Loading...
2000-04-05 ARRA PacketAGENDA Regular Meeting of the Governing Body of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority * * * * * * ** Alameda City Hall Council Chamber, Room 390 2263 Santa Clara Avenue Alameda, CA 94501 Wednesday, April 5, 2000 Meeting will begin at 5:30 p.m. City Hall will open at 5:15 p.m. 1. CLOSED SESSION OF THE ARRA TO CONSIDER CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR Property: Alameda Naval Air Station Negotiating parties: ARRA and the Navy Under negotiation: Terms 2. ROLL CALL 3. CONSENT CALENDAR 3 -A. Approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of the March 1, 2000. 5:00 p.m. 3 -B. Recommendation to adopt a resolution authorizing the Deputy City Manager to apply to the California Trade and Commerce Agency for a California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant. 3 -C. Recommendation to adopt a resolution authorizing the Deputy City Manager to represent ACET in applying to the California Trade and Commerce Agency for a California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant. 3 -D. Report from the Deputy City Manager recommending changing the ARRA fiscal year to correspond to the City's fiscal year. 3 -E. Report from the Deputy City Manager recommending that the ARRA Governing Body endorse Senate Bill 2049 (Perata). 4. ACTION ITEMS 4 -A. Report and recommendation from the Deputy City Manager regarding adoption of a policy limiting Purchase Options in future sublease agreements. 4 -B. Report and Recommendation from the Deputy City Manager requesting authorization for the Executive Director to negotiate and execute a lease of Building 585 with AIA regarding the Home Project for 10 years. ARRA Agenda - April 5, 2000 Page 2 5. ORAL REPORTS 5 -A. Oral report from BRAG. 5 -B. Oral report from the Deputy City Manager (non- discussion items). 6. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON - AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT) (Any person may address the governing body in regard to any matter over which the governing body has jurisdiction, or of which it may take cognizance, that is not on the agenda.) 7. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE GOVERNING BODY 8. ADJOURNMENT This meeting will be simultaneously cablecast on channel 15. The next regular ARRA meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, May 3, 2000. Notes: • Sign language interpreters will be available on request. Please contact the ARRA Secretary, Lucretia Akil at 864 -3400 at least 72 hours before the meeting to request an interpreter. • Accessible seating for persons with disabilities (including those using wheelchairs) is available. • Minutes of the meeting are available in enlarged print. • Audio tapes of the meeting are available for review at the ARRA offices upon request. APPROVED MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE AMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Wednesday, March 1, 2000 The meeting convened at 5:35 p.m. with Chair Appezzato presiding. 1. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Ralph Appezzato, Mayor City of Alameda Tony Daysog, Councilmember, City of Alameda Albert DeWitt, Councilmember, City of Alameda Beverly Johnson, Councilmember, City of Alameda Barbara Kerr, Councilmember, City of Alameda 2. CONSENT CALENDAR 2 -A. Approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of February 2, 2000. 2 -B. Report and recommendation from the Deputy City Manager to approve line item transfers in the Alameda Point Budget for Costs Associated with Water System Maintenance and Capital Improvements. Member Daysog moved approval of the minutes as presented for the regular meeting of February 2, 2000 and the line item transfers in the Alameda Point Budget for Costs Associated with Water System Maintenance and Capital Improvements. The motion was seconded by Member Johnson and passed by the following voice vote: Ayes - 5. Noes - 0. Abstentions - 0. Discussion. Member DeWitt asked staff for a better explanation of why these funds are needed to approve line item transfers? Deputy City Manager, David Berger responded that there was some form of miscommunication on the water system budget when staff prepared the original budget and this item was overlooked. This was discovered later in the year and through some negotiation with Matt Naclerio, the Manager of Alameda point infrastructure, staff was able to move some line items around, as this was just an oversight. However, there is no net impact on the fund and staff is not asking for a supplemental appropriation out of the ARRA fund. Staff is requesting the Board to move some appropriations in the maintenance area to cover this unbudgeted item, which includes the water system operation cost. 1 Member Kerr asked what is the Fox Avenue Improvement Project that is referred to in the staff report? Deputy Berger responded that he believed that it was a water line replacement that was EDA funded. Nanette Banks responded that it was a water line replacement project. Early on when staff began operations and maintenance of the base, it was determined that there was only one supply of water into the base and if something happened, there would not be a backup. A line was moved that feeds Coast Guard Housing into the base that would serve as a backup source of water. This project was managed by our Public Works Department and originally funded through the Navy Caretaker Funds but it did not cover the entire cost of the project. 3. ACTION ITEMS None. 4. ORAL REPORTS 4 -A. Oral report from BRAG. Lee Perez stated that they have the same report as they did last month, as they continue to plan for their town meeting and things are going well. 4 -B. Oral report from the Deputy City Manager (non- discussion items). None. 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON - AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT) Gary W. McAfee, Alameda Historic Complex, 2614 Bayview Drive, expressed to the Board that, assuming they read his article in the newspaper, he was prepared to answer any questions they might have. He stated that with respect to his application to do something with the base, a number of people have been following him around in old cars with black license plates. They do not seem to have jobs and someone has hired them from out of town. Mr. McAfee indicated that he intends to write the police department a letter and if they do not arrest them, he is going to put a steel bumper on his truck and start ramming them. Chair Appezzato suggested that he not do that, but advised Mr. McAfee to talk to the police department if he fears for his safety. Mr. McAfee responded that they would not take anything he says seriously as the Board is aware of the issues and his application in the town. 2 6. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE GOVERNING BODY None. 7. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 5:45 p.m. Respectfully, Lucretia Akil ARRA Secretary Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Interoffice Memorandum March 30, 2000 TO: Honorable Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority FROM: David A. Berger, Deputy City Manager SUBJ: Recommendation to Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Deputy City Manager to Apply to the California Trade and Commerce Agency for a California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Background Last year the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority (ARRA) was awarded $2.4 million from the Economic Development Administration (EDA) for building and water system upgrades. EDA has reduced its matching requirement from 50 percent to a 25 percent for this award. The California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Program operated by the California Trade and Commerce Agency has limited funds available to provide a portion of the matching grant funds required of local communities seeking federal funding for defense- related economic adjustment strategies and programs. The attached resolution authorizes the ARRA's Deputy City Manager to represent the ARRA and apply for the state matching grant money. The state selection guidelines favor recent base closures versus older reuse authorities; therefore, approval of the ARRA's grant application is not a certainty. In 1993/94, when the ARRA received its funding from OEA through the East Bay Conversion and Reinvestment Commission, the ARRA did receive a matching grant from the California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Program. In 1994/95, the California State Legislature did not provide funding for the California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Program, but fortunately the program was funded again in the 1995/96 California state budget. The ARRA received California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Program funds for both 1996/97 and 1997/98 OEA awards and our 1997 EDA building upgrade grant. Discussion For FY 1999/00, the California Trade and Commerce Agency received $3 million for the California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Program. All 1991, 1993 and 1995 California BRAC closure facilities may compete for this funding. The funding is being made available through one competitive round, awarding the entire allocation of $929,350. The maximum amount any community may apply for is $150,000. Honorable Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority March 30, 2000 Page 2 Fiscal Impact To receive EDA funds, EDA requires the ARRA to provide a 25 percent local match; however, the 50 percent match is based on the total project cost. For FY 1999/00, the ARRA has been awarded $1.8 million of EDA funds, the ARRA's required match is $600,000. We are requesting $150,000 from the California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Program. Recommendation It is recommended that the ARRA adopt the attached resolution authorizing the Deputy City Manager to represent the ARRA and apply for the 1999/00 round of the California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Program. Respectfully submitted, David A. Berger Deputy City Manager Community Economic and Development By: Nanette Banks Business & Special Project Manager DAB/NAB /la Attachment: Resolution 25 C: \M W ARD\ MENSLEY \ARRA \STAFFREP\2000\ARRACDAM. WPD ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. 25 AUTHORIZING THE ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (ARRA) DEPUTY CITY MANAGER TO REPRESENT THE ARRA TO APPLY FOR THE CALIFORNIA DEFENSE ADJUSTMENT MATCHING GRANT WHEREAS, California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Program operated by the California Trade and Commerce Agency is designed to provide a portion of the matching grant funds required of communities seeking federal funding for defense- related economic adjustment strategies and programs; and WHEREAS, the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority is eligible to compete against the other California 1991, 1993 and 1995 BRAC closure bases for up to $150,000 of the available $3 million in the 1999/00 round of the California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the California Trade and Commerce Agency requires the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority to authorize application to the California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the California Trade and Commerce Agency requires the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority to authorize its Deputy City Manager to represent the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority concerning the California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Program application and the grant. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Alameda Reuse and Redevelop- ment Authority that the ARRA Deputy City Manager is hereby authorized and empowered to apply, approve, sign and execute in the name of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority any documents necessary for applying to receive funding under the California Trade and Commerce Agency's California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Program. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority in its regular meeting assembled on the 5th day of April, 2000 by the following vote to wit: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTENTIONS: 0 etia Akil, Secretary Alameda Reuse & Redevelopment Authority Date: April , 2000 Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Interoffice Memorandum March 30, 2000 TO: Honorable Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority FROM: David A. Berger, Deputy City Manager SUBJ: Recommendation to Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Deputy City Manager to Represent ACET in Applying to the California Trade and Commerce Agency for a California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Background The Alameda Center for Environmental Technologies (ACET) has applied to the Economic Development Administration (EDA) for new grant funding for FY 1999/00 and for more building upgrade funds. EDA has a 50 percent local match requirement for grant funding. The California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Program operated by the California Trade and Commerce Agency has limited funds available to provide a portion of the matching grant funds required of local communities seeking federal funding for defense- related economic adjustment strategies and programs. The attached resolution authorizes the ARRA's Deputy City Manager to represent ACET and apply for the state matching grant money. The state selection guidelines favor recent base closures versus older reuse authorities; therefore, approval of the ARRA' s grant application is not a certainty. In 1993/94, when the ARRA received its funding from OEA through the East Bay Conversion and Reinvestment Commission, the ARRA did receive a matching grant from the California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Program. In 1994/95, the California State Legislature did not provide funding for the California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Program, but fortunately the program was funded again in the 1995/96 California state budget. The ARRA received California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Program funds for both 1996/97 and 1997/98 OEA awards and our 1997 EDA building upgrade grant. Discussion For FY 1999/00, the California Trade and Commerce Agency received $3 million for the California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Program. All 1991, 1993 and 1995 California BRAC closure facilities may compete for this funding. The funding is being made available through one competitive round, awarding the entire allocation of $929,350. The maximum amount any community may apply for is $150,000. Honorable Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority March 30, 2000 Page 2 Fiscal Impact To receive EDA funds, EDA requires ACET to provide a 50 percent local match; the 50 percent match is based on the total project cost. For FY 1999/00, ACET has been invited to apply for $260,000 of EDA funds, and ACET's required match is $260,000. ACET is requesting $150,000 from the California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Program. Recommendation It is recommended that the ARRA adopt the attached resolution authorizing the ARRA Deputy City Manager to represent ACET and apply for the 1999/00 round of the California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Program. Respectfully submitted, David A. Berger Deputy City Manager Community Economic and Development By: Nanette Banks Business & Special Project Manager DAB/NAB /la Attachment: Resolution 26 C:\M WARD\ MENSLEY \ARRA \STAFFREP\2000\ACETCDAM. WPD ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. 26 AUTHORIZING THE ALAMEDA CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES (ACET) DEPUTY CITY MANAGER TO REPRESENT ACET TO APPLY FOR THE CALIFORNIA DEFENSE ADJUSTMENT MATCHING GRANT WHEREAS, California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Program operated by the California Trade and Commerce Agency is designed to provide a portion of the matching grant funds required of communities seeking federal funding for defense - related economic adjustment strategies and programs; and WHEREAS, the Alameda Center for Environmental Technologies is eligible to compete against the other California 1991, 1993 and 1995 BRAC closure bases for up to $150,000 of the available $3 million in the 1999/00 round of the California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the California Trade and Commerce Agency requires the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority to authorize application to the California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the California Trade and Commerce Agency requires the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority to authorize its Deputy City Manager to represent the Alameda Center for Environmental Technologies concerning the California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Program application and the grant. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Alameda Center for Environmental Technologies that the ARRA Deputy City Manager is hereby authorized and empowered to apply, approve, sign and execute in the name of the Alameda Center for Environmental Technologies any documents necessary for applying to receive funding under the California Trade and Commerce Agency's California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant Program. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority in its regular meeting assembled on the 5th day of April, 2000, by the following vote to wit: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTENTIONS: 0 Lu'retia Akil, Secretary Alameda Reuse & Redevelopment Authority Date: April 5, 2000 Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Interoffice Memorandum March 29, 2000 TO: Honorable Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority FROM: David A. Berger, Deputy City Manager SUBJ: Report from the Deputy City Manager Recommending Changing the ARRA Fiscal Year to Correspond to the City's Fiscal Year Background In 1994, when the ARRA was created under the East Bay Conversion and Reinvestment Commission (EBCRC), the ARRA's fiscal year was established as November through October. Discussion The ARRA's budget cycle runs from July to June, while the audit occurs at the close of October. It will be easier to track the budget and actual expenditures during the same time period. In addition, the ARRA's audit will occur at the same time as the City's audit, making it more cost efficient and easier to coordinate with the independent auditors. Fiscal Impact This year, the ARRA will have to pay for two audits, the year just closing and for the proposed year- end in June, if this item is approved. The subsequent years, the ARRA will pay its regular audit cost. Recommendation It is recommended that the ARRA Governing Body approve changing the ARRA fiscal year from November through October to July through June, to correspond to the City's fiscal year. By: DB/NAB /la C:\MWARD\MENSLEY\ARRA\STAFFREP\2000\AUDIT.WPD Respectfully submitted, David A. Berger Deputy City Manager Community and Economic Development . 664,44.- Nanette Banks Business & Special Project Manager Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Interoffice Memorandum March 30, 2000 TO: Honorable Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority FROM: David A. Berger, Deputy City Manager SUBJ: Report from the Deputy City Manager recommending that the ARRA Governing Body endorse Senate Bill 2049 (Perata) Background On February 25, 2000, Senator Perata introduced legislation authorizing the State Lands Commission to carry out an exchange of public trust lands within the NAS, Alameda property. Discussion The Community Reuse Plan, which was passed by the ARRA Governing Body in January 1996, acknowledged that approximately 70 percent of the property at NAS, Alameda is subject to the Public Trust Doctrine which governs use of property in the Tidelands Trust. The plan contemplated that a land exchange would take place that would allow property to be freed from the Trust in exchange for adding NAS property to the Trust which would be used for purposes consistent with the Trust. The legislation proposed by Senator Perata makes that exchange possible. Fiscal Impact To date, the ARRA has spent approximately $50,000 for survey work related to the land exchange. Additional survey work may be needed and has been budgeted for the next fiscal year. Recommendation It is recommended that the ARRA Governing Body endorse SB2049 and authorize the Mayor to sign a letter of support on behalf of the ARRA Governing Body. Respectfully submitted, David A. Berger Deputy City Manager Community and Economic Development act44,0- By: Nanette Banks Business & Special Project Manager DAB/NB /la C: \M W ARD\MEN SLEY \A RRA\STAFFREP\2000\TI DELND. W PD Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Interoffice Memorandum March 29, 2000 To: Honorable Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority From: David A. Berger, Deputy City Manage Re: Report and Recommendation from the Deputy City Manager Regarding Adoption of a Policy Limiting Purchase Options in Future Sublease Agreements Background: During the last eight months the ARRA Governing Board has approved purchase options in connection with long -term subleases with Audio Video Technical Services (AVTS) for Hangar 22 and Bladium for Hangar 40. These options were offered because the tenants were making substantial non - reimbursable improvements to the buildings and their lender /investors required such to secure their financial commitments. Both uses were consistent with the Community Reuse Plan, and both buildings are slated for long -term commercial adaptive reuse in the Reuse Plan and Alameda Point Financing Plan. In response to questions raised by the BRAG as to the impact of purchase options on long -term redevelopment at Alameda Point, the ARRA Board directed staff to formulate a policy regarding the inclusion of purchase options in future sublease agreements. Discussion: The primary issue regarding purchase options is that they may allow certain interim uses to become permanent, which may not be consistent with the intent and vision of the Community Reuse Plan. This is a reasonable concern; however, staff believes that it should not lead to a blanket prohibition on all future purchase options. To do so might preclude successful negotiation of leases with potentially desirable tenants. For example, it is doubtful that leases with either AVTS or Bladium would have been signed if they did not receive purchase options. To avoid long -term uses which are contrary to the Community Reuse Plan; staff recommends that specific criteria be adopted in identifying properties eligible for purchase options. Staff recommends that the ARRA adopt a policy incorporating three essential criteria as preconditions to consideration of a purchase option agreement. First, the proposed use must be consistent with the Reuse Plan. Second, the property must be located in the Historic District designated for long -term adaptive reuse in the Reuse Plan and Financing Plan. And third, the prospective tenant must be committed to a substantial investment for non - reimbursable upgrades to the property. Staff believes that by strict adherence to these criteria, purchase options may be considered on a case by case basis without compromising the City's options for long -term redevelopment at Alameda Point. Staff will continue to discourage purchase options in its negotiations with prospective subleases and will only recommend to the ARRA that exceptions be made if no other economically feasible alternatives are available to meet a desirable end user's need. Honorable Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority March 30, 2000 Page 2 Fiscal Impact: The fiscal impact of adopting a policy limiting purchase options based on the above criteria is unknown. However, it is probable that allowing limited purchase options will result in signing certain key leases which otherwise would not happen. This could result in substantial economic returns for the ARRA. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the ARRA Board adopt a policy limiting purchase option to leased properties satisfying the following conditions. First, the proposed use must be consistent with the Reuse Plan. Second, the property must be located in the Historic District designated for long -term adaptive reuse in the Reuse Plan and the Financing Plan. And third, the prospective tenant must be committed to substantial non - refundable investments in the building. This recommendation was endorsed by the BRAG at their March 15, 2000 meeting. Respectfully submitted, David A. Berger Deputy City Manager Co init and Economic Development By: Ed Levine Leasing and Property Manager DAB /EL /la cc: Chairman Lee Perez and BRAG Members Chairman Ronald Rossi and Planning Board Members Chamber of Commerce, President Dick Lyons City Manager Planning Director C:\M WARD\ MENSLEY \ARRA \STAFFREP\2000 \PURCHOPT. W PD City of Alameda Interoffice Memorandum March 29, 2000 To: Honorable Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority From: David A. Berger, Deputy City Manager /// Re: Report and Recommendation from the Deputy City Manager Requesting Authorization for the Executive Director to Negotiate and Execute a Lease of Building 585 with AIA Regarding the Home Project for 10 Years Background Alternatives in Action (AIA), an Alameda -based non -profit and operator of the HOME Project, has applied to the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority (ARRA) for a ten -year lease on the 10,553 square foot Building 585, the former Chief's Club, at Alameda Point. AIA proposes to use the building (referred to as the HOMEstead) for a range of youth development activities, as outlined in Attachment A. In addition to a ten -year term, AIA is seeking a below- market -rate lease in exchange for staffing it would provide for community -based youth development services, including several youth- operated businesses, that it plans to offer to the community. Due to the requested length of the lease, ARRA approval of the lease is necessary. Discussion /Analysis Overview AIA is a community -based charitable non - profit with 501(c)(3) tax - exempt status. AIA is the operator of the HOME Project, a youth development program which operates Monday through Friday from 12:00 to 8:00 p.m. and on occasional weekends. The majority of the HOME Project's programming takes place after school and in the evenings and involves 150 youth members, hundreds more who attend conferences and special events, and numerous adult volunteers. The Alameda Unified School District (AUSD) also contracts with AIA to offer several periods of an elective course in Effective Citizenry (E.C.). Approximately 35 AUSD students receive credit for EC participation during the regular school day. Approximately 100 more receive extra elective credits in the after - school version of E.C. The AIA Board of Directors and AIA Executive Director Leslie Medine finance and administer the operations of AIA and the HOME Project. Most of AIA's funding for staff and program operations - averaging several hundred thousand dollars per year since 1996 - comes from private foundations. As a result of their successful fundraising, AIA staffing of the HOME Project has increased from 1.5 paid staff in 1996 to 8 FTE paid positions and 25 adult volunteers in 2000. To assist in its start -up and in exchange for AIA's services, the AUSD has provided space for the HOME Project and has assigned 2 teachers to monitor and grade students enrolled in the E.C. portion of the program. Due to growing enrollment, the AUSD needs to build classrooms in the area HOME has been using and has agreed to pay relocation costs associated with AIA/HOME's move. Honorable Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority March 30, 2000 Page 2 AIA's proposed uses for Building 585 mirror earlier proposals by Pan Pacific University and the Recreation and Parks Department for a Youth Development Center at the same site, as included in the NAS Alameda Community Reuse Plan. A Youth Development Center has been an unfunded item in the City's Capital Improvement Budget since 1992, and the need for additional youth programs and activities, particularly in West Alameda (see Attachment B), has been noted in the Alameda Collaborative for Children, Youth and Families Community Assessment. A recent Recreation and Parks Department estimate to build a Youth Development Center was approximately $3 million. Staffing costs are also high. Staffing for the City View Skate Park, for example, is estimated at $80,000 annually. AIA is proposing to provide adult and youth staffing as part of its community -value contribution to the lease. The Recreation and Parks Department sees AIA's proposal as a partial response to the programming needs of youth and anticipates a variety of joint ventures with AIA/HOME at the facility. AIA Proposal The request for a 10 -year lease is based on the requirement of a capital funder who has committed a matching grant to AIA of up to $100,000 annually for 3 years. Except for the requested extension of the lease to 10 years and the proposed rent structure, other lease teens are standard. AIA would be required to carry insurance, obtain approval to and share revenue from any sublease, be subject to breach and termination clauses, and obtain a Certificate of Occupancy and Use Permit. Specific requirements related to the public benefit portion of the lease are outlined in Attachment C, which in its final form would become an attachment to the ARRA/AIA lease. AIA has maintained a City business license since 1996. AIA's proposal to lease Building 585, as summarized in Attachment D, offers a base rent of $0.03 per square foot for the required Common Area Maintenance (CAM) and assumes the standard rent rebate for building shell upgrades ($0.08/sf for $50,000 credit spread over 5 years). Starting in Year 4 of the lease, AIA proposes to pay 10 percent (estimated at $5,000 in Year 4) of net profits from youth enterprises operated by the HOME Project. Lastly, AIA's proposal offers a range of community services in lieu of the remaining market -rate rent. Specifically, AIA pledges 1.25 new FTE to organize and operate various after- school activities, including Skate Park supervision, development of youth enterprises and small businesses, and community service projects. As proposed, community service projects organized by AIA would generate an estimated 2,000 hours of volunteer service annually for the City and its partners. Finally, AIA is proposing to provide free space for City- sponsored youth activities, including Recreation and Parks Department events and meeting space for the Alameda Collaborative for Children, Youth and Families. Alternate Proposal An alternate proposal (Attachment E) seeks to balance the financial obligations of maintaining, protecting and operating Alameda Point with the community benefits outlined in AIA's proposal. Key features of the alternative include a smaller rent reduction from the City, a guaranteed monthly payment against a higher percentage of receipts from youth enterprises starting in Year 3, revenue - sharing from subleases, and a stipulation that AIA must have an agreement with the AUSD for any services provided to AUSD students, either as a non -profit or charter school, during the lease period. Honorable Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority March 29, 2000 Page 3 In response to the alternate rent structure, AIA states that the economic value of new youth development and community services would offset all lost rent for Building 585, and that projected services over the next three years, funded by $500,000 to $750,000 annually in outside grants, also would be maintained. Fiscal Impact The AIA Proposal (Attachment D) outlines the economic value of AIA's proposed new services and demonstrates offsets equal to $91,848, or $0.73 per square foot in the first year of the lease. Cash payment to the ARRA would be $0.03 square foot per month or $3,798 in the first year, increasing to an estimated $14,264 (approximately $0.11 square foot) in year ten of the lease. In this scenario, the concession related to market rate is approximately $68,000. The Alternate. Proposal (Attachment E) outlines a quasi - commercial leasing approach, including the rent reduction for building shell upgrades, a guarantee against gross receipts, a share of any sublease revenues, and a City contribution (rent reduction) as a partial offset for services. The Alternate proposal would yield cash payments of $19,117 or $0.15 per square foot in the first year of the lease, increasing to a minimum of $41,163 or $0.30 a square foot in years 6 -10. AIA states that it has assurances from a major funder to contribute up to $100,000 in capital funds annually for 3 years to improve Building 585. Approximately $50,000 would be applied in the first year to building shell upgrades. Up to $250,000 more would be used in Years 1 - 3 for major repairs and tenant improvements, including roof replacement, upgrade of the kitchen and improvements to qualify a portion of the building for childcare. The reduced rent would count against the one- for -one match of City funds stipulated by AIA's capital funder. AIA also has commitments for approximately $500,000 in new program funding annually for three years. Some indirect economic development benefits would be derived from AIA's expenditure of funds on salaries and services in Alameda and from sales tax generated by the proposed youth enterprises. Summary The AIA proposal offers benefits to the community by providing after- school and weekend activities for youth and adult volunteers. There would be commercial benefit to Alameda Point residential and commercial tenants created by youth- operated micro - businesses. As the first stage of a City - sponsored Youth Development Center, AIA could bring these programs and services to the community at a relatively low cost. Recognizing the loss of $5 million annually in Navy caretaker funds, $4 million to date in lost opportunities due to other public benefit leases, and the need to service the large lease revenue bond debt, there is a mandate established by the City Council that the rental and redevelopment of Alameda Point should pay its own way. At the same time, a full market commercial lease would ignore the potential community value of the proposed program. Therefore, the recommended Honorable Members of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority March 29, 2000 Page 4 approach is for a reduced -rent commercial lease as outlined in Attachment E and described as the Alternate in the preceding paragraph. This approach recognizes the value of existing and proposed new AIA youth services, assumes that the AUSD is a stakeholder and collaborator in certain youth development activities, demonstrates the match requirement of AIA's capital fonder, and recognizes the imperative to make Alameda Point self - supporting. In short, it strikes the best balance between two important but competing City interests. Other Considerations Time is of the essence to AIA in its negotiations with their funders. Contingent on the action of the ARRA, it is proposed to provide AIA with a letter of intent to lease Building 585 under the terms and conditions specified by the ARRA. Processing of the Use Permit and Building Permit would proceed concurrent with final lease negotiations. It is anticipated that AIA services to be provided in lieu of rent would be memorialized in an attachment to the standard lease (similar to Attachment C) and would be subject to annual reporting and monitoring to assure compliance. Recommendation It is recommended that the ARRA Board authorize the Executive Director to execute a ten (10) year lease on Building 585 with Alternatives in Action (AIA), in substantial conformance with the Alternate Proposal. Respectfully submitted, David A. Berger De utf)ty Manager By: Ed'Levine Lasing and Property Manager Carol Beaver Community Development Manager ARDED Flint, Executive Director Attachment A: Proposed AIA Youth Development Activities Attachment B: Youth Collaborative Needs Assessment Recommendations Attachment C: Draft Lease Addendum Related to Public Benefit Requirements Attachment D: AIA Proposal Attachment E: Alternate Proposal cc: Leslie Medine, HOME Project co) too ect 00 �i•� 1•� 0 0 C14 111 CO tt) • CtA 1:3 • •o mr, ct •^y E cos) Net Effective Rent Staff Recommendation (Excluding Percentage of Commercial Operation) 1-4 EA r-+ - e-4 ■-+ v44.4 Q\ e-4 — N N 000 ~ O 1.01 000 C M N M 40,513 (.3 C� N h EYS V. M V} r-1 \0 C 0 '� V0 HOME Proj (Excluding I Commercial $3,, a n M 4 N d' �t "t• N ‹0 00 0, "I' In 601 VIC `V' FA N NO O 0 et iuw U 00 44 6,8 S`Z V1 `0 N t--- N 01 e 00 00 EA EO3 3.1 ISUBTOTAL CI) '--+ N M d' v ) t� 00 C E.. H Note: This table does not reflect the value of services to be provided by HOME. Attachment A Proposed AIA Youth Development Activities GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The following is a summary of the objectives for the three (3) pilot years of the HOMEstead in the proposed Youth Zone at Alameda Point. A detailed matrix of objectives and tasks by trimester is attached as Appendix 2. * Provide opportunities for youth to become effective citizens for the 21' century. citizens. • ♦ Make Alameda a place where youth can develop and exercise their full potential as Program Objectives for Three -year Pilot s By August 31, 2003, 300 youth members will be involved in the development and managementof the systems and projects of governance, enterprise, education and culture at the HOMEstead. Eighty percent (80 %) of the youth involved will report satisfaction with their experience at the HOMEstead. By August 31, 2003, the Alameda community will support a Youth Zone as evidenced by tangible investments of human resources, funding, facilities and political support of youth - initiated community projects. Year One Objectives By August 31, 2001, to involve 200 youth, 5 - 15 hours a week in the HOMEstead through internal projects (i.e. governance, infrastructure) and external youth - initiated community projects (i.e. youth businesses, services to the larger community). Specific tasks include: Develop the governance and infrastructure of the HOMEstead. Develop the youth membership. Create a safe and exciting learning environment throughout the pilot by increasing the number of trained adults involved. Develop entrepreneurial skills and projects in the HOMEstead. Form a Youth Project Incubator to support the development and expansion of youth - initiated community projects, and monitor and facilitate skill acquisition by individual youth through project development. Involve 30 youth to develop and launch 2 sustainable youth businesses at Alameda Point. Develop a multi -media arts studio in the HOMEstead facilities. Expand the Home Sweet Home child care into a sustainable, licensed business. Increase services to children and youth at Alameda Point. Develop and open a Charter School at the HOMEstead with 25 students. Build the community and culture of the HOMEstead. By August 31, 2001, to have established partnerships and relationships with the City of Alameda, community organizations, local politicians, and other stakeholders in support of the development of the HOMEstead. Tasks include: Develop relationships and support in the larger community by hosting events and sharing information for the community at Alameda Point and the City of Alameda to learn about the HOMEstead and become involved. Support and advocate for youth involvement in community decision - making (i.e. participation in public community meetings, advisory board members for the City and County of Alameda. Establish formal partnerships with key community stakeholders. Year Two Objectives By August 31, 2002, to involve 250 youth, 5 —15 hours a week in the HOMEstead through internal projects (i.e. governance, infrastructure) and external youth- initiated community projects (i.e. youth businesses; services to the larger community). By August 31, 2002, to have developed new partnerships and maintained existing partnerships and relationships with key community stakeholders including the City of Alameda, community organizations, local politicians, and other stakeholders in support of the development of the HOMEstead. Year Three Objectives • By August 31, 2003, to involve 300 youth, 5 —15 hours a week in the HOMEstead through internal projects (i.e. governance, infrastructure) and external youth - initiated community projects (i.e. youth businesses, services to the larger community). By August 31, 2003, to have community support for the expansion of the HOMEstead into a Youth Zone as evidenced by on -going partnerships with key community stakeholders and investments of human resources, funding and political support. -13- •• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Adults realize that children and youth can provide creative solutions and energy to implement new projects, while youth acknowledge that adults can offer experi- ence and resources to help develop their ideas. Attachment B Youth Collaborative Needs Assessment Excerpts Taking Action...Today The efforts of the past year are paying huge dividends today: • The Healthy Start collaborations — Woodstock- Chipman and Encinal —have made significant progress and could serve as a vehicle to reduce some East -West inequities. o The HOME Project convened a "work day" to follow -up on the youth -led projects that were envisioned at last year's conference o The ACCYF is continuing its mission as a clearinghouse of information, incubator of innovative ideas, and advocate for children, youth and their families. Taking into account the lessons learned from this community as- sessment, the following actions were identified: • Increase community -wide education and advocacy on behalf of children, youth and their families in Alameda. Photo: Kathy Baker, Alameda Journal 10 • Increase coordination and cooperation among public and private agencies serving children, youth and their families. • Address the needs of Alameda's new parent population in raising healthy and productive citizens. • Support efforts to address the growing economic inequality and ethnic diversity among Alameda's children, youth and families. • Support the increased participation of youth in decisions affecting their lives. • Create more after- school and recreational opportunities for children and youth. • Increase and coordinate volunteer activities for youth among government, nonprofit, business, and religious partners. • Increase corporate and philanthropic resources for children, youth and their families. • Increase the availability of human and social services for children, youth and their families. • Create more jobs, internships, and job readi- ness programs for youth in coordination with the business community. Alameda Collaborative: For children, youth and their families 40 6 41 40 41 40 6 40 40 40 40 40 41 6 fP 41 41 6 fp 40 6 41 IP 41 40 11 41 fP 41 40 41 41 41 41 41 6 411 41 40 6 41 40 41 41 lb IP fP gl Q Health Services + Social Services CI Children & Youth Services • Educational Et Tutorial O Recreational/Arts/Cultural Health Et Social Servcies Youth Development Programs Community Assessment 7 Attachment C Supplemental Conditions of Lease Between the Alameda Redevelopment and Reuse Authority and Alternatives in Action, Inc. 1. Alternatives in Action (AIA) will enter into an agreement with the Alameda Unified School District (AUSD) for the provision of instructional services to AUSD students. Said agreement shall remain in force until such time as AIA has received all approvals and is operating as a California Charter School. 2. AIA shall hire and supervise a .5 FTE to develop, implement and operate a community services program, in which no less than 100 high school students shall earn their community service credits by working on projects of benefit to the community, such as skate park volunteers, Alameda Point clean-up projects and other City - approved activities. A minimum of 1,000 community service hours shall be documented annually. 3. AIA shall hire and supervise a .25 FTE to develop, implement and operate a microenterprise assistance program for youth and young adults, consisting of all facets of training related to starting and owning a business. 4. AIA shall sublet at no cost to the City or ARRA up to 1,000 square feet of space in Building 585, and shall allow the City and/or ARRA to use additional space as needed to carry out youth and youth- related programs and activities. 5. Starting in Year 3, AIA shall pay a commercial bonus to the ARRA equal to 10% of the gross revenues exceeding $50,000 earned by AIA -based youth enterprises. 6. AIA shall contribute to the ARRA 50% of subleases and any other facilities costs which it may charge for use of the building by other groups. 7. AIA shall submit quarterly and annual reports documenting staff and student time provided to the above activities, describing program accomplishments and barriers, and providing financial information regarding youth enterprise and sublease /rental revenues. 8. Non - compliance with any condition of this Lease Addendum shall be deemed to be a breach of the lease and shall result in termination for cause. HOMEstead Financial Projections Rent Offer Valuation Analysis of First Year Annual Cost Services in Lieu of Rent m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o d co 0 0 0 ER- O N 00 O Lf) O 0) V a) O (1) 0 O U 4! (n N 0 CU CD CU cn CI, cn Q N o O N o o o g a O ,� 0 O N F' 0 >-4 O N CV x Pci x O O i O 00 O a y" N 1 1 0 C O o � X x a, o N . o as c0 •., E () i. o . O . - O 0 N N Q s i v 4, to t,0 g 0 v O CC o 00 g oo w moo cno Eo o u O 14 E ., 4 «. ,5 to co cu w w w t-. as a 10 CU o a as N N O 10 E 0) 4) 0 y 0) N E O O C v m - a) � o ›, a '5 010 CO 0 by \ \ 0 G t1 ). v N ,T.' 4 C, 4 0) .- 0) •+• 0) C ¢' 'o o~ c 5 ' G) tv cu O 0 U U cu 10 .4, t w O` ow 00) x 0 .4.. CI 000 00 �; 0 o y Gl' S1 N may! .4-, co ER °; H H e 0 0 Youth Enterprise Net Profit Share @ 10% 00 00 0" ER- Total Rent Paid Rent Offer Valuation Analysis of Lease Term H M v 0' 0) 00 ro v t0 et v r ett etc m 04 N R v 0-4 M v ti}MO33 Services in lieu of rent O O O C O 0 t 0 00) O N to N .r V� r-r + Eft O\ N 8 O O N \O \O 0 00 M 0 VD rte- O Eft N c0 0 Es v' 0 to r Eft 0\\ Eck N O N Eft Eft Eft Eft N 8 8 0 in N N O O W Eft Eft o\ in 0 8 8 \'O \\0 0 0 CO 0!) O 'd' Eft Eft n '0 00 m 0 00 \O N 0 V4 co O NO 00 O ER Eft 00 N 0 N 0 0 r-0 O o0 O 4 'dr 0. r-I r-. Eft Eft O N 8 W O O 8 tri O t: 0 4 V, N .-0 0-r ER Eft O co 0 W V� rN � 00) 00 lf) 00 00 CO tt) 0" O tri o0 EA 00 rn m � t\ Eft CO w \O Eft r. \NO O Eft 4 O d Po cN tf) Eft NN N Eft 0 d. Eft O 0 M Eft 00 N. r Eft 0 0 O � � O 4) 1 H I O " rn °! U 0 '� `^Y 1 d a+ .++ T 0 O 0 u U m 0) v v F., s ° w Ev a; c> y m 0) E (0 o m p ;; a v b a ~ O O co vo P. G . G Cf to 'v G Rt U a v w v 'Q P. „ Q O o 0 0 .. q >, o ou o8 vo goo o P: ti~ v W O O W ... O W c, ., F¢ H R >+ U ri En U U Youth Enterprise -10% of Net Profit n 0 Eft ER CO Leo en ( -sr 0 Eft Eft 0 n r: O ES CO Eft Eft CO N. O rn Eft Eft h O ER Eft CO m ER ER tft \0 n O Q\ Eft ER CO 0 ti O Eft ER Total Rent Pa Per Square Foot M N 00 kr) O O 69 «-+ Cr) 00 kr) C; C; N 0 O 0 00 V') N O o 0 69 69 00 0> 00 N u'1 O g g 0 Ov 69 69 W t- (M) O O 69 tec Cj 0 O O 63 69 rf it Ri 69 O O 69 M Q\ p."4-. C63 Q O 0 b9 N t— CT 6 ■0 M 0) C> O 0.) 63 Market Rent Per Month Value of Services Provided Rebate for Building Upgrades N O 0 0 63 00 N O O d 69 cc) M Ok) M 6 CO M 63 69 ER M O N MV' 000 N 69 69 63 69 69 63 69 ER 69 00 N 0 0 V0 N O M to O O `O 0O 69 O O 69 O 69 O O 69 0 O 63 Net Rent per square foot O Deferred Rent per square foot 69 69 6R •- O 1/40 0 X00 00 N 69 6R 69 69 69 69 •All-� 0 00 Cj N N Cr) v? 69 69 O V1 a 0 0 44 11 m 15 s U 0 0 w a sz a.� M 00 Monthly Rent * Based on 10% of gross above $50,000 minimum plus 50% of any sublease revenues 00 M• Cr) 0N1 O VO 0 10 M t 00 ON v7 01 16 00 7!' 7,4 63 69 ER 69 N d' - 01 0 O OM [ 00 ON 00 d' 69 63 63 69 69 0 N N .M-+ O 00 O v) O In N M r-+ � 63 63 69 69 69 00 O N �t O S N 01 en 01 10 M ell d' 69 63 69 63 6R v') 0 M 00 O kfl \ Cr t v1 01 10 H N M •i' 63 69 6R 69 69 d' 10 O 10 d' N C� O 10 •-+ 'I:, 01 O N t N 1O 0 r-+ 10 ON kr) •-+ N 69 69 69 63 69 0 10 O 00 6n 00 y} 00 •t 0 M 0 1 �t O 1O O� 00 41 u u 69 63 63 69 69 6R O N .i t— M 01 O M \O 0■ 00 V .-+ <-1 69 63 69 63 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 M O M — era ■ o�cim 00 " 69 63 69 69 Ef3 V0 0000 0 S 01 d' O M N 00 O M a00 "It 69 63 63 69 69 Annual Market Rent Annual Credit Value of Service Annual Rent Paid O Annual Commercial Bonus* 10 01 6R 0 HOME's Major Accomplishments to Date • Over 200 youth have been core members of HOME working up to 15 hours a week from 6 months to 4 years. • HOME has sponsored five major youth conferences in Alameda with over 700 youth participants overall. • HOME youth has made over 60 public presentations to adult audiences throughout the Bay Area. ♦ HOME has involved over 750 adult volunteers. • HOME operates W.A.Y. (Work for Alameda Youth), a youth employment agency that has placed over 160 youth in jobs. • HOME operates Home Sweet Home, a youth -run child care center that has served over 50 families with small children. • HOME built the Cityview Skate Park, the largest outdoor skate park in California with the support of 800 volunteers and 90 businesses. • HOME is in the process of launching a youth business incubator supporting youth -run enterprises. • HOME has raised $1,200,000 for its operations from local and national foundations, public support and private donations. • HOME made its first documentary, "A Place Called HOME." Mission Statement We are the gateway for the future. We discover ourselves, our commitment to each other, our organization, and the world outside searching to find ways to improve, reflect and adjust. We do this by any means possible or impossible. We uphold a process of understanding community, passion for ourselves as individuals, as a group and then through a ripple effect„ we reach out to give and impact the community. We do this anywhere, everyday, in the world. We rest and refocus inside the space called 140ME. * - Excludes Expenditures Related to Capital Improvements £00Z4sanv - ZOOZ .zaquz ZOOZ ;sanv - IOOZ zaquiaidas IOOZ }sanv - 000Z iaquzatdas 000Z 1sn$nv - 666t iaquiatdas 66611sanv - 8661 Jaquiatdas L661 isn2nv - 9661 iaquzatdas Q1 O N O V N O O O 01 O x•77 01 CO CN o 0 Cr) 1-1 N N O O O O Do ,y. Al !y rt F cr z `` CS Q" yf °� Z d to o O. .ri o py O n a o 0 C x 0> o e a c. y m $1) O 'b c9 o 0: rD 7 0 ;-C o .O �+ ao o y oa rD 0 CA .1 `*ti n rD rOr O 71°"' 4 �@ N �- fDS ¢, a �, 7S o o°a o O 0 5 o 4 f D o .-, rD a� , o 0 0 r r) 0. ° rD ss. n ro y O W .0 U1 01 CD Cr] 0 0 0 0 0 0 cOri o o O O O O O O O sauo}sam'cam HOME - Alternatives in Action Total Proposed Lease Payments Youth Enterprise Net Profit Share @ 10% Eh r9 ro h O -o .L z AOi 0) E fD ~ O n O LS p ~ H O (17' PA W .-- rt o J °° fD e N O ° ° rt ° rt o o o ff rt m O� osu om c � '"' %-r • `C y ,n y 1 X n' n et n O .;z) 7 A� rt H • rCi ro r ' 01 ci CIO it va •� '-'3- ' d d o to Q ro n c a c a) o a o et +. CD i... ' ` A, `C 0 '* c ;r Q. rt n O Cn cn v X 5, X O x .. G1 'r O 'Ty to O CIi N C CA 0 a CA o \ \ O x N N A) ., 5 rt CTt Q1 �"1 O CA Oi LU I- ^ p ` > rcn O rt O \ O rn O \ rt ... D `. N `7 r CG N O ) � O O 0� 00 �' . 0 y sv O O; 0 cn \ vl 5 x C N et N et y 9 0 5. < ((D D u) 0. n m 0 N O o U1 •< y C c. 1 n' et W O V O N `5)1 CO 07 O O O O O O E N N 01 :-1 o o o cn o C o4, tri O O O OON V O■ O 0 00 0 C 01 luau ;o nail ui saawas Analysis of First Year and Total Lease Proposal uollenIEA Ja33O luau HOME - Alternatives in Action HOME - Alternatives in Action Analysis of City of Alameda Transaction Income Statement Benefits to the City of Alameda - Lease Term 10 Years Option A - City funds its own Program Option B - EDC Proposal - $1 per Year for 10 year lease term Option C - HOME Proposal - Services in Lieu of Rent Income Cash income from Lease HOME Program Value Youth Community Service - 2,000 hours Tenant Improvement Credit - Code (Amortized over 5 years) Tenant Improvement Credit - Kitchen (Amortized over 5 years) Space for City - Sponsored Youth Group Events Youth Enterprise - 10% of Net Profit Total Income Expenses Program Costs - Youth Center Equivalent Staffing - 2,000 hours - Youth Activities, Skate Park & Community Service Municipal Services Fee Space for City- Sponsored Youth Group Events Tenant Improvement Credit - Code (Amortized over 5 years) Tenant Improvement Credit - Kitchen (Amortized over 5 years) Municipal Services Fee Option A 100,000 Option B Option C $ 10 $ 45,5 9,433,419 9,411,419 100,000 10,010 50,000 4)X) $ 100,000 $ 9,583,429 $ 9M $ 8,404,275 $ 24,348 50,000 20,000 45,599 ,00x0 24. 48 - $ 540,275 45,599 24,348 Total Expenses $ 8,544,223 $ 610,222 $ Net Income /(Cost) to City $ (8,444,223) $ 8,973,207 $ 9,612 %pi © are %S 4!JoMd a.aN asudiavug upno t Q • H ro ti ii cn m co n o 0 Pt w a M CJ) 0✓ CDD `' - art., O4 o- n Q" F y � 0 • v O O 3 CD CD 0 Equivalent Staffing - Micro -Loan Program aatnzas 4unmmoJ q ;noA - Buijje }S 4ualenmbg • N Cn N 0 0 O 0 0 ✓ rCJJ1 N.) 01 -t4 0 0" G 0) � O O Q\ coo cn 0 0) 0 0 c.n ° o o O OOD 0 0 0 CO CO 00 )1 Cn 0 m 0 0 0 luau Jo nail ui saztn.Tas r CA 0 y o 4 7 HOME - Alternatives in Action * - As quoted by ARRA Leasing Staff 01 0n w °w 0 if3 Ni Ni Ni Ni Ni Ni Ni Ni Ni 0 0000 ° a°\ ° ° w o ° °G cn 01 FP ,p W w o � CO Ni Ni O 1/4.0 01 w O■ CO 00 N W Ni CO O W 00 00 O w v ~o 00 00 a N 01 O ON O O O O V 9 WWW N W0 :-n )4". Cr.) Cj Q CO 00 CO Ni V O� 04 ON O FP• O 4 '.07 N 00 00 00 N CD N.) 01 N N O 01 O W O\ 0 00 N N O -Eft N N O hN 0O 01 CT N 00 Ui W 00 01 01 V N 00 0 O CD N..) C Ni ON Ni 00 Cif O ON Ni 01 Ni 1�-� O 01 O O oOx �n ° tri �• � c tD ft 17a fl rt z 4, ro rt rt HOME - Alternatives in Action Annual Budget Use of Funds Personnel - 15 -20+ Full Time Equivalents - Administration - Charter School Staffing - Early Childhood Staffing - Youth Employment /Project Coaches - Consultants - Interns - Related Benefits Non - Personnel - Rent - Supplies - Equipment - Postage - Maintenance /Office Services - Insurance Program Expense Percentage Breakdown 85.9% 14.1% Total Program Expenses * 100.0% - Excludes Expenditures Related to Capital Improvements Appendix I Adult Biographies We are working with a strong team of youth, but would like to take this opportunity to recognize the adult coaches and coordinators that are directly assisting us with our efforts. Leslie Medine - Executive Director, External Coach Leslie Medine brings to HOME 25 years of organizational and administrative planning, having co- founded both Beacon Day and High Schools, and Educational Implementors Inc. She has served as executive director, primary development officer, board president, recruitment/admissions director, financial manager, and community builder for each of these organizations. Leslie was also instrumental in the development and implementation of Catalyst, a unique training model designed to capture the obvious and measurable benefits of physical training, i.e. timed running trials, and apply them simultaneously in other realms of performance - -- mental, professional, creative and emotional. A social worker by background, Leslie Medine understands people and has the knack of involving and committing them to possibilities. She has a Masters from U.C. Berkeley in Organization, Planning and Administration. Patricia Murillo - Program Director, Internal Coach Patricia Macias Murillo serves as the Program Director for HOME. Her work in HOME involves coaching youth in all aspects of non - profit management and providing support and training in youth development for adults. She has 10 years of experience in the non - profit sector and earned a Masters in Social Welfare degree with an emphasis on Management and Planning from the University of California at Berkeley in 1998. Her professional experience includes serving as the Co -Chair of the Latino Affairs Commission of Santa Cruz County, coordinating a community planning effort for the Latino Family Support Program in Contra Costa County, and leading a similar effort through the Encinal Healthy Start planning grant in the City of Alameda. Ms. Murillo has provided direct social services to children, youth and families through advocacy case management, individual and group counseling. She has led training sessions and workshops on issues related to family violence and adolescent development and has been with the HOME Project since 1997. Kim Coulthurst - Enterprise Coach Kim's career working with youth began in the Oakland Mayor's Office in 1992 when she created a citywide reading program called Camp Read -a -Lot. After growing the program from 90 children to 900, she took a position with the City of Oakland to create Team Oakland, a youth employment program. It was through her work with Team Oakland that Kim discovered her passion for helping youth acquire the skills to create the future of their dreams. In 1996 she started her own consulting firm and worked with clients such as East Oakland Youth Development Center, Donald P. McCullum Youth Court and Oakland Unified School District. Kim's career at HOME started in 1998 when she and 7 students began the Work for Alameda Youth program to help youth ages 14 -21 find jobs. Currently she is coaching two after school projects (night club and skate shop) and has assumed a leadership role in HOME's youth - 13 - enterprise projects. Traveling, reading and spending time with her family and friends occupy her free time. She has a BA in history from Mills College and a Certificate of Nonprofit Management from California State University, Hayward. Kim grew up in the East Bay and resides in Oakland's Dimond District. Etsuko Kubo - Work for Alameda Youth (WAY) Coordinator Etsuko Kubo attended Mills College in Oakland, and obtained her BA in Ethnic Studies in May 1999. During her time at Mills College, she participated in the Asian Sisterhood Alliance, and Womanist Against Institutionalized Racism. In December 1999, Etsuko signed on with Work for Alameda Youth as the intern coordinator and HOME Project office manager. In addition, she is a tutor for individual high school students and serves the Mills College Upward Bound Program as a mentor. Since 1994, Etsuko has helped to sustain a small program in the California Central Valley called Tomodachi Gakko, a Japanese American culture and history day camp for youth. Etsuko grew up in the California Central Valley in a town outside of Turlock. She currently lives in Oakland. Marie Kayler - Home Sweet Home Coordinator Marie's career has focused on Early Childhood. She has spent seven years with Head Start programs, which consists of five years as a teacher /enrollment coordinator at the Alameda Head Start Center and two years as a teacher at Oakland Head Start. Prior to this she spent 11 years working at a child care program in a local church. Marie was born and raised in Santa Barbara. California and has been a resident of Alameda for 30 years. Marie has three wonderful children Her interests include reading, music and interacting with children of all ages. Charles Davis - Arts/Media Coordinator Charles Davis is a professional musician and recording engineer and producer in the bay area. Charles has had extensive experience working with youth as a group home counselor, music instructor and project coordinator. He has also had extensive experience working with different community projects ranging from political campaigns to community youth development programs in southern California. He is currently attending Laney College in Oakland, and plan' to transfer to UC Berkeley to obtain his BA in music. Julie Lieberman Neale - Research Consultant A belief in the powerful connection between developing youth and community brought Julie Lieberman Neale to HOME, where she is working on fund development and coaches the youth focus group and research group teams. Prior to HOME, Julie received her masters in city planning, community development at UC Berkeley and spent the year following her degree program researching and writing about youth development and community building for the Annie E. Casey Foundation. Her experience in nonprofit youth organizations began six years ago when she became Program Director at Heart of Los Angeles Youth (HOLA) a youth center near downtown Los Angeles that works with over 700 young people ages six to nineteen. Jul le graduated from UCLA Phi Beta Kappa, Magna Cum Laude with a degree in Mass Communications. -14- Kei H. Chua - Corporate Consultant Mr. Chua was a manager in Arthur Andersen's Global Corporate Finance Practice where he directed financial audit, due diligence, policies and procedures review and agreed -upon procedures engagements in diverse-industries. Mr. Chua has also had extensive experience in corporate restructuring, turnaround and interim crisis management consulting. Mr. Chua has performed operational consulting engagements in the manufacturing, warehousing, logistics, distribution, and retail arena. Mr. Chua is a graduate of New York University where he received his Bachelor of Science, magna cum laude, in Finance and Accounting. He is a Certified Public Accountant licensed in New York State and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the New York State Society of Public Accountants. Mr. Chua is fluent in several Chinese dialects (including Mandarin and Cantonese). Jessie Berg - Office Manager Jessie has a diverse work history ranging from building trails in the Northern Cascade Mountains, working in different office and retail settings, to being a first grade teacher in Honduras. She grew up mostly in Seattle, but moved to New York City in high school and then attended Simon's Rock College of Bard in Massachusetts, and Marlboro College in Vermont. She moved to California last January with plans to finish her BA in Art and Women's Studies at either UC Berkeley or UC Santa Cruz. In her free time she paints, creates beautiful things, plays cello and soccer, reads, and is taking a statistics course at Laney College. CHAMBER of COMMERCE March 16, 2000 TO Economic Development Commission FR: Paula McCloskey — CEO RE: HOME. Project Youth City The Alameda Chamber Board of Directors voted unanimously to supporr the concept of collaboration between the business community and the education of Alarneda's youth. The Chamber has scheduled HOME project students to make a presentation before the business community on Thursday, March 23 at our Networking Luncheon. We have also invited tenants from Alameda Point to join us to learn more about how business can support the students' understanding of the tree enterprise system. I have also made referrals to the HOME project of businesses looking to sub - contract services which may be appropriate for future HOME business ventures and sources of revenue for the project. I feel this is a win -win situation for both sides and the community -et- large, t would like to note the Chamber's history of Support for the WAY program and our desire to continue identifying future opportunities for business and youth to learn from one another. The business member:: or the Alameda Chamber can offer valuable resources to the students as they strive to meet their goal of a Youth Ciry. 2447 Santa Clara Ave., Ste. 302 • Alameda, CA 94501 • {310) 522 -0411 FAX t510) 522 -7677 COMPANIES HIRING YOUTH THROUGH WAY June 15, 1998 — February 29, 2000 TOTAL PLACEMENTS: 161 Affinity Mortgage (6) Alameda Beauty College (2) Alameda Chamber of Commerce (1) Alameda Collaborative for. Children, Youth & Families (2) Alameda Drug (1) Alameda Housing Authority (1) Alameda Ice Cream Dock (3) Alameda Multicultural Center (1) Applebee's (1) Atomic Studios (1) AUSD - Superintendent's Office (1) Aviso (6) Bank of Alameda (2) Bank of the West (1) Barbara Tutor (2) Barbera Insurance (1) Bay Ship & Yacht (2) Brown Chiropractic (1) BusinessServices.net (1) Carrie Garber (2) Cathy Remandi (1) Child Unique Montesouri School (1) City of Alameda (1) Commodore Dining Cruises (1) Data 911 (1) David Stone & Associates (1) Dr. Eulita Johnson (2) DSP.net (1) East Bay AIDS Foundation (1) Encinal Yacht Club (3) Esperanza Community Center (2) Garden Guys (1) Garden Isle Homeowners Assoc. (1) Harsch Investment (1) HOME Project (3) Home Sweet Home Childcare (3) Homes -Link (1) Hunter House Publishing(2) IDX (1) Influence Communications (1) Iris Peacock (1) Island Eyecare (3) Jim Gordon (3) JMS Development (4) Kim Brown State Farm Insurance (2) Kimberly Curtis (3) Kristen Law State Farm Insurance (1) Law Office of Marc Voisenat (1) Law Offices of Michael Cosentino (3) Law Offices of Susan L. Jeffries (1) Manex Studios (1) Mariner Square Athletic Club (1) Mason Management (2) Mastik Senior Center (1) Metamedia Associates (1) Michelle Jacobson (1) Morgan Stanley Dean Witter (1) Mrs. Britton (2) Nancy Keins (1) Needle in a Haystack (1) Outboard Motor Shop (1) Pacific Shops DBA (2) Paine Webber (2) Peerless Coffee (2) Ruiz Antique Lighting (1) Scobie's Grill (1) Score Prep (1) The Whole Shabang (1) Thruston Design Group (1) Togo's (1) Twin Towers United Methodist Church (1) Uniglobe Total Travel (1) USS Hornet (1) Versailles Pharmacy (1) Vivian Pon (1) WAY (2) Wendy Moss (2) William Feole (1) Wink Communications (1) Xanthos (1) Assisted with placements: '35 March 27, 2000 Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority 2200 Central Avenue Alameda, CA 94501 Dear Members: ' osenblum Rosenblum Cellars strongly supports the youth activities of Alameda. We encourage you to approve a very reasonable lease price for Building 585 at Alameda Point so the Work for Alameda Youth/HOME programs may continue. We feel these programs are a great way for Alameda to invest in our future now by allowing young adults an opportunity to experience free enterprise and community involvement. Our society today has too many opportunities for youths to stray into drugs and related problems. The HOME project is one way to help turn that situation around. Kent M. Rosenblum President Cc: WAY/HOME 2900 MAIN STREET • ALAMEDA, CA 94501-7522 • PHONE (510) 865-7007 • FAX: (510) 865 -9225 www.rosenblumcellars.com Affiliated Organizations Organization of Alameda Asians Out On the Island Buena Vista UMC Court Street UMC Sentinel Fair Housing East Bay Central American Refugee Committee Coalitions of Alamedan's for Racial Equality East Bay Asian Local Development Corporation (Fiscal Agent) • • • • • • • • • Multi-Waal Community Cep March 28, 2000 Dear ARRA members: 842 Central Avenue Alameda, CA 94501 Tel: 510 521 -9405 Fax: 510 521 -9429 The Home Project exists to create a safe and empowering environment for our youth within school settings and in the community. The Home Project serves the needs of youth through various instructional programs and events, and by supporting partnerships between various groups. Through Work for Alameda Youth (WAY), which is a work - training program, the Alameda Multi - Cultural Community Center (AMCCC) has been able to employ a youth intern. Our intern, Lee Ann Santos, has been with us for four months and has provided excellent administrative support. In the last two years, 161 referrals have been successfully made to other Alameda and Oakland employers WAY is one of the many projects of HOME that exist to help youth expand their capabilities and enhance their experiences within the community. Projects that are youth- focused, such as HOME.. are what are especially needed. The enrollment of high school youth is continually increasing and ra is essential for our youth to be involved in the community as well as for them to explore a world of opportunities. I strongly support the funding of the HOME project and the future of our Alameda youth. I believe that it is through youth organized projects that our youth will grow and develop into talented, productive citizens. The youth are our hope for tomorrow. Sincerely, 71/(4,1,6o/itff Mariano M. Jauco Executive Director Community through Diversity, Education and Exchange Subj: ARRA Lease Date: 4/4/00 10:41:10 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: OlsonC©BankofAlameda.com (Chris Olson) To: work4youth @aol.com (Work4youth ©aol.com) CC: AndrewsS @BankofAlameda.com (Steve Andrews) Bank of Alameda supports Work for Alameda Youth and the proposed lease for Building 585 at Alameda Point. Bank of Alameda is proud of our support of over 60 Alameda charities and organizations. We believe that WAY is important to the community and our young people. An investment today will deliver great rewards for the future. Steve Andrews President and CEO Bank of Alameda Headers Return-Path: <OlsonC@BankofAlarneda.com> Received: from riy- zb03.mx.aol.com (rly- zb03.mail.aol.com [172.31.41.3]) by air- zb03.mail.aol.com (v70.20) with ESMTP: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 13:41:10 -0500 Received: from boasvint.bankofalameda.com (on.oasysnetworks.com [ 166.90. 141.126]) by rly- zb03.mx.aol.com 071 10) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Apr 200013:40:59 -0400 Received: by BOASVI NT with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id <HQLMRKPN>; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 10:41:16 -0700 Message -ID: <D1 B70F614C99D31 I8ADC00805F654D6705E58C ©BOASVI NTH From: Chris Olson <OlsonC©BankofAlameda.com> To: "work4youth©aol.com" <work4youth ©aoicom> Cc: Steve Andrews <AndrewsS ©BankofAlameda.com> Subject: ARRA Lease Date: Tue, 4 Apr 200010:41:15 -0700 MIME- Version: 1.0 )(Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content -Type: text/plain Tu.sday. April 04, 2000 Amides onun.: Work4Youth Pigs: 1 Subj: SUPPORT! Date: 3/29/00 11:03:37 AM Pacific Daylight lime From: morpall @ix.netcom.com (Paul) To: work4youth @aol.com Thank you for sending me the letter of explanation about your very exciting developments! I look forward to supporting and participating with you. Your group did a great job with their presentation last week at the Chamber of commerce Networking luncheon. Your organization, planning and execution are to be admired and I look forward to working with you. I will be attending the April 5 meeting. If there is something specific you'd like me to address, please let me know. Otherwise, I will speak in general support of your programs. I also look forward to seeing Kim again. I so enjoyed working with her on the Intern program. Best Regards, Moira Fossum Life is short, cruise often! UNIGLOBE CruiseShipCenter A division of UNIGLOBE Total Travel (510) 523-0768 www.alamedatotaltravel.com CST #1013815 -10 Headers Return-Path: <morpall@ix.netcom.com> Received: from rty- st02.mx.aol.com (riy- st02.mail.aol.com [172.31.36.135]) by air- yd03.mail.aol.com (v70.20) wilt E 1P. Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:03:37 -0500 Received: from rty- yh0l.mx.aol.com (rty- yh0l.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.331) by rty- st02.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/AOL- 5.0.0) with ESMTP id MAA18307 for <work4youth©aol.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:57:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from granger.mail.mindspring.net (granger.mail.mindspring.net [ 207.69.200.148]) by rly- yh01.mx.aor c 70 21) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:56:59 -0500 Received: from g2nOf4 (ali- cal1- 13.ix.netcom.com [209.110.226.1411) by granger.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA20051 for <work4youth@aol.com >; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:56:57 -0500 (EST) Message -ID: <000701 b199a8$ce82d760$8de26ed1 @g2n0f4> From: "Paul" <morpall @ix.netcom.com> To: <work4youth @aol.com> Subject: SUPPORT! Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 10:01:06 -0800 MIME - Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset = "iso - 8859 -1" Content- Transfer - Encoding: 7bit X- Priority: 3 X- MSMail- Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X.MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 T,,..,4 ., ♦nrli f4. Nlm Aarriea fMiln.• Wnrk•Yn"th Pena. 1 Subj: this wonderful WAY program Date: 3/28/00 12:31:15 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: nadine.refsell(PaineWebber.COM (Nadine Refsell) To: work4youth@aol.com (1lvork4youth @aoLcom) Dear Work for Alameda Youth: Our Alameda branch of PaineWebber has participated with your working youths for over a year now and I would like you to know that we have enjoyed each and every candidate/inteniewee/participant and the well -run nature of this program. You are giving them solid, useful skills for the workplace and for them to feel they have more choices in life (which is a major benefit of education) and I am happy to be part of it. I hope and encourage you to further expand your program, certainly not delete it. If there are some other ways I can be helpful to your keeping this program in place, please let me know. Sincerely, Nadine L. Refsell, Financial Advisor PaineWebber 1364 Park Street Alameda (510) 864 -5390 Headers Retum -Path: < nadine.refsell @painewebber.com> Received: from rty- zb03.mx.aol.com (rly- zb03.mail.aol.com [172.31.41.3]) by air- zb04.mail.aol.com (v70.20) with ESUTP: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 14:31:15 -0500 Received: from nj- mx- 02.painewebber.com (nj- mx -02.painewebber.com [162.66.204.123]) by rly-zb03.mx.aol.com (v70 21) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 14:31:00 -0500 Received: from painewebber.com (nj- mailhub-01.pwj.com [162.66.157.81]) by nj- mx-02.painewebber.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA00172 for <work4youth©aol.com >; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 14:30:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from psla03.sra.pwj.com 4162.66.157.144]) by painewebber.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA20186 for <work4youth@aol.com >; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 14:22:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from nbs.a0.cwpcg.pwj.com (unverified) by psla03.sra.pwj.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 2.0.15) with SMTP id < B0002210514©psla03.sra.pwj.com> for <work4youth cony Tue, 28 Mar 2000 11:31:10 -0500 Received: from kw0060003.a0.cwpcg.pwj.com 4162.64.60.3]) by nbs.a0.cwpcg.pwj.com (Netscape Messaging Server 3.5) with SMTP id AAA131F2 for <work4youth©aol.com >; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 11:22:59 -0500 Received: by kw0060003.a0.cwpcg.pwj.com with Microsoft Mail id < 01BF988E. D32134D0 @kw0060003.a0.cwpcg.pwj.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 08:22:58 -0800 Message -Id: < 01BF988E. D32134D0 @kw0060003.a0.cwpcg.pwj.com> From: "Nadine Refsell" < nad iine.refsell @PaineWebber.COM> To: "'work4youthdciaol.com" <work4youth ©aol.com> Subject: this wonderful WAY program Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 08:22:57 -0800 MIME- Version: 1.0 Content -Type: text/plain; charset= "us- ascii" Content - Transfer - Encoding: quoted - printable Tuesday, April 04, 2000 America Online: Work4You h Page: I Subj: [Fwd: HOME relo] Date: 3/23/00 6:40 :43 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: massonB@ricochet.net (Suzanne Lindsey) Reply-to: masson @a.crLcom To: Work4Youth@aol.com A copy of my email. Regards, Suzanne X-Mozilla- Status2: 00000000 Message -ID: < 38DABC7D.A6340987 @ricochet.net> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 16:53:18 -0800 From: Suzanne Lindsey <masson @ricochet.net> Reply-To: masson @a.cri.corn Organization: Gallagher and Lindsey Inc. Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win95; I) XAccept- Language: en MIME - Version: 1.0 To: rappezzato@ci.alameda.ca.us Subject: HOME relo Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=" 54CEDBE1CA1C8A87C8C21CBO" This is a multi -part message in MIME format. 54CEDBEICA1C8A87C8C21CB0 Content -Type: text/plain; charset =us -ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, This email is to encourage you to look favorably upon the HOME Project relocation to Alameda Point at the ARRA meeting on April 5, 2000. I will be speaking on their behalf at the meeting. The HOME PROJECT organization contacted Don and me to help find them a new home a while back, and we directed them to the Point as the re-use plan had already identified some places for youth. We told them that there were really no other buildings left on the island meeting their criteria. Happily and hopefully they will be joining all of us at Alameda Point in the near future. Best Regards, Suzanne Lindsey 54CEDBEICA1C8A87C8C21CB0 Content-Type: text/x- ucard; charset =us- ascii; name= "masson.vcf Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content- Description: Card for Suzanne Lindsey Content- Disposition: attachment; filename= "masson.vcf' begin:vcard n:Undsey;Suzanne x-mozi lla -html: FALS E adr.,,,,,, version:2.1 email; i ntemet: masson@a.cri.com Tu„day, April 04, 2000 Amsrka 4nlinr: Work4Youth Peg*: 1 Subj: upcoming hearing Date: 3/29/00 8:51:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: tlachac©earthlink.net (charlotte tlachac) To: work4youth©aol.com Dear "WAY" program administrators, Thank you for developing and continuing the work for youth program that my business has found to be very useful. We have a variety of clerical jobs and miscellaneous projects that were bogging down the front office staff who are working hard enough the way it is. Thus we decided to use less skilled labor to perform these tasks. This gives someone an entry level job to get their feet wet in the employment arena and we get the benefit of having our tasks completed and at a lower cost than if our permanent staff had to put in overtime. We have kept the fist youth on as a permanent part -time worker since he started here over a year ago. He has developed a number of skills over this time that will help him in his college career and in any other job that he may enter. He has learned responsibility, ability to follow directions and better people skills. We recently added a second student as we still had overflow work to do. Lisa has been with us for over a month and is working out very well also. She is a sophomore and we hope to keep her employed alter the WAY program period ends with the end of the school term. This is a very worthwhile program for both the youths it serves and the businesses that are able to take advantage of it. In these economic times, it behooves us to use entry level employees for tasks such as filing, sorting, labeling etc but there are not many adults in that "gene pool ". I strongly urge you to continue this effort and ex pand it if at all possibe. Sincerely, Dr.Charlotte Tiachac Optometrist, ISLAND eyecare Headers Return-Path: <tlachac @earthlink.net> Received: from riy- st07.mx.aol.com (rly- st07.mail.aol.com [172.18.149.18]) by air- yd02.maii.aol.com (v70.20) ratr+ E SEA TP. Wed, 29 Mar 2000 22:51:19 -0500 Received: from riy- zd05.mx.aoi.com (rly- zd05.mail.aol.com [172.31.33.229]) by rly-st07.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/AOL- 5.0.0) with ESMTP id WAA17230 for <work4youth(-c�aoi.com >; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 22:45:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from gull.prod.itd.earthlink.net (gull.prod.itd.earthlink.net [ 207. 217.121.85]) by rly- zd05.mx.aol.com (v70 21 ) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 22:45:06 -0500 Received: from earthlink.net ( sdn- ar -017casfrMP056.dialsprint.net [158.252.221.58]) by gull.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA02190 for <work4youth@aol.com >; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 19:44:59 -0800 (PST) Tund.y, April 04, 2000 Mvoles Oniinm: Work4YoWh Pogo: I Subj: Letter of Support Date: 4/3/00 3:20:03 PM Pacifc Daylight Time From: keri clarkeapi.com To: work4youth ©aoi.corn To Whom It May Concern,. I would like to let you know what a great benefit I feel your service is to Alameda. I am the Director of the Nursery at Twin Towers United Methodist Church and was able to hire a very reliable, responsible youth through your program in Nov 99. Without the program and the pre-screening this task would have been very time consuming and tedious for me without the resources you have. Thank you again for your service and I am in support of Work for Alameda Youth/HOME Best Regards, Keri Clark 510 - 272 -8411 Headers Return-Path: <keri clerk @apl.com> Received: from riy- yg02.mx.aol.com (rty- yg02.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.2]) by air yg05.mail.aol.com (v70.20) with E SM1P, Mon, 03 Apr 2000 18:20:03 -0500 Received: from noamsg04.apl.com «155.14.37.220]) by rlyyg02.mx.aol.com (v70.21) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 18:19:42 -0400 Received: from 155.14.37.192 by noamsg04.apl.com with SMTP (APL WSM SMTP Relay(WSS) v4.3); Mon, 03 Apr 00 15:23:35 -0700 X-Server -Uuid: 9Q286a2- 9182 -11 d3- b258- 00805t85976b Received: from ccMail by apl.com ( ccMail Unk to SMTP R8.31.00.5) id AA954800518; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 15:22:00 -0800 Message -ID: < 0004039548 .AA954800518 @apl.corn> X- Mailer. ccMail Unk to SMTP R8.31.00.5 Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 15 :16:12 -0800 From: keri_clark ©api.com To: work4youth(,,aol.com Subject: Letter of Support MIME - Version: 1.0 X- WSS -ID: 14F7C66D1417456-01 -01 Content -Type: text/plain; charset= us -ascii Content- Transfer - Encoding: 7bit Content- Description: "cc:Mail Note Part" To Whom It May Concern: 4/1/00 Please support HOME and their effort to move to the new building at Alameda Point. We are an Alameda residential family and hope to use HOME as our regular Day Care facility. Supporting quality Day Care facilities is at the heart of building a functional community. Investing in our children is investing in our Community's future, and we are grateful that HOME is dedicated to those needs. Please give HOME the support they need to provide exceptional care in Alameda. Thank you, The Summerfield Family 1850 Elm St. Alameda HaleyadeedAaol.com 510 -522 -6387 Correspondence / Miscellaneous ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Interim Leasing Status Report - April 2000 RevisedInterimlease.xls Signed Leases & Licenses Term Building # Building Sq. Ft. 1 ACET (Environmental Tech. Incubator) long term 7 15,550 2 AC Hornet Foundation long term Pier 3 3 Alameda Aerospace (Advanced Turbine Tech.) long term 398 32,000 4 Alameda Aerospace (Tower Aviation) long term 530 82,250 5 Alameda Point Storage (Mini Storage) long term Near Bldg. 530 Ground Lease 6 Alameda Point Collaborative (Warehouse) long term 92 89,000 7 Alameda Point Collaborative (Office, etc.) long term 101 68,650 8 Alameda Unified School District (Child Care Cntr) long term 258 12,430 9 AVTS (Audio Visual Technical Services) long term 22 66,000 10 Antiques by the Bay (Collectibles Faire) long term Tarmac & 405 4,880 11 Bay Ship & Yacht (Ship Repair) long term 292 2,700 12 Bay Ship & Yacht (Ship Repair) long term 25 (Bay 1) 17,000 13 Bladium (Indoor Games) long term 40 104,000 14 Bobac (Warehouse) long term Bldg 2 FISC 110,000 15 Alameda Power & Telecom (Storage Yard) long term at FISC 16 CALSTART (Electric Vehicle Incubator) long term 20 66,600 17 Cellular One (Cell Site) long term Near Bldg. 360 Ground Lease 18 ,City of Alameda (Dog Run Park) long term along estuary 19 City of Alameda (Ferry Terminal Parking) long term along estuary 20 City of Alameda (Fire Dept Training) long term 522 2,400 21 City of Alameda (Gym & Pool) long term 76 &134 58,450 22 City of Alameda (O'Club) long term 60 29,550 23 City of Alameda (Police Department) long term 494 2,850 24 City of Alameda (Public Works storage) long term 397 17,000 25 City of Alameda (Soccer Field) long term east of Bldg 360 26 City of Alameda (Tennis Courts) long term west of O'Club 27 Container Storage (Cans) long term 338 42,000 28 CyberTran International (Test Track) short term EW Runway 29 Delphi Productions (Exhibit Displays) long term 39 110,000 30 Delphi Productions long term 117 West 32,000 31 Dignity Housing (Homeless Coll.) long term 103,105,809,810 4,400 32 Door Christian Fellowship Church long term 564 8,600 33 Dunavant of California (Storage) long term Bldg 2 FISC 170,000 34 Emerg. Svcs. Network (Office) long term 613 4,600 35 Forem Metal Manufacturing long term 114 46,133 36 Forty Plus (Career Counseling) long term 90 4,500 37 Fribel Internal. (Concrete Statuary) long term 98 8,507 38 Gen. Svcs. Admin. (Maritime Museum Storage) long term 169 86,300 39 Home Auto Repair long term 459 5,400 40 Housing Units (Big White/Ranch Styte/Twnhse) long term 68 units 50,000 41 IWA Engineers (steel Fabrication) long term 113 13,100 42 JBI, Inc. long term 170 North 40,000 43 Jim Bustos Plumbing long term 612 4,000 44 Lexical long term 527 West 6,000 45 Manex Entertainment long term 62 16,473 46 Manex Entertainment long term 13 34,540 47 Manex Entertainment long term 19 27,650 48 Maritime Administration long term Piers 1,2,3 49 Maritime Administration (Warehouse/Office) long term 168 117,419 50 Marine Sanitation long term 611 1,000 51 NB Industries (aka Carstar) long term 24 - Bay 3 26,927 52 Navigator Systems (Furniture Mfg.) long term 14 31,400 53 Nelson's Marine (Boat Repair & Storage) long term 167 & piers 55,450 54 Nelson's (subletting to various businesses) long term 66 28,542 55 Operation Dignity (Homeless Collaborative) long term 816 - 821 15,000 56 Orton Development long term portion of 5 110,000 57 Pacific Fine Food, Inc. (Food Preparation) long term 42 3,000 58 Performance Multihull long term 608 8,213 59 Piedmont Soccer 1 year soccer field 60 Port Distribution & Warehousing long term 117 East 22,000 61 Port Distribution & Warehousing long term 118 West 60,800 62 Puglia Engr. (Ship Repair) long term 67 14,000 63 RCD (Homeless Collaborative) long term various units 8,000 64 Quality Assured Products (valve Mfg..) long term 21 66,000 65 Richard Miller Photography long term 621 5,770 66 San Leandro Shelter (Homeless Collaborative) long term 531,532,533 28,080 67 Simmba Systems (Records Storage) long term 9 92,817 68 Solo Engineering long term 25 1,600 69 Trident 3M Services (Port Mgmt.) long term 393 Ground Lease 70 Trident Management 1 year FISC Wharf Ground Lease 71 Trident Management long term 15 16,600 72 United Indian Nations (Homeless Collaborative) long term various units 6,000 73 University Avenue Housing long term various units 40,000 74 Waters,Caldweli & Assoc. (Environ.Consultant) long term 115 2,200 75 West Coast Seaworks (Marine Construction) long term 43 10,500 76 Woodmasters (Woodworkers) long term 44 5,100 NO. OF EMPLOYEES 1,848 NO. OF PROPERTIES CURRENTLY OCCUPIED 76 OCCUPIED BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE 2,271,931 RevisedInterimlease.xls