1955-02-23 Regular CC MinutesADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA
HELD WEDNESDAY EVENING, FEBRUARY 23, - _ - 1955
The meeting convened at 8:00otclock P. M. With President Anderson presiding.
The Pledge of Allegiance was lead by Councilman Haag.
ROLL CALL:
The roll was called and Councilmen Haag, Jones, McCall o'esi and President
Anderson, (5), were noted present. Absent: None.
MINUTES:
1. The minutes of the regular meeting held February 15, 1955, were approved as
transcribed.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
2. From the East Shore Home Owners Association, with regard to the disposal and
development of the Municipal Nursery Property - especially concerning the drainage
problem. It was suggested that a cul-de-sac street development of the Nursery Pro-
perty be made, rather than a through street from Fernside Boulevard to Garfield
Avenue. Reference was also made to this organization's letter of September 20,
1954 - which had requested that the City impose, as a condition of sale, the res-
triction that the purchaser, when developing the property for residential subdivi-
sion, make a statement of Declaration of Conditions, Covenants, Restrictions and
Charges the same as that Declaration made on April 29, 1953, by the Central Avenue
Land and Development Company as amended. This would make the same conditions appli-
cable to the Nursery Property to be disposed of as are now applicable to the adjacent
Tracts Nos. 1085 and 12L9, which comprise the Association area - and inquiry was made
as to any action on this matter.
President Anderson stated this communication covers two matters - that of the drain-
age problem and the suggestion concerning the type of street improvement of this
area. He said that, if agreeable, he would refer the drainage matter to the City
Engineer and requested that a copy of the letter be s ent to the City Planning Board
for consideration of the street situation.
3. From the Alameda Chamber of Commerce requesting complete information as to the
present status of the Southshore Development Project, and also that, before any
final action is taken on this development, the Council inform the Board of Directors
of the Chamber of its proposed action.
President Anderson stated it is the desire of the members of the Council that such
information be furnished to the Chamber of Commerce and to any other groups of the
City. He inquired of the City Manager when and how this could be done.
Mr. Froerer replied that this information is on hand tonight. He pointed out, how-
ever, that before the proposed Agreement comes to the Council for action there may
be changes - but just as soon as these changes are made, any citizen or members of
the Chamber can have a copy of this data.
President Anderson asked if there was anyone in the audience from the Chamber of
Commerce who wanted to accept the responsibility of taking a copy of the Agreement
to the Board of Directors. There being no response, President Anderson suggested
the copy be sent to the Board by registered mail.
4'./, From the Alameda Chamber of Commerce, concerning the award of contract for the
furnishing and delivering of polling place equipment for the coming City Election -
and requesting that, in the future, local firms be invited to submit proposals for
this job.
Upon Councilman Jones' suggestion that the communication be answered, President
Anderson requested the City Attorney to write a letter of explanation to the Chamber.
_)• From Cpl. Leonard B. Hollywood Post No. 939, Inc., Veterans of Foreign 'Jars of
the United States, requesting a permit be granted to sponsor West Coast Shows, Inc.,
to be held on the Bethlehem Parking Lot, during the period from July 19 through
July 24, 1955 - the proceeds to supplement the organization's Welfare Fund.
Councilman Jones stated this is a regular annual request and moved the City Manager
be authorized to issue the necessary permit to allow Post No. 939 to sponsor this
carnival. The motion was seconded by Councilman Moresi and unanimously c arried.
6. From the Alameda Home Owners Association, expressing its concern and interest in
the proposed development of the South Shore. The Council was commended for the care-
ful consideration it has given this matter in the past and was urged to continue to
explore every possibility to assure that the development be of the highest quality and
that it will preserve and enhance the present values of Alameda. It was suggested
that a "lagoon" development would be an immeasurable asset to the City.
169
The communication was referred to the Committee of the Whole for further consideration
of the Council in the over-all plans of the South Shore development.
7. From Sidney J. and Lillian A. Dowling, submitting their Application for Permit to
Fill Property by truck dumping of a0000 cubic yards of earth and rock material on land
located south of Otis Drive and M ound Street - at the northwesterly corner of Mound
Street and Waterton Street. The Application was accompanied by a surety bond in the
amount of .?'$,000.
Councilman Moresi moved the Application be granted as requested. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Jones and unanimously carried.
REPORTS OF COMMITTEES:
The report was noted and ordered filed.
9: From the Mayor, nominating Douglas D. Stafford, M. D., 912 Grand Street, to the
office of member of the Library Board for the term expiring June 30, 1958 - to serve
the unexpired term of Mr. Louis H. Larsen, deceased.
Councilman Moresi moved the City Manager's recommendation be adopted; that contract
for this project be awarded to Mr. DeSilva at the price quoted and the bid checks be
returned to the unsuccessful bidders. The motion was seconded by Councilman Jones
and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Councilmen Haag, Jones,
McCall, Moresi and President Anderson, (5). Noes: None, Absent: None.
v'
11. From the City Manager, recommending contract be awarded to Paris Bros., the low
bidder, for the project of Constructing Sanitary and Storm Sewers to Connect Alameda
Sewer System to the E. B. M. U. D. Sanitary Interceptor -- Unit V, at the price of
A100,900.
• 1 . From the City Manager, recommending contract be awarded to Garland Chevrolet
Company, the only bidder for Furnishing One New 1955 Four--Door Sedan to the Fire
Department, at the price of 1,718.07.
v/
8. From the Mayor, City Manager and City Auditor, submitting report on the Count of
Money, held February 16, 19550 showing the sum of A3,717,200.86 in the City Treasury
at that time.
The matter was referred to "Resolutions".
10. From the City Manager, recommending contract be awarded to Oliver DeSilva, the
low bidder, for the project of Constructing a Basketball Court at Franklin Park at
the price of A869.
Councilman Haag moved the City Manager's recommendation be accepted; that contract
be awarded to this firm for the specified project at the price quoted and the bid
checks or bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. The motion was seconded
by Councilman McCall and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Coun-
cilmen Haag, Jones, McCall, Moresi and President Anderson, (5). Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Councilman Moresi moved the City Manager's recommendation be adopted; that contract
be awarded to this firm for furnishing the sedan as designated. The motion was
seconded by Councilman. Jones and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes:
Councilmen Haag, Jonas, McCall, Moresi and President Anderson, (5). Noes: None.
Absent: None,
13. At this point, the President
Council, the Order of Business wil
will be presented.
ated that, if agreeable to the members of the
be revised and the matter of "Unfinished. Business"
TJNFINISHED BUSINESS:
1L. The matter was called up concerning the request from Utah Construction Company,
as contained in its letter of January 5, 1955, to dredge on property on San Francisco
Bay controlled by the City of Alameda - and the Company's letter of February 1, 1955,
submitting a draft of an Agreement between the City and Utah Construction Company
providing for the authorization to dredge and fill. These communications had been
read at previous meetings of the Council and had been referred to the Committee of
the Whole for further study.
President Anderson explained that it would be perfectly possible, legally, for the
City Council to grant permission by resolution to the Utah Construction Company to
fill land. He pointed out the request that it be done by ordinance came from Utah
Construction Company itself. He explained that a resolution can be adopted at any
given meeting and is effective immediately, while an ordinance is introduced at one
meeting, laid over to a subsequent meeting for adoption and then becomes effective
thirty days thereafter.
u
INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES:
15. Councilman McCall introduced the following ordinance, after which it was laid
over under provision of law and the Charter:
"Ordinance No.
New Series
An Ordinance Authorizing Utah Construction Company
to Dredge Certain Submerged Lands of the City of
Alameda and Fill Certain Submerged Lands of Said
Company in The City of Alameda, and Authorizing
Execution of Agreement Pertaining Thereto."
Upon request of the President, the Clerk read the ordinance in full. President
Anderson stated that in the case of filling the south shore and later on, Bay Farm
Island - there are two bodies in the City Government who are responsible - the City
Council and the City Planning Board. He thereupon called upon the City Attorney to
explain the procedure as to jurisdiction in this matter.
Mr. Clark stated that, referring to the provisions of the Alameda Municipal Code,
it is definitely set forth that applications for a permit to fill land shall be
filed with and acted upon by the City Council. He said that nowhere within that
ordinance is the City Planning Board mentioned. He stated that the Planning Board
comes into the picture when the area is filled and ready to be developed. He
pointed out that by reason of the fact that negotiations for the taking of fill
have been entered into by the City Council and Utah Construction Company, the City
is in a position to require certain sizes of lots to be developed - which could not
have been done by the Planning Board. He said the Planning Board is powerless to
dictate the matter of costs and types of houses, and the City Council can do this.
Mr. Nelson J. Birkholm, 73h Palmera Court, addressed the Council, stating he thought
there was an ordinance previously passed when this matter came up before - and ques-
tioned how this present ordinance affected that.
Mr. Clark said he remembered the circumstances very well and, at that time, there
was no ordinance enacted - the matter was simply discussed - it never reached the.
stage of having an ordinance even introduced.
Upon Mr. Birkholm's request, the City Attorney read the sections of the Municipal
Code pertaining to dredging and filling - and stated this is the only ordinance the
City has relative to the filling of land.
President Anderson stated that, if agreeable to the members of the Council, he would
ask the City Manager to outline the negotiations the City has had with Utah Construc-
tion Company and give, the arrangements and understanding as of the present time.
Mr. Froerer stated that, before reviewing the proposed Agreement, he would like to
point out that the Council has had informal discussions with Utah on several occasions
and on February 4, a formal Agreement was submitted, covering the securing of fill
from the borrow area. He thereupon read the Agreement and gave explanations of
several of the sections.
Mr. C. J. Klitgaard, 701 Grand Street, ramarked that he heard no mention made in the
Agreement concerning sewers, etcetera - and Mr. Froerer explained that all such pro-
visions are covered by Subdivision Ordinance No. 700, New Series.
Mr. John P. Cobb, 1200 Sherman Street, wanted to ascertain, if possible, if details
of the lot sizes are set forth in the proposed Master Plan.
Upon request, Mr. James M. Campbell, Planning Consultant, stated the position of the
Planning Department - it has not received any tentative plan up to this time - there
is no firm proposition upon which it can act. The Department has made studies of
what is a desirable general plan. The Utah company has worked with the Department on
the general street pattern and lot sizes. The matter will not be directly in the
Department's hands until a tentative map is submitted to it. He said that, so far
as the locations of homes, apartments, commercial zones, schools, parks and main road-
ways are concerned, the Department is in agreement with Utah. The Agreement sets
forth some minimum standards for lot size - 50-foot frontage and containing 5,000
square feet in area. Also, in this proposed Agreement an upgrade of lot size in
certain sections of the south shore area. The Department has been in agreement on
the general features contemplated by Utah but the trouble has been that there has not
been a tentative map upon which it could act definitely. Mr. Campbell said that, in
relationship with the Master Plan studies, the Planning Staff is in agreement with
Utah.
Mr. Cobb stated he thought that, once Mr. Campbell has received a Tentative Map, he
would find conflicts with his Master Plan - the general land use allocations and
general standards. However, Mr. Campbell remarked that he saw no danger of conflicts -
the important items have been very well agreed upon and are guaranteed by the provi-
sions of the proposed Agreement. He pointed out Subdivision Ordinance No. 700, New
Series, as well as the Agreement would support the Planning Staff.
•
Mr. Cobb also questioned the width of the so-called "buffer zone" and inresponse
to President Anderson's euestion as to the adequacy or inadequacy of this, Mr. Camp-
bell replied that he felt 260 feet is satisfactory - this represents the depth of
two lots, plus the width of a street.
Mr. Alfred Cantor, 1814 Clinton Avenue, wondered if it is fair for the City to give
this fill to Utah Construction Company. He also said he thought the beach area would
be behind the contemplated freeway.
Mr. Cobb wanted to know the percentage relationship of the bond to the project - and
Mr. Froerer stated the cost of the filling operation will be approximately $10,,000,000.
and the faithful performance bond will be in the amount of 01,000,000., or 10% of the
cost.
Mr. Dean Ramsden said he noted the bond can be reduced as completion of the project
progresses. He felt the amount of the bond is not commensurate with the size of the
area to be filled.
Mr. Wallace Kaapcke of Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, explained the situation concerning
the bond coverage - stating the project is to be handled in "sections" - A, B, C, D, E -
and each, in turn, will be covered by a million-dollar bond.
Mr. Frank Gottstein strongly protested against the whole proposal.
Mr. George Loorz, 1712 Palmera Court, stated the City is fortunate to have such a
fine, reputable Company willing to proceed with this improvement. Nr. Vincent Luczak,
1371 Pearl Street, stated the Council should consider the benefits that would be
derived by the City in this development.
Mr. Travers of Utah was called upon at this time to present his Company's plans. He
pointed out his organization is world-wide and has been in the construction business
for fifty-four years and the Company has no intention of not completing this develop-
ment. He emphasized that his Company has always finished whatever construction it
started and cited certain enormous construction jobs it had undertaken - Boulder Dam,
etcetera. He said that, perhaps before he finished speaking, those in the audience
would realize there is such a thing as a corporation with a soul. He said he realized
that most of those present lived along the south shore and he could understand that
it is only natural and human that they should feel exactly as they do. He remarked
that the purchase of this property by his Company was not made as a whim. He agreed
that everyone is entitled to protection of the nice homes along the south shore. He
pointed out that many meetings have been held on this matter to interchange ideas -
the City Council deserves credit for the great amount of time and study given this
matter. He emphasized that there are many protective covenants in the proposed Agree-
ment for the proper and sound development of this fill. The Company owns these two
pieces of property - on Bay Farm Island and along the south shore - and it has no
intention of walking out on its commitments - it could not afford to. He explained
that the dredge alone costs two and one-quarter million dollars - and that expenditure
has to be justified. He said there has been some question raised about the perimeter
protection for the fill - Utah proposes, if the City Council gives the Company author-
ity to do so, to proceed with dredging and filling the south shore of Alameda in as
expeditiously a manner as possible - protecting the entire area with a twenty to one
sloping beach front. He said Utah proposes to give the City of Alameda a uniform and
beautiful beach along the entire south shore and Bay Farm Island. Utah does not need
or want the State to come in and build a freeway to protect its beach area. He
stressed the fact that Utah is prepared and ready to risk its capital and reputation
to do a good job and he emphasized that the sand from the borrow pit is to be used
only for the project along the south shore and on Bay Farm Island.
President Anderson then called upon Robert L. Williams, Planning Director, who read
in full the preliminary economic analysis summary of this project.
President Anderson stated this is a matter that concerns all of the people of Alameda -
the Council is representing all of the people and the one question it has to answer
is, "Is it beneficial to Alameda?"
RESOLUTIONS:
16. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Jones, who moved its adoption:
"Resolution No. 5057
Appointing Douglas D. Stafford, M. D., Member of
the Library Board."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman McCall and on roll call
carried by the following vote. Ayes: Councilmen Haag, Jones, McCall, Moresi and
President Anderson, (5). Noes: None. Absent: None. Thereupon the President
declared said resolution duly adopted and passed.
d
ORDINANCES FOR PASSAGE:
17. "Ordinance No. 1147,
New Series
An Ordinance Reclassifying Property by Adding Section 78
to Ordinance No. 725, New,Series." (Rear 50 feet of
property fronting on Marshall Way)
FILING:
18. Form of Agreement - Between City of Alameda and Utah Construction Company -
Re Filling of South Shore.
ADJOURNIENT:
19. There being no further business to come before the meeting, the Council
adjourned - to assemble in regular meeting to be held Tuesday evening, March 1,
1955, at 8:00 o'clock.
Respectfully submitted,