1964-04-21 Regular CC MinutesREGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA
HELD TUESDAY EVENING APRIL 21, 1964
The meeting convened at 7:30 o'clock p.m. with President Godfrey presiding. The Pledge of Alle-
giance was led by Councilman McCall and was followed by an inspiring Invocation delivered by The
Reverend Mr, Franklin Scott, Pastor of Santa Clara Avenue Methodist Church.
ROLL CALL:
The roll was called and Councilmen Freeman, La Croix, Jr,, McCall, Rose and President Godfrey,
(5), were noted present. Absent: None.
MINUTES:
/
/
�
l. Councilmao Freeman requested that the Council's receipt of two communications be noted in the
minutes of the regular meeting held April 7, 1964, as follows: (1) A telegram from Mrs. Inez
Kapellas, 1128 College Avenue, concerning her membership on the Citizens Committee for Community
Improvement, and the request by the Chairman of said Committee for her resignation therefrom; (2)
A request from Mr. Boyd Bisbee, 1611 Bay Street, to put the question of the Park Centre Project to
a vote of the people.
The minutes of said regular meeting and of the adjourned regular meeting held April 7 and 9, 1964,
respectively, were then approved as transcribed.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
2.v `/ From Utah Construction & Mining Co., signed by Mr. H. L. McGinnis, Resident Engineer, South
Shore Project, requesting that the public improvements in Tract No. 1898, South Shore Unit II, as
itemized in its letter of April 14, 1964, be accepted.
Mr. Weller read a memorandum received this date from City Engineer Hanna verifying that said improve-
ments had been completed to the satisfaction of his office, and recommending acceptance thereof.
Councilman McCall moved the public improvements in said Tract No. 1898, as indicated in the City
Engineer's memorandum, be approved. The motion was seconded by Councilman Rose.
Speaking on the question, Councilman Freeman inquired about the fire alarm system in this area and
she was informed by Mr. Hanna that the entire system had been installed and was operative.
The question was then put and the motion carried on the following roll cull vote. Ayes: Five. Noes:
None. Absent: None.
3. From Alameda Junior Chamber of Commerce, signed by Mr. Stanley J. Budge, Project Chairman,
requesting approval of the installation of a "Navy Jet Fighter Plane" in Woodstock Park.
The matter was referred to "Resolutions".
4. From @r. Raoul B. Blanqoie, owner of certain Park Street properties together with several mem-
bers of his family, expressing their support of the plans of the Redevelopment Agency for the
rehabilitation of Park Street.
The communication was noted, ordered acknowledged and then referred to the file on the subject.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
5. Mr. Frank Gottstein, 731 Haight Avenue, spoke at length in protest against the unsightly appear-
ance of the Alameda Belt Line spur track which ran along Atlantic Avenue between Webster and Main
Streets. Be urged that steps be taken to have the track removed.
Mr. Hanna reported that when this matter had been reviewed about a year ago, the Belt Line Railroad
had stated the Naval Air Station required this track as a possible defense facility.
^/
6. Mrs. Inez Kapellaa, 1128 College Avenue, spoke of the proposed terminus at Alameda for the new
Southern Bay Bridge and inquired what the City had done on this question.
President Godfrey stated representatives of the City had arranged to meet with Governor Brown and
other State officials on Monday, April 27, in an effort to ascertain exactly what plans were in
progress for this transbay route.
Mr. Gottstein expressed his views on the subject and urged the Council to protest vigorously against
a bridge terminus being established in Alameda. He said he thought the cities of San Leandro or
Hayward were in favor of having the new Southern Crossing terminus in their vicinity.
HEARINGS:
7:7 The matter was called up concerning an Appeal, filed by Mr, Bolenlauu Przybycien, from the deci-
sion of the City Planning Board to deny his application to allow three dwelling units on a lot of
insufficient area. The property was knowna s 1530 Lincoln Avenue.
The Clerk read certain explanatory comments by the Planning Director who was unable to be present at
this meeting. It was pointed up that the lot deficiency was 814.5 square feet and the Staff strongly
recommended that this request be denied as it would establish a dangerous precedent.
Upon request, Mr. Cunningham stated that the legal issue before the Council was whether or not the
action of the Planning Board under Section 11-161(b) and (e) of the Zoning Ordinance should be
affirmed, modified or reversed.
The President called for the proponents in the matter and there was no response. Upon the call for
the opponents to the question, Mr. Jerry Campbell, Sales Manager of Palm Homes, Inc., spoke on behalf
of Mr. Przybycien.
Mr. Campbell explained the economic circumstances involved in his client's plan to remove an old
structure containing three living units and erect a new three-unit apartment house. He pointed up
the inconsistency of the zoning in this area in view of the size of the lots.
Mr. Przybycien emphasized that he was endeavoring to improve his property and the neighborhood but
it was not feasible to demolish the existing income apartments and replace the building with only two
living units in the new otructure.
Following more discussion of the situation and with the consent of the property owner, the President
continued the Hearing on this matter to the Council meeting of May 5, 1964, in order that further
'information might be obtained from the Planning Director during the interim, and also that the prop-
erty in question might be personally inspected.
The Clerk was instructed to remind Messrs. Przybycien and Campbell at the proper time concerning said
continued Hearing.
8. The matter was presented concerning the continued Hearing on Resolution No. 6519 with regard to
the preliminary determination that public convenience and necessity require the improvement of Garden
Road under the formation of an Assessment District.
"//
9. The matter was presented concerning the continued Hearing on Resolution of Intention No. 6522 to
order the improvement of Garden Road between County and 8ecartney Roads under the formation of an
Assessment District.
There being no objections, the Hearings on both of these matters were omntinued to the Council meeting
of May 19, 1964.
REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS, ETCETERA: .
"~/,
lov From the City Manager, recommending contract be awarded to Morris Landy Motors, as lowest and best
bidder, for Furnishing One 3/4-ton Chassis, Cab Truck with Surveyor Body, at the total cost of
$3,577.68.
Councilman Rose moved the recommendation be adopted; that the contract be awarded to the designated
firm for furnishing the specified vehicle at the price quoted. The motion was seconded by Councilman
Freeman and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
11. From the City Manager, recommending contract be awarded to Ransome Company, low bidder, for the
project of Resurfacing Sherman Street northerly of the Segregation Line, at the total cost of
$3,348.50.
Councilman La Croix moved the recommendation be accepted; that the contract be awarded to said com-
pany for the project indicated at the total cost qooted. The motion was seconded by Councilman; Rose
and carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
12. From the City Manager, recommending the contract be awarded to J. H. Fitzmaurice, Inc., low
bidder, for the project of Constructing Arch Culvert at Santa Clara Avenue and Third Street, at the
total cost of $7,902,40.
Councilman La Croix moved the recommendation be followed; that the contract be awarded to this firm
for the specified project at the price quoted. The motion was seconded by Councilman Rose and carried
on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
,�
]]. From the City Manager, recommending the contract be awarded to BEPCO, Inc., low bidder, for the
project of Wrecking and Removal of the Armory Building in Washington Park, at the total cost of $1,470.
Councilman La Croix moved the recommendation be adopted; that the contract be awarded to the deaig-
nated firm for the specified project at the price quoted. The motion was seconded by Councilman � Rose
and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
L—� l4. From the City Attorney, proposing that the Council adopt a resolution designating May 1, l964,
for recognition and celebration of "Law Day D. S. A."
Councilman McCall commended Mr. Cunningham for the ideals set forth in his letter, calling attention
to the rights enjoyed by every citizen and emphasizing the individual responsibilities correlative
with rights in the observance of certain duties.
The President stated that KPIX TV Station was also very impressed with the City Attorney's letter
| `
and resolution and the Mayor's Proclamation and it had been indicated that the Station would do some-
thing in the way of including these sentiments in its program.
The matter was then :referred to 'Resolutions".
15. From the City Manager, reporting all work satisfactorily completed on the project of Installing
a Suspended Ceiling in the Golf Course Restaurant - recommending it be accepted and the Notice of
Completion be ordered filed.,
Councilman McCall moved the recommendation be approved; that the work on this project be accepted
and the Notice of Completion be filed. The motion was seconded by Councilman Freeman and unani-
mouslDcurried.
16.r From the City Manager, concerning the request from Messrs. K. Ward and George Clair for a
Building Permit covering improvements to be made at 2308 Central Avenue. A favorable report had
been received from the Redevelopment Agency.
This matter was referred to "Beoolutions".
17. From the City Manager, recommending approval of Property Division Map No. 106, covering Liao
parcels lying south of Mecartney Road and west of Island Drive. The map was filed by Mason and
Associates, Inc., for the M.G.M. Development Corporation.
The matter was referred to "Resolutions".
INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES:
18. Councilman Freeman introduced the following ordinance, after which it was laid over under pro-
:
vision of law and the Charter:
"Ordinance No.
New Series
An Ordinance Repealing Section 9-211, Article 1, Chapter 2, Title IX,
of the Alameda Municipal Code, Relating to the Construction of Fences
Exceeding Six Feet in Height."
19. Councilman La Croix introduced the following ordinance, after which it was laid over under pro-
vision of law and the Charter:
"Ordinance No.
(
An Ordinance Authorizing Acquisition of Certain Real Property for
General Municipal Purposes (Most Westerly S. W. Corner Otis Drive and
Rosewood Way -- Utah Construction & Mining Co. -- 8.54 Acres)."
20. Councilman McCall introduced the following ordinance, after which it was laid over under pro-
,
vision of law and the Charter:
"Ordinance No.
New Series
An Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding Subdivision
(129) to Section 17-432 Thereof, Relating to Stop Intersections (Shore
Line -- Grand)."
UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
21/ 2l. Councilman Rose referred to a memorandum from the Mayor, dated April 8, 1964, and moved that
the Council go on record in support of the stand which, the Alameda County Board of Supervisors had
taken on the subject of certain Bills before the State Assembly in connection with welfare adminis-
tration, The motion was seconded by Councilman McCall and unanimously carried.
It was agreed the City Attorney could draft an appropriate resolution in accordance with the request
of the Board of Supervisors of Alameda County. The matter was, therefore, referred to "Resolutions".
Councilman Rose also commended the Alameda County Board of Supervisors for their surveillance of
this matter.
22 Councilman M C '' inquired ' had been received from Assemblyman R b Crown
cerniog the possibility of financing the installation of a water line to the Alameda Memorial State
Beach in order that the area could be used this summer for recreational programs.
23. Councilman McCall also asked if any response had been received from the Governor's Office with
regard to the proposed plans for the new Southern Bay Bridge crossing.
24J/ Councilman McCall then expressed his opinion about the publicity which had been given the pos-
sibility of establishing a Junior College in the City of Alameda without first discussing the matter
with the officials of the City itself.
Following some discussion on this subject, Councilman McCall moved that the Council go on record in
support of the Civic Center site in Oakland for the Peralta Junior College. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Rose.
Speaking on the question, Councilman La Croix suggested the motion be amended to include the Coun-
cil's opposition to any site in the City of Alameda for a Junior College. This was acceptable to
both Councilmen McCall and Rose. However, after further discussion, Councilman La Croix-withdrew
his amendment and the original motion carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Five, Noes:
None. Absent: None.
Councilman La Croix then moved that the City Cnuocil go on record in opposition to the proposed
temporary location of the Junior College aite'in' the City of Alameda.
2°1
The motion was seconded by Councilman McCall and carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes:
Four, Noes: President Godfrey, (l). Absent: None.
25.V/ Councilman McCall again spoke of the Southern Crossing situation and reviewed in detail the
history of the proposed plans which had been discussed, prepared and presented from time to time.
He referred to several Assembly Bills and quoted the routes provided therein. Councilman McCall
said he strongly believed that the City delegation which was to meet in Sacramento with certain State
officials on this matter, should be prepared to submit some alternate plan which would be acceptable
to the City - and not just oppose whatever route the State was offering.
Councilman McCall then submitted a route which he felt could be worked out to the mutual satisfac-
tion of all agencies involved. He believed the City of Oakland would support this plan.
It was requested that City Engineer Hanna endeavor to procure copies of all maps and reports cover-
ing this subject for distribution to the Councilmen for their information prior to the meeting in
The President pointed out that the State Toll Bridge Authority had complete jurisdiction in determin-
ing upon the location of a bridge. However, the State Division of Highways must hold Hearings in
the matter of locating the approaches thereto. Further, it was stated that never in the history of
said Agency, had it established the route of bridge approaches without the approval of the munici-
pality affected. Therefore, the President felt the City had some "leverage'' with which to guide the
route of approaches into or through the City of Alameda.
Councilman La Croix expressed his strong opposition to any bridge approach site at all in the City
of Alameda. Councilman Freeman felt the real need was for a second bridge parallel to the San
Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.
Mr. Hanna suggested that those who would be attending the meeting in Sacramento should read the book
entitled, "Iranahay Studies - 1902" - because all of the information which had been presented to
date concerning this subject had been taken from this book.
Further discussion revealed that the City Council was apparently in agreement that the City delegation
should strongly oppose the bridge terminus in any part of the City of Alameda - but, as a last resort,
a compromise could be accepted which would be the least damaging to the City.
26. At this point, President Godfrey nominated 8r. John Ware as a member of the Citizens' Advisory
Committee for Community Improvement to replace Dr. Howard Converse, who had recently resigned.
Councilman Freeman moved the nomination of Mr. John Ware to membership on said Committee be confirmed.
The motion was seconded by Councilman La Croix and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes:
Five, Noes: None. Absent: Noue,
RESOLUTIONS:
27. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Rose, who moved its adoption:
"Resolution No. 6601
Supporting Position of Board of Supervisors of County of Alameda with
Respect to Assembly Concurrent Resolution 0o, 5, Assembly Bill 59, and
Other State Welfare Legislation."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman McCall and on roll call carried by
the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: 0one, Absent: None,
28. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Freeman, who moved its adoption:
"Resolution No. 6602
Designating May 1, 1964, as a Special Day for the Recognition and Observance
of 'Law Day D. S. A.', and Authorizing and Requesting Mayor to Issue
Proclamation Thereof."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman McCall and on roll call carried by
the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
Councilman McCall inquired if some arrangements could be made to publish this resolution or make
copies available for the high school students. He thought everyone should have.the opportunity to
read the sentiments expressed therein. President Godfrey answered that he would be glad to pass
this information on to Mr. A. Hubbard Moffitt, Attorney and also President of the Board of Educa-
tion, who had shown interest in the subject.
29.Y The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Freeman, who moved its adoption:
"Resolution No. 6603
Rescinding Resolutions Nos. 6598 and 6599, Relating to Consolidation
of Special Municipal Election with State Primary Election of June 2,
1964."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman McCall and on roll call carried-by
the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
30. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Freeman, who moved its adoption:
"Resolution No. 6604
Approving Freeway Maintenance Agreement with the State of California
and Authorizing Execution Thereof (State Highway Route 226)."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman McCall and on roll call carried by
the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
31. / The following resolution was introduced by Councilman La Croix, who moved its adoption:
"Resolution No.
Accepting Gift of Airplane from Alameda Junior Chamber of Commerce and
Authorizing Installation Thereof as Playground Fixture at Woodstock Park."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Freeman.
Speaking on the question, President Godfrey stated he recalled the problem the City had in connection
with its liability insurance due to the many accidents which resulted from the use of an "airplane"
which had been installed at Krusi Park several years ago.
Councilman La Croix stated the Junior Chamber of Commerce members had been working on this project
for some time and he commended them for their effort in civic interest. He said he felt the experi-
ence with the first "Jet" had taught them how to eliminate all hazards to safety and he thought it
would be an excellent play-apparatus for Woodstock Park.
There was considerable discussion about this piece of equipment and its effect upon the City's
insurance. Councilman Freeman then withdrew her second to the motion. Upon request, Councilman
La Croix withdrew his motion to adopt said resolution in order that the City Manager could request
Mr. Mainland, Director of Recreation and Parks, to submit a definite report covering this matter,
including the thinking of the insurance carrier and also a recommendation from the Recreation
Commission.
Said resolution was laid over for further Consideration at the next meeting of the Council.
32: 7 "Resolution No.
Finding and Determining That Work Proposed to be Done Under Building
Permit Applied for by K. Ward and George Clair is Compatible with
Redevelopment Plan for Park Centre Project, No. Calif. R-63, and
Authorizing Issuance of Such Permit."
Councilman McCall raised several questions with regard to the type of business proposed to be
operated at this location and felt the adoption of the resolution should be laid over to the Coun-
cil meeting of May 5, 1964, for further consideration at that time. It was so ordered.
| `
33. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Freeman, who moved its adoption:
, "Resolution No. 6605
| ^
Adopting Report of Progress Relating to Elimination of Street Deficiencies
and Authorizing Submission Thereof to State Department of Public Works,
Division of Highways." '
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman La Croix and on roll call carried by
the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
34. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman La Croix, who moved its adoption:
"Resolution No. 6606
Adopting Specifications, Special Provisions and Plans for Installation
of Arch Culverts at Intersections of Taylor Avenue and Sc. Charles Street
and Pacific Avenue and Hibbard Street., Calling for Bids and Directing
City Clerk to Advertise Same."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Rose and on roll call carried by the
following vote. Ayes: Five, Noes: None. Absent: None. ,
35. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Rose, who moved its adoption:
"Resolution No. 6607
Approving Property Division Map No. 106 for Division of Lagorio Property
West of Tract 1250, Bay Farm Island, and Permitting Recording Thereof."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman La Croix and on roll call carried by
the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
36.V /The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Freeman, who moved its adoption:
��
"Resolution No. 6608
In Appreciation and Commendation of Harold E. Crabb, Retiring Treasurer,
Ex-Officio Tax Collector, of the City of Alameda."
The motion to adopc,aaid resolution was seconded by Councilman Rose and on roll call carried by the
following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
The President then declared the foregoing resolutions adopted as indicated.
ORDINANCES FOR PASSAGE:
37. ' "Ordinance No. 1458, !
i
Nev Series
An Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Article 3,
Sections 11-132(a), 11-136(u), and Deleting Sections 11-133(c), 1l-137(c)
Thereof Relating to Private, 0on-Commercial Swimming Pools, Bo at Landings,
Docks, Piers and Similar Structures in R-1 and R-2 Districts."
' ^ •, , /
Councilman McCall moved the ordinance be passed as submitted. The motion was seconded by Councilman /
|
La Croix and o roll cull carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None, Absent: None. |
.
38. "Ordinance No. 1459,
New Series
An Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Item No. 1 /
of Section 10-2318 Thereof, Relating to Fees for Permits and Inspections
(Electrical)."
Councilman La Croix moved the ordinance be passed as submitted. The motion was seconded by Council- |
man Freeman and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent:
Mone.
FILING:
39. Freeway Maintenance Agreement - Between State of California and City of Alameda.
40. Auditor's Financial Statement - City of Alameda, as of March 31, 1964 - Verified by
| 8uchleman & Larzelere.
Plans 41. Specifications, Special Provisions and - Installation of Arch Culverts at Intersections of Taylor Avenue and St. Charles Street and Pacific Avenue and Hibbard
Street. |
/
BILLS:
)
42. An itemized List of Claims against the City of Alameda and the Departments thereof, in the total
amount of $29,019.04, was presented to the Council at this meeting.
The List was accompanied by certification from the City Manager that the Claims shown were correct.
Councilman McCall moved the bills as itemized in the List of Claims filed with the City Clerk on
April 21, 1964, and presented to the Council at this meeting, be allowed and paid. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Rose and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes:
None. Absent: None.
43. There being no further business to come before the meeting, the Council adjourned - to assemble
in adjourned regular session on Wednesday evening, April 29, 1964, in Room 303, City Hall, at
7:30 o'clock.
Respectfully submitted,
City rk
'.`