2022-12-20 Continued 2022-12-06 Regular CC Minutes 500Continued December 6, 2022 Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
December 20, 2022 1
MINUTES OF THE CONTINUED DECEMBER 6, 2022
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY- -DECEMBER 20, 2022- -5:00 P.M.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 5:10 p.m.
ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Herrera Spencer, Knox
White, Vella, and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft – 5. [Note:
The meeting was conducted via Zoom]
Absent: None.
CONTINUED REGULAR AGENDA ITEM
(22-793) Resolution No. 16017, “Adopting the Draft Active Transportation Plan. The City
previously certified a Final Environmental Impact Report for the Alameda General Plan
2040 Update. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and 15163, none of the
circumstances necessitating further CEQA review are present.” Adopted.
The Senior Transportation Coordinator gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated correspondence from staff was added with new
information showing annual data.
Councilmember Daysog expressed support for the information presented; inquired
whether desired actions pop out from survey respondents; noted the feeling of being
unsafe is keeping people from wanting to walk or ride bicycles more.
The Senior Transportation Coordinator responded the survey has a wealth of data and
can be found under one of the appendices; stated bicyclists desire to be separated from
cars, either vertically or with more space; reducing speeding and installing traffic control
devices are desired actions for pedestrians; crossing the street is a big issue for
pedestrians.
Expressed opposition to adoption of the proposed draft Active Transportation Plan
(ATP); stated the Plan fails to adequately address the needs of Spirits Alley; discussed
the state of Spirits Alley; expressed concern about overemphasis of bike lanes; urged
Council not to consider the matter due to improper noticing: Tod Hickman.
Stated BikeWalk Alameda is thrilled with the Plan; urged Council to adopt the Plan with
one consideration to close the short gap along 8th Street between Central Avenue and
Shoreline Drive; discussed the completion of Central Ave nue upgrades; expressed
support for community involvement and input on the Plan: Denyse Trepanier, BikeWalk
Alameda.
Continued November 15, 2022 Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
December 20, 2022 2
Stated a key step to ensure the Plan is implemented successfully is involving residents
in specific solutions employed in neighborhoods; the Plan has not vetted the
involvement process; urged Council and the City to ensure the Plan adopts clear
priorities and guidelines as to how neighborhood will be involved; expressed support for
community workshops; discussed local plan options: John Brennan, Alameda.
Stated that he is thrilled by the final draft ATP; there has been a long process with lots
of community input; a lot of work has gone into the P lan; expressed support for staff
outreach and events; stated the Plan will be great for Alameda over time; urged Council
to adopt the Plan: Zac Bowling, Alameda.
Urged Council not to adopt the draft ATP; stated one of the main goals of the Plan is to
reduce single occupancy trips across the Island and improve safety for alternative
transportation modes; she has not seen what fraction of total trips are actually muti-
passenger; carpooling is a key component; the Plan is not inclusive of all groups that
need to commute about the Island: Therese Hall.
Stated according to the appendix, most accidents are caused by the bicyclist; bicyclists
tend to not realize that they are seen as a vehicle in the eyes of the State; most people
do not read a drivers’ handbook until ready to drive a vehicle; fewer people are driving
cars and reading the handbook; discussed the lack of pedestrian safety updates on
Gibbons Drive and Fernside Boulevard: Jim Strehlow, Alameda.
Discussed disability access to her in-law’s home; urged Council not to implement any
Plan that takes away the ability for disabled elderly people to en ter their home; stated it
is important for kids to have a safe way to ride bicycles and walk; urged the City to
assign more Police enforcement of running stop signs; stated crossing Grand Street is
dangerous: Hazel Archer, Alameda.
Urged Council to postpone voting on the draft ATP; questioned whether there have only
been three community meetings since 2019; expressed concern over workshops being
held with only like-minded people and the process being exclusionary; stated that she
would like to see statistics on the aging and disabled population; discussed bicyclists
being at-fault in most accidents: Margaret Hall.
Stated the Plan is fantastic overall; urged the City to ensure the project is sufficiently
funded to perform as planned: Cyndy Johnsen, BikeWalk Alameda.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated some speakers indicated there has been no outreach to
seniors and individuals with disabilities; inquired whether the indication is correct.
The Senior Transportation Coordinator responded staff held 50 meetings over three
major outreach periods in three years; stated the meetings included open houses at
Mastick Senior Center; there was a mailing list for reaching out to disabled
organizations and homeless populations, as well as a community advisory group; staff
worked with Mastick to get a representative on the community advisory group ; staff
Continued December 6, 2022 Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
December 20, 2022 3
brought the matter to the Commission on Persons with Disabilities (CPD) twice ; the
community advisory group included a person with disabilities.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer encouraged people to look at the correspondence
staff added; stated the information includes data over time; it is important to look at the
data, which does not show an improvement; there were two deaths in 2022; the
average annual deaths over 14 years is two; the amount of severely injured for 2022 is
15; the average annual severely injured over 14 years is 8.8; her focus is on the deaths
and severely injured; the numbers for injuries are inconsistent; not everyone calls into
the Police and reports accidents that do not have severe injuries; discussed the past
three years of data; stated the 2022 severe injuries is 15, which is more than double the
average for the last 14 years; the decisions being made must be data -driven; the
decisions being made either have no impact or have has a large increase to severe
injuries and deaths; expressed concern over data being lumped together for selected
years; stated that she would like the data to be broken out; she will not be able to
support the changes; the changes are not having the desired consequences no matter
how well-intended.
Councilmember Know White stated the approach is not how using data to make
decisions works; data should not be assigned a meaning; a lot of study has gone into
the national problem of increased deaths on roads; road design is not causing the
increase in deaths; the number of people drinking and driving causing collisions with
people in Alameda is not a street design problem; vehicle design is being recognized as
the number one reason why fatalities are increasing; he would like to approve the Plan
with three minor changes; the first change includes moving the west 8th Street gap into
the short-term timeline; he believes the City will be in the position of wishing the change
had occurred instead of rushing the matter through; Council added $2 million annually
to the Capital Improvement Project (CIP) with direction to use consultants as necessary
to help increase the amount of work being done; Council has been proactive in trying to
ensure staff has the necessary resources to move quicker; the two slow streets are
going away for projects planned in the area; questioned whether the removal of the two
slow streets should be tied to the opening of the facility; discussed Orion Street
improvements; expressed support for a different implementation than the barricades;
stated the text on page 50 regarding the estuary crossing and Fruitvale Bridge
highlights that the City will do nothing until the bridge is rebuilt; the bridge is a priority ,
however, the project is a decade away; the County has provided the City with plans for
what could be protected bike lanes on the existing bridge; expressed support for
language being added to allow the City to pursue protected transportation on the
existing bridge with the County until there are funds and plans to rebuild the bridge;
getting people to Fruitvale Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) is a key issue for Alameda
as the City continues to address cross-estuary traffic; the Plan is the one place where
the City has an opportunity to make it easier and safer for people to get to BART;
expressed support for including the proposed changes.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired the other slow street near Orion Street, to which
Councilmember Know White responded Santa Clara, west of Webster Street.
Continued November 15, 2022 Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
December 20, 2022 4
Vice Mayor Vella expressed support for the Councilmember Know White’s
recommendations; inquired whether the desired wording for the Fruitvale Bridge and
gives staff permission to engage or whether Council is actively requesting staff to
engage; stated that she would like to know the timeline.
Councilmember Know White responded that he intended the direction to give staff
permission, but not to create additional work, and does not include a timeline; stated
that he would like something to the effect that the City will not do nothing until a new
bridge is built; there might be opportunities in the future; the Plan should be open to
pursuing said opportunities.
Vice Mayor Vella expressed support for all the proposed recommendations; stated it is
important to highlight national trends; noted 2021 had a record number of road and
vehicle related deaths and homicides; stated there has been a 54% increase over the
last decade; the trend is not new and is something that has been coming; the City
cannot control vehicle design, however, the City can do everything it can to ensure that
its roads are as safe as possible with multimodal access.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she is aware there is only so much money and staff
time to go around; inquired the process for moving the section of 8th Street to the short-
term timeline; stated when the City moves toward s the Central Avenue project starting
next year, many people will cut off at the proposed intersection; inquired the reason for
the initial delay in the 8th Street plan and what it would take to accelerate the timeline;
stated that she would like clarification the timing of the slow street closures.
The Senior Transportation Coordinator responded the 8 th Street and Westline Drive
project is included in the 2030 Plan as Project 25; stated the goal by 2030 is to have the
plans completed and funding secured; the reasoning is due to some of the work along
Westline Drive; as the road narrows at 8 th Street, a pathway will go through Washington
Park; the pathway project is complex and likely more expensive ; staff wants to make
progress on the pathway, but does not want to promise project completion by 2030; the
bus queue jump lanes along Westline Drive included in the Transportation Choices Plan
(TCP) are being looked at together; the project is dependent on the budget and
resources; the Miller-Sweeney bridge project is also included in the 2030 plan under
Project 28; staff has included completion of an initial phase of adding bike lanes to the
bridge by 2023; the City previously worked with the County on the matter; staff can look
beyond bike lanes and into protected bike lanes with the work being done at Tilden
Way; the intent is included in the draft ATP; staff can add information to th e Chapter on
trails and waterway crossings; the slow streets at Santa Clara have a parallel facility on
Central Avenue that will start construction next year; slow streets that move less easily
can be maintained until Central Avenue is compete; staff can leave Orio n Street,
however, she is unsure of the timing of improvements.
The Planning, Building, and Transportation Director stated Orion Street slow street
depends on how fast the City can build infrastructure at Alameda Point; the West
Continued December 6, 2022 Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
December 20, 2022 5
Midway project will build a chunk of Orion Street, however, there is no schedule yet for
the portion of Orion Street north of West Midway Avenue; staff will have to continue
looking at ways to calm traffic in that area of Alameda Point until the new road is built.
Councilmember Know White stated that he would be happy if Council craft s a motion
around Orion Street that indicates staff should come up with an interim solution that
meets the general goal of slow streets without being an actual slow street ; expressed
support for providing leeway for future Councils or Transportation Commissions.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for staff and the information provided;
discussed walking near Alameda Beach when school was starting and many students
getting off the bus stop near the school; stated some students recovered bikes from the
front of the bus; students were riding bikes and walking; expressed support for the items
being discussed coming to pass; stated utilization can increase with more parents
realizing there are safe modes of transportation for students; other modes help reduce
traffic congestion and air pollution; Alameda County has had recent Spare the Air days;
stated the time to move forward with the ATP is now.
Councilmember Know White stated Council has heard many concerns over not
considering the automobile; the City has a Transportation Master Plan; the current
matter is the ATP where the focus and funding of the P lan is to look at walking and
biking; read a quote related to rethinking how communities are designed; stated the
Plan is another step for the City to take; the Plan will take a long time; the 2030 Plan will
not fix the problem, but is a great step towards thoughtful and deep thinking.
Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the ATP with three minor changes: 1)
the slow streets on Santa Clara Avenue and Orion Street would keep the slow street
designation until the replacement programs on parallel or existing streets are in place ,
with the guidance that how they are implemented can change with input from the
Transportation Commission; 2) add moving the west 8th Street gap to the 2030 plan,
and 3) language around the Fruitvale Bridge be added to recognize that the City does
not need to wait until a new bridge is built before adding new estuary crossings for
active transportation users.
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog requested a friendly amendment to the
motion to direct staff to create an interested parties list of residents and individuals;
stated any time the ATP is discussed, the individuals on the list should be informed of
the upcoming meeting at least 5 working days prior; the concern raised by Speaker
Brennan related to community input is vital; other individuals have expressed desire for
more involvement in community workshops; utilizing a list being any time a Board or
Commission discusses the ATP is low hanging fruit; many times, people are unaware
and do not check the City website for updates; the list would be an easy way to be more
proactive in reaching out to individuals who have expressed interest in following the
ATP.
Continued November 15, 2022 Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
December 20, 2022 6
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the City already has a list in place, how people
are informed of the project, and how to get on the interested list.
The Senior Transportation Coordinator responded staff uses a service on the City
website subscription page; stated there are mailing lists for each Transportation Division
project; the ATP mailing list has roughly 600 subscribers; once the ATP is adopted, staff
will let people know about subscribing to other projects.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether subscribers are notified when a matter of the
ATP is taken to any Board or Commission.
The Senior Transportation Coordinator responded in the affirmative; stated staff also
sends notices of public events and workshops; staff also has a list for Transportation
Commission agendas; the general transportation interest list has roughly 1,300
subscribers; most alerts are sent to the general list.
Councilmember Daysog withdrew his friendly amendment to the motion; inquired
whether the 8th Street gap project being placed into the short -term priority list would
remove an alternative project; noted the City has limited staff time and resources.
The Senior Transportation Coordinator responded the project synergies allow staff to do
their best to add in the project.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether Councilmember Know White is satisfied with
staff’s assessment of doing their best and whether the motion is flexible enough to
accommodate staff’s approach for the 8th Street gap.
Councilmember Know White responded as long as staff is funded and supported with
the necessary resources to perform the project as outlined, the project can be executed;
the motion indicates Council’s comm itment to ensure the Plan happens by 2030 with an
understanding that the resources will be provided via grants and other funding over the
next 8 years.
Councilmember Daysog stated Council will have to find the resources and funding;
expressed support for the motion and for comments made related to Grand Street;
stated many people understand his position; the information and data presented in the
ATP is quite compelling; urged residents to look at ATP Exhibit 6 to see the various
ways in which the fatalities and serious accidents/injuries were broken down by
demographics; the data is Alameda-specific; while the data is great, most residents
understand that most cars are unnecessarily speeding; the ATP has a series of
strategies meant to make City streets and sidewalks slower and safer; he is satisfied
with the ATP; the Plan will continue to evolve due to the long-term timeline; the
continuance of evolving will require public participation; he hopes the City can continue
to get the word out to allow participation in the Board, Commission and Council
meetings; the City does want to slow down traffic; the City is also working to increase
Continued December 6, 2022 Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
December 20, 2022 7
traffic enforcement, which is a vital part of slowing down traffic; it is difficult to promise
zero fatalities or serious injuries, however, it is important to put into place a series of
strategies that support safer, slower sidewalks and streets; he supports the draft ATP.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the City needs better Police enforcement on
streets; Alameda used to be known as a 25 mile per hour (mph) town and is no longer
known for the slow speed; there is a problem of cars and bicycles completely
disregarding stop signs and signals; the last few years have had less policing on the
streets; some of the improvements intended to slow traffic are actually part of the
problem; people are being diverted to streets not typically used as a result of slow
streets; expressed concern over extreme congestion in multiple places through town;
stated Exhibit 6 shows old, pre-COVID data; she requested current data be provided to
show the effects of the improvements over the last three years; Alameda has few ways
on and off the Island; Alameda’s unique characteristics should be considered; she looks
forward to having more Police enforcement; speeding and distracted driving are huge
problems; she disagrees with the improvements made in the last three years; the
amount of severely injured has never been as high as the current number; expressed
concern over parking and home access for people with disabilities.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 6:21
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.