Resolution 13584CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. 13584
APPROVING FINAL MAP AND
ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEDICATIONS AND OFFERS OF DEDICATION AND
EASEMENT VACATIONS FOR TRACT 7387
WHEREAS, an application was made on October 26, 1999 by the Catellus Development
Corporation requesting approval for a General Plan Amendment, Master Plan, Rezoning,
Development Agreement and Tentative Map relating to the development of a residential area
including sites for parks, public open space, a school and a commercial/business park area on a 215
acre site encompassing the Alameda Naval Air Station (NAS) East Housing, the Alameda Fleet and
Industrial Supply Center and Annex. The project would be completed in phases over a multi -year
period, depending on market conditions. The project would include associated parking, landscaping
and public shoreline access; and
WHEREAS, the proposal for a Master Plan, General Plan Amendment, Rezoning,
Development Agreement, Tentative Map, Parcel (Disposition) Map, City Council Resolution 13216
(certifying the Final EIR for the Catellus Mixed Use Development) and City Council Resolution
13217 (making findings concerning mitigation measures and alternatives, and adoption a Statement
of Overriding Considerations and a M MRP) were approved by the City Council on May 31, 2000;
and
WHEREAS, the MMRP identified certain traffic improvements to mitigate potentially
significant impacts of the Project as set forth in the Final EIR of the Catellus Mixed Use Project; and
WHEREAS, the City has identified different traffic improvements and finds that those
improvements are equivalent effective mitigations for the impacts identified in the Final EIR for the
Catellus Mixed Use Development as detailed in the memorandum dated May 7, 2003 (attached
hereto as Exhibits A & B);
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 13423, the City Council approved Tentative Map
amendment TMA01 -002 to Tentative Map, TM -7179 on December 18, 2001; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 30, Article VI, Title 30 -81, Final Map, of the Alameda
Municipal Code ( "AMC "), the City of Alameda, CIC (Owner) and Developer (Subdivider), has
prepared and presented to this Council the Final Map of the Subdivision known as Tract 7387; and
WHEREAS, Tract 7387 established 200 legal lots, private and public streets, lanes and
common areas plus a remainder parcel that will be further subdivided in accordance with is the first
phase of a multi -phased development; and
WHEREAS, said Final Map delineates thereon for dedication to the City of Alameda public
streets, a park, easements for public utilities and rights for public safety vehicles and emergency
equipment easements for private facilities, utilities and access; and
WHEREAS, said Final Map delineates thereon vacation and abandonment of appropriate
existing public easements; and
WHEREAS, the Peralta Community College District, in accordance with Education Code
section 81310 authorized the conveyance of a public access easement to the City of Alameda for the
purpose of providing disabled sidewalk access pursuant to Resolution No. 02/03 -51 on February 25,
2003; and
WHEREAS, subdivider desires to enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement
( "Agreement ") to construct and complete the improvements in said subdivision, has submitted the
Final Map therefore for approval at this time, and has posted its bond guaranteeing full and faithful
performance of said work which has been approved by City, all in accordance with AMC Section 30-
85; and
WHEREAS, it will be to the advantage and benefit of the City to have said work performed
in accordance with said agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Alameda _that
the City Council accepts the equivalent effective mitigations identified in the memorandum dated
May 6, 2003;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Final Map of Tract 7387 be, and hereby is, approved:
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that certain easements dedicated to the public and rights of
access are hereby accepted, on behalf of the public and the City, for use in conformity with the terms
of the dedication;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said public easements designated for abandonment are
hereby vacated;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that other said easements offered for dedication but for which
improvements have not yet been constructed will be accepted at a later date upa on completion of
those improvements;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Alameda hereby accepts conveyance of the
public access easement granted by the Peralta Community College District on February 25, W03, in
accordance with Education Code section 81310 for the purpose of providing disabled 'sidewalk
access pursuant to Resolution No. 02/03 -51;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the agreement for construction and completion of the
public improvements in said subdivision, and all its terms and conditions be, and hereby are,
approved and the City Manager and the City Clerk are authorized and directedto execute and attest-
to, respectively, said agreement on behalf of the City of Alameda; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Bonds in the total sum of $13,081,53.5 guaranteeing
full and faithful performance of said public improvements, labor and materials= fOrai`O'hereby
approved as sufficient in amount.
*
Revised 5/13/03
Exhibit A
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 13, 2003
To: Doug Cole, Redevelopment Manager
From: Cheri Sheets, City Engineer
RE: Catellus FISC Development — Traffic Mitigation Fees
Summary
Attached is a spreadsheet detailing the calculated Traffic Mitigation Fees for the Catellus
Project. This information was presented and reviewed by Cheri Sheets, Doug Cole,
Cynthia Eliason, and David Brandt on Monday April 14, 2003. The calculations were
then adjusted to reflect discussions with Catellus on April 22, 2003 wherein a weighted
traffic average (rather than intersection traffic average) was agreed to for mitigations,
which remedy more than one location.
The residential share of Traffic Mitigation Fees is $1,296,804 or $ 2,674 per residential
unit. This fee represents the total maximum fee owed for the Residential Project for
MMRP T/C 1 through T /C18. The commercial share of Traffic Mitigation Fees would
be $6,608,934 or $3.37 per square foot including TSM fees.
Mitigation Measures have been revised to be the most feasible known equivalent either
based on the Caltrans PSR for Broadway /Jackson or the proposed Phase 2 PSR for
Broadway /Jackson. Where mitigations involve the freeway, it has been assumed that
90% of funding will come from State and Federal transportation grant funds. This is
consistent with CDF Study. The project has not been credited with other local or non-
transportation grant funds since the CDF specifically reserves those for City's
contribution for existing traffic.
Discussion
I was asked to review the Catellus Project contribution traffic percentage calculations
identified in Chandler Lee's memo dated March 27, 2003 and the Table 1 Catellus •
Project Contribution Matrix with PSR Defined Mitigation Costs (undated) developed by
Barbara Hawkins.
Here are my findings:
1. The underlying traffic data used for the calculations for Catellus Project
contribution (Technical Appendix pages 172 thru 174 for existing without project,
pages 246 thru 248 for existing with project and 391 thru 393 for 2020 with
project) are all appropriate, except for the Tinker Avenue Project. Since the 2020
Exhibit A — Page 1 of 2
scenario assumes the Tinker Project is built, the percentage share calculation for
Tinker must be calculated using the average of volumes on Atlantic and Tinker.
2. The memo also included calculation of the percentage share based on project's
share of total 2020 traffic, which is not consistent with the MMRP. The EIR
requires the Project to pay its pro rata share based on growth in traffic. The
revised calculations are included the Attachment A worksheet entitled "EIR T/C
Trip Share ".
3. The Table 1 Project Contribution and PSR Defined $ Matrix needs to be adjusted
to reflect the revised percentage of growth in trips. The matrix also seems to
double count some costs. For example the I -880 SB on ramp is the mitigation
measure for T/C 10 and T/C 13. The matrix adds these items together. The project
should only pay for the average of the two values. See Attachment B worksheet
entitled "EIR T/C Residential & Commercial Cost Share ".
4. Table 1 also identifies the "feasible" mitigation for each identified impact. These
are not the same as listed in the EIR but rather reflect the items identified as
feasible in the Caltrans I- 880Broadway Jackson PSR and the subsequent items
identified for further study in the follow up PSR.
5. The Matrix does not include all mitigations. T/C 6 in particular needed to be
included since it is both am and pm peak hour issue. Although T/C 6a is not
triggered until office development greater than 360,000 square feet both T/C 6b
and T/C 6c are triggered prior to 360,000 square feet of office. The proposed
mitigations require widening outside of existing right -of -way on Atlantic and
Webster, therefore Tinker Extension was used as the feasible alternative
mitigation. Based on a review of the Technical Appendix (page 181 p.m. peak
hour critical movements southbound right turn, eastbound through lane,
westbound through lane) the equivalent residential only impact at
Atlantic/Webster that triggers T/C 6b and T/C 6c is 161 homes. See Attachment B
incorporates all mitigations.
Exhibit A — Page 2 of 2
Exhibit B
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 13, 2003
To: Doug Cole, Redevelopment Manager
From: Cheri Sheets, City Engineer
RE: Catellus FISC Development — Citywide Nexus Study and Development Fees
The Citywide Development Fees ( "CDF ") nexus study dated January 2001 was. approved -
by the City Council on February 21, 2001 pursuant to Ordinance No. 2854. The
Development fees include transportation projects, Parks and Recreation projects, Public
Facilities, and Public Safety projects. The study states the CIC shall pay Catellus share
of CDF since the DA specifically exempts the Developer from future fees.
The estimated CDF for the entire (residential plus commercial) Catellus project is
$6,200,000 of which approximately 58% ($3,596,000) is for transportation purposes. The
residential share of the CDF for transportation purposes is estimated at approximately
$909,000. See Attachment A worksheet entitled "CDF Transportation $ ". The total CDF
fees for the residential project calculated by Doug Cole based on current CDF fee rates
are $1,611,627. See Attachment B entitled "Catellus Project CDF Obligation
Residential ".
Some of the transportation projects in the CDF are included in the EIR mitigations. The
total transportation mitigation fee owed for the Catellus residential project is $1,296,804
of which $1,260,284 is for CDF itemized projects. David Brandt has indicated that City
can choose to credit the $1,260,284 against the CDF for the residential portion of the
Catellus project. Essentially the project would be overpaying the transportation purposes
portion (estimated at $909,000) and deferring payment the other CDF fees such as ARPD
and Public Safety Fees. The net CDF fees owed by the CIC for the residential portion of
the Project are $351,343.
David Brandt has also indicated that the CDF fees are considered "Future Fees" under the
DA Section and therefore the CIC payment would occur only if the Project derives a net
profit to the CIC. Currently there is an anticipated profit; however, the profit will not b_ e_.
seen until 2007. The City should enter into agreement (or alter its JIA) with CIC to _
specifically call out how this fee reimbursement will occur.
Exhibit B - Page 1 of 1
a
E o L
0 N
C� C7
co
N
22 74%
22 74%
22.74%
23.71%1
23 -86%
e
N
23.59°/
CD
M
CD
M
4R Rn %�
e
Co
..-
To
r. y„
C O
e-
�-
t;
e
N-
N
fr
7.57%
7.57%
0)
r:
CA
rr
CD
N
co
is:
o
a
W
h
o
co
eT
CV
(D
'Q
N
°
er
N
fO
d'
T
0
To a..
= E 0
::E`m--
C) 0 f0A a
e
rte.
0
Ps
0
o
CD
0
CD
0
CO
0
CO
0
CO
0
N.
C
0
m
0
CD
0
CD
0
To
T, 9 A d o.
RI 0CCNa`1 --.n1,
e
o
to
"
23.15%
o
In
N
e
N
23.15%
\
N
23.15%
23.15%
23.15%
23.15%
23.15%
\°
N
.c 9 M
7
L. - °' `1
0
r- b CO a)
O C C% C
ec�aa`
5139 3426 30.74%
10242. 6971 32.69%
10242 6971 32.69%
10242: 6971. 32.69%
4382 1209. 34.08%
4291 1373 34.30%
o
Q1
cO
0)
- �;
CO
Co E
o_
W
co
01
-- 1
N
CO
CCD
2562 no _ 53.85%
2562 13(1 53.85 %1
0
r
O
0
C+)
U)
.
co.
I
N
D
N
r'
CCD
.
N N
„O CA
F-0mrF-
Z
�,
N w O G
(400.1-
d a' 69
00.
1 27661 1053
CA
N
C
to
�
cm
N
C
to
0)
N
O
to
35851 412
h
m
co
co
C+ D
O)
co
tr
Cc
o
(A
ao
r,
v
25021 70
2502 70
co
m
a-
v
co
v
1713
r.
CCD
r`
CND)
r'I
M
31731
co
0)
N
C
_ ••�..}
-' �
2432
2432
3245
2174
Impacted
Intersection
MSD at
Constitution/Way
add
Atlantic/Webster
to Tinker/Webster
since no baseline
wTinker Ext.)
add
Atlantic/Webster
to Tinker/Webster
since no baseline
wTinker Ext.)
Add
Atlantic/Webster
to Tinker/Webster
since no baseline
wTinker Ext.)
Atlantic/
Constitution
Jackson/ 6th
Harrison/ 7th
O
Jackson/ 5th
Jackson/ 5th
4tlantic/ Webster
3th/ Central
MSD /CW
Si nalization
Tinker Ave Ext.
(Note 1)
Tinker Ave Ext.
Tinker Ave Ext.
Tinker Ave Ext.
1 -880 Jackson
unbraid on
ramp
1-880 Posey
Tube Direct NB
on ramp
1 -580 Posey:
Tube Direct NB'
On Ramp
1-850 MLK SB
off ramp
1.850 MLK SB
If ramp
0)
C
E
To
c
o)
fn
ITC 5
lc
H
a
r-
C„)
1-
18
1-
03
1-
g
H
W
1-
ITC.10a 1
_
0
1- 1-
Commercial
Share of
Growth
2.79%
e
N
N
23.86%
23.13%
e
L0
0
12.30%
e
a,
m
n
40341
0
QM/
p t
.o ` 3
CU .mc o
IX NCD
0
u)
A
e
0))
ti
e
N
n
o
0))
e
O
e
0)
15181
N o
o m 7- o .- un)
7 d O 0 N ((0 0
75 -Edda)
::E,`oo'
m o r ,_ n
00 a)aC.
0
(nn
CD
0
to
((00
0
uni
((00
0
to
CO (0
0
to
((00
e
U
(.0
C)
Cate!lus
Residential
Share of
Project
Trips
(572/2471)
23.15%
e
Lc)
N
e
tb
N
23.15%
e
Lo
N
23.15 %f
23.15%
9 e
d 7 0
c-a a)..
0 ` ., u
m
d
O g0-6
o c) 11' a
e
(00
C))
e
r°)•
C))
33.25%
e
0))
N
e
(OO•
25.80%
1. Tinker Ext Trip Share based on difference between Atl/Webster and Tinker/Webster since no baseline with Tinker Ext. 1
I2. EIR states project impact at Pacfic Main but Tech Appendix doesn't show so use Atlantic Main as surrogate 1
t C G M an) co N. co O
V�ss++ (0 N
w 0 A N a en
F C7 .1-
m.o
L
y)
3 2 V
a d d co
N w ^O a
NCiaF-
2009
N
01
01
O
4291
3464
3686
5304
3. Broadway Jackson PSR = $49 million less already itemized mitigations in other TC's
—
—
U
TS) d d
0 c a
0 0- I-
O
O
N
471
258
156
729
Exhibit A - Attachment AI
Environmental Impact Report Traffic / Circulation Trip Share
d
S c t
m 300_I-
682
o
3389
2946
�_ 2960
3870
d
C ... 7 3 d
d O d „
N t .0 p a
m 300_I-
682
n
co
2918
2688
2804
3141
e
0
v-
d 0
v d
m .-
a d
E c
Pacific/ Main
Tinker/ Webster
(add
Atlantic/Webster
to Tinker/Webster
since no baseline
wTinker Ext.)
Jackson/ 6th
Oak & 5th
Avg of
Intersections
Harrison/7th and
Broadway /5th
Broadway & 5th
Jackson /7th
h o
c
>
Webster St Tubes
c
d O d
co co m to
d
HES Project
(Note 2)
Tinker Ave Ext.
1 -880 Jackson
On Ramp
1 -880 MLK SB
off
PSR
Broadway /Jack
son (Note 3)
Add thru and
left lane
SR 260 DP
TOS
19 cents /sft
commercial
o d rn Z u a w
m W ~_ `
V i cI- Nm o
e I--
VH
I-
u)
H
H
0
00
FU-
I--
rn
1--
Q
1
Z
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in a regular meeting assembled on the 20th
day of May, 2003, by the following vote to wit:
AYES: Councilmembers DeWitt, Kerr, and Mayor Johnson - 3.
NOES: Councilmember Daysog - 1.
ABSENT: Councilmember Matarrese - 1.
ABSTENTIONS: None.
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said City this
21st day of May, 2003.
1 Ql ,i)Q D-
Lara Weisiger, City CWJk
City of Alameda