Loading...
1995-09-06 ARRA Minutes APPROVED MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Wednesday, September 6, 1995 The meeting convened at 5:31 p.m. with Chair Appezzato presiding. I. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Mayor Ralph Appezzato, City of Alameda; Vice-Chair Sandré Swanson, 9th Congressional District; Vice-Mayor Charles Mannix, City of Alameda; Alternate Jay Leonhardy for Councilmember Henry Chang, Jr., City of Oakland (arrived at 5:36 p.m.); Alternate Tony Daysog for Councilmember "Lil"Arnerich, City of Alameda; Mayor Ellen Corbett, City of San Leandro; Councilmember Albert DeWitt, City of Alameda (arrived at 5:35 p.m.); Alternate Greg Alves for Councilmember Karin Lucas, City of Alameda; Alternate Mark Friedman for Supervisor Wilma Chan (Supervisor Chan arrived and relieved Alt. Friedman at 6:20 p.m.), Alameda County Board of Supervisors, District 3; Ex-officio Member Lee Perez, Chair, Base Reuse Advisory Group (BRAG); Alternate Barbara Rasmussen for Ex-officio Member Gail Greely, Alameda Unified School District (arrived at 5:35 p.m.) Absent: None. II. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting of September 6, 1995. A motion was made by Vice-Mayor Mannix to approve the minutes. The motion was seconded by Alternate Mark Friedman. The motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: 8. Noes: None. Abstentions: 1 - Alternate Tony Daysog . III. ACTION ITEMS A. Oral Presentation and Discussion of the BRAG Composite Land Use Plan for the Naval Air Station (NAS) Alameda. Paul Tuttle, ARRA Base Reuse Planner, gave a short presentation on the BRAG’s recommended composite plan. Mr. Tuttle stated that the plan incorporates a mixed-use transit-oriented development pattern. It presents an ideal regional site for urban infill, strives to be energy conservation-minded and sustainable, and to maximize the number of jobs with a balance of open space in development areas. The four major issues to be faced are: (1) the Tidelands Trust (which will be addressed by Kenneth Taymor of Cassidy and Verges later in the meeting); (2) the number of jobs this plan could create (20,000); (3) the fiscal soundness of plan (this plan provides for no drain on the fiscal balance of City’s fund); and, (4) the outcome of negotiations with Fish & Wildlife. This plan proposes a new bridge connection to increase accessibility to the site. Strategies to fund a bridge will be looked at in the implementation phase of the study. The plan assumes that the Navy will take a major responsibility in demolition of buildings not needed for interim reuse. B. Report from the Executive Director Recommending Approval of the Public Benefit Conveyance Review Criteria. Kay Miller stated that these criteria (approved by the BRAG) will be used to screen the public benefit conveyance requests. A screening committee, proposed to include Paul Tuttle, Kay Miller, Dena Belzer (consultant), and two BRAG members apply these criteria to business plans submitted by public benefit users. Chair Appezzato praised the reversion clause, which allows the property to revert to the ARRA if a public benefit conveyance should fail. Ms. Miller clarified that “fair share” costs pertain to the capability of the public benefit users to contribute to infrastructure costs and city service costs. The infrastructure cost figure was arrived at by dividing the number of developable acres by the known infrastructure costs; this figure was then reduced by half for PBCs. While the cost is very high, the ARRA will be working to get federal grant money, etc. to help further reduce the costs. Similarly, a public service fee was assessed on a square foot basis. There is a legal question on whether a public service fee can be legally assessed on other taxing entities such as AUSD and the EBRPD. However, all PBCs will be expected to pay a share of the infrastructure costs. Speakers: Ms. Ardella Daily raised three issues for AUSD: (1)The Department of Education (DoE) requires AUSD to sign a reversion clause back to the DoE; therefore, they cannot sign another with the ARRA. (2)The infrastructure figure quoted was $95,679/acre, which is impossible for AUSD to pay. (3) It is illegal to charge AUSD for public service fees. Vice-Chair Swanson suggested that talks to continue between the ARRA staff and both AUSD and EBRPD to find a creative solution to the problem. A motion was made by Alternate Daysog to modify the property reversion clause to ensure that when PBC property reverts to the ARRA, the ARRA will market that property with the first right of refusal given to a like kind of user. The motion died for lack of a second. A motion was made by Mayor Corbett and seconded by Vice-Mayor Mannix to approve the Public Benefit Conveyance Review Criteria. The motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: 8 . Noes: None. Abstentions: 1—Alternate Tony Daysog. C. Report from the Executive Director Recommending Approval of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority (ARRA) Budget Amendment to the Office of Economic Adjustment Through January 1995—Completion of the Community Reuse Plan for the Alameda Naval Air Station (NAS) and the Alameda Fleet Industrial Supply Center (FISC). Kay Miller reported that in addition to the budget items presented to the ARRA in August (all of which has been approved), OEA has agreed to fund two additional 2 items: (1) one-half of an Urban Land Institute Panel of experts to take a critical look at the plan and determine if it is marketable (the remainder of the cost to be funded by the foundation sector); and, (2) $12,000 for engineering analysis work to determine the structural repairs needed on buildings for use by AEG. A motion was made by Alternate Leonhardy and seconded by Member DeWitt to approve the ARRA budget amendment. Vice-Chair Swanson requested that a staff report be prepared on diversity in staff hiring and contracting to see whether or not the broader community is participating in the opportunities that are being developed. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. D. Report from the Executive Director Recommending Approval of a Memorandum of Agreement Between the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority (ARRA), the Alameda Center for Environmental Technology (ACET) and the California State University Hayward Foundation. (CSUHF). Kay Miller reported that this MOA clearly defined the relative roles of each of the entities. Vice-Chair Swanson suggested the following minor changes: (1) MOA page 2, paragraph 4: Change “. . . public agencies and the community of the City of Alameda and the region” to “. . . public agencies and the diverse communities of the City of Alameda and the region” (underlining added for clarity); (2) page 4 (4): Advisory Board/Executive Committee members – that the Advisory Board consist of six members rather than five, adding a representative from the EBCRC. Helen Sause, Co-chair of the BRAG, requested that a clause be included to ensure that ACET cooperates with other educational groups. Mayor Corbett stated that she did not think any additional amendment to the language was needed with regard to the Advisory Board but she did want to ensure that there was regional representation. A motion was made by Vice-Chair Swanson and seconded by Alternate Leonhardy to approve the MOA with the proposed changes. The motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: 6. Noes: None. Abstentions: 2—Alternate Daysog and Alternate Alves. E. Report from the Executive Director Requesting Authorization for the Executive Director to Negotiate and Execute a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA), in a Form Approved by the City Attorney, Between the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, San Francisco District, the City of Alameda, and the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority for the NAS Alameda Sewer Improvement Project. Kay Miller stated that we have the money and this MOA is the vehicle to get it to the Corps of Engineers. A motion was made by Vice-Mayor Mannix and seconded by Mayor Corbett to authorize the Executive Director to negotiate and execute an MOA for the NAS Alameda sewer improvement project. The motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: 7. Noes: None. Abstentions: 1—Alternate Alves. F. Report from the Executive Director Requesting Authorization to Negotiate and Execute a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), in a Form Approved by the City Attorney, Between the East Bay Regional Parks District (EBRPD) and the Alameda 3 Reuse and Redevelopment Authority (ARRA) for a Port/Marina Market and Planning Feasibility Study for Naval Air Station (NAS) Alameda. Paul Tuttle stated that the port/marina feasibility study will determine how much we can develop, the cost, and potential market. A motion was made by Vice-Mayor Mannix and seconded by Alternate Leonhardy that the Executive Director be authorized to negotiate and execute an MOU for a port/marina market and planning feasibility study for NAS Alameda. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. G. Report from the Executive Director Recommending that the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority (ARRA) Adopt an Open Listing Policy Allowing Payment of Commissions to Real Estate Brokers Representing Interim Tenants. Ed Levine, ARRA Facilities Manager, stated that this item was motivated by two very promising unsolicited offers from real estate brokers. These brokers could not move forward with negotiations without assurance that they would be paid a commission by the lessor. A motion was made by Alternate Leonhardy and seconded by Vice-Mayor Mannix to adopt an open listing policy allowing payment of commission to real estate brokers representing interim tenants. Member DeWitt asked whether the BRAG had looked at this; he was assured that the BRAG had. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. H. Report from the Executive Director Recommending Approval of a Letter Proposing to Increase Heights of Three (3) Container Cranes at the Port of Oakland’s Charles P. Howard Terminal and Authorization to Communicate this Determination to the Port of Oakland and Naval Air Station (NAS) Alameda. Paul Tuttle stated that there is no effect to the ARRA because no proposal is being considered to reuse the runway after base closure. After discussion, a motion was made by Vice-Mayor Mannix and seconded by Alternate Leonhardy to approve the Port of Oakland’s request to increase the heights of three container cranes at Charles P. Howard Terminal. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. I. Appointment of a Chairperson for the Reuse Subcommittee of the BRAG. Kay Miller introduced Pattianne Parker, who has been recommended by the BRAG as Chair of the Reuse Subcommittee due to the resignation of Doug DeHaan. Mayor Appezzato thank Doug DeHaan for all of his hard work and welcomed Ms. Parker. A motion was made by Member DeWitt and seconded by Mayor Corbett to approve the appointment. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. IV. ORAL REPORTS: A. Legal Briefing on the Tidelands Trust Doctrine by Kenneth Taymor from the law firm of Cassidy & Verges. Ken Taymor gave a summary of the Tidelands Trust Doctrine as outlined in a written report supplied to the ARRA. The State Tidelands Trust—which covers most of the base—restricts use of the land to navigation, commerce, fishery, public 4 access to water-oriented recreation, and preservation of the land in a natural state. Discussion and questions followed. . B. Oral Report from the Chair of the Base Reuse Advisory Group (BRAG) Updating the Reuse Authority on BRAG Activities. Lee Perez, Chair of the BRAG, emphasized the importance of the Saturday, September 9 regional town hall meeting; and the Tuesday, September 12 San Leandro Town Meeting. C. Oral Report from the Executive Director on Current ARRA Matters. Ms. Miller reported on the following: (1) The ARRA has received approval from the OEA for $250,000 to do a feasibility study of an Alameda Science and Technology ($50,000 for the University of California and $200,000 for a consultant procured through a competitive Request for Proposal to be sent out the week of September 18). (2) The ARRA will be informed by the end of September whether ACET has been funded or not. (3) Paul Tuttle has been working with the City of Alameda staff to devise a fast-tracking permit process involving a Master Lease with the Navy and a Master Use Permit with the City to cut the process down by weeks/months. (4) We have received a $16,000 grant from the San Francisco Foundation to fund a third-party neutral facilitator for the Fish & Wildlife working group. (5) Emily Ross-Brown is leaving the ARRA staff. Mayor Appezzato thanked Emily for her work on the staff. V. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT) (Any person may address the Governing Body in regard to any matter over which the Governing Body has jurisdiction or of which it may take cognizance, that is not on the agenda.) Speakers: Vice-Chair Swanson recognized that the President has kept his commitment to being a participant in the conversion effort in our region. Due to direct White House involvement in the grant process, the CALSTART proposal was funded. Dr. William Perry, Secretary of Defense, is planning a visit to Alameda in early October and—hopefully—will announce some additional support at that time. Vice-Chair Swanson emphasized that we need the federal government’s support to make this effort work. The Executive Director was requested to draft a letter to the President expressing the ARRA’s gratitude for his personal interest. IV. COMMUNICATIONS FROM GOVERNING BODY None. VI. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was moved to closed session by Chair Appezzato at 7:13 p.m. to discuss real estate negotiations on building numbers 11, 12, 400A, 20, and 24. There were no announcements and following this closed session the ARRA was adjourned. 5 Respectfully submitted, Margaret E. Ensley Secretary 6