resolution to put it on the ballot. The motion to direct Planning Board to take no further action was carried by unanimous voice - 5. Councilmember Lucas made a motion to direct staff to report back to Council with the Planning Board verbatim at the same time that Council is required to act on the signatures. Councilmember Corica stated he did not believe it was necessary, and that he had watched the meeting and that the Planning Board had tried hard but had come up with nothing, and inquired what Councilmember Lucas felt could be of value. Councilmember Lucas stated there was a lot of testimony as to the cost of the ordinance and she believes it would affect her decision as to whether she would vote for enactment of initiative or put it on ballot. Councilmember Monsef stated he would vote against the motion because he would like the verbatim as soon as possible. Councilmember Hanna seconded the motion and it was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Hanna, Lucas and President Diament - 3. Noes: Councilmembers Corica and Monsef - 2. Absent: None. Councilmember Hanna stated that the City Council's job is to handle the business of the community and understand the ramifications of any action or ballot in Alameda, and to make available to the voters the probable effects of a ballot measure so they may vote with knowledge and that is exactly what he plans to do. Councilmember Corica stated he signed the petition, and he suggested proponents put it on the ballot, and let the voters decide. Mr. Patton requested to speak. Councilmember Lucas made a motion to grant permission to Larry Patton to speak. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Mr. Patton stating he was confused and wanted to know why the item was on the agenda if there was no report from the Planning Board. 289 President Diament explained the report and recommendation to him. 86-710 Councilmember Corica stated that a street was to be named after Rob Davey, a policeman who was killed in the line of duty, but it had not been done and he made a motion to put the matter on the agenda for the next meeting. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion. President Diament commented that perhaps it could go directly to the Planning Board. The City Manager commented that it has been to the Planning Board and as a result, there is a Rob Davey Plaza in the Marina Village area, and the Police Department has been notified. President Diament commented that there should be some City recognition of the Plaza. The City Manager commented he could come back with a full report to the next meeting. Councilmember Monsef stated he believed that would be a good idea. NEW BUSINESS 86-711 Consideration of appointment to Alameda Mosquito Abatement District Board. President Diament noted she had not received any name suggestions or volunteers. Staff was directed to provide a nominee. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, GENERAL 86-712 Charles Tillman, 2415 Roosevelt Drive, commented on the death of Commander Batters and upon the request of President Diament, related a few facts about Commander Batters, noting that he was in the American Legion, he had been a diver in World War I and World War 11, and was a Medal of Honor recipient. 86-713 Mr. Tillman said he would appreciate knowing the footage involved in the lease with the Chamber of Commerce. The City Manager stated he would provide the information to Mr. Tillman. ADJOURNMENT President Diament 290 adjourned the meeting in memory of Commander Batters at 11:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, A 6 Dine B. Felsch, City Clerk