2023-06-20 Regular CC MinutesRegular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 20, 2023 1
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY- - JUNE 20, 2023- -7:00 P.M.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 7:53 p.m.
ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Herrera Spencer, Jensen, Vella,
and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft – 5.
Absent: None.
AGENDA CHANGES
(23-367) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft suggested moving the Consent Calendar after the Regular
Agenda Items.
Councilmember Vella moved approval of hearing the Consent Calendar after the Regular
Agenda Items.
Vice Mayor Daysog seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Herrera Spencer requested clarification that Consent
Calendar items would be heard at the end of the end of the calendar if the motion passes
versus being heard in the order listed.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft responded everything listed under the Consent Calendar would be heard
at the end of the calendar.
Councilmember Jensen stated there are twelve items on the Consent Calendar which is a lot;
there have been many times where items are pulled from the Consent Calendar for discussion;
expressed support for the Consent Calendar being more efficient; stated items on the Consent
Calendar are necessary; Police policies have been recently been added to the Consent
Calendar which can add to the volume; discussed a previous contract extension being pulled
from the Consent Calendar; stated approved contracts should not need to be on the Consent
Calendar; there are ways to streamline the Consent Calendar; expressed support for the
Strategic Plan addressing the matter; expressed support for more study and review before the
agenda is changed dramatically.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the change is a one-off; she is recommending Council hear the
Consent Calendar after the Regular Agenda; changing the actual agenda order is not being
considered; expressed support for the change being made out of respect for speakers; an
average of 22 minutes is being spent on the Consent Calendar, with a high of one and a half
hours; stated the City Clerk will return with information on how items are placed on the Consent
Calendar; items placed on Consent are not arbitrary and not at the discretion of the Mayor;
there is specific criteria for placing matters on Consent; there is likely not enough information
listed on the agenda of why items are placed on Consent.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the agenda is set by the Mayor and staff;
Councilmembers do not see the agenda until published and have no advanced input regarding
what items are placed on Consent; an item being considered spends $4.6 million, which she
plans to pull; expressed concern over Council not being able to consider the matter if moved;
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 20, 2023 2
stated matters placed on Consent are typically heard before other items, and may not be heard
if placed at the end of the calendar.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she does attend the agenda setting meetings, but that she also
has to follow the criteria for items being placed on Consent.
Councilmember Vella amended her motion to approving the balance of the Consent Calendar,
while moving pulled items to the end for this meeting; items being pulled from the Consent
Calendar for discussion are the Alameda Sun agreement [paragraph no. 23-386] and the
Guaranteed Basic Income (GBI) pilot program [paragraph no. 23-376]; changing the agenda
order is done by a Council vote; Council has the option to continue matters to the start of the
next meeting under Continued Agenda Items or the Consent Calendar at the following meeting.
Vice Mayor Daysog expressed support for the amended motion; stated the goal is to speed up
the meeting process; Council will hear the matters; seconded the amended motion.
Under discussion, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for the amended motion.
Councilmember Jensen expressed support for the amended motion; stated that she appreciates
the objective, however, the change happened too quickly and she cannot support the
recommendation.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether staff can indicate any time limitations on the
two matters being pulled for discussion.
The City Manager responded the GBI matter has some time sensitivity.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the items can be heard at the next meeting,
to which the City Manager responded in the affirmative.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft noted matters can be placed under the Continued Agenda Items section of
the next agenda.
The City Clerk responded Council must designate the official newspaper, but the Charter does
not provide a deadline.
Councilmember Vella stated that she is amenable to staying later in order to hear the pulled
items; expressed support for moving forward quickly.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Daysog, Vella and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft – 3. Noes: Councilmembers Herrera
Spencer and Jensen – 2.
PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
(23-368) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft read and presented a proclamation to declaring June 30, 2023 as
Library Director Jane Chisaki Day.
The Library Director provided brief comments.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 20, 2023 3
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(23-369) Weng Tam, Nor Cal Carpenters Union Local 713, urged hiring local; discussed health
care and cost of living.
(23-370) Anya Qualls, Alameda, discussed hiring local and costs of living increases.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Under agendas changes, Council approved hearing the pulled items [the legal notice contract
and Usio Inc. agreement] after Regular Agenda Items.
Councilmember Vella moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer recorded a no vote on the Homeless Housing Assistance and
Prevention grant resolution [paragraph no. 23-379].
Vice Mayor Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so
enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.]
(*23-371) Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting Held on May 11, 2023 and the Special
and Regular City Council Meetings Held on May 16, 2023. Approved.
(*23-372) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,382,581.35.
(*23-373) Recommendation to Award a Three-Year Contract to Maze & Associates
Accountancy Corporation for an Amount Not-to-Exceed $483,215, including Contingency, with
the Option of Two One-Year Extensions, for a Total Five-Year Expenditure Not-to-Exceed
$846,966, including Contingency, for Independent Auditing Services. Accepted.
(*23-374) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a First Amendment with
Alameda Family Services for an Amount Not-to-Exceed $1,067,326 to Provide for Clinician and
Case Management Services for the Community Assessment, Response and Engagement
(CARE) Team. Accepted.
(*23-375) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Amendment to the
Service Provider Agreement with Brad Shirakawa for Project Management, Research and
Media Services for the Alameda Japanese American History Project, to Increase Compensation
in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $40,000 for a Total Compensation Not-to-Exceed $100,000 and to
Extend the Agreement through August 31, 2023. Accepted.
(23-376) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Usio
Inc. to Serve as the Financial Partner for the City of Alameda’s Guaranteed Basic Income Pilot
Program (Rise Up Alameda) in the Amount of $2,987.50 for Disbursement Services and
Passthrough Funds of $3,600,000 to Be Used for Direct Payments to Program Participants for a
Total of $3,602,987.50 with Funding from American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 Funds. Continued
to July 5, 2023.
(*23-377) Recommendation to Endorse a Grant Application to the Federal Emergency
Management Agency Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Administered by the California
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 20, 2023 4
Governor’s Office of Emergency Management for the Alameda Soft Story Seismic Retrofits
Project. Accepted.
(*23-378) Resolution No. 16063, “Authorizing the City Manager to Execute All Necessary
Documents with the Alameda County Transportation Commission to Accept $1,000,000 in Grant
Funds for the Alameda-Oakland Estuary Water Shuttle Two-Year Pilot Program
(2024 through 2026) and to Appropriate the $1,000,000 Towards the Water Shuttle Program
and to Appropriate the $1,000,000 Grant Award and $150,000 in Measure BB Local Streets and
Roads Funds as Grant Matching Funds in Fiscal Year 2023-24 Towards the Water Shuttle
Program.” Adopted.
(23-379) Resolution No. 16064, “Authorizing the City Manager to Apply for, Negotiate, and
Execute an Agreement and Related Documents to Accept $338,198 of Homeless Housing
Assistance and Prevention Grant Funds; and Amending the Grants Fund (222) Fiscal Year
2023-24 Budget to Appropriate an Additional $52,428 from the Homeless Housing Assistance
and Prevention Grant for Village of Love Day Center Services.” Adopted.
Note: Councilmember Herrera Spencer recorded a no vote, so the item was approved by the
following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog, Jensen, Vella and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft – 4.
Noes: Councilmember Herrera Spencer – 1.
(*23-380) Ordinance No. 3342, “Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Fourth Amendment
to the Lease with Williams Sonoma, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Acting for and on Behalf of
Williams Sonoma Stores, Inc., a California Corporation, for Building 169, Suite 102, Located
1680 Viking Street, Alameda, CA, Extending the Term of the Lease for an Additional 12 Months
with No Extension Option.” Finally passed.
(*23-381) Resolution No. 16065, “Ordering the Levy of Assessments in the Amount of 5.302%
or $6,492.30 for Maintenance Assessment District 01-01 (Marina Cove).” Adopted.
CONTINUED AGENDA ITEMS
None.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(23-382) Introduction of Ordinance Approving Third Amendment to Lease of Building 35, 2450
Pan Am Way, at Alameda Point between the City of Alameda and Small Size Big Minds,
Extending the Lease Term by 12 Months with an Additional 12-Month Extension Option, for a
Total Potential Extension of 24 Months. Introduced.
The Community Development Director gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Vella moved introduction of the ordinance.
Councilmember Jensen seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(23-383) Resolution No. 16066, “Ordering the Levy of Assessments, Island City Landscaping
and Lighting District 84-2, Zones 1, 4, 5, 6, and 8.” Adopted.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 20, 2023 5
***
Councilmember Vella left the meeting at 8:22 p.m. and returned at 8:44 p.m.
***
Vice Mayor Daysog stated that he needed to recuse himself and left the dais.
The Public Works Coordinator gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Jensen requested background information related to the authority for landscape
and lighting districts; inquired how the districts were established, under what authority, can
districts be changed, and who are district members.
The Assistant City Attorney responded the district is a special assessment district established
by the Council; stated the Council adopted a motion and resolution several decades ago to
establish the district; the district can be dissolved in part or entirely by the Council; the district
does not have named members, merely parcels and resident owners of the parcels.
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether the district is a geographic designation of certain
parcels or boundaries within the City, to which the Assistant City Attorney responded in the
affirmative.
Councilmember Jensen further inquired whether the district is established through the State
passing a law that allowed cities to levy fees; questioned about fee use.
The Assistant City Attorney responded the fees have a range of uses; stated the uses are laid
out in the landscape law, but are typically improvement related fees: tree trimmings, street
maintenance, street lighting and other associated matters.
Councilmember Jensen stated neighborhoods not in landscape and lighting districts but still
collect fees from residents; discussed a Homeowners Association (HOA) near Fernside
Boulevard; inquired whether the landscape and lighting district has a unique way to assess fees
and how the district provides benefits other organizations do not provide.
The Assistant City Attorney responded since the district is a government creation, the scope of
what the district can assess is more limited; stated the assessment is laid out in the district act;
HOAs would have broader leeway.
***
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft called a recess at 8:30 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 8:45 p.m.
***
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the zones are solely business addresses or
whether any residences are included.
The Public Works Coordinator responded in the affirmative; stated all addresses are
businesses; stated the Marina Village zone has an adjacent HOA; the HOA does not pay into
the assessment.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the same applies to Zone 1.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 20, 2023 6
The Public Works Coordinator responded that she is checking the Engineer’s Report to find the
response.
The City Manager inquired whether Councilmember Herrera Spencer’s inquiry relates to all
districts or only Zone 1.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer responded all of the zones listed are primarily businesses;
stated the action of assessing businesses makes sense; expressed support for receiving
confirmation that residential properties do not pay into the fund.
The Public Works Coordinator stated Zone 1 is the only Zone that she is unable to confirm;
there may be some residential on top of the commercial space, however, the properties are all
commercial; she will need to confirm.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated there are some residential units over retail; inquired whether the
retail property owner would pay the assessment, to which the Public Works Coordinator
responded in the affirmative.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft further inquired whether Zone 1 includes the Lincoln Avenue corridor, to
which the Public Works Coordinator responded in the affirmative.
The City Manager stated that she cannot say for sure, but the maps all indicate commercial
areas.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she plans to support the matter; expressed support
for knowing the policy in the future to ensure residential properties are being excluded from
paying the additional taxes for primarily commercial parcels; the intent of the matter appears to
be to charge businesses for business districts.
The Public Works Coordinator stated staff can add the information as clarification in the next
engineer’s report.
Councilmember Vella moved approval of adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she would second the motion with a friendly
amendment to approve direction to staff to include the information as clarification in the next
engineer’s report.
Councilmember Vella agreed to amend the motion to include the direction.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Absent: Vice
Mayor Daysog – 1.]
(23-384) Resolution No. 16067, “Ordering that No Assessment Be Levied for Fiscal Year 2023-
24 in Connection with Zone 7 of the Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2.”
Adopted; and
(23-384 A) Recommendation to Direct Staff to Engage with the Property Owners of Zone 7 of
the District to Explore Specific Options Regarding the Future of Zone 7 and to Return to City
Council with a Final Recommendation in September 2023.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 20, 2023 7
The Public Works Director gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired the validity of the 1988 Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU).
The Assistant City Attorney responded the MOU has been determined to be not authorized by
the full Council and was only signed by the former Mayor and City Manager, as well as several
residents; the MOU would not necessarily have the weight of an authorization enacted by the
full Council.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the City Attorney’s position is that the MOU
is or is not valid and enforceable.
The Assistant City Attorney responded there are reasonable arguments on both sides; the
position is not a clear-cut issue.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether Council would need to vote in order for the
City to continue having the MOU be in effect, to which the Assistant City Attorney responded in
the affirmative; stated an approved MOU would have the full weight of Council.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she would like confirmation whether or not it is the
City’s position that the MOU is valid and enforceable.
The City Attorney stated staff’s view is that a contract not authorized by the Council has serious
legal deficiencies; if Council wants to have a legally binding document, Council should ratify the
document.
Councilmember Vella inquired whether an individual member of Council and Interim City
Manager could go out and execute a legally binding document regarding tax payer dollars.
The City Attorney responded that the document would not be a lawful contract executed by the
City.
Vice Mayor Daysog stated that he understands the concerns of the Bay Street residents to be
related to funds designated for enhancements being used for normal and routine services that
should be covered by basic property taxes; requested clarification of the criteria used to
constitute enhanced service related to trees for any neighborhood.
The Public Works Director stated the old American Elm trees is a special tree; the trees were
diseased; the district was formed to prolong the tree’s existence; the inherent nature of the zone
is unique and special from the remainder of the urban forest; regular maintenance of the urban
forest includes a 5-year trimming schedule, testing of trees, removal of trees, and planting of
trees; the zone requested and funded larger trees; the crux of the misalignment consists of tree
removal and testing; General Fund contribution have been comingled; the cost of tree removal
comes from zone funds; removal and large scale investment has not occurred.
The City Manager stated because the trees are more susceptible to disease, there is a need to
test and potentially remove trees more frequently; enhanced maintenance is due to trees being
more susceptible to disease; district formation helped address the issue.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 20, 2023 8
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether the Council votes on the assessment annually, to
which the Public Works Director responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Jensen inquired the assessment amount for each district; stated the $150
amount was discussed at one time; inquired whether the $150 amount is unique for District 7
and assessment is not being recommended; stated the assessment levied for other districts did
not indicate an amount.
The Public Works Director responded the engineer’s report has a table; stated the table shows
the proposed total revenue to come in from individual property owner assessment rates.
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether assessment data for each Zone 7 parcel for every
year is available.
The Public Works Director responded in the affirmative; stated the 13-year historic lookback has
the per property assessment; some years ranged from no assessment to $150.
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether there was a fund balance prior to 2009.
The Public Works Director responded in the affirmative; stated 2009 is as far back as staff
reviewed; the information available is per the City’s retention policy; the rolling fund balance
would have been in existence since the formation of the district zone.
Councilmember Jensen stated information would be easily available since there are tax records
and the assessments were levied and approved by Council in the 20 years prior to 2009.
The City Manager stated the Fiscal Year 2010-2011 ending fund balance was roughly $49,000.
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether staff is confident about the ending fund balance
amount, to which the City Manager responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Jensen stated the resolution was not approved by Council and there may not
have been authority; inquired whether the residents of Bay Street would have any remedy.
The City Attorney responded staff believes the City has a right to levy assessments; stated the
City’s ability to levy an assessment comes from authority granted by State law and subsequent
adoption by Council through a regular process; the City does not call into question the formation
of the district, nor does the City call into question the assessments; the only thing that appears
to be outside of regular process and authority is the MOU; the MOU is the overlay on top of the
district that gives residents significant control over the expenditure of assessment funds; there is
no record of a Council action approving the MOU; based on the face of the document and
historical records, the City Attorney’s Office never reviewed the MOU; the City Attorney’s Office
would normally approve such documents as to form; the document most in question is the
MOU; the issue is whether or not the residents have any control over the City’s expenditure of
funds; the existence of the funds is not a legal problem.
In response to Councilmember Jensen’s inquiry related to assessments being passed, the City
Attorney stated there was a Council resolution and action establishing the district; Council did
not approve the MOU which occurred sometime after formation.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 20, 2023 9
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the $98,308.32 closing balance in Fiscal
Year 2021-2022 was collected from assessments from residents or whether any of the money in
the fund was City money.
The Public Works Director responded an annual City contribution is a part of the fund balance.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the City knows how much money has come
from residents.
The Public Works Director responded $54,600 is from property assessments and $39,000 is
from the General Fund contribution.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed support for dissolving the district; stated that she
would like to return monies to the taxpayers; inquired the amount currently held by the City.
The Public Works Director responded staff would have an idea of the fund balance; stated
expenses are not tracked by revenue source; staff could review the numbers and propose how
to disperse the fund balance.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether staff has the amounts available.
The Public Works Director responded in the negative; stated revenue was comingled and
expenses by were not tracked by revenue type; staff can make a recommendation to Council.
The City Manager stated if Council wants to dissolve the district, the fund balance would legally
return to the City; Council could disperse the funds back to the property owners; staff can bring
a separate budget discussion; Council can provide direction on dispersing all funds or a pro rata
share back to property owners; Council would need to provide direction on how to disperse and
apportion the funds; assuming the full budget for this year, the net fund balance is $17,000.
Expressed support for the City’s partnership with Bay Street and the efforts to preserve trees;
stated that he understands the special assessment helps with the preservation of trees as a
supplement to City funding; urged Council to have General Funds pay for regular maintenance
and removal of trees, while using special assessment for planting larger trees: Roger Wise,
Alameda.
Stated the district is to protect the tree canopy; the sole purpose is to pay for enhanced
maintenance; discussed the City paying for tree maintenance; expressed concern over double
payments; stated the City followed the MOU for over thirty years; funds should be replaced: Gig
Codiga, Alameda.
Discussed the district and use of funds being determined by the property owners and the City;
stated property owners have power of veto, which is reflected in the MOU; expressed concern
about broken promises, betrayal, and accounting; stated assessments are monies earmarked
for special enhancements; urged Council to rectify the situation: Felicia Reid, Alameda.
Discussed areas of blight in Oakland and Alameda; stated Bay Street is special and saved trees
most neighborhoods lost; the neighborhood should be celebrated, not penalized; urged Council
to direct staff to reassess priorities: Tom Geary, Alameda.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 20, 2023 10
Stated every assessment has been approved by the neighborhood, apart from the last
assessment; expressed concern about the district fund accounting; stated expenditures for
testing and removal were approved; discussed requests for improvements and removal of
underperforming trees; urged Council to direct staff to use General Funds to cover testing and
removal and use special assessment funds for removal and planting of bigger trees: Julie
Conner, Alameda.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the City could allocate $28,000 to remove
eight trees and $20,000 to replant bigger trees, and direct staff to work with residents to clarify
desired outcomes; inquired whether City funds can be used for testing and removal of trees and
the matter could come back to dissolve the district at some point.
The City Manager responded staff can perform at the request of Council.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of directing staff to use City funds for the
testing and removal of trees, and having the matter come back to dissolve the district at some
point; questioned whether staff needs further clarification.
Councilmember Vella stated there are ten trees on the block; some of the trees require different
approaches and associated costs; requested clarification.
The City Manager stated $37,500 was approved in the mid-year budget; Council would be
agreeing to refund the Zone 7 fund money from the General Fund and pay for testing and
removal expenses; more fund balance would be freed up and used to replace trees that have to
be removed due to disease, death, and unsafe circumstances; staff will need to determine how
many trees would have to come down; a budget of $28,000 for tree planting, insecticide
injections for lindens and other pest control was presented.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed support for the City working with Bay Street
residents; stated that she would like to dissolve the district.
The City Manager stated it appears that residents would like the district dissolved after refunds
occur; the suggestion is to disperse any remaining fund balance to the residents after the district
is dissolved.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the process includes spending the extra
money planting bigger trees.
The City Manager responded in the affirmative; stated General Fund will refund $37,500 and
staff would use the fund balance to replant bigger trees; depending on how many need to be
replanted, the net fund balance would be refunded after the district is dissolved.
Councilmember Vella stated an arborist report requested additional testing; the testing has not
occurred.
The City Manager stated the testing is currently occurring.
The Public Works Director stated the testing is being done this week; the basis of the original
analysis was visual; the current testing is a second level review; the testing includes a
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 20, 2023 11
resistograph to understand the extent of decay.
Councilmember Vella inquired whether there would be liability if the City did not perform testing
after an arborist report indicates it is needed.
The City Attorney responded if the trees failed and caused an injury, the City would primarily be
liable; stated the adjacent property owners might carry secondary liability.
Councilmember Vella inquired whether the original arborist report indicating additional
necessary testing was shared with the district property owners.
The Public Works Director responded in the affirmative; stated property owners are familiar with
the Bartlett Report.
Councilmember Vella inquired whether only the Elm trees are being tested.
The Public Works Director responded the current testing is related to the remaining old
American Elms, which get Dutch Elm disease; stated many of the American Elms have already
succumbed to the disease and have been replanted with Elm hybrids that are disease resistant;
under-performing Elms include two sets of trees and removal of the diseased Elms is estimated
to cost $37,500, which was appropriated in this year’s budget and creates ten vacancies;
property owners also consider eight hybrid Elms to be underperforming and want to replace the
trees.
Councilmember Vella inquired whether staff is waiting on the final arborist report to decide
whether or not removal is necessary; stated the City is almost assuming removal is required.
The Public Works Director responded in the affirmative; stated the projected cost of $37,500
assumes all ten American Elms will need to be removed.
The City Manager stated staff budgeted the full amount to be conservative.
Councilmember Vella inquired how long the City typically wait once an arborist report is
received and indicates a tree needs to be removed.
The Public Works Director responded the process depends on the results received; stated staff
can act quickly and removal can be immediate.
Vice Mayor Daysog stated that he is looking at the matter from a fundamental level; the district
created was unique since those being taxed had to consent to spending revenues on enhanced
services; City staff might have made alterations to the long standing practices around 2019 or
2020; altering the long standing practice was based upon the fact that the MOU was not of the
order of what the City Council normally enters into; the MOU not being typical is nonetheless an
agreement made in the 1980s and provides the City with a guiding policy document for the
unique district; he believes the residents are asking to return to the document with a caveat; the
clearest approach is to perform the testing using the General Fund, which is reasonable;
expressed support for directing staff to receive the consent of the residents going forward;
stated the proposed recommendation might not be the approach to take and could change; it is
better to return to the original policy related to the enhanced services; expressed support for the
work being performed by staff and the analysis of the MOU not being contractual; stated the
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 20, 2023 12
City needs to look at the 1988 MOU as a policy guiding document that will continue being the
policy until reversed.
Councilmember Vella questioned whether the position being taken is that even as a fiduciary of
the City that a policy or agreement could be in place where somebody could create additional
liability and the City would be on the hook to pay the full cost; stated that she could follow the
proposed recommendation if the trees were a different variety; staff is assuming removal is
required, but there is no certainty; the trees are a holdover; there is a professional
recommendation to perform testing; expressed concern over liabilities; stated part of the
enhancement is to perform testing to maintain the trees; expressed concern over an
interpretation indicating the City cannot remove the trees without consent from members of
Zone and creating liability for the City; stated that she does not know whether a waiver
document can be produced; a proposal has been made to have the City cover all costs; she is
not in agreement due to the tree type; expressed concern over the proposed approach creating
increased liability.
Vice Mayor Daysog stated the liability of the trees is a liability the City has in any district and
other neighborhood; if the City decides wrongly regarding tree maintenance, the City is
potentially liable; professionals are hired in the Public Works and City departments to help
Council manage situations; Council is relying on staff to provide guidance on liabilities; he sees
the MOU as a policy document indicating how the City should work with the residents; if City
staff determines incredible liability, Council will deal with the liability; residents or Council will
need to take part in a discussion and make a reasonable determination.
The City Manager stated staff will remove unsafe trees using General Funds regardless of
consent.
Councilmember Vella discussed the MOU.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she has a problem with the MOU for a number of reasons; the
document lacks transparency, was signed by the then Mayor of the City and the Interim City
Manager and was never brought to Council, or run by the City Attorney and other members of
staff; the process would garner an Open Government Complaint under current standards; the
document might have been produced in a past process, however, the practice should not be
carried forward; expressed concern over the language in the last paragraph of the MOU related
to the District representative; noted a representative was not identified in the MOU; stated the
MOU indicates the representative must approve the work to be performed at the City’s expense;
the document needs to be set aside; the matter should be kept in perspective; Alameda is a City
of approximately 80,000 residents and 30,000 households; the current matter considers the
trees located on two residential blocks consisting of 38 homes; staff has spent an inordinate
amount of time working, meeting, and discussing with neighbors to find a solution; it is
incumbent upon Council to make decisions moving forward; expressed concern over high winds
causing falling trees and over equity; stated it appears the matter has the City treat some
neighborhoods different than others; the requested special trees have proven to be problematic
and the City is being asked to use General Fund money to perform testing and treatment;
expressed support for dissolving the district; stated that she would like to find a way to move
forward and would defer to the professional opinion of arborists; a possible disbursement back
to residents can occur once the district is dissolved; expressed support for a motion to have
staff return to Council with the direction to find out what needs to occur with the trees, including
cost; stated trees outside the City’s palette should be treated and paid for by the Zone;
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 20, 2023 13
expressed concern over spending an exorbitant amount of staff time on the matter; stated that
she cannot follow an MOU that should not have been entered into in such a manner; expressed
support for a path forward before trees begin to fall.
Councilmember Jensen stated the establishment of Zone 7 had been based on assumptions
and expectations both for the residents and the City; over the course of 36 years, great things
have happened; she does not think the City planted trees that were known to fail; the City needs
to bear some responsibility for planting the trees; there has been confusion related to who would
be the lead and where guidance would come from; expressed support for the City taking on
responsibility and cost for testing and removal of up to 19 trees; stated the City would work with
Zone residents to use fund balance to identify appropriate replacement trees, which are
available and part of the urban forest; the replacement trees might be better than usual trees
planted; once the trees are in place, Zone 7 would be dissolved.
The City Manager stated there are ten old American Elm trees being tested and potentially
removed.
The Public Works Director stated the additional trees were brought up from public speakers and
relate to the Elm cultivars; the hybrid trees are a disease resistant Elm; there is a general
sentiment amongst owners that the hybrid trees are underperforming, not diseased.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired who chose the ten trees.
The Public Works Director responded that she does not have the sense of history; stated that
she understands the American Elms were a popular tree in the 19th and 20th century; the trees
were in existence before the zone existed; when Dutch Elm disease arrived, the Zone was
formed to slow disease progression.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the trees pre-date the formation of the district, to which
the Public Works Director responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Vella inquired who chose the replacement trees, to which the Public Works
Director responded the property owners within the district.
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether the decision was made without input from the City.
The Public Works Director responded funds existed and property owners wanted to try hybrid
Elms; stated zone funds were used to plant hybrid Elms.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired why the responsibility to test trees falls on the City when the
property owners within the zone chose the hybrid tree.
Councilmember Jensen responded there was a lack of communication, causing confusion;
stated the establishment of Zone 7 illustrates the situation; there is not confidence that the zone
residents picked out and planted the trees without input from the City; she believes residents
suggested the trees and the City complied; the City failed in either approach and should bear
responsibility.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired what the assessment dollars for Zone 7 should be used for, to
which Councilmember Jensen responded the replacement of trees.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 20, 2023 14
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the residents should choose the replacement tree.
Councilmember Jensen responded in the affirmative; stated residents should work with and
receive guidance from the City as was done for prior trees; trees from the urban forest should
be selected.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated her motion addresses the matter and includes using
the General Fund to pay for testing and removal of up to 19 trees, including any trees the
arborist concludes as needing to be removed; discussed the City’s replacement of an
underperforming tree near her home; stated the lifespan of a Dutch Elm is 200 to 250 years;
trees have been replaced under staff recommendations, include a hybrid Elm tree, which the
City allows in the Zone; the second part of the motion includes approving using Zone funds for
enhanced trees; stated instead of providing small trees, bigger trees would be planted with
money from the Zone fund; staff should work with residents, but it is not necessary if Council
provides sufficient direction; the last part of the motion includes approving having the matter
return to Council for dissolving of the district separately.
Councilmember Vella stated that she supports using the General Fund for testing and removal
due to the liability issue; expressed concern over the language contained in the MOU related to
private citizens stopping the City from removing or abating a major liability; stated that she does
not know who the district representative is or how the representative is chosen; there are issues
with transparency and liabilities; expressed concern over defining underperforming trees and for
removing trees based on the definition; stated underperformance is not a reason for tree
removal and is contradictive; questioned whether the City’s definition of underperformance
matches and whether tree removal adheres to the definition; expressed support for not
removing trees which are otherwise healthy.
The Public Works Director stated many zone residents have commented about the lack of
services being performed over the last couple years; the issue relates to underperforming trees;
the City’s arborist does not believe the hybrid Elms are underperforming or at risk; further
discussions need to be held; as part of the urban forest program, staff would likely not remove
the trees.
The City Manager stated staff is not testing any of the hybrid Elm trees; only the ten American
Elms which are susceptible to Dutch Elm disease are being tested.
Vice Mayor Daysog expressed support for the first part of Councilmember Herrera Spencer’s
motion; stated he can support the second part related to district money being used for bigger
replacement trees, but would like language added to include input from residents.
Councilmember Jensen concurred with Councilmember Vella’s comments related to additional
trees; stated that she did not intend to include the additional trees unless there is reason, such
as disease or structural issues, causing need for removal.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether Councilmember Jensen’s desire to address 19 trees
would be reduced to ten, to which Councilmember Jensen responded in the affirmative.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated Council cannot provide veto power to residents over work to be
done; the MOU needs to be set aside while working towards dissolving the district; expressed
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 20, 2023 15
support for folding the district into other neighborhoods.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed support for bifurcating the motion.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of using General Fund money for tree testing
and removal per the arborists’ direction and report.
Councilmember Vella requested clarification that the motion represents up to the ten American
Elm trees.
The City Manager confirmed testing and removal for up to ten American Elm trees.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the arborist is currently only looking at
American Elm trees.
The City Manager responded in the affirmative; stated if the trees are diseased and unsafe, they
will be removed.
Vice Mayor Daysog seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Jensen requested clarification that the testing and removal
being discussed relates to using the General Fund, to which the City Manager responded in the
affirmative.
Councilmember Jensen stated that she would like to look at the City’s contributions to Zone 7;
questioned whether the motion includes General Funds contributed to Zone 7.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the motion has been bifurcated and includes approving the use of
General Fund money to perform testing and removal, if needed, of the ten American Elm trees.
Councilmember Jensen stated that she would like clarification that the General Fund
contributions to Zone 7 are being considered for the testing and removal.
The City Manager stated that she does not understand the motion to include the General Fund
contributions made to Zone 7; stated the General Funds being considered are not from Zone 7.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer concurred with the City Manager; stated the proposed
approved funding is separate, General Fund monies; she will address the fund balance in a
separate motion.
Councilmember Vella stated the process could be approved in one seamless motion that
approves the City using separate General Fund money to cover the cost of testing and any
necessary removal; the replacement of any trees needing to be removed will be covered by the
Zone 7 fund balance; there is a fund balance; some of the residents have a desire for enhanced
replacement trees; residents appear to agree on using funds for replacement trees; any other
testing would be subject to the City’s general urban forest plan; Council can direct staff to come
back to dissolve the district; the approach is attempting to balance the many different aspects of
the discussion to find a way forward that is amenable for all.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft concurred with Councilmember Vella; stated that she would like to add that
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 20, 2023 16
the replacement of trees with enhanced trees must be from the City approved palette.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed support for clarifying the planting recommendations
for Zone 7 are included on page 4 of the correspondence from staff; stated that she agrees fund
monies should be used for enhanced trees, but there are still City costs as part of the
replacement; expressed concern over the fund balance paying for all tree planting costs.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the fund balance includes both City funds and fund
balance, to which the Public Works Director responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the cost of the enhanced trees should come from the
fund balance.
The Public Works Director stated the enhanced trees are a 36-inch boxed tree, which the Zone
previously desired and paid for; the cost is associated with the size of the desired tree; the City
is currently updating its urban forest Master Plan, which will include updates to the tree palette;
stated a recent tree selection from the Zone was the October Glory, which is included in the list.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether there is concern about plating a large size tree.
The Public Works Director responded the selection needs to be site-specific; stated a number of
36-inch boxed tree plantings occurred in 2018 and were funded by the district.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the past practice has been to have the fund
pay for the planting of larger trees and whether General Fund money is used for some costs;
questioned whether all of the costs came out of the Zone fund.
The Public Works Director responded in the recent past, the majority of the large sized tree is
the districts’ responsibility.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether a portion of the City’s money has been used;
stated the fund pays for the larger tree, but not the entire planting of the new trees; expre ssed
support for keeping the same process for planting trees, but having any increased cost paid
from the fund.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the fund is a combination of monies.
The Public Works Director responded in the affirmative; stated the desire is to have the Zone
pay the delta; since funds have been comingled, it is difficult to have portions of payments; the
entirety of the cost is borne by the fund since the General Fund contribution is part of the fund
balance.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer accepted comments provided by Councilmember Vella as a
friendly amendment to the motion [approval of the City using separate General Fund money to
cover the cost of testing and any necessary removal; the replacement of any trees needing to
be removed will be covered by the Zone 7 fund balance; residents have a desire for enhanced
replacement trees; residents appear to agree on using funds for replacement trees; any other
testing would be subject to the City’s general urban forest plan; Council directing staff to come
back to dissolve the district; the approach attempts to balance the many different aspects of the
discussion to find a way forward that is amenable for all].
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 20, 2023 17
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the motion will remain as one-part, to which
Councilmember Herrera Spencer responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the third part of the motion will approve the matter
returning to Council for dissolving the district.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested clarification for the motion on the table; inquired whether the
City Clerk can provide a recount of the motion.
The City Clerk responded in the affirmative; noted there is an action of Council approving
adoption of the resolution finding no assessment and should be incorporated to the motion.
The City Manager requested clarification of the motion; inquired whether Council would like staff
to return with the zone dissolution and budget amendment approvals, and whether Council will
provide direction to staff as to how the fund balance will then be apportioned.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer responded the actions will be taken when the matter returns.
The City Manager stated the matter will incur a fund balance; staff can return with
recommendations for Council as part of the future action including how to apportion the balance;
options will likely include ways to apportion all of the balance, a ratio of City versus zone
contributions, no apportionment, or a combination of all three options.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the disbursement will have to happen at the next
meeting; stated that she understands the process to include the money first returning to the
City.
The City Manager responded in the affirmative; stated in the interest of wrapping everything
would occur at the same time.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she will defer to staff on the process.
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether the discussion is related to the remaining fund
balance after the residents have worked with City staff to identify and cost out the planting of
enhanced trees, to which Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer requested clarification that the approval of no assessment is
also included, to which Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Vella seconded the motion.
Under discussion, the City Clerk stated the motion on the table is to approve testing and any
related, required, removals from the General Fund not comingled with the zone funds for ten
trees, the replacement of the trees within the list on page 4 of the staff communication indicated
as enhanced tree expenses would come from the Zone 7 funds, staff will return with the action
to dissolve the zone, and approving the adoption of resolution finding no assessment.
Vice Mayor Daysog inquired whether the residents will have input to the list and whether Bay
Street residents provided input on October Glory trees.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 20, 2023 18
The Public Works Director responded that she does not know whether the residents provided
input on the 2010 urban forest Master Plan; stated the October Glory was mentioned due to
being recently selected as a replacement tree option.
Vice Mayor Daysog stated the motion on the floor is reasonable; he believes the residents must
have input, if not sign-off, on the trees; it is possible that the residents are amenable to the
motion as-is, however, the policy requires residents to provide input and guidance; he will stick
with the policy.
Councilmember Jensen stated that she would like to ensure the residents have input and choice
on the enhanced replacement trees; she understands the input as part of the motion.
The Public Works Director stated that she understands Council direction to include staff
consulting with the Zone on the preferred replacement tree, but that the tree be part of the City’s
general urban forest palette; since the District will be dissolved in short order, the trees will then
subsequently be maintained by the urban forest program.
In response to Councilmember Jensen’s inquiry related to fund balance, the Public Works
Director stated once the district is dissolved, Council will provide direction on how to disperse
any fund balance; any ongoing maintenance would be incurred by the City’s regular urban forest
maintenance program.
The City Manager stated the matter would be administered consistent with all other urban forest
programs in the City.
Vice Mayor Daysog stated that he is satisfied with the input to be provided.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated it is City policy to work with residents on tree
selections.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS
(23-385) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft suggested that the Usio Inc. contract [paragraph no. 23-376] not
be heard tonight.
Councilmember Vella moved approval of continuing the matter to the continued section of the
July 5 agenda.
Councilmember Jensen seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous vote – 5.
(23-386) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with the
Alameda Sun for the Publication of Legal Notices for Fiscal Year 2023-24.
The City Clerk gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the circulation for the Alameda Sun shows 2,096 total
versus the Alameda Journal at 16,048; inquired whether the figures are correct.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 20, 2023 19
The City Clerk responded in the affirmative; stated the Alameda Sun has indicated a move
toward a more online readership platform.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the cost for the first insertion at Alameda Sun is $15.25,
the second is $12.25, and the third is $11.25 versus Alameda Journal’s cost at $6.16 for each
insertion which is more than half the cost of Alameda Sun; she appreciates Alameda Sun
moving to a more online based process; noted 100% online publishing does not qualify a
newspaper for selection.
The City Clerk stated there is a requirement in the City Charter that the newspaper be
adjudicated.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired the definition of an adjudicated.
The City Clerk responded the newspaper must be an adjudicated paper of general circulation
within the City; stated the requirement is a special adjudication process; Alameda Sun did go
through many hoops and steps to become adjudicated.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the circulation history from March 2020 had been
23,259; she was supportive of paying Alameda Sun extra when the circulation numbers were
much higher; she no longer supports continuing with Alameda Sun due to the circulation of
2,000; inquired what public notices are and the City’s associated responsibility.
The City Clerk responded the City must publish notices of all types: bids, public hearings, and
various legal notices.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the public notices are critical; questions have occurred
in the past in relation to notices; providing published notice in a newspaper circulating to 2,000
versus 16,000 causes her to support reverting back to Alameda Journal.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of awarding the contract to the Alameda
Journal.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would not support the motion for a number of reasons;
public notice is important to people that wish to attend City meetings and follow City business;
questioned how many people come to City Council meetings due to reading the notice in the
classified section of the newspaper; stated the delivery of news service and information has
changed remarkably since the City Charter was established; there are many different ways to
receive information; it is important to support local businesses; this matter is a chance for
Council to support local businesses; expressed concern over small, independent, newspapers
fighting for their lives; stated the community is harmed when a news source is not available to
report on local events; expressed support for Alameda Sun; discussed a weekly column written
for Alameda Sun during the pandemic; stated Alameda Sun has covered local issues; Alameda
Journal contains fractional news based in Alameda; staff recommends awarding the contract to
the Alameda Sun and interacts with the newspaper on a regular basis.
Councilmember Jensen inquired the budget amount for the publication of public notices, to
which the City Clerk responded about $50,000 per year across departments.
Councilmember Jensen stated an adjudicated newspaper can have as few as 40 subscribers;
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 20, 2023 20
there is not a need to have a huge subscription list, however, it is important that there be a local
requirement providing local news.
Vice Mayor Daysog stated the Alameda Journal goes out to roughly 16,000 households;
expressed support for the reporting of Bay Area News; stated the Alameda Journal mostly has
about one and a half pages of Alameda-related news, whereas the Alameda Sun includes ten to
twelve color pages of Alameda-related news; many of the pages include advertisements of local
businesses; he weighs the 2,000 versus 16,000 by number of pages; the Alameda Journal
number might still be larger, however, the City is trying to take into account quality not quantity;
there is something to be said about supporting local business; expressed support for the work of
Alameda Journal as well as Alameda Sun; stated that he will continue to support the Alameda
Sun.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the budget is currently $50,000; inquired whether most
newspaper ads run three times.
The City Clerk responded in the negative; stated some are two runs, and some are three.
The motion failed for lack of a second.
Councilmember Vella moved approval of awarding the newspaper advertising contract to the
Alameda Sun.
Vice Mayor Daysog seconded the motion which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Daysog, Jensen, Vella, and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft – 4. Noes: Councilmember
Herrera Spencer – 1.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(23-387) The City Manager announced the start of a Caltrans project on Encinal Avenue, the 4th
of July parade and 5k run, and a Alameda Municipal Power rate increase.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(23-388) Councilmember Jensen discussed Chamber of Commerce Board meeting, a meeting
with the United States Tennis Association, the grand opening of Firebrand Café, the Alameda
Architectural Preservation Society award ceremony, judging the 55th annual sand castle and
sculpture contest, and the Alameda Democratic Club summer mixer; expressed support for the
leadership at Stopwaste; announced an award for helping homeowners transition to electric
appliances; provided a handout related to reducing waste.
(23-389) Councilmember Herrera Spencer discussed a community beat meeting hosted by the
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 20, 2023 21
Police Department; outlined ways to attend beat meetings and look up crime occurring within
the City.
(23-390) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft discussed the opening of Firebrand Café, the Alameda County
Mayor’s Conference, the homeless working group meeting, and the Association of Bay Area
Governments (ABAG) meeting; outlined an article related to the Alameda northern waterfront by
J.K. Dineen.
(23-391) Mayor’s Reappointment of Kimi Sugiyoka as Alameda Poet Laureate.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft made brief comments about the Poet Laureate.
(23-392) Mayor’s Nominations for Appointment to the Library Board and Social Service Human
Relations Board.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft nominated Anita Battle and Debbie Gibbons to the Library Board, and
Gerald Bryant, Cindy Pile, and Dianne Yamashiro-Omi to the Social Services Human Relations
Board.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 10:52 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.