1957-05-07 Regular CC MinutesREGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA
HELD TUESDAY EVENING, MAY 7, 1957
The meeting convened at 7:30 o'clock p.m. with President McCall presiding. The
Reverend Mrs. Gladys Grier of the Home of Truth delivered a most inspiring Invocation
and the Pledge of Allegiance was lead by Councilman Freeman.
ROLL CALL:
The roll was called and Councilmen Freeman, Haag, Petersen and President McCall,
(4), were noted present. Absent: Councilman Kranelly, (1).
MINUTES:
1. The mindtes of the adjourned regular meeting held April 9, 1957, were approved
as transcribed. With regard to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 16,
1957, Councilman Petersen called attention to what he considered to be an omission -
referring to his persistent questioning of the City Manager, in connection with the
passage of Ordinance No. 1232, New Series, as to why he had originally recommended
that the Building Code not be amended and then had subsequently recommended that it
be done - to which Mr. Froerer had replied, after further consideration, he had
changed his mind. The minutes of the meeting of April 16 were then approved as
corrected.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
2. From Mr. Manuel J. Melin, requesting an additional extension of time in which
to raze the dwelling at 1914 Santa Clara Avenue.
Mr. Annibale reported he had conferred with the Building Inspector on this matter
and had been informed the work is progressing steadily, and the extension of time is
in order.
Councilman Petersen moved the request be granted and Mr. Melin be allowed a thirty -
day extension of time in which to complete the razing of the dwelling on the premises.
The motion was seconded by Councilman Freeman and unanimously carried.
3. From The Honorable George Christopher, Mayor of the City of San Francisco,
addressed to the City Clerk, expressing appreciation to the Council for adopting
Resolution No. 5594, in support of San Francisco's effort to obtain a Major League
Baseball Franchise.
The communication was noted and ordered filed.
4. From City of Berkeley, transmitting copy of its Resolution No. 36,240 -N.S., in
support of Alameda's effort to have a Small Boat Launching Ramp constructed at the
North end of Grand Street.
President McCall stated the letter would be acknowledged and then filed.
5: From Alameda Chamber of Commerce, suggesting the City underwrite the cost of
the project of installing Flag Decoration Holders on electroliers in the business
districts.
Councilman Petersen referred to the letter from the Inter- Service Club Council,
dated April 12, 1957, and signed by Mr. George H. Hagy, in which it was stated,
"The matter of flag decoration holders was given due consideration and it is the
unanimous opinion of this Council that this is a more appropriate project for the
merchants and the Chamber of Commerce ". He stated he felt the origin of the project
is with the Inter - Service Club Council and should be taken care of by it and also,
the economy of the City should be given first consideration.
President McCall explained the matter had started with the suggestion for installing
hanging flower baskets. In response to Councilman Petersen's question as to why
that matter had been turned down, President McCall replied it was determined the
cost would be too high. Councilman Petersen then inquired concerning the cost of the
flag holders, to which the City Engineer stated there are forty -three light stand-
ards on Park Street and twenty -five on Webster Street and the holders would cost
,8.00 each - or a total of $544. Councilman Haag asked what the cost of installation
would be and Mr. Hanna answered, "Approximately $1.00 each ".
Councilman Freeman felt the Council should ascertain if the merchants will take care
of putting out and taking in the flags each day - and asked if it would be possible
to lay the matter over to the next meeting, pending receipt of further information
on the subject.
The matter was thereupon referred to the City Manager for his report on the exact
costs involved.
6. From the Building and Construction Trades Council of Alameda County, signed by
J
Mr. L. Childers, Business Representative, concerning action of the Association of
General Contractors in calling on public bodies, elected officials and representatives
of all the people to exert pressure in its behalf in the current wage negotiations.
Councilman Haag stated the City Council should not interject itself into any situa-
tion involving wage negotiations. Councilman Freeman concurred - and the letter was
ordered filed.
7'' . From Alameda Chamber of Commerce, concerning the proposed development of the
"Clark Pottery" property. It was stated the Chamber has endeavored to find out what
the plans are for this development - and the Board of Directors had discussed the
possibility that a "discount" operation might be planned, which would not be in the
best interests of the business community. It was requested the Council refer any
information it might have, with regard to the property in question, to the Chamber.
It was determined the matter be referred back to the Chamber with the request that
it write directly to the developer for definite information.
8. From the following persons, suggesting, recommending or endorsing Mr..,Randal F.
Dickey, Jr., as the appointee to the City Council to fill the anticipated vacancy:
Hart S. Smith, 1028 Lewelling Court; Paul H. Cronenwett, M. D., 2241 Central Avenue;
John Ohanesson, M. D., Elwood C. Greist, M. D., Donald A. Youngdahl, M. D., Earle G.
Parkinson, M. D., all of 2500 Central Avenue; Richard J. Janusch, 527 -H Palace
Court; Alvin H. Speier, 3220 Thompson Avenue; Mr. and Mrs. R. H. Cooper, 1610 High
Street; Mrs. Mary E. Shade, 85 Glen Avenue, Oakland; R. F. Oldershaw, 1916 Harvard
Drive; George A. Kieffer, 970 Post Street; Mrs. J. J. Schlageter, 3247 Thompson
Avenue; Lillian Musso; Mrs. Albert N. Veltman, 1730 Moreland Drive; Theodor Zachmann,
3269 Thompson Avenue; Mrs. Ella Hagen, 1037 Broadway; Eileen and T. D. Hooper, 2032
Clinton Avenue; Hugh O'Neill, 3243 Thompson Avenue; J. R. Deppen, 2979 Northwood
Drive; Gustav Horst, 3236 Thompson Avenue; Fred Clausen, 3230 Thompson Avenue;
Harry and Margaret F. Wetherald, 1004 Post Street; Mrs. Leonard Bargones, 2707 Otis
Drive; Edward Wm. Watson, 3242 Thompson Avenue; Virgil L. Boudreau, 3232 Thompson
Avenue; Mr. and Mrs. Charles R. Morehouse, 2816 Windsor Drive; E. F. and Marie
Gilligan, 2821 Encinal Avenue; Walter M. and Mary A. Pola, 2050 Encinal Avenue;
Ruckman Ward, President, Local 853, I.U.E., 1828 Union Street; Mrs. Ruth Schmidt,
623 Taylor Avenue; Les Painter, 1641 Everett Street; Mr. and Mrs. John F. Gillespie,
Sr., 2009 Santa Clara Avenue; George and Jean Musso, 1820 Harvard Drive; A. E.
Sinclair, 1906 High Street; Mrs. Pauline F. Baum, 1723 High Street; and Sam Adams,
1252 Regent Street.
9. From the following persons, suggesting, recommending or endorsing Mr. Richard P.
Schacht as the appointee to the City.Council: Mrs. C. Tiedemann, Sr., 3210 Thompson
Avenue; and George E. McDonald, 1516 Oak Street.
President McCall stated all of these communications would be referred to the file on
the subject for further consideration.
10. From Mr. Stanley K. Jansson, 1584 Pacific Avenue, requesting permission to
build a seven -foot fence - or as high as possible - to hide the adjacent "unsightly"
house.
President McCall stated he had asked the Planning Director to inspect the premises
in this case and called upon Mr. Williams for his report. Mr. Williams stated he
had been unable to complete his field survey of the situation and would like to have
the matter continued to the next meeting, at which time he could make his report.
It was so ordered.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
1. Mr. Frank Gottstein, 731 Haight Avenue, spoke of the parking congestion on
Haight Avenue and stated he had been forced to call the police because people had
actually parked in front of his driveway - and the Municipal Parking Lot still remains
empty. He claimed the merchants made a mistake in selecting this location and some-
thing must be done to correct this mistake which the taxpayers are paying for. He
also pointed out there is improper parking in the commercial district at Ninth Street
and Santa Clara Avenue, which results in the busses having to stop in the middle of
the street at times.
He suggested the City consider the establishment of free parking in its Lot on
Haight Avenue on Saturdays, as an inducement for the benefit of the merchants. He
also suggested some plan be worked out for allowing an extended period of time for
parking.
Councilman Haag called attention to_ the fact that when Mr. Gottstein had originally
made the suggestion of parking space rental on a monthly basis - which the Council
had felt was a good one - a survey had been made but the idea was turned down cold
by the merchants and their employees.
It was brought out that the merchants had been approached on the basis of a rental of
only $8.00 to $10.00 per month - and still no one was interested.
Mr. Froerer stated he would like to have an opportunity to check on other types of
meters as he felt it might be possible to work out some arrangement whereby more time
could be allowed for a certain deposit.
Councilman Petersen stated there is a problem in this matter which must be worked out
and he suggested a study be made by the City Manager to ascertain how this particular
situation can be.amended within the realm of the.Charter and the provisions of the
investment bonds and submit a report thereon.
0 4
12. Mrs. Ella Mae Waterbury, 338 Beach
has to deposit five cents - the minimum
Municipal Parking Lots, even though one
minutes.
Road, called attention to the fact that one
amount - every time one has to use the
will be there for only twenty or thirty
Councilman Haag asked Mrs. Waterbury if any of the merchants had ever offered her
a parking token - and she replied, "No ".
V
13. Mr. Harvey R. Marshall, 3205 Central Avenue, spoke in protest against the
double parking of trucks on Park and Webster Streets which causes more congestion
of traffic.
President McCall stated there is an Ordinance for Introduction on the agenda tonight
which provides for loading zones on these two streets and which will eliminate this
situation..
HEARINGS:
14. The matter was called up concerning the request from Mr. M. E. Lee for the
Amendment of Diagram and Assessment of Certain Parcels of Land in the Bay Farm
Island Sewer Assessment District - Project No. 1 - known as Parcels Nos. 90 -21 and
90 -22, into two parcels to be known as Parcels Nos. 90 -23 and 90 -24..
The Clerk stated she had on file the Affidavit of Publication, indicating the
Notice of Public Hearing had been published twice, as required by provisions of
Sec. 27, State Refunding Assessment Bond Act of 1935 - and also, the report of the
City Engineer on the matter. It was stated no protests against the amendment had
been filed.
President McCall inquired if there were any in the audience who objected to the
amendment - and there was no response.
Councilman Petersen inquired where the property was located and Mr. Hanna replied -
the parcels involved are situated on the. East side of Maitland Drive, beginning
about 100 feet North of Fitchburg Avenue.
Councilman. Haag thereupon moved the request of Mr. Lee be granted and the Diagram }
and Assessment be amended to divide Parcels Nos. 90 -21 and 90 -22 into two parcels
to be known as Parcels Nos. 90 -23 and 90 -24. The motion was seconded by Councilman
Freeman and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Kranelly, (1).
REPORTS OF COMMITTEES:
i5v From the City Manager, concerning the Agreement between the Port of Oakland
and Utah Construction Company in connection with the construction of a rip rap
slope protection along the South Shore of Bay Farm Island.
It was explained the Port Authorities have withdrawn their demand for the additional
million cubic yards of fill from the borrow area within the City of Alameda and
have agreed to permit Utah to enter onto their land for said purpose.
Councilman Petersen asked where the slope protection would be located and Mr.
Froerer stated it would run along the common line of property owned by the Port
and Utah, and none of the rip rap would go on City property at any point. He
pointed out the site involved on the map. Councilman Petersen said it appears
there are a number of property owners on Bay Farm Island who believe they are going
to be assessed for the fill.
Mr. Froerer emphasized there has been no reclamation district formed.
Councilman Freeman stated she understood the people on Bay Farm Island are very con -
cerned. She said they had been told they would have to have their land filled or
they would be assessed.
Mr. Froerer agreed it is true that Utah plans to fill the area - but stated he knows
nothing at the present time about a reclamation district. He pointed out the City
has absolutely no jurisdiction in this matter.
Mrs. J. Benton Coffman, 2846 Santa Clara Avenue, stated the matter of drainage is
the only point she has heard discussed. The people are concerned to know whether,
when the land is filled in, they will be responsible for the cost of draining their
property - they have drainage now - or whether the developer is responsible for
draining the land. She reiterated her question, "Who is responsible for the cost
of this work to provide drainage ?"
The City Attorney stated he felt quite sure, under provisions of the Fill Agreement,
the responsibility would be that of Utah - but he would like to have an opportunity
to review the Agreement before rendering a definite answer.
Councilman Petersen requested that any drawings and other pertinent information on
this matter be submitted to those members of the Council who do not now possess them.
J
16. From the Bureau of Electricity, Department of Public Utilities, in explanation
of its capital expenditures program during the next five years- and requesting the
Council to permit the Department to retain in its fund this current year all earnings
above the budgeted amount of $536,000.
Mr. Froerer was called upon to explain the situation. He stated that, in the pre-
paration of the Budget for 1956 -57, it was estimated there would be $536,000. in
revenue from the Bureau. However, at the present time, due to increased earnings,
there is the sum of $59,633.4.8 over and above the budgeted amount which the Bureau
would be obligated to forward to the City's General Fund, under provision of the
Charter - making a total of $595,633.48 for the current fiscal year. He explained
that, due to the expansion program,the Bureau has underway at the present time -
and in order to attempt to avoid floating a bond issue, the Board would like to keep
the extra sum mentioned. He said he would recommend the Councildefer action on this
request for a reasonable time so the Budget for 1957 -58 can be more properly determined.
Councilman Petersen moved the City Manager's recommendation be approved and the mat-
ter be deferred. The motion was seconded by Councilman Freeman and unanimously
carried.
17 From the City Manager, requesting authorization to dispose of dead batteries
and old tires which have accumulated in the City Hall Garage.
Councilman Freeman moved the City Manager's request be granted and he be authorized
to dispose of the obsolete items mentioned. The motion was seconded by Councilman
Petersen and unanimously. carried.
18. From the Board of Education, signed by Donald M. Roderick, Secretary, requesting
the Council to consider the employment of a Planning Consultant for the purpose of
developing a site utilization plan for a model school- community area. This would be
in the 18.8 -acres site reserved for schools, a park and a library in the general plans
.of Unit No. 1 of Tract No. 1866 (Utah -South Shore) . It was stated the cost of employ-
ing such a consultant would be borne equally by the School District and the City -
and it was also pointed out that time is of the essence in this matter.
In response to Councilman Freeman's question concerning the important time element,
Mr. Frc rer replied that the request is for site plans now and then the preparation
of detailed architectural plans would follow - the entire program would take some
two to two and one -half years. He pointed out it is altogether possible that within
this period there might be inhabitants in this area.
Councilman Haag asked if this planning project could not be undertaken by the City
Planning Department Staff - and Mr. Williams replied it is not practical for the City
Staff to try to develop precise and internal site plans - this is a specialized type
of planning - and calls for one more properly described as a park -site planner or a
landscape architect.
Mr. Froerer stated the cost would range somewhere between $2,000. and $3,500.
Councilman Petersen moved the request of the Board of Education be granted. Council-
man Haag stated the motion should be elaborated to include that someone be empowered
to proceed in this matter.
Mr. Froerer pointed out the Recreation Commission had already selected three such
planners for consideration by the Council. Councilman Freeman then suggested the
Council set a time to interview them and notify the Board of Education to this effect.
This action was determined upon and the meeting was set for Tuesday, May 14., at 7:30
o'clock p.m. in the Conference Room and the City Manager was instructed to notify the
parties concerned.
19. From the Recreation Commission, signed by Mr. J. Roger Hooper, Chairman,_recom-
mendirg the Council utilize the existing Golf Course Club House, after July 1, 1957,
on an interim basis, as a Recreation Center Building, to be available to community
groups on a permit basis.
Councilman Freeman stated she would like to approve the Commission's recommendation
and she thereupon moved the Club House be utilized as indicated.
Councilman Haag stated he would like to hear from the City Manager as to the feasi-
bility of the proposed Club House use, to which Mr. Froerer replied he felt the Club
House could be readily adapted for small groups. Councilman Haag then seconded the
motion and on roll call, it was carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes:
None. Absent: Councilman Kranelly, (1).
20. From the Recreation Commission, signed by Mr. J. Roger Hooper, Chairman, recom-
mending the Council immediately retain a Pool Architect to prepare the necessary
plans and specifications for the completion of Alameda Swim Center.
President McCall asked Mr. Hooper to speak on the subject and he explained this would
be a diving and a training pool. He expressed the,hopethat the plans and specifica-
tions can be drawn up in the near future, then it will be known exactly how much
money will be involved and, at an early date, both of these pools can be constructed.
In answer to Councilman Petersen's question as to the total estimated cost, Mr.
,Froerer replied it would be approximately $40,000.
President McCall asked if funds for the architect were available and Mr. Froerer
answered, "Yes ". He pointed out, however, the matter had been presented a month or
so ago, at which time it was referred to the Committee of the Whole for discussion
when the budget is being prepared. He suggested the Council follow this procedure.
Councilman Petersen moved this matter be reviewed during budget discussions. Coun-
cilman Haag concurred and Councilman Freeman seconded the motion, which was unani-
mously carried.
v
21. . -From the Recreation Commission, signed by Mr. J. Roger Hooper, Chairman, con -
cerning the interview and selection by the Council of a Park Site Planner for the
new Washington Park.
It was pointed out a meeting night has already been set for this purpose, earlier in
the meeting, in connection with the matter of a planner for the area in the South
Shore project.
V
22. From the Fire Chief, addressed to the City Manager, transmitting a copy of a
letter addressed to the Mayor, requesting a meeting of the "Hours Committee" of the
Alameda Firemen's Association with the City Council to discuss a shorter work -week
for the members of the Fire Department.
President McCall stated the City has a very fine Civil Service Board and, if there
were no objections, he would refer this matter to the Board for its review and report
to the Council.
2 . From the City Manager, with regard to approval by the Alameda County Mayors'
Conference of the recommendation of its Salary Sub - Committee that the cities adopt
the modified State of California Salary Table. It was stated that, if the - Council
desires the City of Alameda salaries for the fiscal year 1957 -58 to be computed on
this basis, he will request the Civil Service Board to proceed with such studies
as are necessary to determine the cost and feasibility of such action.
President McCall stated he had talked with Mr. Routt, Executive Secretary of the
Board, and had requested him to make a review and submit a report on the comparison
of salaries.
24. From the City Planning Board, recording its endorsement in principle of a
marina as an integral part of the comprehensive beach and park development of the
South Shore - and requesting, since a marina plan is now before the Board for con-
sideration, that a work session be set with the Council, the Board and all inter-
ested parties for review of the plan in the immediate future.
Councilman Haag suggested this meeting be set as soon as possible because the Coun-
cil will soon be involved with nightly budget sessions.
Upon request of President McCall, Mr. Williams, Planning Director., explained the
exact location of the site proposed to be developed by Mr. Knowles.
Councilman Freeman stated a one - million dollar beach would -not be much of a beach.
Upon request, Mr. Froerer stated the Shoreline Master Plan of the City provides for
the development of all of the southerly perimeter of the island from Bay Farm Island
to Encinal High School. The present beach project for the State Beach -Park lies
along the southerly perimeter of Washington Park fill and four to five hundred feet
easterly therefrom.
The conflict in the Knowles plan and the Beach -Park plan lies all the way along the
frontage of Washington Park. The present Knowles plan is quite an ambitious one,
extending from Page Street to the westerly line of Grand Street, extended. Mr.
Froerer stated there is considerable other frontage which might be utilized - but
certainly, under the plan as presented by Mr. Knowles, there is definite conflict.
Councilman Haag said he felt this point is all the more reason for having a meeting
to have these matters cleared up and explained. Mr. Williams agreed this was vir-
tually the germ of the discussion by the Planning Board. These are basic develop-
mental policies and decisions must be made. They hinge upon the ultimate design
proposals of the State. The Alameda State Beach -Park has been approved by the
State Beach -Park Commission. He said the continuity of the beach area is important
and will influence their beach design. The beach would ultimately extend off of
Broadway :westerly to or past Washington Park. The location of the Knowles develop-
ment is roughly from Grand Street virtually to the eastern line of the United States
Maritime property. Its location is very important and significant in the total
shoreline development program.
Councilman Haag asked (1) if the State Beach Park plan does include any such boat
harbor concept, to which Mr. Williams replied, "No, nor does it exclude it ", - and
(2) if beach -parks extend over this great area, have you any guess of what the total
cost of the project would be? Mr. Williams answered that Mr. Drury of the State
Division of Beaches and Parks had indicated a two million- dollar figure would provide
-a substantial beginning and the one million- dollar amount now up for consideration
was a minimum amount.
Councilman Petersen asked if any preliminary action by the Council would, in any way,
jeopardize the City's chances of receiving this fund and Mr. Williams replied any
local plans or programs should have close design coordination with State financed
beach -park developments. He said that, if there are sections of our total shoreline
which are earmarked for later fill and development, then the proper State agencies
should be so notified.
Councilman Haag reiterated he felt a meeting as suggested by the Planning Board
would be very beneficial.
Councilman Petersen said if this particular appropriation for the State Beach -Park
would be impaired by such a meeting, the Council should pass it up. Mr. Froerer
pointed out this legislation might be passed within the next couple of weeks. Coun-
cilman Haag asked if a simple fact- finding session were held, would it impair the
City's chances of getting this State money and Mr. Froerer said he did not think it
would.
President McCall asked if Mr. Knowles had shown his plans and Mr. Williams stated he
has filed his vicinity plan and a preliminary sketch plan. Discussion was then had
with regard to setting up a date for said meeting and it was finally determined that
the next night, Wednesday, May 8, at 8:00 o'clock in the Council Chamber was.the
only time available. The City Manager and Mr. Williams were instructed to contact
the Planning Board, Mr. Knowles and his staff, the Recreation Commission and the
Pleasure Boat- Harbor Advisory Committee to this effect.
During the course of the discussion to decide upon a meeting night for the foregoing
matter, it was brought out that a date had already been set for a meeting with the
Housing Authority on Thursday, May 16, 1957, at 8:00 o'clock p.m. in the Conference
Room.
25. From the Treasurer and Tax Collector, requesting the sum of $28.70 be refunded
to Mrs. Eva D. Meyer, 455 -A Santa Clara Avenue. This sum represents the Use Tax paid
on a Chevrolet purchased in San Bruno, just after the City's jurisdiction ceased.
Councilman Petersen moved the amount of $28.70 be refunded as requested by the Tax
Collector. The motion was seconded by Councilman Freeman and on roll call carried by
the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman Kranelly, (1).
26. From the City Manager, recommending Mr. Forrest V. Routt, Jr., Personnel Direc-
tor, be permitted to attend the Western Regional Conference of the Public Personnel
Association, to be held from June 2 through June 5, 1957, and $125. be appropriated
for this purpose. Councilman Petersen questioned whether this conference attendance
is necessary, mentioning the fact that Mr. Routt had attended a conference last Fall.
President McCall pointed out Mr. Routt is recognized as a very fine Personnel Direc-
tor and he had been invited to present <a paper at the Assembly Conference referred to.
Councilman Haag stated any time Forrest Routt attends a conference, the City "will
get its money's worth ". He thereupon moved the City Manager's recommendation be
approved and Mr. Routt be authorized to attend the designated Conference during the
period specified and A125. be appropriated for his expenses. The motion was seconded
by Councilman Freeman and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Three.
Noes: Councilman Petersen, (1). Absent: Councilman Kranelly, (1).
27. From the City Manager, reporting all work satisfactorily completed in connection
with the Furnishing of Building Protection of fifty -three Housing Buildings in the
Encinal Housing area, recommending the work be accepted and the Notice of Completion
be ordered filed.
Councilman Freeman moved the City Manager's recommendation be adopted; that the work
on this project be accepted and the Notice of Completion be filed. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Petersen and unanimously carried.
28" From the City Manager, tendering his resignation, due to advice of his physician,
and stating he has requested his retirement to become effective August 1, 1957.
Councilman Freeman suggested the Council refuse to accept Mr. Froerer's resignation -
but Mr. Froerer pointed out his action is necessary.
Councilman Haag stated that, under the circumstances, he would move the resignation
of the City Manager be accepted with regret and his retirement become effective
August 1, 1957. The motion was seconded by Councilman Freeman and on roll call
carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman
Kranelly, (1).
INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES:
29. Councilman Petersen introduced. the following.ordinance, after which it was laid
over under provision of law and the Charter:
"Ordinance No.
New Series
An Ordinance Amending Section 17 -364.1 of the Alameda
Municipal Code, Relating to Parking Limits in Parking
Meter Zones."
30. Councilman Freeman introduced the following ordinance, after which it was laid
over under provision of law and the Charter:
"Ordinance No.
New Series
An Ordinance Authorizing Execution of Lease Relating
to Those Certain Premises Commonly Known and Described
as 2226 Santa Clara Avenue in the City of Alameda from
the City of Alameda to the County of Alameda and
Approving the Form and Terms Thereof. "Health Center
Building)"
UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
31. Councilman Petersen asked the City Manager if he had received a report from the
Health Department with regard to the results of the tests of water in the lagoons.
Mr. Froerer read the tentative report of samples taken from the South end of several
streets, all of which were 100 per cent satisfactory, with the exception of the
water off the South end of Cedar and St. Charles Streets, which was 75 per cent.
He said that before making a final report, he would have further checks made. Mr.
Froerer also explained that the City Attorney, the City Engineer and he have gone
over the ends of these several streets in connection with the erection of barricades
and, pending receipt of the next report, certain signs will be posted. This was in
connection with the discussions at the last meeting of the Council concerning the
alleged unsanitary condition of the water for swimming.
Councilman Freeman asked that the City Attorney check to ascertain if the City has
the right to deny the public the use of these waters.
Councilman Petersen asked if the doctrine of attractive nuisance could be employed,
to which Mr. Annibale replied that, if any injuries to persons, particularly chil-
dren, occurred through failure to barricade the street ends, no doubt the doctrine
of attractive nuisance would be involved. However, whether or not it was actually
applied, any particular case could be based only upon the facts and circumstances
of each such case.
NEW BUSINESS:
3Y. Councilman Petersen moved that a letter be drafted by the Council expressing
sympathy to the family of the late Mr. rnest B. Poggi, who heroically gave up his
own life in saving the lives of two children who were drowning - and that the name
of Ernest B. Poggi be considered when streets in the newly proposed residential
area on Alameda's South Shore are to be named. The motion was seconded by Coun-
cilman Freeman and unanimously carried.
It was determined that the portion of the motion pertaining to street names would
be referred to the Planning Board for its consideration in that respect.
33. Councilman .Petersen read the following prepared statement, "It is my belief
that the people of Alameda desire that qualified candidates be presented to the
Council for consideration to fill the prospective vacancy to be created by the
resignation of the Honorable Raymond P. Kranelly. I wish to present the names of
six such Alamedans for consideration. I have listed their names alphabetically
because they are equally competent and, therefore, should be equally considered.
I submit to the Alameda City Council the names of the following qualified citizens
who, through their own civic interests, abilities and personal reputations, merit
the consideration of this Council: Messrs. Richard S. Diament; William S. Godfrey;
Albert C. Gonzales; Henry R. Levo; William F. Murray and Daniel James Rourke."
President McCall stated these names will be referred to the file on the subject for
consideration at the proper time.
RESOLUTIONS:
34. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Haag, who moved its
adoption:
"Resolution No. 5597
Transferring $900.00 from Health Department Account
142.223 (Repairs- -Other Equipment) to Account 142.322
(Laboratory Supplies)."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Petersen and on roll
call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman
Kranelly, (1).
35. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Petersen, who moved its
adoption:
"Resolution No. 5598
Resolution of the Council of the City of Alameda in
Opposition to the Enactment by the Legislature of the
State of California of Assembly Bills 998 and 999,
Relating to the Venting of Gas Appliances and Retro-
activity of Portions of State Housing Act."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Freeman and on roll
call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman
Kranelly, (1).
36. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Freeman, who moved its
adoption:
"Resolution No. 5599
Designating Certain Streets in the City of Alameda
as Major City Streets."
The motion to adoptsaid resolution was seconded by Councilman Haag and on roll call
carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman
Kranelly, (1).
37.'( "Resolution No.
Resolution of the Council of the City of Alameda
Urging the Enactment of H. R. 2229 (S. 1481),
Relating to the Greater Utilization of Commercial
Marine Terminal Facilities by the United States
of America."
Councilman Freeman felt she would like to know more about this proposed resolution
and suggested that, since there seems to be no great urgency in its passage, the mat-
ter be held up pending receipt of more information on the subject. President McCall
asked that Congressman Miller be requested to give his advice on the bill involved.
It was so ordered.
38. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Petersen, who moved its
adoption:
"Resolution No. 5600
Resolution of the Council of the City of Alameda in
Opposition to the Enactment by the Legislature of the
State of California of Senate Bill 2521, Abolishing
the State Division of Housing and Transferring Its
Functions to the State Department of Public Health."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Haag and on roll call
carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman
Kranelly, (1).
39. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Haag, who moved its
adoption:
"Resolution No. 5601
Adopting Specifications for Operating a Refreshment
Concession in the Restaurant and Dining Room Located
in the New A- lameda Municipal Golf Club House and at
Two Refreshment Stands Situated on the Municipal Golf
Course, Calling for Bids and Directing City Clerk to
Advertise Same."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Petersen and on roll
call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman
Kranelly, (1) .
40. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Petersen, who moved its
adoption:
"Resolution No. 5602
Adopting S pecifications for Furnishing to the City of
Alameda Fire and Extended Coverage Insurance, Calling
for Bids and Directing City Clerk to Advertise Same."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Haag and on roll call
carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman
Kranelly, (1).
41. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Haag, who moved its
adoption:
160
"Resolution No. 5603
Adopting Specifications for Furnishing to the City of
Alameda One (1) Theodolite, Calling for Bids and
Directing City Clerk to Advertise Same."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Freeman and on roll
call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman
Kranelly, (1).
42. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Freeman, who moved its
adoption:
"Resolution No. 5604
Amending Portion of Resolution No. 5376, Relating to
Positions and Salaries by Adding Thereto the New
Position of Examination Proctor and Fixing the Salary
Thereof (Civil Service Department)."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Haag and on roll call
carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman
Kranelly, (1).
43. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Petersen, who moved its
adoption:
"Resolution No. 5605
Amending Portion of Resolution No. 5376, Relating to
Positions and Salaries by Deleting Therefrom One
Position of Junior Stenographer -Clerk and Adding
Thereto One Additional Position of Typist -Clerk in
the Health Department."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Haag and on roll call
carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman
Kranelly, (1) .
44. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Petersen, who moved its
adoption:
"Resolution No. 5606
Adopting Specifications, S pecial Provisions and Plans
for Construction of a Levee in the Area North of
Doolittle Drive, Calling for Bids and Directing City
Clerk to Advertise Same."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Freeman and on roll
call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman
Kranelly, (1).
45. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Freeman, who moved its.
adoption:
"Resolution No. 5607
Adopting Specifications, Special Provisions and Plans
for Temporary Re- Alignment of the Northwest Corner of
Park Street and Buena Vista Avenue, Calling for Bids
and Directing City Clerk to Advertise Same."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Haag and on roll call
carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman
Kranelly, (1).
46. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Haag, who moved its
adoption:
"Resolution No. 5608
Adopting Specifications, Special yrovisions and Plans
for Grading and Paving at Krusi Park, Calling for
Bids and Directing City Clerk to Advertise Same."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Freeman and on roll
call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman
Kranelly, (1) .
47. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Petersen, who moved its
adoption:
"Resolution No. 5609
Adopting Specifications, Special Provisions and Plans
for Construction of an Interceptor Sewer Located in
the Vicinity of the Northern Edge of the Estuary
Housing Project, Calling for Bids and Directing City
Clerk to Advertise Same."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Haag and on roll call
carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman
Kranelly, (1).
48. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Haag, who moved its
adoption:
"Resolution No. 5610
Transferring A20,000. from Golf Course Interest and
Redemption Fund Account 615 to Golf Course Construction
Fund Account 702; Transferring 320,000. from Golf
Course Operating Fund Account 702 to Golf Course Con -
struction Fund Account 702; Transferring A14,700.
from Golf Course Operating .Fund Account 702 to Golf
Course Interest and Redemption Fund Account 615; and
Transferring $2,500. from Golf Course Construction
Fund Account 702 to Golf Course Operating Fund Account
702."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Petersen and on roll
call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman
Kranelly, (1).
President McCall thereupon declared all of the foregoing resolutions duly adopted
and passed.
At this time, the Clerk read a letter from Howard G. Converse, D. O., which had been
handed to her during the course of the meeting, endorsing Richard P. Schacht for
appointment to the Council. President McCall stated this letter would be referred
to the file on the subject.
FILING:
49. Specifications and Provisions No. MS 5 -57 -6 - for Furnishing One Theodolite.
50. Specifications and Provisions No. MS 5 -57 -7 - for Furnishing Fire and Extended.
Coverage Insurance.
51. Specifications and Provisions No. MS 5 -57 -8 - for Operating Refreshment
Concessions at the New Municipal Golf Course.
52 Specifications, Special Provisions and Plans No. PW 3 -57 -7 - for Temporary
Realignment of Northwest Corner of Park Street and Buena Vista Avenue.
53. Specifications, Special Provisions and Plans No. PW 5 -57 -12 - for Construction
of Interceptor Sewer at Northern Edge of Estuary Housing Project.
54. Specifications, Special Provisions and Plans No. PW 5 -57 -13 - for Grading
and Paving Krusi Park.
55. Specifications, Special Provisions and Plans No. PW 5 -57 -14 - for Construction
of Levee North of Doolittle Drive.
BILLS:
56. An itemized List of Claims against the City of Alameda and the Departments thereof,
in the total amount of X96,741.62, was submitted to the Council at this meeting.
The list was accompanied by certification from the City Manager that the Claims shown
were correct.
Councilman Haag moved the bills as itemized in the List of Claims filed with the City
Clerk on May 7, 1957, and presented to the Council at this time, be allowed and paid..
The motion was seconded by Councilman Petersen and on roll call carried by the fol-
lowing vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman Kranelly, (1).
57. At this point, Dr. Maynard Moody addressed the Council, stating that, at the
last Council meeting, a letter had been presented to the Council submitting a list
of twenty -six recommendations from the Advisory Golf Commission which he had under-
stood were to be discussed this evening.
Mr. Froerer stated copies had gone out to the Council showing the twenty -six criti-
cisms, with notations on all those items on which action had already been taken. He
said the remainder of the matters are being handled as expeditiously as can be accom-
plished.
Dr. Moody stated the Advisory Golf Commission would like to meet with the Recreation
Commission and the City Council as soon as possible - he said he realized the Coun-
cil is very booked up with meetings, but asked for a date for a meeting sometime the
latter part of this month. He also asked the City Manager if the Commission could
be given copies of the budget as soon as possible.
Following discussion, it was agreed that a meeting could be set for Wednesday even-
ing, May 22, 1957, at 8 :00 o'clock in the Conference Room - and the City Manager
was instructed to notify the interested parties.
58. President McCall commented on the participation of quite a few citizens in mak-
ing trips to Sacramento recently in connection with several important matters before
the Legislature and pointed up the fine work being done by Assemblyman Crown. He
felt Alameda should really be proud of its "Freshman" representative.
ADJOURNMENT:
59. There being no further business to come before the meeting, the Council
adjourned - to assemble in regular session on Tuesday evening, May 21, 1957, at
7:30 o'clock.
Respectfully submitted,