2006-12-05 5-A Power PointAppeal of
ajor Design Review DRO6-002
3292 Washington Street
Power Point Presentation
At the 12 -5 -06 Council Meeting
Re: Agenda Item #5 -A
Project Proposal
• Second Story Addition
and Remodel
• 1,350 Square Feet
• R -1 Zoning District
• Complies with all
Zoning Standards and
Requirements
• Requires Design
Review
Existing Condition
BA
2 tap
jEl BEDROOM *1 (E) BEDROOM *2
E BREAKFAST
-1 /
.1 rE:-
ri
IL) BEDROOM *3
II
21 GARAGE
fEl DINING ARE*,
117.1.,376
jEl LIVING ROOM
® EXISTING/DEMO FLOOR PLAN
1
11.0AC,S SWA.111
co
SITE PLAN
it■
PROJECT DATA
CATER AMU WOK
,,R0lEC7ACCRE. 9,92 rt115.0.10fa MEE,
awavok
5t1.9.AC1(5: FRO, AM REAR
z.TZET SCE
30 Wk.
WASHINGTON
6.5
LOT SUE .3% 3349 SQ. Fr
COVEIASEALLIXAlIt 24% 1542 SQ.
mtra...:no.oser,
U3
0Z4 fl
r.ARE R7CMCE: IMO SQ. ,
Ata°146 016., ,oaa
so,rte (CCM.
:44:27,7:
W 14 DESIGN
A
• -
Elevations Existing
W H DESIGN
I `,1 IL,T. SIX I, 1.111,
0
0
.LAIF
AS xOn
8
•
Floor Plans* Proposed
6.10.11%.14e.A.
+•• •
MMMMM
ONIMIP;..w I N .EMm M1.M1.M 1
y"11-1* '
e
.MMM•MMM 111111.
tffiMINIIM17::.:71•1•111•M0
11111•1IN :; imumm7a
11
i 1 Min
41 IMMO= OW=
01111=
II =IP -Alikumn.
mink=
1
1
PROPOSED FIRST r_OOR LF
w
0
Elevations: Proposed
® PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
PI. IMMO,
W14 DESIGN
1.110, ‘11111, 010+ .1.
w
U)
w
•
.0■10
C:s1t1,1,
Proposed Elevation:
Neighbor's Side
-P,17
M MOM
.omMOIMmMMalm-
M M
..m1 MM.= MOMMIMMMoma..
MI MO MO MOM MOM OM MOM-
MOM OM MI
MI= MINIM OMMMOM
OM MI MEM =MUM! M11■■li
.a• NIM RIO MIN ===1•111= MMI n.
•IM MIA••• •=110M ■IIMM INN MI ■MINIIIM ■■• -
IMIIMIMIMMINNIMANIMINI MN ■IM1 IMNIMI M..
G PG' SIG 2,L
=MEM MIMI= NI
MI OM
MIMMIMMMIMMMIIMIM
-.a "■=min MINIM M MM. ME MMIIIIMM M MIIIMI --MUM M M MO MI
OM MI MI IMM M IM MO IMO IM MN MOM IMI I■1 NM =O l■ ■ NM ■ IMMIIMANN ■ 1■11■1 MEM
/NM= NE Ma NM MI NM= =MOM •■■■ il M 1.•••== MO ■ ==.1a=1= MOM = I
■•••■■■•■•”1111.1=IMINNIIIMI..AMIMMIIMIIIM■IMINNM■1■=11•1•1■■■•••1=1■111.1
....M.N.= MII MI MN =NIMENI■ MEM Mi MI MN ME _MEN MN =I MII___IME ON MUMI1
-A= MI ■ =UM ME ■ ■I MN M. ■ =I •••■■••■•■■■M■■=1CM MINN= M•MNIM.■ MI Wm ■■•■••
. mo mo m m mom am mm nom m m mm mo m am m m =mom m om m ma am m m m mom m m moo nom m mm
-MMOMMM MIMI= M MINIM MMIMMIIIMImmmomoMM MIIIIIMM MMIIMIIIMMIMMEMMEM MI
r
, •
• , • 1 • •
; •-•:.•"•• -• • , • • . ,
111
NNE
Fp.
il
II •
:111 IIJI
EJ• IUUU
MOM= MIMI=
%.4.11
MOM MIMIM
rMITatitlgrAZITM" 0MTA OrlirM—n
MOMMIOMMOMMMMMMIMIMMOMMOIMM
IMIM M MM MIMM MEM MEMO
MOM MM MOM MMMMMM
PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION
0 PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
Application History
January 2006: Application Submitted.
March 2006: Design Review Approved.
May 2006: Planning Board Review — Application Continued:
- Direction to work with neighbors
- Direction to further modify design to reduce shade impacts
September 2006: Planning Board Review — Application Continued:
- Direction to make further specific, minor modifications to reduce
shadow.
October 9, 2006: Planning Board Approved Application.
October Appeal Filed
Basi
The Project is NOT:
• Compatible with its site, adjacent neighboring
buildings and its surroundings.
• Will be detrimental to existing property values
or the growth of the property values in the
vicinity of the project
• Consistent with the principles and standards of
the City of Alameda Design Review Guidelines.
Neighborhood Character
Design Compatibility
a
.
.....ititteX4W Afilliikilhib lora
-11..iiassarw 1111111111111111111111""ii"ffilb
lthi
lailatil '■■•..--, . . 1
1111.11
an
1111 MIER
.11414 454
atsfsigutfoRriti ELEMAMI
PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
'07e" tit"
Detriment:
Neighbor's Side Elevation
141111111111` rolr
iiarairraizi•ti•iiR•rr•i mezzarz
suriteirtAtimiii
a1fIj1rI�1yIi
irr°"r�za :rr+ w•' S"' lmimdL'$ *'Si"'L""1•.La'.Ll"'.i:Iiwi•L•. ..00...u._
arGwcirtierR'" a r1°+ ileri°"irruram
Crlr •ir"`r'"'L'�wlL•''''iro'mz "�"rlll�� ra
t
gerizarcavezzazzeozza
ym
611 7 M WZWi. Z° • TIT#
a r, • g• r • • • a t m
Isw— •#•• i -r�ui:•IraIA • I I TAR= • MAO tr-- �1IirIl ai�
%•'"r•rlr1'101{1"•113•w' I•roalIll%
Nli
11a11•t. rtlH•1•t111aa11111rtartlMlMlMIMIlM 11111i1#11111miM114
1
Nom
mum
1
PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION
PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
are iu _ r -Q
• SEPT. 30, 10:00 AM
Dec. 5, 11:30 AM,
ResidentiaL Design
Guidelines
Second Story - should:
• Be well integrated
• Not "loom" over street or neighbors
Located to minimize loss of privacy
• Minimize verticality
• Form and Mass should relate to neighborhood
Page 17 and 18 (Guidelines for Non - historic
Buildings)
That the City Council uphold the Planning
Board's Approval of the Design Review
Application finding that the project is:
• Is compatible with its site, adjacent neighboring
buildings and its surroundings.
• Will not be detrimental to existing property values
or the growth of the property values in the vicinity
of the project
• Is consistent with the principles and standards of
the City of Alameda Design Review Guidelines.