Loading...
1959-05-19 Regular CC MinutesREGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA HELD TUESDAY EVENING, MAY 19, 1959 The meeting convened at 7:30 o'clock p.m. with President McCall presiding. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Freeman, followed by a most inspiring Invocation delivered by The Reverend Miss Gladys C. Grier, Minister of the Home of Truth. ROLL CALL: The roll was called and Councilmen Collischonn, Freeman, Petersen, Schacht and President McCall, (5), were noted present. Absent: None. MINUTES: 1. The minutes of the regular meeting held May 5, 1959, were approved as transcribed. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: 2. From Waterside Terrace - Thompson Avenue Homeowners Association, signed by Mr. Harry L. Hofmann, President, submitting suggestions for consideration with regard to the proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance pertaining to "Home Occupations ". There being no objections, the matter was referred to the Planning Board, which is now giving study to the subject. 31 From Mr. William Kerry, 1578 Graff Avenue, San Leandro, concerning his purchase of the apartment house at 1804. Santa Clara Avenue and making application for a Use Permit to utilize the "thirteenth" apartment space for his parents. This matter, too, was referred to the Planning Board for further consideration. 4* From Mr. Newton W. Elder, 2206 Encinal Avenue, requesting reconsideration of the Council resolution adopted on May 5, 1959, in opposition to "partisan selection of elective officials ". At the request of Councilman Schacht, the communication was read in full, and was then ordered filed. 5. From Mrs. Peter H. Zars, 1320 St. Charles Street, submitting for consideration three alternate proposals for the development of the sand -lot lands bordering the lagoon. Detailed suggestions were made with regard to the tyre of cover plantings and trees which could be used, the estimated cost of said landscaping and sprinkler installation and the use of prisoners or organized youth groups for the labor involved. At this point, President McCall stated the Council is very much concerned with the problem of blowing sand and dust from the South Shore which has caused much discomfort throughout the City and he called upon the City Manager to present his thinking on the subject. Mr. Weller stated a meeting has been hold with Utah Construction Company on several occasions during the past ten days. He said there is still some difference of opinion between the City and "Utah" about which has the legal responsibility for control of sand on the beach - said beach area, apparently, being the prime source for the present difficulty. However, he felt there is no reason why the public should be faced with this discomfort while a determination is being made as to the responsibility of control. Therefore, he would recommend first - and without any prejudice to the City's future position - to undertake immediately the removal of the sand from the south and north lines of Shoreline Drive; secondly, the City undertake some interim and partial control of the berm area by, perhaps, a water -spray wagon. He emphasized that to find a permanent solution will require more time than it is desired to take right now. Simultaneously with the first two actions, he suggested the City should consult with someone, possibly Professor Johnson of the University of California, to ascertain just who could be contacted to determine what the logical permanent solution of the problem is. He said a number of suggestions have been made toward a solution, all of which cost large sums of money, and he felt that before expenditures of any great magnitude are made, the City should have some reasonable assurance that what is being done will actually do some good. From his personal observation, Mr. Weller stated the bulk of the sand right now appears to be coming from the curb and gutter area, principally along the south side. For the present, he felt the removal of this sand will sub- stantially reduce the problem, and whatever can be worked out during a short period of time will further improve the situation. He said the City should start at once to determine what the ultimate solution ought to be. In connection with these recom- mendations, he said he would like to have an authorization from the Council to expend some reasonable sum of money - possibly $5,000. - to proceed with immediate steps to alleviate this problem., Considerable discussion ensued concerning the entire situation. It was developed that the City has not yet accepted the streets in the Fill Area for maintenance. It was also brought out that the angle of the wind approach is one phase of the problem to be included in the study to be made with some export in this field. The suggestion was made that all prospective building contractors working in the area be requested to keep their particular parcels wet down and thus help control the dust. Mr. Weller pointed out Utah will cooperate fully in this endeavor - he felt it has as sincere a desire as the City in keeping this dust problem minimized. Reference was made to the existing "dust control" ordinance (No. 1255, New Series, adopted November 19, 1957) and the City Attorney stated it is sufficient authorization to notify the contractors concerning the emission of sand and dust from their premises. It was determined that copies of said ordinance would be given to all contractors by the Building Inspector. President McCall stated that, if there were no objections, he would refer Mrs. Zars' letter to the City Manager in order that her suggestions might be given further con- sideration during the survey to be made and she can be informed of the results in appreciation of her interest in this situation. Councilman Schacht then mrved an emergency fund in an amount not to exceed 55,000. be appropriated and made available to the City Manager for a survey of this problem. The motion was seconded by Councilman Collischonn and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: 6. Mr. Frank Gottstein, 731 Haight Avenue, said he felt there would be no remedy to prevent the sand blowing from the Fill Area until it was completely built up with houses. However, he said he wanted to speak of the Fill Area south of Washington Park which is lying idle - and he felt it could be utilized for parking, which is badly needed around said Park. Mr. Gottstein also mentioned the several swimming tanks in the City which had been covered over, located at old Neptune Beach, now Mari- time Training School, and under the baseball diamond at Washington Park. He said all of these were good tanks and now the people need swimming pools. He deplored the fact that the land and these tanks are not being used. He urged the Council to do some- thing about this situation. 7. Mrs. Rosamond Zars, 1320 St. Charles Street, referred to her letter on the subject of the dust control of the area bordering the lagoon. She felt her suggestions could save the City about $5,000. because it would not be necessary to have a survey made. President McCall asked Mrs. Zars to arrange with Mr. Hanna for a meeting to discuss more fully her proposals. 8" Mr. Stanley D. Whitney, Attorney, referred to his communication presented at the last Council meeting, requesting certain amendments to the Alameda Municipal Code rela- tive to closing hours of billiard or pool rooms and the presence of minors therein. He inquired if a report on the matter had been received from the Chief of Police. Mr. Weller explained that he had just received a report from the Chief, the substance of which is that he has no objection to the change of hours, but he sees no merit in the change concerning minors being permitted in said pool rooms. He said he would send copies of the recommendation to the Councilmen and to Mr. Whitney. Mr. Whitney stated that if the Council is willing to modify the ordinance with reference to the hours of closing such establishments, his client would just as soon drop the other matter and not pursue it any further. If the Chief of Police has any objections, his client is willing to go along with his opinion on the subject. Following some discussion, Mr. Annibale suggested the matter be set for the next meet- ing after consideration of the recommendation from Chief Drake. It was so ordered. HEARINGS: 9.� The matter was presented concerning the proposed rezoning of property known as "Chipman Housing Project" from the "R- 4 -PD ", Neighborhood Apartment - Planned Development District, to the "R -5" General Apartment District. This action was initiated by the Council's adoption of hesolution No. 5907. The Clerk stated there is on file the Affidavit of Publication of the Notice of Hearing in this case. The City Planning Board has recommended no change of zone be made. The Clerk read letters of protest against any commercial area being established within the parcel proposed to be rezoned, signed by the following: Mr. B. F. Neville, Real- tor; Messrs. A. C. Finocchio, Ray Coughlan, A. Bianchi (Tim's) and B. F. Kopf; West Alameda Business Association, John E. Mitcheom, President. Mr. Schoenfeld, Secretary of the Planning Board, explained the total area under con- sideration for rezoning is bounded by the California Pacific Lumber Company on the east, to Woodstock Park and School in the west, and from the center lines of Pacific and Atlantic Avenues, south and north, respectively. It was developed that the Board was unanimous in its decision to recommend that the present classification of "R -4 -PD" be retained. Mr. Sam W. Hall, Attorney, addressed the Council on behalf of his clients, Messrs. Joseph Bruzzone and Angelo Ratto, owners of fourteen acres within the parcel in question. He emphasized there are no present plans, or even future tentative plans, to establish any large commercial area in the development of their property with multiple -type family dwellings. Mr. Russell Bruzzone will be the builder. He said the owners feel the 'R -4" District does not allow as high a density as the property justifies and, therefore, they propose a change to the "R -5" District. However, he emphasized the importance of the "PD" designation because, after the property is built up and filled with people, there may develop a need for small, service -type establishments or busi- ness. He pointed out his clients had not made the request for this rezoning and he felt that those who protested against the possible establishment of any commercial area within said land are saying, "we want you to go down the street and rezone some- body else's property so that it will help our own economic present and future ". He pointed up that his clients believe no property rights should be taken away from them - they are interested only in keeping what they have. He stated the density could be justified under the "R -5 ", and he also wanted the "PD" retained. At this point there was further discussion and clarification of the interpretation of the requirements under the classifications of "R -L. ", "R -5 ", "R-4-PD" and "R- 5 -PD ". Mr. Schoenfeld explained that the "PD" designation allows more flexibility in the development of a large parcel of land and still gives the City complete control of the overall layout because the plans en toto are reviewed by the Planning Board to determine if they meet the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance. It was determined that, even though a parcel of land is zoned "R- L. -PD" or "R -5 -PD" and the developer is desirous of keeping within the limitations of regulations for a straight "R -L or teR -5" classification, he does not have to present his complete plans for Planning Board approval before starting construction. Mrs. Marjorie Burns, 2125 Central Avenue, read a prepared statement in protest against the rezoning of this large tract of land for multiple dwellings. It was stated this area could be developed with attractive, medium- priced, FHA- financed, single- family and duplex homes which young married couples could afford to buy and it was recommended that serious consideration be given to an "R -2 ", Two - Family Resi- dence District. It was felt the City would thus receive benefits from substantial home owners rather than "transient" renters. Mr. Hall said he wanted to make it clear that his clients want the rezoning to be to an "R -5 -PD" District, to enable them to utilize the land to its fullest density and also give them the right to submit a planned development possibly in the future. Mr. John E. Mitcheom, President of the West Alameda Business Association, stated his members favor the rezoning to an "R -5" District and they definitely do not want any kind of shopping center or commercial area in the West End of Alameda for the reason that it is not justified. He pointed out there has never been a prospective builder for the area in question whose negotiations have been stopped due to the zoning itself. He mentioned there are already several areas in the West End which are classified in the "C -1 ", "C -2" and "C -3" Districts - Neighborhood Business, Central Business and General Commercial, respectively, which provide ample facilities in this respect. Mr. Frank Gottstein spoke in favor of the rezoning and said he believes the develop- ment of this property will improve the area and bring more revenue to the City. He stated he did not think some small stores for the convenience of the tenants would harm the merchants on Webster Street. Mr. William Stier, 1623 Moreland Drive, stated he is a merchant on Webster Street' and he admitted that business is not good. He spoke on behalf of the "small" busi- ness and said he is very much against the huge type of shopping installations where small businesses are not allowed. Therefore, he is opposed to a business district being made available in the West End because business is already terrible. Councilman Collischonn stated he had instigated the procedure to have this property rezoned primarily because he felt that, since the "Chipman Housing" has been removed, the City should do everything it could to encourage private developers to build low - cost rental apartments. For this reason, he had suggested the zone be changed to an "R -5" District - however, several interested developers and prospective purchasers of certain portions of this area have had no objections to the existing zoning. He said he has, therefore, come to the conclusion that there is no point in striving further to make a change. Councilman Collischonn then moved the recommendation of the Planning Board be approved and the existing classification of this parcel in the "R-4-PD" District be sustained. He felt that if any future developers are not satis- fied with that, then they, themselves, can submit their petition to the Planning Board. Councilman Petersen spoke in favor of the small businessman - believing he is the life -blood of the community. Said merchant not only pays taxes on his business but most of them own their homes and support the City - and he should be protected against any possibility of commercial areas being developed in this particular land. Council- man Petersen said his suggestion would be to reclassify the property to an "R -5" District. Councilman Collischonn's motion was seconded by Councilman Freeman and on roll call it was carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: Councilman Petersen, (1). Absent: None. The Hearing was then declared closed. 10. The matter was called up concerning the request from Mr. and Mrs. Harvey Eshpeter to rezone their property at 616 and 620 Buena Vista Avenue from "R- 4-PD ", Neighbor- hood Apartment - Planned Development District, to the "C -3 ", General Commercial District. The Clerk stated the Affidavit of Publication of Notice of Hearing is on file. The Planning Board has recommended said reclassification of this property. There were no protests against the requested rezoning and the Hearing was thereupon declared closed. The matter was then referred to "Introduction of Ordinances ". Continued from the last meeting was the matter of the proposed closing of a por- tion of Everett Street, north of Blanding Avenue. It was stated that, due to a change pertaining to the exact portion of the street to be closed, the present Hearing has to be abandoned and the procedure initiated again. It was so ordered and the matter was, therefore, referred to "Resolutions". 12. Continued from the last meeting was the matter of the Appeal filed by Mr. John E. Mitcheom from the decision of the Planning Board to deny certain variances on his property at 2002 Alameda Avenue. President McCall stated the Councilmen had personally inspected the premises in ques- tion. He asked if there were any in the audience who wished to voice objections against the requested encroachments. Mr. A. R. Schoenfeld, 3244 Fernside Boulevard, spoke as a private citizen in support of the Planning Board's action. Councilman Freeman stated she believes both the Planning Board and Mr. Schoenfeld are right - there is no doubt they reached their decisions by following the letter of the law. However, it is now up to the Council for detemination and she said she thinks the alterations proposed by Mr. Mitcheom would be a vast improvement in his living conditions. Also, if none of the neighbors object and he is improving his property, Councilman Freeman felt these factors should be considered. Councilman Petersen said he believes the standard of reasonableness should be accepted as the criterion in this case and he thereupon moved the Appeal be granted and the ruling of the Planning Board be reversed to allow the requested variances on the prop- erty at 2002 Alameda Avenue. The motion was seconded by Councilman Collischonn. Some further discussion followed and it was agreed this is a rather unique case and no precedent would be established. The question was then put and the motion carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None, REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS, ETCETERA: 13. From Recreation Commission, signed by Mr. Terry LaCroix, Chairman, recommending installation of three permanent restrooms along the South Shore - at Grand, Willow and Park Streets - and also, that temporary facilities be acquired and installed immediately. Councilman Collischonn moved the City Manager's recommendation in his memorandum of May 15 be accepted - that because of the uncertainties about the nature and extent of public use of the beach area, no formal commitment should be made at the present time for installation of permanent restrooms and action should be deferred until a later date. The motion was seconded by Councilman Freeman. Mr. Weller suggested the Council might want to give some authorization for the installa- tion of temporary units during the remainder of this fiscal year. He felt such facili- ties should be provided as quickly as possible. Considerable discussion ensued on the subject - Mr. Hanna explaining the engineering aspects and Health Code requirements involved. It was developed that the estimated cost for three permanent restrooms is 822,650. and Councilman Freeman inquired what the outlay would be for construction of one such facility to be located possibly at Grand Street, believing that the installation of at least one permanent restroom at this time would be a step forward. Mr. Hanna replied that this particular one would cost $6,300.1 and he estimated it would take about four months for completion, following the normal procedure for any such project. After further discussion, Mr. Annibale stated that, under a finding of great emergency and necessity, the Council could bypass the "bid" process. With the consent of his second, Councilman Collischonn withdrew his motion. Councilman Freeman thereupon moved that one permanent restroom be constructed at the foot of Grand Street as quickly as possible and, with the finding that great emergency and necessity exists, the formal bid process be eliminated. The motion was seconded by Councilman Schacht and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 14. From Recreation Commission, signed by Mr. Terry LaCroix, Chairman, recommending endorsement of the Park Department's 1959-60 budget for maintenance and improvement of all City parks. The communication was noted and referred to the budget file. 15. From City Manager, submitting request from Pacific Coast Engineering Company to abandon a portion of Oak Street, north of Blanding Avenue, in connection with the expan- sion of its facilities. Upon Councilman Freeman's request, Mr. Annibale stated he would submit a report on the matter of closing streets which give access to navigable waters. Also, it was ordered that a Resolution of Intention relative to the requested abandonment be prepared for submission at the next meeting of the Council. 16. From Mr. Marion J. Klein, 3019 Encinal Avenue, tendering his resignation from the Advisory Golf Commission, effective immediately. 60 President McCall praised Mr. Klein for his long period of great service and stated he has been one of the mainstays on behalf of golfing in the community. Councilman Schacht moved Mr. Klein's resignation be accepted with reluctance and the City Clerk be instructed to prepare a resolution of commendation for the next meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilman Petersen and unanimously carried. 17. From Public Utilities Board, signed by Mr. G. A. Baxter, Secretary, submitting its budget for the Bureau of Electricity for fiscal year 1959 -60 and pledging the sum of $646,820. as a dividend to the City's General Fund, which will be the largest in the history of the Utility. President McCall expressed appreciation for this "record" dividend pledge and stated the Public Utilities Board is certainly to be commended upon its fine management. 18. From City Planning Board, signed by Mr. A. Raymond Schoenfeld, Secretary, recom- mending approval of the Record of Survey Map, with certain stipulations, covering the three lots located at the westerly end of Waterton Street, owned by S. J. Dowling & Son, Inc. The Clerk read a letter from Mr. S. J. Dowling, Jr. stating that one of the stipula- tions was the alteration of the Map and his engineer had not been able to accomplish this - therefore, it was requested that consideration of the Board's recommendation be postponed until the next regular meeting on June 2, 1959. There being no objec- tions, the matter was laid over accordingly. INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES: 19. Councilman Schacht introduced the following ordinance, after which it was laid over under provision of law and the Charter: "Ordinance No. New Series An Ordinance Reclassifying and Rezoning Certain Property Within the City of Alameda by Amending Zoning Ordinance No. 1277, New Series." (616 and 620 Buena Vista Avenue - Eshpeter) UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 4 20. Councilman Petersen referred to the Council's meeting with Dr. Brady, City Phy- sician, about the First Aid service and inquired if the Councilmen felt inclined to discuss with the Alameda Hospital Directors the possibility of establishing such facilities in the Hospital. President McCall suggested it would save time if the City Manager would arrange a conference with the Hospital Administrator to discuss the matter and have him present it to his Board for consideration - and thus ascertain the schedule for its building program. Then, he felt, a joint meeting would be justified. There being no objec- tions, Mr. Weller was so instructed. 4 21. Councilman Petersen also referred to the recent beating given a young boy by a couple of juvenile hoodlums. He said he had discussed with Councilman Schacht the possibility of appointing a Citizens Advisory Committee to determine upon some solu- tion to the problem. He suggested that, perhaps, said Committee could be comprised of a member of the Police Department, a member of the Truant Agency of the Alameda School Department and others who are interested in public welfare. Councilman Schacht agreed everyone is concerned and felt the Council should try to eliminate any future occurrences of this type of violence. Upon inquiry, Mr. Weller stated he had nothing specific torecommend at this time and he pointed out again that this is a complex problem and very difficult to solve. He emphasized the City is not trying to shift the blame or to evade the issue, but the practical fact is that the City, as a single agency, is simply not equipped to solve this problem. He cited existing conditions which are inadequate to effectively curb this type of violence and concurred that the idea of a Citizens Advisory Committee has merit. It was the consensus that such a Committee would awaken interest and make everyone in the community aware of what is happening. However, it was also elt a more expedient action would be to support the Police Department in its efforts and, if necessary, add another Patrolman to the night shift, even at the expense of reducing daytime protection. Another suggestion was to have both parents call at the Police Station to pick up their child if he has been taken into custody for violation of the "loiter- ing" ordinance. It was determined that the City Attorney would check into the language of said ordinance and submit a report before establishing such a procedure. With regard to the formation of a Citizens Advisory Committee, it was decided the matter would be on the agenda for the Council meeting of June 2, 1959. Also, in view of a joint meeting of the Council with the Social Service Board, scheduled for Tuesday evening, May 2.6, it was suggested this matter be on that agenda, too, for discussion. RESOLUTIONS: 22. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Schacht, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 5935 Calling for Bids for Legal Advertising for the City of Alameda for the Fiscal Year 1959- 1960." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Collischonn and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 23. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Schacht, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 5936 Adopting Specifications, Special Provisions and Plans for the Installation of House Laterals for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1960, Calling for Bids and Directing City Clerk to Advertise Same." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Collischonn and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 24. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Schacht, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 5937 Adopting Specifications and Provisions for Resurfacing and Repair of Asphalt and Bituminous Pavement for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1960, Calling for Bids and Directing City Clerk to Advertise Same." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Collischonn and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 25. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Schacht, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 5938 Adopting Specifications, Special Provisions and Plans for Repair of Portland Cement Concrete Sidewalk, Driveway, Curb and Gutter for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1960, Calling for Bids and Directing City Clerk to Advertise Same." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Collischonn and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 26. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Schacht, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 5939 Adopting Specifications for Furnishing to the City of Alameda for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1960 - Quarry Waste and Earth Fill at City Dump; Paving Mixtures; and Portland Cement Concrete Mix; Calling for Bids and Directing City Clerk to Advertise Same. The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Collischonn and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 27. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Schacht, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 5940 Adopting Specifications for Furnishing to the City of Alameda for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1960 - Gasoline; Traffic Paint and Thinner; Automobile and Truck Tires and Tubes; Calling for Bids and Directing City Clerk to Advertise Same." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Collischonn and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 28. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Petersen, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 5941 Resolution of Intention to Order the Vacation of a Portion of Everett Street, in the City of Alameda (Northern End -- Everett Street)." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Schacht and on roll c all carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 29. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Collischonn, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 5942 Authorizing Execution of Agreement by and Between City of Alameda and The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company Relating to Installation of Certain Mechanical Equipment (New Switchboard Service)." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Schacht and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. The President thereupon declared all of the foregoing resolutions duly adopted and passed. ORDINANCES FOR PASSAGE: 30. "Ordinance No. 1302, New Series An Ordinance Amending Section 17 -333 of the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding Thereto Subdivision (25), Relating to All Time No Parking." (Willow Street, between Clinton and San Jose Avenues) Councilman Petersen moved the ordinance be adopted as submitted. The motion was seconded by Councilman Schacht and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. FILING: 31. Financial Statement - Bureau of Electricity, as of March 31, 1959 - Verified by Hackleman & Larzelere. 32. Auditor's Financial Statement - City of Alameda, as of April 30, 1959 - Verified by Hackleman & Larzelere. 33. Specifications No. PW 5 -59 -6 - Installation of House Laterals, 1959 -60. 34. Specifications No. PW 5 -59 -7 - Resurfacing and Repair of Bituminous Pavement, 1959 -60. 35. Specifications No. PW 5 -59 -8 Repair of Sidewalk, Driveway, Curb and Gutter, 1959 -60. 36. Specifications No. MS 5 -59 -4 - Furnishing Class "A" and Class "B" Portland Cement Concrete Transit Mix, 1959 -60. 37. Specifications No. MS 5 -59 -5 - Furnishing Paving Mixtures, 1959 -60. 38. Specifications No. MS 5 -59 -6 - Furnishing Quarry Waste and Earth Fill at City Dump, 1959 -60. 39. Specifications No. MS 5 -59 -7 - Furnishing Premium and Non - Premium Gasoline, 1959 -60. 40. Specifications No. MS 5 -59 -8 - Furnishing Tires and Tubes, 1959 -60. 41. Specifications No. MS 5 -59 -9 - Furnishing Traffic Paint and Thinner, 1959 -60. 42. Agreement - between City of Alameda and The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company - re Switchboard Equipment Installation. BILLS: 43. An itemized List of Claims against the City of Alameda, and the Departments thereof, in the amount of 521,555.19, was submitted to the Council at this meeting. The list was accompanied by certification from the City Manager that the Claims shown were correct. Councilman Schacht moved the bills as itemized in the List of Claims filed with the City Clerk on May 19, 1959, and presented to the Council at this time, be allowed and paid. The motion was seconded by Councilman Freeman and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. ADJOURNMENT: 44. There being no further business to come before the meeting, the Council adjourned - to assemble in regular session on Tuesday evening, June 2, 1959, at 7:30 o'clock. Respectfully submitted,