2000-09-05 TranscriptCLARK REPORTING (510) 486-0700
Page I Page2
I ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 1 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Ladies and gentlemen, I'd
2 ALAMEDA CITY HALL 2 like to call a special joint meeting between the City '
3 3 Council and the Community Improvement Commissi'on .to order.
4 SEPTEMBER 5, 2000 4 I'd like to ask Councilmember Beverly Johnson to lead us in
7:30 p.m. to 10 :30 p.m. 5 the Pledge of Allegiance . 5 6 (Pledge of Allegiance) 6 7 I'd like to ask the Reverend Myong Bae Choi of 7
8 8 Alameda Korean Presbyterian Church to lead us in the.
9 REGARDING THE MJTIGA TED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND 9 invocation.
THE KAUFMAN AND BROAD PROJECT IO (Reverend Myong Bae Choi led invocation .)
10 11 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Thank you, Reverend Choi.
II 12 Role call, please.
12 13 THE CLERK: Daysog?
13 14 VICE MAYOR DA YSOG: Present.
14 15 THE CLERK: DeWitt? (Mr. DeWitt arrived at
15 16 7 :40 p.m.) Johnson?
16 17 COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON: Present.
17 18 THE CLERK: Kerr? 18 TRANSCRIPT OF TAPED PROCEEDINGS 19 COUNCILMEMBER KERR: Present. 19 ".
20 20 THE CLERK: Mayor and Chair Appezzato?
21 21 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Here.
22 CLARK REPORTING 22 Do we have a motion on the minutes, please?
23 2161 SHAT11JCK,SUITE201 23 COUNCILMEMBER KERR: I move approval of the
24 BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704 24 minutes .
25 (510) 486-0700 25 COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON: Second.
Page3 Page 4 '/
1 MAYOR APPEZZATO: I have a motion and a 1 We also have a recommendation from the Economic
2 second. Any further the discussion? Motion passes 2 Development Commission regarding approval of the Amendment
3 unanimously . Let's go to the agenda items . 3 of the Business and Waterfront Improvement Project and the
4 THE CLERK: We have a Joint City Council and 4 Amendment of the General Plan from General Industry to
5 Community Improvement Commission Public Hearing to consider 5 Medium Density Residential for the Proposed Marina Cove
6 adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, a General 6 Project.
7 Plan Amendment and an Amendment to the Community 7 In addition, we have a Supplemental Report from the
8 Improvement Plan for the Business and Waterfront 8 Planning Board providing draft legislation for Mitigated
9 Improvement District to change the land use designation 9 Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment, and Rezoning .
10 from General Industry to Medium Density Residential, and to 10 We also have related Legislation l{a) through l(e).
11 incorporate text amendments that reflect the recent 11 MAYOR APPEZZATO: As the public can see from
12 elimination of port priority designation for this site, a 12 the agenda, this hearing and our deliberation tonight will
13 Rezoning from M-2 to R-4-PD for a proposed development 13 consider a number of actions related to the proposed Marina
14 consisting of 127 detached homes and 24 attached homes on 14 Cove Residential Development. Tonight we will not be
15 151 lots, for a total of 151 homes and related utilities, 15 discussing anything related to potential design of the
16 streets, open space, and visitor parking on 20.52 acres. 16 proposed development. Should the City Council approve the
17 The site is located north of Buena Vista Avenue between 17 proposed General Plan, and Redevelopment Plan Amendments,
18 Entrance Road and Hibbard Street and currently contains an 18 and rezoning there would be subsequent hearings related to
19 .industrial building formally occupied by Weyerhaeuser, the 19 the proposed Tentative Map, planned Development, and Design
20 Chipman Moving Warehouse and food storage tanks along the 20 Review applications. Specific issues related to project
21 edge of the Estuary. The subject property is 23 .82 acres, 21 design would be addressed through these subsequent
22 so there will be a 3.3 remainder parcel following a former 22 applications.
23 rail corridor north of the Del Monte Warehouse along 23 However, one of the issues before us tonight for
24 Buena Vista Avenue between Entrance Road and 24 action includes a proposed Amendment to the Business and
25 Sherman Street. Applicant: Kaufman and Broad. 25 Waterfront Improvement Project also known as the BWIP ; Item
.-·
I (Pages I to 4)
ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9-5-00
CLARK REPORTING (510) 486-0700
I Page 5 Page 6 I I ID on the agenda. I equalized assessment roll.
I ,., 2 The state law under which we are acting is the 2 Exhibit 3 --a Certificate of mailing notice of l i
3 Community Development Law of the State of California. That 3 joint public hearing on the proposed Amendment to each
I I 4 law requires that we follow certain procedures, some of 4 residential and business occupant of the Project Area .
5 them formal, in the conduct of the portion of tonight's 5 Exhibit 4 --a Certificate of mailing notice of
6 public hearings which pertains to the Amendment to the 6 joint public hearing on the proposed Amendment to the
7 Community Improvement Plan for the BWIP. A transcript will 7 governing body of each taxing entity which receives taxes
8 be made of the hearing. Now several items will be entered 8 from property in the Project Area
9 into the record by Bruce Knopf, Redevelopment Manager for 9 Exhibit 5 --Certification of Certain Official
10 the City. Bruce. IO Actions been taken by Council, the Planning Board and the
I I MR. KNOPF: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Chair, 11 Community Improvement Commission in connection with the
12 members of the City Council and Community Improvement 12 proposed Amendment to the Community Improvement Plan for
13 Commission, I have delivered to the Clerk, and I would like 13 the Business and Waterfront Improvement Project.
14 to confirm with her that she has in her possession and will 14 Exhibit 6 --Report to the City Council on the
15 enter into the record of the hearing, the following 15 proposed Amendment to the Community Improvement Plan for
16 documents: 16 the Business and Waterfront Improvement Project, adopted
17 Exhibit 1 --an Affidavit of publication of notice 17 August 1, 2000, by Community Improvement Commission
18 of joint public hearing on the proposed Amendment, 18 Resolution #00-92 and received August 1, 2000, by City
19 published once a week for three successive weeks as 19 Council Resolution #13256.
20 required by Sections 33452 and 33458 of the California 20 Exhibit 7 --the Marina Cove Mitigated Negative
21 Health and Safety Code. 21 Declaration.
22 Exhibit 2 --a Certificate of mailing notice of 22 Exhibit 8 --the proposed Business and Waterfront
23 joint public hearing on the proposed Amendment of the 23 Improvement Project Amendment to the Community Improvement
24 Business Waterfront Improvement Project to each assessee of 24 Plan for the Business and Waterfront Improvement Project.
25 ,. land in the existing Project Area, as shown on the last 25 Exhibit 9 --Recommendation from the Economic
[J.
2
3
4 ·:
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
1 \is I I I.__
Page7
Development Commission recommending Approval of the
Amendment of the Business and Waterfront Improvement
Project and the Amendment of the General Plan from General
Industry to Medium Density Residential for the Proposed
Marina Cove Project, and the fiscal analysis of the
proposed Marina Cove Development prepared for the EDC and
the Community Improvement Commission by Strategic Economics
June 2000.
TIIE CLERK: I have received all of these
exhibits.
MAYOR APPEZZATO: These documents will be
made a part of the record. If there are any written
comments received on the Amendment, they will be placed
into the record at this time.
MR. KNOPF: Mr. Mayor, there have been no
written objections from property owners and/or taxing
entities regarding the proposed amendment to the Business
and Waterfront Improvement Project.
MAYOR APPEZZATO: Then we will proceed with
the presentation from the applicant, and then I will take
public comment on the proposed actions before us.
Mr. Panek.
MR. PANEK: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, members of
the Council. My name is Ray Panek, Kaufman and Broad South
Bay 2201 Walnut Avenue, Suite 150 Fremont, California I'm
Page 8
1 the Director of Forward Planning. With me this evening
2 from Kaufman and Broad South Bay is Robert Freid, he is our
3 president, Craig Hodges, Senior VP of Planning and
4 Acquisitions, and John Coleman our Director of Government
5 Relations.
6 It is certainly a pleasure to be with you, and to
7 appear before you this evening to present this project. It
8 is an exciting one for our company, and we think one that
9 is exciting for the Community of Alameda Before I start I
10 want to thank the City Staff for their help, the Public
11 Works Department, the Planning Department, and the City
12 Attorney's office. We have been working on this project
13 for a long time, and it has come a long way, and it a very
14 good project that I will be able to present to you this
15 evening. And for their help I'm very appreciative.
16 I have a high-tech slide presentation, which is not
17 my norm. So we will see how this goes. Scott Davidson
18 will help me. You have a hard copy, and we will start.
19 What I would like to do this evening is talk about some of
20 the parameters both that we used for this site in planning
21 the site as well as some the parameters in the Northern
22 Waterfront area that affected how we plan this site.
23 I would then like to talk a little bit about some
24 of the benefits. There are some very positive benefits
25 that this project will bring to the City of Alameda. I
2 (Pages 5 to 8)
ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9-5-00
CLARK REPORTING (510) 486-0700
Page9 Page 10
1 want to talk a little bit about the boards and commissions 1 Dealing with the issue of front loaded garages,
2 and their review of this project, and then I would like to 2 over half of the units --more than of half of the units in
3 take you on a trip around the site what we have done is 3 this project have garages that are either at the back of
4 take some before and after pictures, and hopefully you can 4 the site or are accessed from the rear of this site. There
5 follow along with me. 5 are no driveways that access Buena Vista Avenue. There are
6 The pictures have been out for the audience's 6 front yards and side yards and no driveways . The inclusion
7 review. I will now tell you that the resolution on the 7 area and work force housing that I will talk more about as
8 camera is not the greatest, but hopefully we can get 8 we move forward. And the school district, we recoi:ded an
9 through that. And finally I would just like to address the 9 agreement with the school district.
10 project site plan, and any questions that you might have. 10 We spent a number of months negotiating
11 So we have a project that is --right now our project looks 11 Superintendent Chicones . He recognized that a new school
12 at 122 single family detached units, 30 duplex units, and 12 was not demanded by this project, but he certainly was a
13 has a 2 acre Waterfront Park. 13 tough negotiator, and got a very good agreement for the
14 Now we will look at some the objectives that we use 14 Alameda Unified School District that can be put towards
15 and the city direction that was provided by your staff to 15 building facilities in the future. Have a look at some of
16 make this project a good one, and to meet the criteria to 16 the issues on the Northern Waterfront that are being
17 move this project forward. 17 brought forward and that are the basis of the staff
18 The Clement Street extension has been accomplished. 18 outlined land use consistency with the existing land uses
19 Extension of the city grid and accessibility to the 19 and residential uses in the neighborhood.
20 Waterfront, provision ofright-of-way provides for 20 We have strived to attain that through both design
21 alternative transit modes in the future. We have 21 and density enhancement of the neighborhood. We think
22 established the Waterfront park and open-face pedestrian 22 that's self explanatory. The removal of the industrial
23 links to the Waterfront, and sidewalks, bike ways along 23 uses at the site, access to the Waterfront. We have public
24 Clement Street, and all of the public streets within this . 24 -streets that go right down to the Waterfront and Waterfront
25 project, articulation of the residential street scape. 25 park. Transportation, as I said before, Clement street
!
Page 11 Page 12 I
J
I extension has been accommodated. Alternative transit modes 1 Folks can't even access this Waterfront now. We
2 -we will be involved with the City in transit marketing 2 open the access, we clean it up, we get rid of the tanks.
3 for this project. We will hopefully put together a 3 And dealing with truck traffic we think over the long run
4 marketing program that is both related to this project,· but 4 truck traffic will slowly diminish, and will diminish
5 that the city can use, and future projects as they come on 5 fairly significantly over time eliminating a number of
6 line to assist with getting people out of their cars and 6 industrial uses where you won't have any truck traffic.
7 using other modes of transportation. 7 The fiscal and economic impacts we talked about,
8 Telecommuting --our homes will be wired to 8 the Amendments to the BWIP. Here is some of the other
9 accommodate telecommuting. On-island employment --the 9 positive impacts: $450,000 in tax increments to your
10 opportunity of the jobs and housing balance here, we think 10 agency, $90,000 housing set aside, $135,000 to the general
11 that there will be a good number offolks that will be able 11 fund. That's over the period and life of the project.
12 to live and work on the island that will enjoy our 12 This does not include about $300,000 or so in transfer tax
13 community. 13 that will be coming to the City as these homes are sold.
14 Infrastructure issues --this has a positive impact 14 We have C-funding for BWIP for other activities on
15 on both the sanitary and storm sewer systems in the area. 15 Webster Avenue, on Park Street, and on the Northern
16 Parks and open space --we have the Waterfront Park and the 16 Waterfront. This project would be maintained by the
17 amenities and the schools recorded agreement with the 17 lighting and landscape district. I think this is important
18 Unified School District. There are obviously a lot of 18 because we have benefits that accrue to all of the City,
19 benefits that come along with a project of this magnitude, 19 but the maintenance of those facilities: the roads, the
20 and I did not want to take 15 minutes talking about them 20 streets, the sidewalks, the park will be paid for by the
21 all . But these are some of the ones that I think stick 21 residents of this community.
22 out, and really will help make a first positive step in the 22 The Planning Board considered this project about a
23 redevelopment of the Northern Waterfront, the elimination 23 month ago, a little more than a month ago. From my
24 of blight, old industrial uses, and conditions on the 24 perspective they had very positive things to say about the
25 Waterfront. 25 project. The project design, the orientation to the
I
3 (Pages 9 to 12)
ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9-5-00
CLARK REPORTING (510) 486-0700
Page 13 Page 14
I Waterfront, and with all the amenities we've talked about. I the a .m. hours, and I trip addition during the p.m. hours . I 2 They got stuck, if you will, on the policy issue of the 2 The other thing about this traffic study that I
3 Northern Waterfront planning process. But two of the 3 would like to comment on is this idea of the !TE standards
I 4 issues that stuck out to me were inclusionary housing. 4 versus what is actual, and it ties into this on-island
5 Two things that the Planning Commission brought up, 5 employment and residential opportunities. The baseline
6 they brought up targeting a goal of20 percent of the 6 standards that generation reads that we use are the very --
7 housing in this project being affordable, and that they 7 standards that are used for suburban subdivisions.
8 would be better distributed throughout the project. I tell 8 We do not feel that this is a subdivision. We have
9 you that we have had discussions with both our designers as 9 actually done accounts at our other project on the island .
10 well as the City Staff here. We know that the site plan IO They are different. They are lower. We think that, and we
I I can accommodate and are planning to accommodate the 11 know that people are telecommuting . They're working from
12 30 units, as I stated, of affordable housing. 12 home . They're using office conversions, and they're
13 We are committed to providing that, and we are 13 looking for employment opportunities on the island, but I
14 committed to continue with dialogue with City Staff to help 14 think we have a ·very conservative traffic study. We have
15 make that happen. We will continue that through the 15 an overall net reduction in traffic.
16 tentative mapping process and bring you a project that 16 The Economic Development Commission, they gave
17 meets this 20 percent target. 17 unanimous support to this project. They cited the
18 The traffic is an issue that is kind of an esoteric 18 various -there was an area-wide strategy that talked
19 one for me, and I can just deal with numbers. And 19 about making this area res_i~ential with positive fiscal
20 Chris Kinzel from TJKM is our transportation consultant, 20 impacts, public access trail, ·affordable housing, and of
21 and he has worked with your staff, and I would ask Chris to 21 course elimination of blight.
22 make a brief presentation when I'm through. Sort of the 22 Now, while we're loading here we're going to get
23 bottom line to me is over the baseline from where these 23 some views of the project site Buena Vista Avenue and
24 industrial facilities were operating we have a net 24 Hibbard Street. That is the existing Weyerhaeuser ts reduction of 158 trips per day, 159 trip reduction during 25 facility. This is what it would look like after. It is --
., ...
I Page 15 Page 16
1 these are front doors here facing the street. I apologize 1 the Weyerhaeuser facility . This is Buena Vista Avenue. )
2 for the graininess of the pictures here. This is the 2 These are houses on Buena Vista and beyond. And again
[
3 entrance road at the tank farm. This is the shipment 3 looking down a public street the separated sidewalks, front
4 moving, storage facility, bulk storage facility, and the 4 yards, street tree planting, and houses beyond. We think
5 Fortman Marina is here. What this shows is the beginning 5 it fits very well into the neighborhood and into the
6 of the Waterfront Park, Clement Street extension, entrance 6 atmosphere we're trying to create for this project.
7 to Fortman Marina, and a duplex on the comer. 7 Just briefly to go through the site very quickly
8 This is a view towards the project looking south. 8 the Buena Vista Avenue here. This is Clement Avenue
9 This is obviously the marina with the tank farm, again, in 9 extension along here, our Waterfront Park, the water and
IO the foreground . And what you end up with is, this is the 10 marina here. It's a large green, grassy area, the
11 Waterfront, a portion of the Waterfront park, the homes 11 connection of the Waterfront trail, the plaza area,
12 back on the opposite side of Clement Street. This is a 12 extension of Stanton and Hibbard Streets north to south to
13 view looking on the Clement Street extension across the 13 access the Waterfront. In addition, there are three other
14 front of the project. This is the Waterfront Park Plaza 14 public streets bringing you down to the Waterfront
15 right here, public streets, houses oriented to the public 15 On this plan there are duplexes located here, here,
16 streets. 16 and here. Our new plan that we are working on revising
17 I heard comments in the audience about a wa!L I 17 will eliminate this pot of duplexes, and in its place we
18 would just like to disspell that. There are no walls at 18 will have four unit modules located mid-block on these
19 all proposed in this project. The project is being built 19 three blocks in the project. So that would give us the 30
20 essentially at grade. There are no artificial grades 20 duplex units . It works with the geometry in the site and
21 created. There are no walls proposed. There are fences 21 the layout we have. They will be the same design as the
22 between lots as you would see in any project, in any home 22 houses that we're proposing, and it works quite well. And
23 in Alameda, wood fences. And there are front yards and 23 we're pleased that will allow us to get a few more houses
L 24 side yards. It's a very traditional look. 24 up here that actually front on Clement Street that will
125 This is looking from within the industrial site, 25 give that street a nice traditional feel.
4 (Pages 13 to 16)
ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9-5-00
......... ~ . ·i «.·
CLARK REPORTING (510) 486-0700
Page 17 Page 18
1 That will end my presentation . I can answer I project.
2 questions now if you'd like, or if you would like me to 2 However, all the intersections have mitigation
3 bring up Mr. Kinzel for just a couple minutes on traffic . 3 measures identified that would allow them to get to an
4 MAYOR APPEZZA TO: Go ahead on the traffic 4 acceptable level of service. And when you add project
5 real quick. 5 service traffic to these 2020 conditions the service level
6 MR. PANEK: Thank you, Mayor. 6 remained unchanged at 14 of the intersections . At one of
7 MR. KINZEL: Mr. Mayor, Councilmembers, good 7 them the level of service changed from a level of service C
8 evening . My name is Chris Kinzel. I'm a traffic engineer 8 to D, and of course D is considered acceptable .
9 with the firm ofTJKM Transportation Consultants. We were 9 The project is improving pedestrian conditions
10 retained to prepare the traffic study for the application 10 within and near the project, and is constructing a portion
11 that's before you this evening, and we prepared a 11 of the Clement Street extension, and is contributing its
12 comprehensive traffic study for the project. We looked at 12 fair share portion of the 2020 mitigation measures needed
13 traffic conditions both in the year 2000, as well as 2020. 13 by paying into the city's proposed traffic impact fee. I
14 We looked at traffic conditions at 15 intersections 14 wanted to give that overview, and ifthere are any
15 including two in the City of Oakland and several street 15 questions on traffic I can answer them now or later.
16 sections. 16 MAYOR APPEZZA TO: We might have questions
17 For your information the proposed project generates 17 for you later. Let's go ahead with the public hearing.
18 only about 25 percent of the traffic that permitted 18 MR. KINZEL: Thank you, Mayor and Council.
19 industrial uses could generate. For the year 2000 all 15 19 It is our pleasure and I wou).~ be happy to answer any
20 intersections operated at acceptable levels of service with 20 questions.
21 or without the project, and in both the a.m. and p.m. peek 21 MAYOR APPEZZATO: There may be some so just
22 hours. One intersection needs a signal right now under 22 hang tight here. We'll get to you later. Stuart Rickard.
23 existing conditions. And by 2020, traffic conditions are 23 MR. RICKARD : Good evening. I assume I have
24 projected to worsen ii:i. the city .. 8 of the 15 intersections 24 3 minutes here?
25 degrade to level of service E or F conditions without the 25 MAYOR APPEZZA TO: Yes. We have a lot of
Page 19 Page20 . . I
1 speakers so I would like to keep it at 3 minutes. 1 I would like you to very carefully look at that issue.
2 MR. RICKARD: I am very excited about this 2 I think -when we looked at this there was a
3 project, and I think it provides a vision of what can 3 community meeting on this project back in October oflast
4 happen in this area. However, I don't think it's the best 4 year, and it was promised at that time by the City, if not
5 that we can get, and I think you as City Councilmembers are 5 the developer, that there would be further public meetings.
6 under an obligation to the community members to try to get 6 And really the public meetings we've had have been in this
7 the best that you can, and balance the needs of the private 7 kind of forum where there's no question and answer session,
8 sector with what the community interests are. 8 and we can't have a dialogue.
9 I would like to address what I think is some 9 And I think we've achieved something even under
IO inaccuracy with regard to the density of this project. IO those conditions by removing the sound wall, but I think we
11 I've heard it said that this is the same density as the 11 can do a lot more if we just take a break. Don't push this
12 existing development in the area, but ifs not. This is 12 through tonight, and have some time to speak with staff and
13 big houses on small lots where the existing community is 13 the developer, and address any concerns that the community
14 small houses on small lots. So I think there will be a 14 has. I think if we do push it through tonight, and there
15 very obvious difference in the density of this project. 15 may have been a counting of votes prior to this meeting,
16 And the developers are being allowed to do in this project 16 and there's a feeling that. yes, we can do it so let's just
17 things that individual property owners would not be allowed 17 go ahead and do it. I think that leads to a lot of anger
18 to do in the surrounding neighborhood, including FAR and 18 and disappointment and apathy among the community because
19 setback variances. 19 they feel that they can't have any input. And I think that
20 Just to go on, I'm very concerned about the 20 --the worst outcome is that there's a lawsuit on this, and
21 remainder parcel because although there is a plan to 21 I think that --
22 provide conditions for that parcel that will address 22 Wow, that went very quickly. Anyway, I hope that
23 development on the that parcel in the future, it could just 23 you will ask the developer to continue this project to
24 remain an undeveloped parcel for a long time because it is 24 another meeting and ask the developer to meet with the
25 not tied into what will happen with the Del Monte property. 25 community.
I
5 (Pages 17 to 20)
ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9-5-00
CLARK REPORTING (510) 486-0700
Page 21 Page 22
1 MAYOR APPEZZA TO: Thank you . 1 Now the City Council is being asked to approve a
~ 2 MR . DA YSOG: Mr . Rickard, I just want to 2 project which will remove one fifth of the proposed plan
3 state that I think you do --you underestimate the power of 3 area from consideration. The Alameda Planning Commission I i 4 the residents and the voices that have been raised. It 4 has already recommended that the Council not approve this
5 wasn't just in working through the issue of the walls, but 5 project until the plan has been completed . We've heard
6 also in establishing the values that you hold for your 6 some assurances that the project will be in keeping with
7 neighborhood, and those values that we hold for all of the 7 the goals of the Specific Plan. But how can we know that
8 Northern Waterfront not just in terms of walls; but in 8 before these goals have been formulated? It's extrem~ly
9 terms of city street designs and auto dependent, auto 9 rare for a city to have the opportunity to shape
10 friendly, whatever. 10 development rather than allowing development to shape the
11 So there's a lot of areas I think where some of the 11 city.
12 values that you expressed, or many of your colleagues 12 Please don't let this opportunity pass us by .
13 expressed, have certainly been listened to. So I just 13 Complete the Specific Plan before you approve this project,
14 wanted to emphasize that. 14 and ensure that we end up with development that we all want
15 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Thank you, Tony. 15 to live with, instead of development we have to live with.
16 Melissa Ehn, if I mispronounced that I apologize. 16 Thank you.
17 MS . EHN: Good evening. Last spring the 17 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Thank you. Clarice Olsen .
18 City Council approved funding to begin a process of 18 MS. OLSEN: Hi. I live at 1717 Willow
19 creating a Northern Waterfront Specific Plan . The Specific 19 Street. I've lived in Alameda for 8 years . I've worked
20 Plan offers a historic opportunity to ensure that land use 20 the past 10 years for the U.s :·Environmental Protection
21 decisions, which will affect Alameda citizens for 21 Agency. I do not claim to be an expert on the California
22 generations to come are made with care, consideration, arid 22 Environmental Quality Act, however, I do have a substantial
23 input from the community. City Staff, members of the 23 amount of environmental experience, knowledge, and
24 Planning Commission, and members of the public have already 24 resources that are available that have helped me in
25 put innumerable hours into this plan. 25 preparing this statement. I want to be clear I am here not
,.,
j 1
Page23 Page24
-as a representative of the EPA, but as a concerned resident l location will dictate that those prices are always going to
2 of Alameda 2 be below market value. And, in fact, what we are doing _is
3 The first issue I want to address is environmental 3 creating a just slim area
4 justice. Environmental justice is .a movement that resulted 4 The other concern I have is with traffic. And I
5 from the impact that people of low income and especially 5 was interested to hear the remarks from the engineer
6 people of color were exposed to a disproportionate amount 6 because that's not what was in the negative declaration.
7 of pollution compared to the rest population. In other 7 And, in fact, one page out of the negative dec;:laration,
8 words, the pollution was located in their neighborhoods. 8 page 49, was missing. But I'm going to go into that now.
9 The plan in this proposal is to locate some of that 9 The baseline study that was used in this statement was when
10 housing, below-market housing, in a separate parcel 10 the warehouses were in operation, and one of these
11 adjacent to the Penzoil facility, a large hazardous waste 11 warehouses has been closed for approximately 7 years, as I
12 generator. 12 understand it.
13 In 1998, Penzoil tower controlled on-site release 13 The study found that with the mitigation project it
14 of33,135 pounds of ammonia, not to mention they have 44 14 would not exceed the 30-vehicle trip threshold established
15 above-ground storage tanks, which holds millions and 15 by the city, which in my understanding would trigger an
16 millions of gallons of petroleum products. The proposal 16 Environmental Impact Report. My concern is that by having
17 does not address the risk of future residents from off-site 17 this piecemeal development we will have several small
18 contamination from this facility. Of particular concern is 18 parcels that will have small increments in traffic that
19 what would happen to all of those things in the event of an 19 won't exceed that 30 threshold limit, but when you look at
20 earthquake? 20 the cumulative effects over time what we're going to have
21 What bothered me most about this is that when the 21 on our hands is a traffic nightmare.
22 developers in the meeting with the Planning Commission were 22 So I mentioned this approach, this piecemeal
23 questioned about this they said the reason why the houses 23 approach, to our EPA Environmental Justice Coordinator, and
[ 24 were placed on a separate parcel was because of the garage 24 he informed me that, in fact , this is common practice among
I 25 orientation. When the fact of the matter is that this 25 developers to use this piecemeal approach because they L
6 (Pages 21 to 24)
ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9-5-00
~ " il -.. ~ ... •
CLARK REPORTING (510) 486-0700
Page25 Page 26
1 avoid triggering an Environmental Impact Report. And they I major intersections . It doesn't talk about the cross
2 actually have a word for it. It's called segmenting . 2 streets that cross Buena Vista Avenue. I live on . \
3 So the other thing I'm concerned about is I 3 Willow Street, and I have concerns that when all of this is
4 mentioned one of the pages was missing from the negative 4 said and done we're going to have several more traffic
5 declaration. I guess I'm out of time. I would like to go 5 lights on Buena Vista Avenue. So I would like to know
6 into that since it was not in the report, and people have 6 about that ahead of time because, frankly, I would like to
7 not had a chance to look at it. 7 put my house on the market now because when those traffic
8 MAYOR APPEZZATO : Please wrap it up. Go 8 lights are in place it will significantly devalue my hoqse.
9 ahead. 9 Thank you.
10 MS . OLSEN : This section addresses the 10 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Thank you. There are some
11 cumulative affects of future impacts on traffic by other 11 people in the city that want traffic lights on every street
12 planned or reasonably foreseeable future developments, and 12 comer that we have believe it or not. Angus McDonald.
13 I'm going to quote here. And it says, "Under the 13 And that is to stop the speeding.
14 cumulative condition scenario in addition, cumulative 14 MR. MCDONALD: Mr. Mayor, members of the
15 traffic to the current conditions would deteriorate the 15 Council, I've been listening to this interesting
16 traffic level of the service for all studied intersections 16 presentation. I just had one small comment that while
17 identified on the Table 3 during the a.m. and p.m. peek 17 we've considered access to the water, we haven't considered
18 hour periods to below a level of service D. And to 18. access from .the water. And that, in fact, there's a place
19 sections that do not presently meet the level of service D 19 where the park goes all the way to the Estuary. And we're
20 standards would be incrementally impacted by an addition of 20 only to provide a place wher~ a dingy can come in? We need
21 project traffic." And level of service Dis described as 21 to provide a place where people can get from the water to
22 unfavorable, and may result in longer delays, many vehicle 22 Alameda as well as getting from Alameda to the water.
23 stops, individual cycle failures, and the influence of 23 Thank you.
24 congestion becomes noticeable. 24 MAYOR APPEZZATO : Thank you. David Landau.
25 The Negative Declaration only discusses traffic at 25 MR. LANDAU: Good evening. My name is
Page27 Page28
1 David Landau. I live at 1807 Wood Street. As I am sure 1 grievance with the Economic Development Commission for
2 you are all aware the Planning Board voted 4 to 1 to not 2 grievance with the developers who are going to provide
3 approve the negative declaration until the Specific Plan 3 up-front financing, and then be reimbursed for the portion
4 was completed. I actually would like to ask the Planning 4 of it that exceeds that.
5 Director Venure to clear up some confusion. In February of 5 And, again, given the number of other projects that
6 this year a consultant was chosen for the Northern 6 I know the Council is aware of, we have moved these forward
7 Waterfront Speeific Plan, and in March the Council approved 7 as quickly as we can given other work load items.
8 this choice, and the Planning Department began to assemble 8 MAYOR APPEZZA TO: Thank you.
9 the funds. 9 Joseph Graceffo.
10 Ifs now September and there is no Specific Plan. 10 MR. GRACEFFO: Thank you, Mayor. Thank you,
11 It hasn't started. And I'm wondering why there's been this 11 City Council. I would like to add my voice to those that
12 delay, and what's been the delay as far as the funding, and 12 have requested a Specific Plan for the Northern Waterfront
13 who's providing the funding in Kaufinan and Broad's case? 13 Development. I would also urge the City Council to use
14 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Is that the end of your 14 prudence and caution before turning over a 20 and a half
15 statement? 15 acre parcel of valuable community property to a developer
16 MR. LANDAU: Yes. 16 known for its track record of dense housing developments.
17 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Colette, do you want to 17 There is--
18 answer that question as best you can? 18 MAYOR APPEZZATO: It's 20 acres of private
19 MS. MEUNIER: Mayor Appezzato, members of 19 property, not community property.
20 the Council, the issues that we have been working on since 20 MR. GRACEFFO : The reason why we are here is
21 we were before you is to see who is finalizing the scope of 21 we have a sense of community --
22 work which requires coordination with Public Works and the 22 MAYOR APPEZZATO: It can't be community
23 resolution of those issues with Planning, Public Works, and 23 property if you are not willing to pay taxes on it.
24 the consultant in order to arrive at a final budget and 24 MR. GRACEFFO: And we're not trying to do
25 work program. And then negotiating, working with staff for 25 that. We just want to keep that send of community about
I
7 (Pages 25 to 28)
ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9-5-00
CLARK REPORTING (510) 486-0700
" .. ·~!;{.} j
Page 29 Page 30 !
1 what we're doing . I process . They get to get up here and say this is what I
1 ~ MAYOR APPEZZA TO : Thank you . 2 we're going to do, and it may look nice, it may not look
Debra Arbuckle. 3 nice. The issue is we have not made this decision as a
J 4 MR. DA YSOG: I want to say real quickly your 4 community, and that to go ahead and skip the Northern
5 point is well taken that this is all about a sense of 5 Waterfront Specific Plan, or some type of plan --I don't
6 community, not just a kind ofa social or spiritual sense, 6 care what you call it, or how you get it going --is a
7 but in the sense that we devise our built environment. And 7 mistake. And we feel like we're being left out of the
8 I hope through the course of this night that we as a 8 loop, and that we are wasting our time.
9 Council try to convey that the term "sense of community" is 9 And, you know , we want to be involved. We want
10 something we take dearly. And hopefully we will be able to IO this to be a better city. We want a voice , and we feel
11 convey that. 11 like we're being left holding a bunch of paper. So I would
12 MAYOR APPEZZATO : Debra Arbuckle and then 12 hope that you could consider waiting, maybe having some
13 Tom Matthews. 13 more meetings with Kaufman and Broad, seeing if we could
14 MS. ARBUCKLE: Hi. I'm here with the 14 move this Specific Plan along in the manner it was supposed
15 Neighborhood Network. And there's a number of neighbors 15 to.
16 around the city that have been working on these development 16 I was told by the group planning the General Plan
17 issues for a good part of the last year and a half, two 17 that they were expecting to look at this area and plug in
18 years. And kind of what came out of a lot of public 18 the Specific Plan. So if it's not done for part of it what
19 meetings was the need for the Northern Waterfront Specific 19 good is it? We've got this mish mosh. We'll do this one.
20 Plan. So we spent a lot of time -I mean David asked you 20 If it all works, oh gee, that's 'nice . If it doesn't, oh
21 because David sat in on hiring the consultants to do it. 21 well. We're out of luck .
22 He took two days off of work. All of us have spent a an 22 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Thank you. Tom Matthews
23 incredible amount of time reading emails, the consultant's 23 then Jon Spangler.
24 proposals, looking at these issues. 24 MR. MATIHEWS : Thank you , Mr. Mayor, members
25 And Kaufman and Broad hasn't included us in this 25 of the Council. My name is Tom Matthews. I've lived in
~, . ~:~
Page 31 Page32
I I Alameda for 17 years. I'm the chair of Renewed Hope 1 fairly low density. And density does not have to mean what
2 Housing Advocates. This project provides you with the 2 happened at the drive-in site. Density can be planned and
3 first opportunity to address the work-force housing issue 3 put together in away that fits into the community, and also
4 '·since Renewed Hope, we thought, brought it to everyone's 4 makes a livable place to live.
5 attention with the East Housing struggle. 5 Others feel -that the plan for the entire Northern
6 Kaufman and Broad is the first developer in town to 6 Waterfront should be in place before the development is
7 develop the required 15 percent affordable units actually 7 approved. Most zoning and general plan designations in
8 on the site and not pay fees for something off the site. 8 this plan have really been done. A developer takes some
9 We applaud them for that effort. However, we met with them 9 risks. When he proposes a project to the city, that's the
IO just before the Planning Board meeting over a month ago and 10 time for providing the changes. I don't believe, frankly,
11 asked them to increase their affordability level to 25 11 that a Northern Waterfront Plan would change this project
12 percent with the additional units being for those folks in 12 dramatically. I think it would probably have very little
13 the middle who are left out by the redevelopment 13 impact on this project.
14 requirements. That's the folks whose incomes for a family 14 We can set aside land for the streets, parks, all
15 of four ranged from $35,000 to $68,000. 15 the things that they've talked about. What should be
16 They have now proposed to do an additional 7 units 16 different is a larger number of affordable units to enable
17 for working families, as we understand it at this point. 17 Alamedians to remain in the community, and for the
18 We welcome this effort, but believe it's not enough. 18 community to provide housing for the new jobs being
19 There's enough housing tax house increment generated by 19 created.
20 this project to include an additional 8 units, and bring 20 We urge your support of the project. However, we'd
21 the affordable units up to 25 percent. 21 like to see the affordable units increased to 25 percent.
22 Some folks feel that this project is too dense. 22 Thank you.
23 Our view of the project is that it's a density that is 23 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Thank you.
. 24 fairly similar to the surrounding community. By today's 24 Jon Spangler.
l 1125 standards with high land costs this is in some senses 25 MR. SP ANGLER: Good evening, and thank you ' [ I
8 (Pages 29 to 32)
ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9-5-00
CLARK REPORTING (510) 486-0700
Page 33 Page 34
I for the opportunity to once again remind you that you're l as fast as it can in competition with other things. It
2 stuck with me. The first thing I'd like to say is I'd like 2 probably should not have proceeded until the Northern
3 to submit a copy of my comments submitted to the Planning 3 Waterfront Plan is done. So there may be a cart before the
4 Department regarding the 2000 General Plan Update, which I 4 horse kind of issue here.
5 am have done to the best of my ability . I will not bore 5 And I would like to tell a little story. Last fall
6 you with that document, reading it here . I hope it stands 6 we needed to do some remodeling. So I had a friend of mine
7 on its own one way or the other. 7 who's an architect, who agreed to do the deal for us to
8 However, reading the 1990 General Plan in 8 drop some plants, and he is a very good architect. And I
9 preparation for the update, I was struck by how off base it 9 went down to our friends in the Building Department
10 is , pardon the pun, because it never anticipated closure of 10 downstairs and talked to Linda Fouier and Gale Moore who
11 the base. It never anticipated a lot of changes in our 11 are very capable individuals . And you know what? They
12 industrial base that are no longer there. Weyerhaeuser is 12 made us change a whole lot of things on those plans, not
13 no longer there. And I would like to suggest that any 13 because the design had changed, but because it wasn't
14 decisions made on that 1990 General Plan should not be made 14 represented accurately.. Small details we thought.
15 when they are at this scale, even ifthe development is 15 It was sort of funny the first time going back and
16 acceptable to its neighbors, and apparently from what I'm 16 forth . The fourth time it got a little old, but my
17 hearing it is not. 17 admiration for them increased. They made us make sure we
18 But just for the sake of argument, assuming that it 18 knew what we were doing, and that the documents that we
19 were acceptable, that it were a perfect development, that 19 submitted, the plans we su_bmitted, we were not only of
20 all the houses looked like they belonged in Alameda, that 20 average quality, but high quality. And everything was
21 would be one thing. It would still be important to me that 21 showing that needed to be. I really respect the kind of
22 this community develop a General Plan that is current for 22 work they do in that office.
23 Alameda before it makes any more major changes. 23 And I think it may be a very good model to follow
24 And I was disturbed by the Planning Director's 24 in any major development decisions that this Council has
25 comments that the Northern Waterfront Plan is moving along 25 come before it. And I hope you will carefully consider all
Page35 Page36
1 the details before you let anything go through. Thank you, 1 which happens to be Buena Vista Avenue where I live, I am
2 very much. 2 naturally concerned with the traffic on that street. I was
3 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Thank you. 3 curious one day as I drove up Buena Vista A venue about the
4 Diane Lichtenstein. 4 perception of the street as being such an industrial
5 MS. LICHfENSTEIN: Good evening. I'd like 5 boulevard or a freeway as it has been called. And it
6 to talk a little bit about policy. I am concerned that the 6 occurred to me this street is not really very wide.
7 approval of this comes before the Northern Waterfront 7 So I inquired, and I found out in fact Buena Vista
8 Specific Plan as has been discussed. We have a wonderful 8 Avenue is 42-feet wide. Lincoln is 56-feet wide.
9 opportunity right now. We're right on the edge to develop 9 Santa Clara is SO-feet wide. Central is 48-feet wide. So
10 our city in very exciting ways, the Northern Waterfront 10 of those streets Buena Vista is the narrowest street, and
11 Alameda Point, FISK, Park Street, Vision, Economic 11 perhaps the least able to handle the traffic. Of course,
12 Development Strategic Plan. And all this adds up to the 12 right now Buena Vista is handling more traffic than all of
13 General Plan. 13 those streets are including Lincoln.
14 And this Kaufman and Broad may well be a very 14 So I think we need to be really sensitive about any
15 wonderful development, but to approve it before we know 15 kind of development at all . But the piecemeal nature is
16 what the total plan is, is concerning to me because of the 16 what concerns me because we'll have this development. It's
17 opportunities that we have. This may not be the plan. It 17 certain we're going to have the Del Monte development too,
18 just depends what the final decision is. Does it fit into 18 and there will be others behind it. And when you add all
19 our vision? And this is my concern. So I would urge that 19 these figures together it does --I don't think we can
20 we hold off approval until we have a definitive plan in the 20 avoid the traffic.
21 entire area. Thank you. 21 So I think the best thing we can do is study it as
22 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Susan Kaplan. 22 an all-over plan, and that would be the Specific Plan. We
23 MS. KAPLAN: I too would ask that we hold 23 have that opportunity to do it. I continue to hear this
24 off with this development until the Specific Plan is in 24 particular project is described as a medium density
25 place. Speaking from my small, little part of Alameda, 25 project. Ifwe knew everything there is to know, we had a
I
9 (Pages 33 to 36)
ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9-5-00
CLARK REPORTING (510) 486-0700
Page 37 Page 38
I good plan, it might be . We might be able to see that I why. People in all job categories, even those in much
2 perhaps it shouldn't be a medium density project. I don't 2 touted high-tech industry, are having a terrible time 1
3 think we know that yet. 3 finding housing. They can't find homes . They can 't even
4 So I just want to make the point that I think we 4 find apartments the can afford. This is a crucial issue
5 need to have wholistic planning rather than piecemeal 5 the city must address if it truly wants to accommodate all
6 planning . There are too many open questions we can't 6 the new bus iness it's anticipating in this area, and the
7 answer. We don't know until we've really studied what's 7 base, and elsewhere. Housing is an essential part of the
8 going to happen in a wholistic way. Thank you. 8 infrastructure as are roads, sewers, and water.
9 MAYOR APPEZZATO : Thank you . Laura Thomas . 9 Having said that as a resident, I'd like to say
10 MS. THOMAS: Hello . My name is Laura Thomas IO that I'm in favor of the density in this development. I
11 and I'm a member of Renewed Hope, and I've lived for 17 11 know that many are opposed to greater density, but I think
12 years at the corner of Buena Vista and Chestnut Streets . 12 the real problem is not the number of people who would come
13 First I want to say that I support the efforts that the 13 to live in this development, but the cars they would bring
14 developers Kaufman and Broad have made to provide 14 with them .
15 affordable housing in this development. Affordable housing 15 The neighborhood is already very densely populated,
16 is not a euphemism for subsidized housing, or Section 8 16 and probably more than many really realize . And I think
17 Housing --I think that has to be repeated often --but 17 the impact of a person who walks or takes public transit is
18 it's exactly that, homes for people who earn less than 18 actually quite minimal, but a person who drives a car has a
19 $70,000. 19 much greater impact. And P.~obably this project, before
20 I understand the developers have offered to sell 20 it's approved , should have every possible element in it to
21 20 percent of the 152 units of below market realty, and I 21 discourage people from using their cars.
22 think this is an excellent start. _However, I submit we can 22 I haven't looked at the design very carefully
23 probably do better, and probably should if we want to 23 myself, I have to admit. I'm glancing at it right now. It
24,. guarantee the economic health of Alameda in the future . I 24 looks like the garages are in the back of the houses. I
25 think 25 to 30 percent would be better, and I'll tell you 25 think that's good . The streets are probably really wide.
Page39 Page40
1 I know that in most suburban developments the streets are 1 the police or anything. This is when it gets backed up at
2· made really wide, and probably shouldn't be made quite so 2 Grand Street, which it does all the time even now, and so
3 wide. There are probably many other things that could be 3 people decide to tum off on J Street, or tum off on Arbor
4 done to accommodate more affordable housing, and keep 4 and speed down these teeny, tiny blocks, which are barely
5 people from driving. 5 able to fit two cars next to each other, and then race down
6 I'm going to stop now because I don't really know 6 Pacific Avenue.
7 all the aspects. I guess I should. Anyway, thank you for 7 And the fact that Pacific Avenue doesn't have many
8 this opportunity . The last thing I'd like to say is I know 8 stop signs, it's a really great place to race. And we
9 other people in the neighborhood have said they haven't 9 haven't been able to get speed bumps or anything like that,
10 been listened to much, and I think that's probably the 10 and that's a different issue. Some people think you can
11 greatest problem is that citizens don't feel they have much 11 stop people from driving. I submit that we cannot stop
12 impact on any of these developments in Alameda, and that's 12 people from driving, that the State of California has
13 too bad. 13 worked very hard for years thinking that if we make more
14 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Thank you. Ms. Lamb. I 14 roads then that will allow people to drive on them, and
15 think it's Danai. 15 that yes, we'll try to have people commute. But to tell
16 MS . LAMB: City Council, Mr . Mayor, my name 16 you the truth it's like spending money, and you always end
17 is Danai Lamb and I live at 1525 Pacific Avenue, which is 17 up spending what you have. People will drive as much as
18 at the comer of Arbor Street and Pacific. So I'm pretty 18 the roads will allow it.
19 close. Arbor street is a small, very small block. I'm in 19 So I think that's sort of a false --you can do all
20 favor of development, but I'm not in favor of something 20 the traffic studies you want. Buena Vista is a small
21 that's unspecific. So I agree with most of what's been 21 street. It's actually sort of a neat street. I grew very
22 said. 22 attached --I've lived here 14 years. I grew very attached
23 The thing that I'd like to add too about traffic is 23 to the Estuary, to the history, to the industrial, to the
24 that very often traffic gets diverted from Buena Vista onto 24 Alameda Beltline. I don't mind seeing the tank park
25 Pacific A venue. Now this is not an official diversion by 25 destroyed, but I definitely don't want to see a housing
10 (Pages 37 to 40)
ALAMEOA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9-5-00
CLARK REPORTING (510) 486-0700
Page 49 Page 50
l my house so that a lot of car traffic is cut down by the 1 increasing. I was very interested to hear what the
2 fact that people can walk back and forth to this comer 2 gentleman had to say about the traffic situation. It sure
3 market to get basic necessities. 3 does not sound like my neighborhood . We do not have a
4 So I don't see any kind of --I'm a little leery 4 break from the traffic until 3:00 or 4 :00 o'clock in the I
5 when I see this project design as a lot of dense housing 5 morning . When we had the Weyerhaeuser we did have a break
6 without any kind of markets, or any kind oflittle stores, 6 after 5:30, and on Saturday and Sundays we had a break .
7 or any kind of things that I think makes a: neighborhood. 7 Now we do not have a break . It is very dense . We have a
8 And that's why I support the Northern Specific Plan , and 8 lot of traffic . And ifthat is happening now what is go,ing
9 also the General Plan, and the whole General Plan process 9 to happen in the future when we have all those homes ,
10 that will give us a wider view of Alameda as a whole. And IO medium density homes are medium density population. I
11 I hope very much that we will have a chance to see that and 11 don't think that's quite true because we have three or four
12 comment on it before moving ahead piecemeal. Thank you. 12 families living in one house and one house that has been
13 MAYOR APPEZZATO : Irma Marin-Nolan. 13 divided, one of those Victorians that has been divided into
14 MS . MARIN-NOLAN: Good evening, Mr. Mayor, 14 three apartments , plus a basement, maybe a little cottage .
15 members of the Council. My name is Irma Marin-Nolan. I 15 All of that has to be taken into consideration. The
16 live at 1804 Grand Street. That's on the comer of 16 neighborhood is already very dense, and with this
17 Buena Vista and Grand. So I have a grand view of all the 17 development it will be even more dense.
18 things that are going to be happening in the developing 18 So I am here before you to urge you not to adopt
19 process . I am really eager to see this happening as soon 19 this negative declaration, not to do anything to amend the
20 as possible. I want to close my eyes tonight and open them 20 General Plan until the Northern Waterfront Specific Plan is
21 tomorrow and see nothing but beautiful homes and parks 21 completed and in place . Let's not leave this opportunity .
22 instead of the old deteriorated cars that people leave 22 Let's not let it escape. I am not concerned with something
23 there to sell or to repair, people walking their dogs 23 that I can live with, or that you can live with, but I am
24 because they know that they don't have to clean after them . 24 concerned for future generations of Alameda and something
25 But at the same time I see that the traffic is 25 that they can live with. Thank you, very much .
Page 51 Page 52
I MAYOR APPEZZATO: Thank you. Jim Sweeney. 1 we've had in the past where we've grown like poppies. We 1
2 MR. SWEENEY: Honorable Mayor, members of 2 need planning, and I think that's the current thing. We've
3 the City Council, I'm Jim Sweeney. I've lived in Alameda 3 been talking with all the other plans we've had. We have
4 for 28 years. I've seen a lot happen here. Mostly I'm 4 wonderful examples like in Suisun City, and Portland, and
I 5 impressed with the enormity of what's going to happen on 5 Chattanooga, Tennessee where they've had the overall plan.
6 this plot We have an old Alameda neighborhood, 6 They have got everything. They have got the
7 established neighborhood on one side, and we have 7 transportation. They got the living, the housing. They
8 industrial development on the other. I think we have a 8 go~ everything, all the amenities, and they've done it
9 terrific challenge, and also a terrific responsibility that 9 right.
10 these people participate in much greater extent than they 10 Now we've shot ourselves in the foot by losing many
11 have. 11 months here, and here we are. The developer is going to
12 There's been one meeting, and I understand the 12 sweeten it up a little bit. He's not going to put those
13 applicant asked for more and said there would be more, but 13 duplexes in those three little pockets; he's going to
14 there haven't been. These people have put their faith in 14 spread them around a little bit; he is going to take down
15 the idea that there's going to be a Specific Plan. I 15 the fence. I think that's great, but what I'm getting at,
16 remember when we sat down with the planning director in 16 I don't think these people have had a chance to
17 February of'99, we talked over the proposals of these 17 participate. And we know what we can do with good
18 consultants . And we talked about --it was expressly said 18 planning. So let's wake up. Let's not make another
19 that the Specific Plan will come first before any other 19 mistake, and let's keep our word. When we say we're going
20 projects. 20 to make a Specific Plan let's do it. Thank you.
21 And now we hear that because of resources that it's 21 MAYORAPPEZZATO: Jean Sweeney.
22 been placed on the back burner when it should have had 22 MS. SWEENEY: I can't possibly say anything
23 priority right along. Ifwe really wanted it to happen we 23 any better than anybody else has, but I would like to just
24 would have made it happen , and we wouldn't be here in the 24 point out this mistake in the staff report that I didn't
25 same --considering the same piecemeal development process 25 think had to be there saying that the General Plan says we J
13 (Pages 49 to 52)
ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9-5-00
CLARK REPORTING (510) 486-0700
·-. :.. .... ·
Page 53 Page 54
I have to extend the Clement Street to beyond the beltline 1 have gone to, and the more I've heard, the more I have to n 2 yard. It says no such thing . It says to consider Alameda 2 say I find it absolutely necessary that we pause.
3 Avenue. Well, they've already extended Alameda Avenue, and 3 I've heard the developer himself, or the
4 so that's very passe. 4 representative mention that there have been no written
5 And I just would like very much that we have a 5 negative comments in regards to this rezoning proposition.
6 general overall Specific Plan for the whole Northern 6 However, I'm wondering if one hand is watching the other
7 Waterfront that takes all the traffic issues . Traffic, 7 hand. I know that during the Planning Department's
8 traffic, traffic, traffic my darling, it's traffic that we 8 discussion of this issue there have been very many. written
9 need to address in this city because I don't think the 9 negative comments.
10 fairy godmother is going to bring us another tube or 10 I would like the City Council to review the
II another bridge in a while. Okay . Thank you . Bye bye. 11 Planning Board's meeting and their decision as to why they
12 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Michael Connors . 12 absolutely refuse to go ahead, and absolutely decided to go
13 COUNCILMEMBER KERR: Mrs : Sweeney, I believe 13 ahead with listening for the Northern Waterfront Specific
14 when you were talking about, the extension you were 14 Plan. There's a reason for it. Most of it has been stated
15 referring to is Atlantic A venue not Alameda 15 by most of the citizens you've heard tonight, and I wish
16 MS . SWEENEY: Yes, I meant Atlantic. Thank 16 that you would employ that same sense. There's only one
17 you. Bye bye. 17 opportunity. It's one island. I know we need to get on
18 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Michael'Connors. 18 with development hei;-e as well . We do need to take our
19 MR. CONNORS : Mr. Mayor, Council, my name is 19 time, but like someone else mentioned let's wait. It's
20 Michael Connors. I live at 1824 Hibbard Street, which is 20 very important, and it's w6ith waiting for. Thank you.
21 at the comer of Hibbard and Eaker. No other property 21 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Rich Newman.
22 would be more affected by this development other than mine . 22 MR. NEWMAN: Good evening, Mr. Mayor, City
23 I have to admit at first this seemed like a very good and 23 Council. My name is Rich Newman. I live at
24 very great idea I could see nothing but dollar signs . 24 1807 Sherman Street directly across from the Del Monte
25 However, the longer I ha"ve been here, the more meetings I 25 plant. And although I think the point about the Northern ..
~ .,
Page 55 Page 56
.J 1 Waterfront that everybody is making is a very valid point 1 So I have a very good level of comfort at this
2 that we should have a plan, I personally do not feel --and 2 point on the project.
3 just as a point of referen~, I can throw a baseball to 3 MAYOR APPEZZA TO : Thank you. Michael Allen.
4 most of the areas that would be affected with the Northern 4 MR. ALLEN: Thank you, Mayor, and
5 Waterfront Plan -I cannot think of a project in my mind 5 Councilmembers. I live on Mintern and Clement Street, and
6 that would be better than putting a development like this 6 in my backyard I can see the Weyerhaeuser factory. And I
7 in place of what is currently there. 7 must say that I will not miss the noise from the
8 I don't think a park, a beautiful park --well, 8 Weyerhaeuser factory if this new development were to go in.
9 actually Alameda has plenty of beautiful parks as it is, 9 Mr. Newman has said that I will not miss the beltline train
10 but I don't think a beautiful park in that area is reality 10 going by behind my house waking up my two small children.
11 in today's world. And I just feel that this project by 11 Also I would like to say that while I've been here 9 years,
12 Kaufinan and Broad, me being a homeowner looking across at 12 5 years on Mintem Street, 4 of them were on the Naval Air
13 Del Monte, and Weyerhaeuser, and Chipman, and the Alameda 13 Station in Alameda aboard the USS Texas, and that was far
14 Beltline that used to go down right in front of my house, 14 more traffic than I've ever seen in here now.
15 which my one-year old son thought was awesome, but I 15 So I think --I can't remember being behind more
16 thought it was even better when they shut it down. 16 than five cars at one time, maybe once. So I don't think
17 I just see it being a very good, positive thing for 17 this will have a very large impact on traffic, and I think
18 Alameda to put homes like this in. I'll trade those 18 my view will improve. And I think you should go ahead with
19 18-wheelers for Lexuses any day. And I think that the 19 this development. Thank you, very much.
20 issues that Kaufman and Broad have been approached with, at 20 MAYORAPPEZZATO: FrankMatarrese. For
21 least at the meetings that I've attended, they've really at 21 those of you who don't know Frank is a volunteer and Chair
22 least come back to the table with an alternate plan . And I 22 of the Economic Development Commission.
23 think they'll probably continue moving forward if you 23 MR. MATARRESE: Honorable Mayor and
24 should decide to go outside of the Specific Plan that 24 Councilmembers, members of the public, this is a very
125 everybody is opposed that you not do. 25 important meeting tonight, and I want to point out some of
-
14 (Pages 53 to 56)
ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9-5-00
CLARK REPORTING (510) 486-0700
Page 57 Page 58
I the activities that led the Economic Development Commission I housing as built inside the development where in the past
2 to vote in support of changing the zoning and the 2 that money was shunted out, and they bought away from that
3 requirements of the BWIP plan . We used as criteria, not 3 responsibility . This one doesn't. j
4 our own personal biases, but the City of Alameda Economic 4 Finally, the two provisions of extending the street
5 Development Strategic Plan, which is the nearest thing we 5 grid and removing any kind of walls between this project
6 have to an up-to-date comprehensive plan for the whole City 6 and existing residential areas was accomplished, and that's
7 of Alameda. 7 a continuing theme, so that this is not a walled
8 It was developed by 28-member task force, many of 8 development separate from the rest of the town . It al~o
9 whom are in this room right now, some of whom have spoken, 9 provides waterfront access to the public, which is not
10 where I think people spoke from the heart of what they want 10 · currently available in its existing form .
11 for Alameda. And we measured this project, as is our 11 When all of these were added up, and then the
12 charge, from an economic point of view. We're not a 12 bottom line to the city, which benefits us all as residents
13 Planning Board, but we're an Economic Development Board. 13 of this city includes an increase in revenue, the Economic
14 We looked at, first of all, does it meet the requirements 14 Development Commission voted unanimously to support this .
15 of our redevelopment area, which is to remove blight, and 15 Thank you.
16 to improve the properties within those redevelopment areas, 16 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Jerry Sherman.
17 and it certainly does. 17 MR. SHERMAN: Thank you, Mayor. My name is
18 The last two speakers spoke directly to that. More 18 Jerry Sherman. I am the President of the Park Street
19 from the heart of Alameda, I refer back to the Renewed Hope 19 Business Association. I participated in the area-wide
20 speaker who mentioned the continual theme of affordable 20 strategy that came out in 1991, and was adopted in 1993.
21 housing in this city, the ability of work-force salaries to 21 This housing element was part of it. It was included in
22 afford a house in the city, the ability of any of our 22 it. So it has been around for a long time. I think Park
23 children to afford a house in this city. And this project 23 Street's turnover of property is attributed to the BWIP in
24 in meeting with the intent of the Economic Development 24 a greater amount than the monies that were expensed.
25 Commission from longstanding includes the affordable 25 Any changes along the Northern Waterfront that
Page 59 Page 60
1 benefit the BWIP are going to greatly enhance the city's 1 a little bit late, but we're citizens of Alameda. We have
2 ability to fulfill its obligations and adopt a vision. We 2 a slightly different perspective. We've just moved into a
3 certainly support anything that they can do on that. You 3 home at 1415 Willow Street after living aboard our sailboat
4 are asked here to change the General Plan, and the zoning, 4 at Marina Village for almost 15 years. We've seen the land
5 and the Ordinance Amendments. I ask you to do that as a 5 from the water perspective, and I like the suggestion of
6 way of jump-starting the City Vision Plan, paying for the 6 access from the water. We can agree with that.
7 projects as they come along, and doing something for 7 I think overall the point I'd like to make is that
8 reduction of blight without having eminent domain. Thank 8 we are definitely in support of a development project of
9 you. 9 this nature. I think in all honesty we're a bit neutral at
10 MAYOR APPEZZA TO: Ellen Lohmeier. Is 10 the moment about whether or not the Specific Plan should be
11 Ellen Lohmeier still here? 11 developed prior to allowing this project rezoning to occur.
12 MS . LOHMEIER: I do have a question. I've 12 Thank you.
13 been a resident of Alameda for about three years, and I'm 13 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Thank you. Derrick Hill
14 not familiar with the Northern Waterfront Specific Plan 14 does not want to speak, but says he's in favor of the
15 that everybody keeps talking about. And I wonder when is 15 project, but does not wish to speak. Louise Hill. Is
16 the plan supposed to be finished? Is there an answer? 16 Louise Hill still here? David Gonzaleh. Again, another
17 MAYOR APPEZZA TO: Yes. Clarice, will you 17 statement, "I do not wish to speak. I'm in favor of the
18 quickly mention --18 project." Debra Ammvata. If I mispronounced it, I
19 MS. MEUNIER: Mr. Mayor and members of the 19 apologize.
20 Council, the Northern Waterfront Specific Plan is projected 20 MS. AMMV AT A: I may be young, but I've lived
21 to take about a year to 14 months. 21 in Alameda for 23 years. I'm in favor of this project. I
22 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Thank you. Vern Beckwith 22 think it is a good idea. I don't think that it's too
23 and Beryl Beckwith. Do you both want to speak at the same 23 dense. I know a lot of people that live in that area, and
24 time? Are the Beckwiths still here? Okay. 24 they don't like the view that they get when they're looking
25 MS. BECKWITH: We're coming into this debate 25 out at the warehouse industrial area. And I'm in favor of
15 (Pages 57 to 60)
ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9-5-00
CLARK REPORTING (510) 486-0700
Page 61 Page 62 I
1 the project. 1 to many of the meetings, and it was always a concern of
\ 2 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Robert Jensen . 2 traffic, always a concern of schools. Until we all die and
J
3 MR. JENSEN: My name is Robert Jensen .. I 3 leave this planet and it's obliterated there is always
4 live at 14 Marina. I lived in Alameda about four years, 4 going to be traffic, and we are always going to need more .. -
5 and from what I've seen prior to moving to Alameda was 5 schools.
6 planning studies and development studies in the valley 6 I think this development has satisfied the
7 where I lived before. I find that the development 7 requirements for the traffic . Based on the engineer's
8 basically leads how --or the developers lead how projects 8 reports there will actually be a decrease in traffic. Tpey
9 are developed . In any area you get one project in and they 9 satisfied the school requirement with a recorded agreement
10 put the money forth, they take the risk, they develop it, 10 with the school department. So I think we've got to move
11 and other projects follow suit, and blend in with that need 11 on from those two things. We've beat them to death. We've
12 and with the development idea. 12 beaten them to death with every development I've just
13 And I think Kaufman and Broad have to come in to do 13 mentioned, and traffic is going to be with us forever.
14 this project, and from then on let other projects follow 14 So this project, the quality of this project, the
15 suit and develop according to the needs of the community. 15 design, the architecture is better than anything that's in
16 I think it's a good idea. Thank you. 16 the Bay. It's better than anything that's on south shore.
17 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Dale Reno . 17 It's better than the east shore homes. It's better than
18 MR. RENO: Mr. Mayor, City Councilmembers, 18 the townhouses on Harbor Bay, and it is as good or better
19 my name is Dale Reno. I've been a resident in Alameda for 19 than most of the Harbor Bay Development.
20 59 years. So I think I beat Mr. Sweeney over there. I've 20 This is a fantastic pro)ect. The people who live
21 seen every development in the City of Alameda starting with 21 in that area who live here, a few of them have been for it,
22 the wartime housing projects, the bay, east shore, south 22 a few have been against it. That whole area is --property
23 shore, west south shore fill in. We watched the townhouses 23 values are going to appreciate. They are going to get out
24 on Bayfront Island built, and then the Harbor Bay filled in 24 and mow their lawns . They are going to cut the bushes.
25 and built. And I've got to say I watched all those, went 25 They're going to paint their houses. This area is going in
~·,
I
~J Page 63 Page 64
1 our lifetime, probably my lifetime I hope, is going to go 1 that we're beating some of these issues to death. And I
2 through a complete rejustification, and it's going to be 2 would love for nothing more than for you to move forward,
3 fantastic. And this is going to be the catalyst for it. 3 rezone this. I probably have spent more time there being
4 And I humbly request all of you to vote positively 4 that I've worked there for the past 12, 13 years. Every
5 on this tonight. Let's gets away from all the negative 5 day, 8 hours of my life, if not more, I've spent half of my
6 stuff. Ifs positive for Alameda, positive for the 6 life down there like I said for the past 12, 13 years.
7 neighborhood, positive for all of us. And so I sincerely 7 This place is the one of the spots, other than my
8 request you pass whatever zoning is necessary to approve 8 marina, that I'm ashamed of in Alameda. The parks here are
9 this project tonight. Let's get on with the development of 9 a wonderful asset to the community. I think that they have
10 the Northshore. 10 done everything they possibly could. They have come back
11 MR. DEWITT: Where do you live? 11 to the bargaining table time and time again to address the
12 MR. RENO: Right now 3315 Lewis Lane. I've 12 community's needs .
13 lived in they east end, the west end, the middle of town, 13 The situation down there is not only an eyesore,
14 and the now the Bay Front. I've seen it all. Thank you. 14 but it's dangerous. I have had to call the police several
15 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Mark Ruckman. 15 times to get the children out of there that are playing on
16 MR. RUCKMAN: Good evening, Mr. Mayor, City 16 top of the tanks, that have been injured, that we have
17 Councilmembers. My name is Mark Ruckman, and I was brought 17 personally taken care of, and bandaged. We have had drug
18 to Alameda on board the USS Kismus for 4 years in the Navy, 18 addicts back there. We have had theft and crime as ·a
19 and have since made this my home. I have lived here for 14 19 result of people hanging out back there.
20 years, and I am now working in Alameda as the harbor master 20 The truck traffic is just awful. As far as --
21 at Fortman Marina I have been there for 12 years, and I 21 another gentleman also touched on the amount of traffic
22 am proud to call Alameda my home. And I am proud of the 22 that would be generated from this project. Nobody here has
23 schools. I'm proud of the development. And I am proud of 23 seemed to realize that we are also proposing a Clement
'f the job that Kaufman and Broad has done here. 24 Street extension that should alleviate whatever additional I 25 It seems to me, as the other gentleman said here, 25 traffic you have.
16 (Pages 61to64)
ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9-5-00
CLARK REPORTING (510) 486-0700
I Page 65 Page 66
The Naval air station, when I was there --we had 1 exceed the minuses. So I urge you to vote in favor of the
2 another ex-sailor that stepped up here and said , "I owned a 2 project. .. 1
3 car out there, and when the aircraft carriers and 3 MAYOR APPEZZA TO: Nick Cabral.
4 everything was in here there was probably a hundred times 4 MR. CABRAL: Mr. Mayor, and members of the
5 more traffic" --excuse the exaggeration --"than this 5 Council, my name is Nick Cabral. I've lived on Buena Vista
6 project will generate." I think that the traffic issue is 6 between Arbor and Stanton and Bay Street and Mintem for
7 a non-issue right now, and I would implore the city to 7 60 years. I've seen the traffic at its height during 1945,
8 rezone this, make this project move forward with something 8 50. When I was a kid I never could get a bike because of
9 that I as a resident, homeowner, person that lives and 9 traffic. And we still got traffic. And I know one thing
10 works here in Alameda am entirely in favor of. 10 that Kaufman and Broad is going to give me an opportunity
11 And I am grateful that we have the chance to have 11 to be proud of my neighborhood for the first time in my
12 developers that want to come here and put their time, and 12 60 years.
13 money, and efforts into making Alameda a better place to 13 And I love my neighborhood, but now we're going to
14 live. Thank you. 14 be proud. And I know these concerned citizens. That's why
15 MAYOR APPEZZA TO : Thank you. George Oliver 15 I love Alameda because all these wonderful people, pro and
16 put a slip in, but does not wish to speak. He supports the 16 con, care for our community. But I think it's time for us
17 project. Andy McCormack. 17 to move forward and get this project going. Thank you.
18 MR. MCCORMACK: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, and 18 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Richard Neveln.
19 members of the Council. I decided to speak in favor of the 19 MR. NEVELN: J-1r. Mayor, members of the City
20 project, and urge you to proceed with rezoning and 20 Council, I support development in Alameda, and I think in
21 approving the plan for one simple reason. We have talked 21 general this is a good project. I reviewed the Kaufman and
22 of strategic planning in the City of Alameda for the last 22 Broad book out in the lobby before coming in, and I was
23 25 years that I know of, and we're still making progress. 23 struck with one thing. As a member of the Public Transit
24 But if you weigh the pluses and the minuses of this project 24 Committee for the City of Alameda I notice no bus pullouts
25 as presented tonight to you, I believe that the pluses far 25 or transit shelters in any ' of their designs.
Page 67 Page 68
1 And that although we're going to have perhaps less, 1 very briefrecess -go ahead and speak. We will -then
2 maybe more, traffic -as our friend Dr. Bill Smith said, 2 that will be the last speaker. We will take a recess,
3 "The devil is in the detail," and that we need to work on 3 very, very short recess, then we'll have Council
4 the detail of providing better public transit for the 4 deliberation, then we will have the regular Council
5 citizens of Alameda, and to lead the way with this project 5 meeting. It shouldn't be too long.
6 with some public transit provisions, shelters, and general 6 UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: Mr. Mayor, and
7 considerations by the developer. Thank you. 7 Councilmembers, I'm for it. Thank you, very much .
8 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Thank you. 8 MAYORAPPEZZATO: Thankyou. Briefrecess.
9 COUNCILMEMBER DEWITT: Did I hear in the 9 We'll be right back.
10 presentation that Kaufman and Broad had made some type of 10 (Off the record)
11 modifications to handle the transportation needs, or not? 11 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Ladies and gentlemen,
12 Would it be possible to get a clarification on that? 12 let's get started. Let's get started. Let's start it
13 MR. PANEK: Mr. Mayor, members of the 13 before more have to leave. Council discussion .
14 Council, one of the things that we've committed to do is to 14 Mr. Daysog.
15 enter into an agreement to provide bus shelters at the 15 VICE MAYOR DA YSOG : Thank you very much, and
16 project to assist in transit. Number 2, to provide a 16 thank you very much to the residents who took the time to
17 marketing plan that will be both the marketing plan for 17 come out tonight and to prepare their remarks or to speak
18 transit opportunities that will be project based. Its 18 from the heart and share the value and the vision that each
19 components of which will also be available and can be used 19 and every one of you have for all of our City of Alameda.
20 city-wide to market transit opportunities. And that plan 20 What struck me tonight, I think, was certain words that
21 will be shared and will be deveioped together with the City 21 popped out which, I think, speak to perhaps what the
22 Transportation Staff. So we're hitting it from both sides, 22 discussions are all about: corner markets, garage doors,
23 from a physical improvement as well as a marketing side. 23 speed bumps, the absence of perimeter walls.
24 MAYOR APPEZZA TO: Thank you. That's the 24 I think more and more what we want to see and
25 last speaker. I'll close the public hearing. We'll take a 25 experience is a slowing down of the life that we all live
I
17 (Pages 65 to 68)
ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9-5-00
CLARK REPORTING (510) 486-0700 -:. ... ," ...
Page 69 Page 70
I in, and we want to begin to celebrate that sense of I here with the Kaufman and Broad project is actually n 2 community that Joe --and I forget Joe's last name --that 2 elements in the built environment that bring us closer to
3 Joe spoke of. We want to .begin to celebrate that sense of 3 those civic ideals of which we speak and that we value l 4 community that day by day we feel we may fray away by our 4 highly .
5 long commutes after long commutes to work and to back home . 5 When you look at the grid design, linear streets,
6 And I think in part what we're speaking about then is 6 they're not just linear streets, but they are streets that
7 really a civic ideal toward which we are all striving and 7 extend from other streets from the other side of Buena
8 hope to see in our built environment, not just here for the 8 Vista Avenue so that if you live on the south side ofauena
9 Kaufman and Broad project or for the Northern Waterfront 9 Vista A venue and the Kaufman and Broad project is there you
10 area, but I think certainly for all of Alameda. 10 can go up that street. It's a public street by the way,
11 It is a civic ideal tempered by an appreciation for 11 and you can enjoy the waterfront, enjoy an opportunity for
12 each other to celebrate, to be able to engage each other, 12 civic engagement. I
13 whether it's at corner markets, or whether it's -for 13 And also, I think, when you look at other design
14 those of you who didn't quite grasp what we are talking 14 features like the way that they've put in certain kinds of
15 about when we were talking about garages that were not just 15 pedestrian-friendly features at the corners of the blocks,
16 in the front, but in the back --whether it is the ability 16 I think, that's again to encourage and invite people to
17 to engage each other and talk to each other neighbor to 17 celebrate the fact that we live in a community, and that as
18 neighbor in the driveway. For far too long we have allowed 18 individuals our fulfillment can't be realized until we
19 a close environment that rather than bringing us together 19 engage with each other.
20 has allowed us to separate each other by walls figuratively 20 So I think when I look.~t the Kaufman and Broad
21 or literally . 21 project and I relate it in comparison to the other issue
22 And as a result I think that has contributed to a · 22 that's being raised tonight -the first issue is, I think,
23 sense of cynicism. But I think what we have here in the 23 one fulfilling our civic ideal, which I think Kaufman and
24 Kaufman and Broad design -although technically I know I'm 24 Broad does ; And the other issue raised tonight by the
25 not supposed to talk about design --I think what we have 25 residents is one about community input in a planning
[!,
-:.··i
Page 71 Page 72
process. 1 While we said we could have improved community input, on
2 To be sure.I think we have to be honest here. I 2 the values that we hold for the area in general or the
3 think in any process we always have to improve community 3 inspirations that we have for the waterfront area I think
4 input whether it's this process or anything else. And no 4 the Kaufinan and Broad really hits the mark. And quite
5 one here can say that we can't improve on community input. 5 frankly I think this is the project that sets the standard
6 And we will, but we are going to need everyone to be 6 for the Northern Waterfront planning ..
7 involved in the Northern Waterfront planning process. And 7 So I think to summarize, on the one hand we talked
8 while community input needs to be increased and improved 8 about kind of our civic ideals and how we'd like to see it
9 on, I think ifs also fair to say that within that 9 incorporate a built-in environment. And at that micro
10 deliberate framework for our discussion where we can better 10 level I think the Kaufman and Broad project does that, and
11 identify how our civic ideals can be built in the built 11 therefore qualifies for moving forward on the motions that
12 environment. 12 we are being asked to move. And on the macro, on the
13 We also come into the civic framework with certain 13 larger issues, of whether or not this is being integrated
14 inspirations or values that we hold for our city. For 14 well with the specific planning for the waterfront area, on
15 example, I think we all agree that we want residential over 15 those issues I think they seamlessly fit together. And so
16 industrial land uses. I think we all want traditional town 16 I'm open for certainly for future discussion on this
17 planning versus suburban designs with windy streets that 17 matter.
18 aren't really to the car and not to the pedestrian. And I 18 I certainly would love to engage residents more on
19 think we all want an accessible waterfront, and certainly 19 . the specific Northern Waterfront planning because I think
20 not something that keeps away from that. 20 in the final analysis for that 20 acres what do you want?
21 And I think on these scores alone, on these values 21 I think a lot ofus want residential. I think a lot ofus
22 that we hold for the Northern Waterfront area, I think it's 22 want nicely planned traditional environments. And I think
23 safe to say that the Kaufinan and Broad project meets those 23 a lot of us want access to the waterfront.
I 24 values. And for that reason, while certainly they or 24 Thank you, very much, and I appreciate the time and
25 anyone on the City Council --we're responsible ultimately. 25 energy you took in taking part in tonight's and previous
18 (Pages 69 to 72)
ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9 -5-00
CLARK REPORTING (510) 486-0700
Page 73 Page 74 ~
meetings. And I can only hope that there will be even
I
1 1 three people who may not be familiar with it, the Tinker I 2 more, and that you will also be fully engaged. Thank you . 2 Avenue extension is a way of bringing and its ancillary i
3 COUNCILMEMBER KERR: First of all, I'd like 3 projects is a way of bringing traffic out of the FISK and
4 to applaud Kaufman and Broad's actual inclusion of the 4 east housing area to and from the tube, and can also
5 low-income housing in the project instead of paying fees. 5 connect that traffic flow with the rest of Alameda . .
6 That's a first , and I think that's great. All the other 6 There have been various proposals on the
7 developers have paid fees for the low income housing and 7 Tinker A venue extension to increase the connection between
8 moderate income housing. So they do need to be applauded 8 the FISK and Marina Village Parkway concerning major
9 for that. 9 changes to the Webster/Atlantic intersections, what to do
10 I'm disappointed that the Northern Waterfront 10 with major changes to the Constitution/ Atlantic
11 Specific Plan has fallen behind. It has been left on the 11 intersection. That's coming from the west. Flowing into
12 back burner. And I remember talking about it at the 12 this same area is the Clement Avenue extension . For years,
13 beginning cif'99, and here we are saying it will be 12 13 most of the 30 years I've lived in Alameda, it has been
14 months to 14 months before it happens. Because one of the 14 known as the Atlantic A venue extension.
15 critical issues that we have to solve in this development 15 The traffic has --and actually I think it was
16 and in conjunction with other developments is our traffic 16 talked about before I moved here --but the traffic is
17 flow. 17 discussed as flowing along the Northern Waterfront.
18 I remember going -by the way if you really 18 Kaufman and Broad has already included part of the system,
19 believe in community participation in these meetings at 19 but it dead ends at both ends. And what's disturbing is
20 Independence Plaza, or whatever, then you have to show up 20 that that 3.31 acre part of the whole parcel -there's
21 and listen .to people. But at the meeting, the last Tinker 21 3.31 acres that's behind the old Del Monte brick building
22 meeting, the traffic consultant calmly announced that he 22 that's needed to bring the Clement A venue extension to
23 didn't happen know about the Clement extension, or where it 23 Sherman, but that's not going to be.
24 would go to make his decision on traffic flow for the 24 Kaufman and Broad will be asking for a subdivision
25 Tinker Avenue extension. And for those of you, two or 25 so they won't be buying it, and therefore there's no way
Page 75 Page 76 !
1 for the traffic to get from their version of Clement A venue 1 there's no money for the Clement A venue extension. This
2 to Sherman. And we haven't discussed that. Mrs. Sweeney 2 makes no sense at all. We need to get these two major
3 brought out an excellent point. For all the years we're 3 traffic projects planned at the same time, and talking to
4 talking about the Atlantic Avenue extension, ak.a Clement 4 each other, and funded through the same means .
5 A venue extension --well, Atlantic A venue has been extended 5 It is absolutely astounding that the traffic headed
6 from Webster to Sherman in my lifetime, and it is doing a 6 to the tube from the east and the west along the Northern
7 good job of carrying a lot of traffic. But where does the 7 Waterfront is not being planned together. And so I'm very
8 traffic go from there? Right now it all comes to a 8 concerned that the 3 .31 acres behind the old Del Monte
9 screeching halt at the stoplight at Buena Vista and 9 building -the request will be to subdivide it out, and it
10 Sherman. IO will not be preserved or contributed for traffic flow to
11 And I do not understand why people think there's an 11 Sherman and as a matter of fact no planning seems to be
12 acceptable level of service at that intersection because in 12 done .
13 the p.m. commute hours it backs up almost to the entrance 13 If you stand on the west end of Clement Avenue and
14 to Wind River. It's impossible to get out of Eagle Avenue 14 you look west you're looking into the Penzoil property, a
15 onto Sherman during the p.m. commute hours . So given that 15 very short stretch, you -as a matter of fact, you can see
16 problem, and given that we're spending all this time on the 16 the tank farm from the end of Clement. So you can see what
17 Tinker A venue extension bringing traffic flow from the west 17 will become the road from the west end of Clement. But we
18 to the entrance to the tube area, and we are spending no 18 aren't even discussing doing anything about that. And all
19 time on planning on bringing traffic from the east to that 19 the conversations have been on Tinker and nothing on
20 exact same area --and it's an absolute no-brainer we 20 Clement.
21 should be planning the two extensions to meet in a 21 I can support changing the General Plan, but
22 compatible fashion. 22 because of the statements that I've just made, and because
23 And we are talking actual prices of between 17 and 23 of the statements that-what the Planning Board found in
24 a half and 20 million dollars to build a Tinker A venue 24 their meeting --I can't support accepting the Mitigated
25 extension . And we're all throwing up our hands and saying 25 Negative Declaration because the traffic problem is clearly
I
19 (Pages 73 to 76)
ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9-5-00
CLARK REPORTING (510) 486-0700
' Page 77 Page 78
I an issue, and it is something that we need to address . 1 will not have the entitlements to build. And we will not .
l 2 Another thing is that these houses are going to be 2 have the power over the decision. We're not --I'm I
3 very close to the street. Some of the garages and porches 3 astounded to hear we're not supposed to talk about design
4 will be as close to the street as from me to 4 tonight. To me design in urban planning is almost
5 a point between Councilmembers Johnson and DeWitt. So 5 everything. Ifwe still control the zoning then we would
6 that --and Kaufman and Broad's own presentation showed how 6 have a greater leverage in getting the design that we want.
7 close to the street they were. One of the speakers made 7 For example, as of last Friday morning they were
8 the very perceptive observation, and we on the north side 8 still uncertain whether the houses along Buena Vjsta would
9 have known for years, that the density between new 9 be built so as to give the appearance of facing
IO developments --and they're always talking about small 10 Buena Vista, or whether they would be facing the side
11 neighborhoods. There are. There are also some big ones, 11 streets. And what would be presented to the existing
12 but the difference is that the housing in general in our 12 community would be the size of the houses with the
13 older neighborhoods is inproportionate to the lot on which 13 connecting fences. And I've heard it said that the fences
14 it sits . 14 would be wood. They wouldn't be precast concrete or
15 And these are going to be very large houses . And 15 anything, but that's also true of the old drive-in site.
16 as a matter of fact the presentation that they have put in 16 If you look at it, it's actually a backyard fence.
17 our packet gives the house sizes, and they are really quite 17 So I would support the change to the General Plan,
18 large. And so there isn't really very much compatibility 18 and support the change to BWIP. I can't support the change
19 between the setbacks proposed for north of Buena Vista and 19 to zoning because I think we would be throwing away our
20 the existing setbacks with the exception of the apartment 20 leverage in getting support'from the extension of the
21 houses on the southern side. And the front yards on the 21 Clement A venue extension and other planning details. And
22 southern side are generally in proportion to the size of 22 that's about the only major choice of power that we have.
23 the houses, and these would not be. 23 And so I think it's important that we nail down
24 The reason --the only power we have really is the 24 some of the things that are going to be happening, and that
25 rezoning. And if --because without the zoning then they 25 we do the connection between the Tinker A venue extension
~ ...
Page 79 Page 80 ·
1 and the Clement Avenue extension in one plan, which is the 1 didn't say anything about getting people out of their cars. '-_,
2 only sane way to do it rather than building --approving a 2 I think that's a great idea. I use public transportation
3 dead-en~ street with traffic with no place to go. Thank 3 when I can. In our older, traditional neighborhoods you
4 you. 4 don't see many garages in the front of the house and --
5 VICE MAYOR DA YSOG: Just a quick comment. I 5 VICE MAYOR DA YSOG: Exactly.
6 put together this --you probably can't see it in fine 6 COUNCILMEMBER KERR: --you certainly don't
7 detail, but the orange are the homes where the garages are 7 see 50 percent of the garages in the front of the house as
8 set back. So that--clearly outlines out of 150 or so 8 is proposed here. What I said is the houses themselves are
9 there are about 80 or so, 80 plus homes, where the garages 9 going to be very close to the street, and so the front
10 are set back. And they are clearly scattered throughout 10 yards are going to be quite small. And many of the
11 the project. The goal of which is, again, when people get 11 setbacks are somewhere approaching the distance betWeen me
12 out of the cars rather than being able to run quickly 12 and some point between the two Councilmembers on the far
13 inside of their homes and never meet their neighbors, the 13 side. And people do --so in no way --I mean, I don't
14 goal is that they can meet their neighbors. 14 think you were listening to what I said Vice Mayor because
15 So I think at that minuscule level certainly I 15 that's not what I said.
16 think this project, contrary to what Councilmember Kerr 16 MAYORAPPEZZATO: Okay. Can we listen to
17 implied, this project certainly meets the idea of getting 17 some other Councilmembers?
18 people out of their cars, and walking in their driveways, 18 COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON: Mr. Mayor, I will
19 and perhaps potentially engaging .each other.in the way we 19 make my comments brief. Just on the issue of garages, just
20 would, which any resident in Alameda would engage each 20 addressing the issue of the detail that Kaufman and Broad
21 other. I wanted to clarify that because the garages --and 21 has gone to make this a better neighborhood is just the
22 I received an email that this was going to be a series of 22 example of the garage doors. There's nothing worse than
23 garages butting up against the street, and that's just not 23 driving down a street and having garage doors facing the
I .24 the case. 24 streets. In this development they are proposing to have
125 COUNCILMEMBER KERR: I just wanted --I 25 them staggered, like Vice Mayor Daysog indicated, where you
20 (Pages 77 to 80)
ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9-5-00
CLARK REPORTING (510) 486-0700
Page 81 Page 82
1 have some in front, some in the back so that it isn't a I are different from the requirements that families had when
2 wall of garage doors . I think that is going to make it a 2 those houses were built. And you see all around Alameda, i
3 much more attractive design-if it goes forward . 3 you can see it. We have controversies in neighborhoods
4 So I am prepared to support the project. We all 4 because families are moving in. The homes that were built
5 want to see the Northern Waterfront Specific Plan go 5 30, 40, 50 years ago that are not sufficient to meet the
6 forward, and it needs to go forward, and we have made a 6 needs of families now, and so they add onto them . We have
7 commitment that that will take place. What we didn't 7 people coming to the Planning Board. We have appeals to
8 commit to was putting a moratorium on all Northern 8 the City Council because people want to add onto those
9 Waterfront development until that's done. 9 homes. When homes are built hopefully to meet the needs of
10 And I come from the Planning Board . I think 10 who will be living in them we will avoid many of those
11 planning is very important. I agree with the comments that 11 problems.
12 we've had that we have some developments in Alameda that we 12 The traffic --it's true traffic is a problem. I
13 are not all that proud of, and I don't want to see that 13 don't know if it is a problem as much as people say it is .
14 happen again, but I don't think that this is going to be 14 We do have --Councilmember DeWitt and I serve on the
15 one of those projects. We've heard comments about the 15 Transit Committee. The City of Alameda is making a real
16 quality oflife and the quality of the community. I think 16 effort to make Alameda a more friendly, transit-accessible
17 that this development is going to do a lot to improve the 17 to provide transit to the residents so that hopefully some
18 quality of the community in the community that's going in. 18 of us won't have to own a car, and can get around without a
19 There .have been great efforts to blend the design with the 19 car. And that's --we are ll}~ing a serious commitment
20 surrounding neighborhood. 20 toward that. '.
21 We've had comments that other areas are small 21 And also the benefits of the project-the
22 houses on small lots, but what happens with those small 22 waterfront in that area is not accessible. I think that
23 houses on small lots is people expand the houses to the 23 that benefit alone makes this project well worth it.· Once
24 extent they can either with or without a variance as 24 that waterfront is accessible to the residents in that area
25 needed. But the demands that families have for housing now 25 I think you'll all be thankful we went forward with this
Page 83 Page 84
1 project and that we didn't delay, and delay, and delay 1 housing and employment, that will help us solve our traffic
2 because it's a beautiful waterfront there. And from Marina 2 problems. So there -housing is a regional issue .. We
3 Village to -I don't know. There's a small amount of 3 need to go forward with housing, and that's not to say we
4 accessibility at Grand Street, but really from Marina 4 should go forward with housing to the sacrifice of the
5 Village to the east end of town there isn't a place where 5 residents who live here now, but I think if our commitment
6 the waterfront is truly accessible. 6 is to move forward with development. We don't--the city
7 We're doing the waterfront path there, a park 7 doesn't own that property.
8 community. The streets will extend from Buena Vista to the 8 One speaker commented that we shouldn't turn it
9 waterfront so that it won't be a community that feels like 9 over to a developer. We don't own that property.
10 it's surrounded and excluded from the rest of the 10 Something is going to happen there. What we need to decide
11 neighborhoods. So you won't have that. There is not going 11 is do we leave it industrial, or do we want to rezone it as
12 to be a sound wall. That's been eliminated from the plan. 12 residential. And that's what we're doing tonight is we're
13 I just feel that this is going to uplift the entire area. 13 deciding whether or not it should be rezoned to allow the
14 People have commented to me if those homes were for sale 14 residential development.
15 today they would buy one today before they're even built. 15 So I will support the project, and I truly believe
16 People would buy a home today before they are even built. 16 there has been a lot of effort on the part of the
17 We can't necessarily --we are creating more jobs in 17 community, and I think that's good. I think that the more
18 Alameda, and we need to provide houses for those people to 18 input we have, the more interest people take in their
19 live in. We have --the developers agreed to provide 19 neighborhoods, the better off we all are. So I think that
20 20 percent affordable housing and that is for --that's 20 --I appreciate everybody coming in tonight. And I want to
21 basically going to be workforce housing, housing for people 21 let you know we do listen. We may not always agree, and we
22 who work in Alameda. And one of the ways to eliminate 22 do listen, and your input is important. But uhfortunately
23 traffic is to provide places for people who work in Alameda 23 sometimes there are always areas where we just can't agree.
24 with places to live. 24 But I really believe that this is one of the
25 And so if we can achieve a better balance of 25 projects that once it's done, once it's in, once people see
I
21 (Pages 81 to 84)
ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9-5-00
CLARK REPORTING (510) 486-0700
Page 85 Page 86
l
I it in , we're going to say we like that. It's better than I residential use. I
l 2 what was there before, and we are doing a good job of 2 I think if we were to go through with our Specific t
3 planning . And it's not going to be one of those 3 Plan what have you , we would come out with the highest and
4 developments where you say, "How did that happen here in 4 best use would be residential. And as Beverly Johnson has
5 Alameda?" So I'm prepared to support is the project. 5 said we have a project before us that the City does not
6 MAYOR APPEZZA TO : Councilmember De Witt . 6 own .. It's a private developer. It's a private land . They
7 COUNCILMEMBER DEWITT: Thank you, Mr . Mayor. 7 bought it. They're trying to develop it. We can set the
8 I think what we've done here is we've sort of got our 8 zoning . We can give them an idea of what the 1;1ses are
9 procedures mixed up. Like Mr . Sweeney said, we're going 9 through the zoning, but we d.on't really have the right to
10 ahead with a development when we haven't really done all IO tell them what color to paint the houses, and exactly when
11 the planning that we really should do. And that's been our 11 to do everything that's in there.
12 biggest error in here is not having the Specific Plan done 12 I think that is kind of a problem that Planning
13 before we actually add on a project. And so I recognize 13 Boards and Councils get into. They turn into engineers,
14 that, and I admit that it's really true, and it's a burden 14 and architects, and every other thing. So I really believe
15 to us . But I also realize that we are creating jobs here 15 · that we should set the use for an area through the zoning,
16 in the city of Alameda And if we're going to create the 16 and then we should supervise that, and make sure that they
17 jobs then we need to create the housing. 17 are producing things that are in keeping wi~ the
18 So I looked at this project to see whether or 18 community, and the goals and the desires of the community.
19 not --while the Specific Plan would provide us with three 19 To make a long story short, I believe that the
20 things . It would provide us with a use for the project for 20 highest and best use for the 'area is residential. I
21 the location, and provide us with an environmental impact, 21 believe that the environmental portion of this creates a
22 environmental problems that we may have in the area, and 22 problem, that it will create additional traffic. I believe
23 then it would allow us to properly zone the area So 23 that we must have an artery along Clement A venue that takes
24 looking at the use for this area it ap~,ars to me that the 24 the traffic off of Buena Vista. I believe that the project
25 best use, biggest and best, or whatever use for the area is 25 here has done what they can do to provide the Clement
-... ~.· ..... -.
Page 87 Page 88
·I . Avenue extension. They are going to provide a street 1 MR. FLINT: I think it's our understanding,
· · ·f ' call~d Clement A venue extension, or whatever the name is 2 what was shared with us this evening, we want to preserve 't ' · goirjg to be. I hope it's Clement, and they're going to pay 3 the option of being able to have extension through that
=4·· for it. They•re"g oing to build the street, and they're 4 property developed .
5 going to pay for it. They will have done what they can do . 5 COUNCILMEMBER DEWITT: Preserve the option
6 We still have another portion where the Penzoil 6 for the extension . That's a good legal way of saying it.
7 tanks are, but I believe that that will fall in line once 7 We're going to do the Specific Plan. We got it a little
8 this development goes through. Then the other property 8 backwards, one behind the other, but we still want to do
9 owners will see what is there, and what's going on, and 9 the Specific Plan . We want to make sure we get the
10 they will try to make some money too, and we will have that 10 transportation accesses down through there. Thank you,
II Penzoil extension area done. II very much.
12 The area that Councilmember Barbara Kerr spoke of, 12 Mr. Mayor, I believe that the Kaufman and Broad
13 Peter Wong's property is there. We need that area also. I 13 people have done everything they possibly can with regards
14 would propose here this evening that we end the Specific 14 to making sure that the extension is there, and the other
15 Plan, which is going to be developed at a proper --and a 15 owners will have to be addressed in order to make that. I
16 proper access be provided. I know I can't do that tonight, 16 believe that housing is our highest and best use. We are
17 but when you're doing your Specific Plan, which is in the 17 creating jobs. We must create housing : Therefore,
18 process of going now, we're spending the money. Let's go 18 Mr. Mayor, I will support the change of the zoning for that
19 ahead and make sure that --what am I trying to say? I 19 area
20 know I can't make any motions here, but I would like to 20 COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON: May I make one other
21 see --Mr. City Manager, would you --21 comment? We kind of glossed over the issue of the benefits
22 MR . FLINT: Colette, would you like to 22 of the project. The other one that has been mentioned is
23 respond to the Chair? 23 the contract with the school district. And two years ago
24 COUNCILMEMBER DEWITT: I'm trying to make 24 we would have had more than twice the number we have here
' 125 sure that that --25 tonight because we had such a controversy about qeveloper !
I
22 (Pages 85 to 88)
ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9-5-00
CLARK REPORTING (510) 486-0700
Page 89 Page 90
I fees and school facilities. But through the leadership, I We 've been talking about private property rights
2 really of the City , we reached an agreement with the school 2 tonight. One thing that should be mentioned is that the I
3 distr ict on the Catellus Project , which I'm sure helped in 3 only ownership by Kaufman and Broad so far is, at least as
4 the negotiations on the Kaufman and Broad project. 4 of Friday, was the Weyerhaeuser property . They, as of
5 So this is not only going to be good for the things 5 Friday, do not own the Chipman warehouse . And the Chipman
6 that we've already mentioned, but also the schools . This 6 warehouse, as I understand it, has a 13-year lease on that
7 is going to help our school systems, and this will help us 7 property . So there's no immediate relief from the truck
8 build new school facilities. So I just wanted to make a 8 traffic in sight. They speak of --it will ~e a lower
9 point of letting --reminding people that that's also a 9 traffic impact because the trucks will be gone. Well , we
IO part of the deal. 10 don't know at th is particular time ifthe trucks will be
11 COUNCILMEMBER KERR: I do want to make a 11 gone .
12 couple of further comments . As I said I do applaud Kaufman 12 Maybe Peter Wong will choose to buy Chipman out of
13 and Broad in their initial plan of 15 percent to include 13 the lease, maybe he won't. I don't know, but I don't see a
14 low-income housing as well as moderate income housing . But 14 promise or a guarantee of any relief from the truck traffic
15 because most people do only pay 9 percent moderate income 15 because the people on the north side know that Chipman and
16 housing and inland fees --but the increase from 15 to 20 16 Container Care are the two worst generators of truck
17 percent, by the way, is proposed to be done with the 17 traffic that exist there . And Container Care is not going
18 payment from the 20 percent set aside that's being 18 in the foreseeable future. And for 13 years we might well
19 generated by the Business Waterfront Improvement Project. 19 have the Chipman warehouse keep going. So we don't know if
20 So, in other words, the increase of 5 percent would be paid . 20 the whole project can even be' developed at this point, and
21 for by public money. I think I should mention that. 21 we don't have any promise of relief from all the truck
22 I also forgot to praise Mr. McDonald's proposal for 22 traffic . Thank you.
23 the dock at the waterfront. Having cruised on my sailboat 23 MAYOR APPEZZATO: I saved my comments for
24 for four years around the Gulf of Mexico, these docks are 24 last. Unless another Councilmember would like to speak
25 invaluable. And I think that's a great idea. 25 some more, I will wrap this up. I have been doing this for
Page 91 Page92
I .about IO years now. I have been a member of the Planning 1 Generating that revenue is critical if we are going to
2 Board for 2 years, on the City Council, and Mayor for 6. 2 maintain our quality oflife.
3 It will be coming to a close soon . I want to talk to all 3 On two occasions in the near past this community
4 of you, but also I hope to many of the citizens who are 4 rejected raising taxes; one for a school bond, and one for
5 watching, and maybe bring a summary to where I think we're 5 our library. With a two-thirds vote required to raise
6 going. I think that should be the role ofa Mayor, and 6 taxes and or fees it would be extremely difficult, ifnot
7 I'll do that. 7 impossible, to raise revenue by asking our citizens to
8 The role of the City Council, I believe, is to 8 raise taxes. Maybe that leads us to the only other
9 promote the common good . The common good of all of our 9 alternative to raise revenue by progressively and
IO citizens, all 75,000, give or take three, whatever the IO responsibly promoting business and responsible development.
11 census will be -ifs in the range of75,000 -and 11 To not progressively move forward, I think, would be
12 promoting and providing the services and the best quality 12 irresponsible.
13 of life for all of our citizens. This role of providing 13 We need revenue for our schools . We need
14 for the common good , as you all know by being here tonight, 14 affordable housing. We need to provide adequate police and
15 is not an easy one, but we as a Council were elected to do 15 fire services. We need to maintain our libraries and
16 just that. Not everyone will agree on how we proceed, but 16 parks, and we need to maintain our streets and trim our
17 we must go forward one way or the other. 17 trees, only a few things. I suggest that if we do nothing,
18 We have choices . We can delay, or do nothing, or 18 and delay, or continue to plan forever and ever we can get
19 we can progressively move forward. No matter what we do 19 away with that kind of attitude or thinking for about two
20 there will be criticism. There is a way to avoid that 20 or three years. And then in two or three years we will
21 criticism, and that, of course, is to delay, or do nothing. 21 wake up some morning and say, "What happened to our
22 And if you want to go back and look at my campaign 22 community? The streets have deteriorated because we're not
23 literature I didn't run for mayor on the vow to do nothing . 23 going to raise taxes, and we have challenges paying our
24 The role of the City Council is to make sure we have 24 police, and fire, and our employees." And we'll look at
25 sufficient revenue to pay for our city services. 25 our parks --this isn't about a momentary decision.
I
23 (Pages 89 to 92)
ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9-5-00
CLARK REPORTING (510) 486-0700
!i i .
Page 93 Page 94 I I
1 I think we on the Council have to some degree be 1 developer or not. n 2 visionaries and look to the future two, or three, or four, 2 Of the 2,000 acres --you need to know this because I
3 or five years out to decide how we should to proceed 3 people talk about density and traffic, and you need to at i
4 because raising taxes --and we're not going to have these 4 least hear it. If you don't agree with it that's fine , but
5 good times forever --raising taxes is not going to happen 5 I need to say it. Of to 2,000 acres, 565 acres, 25 percent
6 any time soon . 6 of the dry land of the base if you include the wetlands,
7 I propose to move forward, hopefully, with a bright 7 900 acres --so let's just say the dry land, 25 percent
8 vision for our future. We have currently two developments 8 will always be open space of fish and wildlife refuge,
9 being proposed. One before us tonight, the other the 9 25 percent of the land, about one-third of our city that is
10 Catellus Development will occur in the near future . And to 10 being turned over to us . 200 acres is proposed to be a
11 put it all in perspective, and kind of give you ·a general 11 golf course, 56 acres a sports complex . East Bay Regional
12 view from how I'm looking at it, let me look at the base 12 Park is going to build another park, a marina beach . We
13 first. We need to be reminded what we're doing out there 13 have a historical district that will be preserved. 50 to
14 because it's all interelated because it's important, and 14 70 percent of the bases tidelands will be entrusted to the
15 density and traffic are important to the picture of our 15 people of the State of California You cannot build
16 city. 16 housing on tideland.
17 We will acquire almost 2,000 acres from the Navy. 17 With this first Catellus Development of200 acres
18 When the land is finely turned over we have plans, current 18 we will not overbuild, especially with housing. In fact,
19 plans, to develop only 200 acres of that 2,000. The 19 if we build 500 new homes at east housing and the 152 homes
20 Catellus Development, which is a mixed use development with 20 at the Weyerhaeuser site, the' Kaufman and Broad project, we
21 500 homes, this development will give us the revenue to 21 will build only 652 homes. That is less homes than we
22 begin to redo the infrastructure out at the base. Any 22 currently plan to tear down at the base. We plan to tear
23 further development beyond the 200 acres is probably light 23 down , if it goes forward, 600 homes and probably another
24 years away. We haven't even discussed it yet. There will 24 200 or 300 in west housing, but it will be more than 650.
25 be discussion next week whether we should go with a master 25 Ifwe tear down approximately 800 homes and we
·-, .. ~.
Page95 Page96
I I build 652, we will only have about 150 homes less than we 1 rid of the trucks, and getting rid of the blighted area.
2 had 10 years ago. Building 652 homes on these two projects 2 And we definitely want to get rid of those shipping
3 will be less homes than we had 10 years ago when the Navy 3 containers out there. I think that's the goal of the
4 owned the base: Additionally, we will be tearing down 4 Council, and probably the goal of future Councils.
5 homes in one location, the base, and building or spreading . 5 Yet some don't want the obvious alternatives. We
6 them out in two additional locations. Housing density will 6 are becoming a residential community. We always have been.
7 improve. 7 And some say a high-tech, bio-tech community. We're trying
8 Let me make another point. Alameda's population is 8 to attract clean industries, and we're doing it pretty
9 down 8,000 to 10,000 from a few years ago. We'll know for 9 successfully. And we need housing. We need good schools.
10 sure when the census comes out. We have a 1,000 vacant 10 We need affordable housing, and responsible development
11 homes right now. We lost 14,000 jobs, and have only 11 will get us there.
12 replaced 2,000 to date . Somehow population density, and 12 I said earlier that no one plans to raise revenue
13 housing density, and traffic density must be significantly 13 by raising taxes. It won't work. However, we better be
14 less than it was 10 years ago. I'm not saying it's not 14 creative and progressive if our community is to thrive. We
15 going to get worse, and I'm not saying we shouldn't plan 15 need money for our schools. We need affordable housing.
16 for it, and we need to do that, but I think you need also 16 We need to take care of our seniors. These are three of
17 look at the facts. 17 the most important issues in our community, but also three
18 Let's look at the Weyerhaeuser site real quickly. 18 of the most important issues that are on the front pages
19 The proposed development site is certainly a blight on our 19 all across this country.
20 city. It doesn't take a very intelligent Alamedian to go 20 And I propose that this Council is taking the first
21 stand on the corner and look at it. Some of us want to get 21 step to deal with all three. The State of California
22 rid of heavy industry and the trucks, and I certainly agree 22 mandates that a $1.93 a square foot of every new home built
23 with that. That we do need to get rid of, that degree. 23 go to schools . Catellus and Kaufinan and Broad have both
24 It's past its time, and the trucks need to go. And I'm 24 agreed to $4.20 a square foot supported by our school
h 5 sure this Council and future Counclls will work on getting 25 district. Ifwe build the 652 homes at east housing and
I I
L
24 (Pages 93 to 96)
ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9-5-00
CLARK REPORTING (510) 486-0700
Page 97 Page 98
I the Weyerhaeuser sight almost 5.5 million dollars will be I most critical areas in our community, and in the country:
2 based on those homes at 2,000 square feet a home and 2 education, affordable housing, and our seniors are being !
3 multiply it by or 20 times comes to about 5 and a half 3 addressed, maybe not as adequately as it should be, but at
4 million dollars to our schools, to build new schools at the 4 least we're talcing the first step --education, our
5 FISK sight, and to remodernize because it is all capital 5 schools, affordable housing, and our seniors . We begin to
6 money. We can probably modernize every school in our city. 6 address these three critical areas if we begin to take the
7 That's a responsibility we need to address whether 7 first steps, and we do so without raising taxes . We build
8 we do it this way, or help the school district do it 8 new and rehabilitate old schools. We build affordable
9 another way. I challenge anyone here to tell me how to 9 housing, and we acquire a senior center, and this is just
10 raise 5.5 million for our schools without raising taxes . 10 the beginning .
11 And I don't suggest taxes, but responsible development is a 11 We have a city to run. I've outlined a framework ,
12 good way to get there. Affordable housing, what the State 12 but I think it may be a small vision for the future . Maybe
13 mandates is 15 percent of all new homes built to be 13 I'm the only one that believes it. Again, I believe to do
14 affordable. Both developers have agreed to 20 percent, and 14 nothing is irresponsible. I choose to go forward taking
15 some of the money that will be used to develop the Kaufman 15 the action necessary to make this one of the best
16 and Broad affordable housing homes comes from the 16 communities in the east bay. I'll close and accept a
17 redevelopment area, but that's exactly what the money is 17 motion .
18 for. One out of every five new homes built will be 18 VICE MAYOR DA YSOG : Mr. Mayor I'd like to
19 affordable, at least by the mandate of this state. Again, 19 make a motion and I move to adopt, correct me ifl'm wrong,
20 I challenge anyone here to tell me how to build that number 20 move to adopt the Mitigated'.Negative Declaration (a Finding
21 of affordable new homes without responsible development, 21 of No Significant Impact pursuant to the California
22 and by not raising taxes. 22 Environmental Quality Act as mitigated), a General Plan
23 Additionally, as we go forward with the development 23 Amendment and an amendment to the Community Improvement
24 of the Catellus the Senior Center will revert to the city 24 Plan for the Business and the Waterfront Business District
25 and be guaranteed for our seniors forever. Three of the 25 to change the land use designation from General Industry to
Page99 Page 100
1 Medium Density Residential, and to incorporate text 1 (Councilmember Kerr -no)
2 amendments that reflect the recent elimination of port 2 COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON: Mr. Mayor, I will
3 priority designation for this site, a Rezoning from M-2 3 make a motion to adopt a resolution approving a General
4 (General Industrial) to R-4-PD, (Neighborhood Residential, 4 Plan Amendment, GPA-99-1 for the Marina Cove Development to
5 Special Planned Development Combining District) for a 5 Change the Land Use Designation to Medium Density
6 proposed development consisting of 127 detached homes and 6 Residential, and to Incorporate Text Amendments that
7 24 attached homes on 151 lots, for a total of 151 homes and 7 Reflect the Recent Elimination-of Port Priority Designation
8 related utilities, streets, open space, and visitor parking 8 for this site. (For City Council action.)
9 on 20.52 acres. 9 VICE MAYOR DA YSOG: Second.
10 COUNCILMEMBER KERR: Mr. Mayor, we have 10 MAYOR APPEZZATO: We have a motion and a
11 three separate Resolutions and Ordinances. Could we do 11 second. Any further discussion? All in favor? Motion
12 them one by one, if Vice Mayor Daysog would agree to that? 12 passes 5 to 0. Next one.
13 You can move all three in succession. I would appreciate 13 COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON: Mr . Mayor, I will
14 it if we could do the three one by one. 14 make a motion to approve a Resolution Adopting Findings of
15 VICE MAYOR DA YSOG: Certainly, out of 15 Fact Regarding Environmental Impacts, Mitigation Measures
16 courtesy to Councilmember Kerr, sure. 16 and Mitigation Monitoring Programs; in Accordance with the
17 COUNCILMEMBER KERR: First one is --17 California Environmental Quality Act for the Proposed
18 VICE MAYOR DA YSOG: I move to --whoever 18 Amendment to the Community Improvement Plan for the
19 wants to make the next motion, go ahead. For the first one 19 Business and Waterfront Improvement project. And this is
20 I move to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration (a 20 for CIC action.
21 Finding of No Significant Impact pursuant to the California 21 VICE MAYOR DA YSOG: Second.
22 Environmental Quality Act as mitigated). 22 MAYOR APPEZZATO: We have a motion and a
23 COUNCILMEMBER JOHSNON: Second. 23 second . Any further discussion? All in favor? Motion
24 MAYOR APPEZZATO: Any further discussion? 24 passes 4-1. (Councilmember Kerr --no)
25 All in favor? Vote passes 4-1. 25 VICE MAYOR DA YSOG: I move introduction of
I
25 (Pages 97 to 100)
ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9-5-00
CLARK REPORTING (510) 486-0700
Page IOI Page 102 I
I Ordinance --Amending Ordinance No. 2559, as Amended by I ST A TE OF CALIFORNIA )
2 Ordinance No . 2681 and 2835 , and Approving and Adopting the )
I
3 Amendment to the Community Improvement Plan for the 2 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA )
4 Business and Waterfront Iinprovement Project to Change the 3 I
5 Land Use Designation from General Industry to Medium 4 I, ELIZABETH A. WILLIS, a Certified Shorthand
6 Density Residential. 5 Reporter 12155, do hereby certify:
7 COUNCILMEMBER JOHSNON: Second. 6
8 MAYOR APPEZZATO: We have a motion and a 7 That the foregoing proceeding was taken before me
9 second. Any further discussion? All in favor? Motion 8 at the time and place therein named; and
10 passes unanimously. 9 That the same was taken in shorthand by myself,
11 COUNCILMEMBER DEWITT: Introduction of 10 and was thereafter transcribed into typewritten
II transcription. ' 12 Ordinance Rezoning, R-99-1, Reclassifying and Rezoning 12 I further certify that I am a disinterested person
13 Property located between Entrance Road and Hibbard Street 13 to said action and in no way interested in the outcome
14 North of Buena Vista from M-2, (General 14 thereof nor connected or related to any of the parties
15 Industrial/Manufacturing Zoning District), to R-4-PD 15 thereto .
16 (Neighborhood Residential with a Planning Development 16
17 Combining Zoning District.) This is for City Council 17 IN WI1NESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
18 action. 18 affix my official seal of office this 15th day of
19 COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON: Second. 19 September, 2000 .
20 MAYORAPPEZZATO: We have a motion and a 20
21 second. Any further discussion? All in favor? Motion 21
22 passes 4-1. (Councilmeinber Kerr -no) 22
23 (Meeting adjourned 10:30 p.m.) 23 ELIZABETH A. WILLIS
24 24 CLARK REPORTING
25 25
1 '
_,
..
I
26 (Pages 101 to 102)
ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9-5-00