2005-02-15 PacketCITY OF ALAMEDA • CALIFORNIA
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION
TUESDAY - - - FEBRUARY 15, 2005 - - - 6:10 P.M.
Time: Tuesday, February 15, 2005, 6:10 p.m.
Place: City Council Chambers Conference Room, City Hall, corner
of Santa Clara Avenue and Oak Street.
Agenda:
1. Roll Call.
2. Public Comment on Agenda Items Only.
Anyone wishing to address the Council /Commission on agenda
items only may speak for a maximum of 3 minutes per item.
3. Adjournment to Closed Session to consider:
3 -A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
Name of cases:
Alameda Belt Line v. City of Alameda,
Alameda Belt Line v. City of Alameda, and
City of Alameda v. Alameda Belt Line.
4. Announcement of Action Taken in Closed Session, if any.
Adjournment
Beverly Jo or
Chair, Comm ity Improvement
Commission
Time:
CITY OF ALAMEDA • CALIFORNIA
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY - - - FEBRUARY 15, 2005 - - - 6:30 P.M.
Tuesday, February 15, 2005, 6:30 p.m.
Place: City Council Chambers Conference Room, City Hall, corner
of Santa Clara Avenue and Oak Street.
Agenda:
1. Roll Call.
2. Public Comment on Agenda Items Only.
Anyone wishing to address the Council on agenda items only,
may speak for a maximum of 3 minutes per item.
3. Adjournment to Closed Session to consider:
3 -A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Agency Negotiators:
Employee Organizations:
Human Resources Director and Craig
Jory.
Management and Confidential
Employees Association, International
Brotherhood of Electrical Workers,
and Police Association Non - Sworn.
4. Announcement of Action Taken in Closed Session, if any.
Adjournment
CITY OF ALAMEDA • CALIFORNIA
IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL:
1. Please file a speaker's slip with the Deputy City
Clerk and upon recognition by the Mayor, approach the
podium and state your name; speakers are limited to
three (3) minutes per item.
2. Lengthy testimony should be submitted in writing and
only a summary of pertinent points presented verbally.
3. Applause and demonstration are prohibited during
Council meetings.
AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY - - FEBRUARY 15, 2005 - - - - 7:30 P.M.
[Note: Regular Council Meeting convenes at 7:30 p.m., City
Hall, Council Chambers, corner of Santa Clara Ave and Oak St.]
The Order of Business for City Council Meeting is as follows:
1. Roll Call
2. Agenda Changes
3. Proclamations, Special Orders of the Day and Announcements
4. Consent Calendar
5. Agenda Items
6. Oral Communications, Non - Agenda (Public Comment)
7. Council Communications (Communications from Council)
8. Adjournment
Public Participation
Anyone wishing to address the Council on agenda items or business
introduced by Councilmembers may speak for a maximum of 3 minutes
per agenda item when the subject is before Council. Please file a
speaker's slip with the Deputy City Clerk if you wish to address
the City Council.
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND 6:10 P.M.
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CONFERENCE ROOM
Separate Agenda (Closed Session)
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL 6:30 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CONFERENCE ROOM
Separate Agenda (Closed Session)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
1. ROLL CALL - City Council
2. AGENDA CHANGES
3. PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
3 -A. Proclamation supporting the Navy League's efforts to designate
the City of Alameda as an official "Coast Guard City." [Mayor
Johnson]
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be
enacted, approved or adopted by one motion unless a request
for removal for discussion or explanation is received from the
Council or a member of the public.
4 -A. Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings held
on February 1, 2005.
4 -B. Bills for ratification.
4 -C. Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for
the second calendar quarter of 2004.
4 -D. Adoption of Resolution Appointing an Engineer and an Attorney
for Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84 -2.
4 -E. Adoption of Resolution Appointing an Engineer and an Attorney
for Maintenance Assessment District 01 -01 (Marina Cove).
4 -F. Adoption of Resolution Amending the International Brotherhood
of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Salary Schedule by Establishing a
Salary Range for the Position of Inventory Control Clerk.
5. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
5 -A. Adoption of Resolution Appointing Dennis J. Hanna as a Member
of the Social Service Human Relations Board. [Partial term
expiring June 30, 2007]
5 -B. Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code
to Increase the Composition of the Golf Commission from Five
to Seven Members by Amending Subsections 2 -9.1 (Commission
Created; Composition), 2 -9.2 (Membership; Appointment;
Removal) and 2 -9.3 (Voting) of Section 2 -9 (City Golf
Commission). [Mayor Johnson]
5 -C. Recommendation to award Contract in the amount of $2,110,000,
including contingencies to Ghilotti Brothers, Inc. for Park
Street Streetscape and Town Center Project, Phase I, No. P.W.
10- 02 -13, and authorize the allocation of additional funds
from the Merged Areas Bond Issuance of 2003.
5 -D. Adoption of Resolution Approving the Form of and Authorizing
the Execution and Delivery of a Purchase and Sale Agreement
and Related Documents with Respect to the Sale of the Seller's
Vehicle License Fee Receivable from the State, and Directing
and Authorizing Certain Other Actions in Connection Therewith.
5 -E. Recommendation to accept budget adjustments to revenue and
appropriations.
6. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON- AGENDA (Public Comment)
Any person may address the Council in regard to any matter
over which the Council has jurisdiction or of which it may
take cognizance, that is not on the agenda.
7. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (Communications from Council)
8. ADJOURNMENT
• For use in preparing the Official Record, speakers reading a
written statement are invited to submit a copy to the City Clerk
at the meeting or e -mail to: lweisige @ci.alameda.ca..us
• Sign language interpreters will be available on request. Please
contact the City Clerk at 747 -4800 or TDD number 522 -7538 at
least 72 hours prior to the Meeting to request an interpreter.
• Equipment for the hearing impaired is available for public use.
For assistance, please contact the City Clerk at 747 -4800 or TDD
number 522 -7538 either prior to, or at, the Council Meeting.
• Accessible seating for persons with disabilities, including
those using wheelchairs, is available.
• Minutes of the meeting available in enlarged print.
• Audio Tapes of the meeting are available upon request.
• Please contact the City Clerk at 747 -4800 or TDD number 522 -7538
at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to request agenda
materials in an alternative format, or any other reasonable
accommodation that may be necessary to participate in and enjoy
the benefits of the meeting.
CITY OF ALAMEDA
Memorandum
Date: February 8, 2005
To: Honorable Mayor
and Councilmembers
From: William C. Norton
Interim City Manager
Re: Regular and Special City Council Meetings and Special Joint City Council
and Community Improvement Commission Meeting of February 15, 2005
Transmitted are the agendas and related materials for the Regular and Special City
Council Meetings and the Special Joint City Council and Community Improvement
Commission Meeting of February 15, 2005.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
1. ROLL CALL - City Council
2. AGENDA CHANGES
3. PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
3 -A. Proclamation supporting the Navy League's efforts to designate
the City of Alameda as an official "Coast Guard City." [Mayor
Johnson]
At this time the Mayor will present a proclamation to Barbara Price supporting the
Navy League's efforts to designate the City of Alameda as "A Coast Guard City."
CONSENT CALENDAR
4 -A. Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings held
on February 1, 2005.
The City Clerk has presented for approval the Minutes of the Special and Regular
City Council meetings held on February 1, 2005.
4 -B. Bills for ratification.
4 -C. Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for
the second calendar quarter of 2004.
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
Honorable Mayor and Page 2
Councilmembers February 8, 2005
It is recommended that Council accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the
second quarter of 2004. Although the quarterly sales tax revenues increased by
5.4% compared to the same quarter of the prior year, the two year period reflects a
decrease of 1%.
4 -D. Adoption of Resolution Appointing an Engineer and an Attorney
for Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84 -2.
Adoption of this resolution appoints an engineer and an attorney for the Island City
Landscaping and Lighting District. It is proposed again, as was done in the past, to
appoint the City Engineer and the City Attorney for these services.
4 -E. Adoption of Resolution Appointing an Engineer and an Attorney
for Maintenance Assessment District 01 -01 (Marina Cove).
Adoption of this resolution appoints an engineer and an attorney for the
Maintenance Assessment District for Marina Cove. It is proposed again, as was
done in the past, to appoint the City Engineer and the City Attorney for these
services.
4 -F. Adoption of Resolution Amending the International Brotherhood
of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Salary Schedule by Establishing a
Salary Range for the Position of Inventory Control Clerk.
It is recommended that Council approve the amendment to the IBEW salary
schedule. This resolution establishes the hourly salary range of a new
classification, Inventory Control Clerk, AP &T, on the IBEW salary schedule. This
recommendation does not require any addition to headcount and there is no
financial impact to the General Fund. The AP &T Enterprise Fund will pay the funds
required to cover the recommended salary range.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
5 -A. Adoption of Resolution Appointing Dennis J. Hanna as a Member
of the Social Service Human Relations Board. [Partial term
expiring June 30, 2007]
It is recommended that Council adopt a resolution appointing Dennis J. Hanna as a
member of the SSHRB.
5 -B. Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code
to Increase the Composition of the Golf Commission from Five
to Seven Members by Amending Subsections 2 -9.1 (Commission
Created; Composition), 2 -9.2 (Membership; Appointment;
Removal) and 2 -9.3 (Voting) of Section 2 -9 (City Golf
Commission). [Mayor Johnson]
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
Honorable Mayor and Page 3
Councilmembers February 8, 2005
It is recommended that Council introduce an ordinance amending the Municipal
Code to increase the composition of the Golf Commission from five to seven
members. The additional members would help promote regular and tournament
golf play, prioritize golf course improvement projects (Clubhouse) and make certain
the successful operation of the Golf Complex. The funding for costs for the
additional Golf Commissioners will come from the Golf Course Enterprise Fund.
5 -C. Recommendation to award Contract in the amount of $2,110,000,
including contingencies to Ghilotti Brothers, Inc. for Park
Street Streetscape and Town Center Project, Phase I, No. P.W.
10- 02 -13, and authorize the allocation of additional funds
from the Merged Areas Bond Issuance of 2003.
It is recommended that Council award the contract in the amount of $2,110,000,
including contingencies, to Ghilotti Brothers, Inc. for the Park Street Streetscape
and Town Center Project, and authorize the allocation of $175,000 additional funds
from the 2003 Merged Areas Bond. Applying funds from this source will not affect
the City's ability to carry out other, major projects (such as the Theater and Parking
Structure).
5 -D. Adoption of Resolution Approving the Form of and Authorizing
the Execution and Delivery of a Purchase and Sale Agreement
and Related Documents with Respect to the Sale of the Seller's
Vehicle License Fee Receivable from the State, and Directing
and Authorizing Certain Other Actions in Connection Therewith.
It recommended that Council adopt this resolution. Alameda's participation in the
VLF Program will have many benefits which are listed in this report. The sale of the
City's VLF Receivable would provide additional revenues in FY 2004 -05, which can
be applied to resolve budgetary challenges in FY 2004 -05 and 2005 -06.
5 -E. Recommendation to accept budget adjustments to revenue and
appropriations.
It is recommended that Council approve the described recommended changes to
revenues and appropriations. In summary, revenue estimates are reduced by $1.4
million and appropriations are reduced $6.3 million. It is estimated that there will be
no net change at year -end to General Fund Reserves.
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
Proclamation
Whereas, The United States Coast Guard shares a rich history alongside
Alameda; and
Whereas, the Coast Guard has operated in the Estuary between Alameda
and Oakland since 1926; and
Whereas, numerous cutters have shared Coast Guard Island as a home -port
including the TANEY, GRESHAM, and BARATARIA; and currently
the BOUTWELL, MUNRO, and MORGANTHAU are stationed
there; and
Whereas, the City of Alameda, its businesses and residents support the
Coast Guard in action and deed, from proclamations to military
discounts; and
Whereas, the City of Alameda takes pride in our support of Coast Guard
troops and has consistently supported efforts that benefit the
troops' families such as the retention of the Woodstock Child
Development Center which serves many Coast Guard children; and
Whereas, making Coast Guard men and women and their families feel at
home in their "home away from home" is an invaluable contribution
to morale and service excellence; and
Whereas, the Alameda Council of the Navy League of the United States has
commenced their efforts to obtain the Coast Guard's official
designation of Alameda as a "Coast Guard City."
Now therefore be it resolved, that we, the City Council of the City of Alameda, do
hereby proclaim support for the Navy League's efforts to designate the City of
Alameda as an official
11
t Guard City"
Tony Daysog
Council Member
rank Matarrese
ouncil Member
Proclamation #3 -A
2 -15 -05
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY - - - FEBRUARY 1, 2005 - - - 6:45 P.M.
Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:45 p.m.
Roll Call - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore,
Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5.
Absent: None.
The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider:
(05- ) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation; Name
of case: Younger - Wunar, Inc. v. City of Alameda.
(05- ) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation; Name
of case: Gallagher & Burke, Inc. v City of Alameda.
Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened
and Mayor Johnson announced that regarding Younger - Wunar, Inc. v.
City of Alameda, the Council obtained briefing and instructions
were given to Legal Counsel; and regarding Gallagher & Burke, Inc.
v. City of Alameda, the Council obtained briefing and instructions
were given to Legal Counsel.
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the
Special Meeting at 7:10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
February 1, 2005
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY- - FEBRUARY 1, 2005- -7:30 P.M.
Mayor Johnson convened the Regular Meeting at 8:21 p.m.
ROLL CALL Present: Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore,
Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5.
Absent: None.
AGENDA CHANGES
None.
PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
(05- ) Proclamation declaring January 30, 2005 through April 4,
2005 as A Season for Nonviolence in the City of Alameda.
Mayor Johnson read the Proclamation and presented it to Pat Dilks
of the Children's Learning Center representing the Youth
Collaborative.
Ms. Dilks thanked the Council for their support.
(05- ) Update on the new main library project.
The Project Manager submitted a timeline and provided an update on
the project.
Mayor Johnson inquired when the construction budget would be
submitted, to which the Project Manager responded that the
construction budget was set by the $17.4 million contract.
Mayor Johnson inquired when the spending schedule would be
provided, to which the Project Manager responded that a schedule
would be provided this month.
Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the steel prices were locked in
before the end of 2004, to which the Project Manager responded in
the affirmative; stated the rebar subcontractor withdrew because of
bankruptcy.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Johnson announced that the minutes [paragraph no. 05- 1, and
the Resolution Authorizing the Application to the Metropolitan
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council 1
February 1, 2005
Transportation Commission [paragraph no. 05- ] were removed from
the Consent Calendar for discussion.
Councilmember deHaan moved approval of the remainder of the Consent
Calendar.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
[Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding
the paragraph number.]
(05- ) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council meetings
held on January 18, 2005.
Mayor Johnson requested that the minutes of the Regular City
Council Meeting should be revised to reflect that she was not
absent.
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the Special City Council
Meeting and revised Regular City Council Meeting.
Councilmember deHann seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
( *05- ) Ratified bills in the amount of $4,627,942.61.
( *05- ) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Investment Report
for period ending December 31, 2004. Accepted.
( *05- ) Recommendation to approve Agreement with Ameresco Half
Moon Bay, LLC for the purchase of power from Landfill Gas
Generation. Accepted.
( *05- ) Resolution No. 13812, "Authorizing the Application to
CalTrans for a Bicycle Transportation Account Grant for
Improvements to the Bay Farm Island Bicycle Bridge Approach."
Adopted.
(05- ) Resolution No. 13813, "Authorizing the Application to the
Metropolitan Transportation Commission for a Regional Bicycle and
Pedestrian Program Grant for the Cross Alameda Trail Phase I."
Adopted.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the purchase of the right -of-
way for the linear park was part of the Alameda Belt Line property,
to which the Public Works Director responded in the affirmative.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
February 1, 2005
2
The City Attorney stated that the Alameda Belt Line litigation
involves the exercise of the right to purchase the entire Alameda
Belt Line property, not just the 22 acre site.
Mayor Johnson stated that the purchase of the right -of -way for the
linear park was separate from the down zoned area [Measure D,
2000]
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the curb on Ralph Appezzato
Memorial Parkway was under the City's jurisdiction, to which the
Public Works Director responded the street from curb to curb is
within the public right -of -way.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether improvements have been made
to the area, to which the Public Works Director responded that
there were no improvements on the south side of Appezzato Memorial
Parkway because the City only owns the area to the curb; the
Alameda Belt Line property runs from the back of the curb to the
fence line.
Councilmember deHaan moved adoption of the Resolution.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
( *05- ) Resolution No. 13814, "Approving Submittal of a Revised
Application, Incorporating a Flat Parking Lot and Budget
Adjustments, to the Office of Library Construction Under the
California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library
Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000." Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(05- ) Public Hearing to consider an Appeal of the Planning
Board's approval of Design Review, DR04 -0101, to allow a 5,300
square foot new commercial building (veterinary hospital) to
replace approximately 2,000 square feet of commercial buildings,
with a parking lot expansion to 23 spaces; and adoption of related
resolution. The property is located at 1410 Everett Street in the
C -C Community Commercial and R -5 Hotel Residential Zoning
Districts. Appellant: John Barni, Jr. Applicant: Park Centre
Animal Hospital.
The Supervising Planner provided a brief overview of the project.
Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether rezoning from R -5 to C -C would
make the existing property conform to the General Plan designation,
to which the Supervising Planner responded in the affirmative.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council 3
February 1, 2005
Mayor Johnson opened the Public Hearing.
Proponents (In favor of appeal): George Borikas, Alameda; John
Barni, Appellant; Paul Schmidt, Alameda; Erin Beales, Alameda; Tom
Matthews, Alameda; Joe Meylor, Alameda.
Opponents (Not in favor of appeal): Steve Busse, Park Centre Animal
Hospital; Richard Raus, Applicant's Architect; Gregory Roseen,
Roseen Builders Inc.; Cathy Wydner, Park Centre Animal Hospital;
Genevieve Manchester - Johnson, Park Centre Animal Hospital; Helen
Mohr, Alameda; Robb Ratto, Park Street Business Association; Debbie
George; Tracy McKean, Alameda Publishing Group; Gene Oh; Shana
Levy, Alameda.
There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public
portion of the Hearing.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the Planning Department was
comfortable with the notification process and whether there was a
problem with the identification of the addresses.
The Supervising Planner responded that all three speakers who
advised that they did not receive notification are on the mailing
list; the Planning Board notification was sent out on November 23
for the Planning Board Meeting in early December; the same list was
used for notification of tonight's meeting; there was no indication
that any of the 171 notices were returned for non - receipt.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether there was confusion with the
project address, to which the Supervising Planner responded that
the current Veterinary Hospital address was used; there might have
been some confusion about whether or not the corner lot was also
going to be redeveloped if the plans were not reviewed.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether there has been confusion with
addresses in the past.
The Supervising Planner responded that addresses for corner lots
could be confusing because of multiple addresses; a scanned site
location map will be attached to notifications in the future.
Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether there were three separate
addresses for the three different parcels, to which the Supervising
Planner responded in the affirmative.
Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether having two different addresses
would change the notification circumference, to which the
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council 4
February 1, 2005
Supervising Planner responded that the circumference would be
changed slightly; all three speakers who stated that they did not
receive notification live within 300 feet regardless of the Everett
Street or Central Avenue address.
Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether someone would be unaware that
Central Avenue was involved if they did not review the plans, to
which the Supervising Planner responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether use permits run with the
current proprietor or with the property, to which the Supervising
Planner responded that use permits run with the land; stated use
permits do not change the zoning.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the notice is valid, to which the
City Attorney responded that the notice complies with the
requirements of the Municipal Code and the current practices of the
Planning Department.
Councilmember deHaan requested clarification on the dog walking
practices.
Mr. Busse stated that currently the dogs are walked on the existing
bank property as well as in the neighborhood.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether dogs are boarded, to which
Mr. Busse responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether there is design latitude on
the Central Avenue side, to which Mr. Busse responded enhancements
have been made; additional latticework is being added.
Councilmember deHaan stated he was concerned with trees covering
the sign.
Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether landscaping was one foot
from the lot line and five feet from the edge of the sidewalk.
Mr. Busse responded that there would be a five foot two inch
landscape buffer from the existing sidewalk.
Mayor Johnson stated that she supports the project; Design Review
is the only issue before the Council; good improvements have been
made.
Councilmember deHaan stated that he is concerned about the
notification.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
February 1, 2005
5
Councilmember Matarrese stated that the project should be
renoticed, and Design Review should be sent back to the Planning
Board.
Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that she would like to go on record as
liking the design, especially the changes the architect has made;
she is concerned about the noticing issue.
Mayor Johnson stated that she concurs with Vice Mayor Gilmore; not
including the address on Central Avenue in the notice may have
caused confusion; she feels badly for the business because of the
project delay.
Councilmember Daysog stated that speakers mentioned that the design
does not fit the residential character of the neighborhood;
arguments could be made that the design is an improvement over the
existing structure; the project is a positive step.
Councilmember deHaan moved that the matter be sent back to the
Planning Board for proper notification.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
Councilmembers Matarrese, Gilmore, Daysog, and Mayor Johnson went
on record that the only reason the matter was being sent back to
the Planning Board was to allow proper notification.
(05- ) Public Hearing to consider Amendment to Zoning Map to
rezone approximately 7,800 square feet (1/5 acre) at 1410 Everett
Street, APN 070 - 170 -15, from R -5 Hotel Residential to C -C Community
Commercial; and
(05- A) Introduction of Ordinance Reclassifying and Rezoning
Certain Property within the City of Alameda by Amending Zoning
Ordinance No. 1277, N.S., from R -5 (General Residential) Zoning
District to C -C (Community Commercial) Zoning District, for that
Property Located at 2507 Central Avenue at Everett Street. Not
introduced.
Mayor Johnson opened the Public Hearing.
Proponents (In favor of rezoning): Robb Ratto, Park Street Business
Association; Steve Busse, Park Centre Animal Hospital.
Opponents (Not in favor of rezoning): John Barni, Alameda.
There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
February 1, 2005
6
portion of the hearing.
Vice Mayor Gilmore moved that the matter be sent back to the
Planning Board for proper notification.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
* * *
Mayor Johnson called a recess at 10:05 p.m. and reconvened the
Regular City Council Meeting at 10:21 p.m.
* * *
Mayor Johnson announced that the recommendation to direct the City
Manager to prepare an ordinance [paragraph no. 05- ] would be
heard before the discussion regarding options for relocation
assistance [paragraph no. 05- ].
(05- ) Recommendation to direct the City Manager to prepare an
ordinance establishing a Theatre Combining District in Chapter XXX,
Development Regulations.
Lars Hanson, Park Street Business Association (PSBA), stated that
PSBA supports establishment of the ordinance.
Mayor Johnson announced that the following speakers are in favor
but would not comment: Pauline Kelley, Alameda; Abigail Wade,
Regency Antiques; Nick Petrulakis, Books Inc.; Elizabeth Pinkerton,
Dog Bone Alley; Gene Oh, Alameda Bicycle, Robb Ratto, PSBA.
Councilmember deHaan moved to approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog inquired whether accepting
the staff recommendation allows the Central Cinema to continue
operating, to which the City Attorney responded in the affirmative.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
(05- ) Discussion regarding options for relocation assistance
legislation and a temporary moratorium on all new construction,
demolition and condominium conversion in the "West End Atlantic
Corridor Area" (bounded by Webster Street, Main Street, Pacific
Avenue and Ralph J. Appezzato Memorial Parkway).
Proponents: Mosetta Rose London, Alameda; Donald Cummingham,
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council 7
February 1, 2005
Alameda; Modessa Henderson, Harbor Island Tenant Association
(HITA); Motoe Yamada, Alameda; Emily, Lin; Michael Wharton, Alameda
Unified School District; Gerbrehiwot Tesfandrias, Alameda; Michael
John Torrey, Alameda; Samya Ahmed, HITA; David de la Torre,
Alameda; Lorraine Lilley, HITA; Tom Matthews, Renewed Hope; Lynette
Lee, Renewed Hope; Isolina Cadle, HITA; Michael Yoshii, Buena Vista
United Methodist Church; Judge Richard Bartalini, Alameda; Arnold
Fong, Alameda resident and RPO; Lily Lueng, Alameda.
Neutral: Dr. Mary Abu -saba, Alameda; Deborah James, Alameda; Craig
Miott, Alameda.
Opponents: Jack Sullivan, Alameda resident and Rental Property
Owner (RPO); Jun Saraspi, RPO; John Goerl, RPO; Shirley Green,
Alameda resident and RPO; Paul Anders, Alameda resident and RPO;
Merle Pagel, Alameda resident and RPO; Maewood Zarback, Alameda
resident and RPO; Roger Armstrong, RPO; Rosemary McNally, Alameda
resident and RPO; Angela McIntyre, Alameda Association of Realtors;
Harry McMillan, RPO; Ann O'Rourke, Alameda resident and RPO; former
Councilmember Hadi Monsef, Alameda; Chris Mazala, Mason Management;
Don Camara, Alameda resident and RPO; Lisa Fowler, Gallagher and
Lindsey; Eileen Walker, Alameda resident and President of Alameda
Association of Realtors; Ann Bracci, Alameda; Dave Gallagher, RPO;
Hanna Fry, Alameda resident and RPO; Mark Palmer, Alameda resident
and RPO; Ellen Purdy, Harbor Bay Realty; Ed Murphy, Alameda
resident and RPO; Arch Woodliff, Alameda resident and RPO; Suha
Erdem, Alameda resident and RPO; Cynthia Ridenour, Alameda resident
and RPO; former Councilmember Barbara Kerr, Alameda; Thomas Cooke,
Bonanza Apartments; Carol Martino, Realty World Martino Associates;
Kathy Lautz, Apartment Owners Association; Steve Edrington, Rental
Housing Association of Northern Alameda County.
* * *
(05- ) After speaker Cynthia Ridenour, Councilmember Matarrese
moved that the Regular Meeting be continued past midnight.
Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
* * *
Councilmember Daysog stated that as a graduate student he worked on
a project analyzing the impacts of rent control in Berkeley and
Santa Monica; in both cases, rent control laws did not help the
people; he is concerned that someone would use the proposed
ordinance to file a lawsuit for reasons having little or nothing to
do with the Harbor Island Apartment situation; the emphasis of the
proposed ordinance is wrong by focusing on landlord /tenant
relations; involvement in landlord /tenant relations is done
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council 8
February 1, 2005
informally via the Rent Review Advisory Committee; requested that
staff, landlords and residents work together to develop something
other than an ordinance that speaks to short notice mass evictions
and voluntary relocation assistance.
Mayor Johnson requested staff to determine how local and State
statutes could be put to better use; stated the maintenance and
quality of life issues at the Harbor Island Apartments could have
been handled better.
Councilmember Matarrese stated that he has not met one person who
has defended the 15 Asset Management Group's action; requested
staff to review whether there is a hole in the condominium
conversion ordinance and whether there is an attempt to circumvent
the ordinance; the proposed ordinance does not address the impact
of not providing a reasonable, fair amount of public notice for
vacating the complex completely; the Alameda Unified School
District is trying to close a gap of over a million dollars;
perhaps the 15 Asset Management Group should pay an impact fee; the
Harbor Island Apartment issue will not be resolved soon; encouraged
investment and improvement in the West End; stated process should
include social impacts.
Vice Mayor Gilmore stated the goal should be preventing a Harbor
Island Apartment situation from happening again; the question is
how to go about it; the City needs to work to enforce current laws;
the former residents suffered greatly; West End residents need to
know that they are just as important as residents in other sections
of the City; landlords have stated that the proposed ordinance will
not work from their standpoint; challenged the landlords to work
with the City and the residents and come up with a way of
preventing the situation from happening again; stated steps need to
be put in place to have it happen sooner rather than later.
Councilmember deHaan stated that redeveloping the West End will
cause displacement; a good social eye is needed for what is
occurring; the City knew that something was going astray; a wedge
has been driven between the landlords and tenants; the size of the
Harbor Island Apartments makes it difficult to manage; the property
cannot afford to be kept out of the rental market; that he does not
believe the ordinance or moratorium are the answer.
Councilmember Daysog stated the concerns that people had regarding
mandatory relocation assistance could be the same concerns
regarding mandatory impacts; the City needs to be creative in
following through with a voluntary relocation program.
Mayor Johnson stated that she had no expectation that the Council
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council 9
February 1, 2005
could create an ordinance tonight; she does not think the drafted
ordinances are the answers; stated that she concurs with Vice Mayor
Gilmore's challenge to have property owners and residents work
together and provide suggestions; no one in Alameda has not been
offended by the actions of 15 Asset Management Group.
Councilmember Matarrese stated that he is looking for some type of
quantifiable action in going forward; over the last year and a
half, Council had knowledge of the crime situation around the
complex; Housing Authority reports stated Section 8 units were
being decertified because standards were not being met; requested
the City Manager to compile indicators such as crime, Code
Enforcement complaints, and Housing Authority Section 8
decertification which would allow Council to set a policy on how to
react should there be another large complex that is spinning in the
same fashion as the Harbor Island Apartments situation.
Mayor Johnson requested an inventory of ordinances that have not
been strongly enforced to allow Council to set a policy on
enforcement.
Councilmember Matarrese requested staff to review the Harbor Island
Apartments in relation to Alameda Municipal Code Section 13 -11.3.
Mayor Johnson requested an inventory of ordinances that apply to
Alameda, whether State or local.
Councilmember deHaan stated that he would like to review how other
cities have utilized the State ordinances and whether other cities
have been effective.
Mayor Johnson stated that it is important for the Council to set a
policy utilizing existing ordinances.
Councilmember Daysog requested feedback from staff on his draft
voluntary relocation assistance.
Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that going through the process has raised
public awareness; a committee of tenant and landlord
representatives should be formed to keep the momentum going and
discuss the issues; landlords have been reactionary to tenants'
ideas; landlords and tenants should work more cooperatively in
developing ideas for preventing the situation from occurring again.
Mayor Johnson requested that suggestions on the framework of the
committee be brought back to Council at the next City Council
meeting.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
February 1, 2005
10
Vice Mayor Gilmore moved that staff follow up on direction provided
tonight.
Councilmember Matarrese clarified that the motion was to direct
staff to: 1) provide a compilation of indicators relating to crime,
Code Enforcement, and Housing Authority Section 8 decertification
which would enable the Council to develop a policy on how to react,
and 2) provide a framework for a committee which would include
defining what happened at the Harbor Island Apartments and how to
prevent the situation from happening again.
Mayor Johnson stated Councilmember Daysog's voluntary relocation
assistance draft should be included.
Councilmember Daysog stated his suggestion could be reviewed by the
proposed committee.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote -5.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON - AGENDA
(05- ) Former Councilmember Barbara Kerr, Alameda, stated the
City Attorney received a copy of the State law on rentals two years
ago; noted Committees, except those she has chaired, often do not
sunset on time; stated landlords would get together to respond to
Councilmember Gilmore's challenge [to come up with a something to
prevent a Harbor Island Apartment situation from happening again].
(05- ) Judge Richard Bartalini, Alameda, thanked Councilmember
Daysog for returning property he left in the Chambers at a previous
meeting.
(05- ) Steve Edrington, Rental Housing Association, stated that
he could provide Council with copies of the rental housing laws.
(05- ) Arch Woodliff, Alameda, noted that he chaired the
committee which dealt with rent in 1974 and first founded the Rent
Review Advisory Committee.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(05- ) Consideration of Mayor's nomination for appointment to the
Social Service Human Relations Board. [Partial term expiring June
30, 2007]
Mayor Johnson nominated Dennis Hanna for appointment to the SSHRB.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
February 1, 2005
11
(05- ) Vice Mayor Gilmore request staff to provide information on
the cost for filing an appeal; stated Mr. Barni indicated his
appeal cost $700; that she understood the fee was $95; inquired
where the fee for the other $600 came from and if it was a result
of Council direction.
Mayor Johnson stated that the appeal fee appears to be open- ended.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether winning an appeal resulted in
a fee refund.
Mayor Johnson stated that she believes there should be a flat fee
for appeals.
(05- ) Councilmember deHaan requested staff to investigate the
renovation on the 2200 block of San Jose Avenue; stated
approximately three times the size of the previous structure is
being added; inquired what can be done to ensure similar
renovations from occurring in the future.
(05- ) Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the City has a
graffiti team; requested staff to respond to graffiti on green
utility boxes throughout the City.
(05- ) Councilmember Daysog stated a local dentist contacted him
about not being able to put a sign on his office; other offices in
similarly zoned areas have signs; requested staff to investigate
the matter.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the
meeting at 1:14 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
February 1, 2005
12
February 10, 2005
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers:
This is to certify that the claims listed on the check register and shown below have been
approved by the proper officials and, in my opinion, represent fair and just charges against the
City in accordance with their respective amounts as indicated thereon.
Check Numbers
132957.- 133377
E13137 - E13246
Void Checks:
GRAND TOTAL
Respectfully submitted,
Council Warrants 02/15/05
Amount
2,133,708.52
67,160.07
2,200,868.59
BILLS #4 -B
02/15/05
CITY OF ALAMEDA
Memorandum
DATE: February 7, 2005
TO: Honorable Mayor and
Councilmembers
FROM: William C. Norton
Interim City Manager
RE: Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the Period Ending September 30, 2004 for
Sales Transactions in the Second Calendar Quarter of 2004
BACKGROUND
This sales tax report and the accompanying charts relate to sales tax receipts for the
period ending September 30, 2004 and are sales transactions occurring April — June, 2004
(second calendar quarter).
DISCUSSION /ANALYSIS
Quarterly sales tax revenues increased by 5.4% compared to the same quarter of the prior
year after adjusting one -time payments. Transportation, as an economic segment
contributed 32.75% in the second quarter of 2004, up from 30.61 % for the same quarter in
2003. The transportation category includes auto sales, new, used and miscellaneous
vehicle sales, auto parts and repairs, and service stations.
A comparison of the major business groups is as follows:
Percent
2nd Quarter
2004
Percent
2nd Quarter
2003
Percent
Change
Economic Category
Total
of Total
Total
of Total
12.8%
Transportation
$444,879
32.75%
$ 394,446
30.61%
-2.2%
General Retail
284,917
20.98%
291,264
22.61%
1.5%
Food Products
302,763
22.29%
298,235
23.15%
14.6%
Business to Business
258,947
19.06%
226,025
17.54%
16.3%
Construction
56,363
4.15%
48,478
3.76%
-65.2%
Miscellaneous
10,434
.77%
29,976
2.33%
5.4%
Total
$1,358,303
100.00%
$1,288,424
100.00%
All categories showed solid increases except for a significant decrease in the
Miscellaneous category and a small drop in the General Retail category. The
Miscellaneous category represents Tess than one percent of the total sales tax revenues.
These trends follow the general trend in the Bay Area, which showed a 6.9% increase
overall.
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
Report #4 -C CC
2 -15 -05
Honorable Mayor and
Councilmembers
February 7, 2005
Page 2 of 3
The following table shows a breakdown of sales by Alameda's geographic sectors. The
Marina Village Business Park and Ballena sectors showed the greatest positive gain in
sales over the same quarter of the prior year.
The top 25 sales tax generators contributed 47.9% of the total sales tax revenue.
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
Current Year
Prior Year
Percent
2nd Qtr 2004
Percent
2nd Qtr 2003
Percent
Change
Geographic Areas
Total
of Total
Total
of Total
5.2%
Park - North of Lincoln
$ 321,267
23.65%
$ 305,357
23.70%
-1.4%
South Shore Center
253,450
18.66%
256,958
19.94%
-2.5%
Park - South of Lincoln
146,093
10.76%
149,887
11.63%
6.9%
Webster -North of Lincoln
75,387
5.55%
70,526
5.48%
-6.9%
Neighborhood Commercial
Districts
64,319
4.74%
69,091
5.36%
-5.21%
North Waterfront
57,336
4.22%
60,445
4.69%
71.2%
Marina Village Business Park
134,927
9.93%
78,810
6.13%
-3.6%
Harbor Bay Landing
54,069
3.98%
56,103
4.35%
40.6%
Balance of City
63,990
4.71 %
45,498
3.53%
-3.5%
Harbor Bay Business Park
40,661
2.99%
42,134
3.27%
-11.4%
Marina Village Shopping Center
34,504
2.54%
38,960
3.03%
-9.3%
Alameda Point
35,335
2.61%
38,946
3.02%
- 18.4%
Mariner Square
19,994
1.47%
24,506
1.90%
-3.7%
Webster— South of Lincoln
27,944
2.06%
29,014
2.25%
3.5%
Fernside Center
13,050
0.96%
12,606
0.98%
66.8%
Ballena
15,950
1.17%
9,563
0.74%
0.00%
Heritage Bay
23
0.00%
23
0.00%
5.4%
TOTAL - QUARTER
$1,358,299
100.00%
$ 1,288,427
100.00%
The top 25 sales tax generators contributed 47.9% of the total sales tax revenue.
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
Honorable Mayor and
Councilmembers
February 7, 2005
Page 3 of 3
A three -year comparison by economic categories as compared to the same reporting
period is as follows:
Percent
Percent
Percent
Change
Economic Category
2004
of Total
2003
of Total
2002
2.8%
Transportation
$1,584,097
30.70%
$1,540,590
10.4%
1,559,277
-1.4%
General Retail
1,172,548
22.73%
1,189,413
23.0%
1,273,973
6.0%
Food Products
1,214,461
23.54%
1,145,600
22.1%
1,125,426
-10.8%
Business to Business
938,980
18.21%
1,053,042
20.3%
1,009,626
10.2%
Construction
208,244
4.04%
289,031
5.6%
205,692
-34.4%
Miscellaneous
40,413
.78%
61,659
1.2%
35,878
-0.4%
TOTAL - QUARTER
$5,158,653
100.00%
$5,178,245
100.00%
$5,209,872
As can be seen above the annual change from 2003 to 2004 is a decrease of only 0.4 %.
However, the 2 -year change is a decrease of 1%. These statistics are based on cash
payments and do not reflect any year -end accruals of local sales tax allocations.
BUDGET /FISCAL IMPACT
Our sales tax projections for 2004 -05 have already taken into consideration these declining
trends. We continue to monitor this revenue source closely.
RECOMMENDATION
This is provided for informational purposes only.
Respectfully submitted,
William C. Norton
Interim City Manager
JAB:di
cc: Robb Ratto, PSBA
G:\ FINANCE \COUNCIL\2005 \020105 \SALESTAX2nd QTR.doc
elle -Ann : ,,yer
hief Financial Officer
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
CITY OF ALAMEDA
MEMORANDUM
Date: January 24, 2005
To: Honorable Mayor and
Councilmembers
From: William C. Norton
Interim City Manager
Re: Resolution Appointing an Engineer and an Attorney for Island City Landscaping and
Lighting District 84 -2
BACKGROUND
On June 7, 1984, City Council established the Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-
2. The purpose of this assessment district is to provide enhanced maintenance in certain business
or neighborhood districts throughout the City.
DISCUSSION /ANALYSIS
There are currently seven zones in the assessment district. District Maps are also attached.
Zone 1:
Zone 2:
Zone 3:
Zone 4:
Zone 5:
Zone 6:
Zone 7:
Lincoln Avenue between Sherman Street and St. Charles Street.
Webster Street between Central Avenue and Lincoln Avenue.
Webster Street between Lincoln Avenue and Ralph Appezzato Memorial
Parkway.
Park Street between Blanding Avenue and San Jose Avenue, and Santa
Clara Avenue and Central Avenue between Oak Street and Broadway.
Harbor Bay Parkway between Doolittle Drive and the west end of
roadway, including North Loop Road and South Loop Road.
Alameda Marina Village
Bay Street between San Antonio Avenue and the Lagoon.
It is necessary to appoint an Engineer -of -Work for preparation of the assessment diagram and the
assessment amount, by parcel, within the zones of the assessment district. It is also necessary to
appoint an attorney to perform the legal services required in the conduct of these proceedings.
Past practice has been to use the services of the City Engineer and City Attorney. As it has
worked well for us in the past, it is proposed to again appoint the City Engineer, as the Engineer-
of -Work and also the City Attorney, as attorney for the District. It would be advantageous to the
City to once again avail themselves of their services.
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
G% Alameda
tublicWoirs
2p riment
Public wok i+m.t,l +r ,!
Re: Resolution #4 -D CC
2 -15 -05
Honorable Mayor and
Councilmembers
BUDGET CONSIDERATION/FINANCIAL IMPACT
Page 2
January 24, 2005
The fees associated with this work are payable by the Assessment District, and apportioned to
each zone, based on the individual zones' percentage of the total Assessment District budget.
Only the direct costs for services are charged to the Assessment District. It is recommended,
therefore, that a contingency budget for this work be set at $2,000 for attorney fees and $8,600
for the engineering, advertising and mailing fees for a total of $10,600.
RECOMMENDATION
The Interim City Manager recommends that the City Council, by motion, adopt a resolution
appointing an engineer and an attorney for Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84 -2.
MTN:MM:gc
Attachment
G:\PUBWORKS\pwadmin\COUNCIL\2005\021505\islandcity.doc
Respect lly,bmitted,
atthew T. Naclerio
P blic Works Director
flu
By: Marga cLean
Acting ' - . lic Works Coordinator
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
�U GtvafAIaiw a
Ueparlment
wbIicW4 Wo,* r,,,,r
is
NVWW?HS
k
W
N
J
a � 0
0 O 0
0 0
0
p . d
O L70-7L0
/1,1iaHr
0
0
N
O<7G-tL0
O I 0 •
O 0
a n
O 0
0 4
acr0 -rLO.
•
?370- _6
Q
0
0
£ZP-0 -£40
t
J
O , h,' n
O 0 0 0 ,- 00
,, • 0 0 0 V
a2_'S 3M
0 nl 0
.Q t�ia -rLi
0
a0 0
n n w
0 0 0
0 0
ti
0
r N
0 p
7- PO -r:0
tSi
•
)
;I I I
c
T.
�]/
\ |
r.G77 %:J 'Yvryy ":"/&
z/*C=zN CVE N UE
00.2 01
� �
1 1
Tit
G70 - Of 9G
o..- saes _,
07f 0262
I
1 ti {i
1 O IO
1 — 41NCLLN •
035 -0/
P4NF1
4 VE
ID
fri
r
1
„
1s -
0/7-
DO
0K-
azD -0/
03:-00
0o.-00
CLEMENT
D/5 -0o
Dn -0,
00. -00
BLAND/AI .G,
A L A u
t
st VENUE
O/7 -00
Ole -00
EST UAPY•
COZO - /40
(7' :]]NJ' x0 a7nir/LN07)
OO -C70
o0•no
OO•f,0
[o•+.01
i 1 a O I c o .- a- 14 °
s--. w
s 1 a o 1 o n
�
¢ I
� 1 i OO -ZOO
00-a10
. I -:OI-- il • i
i r:1I L� -+
..T EEr
6W0-OLO •
3/TN3AY
00 -0 /0
00.600
V
1
t. lat .1: O
I
°° 4 414 4
Vd V77
-GO
4 1
1
a ! c
LB/O -04.0
b 7I,6 -.OLO
• • 0 °
4 .y :,4
•
Y NYS
°
C 1 0
I�
to
c
a°
-
°°
1212 4
1 . I
y
4
�.
• Z
41 nS
4 O I
-7 N 1 7
10 Qi ".
I
4. a 4 y
n° I °
CO./02 I •
OO;O CO
00.420
yd. jVY7Y .o -eZO
•
ZO -coo I
Oo -soot
00 -700
1--707:;01
00 -..00 !
00-0101
0.1-720 •
7YNi7 iv3
k
7Bf0-049
Lc
V
O
N
7/11e
:0.17 /0
li .20.010
3SOr ND
OL /O -0LD
r
s
o`
3
11.1
11° •
0101E!
tIJ1_• •
o, y.
III 0,—•-
.0111
JIJ1
I I li
I I 1 is
O
0
Z z
0
\0
0
v / 1212 0,
•fMC11 MA11•
I I It
t
1
<s—
f'•
as
.4
V
: ?h
•
=r
-t
2 :n
7JC n� +
•
-.-i
�I:. " =
V, ^ - •
VI
y
Ea
Fi
$I 1 I
1
•111
jI
t ^tnt"frt. v—v" t ^t- n. t— l —t —t— t— 1I
.e
•
e44.et.4• Q 4.......000e.e.
oo4Gout.aL �
CnC^ C ^CnC ^4 C� C
IC
•
▪ •
4.. ..
P
e • ^e ^c " ^ °n
▪ •
c to
It
• a4r..eet :°
.•.o4.op e
Lt.
■■w...•.t - t..... R
rn ent:^e nvr
4 u
04444.4 44
eeyse
ek
000asep•..te. flF
CnC -C -C ^C ^ems � O
tl>
w
e4t.eg:. .e.
;.ems...
C ^L- C ^C ^C-
A
4 14
.ttte
\ 3—
RS
c•
11
11
r IN
_....._. •
cool
/or i',01
-,co
;
j:11
1 1 - It
1 1 It
CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO.
APPOINTING AN ENGINEER AND AN ATTORNEY FOR ISLAND CITY
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84 -2
E WHEREAS, on June 7, 1984, by Resolution No. 10353, the Council of the City of Alameda
L.
® >, ordered the formation of and levied the first assessment within the Island City Landscaping and
U" w Lighting District 84 -2 (hereinafter the "District ") pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and
® z Lighting Act of 1972 Highways Code (hereinafter the "Act "); and
� i- WHEREAS, Sections 22620, et seq., of the Act provide for the levy of annual maintenance
assessments after formation of the District; and
>-
V WHEREAS, the purpose of said assessments is to provide for enhanced maintenance in
business district Zones 1 through 6 and residential Zone 7 located throughout the City and described
in proceedings in and for said District heretofore approved by this Council and herein incorporated
by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the public interest and convenience will be served by appointing an Engineer
and an Attorney for assessment and legal services; and
WHEREAS, it would be advantageous to the City to continue with the services of the City
Engineer as the Engineer -of -work and the City Attorney as the Attorney for said District;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Alameda that the City
Engineer for the City of Alameda is hereby appointed as Engineer for preparation of the assessment
diagram and the assessment amount by parcel within the zones of the Island City Landscaping and
Lighting District 84 -2; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Attorney for the City of Alameda is hereby
appointed as Attorney to perform the legal services required in the conduct of said proceedings.
Resolution # 4 -D CC
2 -15 -05
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in regular meeting assembled on the 15th
day of February 2005, by the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said City this
15th day of February 2005.
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
City of Alameda
CITY OF ALAMEDA
MEMORANDUM
Date: January 24, 2005
To: Honorable Mayor and
Councilmembers
From: William C. Norton
Interim City Manager
Re: Resolution Appointing an Engineer and an Attorney for Maintenance Assessment District
01 -1 (Marina Cove)
BACKGROUND
On June 7, 2002, City Council established Maintenance Assessment District 01 -1. The purpose
of this assessment district is to provide maintenance in the Marina Cove Development.
DISCUSSION /ANALYSIS
It is necessary to appoint an Engineer -of -Work for annual preparation of the assessment diagram
and the assessment amount, by parcel, for the Maintenance Assessment District. It is also
necessary to appoint an Attorney -of- Record to perform the legal services required in the conduct
of these annual proceedings.
Past practice has been to use the services of the City Engineer and City Attorney. As it has
worked well for us in the past, it is proposed to again appoint the City Engineer, as the Engineer -
of -Work and the City Attorney, as the Attorney -of- Record for the District. It would be
advantageous to the City to once again avail themselves of their services.
BUDGET CONSIDERATION/FINANCIAL IMPACT
The fees associated with this work are payable by the Assessment District, and apportioned to
each zone, based on the individual zones' percentage of the total Assessment District budget.
Only the direct costs for services are charged to the Maintenance Assessment District. It is
recommended, therefore, that a contingency budget for this work be established at $2,000 for
attorney fees and $1,600 for the engineering, advertising and mailing fees for a total of $3,600.
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
GtyofMimeda
uubIicWorks
apartment
Public Wo l Iffiria fir You!
Re: Resolution #4 -E CC
2 -15 -05
Honorable Mayor and
Councilmembers
RECOMMENDATION
Page 2
January 24, 2005
The Interim City Manager recommends that the City Council, by motion, adopt a resolution
appointing an Engineer -of -Work and an Attorney- of - Record for Maintenance Assessment
District 01 -01, Marina Cove.
MTN:MAM:gc
G: \PUB WORKS \pwad min \COUNCIL\2005 \021505 \islandcity.doc
Gty ofAbmeda
PpublicWorks
apartment
Public Works IRAs- fir Y d
Respec f5a l submitted,
Matthew T. Naclerio
Pulblic Works Director
By: Margare - Lean
Acting ' . c Works Coordinator
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
E
0
IJ-
0
us
0
0.
CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO.
APPOINTING AN ENGINEER AND AN ATTORNEY FOR CITY OF
ALAMEDA MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 01 -1, (MARINA COVE)
WHEREAS, by its previous proceedings, the Council of the City of Alameda determined to
undertake the formation of the first maintenance assessment district within the City of Alameda
Maintenance Assessment District 01 -1 (hereinafter the "District ") pursuant to the provisions of
Chapter 3, Article V of the Alameda Municipal Code (the City of Alameda Maintenance Procedure
w Code) (hereinafter the "Code "), which also incorporates the procedural requirements of the
Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (hereinafter the "Act "); and
or
® WHEREAS, the formation of a Maintenance Assessment District, Sections 22620, et seq., of
d the Code provide for the levy of annual maintenance assessments after formation of the District; and
t-- WHEREAS, the purpose of said assessments is to provide for enhanced maintenance in the
0 district established via the Code located throughout the City and described in proceedings in and for
said District heretofore approved by this Council and herein incorporated by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the public interest and convenience will be served by appointing an Engineer
and an Attorney for assessment and legal services; and
WHEREAS, it would be advantageous to the City to continue with the services of the City
Engineer as the Engineer -of -Work and the City Attorney as the Attorney for said District;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Alameda that the City
Engineer for the City of Alameda is hereby appointed as Engineer for preparation of the assessment
diagram and the assessment amount by parcel within the zones of the City of Alameda Maintenance
Assessment District 01 -1; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Attorney for the City of Alameda is hereby
appointed as Attorney to perform the legal services required in the conduct of said proceedings.
Resolution # 4 -E CC
2 -15 -05
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in regular meeting assembled on the 15th
day of February 2005, by the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said City this
15th day of February 2005.
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
City of Alameda
CITY OF ALAMEDA
Memorandum
TO: Honorable Mayor and
Councilmembers
FROM: William C. Norton
Interim City Manager
Date: February 15, 2005
RE:
Resolution amending the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW)
Salary Schedule by establishing a salary range for the position of Inventory
Control Clerk
BACKGROUND
The Memorandum of Understanding for the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
(IBEW) was adopted in 1999 and covers the period January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2004.
The resolution establishes the hourly salary range of a new classification on the IBEW salary
schedule.
DISCUSSION
On January 18, 2005, the Public Utilities Board adopted a resolution for Alameda Power &
Telecom to establish an Inventory Control Clerk position in the Administrative Services
Division. This position will establish a check and balance relationship between procurement and
warehouse personnel, and analyze and recommend reorder levels of stocked inventory based on
usage that will, in turn, improve the performance of inventory dollars. This inventory control
and management function requires an appropriate classification of worker that currently does not
exist. This recommendation does not require any addition to headcount.
BUDGET CONSIDERATION/FINANCIAL IMPACT
The Alameda Power & Telecom Enterprise Fund will pay the funds required to cover the
recommended salary range. There is no financial impact to the General Fund.
RECOMMENDATION
The Interim City Manager recommends that the City Council, by motion, approve the
amendment to the IBEW salary schedule.
Respectfully submitted,
Karen Willis
Human Resources Director
"Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service"
Re: Resolution #4 -F CC
2 -15 -05
as to Form
CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO.
AMENDING THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS
(IBEW) SALARY SCHEDULE BY ESTABLISHING A SALARY RANGE FOR THE
POSITION OF INVENTORY CONTROL CLERK
w
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Alameda that the salary
cc resolution of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) is hereby amended by
establishing the salary rate, salary range, salary steps and benefits for the position of Inventory
Control Clerk designating those as applicable to the classification in the service of the City of
> >_ Alameda.
0 CITY OF ALAMEDA
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS
Effective February 20, 2005
Code
Classification
NON - EXEMPT
HOURLY
Step
1
Step
2
Step
3
Step
4
Step
5
7135
Inventory Control Clerk
$23.55
$24.73
$25.97
$27.27
$28.63
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in a regular meeting assembled on the
day of , 2005, by the following vote to wit:
AYES
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said City this
day of , 2005.
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
City of Alameda
Resolution # 4 -F CC
2 -15 -05
CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO.
APPOINTING DENNIS J. HANNA AS A MEMBER OF THE
SOCIAL SERVICE HUMAN RELATIONS BOARD
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Alameda that pursuant to the provisions of
Article X of the Charter of the City of Alameda, and upon nomination by the Mayor, DENNIS J.
HANNA is hereby appointed to the office of member of the Social Service Human Relations Board
of the City of Alameda, to fill the unexpired term of Steen Currie, commencing February 15, 2005
and expiring on June 30, 2007, and to serve until his successor is appointed and qualified.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in adjourned regular meeting assembled
on the 15th day of February, 2005, by the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said City this
16th day of February, 2005.
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
City of Alameda
Resolution # 5 -A
2 -15 -05
City of Alameda
Inter - department Memorandum
February 8, 2005
To: Honorable Mayor and
Councilmembers
From: William C. Norton
Interim City Manager
Re: Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code to Increase
the Composition of the Golf Commission From Five to Seven Members
BACKGROUND
Alameda's City Council created a seven member Golf Commission in 1925 to oversee
the development and operation of the new golf course on Bay Farm Island. The
Commission was composed of the City Manager, a Councilmember, and five members at
large. The Commission was reorganized in 1932 as a seven (7) member citizen's board
appointed by the City Manager. In 1967, the Golf Commission was merged with the
Recreation Commission, which grew from five to seven members. In 1973, former
Mayor Chuck Corica introduced an ordinance reinstating the Golf Commission. The new
seven member board contained five appointees and two ex- officio members from the
Council. The ordinance was revised in 1983 to remove the ex- officio members. Since
then, the Golf Commission has been comprised of five citizen board members.
DISCUSSION
The Golf Commission is made up of five members appointed to overlapping terms of
four years. The Commission was established to advise City Council on matters of
operational policy, to ensure the promotion and successful management of the Golf
Complex. In recent years there has been a dramatic increase in daily fee, public golf
courses in the San Francisco Bay Area with no significant increase in golf demand. This
has created a very competitive golf market. In order to gain a competitive edge on the
golf market it would be helpful to increase the golf commission from five to a seven
member board. The additional members can use their expertise to help promote regular
and tournament golf play, prioritize golf course improvement projects (Clubhouse) and
make certain the successful operation of the Golf Complex. In addition to amending the
Municipal Code to increase the number of members from five to seven, the votes
required to take an action would be increased from three votes to four.
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service Re: Intro of Ordinance
#5 -B
2 -15 -05
Honorable Mayor and Page -2-
Councilmembers February 8, 2005
BUDGET CONSIDERATION/FINACIAL ANALYSIS
Any increase (nominal) in cost for the additional Golf Commissioners will be absorbed in
the current golf administration budget. The funding for these costs will come from the
Golf Course Enterprise Fund.
RECOMMENDATION
The Interim City Manager recommends that City Council introduce an Ordinance
Amending the Municipal Code to Increase the Composition of the Golf Commission
from Five to Seven Members.
ctfully submitted,
General Manager, olf
DVB
xc: Golf Commission
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
CITY OF ALAMEDA ORDINANCE NO.
New Series
AMENDING THE ALAMEDA MUNCIPAL CODE TO
INCREASE THE COMPOSITION OF THE GOLF
COMMISSION FROM FIVE TO SEVEN MEMBERS BY
AMENDING SUBSECTIONS 2 -9.1 (COMMISSION CREATED;
COMPOSITION), 2 -9.2 (MEMBERSHIP; APPOINTMENT;
REMOVAL) AND 2 -9.3 (VOTING) OF SECTION 2 -9 (CITY
GOLF COMMISSION)
>-BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Alameda that:
ILI
CC
Section 1. Subsection 2 -9.1 of the Alameda Municipal Code is hereby amended to
I—read as follows:
2 -9.1 Commission Created: Composition.
There is hereby established a Commission which shall be known as the Golf
Commission of the City of Alameda, which shall consist of seven (7) members.
Members shall at the time of their appointment and continuously during incumbency be
electors of the City.
Section 2. Subsection 2 -9.2 of the Alameda Municipal Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
2 -9.2 Membership; Appointment; Removal.
The seven (7) members of the Commission shall upon nomination of the Mayor,
be appointed by the City_ Council. The terms of such members shall be for four (4) years
and thereafter until the successor of such member is appointed and qualified, and all
terms shall begin on October 1. A vacancy in the office of any such member shall be
filled for the unexpired term of appointment in the manner hereinabove set forth. A
member may be removed by the affirmative vote of four (4) members of the City
Council.
Section 3. Subsection 2 -9.3 of the Alameda Municipal Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
2 -9.2 Voting.
The votes of four (4) members of the Commission shall be necessary for any
action thereof.
Introduction of Ordinance # 5 -B
2 -15 -05
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and
after the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of its final passage.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was duly and regularly adopted
and passed by Council of the City of Alameda in regular meeting assembled on the
day of , 2005, by the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said City
this day of , 2005.
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
City of Alameda
CITY OF ALAMEDA
MEMORANDUM
Date: January 19, 2005
To: Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
From: William C. Norton
Interim City Manager
Re: Recommendation to: 1) Award Contract in the Amount of $2,110,000, including
contingencies, to Ghilotti Brothers, Inc., for the Park Street Streetscape and Town Center
Project Phase One (P.W. 10- 02 -13; and 2) Authorize the Allocation of Additional Funds
from the Merged Areas Bond Issuance of 2003.
BACKGROUND
On November 16, 2004, the City Council adopted plans and specifications and authorized a call for
bids for the Park Street Streetscape and Town Center Project, No. P.W. 10- 02 -13. This first phase of
a multi -phase project will provide for streetscape improvements along Park Street from just north of
Central Avenue to Webb Avenue, with utility joint trench work occurring from Lincoln Avenue to
Central Avenue. Streetscape improvements include construction of at -grade curb extensions for
transit plazas and corner extensions to promote pedestrian safety. Existing curb extensions on Park
Street will be recast to create perfectly horizontal surfaces. Irrigated planter areas will also be
installed as well as street furniture such as benches, trash receptacles, and bike racks. Double- headed
Victorian streetlights, similar to those once used on Park Street, with advanced microwave -based
lighting technology, will also be installed. Major pavement reconstruction at intersections and mid -
block plazas will also be undertaken to assure proper drainage and acceptable cross - slopes. Six
custom - designed bus shelters will also be installed within the project area. New, full -width sidewalks
will be constructed only at the transit plazas and curb extensions. The Park Street Business
Association is aware of this and supports this approach.
DISCUSSION /ANALYSIS
To solicit the maximum number of bids and the most competitive price, specifications were provided
to 18 separate building exchanges throughout the Bay Area. Staff also contacted contractors that
have provided good service to the City in the past and personally encouraged them to bid on the Park
Street project. Thirteen (13) contractors were also sent a complimentary set of plans and
specifications. In addition, a notice of bid was published in the Alameda Journal.
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
blicWorks
Public Works Nbrlsfor You!
Report #5 -C
2 -15 -05
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
Page 2
January 19, 2005
Bids were opened on January 12, 2005. Four contractors submitted bids. The list of bidders from
lowest to highest for total project cost is as follows:
Bidder
Location
Bid Amount
Ghilotti Brothers, Inc.
San Rafael
$1,916,528.50
Ghilotti Construction
Santa Rosa
$2,434255.00
John Clay General Engineering
Hayward
$2,484,116.00
Sposeto Engineering
Union City
$2,605,094.00
The bid amount includes the following add alternates that the Interim City Manager recommends
included in the award of contract:
• Geogrid — to be used in wet weather conditions,
• Protection of dig -out areas in wet weather conditions, and
• Holiday closure, as requested by PSBA, to ensure construction will not occur between
November 14, 2005 and January 1, 2006.
In addition, there is a $10,000 allowance for City Permits. The construction cost to complete the
project is $2,110,000, including a 10% contingency. The Engineer's estimate for the project was $2
million. The contract is on file in the City Clerk's Office.
BUDGET CONSIDERATION /FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
The Park Street Streetscape Project was awarded by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
(MTC) in 2002. Since that time, many costs in the construction industry have risen. To offset those
costs, the original project has been reduced in scope. Nonetheless, there is still a shortfall which
could be made up through application of funds from the Merged Areas Bond Issuance of 2003.
Applying funds from this source to the Park Street Streetscape & Town Center Project will not affect
the City's ability to carry out other, major projects (such as the Theater and Parking Structure) which
are also to be funded from the Merged Areas funds.
Revenues in Hand:
Available funding for the project (funded under CIP# 02 -75) totals $ 2,801,000:
• A $921,000 grant from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission's (MTC)
Transportation for Livable Communities Program,
• A $500,000 match from the Community Improvement Commission (CIC) authorized by
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
Glyafitkeda
tublicWorks
Department
Public Wats Kay fo Y
C: \DOCUM E--1 \cm_user\W CALS-1 \Temp \parkstreet. doc
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
Page 3
January 19, 2005
Resolution # 13515 dated August 7, 2002.
• $380,000 from Alameda Power & Telecom for the under grounding of utilities
• $1 Million 2003 Merged Area Bond
Cost:
Expenditures to date:
$2,976,000
• City staff
$133,000
• CCS Engineering (developed construction documents)
270,000
• Survey work (Milani Corporation)
40,000
• Miscellaneous
3,000
Subtotal
$446,000
Construction and construction - related:
Contract (including AP &T & contingencies)
2,110,000
City- furnished items:
• Streetlights
185,000
• Water Meters
60,000
• Testing
5,000
Subtotal
$2,360,000
Estimated future costs:
• Contract Administration (Harris & Associates)
75,000
• Project Engineer (Public Works)
35,000
• Inspection (Public Works)
60,000
Subtotal
$170,000
Grand Total
$2,976,000
Total Project Cost
$2,976,000
Revenue on -hand
2,801,000
Total needed allocation
$ 175,000
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
�U avotwaneda
Department
Public Work !Mafw You!
G:\BUSASSOC\Park Streetscape\staff report accepting bid.doc
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
RECOMMENDATION
Page 4
January 19, 2005
The Interim City Manager recommends that the City Council, by motion: 1) award the contract in the
amount of $2,110,000, including contingencies, to Ghilotti Brothers, Inc. for the Park Street
Streetscape and Town Center Project, No. P.W. 10- 02 -13; and 2) authorize the allocation of
$175,000 additional from the 2003 Merged Areas Bond.
Respectfully submitted,
Matthew T. Naclerio
Public Works Director
and Leslie A. Little
Development Services Director
By: Wali Wajziri by:
Associate Civi
WCN/MTN /LAL:ry
cc: Sally Kueh, Finance Dept.
Robb Ratto, Park Street Business Assn.
CityofAlaneda
ubIicWorks
apartment
Puh�k Wod w.lal You!
-0M411%&:PS
ene E. Soto
Manager, Business
Development Divisio
by: ue G. ussellV
Management Analyst
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
G:'BUSASSOC\Park Streetscape\staff report accepting bid.doc
CITY OF ALAMEDA
MEMORANDUM
Date: February 7, 2005
To: Honorable Mayor and
Councilmembers
From: William C. Norton
Interim City Manager
Re: Resolution Approving the form of and Authorizing the Execution and Delivery
of a Purchase and Sale Agreement and Related Documents with Respect to
the Sale of the Seller's Vehicle License Fee Receivable from the State; and
Directing and Authorizing Certain Other Actions in Connection Therewith
BACKGROUND
Vehicle license fees ( "VLF ") were historically assessed in the amount of 2% of a
vehicle's depreciated market value for the privilege of operating a vehicle on California's
public highways. Beginning in 1999, the VLF paid by vehicle owners was offset (or
reduced) to the effective rate of 0.65 %. In connection with the offset of the VLF, the
Legislature authorized appropriations from the State General Fund to "backfill" the offset
so that local governments, which receive all of the vehicle license fee revenues, would
not experience any loss of revenues. The legislation that established the VLF offset
program also provided that if there were insufficient State General Fund moneys to fully
"backfill" the VLF offset, the percentage offset would be reduced proportionately (i.e.,
the license fee payable by drivers would be increased) to assure that local governments
would not be disadvantaged.
In June 2003, the Director of Finance under the Davis Administration ordered the
suspension of VLF offsets due to a determination that insufficient State General Fund
moneys would be available for this purpose, and, beginning in October 2003, the VLF
paid by vehicle owners were restored to the 2% level. However, Governor
Schwarzenegger rescinded the offset suspension on November 17, 2003, and State
offset payments to local governments resumed. Local governments received "backfill"
payments totaling $3.80 billion in FY 2002 -03. " Backfill" payments totaling $2.65 billion
were paid to local governments in FY 2003 -04. However, approximately $1.2 billion
was not received by local governments during the time period between the suspension
of the VLF offsets and the implementation of higher fees. This amount is still owed them
by the State (the "VLF Gap Repayments "). The City's share of the VLF Gap Repayment
is $1,270,770 (the "VLF Receivable ").
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
Re: Resolution #5 -D
2 -15 -05
Honorable Mayor and February 7, 2005
Councilmembers Page 2 of 4
DISCUSSION /ANALYSIS
As part of the 2004 Budget Act negotiations, an agreement was made between the
State and local government officials (the "State -local agreement ") under which the VLF
rate will be permanently reduced from 2% to 0.65 %. The State -local agreement also
provides for the repayment by August 15, 2006 (Fiscal Year 2007) of the approximately
$1.2 billion VLF Gap Repayment. In order to protect local governments, the reduction in
VLF revenue to cities and counties from this rate change will be replaced by an increase
in the amount of property tax they receive. Under the State -local agreement, for FY
2004 -05 and 2005 -06 only, the replacement property tax that cities and counties receive
has been reduced by $700 million. Commencing in FY 2006 -07, local governments will
receive their full share of replacement property taxes and those replacement property
taxes will now enjoy constitutional protection against transfers by the State due to the
approval of Proposition 1A at the November 2004 election.
VLF Program: Authorized under SB 1096, the VLF Program was instituted by the
California Statewide Communities Development Authority ( "CSCDA ") in 2004 to enable
the City and other cities and counties to sell their respective VLF Receivables to
CSCDA for an upfront fixed purchase price estimated to be 90.34% of the VLF Gap
Repayments. CSCDA is planning to issue notes ( "VLF Notes ") and to use the note
proceeds to purchase the VLF Receivables and pay financing costs. The actual
purchase price of the VLF Receivables will depend on the total amount of VLF
Receivables that cities and counties sell to CSCDA and on bond market conditions at
the time the VLF Notes are priced. If the City sells its VLF Receivable under the VLF
Program, CSCDA will pledge the City's VLF Receivable to secure the repayment of a
corresponding portion of the VLF Notes. The City's sale of its VLF Receivable will be
irrevocable. Bondholders will have no recourse to the City of Alameda if the State does
not make the VLF Gap Repayment.
VLF Program Sponsor: CSCDA is a joint powers authority sponsored by the League of
California Cities and the California State Association of Counties. The member
agencies of CSCDA include approximately 230 cities and 54 counties throughout
California, including the City of Alameda. As a joint powers authority, it has the ability to
engage collectively in permitted activity of the members.
Benefits of Participation in the VLF Program:
The benefits to Alameda of participation in the VLF Program include:
• Immediate payment — the sale of the City's VLF Receivable is estimated to
provide Alameda with approximately 90.34% of its VLF Receivable in early 2005. Half
will be used as current year revenue and the remainder will be included as a pre -paid
item for Fiscal Year 06 revenue.
• Level cash flow from the State over next two years — as explained above, in each
of FY 2004 -05 and 2005 -06, cities and counties across the State will lose a total of $700
million annually in property tax payments to the Educational Revenue Augmentation
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
Honorable Mayor and February 7, 2005
Councilmembers Page 3 of 4
Fund ( "ERAF "), which benefits the State. Accordingly, the City is projected to lose
approximately $930,000 in each such fiscal year from the "Triple Flip" to the General
Fund. This loss in property tax revenue in FY 2004 -05 and 2005 -06 will be followed by
an increase in revenues in FY 2006 -07 due to the payment by the State of the VLF Gap
Repayment and due to the cessation of ERAF payments in that year. If the City sells its
VLF Receivable through the VLF Program, it can use the sale proceeds to offset the
Toss of revenues due to its property tax contributions over the next two years and
eliminate the spike in revenues in the third year, thereby creating a more level cash flow
in each of the next three fiscal years.
• Mitigates impact of property tax in -lieu of VLF swap over next two years —
beginning in FY 2004 -05, the State will permanently eliminate the VLF backfill paid to
the City and will replace it with an equal amount of property tax. While these actions are
intended to cancel each other out, the City is now receiving these payments semi-
annually as property taxes, rather than monthly as VLF backfill payments. This situation
creates a potential cash flow problem, which could be temporarily alleviated by selling
the VLF Receivable.
• Budgetary flexibility in FY 2004 -05 and 2005 -06 — the sale of the City's VLF
Receivable would provide additional revenues in FY 2004 -05, which can be applied to
resolve budgetary challenges in FY 2004 -05 and 2005 -06.
Estimated Proceeds of the Sale of the City's VLF Receivable:
Upon delivery of the VLF Notes, CSCDA will make available to the City its fixed
purchase price. This payment will equal the City's VLF Receivable amount Tess
capitalized interest costs (to pay interest on the VLF Notes until maturity), credit
enhancement fees and bond issuance costs. As discussed above, Alameda's VLF
Receivable is $1,270,770. The purchase price to be paid by CSCDA is estimated to be
$1,148,000 but cannot be determined with specificity until the total number of
participants in the VLF Program is known and bond market conditions are taken into
account at the time the VLF Notes are priced. There is a possibility that, if the State
pays the VLF Receivable as scheduled on August 15, 2006, there will be some residual
interest earnings on the funds prior to the maturity date of the VLF Notes, which
amount, up to 1% of the VLF Receivable, would be refunded to the participants.
Document Summary:
The proposed VLF Receivables Sale Resolution:
(1) authorizes the sale of the City of Alameda's VLF Receivable to CSCDA for a
minimum sale price at least equal to $1,148,000;
(2) approves the form, and directs the execution and delivery, of the Purchase and
Sale Agreement with CSCDA and related documents;
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
Honorable Mayor and February 7, 2005
Councilmembers Page 4 of 4
(3) authorizes and directs any Authorized Officer (Acting City Manager, Assistant
City Manager or Chief Financial Officer) to send, or to cause to be sent, an irrevocable
written instruction required by statute to the State Controller notifying the State of the
sale of the VLF Receivable and instructing the disbursement of the VLF Receivable to
the VLF Bond Trustee;
(4) approves the use of the VLF Receivables proceeds for general operating
purposes;
(5) appoints certain City of Alameda officers and officials as Authorized Officers for
purposes of signing documents; and
(6) authorizes miscellaneous related actions and makes certain ratifications, findings
and determinations required by law.
The Purchase and Sale Agreement (copy on file with City Clerk):
(1) An agreement between the City of Alameda and California Statewide
Communities Development Authority (CSCDA);
(2) Authorizes the sale to and the purchase by CSCDA of the City of Alameda's VLF
Receivable
(3)
All necessary authorizations to implement the purposes of the resolution above.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Approval of this resolution will increase revenues by approximately $580,000 this and
next fiscal years. Given the flat revenue growth Alameda has been experiencing any
action that provides the cash now rather than later is advantageous.
RECOMMENDATION
The Interim City Manager recommends approval of the Resolution as presented.
JAB:d1
Respectfully submitted
William C. Norton
Interim City Manager
By: -Ile -Ann Boyer
Chief Financial Officer
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FORM OF AND AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
AND RELATED DOCUMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF THE
SELLER'S VEHICLE LICENSE FEE RECEIVABLE FROM THE STATE;
AND DIRECTING AND AUTHORIZING CERTAIN OTHER ACTIONS IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH
WHEREAS, certain public agencies within the State of California (the "State ") are
cc entitled to receive certain payments payable by the State to each such local agency on or before
® August 15, 2006, in connection with vehicle license fees pursuant to Section 10754.11 of the
California Revenue and Taxation Code ( "VLF Gap Repayments ");
WHEREAS, the City of Alameda (the "Seller ") is entitled to and has determined to sell
v all right, title and interest of the Seller in and to the "VLF Receivable ", as defined in Section
6585(i) of the California Government Code (the "VLF Receivable "), namely, the right to
payment of moneys due or to become due to the Seller out of funds payable in connection with
vehicle license fees to a local agency pursuant to Section 10754.11 of the California Revenue
and Taxation Code;
WHEREAS, the California Statewide Communities Development Authority, a joint
exercise of powers authority organized and existing under the laws of the State (the "Authority "),
has been authorized pursuant to Section 6588(w) of the California Government Code to purchase
the VLF Receivable;
WHEREAS, the Authority desires to purchase the VLF Receivable and the Seller desires
to sell the VLF Receivable pursuant to a purchase and sale agreement by and between the Seller
and the Authority in the form presented to this City Council (the "Sale Agreement ") for the
purposes set forth herein;
WHEREAS, in order to finance the purchase price of the VLF Receivable from the Seller
and the purchase price of other VLF Receivables from other local agencies, the Authority will
issue its taxable and tax - exempt notes (the "Notes ") pursuant to Section 6590 of the California
Government Code and an Indenture (the "Indenture "), by and between the Authority and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (the "Trustee "), which Notes will be payable solely
from the proceeds of the VLF Receivable and such other VLF Receivables;
WHEREAS, the Seller acknowledges that the Authority will grant a security interest in
the VLF Receivable to the Trustee and any credit enhancer to secure payment of the Notes; and
WHEREAS, a portion of the proceeds of the Notes will be used by the Authority to,
among other things, pay the purchase price of the VLF Receivable;
Resolution # 5 -D
2 -15 -05
WHEREAS, the Seller will use the proceeds received from the sale of the VLF
Receivable for any lawful purpose as permitted under the applicable laws of the State;
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Alameda hereby resolves as
follows:
Section 1. All of the recitals set forth above are true and correct, and this City
Council hereby so finds and determines.
Section 2. The Seller hereby authorizes the sale of the VLF Receivable to the
Authority for a price no less than the Minimum Purchase Price set forth in Appendix A. The
form of Sale Agreement presented to the City Council is hereby approved. An Authorized
Officer (as set forth in Appendix A) is hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the
Sale Agreement on behalf of the Seller, which shall be in substantially the form presented to this
meeting, with such changes therein, deletions therefrom and additions thereto, as such
Authorized Officer shall approve, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by the
execution and delivery of the Sale Agreement.
Section 3. Any Authorized Officer is hereby authorized and directed to send, or
to cause to be sent, an irrevocable written instruction to the State Controller notifying the State of
the sale of the VLF Receivable and instructing the disbursement pursuant to Section 6588.5(c) of
California Government Code of the VLF Receivable to the Trustee, on behalf of the Authority.
Section 4. The Authorized Officers and such other Seller officers, as appropriate,
are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things and to execute
and deliver any and all documents, including but not limited to one or more tax certificates, if
required, appropriate escrow instructions relating to the delivery into escrow of executed
documents prior to the closing of the Notes, and such other documents mentioned in the Sale
Agreement or the Indenture, which any of them may deem necessary or desirable in order to
implement the Sale Agreement and otherwise to carry out, give effect to and comply with the
terms and intent of this Resolution; and all such actions heretofore taken by such officers are
hereby ratified, confirmed and approved.
Section 5. All consents, approvals, notices, orders, requests and other actions
permitted or required by any of the documents authorized by this Resolution, whether before or
after the sale of the VLF Receivable or the issuance of the Notes, including without limitation
any of the foregoing that may be necessary or desirable in connection with any default under or
amendment of such documents, may be given or taken by an Authorized Officer without further
authorization by this City Council, and each Authorized Officer is hereby authorized and
directed to give any such consent, approval, notice, order or request, to execute any necessary or
appropriate documents or amendments, and to take any such action that such Authorized Officer
may deem necessary or desirable to further the purposes of this Resolution.
Section 6. The City Council acknowledges that, upon execution and delivery of
the Sale Agreement, the Seller is contractually obligated to sell the VLF Receivable to the
Authority pursuant to the Sale Agreement and the Seller shall not have any option to revoke its
approval of the Sale Agreement or to determine not to perform its obligations thereunder.
approval.
Section 7. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its adoption and
Minimum Purchase
Price:
Authorized Officers:
APPENDIX A
CITY OF ALAMEDA
An amount equal to or greater than $1,148,000.00 (the "Minimum
Purchase Price ").
Acting City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Chief Financial Officer
any designee of any of them, as appointed m a written certificate of
such Authorized Officer delivered to the Trustee.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in a regular meeting assembled on the
day of , 2005, by the following vote to wit:
AYES
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said City this
day of , 2005.
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
City of Alameda
CITY OF ALAMEDA
MEMORANDUM
Date: February 10, 2005
To: Honorable Mayor and
Councilmembers
From: William C. Norton
Interim City Manager
Re: Adjustments to Estimated Revenues and Appropriations as of
February 2005
BACKGROUND
The Mid -Year Review presented for your consideration at the February 1st meeting
indicated that the General Fund was by year end estimated to spend $4.8 million more
than it would receive in revenues. It was also indicated that this report would be
coming to you for your consideration and approval. Your approval is being sought
because of the magnitude of these changes.
DISCUSSION /ANALYSIS
Since adoption of the 2004 -2005 Budget on July 20, 2004, and the subsequent lack of
implementation of certain new revenue sources, it has become clear that a major
review of all General Fund Revenues and Transfers In and Appropriations and
Transfers Out needed to be performed. This review was benefited by a clearer
understanding of the effect of the "triple flip" (Proposition 1A), state take -away of
revenues, Council approved uses of Reserves, new contract with one bargaining unit,
and departmental appropriation reductions
Beginning in early January, the Interim City Manager provided a target for each
General Fund department. These targets included not only dollar amounts but also
the following principles: impact community services the least, prevent employee
layoffs where possible and "be creative" in finding solutions, including identification of
items that could be eliminated. Lingering problem issues have been resolved through
diligent research and record building. With many hours of intense effort, staff is
pleased to report that the $4.8 million deficit will be eliminated with the proposed
changes. The net change to the General Fund by Year End should be zero. The
changes are summarized in Exhibit A and B.
There are miscellaneous positive changes to revenues of $133,000. The Payment in
Lieu of Taxes /Return on Investment (PILOT/R01) adoption adds $823,000. The
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
Report #5 -E
2 -15 -05
Honorable Mayor and February 10, 2005
Councilmembers Page 2 of 2
Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Contract with Alameda County ended in
September reducing our revenues by $256,000 (likewise our expenditures will be
reduced by $217,500). In the interim, a new contract is being negotiated. The sale of
the Vehicle License Fee (VLF) receivables will add about $580,000 in revenues this
year. Sales tax revenues appear to have a shallower growth curve than anticipated
and we have therefore reduced our Sales Tax estimated revenue by $219,000.
Lastly, a budgeted item that is no longer needed is the ARRA Transfer in and the
FISC (public safety) Transfer Out for offsetting amounts ($2.5 million each).
In addition to the departmental changes and impacts as included in Exhibits B and C,
there are significant miscellaneous changes as well. The Pension Fund 1079 -1082
appropriation can be reduced by $1.13 million. The EMS contract costs are reduced
by $217,500. The Transfer Out to the Risk Management Fund is reduced by
$391,120 due to cost savings. Payments of $20,000 from reserves to our federal
lobbyist, Holland & Knight, have been included in the changes shown in the exhibits.
This appropriation requires Council approval. The Departmental appropriation
reductions total $2.1 million. All appropriation reductions total $6.3 million.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
In summary, revenue estimates are reduced by $1.4 million and appropriations are
reduced $6.3 million. It is estimated that there will be no net change at year -end to
General Fund Reserves. Exhibit A recapitulates these changes and their affects on
estimated fund balance.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Council approve these recommended changes to
revenues and appropriations.
JAB:di
Attachments: Exhibits A -C
Respectfully submitted,
William C. Norton
Interim City Manager
0114!
ifflle -Ann : •yer
hief Financial Officer
G:\ FINANCE \COUNCIL\2005 \021505 \Staff Report Feb Budget Amendments ver 3.doc
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
EXHIBIT A
O A N O O O A 00
0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0
O et NN10 ANN
V W W W r O r W
(0M001N00
W 10 r A W W v 01
VMr V(00) C4
II el cl en co a in
0 n (0 000 000 O OD
r
,5 -o N O N N 0 0
C
00 N O v W.
0) r N r
E „.
Q bR
N
z
0 (00
▪ NE
M C M
O 0)
min
E
m G Q VT
d N
Q }
en ce
MW 0 0)
wm O
m w 0;0
ZLL O` 0)
> CO LL
' Q
w
mZ
0°Z
ZLLJ0 m
=LL Qw 0"0'O A
Jg °� d v
g1(7) Q d' C O) N
WW 0 0 E 7 W
W O y N Q m v)
0z .
00
I- m a
m
H
F.
Q
0
w
m
AUDITED FUND BALANCE - July 1, 2004
to in CD
O 0 -
0
0 N 0
N O
T.-
r O
<D O
r O
CO Cele
N
CO
0 0
N O
M 0
0) A N O O 1000 NO
0N000W OD NA
.707 N N010 V W
A N W W r W A O N
M M ( 0 0 ) 10 10 10 0
O 10 r A W r O V 0
-NMr 000W,
$ 67,508,484
CD CO N N O N T 0 0 ti et O
0)0r Ar 0006
OAA_A V. CD C4
10 a N10 M ID
IA o. 0 1010 , tia
V 000) O V Wd)M01
A �VV �N1111VNO
N N n 1100 0 0 0 0 0 A 0 0
N 0100MN 1D000 10
A M O A N a- N 0
N N
N r NO"..." ' v '
W 49
WOOAUD r 0 Ce M O co co r W N co
V
(0'I0' 01
M.• r. v
A N 0 M A r 0 T CO 0 CO N
CO r01-00)AOiO V V W
0 00rrMA W AAOiWO1
a V M01Na000MM
21.:
V OA O)MO VMOA W
N L. W 10 10 V r r O1 M
O 10 a- N W M r N
49 49 40 49 49
$ 69,067,768
0
A
A
O
M
r
fR
M
W
0>
O
0)
N
t0
<0
W
O
A
0
10
<0
U3
$ (1,388,257)
N
N
W
10
uD
00
vs
49
10
N
00
in
0
o
N
O
M
w
Z
M
Ln
N LL w
0 C L: OW w _
c ww 01 Z .�
I. 10 O
0 a) d'0 zQ0
L °1 N 0 J w Q R
a aNia ° 0. m y E QtL m
•0 yE = =. Ep 30 cm 8 u mX 0 r
3 N xa 0 y0 0, 0 =c m 0. c mw °a.i
a 0) Q N '++
> • xH c d O C'Z o Q .. H _ cYN Cm l6 d }to LL AO
re1`°u100 .. -g°m KcRm`0c0 . y'zt �w W >a
.J'D 0 =-= w im Q':� m d0 .. m zn 1 v
OI C o M C d'1- a a'? 4 m m 0.7'19 HNQ rew 2 7w
24 u w c O'5 0D• z`� g m °°i m Qm = 1 0 Dw N uo
.0 .i L . 00W c3aa . 0 L i J 0 l o z OW w * Qa
BUDGET AMENDMENTS AS OF FEB, 2005
Changes
REVENUE
Misc $ 133,000
PILOT/R01 #1 823,000
EMS #2 (256,000)
VLF Receivable Sale #3 580,000
ARRA Trsf in /out for public safety (2,500,000)
Sales Tax (219,161)
Exhibit B
Original. Est Amended Est
$ 67,996,248
Total $ (1,439,161) $ 66,557,087
EXPENDITURES
Non Departmental -FISC p.s. $ (2,500,000)
Pension 1079 -1082 (1,130,000)
EMS (217,500)
Reduce Trsf to RM (391,120)
Holland & Knight 20,000
Sub Total
$ 72,853,070
$ (4,218,620)
City Council (15,050)
City Mgr (31,500)
Contingency (20,000)
City Clerk/Elections (7,200)
City Attorney (980)
Finance (36,250) #4
HR 140,087 #5
IT (19,596)
Police (817,422)
Fire (654,102)
Planning (171,150)
Bldg & Code Enf 85,100
PW (515,700)
Rec & Park (80,600)
Library 67,000
Total
NET CHANGE TO THE GENERAL FUND
$ (2,077,363)
$ (6,295,983) $ 66,557,087
#1:Payment In Lieu of Taxes /Return on Investment - City ordinance
#2:Emergency Medical Services - county wide enactment
#3: Vehiclie License Fee - a state subvention to Cities reduced but not paid by the State
#4: Need $45,000 for Financial Model requested /approved by Council
#5: Salaries & benefits understated from July
Summary changes 3- 01- 05.xls
$ ZERO
To
0
i-
n
O
O
To
0
O
a)
a)
0
co o00000
C Lc)00000
0 O r-06)OCc-cn
< E 'cl U)
2 Q
CO ER
F- cn
Z
W e
2 N
fn c6
7 `
0
Q cL
~ O
w
H
0 c6
7
CO
0 0
LC) 0 0 0 0 0
0 CO
O VI O 0 N 0)
0 M d
•- CO N
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Lo O O O
6)4 -•0
64
69- 6s
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 O N
N 'c•
6- 64
N M cc) 0 0 0
0 N CO M O O)
64
J co
H Z
Z (1)
w 0
Q
o = o
0. w CO
w a c _ °=
G y cn a) a) E E co
c 0
c w u)
a ti a) a)
m • a E .c o i) - iD3 m 0
c n a) a) �+. L
n c� +, co
E c o) o a) ca o 0` y
a) a) o a) °x > a) >
o) aa) o o o o
o N O` m E a) U m L
m
.coc a n � 7 Cn CU 2 : E
a) 0 ' o O _ o c ■o co
N N ate) co E > Q O ° W V o c co is 0 voi 3 U m y y 'a U) 'O U -o CO o
0 0 o C a) U O U'- c0 a) r y +? o '++ Ce
L m O U C y co a) co U co a) co U c0 co },
�c aciE (1/ a)�� •> •EE �E Z` .,.� c
c
a)
E
co
a)
n
a)
0
_ a)
I m o � o �> m a) aai 0 C/) E
c �o U c o N c c ton co ( O fn o d E a) n
= n o U CO m c' C CO N- cL '5
c o co U C 3 -o o O C a) ca a) c C 3 'a a) Q
` o w 0 o c9 0 0 ;_, O '1- O C c O m Q C C W
O N N m _ ` N C a) •y o U O c co W c0 0 0
N L , y a) `O N o 0 0 aa)) a- @ a G)) U O Y a
mN o t O o voi -O 0 a) c a) O •— U O a)
n.EO22H m <2<o_ a` - OE— o..ZOmf- o
•U
O
0
0
T
m
c0
c0
0
a) C O
m a)
U ° Q
o 0 w 0
Group Total
W
n
0
0
O O O O O O O
C O O O O r 0
c000 LC) LnI.0O �O
O c O M 0 r- O) LO
E co r N v
Q
ER
M er
EA. ER
Ln 0 0 0 U)
COI,- GOON-
IX/ N 0 ) 1 0 C
OD (0 4. r r
In
E9
OO)I- 001`0000
O r- O N- O I` O O) L(7 O O
N L() CO d' M L(j CO M O CO
C) N r
E9
To To
1--
0
0 0
0
E
O
E
O
co
U
O
0
0
0
U
c/ O 2
0 C
N C N U
C a d O O)
oI O a) C
.0 a a) X
co °' 06
c
0 _o
U y
as -O E C
E
. a)E •0 0)
0 U C co 0 i
O > (°
O a a E c a O Ea -)Cc
L O m o w L
U
C N 0 L o 7 co a)
> U 7 U 'c U
@ •C a O O 2 o) ' E
L e. 0) 0 0 C C -
O C (o a) 0 0 0 U
0 o p E V U 0 U O
i E a) O
(0 +0 c 0 y y 0 "O a) co o •U_
= O O Z
coi c a) 0 E .� . - m a) 0 •
E�mc9(,)2� c a _v)
L (0 U a) U
�La?)cca(0
o ou)i -0(n (cou-
Department
0 0.0
ac in c
iv01 a>
Human Resources
E
m
0)
(0
(D
E
0
U
(n
a)
a
0.
(/)
c
O
0
(0
CO
y
0) to
c"— C E
O N
C .97. a) N co co
aa)) n 1) cn 0 O a
� 0 C0 (c a) ° � E
C CO U y 0 a) O) a)
O a a) '>. L- 0 o. (0 C
a0OOUm0o10_22
a
0)
0
0
0
U
a)
O
OS
ER
City Administration
co
1--
a
2
N
I -
in
Z
W 0
N
CO (
L
0
Q Il
W H O
0 co
0 (Is
CO
J
1—
z
W
2
i-
ce
a
W
M r O O N
t
O O O O
CO N CO.
N N
N O
a-
r c()
C O
EPr d}
O O 0 0 O 0
0
O O O O O
N (0 O (O . 0)
( N ,— c() -- N
b?
O C (6
C a) in- "" .. O jL O uJ O
° c
-C O a C N L O U
C •� cpj 0) 7 a) C
=
C 0= .0 «p-. G) U) •� N d co
a3 N
c N .0 c 7 0 a) c6 > U 0) N
C m C 2 .0 u) co co cB N 0. •�
O O
C C U 6 a E a) C O 2 Q > C N
0) L o_ U 2 C E c O O'cp 0 5 O o
N O c -0 -0 0 O a) N C Ca i) -p N U
C N '0 O a) U E u) 0) .
0
c _0 O - 7 U) '«_ E C 7 a) 0
0 C co N m m 0 a) a) _ O 0- > c
cy) c
c rn•v E -c 0) > w ° o m co
a) .S - a) S o ° o m CD • c
C E �, .c > Q _c a7 as w u) o '� U .c .0 o
o� Ea°) u7) EUaa)) 0 mm C °•= 0 0) 0
a) Cr) — L c 7 D 0 N 0 C 0. Q "0 '� a) 0
0 a) .D N c .4., .� a7 ° p E Q 0)
C
C — O C E N N C d° p
w
co
co N o O cn C •o 1L U U c O -p E c' •0 E
E m o a) N m m > U as $ 7 0
v O N a > as N d a (0 aa) c U .� co
co
r Q 0 U u) 0 M '' E> 0 CO ` 4 +L 7 >. U C O L_ w
a)
:.-:,- a; o c .O o E N N U 7 m 7 °0 y L d c
E. E c L o U a m o as E a nom �om� m c ��U ooio aE)
. a) . � .0 d U U c c U ) 0> w >' C) d o > a) - c 0 E
O N w ip 0 0 U as 0) E '— O N -
0) °) C° U N uEi Z 0 a3 U) c '00 .c 0>, U LO .c •— y m u)
. o °' v) a) a) `o n •- > ° a) o is m °—) '
m� >. 0p�oco �Q-° 2&m wU(-07o�'EZo'Z =a-4i
N a) - a ° m o. 0) c°d m c 0 c ui N 4-t ~ c 8_
' O. C °' w 7° w
a
C •C C m '.E., .p C ' U a) • - O C ` 0 0) a) cn w o u) p) U 7 U) al
c a C °) -o a) o,( co m E m m c a) E •0 o a) o a) c a) _a 0
O O O•c c• a0 aU)•cc —� Na 9-.U• .L ° °aa) O fl vi •V c U c
a) Q a) ' C o 7 00) O` — 7 0 u) a) j a) IP 7 O- C 7 M 7 a) a) a) O 2 LE
d co Cl. L V) cam �.. � U) W m U Q n W C)) .E 7 U) 4O V) = co 0. W 3 a
c
E
0
n
a)
0
a)
U
a)
LL
N
0
a
z
W
• N
N R
0
au.
I-
0
W
• y
• o
CO
-J
z
W
1-
W
act Description
Department
O O L()
co r--
LC)
O N T
69
O
0
T
(C)
a0
69
(°n 0
co I. (0 O
(0 O O
O T co (0
O ..
69 69 (A 69
0 0 O
0 (C00 O
LC) co- N.
T co (0
O
64 EA- 69
O
O
O
69
co CO To To
O 0
j i2 O 0 0 CO
c
C.) ) 0 'c
3 Jo
o .
O 0 Ea. y
0
O 0 0 c
P. CO 0 0
7 0 3 • c P
O C O CO
• 0 c_
C co N E
0 0 0 >, n —
uu)) co) o co a c
c 7 (9
a s c ca ( O C
o
°) E
CI)
>m o a a) • ��E
o
u▪ � ▪ -0 .- c > i ° 0
o Y O co 2 a) -u) 0)
n o Z a� o c fl'y-0
C 0 CO = 7 U
• C co O - c
CO y O `
3 o c co o c a a) 0
o) c 0 '> c (o 'co— E v 3 0
2 m ° Q) a- 8 m
c 0 .r v) O n
▪ 0 c - a c m C i
` o
> E c
0) 0 2 u) w CO 0 C CO
C y •c c
N c Q vii 0 V ca E. co a) a)
(1) CD 4- C C O a0) a >, CO
v- O -0 co O_ 4= -p V)
co U m O 2 U m 0 .7 C .0 8 0 0 a
-Z c w o -> c> m -> (/j c o w
CD > > 'p N g -O 0 (0
� co C C o'" 5 i C Y i o 0 C
C 0 0 0 C 0 co co 0 C C .� co 0 O 0 w CD
V
0)Q -c oz..° c °in-'— oE.0a)L
a
0 7 a) co > 0 7 0 0 0 7 7 N a0i = CD
O
O
O
0)
M
O
0
0
CO
(0
64
0)
c
C t•
o
11 CO CO aC)(/) 0. CL 0. 0_ _o Et a-1
Building /Code Enforce
Public Works
Recreation & Parks
Grand Total