The URL can be used to link to this page

2006-06-20 SubmittalsDAVID Brandt - For Debbie when she gets to your office. Page 1 of 1 From: Elizabeth Cook To: DAVID Brandt Date: 6/20/2006 4:41:16 PM Subject: For Debbie when she gets to your office. »> "Douglas Biggs" <DBiggs @apcollaborative.org> 6/20/06 12:04 PM »> Dear Ms. Potter, I am writing on behalf of the Alameda Point Collaborative to comment on the Five Year Implementation Plan for Alameda Point. To begin with, we are very pleased that you have highlighted Ploughshares Nursery as one of the catalyst development projects at Alameda Point. We believe that Ploughshares Nursery will not only provide significant economic benefit for APC residents, but will help set the standard for environmentally sustainable development at Alameda Point. Along the lines of economic development, we would strongly encourage you to include the work that has gone into developing the protocols for the first source hiring project as one of the accomplishments of the first five years of the implementation plan and we would ask that you include as one of the goals and objectives in the next five year plan the full implementation of the first source hiring program. As designed, the program will provide significant economic benefit to low- income Alameda residents and — by keeping dollars in Alameda — benefit the entire community, while providing employers with skilled and qualified applicants competing for new jobs that will be created with the redevelopment of Alameda Point. Last but not least, we encourage the City to use the opportunity of updating the Five Year Implementation Plan to call for strong citizen support to move negotiations with the Navy Forward so that the goals and objectives of the plan can finally be accomplished in a timely manner. Thank you very much for the opportunity to comment on the Plan. Doug Biggs Community Resources Director Alameda Point Collaborative (510)898 -7849 www.apcollaborative.org Re: Agenda Item #2 -A CIC 6 -20 -06 file: / /C:\ Documents% 20and% 20Settings \cdd_user\Local %20Settings \Temp \GW} 00001.H... 6/20/2006 Jfefen Sause 816 Grand Street Alameda, California 94501 Telephone: 510 -521 -3940 Email. fei?nsause @a1 medanet. tiet '; j I:, 03 Jr- Memorandum: CO1V MUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION, City of Alameda From: Helen Sause, President Housing Opportunities Makes Economic Sense (HOMES) 816 Grand Street Alameda, California Re : FIVE — YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2005/6 — 2009/10 Comments: Draft page 5: the goals embedded in The General Plan provide policy direction for the Alameda Point area that is not achievable from the public review of the Preliminary Development Concept (PDC). Those goals are not evident in the PDC and the numerous statements made at every meeting by the public in reviewing the PDC are not in any way described. There is simply a statement that there were workshops to "receive community recommendations ..." but no mention that the PDC did not achieve the General Plan Goals that the public reaffirmed that they wished to see in the development of the area. A statement to that effect that the City is taking in actually doing an EIR alternative showing development of the area without the constraint of Measure A and considers how these General Plan objectives can be achieved would provide reassurance to the community that their comments were taken seriously. This would also forestall objections made directly to the State. Draft page 6: the contingency of the two "key contractual relationships." Should be commented on more fully. What if the CIC /ARRA/City — APCP cannot agree on a DDA? What happens to the Redevelopment Plan if there is no agreement with the Navy? Re: Agenda Item #2 -A CIC 6 -20 -06 Draft page 9: The reference to the PCD in the first full paragraph 2/3 of the way down the page treats the PDC as though it was a totally acceptable document and the community has had repeated assurances that it is not and will be studied further. Please consider these comments. Sincerely, /k)VtAA Helen Sause HOMES 510.521.3940 Gay Pride Proclamation for the City of Alameda - June 2006 Whereas, members of the Alameda gay and Lesbian community recognize June as their international month of pride and celebration; and Whereas, members of our gay and Lesbian community contribute to and participate in activities beneficial to the City of Alameda; and Whereas, members of the Alameda gay and Lesbian community share in and contribute to our collective culture of strong, loving, and enduring friendships and families; and Whereas, members of the Alameda gay and Lesbian community have always and continue to dedicate their lives to our country in every capacity, including the military and military reserves, in times of peace and war; and Whereas, members of the Alameda gay and Lesbian community have made numerous material and financial contributions in support of various city -wide activities and projects; and Whereas, members of the Alameda gay and Lesbian community serve on various City boards, commissions, and committees; and Whereas, members of the Alameda gay and Lesbian community have helped the public understand that Domestic Partnerships and Civil Unions are not the same as non- religious, Legal Marriage in that they deny gay and Lesbian couples 1,138 rights and benefits automatically granted by the Federal government to legally married couples; and Whereas, members of the Alameda gay and Lesbian community's quest for full equality has been celebrated and supported by many members of the community at large; Now therefore, 1, Beverly Johnson, Mayor of the City of Alameda, hereby recognize the contributions to our City by our gay and Lesbian citizens, and encourage the community to recognize these contributions and the importance of full and equal citizenship for all its residents, particularly during the month of June, Gay Pride Month. Alternate Proclamation Read by: Mayor Johnson At the 6 -20 -06 Council Meeting Re: Agenda Item #3 -B (T(T.CT.CS.0 C.N:-∎CCC yvvCr CC, 07CJ CJCJU A 4: vy- INAAAAA N: �C(C CC-, OZCT-PC.: W W W W W Jcn cr-P Wf.:- W W UNN: .CCCOC■O;CTAWh KA,:NNNNK:1\:-■-,--,-+- —sC(COC�O'(SAWn:�O +- +- +-+-+-, cca V Q: CT A G.I`- A W i7- 69 69 000 , A AN ,-, w A - w WIN W 1742694 177187 5041256 187218 1643408 $469.40 2601135 $401.14 INDIVIDUAL SERVICE 63699 $355.39 4490601 $443.54 ENCINAL AVE> 02040 B CURRAN, DANIEL 2040 ENCINAL AVE 508668 $550.91 ENCINAL AVE> 02121 ;MACDONNELL, ELEANOR 2121 ENCINALAVE 2292325 $638.42 MINTURN ST> 01514 WATTS, SHERYL 1514 MINTURN ST 5177486 $473.36 OAK ST> 01700 STONE, TERRY 1661 FOOTHILL PARK CIR. 2275639 $515.90 PACIFIC AVE> 00541 FR !, SARASPI, MARCIANO ,6 SHANNON CIRCLE 1884685 8685.10ICENTRAL AVE> 02431 A 11400 EVERETT LCC 2 MCMURTY CT 2251886 $388.87 EAGLE AVE> 02525 'MILLER, ERIK 12525 EAGLE AVE ACCT TOTAL I SERVICE ADDRESS OWNER OWNER ADDRESS COMMERCIAL SERVICE 55 $1,477.85 PARK S1> 01813 (THORNTON, JOHN P. 1813 PARK ST CENTRALIZED SERVICE 255306 $2,374.28 CEDAR ST> 00840 -00842 CLARK, JOHN W. JR 2712 WASHINGTON ST PLEX SERVICE 187983 $440.08 BUENA VISTA AVE> 01731 A (CORTEZ, ANTHONY P.O. BOX 3716 A F 1 1 1 N 1 O , N .p. (RAVENS COVE> 03258 IMARTINEZ, RAY CENTRAL AVE> 01001 IBRADAS, LOUIS R CENTRAL AVE 01823 LIU, CYNTHIA COLLEGE> 01239 ARADA, CARL COURAGEOUS CT> 00012 !!GOMEZ, GENERO BAY PARK TERRACE> 00125 ICHUNG, KAREN L BUENA VISTA AVE> 00779 GOMEZ, ELBIA BUENA VISTA AVE> 01594 GHALON,PARAMJEET BUENA VISTA AVE> 01722 IPENA, NAPOLEAN T 1001 CENTRAL AVE 1ALAMEDA ICA 1823 CENTRAL AVE ALAMEDA CA 1239 COLLEGE ALAMEDA CA 24199 APPALOOSA WAY 'SONORA CA 49 BAY PARK TERRACE ALAMEDA ICA 779 BUENA VISTA AVE ALAMEDA ICA 1594 BUENA VISTA AVE ALAMEDA CA 1722 BUENA VISTA AVE ALAMEDA ICA 1611 WALNUT ST 1ALAMEDA CA 1038010081 ALAMEDA CA '147 BANISTER ALAMEDA ;CA 11038 HIGH ST ' ALAMEDA CA '94501 1A ARC (PLEX N _ -- jKEVIN JOHNSON ( tenant) 905 TAYLOR AVEC !, ALAMEDA CA 94501 .A ARC ',PLEX OWNER 1414 COURT ST '' ALAMEDA CA 94501 IA ARC PLEX OWNER 1611 WALNUT ST A IALAMEDA CA 94501 IS ARC PLEX HILLIARD, ANGELICA (tenant) -- -- - - -. __I ALAMEDA CA 94502 ;A ARC PLEX GARD, DONALD (tenant) ALAMEDA CA 94501 -1526A ,ARC PLEX OWNER Q - N - CO '.. 1 . A O O IC^, aaa . 00 A.A _ o ■ ,, Off% - 1 V7 to � D A aaa i0 YS A A O O w N NA. 4 A O N N a A W a 94501 -230 A ARC 94501 262 S ARC 94501 A ARC 95370 'A 'ARC 94502 A ARC 94501 -211 A [ARC 94501 -1261A 'ARC 94501 -126 A ARC SINGLE FAMILY !OWNER SINGLE FAMILY OWNER I SINGLE FAMILY MEDCALFE, TRACEY (tenant) [SINGLE FAMILY 'OWNER SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY 'SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY C OWNER ALLEN, ARTHUR (tenant) ... 1OWNER Submitted by: Public Works At the 6 -20 -06 Council Meeting Re: Agenda Item #5 -D N O crQ p CD , G: 0: I�:—, Cr. CT C CC Cr CTCTCT CC A Cr CT Cr CT A C,: CT CT n: -o CT AAAAAAAAAA C CCa 6CT A CCt\: —, G:0:WWC.:0:C.: C CCx J O CT A CCC\: C.: CO —, G: I■: CCC Cs.: C.: CC \0: N f.: CT N: ti ACS: n: N: C':� n:—, C CC }-- CC � 0-, V + —, } -, 41 o: r.:-oO —,.-, CC OC �I 6; (J AG'f�: -* N NA IJ T Vi W N lA W O A A W U A b A J b O W b A OI W O N b b- N O- W Oo N b O Oo 00 b to O A A J O O b to N b N A T T T - J T - J b A O W - ut A"- T "' 00 O N J b A U ut J W a O T _ v` N 1 - O- N J y co.... T - ,- T b N O A T U b l"f. A N- T T O a, W a N In - N 00 A -- JA A A to -Oa A oo J O b A b ton A A N N N N A T OAO N J b U J A 1 0 N T b N W N p N- A N O r CO O - co ON ,� a W- T J W t0ii W IV L. 'J' L. b 9,1 I 4887276 1 $1,34642 CENTRALIZE 255306 1 $2,374.281 ALAMEDA LIENS APRIL 2006 RESIDENTIAL 1 I A I F I G I H I 1 I N I 0P I Q I R I S I T I ___T FA FA 69 O� Vi 69 b A fA b9 T `W FA fA A A fA b1 O A fA 69 A A fA 69 A A 69 69 m A 69 {A W N 69 69 A N 00 A A 69 O� CA 0 b y ^:A EA a A O h9 co A N co A A f1�AplI W J A O EA A O? T a 0 N b a 0 a 'co a A O 0 N W 69 ON iiiJ N O J 69 O A 0 $69.47 $69.47 $69.47 $69.47 b� ? A W OOH J b A $69.47 $69.47 $69.47 $69.47 OO b b J J $69.47 STOPPED � b J J 0 T SO A 69 T EA b b A A CA CA b b A J $139.91 STOPPED $69.47 $69.47 69 FA W Ab A- fA N O — 69 0 TT .O b A A 69 TO b b A $138.94 $138.94 EA 69 b TT 0 J A 69 69 b 0 A A 069 - 0134 -005 074 -1341 -045 069 - 0097 -027 074- 0428 -028 074 - 1036 -011 072 - 0294 - 015 -01 073 - 0410 -050 074 -1336 -045 073 - 0407 -031 069 -0019- 009 -01 074 - 0955 -025 072 - 0337 -002 074 - 1326 -112 074 - 0441 -010 071 - 0279 -015 070 - 0146 -006 074 -1230 -059 074 - 0468 -004 073 - 0392 -017 071 - 0277 -016 073 - 0412 -019 072 - 0329 -029 072- 0297 -001 074 1068 023 `071.- 0256- 008 -02 1073- 0391 -046 1071- 0218 -020 071- 0233 -004 071 - 0233 -004 069 - 0036 -001 069 - 0036 -001 074 - 1345 -012 074 - 1336 -188 069 - 0085 - 011 -02 071- 0200 -022 071 0221 005 074 - 0436 -006 071 - 0221 -005 070 - 0182 -050 07-1 -0207 -006 072 - 0294 -010 070 - 0187 -009 070 - 0166 -017 071- 0245 -037 071- 0237 -019 072- 0301 -019 BUENA VISTA AVE> 01731 A CENTRAL AVE> 02431 A EAGLE AVE> 02525 ENCINAL AVE> 02040 B ENCINAL AVE> 02121 MINTURN ST> 01514 OAK ST> 01700 OAK ST> 01707 PACIFIC AVE> 00541 FR PACIFIC AVE> 02269 PARK AVE> 01100 PARK ST> 01221 C STANFORD ST> 01919 B TAYLOR AVE> 00905 WALNUT ST> 01422 WALNUT ST> 01611 WALNUT ST> 01611 A WASHINGTON ST> 03204 LO WASHINGTON ST> 03206 BANNISTER WAY> 00147 BAY PARK TERRACE> 00125 BRIGGS AVE> 03275 BUENA VISTA AVE> 00779 BUENA VISTA AVE> 01594 BUENA VISTA AVE> 01722 I CAMINO DEL VALLE> 01119 I CEDAR ST> 00849 CENTRAL AVE> 00227 CENTRAL AVE> 01001 CENTRAL AVE> 01823 COLLEGE> 01239 COURAGEOUS CID 00012 FOUNTAIN> 01538 HAIGHT AVE> 00630 MAITLAND DR> 00138 MINTURN ST> 01816 NINTH ST> 01809 OAK PARK> 00134 PACIFIC AVE> 00836 POST> 00992 RAVENS COVE> 03258 SAN JOSE AVE> 01408 SHANNON> 00006 SIXTH ST> 01505 UNION ST> 01512 WASHINGTON ST> 02712 CORTEZ, ANTHONY 1400 EVERETT LCC MILLER, ERIK CURRAN, DANIEL MACDONNELL, ELEANO WATTS, SHERYL STONE, TERRY WILLIAMS, STUART 5. SARASPI, MARCIANO WILLIAMS, STUART HEIRS OF HELEN ARMST BIIAOFORD,-BASAN GUTLEBEN, VIOLET LIENG, LYNN JACOPETTI, LOUIS SKILLING, SHAWNA SKILLING, SHAWNA WILLIAMS, STUART S. WILLIAMS, STUART S. 1 WU -CHYI FAMILY TRUST CHUNG, KAREN L FIELDING, FRED GOMEZ, ELBIA GHALON,PARAMJEET PENA, NAPOLEAN T SANCHEZ, CARMEN RAMIREZ, NICKOLAS BRADAS, LOUIS R LIU, CYNTHIA ARADA, CARL GOMEZ, GENERO BLAKEMORE, CAMILLE B ANDERSON, COLLEEN VARGAS, EARL VARGAS, RICHARD P LOUGH, PATRICK BURESH, HELEN AGADIER, ALBERT STANG, JEAN L MARTINEZ, RAY GREEN, TSUTAKO SARASPI, LISA D. RODRIGUEZ, DANA R EARLYWINE, RAYMOND : CLARK, JOHN W. YU, CHEUK MOONEY, BARBARA CLARK, JOHN W. JR OWNER OWNER ADDRESS 1THORNTON, JOHN P. 11813 PARK ST 2341 CLIPPER LANE 905 TAYLOR AVE C 1414 COURT ST 1611 WALNUT ST A 1611 WALNUT ST A 1038 HIGH ST 1038 HIGH ST 147 BANISTER 49 BAY PARK TERRACE 3275 BRIGGS AVE 779 BUENA VISTA AVE 1594 BUENA VISTA AVE!. 1722 BUENA VISTA AVE 1119 CAMINO DEL VALL 849 CEDAR ST 227 CENTRAL AVE 1001 CENTRAL AVE 1823 CENTRAL AVE 1239 COLLEGE 24199 APPALOOSA WAY 1538 FOUNTAIN 630 HAIGHT AVE 138 MAITLAND DR 1816 MINTURN ST 1809 NINTH ST 134 OAK PARK 836 PACIFIC AVE 992 POST 29195 SANTA DOMINGO 1408 SAN JOSE AVE 6 SHANNON 1505 SIXTH ST 1512 UNION ST 2712 WASHINGTON ST 5 WHIMBREL P.O. BOX 3716 SEWARD 2 MCMURTY CT ALAMEDA 2525 EAGLE AVE ALAMEDA 2040 ENCINAL AVE ALAMEDA 1 2121 ENCINAL AVE ALAMEDA 1514 MINTURN ST ALAMEDA 1661 FOOTHILL PARK C11 LAFAYETTI 1038 HICH ST ALAMEDA 6 SHANNON CIRCLE ALAMEDA 1038 HIGH ST ALAMEDA I P.O. BOX 872 SAN LEAM 13310 WASHINGTON CT 'ALAMEDA 11715 BUENA VISTA AVE 1ALAMEDA >> > >aaa.,aaaaa > aaaaa N ->>>>>> rrrrrr rrrrrrrrOrrrrr rrrrrr rrrrrrO >aa >»zaa >>aaaz >>aa> aaaaa aaaao >>>>>>,>>>>>>>> aaaaa aaaaaa; >a >>>>z a>a>aaa >aaaaa>aa>a » a'a>a>> >> >>>>9aaa9>aa>aan b b b b a b b b .D b A `1". ` b O b b T. b b b A N N O o 0 o O N N W 0 U 0 n O O O O O N O O N O O O JO O O O O O. i N W W W A O W J Op U N J r ON AN N A W - N" O T A U 6O A- A - OO N O N 95204 94501 94501 94501 94501 94501 94501 194502 94502 94502 94501 -2115 94501 -1261 94501 -1269 ,O b b b b b b -A .O b A A A A U A A b A O 0 o 0 0 J O 0.0 0 0 0 N Y N 0 y ... aaaa aaaaaaaaaa >aaNa >aaaaaaa aay>aaaa » a>> aaaaa S IM2B !BUSINESS IOWNER IA IMFQ !MULTI- FAMILY[ OWNER aaaaaaaa » » aaaaaaaaa >aa>>: >aaaasaaaa > aaaaaa nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnn PLEX PLEX PLEX PLEX PLEX PLEX PLEX FLEX PLEX PLEX PLEX PLEX PLEX PLEX PLEX PLEX PLEX PLEX PLEX SINGLE FAMILI SINGLE FAMILI SINGLE FAMILS SINGLE PAWLS SINGLE FAMILS SINGLE FAMILS SINGLE FAMILS SINGLE FAMILS SINGLE FAMILS SINGLE FAMILS SINGLE FAMIL7 SINGLE FAMILS SINGLE FAMILI SINGLE FAME.) SINGLE FAMILI SINGLE FAMILS SINGLE FAMILS SINGLE FAMILS SINGLE FAMILS SINGLE FAMIL7 SINGLE FAMILS1 SINGLE FAMILS SINGLE FAMILS SINGLE FAMILS SINGLE FAMIL SINGLE FAMILS SINGLE FAMIL. SINGLE FAMILI c OWNER GARD, DONALD (tenant) OWNER _ OWNER OWNER SHEILA RIACH (tenant) GARDNER, THOMAS (tenant) TORIO, ANNABELLE (tenant) DORSEY, JOHNNIE MAE (tenant) KEVIN JOHNSON (tenant) CLOVER, KNIEQUELL (tenant) FISHER, BRANDY (tenant) ROSS, LYLA (tenant) OWNER OWNER HILLIARD, ANGELICA (tenant) OWNER SINATO, CRYSTAL (tenant) COLLINS, DONNA (tenant) HARVEY A MARKINSON (tenant) OWNER OWNER OWNER ALLEN, ARTHUR (tenant) OWNER OWNER CABRERA, PETRA (tenant) OWNER OWNER OWNER OWNER RICHARD T GOMEZ (tenant) CAMILLE B WELPTON (tenant) OWNER JEFFERSON, REGINA (tenant) OWNER ALLAN BROWN (tenant) OWNER OWNER OWNER MEDCALFE, TRACEY (tenant) OWNER OWNER OWNER OWNER OWNER PHUNG, KIEN P. (tenant) WHO WE BILLED ORIGINALLY CITY OF ALAMEDA MEMORANDUM ECEIVE JUN 1 6 2006 CITY OF ALAMEDA CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Date: June 14, 2006 Off Agenda To: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers From: Debra Kurita "/ City Manager Re: Additional Information Requested For Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolution Authorizing Collection of Delinquent Integrated Waste Management Accounts by Means of the Property Tax Bills BACKGROUND On June 6, 2006, the City Council set a Public Hearing for June 20, 2006 to consider collecting past due integrated waste management (IWM) accounts through the property tax bills. Council deHaan requested that staff provide the following information prior to the Public Hearing: outcome of last year's proceedings; the number of customers that are on both last year's and this year's list for collecting past due accounts through the property tax bills; and the changes implemented by the City and Alameda County Industries (ACI) to notify customers that their IWM accounts are past due. At the direction of the City Manager, the Public Works Department has prepared this an off - agenda report to address these concerns. DISCUSSION Last year, ACI assigned 73 accounts (for a total of $44,353.11) to the City for collection through the property tax billings. The Public Hearing was held on June 21, 2005 with 3 individuals speaking and 2 individuals sending written comments requesting reconsideration of the proposed Council action. Public Works staff contacted all 5 residents to address their concerns regarding the past due charges and, as provided by Council's approval, the City took the following actions: waived the charges for one account because the property owner provided documentation that the residence was vacant, reduced the amount due on 1 account which was subsequently paid, worked with 1 customer to develop a payment plan which has subsequently paid in full, and determined that there was no justification to reduce or waive the amount due on 2 accounts. Since the customers were unwilling to pay the amount due, the unpaid balances were placed on the property tax bills. The disposition of all 73 accounts is as follows: 1 account was waived; 17 accounts were paid in full; 3 accounts were reduced and paid; 18 were placed on a payment plan through the City, 11 of which have been paid in full; and 34 were placed on the property tax bills. A comparison between last year's list and this year's list indicates that 12 customers are the same. None of the property owners on this year's list receives a senior or low income discount. Re: Agenda Item #5 -D 06 -20 -06 After last year's Public Hearing, Council directed staff to improve the notification process for customers and property owners with tenants when IWM accounts are past due. Public Works and ACI executive staff worked together to develop an enhanced notification procedure that provides four formal notification letters, in addition to the quarterly billing statements, stating an IWM account is past due before ACI transfers the account to the City for collection. The details of this enhanced procedure was provided in a September 9, 2005 memo (attached). The first formal notification, which is sent 60 days after the billing statements have been mailed, is provided to the customer and property owner (if different from the customer) and explains that IWM services is a state and local requirement, provides a City of Alameda contact to answer questions regarding the requirements and states property owners are ultimately responsible for payment. The second formal notification is sent at 120 days. This notification restates the information provided in the first letter and includes a statement that a property lien will be the final step for collecting amounts owed. A third notice is sent at 200 days and reminds the customer that the property may be liened to collect past due amounts. The final letter is sent at 300 days stating this is the last opportunity to pay the bill before the account is transferred to the City, which may place a lien on the property. BUDGET CONSIDERATION/FINANCIAL ANALYSIS General Fund monies are not used for this program. This program is fully funded through the garbage rates and various grant sources. RECOMMENDATION This report is provided for informational purposes only. Respectfully submitted, ar/fget) Matthew T. Naclerio Public Works Director By: �f Maria F. DiMeglio Attachment cc: City Manager Assistant City Manager City Attorney -Pi A "sfan City Manager Public Reference Binder G: \pubworks \pwadmin\ COUNCIL \OFFAGEND\2006 \Iiens.doc CITY OF ALAMEDA MEMORANDUM Date: September 9, 2005 To: Debra Kurita City Manager From: Matthew T. Naclerio Public Works Director Re: Enhanced Billing & Collection Procedure for Integrated Waste Management Bills by Alameda County Industries (ACI) BACKGROUND On June 21, 2005, City Council reviewed a list of Integrated Waste Management (IWM) accounts that were delinquent for one year or more. The City Council unanimously approved collecting these delinquencies by means of the property tax bill. Council also directed the Acting City Manager to work with ACI to review and improve their billing and collection practices. DISCUSSION The collection of delinquent IWM bills through the property tax bill is a process utilized by a number of cities throughout Alameda County that have new or renewed Solid Waste/Recycling Franchise Agreements. The City of Alameda's goal is to minimize the number of accounts that are subject to this collection process. ACI and Public Works staff reviewed the current collection practices and developed an enhanced Billing & Collection Procedure (Attachment A). The new procedure includes advance notification to property owners and requires a deposit for tenants who are either first time customers or have a history of non - payment. The City of San Leandro has implemented a similar procedure which has successfully reduced the number of properties sent to lien. As part of this new program, ACI will provide additional customer service training specific to the City of Alameda's requirements. BUDGET CONSIDERATION/FINANCIAL IMPACT Implementation of the enhanced Billing & Collection Procedure will not increase ACI's charges to the City and does not affect the General Fund. RECOMMENDATION This report is provided for informational purposes only. MTN:MFD:gc Attachment cc: Assistant City Manager Assistant to the City Manager Vice President — ACI G:\pubworks\pwadmin \COUNCIL \OFFAGEND\2005\ACI Collection procedures 1.doc Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service Attachment A ENHANCED BILLING & COLLECTION PROCEDURES (Current practice is shown in Italics) Residential Collection: (Residential Customers are billed quarterly in advance) 1. First week of the new quarter send out billing statements. Late statements sent out at 45 days 2. 60 days - send out late notices to tenant and property owners. Include statements that: a. State and local ordinances require all properties to subscribe to and pay for Integrated Waste Management (IWM) services whether the service is used or not. b. The full IWM fee must be paid. Local ordinances do not allow for partial exemptions (organics or recycling). c. Property owners are ultimately responsible for non - payment of tenants and that after 120 days of non - payment by tenant, billing address will be changed to property owner's. d. Minimum service (removal of recycling and organic containers and reduction to 32- gallon garbage container) will be implemented after 120 days of non - payment. e. These are City of Alameda requirements and provide Public Works Department contact for questions regarding these requirements. f. $20 late fee will be assessed after 90 days of non - payment and every quarter thereafter. 3. 90 days - late fee assessed and reflected on new quarterly statement. If customer contacts ACI, they will work with them to resolve payment issues, including setting up a payment plan. 4. 120 days — ACI will take the following actions: a. Make collection phone calls to discuss non-payment with customer directly. b. If ACI determines that customer has moved and left no forwarding address (typically occurs when rental property involved), send to collection agency ($50 fee attached). c. Send 1st letter re: Potential Lien Proceedings to billed customer and property owner. Include a statement that property owner is ultimately responsible for non- payment of tenant. d. Remove recycling (blue) and organics (green) carts and reduce service to 32- gallon service. e. Change billing address from the tenant to the property owner. f. Inform customer that $20 late fee will be assessed after 180 days of non - payment and every quarter thereafter. g. Include statement that these are City of Alameda requirements and provide Public Works Department contact for questions regarding these requirements. 5. 180 days — late fee assessed. 6. 200 days - send 2nd letter re: Potential Lien Proceedings to billed customer and property owner. Include statements that property owner is ultimately responsible for non - payment of tenant and these are City of Alameda requirements. Provide Public Works Department contact for questions regarding City requirements. 7. 270 days — late fee assessed. Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service 8. 300 days - send 3rd and final letter re: Potential Lien Proceedings to billed customer and property owner. Include a statement that this is last opportunity to pay bill before ACI transfers to delinquency to City and reminder that property owner is ultimately responsible for non - payment by tenant. Clarify that these are City of Alameda requirements and provide Public Works Department contact for questions regarding these requirements. 9. Submit all balances over 1 year old to City for collection through property tax. First Time Residential Customers that are renters or customers with history of non- payment: 1. First Time residential customers that are tenants or customers with history of non- payment are required to fill out an Application for Service, The application will be on file with ACI and provided to the property owner. 2. First Time residential customers that are tenants and who are required to pay their IWM bill by the property owner or customers with history of non - payment, will be required to leave a deposit that will cover three (3) months of service. Commercial and Debris Box Customers: (Commercial and debris box customers are billed in arrears at the end of the month) 1. Last day of the month customer is billed for all activity for the prior 30 days. 2. 45 days - customer and property owner is assessed a late fee and sent 15t collection letter. If customer contacts ACI and arranges and meets payment schedule, ACI will continue to provide existing level of service. Because of the possibility of the business going bankrupt in a short period of time, ACI closely watches commercial accounts. Include statements that: a. State and local ordinances require all properties to subscribe to and pay for Integrated Waste Management (IWM) services whether the service is used or not. b. The full IWM fee must be paid. Local ordinances do not allow for partial exemptions (organics or recycling). c. Property owners are ultimately responsible for non - payment of tenants and that after 60 days of non - payment by tenant, billing address will be changed to property owner's. d. Minimum service (removal of recycling and organic containers and reduction to 32- gallon garbage container) will be implemented after 60 days of non - payment. e. These are City of Alameda requirements and provide Public Works Department contact for questions regarding these requirements. 3. 60 days — ACI will take the following actions: a. Make collection phone calls to discuss non-payment with customer directly. b. Remove recycling (blue) and organics (green) carts and reduce solid waste service to 32- gallon service. c. Change billing address from tenant to property owner. 4. 75 days — An additional late fee assessed, and if account is not paid, additional late fees are again assessed every 30 days thereafter. Send 1st letter re: Potential Lien Proceedings letter notifying property owner that billing address has been changed to property owner's address, property owner is ultimately responsible for non - payment of Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service tenant, inform of potential to collect on property tax, advise that these are City of Alameda requirements and provide Public Works Department contact for questions regarding City requirements. 5. 100 days - send 2 "d letter re: Potential Lien Proceedings to property owner. Include statements that property owner is ultimately responsible for non - payment of tenant, inform of potential to collect on property tax, advise that these are City of Alameda requirements and provide Public Works Department contact for questions regarding City requirements. 6. 200 days - send 3rd and final letter re: Potential Lien Proceedings to property owner. Include statements that this is last opportunity to pay bill before ACI transfers to City, property owner is ultimately responsible for non - payment of tenant, inform of potential to collect on property tax, advise that these are City of Alameda requirements and provide Public Works Department contact for questions regarding City requirements. 7. Submit all balances over 1 year old to City for collection through property tax. First Time Commercial and Debris Box Customers: 1. On demand debris box customers will not be allowed to order new pick ups once an invoice is forty five days past due. Contractors are the most likely to not pay, especially small ones that work on a less than regular basis in the City of Alameda. 2. All customers, especially commercial and debris box customers, will be made aware of collection policies when new services are initiated (application process). In addition, the collection policies are reflected on the statements. G:\pubworks\pwadmin\ COUNCIL\ OFFAGEND \2005\acicollectionproced ures 1 attach.doc Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service Note: Letter has been typed as written (attached) by its author. To Whom It May Concern: This letter is concerning the account #508668 at 2121 Encincal Ave, Alameda, California. The property at 2121 Encinal Avenue is listed as a duplex and was so used for fifteen years. The house was purchased in 1955 but has been used as a single dwelling since 1970. I am requesting that I be billed for a single home instead of a duplex. Yours truly, Eleanor MacDonnell Re: Agenda Item #5 -D 06 -20 -06 0 i \ t \ ,.,1 k \ ‘ See OAK, Page A14 1 O :tA.1§ o a:i 101 g a ihflRtfl ct, a'!to.'o yt't , = o �..,a'w.40 °rc'eod �° y mac, �3` F. 8' " �{ Q :p'' O' 69. cb D o g-s. ga bA V a o 1tfl.ijfl fi Co 6 i'! t; p+prn..,o o 0)t ' 73,, .0 0 °P -g oo, y� l.hb b!i .0 s~ s r aG, a a pp er o y c°°Eow v o oo C w i p b`1v °u • o t 0 N o° P cd v >'o o a .g .E 0 ] - O . a - pv C-p . THURSDAY, /_ne 8, 2006 THE OAKLAND TRIBUNE METRO 3 OAKLANDERS, WE RESERVED LAND FOR PUBLIC PARKS: DON'T WALL OFF OUR WATERFRONT! Support parks on our PUBLICLY-OWNED waterfront near Jack London Square. Oakland Harbor Partners wants to build 3100 housing units on public lands at our waterfront. These lands are supposed to pro- vide public parks. The Estuary Policy Plan, adopted in 1999 with broad public support, calls for extensive waterfront parks in the Oak St. to 9th Ave. area — "one of the most signifi- cant additions of urban parkland within the entire Bay Area." But the developer wants to cut out 40% • of those parks! The remaining parks would • mostly be hidden from public view, and serve owners of pricey new condos. Wall -to -wall buildings, 6 to 24 stories high, would block views of the water from the Embarcadero, the main access street. For example, the develop- er wants to take a third of Channel Park for condos, blocking views (see visualizations at right). In 2002, Oakland voters passed the. Measure DD park bond by an 80% margin. One of its main purposes was to implement the Estuary Policy Plan. It provides $18 mil- lion to develop these parks. But if the developer has its way, we won't get the parks that we voted for. Once this public land is gone, we'll never get it back for public use. The City Council will decide the fate of this vital area at its June 20 meeting. We have to speak out now. Contact your City Councilmembers, listed at right. Cut out the coupon in this aid) and mail it to your Councilmember. Urge them to retain the full open space called for in the City's Estuary Policy Plan. Ask for all the waterfront parks we voted for in the 2002 Measure DD bond measure. Sponsored and paid for by: Lewc.E or WOMEN VorERS OF OAKLAND SIERRA CLUB, S. FeANcrsco BAST CHAPTER: 8 Visualization of the view from Embareadero towards the planned Channel Park (at top) and with a building of the size proposed(above). Striped areas were shown as parkland in the Estuary Policy Plan, but are now proposed as building sites. Ninth Avenue Terminal is proposed for 93% demolition, replaced by turf on concrete. Henry Chang (at- large) cityochang @aol.com (510) 238 -7008 Fax: (510) 238.6910 Jane Brunner (District 1) jbrunner@oaklandnet.com (5)0) 238 -7001 Fax (510) 238 -6910 Pat Kernighan (District 2) pkernighan@ oaklandnet.com (510) 238.7002 Fax: (510) 238 -6910 Nancy Nadel (District 3 ) nnadel@oakiandnet.com (510) 238 -7003 Fax: (510) 238.6929, Jean Quan (District 4) jquan @oaklandnet. com (510) 238 -7004 Fax: (510) 986.2765 Ignacio De La Fuente (District 5 ) idelafuente@ oaklandnet.com (510) 238 -7005 Fax: (510) 238 -6929 Desley Brooks (District 6) dbrooks@oaklandnet.com (510) 238 -7006 Fax: (510) 238 -6910 tarry Reid (District 7) lreid @oaklandnet.com (510) 238.7007 Fax: (510) 238 -6910. Address for all Counctlmembers: City Hall 1 Frank Ogawa Plaza Oakland, CA 94612 Ronald Dellums (mayoral candidat¢). 1212 Broadway, 9th Fl. Oakland, CA 94612 rondellumsformayor@ sbcglobaLnet (510) 444.6016 Fax: (510) 444 -6067 Dear City Councilmember, In voting on the Oak to 9th project, please insist on: • All of the open space called for by the Estuary Policy Plan • Adequate affordable housing • Alt of the waterfront parks we voted for in Measure DD Yours truly, Name Address Phone Email from t. ilorNev, t\LI ee-f9._ ktt&C-orfe» mcifl USi cD< 12.4-e re.,s e._,(:+0k 39 c, Cre.r\ke,r Dr., 5,g,00 c:e(2.09\anrVi 14S-13(1-200 'Swat_ 11, '1066 tz-A-k ()Oa t.ixe MP N (4.42-cy, 4 i1jtii, 1 7-) to isr‘ ThQ 2oOtkt f\,55 6c:fm-V)o,/stis (NkR.11\1) CLAN 4?-)r rltQ. sk-ckrr IAQ 1c7u) urn , n (TV 0, rv‘e,ri-One...c cQ INN-V*0r\ Ckt 2k1S0 ick+; On rne cknir5 ff& t)o(' co Of- epe c,A, 12.e_kittv evy...,,,,.3 sza.\--k- 4-0 t_,, Jr t..,,,,„ e....x Q. c, u....-N \ v Q..... - \.1 t C..Q, r reSi ci 4-1+ Wchre, l..0‘14z1 'IS c.kkke.M(Sk-fi ni to 5.Q.."k ye 0 c.t.Acvi Az..r.-k-s ( 1....kikex 0. "Id Sim- ki c5 ) T.. 8 0 i'N' 4- 440‘k... c).. OW INkC‘ (if Q_ckrm o ok,ro- V.:1 AA/ e, ;3 6141-:1 f.,$ kA.Ii.5. o e S I A)" (.4 o 1 V-voie, cav5 I N D i 'A RI7.,44 30 0 S LO A V ; ( s E , R 1 . _ G- G- I e D A Keft'S .5 . VOR.. V\ e R LI I\1 D Et rZ. STAN 01:ig G") 0 rl i€4er ckPia Sod-sny -ri, 1 wiz.. N , ft, i A , t5 fi-e_ o v\e, or' 30‘. r. it -2..o:\-- + 0 n I pi ft MQ-r-$1 Ca 7.7 sz = g = Ci c....0,--k_42_ sk),,r‘ tocoN, tr\ c.,01-stykss okr“.4 44AQ. CcA■C or n:co, 91-004-t, ',--L V..) 0 k..4.,\ (4 ell C,.. 0 Lke c8, t:4.,. Co r\ c-t'cz. 55 7, E-1 e1 4-k; 5 cl e...44.,4:44+ kcippe...A, .1 prodk.5 -i--0 Grocl E az 41 c4 cf) ; LI t 04,P L,) GI ck, 4—IN•04-4". rt+ W 0 0.14-1 Nol 11-01-Norcf, Q., Sto,c14,— C 0 r. (sfiQ.s5 1 , cjScL O C 12.ep fe.SR, r\-itkirV% vtF.) g-e- s or\ s ■Alh‘6 -1r Ctv -)4,) 11- tR ‘e:Icz.:\ck enve, c,Wt vAiot cal 15 44% V-1%.A, 1'N r 44A Ce_A rN5 ckce. 4 tA s?, or o s-kv s vt,q3 :.,) ‘4..c. cLA cd CcimitNeti r. t i- CZ" S SA-CON I Nd tL rnr \t i-i-N44\t.c'ffy‘'t cocts"-‘c\-- rrN Oeq.. +..s\ .0\ ti\-\-- celme-s ‘inrc-i-kfirot'twN, Ahr acri 0 r\ s‘e (Ay. cd1 kb rfAt4*. Q.-4.-orss, 0 Q0e3-e.A-tiv\s cAN9d -V-ke, W\e't V‘o-L"'--, r ci pros(2..c..L.zi=e„ci loc,ke4 f)) or ,wk are_, `) es\-- o(\9 fvo cii INO Vit,—CokQr$4.) kft a to cyAtstkr‘ot kr(' SA—ch I\ (I wIrvc5 pot (i V( a ; akiNS:".; os it, 5., v. 19 .., pork; (15 1 oq.5\t\ <zit- ‘' 5‘.170A, C,,o1NirrAll in. 5 i-9...c.c) 0 C: 14.e.tpirN5 --1-AN44. R- v...‘ (: NS i r, ..so,'‘VI i-,-- .\--,e, 4, 5\-\.“- /1iG- tA.n t.-ort ro 1 1 cvc0 .0 °Sze- (% orN e_cl a-V ‘ aw- ck,‘,'‘ ii v•,5 cAVi -2.4e..rvs: ( 3"`lit- ..i... 6-E c.i., kik +0 rilQ, i-kc\ cs,kisl- utet cYtr.N c.fik'r-z....mNs kc&oR„ i rl 0-tiN‘ rs% (-, to u1/41 o T'r CI 4 \oo ki.j.k.". -tko-k .\--k2- to.N.4Nct- \\ (i)k-or\ i ColNk CI 6 ti I \ CJA-,3 S CA4C Q,,, t'Alt m ca..,c\ c -1-1,1q..,5-:,t, C .., P e-citke 0 '''' .C.e., (Rfr , , 1 1 cAr\cl vio\>.:0 V..)...(;-4,Aot\#) s.,BkKk- +.11.6.7\- 15 ,.5visi- mt.) f Nik,R, Joel:, cri- \icpa,1 tA,11(?.? NA-‘0.-+ cA. 0 w pr■ s irk oe fzi-,13. s ()A- d rN Ov 4-N O‹ NR.J eMV;) (670 D.,0c--16,7 ( 9 H rror,ei-t4;61e.; re,i-e. Stalk- Corv3res5 UaSu e, & tQSCJS ms,e. 12, o or\ k Ntkii)t. cos 110+ Aix* Ok 0 t)J t.r 0, 9,Q "vkr\ pr (Not ciy\iik5 sVNov,..\ rv,P,i' ca h (As() os, i".c.) Q't c4Lckr 1,1/41\6- i) (Iv* c%5 at, -13f0A- s tx5.-} I in 111 J1P cos n +-ke. 0 +A wz..,e c- 131/4-“1 k-AA CA. .krk. ot VINg 04„ rN VA‘ 5- \1/4 s cuke. A* tA, damoi.v% cr o.+IS r42,i3ty A-Vok (‘‘ -4k:s ct an ~ro 1 e cLV ckis u yN5 Grupt5, c3iNd vl 5 a u.‘k,c out I 1/ ( S C.A.,--1/4A— CI\ p o QA1/4 71-1,‘ ‘A, ck-- 0 rr OCc c .(3 VS74 04,. cAlic i'V\:1/4 1\ k rt-k-Vq_c c-c . Co vsA co o orN 1QJ (41 1-.N 1/43 4-..t.No1/4. 5k-Vs c1/4\7 0 441,z4- 42_ D.. a o k.v.4ifis. 1/4),--V 4-1(1Q- rel Q. -11., o-V. o. 15c 17- 1) 1 k, \J L )1,A'‘ tv■:t c\rNA-- 6 42- fr sic (-1/4„c.Q a GAr• r,,N. r> kA e-1) C.1. dri Or\ 8" kOir k\nrccV o•Ce, eiNC-or ct,(1 173 c*.\• .1- (),v,) R., rvi O¼ct . Q.C5 PITOVA-Ciiik Mr. MU 4i.1 Torrey 94501:;*ft ki ($t ote\ 5r es..5 fywor, Sov\c' r'%155e-j rn-o t0k . c 0(9 U.) _S S k--1-\1k1.5 \r‘Q-c tz- c et vn 0 A4AS I €-Virk)r \k' 0, p -QA's ck" k S Us0 S ()on .c;(t\CR-CQ-1 OA0411. 9741 C--:45CfC4-.'1. \ Ci'1. CA .,1 10 CkLS kr0 US 1 rl C.., offv1iArl XX if troot--0..\9Q,- c.),c6 ckect JQ Cor\c,3r-e_ss. klorn(AA J-Ionoro.1,(Q_, Cy couv-\c.2,,k O The., c__.ky Hor\orektok, C■icy Giceit-, De-Lbre_ k,usrika Nic■nc.citx CIA-y tilarr)QA0, WAYNE LAPIERRE EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA May 31, 2006 Mr. Michael J. Torrey 174 Maple Way Alameda, CA 94501 -1847 11I1uuI1,I1,1I1u11 11��h111IuIut1 ,u11uII11uII1u1Il111Iul1 Dear Mr. Torrey, 0697713 You have been specially selected to represent your fellow gun owners in the Alameda, California area in the enclosed National Gun Owner's Action Survey. I have enclosed two copies of this critical document for you. Please, complete the top copy and return it to me in the envelope provided, and keep the bottom copy for your records. It will only take a few minutes of your time. This national Action Survey is designed to get the attention of every Congressman, Senator, and state legislator, and let them know in no uncertain terms that we gun owners are sick and tired of being treated like second -class citizens ... That we are drawing a line in the sand against more gun bans ... And, that we will FIGHT BACK against politicians who try to ban our guns and ammo. As you know, our Founding Fathers gave us our Bill of Rights to protect all of our sacred freedoms. But now, hundreds of powerful politicians have targeted one of those rights for destruction -- our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. That's why gun owners like you need to take a stand, and why I've chosen YOU to provide your answers on this special Survey. Yours is a respected voice in the Alameda, California area. When you speak up, your elected officials will listen. So please, answer this Gun Owner's Action Survey today, and help me send a clear message to Congress, to candidates in your state, and to the national media -- that we cannot and will not give up the rights that our forefathers died to defend. And, if you want to keep your guns, then please do one more thing: Please join the NRA. But the NRA is only as powerful as your personal commitment to keep your freedoms. We can't protect your rights without YOUR help. Unless gun owners like you help support the NRA and participate in our fight, then (Over, please) 11250 WAPLES MILL ROAD • FAIRFAX, VA 22030 WWW.NRA.ORG your right to keep and bear arms could soon be legislated out of existence. That's why I hope you'll use the enclosed Membership Application to join the NRA today. As an NRA member, we'll provide you with the information you need to fight back against politicians like Senators Hillary Clinton and Ted Kennedy, media elites, and gun - ban organizations who have set their sights on your Second Amendment rights. These powerful anti - gunners say that, because of violent crime, you should give up your freedom AND your guns. The real truth about crime is that hundreds of violent felons are turned loose on our streets every day by our failed criminal justice system. And many of these criminals commit more violent crimes -- including murder, arson, rape, and robbery. But, instead of supporting tough laws to keep these thugs in jail, anti -gun politicians are demanding more "gun control" laws aimed at law - abiding citizens. They say you should give up your right to privacy and allow the government to maintain detailed records about your personal life, including your fingerprints, your photograph and other information just like a common criminal! They've proposed legislation in Congress which would require you to have a government license for gun purchases, force you to undergo mandatory "safety training" at the hands of anti -gun bureaucrats, and hold you criminally liable if a` convicted felon steals our guns and uses them tp commit a heinous crime. *is d ct ` CA at d loa l% trs ustf\ & u - s o►nc\ \C. t.k \\ 10 4.,` S V.i k-C\A ovv And they've demanded that you register yourself and your guns; then give the l government the power to decide whether you're "fit" to own a gun! 4 (e p0' In other words, they're blaming you for the actions of violent criminals. And & U S they're demanding that you give up your guns to make up for the failures of our criminal 0 r justice system! ! ! 6- u That's why you need to answer the enclosed National Gun Owner's Action a Survey. You need to send these politicians a message to GET TOUGH ON CRIME and u tell them to keep their hands off your guns. c> And, if you cherish your freedoms like I think you do, it's very, very important for you to join the NRA today. In fact, because it's so important for you to join the NRA, I want to offer you a special, $10 discount off your membership dues. That means, instead of our regular dues rate of $35, you can join the NRA today for just $25. Or you can save even more by choosing a two -year membership for $50 (normally $60) or a three -year membership for $70 (normally $85!) Plus, in addition to your discount, you'll receive a number of excellent benefits to (Next page, please) 3 make your membership even more valuable and worthwhile. These special membership benefits include: * The NRA Black & Gold Shooter's Cap. * A subscription to one of the NRA's great magazines: American Rifleman, American Hunter, America's 1S1 Freedom or Woman's Outlook (your choice!). * Members -only DISCOUNTS at participating gun stores, sporting goods stores and other retailers. * Special NRA hotel, motel, and rental car discounts -- with UP TO 30% SAVINGS! * Access to NRA's hunting, shooting and safety programs. And, invitations to NRA events, including our famous "Friends of NRA" events near your home. * A personalized membership card and window decal. Most important, as an NRA member, you'll receive the information and tools you need to play" an important grassroots role in defending the Second Amendment. And you'll get this information absolutely free. But, if you don't join now, tomorrow may be too late to save your guns. During the past four years, we have seen gun bans and confiscations on a worldwide scale, including Canada, Australia and Great Britain. Now, here in America, the anti - gunners are using the same strategy to ban YOUR guns that they used in these other countries -- by turning your fellow citizens against gun owners and placing the blame for violent crime on you. As I write, they're trying to convince your fellow Americans that, because you own a gun, you're a "kook" and a second -class citizen who doesn't deserve the same rights as other Americans. This sounds like something that could only happen in Hitler's Germany, Stalin's Soviet Union, or Mao Tse Tung's communist reign of terror in China. But it's happening right here in the USA with anti -gun Congressmen, the gun -ban lobby, and the gun - hating media attempting to take away virtually all your Constitutional rights ... ... And they want to discriminate against you and treat you like a second - class citizen ... Simply because you own a gun. To me, that's not right. As Executive Vice President of the NRA, I know that the overwhelming majority (Over, please) — 4 — of gun owners are law - abiding, patriotic citizens who are leaders in their communities and fine role models for our children. That's why I need you to answer this National Gun Owner's Action Survey immediately. Your Survey answers will enable the NRA and me to tell Congress and the media where you stand on firearm issues and crime issues, and put them on notice that we're serious about keeping our GUNS and our FREEDOMS. For your rights to survive, you must let them know where you stand. So please, answer this critical Survey today. Return the top copy to me in the postage -paid envelope I've enclosed. And keep the bottom copy for your own records. And please, join the NRA today. These two actions -- completing your National Gun Owner's Action Survey and joining the NRA -- will put the politicians on notice that you cannot and will not accept the further destruction and chipping away at your fundamental freedom to hunt, shoot, and own a gun for the defense of your home and loved ones. Our ancestors paid the price of freedom with their blood. But, unless you and I stand firm under one banner to defeat gun bans, it's only a matter of time until we lose our freedom, our heritage, our rights, and our guns. That's why I'm calling on you to answer the enclosed National Gun Owner's Action Survey, and return it right away with your NRA membership dues. Thank you very much. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, Wayne LaPierre Executive Vice President P.S. In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks, gun haters are cynically trying to use the Homeland Security issue as a new lever to restrict your personal right to own and use firearms ... making your Survey answers and your membership in the NRA more important than ever. 14 ot r O w '"or Ma. P.P.S. Remember, when you join the NRA today you'll receive the Black & Gold NRA Shooter's Cap -- and a special $10 membership discount. Or, save even more with a two -year or three -year membership. And whatever membership you choose, be sure to return your completed Gun Owner's Action Survey today. Thanks again. rn cam (' . �, eR_ v a-as1ry d % _ o c,'45hNAzoji, &u%n ow n e5(\i.p) cAc a S �� REGISTERED To: National Rifle Association of America 2006 National Gun Owner's Action Survey REGISTRATION NUMBER: MR. MICHAEL J. TORREY 174 MAPLE WAY ALAMEDA, CA 14501-1647 CVM N r P & IN 0 r In or 061773,3 17291962 KLEVH43N7 f'&\ oUnkic" (2, kk \)0,\Q„Ri \c,c, 1. Do you agree that the Second Amendment of our United States Constitution guarantees your individual right to own a gun and that the Second Amendment is just as important as your other Constitutional rights? Yes CI No * No opinion 2. Do you think the government should be allowed to store personal information on you just because you are a gun owner? Yes 0 No 0 No opinion 3. Do you think the government should have II-Le power tp limit the number of guns you can own? shokia 10,4AI * Yes CI No 0 No opinion (314 4. Do you agree with politicians in Washington who say that all gun owners should be licensitd, _,and forc0 tq register their guns with the government? ft b..s “1-1 it Yes 0 No I q No op nion tic.J k,dck---S rr-o. 5. Using your tax dollars, t e u nited Nations is preparing a plan to impose international gun control affecting you and other American citizeps. Do you think this is a good 4.1se of your tax dollars? ‘■,‘ r4 cmoc,Ns * Yes Qg No 0 Undecided , 1,0'4f1A 0." WV 6. Do you suppo he passage of a w w w uld rhandate - - the use of "trigger locks" and hold gun owners criminally responsible if their gun is used in a crime, even if the gun is stolen? L. WON bQ. C0-14'fikictiroLS 111. Yes k No CI Undeci ed 7. Do you agree with certain government officials 49 want to i) AIN% 5 s ban hunting on public lands? VhvciN. 1141 ‘Nki.filertlq Ilk Yes LI No 0 No opinion ))1()Q.,(1 C,OCI)Q,S-V° /04 k-tAcCt " qvCN tv\ (AY \ (‘-5 PLEASE DO NOT DETACH - RETURN TH Do you believe that gun owners should be required to submit to "safety training' by government bureaucrats before they're allowed to exercise their Second Amendment right keep and bear arms? lb O Yes , No 0 No °cog C. .r exfK'S' ,,,4Q-ervtivi. 0 (pop 9. Do you think law-abiding gun owner e you sel are in any way responsible for the actions of murderers and robbers ettio use guns to commit their crimes? 5c9r4w,k‘ V5 1--r-st- 1 ". Yes 17' tA"51:-.1 No . Undecided Q.., Art, 3c- tvz., kij r 10. Do you thin our criminal justice system has done a good job in keeping repeat violenkoffenders out of our communities and off our streets? 1-0.a\LAn chiC C-Vc OtIV,Autr,A ca Yes 0 No * Undecided co., 11. If law-abiding citizens were forced to give up their guns to the government, do you think crime rates in your community would go up, go down, or stay about the same? 1",,,oxeii -1-%o Sc, O Go up , q Go down 0 Stay about the same Q-C 15c1101.0Mora V-0,\ a ete5an 12. Do you agree wit 1 anti-gun extremists who claim that gun registration, gun-owner licensing, and outright gun bans would help prevent terrorist attacks on our nation? A. 5 0 ,f1 J Yes No, CI No anion ora,crett'ICS e-3 G-von..s 13. Will you authorize the NRA to use your Survey answers in our compiled results to be released to Congress, Administration officials and your state legislature? /f" (.1\ cvt) N * Yes CI No t 5u r".' 14. Will you join the NRA today? r 00,4, o Yes 0 No 11-t e.) f2j< Please sign nertto validate your survey answers- , °Vv‘eC t4c,&. ert\ 1 Date:06-11--- o Signature: TY 4141.. IS COPY IN THE ENV PE PROVIDED National Gun Owner's Action Survey And MEMBERSHIP ACCEPTANCE 6221-06 THE PRESIDENTIAL POLL 1995 (continued) II. The Republican Agenda: (continued) 2. Do you favor or oppose Republican efforts to enact a capital gains tax cut which would deliver 70% of its benefits to households making more than $200,000 per year? A. I don't know. Exactly how do low income households benefit from this venture? As a concern of evident how do the homeless households before the earthquake of 1989 benefit from this venture? 3. Do you favor or oppose Republican plans to make huge cuts in entitlement spending. including reductions in Medicare and Federal employee retirement programs? A. I don't know. Exactly who's entitlement spending did they have in mind? And how are they defining diminution? By elevating the Doctor's salary, or descending the patient's medical bill? Which method will guarantee more lives? 4. Do you favor or oppose Republican efforts to repeal the assault weapons ban? A. Yes I strongly oppose the Republican attempt to repeal the assault weapons ban. Someday they will reveal their obligation; because the lives preserved will be their own, as well as the lives of children in all locations of this University. Actually weapons should be abolished entirely; especially where children are paronymous; veneering the fact that guns are following children to pedagogic institutions from elementary to higher learning. 5. Republican leaders are advocating a welfare reform plan that would end welfare benefits for single parents who cannot find work, and spend the money on orphanages to house their children. do you support or oppose this approach? A. I don't know. Single parents have to eat, pay revenues, and raise their children just as married parents do. Some single parents have already exausted their child support services. If they have no income on which to support their children, they then become child maledictors. It is a deplorable eventuality when an exceptional single parent is deemed a child maledictor due to circumstances beyond their control. Will the real child maledictor please stand up? FROM: A HUMAN BEING COMPANY: GOD'S WORLD INCORPORATED 042195 1400 K STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 PH: (916) 658 -8200 Fx: (916) 658 -8240 LEAGUE CITIES OS " June 7, 2006 TO: Mayors, City Managers and City Clerks RE: Designation of Voting Delegate and Alternate for 2006 League Annual Conference — September 6 -9, San Diego WW \V.CACITIES.ORG Please review this memo carefully, as new procedures have been adopted regarding designation of voting delegates and alternates and voting at the Annual Conference. The League's 2006 Annual Conference is scheduled for September 6 -9 in San Diego. An important part of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting, scheduled for Saturday morning, September 9. At this meeting, the League membership considers and takes action on resolutions that establish League policy. In order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting your city council must designate a voting delegate and may designate a voting delegate alternate. Please complete the attached voting delegate form and return it to the League's office no later than August 15 so that voting delegate /alternate records may be established prior to the conference. At the conference, voting delegate forms may be returned to the Voting Delegate desk located in the conference registration area. Please note the following procedures that are intended to ensure the integrity of the voting process at the Annual Business Meeting. • Action by Council Required. Consistent with League bylaws, a city's voting delegate and alternate must be designated by the city council. When completing the attached voting delegate form, please attach either a copy of the council resolution that reflects the council action taken, or, have your city clerk or mayor sign the form affirming that the names provided are those selected by the city council. Please note that designating the voting delegate and alternate must be done by city council action and cannot be accomplished by individual action of the mayor alone. • Conference Registration Required. The voting delegate and alternate must be registered to attend the conference. At least one must be present at the Business Meeting and in possession of voting card in order to cast a vote. • Transferring Voting Card to Non - Designated Individuals Not Allowed. The voting card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternate, but only between the voting delegate and alternate. If the voting delegate and alternate find themselves unable to attend the Business Meeting, they may not transfer the voting card to another city official. -over - Council Communication #7 -A 6 -20 -06 i • Options. In order to plan ahead for such situations, we suggest that when your council adopts the initial resolution designating the voting delegate and alternate that they also designate in a separate action, a second alternate, should one be needed. Verification of the appropriate city council action to designate the additional alternate should be used by the individual when requesting new alternate status at the voting desk. (Please note: A League bylaws change will be proposed at this year's conference to increase the number of alternates to two. However, if enacted, such a change will not go into effect until the 2007 conference.) • New Seating Protocol during General Assembly. At the Business Meeting, individuals with the voting card will sit in a separate area. Admission to this area will be limited to those individuals with a special stamp on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate or alternate. If the voting delegate and alternate wish to sit together, both should sign in at the Voting Delegate desk and obtain the special stamps on their badges. The voting procedures that will be used at the conference are attached to this memo. Please share them with your council and especially with the individuals your council designates as your city's voting delegate and alternate. The Voting Delegate desk in the registration area will be open September 6, 7 and 8 and prior to the Business Meeting on September 9. The Voting Delegate desk will also be open at the Business Meeting, but not during a roll call vote, should one be undertaken. Once again, thank you for completing the voting delegate and alternate form and returning it to the League office by August 15, 2006. If you have questions, please call Debbie Kinsey at (916) 658 -8221. Attachments: • 2006 Annual Conference Voting Procedures • Voting Delegate /Alternate Form 1 LEAGUIA E OF CALIFORN CITIES 1400 K Street, Suite 400 • Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916.658.8200 Fax: 916.658.8240 www.cacities.org Annual Conference Voting Procedures 2006 Annual Conference 1. One City One Vote. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to League policy. 2. Designating a City Voting Representative. Prior to the Annual Conference, each city council designates a voting delegate and an alternate; these individuals are identified in the Voting Delegate Form provided to the League Credentials Committee. 3. Registering with the Credentials Committee. The voting delegate, or alternate, may pick up the city's voting card at the voting card desk in the conference registration area. 4. Signing Initiated Resolution Petitions. Only those individuals registered and with signatures on file with the Credentials Committee may sign petitions to initiate a resolution. 5. Voting. To cast the city's vote, a city official must have in his or her possession the city's voting card and be registered with the Credentials Committee. 6. New Voting Area at Business Meeting. At the Business Meeting, individuals with the voting card will sit in a separate area. Admission will be limited to those individuals with a special stamp on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate or alternate. If the voting delegate and alternate wish to sit together, both should sign in at the Voting Delegate desk and obtain the special stamps on their badges. 7. Resolving Disputes. In case of dispute, the Credentials Committee will determine the validity of signatures on petitioned resolutions and the right of a city official to vote at the Business Meeting. LEAGRUE CITIES CITY: Pk "L We PA 2006 ANNUAL CONFERENCE VOTING DELEGATE /ALTERNATE FORM Please complete this form and return it to the League office by August 15, 2006. Forms not sent by this deadline may be returned to the Voting Delegate Desk located in the Annual Conference Registration Area. In order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting, voting delegates and alternates must be designated by your city council. Please attach the council resolution as proof of designation. As an alternative, the Mayor or City Clerk may sign this form, affirming that the designation reflects the action taken by the council. Please note: At this year's conference, voting delegates and alternates will be seated in a separate area at the Annual Business Meeting. Admission to this special area will be limited to individuals (voting delegates and alternates) who are identified with a special stamp on their conference badge. If your city's voting delegate and alternate wish to sit together at the Business Meeting, they are both encouraged to register at the Voting Desk in order to obtain the identifying stamp that will admit them to the special voting area. 1. VOTING DELEGATE Name: Tb v1 i ci J So, Co v� CA. ( ►r -e�+ry (o %-tom Title: 2. VOTING DELEGATE ALTERNATE Name: Dom del- f. a►., Title: CA) v\c. ATTEST (I affirm that the information provided reflects action by the city council to designate the voting delegate and alternate.) Name: Title: Phone: S tO 717. LI jOO Date: I I O (p Please complete and return by August 15 to: League of California Cities ATTN: Debbie Kinsey FAX: (916) 658 -8240 1400 K Street Sacramento, CA 95814 AC2006 V otingDelegate Letter. doc City of Alameda Interoffice Memorandum June 20, 2006 To: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Re: The Proposed FY2006 -2007 Budget Issue Bin Items On May 30, the proposed budget for fiscal year 2006 -2007 and 2007 -2008 was presented to the Council for review and consideration. This budget reflects the challenges and opportunities that the City will face over the next two fiscal years. The proposal continues the City's emphasis on maintaining the highest quality of public safety and general services, on addressing new or enhanced service areas, on continuing a focus on improvements to the City's infrastructure and on defining and implementing improvements to the City's internal operations and systems in order to enhance customer service. During the discussion of this proposal a number of issues were identified for further review. The purpose of this document is to provide the responses to those issue bin items. These items have been segregated into the general categories of: City or Department Operations Issues Capital Improvement Program Issues Redevelopment Issues Enterprise Fund Issues Challenges Issues Additionally, the Proposed Budget and Plan Handout has been revised and attached for review. Respectfully submitted, Debra Kurita City Manager DK:cb Re: Item 1 Special Council /CIC /ARRA June 20, 206 June 20, 2006 City or Department Operations Issues: Issue Bin Items Page - 1 — Issue: Please review the General Fund proposal to identify the funding and cost increases from the previous year. The General Fund budget provides for the functions most commonly associated with city government: police, fire, recreation, library, planning and building, street maintenance, and general city administration. This budget supports the City's focus on maintaining high quality services, addressing new or enhanced services and implementing improvements to internal systems. The General Fund revenues increased from $72,482,226 in 2005 -2006 to $77,376,160 in 2006 -2007 which constitutes a six percent growth. As outlined in Exhibit A, the growth in the revenue sources varied. The appropriations for general operations include $1,665,506 for the Managed Vehicle Replacement program which is funded through the Equipment Replacement Reserve. These reserve funds are generated by an annual expense charged to the departments for depreciation on their assigned vehicles In terms of maintaining current services, the proposed general fund appropriations contain a base level of $75 million which is a 3.1 percent increase over the 2005- 2006 amended budget base, excluding the $3.2 million added during the year for infrastructure improvements. This proposal accommodates the current City services including the following activities or programs that were enhanced or restored during the current fiscal year: DARE Program Expanded School Resources Officer Expanded Recreation after - school Program The Teen Shuttle Alameda Safe School Enforcement Team In identifying the programs to be expanded during the next two fiscal years, the primary focus was to address the enhancements to the library operations with the completion of the new Main Library and to accommodate the increases in development and administrative activities. Additionally, the proposed budget assumes an expansion of the crossing guard program to accommodate changes within the school district's operations. Further, the allocation for the first phase of the turf management program is included in this proposal. Also, the proposal contains a number of enhancements to the Annual Maintenance and Operations Program in the Public Works Department. Exhibit B details the increases in appropriations by department or activity in the General Fund. The costs associated with these proposed new or enhanced June 20, 2006 City or Department Operations Issues: Issue Bin Items Page - 2 — programs or projects are identified in the first column of the following table. The second column itemizes those expenditures that are supported by unrestricted revenue sources. The total of $1,375,286 represents the monies allocated to the recommended program enhancements, but may be applied to other activities. Proposed 2006 -2007 General Fund Enhanced Program Summary Unrestricted Description Amount Funding Personnel Library Related $195,419 $195,419 Parks and Recreation $181,033 $181,033 Planning Related $115,506 $0 Administrative in Fire and H.R. $122,402 $122,402 Crossing Guard Program $33,000 $33,000 Enhancement Parks and Recreation Turf $27,000 $27,000 Management Annual Maintenance and Operations $350,000 $30,000 Program Increase CIP Transfer Increase $300,000 $300,000 Contingencies $486,432 $486,432 Managed Vehicle Replacement $1,665,506 L0 Program TOTAL $3.476.298 $1.375.286 In order to provide additional information related to these programs, Exhibit C outlines the costs associated with the proposed workforce changes and Exhibit D details the projects included in the Annual Maintenance and Operations Program. June 20, 2006 City or Department Operations Issues: Issue Bin Items Page - 3 — Issue: What is the change in growth in employee FTEs? Please explain the background and total number of unfunded positions. The staffing history from FY93/94 to the proposed FY2007/2008 is provided again as Exhibit E. Over the course of the past several fiscal years, the impact of the State's actions to balance its budget by diverting, retaining or reducing local government revenues caused the City to employ a number of budget balancing techniques, including the unfunding of the previously authorized positions. The unfunded positions are those positions that had been authorized and funded by City Council in a previous year, but through circumstances of reduced resources, the funding for the position was not appropriated in a subsequent year. The list of positions that will remain authorized but unfunded if the proposed budget is approved is provided as Exhibit F. The proposed budget contains the addition of eight positions in the 2006 -2007 fiscal year and six in the 2007 -2008 fiscal year; of those, nine are currently unfunded four are new and one is an upgrade from part- time to full -time. However, it is important to note that the internal process for justification of a new position to the City Manager is not impacted by the funding status of the position. The addition of a position, either new or previously authorized but currently unfunded is recommended based on the current or projected workflow and the impact on the effectiveness of the program or project to which the position is assigned. Issue: Please describe the process to rebuild and monitor the reserve fund. In August 2005, as a potential means of providing one -time funds to address a portion of the existing infrastructure needs, the Council directed staff to develop a recommendation regarding the reduction of the existing reserve target of 25 percent of appropriations. After reviewing the recommendations of professional governmental accounting associations, analyzing the standards of the municipal credit reviewing agencies and surveying the practices of surrounding cities, staff determined that a reduction to 20 percent of appropriations could be recommended. That level of reserves would provide sufficient funds to continue municipal operations for a period of three months and to insure that the City would have sufficient time to develop an action plan during a disastrous event or downturn. A revised reserve target of 20 percent of appropriations resulted in the availability of another $2 million that could be appropriated toward addressing the deferred maintenance of the City's infrastructure. At the time, the Council allocated the $2 million to infrastructure projects, approved a one -time reduction in the reserves, and June 20, 2006 City or Department Operations Issues: Issue Bin Items Page - 4 — identified a target range of 20 to 25 percent with the goal of rebuilding the reserve to the 25 percent level over time. Rebuilding the reserve is one of the strategic planning objectives. The objective of rebuilding the reserve can be achieved through either increasing revenues or decreasing expenditures in the General Fund. Historically, revenue estimates were achieved and appropriations were not fully expended, thereby resulting in a positive contribution to the reserve. Staff will continue to monitor and report the forecasted contributions and uses of reserves on a quarterly basis. However, as appropriations are adjusted by Council during a year, the target number will change; as a result, the process becomes iterative. A final report of how well the target is met is only possible at the year end. The application of the excess resources toward the reserve directs revenues that may be appropriated to address competing priorities, such as deferred maintenance infrastructure projects. Staff recommends that the Council systematically review the status of the reserves on an annual basis, after the closure of the accounting process, to determine whether all or a portion of these funds will remain in the reserve or be allocated toward other one -time strategic objectives such as improvements to the infrastructure. Issue: How can we engage in Strategic Planning with the City Council to address the Challenges and other goals such as providing services /goods in Alameda that residents can spend their money on locally? We intend to begin the Strategic Planning process with the Council in the 2006- 2007 fiscal year to address the challenges and establish priorities. To assist in this process, the City has developed a Strategic Financial Planning Tool. This tool will help the City project revenues and expenditures beyond the fiscal year budget cycle and permit the City to make long -term policy choices that can help plan for and achieve the City's longer -term goals and objectives. Issue: Please provide the details of DARE and School Resource Officers Programs. The proposed budget includes the continuation of the police department's Community Oriented Policing Preventative Services Unit which is responsible for the Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE), Volunteer's in Policing Program, the Neighborhood Watch Program, the Citizen's Police Academy, the Crime Prevention through Environmental Design Program, the Children's Awareness Program, and the Handicap Awareness Parking Program. It also includes the continuation of the expansion implemented in 2005 -2006 of the existing School Resource Officer June 20, 2006 City or Department Operations Issues: Issue Bin Items Page - 5 — Program of two additional police officers to work in Alameda's middle schools. The benefits of establishing positive relationships yield long term benefits, as well as provide the middle schools with a specific law enforcement resource Issue: Please provide the details of parks staffing contained in the proposed budget As a means of expanding programming opportunities for teens the Recreation and Park Department will be implementing a number of new programs for the summer. Included among these will be a shuttle service from Bay Farm Island to the Teen Center with additional service being available to the Skate Park and Alameda Point Gymnasium. In addition to more convenient access to the Skate Park, teens will have the opportunity to participate in a number of sports and fitness activities in the Gym. Also, staff is in the process of planning a teen health day to feature options for a more healthy diet, exercise, and positive life style. Further, the proposed budget continues the expansion of the recreational after - school programs from eight to 10 schools that was implemented in the 2005 -2006 fiscal year. Issue: What is the current rent subsidy provided to Alameda for the Museum and how is it funded? The General Fund provides the $47,500 rent subsidy for the Alameda Museum. Issue: What is the balance in the Public Art Fund? As of May 31, 2006 the balance in this fund is $32,410. Issue: Please add more historic information of real research - quality on the website and describe what is there presently? The following is the historic Information on the website: http: / /www.ci.alameda.ca.us /historical/ This link provides access to the City's history and information on historical structures. http: / /www.ci.alameda.ca.us /qov /city charter.html This link provides access to the City charter and is searchable. http: / /www.ci.alameda.ca.us /qov /municipal code.html This link provides access to the Municipal Code and is searchable. June 20, 2006 City or Department Operations Issues: Issue Bin Items Page - 6 — http://www.ci.alameda.ca.us/archive/ This link provides access to the document sections for the City and includes the Council and Planning Board agendas and minutes from 2001 to the present as well as agendas and minutes for other boards and commissions. The City Council agendas have been enhanced to include links to the actual reports referenced in the agenda. The Planning Board agendas were upgraded in this way starting in April 2005. Issue: Please describe the features that streaming video will provide. The City of Alameda is finalizing an agreement with Granicus Inc., a leading provider in the area of streaming video for municipal governments. Their MediaManager product will provide us the following: a full featured software application to access, archive, keyword search, index, and integrate rich -media such as documents and slides into webcasts. It includes basic training, and unlimited 24/7 technical support and system monitoring. This solution will provide one full year of meeting videos online for any meeting held in the Council Chambers and filmed. They are then linked to the City's website. Granicus stores and maintains all the video information offsite at their server farm and for a nominal additional fee, they will host multiple years of data if needed. June 20, 2006 Capital Improvement Program Issues: Issue Bin Items Page - 7 — Issue: Please provide an updated summary of the CIP sources and uses and an explanation of the change from the $17.7 mentioned in the presentation. The summary of the proposed CIP is consistent with that provided in the slide presentation as follows: 2006 -2008 Capital Improvement Program 2006 -2007 2007 -2008 Sewer $4,873,000 $1,766,000 Golf $4,500,000 Streets $2,844,000 $1,200,000 General City Facilities $1,922,000 $1,070,000 Drainage & Marine $748,000 $558,000 Traffic $515,000 $744,000 Bike /Pedestrian $100,000 $50,000 Parks $765,000 TOTAL $15,502,000 $6,153,000 2 -Year TOTAL $21,655,000 During the course of the development of the CIP proposal the Phase I of Bay Farm Island Seawall project of $2.2 Million had been included. As the costs estimates for this project have been increased to $7 Million and the funding has not been identified, the project was moved to the Unfunded List. Issue: Please provide a list of the proposed Capital Improvement Projects by funding source with an explanation of those sources. Exhibit G provides a summary of the proposed CIP by funding source. This chart is also incorporated into the revised proposed Budget and Plan handout. The funding sources and their restrictions are defined in Exhibit H. Issue: Please provide a rating sheet used to evaluate the projects and provide a large map of the Capital Improvement Program. The rating sheets are provided as Exhibit I, and the maps will be forwarded under separate cover. June 20, 2006 Capital Improvement Program Issues: Issue Bin Items Page - 8 — Issue: Clarify the difference between the Capital Improvement Program budget and the Public Works operating budget. Issue: What are the infrastructure projects that are funded with revenues other than General Fund revenues? Issue: What is the 5 -year plan for sewer, drainage and repaving and resurfacing? Issue: What is the cost of implementing the recommendation for the Pavement Management Program? Issue: What would be the impact of increasing expenditures on infrastructure maintenance project by 5% or some other COLA measurement? The above questions are all related to the City's previously expressed goal of increasing the City's expenditures on infrastructure maintenance and repair to a level that would ensure the continued "good" condition of the City's infrastructure. Infrastructure expenditures generally fall within two categories, maintenance and repair, and capital improvement projects. Capital improvement projects are defined as those projects that either add new assets to the City's infrastructure inventory or substantially improve or extend the life of existing infrastructure assets. Maintenance and repair activities are those types of expenditures that are intended to maintain the City's infrastructure in its existing condition. Capital improvement projects are reviewed biannually and specific projects are identified and accounted for in a separate Capital Improvement Budget. Maintenance and repair activities are budgeted annually through the City's operating budget and specific projects are not typically identified. Obviously, there is no bright line between these types of infrastructure investments, but the distinction is maintained to assist the City Council in better managing the City's infrastructure priorities. The major components of the City's infrastructure are streets, sidewalks, sewers, storm drains, street trees and landscaping, parks, buildings, and vehicles and large equipment and marine infrastructure (e.g. seawalls and lagoons). The City also has electric and telecommunications infrastructure, but pursuant to the City Charter, those infrastructure assets are managed by the Public Utilities Board and are outside the City's budget process. Each of these basic infrastructure components is separately managed, primarily because there are funding sources and maintenance issues distinct to each of the components. Sewer repairs are funded primarily through the sewer fund, storm drains are maintained with funds from the Urban Runoff program, and street repairs and maintenance is eligible for funding from the State gas tax as well as other dedicated revenues. June 20, 2006 Capital Improvement Program Issues: Issue Bin Items Page - 9 — Infrastructure Elements and Funding Sources Major Component Streets Sidewalks Sewers Storm Drains Street Trees and Landscaping Parks Buildings Vehicles (including Large Equipment) Restricted Revenue Sources* Other Sources Const Impvt Gas Tax Fund XIX Trans Impvt Fund (Prop 42) General Fund Traffic Safety Meas B Local Sts & Rds CDF (as predetermined) Transp Impvt Fund General Fund Const Impvt Fund Sewer Fund Urban Runoff Landscaping and Lighting Assmt General Fund Open Space Impvt Fund General Fund Dwelling Unit CDF (predetermined) Fund CDF (predetermined) General Fund Const Impvt Fund Equipment Replacement Enterprise Funds General Fund *Does not include redevelopment or CDBG Funds which might be available at certain specified locations for limited types of repairs It is the City's goal to systematize the repair, maintenance and replacement of all of the City's infrastructure components. The City has had an adopted Pavement Management Program for a number of years. Both a Sewer Master Plan and a Master Storm Drainage Plan, which are modeled after the Pavement Management Program, are currently under preparation within the Public Works Department. In June 20, 2006 Issue Bin Items Page - 10 — Capital Improvement Program Issues: the 2006 -2007 fiscal year, the City will be implementing a Managed Vehicle Replacement Program as well as a Turf Management program for our parks. The City still needs to develop a systematic management program for sidewalk repair and maintenance as well as street tree replacement. As sidewalk repair and street tree removal are so closely linked, it is possible that there will be a single program for managing both of these infrastructure assets. Until all of the infrastructure component management plans have been completed we cannot know with precision what level of expenditure is required to bring the City's total infrastructure asset to a "good" condition and to maintain it at that level. However, with regard to street pavement, the 2004 Pavement Management Program Update indicates that the condition of the City's street pavement (the Pavement Condition Index or "PCI ") is rated at a 68 which is in the high range of "good' condition as set forth in the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) guidelines. This level is above average for the more than 100 cities participating in the program. The report recommends providing a level of expenditure necessary to increase the PCI to 71 that is within the "very good" range and would place the City within the top third of the participating cities. The 2004 Pavement Management Program Update estimates that it would take an average annual expenditure of $2.65 million to achieve this objective within ten years. In the 2005 -2006 fiscal year, the City budgeted $3.1 million for pavement maintenance. In order to maintain an annual average expenditure of $2.65 million over ten years, the City would need to invest at least $2.2 million in 2006 -2007. The projected General Fund expenditure for 2006 -2007 for pavement management is $350,000. In addition, in order to maintain the appropriate minimum level of recommended expenditures for street paving maintenance, it is recommended that the City allocate an additional $720,000 from the fund balance of the Construction Improvement Tax and $110,000 from the balance of the Urban Runoff Fund. Further, it is recommended that the Council identify the $300,000 in tax revenue from Proposition 42 funds that is currently contained in the Governor's proposed budget and allocate those funds to this activity upon approval of the State's budget. Finally, it is recommended that during the mid -year review, the Council assess the status of the reserve fund, which is currently estimated to be at a 23 percent level, and consider appropriating $720,000 from these reserves. If the Proposition Infrastructure Bond passes this November, another $2.4 million will be available for street repair and maintenance in FY07 -08. The effects of inflation are factored within each of the infrastructure component management plans. As a result, there is no need to separately account for inflation within the budget line item. June 20, 2006 Capital Improvement Program Issues: Issue Bin Items Page - 11 — Issue: Please provide additional information regarding the allocation of funding for small projects. In the past, $100,000 has been allocated annually for small CIP projects and those projects were identified separately. In the proposed FY06 -08 budget the small projects that are maintenance related are addressed in the Building Renovation Project and those that are related to construction or non - maintenance activity are incorporated into the CIP. Small CIP Projects Six small projects are proposed for funding and included in the FY06 -08 proposed CIP, totaling $372,000. The description plans proposed projects displayed by category and fund source are provided on pages 30 -32 of the Proposed Budget Plan Handout: Spartina Eradication $58k (both years) ADA Upgrades $50k (both years) Lincoln Avenue Parking Striping $50k Signal Coordination, Eighth Street $26k Park Street Reconfiguration at Oakland Triangle $30k Central Avenue Bike Lanes $50k Four additional small projects were considered unfunded in the FY06 -08 budget, totaling $121,000. The descriptions are included in the Unfunded List provided as pages 33 -39 of the Proposed Budget Plan Handout Tree Study $25k Washington Park Basketball Court $44k Lincoln Park, Decomposed Granite Pathways $23k Signal Coordination, Webster $29k Building Renovation Projects The projects included in the Building Renovation Project activities are provided in order of priority (from highest to lowest) based on submittals from all departments and ranking by Maintenance staff. Those projects with funding source other than the General Fund, are noted. Those projects that would formally have been considered under the Small CIP category are noted with an asterisk. June 20, 2006 Issue Bin Items Page - 12 — Capital Improvement Program Issues: FY 06 -07 Rank Cost Dept. PW# Name of Proiect 1. 40,000 ARPD 06 -42 Window Replacement, ARPD Offices* 2. 100,000 PW 07 -08 Central Garage Roof Replacement 3. 15,000 PW 07 -08 Central Garage Fire Suppression System* 4. 20,000 ARPD 06 -48 Locks and Keys, ARPD Buildings* 5. 60,000 Fire 06 -20 Fire Station No. 2, Rear Apparatus Room Door 6. 20,000 ARPD 07 -09 HVAC Replacement, Harrison Center* 7. 30,000 PW 06 -44 Gas & Gate Card Reader System, MSC* 8. 40,000 PW 06 -50 Animal Shelter Roof Repair* 9. 49,000 ARPD 07 -04 Renov. of Restroom at Lower Wash. Park (DUT)* 10. 86,000 PW 07 -12 Generator, City Hall West 12. 100,000 Fire 06 -70 Fire Station #4 Roof Painting and Repair 10,000 Contingency $570,000 FY 07 -08 Rank Cost Dept. PW# Name of Project 11 40,000 Fire 07 -13 Generator, Fire Station 5, AP* 13 19,000 ARPD 07 -01 Refinish Hardwood Floor Veteran's Building (DUT)* 14 40,000 PW 06 -45 Generator, Bldg. 2, Wing 2, AP* 15 43,000 PW 07 -14 Generator, MSC* 16 32,000 ARPD 05 -29 Veterans' Building Stairs and Railings* 17 100,000 ARPD 04 -59 Veterans' Building, Interior Walls Repair (CIT) 18 135,000 ARPD 07 -05 Mastic Senior Center Reroofing 19 75,000 PW 06 -49 MSC Corp Yard Repairs 20 25,000 PW 06 -37 Replace Clarifier, MSC Corp Yard (URCWP)* 21 30,000 PW 06 -71 Recarpeting, MSC* 31,000 Contingency $570,000 June 20, 2006 Capital Improvement Program Issues: Issue: Issue: Deferred Projects Rank Cost 22 120,000 23 188,000 24 75,000 25 59,000 26 44,000 27 162,000 28 46,000 29 45,000 30 125,000 31 80,000 $944,000 Issue Bin Items Page - 13 — Dept. PW# Name of Project ARPD 07 -03 Renovation Lydecker Recreation Center (CIT) ARPD 07 -02 Renovation Harrison Recreation Center (DUT) PW 05 -08 City Hall Interior Painting and Lead Abatement Fire 06 -23 Fire Station No. 5 Ventilation System Fire 06 -18 Fire Protective Clothing Wash. Machine (Install)* Fire 06 -12 Fire Department Pump Test Drafting Pit Police 05 -12 Police Administration Building Retile /Recarpet* Police 06 -29 Police Admin Bldg, Ventilation Cleaning* Police N/A Police Admin Building, Roof Replacement Police N/A Police Admin Building, Boiler Replacement Please provide the Alameda Point Gym improvement details including the roof and floor. Staff has estimated the costs for the immediate repairs necessary to the roof at $10,000 which will be funded with ARRA monies. This is a preliminary estimate and may be amended if additional repairs are found to be necessary once the roof is exposed. The repairs to the floor area are estimated to be $10,000 and will be allocated through the existing Building Renovation funds. Please provide more information on the Veteran's Building Kitchen Project. The project to upgrade the kitchen in the Veteran's Building is currently on the Unfunded Projects List. Over the past year, ARPD has worked with an architect to develop cost estimates for this project. According to the architect, the value of work proposed in the kitchen will trigger the need to provide required ADA upgrades to the elevator. The cost estimates for 2 scenarios are: Warming Kitchen: $800k, Elevator: $500k = Total $1.30M Commercial Kitchen: $2M, Elevator: $500k = Total $2.5M The projected income for the operations of a rental facility with a warming kitchen is $75 per hour. The City costs directly associated with the rental activities include the building attendant staff, custodial and administrative costs at June 20, 2006 Capital Improvement Program Issues: Issue Bin Items Page - 14 — approximately $24 per hour. The annual income of this amenity would depend on the number and length of scheduled events. Issue: Please provide information related to any changes in the unfunded capital projects list. The FY 06 -08 unfunded list includes 82 projects which is an increase from the 64 included in the FY04 -06 list. There are some projects that had previously been included on the unfunded list that were deleted based on the following reasons: • Since AP &T now maintains streetlights, the following projects were not included in the unfunded list: Historic Street Lights Upgrades, Address Accumulated Deferred Maintenance Historic Streetlights Upgrade, Phase 1 Streetlights Repairs, Address Accumulated Deferred Maintenance • Pending Alameda Point land transfer the following projects, which would be the responsibility of the developer, were not included in the unfunded list: Alameda Point City Building Roof Repairs Alameda Point Sewer Pump Systems Upgrades Alameda Point Storm Upgrades Alameda Point Street Upgrades Alameda Point Water Upgrades, Phase 2 Alameda Point Water Upgrades, Phase 3 • Projects related to Alameda Beltline were deleted pending outcome of litigation: Sherman Street Extension Completion Clement Avenue Extension (Tilden to Grand) Atlantic Avenue Median Improvements Clement/Atlantic Corridor Improvements (a vague placeholder for all of the above) June 20, 2006 Capital Improvement Program Issues: Issue Bin Items Page - 15 — • The following projects were removed because they were completed: Storage Area Network Skateboard Park — Wall Repair Cross Alameda Bay Trail — Study • The following projects were withdrawn by the department heads who originally had submitted them: Bay Farm Island Fire Department Training Center Upgrades Update and Repairs Conference / Training Facility, Bldg 522 at AP Upgrade Fire Administration Building Practice Greens, Renovation Fire Department Needs Assessment Study Police Station Parking Annex Installation of HVAC System in ARPD Office Consolidated Corporation Yard June 20, 2006 Redevelopment Issues: Issue Bin Items Page - 16 — Issue: What is the acreage in the Redevelopment area and please explain how tax increments work in a Redevelopment area? The acreage in the Alameda redevelopment areas totals 3,664 acres. It is allocated among the three areas as follows: • Alameda Point Improvement Project = 2,566 acres • Business Waterfront Improvement Project = 873 acres • West End Community Improvement Project = 225 acres The following describes how tax increment works in the Redevelopment area: ASSESSED VA I _L + OF PROPERTY ?R111.1.1ON :i a:l 2111 15(1 111111II lII1 1111 1ii111!II III Ili II! iii �� 5 11) 15 YEARS (A) Before a redevelopment project area is formed, all property tax revenue goes to the county, city, schools, and special districts. In a blighted or underdeveloped area, the tax revenue is usually stagnant or lags behind the increases in land values of areas that do not have these characteristics. (B) When the redevelopment project area is formed, all tax agencies continue to receive the tax revenue they received before the redevelopment agency was formed. (C) In addition, the redevelopment agency shares an increase of two percent annually, a mandatory amount of the increased property tax revenues with June 20, 2006 Redevelopment Issues: Issue Bin Items Page - 17 — the county, school districts, special districts, etc., using a formula in the law. This is intended to offset significant detrimental fiscal impact due to redevelopment. The redevelopment agency passes these tax revenues through to the taxing agency each year. In Alameda, the Redevelopment Agency, known as the Community Improvement Commission, or CIC, also gives other negotiated funds to the School District to assist with the goals of the District. (D) Twenty percent of the "tax increment must be set aside into a special fund for low- and moderate - income housing programs administered by the redevelopment agency, or CIC. In addition, the CIC of Alameda requires all new housing projects to provide 25 percent of its units, for -sale or rental, to low- and moderate - income families. (E) As property is sold and as new construction (private and public) occurs in the redevelopment area, the assessed value of the property goes up. This causes tax revenue to increase even though the tax rate does not change. The increased tax money is known as "tax increment." It is used by the redevelopment agency to pay the expenses of improving the area and eliminating blight. (F) At the end of the redevelopment project (typically 35 -45 years), after all agency debts are paid, the redevelopment project is terminated and all tax revenue from the increased assessed value created by redevelopment of the area goes to all other tax agencies in the project area in proportion to their tax rates. Issue: Please provide the details of the proposed ARRA Budget The Development Services Director reviewed the ARRA budget with the ARRA Board in March 2006. A copy of that presentation is attached as Exhibit J. No changes have been made since that time. However, if changes occur the changes will be presented for review and potential amendment. June 20, 2006 Enterprise Fund Issues: Issue Bin Items Page - 18 — Issue: Please describe the Council role in the approval of AP &T Budget Under the City Charter, certain powers are granted to the Public Utility Board, and certain powers are specifically granted or reserved to the City Council. The power to prepare and adopt an annual budget is granted exclusively to the PUB, pursuant to Charter section 12 -4 D. Reaffirming this role, there would be little need for the PUB to file monthly fiscal reports and an annual audit with the Council, as it is required to do under Charter section 12 -4 B, if the Council had more direct control over the AP &T budget. Issue: Please provide details of the farebox recovery effort for the Ferry Program in 2005 -2006 In July, the City implemented a Marketing Action Plan designed to increase the Alameda Harbor Bay Ferry (AHBF) ridership and meet or exceed the Metropolitan Transportation Commission's 40% Farebox Recovery Ratio (FRR) requirement. The result was that the AHBF averaged a 46.5% FRR over the last nine months. The City and the Water Transit Authority began discussions on a spring 2006 advertising campaign designed to benefit both ferry services. Issue: Please provide the balances for the past 2 -3 years of the Golf Enterprise Budget. Exhibit K provides this information for the Golf Enterprise. The weather is one of the most important factors that directly affect attendance totals and therefore revenue at the golf complex. The golf department has been tracking "rain days" defined as weather affecting regular attendance, for the last 10 years. The last three years have been the wettest years in San Francisco bay Area history, dating back to 1880. The proposed 2006 -2008 golf department budget is based on average rainfall. Therefore, the projected attendance levels and revenue will increase from the last two fiscal years. Additionally, the department, together with the Golf Commission, is currently reviewing the fees and programs offered through this department. June 20, 2006 Enterprise Fund Issues: Issue Bin Items Page - 19 — Issue: What is the current status on the return on investment rate charged to the Golf and AP &T department? Both enterprises, Golf and AP &T were able to provide a revenue source to the General Fund during the difficult period of FY2004 -2005 and 2005 -2006. In the proposed budget, the ROI rate applied to these enterprises has been reduced, which resulted in a reduction of a total of $500,000 from initial General Fund projected revenues. This action recognizes the needs of both funds to reduce their costs of doing business as well as the improved health of the General Fund. June 20, 2006 Challenges Issues: Issue Bin Items Page - 20 — Issue: Please provide the estimated dollar value of each of the Challenges and potential funding opportunities and add the centralizing of City Hall operations to the list. Although the proposed budget is balanced, staff has identified a number of potential challenges that may be discussed as part of the strategic planning process. The list was intended to be dynamic; to change as additional items are identified and existing ones are discussed. The format and scheduling of the strategic planning process was the first challenge identified and the costs associated with this ongoing activity will be minimal and absorbed by the operating budget. Additionally, the next two challenges are related to potential impacts to the City by external forces: specifically the Federal and State actions that may impact the City's ability to balance its budget either by decreasing revenues or increasing expenditures. The proposed budget anticipates that CDBG funding will be reduced from $1.56 million in fiscal year 2006 -2007 to approximately $1 million in fiscal year 2007- 2008. In addition to the anticipated reductions to CDBG funding, the passage of Proposition 1A last November did not protect redevelopment tax increment in the same fashion as it protects local property tax revenue for cities and counties, consequently redevelopment funding remains at risk. We will continue to monitor the actions of these agencies to analyze any impact on the City's programs. Exhibit L provides the preliminary projections and potential funding sources for the remaining challenges and includes the centralizing of City Hall operations on the list. Issue: One of the challenges identified was the completion of the Library Branches, what is the balance of Measure "0" fund identified for these facilities? The Council approved a transfer of $670,000 from the branch Library funds to the new Library construction fund. The funds remaining in the current branch library construction total is $1.5 million. The original amount of Measure 0 Bond sale was $10.6 million. The original allocation to the new library construction was $8,339,667 and to the branch libraries was $2,169,875. However, according to the project manager, none of the $670,000 has been expended and he expects that the entire amount, plus some interest, will be returned to the library branch projects. This potential reappropriation of funds would be considered by the Council after the Main Library construction project is completed and the accounting for that project is closed. EXHIBIT A L U ▪ 0 0 LO CO0MM0)0)N.0 -01- 0 C` CO CO C() LC) 'Cr CO CO N M 0 COOOrtrM N.NCO1- NMOO NMO)NOCfl4d NO)OCON(O NO NCOMMOOoeN— O h co 4 4 CO O co co CO - (0 O C` 1- N N (C)COCOCOr rNr N 0 co co O) O O co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cf) M M M O In +- r N N N N O r 0 1- d CO '' 1- 0 M O CO CO CO 0 0 N. O c0 et • 0)rOl-001-1.00 LONrO C) CA CO CA Ci) r O O C 1* M c0 CO 1- O O M N N (: 0' ai cri R N r cri 0 C9 r 3 ^ 00 U) 00nNMCOr-.4coco NMOO m 0 CONCOrMCA1' 1h000�00 CI) M1� 'O CO OCOCC)OOCO err Nr COO 4) 0 N E LL '4- (0 W O co C(0 M N. n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o � 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 ✓ � COMLO Cp N0C000M000 U Base Level O O O O co CO et 1- 0000MMM0 0N.0 W - 0)r0N. 001' 00 LC)NMro 1-OOr00LO0)C 0001-00 M N N N M N c o C H O) O M c0 CJ CO • N CO CO ('s 1- CO CO N M N- CO N LO 01 0) 1F1N00(-c000I. NLC; CC CI S .Nr (00 co O) O CA O co O C[) CC) M CO Nr0000010N0(.MO)MO ✓ 1- 0) 0 CD 0 CO CO M r 0 n cc) N- O 0) 0 'l O N LC) 0 CO CO N C() co (n CO O 't CO CO (n N LO N lC) r n 1- 1- 0) 0 O) 0) 0) 00 CO (- Co O N. CbOCC)h cc; 'rNr COCA N 0) N C LI- ) ZT LL a3 J a0) E Cn Cn p C1 CO 0) ~- CO c C 0 0 E V o U 0) y LL a i 'C O c 0) J off$ O 0) C DJ o$t n r y O c c 0 0211 N >•c U C c O y W 0. a N 0 > C .5 2 ° = > p U _ E L1 ZT a_ co o_ H CL m J c LE CC 0 O O O O CO o CO C4 O Cfl N N CO N -J H 0 1— U d > ccs U 0) U as a) To C c O o 0) U 0 Cn C C • to 7 N 'N L L O O N CO U C • N • i > CC co Exhibit H_2 : GF : 6/15/2006 L 0 0 0) m 0 0 r E LL W L c v co .c o O w Z Q J Q. W co O Q Q O Q yn � o 0 m LL Base Level CO O n CO P n 0 (0 CO v N r hN oui0 .N- O CO Cr) O r r CO co +- r N r M CO 0 o LO N CO o) CO O N N CV 0 OD 0 O O N o) (0 N o- (O r- CO r CO N f9 d' NI- CO CO CO N O r N CO 0 '4) N. r- t6 ui o �6 T00 0 0 N (') M O co O 0 r 0) r r N r N CO CO co co c6 ci 0 C'o M (O N N Ps CO O n US U O M 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M O N� I� T N N M N M m m CO U CO N 0 0) O) (0 O Nt CO CO _M U) LO (O 0 O O) N (- (s 0 U) N nu)OOCONN- N CO CO 0 N n CO 0 CO 0 0 0 CO I-- r C\I r co co co 0 (-. 0 �t O O O co co 0) O) 0 7 0 N 0) O) N C6 o) W O) h 0) Tr V N 0 u) O r M O N O 0 T r N r O N 0 00) O ((0 O M (f) r- O co co O (0 N (O rt co d 0 O (O - a) (0 N CV � 00 v 0 oo 0) 00 00 O C0 0 CCV ((00 n 0 0 0 0 co O 0 r h O CI Ps o o o xi ui 1.6 cci 1- (0O^ N O N S - M 0 0 00 CO 0 0) 0 0 N- CO 0 0 CO (n NO h o (0 O 00 N CI 0 N U) n r r r DO 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C M� U) N T O C r 0) r u) m Q m COo 0 0 0 co Tr O) U) 0 0 0 0) 00) u7 O 0 0 00)) •- M CO N CO O r Ps CO NI- Is ui 00 (0_0 (O CV r N N (0 O r co of tri 0o0 On) 1 N 00 as N Cn c U CL 70 (NI 7 a )arn z o a) r cu N O ._ C) O c 2 U N a .0 a c_ U m > ° H E c 7 co u) cc°)a x E .o ¢ o 0) ° U m 5(0 w c c ro > c O 2 U Q c cu E° 0 .E .0 O16 Z' -'' Z" C j O N •O (1)" C C 2000LEI. o o_ it a a_¢ erational Ex N n 0 CO (09 0 O CO N (0 1,665,506 E CO cv 1:3 co in (o - a_o o) N W u) co C 0 r O r C) 0 M LL N 0 ' 0 CO CO CO CO CV 0 CO_ 0) N cci c6 CO *N- CO') O T LO N M M f- I. n ' O ' (0 O O CO N o) N M n CO 0 1- 0 0 ((0 M ar 00)) Cr- r N h r 0 N-NOr-h o r o (0 N n 1- O 0 N 0 r N 1- co 0 (C! N CO N n to 0 to f: M 0) r r r (C) n r ap N Total Public Works Rec & Parks Operating Sub Total O co (O r- n (O N U) N et CO N ( 71: N LC)- r C) r 0 0 W U) M 0 O co h O ((000 m co 0 W Q 0) a) c d H c c0 o J O O O OH 0 m C V 03 m d a c O Z (i 7 E u_ O a) 0 ((0 C) _ 0 H = W .0 (A ( 0 c6 m W Ti C m xaoa=) W 0 0 c a) C) - y C C C C 6 C 0 O O 2 z0H Exhibit H4 : GF : 6/16/2006 EXHIBIT B 2§ 0 Eu w 0 006 -2007. See list attached. Base Level E Descriptions of Discretionary Items Exhibit H_2 : GF : 6/15/2006 Workforce Changes New & Newly Funded Positions Department /Position Human Resources Executive Assistant Info Tech /Library Computer Services Coordinator Planning & Building Combination Building Inspector Planner I Fire 05/06 Status Unfunded New New / replace part-time Unfunded FY07 1 EXHIBIT C FY07 $ 64,422 1 65,999 1 65,107 1 50,399 Executive Assistant New 1 57,980 Library Supervising Librarian Unfunded 1 88,452 Library Technician Unfunded 1 40,968 Recreation & Parks Recreation & Park Director Unfunded 1 181,033 8 $ 614,358 ** ** Partial year funding for all positions except Recreation & Parks director due to hiring schedule; annual amount is $700,700 Workforce Changes New & Newly Funded Positions Department /Position Finance Police Fire Financial Services & Budget Manager Public Safety Dispatcher 05/06 Status New Unfunded FY08 1 EXHIBIT C FY08 $ 143,109 1 77,825 Administrative Management Analyst New 1 101,860 Public Works Traffic Signal Maintenance Technician Unfunded 1 92,669 Maintenance Worker I Unfunded 1 60,756 Maintenance Worker II Unfunded 1 75,025 6 $ 551,244 Oo O O N ■z O W 4 � w W i Q s-1 �O 44 a Ts E H � - >U U © ett Funding Comments Other URCWP Sewer Measure B Golf General Gas Tax DUT CIT Annual Total Cost L ed z 0. Project Name Annual Capital Operations PUB WORKS 0 LO fA PUB WORKS PUB WORKS co co co O w O U O 0 U 0 a) O ax ) c E c 00 0 0 rn o South Shore Lagoon Storm Upgrades Storm Drain Maintenance of r� m os� E '"a° m �vE EmN �o uoE `5a ES° U m a w> . N j 7 O g T 0.20 c�.o .g Si 1"/ 03 'ii U >f wo` a°o. y0c go °° c2 a rn- U c° Lam.- c cU m.. j >.-.° ° u 9 0. o o. 3N N Eoin °`r o !�o> >Q a.-§' am mmo F=aU cc0. °moo (7) '4 vow m R I0 N ER PUB WORKS N- CO 0 co co Beach Sand Replacement L w 0 L(i In 0 CNJ Tr, Ee O ER 0 LO N ER LO N_ K3 O CO ER PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS EN co r- O o y a) V) 3 U N a) f0 O V) a) m O c c O •(0 W v 0) TO co E c o o z < 0 0 u) co M Lf) a0 0 0 co a) O 0 4 0 Doolittle Landfill Closure Graffiti Abatement Y_ .a d a 0 ER 0 (r) PUB WORKS Ln N Tuesday, June 13, 2006 Oji Funding Comments Other URCWP Sewer Measure B Golf General Gas Tax DUT CIT Annual Total Cost C E A Project Name Annual Capital Operations O (0 Ea PUB WORKS O CO (() aj O N C Ca) E I-- a) O (c0 O L � c O • F, a) f6 a) 0 > W a) a (0co O te 0 I0 E9 0 O E9 PUB WORKS PUB WORKS O rn Sanitary Sewer Maintenance .1 .12 N Proposed for annualization Eft ER LO E9 0 CO E9 O O O 69 0 O CO E (C) CNi E9 Lo 9 64 O ss- E9 O LO M 69 (f) PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS O co co O rn Y 0 PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS 0)) a(0 N cam) O O (0)) (00 CO ▪ rn O Parking Meter Maintenance Pothole Patching Program Street Tree Pruning, Citywide Street Tree Removal and Planting co H PUB WORKS CO (() o) (o O E (0 0) O 0 C a) a) 0) (0 as 2 c O 0)0 c 0o Tuesday, June 13, 2006 • Funding Comments Other URCWP Sewer Measure B Golf General Gas Tax DUT CIT Annual Total Cost 1 CL O COD E z • a` Annual Capital Operations Proposed for annualization 0 63 0 0 O M 0 ER 0 LO 0 0 M Ki 0 0 0 CO O ER EA PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS M N 0 0 c%) 0 4 Street Sweeping Signage Traffic Operations (TTT & TC) Traffic Signal and Light Painting Transportation Master Plan O LO PUB WORKS N CO 0 Bus Shelter Maintenance $565 $100 $180 $553 0 V� 0 N w 0 N 0 ur 0 N b3 Total for Annual Capital Operations FY 06 -07 Tuesday, June 13, 2006 Funding Comments Other URCWP Sewer Measure B Golf General Gas Tax DUT CIT Annual Total Cost a O z a Annual Capital Operations O M PUB WORKS PUB WORKS ER O LO ER PUB WORKS M co 0 0 0 co U O 0 0 U t c 0 c m E 00 0 O L0 L0 1- CO O 0) 0 South Shore Lagoon Storm Upgrades Storm Drain Maintenance w 2 LO N ER PUB WORKS Beach Sand Replacement N FA O ER 0 EA O EFT LO N 69 LO N_ ER PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS N CO h N N COO O O a) 0 U N C •c 0 0 c c 1 'EF) U W o .4) .t To E Q 0 0 0) co 0 4 0 Doolittle Landfill Closure Graffiti Abatement _ m 0) O Ln 0 LE) ER PUB WORKS Lf) N 1 O Tuesday, June 13, 2006 00 N CIO LT* o w0 Tei • E a E > 1—C V E>~ ICI ert 44 ..r et Funding Comments Other URCWP Sewer Measure B Golf General Gas Tax DUT CIT Annual Total Cost e E w Project Name Annual Capital Operations (o 69 PUB WORKS O ER O 64 0 PUB WORKS PUB WORKS CO LC) (`) CD (0 0 CO 0 Sanitary Sewer Maintenance c O C O to Cn U Cl. J E (n Q. o E 0 Co U (0 • c • C �2 d N uiU m m o m' o a U .8 Proposed for annualization CO LO ER ER O CO 0 0 0 0 0 CO CO ER N ER CO N Ee LO ER ER O to ER 0 PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS O CO (0 0 rn o (o (o a• N O9) a) a) co a) Parking Meter Maintenance Pothole Patching Program • CO O P- M') O (cc) O M o (n CO rn O Street Tree Pruning, Citywide Street Tree Removal and Planting co F- 0 M ea 0 CO PUB WORKS co (A (0 0 E (0 c) O 0 m E a) Q) (0 c (0 C O c)2 Tuesday, June 13, 2006 • Funding Comments Other URCWP Sewer Measure B Golf General Gas Tax DUT CIT Annual Total Cost 1 a+ E z O Annual Capital Operations Proposed for annualizalion 0 69- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ER 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 d4 PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS 0) lf) 0) N 0 M 0 Street Sweeping Signage Traffic Operations (TTT & TC) Traffic Signal and Light Painting CD 6) 0 U f0 N co 2 c _m rn 'a E U f0 N O H 0 to co 9 C0 0 Transportation Master Plan w >▪ 2 o c ▪ E U rn 0 c l0 I- 0 0m 64 0 0 CO PUB WORKS PUB WORKS Bus Shelter Maintenance Employee Transit Pass Program $100 $180 $553 0 (0 tft 0 0 co ur 0 N 4 0 �n 0 M Total for Annual Capital Operations FY 07 -08 Tuesday, June 13, 2006 Funding Comments Other URCWP Sewer Measure B Grants General Gas Tax DUT CIT CDF Total Cost C s 1 z Project Name FY 07 -08 Proposed Projects 0 0 ER ER PUB WORKS 0 0 0 0 O N 69 PUB WORKS 0 0 0 0 6F? w co co 0 0 c d U co 0 O • c CD CO 7/3 O p N y N t u- a Coastal Conservancy Grant PUB WORKS N co M O Spartina Control L RI 0 0 M CO CO co co 69 REC & PARK Lincoln Park Improvements 0 ER 0 ce PUB WORKS M N CO 0 Accessibility (ADA) Upgrades s- 0 d to 0 ER EA 0 O CO ER. 64 PUB WORKS PUB WORKS N 0 O bL Tuesday, May 30, 2006 w ✓ o X w N N IX F- ▪ Z CD I- N EC N w re Q u O Z U < LL ECTED OO co N N O r L? Cr) ti r CO O LC) CO N N M vN- CO N N r) rn V N r r r ti O I's CO ti N N O CO CO O) CO N CO M N N r 0)v r r r- CO o o o O N N O Cr) co O r N- - N CO CO 00 N N CO • Nei' ti N N �t v rn v O r N - N CO LC) O O 0 0 N N LC) N r L) Cr) r 0) t- Cr d M M .- M N Lc) ., I'2 o Lc 0 o r O N m N r-- O 1� CO Nt 0 0 r Cr) ~ r C)N) ° M CO N CO • d' CO O N LO CO r N LC) r cr 0-- I� r r CO M r r r M N Cp � N CO O 0 N N CO N r CO 00 t` r r N 0) o N CO ct CO N , 0 CO �}' N r N r 0 ao V CO r 0 r o r N N co ti O O N N CO ti O Ln M O r r r M,- O `- r co CO CO O O M CO N LC) r CT) r , r O CO r CO r co ''- CO N O O N N O 0) CO I� r O r CO (p r Lo OM L1) M CO cr O N O N LC . �- O r .- r 07 V ti r' M O CO O o CO 0) CO 0) 0 r N O M CO r co O M to Lo O ONO N N r r,- 6 CO r LC) Or �i T-• 05 co a)) N r -O) � O C C)) Lo 1.0 ti Lo Lo Ci cr� Lo N CO r N N r„: r Ln r Lo r rn CO ►� in co 00)) N r r LO Lo CY) f— CO M CO r N I� r o to o Lo CO r r co L!� M N CO O �. N N LO r r CO LO r r Lo r r 09 T 0) O T T ti LC) OD Cr) Op r O r to c' N Lo Cfl r co LL) d' N O C)) M d N O N Lo C0 r CO In r . o `- O O r 0 O r LC) CO 0) 0) T T ct ti r N CO 0 0 M r co M N p 74. M N N N Cfl r Lo r c h 00 r 0 O 0) 0) T T ti LG) ,- r O _ ° If) mM0 LO r N 7- CO N r .4'rnv r 7r M et CO co 0) N- O M to r- c- O _ ~ o to os LO N r co CV N 0 o 594.0 W I— Ce W O O U a`) C (6 Y U o h o n a 1- I.L. �, N L �' U 0. E 0 U o oa ,., o ti = L N U * a) U c LE * 0 N I- c O O c 'Human Resources * Public Works plus vacancies Development Svcs * ** TOTAL Community Development Dept * ARRA (93 -95 Base Closure) Cooperative Agreement Admin Planning /Building * Housing Authority * / * * ** Recreation & Park * / * * * ** o 0 f C y o ' 0 a) E c Police - TOTAL UJOMC UJOMSUON I a) °d Q w eiecom Ni- o) a) c 0 U 0 0 O.. 0 o_ U a) O 0 o o O r` 0 m 0 0. to Ln co 0 O 2 0) CO O Z O O R- FD O CL w O a C 0 E •c o c Q 0 "-c- o N Q N 0 Q) N _Q)Q) .L) Q 0 N co Q) O > 0 _U j O Q3 co co d 0 LI N Q) O 0 F- 3 U c o m -2 — C O ° c Y co E Q) C O o O co E O. N 0 o E °o. CO 0 C 0_ O m m ° o a� 0 (D C 'O CD CD CO co CO • C m 'O 0 Q) -a O '4- .5 m 0 O Q N 15 E li- a) E N C) Q7 C U L > (n -O O °) ° ° w 5 °° a°i o co LL n) e Li_ N W ' O • Q) 0 U O- m Q7 O a U O) O O LO _ o Ts Q) m m r o m o ", 0,5 9 0 It C.0 C LL .0 C 0 ... O 0) 0 Q) ` O • o m mY - ots Na r E ° °'O c c CD u) o a ` c c) m c O02 o0atL . c 0-°) o w� t'' CO O d '- 00 Q7 U@ O a) U N N o. '«. N >. 73 Q) 0 > > Cn Q) O N w 0 Y Q) O 0 YO ? NOTES as of July 1, 2005 as of July 1, 2005 as of July 1, 2004 as of July 1, 2004 as of July 1, 2004 per MOU thru 1/5/08 as of July 1, 2005 as of July 1, 2005 as of July 1, 2005 as of July 1, 2004 as of July 1, 2004 as of July 1, 2004 as of July 1, 2004 as of July 1, 2005 as of July 1, 2004 as of July 1, 2005 as of July 1, 2005 as of July 1, 2005 as of July 1, 2004 as of July 1, 2005 as of July 1, 2005 la CO 0 0 N n 0 0 [� c N n O O N (0 O O }N LL a N 13 C N 0 13 N a C CD E 0 U N to c 0 o 0 o. o N co 7 U x N r STATUS Unfunded Unfunded Unfunded Unfunded Unfunded Unfunded Unfunded Unfunded Unfunded Unfunded Unfunded Unfunded Unfunded Unfunded Unfunded Unfunded Unfunded Unfunded Unfunded Unfunded Unfunded UNFUNDED Tot SNOLLISOd r r r r CO N r r r r N r r (0 N CO NOI1fSOd Deputy City Attorney I lint Clerk Accountant I I (from FncI Svcs & Budget Mgr) Sr Clerk Firefighter Firefighter Int Clerk Housing Specialist I Int Clerk Int Clerk Admin Mgmt Analyst Sr Mgmt Analyst Library Technician Police Officer Admin Mgmt Analyst Associate Civil Engr (CIP) Construction Inspector Office Asst Program Specialist I (Land DevfTrans) Program Specialist I (Land Dev/Trans) Supv Civil Engineer (CIP) DEPARTMENT City Attorney City Attorney Finance Finance Fire Fire Fire Housing Authority Housing Authority Human Resources Info Tech Info Tech Library N _ O d Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Note: Refer to Individual Project Descriptions for more on Funding Sources (Projected Costs are in Thousands of Dollars) y Project Name 'W No Score Department n a rer n Funding Comments FY 06 -07 Proposed Projects 0) Fa G O O O O ER ER PUB WORKS PUB WORKS O O CO a c E a7 (0 a rn Et? 2 as c C U E O O O co cc 0 000 m CO a) C C O (0 O C m CU EN (00 y General City Facility O 0 U Other Financing ($1065K)In addition to $400,000 in designated reserve approved FY 06 Per original lease agreement Replaces funds for Fire Bldg Maint, Park Bldg Maint, and City Bldg Maint 0 N fA 0) O ER O CO CO fA N ER CO LO ER N H3 O O 0 (R O (O ER PUB WORKS W LL PUB WORKS PUB WORKS co CO N (f) N O O Electric Vehicle Charging Stations a) co s c a c E U N ac co i1) C D- O Q t0 (0 O 0) C O a) CC ui c O O c c) N. 0 '5 0 m U li O O O EA- Golf Clubhouse Remodel N as L 2 Coastal Conservancy Grant PUB WORKS Spartina Control O (C) ER 64 PUB WORKS PUB WORKS ((i N co O N (0 O c C (0 V7 c c J Y mw C Y < 0 (—`0 a) • C 0 U) Accessibility (ADA) Upgrades Page 1 of 3 Tuesday, May 30, 2006 (Projected Costs are in Thousands of Dollars) Note: Refer to Individual Project Descriptions for more on Funding Sources Funding Comments Other URCWP Sewer Measure B Grants Golf General Gas Tax CIT CDF Total Cost a) d ea ea a) A Project Name FY 06 -07 Proposed Projects 3 d W 0 0 0 M EA 0 0 CO • H} 0 LO ER O O (0 ER PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS co Cf) CO 0 n co co 0 4 rn M CO O co co 0 y c .@ a) U c m E y a) (0 (0 y N 0 m N O (/) rn U ors w a C 0 0 CU a I- CC ki m a) le a) O U L- (I) UW d L Catellus Mitigation ($420K) c c C ` C Z 8 8 E m E : m - tO m d o C 0, NE .t1. T. oU G t C U ij � J H d T O N H C C E O O 0 LL < Hwy Bridge Rehab (HBR) grant 0 E 0 M K3 0 0 M ER 0 0 1- N (o ER 0 N O E O 00 0 LO E O O M O 0 ti ea N (0 ER PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS 0 w 0 PUB WORKS 0 (1) O 4 0 0 N- 4 co Cf) Co M N O O 9 Co 0 N y (2 C0 'c EL c rn o c 'c 7 c (°)a c O a) cc Qtr N c 1E CD c co co co o O c rn a) Tinker Extension Resurfacing, Annual, FY 07 Sidewalk Repair, Annual Park Street Streetscape, Phase II (;) a m rn a U E y 5) a) m c O m co 7 a) y c mU L H PUB WORKS PUB WORKS 0 Co 0 N Co 0 Lincoln Avenue Parking Striping Tuesday, May 30, 2006 Note: Refer to Individual Project Descriptions for more on Funding Sources (Projected Costs are in Thousands of Dollars) y Project Name 'W No Score Department n C o e 4 n Funding Comments ea A r9 y k w co " FY 06 -07 Proposed Projects 0 0 0 0 0 E y o g N • O a am 0 @ N 2 m d n 69 w m 0 O Sinking fund for future work r- 1[) CO C b9 CO N 0 0 co N. CO 0 0 PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS Cf) N •zr LO CO O t!) d' 9 O O 0 LO 0 Cn C C O E O E co a) C c 0 co O To 0 Q) C o 2 0 W C V) p) J O C c C O CD CO CT O a) u) a) To P N a) U_ c O a N /)0 da HU $500 $3,000 $1,454 $810 $4,823 $760 $3,109 O o 0 N 1 a 0 u) vi 4 Total for FY 06 -07 Proposed Projects Tuesday, May 30, 2006 • (Projected Costs are in Thousands of Dollars) Note: Refer to Individual Project Descriptions for more on Funding Sources Funding Comments Other URCWP Sewer Measure B Grants General Gas Tax DUT CIT CDF Total Cost 1 A 0 ) z Project Name it a 00 0 0 O fi3 PUB WORKS N c c0 co "O O R c o p a0- Jo S v 03 ` CI E O U General City Facility 0 0 0, a 0 0 M o N ER 0 N- U) ER 0 0 Ln ER PUB WORKS O m 0 d 2 Coastal Conservancy Grant O N ER 0 LO ER- PUB WORKS N L() M O LC) 0 Spartina Control 0 0 c,) ffT LID CO REC & PARK L() co 0 Lincoln Park Improvements Y d 0 O LO PUB WORKS L0 0 Accessibility (ADA) Upgrades 0 O 69 CO O O E!3 0 ER PUB WORKS PUB WORKS M LOf) CNJ O 0 L[) 0) 0 4'(=3 c 0 U 0 a E c 0 a a) E CL 0 (A ono (vs (1) >, >- ID a OLL c0D Tuesday, May 30, 2006 00 Cid N Rl 0 ^1. E i.+ a eel E CC U (Projected Costs are in Thousands of Dollars) Note: Refer to Individual Project Descriptions for more on Funding Sources Funding Comments Other URCWP Sewer Measure B Grants General Gas Tax DUT CIT CDF Total Cost a) E CC CC CLI 0 z Project Name FY 07 -08 Proposed Projects N 0 O 0 0 O O M Ea O N ff3 O O O co 0 ER PUB WORKS PUB WORKS LO() M O N O CO CO Resurfacing, Annual, FY08 Sidewalk Repair, Annual L F— Sinking fund for future work 0 O CO N EA O O O O M PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS PUB WORKS co 0 CO N CJ O 0 0 O O t` M 4 0 2 m .c c.) °) c co 0 0 T 0 00 < U To To c 0) cp .CT)U 0 0 u) 0 0 > (p13 c m i3 o o 00 00 To 0 c = D) Ti) N Y � o • m c o 0) f9 g c 2 o > 0 UO (0 0) iT)O 0 0 0 U c rnE (1) 0 0 0 C 0 E 0 m 0 0 W - J m rn (0 S HCD. >, O c 0 0 0 To 0) 0 c o E I— a $38 $1,093 $1,716 $570 $1,050 Total for FY 07 -08 Proposed Projects Tuesday, May 30, 2006 Exhibit H Capital Projects Revenue Sources The following provides an explanation of the potential funding sources for capital projects: Citywide Development Fee: Under Subsection 27 -3 -5 of the Alameda Municipal Code, the Citywide Development Fee was established to generate funds on development in the City to pay for development's share of a predetermined list of traffic safety /capital replacement and transportation improvements and facilities; parks and recreation improvements and facilities; public facilities; and public safety facilities based upon their impact. The fee, which is imposed by land use category of development, is imposed upon all new or expanded existing, commercial• development and on new residential development or where use permits intensify the use of existing commercial or residential properties. Community Improvement Tax: Under Section 3 -62 of the Alameda Municipal Code, the Community Improvement Tax is levied on all construction projects at a rate of 16)/0 of the improvement cost. These funds can be used to defer any of the costs of municipal services generated by the development of the property. Dwelling Unit Tax: Under Section 3 -60 of the Alameda Municipal Code, the Residential Dwelling unit Tax is required to be paid on each new dwelling unit constructed with the City limits. This money is used for providing park and recreation facilities within the City. One -sixth of this revenue, which has been collected since July 1, 1987, is to be used for the construction of a library facility. Gas Tax Funds: Under Section 2107 of the Street and Highways Code and 2106 of the Streets and Highways Code, money is received annually for the construction and maintenance of City streets. A portion of these funds are annually transferred to the General Fund in support of maintenance services. The balance is held for City street construction projects. Measure B: In 2000, county voters passed Measure B authorizing the one - half cent sales tax for transportation projects. The tax will be effective through 2022. Sixty percent of the revenue will be distributed to local jurisdictions. The remaining 40% is applied to previously approved capital projects, such as the 1880- Broadway- Jackson project. Measure B funds are allocated for the following uses: 55.7% for local streets and roads, 31.4% for ferry service, 7.1% for bicycle and pedestrian safety and 5.7% for Para transit service to seniors and people with disabilities. Exhibit H Capital Projects Revenue Sources Parking Meter Fund: This revenue is derived from parking meter collections. Money is transferred each year to the General Fund for cost of operations and maintenance of the meters. Tideland Trust Fund: This is revenue from tidelands leases. Revenues from this fund are used for capital projects which improve the shoreline. Some funds are transferred to the General Fund for maintenance of tideland areas. Enterprise Funds (Golf, Sewer and Ferry Funds): Revenues derived from services provided are used in operations and capital improvement projects. Large Project Rating Sheet A Blank Project Rating Sheet 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MAJOR AREAS OF CONCERN POINTS Environmental: Improve Existing _Environmental Quality. (Air, Water Noise, etc.) 10 points Provide New Environmental Opportunities 8 points_,, Preserve Existing Environmental Opportunities (Open Space, Wetlands) 6 points,.. Create Visual,_Scenicor Aesthetic Opportunities 4 points._ Recreational, Cultural, Educational, and Historical Benefits: Preserve Recreational/ Cultural / Educational /HistoricalHeritage 10 points _ Improve / Enhance Recreational / Cultural / Educational / Historical Opportunities 8 points_ Create New Recreational / Cultural /._ Educational _ / Historical Opportunities 6 points__ Maintenance / Facility Utilization: Provide repair / construct gap closure / improve facility utilization to major infrastructure 10 points Provide repair / construct gap closure / improve facility utilization to minor infrastructure 5 points Provide Preventative Maintenance of City Facilities / Reduce On -Going Maintenance 5 points Minor Improvement to City Facilities 2 points Economic Development: Significantly Increase or Preserve Existing Sales Tax / Tax Increment / Other Revenue > $25ok , 10 points Moderately Increase / Preserve Sales Tax / Tax Increment / Other Revnue $100k < $2_50k points. Provide Minor Increase / Preserve Existing Sales Tax / Tax Increment / Other Revenue <1100k 6 points Foster New Development / Job Opportunities , _ _ S points Improve the General Community Appearance 4 points_- ,..__... Cost Effectiveness: Result In Significant Quantifiable Cost Savings _ 2 thru 20 points Score: [(value of infrastructure repaired or savings realized or future income) / (Project cost)] Outside Funding Utilization: Utilize Funding Sources Other Than City Monies or City Resources 2thru 20points,_ Score: 2 points per 10% of funding source or resources other than City for project Disaster: Improve Capability to Respond to Disasters 10 points,., Reduce Potential for Loss of Life or Property Damage 8 points_. Provide On -going Disaster Preparedness Of the City 6 points ,___ Transportation: Improve Circulation, Construct Major Street Extension 1Q points__ Reduce Congestion Improves Level of Service (LOS) 10 or 8 points .... Score: 10 points if existing or projected LOS is F; 8 for LOS E Reduce Potential Safety Concerns (Accidents, Speed, etc.) 8_ points Provide New or Expand_ Existing Alternative Modes of Transportation 10 points_. Encourage or Accomodate Future Alternative of Transportation 8 points Other City Strategic Goals: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - Serves entire community 10 points COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - Serves segment of community 5points CUSTOMER SERVICE - Serves entire community 10 points -_ -_ CUSTOMER SERVICE - Serves segment of community . ,5 points; EMPLOYEE WELL BEING / PRODUCTIVITY - . Serves all employees 10_ points _. EMPLOYEE WELL BEING / PRODUCTIVITY- Serves segment of employees _5 points , , Other City Strategic Goal Not Included Above 5 points _. Large Project Rating Total: 0 Wednesday, May 31, 2006 Exhibit 1 Risk Management Rating Sheet A Blank Project Rating Sheet 0 0 0 O O' MAJOR AREAS OF CONCERN I POINTS. Heath Risk: Avert Health Risk (e.g. occasional backflow of sewer) 10 points Avert Potential Health Risk, (e, Q. presence of asbestos or lead paint) 5 points Litigation: Address Pending or Noticed Lawsuit > $250,000 . 10 points Address Pending or Noticed Lawsuit < $250,000 8 points_ _, Address Possible Future Lawsuit > $250,000. 6 points_ Address Possible Future Lawsuit < $250,000_ 4_points Reduce City's Overall Liability_ 2. punts Damage to Public or Private Property: Avert High Probability Of Severe Damage > $250,000 10 points Avert High Probability Of Moderate _._Damage < $250,0O0 8 points Avert Severe Damage > $250.,000 6 points_ Avert Potential Moderate Damage. <$250,000 4 points_,_____'. _ Provide Protection From Future Damage 2 points_ Legal Requirement: Implement Non- Deferrable Legal Requirement,(eq, ADA,,NPDES) 10 points.. Implement Deferrable (short-term < 5 Legal Requirement 5 points Implement Deferrable (long -term > 5 years) Legal Requirement 3_ points -. Implement Locally Adopted Codes or Ordinances 5 points._ Implement Local Standards or General Plan Obiectives 3 points IRisk Management Rating Total: 0 Large Project Rank = Large Project Rating Total + Risk Mgmt Rating Total: 0 Large Project Rating Comments: Risk Management Rating Comments: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 Page 2c of 201 Small Project Rating Sheet A Blank Project Rating Sheet 0 0 O O MAJOR AREAS OF CONCERN POINTS Community Development: Serve Entire Community or Have Broad Community Interest and Year Round 30 points_ SeryeEntire Community or Have Broad _Community Interestand Used Seasonally 25 points_ Serve Entire Community or Have Broad. Community InterestandUsedAs- Needed P 20 points, Serve Segment of Community (e.q. Seniors, Youth, Disabled) and Used Year Round 25 points Serve Segment ofCommunity_(eq Seniors, .Youth Disabled) and Used Seasonally 20 points Serve Segment of Community (e.q. Seniors, Youth, Disabled) and Used As- Needed 15 points Serve Specific Residential Area Only and Used Year Round 20 points Serve Specific Residential Area Only and Used Seasonally 15 points. Serve Specific Residential Area Only and Used As- Needed 10 points Ecomonic Development: . Significantly Increase or Preserve Existing Sales Tax / Tax Increment / Other R evenue> $25k 15 points.... .. Moderately Increase / Preserve Sales Tax / Tax Increment / Other Revnue$10k < $25k 10 points._ Provide Minor Increase / Preserve Existing Sales Tax / Tax Increment / Other Revenue <$10k 5 points Foster New Development / Job Opportunities W 10 points Improve the General Community Appearance 5 points Cost Effectiveness: Result In Significant Quantifiable Cost Savings 2 thru20points Score: ((value of infrastructure repaired or savings realized or future income) / (Project cost)] Outside Funding Utilization: Utilize Funding SourcesOther Than City Monies or City. Resources 2 thru 20 points Score: 2 points per 10% of funding source or resources other than City for project Maintenance / Facility Utilization: Provide repair /construct gap closure / improve facility utilization to major infrastructure 10 points ._ Provide repair/ construct gap closure / improve facility utilization to minor infrastructure 5points Provide Preventative Maintenance of City Facilities / Reduce On -Going Maintenance 5 points, Minor Improvement to City Facilities 2 points_... Customer Service: Improve Capability to Respond to Community -Wide Customers 10_points Improve Capability to Respond to Segment of Customers 8 points Improve Internal Efficiency -Operations to Community -Wide Customers 6 points Improve Internal Efficiency _Operations to Segment of Customers 4 points Pro. moteCuatomer Service 2 points Implement New Technology 4 points_ Recreational, Cultural, Educational, and Historical Benefits: Preserve Recreational / Cultural / Educational / Historical Heritage 10 points .__ Improve _/ Enhance Recreational / Cultural /Educational / Historical Opportunities 8 points Create New Recreational / Cultural / Educational / Historical Opportunities 6 points Other Strategic Goals: Improve Employee Well Beinq /Productivity for All Employees 10 points Improve Employee Well Beinq /Productivity for Se gmentof Employees 5 points ,_ _. 5 points_ _ v Other City Strategic Goal Not Included Above Small Project Rating Total: 0 Small Project Rating Comments: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 Page 2b of 201 ^I .c! L W X S- E) N O O N, 0 LL \ 0 0 7 0 N 0 0 4, 5 5 ° 8 E 40 ($751,261) ($1,128,576) 0 ZL 0 oi a 8 PROJECTED FUND BALANCE fmmfpp IAN -0 w w gw dg O O .a R' Wg n m OG n So win nun m N 2.3 n ym N N V NW N0 N, ea 19 8 N Q O t 24 ft1pDp N V1 N dot a2 N m ail N N aa y0 8 Oemi N 8 3 m V I O N V W W O I n �t(pp� (om tO ^O O „12.7.U2 N 2 69 oaNO2$$2 .g 8 am o N :N N roro yy ^ M 0§ §89028$ Vawggi 1 11 og°8 §$oi5825120 m oin °Qig$S a KHHWa ,-mmom 000 ippa 81 o u° i m?m o pppop 8 (($yy a 2yye JI ooWpp' N N N g q a N N w O p y W8N ((9n N1IRn g 8 a 8 OD IA NT W WH fm 10 t0O s 49 giaas ggasa U Haas 2 n§.O n8 n V O 82U 0)0 nm 8t,-1� H-S 00 2g Eiger ^^ MIWR Elaqi� W w Vl 8WmINO_Own lad "g ^�^ w N W. 8 W" Nino F.R §.ns ga iii kiln 0° 24 w s ua22 N MNSS ga H222 8R? mato 888 O N O N NW 28 W U ggs aau NN i W opp ppOo O< N ^M 1n f9 N t- g 0 819 N IO N N O N 43.-0000g w h N O t p oONmpr n W W N N ,p W 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rnnolo.° ttp)m 19 �� On 4-388 k§1§§.§. iFg21 '45 W NN 8 N r N N O I1 Dy u l N n N I n ^- N1n ^ M1 19 4so N w °J tp O dig • N , NW a Q O af N a LO w O CO N LO q. O � WV N 19 yG� Iy S ilB CHU airc JUNI 1E x w Golf Fund Balance History Golf : 6/15/2006 Net Unrestricted Balance r-- LC) oSC) N o) M CO r M 2,565,945 2,172,849 I (o o r- co O) r Less Restricted Assets 4,322,900 4,150,877 4,151,744 4 Nt- 4,151,744 1 Ending Net Assets 8,252,427 7,664,761 o) CO O N r n C.0 6,324,593 O O r- co C cs5 Change in Assets N (0 O O O O CO r- co co LC) (947,072) (393,096) (235,813) Transfers In /Out Net (538,637) (547,034) (414,185) (446,619) (454,317) Net Income (Loss) 470,575 (40,632) (532,887) 53,523 218,504 N C c 0 0 W ■ CM O L >- 0 0 r 0 N- 0 0 o) O s and Capital Outlay from Expenses and use to inc restricted assets K3 4,327,532 4,378,087 4,077,158 4,838,577 4,819,596 1 Revenue } } 0 e e � e e ER 4,798,107 4,337,455 3,544,271 4,892,100 5,038,100 Net Unrestricted Balance 3,887,517 3,929,527 3,513,884 2,565,945 2,172,849 Less Restricted Assets / Reserves N O O O) o) N c\ co M r,- t\ co O r 4,151,744 4,151,744 Beginning Balance 8,320,489 8,252,427 '-- O r '4 co O N7 6,717,689 6,324,593 LL J 0 N• LC) }O }O LL LL CO }O lL F CO }O} yOy LL LL Actual Actual Estimated Actual Projected Budget Projected Budget Golf : 6/15/2006 CU v in o G1 c o g g 00 O a) 3 U 'f U U 'c 'c 'C > J W W U ><< U U > >> 0 .r C co X C W , -I C M M O.--I .--r O01 01 01 L }}f) N . }}1 }M N. IN O' OO LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL Various /Developer cu EV E W Ln FY1 0) ro ICI EC o aa) m V co m E iv aa) o f, Ou c a) Q E ro an F. C 2 1}'D Q o a x .c c > E _° c (4.5 ° ° `- E E ° E C E U c 0 r0 O v r� io -0 += t'j ri+ c v, o N �# a O a Q c 0 C Ury 7 1n V O a 0 O U ti m CA C � -47J- ID ID C C C O w V C aO+ d 7 C E ° Li O U ° -0 a $128.1 mill E , E 'E E 'E E an vi o o N M Ln E E c c O O Construction of garage on Webster St. Funds to maintain infrastructure in Good Condition Funds to bring street to very Good Condition C O U C U 0 0 C7 0 a) 4-, 1 V) V) C ro 3 a) c a0i O En C 7 0-i (/) Park & Ride Lot (West End) Other Projects and those with Unknown Costs LL IA a) O X O U C7 GF, Special Revenue Funds GF, Open Space O > c C C }~ O OC O 0 co �L Y Y Y 5 C C C C 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 C C C cc C 7 7 7 7 7 7 Branch Library Upgrades Centralized location of operations Estuary Park - acquire and construct Joint Corporation Yard ABL Park - construction C u a) N o >, 0- 113 c -O v C 7 o a+ c E ` 4) 7 rn Ln . rio C r0 co a o C N O rn +' E E - o a� ti3 0 O