2021-05-18 Regular CC Minutes
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 18, 2021 1
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY- -MAY 18, 2021- -7:00 P.M.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 7:05 p.m. Councilmember Daysog led
the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Herrera Spencer, Knox
White, Vella, and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft – 5. [Note:
The meeting was conducted via Zoom]
Absent: None.
AGENDA CHANGES
None.
PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
(21-333) Proclamation Declaring the Month of May 2021 as Older Americans Month.
(21-334) Proclamation Declaring the Month of May 2021 as Asian Pacific Heritage
Month.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Herrera Spencer requested the ambulance purchase [paragraph no.
21-338] be removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion and noted she would
vote no on the Franchise Agreement [paragraph no. 21-343].
Councilmember Knox White noted that he will vote no on the Fernside pathways
[paragraph no. 21-341].
Councilmember Daysog noted he would vote no on the Franchise Agreement.
Stated that she would like to know the timeline for pursuing lower emission alternatives
for fleet vehicles; questioned whether the City should lump together the budget for
related matters under the Alameda Police Department (APD) until the armored vehicle
is sold per a previous Council recommendation: Ashley Lorden, Alameda.
Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Ayes; Knox White: Aye; Vella:
Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 18, 2021 2
indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.]
(*21-335) Minutes of the Special Meeting, the Special Joint City Council and Successor
Agency to the Community Improvement Commission and the Regular City Council
Meeting Held on April 20, 2021. Approved.
(*21-336) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,197,536.94.
(*21-337) Recommendation to Approve the Execution of a Reciprocal Tax Information
Sharing Agreement between the City of Alameda and the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) of
the State of California. Accepted.
(21-338) Recommendation to Authorize the Purchase of an Ambulance Consistent with
Revised Vehicle Replacement Policy in an Amount Not to Exceed $311,598 from
Leader Emergency Vehicles, REV Group.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer requested staff to share a brief summary.
The Public Works Fleet Supervisor stated the replacement ambulance was approved in
the previous two year budget cycle; the ambulance meets the replacement criteria set
forth in the replacement documentation by the City.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired how many ambulances the City currentl y has
and the need for replacement.
The Public Works Fleet Supervisor responded the need for the replacement is to keep
Fire Department vehicles in reserve status as outlined in the vehicle replacement
criteria; stated both frontline and reserve units are maintained to facilitate vehicle repairs
and service without a drop in the service; the vehicle cited for replacement will move
into a reserve status.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer requested clarification about the clean vehicle
technology mentioned in public comment.
The Public Works Fleet Supervisor stated the vehicle will meet or exceed all modern
diesel emission standards, is clean diesel and is equipped with a Select Catalyst
Reduction (SCR) and Diesel Exhaust Fluid (DEF) which injects -re catalyst and allows
for cleaner emissions per State requirements.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether there are electric vehicle options for
ambulances.
The Public Works Fleet Supervisor responded the proposed vehicle is the best the City
can do under the current platform; stated staff is watching market trends and is hopeful
for a transition to an electric fleet as soon as vehicles are available with the additional
needs for life saving duties; the battery life is not yet sufficient for the type o f vehicle;
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 18, 2021 3
additional vehicles will be coming to market aimed at transitioning first responders out of
liquid fueled vehicles into electric.
The Public Works Director stated the City has three operational units and two units in
the active reserve status; the replacement unit will bump one of the operational units to
an active reserve status.
The City Manager stated the next budget include s a fourth ambulance per prior Council
approval; however, due to the pandemic, staff has delayed the implementation f or one
year.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Ayes; Knox White: Aye; Vell a:
Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
(*21-339) Recommendation to Authorize the Purchase of Twelve Vehicles Consistent
with Revised Vehicle Replacement Policy in Amounts Not to Exceed $118,098 from
Cromer Material Handling for Three Forklifts, $465,873 from Downtown Ford Sales and
$96,815 from Elk Grove Auto Group/Winner Chevrolet for Nine Light and Medium Duty
Trucks. Accepted.
(*21-340) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Second
Amendment to Agreement with Douglas Herring & Associates to Increase
Compensation by $40,000, for a Total Aggregate Compensation Not to Exceed
$220,000, to Complete the Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan 2040
Update. Accepted.
(*21-341) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute the
Relinquishment of Rights, Imposition of Restrictions and Reservations of Rights for the
Pathway Located between 3335 and 3341 Fernside Boulevard. Accepted.
[Note: Councilmember Knox White recorded a no vote on this item, which carried by th e
following vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Ayes; Knox White: No;
Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1.]
(*21-342) Resolution No. 15773, “Declaring Results of Special Election in Community
Facilities District No. 17-1 (Alameda Point Public Services District), Determining that
Alteration of the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Taxes for the District is
Lawfully Authorized, and Directing Recording of an Amendment to Notice of Special Tax
Lien.” Adopted.
(*21-343) Ordinance No. 3299, “Approving the Franchise Agreement between the City
of Alameda and Alameda County Industries AR, Inc.” Finally passed.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 18, 2021 4
[Note: Councilmembers Daysog and Herrera Spencer recorded no votes on this item,
which carried by the following vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: No;
Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 3. Noes: 2.]
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(21-344) Resolution No. 15774, “Appointing John Kim as a Member of the Golf
Commission.” Adopted; and
(21-344 A) Resolution No. 15775, “Appointing Kaiwin Su as a Members of the Golf
Commission.” Adopted.
Councilmember Knox White moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella:
Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
Mr. Kim made brief comments.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office.
(21-345) Resolution No. 15776, “Containing Findings of Local Climatic, Geological and
Topographical Conditions as Required to Adopt Alameda Local Amendments to the
2019 California Energy Code and Rescinding Resolution 15607 Limiting Natural Gas
Infrastructure for New Residential Construction on City Owned Property.” Adopted; and
(21-345A) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by
Amending Article I (Uniform Codes Relating to Building, Housing and Technical Codes)
of Chapter XIII (Building and Housing) to Adopt Local Amendments to the 2019
California Energy Code to Require Newly Constructed Buildings to be All-Electric.
Introduced.
The Sustainability Manager gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the use of the term “equity” only
speaks to the cost of the building or whether the term includes use of the building over
time in comparing the cost of electricity versus natural gas for heating.
The Sustainability Manager responded staff has found the cost of utility bills for
residents will decrease with the use of electric versus electric and natural gas.
Farhad Farahmand, TRC Companies stated Alameda Municipal Power’s (AMP) rates
were reviewed; in Alameda the proposal would save on residential building upfront
construction costs and the ongoing bill costs would also reduce compared to a mixed
utility.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 18, 2021 5
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the cost is less to heat a house with
electricity versus natural gas without looking at building costs.
Mr. Farahmand responded in the affirmative; stated simulations were conducted for the
climate zone and hourly energy consumption through the model of AMP utility rates;
there would be an on bill increase for Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E); the reduction in
rates is predominately due to heat technologies operating at high efficiency.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether AMP is planning to keep lower rates
as the demand for electrification grows.
The AMP General Manager responded staff performs an in-depth analysis each year to
forecast rates; stated the Public Utilities Board (PUB) adopts a load forecast; the PUB
adopted a zero percent rate increase for the current and next fiscal year; staff expects
the rates for PG&E to widen; based on the ten-year forecast, a modest rate increase in
the range of 2% is anticipated; AMP is currently fully resourced and anticipates
purchasing more carbon-free energy; as AMP adds additional loads through building
electrifications or Electric Vehicles (EV) more revenue is produced , which puts
downward pressure on rates.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer outlined a previous power blackout; stated that she
recalls being asked to prepare for multiple rolling blackouts; she does not support a long
term plan which includes rolling blackouts; inquired whether there is a commitment that
blackouts will not be experienced.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested clarification about the rolling blackouts experienced in
the past year.
The AMP General Manager responded a variety of events occurred in August 2020;
stated rolling blackouts were unprecedented; as a utility, AMP is obligated to participate;
outlined the plan provided to and by AMP for service circuits; the blackout instance was
about an hour in duration which resulted in one circuit being dropped for a time; s tated
another incident was due to a substation being hit by lightning causing a large outage;
staff has brought the matter forth to the PUB for protocol and communication review; the
situations outlined are out of the hands of AMP; staff is looking at ways to have local
generation; AMP has limited capability; another way is to harden the system and limit
any potential impacts from outages; generally, the outage statistics are good; customers
typically do not experience many outages on average; staff is hope ful the number of
rolling blackouts will reduce; there is a risk that blackouts will happen again in the
current year.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether AMP will be able to keep up with the
increased demand and if the increase will not contribute to rolling blackouts.
The AMP General Manager responded electrification matters taken in totality will put
pressure on the system; stated the implementation and capacity issues will not take
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 18, 2021 6
place for the next 10 to 20 years; there are options for dealing with the issues; starting
in July, EV owners are encouraged to charge at different times; many tools will be
available to staff and mitigating effects will be possible by encouraging and incentivizing
customers to move usage to different time perio ds; the issue will not arise for quite
some time, if ever.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the time of use rate had been
factored into the calculation for heating a home with electricity versus natural gas.
Mr. Farahmand responded in the negative; stated the current rates and tier structure
were used.
The AMP General Manager stated the time of use rate is currently only for EV owners;
staff has conducted preliminary discussions about expansion and building electrification
scenarios; there will be a large benefit for EV owners and incentivizes owners not to
charge between 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired where AMP currently gets it power.
The AMP General Manager responded AMP is 100% carbon-free; stated the bulk
comes from a geothermal facility in Lake County, a share of hydroelectric facilities
operated by the Northern California Power Agency, an allocation of Federal hydropower
and three to four wind and landfill gas contracts.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether any of the power is coal-produced,
to which the AMP General Manager responded in the negative.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether there is anticipation for electricity to
come from a coal source.
The AMP General Manager responded in the negative; stated staff is looking at
additional resources; all are renewable sources.
Expressed support; stated AMP has provided the City with 100% clean energy and
provides residents with leadership in joining communities around California to ask for all
electric in new construction; she anticipates future discussions on other ways to reduce
carbon emissions from building stocks: Ruth Abbe, Community Action for Sustainable
Alameda (CASA).
Expressed support; outlined a recent panel about electrification; stated the feedback
from many Alamedans included wanting weatherization of existing homes and installing
EV car chargers; urged Council to consider targeted and strong steps toward
weatherized buildings, an increase in community outreach, education for new
technologies and incentives for renters: Ingrid Ballmann, CASA.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 18, 2021 7
Outlined a recent panel on electrification; stated not many speakers wanted to address
renters at the onset of the panel; renters account for more than half of Alameda
residents and electric use; if the City wishes to meet its carbon targets, the issues must
be addressed; weatherization is a big topic; urged having an equity and inclusion
program and electrification being the way to reach out to communities; stated there is a
problem with the rate structure; a change is needed; the structure is not equitable;
urged Council to keep equity in mind and push the PUB to put rates out soon: William
Smith, League of Women Voters.
Expressed support for the electrification of homes, weatherization, and increasing
incentives for EV charging in multi-unit buildings; stated the issue is ongoing due to the
need for electrical updating; a push for EV must be made; electrification affordability
needs to be for all: Jeanne Lahaie, Alameda.
Expressed support; questioned whether the carve-out language for Accessory Dwelling
Units (ADUs) could be changed to allow for attached ADUs to get the exception versus
detached units; stated there have been discussions related to removing parking
minimums; if parking minimums are kept, the City should provide EV charging as part of
the parking plan: Zac Bowling, Alameda.
Questioned the reason ADUs were not included and what would restrict ADUs from
being all-electric: Carmen Reid, Alameda.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she recollected a heatwave occurring
during the rolling blackouts; inquired whether calculations are based on 68 degree
weather; noted the calculations may not include information for a heatwave; stated the
calculations may not include projected increases in temperature.
Mr. Farahmand responded simulations are performed using typical meteorological year
weather files; the weather files are required by the California Energy Commission to
demonstrate performance for the building; the files are being updated to model future
impacts of climate change; the models recently run are from the past 20 years; the
ordinance allows electrification for heating uses; during hot times, the primary load is for
air conditioning, which drives brownouts; during winter, the electrified heating uses are
going to be working hardest and will have the largest impact on the grid; the
transmission distribution systems are typically sized for air conditioning loads, not winter
time loads; staff understands the result will be an increase in winter time peaks, not
similar to the summertime peaks.
The AMP General Manager stated the grid in California has been designed to
accommodate the air conditioning load; Alameda has historically been in a different
situation and peaks in the winter time; winter yields more lighting usage, which can
cause a higher impact; the grid size will not cause an issue; AMP has structured the
system to accommodate the load.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 18, 2021 8
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the rolling blackouts occurred during
summertime; use of air conditioners is increased during the summer; expressed
concern about blackouts; stated blackouts place people in harm ’s way; she does not
feel safe in her home with the lights out indefinitely; expressed support fo r ensuring the
City is getting ahead, for using electricity and converting; expressed concern about
doing so much that the demand increase will be beyond capability and cause blackouts;
expressed support for an assurance of no blackouts.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated part of the ordinance is inspiring; she is proud of the work;
the ordinance is a way to directly reduce greenhouse gas emissions produced by
buildings; greenhouse gas emissions contribute to global warming and lead to extreme
climate events, which cause rolling blackouts across the State; the situation is complex;
however, the solution is clear.
The AMP General Manager stated the rolling blackouts were a Statewide issue; there
have been unprecedented heatwaves; the State relies on neighboring s tates to help in
said situations; intense shortages and loss of generation create blackout situations;
AMP does not have control over the blackouts; however, AMP does have control over
what is happening in Alameda; Alameda is fully sourced and will not ha ve a power
deficiency for another four to five years; AMP is currently planning how to fill the need
and is looking to distribution centers for hardening and increasing capability in order to
accommodate electrification; alternatives in technology are also being looked at to help
mitigate impacts; accommodating the proposed matter is not a problem for AMP; rolling
blackouts could occur; however, AMP has done its part in order to ensure there are
enough resources to keep the lights on; AMP does not have cont rol over what happens
at the State level.
Councilmember Knox W hite moved approval of the staff recommendation [including
adoption of the resolution and introduction of the ordinance ].
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1.
(21-346) Resolution No. 15777, “Declaring Five Project Sites at Alameda Point,
including the Enterprise District, Residential Parcels Both Market Rate and
Collaborative (Package K), Building 92, Building 11 and Building 19, and Building 25
Exempt from the Surplus Land Act and Authorize the City Manager to Comply with
Surplus Lands Act Procedures Related to the Properties Notwithstanding Their Exempt
Status.” Adopted.
The Community Development Director gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether anything would prevent the City from
extending the boundaries to the Enterprise District further south to West Hornet Avenue;
stated extending the border seems natural.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 18, 2021 9
The Assistant Community Development Director responded nothing prevents the City
from extending the boundary; stated staff strategically omitted the southern parcels due
to the high desirability of waterfront parcels; staff wanted to prevent people from cherry -
picking and selecting the parcels without landlocked areas being developed; the
Request for Proposals (RFP) for the Enterprise District did not include the southern
parcels for the reason mentioned; staff wanted to ensure the landlocked parcels
received the attention deserved before the desired waterfront parcels are added.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he would like to exclude the southern area from the
State Lands process in order to put the City in the driver’s seat.
The Assistant Community Development Director stated the decision lies with Council;
staff is recommending Council decide whether to go through the surplus process; if
Council wishes to include the parcels, the City would not necessarily be in the driver’s
seat; if Council decides the parcels are exempt, due to already going through a surplus
process on a federal level, then the City is more in the driver’s seat.
Councilmember Daysog stated the area should be exempt; Council is being asked to
include or to exempt; expressed support for exemption.
The Assistant Community Development Director stated the approach makes sense ;
however, staff is not seeking approval for the southern area; the Enterprise District area
stops further north; if Council decides to move forward with the exemption, Council may
decide to include the southern parcels.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed concern about the matter not being included on the
agenda; requested clarification from the City Attorney about parcels not included in the
proposed matter.
The City Attorney stated the area discussed is not presented in the staff report;
recommended Council only give very brief direction for the matter to return for future
discussion.
The Community Development Director stated the parcels have not been included for
Council discussion; staff intends to bring future parcels before Council for potential
surplus or exemption.
Councilmember Knox White stated the Enterprise District has not be on an agenda in
quite a while; different staff presented last time; Council should have a conversation
about how to move forward in closed session first, then open session to follow; his
recollection includes Council having unresolved questions at the time; noted some of
the upcoming issues have been presented by Councilmember Daysog’s inquiries.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer requested the first resolution be clarified; inquired
whether Council is being asked to declare that the properties exempt from the Surplus
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 18, 2021 10
Lands Act and the City is going to proceed with the Surplus Lands Act procedures.
The Community Development Director responded the comments are correct; stated the
option is a cautious approach; modification to the statute about how the exemptions
may be applied is new and untested; other cities are taking a position that the land is
exempt; staff feels as though the approach is risky and risk should be avoided; staff
recommends taking a cautious approach.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed support for the approach.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved adoption of the resolution exempting the
properties from the Surplus Land Act and authorizing the City Manager to comply with
Surplus Lands Act for the properties listed.
Councilmember Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella:
Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
(21-347) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Second Amendment to the Lease with
Greenway Golf Associates, Inc., a California Corporation, for Chuck Corica Golf
Complex to Adjust Lease Area to Include the Old Fire Training Tower. Introduced.
The Recreation and Park Director gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed concern about the lack of hold harmless language;
inquired how the City would be protected if an injury incident occurs during demolition or
renovation; stated that she is used to seeing a hold harmless clause in agreements.
The City Attorney responded Section 12.4 of the original lease states the tenant shall
indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the City and its employees arising from
essentially the tenants use, occupation and enjoyment of the premises; stated the lease
extends the premises; therefore, the protection applies to the proposed amendment; the
amendment fits into the principal indemnification.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated Greenway Golf will pay for any work completed; inquired
whether there is a way to incorporate the hold harmless clause by reference within the
amendment.
The Chief Assistant City Attorney responded staff can include such language if Council
directs as such; stated the hold harmless provision in the original lease carries forward.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would feel better having the language referenced.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated Greenway Golf will receive storage space;
inquired the size of the storage space.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 18, 2021 11
The Recreation and Parks Director responded the entire area included in the
amendment is approximately half an acre; stated the area includes the tower and
surrounding space; the storage area referenced currently has heavy machinery and
piles; the materials are for construction, including equipment staging for a Public Works
Department project; a clause within the agreement allows the materials to stay through
August 30th when the Public Works Department project will be completed.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she would like to know the size of the
storage area; Greenway Golf will have more area than just the tower at no additional
cost, which is important to be clear about; there is a demand for storage space in
Alameda; she has not seen a cost for the murals versus the value of the land; typically,
when a tenant receives additional land, more is paid; ; expressed support for an
equation subtracting the value of the additional land , ; stated the City’s property is not a
gift to Greenway Golf.
The Recreation and Parks Director stated that she does not have a definitive cost for
the improvements or the land; she estimates improvements costs could easily be
$100,000 or more; the cost depends on what is found with the structure ; there could be
hazardous materials and abatement; the cost could easily be close to $100,000 to
$200,000; the entire half acre area includes the storage space.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested clarification of the improvement costs; stated how
Greenway Golf will treat the land is not known.
The Recreation and Parks Director stated the rough estimate includes hazardous
abatement and testing; the mural will need components taken from a contractor; the
landscaping is planned for the surrounding concreate area; there will be a cost for the
contractor to remove concrete and fencing and costs for re-landscaping; the costs add
up.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether Greenway Golf will continue to maintain the
landscaping for the duration of the lease.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded in the affirmative; stated the amendment
adds current lease requirements for the area; the language does not exclude a storage
use; however, the use is not intended; Greenway Golf’s intention is to beautify and
landscape the space.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired how many years are left on th e lease, to
which the Recreation and Parks Director responded approximately 41 years.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether Greenway Gol f will be paying
additional money for the space.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded the existing le ase structure is not based
on a square footage formula; Greenway Golf pays a flat fee of $175,000 per year; the
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 18, 2021 12
fee increases January 2023 to $300,000 or 8% of gross revenue; lease of this type are
generally based on gross revenue rather than square footage.
In response to Vice Mayor Vella’s inquiry about the timeline, the Recreation and Parks
Director stated the addition would fold into the same lease term of 40 years.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the amount could be significantly less than
estimated range of $100,000 to $200,000; inquired whether there is documentation to
support the estimated figures.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded in the negative; stated the figures could
be less or significantly more if hazardous abatement be required; $100,000 is not high
based on the many park construction projects completed over her nine year tenure;
park projects cost more than often thought.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated if the cost are closer to $200,000, the cost
would be $400 per month for storage space over the 40 year lease; expressed support
for having more numbers to ensure Council is not giving away the City’s property.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated there can be consideration if Council desires to specify the
area not be used for storage.
Stated that he is reaffirming the commitment to refurbishment and restoration of the ire
tower; there is a commitment to beautify the space whether or not the tower remains
standing; the space will not be used for storage ; the project is about beautification and
adding a focal point to the entrance of the Golf Course and for homeowners in the area;
Greenway Golf is excited to take the opportunity to undertake the work ; there has been
enthusiastic feedback from the Alameda Fire Department (AFD), homeowners and golf
patrons; there has been positive feedback from the community generally; the project will
be expensive, especially if abatement is needed; the City has been open about the
unknown condition of the building: Umesh Patel, Greenway Golf.
Acknowledged the partnership between Greenway Golf and the City; stated the
partnership has improved the focal point and speaks to the intention of continuing to
bring joy to the community and visitors; the space is currently not being used to
capacity; turning the space into a nice piece of land far outweighs the value of storage;
Greenway Golf will deliver quality to any project: Patrick Harris.
Expressed concern about the upcoming Housing Element; urged Council consider the
possibility of the space being used for potential housing; stated the City will be in a
pinch to find available space; the proposed area could serve as an equitable housing
function: Zac Bowling, Alameda.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft outlined a portion of Exhibit 1, page 2; stated her primary concern
for the fire tower structural safety; she would like to required licensed California
professional engineers evaluate the condition of the tower; expressed support for
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 18, 2021 13
making the exhibit more equitable between the City and Greenway Golf; stated th at she
would find the terms to be more balanced by adding: “if tenant and the City jointly
determine that both demolition and renovation of the fire tower are infeasible,….;” the
area is City property; the City should have a say in decisions made; expresse d support
for including language in the amendment stating the property shall not be used for any
type of storage during the lease.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether permission is given to demolish or whether
the Council has to provide support if Greenway Golf determines demolition is feasible.
The Recreation and Parks Director stated the intent is to have consultation with the City;
the language can be strengthened to include that the City will have final say on whether
or not the tower is demolished.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether there is a reason the City cannot
continue to use the storage space.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded the intention is to beautify the space;
stated having large and heavy equipment is not cond ucive to a nice visual entry to the
Golf Course; Greenway Golf intends to landscape the area.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the current blacktop area will be
demolished for landscaping, to which the Recreation and Parks Director responded in
the affirmative.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated there is already a nice area at the Golf Course
approach; it is unknown whether the proposed area needs to be pulled up and
beautified; the tower should be beautified; however, the storage area in the back may
not need to be converted to more beautification and landscaping.
The Recreation and Parks Director stated any landscape, tower and mural plans will
have to go through the Golf Commission and Planning Board; the improvements are in
consultation with the City.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the City currently uses the storage area and
may need to use the space in the future; inquired whether there is a way to add panels
or fabric to conceal the storage area to aid beautification of the space; expressed
support for keeping the area available for alternative use; stated the City has historically
stored items in the proposed space for projects on Bay Farm; expressed support for the
City keeping the area if Greenway Golf does not need the space.
The Recreation and Parks Director stated there are a couple options for storage and
staging; there is a location across the street that will continue to be under the
responsibility of the City where cars parked and construction material and equipment is
stored; staff can work with Greenway Golf to stage items in the parking lot if needed;
busses have been staged in the location during summer.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 18, 2021 14
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated if possible, she would like Council to be more
involved in the process versus handing off the matter; Council may want to keep more
of the proposed area; she is unsure whether the area needs to be given to Greenway
Golf; the City has needs and use for the proposed area.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the needs for th e area are in reference to
housing.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer responded that she will not specify the needs ; stated
the space has been used for storage; she is not opposed to considering housing for the
space; there is sufficient area; the size of th e storage area is unknown and was not
presented; expressed support for having a proposal return to Council depicting the
amount of space Greenway Golf needs.
Vice Mayor Vella expressed concern about the language as drafted; stated that she
would like language included to require testing of hazardous materials at the onset; the
results of testing need to be shown to the City; expressed support for more direction
relative to the testing process; stated the process currently seems vague; she has
concerns based on the type of structure; she would like to ensure there is a process for
the City to oversee testing and abatement; expressed concern about turning the
proposed area over for the duration of the lease; the parcel was originally left out of the
lease for a reason; she would like to have staff comment on the reason for passing the
area off to Greenway Golf at this time; inquired whether the reason is related to funding.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the amendment has not specified which entity should
perform the testing; noted Vice Mayor Vella’s involvement with the Lead Abatement
Board; stated Council needs to specify using a testing agency licensed in the State of
California.
Vice Mayor Vella expressed concern about the testing agency understanding which
portion of the building to test and the elements for which to test.
The Recreation and Parks Director stated the area was not originally included in the
lease because the then existing management of Greenway Golf did not want the parcel;
at the time, the City did not actively state there was a desire to keep the parcel; new
management is interested in beautifying the space , which has been discussed by the
Golf Commission numerous times over the years; expressed support for the approach
to the hazard abatement; stated staff can specify that only licensed California
professional engineers will evaluate the integrity and also specify Greenway Golf is
responsible for hazardous material testing by a licensed consultant; a licensed
contractor can be hired to do the abatement.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the results of testing will be shared with the City.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded in the affirmative; stated the language
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 18, 2021 15
can be combined with the addition of having both the City and Greenway Golf
determining demolition; within the original agreement, Greenway Golf is required to
comply with all County, State and federal regulations; there are strict guidelines and
reporting regulations; Greenway Golf will be required to report to the Alameda County
Environmental Health Agency or Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) in
relation to what is found from the fire tower abatement; staff can include an overall
reference in the original agreement and add specificity in the proposed am endment as
well.
Vice Mayor Vella stated that she would like to ensure there is transparency in the
testing results coming back to the City; expressed concern about having the City
handing off testing; stated that she would like to be aware of who is performing testing
and ensure reports are received; many projects do not test or do not test proper places;
proper testing is important and should be transparent in order for the City to understand
what hazards exist and to ensure proper abatement; inquired what happens to the
parcel if there is a need for housing in the next 50 years; inquired whether the City
would return to Greenway Golf to negotiate getting the parcel back.
The City Attorney responded the parcel is currently zoned park land; stated in or der for
the City to develop the space into housing, the City Charter requires action be taken;
the current provision leases the space to Greenway Golf for 40 years ; the City would
have to request the land back if it is needed; provisions can be built in subject to
negotiation between the Recreation and Parks Director and Greenway Golf for return of
the property if the City desires to build housing in the location.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she does not believe the property would be in the map
areas being looked at to meet the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA)
allocation.
Councilmember Knox White noted voter approval would be required; the area is not
currently being used as a park; inquired whether the parcel would be taken out of the
inventory if Council adds the area to the Golf Course.
***
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft called a recess at 9:02 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:1 8
p.m.
***
The City Attorney stated at this time, staff does not recommend an in depth analysis
about the possible protections which can be built into the lease amendment in order to
provide the ability to build housing if desired by Council; the discussion relates to lease
protections; some lease protections are allowable pending negotiations by the
Recreation and Parks Director.
The Recreation and Parks Director stated Greenway Golf agree s to a revision clause for
housing; Greenway will need to receive compensation from the City for any funds spent
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 18, 2021 16
on beautifying the area if the housing clause is enacted.
Vice Mayor Vella stated Council needs to give direction about potential language that
will return for approval; the language will matter.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the matter includes the introduction of an ordinance;
inquired whether the changes being made will require returning for introduction.
The City Attorney responded given the volume of changes being made, the matter will
need to return to Council for another first reading.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the input provided by Council thus far has been
sufficient and is able to be compiled by staff.
The Recreation and Parks Director stated Council wishes to: specify that the space is
not to be used for storage, require licensed California professional engineers to
evaluate the integrity of the tower, to specify that Greenway Golf is responsible for any
hazardous materials, testing, and will require a licensed consultant to test with a
contractor to abate, to comply with County Environmental Health and provide reports to
the City for review and approval of next steps, for Greenway Golf and the City to jointly
determine demolition and the inclusion of a revision clause for potential housing with
Greenway Golf receiving compensation from the City for any funds spent on
beautification of the space.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired the method for handling the hold harmless provision;
questioned whether the amendment will reference back to the original lease.
The Chief Assistant City Attorney responded staff can reiterate the language in the
amendment.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed support for the matter returning with
research related to the parcel being subject to the Charter as parkland.
The City Attorney stated staff will likely share the information confidentially and not in an
open session staff report.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the information will be relevant to the upcoming
discussion.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated a number of things may be needed for the parcel; inquired
the concern for the information being presented in open session.
The City Attorney responded the recommendation is to share legal information with
Council in a confidential memorandum about options for use of the property related to
housing; if Council wishes to publically share the information included in the memo,
Council may do so by a vote of three Councilmembers.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 18, 2021 17
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether staff will schedule the matter to return for Council
discussion.
The City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated staff will need some time to
analyze Charter Section 22-12; staff will need a few weeks to provide the confidential
memo.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for remaining cognizant of Greenway Golf’s
timeline and ensuring the City is causing unnecessary delay.
Councilmember Knox White stated that he is surprised to find out that Council would
need to vote in order to de-classify how the City views the parcel; it is odd to suggest
that whether or not parkland is public land is not disclosable; it is valid to discuss
disposal, strategies and negotiations in closed session; however, he expects to be open
with the people that own the land on the zoning.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated there may be other considerations for disclosing the
information by a confidential memo.
The City Attorney stated staff can prepare a short analysis for Council related to Charter
section 22-12 and the proposed property; he will defer to the Recreation and Parks
Director on when the entire matter can return to Council for discussion.
The Recreation and Parks Director stated staff can bring the matter back by the second
Council meeting in June.
In response to Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft’s inquiry, the City Attorney stated staff will provide
the memo to Council the first week of June.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he is concerned about anything regarding housing
in the area; there has been a history of concerns about housing in the area.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(21-348) The City Manager announced that the City plans on initiating bargaining
negotiations with the Alameda Police Officers Association, the Alameda Police
Management Association and the Alameda Fire Chiefs Association within 30 days ;
made an announcement regarding the next vaccine clinic; announced the appointment
Nishant Joshi as the next Police Chief.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(21-349) Clinton Tan, Alameda, stated that he is among the dozens of families that lost
the means to pay for rent as a result of Housing Authority policies in 2018 and 2019 ; he
is still trying to reach a just settlement; it is unethical for a public agency like the
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 18, 2021 18
Housing Authority to levy debt against low-income families with no calculation provided
and to allege misconduct against the same low-income families through biased internal
administrative hearings, increasing the housing insecure and homeless population.
(21-350) Zac Bowling, Alameda, discussed Assembly Bill (AB) 672 which allows for
housing on golf courses.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
(21-351) Consider Scheduling a Performance Evaluation for the City Man ager as Soon
as Possible. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer)
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the item does not need to be heard; however,
will remain on the agenda until the evaluation has been completed .
(21-352) Consider Addressing the Surplus Lands Act, including Lobbying Efforts and
Assembly Bill 1486. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer)
Councilmember Herrera Spencer gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of having the matter return for
Council discussion.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Knox White stated that he will be voting no since
Council already discussed the matter.
On the call for the question, the motion failed by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: No; Vella: No; and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: No. Ayes: 2. Noes: 3.
(21-353) Consider Directing Staff to Place the Audit Report Approved April 20, 2021 on
a Future Agenda to Allow the City Auditor to Give a Presentation. (Councilmember
Herrera Spencer).
Councilmember Herrera Spencer gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of directing staff to place the matter
back on the agenda and allow for comments from the City Auditor .
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the reason she originally voted against
allowing additional speaking time to the City Auditor was due to yelling on multiple
occasions; recommended that comments be worked out ahead of time and not to yell at
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 18, 2021 19
the conductor of the meeting.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the audit disclosed significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses for two years; it is important to allow the City Auditor to coordinate
with the City Manager and have time on the agenda to speak to the public.
Councilmember Knox White inquired whether the motion is to have the City Auditor
return to speak for five minutes; noted the material deficiencies were provided in a letter
drafted by staff and the auditors performing the audit; questioned whether Council is
directing staff to work on the matter.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she is not requesting staff to work on the
matter; her understanding is that the City Auditor previously reached out to City staff
and was set aside time as a member of the public; noted the City Manager announced
that he would work with the City Auditor to allow for more than a two minute speaking
time; it is important for the elected City Auditor to speak to the public; a presentation is
allowed up to ten minutes.
Councilmember Knox White stated the audit on the Consent Calendar would make the
presentation five minutes in length; questioned whether the proposed motion is to have
the City Auditor provide a five minute presentation including comments on the staff
work.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated discussion at a previous meeting included
allowing for the presentation to be on the public side; the five minute rule is newly
adopted by Council; the City Auditor was not previously limited to five minutes and was
given time to present; expressed support for treating the City Auditor’s presentation as
other presentations and up to ten minutes be provided.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the intention is to bypass the current Council Rules
of Order and revert to previous Council Rules of Order which are no longer in effect.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the matter is looking forward to the upcoming
year’s audit process.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the City Manager announced that he would set
the audit as a Regular Agenda Item , not in defiance of Council Rules of Order, to allow
the City Auditor time to present.
The City Manager stated that he has indicated to the City Auditor that fut ure audit
presentations will be placed on agenda as a Regular Agenda Item; staff previously
paced the matter on the Consent Calendar; there had been internal confusion about
speaking time.
Councilmember Daysog stated that his interpretation of the motion is to invite the City
Auditor back to complete his report; two minutes of speaking time was not enough to
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 18, 2021 20
provide sufficient rendering and analysis of the audit.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer concurred with Councilmember Daysog’s
interpretation.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: No
Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether Council is setting the amount of time for the
presentation and whether the matter is being placed on the Regular Agenda to give the
City Auditor two minutes of speaking time.
Councilmember Knox White stated that he understood the direction to allo w for a ten
minute presentation; however, the City Auditor’s previous comments were almost
completed, which would mean ten minutes would not be needed; the City Auditor will
return to Council and complete his comments.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the matter will be placed on the agenda as a Regular
Agenda Item or a Consent Calendar Item.
Councilmember Knox White stated the matter is assumed to be placed as a Regular
Agenda Item.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated Councilmember Knox White’s rendition is
correct; the matter would be placed on the Regular Agenda and wil l be retroactive to
capture the previously presented audit.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether public comment would be closed and that the matter
is considered a continued agenda item or whether the matter will be considered new.
The City Attorney responded the matter brought forth will be placed on the Regular
Agenda and the public will have a right to comment.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether Council’s previous accept ance of the audit would be
undone.
The City Attorney responded the matter will be similar to bringing a presentation forth
for Council discussion, such as a presentation from the Historical Society; the
presentation will not have an impact on the audit and will simply be brought forth as a
presentation to Council.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed concern about setting a precedent.
The City Manager stated his previous recommendation was direction for the upcoming
2022 audit.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 18, 2021 21
The City Clerk noted the report will be titled as a presentation by the City Auditor and
kept simple with the audit report referenced; the presentation will be timed, with no
Council action.
Vice Mayor Vella stated that she would like to be clear that the recommendation is
strictly for a presentation with no Council action.
Councilmember Daysog stated the matter will only be a presentation; if the presentation
yields substantive information, the information will be addressed at a future Council
meeting.
The call for the question continued: Vice Mayor Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft:
Aye. Ayes: 5.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(21-354) Mayor’s Nominations for Appointment to the Housing Authority Board of
Commissioners and Social Service Human Relations Board. Not heard.
(21-355) Councilmember Daysog recommended a remembrance for fallen Alameda
Serviceman, Staff Sergeant Thomas “Tommy” Fogarty for the upcoming Memorial Day;
expressed support for starting the naming process in his memory.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft noted there is an annual tradition in Alameda at Veteran’s Park for
Memorial Day.
(21-356) Councilmember Herrera Spencer discussed the Memorial Day tradition at
Veteran’s Park; noted the USS Hornet may host a similar event; announced the
upcoming City Council Budget Workshop; discussed funding opportunities for outdoor
recreation; urged the public to advocate for desired funding topics; discussed a new
recycling area on Davis Street for composting; .
(21-357) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft discussed a trip taken with staff to San Jose to see
emergency modular housing being built; noted one site is on San Jose surplus l and and
the other site is on Caltrans property; discussed an Association of Bay Area
Governments (ABAG) regional planning committee meeting related to RHNA
allocations; announced a vaccine clinic event at Mastick Senior Center; stated Pfizer
vaccines have been approved for adolescents ages 12 and up ; older teens are getting
vaccinated; discussed a United Against Hate rally protesting incidents of violence and
aggression towards members of the Asian American and Pacific Island community;
noted the upcoming Council Budget Workshop will include Council discussion on
American Recovery Plan Act funds.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 10:11
p.m.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 18, 2021 22
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.