Loading...
1958-05-06 Regular CC MinutesREGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA HELD TUESDAY EVENING, MAY 6, 1958 The meeting convened at 7:30 o'clock p.m. with President McCall presiding. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Freeman followed by an inspiring Invoca- tion delivered by Rabbi Gunther Gates of Temple Israel, ROLL CALL: The roll was called and Councilmen Collischonn, Freeman, Petersen, Schacht and President McCall, (5), were noted present. Absent: None. MINUTES: 1. The minutes of the regular meeting held April 1 1958, were approved as transcribed. WRITTEN COMYUNICATIONS: From Alameda Chamber of Commerce, signed by Mr. Jerry C. Jacobs, President, suggesting funds be appropriated to build a barbecue at the Bay Farm recreation Center and stating a member of the Chamber has agreed to make available, at no cost, sufficient fire bricks to construct said facility. Councilman Petersen suggested the matter be referred to the budget sessions for further consideration. Councilman Freeman stated she would like to thank the member of the Chamber who has oCfered to furnish the bricks and felt the Council ought to accept taem at this time. She pointed out the employees of the Golf Course who cannot perform their maintenance duties during the rainy weather could possibly work on the construction of a barbecue. Further discussion determined that the City Engineer would prepare the necessary drawings and an estimate of cost of such a barbecue. President McCall brought out the fact that some Service Club might be interested in undertaking said construction as a community project. 3. From Alameda Chamber of Commerce, signed by Mr. Donn Thoms, Assistant Manager, requesting a permit for the use of all Off-Street Parking Lots during the period of May 19, 20 and 21, 1958, for the May Day Sales Promotion of the City merchants. It was also asked that it be informed as to the estimated total cost for such use. Mr. Weller stated the charge would be -;120. for the designated period, which is in line with the provisions of Resolution No. 5678 adopted by the Council on April 15 1958. Councilman Petersen moved the permit be granted as requested. The motion was seconded by Councilman Freeman and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. From the following with regard to the proposed new Zoning Ordinance: Mrs. Isabelle 1. Wright, concerning property at northeast corner of Encinal Avenue and Fountain Street; Mrs. James Wiley, 1232 St. Charles Street, urging Council to support Planning Board's density-standard recommendations; Mr. Lawrence Ziegenfuss, 1128 Morton Street (southeast corner of Encinal Avenue and Morton Street; and Two petitions, signed by L3 and 14 residents, respectively, concerning the proposed zoning of Morton Street, between Encinal and San Antonio Avenues. Upon request, Mr. Annibale stated he and Councilman Freeman had attended the Planning Board's meeting the previous evening at which time the Board had acted on the five points the Council had asked be given further consideration. He said the proposed new Zoning Ordinance will be returned to the Council in time for its next regular meeting when he would anticipate it will be re-introduced and another public hearing be set for the following meeting. Considerable discussion ensued upon the situation - especially with regard to the interpretation of the provision for non-conforming uses and their reconstruction in the event of fifty per cent destruction. Councilman Freeman felt the general public has been worried about this particular phase of the ordinance, and she emphasized they have nothing to fear in this respect. She pointed out another misconception of the ordinance is that those who own lots smaller in size than the standards set up therein think they cannot build or rebuild on them. Mr. Annibale agreed, pointing out the whole conception of the Zoning Ordinance by the Planning Board is it realizes the City contains lots of all sizes, many of them very small - and when a person seeks to build on these, in many instances he is going to have to come to the Board to ask for variances or exceptions. He said the ordinance is so set up that these people can apply to the Board and, it is assumed, the Board will favorably consider their requests - and if the Board does not favorably con- sider the requests, then the applicants can appeal to the City Council. z Councilman Petersen stated he felt that where there is hardship involved in any case, the purpose of the Planning Board is to benefit the people and try to work out their problem the best way possible in the interest of the City and the people. Mr. Annibale concurred this is a function of the Board. President McCall stated he felt the Council should meet on Tuesday, May 13, to dis- cuss the Zoning Ordinance with the Planning Director and any interested parties in order to have a complete understanding of the subject before it comes up at the next regular meeting for action. There being no objections, President McCall stated these several communications concerning the new Zoning Ordinance will be referred to the file on the subject for further consideration. From California Labor-Industry Committee for Shipbuilding, signed by Mr. John F. O'Hara, Secretary-Treasurer, expressing appreciation for the Council's support of its effort to bring about successful passage of Assembly Bill No. 24, exempting from taxation vessels of more than 1000 tons while under construction. President McCall stated the Alameda Council is one of the few who took official action on this matter and the labor and shipyards industries are very appreciative. Mr. Harold Ainslow, Assistant Treasurer of Todd Shipyards Corporation, personally thanked each individual Councilman for his support of the shipbuilding tax exemption bill. 6. From Alameda County Taxpayers Association, Inc., signed by Mrs. G. C. Morris, Executive Vice President-Manager, recommending careful attention be given all expendi- ture items in an endeavor to hold the 1958-59 budget at the current level of service. President McCall stated the City Council, in the budget for the ensuing fiscal year, is going to do everything within its power to hold the present level of service and to keep the tax rate down. If possible to make a cut, it will be made and the Coun- cil is going to work in the best interests of the taxpayers as a whole - and it does not want to have some association or group take the credit for what it is going to try to do. 7. From Mrs. Emily Powell, 1170 Regent Street, requesting transfer of the permit of John A. Taylor to operate a newsstand at the southwest corner of Webster Street and Lincoln Avenue, Councilman Schacht moved the permit for the operation of the designated newsstand be transferred to Mrs. Emily Powell. The motion was seconded by Councilman Petersen and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 8. From Veterans Affairs Commission of Alameda County, signed by Mr. Allen F. Strutz, Treasurer, requesting the Council appropriate Two Hundred Dollars as Alameda's pro rata share of the costs for the 1958 Veterans' Day Observance, to be held in Oakland. It was developed that this is the normal procedure in this matter and Councilman Freeman thereupon moved the appropriation of the requested amount be made in the budget for 1958-59. The motion was seconded by Councilman Collischonn and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. The City Manager was instructed to include this item in the budget. 9. From the Citizens Committee for Water Development, signed by Mr. Charles F. Howard, Chairman, requesting the Council consider the adoption of a resolution endors- ing the program for the water development project of the East Bay Municipal Utility District. The matter was referred to "Resolutions". 10. From Alameda Real Estate Board, Public Affairs Committee, signed by Mr. W. J. Justin, Jr., President, requesting permission to hold several work sessions with the Council to iron out some of the important items contained in the proposed Zoning Ordinance. This communication had been delivered to the President after the Council meeting convened and was, therefore, read in full. Mr. Annibale outlined the steps taken thus far in connection with the Zoning Ordi- nance. Legally speaking, the Board submitted to the Council, some weeks ago, the proposed new Zoning Ordinance with its recommendation that it be adopted. The Council examined it,heard several people express their views and then sent it back to the Board with five recommendations. The Board took the position and, he felt, rightly so, that its only duty was to hear on these five points - and, he understood, it did this. On the basis of the Council's return of the Ordinance to the Board and its hearing and its own feeling, it is now ready tor eturn to the Council the new Zoning Ordinance, as revised. He said it would seem, therefore, the matter is now out of the hands of the Board and into the hands of the Council for its decision. He said he believes the Council should hold another public hearing on the Ordinance. The Council has the power to affirm, modify or deny the recommendations of the Board. Councilman Schacht pointed out he had understood that the Board was going to consider not only the five points specified by the Council - those were mandatory - but also that there would be additional meetings with anyone interested so that anything else not already covered would be brought out. He felt he, himself, would like some discussion with, perhaps, the Planners and City Attorney to find out all the facts about the Ordinance. He thought this document is probably one of the most important ordinances to come up in Alameda for a long time and he felt the Council should be cautious and know just what its regulations mean. Councilman Petersen stated that if another hearing is to be held and since the requests of the Real Estate Board are technical in nature, he felt the Planning Board should be invited to be present, also, in order that the Council could have the benefit of its experience in making any decision. Councilman Freeman asked that those who initiated the Master Plan be included because, as was pointed out at the Board meeting last night, if the Zoning Ordinance is going to be changed, one must go back to the Master Plan which designates the type of City desired. Therefore, she asked that all persons who were interested in instigating the Master Plan should be invited - the former members of the Planning Board and the City Council so the Council may hear all phases of the situation. President McCall agreed and stated he felt the Real Estate Board undoubtedly has definite ideas in mind and if a meeting is to be held on May 13, he thought the Council should receive in writing, by May 9, a list of specific items from the Board so the Council can weigh the facts and discuss them prior to that meeting. Councilmen Schacht and Collischonn concurred that the Council should make every effort to hear all pertinent information on the subject. Mr. Annibale also suggested a Notice of Public Hearing be published. Councilman Schacht thereupon moved that, at the conclusion of this meeting, the Council adjourn to an adjourned regular meeting to be held on Tuesday, May 13, 1958, at 7:30 o'clock for the specific purpose of holding a Public Hearing on the proposed new Zoning Ordinance and an advertisement to this effect be published. The motion was seconded by Councilman Collischonn and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: 1 11. Mrs. James Wiley, 1232 St. Charles Street, stated she had followed the progress of the Zoning Ordinance for the past five years and she is very anxious to have a really good Zoning Ordinance for the City of Alameda and she wants it passed just as soon as the Council can reasonably do it. She felt the longer it is delayed, the more the errors of the past will be perpetuated. She suggested the Council realize that the people who do not have an ax to grind - who only want to have a fine City to live in - are the ones who must be listened to very carefully. She mentioned several sources from which planning advice could be obtained - pointing up, however, the fact that the City's Planning Department is very fine and is doing an excellent job. She felt the City Planning Board had worked hard and conscientiously and their work should be recognized by the Council. She emphasized that opinions should be asked, not from those who earn their livelihood by the increased density of popula- tion, but from those who have the long-range point of view, and who can see what is best for the whole City. The immediate dollar is not what concerns the citizens - they are concerned with the welfare of the City over the long pull. She urged that the Council get advice from disinterested, wise parties. 12. Mrs. Ella May Waterbury, 338 Beach Road, addressed the Council on behalf of the Bay Farm Island Improvement League and the Mothers' Club concerning Godfrey Park. She stated she had contacted several City officials, pointing up the lack of facili- ties in the park and inquiring about its development. She had been informed that no great progress could be made because there is not yet a Master Plan for the park, and now, she understands, the Master Plan cannot be evolved because the park site is too close to the Oakland Airport. She mentioned the growth of population in that area - there being two hundred and fifty small children alone, who attend Otis School, plus those who attend Lincoln or the High School. She said the park really gets terrific use and the Mothers' Club and the League are willing to raise money to fur- nish certain facilities to help develop the park - but they cannot even planta tree because there is no Master Plan. Upon request, Mr. Weller explained that he had asked the Superintendent of Recreation to include in his 1958-59 budget some funds for the improvement of Godfrey Park. He pointed out, however, there are several major problems which must be solved before the City can proceed with an over-all plan - for example, the flight patterns of the Airport, the future planning of the School District and the progress of the Bay Farm Island Assessment District. He felt it would be foolish to lay out any long-range plans until these problems are resolved. He said he expected there ought to be some development of the park this coming year, but when it comes to structural improve- ments which would cost thousands of dollars, the City would want to be sure of loca- tions before going ahead. Following further discussion, during which it was brought out the actual site of the park may be changed, Councilman Collischonn inquired if it would be possible to pro- vide in the 1958-59 budget of the Recreation Department for some additional equipment in this park. Said installation would not be too costly and if it is determined this particular area would not be used as a perk in the future, the equipment could be moved. It was agreed this much could be done. The City Manager was instructed to discuss the situation with Mr. Saalwaechter and follow through with some development during the ensuing fiscal year. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS, ETCETERA: 13. From the Bureau of Electricity, signed by Mr. G. A. Baxter General Manager, informing the Council of the transfer to the General Fund of $'7T_J_,156.67, and request- ing permission to retain in the "Bureau of Electricity Fund" all earnings for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1958, in excess of L89,16.67. The latter amount was computed in conformity with the formula in Section 12-6, Article XII of the Charter of the City of Alameda. In response to Councilman Petersents request, Mr. Weller explained the financial details involved. To cover the request of the Board, Mr. Weller suggested the Council grant it subject to the understanding that any discrepancy between the esti- mate and the actual cash figure be carried over and shown as income to the Bureau for 1958-59. Councilman Petersen then made a motion as stated by the City Manager. Councilman Schacht seconded the motion which was carried by the following roll call vote. Ayes: Five. Noes : None. Absent: None. 14. From the Social , 1 Service Board, signed by Mrs. Myrtle C. L tle, Executive Secre- tary, informing the Council of a motion passed by the Board that no change be made in the contract agreement between the City and Family Service Agency covering the services of the Executive Director - and the agreement be renewed for the fiscal year 1958-59„ The matter was referred to "Resolutions". INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES: 15. Councilman Schacht introduced the following ordinance, after which it was laid over under provision of law and the Charter: "Ordinance No. New Series An Ordinance Authorizing the Acquisition of Certain Real Property for Street, Highway and General Municipal Purposes (Widening of Willow Street-- Alameda Hospital)." A lengthy discussion was had on the contemplated project of widening Willow Street. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 16. The matter was presented concerning the establishment of mental health services in the City by Alameda County in accordance with the provisions of the Short-Doyle Act. This subject had originated with the request of the California Congress of Parents and Teachers, Inc., at the Council meeting of March 18, and had been sup- plemented by the recommendation of the Alameda Council Parent-Teachers Association, submitted to the Council at its meeting of April 15, that it adopt a resolution requesting the County Board of Supervisors to proceed to take steps to establish these services. Councilman Freeman explained the provisions of the Short-Doyle Act, stressing the fact the first step is to set up a seven-man Board which is necessary to start the program functioning. This Board will be comprised of psychiatrists, doctors and laymen who will investigate the whole situation and determine the need. Nothing can be done until this Board is created. Councilman Freeman emphasized the import- ance of the fact there would be an out-patient, in-patient clinic where many people could receive treatment and still continue to work at their jobs and to live at home with their families. She felt this would save the County Welfare Department con- siderable money, and also a great deal of money could be saved under this program because the State is to pay half the cost. President McCall said he felt no matter how these services are set up, the program is still going to cost the taxpayers money in one way or another. Councilman Schacht stated he believes this measure is a valid one and, oven though it is going to cost the County money, he thought, in the long run, the Council would be endorsing more service and actually saving some money that is now beingr, spent. He felt this program is a stop in the right direction. The matter was then referred to "Resolutions". NEW BUSINESS: 17. Councilman Petersen referred to the Committee of the Whole meeting scheduled after the Council meeting, and itemized the six topics to be discussed at that time. He said all of these items are matters of public interest and he could see no reason why, with the exception of one or two of the subjects, they should not be handled before the public. He felt if they cannot be put on the agenda for the regular Coun- cil meeting, then no meeting should adjourn to the Conference Room, but it should adjourn in the Council Chamber and the Committee meeting held and recorded on the machine just as any business coming before the City Council so there will be a record of this information and it will be available to the public if desired. He felt all business of the City should be conducted in the Council Chamber or some place where it can be recorded. President McCall stated he did not think there is any objection to using the recorder. He pointed out the Committee of the Whole meeting is open to the public - Councilman Freeman said she actually thought Councilman Petersen has made a fine recommendation. She believes many people who come to the Council meetings aro inter- ested in everything the Council is doing and she would like very much to hold the Committee of the Whole meetings in the Council Chamber. Mr. Weller explained that at least three or four of the items referred to have to do with potential negotiations on the part of the City and he, personally, would be inclined to think the public would not want to be in the position of possibly jeo- pardizing the City's stand on these matters. He said he was not talking about secret meetings, but he was talking about what seems to him to be perfectly valid instances where the Council ought to have the opportunity to discuss the City/s position on matters which, ultimately, might end in Court or, certainly, would termi- nate on the basis of "who is going to pay how much", without exposing the City's hand and position to, one might say, the opposition. He said he thought that is the general purpose of Committee of the Whole meetings and he felt, in his judgment, the City's position would be weakened if such matters were discussed publicly. He said he has no objection whatever to the Press being present - it regularly has been - and he has no objection, if the Council wishes to do so, to discussing all matters pub- licly - but he thought there are times, and he felt the public would agree, when it is not in the public interest to discuss certain matters publicly. Councilman Collischonn thereupon moved the Council continuo with the procedure it has been following. He felt there is a great deal of discussion held at the Council meetings in which the public cannot possibly be interested - it just prolonFs the meetings, particularly for those who have an interest in items which are coming up later on the agenda. He thought the Committee of the Whole meetings are perfectly legitimate. Councilman Schacht concurred with Hr. Weller's points - stating that, in some instances, the nubile interest would be damaged by open discussion. Following further discussion, Councilman Collischonn amended his motion to include that the Committee of the Whole meetings be recorded on the machine. Councilman Schacht thereupon seconded the motion, as amended, which carried by the following roll call vote. Ayes: Councilmen Collischonn, Freeman, Schacht and President McCall, (h). Noes: Councilman Petersen, (1). Absent: None. 16. Councilman Collischonn stated that some time ago the Council met with Mr. Justin Herman, Director of the Federal Housing and Home Finance Agency, who explained what requirements Alameda had to meet to qualify under a Workable Program in order to permit private enterprise to secure Federal funds to develop property in Alameda. The reason for the meeting was that the Council was concerned about the closing of Chipman Housing Project with its attendant damage to the business of the West End merchants - and the Council's desire to get this property developed as quickly as possible. Councilman Collischonn stated he understands Alameda is at least sixty per cent along the way to having a Workable Program under which these private build- ers could qualify and he inquired as to the present status of the Program - has any further progress been made? He stated he was afraid that if the matter of submitting the Program for approval of the Federal Housing and Home Finance Agency is delayed too long, the prospective developers will lose interest, the west End Merchants Asso- ciation will be angry and the property itself will be kept off the tax rolls just that much longer. Mr. Weller stated the fact of the matter is the work of completing the Program has not progressed at all. He gave a resume of the steps taken in this matter, and stated it was his view that, since the Council had not taken any action on the matter, he had not been instructed to proceed any further. President McCall asked if the instructions would be for the City Manager to have the staff prepare the necessary material to be forwarded to the Federal Housing and Home Finance Agency. Mr. Weller indicated this is right. Councilman Freeman stated she understood that, at the time of the meeting with Mr. Herman, the City participated in no way - it did not have to set up a commission - because it involved private money. She had contended that if it is private money being used, then why must the City be involved? She felt the urban renewal phase is fine, but when one gets to the redevelopment requirements, there is more legis- lation needed. Councilman Collischonn pointed out the City is not undertaking urban redevelopment under Title 221. He emphasized that the City is concerned only with the development of the Chipman area, involving private capital and not public funds, or City funds. It would be Federal funds as a loan to private enterprise. The Workable Program is required as the initial step. He pointed out the Housing Authority is obliged to close Chipman Housing Project as of June 30, 1958, and his main concern is the development of this area. Councilman Collischonn stated that, with no obligation on the part of the City, he could not see why the Council does not proceed with at least the preparation of a Workable Program. If, ultimately, the Council is informed th't, in order for developers to obtain Federal funds, the City must participate in some financial way, then he would be one of the first to withdraw. Councilman Freeman claimed the first step in the procedure is that the City must participate - either set up or "X" itself as a commission. She said another provi- sion is that the community has to request the Program. If the City did n ot have to instigate the setup - if it could say merely it is in agreement that the Program is needed, and it would like to have it, the developers are ready to build and all they need is Federal funds - that would be fine. Councilman Collischonn asked the City Attorney for his interpretation of Mr. Herman's letter. Mr. Annibale stated there seemed to be some confusion between procedure under Section 221 and an urban renewal plan. He stated the procedure under the former does not involve the City in any manner, with the exception of evolving the items of the workable Plan. All the City has to do is show that it has the points of the Workable Program presently in existence or say that it intends to put the remaining portion into existence - beyond that the City does not have to go. Councilman Petersen asked if the City would not be assuming an obligation in accepting the seven-point Workable Program to fulfill the Program once it had been entered into. Mr. Annibale replied that there would be no legal liability if it failed to complete the Workable Program, and there is actually no contract being entered into - it is merely a request for a statement of fact as to what is set out in the Workable Program. President McCall pointed out the City is concerned only with the development of the Chipman property and in order for a private developer to get a loan from the Federal Government, under Title 221, the City must have some kind of a Workable Program. There is to be no signed contract or binding agreement - but the City indicates it fulfills the seven points of the Workable Program. Mr. Annibale agreed this is his understanding. In response to Councilman Schacht's question ns to there being any financial burden upon the City in its undertaking of meeting the seven points, Mr. Annibale stated there is none. He thereupon enumerated the seven points to be fulfilled, which were discussed fully. Mr. Weller explained certain points. Councilman Collischonn stated he thinks it is highly important the Council proceed in this matter. He thereupon moved the City Manager proceed with the preparation of a Workable Program as promptly as possible so the opportunity of having private enterprise develop Chipman property will not be missed. The motion was seconded by Councilman Schacht and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Councilmen Collischonn, Schacht and President McCall, (3). Not Voting: Councilman Freeman, (1). Noes: Councilman Petersen, (1). Absent: None. Mr. Weller stated he understood at the outset that the Workable Program would be submitted first to the Council so it could be apprised of what it entails, as it can- not be visualized at this moment exactly what will be in it. He said he did not feel there would be any obligations on the part of the City but he would like to have the Council see the Program first so it can be reassured in this respect. what the City would be doing, in effect, would be to submit a proposed Workable Program, with the consent of the Council, - the elements of the Program as presented would be satis- factory to the Council. If it were not satisfactory to the Federal Government, that would be the end of it, until the Program is changed - so there is no obligation beinc, made by the submission. Mr. Annibale also pointed out that when the Workable Program has been evolved, a reso- lution should be passed by the Council transmitting it to the Federal Government. Further discussion ensued on the interpretation of certain requirements of Section 221. RESOLUTIONS: 19. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Schacht, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 5769 Requesting Cancellation of County Taxes on Property Acquired by the City of Alameda for Municipal Purposes (1-Foot Strip Required--Subdivision Tract No. 1250)." (Duggan - Bay Farm Island) The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Freeman and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 20. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Petersen, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 5770 Consent to Sublease to Todd Shipyards Corporation, a New York Corporation, of Real Property Held Under Lease Between the City of Alameda and Matson Navigation Company, a Corporation." (1. The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Schacht and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent None. 21. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Freeman, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 5771 Resolution of the Council of the City of Alameda Urging and Requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of Alameda to Take the Necessary Steps to Put into Effect the Provisions of the Short- Doyle Act Within the County of Alameda." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Collischonn and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Councilmen Collischonn, Freeman, Petersen and Schacht, ()). Noes: President McCall, (1). Absent: None. 22. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Collischonn, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 5772 Authorizing the Acquisition of Certain Real Property From Melvin M. Onkle and Wretha P. Onkle, His Wife, as Joint Tenants, for Public Street and Highway Purposes. (Park Street and Otis Drive)." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Freeman and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 23. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Collischonn, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 5773 Approving Second Supplemental Memorandum of Agreement for Expenditure of Gas Tax Allocation for Major City Streets and Authorizing the Execution Thereof." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Petersen and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 211. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Petersen, who moved its adoption: Resolution No. 5774 Adopting Specifications, Special Provisions and Plans for Street Construction at Park Street and Otis Drive, Calling for Bids and Directing City Clerk to Advertise Same." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Schacht and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None, 25. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Schacht, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 5775 Authorizing Extension of Agreement by and Between The City of Alameda and the Alameda Family Service Agency, a Nor-Profit Corporation, for a One-Year Period, Said Agreement Relating to Furnishing of The Services of an Executive Secretary to the Social Service Board." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Collischonn and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 26. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Freeman, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No, 5776 Resolution of the Council of the City of Alameda Endorsing and Approving the East Bay Municipal Utility District's Water Development Project and Urging All Voters to Endorse Same at the June 3, 1958 Election." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Collischonn and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent None. Mr. Buford Fisher, Staff Assistant to the Commercial Division Manager of the East Bay Municipal Utility Distl'ict, expressed his appreciation to the Council for this action. President McCall thereupon declared all of the foregoing resolutions duly adopted and passed. OBDINA MCE FOR PASSAGE: 27. "Ordinance No. 1269, New Series An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 10101, New Series, by Extending Term of Lease of City Property Authorized Thereby." (To United States of America for Anti- Aircraft Site on Bay Farm Island) Councilman Petersen moved the ordinance be adopted as read. The motion was seconded by Councilman Schacht and on roll call carried bv the following vote. Ayes: Five, Noes: None. Absent: None, 2e. Financial Statement - Bureau of Electricity, as of March 31, 1958 - Verified by George A. Hackleman 8-, Co. 29. Second Supplanental Memorandum of Agreement - Between State of California and City of Alameda for Expenditure of Gas Tax Allocation for Major City Streets. 30. Specifications No, PW 5-58-2 - for Street Construction at Park Street and Otis Drive, 31. A7reement - Between City of Alameda and Alameda Family Service Agency he Services of Executive Secretary to Social Service Board. 32. An itemized List of Claims against the City of Alameda, and the Departments thereof, in the total amount of (:,-311.1,141.67, was submitted to the Council at this meeting. FILING: BILLS: The list was accompanied by certification from the City Manager that the Claims shown were correct. Councilman Petersen moved the bills as itemized in the List of Claims filed with the City Clerk on May 6, 1958, and presented to the Council at this time, be allowed and paid. The motion was seconded by Councilman Freeman and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None, Absent: None. ADJOURNMENT: 33. There being no further business to come before the meeting, the Council adjourned - to assemble in adjourned reeuler session on Tuesday evening, May 13, at 7:30 o'clock. Respectfully submitted