1958-03-18 Regular CC MinutesREGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA
HELD TUESDAY EVENING, MARCH 18, 1958
The meeting convened at 7:30 o'clock p.m. with President McCall presiding. The
Pledge of Allegiance was lead by Councilman Freeman and was followed by the delivery
of a most inspiring Invocation by the Reverend Mr. Mervin Megill, Pastor, Immanuel
Baptist Church.
ROLL CALL:
The roll was called and Councilmen Collischonn, Freeman, Petersen, Schacht and
President McCall, (5), were noted present. Absent: None.
MINUTES:
1. The minutes of the regular meeting held March 4, 1958, were approved as
transcribed.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
From Mr. S. J. Dowling, Jr., referring to the bad condition of Mound Street,
between Otis Drive and Waterton Street, and suggesting action be taken to effect
permanent improvement thereof.
President McCall stated that, if there were no objections, the matter would be
referred to the City Engineer for review and report back to the Council. It was so
ordered.
3. From California Congress of Parents and Teachers, Inc., Sixteenth District,
signed by Mrs. William A. Dillon, President, suggesting the Council appoint a fact -
finding advisory committee to study the advisability of establishing mental health
service to the City, which could be made available under the "Short -Doyle Act".
President McCall remarked it has been suggested the matter be referred to the local
Parents- Teachers Association for its recommendation to the Council. There being no
objections, it was so ordered. The Clerk was requested to send a copy of the letter
to said organization.
4. From Mrs. Alfred Huntoon, 555 Haight Avenue, requesting an additional Director
be assigned to Longfellow Park in order to provide adequate supervision for the
increasing attendance, especially during the vacation months.
President McCall referred to Mr. Weller's memo of March 17, 1958, which explained
to the Council the financial situation as set up in the budget relative to this
Park. It was pointed out it would be logical to transfer one Director from
McKinley Park to Longfellow Park as of about April 15, at no additional cost to the
City, in view of the fact Thompson Field will not be available for use from that
date until the start of the Fall term in September. Any extra e xpense would be
dependent upon the period for which a second Director is authorized prior to April 15 -
immediate authorization would cost approximately Ifi200. - service during Easter vaca-
tion would run about 1)100.
Councilman Petersen stated he would request Longfellow Park be given two Directors
during the Easter Week period and refer the rest of the matter to the budget sessions.
Councilman Freeman concurred, but also suggested the matter be referred to Mr.
Saalwaechter, Director or Recreation and Physical Education, to make another study
and report on the situation to bring the Council up to date, since it was his recom-
mendation last year to cut out the leadership for this Park.
Councilman Petersen stated he felt that, before funds are allocated for a second
Director at Longfellow Park, a survey should be made in reference to last year's
leadership program, as recommended for Krusi, McKinley, Franklin and Longfellow
Parks. He stated he had no objection to maintaining two Directors at Longfellow
Park during the summer vacation, but pointed out there is Longfellow School play-
ground and Woodstock Park available nearby, the latter, he thought, having two
Directors in charge.
He stated Longfellow Park was closed by recommendation of the Recreation Director
last year because he had felt the new Woodstock Park would be able to handle the
recreational needs in this vicinity. He felt there is no necessity, most of the
time, for two Directors at Longfellow Park.
Councilman Petersen pointed out the Council had already made a concession above and
beyond the recommendation of the Recreation Director and had allowed one Director
to be assigned there at a cost of 81,800. and he thought said Director could conduct
a reasonable supervision of the Park. He felt the Council should consider the tax-
payers of the community, and he is opposed to any action to assign two Directors to
this Park.
President McCall explained that, during last year's budget sessions, the Council
itself had asked the Recreation Director to review his budget and attempt to prune
it down - and, against his better judgment, he did cut out his original request for
Longfellow Park. However, some time later, a delegation of parents from the area
appeared before the Council, and the usage of the Park was proved. As far as using
Woodstock Park is concerned, President McCall pointed out many of the children would
have to cross Pacific Avenue, a very busy thoroughfare. He felt that with the number
of children in the vicinity who need recreational supervision and with the opportun-
ity now to transfer a Director from McKinley Park, the Council should do so and then
consider the matter further at budget -study time.
Mr. Weller stated he thought the level of service given for the next fiscal year
should, perhaps, come in the form of a recommendation from the Recreation Commission.
Therefore, the Council will not have to take a stand for the year 1958 -59 at this
time. He said he had asked Mr. Saalwaechter to check on the daily attendance at
some of the parks during last month and the average was as follows: Longfellow,
ninety; Woodstock, eighty- seven; Godfrey, eighty -one.
Councilman Freeman stated there may be a need at Longfellow Park of which the Council
is not aware. She said she would like to have the matter referred to Mr. Saalwaechter
for further study.
It was determined that, in the meantime, an extra Director would be assigned to said
Park for the Easter vacation. There being no objections, it was so ordered. The
City Manager was requested to have Mr. Saalwaechter submit his report on the matter.
ORA , COMMUNICATIONS:
5YT Councilman Freeman referred to a meeting held on March 12, and asked if the sub-
ject matter discussed at that time was public business - and of concern to the com-
munity, particularly with reference to the "workable plan ". Mr. Annibale replied,
"The workable plan is definitely public business."
Councilman Freeman said she would like to make the following very brief statement on
the matter: "As this plan develops for the Chipman Project medium -cost multiple
dwellings, it was revealed to necessitate the use of a workable plan before Federal
funds would be expended under Federal. Law Title I, 1947 -1957, as amended up to 1957.
This is the Housing Act. The cost of developing this workable plan of course, would
be borne by the City before the Federal funds could be expended. I have always felt
that we must start where we are - and, at this moment, it would seem that the first
step would appear to be a request of the citizens of this community that they desire
urban renewal and redevelopment and will assume the necessary costs and will support
action necessary to do the full urban renewal job. It would seem logical that pub-
licity be given to the workable plan so that citizen participation requirements
could be met before proceeding in an orderly step to accomplish the wishes of the
people for a workable program." Councilman Freeman said the reason she brings this
in is, though it was explained this is not "urban renewal redevelopment ", it is part
of the Act and it is actually part of urban renewal redevelopment, and she felt that
with citizen participation the Council would know how to proceed.
6. Mr. Frank Gottstein, 731 Haight Avenue, addressed the Council, stating he would
like to renew his efforts to try to get signal lights installed on Webster Street
close to Posey Tube. He stated traffic is backed up at the peak hours now and when
the new tube is constructed and Posey Tube is used for one -way northerly traffic,
the several lanes are going to have to converge into two lanes through the Tube, and
some control is going to be needed. He pointed out it is part of the State Highway
and he thought the State is obligated to pay any expenses, or at least a portion
thereof. He urged some action be taken to remedy the traffic congestion at this
point.
President McCall stated, if there were no objections, he would refer the matter to
the City Manager to have a review and report made by the Chief of Police. It was so
ordered.
7. President McCall reported he had attended the meeting of the Alameda County
Board of Supervisors this morning, at which time bids were opened for the lighting
project in Posey Tube. The low bid was submitted from Scott - Buttner Electric Co.,
Inc., in the amount of 834,737., which was lower than had been estimated and it is
felt, therefore, there is the possibility that more improvement may be accomplished
than had been expected. He stated he believes the project will get under way within
seven to ten days.
8. President McCall also spoke of the traffic congestion on the Eastshore Freeway
and the fact there is no diversion of traffic when some accident occurs which blocks
everyone. He said he felt there should be some way - a flashing yellow signal to
slow down oncoming cars and then a green signal as a go ahead for traffic to turn
off the Freeway at some point prior to the tie -up. He said he had spoken to the
Board of Supervisors on the subject and it had been suggested the City Council for-
ward a letter to the Board, asking it to bring the matter before the Alameda County
Highway Advisory Committee to have an investigation made.
The City Manager was requested to prepare said letter and forward it to the Board
of Supervisors, sending copies to the Councilmen.
9 Councilman Petersen referred to the recent number of accidents to children where
they had been struck by cars - and the fact that an accident prevention program had
6
been instigated. He said the program is well under way and he had heard Sergeant
Rasmussen of the Police Department when he had presented a film and had given an
excellent talk to the children at Washington School. He emphasized that Sergeant
Rasmussen had expressed himself well and had put over his point to the students
more than adequately. Councilman Petersen stated he was really impressed by his
method of presentation and felt the Council should note the outstanding job the
Chief and Sergeant Rasmussen are doing in presenting this program which will help
prevent accidents of this type in the community. He thought the Police Department
merits commendation for this activity.
President McCall stated the Council appreciates the program the officers are carry-
ing out at the schools and he requested the Clerk to direct a letter to Chief Drake,
commending him and his Staff for the fine work being done.
J
10. President McCall inquired of the City Manager if he had contacted the City of
Oakland with regard to a meeting held concerning the Bethlehem Shipyard situation.
He stated the City is vitally interested in getting this yard opened up by some
private industry and explained the City of Oakland has met with labor groups and
Alameda is interested in this program and wants to be a part of it. Mr. Weller
stated he had no information at this time but he would call the Oakland officials
tomorrow.
President McCall asked that the Council be informed on this matter as soon as pos-
sible as it is trying to get all of these surplus yards back in action and on the
tax rolls.
REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS, ETCETERA:
.1
11. From the City Manager, reporting all work satisfactorily completed on the pro-
ject of Constructing a Rest Room at the 15th Green of the New Golf Course - recom-
mending it be accepted and the Notice of Completion be ordered filed.
Councilman Petersen moved the recommendation be adopted; that the work on this pro-
ject be accepted and the Notice of Completion be filed. The motion was seconded by
Councilman Collischonn and unanimously carried.
12. From the City Planning Board, signed by Mr. Schoenfeld, Secretary, recommending
adoption of the amendment to the Improvement Drawings for Tract No. 1866 - which
would substitute a three -foot sidewalk adjacent to the curb between the north and
south drives of the shopping center, to permit more adequate screen planting on the
street side of the parking area.
Councilman Freeman moved the Board's recommendation be accepted as outlined. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Collischonn.
Upon request of Councilman Petersen, the City Engineer explained the situation by
display of a map of the area in question. He stated the proposal is desirable from
the point of view of the architect, the City and Planning Board, as well as the
Planning Director and himself.
The question was then put and the motion carried on the following roll call vote.
Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
13. From the City Planning Board, signed by Mr. Schoenfeld, Secretary, recommending
approval of the suggested amendment to the Alameda Municipal Code (Subdivision Ordi-
nance No. 1208, New Series) relating to Record of Survey Map procedures, provided
the Planning Board may impose time limits on the installation of the improvements.
The matter was referred to "introduction of Ordinances".
14. From the City Planning Board, signed by Mr. Schoenfeld, Secretary, recommending
approval of the proposed amendments to the Alameda Municipal Code (Zoning Ordinance
No. 724, New Series) relating to kitchens in One- Family Dwelling Districts.
The, matter was referred to "Introduction of Ordinances ".
INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES:
15. Councilman Collischonn introduced the following ordinance:
"Ordinance No.
New Series
An Ordinance Amending Title XI, Chapter 1, of the
Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Section 11 -1119
Thereof and Adding a New Subsection (6) to Section
11 -162, Relating to Kitchens in One - Family Dwellings."
The above ordinance is being enacted as a measure for the immediate preservation of
the public peace, health and safety in great emergency and necessity and based upon
the following facts: The existing Zoning Ordinance of the City of Alameda allows
more than one kitchen in a one - family dwelling without control by the City Planning
Board or City Council. This constitutes an immediate menace to the zoning plans for
the City of Alameda in that the neighborhood character of a one - family district may
deteriorate into a multiple dwelling district without any prior notice to or control
by the City.
The ordinance was then referred to "Ordinances for Passage'.
16. Councilman Petersen introduced the following ordinance, after which it was laid
over under provision of law and the Charter:
"Ordinance No.
New Series
An Ordinance Amending Section 11-319, Chapter 3,
Title XI, of the Alameda Municipal Code, Relating
to the Approval of Record of Survey Maps."
RESOLUTIONS:
17. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Collischonn, who moved its
adoption:
"Resolution No. 5757
Resolution of the Council of the City of Alameda
Approving in Principle the Joint Development and
Usage With the Alameda Unified School District of
That Certain 18.8-Acre Tract of Land Contained
Within South Shore Unit No. 1."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Petersen and on roll
call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
18. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Schacht, who moved its
adoption:
"Resolution No. 5758
Transferring Various Amounts from and to Certain
Funds and Directing Certain Changes in the
Appropriations for the Fiscal Year 1957-1958,
All as Described Within the Body of the Resolution."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Collischonn.
Speaking on the question, Councilman Freeman said she had noted one item which con-
cerns the replacement of the rug in the Golf Course Pro Shop. She s aid she had under-
stood the rugs were originally installed because of the danger of slipping and falling
and actually, as far as she knew, the City would not go on refurnishing them. In
view of the fact they are walked on with spike-shoes, she did not feel the City
should pay for the replacement of the rug in the Pro Shop because this is a leased
concession and all equipment the lessee puts in may be taken with him when he leaves.
She inquired of the City Attorney if he finds any provision in the agreement where
the City stipulates it will replace the rug or any of the equipment which wears out.
Mr. Annibale stated the City would not be required to replace the rug or install any-
thing else. He said the City could, if it so desired, but there is no requirement
to do so.
Councilman Freeman cited similar circumstances in the Golf Course Restaurant and Mr.
Annibale pointed out the same situation would prevail - in other words, the City can-
not be required to replace the rugs but the City would have the right to replace them
if it so desired.
Councilman Freeman said the total cost would be over $3,000., and if the concession-
naires have to pay for these rugs they would exert more care in their use - and might
take the steps which have been recommended to save them from further damage. She
asked if the matter could be checked into - and let the concessionnaires know the
City's position, if the Council is willing.
Mr. Weller was called upon and stated he had no objection to effect the reduction of
some $3,100. from the Golf Course operating budget. If that is the ruling of the
City Attorney, the Council could either take that sum out of the item in the resolu-
tion or it could leave it in with the understanding that this particular expenditure
would not be authorized. He said the Golf Course Operating Fund is somewhat differ-
ent from the General Fund accounts, because there is no transfer actually being made.
All that is being done is reducing the authorized appropriation. In a technical
sense, it would not be necessary to make any adjustment in those special fund
accounts, but he thought all operating departments should be held on essentially the
same basis. He reiterated the matter can be handled either way - if there is any
question as to whether or not the rugs ought to be replaced at City expense, the
revised appropriation should be loft as is. If there appears to be no question, and
the City is not going to expend the funds, then the revised appropriation could be
reduced to that extent.
In response to Councilman Petersen's questions, Mr. Weller gave the financial break-
down of the item.
At this point, Councilman Petersen interjected the statement that, in the interest
of the taxpayers of the City, he would like to read for the record the status of the
over -run of $1,975. relative to the Longfellow Park recreation problem: `The over-
run of 11,975. - addition of a limited program at Longfellow Park, estimated to cost
$1,800, for the year. (which exception the City has made) A total of $432. was
omitted from the original budget as a clerical error and .8750. was authorized by the
Council for equipping Bay Farm Island Recreation Center. This was offset, in part,
by a saving on recreation supplies but the entire amount cannot be absorbed in the
budget." He stated, as far as the Recreation Department is concerned, the City can
regain some of the monies that cannot be absorbed in that account because he is posi-
tive the Park can be run efficiently without adding another man there. He felt the
Recreation Department has a duty to the City, since the City has given it excess
monies to sponsor a program for the people in this community - it has a responsibility
to this City Council and the members of this community to try to absorb some of the
monies it is utilizing in this particular area.
Referring back to the question under discussion, Councilman Freeman inquired as to
the Council thinking with regard to saving 83,160. , the cost of replacing rugs in
the Pro Shop and the Dining Hoorn - pointing out it will be a recurring expense over
the years, unless the most desirable type of rug is laid, which is very costly.
President McCall suggested the City offer to pay the $3,100., approximately, toward
the total cost and ask the concessionnaires to pay the difference, in order to get
a better quality floor covering which would hold up. He felt this was reasonable in
view of the fact the Golf Course is attracting many players and making money for the
City. He felt the Council could go this far - it would not be a recurring expense -
the Council should be willing to pay said amount this time due to the fact that the
original material did not hold up as expected.
Councilman Freeman stated the City was not supposed to pay for the rug in the first
place. In the discussion at the time, it was determined it was their responsibility
but because of the need for getting ready so quickly to open the Golf Course and
because there was an insurance risk, the City decided to do it. She asked if the
City is subsidizing the concessionnaires in this respect, since the responsibility
is spelled out as being theirs.
Mr. Annibale stated it all depends upon whether you look upon this as a permanent
improvement or something temporary. If the concessionnaire pays for the floor cover-
ing, he would be entitled to take it with him at the end of his contract period -
whereas, if the City pays for the improvement, and it is of a permanent nature, it
is City property and stays with the premises and makes it more rentable. Mr. Annibale
stated it is actually a policy matter to be determined at the discretion of the
Council.
Councilman Collischonn stated he is inclined to agree with Councilman Freeman on this
matter. The fact appears to be that the rug was installed originally by the City as
an accommodation.
Councilman Schacht inquired if the concessionnaires had been aware that the replace -
ment of the floor coverings would fall upon them, to which Mr. Annibale replied he
did not believe this factor had ever come up. Councilman Schacht stated he thought
the item should be deleted and an investigation made to determine what the fairest
procedure would be.
Mr. Weller pointed out the alternative possibility would be to leave the item in the
proposed resolution, with the express understanding that the expenditure would not be
made until a report had been given to the Council. He explained Mr. McMurry, Golf
Course Manager, has been investigating the various materials for some time to deter-
mine what would serve best and he thinks he has found the answer in a type which
would be covered by the $3,100. item. He said he would be reluctant to have either
the City or concessionnaires buy the carpeting right now without further investiga-
tion anyway. If, by chance, a type of covering could be found which would be sub-
stantially permanent then, perhaps, as the City Attorney has suggested, it might be
better all around for the City to install it with that understanding. He said he
was inclined to think it should be counted as part of the service.
Further discussion ensued - it finally being determined the item would remain in the
resolution and the City Manager was requested to confer with the Golf Course Manager
and submit definite cost figures for the needed floor covering and present his recom-
mendation to the Council as to the best course to follow.
Councilman Freeman added her request that the City Attorney notify the concession- -
naires that "if" the City pays part of the cost this next time, the City's obligation
ends there and evermore.
The question was then put and the resolution was adopted by the following roll call
vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
V
19. "Resolution No.
Authorizing Execution of Supplemental Agreement
(Amending Original Agreement) by and Between the
City of Alameda and the Southern Pacific Company,
Relating to Retirement, Relocation, Removal and
Installation of Railroad Tracks on Tilden Way."
Upon request, the City Attorney explained the purpose of the resolution, stating that
the Railroad was going to remove the freight shed at the Park Street station, includ-
ing the platform appurtenant thereto, to concrete foundations at Clement Avenue and
Broadway, making the necessary utility connections. The City had originally obli-
gated itself to pay for that. Now, apparently, this is not feasible - the Railroad
wants to erect a new building at Clement Avenue and Broadway. It has been estimated
that the cost under the original Agreement would be A7,240. and so, instead of the
City expending that amount to remove the freight house portion of the station, under
the original Agreement, this sum will go toward the cost of the new structure.
Several questions were raised - Councilman Petersen contended the City has no "con-
struction obligation" under the original Agreement, it has an obligation only to
move the building - and now the building is not going to be moved, but torn down.
He asked why the City cannot pay just for having the building torn down, without
paying w7,240. into the construction fund of Southern Pacific Company.
Mr. Hanna was called upon to explain the situation and he stated the City had asked
the Railroad to give up that right -of -way so the City might better use the land as
a public highway. The basic premise was that the City could not put the Railroad
out of business. It had to have a going facility, it had to have an equivalent
facility, both in trackage and freight shed. Therefore, combined with the relocation
of rails, etcetera, was the thought that the freight shed would have to be moved to
Clement Avenue and Broadway. However, approximately a year ago, it was discovered
that, while the original thought was good, the building was to be moved into a new
fire zone which would not permit that type of construction. That precluded the mov-
ing of the structure and, therefore, made necessary the construction of an entirely
different type.
Considerable discussion was had during which time every possible ramification of the
circumstances was developed. However, in view of Mr. Neil Clark's absence from this
meeting, and inasmuch as he is fully conversant with all negotiations held, it was
suggested the resolution be laid over to the next meeting in order that he can give
further explanations on the subject. It was so ordered.
20 The following resolution was introduced by Councilman. Schacht, who moved its
adoption:
"Resolution No 5759
Resolution of the Council of the City of Alameda
Endorsing and Urging Passage of Certain Amendments
to the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit Act to
The End That Mayors, Councilmen and Supervisors May
Serve on the Board of Such District."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Freeman and on roll
call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
21. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Freeman, who moved its
adoption:
"Resolution No. 5760
Resolution of the Council of the City of Alameda,
Supplemental to Resolution No. 5312, Directing the
Bank of America, N. T. & S. A., Fiscal Agent Under
Said Resolution No. 5312, Section 5.08(6)(d) to
Purchase City of Alameda Off- Street Parking Revenue
Bonds as Set Out Below."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Petersen.
The resolution was read in full and Mr. Weller and Mr. Annibale explained the details
and purpose of the resolution. The question was put and the motion carried by the
following roll call vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
The President declared all of the foregoing resolutions duly adopted and passed, with
the exception of the one noted otherwise.
ORDINANCES FOR PASSAGE:
22. "Ordinance No. 1263,
New Series
An Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by
Adding Subdivision (82) to Section 17 -432 Thereof,
Relating to Stop Intersections."
Councilman Schacht moved the ordinance be adopted as read. The motion was seconded
by Councilman Collischonn and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes:
Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
23.
"Ordinance No. 1264,
New Series
An Ordinance Amending Title XI, Chapter 1, of the
Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Section 11 -1119
Thereof and Adding a New Subsection (6) to Section
11 -162, Relating to Kitchens in One - Family Dwellings."
Councilman Collischonn moved the ordinance be adopted as read. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Schacht and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes:
Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. This being an emergency measure, the ordinance
will be effective immediately.
FILING:
24. Financial Statement - Bureau of Electricity, as of January 31, 1958 -
Verified by George A. Hackleman & Co.
25. Auditor's Financial Statement - City of Alameda, as of February 28, 1958 -
Verified by George A. Hackleman & Co.
BILLS:
26. An itemized List of Claims against the City of Alameda, and the Departments
thereof, in the total amount of $93,050.05, was submitted to the Council at this
meeting.
The list was accompanied by certification from the City Manager that the Claims
shown were correct.
Councilman Petersen moved the bills as itemized in the List of Claims filed with the
City Clerk on March 18, 1958, and presented to the Council at this time, be allowed
and paid. The motion was seconded by Councilman Freeman and on roll call carried by
the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
27. At this time, Councilman Freeman asked that Mr. Hanna submit a report on what
progressis being made with regard to dust control, stating she had been receiving
many complaints in this respect.
Mr. Hanna stated he could make such report now and thereupon displayed a map of the
Washington Park fill area which indicated the section which had been sprayed this
afternoon. He said his crew will pursue the matter diligently until the whole area
is covered. He pointed out the main area and some additional area out on the extended
beach will be completely covered and the dust should be under control within a week.
2. President McCall announced that on March 29, 1958, the Alameda Rotary Club,
the Southern Pacific Company and the City of Alameda are jointly sponsoring the
dedication of the locomotive in Washington Park and there is a fine program planned.
All citizens of the community are invited to attend. He felt sure this locomotive
will be an added attraction for the children of the City and a realistic piece of
play- equipment which all are looking forward to seeing installed.
29. President McCall referred to the United States Maritime School property and
stated that, evidently, this site is no longer being considered for the location of
a State College. He assured the Council, however, efforts are stillbeing exerted
to have some use made of this land. Contacts have been made with the State Division
of Beaches and Parks and attempts are being made to have some State agency investigate
the area with the hope of negotiating development of this "surplus' site. He pointed
out the excellent facilities existing thereon. In connection therewith, President
McCall mentioned a Notice of Meeting of the Small Craft Harbors Commission to be
held in Stockton on Monday, March 24, 1958, and asked if there were any objections
to his attendance at said meeting. There being none, he stated he would plan to
attend - and the Council would be kept informed of any negotiations as they progress.
30. Councilman Petersen said he noticed in the newspaper recently that the Chamber
of Commerce had sent certain of its members to Sacramento to appear before a Commit-
tee with regard to the shipbuilding tax exemption. He stated he felt the Chamber
should notify the Council when it is undertaking such representations.
31. Councilman Freeman again referred to the urban renewal redevelopment workable
plan and stated the Council had requested the Chamber of Commerce to try to develop
Chipman Project. She s aid, as far as she knew, the Council has not notified it that
the Council has been contacted by anyone and she wondered just what the Chamber has
learned from its efforts to get someone to develop the area. She felt the Council
should get a report from the Chamber and also, keep it informed.
The President called upon Mr. Weller, who stated he could give a very informal report -
he said he had talked with Mr. Nutzman, Manager of the Chamber, just yesterday - and
it developed the Chamber, apparently, is well aware of the possibilities the Council
is presently exploring. Mr. Nutzman had expressed himself as being well pleased with
the situation - his own group, also, feels it has people who are interested, but
these parties understand that by the time they get ready to proceed, if at all, some
other negotiation may have been developed. This appears to be satisfactory to Mr.
Nutzman.
ADJOURNMENT:
32. There being no further business to come before the meeting, the Council
adjourned - to assemble in regular session on Tuesday evening, April 1, 1958, at
7:30 o'clock.
Respectfully submitted,
0
C t r .er