2015-04-07 Regular CC Minutes
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY- -APRIL 7, 2015- -7:00 P.M.
Mayor Spencer convened the meeting at 7:01 p.m.
ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese,
Oddie and Mayor Spencer – 5.
Absent: None.
AGENDA CHANGES
(15-209) Mayor Spencer announced that the Investment Policy \[paragraph no. 15-217\],
the purchase of Equipment \[paragraph no. 15-221\], and the setting the hearing for the
Webster Street Business District \[paragraph no. 15-224\] were removed from the
Consent Calendar for discussion.
PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
(15-210) Proclamation Declaring the Month of April as Autism Awareness Month.
Mayor Spencer read the proclamation and presented it to Jodie Moore, former member
of the Commission on Disability Issues.
Ms. Moore encouraged everyone to be nice to each other.
(15-211) Proclamation Declaring the Month of April as Fair Housing Month.
Mayor Spencer read the proclamation and presented it to Tony Berg, Alameda
Association of Realtors.
Mr. Berg made brief comments.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(15-212) Kurt Peterson, Alameda, expressed his appreciation for moving forward with
transportation planning; made suggestions regarding the consultant; urged a
moratorium on future development, including Site A at Alameda Point, until the study is
completed.
(15-213) Cynthia LaCroix, Alameda Backyard Growers, made an announcement and
thth
invited everyone to attend the 5 Anniversary on April 12.
(15-214) Ken Peterson, Alameda, expressed his concern over the Del Monte project
and staff following the requirements of the density bonus ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
1
April 7, 2015
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Spencer announced that the Investment Policy \[paragraph no. 15-217\], the
purchase of Equipment \[paragraph no. 15-221\], and the setting the hearing for the
Webster Street Business District \[paragraph no. 15-224\] were removed from the
Consent Calendar for discussion.
Councilmember Oddie moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote – 5. \[Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the
paragraph number.\]
(*15-215) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meeting Held on March 3,
2015. Approved.
(*15-216) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,711,219.52.
(15-217) Recommendation to Approve the City of Alameda Investment Policy.
The City Treasurer and Martin Cassell, Chandler Asset Management, gave a brief
presentation.
Councilmember Oddie stated there is an old saying, “think globally, act locally”;
Alameda is on the front line of sea level rise; it is wrong to invest in companies that
contribute to sea level rise, climate change and global warming; Alameda does not
allow a Walmart, but invests in a corporate bond with Walmart; Walmart outsources
labor costs to taxpayers and forces government assistance on employees; the City of
Portland has divested from Walmart; Alameda should engage in a similar dialogue to
find out ways to be socially responsible and fulfill the duty to earn a rate of return for tax
payers.
The City Treasurer stated that he is open to having the discussion; it is difficult to focus
on individual companies; that he would prefer the fundamental perspective that there
are industries or nature of businesses that the community does not want to invest in,
such as fossil fuel; this perspective defines Alameda’s moral stance as a community
and is a solid policy which is executable and manageable.
Mr. Cassell stated his company has a fiduciary responsibility to invest funds in the best
interest of the City.
Councilmember Daysog stated residents need to know Council is not just rolling the
dice; Alameda’s investing is more conservative to achieve security; Councilmember
Oddie’s intent is great, but he cautions against being restrictive.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
April 7, 2015
The City Treasurer stated the City cannot invest in stocks, only bonds; new technology
companies do not have credit; portfolios are more long-term in nature; in terms of
liquidity, the money is not for use for operations.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated Walmart has hiring practices that impact society;
the City owns bonds from Walmart and Costco but is not involved in ownership of the
companies.
The City Treasurer stated if Council has themes it would like to see, he could talk to the
asset managers.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would like the issue to come back for
public discussion.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated that he would like to approve the investment policy tonight
and have analysis brought back.
The City Treasurer stated the policy comes back annually for Council approval;
requested time for asset managers to discuss and adjust the policy.
Councilmember Oddie moved approval of the investment policy.
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote –
5.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved to schedule the topic to return to discuss specific
restrictions on investment in a timely manner for the firm to make adjustments at the
next cycle.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion; requested a friendly amendment for the
City Treasurer to come back for discussion on consequences and impacts.
Under discussion, Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the City Treasurer
will bring back the supplemental restrictive guidelines before the annual approval of the
investment policy, to which the City Treasurer responded in the affirmative; stated he
would vet Council’s specific feedback with the asset managers and come back with
more concrete information.
In response to Mayor Spencer’s inquiry, Mr. Cassell stated under Alameda’s investment
policy, there are 250 companies that would meet the minimum criteria; the firm
evaluates credit quality and whittles the list down to about 40.
Mayor Spencer stated that she would like more information on why companies were
chosen in the past and the percentage of green companies; diversification is critical and
she supports green energy.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
April 7, 2015
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote – 5.
(*15-218) Recommendation to Award Contract in the Amount of $377,451, Including
Contingencies, to BKF Engineers for Engineering Consulting Services in Connection
with the Arbor Street Storm Drain Pump Station Replacement, P.W. No. 10-14-15.
Approved.
(*15-219) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Ranger Pipelines, Inc. for Cyclic
Sewer Replacement Project, Phase 10, No. P.W. 05-12-14. Accepted.
(*15-220) Recommendation to Accept the Work of MCK, Inc. for Repair and
Resurfacing of Certain Streets, Phase 33, No. P.W. 02-14-04. Accepted.
(*15-221) Recommendation to Authorize the Purchase of Equipment from Alameda
Paving and Excavating in the Amount of $129,800 and Authorize the City Manager to
Execute All Necessary Documents. Accepted.
Councilmember Daysog recused himself and left the dais.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote –
4. \[Absent: Councilmember Daysog – 1.\]
(*15-222) Recommendation to Approve Agreement Appointing Elizabeth Warmerdam
as Interim City Manager and Approve Interim City Manager Pay at $240,000 Annually.
Accepted.
(*15-223) Summary Title: Approving Annual Work Plan and Setting a Public Hearing to
Continue Assessing Merchants with Park Street Business District
Recommendation to Approve the Park Street Business Improvement Area (BIA) Annual
Assessment Report; and
(*15-223 A) Resolution No. 15010, “Intention to Levy an Annual Assessment on the
Park Street BIA of the City of Alameda for Fiscal Year 2015-16 and Set a Public
Hearing for May 5, 2015.” Adopted.
(15-224) Summary Title: Approving Annual Work Plan and Setting a Public Hearing to
Continue Assessing Merchants with Webster Street Business District
Recommendation to Approve the Webster Street Business Improvement Area (BIA)
Annual Assessment Report; and
(15-224 A) Resolution No.15011, “Intention to Levy an Annual Assessment on the
Webster Street BIA of the City of Alameda for FY 2015-16 and Set a Public Hearing for
May 5, 2015.” Adopted.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
April 7, 2015
Councilmember Daysog recused himself and left the dais.
Vice Mayor Matarrese Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote –
4. \[Absent: Councilmember Daysog – 1.\]
(*15-225) Summary Title: Receipt of an Authority to Access Unemployment Information
from the State of California
Resolution No.15012, “Authorizing the Community Development Department, Economic
Development Division, to Receive and Analyze Quarterly Census of Employment and
Wages Data for the City of Alameda Obtained from the California State Employment
Development Department for Economic Development Purposes and Authorizing the
City Manager or his Designee to Negotiate and Execute all Necessary Agreements with
the California State Employment Development Department.” Adopted.
(*15-226) Summary Title: Set Public Hearing to Consider Expansion of Territory and
Municipal Services for Financing District at Alameda Landing Development and Levy of
Corresponding Special Tax
Resolution No.15013, “Consideration to Alter the Municipal Services to be Financed by
Community Facilities District No. 13-2 (Alameda Landing Municipal Services District).”
Adopted; and
(*15-226 A) Resolution No. 15014, “Intention to Annex Territory to the City of Alameda
Community Facilities District No. 13-2 (Alameda Landing Municipal Services District)
and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Therein.” Adopted.
(*15-227) Summary Title: Set Public Hearing to Consider Expansion of Territory and
Public Improvements for Financing District at Alameda Landing and Levy of
Corresponding Special Tax
Resolution No.15015, “Consideration to Alter the Facilities to be Financed by and the
Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Taxes for, and to Increase the Bonded
Indebtedness Limit of, Community Facilities District No. 13-1 (Alameda Landing Public
Improvements).” Adopted; and
(*15-227 A) Resolution No. 15016, “Intention to Annex Territory to the City of Alameda
Community Facilities District No. 13-1 (Alameda Landing Public Improvements) and to
Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Therein.” Adopted.
(*15-228) Ordinance No. 3123, “Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a 24 Month Lease with
Advanced Roofing Services, a California Corporation, for Building 612 located at 1450
Viking Street at Alameda Point.” Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
5
April 7, 2015
(15-229) Recommendation to Receive an Update to the July 23, 2013 Report on the
City’s Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) Liabilities.
The City Manager gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether evaluations are done annually, to which
the Assistant City Manager responded every 2 years.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired when this year’s actuarial is expected.
Doug Pryor, Bartel and Associates, responded four to six weeks before presenting to
staff; stated his firm is still collecting data and does not have all the information to
proceed.
Councilmember Daysog stated the OPEB unfunded liability is distributed in two ways:
one for people who are retired and the other for people still working.
Vice Mayor Matarrese inquired whether assumptions on solutions and the liability
project an 8% increase in health costs per year and the same number of active
employees, to which the City Manager responded in the affirmative; stated the
assumption is to continue to budget for full time staffing, but not increasing or
decreasing.
Councilmember Daysog stated people should understand that if assumptions change,
all modeling that has been done could potentially change; staffing levels and
benchmarks are important points; employee numbers maintain when the proposal
moves forward.
The City Manager stated adding another body would increase pension and healthcare
in the future which needs to be managed over the years; the full cost has to be
addressed in every decision which does not happen in local government.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether there is a dollar amount for unfunded PERS.
The City Manager responded he does not have the PERS amount tonight.
Mayor Spencer stated that she would like to see a written report that includes the
numbers and slides not included in tonight’s presentation.
The City Manager stated everything presented tonight will also be presented to the
th
public on April 16.
Mayor Spencer stated she wants to make it clear to the public that the item is coming
th
back to the Council at a Special Meeting on April 29.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
April 7, 2015
Mayor Spencer inquired how overtime pay impacts pensions and the City’s contribution.
The Assistant City Manager responded overtime does not affect OPEB; the
presentation is about retirement healthcare; there is a very small portion of overtime that
is factored into retirement; overtime is not counted toward PERS service; the Fire
Department has a small portion of planned overtime factored into the work schedule
which is pensionable.
The City Manager stated employees receive the same OPEB benefits which are not
impacted by years or service or rank; employees receive different pensions.
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft’s inquiry, the Assistant City Manager
stated Alameda’s current vesting term is 10 years.
Mayor Spencer stated that she would like the contract approval to be done at the next
regular meeting, not a special meeting.
The City Manager stated the Sunshine Ordinance requires 15 days notice and the next
regular meeting is in 14 days.
Mayor Spencer stated that she is concerned the public would perceive the Council as
pushing the contract through.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the Charter does not allow the contract
to be heard at a special meeting, to which the City Attorney responded in the negative;
th
stated the Council can vote on the contract at the April 29 special meeting.
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft’s inquiry about noticing, the City Manager
stated documents approved in Closed Session will be part of the agenda packet for the
th
April 29 meeting.
th
Mayor Spencer inquired how the April 29 schedule was approved, to which the City
Manager responded the Council took a vote in Closed Session.
Councilmember Oddie stated using the term “push through” gives the wrong
impression; Council is being responsible by providing ample notice.
Mayor Spencer stated it is responsible to have the issue on a regular meeting.
Councilmember Oddie stated the vote was already done in Closed Session.
In response to Mayor Spencer’s inquiry, the City Manager stated it was made clear
th;
before the vote that the contract approval would take place on April 29 the term “push
through” is problematic; there was a task force in 2012 and the issue has been
discussed for nearly 4 years.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
7
April 7, 2015
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated that he would like to keep focused on a contract which
implements a program that reduces liability; the information will be provided to the
th
public and Council with enough time for review and feedback; by April 29, the Council
can make an informed decision.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the issue should have been approved a long time
ago; Council should be responsible and provide a blue print for fixing the OPEB
problem.
Expressed concern over the City Manager giving the presentation rather than the City
Treasurer or Auditor: Kurt Peterson, Alameda.
Stated good healthcare and pensions are important; the International Association of Fire
Fighters (IAFF) are partners with the City and are willing to work together to fund the
benefit: Jeff DelBono, IAFF.
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft’s inquiry, the City Treasurer stated
Council should resolve the issue in a manner that does not bankrupt the City or deny
promises made to employees.
The City Manager stated the longer issues are not addressed, the harder it will be to fix
them; based on Council direction the contracts are the first step in the solution.
Mayor Spencer requested changes be highlighted when the contracts come back.
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft’s inquiry, the City Manager stated the
contract will not include City Treasurer analysis; the City Treasurer would attend the
th
April 29 meeting to provide commentary.
Councilmember Oddie stated that he hopes Council remains focused on how to take
care of unfunded liabilities and shows leadership in finding a solution.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether folks feel the Council does not have
enough information to move forward.
th
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated that he is fine meeting on May 5; six days does not make
a difference.
In response to Mayor Spencer’s inquiry regarding other budget meetings, the City
Manager stated budget sessions include: April 16, April 21, April 29 and May 12.
Mayor Spencer stated the numbers should be shared with the public; that she has not
been privy to see the entire contract and is looking forward to the budget meetings.
(15-230) Recommendation to Accept Report on Offer to Transfer a Portion of the
Oakland Inner Harbor Tidal Canal From the Army Corp of Engineers (Corp) to the City
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
8
April 7, 2015
of Alameda at No Cost and Subsequent Disposition of Property.
The Assistant City Attorney and Jillian Blanchard, Rudder Law Group, gave a Power
Point presentation.
Vice Mayor Matarrese inquired who is responsible for dredging, to which Ms. Blanchard
responded the Corp is responsible but has not had to do maintenance dredging; the
Corp cannot transfer the dredging responsibility.
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft’s inquiry, Ms. Blanchard stated dredging
the tidal canal alleviated a mosquito born disease.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the residential agreement would disclose all
issues, to which Ms. Blanchard responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the Proposition 13 legal description of the
parcel is a sliver, to which Ms. Blanchard responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the two parcels could be combined, to which
Ms. Blanchard responded further research is required to determine what individual
property owners might do.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the City would automatically transfer the
property to residents, to which Ms. Blanchard responded in the affirmative; stated the
transfer would go from the Corp to the City, and then immediately to the property
owners.
In response to Mayor Spencer’s inquiry, Ms. Blanchard stated it would be necessary for
the City to take ownership before transferring the commercial parcels directly to EBRPD
for public trust and potential liability issues; removing the Fruitvale Rail Bridge and
dredging maintenance would remain a responsibility of the Corp.
The City Attorney stated the Corp would retain dredging responsibility no matter who
owns open water.
Ms. Blanchard concurred with the City Attorney; stated the Corp cannot transfer the
dredging responsibility.
The Assistant City Attorney concluded presentation.
Provided information on the Kirkland survey done in the 1980s; urged the City to move
ahead with the transfer: Kurt Braun, Alameda.
Urged Council to continue to move forward with the transfer: Anne deBardeleben,
Alameda.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
9
April 7, 2015
Stated dredging is not needed as the water flows quickly and smoothly; when he was on
the Council, the issue was discussed; that he hopes the issue gets resolved this time
around: Former Councilmember Mike Gorman, Alameda.
Stated that she is still unable to maintain her dock after 10 years; she supports the
parcel transfer: Donna Rauk, Waterfront Home Owners Association (WHOA).
Stated it has been difficult not being able to do anything with his backyard for 15 years;
urged moving forward with the transfer, which is no cost to the City: Kevin Peterson,
WHOA.
Stated it is exciting that homeowner issues over the last 39 years can be addressed
now; everybody benefits; encouraged Council to move forward: Ed Payne, WHOA.
Stated WHOA is grateful yet frustrated; asking for speedy action by the Council; WHOA
is prepared to make the process painless for the City: Seth Hamalian, WHOA.
Stated WHOA has unique qualifications and has resources the City could lean on;
urged Council to move forward: Paul Mabry, Alameda.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated Council needs to move the item forward;
commended WHOA; stated that she would like to see the matter come back to Council
as soon as it is ready.
Councilmember Oddie stated the matter is complicated and is not an action item; that
he would like to see it get done; the residents are not asking for anything special; it is
the Council’s responsibility to help the residents.
Vice Mayor Matarrese inquired when the next milestone would be; stated follow-up
should consider whether the transfer of the commercial portion is a benefit or liability.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired how the City would address moving forward if
there is not 100% consensus of the residents.
The Assistant City Attorney responded WHOA would take title of the property and cover
the cost of any hold out members; stated the solution is conceptual but there is a lot of
interest.
In response to Vice Mayor Matarrese’s inquiry regarding the next milestone, the
Assistant City Attorney stated the City would start reaching out to EBRPD about
surveying and map work, then take information to the homeowners to resolve any
conflict; staff could report back with progress once there is an agreement in concept.
In response to Vice Mayor Matarrese’s inquiry regarding the timeframe, Ms. Blanchard
stated the City is just one party and needs the Corp’s engagement; the Corp is waiting
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
10
April 7, 2015
for response from the Regional Board on their review of existing environmental reports;
strong Council support to move forward would motivate the Corp as well.
In response to Mayor Spencer’s inquiry, the Assistant City Attorney stated EBRPD does
not have buy-in yet and Alameda does not know where EBRPD stands in their
negotiations with the Corp.
***
(15-231) Mayor Spencer stated a motion is needed to consider the remaining items:
economic development presentation \[paragraph no. 15-225\], the report on waste
collection rates \[paragraph no. 15-234\] and the referral on the theater marque
\[paragraph no. 15-235\].
Vice Mayor moved approval \[of considering the remaining three items\].
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote –
5.
***
The City Attorney stated staff could make a commitment to proceed with all deliberate
st
speed and have a progress report back to Council by July 1.
Vice Mayor Matarrese inquired whether Council could give direction to move forward, to
which the City Attorney responded in the affirmative.
In response to Councilmember Daysog’s inquiry regarding due diligence, the Assistant
City Attorney responded three months to compile information is a good timeframe; that
staff could come back sooner if there is material progress to report.
***
Mayor Spencer called a recess at 10:32 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 10:37 p.m.
***
(15-232) Presentation on the City’s Economic Development Programs and Initiatives
and Status of the Economic Development Strategic Plan; and Recommendation to
Establish the Mayor’s Economic Development Advisory Panel In Lieu of Re-Establishing
an Economic Development Commission (EDC).
The Community Development Director made brief comments and the Economic
Development Manager gave a Power Point presentation.
***
(15-233) Mayor Spencer stated a motion is needed to continue the meeting past 11:00
p.m.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval \[of continuing the meeting\].
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
11
April 7, 2015
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote –
5.
***
Stated the Chamber’s mission is to work with the City to support existing business and
attract new businesses; the Chamber supports the staff recommendation: Michael
McDonough, Chamber of Commerce.
Stated that he supports the staff recommendation for an advisory panel: Robb Ratto,
Park Street Business Association (PSBA).
Stated Alameda could be a great tourist destination; urged Council to add tourism as
another strategic focus: Karen Bey, Alameda.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated the activities which the EDC had on its plate resulted in
the 2000 Strategic Plan; that he would prefer a commission that would go through a
regular process with agendas, minutes, reports, and receiving direction from Council.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated staff will be tasked with overseeing a commission;
the presentation encompasses the Vice Mayor’s objectives; the advantage of an ad hoc
committee is the more flexible structure and approach; there is a process for
assembling members to address specific needs; the two projects Vice Mayor Matarrese
referred to have been successful; she does not support a Mayor’s committee and
prefers an ad hoc committee which comes to Council for approval; a City Advisory
Committee is preferred, not a Mayor Advisory committee; she would like to hear
feedback from the business community.
Councilmember Oddie stated there is lots of overlap between roles of the EDC and the
Mayor’s committee; he is at odds about what to call it, and how much oversight and
formality there should be; the goals of the EDC are more broad and membership is
diverse; the goals of the Council referral and proposed Mayor committee are the same;
he would like to find a way to marry the two; Alameda is becoming a tourist destination
and adding goals is a good thing; that he is in favor of Vice Mayor Matarrese’s proposal.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he concurs with the staff recommendation for an
advisory panel working with the Mayor; the two key issues are function and attributes; a
commission’s role is more planning and monitoring; a panel’s role is implementation and
closing deals as projects move forward; a task force could be nimble; he would like
Economic Development working closely with Council, the Mayor, and key business
leaders who are ready to quickly open doors and close deals; that he would choose the
staff recommendation.
Mayor Spencer stated the matter started in 2013 before she was Mayor; she would like
a group that would be more flexible than a commission; staff is not asking for a group to
set policies, but for an ad hoc group; there are business people waiting to step up and
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
12
April 7, 2015
move forward with the staff recommendation; deals cannot be closed at a commission
meeting; the group needs to be flexible; she would support the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired what would keep staff from doing any of the
proposed projects on their own versus an ad hoc committee.
The Economic Development Manager responded staff does have the relationships to
work on proposed projects now, but the advantage of an advisory panel is the
organizing principle.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired who would give direction to staff, to which the
Economic Development Manager responded the Council would give direction; stated
executives could provide a formal proposal to Council, and Council would give direction
based on staff recommendations.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired what is it that staff is not able to do now without
an ad hoc committee or EDC.
The Economic Development Manager responded in some ways, nothing, but there is
value in the formality of a committee; there is weight and punch of an advisory panel.
Councilmember Daysog stated the power of a task force could come in the form of a
letter to business or corporation Alameda is trying to attract.
Mayor Spencer stated letters are sent out with her signature.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated no deal would be closed without coming to Council first;
he is looking more at what is going to be done, not how it is going to be done; he does
not want just executives coming to Council on economic development; an economic
development policy addresses tasks in clear light and could answer tough questions
such as the real value of land at Alameda Point and whether the fiscal neutrality policy
is valid today; his goal is having an EDC for accountability and traceability for when and
how decisions are made; the EDC can be nimble and be directed if Council takes the
lead on priorities; updating the strategic plan is a perfect task for the Commission.
Councilmember Daysog stated the summary functions of the an EDC is planning,
monitoring, and implementation; emphasis should be on implementation; one way to
deal with planning is to have an economic development task force which may continue
on to become a commission.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved approval of directing staff to follow the parameters of his
referral to re-form an EDC that includes elements presented in the report and
parameters for providing Council direction on the tasks.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which FAILED by the following vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Matarrese and Oddie – 2. Noes: Councilmember Daysog and Mayor
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
13
April 7, 2015
Spencer – 2. Abstention: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft – 1.
Councilmember Daysog moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Mayor Spencer seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Mayor Spencer stated staff can continue the status quo and wait for
Council direction; Council always gets to weigh in and can try again if the process does
not work; the committee has not been seated; staff is ready to seat the committee and
move forward.
Councilmember Oddie stated that he is concerned that the Council has no say in how
the economic advisory panel is composed.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated he does not think the advisory panel provides the visibility
or proper stage for setting policy and tackling harder economic questions.
On the call for the question, the FAILED by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmember
Daysog and Mayor Spencer – 2. Noes: Councilmembers Matarrese and Oddie – 2.
Abstention: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft – 1.
(15-234) Recommendation to Accept an Informational Report on Establishing Integrated
Waste Collection Ceiling Rates and Service Fees for Alameda County Industries, Inc.
(ACI) for Rate Period 14 (July 2015 to June 2016).
The Deputy Public Works Director, Marva Sheehan, HF&H Consultants, Kent Kenny,
ACI, Andy Rose, ACI, and Fred Pecker International Longshore and Warehouse Union
(ILWU), gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she visited the ACI recycling facility in San
Leandro; she is troubled that the current pay rate is $14.59 from $9.00 but the burdened
rate only went up 2 cents because ACI was paying a temporary agency fee; inquired
whether ACI would reduce workforce if the facility is retooled.
The Deputy Public Works Director responded updating the facility is an option which
would need only one worker for a shift.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether costs would reduce if the workforce
goes away, to which the Deputy Public Works Director responded in the affirmative;
stated the ratepayers would see the benefit.
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquiry, Mr. Kenny stated there are no
definitive plans to retool the facility right now; stated retooling is very challenging and
capital intensive.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
14
April 7, 2015
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft’s inquiry, Mr. Kenny stated reduction in
recycling revenues is a long term issue of migration to smaller containers.
Expressed support for ACI: Robb Ratto, PSBA
Expressed support for the union and ACI: William F. Dow, Alameda.
Expressed support for immigrant workers: Reverend Michael Yoshii, Buena Vista
Methodist Church and Alameda Resident.
Expressed support for the increase to support the workers’ wages; stated zero waste is
essential to climate control: Brooke Anderson, Movement Generation.
Read Patricia Lamborn’s statement in support of the workers: Amy Welsh, ILWU.
Councilmember Oddie stated that he is impressed by management, labor, the City and
banks coming together on this issue; zero waste would be good; that he is glad Council
is taking efforts to get workers a living wage.
Councilmember Daysog inquired why other cities are paying less.
Mr. Kenny responded other cities are being asked to increase their rates as well; rates
are based on tonnage and each city has a different dynamic; San Leandro has a large
industrial base that subsidizes residential rates; Livermore has cheaper landfill fees.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated paying fair wage and benefits is a must; Alameda is
paying a fair share.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated no one likes to see bills increase; the issue is not
creating hardship for people to live and work in the area; inquired when Alameda could
anticipate ACI’s bulk pick-up pilot program, to which the Deputy Public Works Director
st
responded staff will know more by July 1.
Mayor Spencer stated that she is looking forward to seeing the report in advance; stated
she is concerned about the amount ACI was paying the temporary agency; ACI should
not be profiting; more money should be going to employees without increasing out of
pocket cost; important information such as gross income is insufficient in the report;
clearly justifying that the rate increase does not result in a revenue increase for
company is important; regional rates need to come back in the next presentation and
the balancing account needs to be addressed; she cannot support the rate increase
without the missing information.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
None.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
15
April 7, 2015
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
(15-235) Consider Directing Staff to Research Lighting up the Alameda Theater
Marquee. (Councilmember Daysog)
Councilmember Daysog made brief comments on his referral.
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft’s inquiry, Councilmember Daysog stated
he is unable to read the external marquee at night.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the City owns the historic theater, to which Vice
Mayor Matarrese responded the theater operator leases the ground and the historic
theater from the City.
Mayor Spencer stated Alameda Municipal Power could help with the lighting issue.
Councilmember Daysog stated research could be done for the lighting of the marquee.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the matter is urgent, to which
Councilmember Daysog responded in the negative.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated Council has a lot of issues on its plate that may
affect residents.
Councilmember Daysog stated he would like to gather information to move forward.
Expressed support and offered assistance: Robb Ratto, Friends of Alameda Theater.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft noted people go online to see what is playing.
Councilmember Daysog stated he would like the marquee lighting to coincide with the
th
10 Anniversary of the Theater.
Mayor Spencer stated research could be done on the side without putting more work on
the Assistant City Manager.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft questioned why the City would have to be involved at all.
Mayor Spencer responded staff could talk to Alameda Municipal Power.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he understands the concerns about staff time; there
is no timeframe and he would just like to get the ball rolling.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
16
April 7, 2015
The City Manager stated staff is very lean and the matter would not be a priority.
Councilmember Daysog moved approval of his referral.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by the following vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Daysog, Oddie, and Mayor Spencer – 3. Noes: Councilmembers
Ezzy Ashcraft and Matarrese - 2.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(15-236) Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft announced that she attended the League of
California Cities East Bay Division meeting, which addressed public safety.
(15-237) Councilmember Oddie announced that he was a judge at Bay Farm School’s
Natural History Day and spoke at the opening of exhibits at the Alameda Main Library.
(15-238) Councilmember Daysog requested the status on the Lincoln Avenue road work
and announced that he will be attending the League of California policy meeting in
Ontario on Thursday.
(15-239) Mayor Spencer announced that she was a judge for the Season of Non
Violence speeches and attended the Rent Review Advisory Committee meetings.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 1:08 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
17
April 7, 2015