2005-05-03 PacketCITY OF ALAMEDA • CALIFORNIA
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY - - - MAY 3, 2005 - - - 5:30 P.M.
Time: Tuesday, May 3, 2005, 5:30 p.m.
Place:
Agenda:
City Council Chambers Conference Room, City Hall, corner
of Santa Clara Avenue and Oak Street.
1. Roll Call.
2. Public Comment on Agenda Items Only.
Anyone wishing to address the Council on agenda items only may
speak for a maximum of 3 minutes per item.
3. Adjournment to Closed Session to consider:
3 -A. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Title: City Attorney.
3 -B. WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIM (54956.95)
Claimant: James Mackey.
Agency Claimed Against: City of Alameda.
3 -C. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Agency Negotiators:
Employee Organizations:
Human Resources Director and Craig
Jory.
International Brotherhood
Electrical Workers
Management and
Employees Association
of
(IBEW) and
Confidential
(MCEA).
4. Announcement of Action Taken in Closed Session, if any.
Adjournment
Beverly oh ' -��n, � Mayor
CITY OF ALAMEDA • CALIFORNIA
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION
TUESDAY - - - MAY 3, 2005 - - - 7:05 P.M.
Time: Tuesday, May 3, 2005, 7:05 p.m.
Place: City Council Chambers Conference Room, City Hall, corner
of Santa Clara Avenue and Oak Street.
Agenda:
1. Roll Call.
2. Public Comment on Agenda Items Only.
Anyone wishing to address the Commission on agenda items only
may speak for a maximum of 3 minutes per item.
3. Adjournment to Closed Session to consider:
3 -A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of litigation pursuant to subdivision (c) of
Section 54956.9
Number of cases: One.
4. Announcement of Action Taken in Closed Session, if any.
Adjournment
CITY OF ALAMEDA • CALIFORNIA
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION
TUESDAY - - - MAY 3, 2005 - - - 7:25 P.M.
Location: Council Chambers, City Hall, Santa Clara Ave. and Oak St.
Public Participation
Anyone wishing to address the Council /Commission on agenda items or
business introduced by Councilmembers /Commissioners may speak for a
maximum of 3 minutes per agenda item when the subject is before the
Council /Commission. Please file a speaker's slip with the Deputy
City Clerk if you wish to speak on an agenda item.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
MINUTES
Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and Community
Improvement Commission Meeting held on April 19, 2005.
AGENDA ITEMS
1. Joint Public Hearing to consider authorizing the City
Manager /Executive Director to enter into a Disposition and
Development Agreement with Alameda Entertainment Associates,
L.P., approval of the 33433 Report, and adoption of a
Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Alameda Theater,
Cineplex and Parking Structure Project (State Clearinghouse
#2004 - 122 -042). [Continued from April 19, 2005]
• Adoption of Resolution Approving and Authorizing Execution
of a Disposition and Development Agreement Between the
Community Improvement Commission and Alameda Entertainment
Associates, L.P., Approving Certain Mitigation Measures for
the Project, and Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring Program.
[Community Improvement Commission]; and
• Adoption of Resolution Approving and Authorizing Execution
of a Disposition and Development Agreement Between the
Community Improvement Commission and Alameda Entertainment
Associates, L.P., and Adopting a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program. [City
Council]
2. Adoption of Resolution Approving and Authorizing Payment of
Certain Public Improvements to the Park Street and Otis Drive
Intersection. [Community Improvement Commission]; and
• Adoption of Resolution Approving and Authorizing Execution
of a Public Improvements Construction Agreement Between the
City and Harsch Investment Corporation. [City Council]
3. Recommendation to approve an Amended Contract with
Architectural Resources Group, Inc., by increasing the
Contract amount an additional $44,275 to provide additional
pre - planning services for the proposed Alameda Theatre
Project. [Community Improvement Commission]
ADJOURNMENT
Beverly John ay
Chair, Community
Commission
Improvement
AGENDA
CITY OF ALAMEDA • CALIFORNIA
IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL:
1. Please file a speaker's slip with the Deputy City
Clerk and upon recognition by the Mayor, approach the
podium and state your name; speakers are limited to
three (3) minutes per item.
2. Lengthy testimony should be submitted in writing and
only a summary of pertinent points presented verbally.
3. Applause and demonstration are prohibited during
Council meetings.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY - - MAY 3, 2005 - - - - 7:30 P.M.
[Note: Regular Council Meeting convenes at 7:30 p.m., City
Hall, Council Chambers, corner of Santa Clara Ave and Oak St.]
The Order of Business for City Council Meeting is as follows:
1. Roll Call
2. Agenda Changes
3. Proclamations, Special Orders of the Day and Announcements
4. Consent Calendar
5. Agenda Items
6. Oral Communications, Non - Agenda (Public Comment)
7. Council Communications (Communications from Council)
8. Adjournment
Public Participation
Anyone wishing to address the Council on agenda items or business
introduced by Councilmembers may speak for a maximum of 3 minutes
per agenda item when the subject is before Council. Please file a
speaker's slip with the Deputy City Clerk if you wish to address
the City Council.
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL 5:30 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CONFERENCE ROOM
Separate Agenda (Closed Session)
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT 7:05 P.M.
COMMISSION, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CONFERENCE ROOM
Separate Agenda (Closed Session)
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND 7:25 P.M.
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Separate Agenda
1. ROLL CALL - City Council
2. AGENDA CHANGES
3. PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
3 -A. Proclamation declaring May as "Older Americans Month."
3 -B. Update on the new main library project.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be
enacted, approved or adopted by one motion unless a request
for removal for discussion or explanation is received from the
Council or a member of the public.
4 -A. Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held on April 19,
2005; and the Special City Council Meeting held on April 21,
2005.
4 -B. Bills for ratification.
4 -C. Recommendation to authorize Call for Bids for Legal
Advertising for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2006.
4 -D. Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Investment Report for
period ending March 31, 2005.
4 -E. Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Financial Report for
the period ending March 31, 2005 and approve third quarter
budget adjustments.
4 -F. Recommendation to set Hearing to establish Proposition 4 Limit
for Fiscal Year 2005 -06 for May 17, 2005.
4 -G. Recommendation to accept the work of SpenCon Construction,
Inc., for Repair of Portland Cement, Concrete Sidewalk, Curb,
Gutter, Driveway and Minor Street Patching Phase 5, Fiscal
Year 2004 -05, No. P.W. 08- 04 -08.
4 -H. Recommendation to approve an Agreement with Alameda County to
continue participation in the Alameda HOME Consortium and
authorize the Acting City Manager to negotiate and execute
necessary documents.
5. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
5 -A. Adoption of Resolutions Appointing Ray A. Gaul, Bill T.
Schmits, and Jane Sullwold as Members of the Golf Commission.
5 -B. Final Passage of Ordinance Reclassifying and Rezoning Certain
Property within the City of Alameda by Amending Zoning
Ordinance No. 1277, N.S., from R -5 (General Residential)
Zoning District to C -C (Community Commercial) Zoning District,
for that Property Located at 2507 Central Avenue at Everett
Street.
5 -C. Recommendation to accept the West Alameda Neighborhood
Improvement Concept Plan.
6. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON- AGENDA (Public Comment)
Any person may address the Council in regard to any matter
over which the Council has jurisdiction or of which it may
take cognizance, that is not on the agenda.
7. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (Communications from Council)
8. ADJOURNMENT
• For use in preparing the Official Record, speakers reading a
written statement are invited to submit a copy to the City Clerk
at the meeting or e -mail to: lweisige @ci.alameda.ca.us
• Sign language interpreters will be available on request. Please
contact the City Clerk at 747 -4800 or TDD number 522 -7538 at
least 72 hours prior to the Meeting to request an interpreter.
• Equipment for the hearing impaired is available for public use.
For assistance, please contact the City Clerk at 747 -4800 or TDD
number 522 -7538 either prior to, or at, the Council Meeting.
• Accessible seating for persons with disabilities, including
those using wheelchairs, is available.
• Minutes of the meeting available in enlarged print.
• Audio Tapes of the meeting are available upon request.
• Please contact the City Clerk at 747 -4800 or TDD number 522 -7538
at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to request agenda
materials in an alternative format, or any other reasonable
accommodation that may be necessary to participate in and enjoy
the benefits of the meeting.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY- -APRIL 19, 2005- -7:27 P.M.
Mayor /Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 7:56 p.m.
ROLL CALL -
MINUTES
Present: Councilmembers /Commissioners Daysog,
deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and
Mayor /Chair Johnson - 5.
Absent: None.
(05 - CC /05- CIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and
Community Improvement Commission Meeting held on April 5, 2005.
Approved.
Vice Mayor /Commissioner Gilmore moved approval of the minutes.
Councilmember /Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion, which
carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
AGENDA ITEMS
(05- CC /05- CIC) Recommendation to approve the Annual Operating
and Capital Budget for the Bayport Project. Approved.
The Acting City Manager stated the budget scenario is considerably
better based upon the profit participation section that allows
participation in some of the developer's profit.
The Development Services Director gave a brief report on the
project.
Councilmember /Commissioner Daysog inquired whether bond issuance is
not required because revenue generated would cover public
improvements and still provide an $800,000 profit.
The Development Services Director responded that one bond was
issued early in the project; the project's bottom line does not
require using any other bonds to finish the project.
Mayor /Chair Johnson inquired whether bond capacity is freed up for
other potential uses in the future.
The Development Services Director responded in the negative; stated
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and
Community Improvement Commission
April 19, 2005
1
the existing agreement does not just contemplate the current phase;
the obligations of the projects are linked; any project proceeds
that flow from Phase I tax increments are obligated to Phase II
unless negotiated differently.
Mayor /Chair Johnson inquired whether Phase II has been negotiated,
to which the Development Services Director responded Phase II has a
Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA).
Mayor /Chair Johnson inquired whether the DDA provisions could be
renegotiated, to which the Development Services Director responded
in the affirmative.
Councilmember /Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether the bottom
line of the next phase is more favorable.
The Development Services Director responded that a developer
advance is not required; available funds would be required to be
put into the infrastructure in a different pattern.
Councilmember /Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether the Research
and Development Park and Business Park look more favorable, to
which the Development Services Director responded that she could
not respond; there are other issues related to the economics.
Councilmember /Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether the profits
rolling into the next project allow for a more favorable situation,
to which the Development Services Director responded possibly.
Councilmember /Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the price of
homes is the principle factor for the current situation, to which
the Development Services Director responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember /Commissioner deHaan stated the break even point was
$650,000.
The Redevelopment Manager noted the average sale price of the homes
was $725,000.
Councilmember /Commissioner Daysog stated that news is good overall;
profit participation was initially questionable.
Councilmember /Commissioner deHaan moved approval of the staff
recommendation.
Councilmember /Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion, which
carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
Doug Biggs, Alameda Point Collaborative (APC), stated that the APC
was originally granted 39 units to meet housing needs for the
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and 2
Community Improvement Commission
April 19, 2005
homeless; APC entered into an agreement with the City to replace
the original units in east housing near the corner of Atlantic
Avenue and Fifth Street; the City told APC that there are no funds
to build the 39 units; the City is contemplating financing a 39-
unit project through other funds instead; the City specifically
designated project revenues from the Catellus Project as the
primary source for the 39 units, including $2 million from the sale
of land; that designation of funds is not shown in the accounting
presented tonight; without the agreement with APC to relocate
units, the Bayport Project would not have happened; the use of the
Catellus funds could go a long way toward making units more
affordable and serve the homeless.
Councilmember /Commissioner Matarrese requested an Off Agenda Report
in response to Mr. Biggs' comments.
(05- CC /05- CIC) Joint Public Hearing to consider
authorizing the City Manager /Executive Director to enter into a
Disposition and Development Agreement with Alameda Entertainment
Associates, L.P., approval of the 33433 Report, and adoption of a
Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Alameda Theater, Cineplex
and Parking Structure Project (State Clearinghouse #2004 -122 -042).
(05- A /CIC ) Adoption of Resolution Approving and Authorizing
Execution of a Disposition and Development Agreement Between the
Community Improvement Commission and Alameda Entertainment
Associates, L.P., and Approving Certain Mitigation Measures for the
Project and Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring Program; and
(05- A /CIC ) Adoption of Resolution Approving and Authorizing
Execution of a Disposition and Development Agreement Between the
Community Improvement Commission and Alameda Entertainment
Associates, L.P., and Adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring Program. Continued to May 3, 2005.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor /Chair Johnson adjourned the
Special Joint Meeting at 8:06 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
Secretary, Community Improvement
Commission
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and
Community Improvement Commission
April 19, 2005
3
CITY OF ALAMEDA
MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Chair and
Members of the Community Improvement Commission
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
From: William C. Norton
Acting Executive Director /City Manager
Date: April 20, 2005
Re: Joint Public Hearing to Consider Recommendation to Authorize the City
Manager /Executive Director to Enter into a Disposition and Development Agreement
with Alameda Entertainment Associates, L.P., Approval of the California Health and
Safety Code Section 33433 Report Summarizing the Financial Impact of the Project
and Adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Alameda Theatre, Cineplex
and Parking Structure Project (State Clearinghouse #2004 - 122 -042)
Resolution of the Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda
Approving and Authorizing Execution of a Disposition and Development Agreement
between the Commission and Alameda Entertainment Associates, L.P., and Approving
Certain Mitigation Measures for the Project and Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring
Program
Resolution of the City Council of the City of Alameda Approving and Authorizing
Execution of a Disposition and Development Agreement between the Commission and
Alameda Entertainment Associates, L.P., and Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring Program
BACKGROUND
This item had been originally scheduled for April 19; at that time, staff requested a
continuance to May 3, 2005.
The Community Improvement Commission (CIC) entered into an Exclusive Negotiation
Agreement with Kyle Conner to negotiate terms for development of a new two -story
multiplex cinema as part of a total project that includes the rehabilitation of the Historic
Alameda Theatre and construction of a new parking structure with approximately 350
parking spaces. Presented is the final Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) with
Alameda Entertainment Associates, L.P. based on the business terms approved by the
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
G: \Soto \Theater Project\Staff Reports \DDA 3- 15- 05.doc
F: CP /Alameda Theatre /DDA/Staff Reports
Re: Public Hearing and
Resolutions #1 -
Council/CIC
5 -3 -n5
Honorable Chair and
Members of the Community Improvement Commission
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
CIC. (This DDA is on file with the City Clerk.)
DISCUSSION /ANALYSIS
Project Summary
April 20, 2005
Page 2
The project is comprised of three primary and related components: the public parking
garage, the proposed acquisition and renovation of the Historic Alameda Theatre, and the
development of a new two -story multiplex cinema. The project is anticipated to use a
combination of funds from the 2003 merged area bond issue and /or with subsequent
review of a financing plan, a HUD Section 108 loan and Brownfields Economic
Development Initiative (BEDI) Grant. The total funds needed by the CIC for the project is
anticipated to be approximately $22,770,000. It is also important to note that a number of
actions in the DDA will require a 4 /5th vote of the Council and CIC and with the approval of
the DDA the Developer will be moving forward with a substantial expense of funds.
Developer Experience
The project developer is Kyle Conner. Mr. Conner has over 25 years experience with
theater management, operation, design, construction and fixture and furniture supply. Mr.
Conner has been a partner in several area theaters and brings to Alameda his experience
from those projects. This will be Mr. Conner's first project as primary developer.
Primary DDA Business Terms
Public Parking Structure
The CIC has acquired the first parcels needed for the parking structure. The Historic
Alameda Theatre will also need to be acquired. In February, the CIC presented an offer to
purchase the Historic Alameda Theatre. The design is being finalized and it is planned to
go out to bid within the next two months. The parking structure will begin construction in fall
2005 and be completed by fall 2006. The Developer will have the ability to validate parking
for theater patrons for an annual fee of $10,000. This fee is based on the usage anticipated
by the theater and will increase each year by the CPI.
New Multiplex Cinema
The Developer intends to construct a seven (7)- screen multiplex cinema with approximately
1,100 seats. The multiplex cinema will have stadium seating with all current state -of- the -art
equipment. Patrons will enter the new cinema via the Historic Alameda Theatre providing
the feeling of one overall theatre complex to the public.
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
G: \Soto \Theater Project\Staff Reports \DDA 3- 15- 05.doc
F: CP /Alameda Theater Project/DDA/Staff Reports
Honorable Chair and
Members of the Community Improvement Commission
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
April 20, 2005
Page 3
The CIC has acquired one of the parcels needed for the new multiplex cinema. The CIC
hopes to acquire the remaining parcel to complete the land acquisition needed for the
project. The CIC will lease the land to the Developer where the new multiplex cinema is to
be built. The lease payments are $12,000 annually for the first six years and $96,000
annually for years seven through ten. The lease payments will then increase by the CPI
with a floor of 3% and a ceiling of 5 %.
The initial estimated costs for the new multiplex cinema are $8,834,500, based on
conceptual drawings. The private investment commitment is $5,359,500 and the balance
(economic gap) would be funded by the CIC. The Developer will provide funding in the
amount of $5,359,500: an equity contribution of $1,350,000, a construction loan of
$3,159,500 and a furniture, fixtures and equipment (FFE) loan of $850,000. The CIC's
financial obligation under the proposed DDA is $3,475,000; a lump sum grant of $675,000
towards funding a portion of the vertical circulation elements needed to access the historic
theater and the second story multiplex and the economic gap portion needed to fund the
two -story multiplex, a not -to- exceed amount of $2,800,000.
Repayment by the Developer of the $2,800,000 is split into a $1,400,000 loan that would
start to be repaid in year seven of the project when the Developer has repaid his FFE bank
loan. The remaining $1,400,000, of the $2,800,000, that the CIC is funding, is repaid over
time by percentage rent from the revenues of the project. The percentage rent is in addition
to the base rent. During years one through six, the percentage rent would be 15% when
the Developer reaches gross revenues above $3,250,000. The percentage rent increases
to 17.5% when gross revenues go above $4,210,000 in years seven through ten. In years
11 through 30, the percentage rent remains at 17.5% but the gross revenues threshold
increases by the same percentage amount as the monthly minimum rent is increased.
Once the $1,400,000 is repaid, the percentage rent is reduced to 12% with the gross
revenues threshold staying the same as the previous year.
The Developer will also have an option to purchase the land under the new multiplex
cinema for a price not to exceed the full internal costs and expenses incurred by the CIC or
fair market value whichever is higher. The option to purchase cannot be exercised prior to
the Developer having operated the cinema successfully for five years.
Historic Alameda Theatre
The project anticipates the potential acquisition of the Historic Alameda Theatre. It is
estimated that the total costs of this part of the project will be $9,563,591 for the Historic
Alameda Theatre. The $9,563,591 budget includes a $125,000 contingency, which may be
used towards the Developer's extraordinary FFE costs. The $125,000 can only be used for
the project to the extent that the Developer has spent not Tess that $1,200,000 on FFE for
both the new building and the Historic Alameda Theatre.
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
G: \Soto \Theater Project\Staff Reports \DDA 3- 15- 05.doc
F: CP /Alameda Theater Project/DDA/Staff Reports
Honorable Chair and
Members of the Community Improvement Commission
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
April 20, 2005
Page 4
The Developer will have the option to expand the Historic Alameda Theatre rehabilitation to
include two additional screens on the upper level at a later date at his sole expense.
The Developer will have an option to purchase the Historic Alameda Theatre for a price not
to exceed the full internal costs and expenses incurred by the CIC or fair market value
which ever is greater. The option can only be exercised after five years of successful
operation as a theatre.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial
Study /Environmental Assessment (draft IS /EA) has been completed and a proposed
Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for public comment from December 9, 2004
to January 10, 2005. The draft IS /EA analyzes the impacts of two development options for
the Alameda Theatre, new cinema and parking structure.
Option A consists of construction of a new multi -level parking structure with 352 spaces;
the proposed rehabilitation of the existing Historic Alameda Theatre to create a restored,
500 -seat cinema; and construction of an adjacent approximately 1,300 -seat, seven -to-
eight- screen cineplex. The new parking and cineplex structures would also include
approximately 3,500 square feet of ground floor retail space. A possible future expansion
of the proposed parking garage onto the existing adjacent Longs Drug site, referred to as
Option B, was also analyzed and would have added approximately 158 more parking
spaces to the garage, for a total of approximately 508 spaces, and a net increase of
another approximately 15,000 square feet of retail space on the expanded site.
These environmental documents will be used in conjunction with several potential City
actions related to the Historic Alameda Theatre, Multiplex Cinema and Parking Structure
Project including, but not limited to:
• Site Acquisition
• Funding
• Planning Board project approvals (Use Permit, Design Review)
• Historical Advisory Board Certificate of Approval for the Historic Alameda Theatre
• Necessary Permits (demolition, constructions, etc.)
During the public review process six comments were received from:
• Monika Slay Pitchford
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
C:\DOCUME- 1\cm_user\LOCALS. -1 \Temp\DDA 3- 15- 05.doc
F: CP /Alameda Theater Project/DDA/Staff Reports
Honorable Chair and
Members of the Community Improvement Commission
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
• David J. Rehnstrom, East Bay Municipal Utility District
• Christopher Buckley, Alameda Architectural Preservation Society
• Governor's Office of Planning and Research ( #1)
• Governor's Office of Planning and Research ( #2)
• Timothy C. Sable, State of California Department of Transportation
April 20, 2005
Page 5
Wagstaff and Associates, consultant to the CIC for the IS /EA, responded to comments.
The consultant has corrected and made a clarification to the design review process to be
consistent with City policies and procedures and the enlarged review and comment role by
the Historic Advisory Board. None of the comments received identified significant impacts
associated with the project, nor did the comments identify new mitigation measures or
challenge the adequacy of the proposed mitigation measures. The following documents
are on file with the City Clerk:
• Exhibit "A" — Responses to Public Comments Received on the December 2004 Draft
Initial Study /Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Alameda Theater, Cineplex
and Parking Structure
• Exhibit "B" — Findings Regarding Significant Impacts That can be Mitigated to a Level of
Insignificance
• Exhibit "C" — Mitigation Monitoring Checklist for the Alameda Theater, Cineplex and
Parking Structure Project
FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact from the proposed DDA is described in the 33433 Report (on file with the
City Clerk). The annual revenue to the CIC from the ground lease, Historic Alameda
Theatre lease, retail leases and parking revenue is expected to be $525,000 in the first
year.
Additional fiscal benefits are anticipated to accrue to the CIC with tax increment, to the
General Fund with permit fees, business license fees and sales tax and to Alameda Power
& Telecom (AP &T) with new energy sales.
Permit Fees (one time revenue):
Parking Structure
Historic Alameda Theatre
$368,000
$238,000
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
C: \DOCUME -1 \cm_user\LOCALS -1 \Temp \DDA 3- 15- 05.doc
F: CP /Alameda Theater Project/DDA/Staff Reports
Honorable Chair and
Members of the Community Improvement Commission
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
New Multiplex Cinema $286,000
Annual Sales taxes per year:
New Multiplex Cinema retail $3,750
Historic Alameda Theatre retail $7,103
AP &T income per year:
New Multiplex Cinema
and Historic Alameda Theatre $21,600
Annual Business license fees $1,789
New jobs created 337
April 20, 2005
Page 6
The annual sales from the multiplex cinema and Historic Alameda Theatre for the first year
are expected to be $3,052,800 and the retail space sales are expected to be $1,302,300
for a total of $4,355,100.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the GIC and City:
1. Adopt the Resolution and approve and authorizing the Executive Director to execute
the DDA with Alameda Entertainment Associates, L.P.
2. Adopt the Resolution and Approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the DDA.
Respectfull, submit��d,
Leslie . Little
Development Services Director
By:
Dorene E. Soto
Manager, Business Development Division
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
G: \Soto \Theater Project\Staff Reports \DDA 3- 15- 05.doc
F: CP /Alameda Theater Project/DDA/Staff Reports
Honorable Chair and
Members of the Community Improvement Commission
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
WCN /LAL /DES:ry
cc: Kyle Conner, Alameda Entertainment Associates, L.P.
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
G: \Soto \Theater Project\Staff Reports \DDA 3- 15- 05.doc
F: CP /Alameda Theater Project/DDA/Staff Reports
April 20, 2005
Page 7
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA
RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A DISPOSITION AND
W
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COMMISSION AND
CO
ALAMEDA ENTERTAINMENT ASSOCIATES, L.P., AND APPROVING
CERTAIN MITIGATION MEASURES FOR THE PROJECT AND ADOPTING
A MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
U
WHEREAS, the Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda
( "Commission ") is carrying out the Community Improvement Plan ( "Plan") for the Business and
Waterfront Improvement Project (the `BWIP "); and
WHEREAS, the City of Alameda ( "City") and the Commission wish to further the City's
downtown redevelopment goals by renovating the existing downtown historic Alameda theater,
,providing for increased retail space and a new multi -plex cinema, and providing for additional
public parking within the BWIP; and
WHEREAS, the Commission has received a proposed Disposition and Development
Agreement ( "DDA ") from Alameda Entertainment Associates, L.P., a California limited
partnership ( "Developer "), providing for the redevelopment of that certain real property located
on the northeast corner of Central Avenue and Oak Street within the area of the BWIP (the
"Site ") for purposes of renovating the historic Alameda theater, constructing a new Cineplex and
other retail space, and constructing a public parking structure (the "Project "); and
WHEREAS, a portion of the Site is owned by the Commission ( "Commission Property")
and a portion of the Site is proposed to be acquired by the Commission ( "Acquisition Property");
and
WHEREAS, the DDA provides for, among other things: (a) the potential acquisition of
the Acquisition Property by the Commission; (b) the ground lease of a portion of the Site to
Developer for construction of a new Cineplex and other retail uses ( "Cineplex Parcel "); (c) the
Commission's renovation and lease to Developer of the existing historic Alameda theater on the
Site (the "Theater Property"); and (d) Commission's construction of a public parking garage on a
portion of the Site; and
WHEREAS, due to the potential use of federal Housing and Urban Development
( "HUD ") funds to assist in redeveloping the Project, the Project is subject to both the California
Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq. ( "CEQA "), and the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Public Law 91 -190 as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. 4321-
4347 ( "NEPA "); and
CC /CIC Resolution #1 (CIC)
5 -3 -05
WHEREAS, in accordance with CEQA and NEPA, the City, as proponent of the Project
and lead agency under CEQA and as the responsible entity under NEPA, prepared a joint
environmental document in the form of a CEQA- authorized Mitigated Negative Declaration and
a NEPA- authorized Mitigated Finding of No Significant Impact ( "Mitigated FONSI "), supported
by a joint Initial Study /Environmental Assessment (collectively, the `Environmental
Documents "); and
WHEREAS, under CEQA Commission is a Responsible Agency, as defined in Section
21069 of the California Public Resources Code; and
WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California (Health and
Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) provides in Section 33431 that any sale or lease of
Commission property may be made only after a public hearing of the Commission after
publication of notice as provided by law; and
WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Law provides in Section 33433 that before
any property acquired, in whole or in part, with tax increment monies, is sold or leased for
development pursuant to a redevelopment plan, such sale or lease shall first be approved by the
legislative body after a public hearing, that notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be
published in a newspaper of general circulation in the community for at least two (2) successive
weeks prior to the hearing, and that the Commission shall make available for public inspection a
copy of the proposed sale or lease and a report containing specified information and the financial
aspects of the proposal; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 33445 of the Community Redevelopment Law, the
Commission is authorized, with the consent of the City Council, to pay all or part of the value of
the land for and the cost of the installation and construction of any building, facility, structure or
other improvement which is publicly owned either within or without a project area upon a
determination by the City Council that such building, facility, structure or other improvement is
of benefit to the project area or the immediate area in which the project is located, that no other
reasonable means of financing such building, facility, structure or other improvement are
available to the community, that the payment of funds for the cost of the building, facility,
structure or other improvement will assist in the elimination of one or more blighting conditions
inside the project area, and that the provision of the building, facility, structure or other
improvement is consistent with the implementation plan adopted by the Commission; and
WHEREAS, notice of a joint public hearing on the DDA and Mitigated Negative
Declaration of the City Council of the City of Alameda ( "City Council ") and the Commission
was published in the Alameda Journal on April 5, 2005, and April 12, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Commission prepared a report pursuant to Section 33433 of the Health
and Safety Code containing a copy of the proposed DDA and a summary describing the cost of
the DDA to the Commission, the value of the property interest to be conveyed, the value of the
lease payments and other information required by said Section 33433 ( "Report"), and said Report
was made available to the public for inspection; and
WHEREAS, the City Council and the Commission held a joint public hearing on May 3,
2005, in the City Council Chambers to consider and act on the Mitigated Negative Declaration
and disposition and development of the Site pursuant to the DDA.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ALAMEDA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Commission hereby finds and determines that the acquisition of land for
and the costs of the public parking garage are necessary to effectuate the purposes of the Plan,
and the Commission is authorized, with the consent of the City Council, to provide the public
parking garage. The Commission further finds and determines that the public parking garage is
of primary benefit to the area of the BWIP (`BWIP Project Area "); that no other means of
financing the public parking garage is available to the City; and that the payment of funds by the
Commission for such public parking garage will assist in eliminating blight within the BWIP
Project Area and is consistent with the Commission's Implementation Plan for the BWIP
adopted pursuant to Section 33490 of the Community Redevelopment Law ( "Implementation
Plan"). These findings and determinations are based upon the following facts:
a. The public parking garage is located within the downtown business district of the
BWIP Project Area and will, therefore, provide parking needed to serve the retail and
commercial businesses within the BWIP Project Area;
b. The City has explored and sought other funding alternatives and is requesting HUD
funds to assist in paying some of the costs of the public parking garage, however,
additional funds are necessary and the City does not have funds available for the
additional costs of the public parking garage;
c. The public parking garage will eliminate blight by providing adequate land and
facilities for parking and stimulating new commercial expansion, employment and
economic growth within the BWIP Project Area; and
d. The public parking garage is consistent with the Implementation Plan, as the
Implementation Plan's goals include the elimination of inadequate public facilities,
the provision of adequate land for parking and the strengthening of the economic base
of the BWIP Project Area, and one of the programs of the Implementation Plan is the
improvement of public facilities, including the development of more public parking.
Section 2. The Commission hereby finds and determines that the ground lease of the
Cineplex Parcel and the lease of the Theater Property to Developer and development of the
Project on the Site pursuant to the DDA will assist in the elimination of blight within the BWIP
Project Area and is consistent with the Implementation Plan. This finding is based upon the facts
and information contained in the Report.
Section 3. The Commission hereby finds and determines that the consideration to be paid
by Developer for the ground lease of Cineplex Parcel is not less than the fair reuse value of the
Cineplex Parcel at the use and with the covenants and conditions and development costs
authorized by the DDA. Commission also finds that the consideration to be paid,by Developer
for lease of the Theater Property is not less than the fair reuse value of the Theater Property at the
use and with the covenants and conditions and development costs authorized by the DDA. These
findings are based on the facts and information contained in the Report.
Section 4. The Commission has reviewed and considered the Mitigated Negative
Declaration prepared and adopted by the City (including the comments and responses thereto)
and hereby finds and determines that the Project, including the development of the Site pursuant
to the DDA, is covered by the Mitigated Negative Declaration relating to the Project, and that the
Project incorporates all applicable mitigation measures identified in the Environmental
Documents to reduce environmental impacts to less than a significant level. As to such
mitigation measures and environmental impacts, the Commission hereby adopts and incorporates
by reference herein those CEQA findings and mitigation measures and Mitigation Monitoring
Program set forth in City Council Resolution No.
Section 5. Commission hereby approves the ground lease of the Cineplex Parcel and the
lease of the Theater Property pursuant to the DDA. Commission hereby further approves the
DDA substantially in the form attached hereto, subject to any minor conforming, technical or
clarifying changes approved by the Executive Director and Commission Counsel. The Executive
Director and Secretary of the Commission are hereby authorized and directed to take such further
actions and execute such documents as are necessary to carry out the DDA on behalf of the
Commission, including without limitation, the leases, deed of trust and all other actions and
documents necessary for the acquisition, disposition and development of the Site in accordance
with the DDA.
Section 6. The Secretary of the Commission is hereby authorized to file a Notice of
Determination with the County Clerk of the County of Alameda and the Office of Planning and
Research, if applicable, following approval of the Project by the City and adoption of this
resolution by the Commission.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
adopted and passed by the Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda in a
Special Community Improvement Commission meeting assembled on the day of
, 2005 by the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said
Commission this day of , 2005.
Lara Weisiger, Secretary
Community Improvement Commission
Beverly Johnson, Chair
Community Improvement Commission
E
0 IJ-
CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A DISPOSITION AND
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COMMISSION AND
ALAMEDA ENTERTAINMENT ASSOCIATES, L.P., AND ADOPTING A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION
MONITORING PROGRAM
w
0 e z
CC
0 WHEREAS, the Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda
H( "Commission ") is carrying out the Community Improvement Plan ( "Plan ") for the Business and
a Waterfront Improvement Project (the `BWIP "); and
>-
o ~ WHEREAS, the City of Alameda ( "City") and the Commission wish to further the City's
0. U downtown redevelopment goals by renovating the existing downtown historic Alameda theater,
�!% providing for increased retail space and a new multi -plex cinema, and providing for additional
�� public parking within the BWIP; and
WHEREAS, the Commission has received a proposed Disposition and Development
Agreement ( "DDA ") from Alameda Entertainment Associates, L.P., a California limited
partnership ( "Developer "), providing for the redevelopment of that certain real property located
on the northeast corner of Central Avenue and Oak Street within the area of the BWIP (the
"Site ") for purposes of renovating the historic Alameda theater, constructing a new Cineplex and
other retail space, and constructing a public parking structure (the "Project "); and
WHEREAS, a portion of the Site is owned by the Commission ( "Commission Property")
and a portion of the Site is proposed to be acquired by the Commission ( "Acquisition Property");
and
WHEREAS, the DDA provides for, among other things: (a) the potential acquisition of
the Acquisition Property by the Commission; (b) the ground lease of a portion of the Site to
Developer for construction of a new Cineplex and other retail uses ( "Cineplex Parcel "); (c) the
Commission's renovation and lease to Developer of the existing historic Alameda theater on the
Site (the "Theater Property"); and (d) Commission's construction of a public parking garage on a
portion of the Site; and
WHEREAS, due to the potential use of federal Housing and Urban Development
( "HUD ") funds to assist in redeveloping the Project, the Project is subject to both the California
Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq. ( "CEQA "), and the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Public Law 91 -190 as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. 4321-
4347 ( "NEPA "); and
WHEREAS, in accordance with CEQA and NEPA, the City, as proponent of the Project
and lead agency under CEQA and as the responsible entity under NEPA, prepared a joint
environmental document in the form of a CEQA- authorized Mitigated Negative Declaration and
a NEPA- authorized Mitigated Finding of No Significant Impact ( "Mitigated FONSI "), •supported
by a joint Initial Study /Environmental Assessment (collectively, the `Environmental
Documents "); and
CC /CIC Resolution #1 (CC)
5 -3 -05
WHEREAS, in accordance with CEQA and NEPA, the City published and distributed a
Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance with Mitigation
Measures, a Notice of Findings of No Significant Impact and Notice of Intent to Request Release
of Funds; and has made the Environmental Documents available for public review in accordance
with CEQA and NEPA; and
WHEREAS, all applicable mitigation measures identified in the Environmental
Documents to reduce potential environmental impacts to less than a significant level were
conditions of approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigated FONSI and,
therefore, have been incorporated into the proposed DDA for the Project; and
WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California (Health and
Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) provides in Section 33431 that any sale or lease of
Commission property may be made only after a public hearing of the Commission after
publication of notice as provided by law; and
WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Law provides in Section 33433 that before
any property acquired, in whole or in part, with tax increment monies, is sold or leased for
development pursuant to a redevelopment plan, such sale or lease shall first be approved by the
legislative body after a public hearing, that notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be
published in a newspaper of general circulation in the community for at least two (2) successive
weeks prior to the hearing, and that the Commission shall make available for public inspection a
copy of the proposed sale or lease and a report containing specified information and the financial
aspects of the proposal; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 33445 of the Community Redevelopment Law, the
Commission is authorized, with the consent of the City Council, to pay all or part of the value of
the land for and the cost of the installation and construction of any building, facility, structure or
other improvement which is publicly owned either within or without a project area upon a
determination by the City Council that such building, facility, structure or other improvement is
of benefit to the project area or the immediate area in which the project is located, that no other
reasonable means of financing such building, facility, structure or other improvement are
available to the community, that the payment of funds for the cost of the building, facility,
structure or other improvement will assist in the elimination of one or more blighting conditions
inside the project area, and that the provision of the building, facility, structure or other
improvement is consistent with the implementation plan adopted by the Commission; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with NEPA, the City has submitted the Mitigated FONSI to
HUD; and
WHEREAS, notice of a joint public hearing on the DDA and Mitigated Negative
Declaration of the City Council of the City of Alameda ( "City Council ") and the Commission
was published in the Alameda Journal on April 5, 2005, and April 12, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Commission prepared a report pursuant to Section 33433 of the Health
and Safety Code containing a copy of the proposed DDA and a summary describing the cost of
the DDA to the Commission, the value of the property interest to be conveyed, the value of the
lease payments and other information required by said Section 33433 ( "Report"), and said Report
was made available to the public for inspection; and
WHEREAS, the City Council and the Commission held a joint public hearing on May 3,
2005, in the City Council Chambers to consider and act on the Mitigated Negative Declaration
and disposition and development of the Site pursuant to the DDA;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the acquisition of land for
and the costs of the public parking garage are necessary to effectuate the purposes of the Plan,
and the City Council consents to the Commission providing the public parking garage. The City
Council further finds and determines that the public parking garage is of primary benefit to the
area of the BWIP (`BWIP Project Area "); that no other means of financing the public parking
garage is available to the City; and that the payment of funds by the Commission for such public
parking garage will assist in eliminating blight within the BWIP Project Area and is consistent
with the Commission's Implementation Plan for the BWIP adopted pursuant to Section 33490 of
the Community Redevelopment Law ( "Implementation Plan "). These findings and
determinations are based upon the following facts:
a. The public parking garage is located within the downtown business district of the
BWIP Project Area and will, therefore, provide parking needed to serve the retail and
commercial businesses within the BWIP Project Area;
b. The City has explored and sought other funding alternatives and is requesting HUD
funds to assist in paying some of the costs of the public parking garage, however,
additional funds are necessary and the City does not have funds available for the
additional costs of the public parking garage;
c. The public parking garage will eliminate blight by providing adequate land and
facilities for parking and stimulating new commercial expansion, employment and
economic growth within the BWIP Project Area; and
d. The public parking garage is consistent with the Implementation Plan, as the
Implementation Plan's goals include the elimination of inadequate public facilities,
the provision of adequate land for parking and the strengthening of the economic base
of the BWIP Project Area, and one of the programs of the Implementation Plan is the
improvement of public facilities, including the development of more public parking.
Section 2. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the ground lease of the
Cineplex Parcel and the lease of the Theater Property to Developer and development of the
Project on the Site pursuant to the DDA will assist in the elimination of blight within the BWIP
Project Area and is consistent with the Implementation Plan. This finding is based upon the facts
and information contained in the Report.
Section 3. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the consideration to be paid
by Developer for ground lease of the Cineplex Parcel is not less than the fair reuse value of the
Cineplex Parcel at the use and with the covenants and conditions and development costs
authorized by the DDA. City Council also finds that the consideration to be paid by Developer
for lease of the Theater Property is not less than the fair reuse value of the Theater Property at the
use and with the covenants and conditions and development costs authorized by the DDA. These
findings are based on the facts and information contained in the Report.
Section 4. The City Council hereby finds that the Environmental Documents for the
Project have been prepared, published, circulated and reviewed in accordance with CEQA and
NEPA, and the applicable regulations pertaining thereto, and that the conditions of approval
( "Conditions of Approval "), which were set forth in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and
incorporated into the Project before the Environmental Documents were released for public
review, reduce all environmental impacts to less than a significant level.
Section 5. Comments received during the public review process of the Environmental
Documents and responses thereto are contained in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated
herein, and based on such comments and responses, the City Council finds that the comments did
not identify new significant impacts associated with the Project, identify new mitigation
measures or challenge the adequacy of the mitigation measures contained in the Mitigated
Negative Declaration and, therefore, do not include new information or substantial evidence that
a potential environmental effect may occur as a result of the Project.
Section 6. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in
the Environmental Documents and has evaluated all comments received during the public review
process and responses prepared thereto, prior to adopting this resolution and acting on the DDA.
Section 7. The City Council hereby finds, on the basis of the whole record before it
(including the Environmental Documents, comments received and responses thereto, and the
specific findings described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein) that there is no
substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment, and that
the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the City Council's independent judgment and
analysis.
Section 8. The City Planning and Building Department is hereby designated as the
custodian of the documents and other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon
which the City Council's approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration is based.
Section 9. The City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration, including
all mitigation measures set forth in the Conditions of Approval of the Mitigated Negative
Declaration, as identified in the Environmental Documents.
Section 10. For purposes of reporting on and monitoring the mitigation measures
incorporated into the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the City Council hereby adopts the
Mitigation Monitoring Program set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein.
Section 11. The City Council hereby approves the DDA in substantially the form on file
with the Secretary of the Commission.
Section 12. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to file a Notice of Determination with
the County Clerk of the County of Alameda and the Office of Planning and Research following
adoption of this resolution by the City Council.
EXHIBIT "A"
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 19, 2005
TO: Ms. Cynthia Eliason
Supervising Planner
City of Alameda Planning and Building Department
FROM: John Wagstaff
PROJECT: Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure Project
SUBJECT: Responses to Public Comments Received on the December 2004
Draft Initial Study /Environmental Assessment for the Proposed
Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure
The Draft Initial Study /Environmental Assessment for the Alameda Theater, Cineplex
and Parking Structure Project (Draft IS /EA), dated December 6, 2004, was released for
public review on Thursday, December 9, 2004. Implementation of the project will require
local (City and CIC), state (State Office of. Historic Preservation) and federal (HUD)
approval actions, and therefore invokes the environmental documentation requirements
of both the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA). Under the CEQA Guidelines (Governor's Office of Planning and
Research, California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines, 2004), the City of
Alameda is the "lead agency" having primary responsibility for approving and carrying
out the project, and for completing the associated CEQA environmental documentation
process. It has also been mutually agreed upon between the City and HUD that the
City, as the prospective recipient of HUD assistance for the project, will be the
"responsible entity" for the NEPA environmental documentation process- -i.e., will
assume NEPA environmental review responsibilities for the proposed HUD assistance
action, pursuant to HUD Regulations Governing Environmental Review Procedures for.
Entities Assuming HUD Environmental Responsibilities.'
The CEQA and NEPA laws establish similar environmental documentation processes.
For projects which invoke both CEQA and NEPA, "Lead Agencies " / "Responsible
Entities" are encouraged to prepare joint CEQA/NEPA documents. The City and HUD
have agreed that a joint CEQA/NEPA environmental document is appropriate for the
Alameda Theater Rehabilitation /Cineplex/Parking Structure project.
It has also been determined by the City that the joint environmental document shall take
the form of a CEQA- authorized Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) supported by an
Initial Study (IS),2 and a NEPA- authorized Mitigated Finding of No Significant Effect
'Code of Federal Regulations, Title 24, section 58 (24 CFR 58).
2CEQA Guidelines section 15071(d).
C: IDOCUMEE11cel lasonfLOCALS- 11TempW -19 -05 responses memo 647.doc
Memorandum
April 19, 2005
Wagstaff and Associates
Page 2
(Mitigated FONSI) supported by an Environmental Assessment3- -i.e., a joint Initial Study/
Environmental Assessment (IS /EA) document.
Pursuant to both CEQA4 and HUD5 requirements, copies of the Draft IS /EA document
have been made available through State (State Clearinghouse) and local (City of
Alameda) libraries. A copy of the Draft IS /EA has also been available on the City's
website. Notice of availability of the Draft IS /EA for public review has been published in
a local newspaper of general circulation (The Alameda Journal). Copies of the Draft
IS /EA have been distributed to all known responsible and interested public agencies and
individuals and groups known to be interested in the proposed project activities.
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines6 and HUD Environmental
Review Procedures for Entities Assuming HUD Environmental Responsibilities' stipulate
that the lead agency and responsible entity (the City) must consider the proposed
Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI),
together with any associated comments received, before approving the project. Under
CEQA, the lead agency must provide a public review period of not less than 30 days for
a proposed mitigated negative declaration (MND) that has been submitted to the State
Clearinghouse (SCH) for review by state agencies.s Similarly, under HUD
Environmental Review Procedures, if a FONSI has been prepared, the issuing office
(i.e., the responsible entity) must provide a 15 -day public comment period for public
review of the supporting EA before taking action on a project.9
In accordance with these requirements, this memorandum includes the following:
(1) a list of all comments received during and after the public review period pertaining
to the project or the associated Draft IS /EA;
(2) the responses of the IS /EA authors to all of the listed comments received
pertaining to the content, adequacy, and conclusions of the Draft IS /EA; and
a set of revisions (errata) to the Draft IS /MND text (Attachment 1 hereto) made in
response to comments received.
(3)
As the responses which follow explain, none of the comments received or associated
revisions (Attachment 1) change the Draft IS /EA (MND /FONSI) report conclusion that,
with implementation of the mitigations identified in the report (summarized in section 2 of
340 CFR Section 1508.13.
4CEQA Section 15072.
524 CFR 58.43.
6California Public Resources Code section 21091(f); CEQA Guidelines section 15074(b).
'Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 24 (Housing and Urban Development), Part 58,
Section 58.43.
8CEQA Guidelines section 15073.
924 CFR 58.45.
C: IDOCUME- 1lceliasonlLOCALS-- 11Templ4 -19-05 responses memo 647.doc
Memorandum Wagstaff and Associates
April 19, 2005
Page 3
the report), the proposed Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure project will
have no significant environmental effects.
I. RESPONSES TO WRITTEN COMMENTS
A. WRITTEN COMMENTS RECEIVED
During the.30 -day public review period, the City received written comments (letters,
faxes and e- mails) from the following four agencies and individuals pertaining to the
project and/or the Draft IS /EA (MND / FONSI):
1.
Monika Slay Pitchford, 1835 Nason Street, Alameda; December 21, 2004
2. David J. Rehnstrom, Senior Civil Engineer, for William R. Kirkpatrick, Manager of
Water Distribution Planning, East Bay Municipal Utility District; December 30,
2004
3. Christopher Buckley, Chair, Preservation Action Committee, The Alameda
Architectural Preservation Society; January 10, 2005
4. Terry Roberts, Director, State Clearinghouse, State of California Governor's Office of
Planning and Research; January 10, 2005
After the close of the 30 -day review period (January 7, 2005) the following two additional
letters were received by the City pertaining to the project and/or the Draft IS /EA
(MND / FONSI):
5. Terry Roberts, Director, State Clearinghouse, State of California Governor's Office of
Planning and Research; January 20, 2005 (forwarding letter 6)
6. Timothy C. Sable, District Branch Chief, State of California Department of
Transportation; January 19, 2005
B. RESPONSES TO WRITTEN COMMENTS
Written comments received which pertain to an environmental point and/or to the
adequacy of the Draft IS /EA (MND/FONS1) are coded and paraphrased below, followed
by the response of the Draft IS /EA authors. The verbatim written comments (letters)
with corresponding coding (added to the margins) are also attached hereto (Attachment
2).
Letter 1: Monika Slay Pitchford, 1835 Nason Street, Alameda; December 21, 2004
Comment 1.01: Commenter expresses opposition to theater expansion, stating
belief that Alameda cannot support a seven -to- eight- screen multiplex.
Commenter expresses support for the refurbishing of the theater only, stating
that the project should stop there.
Response 1.01: These comments include no specific reference to the content or
adequacy of the Draft IS /EA (MND /FONSI); rather, the comments pertain to the
perceived viability and merits of the project. These comments will be considered
by the City in its deliberations on the project.
C: I DOCUME- 1lceliasontLOCALS -11 Templ4 -19 -05 responses memo 647.doc
Memorandum
April 19, 2005
Wagstaff and Associates
Page 4
Comment 1.02: Commenter expresses strong opposition to the project design
( "huge blank box "), and suggests that if the theater must be extended, 'Why not
mimic the design of the existing theater so that the new building blends with the
old one."
Response 1.02: These comments include no specific reference to the content or
adequacy of the Draft IS /EA (MND /FONSI); rather, the comments pertain to the
perceived merits of the project. These comments will be considered by the City
in its deliberations on the project, including design review.
It should be noted in response to the suggestion regarding mimicking the design
of the existing Alameda Theater in the new building ( cineplex and parking
structure) design, that given the "historic resource" status of the existing theater,
the design of the proposed theater rehabilitation and adjacent cineplex and
parking structure components will be subject to `The Secretary of the Interior's
Standards for Rehabilitation" (see Mitigations AES -1 and HIST -1 and related
discussions on Draft IS /EA pages 2 -3, 2 -4, 3 -8, 3 -15, 3 -16, and 3 -17). These
standards specifically state that "Each [historic] property shall be recognized as a
physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of
historic development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other
buildings, shall not be undertaken." The standards also specifically state that
"New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall...be
differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale
and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its
environment."
Letter 2: David J. Rehnstrom, Senior Civil Engineer, Water Service Planning, for
William R. Kirkpatrick, Manager of Water Distribution Planning, East Bay Municipal Utility
District; December 30, 2004
Comment 2.01: The commenter describes existing EBMUD water service
provisions to the existing property (EBMUD's Central Pressure Zone) and
recommends that, if additional water service is needed to serve the project,
including water service for fire sprinkler protection, the project sponsor should
contact EBMUD's New Business Office, and associated "substantial lead time"
should be provided for in the project development schedule..
Response 2.01: The comments include no specific reference to the content or
adequacy of the Draft IS /EA (MND /FONSI); rather, the comments provide helpful
guidance to the City and CIC regarding subsequent development design
coordination with EBMUD and overall development scheduling. The comments
are acknowledged and appreciated by the City. The City of Alameda CIC will
conduct the necessary contacts and consultation with EBMUD.
Comment 2.02: The commenter describes existing EBMUD wastewater service
to the existing property and recommends that the project sponsor (the CIC)
should confirm with the City's Public Works Department that there is available .
treatment capacity within the local subbasin flow allocation to serve the project.
The commenter states that it is not possible to make a determination that the
increased wastewater treatment demand from the project would be less -than-
significant without having this confirmation from the City. The commenter
therefore suggests that the MND include the following language: `The City of
CA DOCUME- 1lceliasontLOCALS-- 11Templ4 -19-05 responses memo 647.doc
Memorandum
April 19, 2005
Wagstaff and Associates
Page 5
Alameda Public Works Department has confirmed that there is available
wastewater capacity within subbasin (insert subbasin number here) that is
reserved for this project."
Response 2.02: In response to this comment, the suggested mitigation language
(with the identified subbasin number) has been added to Draft IS /EA pages 3 -44
and 4 -29. See associated errata in Attachment 1 (Revisions to the Draft IS /EA
attached hereto).
Comment 2.03: The commenter suggests a revision to the wording on Draft
IS /EA page 3 -44 regarding possible replacement or rehabilitation of the existing
sanitary collection system serving the project site to clarify that such
improvements could occur both on -site and off-site.
Response 2.03: Comment acknowledged. The suggested revision (removal of
the words "off- site ") has been made to Draft IS /EA page 3 -44. See this change
to page 3 -44 in Attachment 1 (Revisions to the Draft IS /EA) attached hereto.
Letter 3: Christopher Buckley, Chair, Preservation Action Committee, The Alameda
Architectural Preservation Society; January 10, 2005
Comment 3.01: Commenter states that the Alameda Architectural Preservation
Society (AAPS) believes that it is inappropriate to use visual simulations and
elevations, as presented, as the basis for various conclusions made in the Draft
IS /MND concerning the aesthetic and cultural resources impact of the proposed
new project structures. The commenter states that the simulations and
evaluations show a degree of architectural refinement that is premature, given
the actual status of the City's design review process for this project ( "not yet
started and the garage architect has not even been selected "). The commenter
also states that "the facades shown on the simulations and elevations are not the
same, so it is not clear which design treatment is being evaluated."
Response 3.01: The two visual simulations included in Appendix E of the Draft
IS /EA to which the commenter alludes, Figures 9 (Visual Simulation of View from
Central Avenue) and 10 (Visual Simulation of View from Oak Street), on pages
A -14 and A -15, respectively, have been prepared by an independent visual
simulation computer consultant retained by the IS /EA consulting authors. The
simulations have been prepared to show the basic massing and component
characteristics of the project, and are based on preliminary architectural concept
drawings and associated preliminary information on both the proposed cineplex
and parking structure components of the project provided in October 2004 by the
current planning architects. The Draft IS /EA document also includes one
"Proposed Project Conceptual Elevation" exhibit, Figure 8 on page A -13,
provided to the Draft IS /EA authors at a later date (November 2004). The project
design process is ongoing. These visual simulations and architectural elevations
include the level of preliminary conceptual detail available at that time from the
CIC and its planning architects. These exhibits are intended to provide
preliminary, "conceptual" depictions of the potential basic project appearance- -
i.e., building height, building mass, and building finish relationships to the
adjacent existing theater and surrounding properties (i.e., historic and cultural
resource values). The developer will present more specific architectural designs
as part of subsequent project approval phases.
C: IDOCUME- 1lcel iason1LOCALS- 11Templ4 -19 -05 responses memo 647.doc
Memorandum
April 19, 2005
Wagstaff and Associates
Page 6
The conceptual elevations included in Figure 8 were prepared at a latter date
than the visual simulations on Figures 9 and 10, and are intended to test
alternative design concepts for architectural detail and articulation on the
northwest (Central Avenue) and northeast (Oak Street), including some
preliminary proposals for horizontal banding and a different architectural bay
configuration (curved) than depicted on Figures 9 and 10. These differences do
not affect the impact conclusions and mitigation recommendations of the Draft
IS /EA with regard to project aesthetic and cultural resource impacts- -i.e., Impacts
and Mitigations AES -1 (Project Visual Compatibility Impact) on pages 2 -2 and 2
3 and 3 -6 through 3 -9, and HIST -1 (Potential Project Design Effects on Historic
Resources) on pages 2 -3 and 2 -4 and 3 -15 through 3 -17. Following normal City .
practice, the project design review process is ongoing and such design changes
and refinements were anticipated by the Draft IS /EA authors to continue after
City adoption of the project CEQA/NEPA documentation. Following normal
practice, mitigation recommendations, included in the Draft IS /EA pertaining to
the project's potential aesthetic and historic /cultural resource impacts have been
formulated in anticipation of future design review and refinement, and are
therefore formulated in the form of design guidelines and precautions for
consideration in that process.
The following key Draft IS /EA impact statements are not affected by current
differences in, and will not be affected by future revision to, the project
architectural details as the design is refined through the course of the City's
normal design review process [bold type added for reemphasis]:
Page 3 -8 (Impact AES -1): "It appears that the current conceptual project design
would have a positive (beneficial) visual impact in improving the visual
compatibility of the project site, and in general, would visually enhance the
surrounding Central Avenue and Oak Street streetscapes, as well as the overall
Park Street Historic Commercial District east of the project site. The project
design appears to be consistent with applicable City of Alameda General Plan
policies pertaining to Downtown visual, aesthetic and urban design factors, and
with applicable U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and
Restoration. Specifically, the current conceptual design includes building
heights, scales, and setbacks which are compatible with opposite streetscapes
and the adjacent Park Street Historic Commercial District, as well as building
placement, height, scale, massing, materials and finishes which appear to be
visually sensitive and compatible with the Alameda Theater and surrounding
historic and potentially historic structures. "Nevertheless, until the project
architectural details are finalized, and these preliminary conclusions can be
approved by the City of Alameda Historical Advisory Board and City of
Alameda Planning Board during the City- required discretionary review
process, it is assumed that the project final architectural design may have
a potentially significant adverse visual compatibility impact."
Page 3 -8 (Mitigation AES -1, as revised for clarification): "Issuance of a
Certificate of Approval by the City's Historic Advisory Board for structural
alterations to the Alameda Theater with project review and comments to the
Alameda Planning Board and design review and approval by the Planning Board
would be required to finalize the architectural design of the proposed
project. To ensure that the final, more detailed project architectural design
remains consistent with pertinent City visual and urban design policies and with
state and federal historic preservation standards- -i.e., the U.S. Secretary of the
C: IDOCUME- ilcel lasonlLOCALS- 11Temp14 -19 -05 responses memo 647.doc
Memorandum
April 19, 2005
Wagstaff and Associates
Page 7
Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Restoration, retain an independent
historic preservation professional to review the project plans and
specifications for consistency with these policies and standards. The
retained independent professional shall meet the Secretary of the Interior's
Proposed Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards (1996) for
Historic Architecture, Historic Preservation Planning and/or Architectural History.
Final Historical Advisory Board certification of the structural alterations to the
Alameda Theater and review and Planning Board approval of the project
architectural design review shall include consideration of these independent
review findings and any associated design refinement recommendations. Project
commitment to this mitigation measure would ensure that any adverse project
visual incompatibility impacts would be reduced to a less - than - significant level."
Page 3 -16 (Impact HIST -1, as revised for clarification): "An independent Section
106 review by Carey & Co., historic preservation architects (Attachment D),
concludes that the preliminary theater rehabilitation design plans (October
2004) comply with the Secretary of the Interior's standards and their effects
would therefore be less than adverse and in most cases beneficial, with overall
positive impacts on the Alameda Theater historic resource. In addition, the
Carey & Co. review has determined that the proposed project, including the new
cineplex and parking structure components, would not have an adverse effect on
the Park Street Historic Commercial District, and would not have an adverse
effect on other identified and potential historic resources surrounding the project
site.
"However, review of final project design details and specifications would
be necessary to ensure that the final design of the theater rehabilitation/
restoration and adjacent cineplex and parking structure components
continues to comply with the Secretary of the Interior's standards.
Therefore, until the project achieves design review approval by the City of
Alameda Planning Board, based in part on the review and comment by the
Historical Advisory Board and the findings and recommendations of an
independent professional engaged in preservation- -i.e., is determined by
the Board to be consistent with City- adopted standards for design review
and with applicable Secretary of the Interior Standards for Historic
Rehabilitation and Restoration, it is assumed that the project may have a
significant adverse effect on the historic Alameda Theater."
Page 3 -17 (Mitigation HIST -1, as revised for clarification): `To assure project
compliance with City policies and standards and state and federal standards
pertaining to the protection of historic resources (i.e., the Secretary of the
Interiors Standards), issuance of the required Certificate of Approval for the
structural alterations to the Alameda Theater by the City's Historical Advisory
Board, and the required final design review and approval of the entire
project by the City of Alameda Planning Board, shall include consideration of an
independent review of the final project plans and specifications by a
professional engaged in historic preservation. The review professional shall
meet the Secretary of the Interior's Proposed Historic Preservation Professional
Qualification Standards (1996) for Historic Architecture, Historic Preservation
Planning, and/or Architectural History. Project commitment to this mitigation
measure would reduce this impact to a less- than - significant level."
C: IDOCUME. 11celiasonlLOCALS -- 1ITempW -19 -05 responses memo 647.doc
Memorandum
April 19, 2005
Wagstaff and Associates
Page 8
The specific concerns expressed in this comment regarding the "highly
Modernistic architecture" depicted in conceptual design materials released to
date, and the suggestions regarding a higher degree of articulation on the
building surfaces, will be considered by the City in the subsequent design review
process mentioned to in the Draft IS /EA mitigation language excerpts above.
Additional more detailed architectural exhibits will be provided for City design
review as the project advances.
The commenter suggests that revisions to the visual simulations be included in
the Draft IS /EA, including suggested simplification of the simulations to eliminate
implied surface materials and textures. Such revisions would not change the
Draft IS /EA impact or mitigation findings.
The commenter has also suggested deletions of all Draft IS /EA references to
"architectural features," "finishes," "exterior design," "architectural details" and
"project design." Such changes would not change any Draft IS /EA impact
findings. Nevertheless, some of the commenter's suggested edits represent
improvements to the Draft IS /EA and have been incorporated verbatim or in
variation by the Draft IS/EA authors and included in Attachment 1 (Revisions to
the Draft IS /EA) attached hereto (see revisions to Draft IS /EA pages 3 -6, 3 -7, 3-
8, 3 -16, 4 -6, and 4 -7).
In addition, the remaining suggested changes, and the marked up (edited)
versions of the Draft IS /EA submitted by the commenter, are attached hereto
within Attachment 2 of this response -to- comments memo for consideration by the
City in its deliberations on the Draft IS /EA and the project.
Letter 4: Terry Roberts, Director, State Clearinghouse, State of California Governor's
Office of Planning and Research; January 10, 2005
Comment 4.01: Notice provided that City has complied with State Clearinghouse
review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to CEQA. No
State agencies submitted comments.
Response 4.01: No response necessary.
The following two additional letters were received after the close of the 30 -day
public review period on the Draft IS/EA:
Letter 5: Terry Roberts, Senior Planner, State Clearinghouse, State of California
Governor's Office of Planning and Research; January 20, 2005
Comment 5.01: Comment transmits January 19, 2005 letter from Caltrans, and
indicates that Caltrans letter was received after the end of the state review period
on the Draft IS /MND, which closed on January 7, 2005. The commenter explains
that CEQA does not require lead agencies to respond to late comments, but
encourages lead agencies to "incorporate these additional comments into your
final environmental document."
. Response 5.02: Comment acknowledged. Please see Letter. 6 comments and
responses which follow.
CA DOCUME- 1lcellasonlLOCALS-- 11Templ4 -19-05 responses memo 647.doc
Memorandum
April 19, 2005
Wagstaff and Associates
Page 9
Letter 6: Timothy C. Sable, District Branch Chief, State of California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans); January 19, 2005
Comment 6.01: The commenter requests that the lead agency provide the traffic
analysis, dated December 2004, mentioned on page 3 -36 of the Draft IS /EA.
Response 6.01: In response to this comment, City staff has forwarded a copy of
the full December 2004 traffic analysis to the commenter.
Comment 6.02: The commenter requests that project effects on intersections
along Encinal Street (State Route 61) be evaluated.
Response 6.02: Based on the IS /EA initial traffic analysis screening exercise, it
was determined that the project would not have a significant impact on these
intersections.
CA DOCUME-- 11cellasonILOCALS- 11Temp14 -19 -05 responses memo 647.doc
ATTACHMENT 1
REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT IS /EA
Wagstaff and Associates
City of Alameda
April 6, 2005
Draft MND /MFONSI
Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure Project
Page 3-6
3.4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
3.4.1 Aesthetics. Would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
Answer: LESS - THAN - SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Explanation: The project site and vicinity are designated for relatively intensive
urban development in the City of Alameda General Plan and are
already substantially urbanized. The project would not have a
substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista. Other than the
surrounding views of the massive, Art Deco, Alameda Theater
structure, there are no identified scenic vistas through the project site
towards onsite or surrounding visual features. Project impacts on the
visual quality of the Alameda Theater and the remainder of the
project site and surroundings, are further described under items b, c
and d below.
b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
Answer: POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT UNLESS MITIGATION
INCORPORATED
Impact AES -1:
Note: The following impact and mitigation conclusions are excerpted
from Attachment C: Aesthetic Impacts Analysis.
Project Visual Compatibility Impact. Based on independent review
of the project preliminary design package, the environmental
consultants, with the assistance of Carey & Co., Inc., historic
preservation architects, have determined the following:
• the historic Alameda Theater structure would be used for its
historic purpose with minimal change to its defining
characteristics;
• the distinctive features and finishes that characterize the
theater, including its Art Deco marquees, fluting and bas - relief
ornamentation, would be preserved;
■ the deteriorated and modified Art Deco storefronts which flank
the theater entrance would be substantially repaired and
restored;
C:IWDIJOBS16471PRDIMND -EA 647 -sec 3 errata.doc
Wagstaff and Associates
City of Alameda
April 19, 2005
Draft MND /MFONSI
Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure Project
Page 2 -3
2.2 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (NEPA) FINDINGS
The specific findings of the Environmental Assessment component of this joint document are
included in chapter 4 and are summarized below. With the inclusion of the mitigation measures
specified in this document, the project is anticipated to have no significant impact on the
environment.
Environmental Factor
Project Impact
• Conformance with Comprehensive Plans and
Zoning
• Compatibility and Urban Impact
• Employment and Income Patterns
• Commercial Facilities
• Open Space and Recreation -- Recreation
Potentially beneficial
• Transportation
• Soil Suitability
• Hazards and Nuisances including Site Safety
• . Noise: Contribution to Community Noise Levels
• Air Quality: Contribution to Community Pollution
Levels
• Environmental Design: Visual Quality -- Coherence,
Diversity, Compatible Use and Scale
Requires mitigation
-
• All other environmental factors
No impact
2.3 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (LIST OF MITIGATIONS)
The mitigations listed below represent Conditions for Approval adopted by the City of Alameda
(the Lead Agency under CEQA and the Responsible Entity under NEPA) to eliminate or
minimize adverse environmental impacts, pursuant to CEQA and NEPA, as amended. These
conditions must be included in project contracts and other relevant documents as requirements
[CEQA Guidelines section 15070, 24 CFR 58.40(d), and 40 CFR 1505.2(c)]. See chapter 3 (the
CEQA Initial Study Evaluation) and chapter 4 (the NEPA Environmental Assessment) of this
joint document for a more detailed explanation of these impact and mitigation findings.
Mitigation AES -1: Project Visual Compatibility Impact. Issuance of a Certificate of Approval
by the City's Historic Advisory Board for structural alterations to the Alameda Theater with
project review and comments to the Alameda Planning Board and design review and approval
by the Planning Board would be required to finalize the architectural design of the proposed
project. To ensure that the final, more detailed project architectural design remains consistent
with pertinent City
C:ID000ME -11cm userILOCALS- 11TempIMND -EA 647-sec 2 errata pages.doc
Wagstaff and Associates
City of Alameda
April 19, 2005
Draft MND /MFONSI
Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure Protect
Page 2 -3
visual and urban design policies and with state and federal historic preservation standards- -i.e.,
the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Restoration, retain an
1 independent historic preservation professional to review the project plans and specifications for
consistency with these policies and standards. The retained independent professional shall
meet the Secretary of the Interior's Proposed Historic Preservation Professional Qualification
Standards (1996) for Historic Architecture, Historic Preservation Planning and/or Architectural
History. Final Historical Advisory Board certification of the structural alterations to the Alameda
Theater and Planning Board approval of the project design review shall include consideration of
these independent review findings and any associated design refinement recommendations.
Project commitment to this mitigation measure would ensure that any adverse project visual
incompatibility impacts would be reduced to a less - than - significant level.
Mitigation AQ -1: Construction - Period Dust Impacts. Reduce the severity of project
demolition and construction period dust impacts by requiring implementation of the following or
similar standard, BAAQMD- approved dust control measures (final list shall be determined to
City satisfaction):
(a) Periodically water all active demolition and construction areas;
(b) Pave, periodically water, or apply (non- toxic) soil stabilizers on all exposed graded areas,
unpaved access drives, unpaved parking areas, and /or unpaved staging areas at the
construction site;
(c) Sweep daily (with water sweepers) adjacent public streets and haul routes, as well as all
paved access drives, parking areas, and staging areas at the construction site;
(d) Periodically sweep (with water sweepers) any visible soil material carried onto adjacent
public streets;
(e) Cover all hauling trucks or maintain at least two feet of freeboard;
(f) Enclose, cover, periodically water, or apply (non- toxic) soil binders to exposed stockpiles
(dirt, sand, etc.);
(g) Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways;
(h) During high wind periods, suspend any activities that cause visible dust plumes that cannot
be controlled by watering.
Project commitment to these or a similar set of City- approved mitigation measures would reduce
this impact to a less - than - significant level.
Note: The project may also result in short-term air quality impacts associated with disturbance
of contaminated soils. Mitigation requirements for this potential construction period impact are
described in Section 3.4.7 herein under Mitigation HAZ -2.
Mitigation HIST -1: Potential Project Design Effects on the Historic Resources. To assure
project compliance with City policies and standards and state and federal standards pertaining
to the protection of historic resources (i.e., the Secretary of the Interiors Standards), issuance of
the required Certificate of Approval for the structural alterations to the Alameda Theater by the
City's Historical Advisory Board, and the required final design review and approval of the entire
project by the City of Alameda Planning Board, shall include consideration of an independent
review of the final project plans and specifications
C:ID000ME -11cm userILOCALS- 11TempIMND -EA 647- sec 2errata pages.doc
Wagstaff and Associates
City of Alameda
April 6, 2005
Draft MND /MFONSI
Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure Protect
Page 3 -7
• the preliminary, conceptual design for the project indicates that
the adjacent new cineplex structure would be visually
differentiated from the original historic Alameda Theater
structure by a lower building height and an exterior wall recess
where the two buildings meet, and would feature compatible
massing and scale;
■ the preliminary, conceptual design for the project indicates that
the new cineplex and parking structure additions would be
designed in such a manner that if removed in the future, the
essential form and integrity of the Alameda Theater would be
unimpaired;
■ the preliminary, conceptual design for the project indicates that
the new cineplex and parking structures would include building
heights, massing, setbacks, and finishes which are reflective
and respective of existing historic and architecturally
significant structures on the opposite sides of Central Avenue
and Oak Street (Le., the Alameda High SchooVAlameda Adult
School building, Twin Towers Methodist Church, and Alameda
Free Library);
• the preliminary, conceptual design for the project indicates that
the architectural features of the new cineplex facade along
Central Avenue would have an appropriate zero -lot -line
relationship to the sidewalk and street; would respect, maintain
and enhance the visual distinctiveness and prominence of the,
historic Alameda Theater structure; would effectively enhance
the desired pedestrian character of the site's Central Avenue
frontage; and would be visually harmonious in height and
finish (texture) with the existing, architecturally distinctive Twin
Towers Methodist Church on the opposite (northwest) corner
of the Oak Street and Central Avenue;
• the preliminary, conceptual design for the project indicates that
the architectural features of the new parking structure facade
along Oak Street would also have an appropriate zero -lot -line
relationship to the sidewalk and street and would be visually
harmonious in height and finish (brick veneer) with the existing
Alameda Free Library structure on the opposite side of the
Oak Street;
■ the preliminary, conceptual design for the project indicates that
the intensive zero -lot -line architectural elements of the new
cineplex structure and new parking structure, including their
ground floor retail storefronts, would serve to balance the
affected Central Avenue and Oak Street streetscapes, visually
unify the block, create an appropriate sense of place around
C :IWDIJOBS16471PRDIMND -EA 647 -sec 3 errata.doc
Wagstaff and Associates
City of Alameda
April 6, 2005
Draft MND /MFONSI
Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure Project
Page 3 -7A
the Alameda Theater, and introduce needed visual
cohesiveness within the block and between the block and
surrounding downtown blocks;
• the preliminary, conceptual design for the project indicates that
the project exterior design concept appears to be generally
consistent with City- adopted visual and urban design policies
for the Downtown and Park Street area; and
C:IWDIJOBS16471PRD1MND -EA 647 -sec 3 errata.doc
Wagstaff and Associates
City of Alameda
April 19, 2005
Draft MND /MFONSI
Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure Project
Page 3 -8
• the preliminary, conceptual design for the project indicates that
the project preliminary exterior design concept appears to be
in compliance with U.S. Secretary of the Interiors Standards
for Rehabilitation and Restoration, including standards
pertaining to preserving the visual and historic integrity of the
onsite Alameda Theater, and standards pertaining to
protection of surrounding historic and potentially historic
resources.
It appears that the current conceptual project design would have a
positive (beneficial) visual impact in improving the visual compatibility
of the project site, and in general, would visually enhance the
surrounding Central Avenue and Oak Street streetscapes, as well as
the overall Park Street Historic Commercial District east of the project
site. The preliminary design concept appears to be consistent with
applicable Citv of Alameda General Plan policies pertaining to
Downtown visual, aesthetic and urban design factors, and with
applicable U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation
and Restoration. Specifically, the current conceptual design includes
building heights, scales, and setbacks which are compatible with
opposite streetscapes and the adjacent Park Street Historic
Commercial District, as well as building placement, height, scale,
massing, materials and finishes which appear to be visually sensitive
and compatible with the Alameda Theater and surrounding historic
and potentially historic structures.
Nevertheless, until the project architectural details are finalized, and
these preliminary conclusions can be verified by the City of Alameda
Historical Advisory Board and City of Alameda Planning Board during
the City- required discretionary review process, it is assumed that the
project final architectural design may have a potentially significant
adverse visual compatibility impact.
Explanation: See Attachment C: Aesthetic Impact Analysis, for a more detailed
explanation of the Impact AES -1 finding above and Mitigation AES -1
finding below.
Issuance of a Certificate of Approval by the City's Historic Advisory
Board for structural alterations to the Alameda Theater with project
review and comments to the Alameda Planning Board and design
review and approval by the Planning Board would be .required to
finalize the architectural design of the proposed project. To ensure
that the final, more detailed project architectural design remains
consistent with pertinent City visual and urban design policies and
with state and federal historic preservation standards- -i.e., the U.S.
Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and
Restoration, retain an independent historic preservation professional
to review the project plans and specifications for consistency with
these policies and standards. The retained independent professional
shall meet the Secretary of the Interior's Proposed Historic
Preservation Professional Qualification Standards (1996) for Historic
Architecture, Historic Preservation Planning and/or Architectural
History. Final Historical Advisory Board certification of the structural
alterations to the Alameda Theater and Planning Board approval of
the project design review shall
Mitigation AES -1:
C:ID000ME --11cm user.LOCALS- 11TempIMND -EA 647 -sec 3 errata pages.doc
Wagstaff and Associates Draft MND /MFONSI
City of Alameda Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure Project
April 19, 2005 Page 3.16
Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring and Reconstructing Historic
Buildings. An independent Section 106 review by Carey & Co.,
historic preservation architects (Attachment D), concludes that the
preliminary theater rehabilitation design plans (October 2004) comply
with the Secretary of the Interior's standards and their its effects
would therefore be Tess than adverse and in most cases beneficial,
with overall positive impacts on the Alameda Theater historic
resource. In addition, the Carey & Co. review has determined that
the proposed project, including.the new cineplex and parking
structure components, would not have an adverse effect on the Park
Street Historic Commercial District, and would not have an adverse
effect on other identified and potential historic resources surrounding
the project site.
However, review of final project design details and specifications
would be necessary to ensure that the final design of the theater
rehabilitation /restoration and adjacent cineplex and parking structure
components continues to comply with the Secretary of the Interior's
standards. Therefore, until the project achieves design review
approval by the City of Alameda Planning Board, based in part on
review and comment by the Historical Advisory Board and the
findings and recommendations of an independent professional
engaged in preservation- -i.e., is determined by the Planning Board to
be consistent with City- adopted standards for design review and with
applicable Secretary of the Interior standards for historic rehabilitation
and restoration, it is assumed that the project may have a significant
adverse effect on the historic Alameda Theater.
Explanation: The proposed project includes the historic rehabilitation of the
existing 1932 Art Deco style Alameda Theater structure to create a
restored, 500 -seat cinema, and construction of a new cineplex, retail,
and parking structure adjacent to the restored theater structure. The
Alameda Theater is a locally - listed Alameda Historic Monument
(1975) and is listed in the National Register of Historic Places
(NRHP) as a contributing structure within the National- register listed
Park Street Historic Commercial District (see Figure 3 in Attachment
A). HUD BEDI grant funds and HUD Section 108 loan guarantee
funds are being requested by the City to help finance the parking
structure component of the project (see page 4 -1 of this document).
Section 106 of the NHPA requires federal agencies to review and
consider the impacts of their undertakings, including grants and
loans, on historic properties. Pursuant to this requirement, an
independent Section 106 review of the potential impacts of the
proposed project on the Alameda Theater, other surrounding historic
resources, and the Park Street Historic Commercial District, has been
completed by Carey & Co., historic preservation architects, under
contract to the environmental documentation authors, Wagstaff and
Associates. A Draft version of the Carey & Co. Section 106 report is
attached to this environmental document as Attachment D. The
Impact HIST -1 finding above and Mitigation HIS -1 finding below are
C: IDOCUME- 11crn_user1LOCALS- 11TempIMND -EA 647 -sec 3 errata pages.doc
Wagstaff and Associates
City of Alameda
April 19, 2005
Mitigation HIST -1:
Draft MND /MFONSI
Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure Project
Page 3-17
derived from Attachment D. Please refer to Attachment D for
explanatory details. (In particular, see Attachment D, pages 44
through 50.)
To assure project,compliance with City policies and standards and
state and federal standards pertaining to the protection of historic
resources (i.e., the Secretary of the Interiors Standards), issuance of
the required Certificate of Approval for the structural alterations to the
Alameda Theater by the City's Historical Advisory Board, and the
required final design review and approval of the entire project by the
City of Alameda Planning Board, shall include consideration of an
independent review of the final project plans and specifications by a
professional engaged in historic preservation. The review
professional shall meet the Secretary of the Interior's Proposed
Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards (1996) for
Historic Architecture, Historic Preservation Planning, and/or
Architectural History. Project commitment to this mitigation measure
would reduce this impact to a less- than - significant level.
Impact HIST -2: Potential Project Construction Period Effects on the Historic
Alameda Theater. Carey & Company has also concluded that
construction of the new cineplex and parking structure foundations
and walls, and other project construction activities including operation
of equipment and storage of materials, could have an adverse effect
on the existing historic Alameda Theater resource. In particular,
operation of construction equipment and storage of construction
materials could potentially damage the west elevation (Central
Avenue frontage) of the existing historic theater, representing a
potentially significant adverse impact. The Carey & Company review
has also concluded that the proposed demolition of the Video
Maniacs commercial /retail structure would take place far enough
away from the existing historic theater so that this activity would not
cause direct effects to the theater.
Mitigation HIST -2: As part of the formal agreement with the project sponsor, the project
demolition and construction manager(s) shall include provisions in the
project demolition and construction specifications, subject to review
and approval by the City, establishing a training program for
construction workers emphasizing the importance of protecting
historic resources. The provisions shall include directions on being
careful when working around and operating equipment near the
Alameda Theater; taking reasonable means to minimize vibration
from demolition and excavation; and watching, being aware of and
reporting to the project sponsor any potential actions or problems that
could adversely affect the historic theater or other historic resources
in the area. Project commitment to this mitigation measure would
reduce this impact to a less - than - significant level.
C:ID000ME --11cm userILOCALS- 11TempIMND -EA 647 -sec 3 errata pages.doc
Wagstaff and Associates
City of Alameda
April 6, 2005
Draft MND /MFONSI
Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure Project
Page 3-44
(large parking structure). Because this disruption would occur for
short durations and only at a few select locations in Downtown, it
would not be considered a significant transportation impact.
3.4.16 Utilities and Service Systems. Would the project:
a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality
Control Board?
Answer:
Explanation:
LESS - THAN - SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Due to the intensification of use at the site, development of the
proposed project would incrementally increase the demand for water
and sewer service. The City of Alameda Public Works Department
has confirmed that there is available wastewater capacity within
Subbasin 94E that is reserved for this project.
Any necessary local sanitary sewer system improvements would be
required to be incorporated into the project design to City and
EBMUD satisfaction. The City would require that any existing
sanitary sewer pipes not requiring replacement be inspected, and any
inflow and infiltration from open joints, broken pipes, etc., be
rehabilitated by means acceptable to the City Engineer (e.g., slip
lining, pipe bursting, replacement, inversion lining).
b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
Answer: LESS - THAN - SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Explanation: Existing municipal sewer mains are located under the adjacent
roadway system, sized to serve commercial buildout and full
occupancy of the project block under current zoning. In accordance
with standard City procedure, the project would be required to provide
sanitary sewer calculations that compare total projected peak flows
with historical (Le., previous full occupancy) peak flows, and to
incorporate any necessary local sanitary sewer improvements into
the project design to City satisfaction. Although there would be an
increase in average daily wastewater flow over the current amount
from the project site due to the addition of the cineplex and new retail
uses, the project would not be expected to require the construction of
new wastewater collection or treatment facilities, or the expansion of
existing wastewater treatment facilities.
CAWDUOBS16471PRDIMND -EA 647 -sec 3 errata.doc
Wagstaff and Associates
City of Alameda
April 6, 2005
Draft MND /MFONSI
Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure Project
Page 4 -6
STATUTORY CHECKLIST
124 CFR §58.5J Record the determinations made regarding each listed statute, executive order or
regulation. Provide appropriate source documentation. [Note reviews or consultations completed as well
as any applicable permits or approvals obtained or required. Note dates of contact or pages references.]
Provide compliance or consistency documentation. Attach additional material as appropriate. Note
conditions, attenuation or mitigation measures required.
Factors
Historic Preservation
[36 CFR 800]
Determination and Compliance Documentation
Compliance steps (Conditions of Approval) have been
identified. The proposed project includes the historic
rehabilitation of the existing 1932 Art Deco style Alameda
Theater structure to create a restored, 500 -seat cinema,
plus construction of a new cineplex, retail, and parking
structure adjacent to the restored theater structure. The
Alameda Theater is a locally - listed Alameda Historic
Monument (1975) and is listed in the National Register of
Historic Places (NRHP) as a contributing structure to the
adjacent National- register listed Park Street Historic
Commercial District (see Figure 3 in Attachment A). HUD
Section 108 loan guarantee funds and BEDI grant funds are
being requested by the City to help finance the parking
structure component of the project. Pursuant to Section 106
of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), an
independent Section 106 review of the potential impacts of
the proposed project on the Alameda Theater, other
surrounding historic resources, and the Park Street Historic
Commercial District, has been completed by Carey & Co.,
historic preservation architects, under contract to the
environmental documentation authors, Wagstaff and
Associates. The Carey & Co. Section 106 report is attached
to this environmental document as Attachment D.
The existing Alameda Theater building would be
rehabilitated and returned to its original use as a theater.
The proposed rehabilitation is intended to comply with the
U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment
of Historic Properties and Guidelines for Preserving,
Rehabilitating, Restoring and Reconstructing Historic
Buildings. The independent Section 106 review by Carey &
Co. concluded that the preliminary theater rehabilitation
design concept (October 2004), and the preliminary design
concept for the adjacent new cineplex and parking structure
components, comply with the Secretary of the Interior's
standards and their potential effects on the historic Alameda
Theater structure are therefore less than adverse and in
most cases beneficial, with overall positive impacts on the
historic resource. In addition, the Carey & Co. review has
determined that the proposed project preliminary design
concept,
C:IWDIJOBSI6471PRDIMND -EA 647 -sec 4 errata.doc
Wagstaff and Associates
City of Alameda
April 6, 2005
Draft MND /MFONSI
Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure Project
Page 4 -7
including the preliminary design concept for the new
cineplex and parking structure components, would not have
an adverse effect on the Park Street Historic Commercial
District, and would not have an adverse effect on other
identified and potential historic resources surrounding the
project site.
However, review of final project design details and
specifications will ultimately be necessary to ensure that the
final design of the theater rehabilitation/restoration and
adjacent cineplex and parking structure components
continues to comply with the Secretary of the Interior's
standards and this potential impact would not be significant.
With implementation of mitigation HIST -1, project
compliance with City policies and standards and state and
federal standards pertaining to the protection of historic
resources (i.e., the Secretary of the Interiors Standards)
would be assured and this potential impact would not be
significant. For the text of this mitigation measure, see
section 2.3, "Conditions of Approval," on page 2 -3 of this
document.
The independent Section 106 review by Carey & Co. has
also concluded that construction of the new cineplex and
parking structure foundations and walls, and other project
construction activities, including operation of construction
equipment and storage of construction materials, could have
an adverse effect on the existing historic Alameda Theater
resource. In particular, operation of construction equipment
and storage of construction materials could potentially
damage the west elevation (Central Avenue frontage) of the
existing historic theater. With implementation of mitigation
measure HIST -2, this potential impact would not be
significant. For the text of this mitigation measure, see
section 2.4, "Conditions of Approval," on page 2 -4 of this
document.
The independent Section 106 review by Carey & Co. has
also concluded that the proposed demolition of the Video
Maniacs commerciaVretail structure would take place far
enough away from the existing historic theater so that this
activity would not cause direct effects to the theater.
The mitigation measures described above have been
incorporated into the project Conditions of Approval (see
section 2.3 herein) to ensure project compliance with 36
CFR 800.
Floodplain Management
[24 CFR 55, Executive Order
11988]
Compliance steps are not invoked. The project does not
involve property acquisition, land management, construction
or improvement within a 100 year floodplain (Zones A or V)
or 500 year floodplain (Zone B) identified on a Federal
C:IWDIJOBSI647IPRDIMND -EA 647 -sec 4 errata.doc
Wagstaff and Associates
City of Alameda
April 6, 2005
Draft MND /MFONSI
Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure Project
Page 4-29
Waste Water
Storm Water
1
services in Alameda and would not require
additional solid waste management facilities.
Project construction has the potential to
generate solid waste, especially from
demolition of the existing Video Maniacs
building and removal of demolition debris
associated with the Alameda Theater
rehabilitation. However, this increase in solid
waste would not be expected to significantly
affect existing landfill capacity. Construction
waste would be disposed of in accordance
with the provisions of Municipal Code Chapter
XXI (Integrated Waste Management System).
Therefore, project construction will not
significantly impact solid waste management.
Due to the intensification of use at the site,
development of the proposed project would
incrementally increase the demand for sewer
service. The City of Alameda Public Works
Department has confirmed that there is
available wastewater capacity within Subbasin
94E that is reserved for this project.
Any necessary local sanitary sewer system
improvements would be required to be
incorporated into project design to City and
EBMUD satisfaction.
Existing municipal sewer mains are located
under the adjacent roadway system, sized to
serve commercial buildout and full occupancy
of the project block under current zoning. In
accordance with standard City procedure, the
project would be required to provide sanitary
sewer calculations that compare total
projected peak flows with historical (i.e.,
previous full occupancy) peak flows, and to
incorporate any necessary local sanitary
sewer improvements into project design to
City satisfaction. Although the proposed
cineplex and retail uses would increase
wastewater flows from the site over current
flows, the project would not require the
construction of new wastewater collection or
treatment facilities, or the expansion of
existing wastewater treatment facilities.
1
CAWDWOBSI6471PRDIMND -EA 647 -sec 4 errafa.doc
Currently, the project site is entirely covered
with structures or surface parking (asphalt
paving). The project would not substantially
change (increase or decrease) the proportion
ATTACHMENT 2
VERBATIM LETTERS RECEIVED DURING
AND AFTER THE 30 -DAY PUBLIC REVIEW
PERIOD FOR THE DRAFT IS /EA
JAN -00 -2005 06 54PM FROM - PLANNING DEPT +5107454503 T -231 P.001/003 F -580
MONIKA SLAY PITCHFORD
December 21, 2004
To the City of Alameda Planning and Building Department:
I am writing to share my comments on the proposed expansion of Alameda
Theater,
I do not support the extension because I do not think it is a good use of city
Funds. I do not believe the island can support a seven or eight screen multiplex. I predict
after the initial rush of excitement for a new project, the theater will stand empty and we
will wonder what we were thinking when we spent the money on the extension. I do
support retur—bisl'ling tF�e existing fti raTEr, hbtveverTtiudit tie -project 91Td'i1 stop there......
If the extension of the theater does take place, I am horrified by the ugly design
of the building. What is the idea behind huge blank box? Is this a serious proposal? It
is hideous! If we must extend the theatez why not mimic the design of the existing
theater so that the new buildin# blends in with the old one? This large flat box of a
building is one of the ugliest designs I have ever seen and I would be ashamed if our city
built it. Please consider finding new architects as the ones you are using now have
terrible taste.
Monika Slay Pitchford
00Z1Z330
RECEIRITT1
DEC 21 2004 1
ALAMI • ':.•L": 1
1835 NASON STREET • ALAMEDA, CA • 94501 510.814 -7394
JAN -03 -2008 08 :84PM FROM- PLANNING DEPT . +510T404503 T -231 P.002 /003 F -800
M • t
,4E111? EAST BAY
SMUNICIP.4LLJTILFTYOI5TR/CT '�� Q
. r.r.
'V ..,j..
*
........,....,..f.,...9,45,
December 30, 2004
Cynthia Eliason, Supervising Planner
City of Alameda Planning and Building Department
2263 Santa Clara Avenue, Room 190
Alameda, CA 94501
Dear Ms. Eliason:
Re: Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance
with Mitigation Measures for Alameda '[heater, Cineplex and Parking Structure
Project, Alameda
East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) appreciates the opportunity to comment on
the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking
Structure Project located in the City of Alameda (City). EBMUD has the following
comments.
WATER SERVICE .
EBMUD's Central Pressure Zone, with a service elevation range between 0 and 100 feet.
provides water service to the existing property, with site elevations ranging between
approximately 29 feet and 30 feet. If additional water service is needed, including water
service for fire sprinkler protection, the project sponsor should contact EBMUD's New
Business Office and request a watcr Service estimate to determine costs and conditions
for providing additional water service to the proposed development. Engineering and
installation of water services requires substantial Lead -time, which should be provided for
in the project sponsor's development schedule.
WASTEWATER SERVICE
RIWT TTYa 'Ar i n WrstrwatPr Treenrrnt Plant is antininated to have Mean= dry weather
capacity to treat the proposed wastewater flow from this project, provided this
wastewater meets the standards of EBMUD's Environmental Services Division.
However, the City's Infiltration/Inflow (1/I) Correction Program set a maximum
allowable peak wastewater flow from each subbasin within the City and EBMUD agreed
to design and construct wet weather conveyance and treatment facilities to accommodate
these flows. EBIVIUD prohibits discharge of wastewater flows above the allocated peak
flow for a subbasin because conveyance and treatment capacity for wet weather flows
may be adversely impacted by flows above this agreed limit. The project sponsor for this
projectneeds to confirm with the City's Public Works Department that there is available
capacity within the subbasin flow allocation and that it has not been allocated to other
375 ELEVENTH STREET . 0411CLAND . CI AUC07. &UO . TOLL Foss 14U6.JO.EIMUO
erol
JAN -06 -2006 06:66PM FROM- PLANNING DEPT
Cynthia Eliason, Supervising Planner
December 30, 2004
Page 2
+6107464603 T -231 P.003/003 F -660
developments. It is not possible to make the determination that the increased demand
would be less -than- significant without having this confirmation from the City. The
projected peak wet weather wastewater flows from this project need to be determined to
assess the available capacity within the subbasin and confirmation included in the
Mitigated. Negative Declaration. Suggested language to include is the Mitigated
Negative Declaration is as follows: "The City of Alameda Public Works Department has
confirmed that there is available wastewater capacity within Subbasin (insert subbasin
number here) that is reserved for this project."
On page 3 -44 under Utilities and Service Systems, the Mitigated Negative Declaration
states that the project will address the replacement or rehabilitation of the existing on -site
sanitary sewer collection system as directed by the City to prevent an increase in I/I.
Please remove the words "on- site ", as there may be new or rehabilitated sanitary sewers
that are not on site but will still be required.by the City. This approach for I/I correction
is acceptable to EBMUD.
If you have any questions concerning this response, please contact David J. Rehnstrom,
Senior Civil Engineer, Water Service Planning, at (510) 237 -1365.
Sincerely,
4-au4,4•<
-z... WILLIAM R. KIRKPATRICK
Manager of Water Distribution Planning
WRI(:ARC:sb
sb04_405.dac
JAN -10 -2006 08 :2TPM FROM- PLANNING DEPT
The
ALPA
• If.
�. t TR IL
Preservntian ,,r
Society
.+e4r41140V4
Ms. Cynthia Eliason, Supervising Planner
City of Alameda Planning and Building Department
2263 Santa Clara Avenue
Alameda, CA. 94501
i •441 r.04 /UI r -U14
RECE07-19.,
JAN 10 2005 .••w
PERNirr DENTS
ALAME„DA, CA 9.
January 10, 2005
Subject: Draft Initial Study/Environmental Assessment for Alameda Theater,
Cineplex and Parking Structure.
Dear Ms. Eliason:
The draft Initial Study/Environmental Assessment (IS/EA) makes repeated reference to
the visual simulations (Figures 9 and 10 of IS/EA Attachment A and Figures 9 and 10 of
Appendix E to Attachment D) and conceptual architectural elevations (Figures 7 and 8 of
IS/EA Attachment A) of the new clneplex and parking garage structures and reaches
various conclusions concerning the aesthetic and cultural resources impacts of the new
structures based on the simulations and elevations. These conclusions are in turn based on
conclusions presented in the Aesthetic Impact Analysis and Historic Resources Impact
Findings for the project (Attachments C and D to the IS/EA).
The Alameda Architectural Preservation Society (AAPS) believes that it is inappropriate
to use the visual simulations and elevations, as presented, as the basis for these
conclusions. The simulations and elevations show a degree of architectural refinement
that is premature given that the actual City review process for these designs has not yet
ctirtrrl onri that thP garage arrhitert hsa not awn hnrn aeleotad, Moreover. the &cubs
shown on the simulations and the elevations are not the same, so it is not clear which
design treatment is being evaluated.
While AAPS agrees with the ISIEA's conclusion that the height, massing and setbacks of
these structures will not adversely affect surrounding historic properties, we do not agree
with this conclusion with respect to "finishes ", detailing (or lack thereof), "architectural
features ", "current conceptual project design" and "project exterior design ". More
specifically, we are concerned over the highly Modernistic architecture used for the
structures and the expansive windowless and generally undifferentiated upper wall
surfaces of the cinep]ex's corner block containing Cinema Nos, 4, 7 and 8 and do not
agree with the IS /EA's conclusion that these features are "compatible" with neighboring
historic properties.
P, 0, Box 1677
Alameda, C4 94501
519- 986 -9232
3.01
JAn- IU -41.147 Ut:'LWdM rKWrLAnninu UCri TOIY1404OVO rear r.uuoiuiy r -O+c
While we understand that under the Secretary of the Interior's Standards the new
cineplex must be "differentiated" from the existing historical Alameda Theater and not
convey an image of "false historicism ", it is not our understanding that the design must
be as modernistic as depicted in the simulations and elevations.
We also recognize that the upper floor occupancy of the corner block by theaters will not
allow windows but believe that there needs to be a higher degree of articulation on these
surfaces so they do not present a blank wall. The windowless upper elevation of the
Alameda Theater itself is a highly successful example of such articulation..
We are concerned that the inclusion of the simulations and exterior elevations in the
IS/EA in effect puts these designs `ton the table" for discussion and that they may set the
tone for the actual design, even though City staff indicates that this is not intended to be
the case and that the Historical Advisory Board and Planning Board will provide input on
the overall design approach before actual design work will begin.
AAPS therefore requests:
1. That the visual simulations and elevations be simplified so that they are much
more schematic, do not look like actual buildings and show only the proposed
structures' height, massing and setbacks and delete fenestration, other openings,
detailing and implied surface materials and textures.
2. That the IS/EA text delete all references to "architectural features", "finishes ",
"exterior design ", "architectural details" and "project design" with respect to the
cineplex and parking structures and that these text changes be as specifically
shown in Attachment A (consisting of marked -up IS/EA pages showing specific
text changes) to this letter. The Attachment A changes should also probably be
reflected in the Aesthetic Impact Analysis and Historic Resources Impact
Findings (Attachments C and D to the IS/EA).
As an alternative to the above approach, the simulations and elevations and all text
referring to them could be deleted entirely and that mitigation of potential aesthetic and
cultural resource impacts be as set forth in Mitigations (or Conditions of Approval) AES-
1 and HST -1, which present the process for developing the actual design, including hiring
an independent historic preservation professional to review the project plans for
consistency with City, State and Federal policies and standards, including the Secretary
of the Interior's Standards.
Finally, we request that we be given an opportunity to review and comment on the
process for hiring the garage architect and the independent historic preservation
professional.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please contact me at 523 -0411 or
cbucklevcu alamedanet.net if you would like to discuss these comments. For U, S. mail,
2
i.vm -r rrnnn nw marl
*5IUT414010 T -241 P.008/019 F -812
please use my address at 1017 San Antonio Avenue, Alameda, CA. 94501, rather than the
AAPS post ofFice box. ...,.�
Christophe = uckley,
Preservation • ction Co
Attachment A: Marked -up pages from the Draft IS/EA.
cc; AAPS Board and Preservation Action Committee members
3
nvm -r YrwV1 II\N Vir1
+610T464603 T -241 P.007/010 F -612
ATTACHMENT A: MARKED -UP PAGES FROM TIIE DRAFT INITIAL
STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
O+n -iu- vuo uo:wr, rnuM- rLAnnlnu midi +510T464563 T -241 P.000 /016 F -612
Draft NINDIMPONSI
Wagatilif and Mud" — metic Theater, Cineplex and l'arldne sow= y *1 Alameda
b 2004
Page 2-2
2.2 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSEINIMENT (NEPA) FINDINGS
The specific findings of the Environmental Assessment component of this joint document are
included In chapter 4 and are summarized below. With the.Inclusion of the mitigation measures
specified in this document, the project is anticipated to have no 9ignhfioant intpact on the
environment.
Environmental Factor '
Project Impact -_ i
Potentially beneficial
•
:
—
Conformance with Comprehensive Plane and .
Zoning
•
Compatibility and Urban Impact
•
Employment and Income Patterns
•
Contineroiai Fadittles .
■
Open Space and Recreation— Recreation
•
Transportation
. Requires mitigation
•
Soil Suitability
•
Hazards and Nuisances including Site Safety
•
Notso: Contribution to Community Noise Levels
•
Air Quality: Contribution to Community Pollution
Levels
•
Environmental Design: Visual Quality— Coherence,
Diversity, Compatble Use and Scale
•
•
•
All other environmental factors
No impact
2.2 .CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. (UST OP MITIGATIONS)
The mitigations listed below represent Conditions for Approval adopted by the City of Alameda
(the Lead Agency under CEQA and the Responsible Entity under NEPA) to eliminate or
minimize adverse environmental impacts, pursuant to CEQA and NEPA, as amended These
conditions must be included in project contracts and other relevant documents as requirements
[CEQA Guidelines section 16070, 24 CFR 58.40(d), and 40 CFR t505:2(c)]. See chapter 3 (the
CEQA Initial Study Evaluation) and chapter 4 (the NEPA' Environmental Assessment) of this
Joint document for a more detailed • n of these impaot and mitigation findings.
Mitigation AES -1:. Project Visual
by the City's Historic Advisory Boa
Board would be required
that th
patibility impact. • Issuance of a Certificate of Approval
and design review and approval by the Alameda Planning
a architectural design of the proposed project. To ensure
hitecturai design remains consistent witty pertinent City
CAWDVOBS18471PRDIMND•EA 64?- sea adao
■
i
?ft P r2.- IP
• owm -r rrxau n• MI' 1
Wagstaff and Associates
Cltyyot Alameda
Decemt>ar e, 2004
+5107484503 T -241 P.009/019 F -812
''Draft MND/l1AFON$I
Alameda Theater. Cineplex and Parking Structure Project
Page 340
3.4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
3.41 Aesthetics. Would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
Answer. LESS - THAN - SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Explanation: The project site and vtdnity are designated for relatively intensive
urban development In the City of Alameda General PI>a.M and are
already substantially urbanized. The project would not have a
substantial adverse effect on a soenlo vista Other than the
surrounding Views of the massive, Art Deco, Alameda Theater
structure, there are no Identified scenic vistas through the project site
towards onsite or surrounding visual features. Project impacts on the
visual quality of the Alameda Theater and the remainder of the
project site and surroundings, are further described under items b, c
and d below.
b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
Answer: POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT•IMPACT UNLESS MITIGATION
INCORPORATED
bigtz The fallowing impact and mitigation conduslons are excerpted
from Attachment C: Aesthetic Impacts Analysts
Impact ABS-1: Project Visual Compatibility Impact. Based on independent review
of the project preliminary design package, the environmental
consultants, with the assistance of Carey & Co., Inc., historic
preservation architects, have determined the following:
• the historic AlamedaTheater structure would be used for its
historic purpose with minimal change to its defining '
characteristics;
• the distinctive features and finishes that characterize the
theater, including its Art Deco marquees, fluting and bas - relief .
ornamentation, would be preserved;
• the deteriorated and modified Art Deco storefronts which flank
the theater entrance would be substantially repaired and
restored;
C:IWDWOes18471PROMN .EA 8474e0 &dos
f2-01-1, r�'2�
inn— IV —rvvo VU:airm
rrtVm- rLAMMIM41 wen
Wegsteff C Al and Associates
December 6, 2004
+610!464693 T -241 P.010/018 F -812
Alunod rrr after, Cineplex and Perking Stage Project
Pie 3■
• the adjacent new cineplex structure would be visually
differentiated from the original historic Alameda Theater
structure by a lower building height and an exterior wall recess
where the two buildings meet, and would feature compatible
maser, ' - lei ,
■ the new clneplex and parking structure additions are designed
In such a manner that if removed In the future, the essential
form and integrity of the Alameda Theater would be
unimpaired;
• the new cineplex and parldng ctures have been designed
with building heights, massing, setbacks, gut iMsbes -whk , !
are reflective and respective of existing historic and
arohiteoturaliy significant structures on the opposite sides of
Central Avenue and Oak Street (Le., the Alameda High
SohooVAlameda Adult School building, Twin Towers Methodist
Church, and Alameda Free Library);
ew cineplex facade along
ntral Avenue would ha an appropriate zero -lot -fine
relationship to the sidewaikend street; would respect, maintain
and enhance the visual distinctiveness and prominence of the,
historic Alameda Theater structure; would effectively enhance
the desired pedestrian actor of the site's Central Avenue
frontage; and would b ermonious
kalmis4.0extufebwith the !sting, architecture y distinctive win
Towers Methodist Church on the oppo' to (northwest) comer
of the Oak Street and Central Avenue;
• they ew parking structure facade
along Oak Street would also have an appropriate zero-lot-One •
relationship to the sidewalk and street and would be
harmonious with the a ng
Alameda Free Library structure on the oppos a side of the
Oak Street
• the intensive zero-lot-line architeotural elements of the new
c ineplex structure and new parking structure, including their
ground floor retail storefronts, would servo to balance the
affected Central Avenue and Oak Street streetscapes, visually
unify the block, create an appropriate sense of place around .
the Alameda Theater, and introduce needed visual
cohesiveness within the block and between the black and .
surrounding downtown blocks;
• the • -• " r it : - .,; would be consistent with City -
adopted visual and urban design policies for the Downtown
and Park Street area; and
C:IWDVO5516471PROVNNaaa c 47•sec 3.00c
•fn- IV-iww vv:airM rRVM- rhAnnimY ymel
:liar astes
`odilmtrer a, 2004
+510T484603
T -241 P.011/010 F -612
Draft.
Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parldntetnittar,
a the - = , Would be in compliance with U.S.
Secretary of the 'Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and
Restotadon, .Induding standards pertaining to preserving the
visual .and historic integrity of the onette Alameda Theater, and
standards pertainingio protection of surrounding historic and
otentially historio resources.
•
It appears that the _ auld have a
•- positive' (beneficial` visual impact In Improving the vreuet oompatibllity
OT Intl pr ui+oui aloe, a ►J L ► y,,..1$11, would ulcr 17IIif 111hitiVY9 tilfl
•a , • .:, - Avenue and Oak Street etreetsoepss, as well as
the overall Park - _ _ - , ritCommercial District east of the project
site. - : to:b0 consistent with applicable 2.,N
gajamaskaseral Pjatipollales pertaining to Downtown visual,
urban design factorsi and with applicable U.S
for Rehabilitation and
opposite streetscapes
Commercial District;
..end•eemeatiblemitiithe Atarrfeda "[boater and eu • u + . I, ! , storic
and potentiaallyhietorta atructuures.
— Nevertheless, until the project
•
the City
Mitigation AES -1: 1 • . '"1` cafe• , =1Appr6ira1 by the City's Historic Advisory
oard and design revs -• approval by the Alameda Planning
Board Would be requi , =' e arohitscturel design of th
proposed project. To ensureth .. .
architectural design romaine consistent with pertinent City visuaf'and
urban design policies and with. etahe and federal historic preservation
• standards—Le:, the U.S. Sece.F iy bf the Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation and Reastoi tan', retriln an independent historic.
preservation'protesslonal ere** the completed projeot plans and
specifications for'consistenoy With these policies and standards. The
retained Independent professional shall meet the Secretary of the
interior's Proposed Historic Preservation Professional Qualification
Standards {1996) for Historic Architecture, Historic Preservation '
Planning andlor Architectural History. Final Historical Advisory Board
and Planning Board approval of the project architectural design shall
and
these preliminary ;conclusions :cad be verified by the City of Alameda
Hietorloa l Advlsory.Board and City :of Alameda Plannhig'Board during
•required.diecretlonary. revlew.prooeee, it is assumed that the
•adverse visual bffi[y gkrlplvaoLy have a potentially significant
Explanation: Sete Attachment Cr •A�esthetip Itnpaaat Analysis, for a more detailed
• • • explanation of tie impaorAES4 finding above and Mitigation AES -1
finding below.
GaWDU0BS1 471PADtMND•FA 847400 3 coo
1
r
1
1
1
1
Avg- ior 1
JAN -10 -2005 " 08 :33PM
1/1.1H.
FROM- PLANNING DEPT
L...
Waigemfrand.Assaoiates
• •. Der. mbe 0x , 2004 •
+510T484883 T -241 P.012/019 F -812
Draft MNDfMFQNSI
Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure Protect
Page
include consideration of these independent review findings and any •:r»
associated design refinement recommendations. Project commitment
to this mitigation measure would ensure that any adverse protect
visual incompatibility Impacts would be reduced to a lass-than-
significant level.
c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its
surroundings?
Answer; POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT UNLESS MITIGATION
INCORPORATED
Explanation: Same as 3.4.1.b above.
d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
Answer.
Explanation:
104 r..tgga F5
Mme/ ir&
w,PanSJ•R �/
LESS THAN -SIGN ANT IMPACT
vi; l!
The
prof • -would not involve use of any highly reflective building surfaaa
with potentials to create glare Impacts. The project would also
eliminate the high extdrlor luminaires now located within the omits
surface parking areas.
Various Illuminated aspects of the project, including the existing and
new cinema marquees and the open parking garage levels, would be
viable from surrounding streets. Given the existing highly urbanized,
downtown commercial and civic nature of these street frontages, the
project - introduced lighting effects would not be conspicuously
different than other lighting already existing in the Alameda
Downtown. Also, there are no surrounding residential uses, and
under its normal Design Review procedures, the City routinely
requires that new lighting be shielded to prevent unnecessary glare.
As a result, the prdj}ct would have a less -than slgnh7cant adverse
exterior Ught or glare impact on existing surrounding aCtivities and
uses.
lip Agricultural rte. (In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources
are sign$cant environmental erects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural
Land Evaluation and Site Amessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of
Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland)
Would the project:
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance
(Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and •
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non - agricultural use?
C1WDUOBS1647IPADIMND -E4 $47-seo 34o
SAN -10 -2006 08 :34PM FROM- PLANNING DEPT
Wagstaff and Associates
De r 8, 2004
Give. t(t)
0-f P)/1.► ,y3
N ssuc ss .y -To
fa[,v11F = CtwS Lai-'t.-3
rJr"s7'fr CaJcws�
affir
ti
14;.1.-1-,
erg 0.1,44 .
Explanation:
+3107484603 T -241 P.013/010 F -812
Alarnsda Theater, Cineplex and D 1NND'PrO 1
Parking Structure�
Page s-1s
Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring and Reconstructing Hlstorlo
Buildings. An Independent Section 106 review by Carey & Co.,
historic preservation architeots (Attachment D), concludes that the
preliminary theater rehabilitation design plans (October 2004) comply
with the Secretary of the Interior's standards and their effects would
therefore be less than adverse and in most cases beneficial, with
overall positive impacts on the Alameda Theater historic resource. In
addition th = re & Co. review has determined that the proposed
project, including ew oineplex and parking structure
components, would not haveeen adverse effect on the Park Street
Historic Commercial District, and would not have an adverse effect on
other identified and potential historic resources surrounding the-_.
project eite.
However, review of final project design details and specifications
would be necessary to eneure that the final design of the theater
- = . • restoration and adjacent dneplex and parking struoture
oompone _ with the Secretary of the Interior's
standards. erefore, until the-final project design achieves design
review approval by the City of Alameda Historical Advisory Board and
Planning Board, based in part on the findings and recommendations
of an independent professional engaged in preservation—Le., is .
determined by the two Boards to be consistent with City- adopted
standards for design review and with applicable Secretary of the 1,
.interior standards for historic rehabilitation and restoration, ft is .
umed that the • L - may have a significant adverse effect on the
historic ameda Meats `
The proposed project includes the historio rehabilitation of the
existing 1932 Art Deco etyie Alameda Theater structure to create a
restored, 500-seat cinema, and construction of a new cinepiex, retail,
and parking'struoture adjacent to the restored theater structure. The
Alameda Theater is a locally -fisted Alameda Historic Monument
(1976) and is listed in the National Register of Historic Places
(NRHP) as a contributing structure wlthin the National- register listed
Park Street Historic Commercial District (see Figure 3 in Attachment
A). HUD BEDi grant funds and HUD Section 108 loan guarantee
funds are being requested by the City to help finance the parking
structure component of the project (see page 4 -1 of this document).
Section 106 of the NHPA requires federal agencies to review and
consider the impacts of their undertakings, including grants and
loans, an historic properties. Pursuant to this requirement, an
independent Seotion 106 review of the potential impacts of the
proposed project on the Alameda. Theater, other surrounding historic
resources, and the Park Street Historic Commercial District, has been
completed by Carey & Co., historic preservation architects, under
contract to the environmental documentation authors, Wagstaff and
Associates. A Draft version of the Carey & Co. Section 106 report is
attached to this environmental document as Attachment D. The
impact HIST -1 finding above and Mitigation HIS -1 finding below are
CA WDUOSS16471PRD1MNo.a4 647 -no 3.doc
?Aril- G op- 1'1.
JAN -10 -2006 08:34Ptd FROIA- PLANNING DEPT
'/ Lam......
:, W aattafaAs'cciates
;.. City Alameda
Decatriber 8, tom
+6107484683 7-241 P.014/010 F -812
Draft MND/14Fal81
Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking ettuchire'Prblent
'Pa0i48
STATUTORY CHECKLIST
(24 CFR §58:5J Record the determinations made regarding each listed statute, executive order or
regulation:. Provide appropriate source documentation. (Note rev's*, or Consultation completed as wel!
:ea anyappioabie permits or approvals obtained or required. Note dates of contact or pages rrhrences l
Provide oqm. plane or consistency documentation. Attach adddonal material As appropriate. Note ' •
conditions, attenuation or mitigation measures required
Factors.
H'tssto�dc Preservation
[36 CFR 5001
Determination and Compliance Documentation
oompnance steps (Condttons of Approval) have been
identified. The proposed project includes the historic
rehabilitation of the existing 1932 Art Deco style Alameda
Theater structure to create'a restored, 500-seat cinema,
plus construction of a new Cineplex, retail, and perking
structure adjacent to the restored theater structure. The
Alameda Theater is a locally- listed Alameda Historic
Monument (1975) and is fisted in the National Register of
Historic Places (NRHP) as a contributing structure to the
adjacent National - register listed Park Street Historic
Commercial District (see Figure 3 in Attachment A). HUD
Section 108 loan guarantee funds and BEDI grant funds are
being requested by the City to help finance the parking
structure component of the project Pursuant to Section 106
of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), an
independent Section 106 review of the . potential impacts of
the.praposed•project on the Alameda Theater, other
surrounding historic resources, and the Park Street Historic
Commercial District, hasbeen oompieted•by Carey & Co.,
historic preservation architects, under contract to the
environmental documentation authors, Wagstaff and
Associates. The Carey & Co. Section 106 report is attached
to this environmental document as Attachment D,
The existing Alameda Theater building would be
rehabilitated and returned to its original use as a theater.
The proposed rehabilitation Is intended to comply with the
U . S . Sec retaryof the Interiors Standards for the Treatment
of Historic Properties and Guidelines for Preserving,
Rehabilitating, Restoring and Reeconstructing Historic
Buildings. The independent Section 106 review by Carey &
Co. concluded that the preliminary theater rehabilitation
design plane (October 2004), and the pr.Aminaryteciga # ee)
the adjacent new chaplet and parking structure
components, comply with the Secretary of the Interior's
standards and their potential effects on the historic Alameda
Theater structure are therefore less than adverse and in
most cases beneficial, with overall positive impacts on the
historic resource. In addition, the Carey & Co. review hae
determined that the propoeed ro eot preliminary design,
CAWGUQ881 t'►47t PRDlMND -EA 647400 440C
1
i
1
r
r
r
t
i
1
t
1
t
N
1
■
JAN- 10 -Z005 00:35PM FROM- PLANNING DEPT
• Wf•and Associates
-Decanter 6, 2004
.G► ��`J v+, 443 14
+6107464673
•
T -241 P.015 /017 F -812
Draft MND/MFONSI
Theater, Cineplex aitd Parking Structure Project
Page 4-1
.Iachldlrt�i�e pre�lminary e new clneplex end
parking structure components, would not have an adverse
effect on the Park Street Historic Commercial District, and
would not have an•adveree effect on other Identified and
:potential historic resources surrounding the project site.
However, review of `(fnei projeot design i nd
specifications will ultimately be necessat to sure that the
final design of the theater rehablltatlon/restoration and
scent dneplex and parking structure components
the Secretary of the Interior's
ards and this potential impact would not be significant.
With implementation of mitigation HIST -1, project
compliance with City polders and standards and state and
federal standards pertaining to the protection of historic
.resources (i.e., the Secretary of the Interiors Standards)
would be aaeured and this potential impact would not be
significant. For the text of this mitigation measure, see
section 2.3, `Conditions of Approval," on page 2 -3 of this
doormen.
The independent Section 106 review by Carey & Co. has
also concluded that construction of the new cinepiex and
parking structure foundations and walla, and other project
construction activities, including .operation of construction
equipment and storage of construction materials, could have
an adverse effect on the exlating historic Alameda Theater
resource. In particular, operation of construction equipment
and storage of constuoGon materials could potentially
damage the west elevation (Central Avenue frontage) of the
existing historic theater. With implementation of mitigation
measure HIST -2, this potential impact would not be
significant For the text of this mitigation measure, see
section 2.4, "Conditions of Approval," on page 2.4 of thia
document
Floodplain Management
[24 CFR 55, Executive Order..
11988]
The independent Section 106 review by Carey & Co. has
also concluded that the proposed demolition of the Video
Maniacs commercial/retail structure would take place far
enough away from the existing historic theater so that this
activity would not cause direct effects to the theater.
The mitigation measures described above have been
incorporated into the project Conditions of Approval (see
section 2.3 herein) to ensure project compliance with 36
CFR 800.
Compliance steps are not Invoked. The project does not
Involve property acquisition, land management, construction
or improvement within a 100 year floodplain (Zones A or V)
or 500 year floodplain (Zone 9) identified on a Federal
C NOVCBS16471PADLMND -E4 517402 4400
ammo
JAN -10 -2005 06:36PM FROM-PLANNING DEPT
�if.Alamiila:: •
D,eaambdr 8','2004
+5107464503 T -241 P.016/010 F -812
_ ;• _.. .:� '.:.a
Draft MK/IRONS!
' Alameda Theater, Owlet and Paridng•9tna>se aee Prefect
tie4.2Z
•
:preservation architects, hae determined the
following:
• the historic Alameda Theater structure
would be used for its historic purpose
with minimal change to its defining
characteristics;
• the distinctive features and finishes
that characterize the theater, including
Its Art Deco marquees, fluting and bas-
relief ornamentation, would be
preserved;
• the deteriorated and modified Art Deco
storefronts which flank the theater ..
entrance would be substantially
repaired and restored;
4
• the adjacent new oineplex structure
would be visually differentiated from
the original Alameda Theater :structure
by a lower building height and an
• • r . , f• ere the two
buildings meet, and ip Id feature
compatible maeeingg
• the new oineplex and parking structure
additions are designed in such a
manner that if removed in the future,
the essential form and integrity of the
Alameda Theater would be
„unimpaired;
• the new oineplex and park
structures have been des ' ed with
building heights, mask( etbacks,
hich are reflective and
respective c�i' existing historic and
architecturally significant structures on
the opposite sides of Central Avenue
and Oak Street (Le.. the Alameda High
SchooVAlameda Adult School building,
Twin Towers Methodist Church, and
Alameda Free Lib
G l W 108S16471PRDIMND -E4 647,61a 4 4oc
JAN -10 -2008 08 :37F1,1 FROM- PLANNING DEPT
"Deondrr ZO4
+5107484593
T -241 P.018/019 F -812
Draft MNP/MFONSI
Aiamsde Theater, Olneoleic end Pa idn9 nPProlect
:preservation architects, has determined the
following:
•
• the historic Alameda Theater structure
would be used for its historic purpose
Mt minimal change to its defining
characteristics;
• the distinctive features and finishes
that characterize the theater, including
Its Art Deco marquees, fluting and bas -
relief ornamentation, would be
preserved;
• the deteriorated and modified Art Deco
storefronts which flank the theater
entrance would be substantially
repaired and restored;
• the adjacent new oineplex structure
would be visually differentiated from
the original Alameda Theater structure
by a lower building height and an
ere the two
buildings meet, and :" Id feature
compatible massingj
•
the new dnepiex and perking structure
add'itio'ns are designed in such a
manner that if removed in the future,
the essential form and integrity of the
Alameda Theater would be
,unimpaired;
• the new cineplex and park
structures have been des , ed with •
building het hts, maskrt r : etbacks,
Mein are refeotive and
respective sedating historic and
arohitecturaiy significant structures an
the opposite sides of Central Avenue
and Oak Street (Ls., the Alameda High
SchooVAlameda Adult School building,
Twin Towers Methodist Church, and
Alameda Free Ub
c,twauaas+84 RnIMNa -54 $47-s ea e.doc
PAr fi e. C) oft- ice I
t
1
JAR -10 -2005 05:3TPM FROM- PLANNING DEPT
.: Natlatatt and-Aeaoolatee
DDaae 2004 •
L,.
+5107484503 T -241 P.017/010 F -812
Draft MND1FAFCN$I
Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parldrg Structure
4he- arcla�
the new
clneplex facade along C rei Avenue
would have an appropriate zero -lot -line
relationship to the sidewalk and street;
would respect, maintain and enhance
the visual uniqueness and prominence
of the historic Alameda Theater
structure; would effectively enhance
the desired pedestrian character of the
Bite's Ce Av nue frontage; and
would be�armoniou
with the costing,
architecturally di otive Twin Towers
Methodist Church on the opposite
(northwest) comer of the Oak Street
and Central Avenue;
• the(e6ibit eienew
p ng structure facade along ak
Street would also have an appropriate
zerro -lot line relationship to the
sidewalk and street and would be
rmonious
) with the existing
Alameda free Library structure in the
opposite side of the Oak Street;
• the intensive zero-lot-line architectural
elements of the new olneplex structure
and new parking structure, including
their ground floor retail storefronts,
would serve to balance the affected
Central Avenue and Oak Street
atreetscapes, visually unify the block,
create an appropriate sense of place
around the Alameda Theater, and
introduce needed visual cohesiveness
within the block and between the block
and surrounding downtown blocks;
• th uld be
oon latent with City -ado visual and
urban design policies for the
Downtown and Park Street area; and
CIWDWOBSt8471PROWNO•EA 647-sec 4.doc
• the�pre} would be in
c plianoe with U.S. Secretary of the
interior's Standards for Rehabilitation
and Restoration, including standards
sows
P,c 117 ar -J2
JAM - iu -mu u11:411IM PROM-PLANNING DEPT
+5107484599 T -241 P.018/018 F -812
Draft MNQ,MFONSI
• Marnaida Theater, Clnaplac and Patklnp &n»ctu �Pe
pertaining to preserving the visual and
. historic Integrity of the onsfte Alameda
Theater,' and standards pertaining to
protection of surroundng historic and
poteritiaily•historic resources.
It appears that th
. 'deeigiwourd ha positive (beneficial)
visual impact in improving the visual
compatibility of the project site, and In general,
would vieualty enhance the surrounding
Central A - - Street streetscapes,
ark Street Historic
of the project site.
peal to be consistent
the overall
with applicable
policies pertaining to Downtown visual,
aesIhetio and urban design faotors, and with
S. Seoretawy 011ie Interior's
Rehabilitation and Restoration,
are oompatible with opposite
the acijacent Park Street
*al District,
11)...„)
C: i wovoes16471 PRO1 MND-EA 517 .iec 4.02
1
the
'
Alameda Theater and eurroun dg historic and
potentially historic structures. •
Nevertheless, until the prof oebltaaly al.
itletatkr , and these preliminary
conclusions can be verified by the City of
Alameda' Historical Advisory Commission and
City of AJemede Planning Board during the
City- required discretionary review process, tt
is assumed that the project final architectural
design may have an adverse environmental
design impact. With implementation of
mitigation measure AES-1, this potential
impact would not be significant. For the text
of this mitigation measure, see section 2.3,
"Conditions of Approval;' on page 2-2 of this
docutent. For additional discussion of
project environmental design and visual
quality implications, including this mitigation
finding, please see Attachment 0; Aesthetic
Impact And els,
PAY:. I 1 avi- I
1
1
JAN -10 -2006 08:38PIJ Mil-PLANNING DEPT
It
M
r
w
-Wagetaff.and Aewalatee
.011y of Afamada .
Docember 8, 2.004
+6107484683 T -241 P.010/016 F -812
Draft IAND/MFONSI
Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure Project
Page 445 AL
Socioeconomic
Code
Source of Documentation
Demographic Charaoter
Changes
•
•
1
•
The proposed project would include no
housing component, The project would
continue and expand existing and planned for
Commercial uses at the Downtown site at a
scale which would not be expected to induce
substantial incremental population growth In •
the area, either directly or indirectly.
DIsplaoement ' ' '
•
. -
.
•
•
1
•
.
No housing would be displaced with project
Implementation. For any existing business
d'lsplacement which may result from the
project, relocation assistance would be
required by state redevelopment law. Seotion
8082 of Title 25 of California Redevelopment
Law (CRL) would require the City's
Community Improvement Commission (CIC)
to develop and Implement a relocation
aselatance advisory program to ensure that
any persons displaced from their place of
business would be assisted in reestablishing
frith a minimum of delay' Required
compliance with these CRL provisions would
reduoe the potential adverse impaot of the
project resulting from possible business
displacement ta. a less than significant level.
Employment and Inoome
Patterns
•
'
•
•
2
In 1996, the City of Alameda's principal
employer and business generator, the
Alameda Naval Air Station (NAS), was dosed,
with significant adverse economic impaots on
the City, Including the direct loss of
approximately 10,980 miiiitary personnel,
3,230 civilian jobs and at least 1,800 Iooal Jobs
Indrectly related to base activities. As a result
of the NAS closure, the City has been
compelled to redirect and diversity its local
economy. Plans and other efforts to establish
viable reuse of the NAS are underway. In
addition, the City's General Plan, Business
and Waterfront Improvement Plan (BWIP),
Alameda Downtown Vision Plan and
Economic Development Strategio Plan all
plaoe. emphasis an the need to revitalize the
City's Downtown and National Register listed
nark 2troot Ntotorio Commoroial Dlctriot se a
key means of broadening the City's economic
base. The project Is a core component of this.
redevelopment strategy to Improve the City of
Alameda's downtown economic base. The
C :ND1JO13816471PRDtMND-E4 547leo 4doc.
P,46•f":-
JAN ..10•2005 06:28PM FROM- PLANNING DEPT
Amid
Scatwaneenegger
Govemor
January 14, 2005
+6107484533
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Governor's Office.of planning and Research.
State Clearinghouse and planning 'Unit
Cynthia Ellison •
City of Alameda
2263 Santa Clara Avenue
Alameda, CA 04577
Subject: Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure Project
KIM 2004122042
7 -241 P.002 F -812
fr."1141)
Jan Sod
Acting Director .
Dear Cynthia Euston: • -
The State Clearinghouse submitted the above taamed Negative Declaration to selected elate agonies for
review. The review period closed on Jannaty 7, 2005, and no state agencies submitted oo:ns es by dot
datd. this letter aebnowledges that you have complied with the State Cleats hems review requirements
for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act.
Please call the state Clearinghouse at (916)445-0613 if you bave any questions regarding the
environmental review process. If you have a question about the abova•nsioed project, please refer to the
ten -digit State Clearinghouse off' when contacting This o!i!loe.
Sincerely,
,6444-z- •
Terry Roberts
Director, State Clearinghouse
•
1400 TENTH STREIT P.O. 110X 3044 $ACRAN13NT0, Cn►L1!QRN1A 95612.3044
TEL (916)445.0613 PAX (916) 3234013 vrwtaapr.ea.3ev
4,01
JAN -10 -2006 08:ZTPM FROM- PLANNING DEPT +5107414603
, State Clearinghouse Data Base
SCile 2004122042
Project TM Alameda Theater, CInephot and Parking Structure Project
LoadAgency Alameda, City of
T -241 P.003/019 F -812
Type Nee Negative Declaration
Cesoripdan The currently proposed proJsct, referred to as "option A," consists of rehabilitated of a key opportunity
site In Downtovm Alameda, Including construction of a new multi-level parking structure with 350
spaces; rehabllitatlon of the existing Art Deco style, Monads Theater.te create a restored, 500 -seat
cinema; and construction of an edjecer t 3,600 SF of ground floor retail space. A possible future
expansion of the proposed parking garage onto the existing adjacent Long's Drug site, referred to as
"Option B," would add eoproxtmately 158 more perking spaces to the garage, for a total of
approximately 508 spaces, end a net increase of another apprmlmately 15,000 SF of retell space on
the expanded aha.
Lead Agency Contact
Name . Cynthia Illason
Agsnay City of Alameda
Phone (510) 747.6800 her
email
Addipta 2283 Santa Clara Avenue
Clp' Alameda State CA Zip 94577
Project Location .
County Alameda
City Alameda
Raglan
Cross Streets Central Avenue /Oak Street / Santa Clara Avenue
Pease/ No. 071.0203 -014, p15, 018, 017
Township Range Seaton Rise
Proximity tot
!Highways SR 51
Airports oalciand Intematonal
Railways N/A
Waterways SF Say, Ooldand Inner Harbor
Schools
Lead 1/s* Cineplex / Commercial 1 Parking - CC 4 CC/PD
Project Issues AesthetieNisual; Alr Quay; Archaeologic-Historic: Cumulative Effects; Econera1esl lobs; Nolan+ Other
issues; Taxic/Hasardous; Tnaflo/Cirr ulatlon
Reviewing Resources Agency; Regional Water Quality Control Boar, Region 2; Department of Parks and
Agencies Rscrootlon; Native American Heritage Commission; Office of Hided* Preservation; Department of Fish
and Game, Region 3; Department of Water Resources; California Highway Patrol; Coltrane, District 4;
Caltrans, Division of Aeronautice; San Prandaoo Bay Conservation and Development Commission; •
State Lands Commissin
Date Received 12/09/2004 Start of Roviow 1210@/2004 Ind of Review 01/07/2005
Note: Blanks In data fields result from Insufficient Information Anovlded by lead agency.
FEB-02 -2006 02:1OPM FROM- PLANNING DEPT
1...
+6107484683 7 -250 P.001 /003 F -858
' STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Governor's Office of Planning and Research
State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit. : , •�'`-
A.-aold • , j�
Schwatzenc*ge7' i i w. 'y�, � r �„ 4M y i g Die •
Governer �`% v...• Aetizig Dir
�R41:
January 20, 2005
-r",e. "
Cynthia Eliason i
City of Alameda
22G3 Santa Clara Avenue
Alameda, CA 94577
Subject; Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure Project
SCHM: 2004122042
Dear Cynthia Elieson;
The enclosed comment (s) on your Negative Declaration was (were) received by the State Clearinghouse
after the cad of the state review period, which closed on January 7, 2005. We arc forwarding these
comments to you because they provide information or raise issues that should be addressed hi your Final
environmental document. •
The California Environmental Quality Act does not require Lend Agencies to respond to late comments.
However, we encourage you to incorporate these additional comments into your final environmental
document and to consider them prior to taking final action on the proposed project.
Please contact the State Clearinghouse at (916) 445 -0613 if you have any questions concerning the
environmental review process. If you have a question regarding the above - named project, please refer to
the ten -digit State Clearinghouse number (2004122042) when contacting this office.
Sincerely,
4444z-
Ten y Roberts
Senior Planner, State Clearinghouse
Enclosures
cc: Resources Agency
1400 TENTH STREET P.O. BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO, CALIPORNIA 95812.3044
TEL (9l6) 44$.6 13 PAX (913) 323.3018 www.apr.c .gov
5.01
FES-02 -2006 02:11PM FROM- PLANNING DEPT
DEPARTMENT .OF TRANSPORTATION
1 1 1 ORAND AVENUE
t. 0, BOX 23660
OAICIAND, CA 94623.0660
PHONE (510) 21164505
FAX (310) 2se.sst3
TTY (800) 733.2929
January 19, 2005
Ms. Cynthia Mason
City of Alameda
2263 Santa Clara Avenue
Alameda, CA 94577
Dear !vb. Elision:
+6107484603 T -260 P.002/003 F -868
RECEIVED
JAN 1 9 2005'
STATE CLEARIN3 HOUSE
Clear
Flu your pond
Ae mew ddtrlr ul
ALA•61.19.84
ALA061086
sCx• 2004122042
Alameda Theatre, Cineplex and Parldng Structure Project — Initial Study/ Mitigated
Negative Declaration (MND)
Thank you for including the California Department of Transportation in the environmental
review process for tha proposed project, We have reviewed the MND and have the following
coatamenta to offer:
Please provide the Alameda Theatre, Cineplex and Parking Structure Transportation Impact
Analysis dated December 2004, which is mentioned on page 3 -36 of the MND, for our review.
We will not be able to determine if the proposed project will adversely impact State
transportation facilities until we have had the opportunity to review this document.
In addition, based upon the mitigation measures listed in the NAND it does not appear that the
intersections along Facing Street (State Route 61) were studied in the ttmispottation impact
aaalyeis. The proposed project site is only one block away from State Route (SR.) 61, and
therefore impacts to the intersections along SR 61 should be evaluated. Specifically, the
analysis needs to evaluate the impacts of die proposed project on the following intersections:
SR 61/ Oak Street, SR 61/ Park Street, Park Avenue. Measures must be proposed and
implemented to mitigate any significant impacts to these State intersections.
Please send a copy of the transportahion impact. analysis and the above•mentioned intersection
analyses to the address at the top of this letterhead marked ATTN: Patricia Maurice, Office of
Transit and Community Planning
°Cal►roni improver molignY germ Caijlbmum"
6. al
6.01-
+6107484603
ML. Cradle nowt City of AIAIaris
Wort 10, 3004
Pap 2
T -260 P.003/003 F-658
Should you require further information or have any questions regarding this letter, please call
Patricia Maurice of my staff at (510) 622 -1644.
Sincerely,
1
ryr
TIM • / . SABLE
Dint riot 8 h Chief
IOR/CEQA
c: State Clearinghouse
EXHIBIT B
FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS
THAT CAN BE MITIGATED TO A LEVEL OF INSIGNIFICANCE
The following sets forth all significant effects of the project, all of which can be reduced
to a level of insignificance, and less than significant impacts for which mitigation is
recommended.
1. Project Visual Compatibility Impact. Based on independent review of the project
preliminary design package, the environmental consultants, with the assistance of Carey
& Co., Inc., historic preservation architects, have determined the following:
• the project would introduce needed quality architectural elements and improve the
visual image of the area;
• the historic Alameda Theater structure would be used for its historic purpose with
minimal change to its defining characteristics;
• the distinctive features and finishes that characterize the theater, including its Art
Deco marquees, fluting and bas - relief ornamentation, would be preserved;
• the deteriorated and modified Art Deco storefronts which flank the theater entrance
would be substantially repaired and restored;
• the adjacent new cineplex structure would be visually differentiated from the original
historic Alameda Theater structure by a lower building height and an exterior wall
recess where the two buildings meet, and would feature compatible massing, scale
and architectural features;
• the new cineplex and parking structure additions are designed in such a manner that if
removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the Alameda Theater would
be unimpaired;
• the new cineplex and parking structures have been designed with building heights,
massing, setbacks, and finishes which are reflective and respective of existing historic
and architecturally significant structures on the opposite sides of Central Avenue and
Oak Street (i.e., the Alameda High School/Alameda Adult School building, Twin
Towers Methodist Church, and Alameda Free Library);
• the architectural features of the new cineplex facade along Central Avenue would
have an appropriate zero -lot -line relationship to the sidewalk and street; would
respect, maintain and enhance the visual distinctiveness and prominence of the,
historic Alameda Theater structure; would effectively enhance the desired pedestrian
character of the site's Central Avenue frontage; and would be visually harmonious in
height and finish (texture) with the existing, architecturally distinctive Twin Towers
1
Methodist Church on the opposite (northwest) corner of the Oak Street and Central
Avenue;
• the architectural features of the new parking structure facade along Oak Street would
also have an appropriate zero -lot -line relationship to the sidewalk and street and
would be visually harmonious in height and finish (brick veneer) with the existing
Alameda Free Library structure on the opposite side of the Oak Street;
• the intensive zero - lot -line architectural elements of the new cineplex structure and
new parking structure, including their ground floor retail storefronts, would serve to
balance the affected Central Avenue and Oak Street streetscapes, visually unify the
block, create an appropriate sense of place around the Alameda Theater, and introduce
needed visual cohesiveness within the block and between the block and surrounding
downtown blocks;
• the project exteriorr design would be consistent with City- adopted visual and urban
design policies for the Downtown and Park Street area; and
• the project exterior design would be in compliance with U.S. Secretary of the
Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Restoration, including standards
pertaining to preserving the visual and historic integrity of the onsite Alameda
Theater, and standards pertaining to protection of surrounding historic and potentially
historic resources.
It appears that the current conceptual project design would have a positive (beneficial)
visual impact in improving the visual compatibility of the project site, and in general,
would visually enhance the surrounding Central Avenue and Oak Street streetscapes, as
well as the overall Park Street Historic Commercial District east of the project site. The
project design appears to be consistent with applicable City of Alameda General Plan
policies pertaining to Downtown visual, aesthetic and urban design factors, and with
applicable U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Restoration.
Specifically, the current conceptual design includes building heights, scales, and setbacks
which are compatible with opposite streetscapes and the adjacent Park Street Historic
Commercial District, as well as building placement, height, scale, massing, materials and
finishes which appear to be visually sensitive and compatible with the Alameda Theater
and surrounding historic and potentially historic structures.
Nevertheless, until the project architectural details are finalized, and these preliminary
conclusions can be verified by the City of Alameda Historical Advisory Board and City
of Alameda Planning Board during the City - required discretionary review processes, it is
assumed that the project final architectural design may have a potentially significant
adverse visual compatibility impact.
Finding. The City Council/Community Improvement Commission hereby makes the
followings finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the
2
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Initial Study/Environmental Assessment.
Facts in Support of Finding. The following mitigation measure indicates that the
identified impact will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation AES -1: Project Visual Compatibility Impact. Issuance of a Certificate of
Approval by the City's Historic Advisory Board for structural alterations to the Alameda
theater with project review and comments to the Planning Board would be required.
Additionally, design review and approval by the Alameda Planning Board would be
required to finalize the architectural design of the proposed project. To ensure that the
final, more detailed project architectural design remains consistent with pertinent City
visual and urban design policies and with state and federal historic preservation
standards- -i.e., the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and
Restoration, retain an independent historic preservation professional to review the project
plans and specifications for consistency with these policies and standards. The retained
independent professional shall meet the Secretary of the Interior's Proposed Historic
Preservation Professional Qualification Standards (1996) for Historic Architecture,
Historic Preservation Planning and/or Architectural History. Final Historical Advisory
Board certification of the structural alterations to the Alameda theater and review and
Planning Board approval of the project design review shall include consideration of these
independent review findings and any associated design refinement recommendations.
Project commitment to this mitigation measure would ensure that any adverse project
visual incompatibility impacts would be reduced to a less - than - significant level.
2. Construction - Period Dust Impacts. Construction dust and construction equipment
exhaust emissions during the project demolition and construction period could result in
temporary but significant nuisance and health impacts on on -site workers and on adjacent
and nearby retail, service commercial, office, institutional, and civic uses.
Finding. The City Council/Community Improvement Commission hereby makes the
followings finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Initial Study/Environmental Assessment.
Facts in Support of Finding. The following mitigation measure indicates that the
identified impact will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation AQ -1: Construction- Period Dust Impacts. Reduce the severity of project
demolition and construction period dust impacts by requiring implementation of the
following or similar standard, BAAQMD- approved dust control measures (final list shall
be determined to City satisfaction):
(a) Periodically water all active demolition and construction areas;
3
(b) Pave, periodically water, or apply (non- toxic) soil stabilizers on all exposed graded
areas, unpaved access drives, unpaved parking areas, and/or unpaved staging areas at the
construction site;
(c) Sweep daily (with water sweepers) adjacent public streets and haul routes, as well as
all paved access drives, parking areas, and staging areas at the construction site;
(d) Periodically sweep (with water sweepers) any visible soil material carried onto
adjacent public streets;
(e) Cover all hauling trucks or maintain at least two feet of freeboard;
(f) Enclose, cover, periodically water, or apply (non- toxic) soil binders to exposed
stockpiles (dirt, sand, etc.);
(g) Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public
roadways;
(h) During high wind periods, suspend any activities that cause visible dust plumes that
cannot be controlled by watering.
Project commitment to these or a similar set of City - approved mitigation measures would
reduce this impact to a less - than - significant level.
3. Potential Project Design Effects on the Historic Resources. The existing Alameda
Theater building would be rehabilitated and returned to its original use as a theater. The
proposed rehabilitation is intended to comply with the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's
Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and Guidelines for Preserving,
Rehabilitating, Restoring and Reconstructing Historic Buildings. An independent
Section 106 review by Carey & Co., historic preservation architects, concludes that the
preliminary theater rehabilitation design plans (October 2004) comply with the Secretary
of the Interior's standards and their effects would therefore be less than adverse and in
most cases beneficial, with overall positive impacts on the Alameda Theater historic
resource. In addition, the Carey & Co. review has determined that the proposed project,
including the new cineplex and parking structure components, would not have an adverse
effect on the Park Street Historic Commercial District, and would not have an adverse
effect on other identified and potential historic resources surrounding the project site.
However, review of final project design details and specifications would be necessary to
ensure that the final design of the theater rehabilitation/restoration and adjacent cineplex
and parking structure components continues to comply with the Secretary of the Interior's
standards. Therefore, until the project achieves design review approval by the City of
Alameda Planning Board, based in part on review and comment by the Historical
Advisory Board and the findings and recommendations of an independent professional
engaged in preservation- -i.e., is determined by the Planning Board to be consistent with
City- adopted standards for design review and with applicable Secretary of the Interior
4
standards for historic rehabilitation and restoration, it is assumed that the project may
have a significant adverse effect on the historic Alameda Theater.
Finding. The City Council /Community Improvement Commission hereby makes the
followings finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Initial Study/Environmental Assessment.
Facts in Support of Finding. The following mitigation measure indicates that the
identified impact will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation HIST -1: Potential Project Design Effects on the Historic Resources.
To assure project compliance with City policies and standards and state and federal
standards pertaining to the protection of historic resources (i.e., the Secretary of the
Interiors Standards), issuance of the required Certificate of Approval for the structural
alterations to the Alameda Theater by the City's Historical Advisory Board, and the
required final design review and approval of the entire project by the City of Alameda
Planning Board, shall include consideration of an independent review of the final project
plans and specifications by a professional engaged in historic preservation. The review
professional shall meet the Secretary of the Interior's Proposed Historic Preservation
Professional Qualification Standards (1996) for Historic Architecture, Historic
Preservation Planning, and/or Architectural History. Project commitment to this
mitigation measure would reduce this impact to a less - than - significant level.
4. Potential Project Construction Period Effects on the Historic Alameda Theater.
Carey & Company has also concluded that construction of the new cineplex and parking
structure foundations and walls, and other project construction activities including
operation of equipment and storage of materials, could have an adverse effect on the
existing historic Alameda Theater resource. In particular, operation of construction
equipment and storage of construction materials could potentially damage the west
elevation (Central Avenue frontage) of the existing historic theater, representing a
potentially significant adverse impact. The Carey & Company review has also
concluded that the proposed demolition of the Video Maniacs commercial/retail structure
would take place far enough away from the existing historic theater so that this activity
would not cause direct effects to the theater.
Finding. The City Council/Community Improvement Commission hereby makes the
followings finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Initial Study/Environmental Assessment.
Facts in Support of Finding. The following mitigation measure indicates that the
identified impact will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation HIST -2: Potential Project Construction Period Effects on the Historic
Alameda Theater. As part of the formal agreement with the project sponsor, the project
5
demolition and construction manager(s) shall include provisions in the project demolition
and construction specifications, subject to review and approval by the City, establishing a
training program for construction workers emphasizing the importance of protecting
historic resources. The provisions shall include directions on being careful when
working around and operating equipment near the Alameda Theater; taking reasonable
means to minimize vibration from demolition and excavation; and watching, being aware
of and reporting to the project sponsor any potential actions or problems that could
adversely affect the historic theater or other historic resources in the area. Project
commitment to this mitigation measure would reduce this impact to a less -than-
significant level.
5. General Potential for Disturbance of Buried Archaeological Resources. Since the
entire project site has been previously graded and developed, the potential for
encountering buried archaeological resources is minimal. However, some potential for
encountering buried archaeological resources does exist from the proposed new grading
and excavation activity within the project site, representing a potentially significant
adverse impact.
Finding. The City Council/Community Improvement Commission hereby makes the
followings finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Initial Study/Environmental Assessment.
Facts in Support of Finding. The following mitigation measure indicates that the
identified impact will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation CULT -1: General Potential for Disturbance of Buried Archaeological
Resources. In the event that any unrecorded archaeological or historical resource is
discovered during project earthmoving activities, all grading activity within 150 feet of
the resource shall be halted until an appropriate mitigation program is formulated by a
qualified archaeologist to the satisfaction of the City's Planning and Building
Department. Any such identified cultural resources shall be recorded on DPR 523
(historic properties) forms. Project commitment to this mitigation measure would reduce
this impact to a less than significant level.
6. Potential Ground Instability. The project site may be underlain by soils which are
susceptible to significant shrink -swell or earthquake- induced lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction, and lurching, with associated significant damage to project
buildings and other improvements, if not properly engineered to account for this
condition. This possibility represents apotentially significant adverse impact.
Finding. The City Council/Community Improvement Commission hereby makes the
followings finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Initial Study/Environmental Assessment.
6
Facts in Support of Finding. The following mitigation measure indicates that the
identified impact will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation GEO -1: Potential Ground Instability. Complete and implement the
geotechnical mitigation recommendations identified in a site - specific geotechnical
investigation and engineering study prepared to City satisfaction by a state - certified
engineering geologist. Project commitment to this mitigation requirement would reduce
this impact to a less - than - significant level.
7. Potential Release of Asbestos and Lead -Based Paint. The proposed project would
involve demolition of a one single -story commercial /retail building (Video Maniacs
structure) and demolition and repair activities involving the Alameda Theater. Both of
these structures include components constructed prior to 1979, when federal legislation
regarding the use of asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and lead -based paint (LBP)
were enacted. As commonly found in building construction completed prior to 1979,
surveys conducted by the City indicate that the Alameda Theater building contains
potentially friable asbestos, lead -based paint and four types of mold. Similarly, if the
project is expanded in the future to include the Long's Drug store property (Option B),
the existing one -story retail structure which would be demolished under that scenario to
accommodate the expanded parking garage may also contain potentially friable asbestos,
lead -based paint and mold. The proposed demolition and potential renovation activities
involving on -site structures could therefore result in the release of asbestos fibers, lead -
based paint particles, and toxic mold particles into the environment. Construction
workers could be exposed to these hazardous materials during building demolition and
renovation activities. Over the longer term, project occupants could also be exposed to
these materials if the materials are not properly removed or adequately sealed during
project construction. This exposure possibility represents a potentially significant
impact.
Finding. The City Council/Community Improvement Commission hereby makes the
followings finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Initial Study/Environmental Assessment.
Facts in Support of Finding. The following mitigation measure indicates that the
identified impact will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation HAZ -1: Potential Release of Asbestos and Lead Based Paint. As a
condition of future on -site demolition and/or construction permit issuances, a Phase II
Environmental Investigation shall be undertaken by the City of Alameda to identify any
and all ACM, LBP, and/or mold remediation measures necessary to comply with the
building demolition and hazardous materials removal and disposal regulations
administered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), federal Occupational
Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Ca1OSHA, Bay Area Air Quality
Management District (BAAQMD), and all other regulatory agencies with related
jurisdiction. The regulations of these agencies apply to the selection of remediation
7
contractors, the set up of the removal operation, and the actual removal and disposal of
these materials. Under these regulations, asbestos related work must be performed by a
licensed asbestos contractor if there is more than 100 square feet of asbestos involved. If
less than 100 square feet is involved, the contractor is not legally required to have the
asbestos licensing. However, the contractor must have proper training and utilize the
same engineering controls, protective equipment, exposure monitoring, etc., that are
required of a licensed asbestos contractor. For this reason, it is recommended that any
asbestos related work be performed by a licensed asbestos contractor regardless of the
quantity. (Most contractors without asbestos licensing do not have trained asbestos
workers or the specialized tools and equipment required to properly perform asbestos
related work.)
Lead and asbestos surveys should be reviewed/performed and a Demolition Plan for safe
demolition of existing structures at the project site should be prepared. All transportation
of hazardous or contaminated materials from the site shall be performed in accordance
with an approved Demolition Plan and Removal Action Workplan. The Demolition Plan
should address both on -site worker protection and off -site resident protection from both
chemical and physical hazards. All contaminated building materials shall be disposed of
at appropriate licensed landfill facilities. Prior to whole -scale demolition, hazardous
building materials such as mold; peeling, chipping and friable lead -based paint; and
asbestos - containing building materials, should be removed in accordance with all
applicable guidelines, laws and ordinances. The Demolition Plan should include a
program of air monitoring for dust and mold particulates and attached contaminants.
Dust control and suspension of work during dry windy days should be addressed in the
Demolition Plan.
For the impact of flaking and peeling lead paint, the requirements of Title 8, California
Code of regulations, Section 15321. (T8 CCR 1532.1) must be followed.
Project commitment to this mitigation would reduce this impact to a less - than - significant
level.
8. Presence of Registered Underground Storage Tank. The previous presence of
registered underground storage tanks (USTs) containing petroleum products associated
with the previous Texaco Gas station operation on the project site (parcel #12 on Figure
5) is indicated on a 1998 State Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) manifest
in City files. As a result, petroleum and hydrocarbons (i.e., gasoline) could be present in
underlying soils and groundwater. Construction workers and members of the public may
be exposed to these hazardous materials during project construction activities,
representing a potentially significant project impact.
Finding. The City Council/Community Improvement Commission hereby makes the
followings finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Initial Study/Environmental Assessment.
8
Facts in Support of Finding. The following mitigation measure indicates that the
identified impact will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation HAZ -2: Presence of Registered Underground Storage Tank. As a
condition of grading permit approval for the proposed project, a Phase II Environmental
Investigation shall be undertaken by the City of Alameda. The Phase II investigation
would include actual sampling and laboratory analysis of the soil and groundwater on the
project site for hazardous materials to identify the nature and extent of these materials in
soil and/or groundwater. The following process shall also be undertaken by the City in
order to more fully identify and reduce potential impacts associated with the project:
To the extent necessary after identification in the Phase II Investigation, and with
consultation with appropriate agencies, any affected soil shall be removed, transported
and disposed of in an appropriate manner in accordance with federal, state, and local
regulations.
Potential health and safety impacts associated with excavation within sites where a
chemical release has occurred would be minimized by implementing legally required
health and safety precautions. For hazardous waste workers, federal and California
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal/OSHA) regulations mandate an
initial training course and subsequent annual training. Site - specific training may also be
required for some workers. Preparation and implementation of a Site Health and Safety
Plan and compliance with applicable federal, state, regional, and local regulations would
minimize impacts to public health and the environment. The plan would include
identification of chemicals of concern, potential hazards, personal protection clothing and
devices, and emergency response procedures, as well as required fencing, dust control or
other site control measures needed during demolition and excavation. In protecting the
workers who would be closest to potential sources of hazardous materials, these health
and safety measures would also serve to protect others who live, work, or visit the area
during the temporary demolition and construction period. These measures would serve to
protect human health and the environment during site demolition, excavation and grading
activities, thus minimizing impacts associated with exposure to hazardous materials.
Project commitment to this mitigation measure would reduce this impact to a less -than-
significant level.
9. Land Use/Noise Compatibility. The projected year 2010 noise environment along
Central Avenue and Oak Street (60 to 64 dB La) would make the proposed project along
these frontages "Conditionally Acceptable" under the land use /noise compatibility
standards of the City of Alameda General Plan Health and Safety Element. The Health
and Safety Element indicates that "New construction or development [in such a noise
environment] should be undertaken only after detailed analysis of the noise reduction
requirements is made and needed noise reduction features [are] included in the [project]
design." These provisions indicate a potentially significant impact unless an adequate
9
acoustical analysis is conducted and any study - indicated mitigation needs are
incorporated into the project design.
Finding. The City Council /Community Improvement Commission hereby makes the
followings finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Initial Study/Environmental Assessment.
Facts in Support of Finding. The following mitigation measure indicates that the
identified impact will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation NOI -1: Land Use/Noise Compatibility. Conduct and submit an acoustical
study that identifies to City satisfaction the noise insulation features and other elements to
be included in the design of the project theater rehabilitation, retail and cineplex
components sufficient to maintain interior noise levels at or below City standards (45
Ldn). This report shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning and Building
Department prior to issuance of a building permit. Project commitment to this mitigation
measure would reduce this impact to a less - than - significant level.
10. Santa Clara Avenue /Oak Street Intersection - -Base Conditions Plus Project
Option A (Small Parking Structure). During the PM peak hour, levels of service
would drop from LOS C to LOS E at the Santa Clara Avenue /Oak Street intersection
with the implementation of project Option A (small parking structure), resulting in a
significant impact.
Finding. The City Council/Community Improvement Commission hereby makes the
followings finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Initial Study/Environmental Assessment.
Facts in Support of Finding. The following mitigation measure indicates that the
identified impact will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation TRANS -1: Santa Clara Avenue/Oak Street Intersection - -Base
Conditions Plus Project Option A (Small Parking Structure). Modify the signal
timing at this intersection to give the greater percentage of time to the north /south traffic
flow rather than the east/west traffic flow. Implementation of this measure would
improve intersection operations to LOS D, reducing this impact to a less - than - significant
level.
11. Santa Clara/Broadway Intersection - -Base Conditions Plus Project Option B
(Large Parking Structure). During the PM peak hour, levels of service at the Santa
Clara/Broadway intersection would degrade from LOS D to LOS E with the
implementation of project Option B (large parking structure), resulting in a significant
impact.
10
Finding. The City Council/Community Improvement Commission hereby makes the
followings finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Initial Study/Environmental Assessment.
Facts in Support of Finding. The following mitigation measure indicates that the
identified impact will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation TRANS -2: Santa Clara/Broadway Intersection - -Base Conditions Plus
Project Option B (Large Parking Structure). Modify the signal timing at this
intersection to include a north -south split phase. Implementation of this measure would
improve PM peak hour intersection operations to LOS C and reduce this impact to a less -
than- significant level.
12. Santa Clara Avenue /Oak Street Intersection -- Cumulative Conditions Without
Project. During the PM peak hour, levels of service would drop from LOS C to LOS E
at the Santa Clara Avenue /Oak Street intersection as a result of cumulative growth
without or with the project, resulting in a significant impact.
Finding. The City Council /Community Improvement Commission hereby makes the
followings finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Initial Study/Environmental Assessment.
Facts in Support of Finding. The following mitigation measure indicates that the
identified impact will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation TRANS -3: Santa Clara Avenue /Oak Street Intersection -- Cumulative
Conditions Without Project. Modify the signal timing at this intersection to give the
greater percentage of time to the north/south traffic flow rather than the east/west traffic
flow (see Mitigation TRANS -1). The Level of Service at this intersection should be
monitored and as warranted, add exclusive eastbound and westbound left -turn lanes with
exclusive left -turn signal phasing. Implementation of this measure would improve PM
peak hour intersection operation to LOS D and reduce this impact to a less -than-
significant level.
13. Santa Clara/Broadway Intersection -- Cumulative Conditions Without Project.
In the AM peak hour the Santa Clara Avenue/Broadway intersection would degrade from
LOS C to LOS E and in the PM peak hour from LOS D to LOS F, as a result of
cumulative growth in Alameda, resulting in a significant impact without or with the
project.
Finding. The City Council/Community Improvement Commission hereby makes the
followings finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Initial Study/Environmental Assessment.
11
Facts in Support of Finding. The following mitigation measure indicates that the
identified impact will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation TRANS -4: Santa Clara/Broadway Intersection -- Cumulative Conditions
Without Project. Modify the signalization at this intersection by adding exclusive
northbound and southbound left -turn lanes through the removal of on- street parking.
Implementation of this measure would improve intersection operations to LOS D in both
the AM and PM peak hour, reducing this impact to a less - than - significant level.
14. Lincoln Avenue/Tilden Way/Park Street Intersection -- Cumulative Conditions
Without Project. In the PM peak hour, the Lincoln Avenue /Tilden Way/Park Street
intersection would degrade from LOS C to LOS E as a result of cumulative growth in
Alameda, resulting in a significant impact without or with the project.
Finding. The City Council/Community Improvement Commission hereby makes the
followings finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Initial Study/Environmental Assessment.
Facts in Support of Finding. The following mitigation measure indicates that the
identified impact will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation TRANS -5: Lincoln Avenue/Tilden Way/Park Street Intersection- -
Cumulative Conditions Without Project. Add an exclusive left -turn signal phasing on
the eastbound and westbound Lincoln Avenue/Tilden Way approaches to this
intersection. Implementation of this measure would reduce average delays at the
intersection and improve PM peak hour intersection operations to LOS C, reducing this
impact to a less-than-significant level.
15. Santa Clara Avenue/Park Street Intersection -- Cumulative Conditions Without
Project. In the Saturday mid -day peak hour, the Santa Clara Avenue/Park Street
intersection would degrade from LOS C to LOS E as a result of cumulative growth in
Alameda, resulting in a significant impact without or with the project.
Finding. The City Council/Community Improvement Commission hereby makes the
followings finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Initial Study/Environmental Assessment.
Facts in Support of Finding. Either one of the following mitigation measures indicates
that the identified impact will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation TRANS -6A: Santa Clara Avenue/ Park Street Intersection -- Cumulative
Conditions Without Project. As weekend traffic increases, there may be a need to
restrict left -turn movements at the Santa Clara Avenue/Park Street intersection. This
12
measure would divert traffic away from the intersection and additional traffic would be
expected on Oak Street as a result. The level of service at this intersection should be
monitored and left turn restrictions put in place as warranted. Such left- turn restrictions
have proven effective in limiting significant impacts during the PM peak hour and are
projected to reduce this impact during the Saturday mid -day period to a less -than-
significant level.
Mitigation TRANS -6B: Santa Clara Avenue/ Park Street Intersection -- Cumulative
Conditions Without Project. As weekend traffic increases, add left -turn lanes and
exclusive left -turn signal phasing on the eastbound and westbound Santa Clara Avenue
approaches to Oak Street. Implementation of this measure would improve Saturday mid-
day peak hour operation to LOS D, reducing this impact to a less - than - significant level.
16. Santa Clara Avenue /Oak Street Intersection -- Cumulative Conditions Plus
Project Option A (Small Parking Garage) or Project Option B (Large Parking
Garage). Operations at the Santa Clara Avenue /Oak Street intersection would degrade.
from LOS E to LOS F during the PM peak hour with the implementation of project
Option A (small parking structure), resulting in a significant impact. Intersection
operations would remain at LOS E in the PM peak hour with implementation of project
Option B (large parking structure).
Finding. The City Council/Community Improvement Commission hereby makes the
followings finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Initial Study/Environmental Assessment.
Facts in Support of Finding. The following mitigation measure indicates that the
identified impact will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation TRANS -7: Santa Clara Avenue /Oak Street Intersection -- Cumulative
Conditions Plus Project Option A (Small Parking Garage). Implementation of
Mitigation TRANS -3 above would improve PM peak hour intersection operation to LOS
D, reducing this impact to a less - than - significant level for project Option A (small
parking structure).
17. Lincoln Avenue/Tilden Way/Park Street Intersection -- Cumulative Conditions
Plus Project Option A (Small Parking Garage) or Project Option B (Large Parking
Garage). For project Option A (small parking structure), the Lincoln Avenue /Tilden
Way/Park Street intersection would degrade from LOS E to LOS F during the PM peak
hour resulting in a significant impact. For project Option B (large parking structure),
intersection operation would remain at LOS E in the PM peak hour, but delays would
increase.
Finding. The City CouncillCommunity Improvement Commission hereby makes the
followings finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the
13
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Initial Study/Environmental Assessment.
Facts in Support of Finding. The following mitigation measure indicates that the
identified impact will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
17. Lincoln Avenue/Tilden Way/Park Street Intersection -- Cumulative Conditions
Plus Project Option A (Small Parking Garage) or Project Option B (Large Parking
Garage). The adding of exclusive left -turn signal phasing on the eastbound and
westbound Lincoln Avenue/Tilden Way approaches to this intersection (Mitigation
TRANS -5) would result in LOS C operation in the PM peak hour for both project
options, thereby reducing this project - related impact to a less - than - significant level.
18. Santa Clara Avenue/Park Street Intersection -- Cumulative Conditions Plus
Project Option A (Small Parking Garage) or Project Option B (Large Parking
Garage). The Santa Clara Avenue/Park Street intersection would degrade from LOS E
to LOS F during the Saturday mid -day peak hour with the implementation of project
Options A or B, representing a significant impact.
Finding. The City Council/Community Improvement Commission hereby makes the
followings finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Initial Study/Environmental Assessment.
Facts in Support of Finding. ' Either one of the following mitigation measures indicates
that the identified impact will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation TRANS -9A: Santa Clara Avenue/Park Street Intersection -- Cumulative
Conditions Plus Project Option A (Small Parking Garage) or Project Option B
(Large Parking Garage).. As weekend traffic increases, there may be a need to restrict
left -turn movements at the Santa Clara Avenue/Park Street intersection (Mitigation
TRANS -6A). This measure would divert traffic away from the intersection, resulting in
additional traffic on Oak Street. The level of service at this intersection should be
monitored and left turn restrictions put in place as warranted. Such left- turn restrictions
have proven effective in avoiding significant impacts during the PM peak hour and are
projected to reduce this intersection impact during the Saturday mid -day period to a less -
than- significant level.
Mitigation TRANS -9B: Santa Clara Avenue/Park Street Intersection -- Cumulative
Conditions Plus Project Option A (Small Parking Garage) or Project Option B
(Large Parking Garage). As weekend traffic increases, add left turn lanes and
exclusive left -turn signal phasing in the eastbound and westbound Santa Clara Avenue
approaches to Park Street (Mitigation TRANS -6A). Implementation of this measure
would improve Saturday mid -day peak hour intersection operation to LOS D, reducing
this impact to a less - than - significant level.
G:\ PLANNING \SPECPROJ\Alameda Theater \Theater MND Findings (Revised).doc
14
City of Alameda Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration
April 19, 2005 Mitigation Monitoring Program
EXHIBIT "C"
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR THE ALAMEDA THEATER,
CINEPLEX AND PARKING STRUCTURE PROJECT
The following mitigation monitoring and reporting checklist has been formulated for
implementation of environmental impact mitigation measures identified in the Initial
Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure
Project document, dated December 6, 2004, and adopted by the City of Alameda in February
2005.
A. STATE MITIGATION MONITORING REQUIREMENT
Section 21081.6 of the California Public Resources Code requires all public agencies to adopt
mitigation monitoring and reporting programs when they approve projects subject to an EIR or
mitigated negative declaration. As mandated by this legislation, a mitigation monitoring and
reporting program must be implemented by the lead agency (the City of Alameda) for the
Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure Project subsequent to City adoption of the
mitigated negative declaration for the project.
Most of the mitigation measures (conditions for mitigated negative declaration) identified in the
Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure Protect Mitigated Negative Declaration
document have been incorporated into the project. As a result, most of the measures are being
or will be implemented and monitored through the City's normal development review procedures
for future project implementation actions- -e.g., through design review and/or conditions of
approval for individual permits, and associated plan check and construction period field
inspection activities necessary to carry out the project.
B. MATRIX FORMAT
The attached monitoring checklist includes spaces for: (1) a summary of each potentially
significant impact identified in the Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration document; (2) a
summary of each mitigation measure identified in the Initial Study /Mitigated Negative
Declaration document that has been adopted as a condition of project approval by the City; (3)
identification of the entity responsible for implementing the mitigation; (4) identification of the
entity responsible for verifying that the mitigation has been implemented; (5) identification of the
implementation action required and associated timing requirements; and (6) a verification
signature and date.
C :IDOCUME -1I celiasonl LOCALS -11 Tempi mmp.647. doc
EXHIBIT "C"
1
a
5
N
t
7 fA
E03
.0
g .a
8 o
S
E
86
Rg
E
£ w
151 1 c
8-0
fig!
E '3
m c
am
EE
m 5
F a
0.=
-8;2:
>0
o E
0. 0
>, o
N
c c
C C
m
co
L
� m
r r
m 8
tc
as
C L
m m
a E
m
m
m $
c o
51
0
g m
m 4
g.a
0
iI
MONITORING
C '
Eg
FCC
C f0
m O
el
0
VI$>
U
E
W
0
v 0.
c o
m m
U�
RELATED MITiGAT1ON MEASURE
m
L
m m
i mE m m o0 o o =° N 4g i e _ ac gm m "c a m m m c3 s ( m '? ac5 v i ro
m
a.nabc') 4" o arnc « o-0
E om 8.m°mmc sfi
)a m3 0=U°��LL�o m
v >a, .0-w, mc 1 -od0 0
To °°m °mvEi$ °CyzZ�0...-007-0.-0=m-0
«EapmmcmviUZp m a nmnmc
moe — e 0000•N
02 vc u75- 111 4a a �
m 0ppZ'l- o i3 cv v m o - i m °m >vpa:cwc r° `c 0ccv
Z •$ om v o ....s t °m� v E m $o
�
a>3Emro m$ 4N«` oEEY3v -yaZ u0 omocp
7 c 3 °
m m •m E m .
77 c U m Ec c 2 R v L y C m V O C 0 0 N v %
w E_-7ve mas- 00 (0,00,0— Er'0m{mEo
w 5 8N.0o> m ccn o- yrodwome,me E°>,-
fox a 7N 0m-0 jmm Nn > :a"c Q vo�_7 ,0 ccE- Pmav5 mmE
)
O c v cm m Yu y N c °o � c s mv' y maF z�c c.°moQ0� @cmc�F mpc 1WUigUTgcv N- 2)52c °3 Eoro
oi co°m°" =Emtdcmcc mofim2mEc5mo0 0•2nn. iatai> l8.
IDENTIFIED IMPACT
AESTHETICS
7,- m •: �- _
�cq �m r m om -� m
o .7_- co> �� 6 "ii °c 3cm mm m
O/ > U
m oc 'om 0o NE- =v mmv mc°omN
aaif�m§ vo 0E rO1�m ��c om.cm6 0
o00m0_° ami° yao, vcm0a�i ¢ � ° cE unil
c 13 -.—C ''.q 0
>40—en NC •SNm -o• omB' vccOCC Came °.C� 'O
v mEr E £
!IJ m o,0 0,�. 3 c»-� '0 c9 rn! °•_w cco
�cvc04 °mo 3 � �c•� osv00 >mQ'.°F g = zvEcmm 0
; WEJ8= .o.' E c,5s2Y, 2g Elq mg� m Tm 5 o U
V01,200. ,g a =0 E E2 '52oCEO vQm� cva•�'_gc'2°k1 c
ii i �i (02 fim n'> 6 3 E o 6 cciD o 6Q 3 fiat o. 3 cca fi
EE° >0
• ■ •
— — naci O liS
O
O
CC 2
0
0
pt
WO
O
Z
CC
0
t
2
Monitoring and
Verification Entity
A.
AW
W
cc
0
N
1
2
z
O.
F
a
0
E
2
0
W
5
W
IX
Tv m
C,C Of
C m L
Et~
0! l0
V m
E
7 m as
y y Q
�wm
m6-o
F.. rnfiom
omm
C m m
, C d
LAI E-m7
w
Zv�oo
ca6.23
0
U c
y t N y C
a) c a/.._) m t0
7 'd U L '" m C
tL4a .8cL.°�
pC C
y y> O1L as
y --p y¢ 2 L
rn =L m.. mom
c 7 y C •o 0 7
L w O� m L L
€'v��m��V _
.o.g5t°)V¢=4!) -E"
c� myo •)0
NC O. A0 m¢O
U m 0)(1)-000<601 3
3 .Z `
0.
yy �j 8"' QQ
cmymh0 oY=CE
mcaca��mca53ro
6LE 6OrnH¢
m _ ; •y C C C C m c m o g
m .. O.L . >.`� 2t co m al Z lad a•O
7 C N m U 'o C— 7 U m .Y O L m II m m. O• U m
3c «�"c�'�'m�c 0 3Ngm° -)O) ` vc -o.�_fi
N N 1 O1 C m U y M u) Y N C 7 + N— y C
C Q U L'. C _ y> ...'o O C Q N. L 'y Q T yy •C G
m C c E y"C a) m L >, •c •' m m 'O' G •R m•' v. o) 3 -- C C
Td mo m am .,- 0) «.c m t c mymN
N 01 .O .m-. y ,O ,C O C lC y Y m U x •- .�.. O y
O C M Y c 0- "a � m 5 r= L m m O 2 a -Na �o g o -0 2� 7 c C .9 .2 1-13 2
dU1tl3c_�Ctc 3� OE ayima3o� Y m- c°U >Ccl)C
Zgla:0.42m k- E.E:cycoi> �aSE `° cc3 m-°E,c1-.�
co.- `hoc ccnv.� cvv 0O aiOm
)�.ay,1 m N m°. N o) asoff¢ 1Cmt)-,m °uI:h :g� o JJVI -) "8 m m o N
• >�
•i" v- at L y O '.� f0 •1`- O m v C lL y .
-0 C o , 0 m >
U m c v U m§ m 2 a) o .0 m t .0 •0 1 m c !3 •0„0(( m 'p
asN7p77L 7mC0 C m CGa dLmy CmaC (AYC0)
mco�oy�'oaai >m• §a mco'om'o� ma. • a)mmo�Y000�
6'03 E." F•-ofn £+a323:c¢o ZmcrnQc7.omc
• •
C :IDOCUME 11cm userILOCALS- 1(Templmmcht647.doc
8
O>
0.
N
0)
lC
d
C :IDOCUME 11cm userlLOCALS- 11TempVnmcht64zdoc
MONITORING
e 2
E
F cr
Monitoring and
Verification Entity
E l
W
IRELATED MITIGATION MEASURE
IIDENTIFIED IMPACT
C :IDOCUME 11cm userlLOCALS- 11TempVnmcht64zdoc
8
o2
0
Z�
E2.
0
WO
CC 2
MONITORING
lg
Per
0
E
m
n
0
d
P o
RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE
' O
'U y > m C
v yCS E m ▪ C' 0 X ro t G ro V N 0
ro o m y a a O 3 7 o m=m ro a� 0 E Vi c m a MI >, is 112
-,,o- o gill a a.. o ro'0 co cz vlo • m o °' O m 6 ` °0 o °� m t 3 L C m m nO >C a
a v • ao m Ma; ` 3:m m3 �
k° °= am v Om... a)c C Cd ro ro m u a N tog
O 'c 0) mro E y ro oQ O a 0) °13243 V-aL tm ao ro > • °m o 3 c $ >o m= m u c ! o NN s
m= mH °� ° q� :°m Y m 12 ma= 3° ! v - 'c a 3 m o omm mE h c m m
o m m N rn
>mm� ro rn n� 2 o° % N> a m f)cc C
, a > mg > 1 > 3
= o
o m mvE -m
ro C ?^m $o ff v _ c 0c m
73-0-0 m ro _ .CCD O= 'O L .g E
Q C v• �ro ` a t c a o) 'E
_ mv ,,m o ro° > o c a m o ° lima
o o � N O am? .o N ° E
m N C
mos ow Z - 0 d =mm o a m {i- Q j _ >. m"1palgro_ a _ i ah(02,156 i6 i U v cy aEo oE a o m wc ro E gva E ro ° �'o c cr za ro{ o m i _O _ �4c rn E �,fi Et;
IDENTIFIED IMPACT
A
6 4
-
c-
01;
RR
O E
O 0
ro
t �
017
E
c
rnm
-o m
C :IDOCUME 11cm userILOCALS 1(Templmmcht647.doc
w
ami
MONITORING
U
0.
0
m
RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE
_ C y 0 C Jd G ro c 1 •a°
O 0 U m
p▪ 0Z` 80 a 0iEoa,,,o-0aa�yiO?? c0.2
o 0 � �fi
_• p ._t ° =mo ..iofomm2': Oa
;°m3•mo0r Fa°,`o¢mccm y.6oE
O c0i ocV °�CDov000otio�a,H
a ▪ `o E4fi m c0- mU 0 o °~ tr_z e,E m
17. r, r 0.s o m pm E'. m fp C U N « - T� -
c 0O-rnfpO 'wm No0 my's)Q3 W
3 0, av c 0 V p.%'0 0. c C E a m Chi -2 roam 2
z f0• 0nt` m7m� °amm9°ro °cyEfivc
2W fa a" { .oEac,mcaaitr=nZ(0aZE'vli
IDENTIFIED IMPACT
CULTURAL RESOURCES
CD .0
o . i c f0 o
CO a) • 8 y • a`
C � C N C ;060-0 c
rEp • ° 0 C C Z C
rnc�Z �Ff"oo0�im€C naj m 9 2 0 30 p
E 8•c0n
ro �m
a �°cEdv m °gym Fvc wog iN ZOO a - °cc oE.c
- d� ° '° co c arn it' ic ava G°EN c, o.n°)
dep)'o _ c ° m0y mV C L): 7 � 23mEro0in�ao£E�o 5 0) cE•oi�$royaroLO> o¢ m O •c O U y a m U N N O •O c t 0, o p N C
0 ooLa aa�•0 U c �mE 'm°3c {
° ° N c o m d$ m dv 0 m, - '3m- . fo - c o { O's 60 7.) . 3 o
2i-° c m U 0 v'0 rn � 'v
Ofn?p -0 2h " -0 a>'c8 S,0_U >6° = -cm
la a G .- .C42) C?) - ,.:g m_'dro` €° m' .:_cog c°c{a'mr >�a c ar
1:,-..2 m °�0 - ¢ c c c 3 0 c
�°og c o E Zc °.•E_ m ou@! '.�m ( v'1 'o
, d o� a) -(4 i p)0,LD� fi v•> y iE_ to
4 g2'°vio'E'e- rE2>:0082 2t cae22
o°�my. �Ea0 =°0,Emjy.rus E mfrrn0 . o mmi 3)4mv'm.. a=� '°ggt8ct't:ia'$v5mPa §c§mt .w'o, �a=-.°' >
c v� (0 ....
o.43 ` w- wa -
v
t
> fi3m�ma. u d & 8 fg1 �ugfdro U >�
~5 E'Sa ioe?V tdN 8mQScUa) $vf2°'� ..,...` 1c„0c>
g2 l0 . fn . J v .. .o m C o c L 0 c p 2 C1 i p 0 m o >. •N . c O o w. c E z o¢ � ?.. h .m ;@ m A L 0 ` fn C a fa _ , 0 c z E c 'a c > m.0O, 2 " o 0
u •cYu,a ome•ca =.$r0n m ° � E ommo2 d .m y � >o.w 1-2a �i m c�oca1.9 w m. '
a trofo82arom =ES•cm2Qm o-mtg' 006:EaavaZEEam d:3.P
w amEdcm0m�`°c mcQ o�yEc•- sE0ao Emda���i2 o mrqq 0o. w
(0
0
F¢
0
0
0
a
0
CD
m
0
a)
0
m�'
00
a
0
0
RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE
Ecc
z
0
v C m a C N H N
0 t; 1' D)� 0ca�n O
°r CI 0) 0 m
c m co vi 0) aC oa vi > o d
W -a00>C 0 mc.. .W.0 Ca)Um ca
4± = ro my m c2 U c 8.v•c.1 E
G) a) E$ O co a0� m'•OL c - p -
o •- 3
a! «°0rnm 00o0om .,� ) °yE'-
ocmm02 v00)0mEvm 3m;� om
ao gmtacm��}0;;0Emynfimo8
E m m i o 0.via 3-._ E m E _£ E `o o m-
.5Lu act m o 0 c av of cook avm
v 0 Q { 'F. m O C m cp ns E T. ° 2 7
dp¢a cc0i oaaQo >cam §0
• mm §c UcndOggcxo0 °c Csicsi
Zom c00,° >RS o
° , m corc mEv°
e c
o °- O ,T, -o
W m O a ° 0- NC 2
00mv ' Oto)Eooro 63aoom cm5m
rom m Ecaao0'SE m°a
�00 ci 8on•+
204 v0 0 a 0. cv cu in m •.E
1
Ts
v$m °mc� a) 8 0
o To' a ql 0) m .0 R) O l0 m ° 0 �+
0 •c !0 p 0 E a 7 m 6 0 ca p m 0 C
>" 3 v a 2 N V p o c°) U = 3 0 0 0=
L c C c C t 28 m 4) D O 2 m 2 2 a) O
v=Emctmm.- o•ENrTmE -gg�
a O p o 0 c E m y 2 d c e c v E a comma
c°cv�av yEii vm« Um
W > o 7 0 C C .. m =. '+ V> T O m
VIII et3 ° pm Em?)0cn ge
s�` me °>Ec i_�cosnEo)m
Na .. ft 800 fi088° p (88:���°.o• omvccm£0w
tiLE06c macid•.0�
ESirgol-acifirD'alEalliiil
v U
c N O 00••
oo .... N cn
— 8 O
m co m ai ap
mmmco0 4cr o2a° oE
4)80 )4) E
m a>m; °
mm.sr a p pE
v
E< qqg c� 16avvfiv�
Emara,,,. mood
o ro - . a 3 .
': m " "o a7 m Tm C
�c0LO oE C g•�c�
a m
mo<01 c C
p) 7 0 L c • 7. q) 7 m co
t m E 0 a a i v° , o E>,
2COC ov roses `3O 20.E-92
GEOLOGY AND SOILS
C: DOCUME 11cm userILOCALS 1l%mplmmcht647.doc
N 6 da 2a c i U
O 0. a)z cl of � z c i u; o mV 5
�;E d � -a� c aE � of E a>i
=p V` `gaz,AN8�A.@ LBrg E$cgC g ii - 2
2 8.5:1. g Z N 7 O.0 do O= y r g o a
0 o.y8y8v0m28g`85.b8 U(et'o $2'888E8
4E).2
iU c
U a� O G.
2-0E00
«1 c +c 0
calccc
co o8m
E EL)
Qo p2oc
o E 8 g
CL al au
g Y3
0 a
a a Zt
C
i C
'S iv yd
O
c
'0
E
a)
Q O A
a y
c
1 o 0
m E m
c a ._ h
a I
c �
2 °C .O V
• .o 0 W
a m
co c o • 7 a 6
loal
0 0 9
O u U
m
.0 m
aa)i a1 r
H
c m
> o
m • c
IT E 'c
0. m '0
E E c
m o • 8
_▪ c c
ar r E
o O `o
g a co N
m 0 C
jg C Qj
ca y O _ — .0 C (a
m a) O a
c.
7 ▪ -a d To
` Qo
, • a 0 a- U--,
3 m t a
c m
C 3
m O o o W
0.0 0 (0 o 'C
0 A CO C O
C
• a cm ▪ m m
rr r C i
asm a 0O
7
alt F. - a
Ili E o
-8 To ,- a c
o•- w
m
n ° o 2 0
a) a IS ca E
co 0 (0 0l C
Q a O ▪ 2 O
y
n' N.0
O m O
C .0 • 3 f0
U o U 0
0 .C) 0 a
0 (a 7 �
▪ o • a 8
0 m C CC 2
•O m D
al y
t '3
F- c N CO m n
r E N c0= (as
e a
0 0
C :IDOCUME 11cmuser1LOCALS 11Templmmcht647.doc
•
•
r
X
a)
a)
MONITORING
E
c
E$
Fay
co
o "g g
To Z=
o
o ca6mo
v Ef,
o o c a
ag822
Monitoring and
Verification Entity
0
E
IRELATED MITIGATION MEASURE
°
3
m
N
o
.00
t
o.
>.
a)
O0
a
c To
N a)
O N a t v 7
-C 171 O N c N .1 y ._ I— "O L
.° O.Et j m m o _ C
IF O L� C0 D .N v m f0 CO E .- a7 C a. a) C co
aO NNZO O = LEVyv1�6a7 0) .0.1 0•O
° C O >. G
v m °o.2 3 EL O arc E m.O E -o c.0b°v ro
762 C+ oU�NCCCma)0'0o)0oa)'CCCQ
Cot: Eo1C0alc�_�oa"2'550=00O.o o
0 -G — 'O (tl a o 8 .o « — y a) 12 as c N .0 =
m ro rnQ m 8 c o$)'E•$ c a `�.ca ° Ti Oo rno
0 co
u)i`°mEE.SE- EpOEoc 0010 0
0 0 .2 eis c+0 >-
m o c °.° € m o ow �•—°c a o� cv E 3 c
2mra`O.°t0r3OVV , oc .0aomo,ao °m
C m m 0 0 0 4 12 c o ai O d 0 O d .0.0 C v o CO
m 3-o y12 .0 g_Q'OtP N v C EC 8O 2L m„
•5 »O- a) a) a p{ 0 m •V a) ms O a .O t o a)
J•_ at co .c N at at�w cccc aat N a0 E at u) .o
_
c
lC r°-r
a) O
mUr
coal C rE
C EU
mOU
°- i
•o 0 .
F,
2F0
•o
o m
mro�o
E ..... vs O m
a1 reu-0
O a) 0 7 CO
LLfi m E
b'
m
O U
,!E
C c
° o,
aH
_Fro
E .
Nays
..0 .. ,`°
E n
E�
8 fi
U
'O
a m
Mitigation HAZ -2: Presence of Registered
Underground Storage Tank. As a condition of
grading permit approval for the proposed project,
a Phase II Environmental Investigation shall be
undertaken by the City of Alameda. The Phase 11
investigation would include actual sampling and
laboratory analysis of the soil and groundwater on
the project site for hazardous materials to identify
the nature and extent of these materials in soil
and/or groundwater. The following process shall
also be undertaken by the City In order to more
fully identify and reduce potential Impacts
associated with the project:
IIDENTIFIED IMPACT
c
o
O y )
"al ti
co
c a
S. E
m
c E
I' y
C :IDOCUME 11cmuser1LOCALS 11Templmmcht647.doc
O
M
O�
go
pt
wO
cc
MONITORING
e
Cc
RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE
o Y
il
m �i y c
v cC _ a G c
3 o v' N m V h
U
il ° _ N 7 d car EO O L. o E-� I ay a>l myc va dN ° cuE=E y O O •O E' n m y N 0 7 E° QS E O "_ I •) C C ° O m O ° L N V . p
N O E N C �mm N �m > C pCV �$h °m 7
3m�«o m._Gp7C0CC—m+«Om
cD = m0 3 m 0� 0,0 o m o oN =a -fi m a a m .0 till km v al m y l = « c ° c W 0 0 «o p rnm m•§ - 2 E av 3 cote ° aa o6 = m m ma m cla °: n m ' c*3 gy m = .D al V 0 ca -m a m S a 2 8 .-. ° m 2 a= m -o m 5 E> 8 t e' sn . ?�> a °' � as c �-0 8 c 'm 3'9 o 0 0)p Z• fs. m =t x o
mro ro. a .m'o a AU• c amm a — m .bxa � v m m m m E co c�
. E
y
1
Npcm ic3�n mY rnDLmyooE -0ooc-0E0) c Em« £f
E u0 '=$ ° o>mc mm?`°c> >,'' Y
a �rmol 7,, .0 co cmmco 3 `000v a)roya
m o e a a s m § . 5 , _ c co ztn et 3 6 -E.2 w= sv a ai =„, U m. ' m c u'y ° c v• cy 0)nro— 6o°mmmc0000'p , mom`° co m ¢ L•o- - - o =y0 mmoC; CO c-0 s' 0 C U C _ C m p c 2c 7 Q m 3> m p m C O o m C
cv c d�L � 0. ro o o L>c o o ° am o E 0 ° E 0 00 E
, E°
m= m .c c m g m 'ro Q vm o c m O m° ° m c 0 a7 vi C o L p .p � °m 0 N cmm_o Ec0ac2'°oomE o°
ooo ° om 0 =- ° ,o2o06>u T`
r ma m o—mmoEd om•oo o aa = - , a' c.�. io=mo�Em0av aig0 -0 oo
> 1-a co co o a �. 0.CDi E ro �. co �._E1 o 0 apvfi m g £o« L OX g E �_ 0� a
i m
IDENTIFIED IMPACT
potentially significant project impact
C.•ID000ME 11cm userILOCALS- 11Templmmcht647doc
MONITORING
Prior to occupancy
Prior to occupancy
Public Works to monitor
C
COW
C
0
2>
m
a
0
m
0
0�
0.
0
m
0
Y
a�
a
O
m
0
RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE
IDENTIFIED IMPACT
y
U m Ja as
156
.....-70c O p
o c v y 0, o ,t
`o°Zomcaio-wZa
c mamacopE
g,= m t o m m d c c=
O aiN m am o~{ S22
v of a •- E •°
0) c (4) 0) " -0 • 0 E CD
C
03 t7) _ cma...,3..
Ummm'6Eca :!mm
E .g 7 U
vmc¢aoom €E
1io 9�.-'c0vc°a'°03
Ol >,tcZz E'v 6 CFDS.
' 0. c c m aoic'9E? 0
2 0 m. • o a o m a E m
m a c° 4?) m E N Q
Om g a c ro z
o�O� m amocc =Nv rn
c a .
°a mv2mEO
>m$-: v:92 vig, ww
mw v a o c c4 °t c E N° °m
Oa Y o T ppa - cc 00 o aJ (q m m G f0 cd m
tc�QCUC(imm /ro°�11CO
mocaom aoi EaiE�Ecc7>,c
�oom�y =OpCCVmae. o,ov.°
CNCmOC m U j' •7U c cu
m> PaiEgmmCI Eenroco
�'O¢EN .a Z >+ P
m'O¢ca yCC.•°w N2°
1 m 1-0 3_3 0, 0.... m0 o p o m c c
O b7,lyc°oE cctawacoc
Z•-.m c m m m •m m
}t,7! °U 3,°k� W a�tY d'pc ao Nm i`°
a c my V fim m y N m l� v� -
E�m•mofizcv�_ etc ==mmoc
0_122
6 f y ai
3'0 c m t
�o1myc(00
oa �- a
12 �aE
lea. 7 O c Z
V c o o. G 0
cr(V,ma0)
m
VJ o C mY c
V N °'m i° m
Nmm•-c EaU:
Cfi c
am o� ma0!
a- a1 a! 0) J c
F c� 2..0,ao °.o,
c.••,�NV,
otm• &Eg
L ag> a2
5_O'y °8 0 �
0 0,c0
c
›.0-0002
3oom1r:
as - 0,m
`O 7 ` fd1300
a 7 V 32 a 2
-a 0) t 0'
" C 7 m m cot
m.oemmg
p��a�i�
G1 > Lew rn§
Z00 EE o c%OJ03a
4.1 0 o of
tm !.omp•a,
c Qp O
caEca_cd -166
SS 60Bt2
's. m .2 ' (0
8
0
oz
2t
z
zx
)0 11)
•0
egg
m•c E
a °•
c E
$cc
egg
0
Z
m
Z
O
thi
$
cc
Prior to occupancy
0
0
.c
a
w W
eg
0
2g.
0
0
a
0
>
m
0)
0.
0
>
m
0
RELATED MmGAT10N MEASURE
a) c 'o
.-:13 0 '-.°0 m 20, . O 0 O
0 .0 £ op o E m rn.- m .
(00.-§-.00
z m 5 c N° c E m m
~fix` -°Eamm 000Eom0•7x
c m c 2.-o0.-0.a 03 t OO
.7 P.130041_0'4 c' c a) m °' m O 0 m m c O]
.aJ m •O C O> 0 .�. 2 m2
2m1 .cOO`c cm >ofcooEoc�°a
m CCaaJC N°<0072°Vm?�O`O
v m E g c, c c B.2,4080-220
= °3E3�Z c=4gTmmca'Ec�c
FflcU
uZiramoao Q QQ
J c#j n L n1 m c` m g-R m m cmf3.O.}g
m�EmmOCE. Hn?{ ..amaz .w
-2.= m
0 0 8 ° 0
0 0 0 .
E_ 8••
•0z =E 23� 0n-,_ 0o
o
o 0 ` m o .mU z aa
Co t E z o o €. c 02$ 0 0
. 2 m 0 t c F m
;7_00.2=2
✓ °a30W c 0 m 0= (`0 t O` 1H9
m0
(A 6 45 m c 0• m Ol O R m O N O
a•6malama, 3 v E—
Zz • z '00 E • on 00,802c
v)3
a 4�v0 Cc Evx)£mcmi�cmi
�oa2- g>0agi >aocamaE
0 2 o 0 a aQ Om a O c ao >,m T
e mamEm~ Eo(0 030
m Y,tl'�njzas m Uct0E0D
0
2- aE2O32. gal-SEEM?)
c > C1:6
L X 0 m .-=o)
5
W m c> E 0.
m 0 0= 0 m m Y = .
c E 0 ° 0. °i0-0 d
QOvoc_mam0
c 02000"00
8!';£x"0 >> -93E
c �
.i•20cEma °o,
ma2 oE0
uupp
'ES a5'•°02
`m9=34F
=a0 mcom
O m 0 R
0 ° m 7 U m m 2 0
r
� 10 r E O E o �'
°!� i O` y c i;
=>0.- 4 m a m m a
2305 co sE
C:IDOCUME 11cm usertLOCALS- 11Templmmcht647.doc
dam
$EEl
o c'
Emgg
q' E
a a
,2cFE
U m
.0
1-
1
C
Eir
PM
Q
0)
C �
O ca
o c
mS
U
8
0
s
0
a
U
A. •
U
U
EW
a
0
a�
m
a
0
>
m
0
a
0
m
RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE
U
_ N
U o ..t la c 0 W O C
7 r •
c_ O CO a
co 7 • 1,175c4)0 g N U ca0 g N-6 O N C m m 0 _
m N a) t 7 O
W?ymoo�m �v0,� rammro ammc300mYa
V�o >mo�crnmo 0� a) Emfl0oE
Y m. m y ... m e ai m 0 am o f
EQOagoro#� rn'v= cmov 0cQclm .z�N
C • 3 m N m 73 0 la .t" . C L la fa m 0 M m . 7 .. 'D Z
i(i) c_ m m c m cti =Y O .O E2 �' E m c 0-.
yeo ^roVE��O��o mE° m >0 N fimc.EU_
O m .3 N ..0. m c fn c a- 'O O o< ` O. O< p 0 m
a asc 0timm �'0 3 asa. ocl o m !9 „vo
S cote m m y 0 m >a� m j3 `�' m �o OI m'_o.-0 c co mP m m
m m O c m cr o m c m 4)a c m
o
ZZ m U m o a w0 Er'p • c
?:0m °Emm°t Zvro E° g mxoia aS`tln�croi
E m�om°amo3mcm� >Tm� E�a0.-. Ea) c
c c vi c m �v �t m >° E •EEoc c`o c m m rnc.r E °'y
0. oa)mcco3~am2�a°iia EEoa 0w0U7,cmace
y1 m o ..)v U at 0 m'� rn.o Y� •c E ro
r ar o o � wL am ° Q co > = °comet -..0 am o_�cv co
2 0. .c E to .- m N O .c a v) 2 I- coo m 3 U) 1 a C) g m 3 v 3 o m
.O
O 0 W �> ar<Oa) >0
O 0
O O
mEw Wgot =0— E-
apccc0. aoEm 0°
ioa2 Z -Q) a` Oc
Z L�— too 3 1710
m w.,rnc
211V;=21{OE3a
W
tw Q �- YE dc p� TrEO, E •am m�Nro ta mi _ y
o!cmmiN ) Y=
0C 5 �oS> 0aF a o
om 1- m O = J . 0 c Eoc
cm i.9E . SL f)
rnmam3Emtaa
20ao`E30 . TEam
IDENTIFIED IMPACT
Y co
W O▪ C a JD o aCs
Z 00 0+� (4 O`
3 -a '71
g• °E 4 >s a _J
0
m a.
0-'3 .i • EU2t a4
)a)v >.E
gs
f/7 C e t
- E tE
/11151"g-t
1E .=ca
40.coge,=t am �
E 2. +. w�(44)m
in3.z
C :IDOCUME 1lcm userILOCALS51ITemplmmcht647.doc
gm
O
gg
of..z
wo
=EEaci
o
E nh'. 8c
ED
.0 0 c :
e
Pm
vCE
W W
cm
EV
r E
0
m
U
0.
0
m
0
a
0
m
m
0
0.
0
0
m
RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE
a m
o0.>
3.mc.
my E
0 00
O 0
0
0
o0•'00)
.2002§
0Eas
U
-c• og
0o<0
EEEc(0aS
O a o a 0
m
g c 8
0 m c0 no c
.•O d m C L
O
CD C)7
i m - m C m C U
eo� -'v c o m EEcv oZ4
r a )
> = <o.; Ei- oot- 'Qo�c >a
4ig po m?V°.a m0a mpc
S0-0° 20(0-E v m m 51
8 o c o
pts _
120 n1m�Jm ;:1705Q
1E �mfim0Ya0 20- C0—
a; c> m m o w
°Pao °'acm$ 0m`o` c
Z"= m m Z 2 Z 0 O E m� E m c
a a W= c o o._ a,D c E v fi
y E a 0. 0 y m ot. .S 0.
C 0)0 S al 0 aJ — C C C 7 0Y C ` —, I f0 mm G • O al '
- E m o m•-
m m 0 0 y r W 0 m mE zM , :n o 2500.0 3 01-Q o
F o< Ea 0
m V) . N . 17 c C
y ` O O Y C w
:1 02w
i- m 1.! Eo III U`Ili E °ym n- cco- w - c•w , >Zam=com <` �._B W= E m 0 oi E� °arEglOmt0 cma„' gp
fsi03 CO
m U ac3glogcZcw042. 0ciig a m m o v �..; : o c e � cl 0 =& a m c mn mov omm`o ' acmmcE� z
cam0 s docmm V
E 000 c0Eco0
tg 0
$ ooEm« 2 m0ma md o%
Um
-mo o`wm'o0m0000m0omo, «��
2 <8aa{E&nE.-cnv,.-L.-$a'u, =<
C :DOCUME 1km userILOCALS- 11Tempimmchi647doc
REPORTING OR
MONITORING METHOD I
additional improvements are
warranted.
§
RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE
IDENTIFIED IMPACT
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in a regular meeting assembled on the
day of , 2005, by the following vote to wit:
AYES
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said City this
day of , 2005.
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
City of Alameda
CITY OF ALAMEDA
MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Chair and
Members of the Community Improvement Commission
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
From: William C. Norton
Acting Executive Director /City Manager
Date: April 20, 2005
Re: 1) Resolution of the Community Improvement Commission of the City of
Alameda Approving and Authorizing Payment of Certain Public Improvements to
the Park Street and Otis Drive Intersection; and
2) Resolution of the City Council Approving and Authorizing Execution of a
Public Improvements Construction Agreement between the City and Harsch
Investment Corporation
BACKGROUND
Harsch Investment Corp. has undertaken an expansion and renovation of South Shore Center,
including a planned 112;000 - square -foot expansion. On July 28, 2003, the Planning Board
approved Resolution 03 -40, providing conditional approval for the first phase of this project,
including a net expansion that would increase the size of the Center from 545,000 s.f. to
approximately 590,000 s.f. South Shore is by far the largest retail center in Alameda and
contributed just over $1,000,000 in sales tax revenue to the City in 2004. Once South Shore
expands, the existing traffic volumes and added trips will necessitate an upgrade to the signal at
Otis Drive and Park Street. Therefore, PB Resolution 03 -40 (Attachment 1) requires that the
traffic signal at Park and Otis be upgraded to a fully actuated operation to accommodate
background traffic and new trips anticipated by the revitalized center. The upgrades required are
not all attributable to South Shore. This intersection is key to the north/south and east /west
movement of traffic in this part of the City. The smooth function of this intersection is also key
to the behavior of traffic along the full length of Park Street as well as Otis Drive. Because the
function of this area impacts the function of Park Street, it is proposed that the City's portion of
the upgrade be financed by the resources from the Business and Waterfront Improvement Project
(BWIP) Area. Because South Shore is not the only contributor of traffic to this intersection, the
upgrade requires a contribution from the City for the non -South Shore Center traffic impacts.
Resolution PB 03 -40 references preparation of a financial agreement to divide the cost of
construction.
Community Redevelopment Law provides for the funding of improvements to public facilities
located inside or outside of a Redevelopment Project Area, provided the City Council determines
that: (1) improvements are of benefit to the Project Area, and (2) no other reasonable means of
publicly financing the improvements are available.
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
Re: Resolutions #2 -
Council/CIC
5 -3 -05
Honorable Chair and
Members of the Community Improvement Commission
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
DISCUSSION /ANALYSIS
April 20, 2005
Page 2
The City of Alameda General Plan includes a "not to exceed" delay standard of 55
seconds /vehicle for the entire intersection, or Level of Service (LOS) D. According to PB
Resolution 03 -40, the existing signal at Park Street and Otis Drive currently operates at
minimum LOS D based on existing trips. Expansion by South Shore Center will cause the
projected level of service to drop to LOS E (65.6 seconds) during the weekend mid -day peak
hour. Without the modifications, lengths of queues will extend into the Park Street business
district portion of the BWIP, causing delays that would exceed the maximum delay standard of
LOS D. Once converted to a fully actuated signal, and after South Shore's expansion, the
intersection LOS will improve to C (24.4 seconds) during the weekend mid -day peak hour. In
addition, the modifications will enable the City to coordinate the traffic signals within the
business district with the Park/Otis signal improving the overall progression in the district.
The cost of conversion from timed operation to fully actuated operation, including allowance for
payment by Harsch of prevailing wage, is estimated to be up to $300,000. This includes design,
construction and inspection and would involve the installation of a new signal controller, vehicle
loop detectors, signal mast arms, and traffic striping modifications. The City's General Fund
does not have adequate resources to undertake the improvements. Under the proposed
Agreement (on file with the City Clerk), the City will have the authority to review and approve
the construction contract amount. Under the Agreement, Harsch's share of the total cost will be
$100,000; the City's share would be capped at $200,000, including the City design costs. The
City is responsible for preparing design and construction specifications. Harsch will construct the
improvements.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no impact to the General Fund. Within the Merged BWIP /WECIP budget, there are
$70,000 of unallocated funds that will be committed for this purpose during FY 2004 -2005. The
balance of $130,000 will be included in the proposed Merged BWIP /WECIP budget for FY
2005 -2006 from available tax increment. The CIC and the City entered into a Cooperation
Agreement dated June 18, 1991, which authorizes the CIC to reimburse the City for, among
other things, provision of public improvements that benefit the Project Area.
At completion, the renovation and proposed expansion of South Shore Center is estimated to
generate over $440,000 in new annual sales and property tax revenue for the General Fund
(Attachment 2). In addition to these annual increases the City will receive approximately
$480,000 in one -time construction improvement tax payments. The CIC's contribution to this
project will be limited to a maximum of $200,000.
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
G: \econdev \Comm Projects\south shore\reports\2005 \CC -CIC 5- 3- 05.doc
F: CP /South Shore Center
Honorable Chair and
Members of the Community Improvement Commission
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
RECOMMENDATION
April 20, 2005
Page 3
It is recommended that: 1) the Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda
adopt a resolution approving and authorizing payment of certain public improvements to the
Park Street and Otis Drive Intersection; and 2) it is recommended that the City Council adopt a
Resolution approving and authorizing execution of a Public Improvements Construction
Agreement between the City and Harsch Investment Corporation.
WCN /LAL /DES/BJMK:ry
R- pect , ly submitted
Leslie A. Little
Development Services Director
By: Dorene E. Soto
Manager, Business D-velop
vision
Attachments: 1) Planning Board Resolution 03 -40
2) Sales Tax Revenue Projection
ce J.
Redev
cc: Randy Kyte, Harsch Investment Corporation
Michael Corbitt, Harsch Investment Corporation
Manager
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
G: \econdev \Comm Projects\south shore\reports\2005 \CC -CIC 5- 3- 05.doc
F: CP /South Shore Center
ATTACHMENT 1
CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD
RESOLUTION NO. PB -03 -40
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA APPROVING
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT, PDA02 -003, AND MAJOR DESIGN REVIEW,
DR02 -095 FOR RECONSTRUCTING AND EXPANDING AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER
AT 21.60 OTIS DRIVE, SOUTH SHORE SHOPPING CENTER
WHEREAS, an application was made on July 30, 2002 by Harsch Investment Corp and its
affiliate Harsch Investment Realty LLC Series C requesting a Planned Development Amendment,
PDA02 -003and Major Design Review DR02 -095, to permit the reconstruction of 545,000 square
foot shopping center, and addition of a net 112,000 square feet of retail and office floor area, and
amendment to parking regulations for the Center; and
WHEREAS, the application was determined to be incomplete for processing by letter dated
August 29, 2002; and was subsequently accepted as complete on February 11, 2003; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is designated as Community Commercial on the General
Plan Diagram; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is located in a C -2 -PD, Central Business District, Planned
Development Combining Zoning District; and
WHEREAS, the Board held a public hearing on this application on May 12, 2003, concluded
July 28, 2003, and examined pertinent maps, drawings, and documents dated May 31, 2002 through
July 21, 2003 (site plan) and March 11, 2003 (phasing plan); and
WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings relative to the Planned Development:
1. The proposed Planned Development is consistent with the General Plan which
specifies commercial uses for the site, which is designated as Community
Commercial. The Community Commercial designation is intended for a wide range
of commercial stores and services, ranging from small stores to larger, auto - oriented
businesses. The proposed expansion of retail commercial, restaurant and office uses
would be consistent with this designation.
2. The Planned Development is a more effective use of the site than is possible under
the regulations for the C -2 zoning district because a Planned Development allows for
consolidation of parking and driving aisles for parcels and a comprehensive site
design including building location, parking lot design, landscaping and internal
circulation to use a site which historically has been linked in this manner.
1
3. The Planned Development, because it incorporates all the mitigations of the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, will not have a significant adverse effect on adjacent
land uses.
WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings relative to the Major Design Review:
1. The project will have no significant adverse impacts on persons or property in the
vicinity because the design of the stores is of a similar horizontal low- profile nature
to structures in the area and have a unified style and theme fitting to the 1950's-
1970's period in which South Shore developed as a neighborhood.
2. As conditioned, the project will be compatible and harmonize with the design and use
of the surrounding area because the buildings would extend the materials, proportions
and sizes of stores in the Shopping Center in a manner consistent with past practice.
3. As conditioned, the project is consistent with the City of Alameda Design Review
Guidelines because the materials, surfaces, shapes and landscaping relate to nearby
structures and provide an attractive streetscape as viewed from adjacent streets and
residential areas.
WHEREAS, an Initial Study was prepared on the project pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act, State Clearinghouse Number 2003 - 042 -073, and was circulated for
public review between April 12, 2003 and May 12, 2003; and no comments were received which
identified new significant environmental impacts which were not already discussed or mitigated in
the Initial Study; and
WHEREAS, on May 12, 2003 the Board found the Initial Study complete and correct, and
after considering public testimony including documents, adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration,
IS02 -0006 and Mitigation Monitoring Program, to address the environmental impacts related to this
project, finding no significant environmental impacts from the project as mitigated;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Board of the City of Alameda approves
Planned Development Amendment PDA02 -003 and Major Design Review DR02 -095, phases II-a,
II -b and IV -a only, subject to the following conditions:
1. APPROVED PLAN. The project shall be constructed in substantial compliance with:
a) the plans consisting of 30 sheets dated May 31, 2002 through July 21 (site plan) and
March 11, 2003 by Field Paoli Architects, et al. including Buildings 100 and 600
(DR03 -0038) and excluding phases ER, IV -b and later phases except pedestrian malls;
for the northerly sidewalk between Office Max and future Building 1500, sidewalk
width is 4 feet and travel lanes for vehicles are each 10 feet wide;
b) a sign program adopted by Planned Development Amendment PDA -97 -05 on December
8, 1997, as amended by tenant signage revision dated March 31, 2003 by Field Paoli
Architects titled "Tenant Sign Design Criteria," in 18 pages; and
c) communication dated April 11, 2003 by Harsch Investment Corp,
incorporating all mitigation measures of the Initial Study into the project.
d) Where feasible, the project includes signs directed toward pedestrians and other feasible
measures within applicant control to minimize, any conflicting movements between
pedestrians at the Washington Mutual ATM machines in the rear of the Washington
Mutual building and the adjacent east -west drive aisle on the Center's parking area, to the
satisfaction of the Public Works Director. A pedestrian walkway at least 4 feet wide
shall be constructed prior to occupancy of Phase II-b, from Office Max to the current
Chevron site.
e) Phase III, IV -b and later phases are specifically not approved, except that pedestrian mall
areas are included in the approved phases. Building 1800 along Shoreline Drive,
originally shown in Phase 11 -a, is specifically not approved. However, the denial is
without prejudice to a later resubmittal of a new environmental review with traffic study,
conforming to California Environmental Quality Act guidelines; and a new Planned
Development Amendment and Major Design review.
f) The following guidelines are requested to be incorporated into resubmittal of the phases
not approved at this time:
1) Provision of a site for future gasoline sales.
2) Shoreline orientation of the approximately 2 acres at Park Street and
Shoreline Drive, including the current Picante Restaurant site and
planned Building 1800.
3) Inclusion in future phases of bus stops, pedestrian and bicycle paths,
bicycle racks, landscaping improvements equal to or better than the
improvements shown in the approved phases.
Such plans and letter constitute Exhibit "A ", on file in the office of the City of Alameda
Planning Department, and are approved except as modified by the conditions in this
Resolution.
2. VESTING. The Planned Development Amendment shall terminate on July 28 , 2004, unless
actual construction under valid permits has begun, or the developer applies for and is granted
an extension prior to expiration; the Planning and Building Director is directed by the
Planning Board to rule upon an extension on their behalf. The Planned Development
Amendment approval shall not be in force and effect, and no building permits will be issued,
unless and until the developer has completed a Lot Merger, Lot Line Adjustment or Parcel
Map to eliminate any encroachment ofbuilding walls over property lines, to the satisfaction
3
of the Planning and Building Director. The Design Review approval shall terminate on
January 28 , 2004, unless actual construction under valid permits has begun, or the developer
applies for and is granted an extension prior to expiration. For initial project vesting,
construction within the timelines herein under DR03 -038 for Buildings 100 and 600 with
adjacent interior malls shall vest both PDA and Design Review for Phase II -a. Once vested,
the PDA and Design Review are approved for a maximum of a limited one and one -half year
(1 1/2) year construction period from the date of this Resolution and shall EXPIRE on
January 28, 2005 for any portion of this project approval that has not been vested and any
additional substantial alteration thereafter shall require a new PDA and Design Review.
PHASING THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. Phasing is tentatively outlined in Exhibit
"A" phasing sheet dated March 2003 from Field Paoli Architects with colors designating
phases, subject to Director approval. Only areas shown in contraction of Phases II -a, II -b and
IV -a, which shall include completion of the pedestrian mall areas currently shown in Phases
IV -b and V, may be constructed. Phasing Amendments shall be as approved by the Planning
and Building Director, with balanced improvements to parking, landscaping, public facilities
including drainage, utilities and transportation.
AMENDMENTS TO THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. Pursuant to Alameda Municipal
Code, minor architectural changes such as storefronts, door and window openings with less
than 5% (five percent) change in floor area may be approved administratively by the
Planning and Building Director in Design Review.
3. LEASING . The applicant shall provide copies of these conditions with each lease over
10,000 square feet or to smaller leases upon request.
4. TRANSPORTATION.
Prior to issuance of a Building Permit for the site, the applicant shall execute an agreement
with the Public Works Director to implement the following measures:.
OTIS/PARK INTERSECTION. Currently during Baseline conditions Otis/Park intersection
operates at LOS D with an additional 150 feet of southbound right turn lane. Within 6
months the City Public Works Department (PW) will remove 150 feet ofparking on the west
side to provide for a dedicated southbound right turn lane. During Baseline Plus Project
conditions this intersection will operate at LOS E (65.6 seconds) during the weekend mid-
day peak hour. For Baseline Plus Project it is required that the signal be changed from pre -
timed operation to fully- actuated. This will involve the installation of a new signal
controller, vehicle loop detectors, signal mast arms, traffic striping modifications and all
equipment necessary to fully actuate the intersection. With these improvements the
intersection LOS will improve to C (24.4 seconds) during the weekend mid -day peak hour.
For Cumulative Plus Project additional lanes will be required.
At the time the total shopping center area increases beyond 590,000 square feet PW will
require the applicant to submit design drawings with the building permit application. At the
4
time the building permit is issued, PW will require the intersection improvements be
awarded for construction. The City continues to work with the applicant regarding his request
for financial assistance with construction of the signal. Certificate of occupancy will not be
issued until construction of the required intersection improvements are completed. The
applicant will have 100% responsibility for construction of these improvements, review,
permitting, inspection and processing. The applicant may elect to request the City construct
the improvements and provide the City with the necessary funding. If this option is selected,
negotiations would be needed so that a design would be ready to meet the schedule identified
above. The cost for additional lanes will be shared between the City and the applicant based
upon a prorated traffic contribution.
OTIS /PROJECT ACCESS - TRADER JOE'S DRIVEWAY. Currently the unsignalized
intersection of Otis/Project Access - Trader Joe's driveway operates at LOS C and therefore
no mitigation is needed. The signal warrant associated with the northbound approach from
the shopping center meets the peak hour warrant for signalization during the weekday PM
peak hour and weekend mid-day peak hour. At Cumulative Plus Project the northbound left
turn movement will gradually degrade. Therefore, if applicants would like to install a signal
to improve the traffic operations at this location they will have 100% financial responsibility.
OTIS /PROJECT ACCESS - EASTERNMOST DRIVEWAY. Based on observed and project
vehicle queuing on Otis Drive during peak commute periods, it is required that this driveway
be limited to right -turn -only inbound/outbound with a physical barrier (concrete
channelization island to accommodate right turn in and right turn out movement). An annual
monitoring will be conducted to review the conflict of right out movement with Otis Drive
eastbound through traffic. The applicant will have 100% responsibility for construction of
theses improvements, review, permitting, inspection and processing.
PARK/PROJECT ACCESS NORTH DRIVEWAY. With projected vehicle queues for the
southbound right -turn movement from Park Street into the project driveway, it is required
that the intersection be monitored for potential vehicle queuing conflicts. An annual
monitoring report is to be submitted to PW in a pre- approved format. If the Public Works
Director receives any objections to the traffic into this driveway, the Director will have the
prerogative to request additional monitoring reports from the applicant. Should vehicle
queuing at this intersection for southbound right -turns cause conflicts PW will require the
installation of a separate right -turn deceleration lane. The applicant will have 100%
responsibility for construction of these improvements, review, permitting, inspection and
processing.
BICYCLE /TRANSIT/PEDESTRIAN. Based on meetings between AC Transit staff and the
developer, transit routing will be located along Whitehall Drive, within the Center.
Traveling in the eastbound direction, a transit stop will be located along Whitehall at the far
(east) side of the intersection at South Shore Center Drive. A striped transit only lane, 10
feet wide, will be provided for a bus to pull out of the through traffic lane when
loading/unloading passengers. Also along Whitehall, in the eastbound direction, a transit
5
stop will be located prior to the intersection with Park Street. In the westbound direction
along Whitehall, transit stops, including striped transit only lanes (10 feet wide) will be
located west of the intersection with Park Street (adjacent to Building 1500) and at the near
side of the intersection with South Shore Center Drive. Back -out parking will not be
permitted along a transit route. Bus turnouts may not double as temporary or permanent
truck loading areas. Bus turnouts and platforms must be consistent with AC Transit
Standards Manual. There will be a minimum-of four (4) transit stop locations within the
Center, two (2) in each direction. In addition, the actual bus stops /pads at the multi -modal
transit center should be constructed of concrete rather than asphalt to prevent wear. Where
possible as confirmed by the Public Works Director, bus stops shall be east of South Shore
Center Drive. The easterly Whitehall transit terminal shall be separated from the truck
loading area of Building 1500 by landscaped trellises, walls and other barriers to create a
secure space for transit patrons.
Signs shall be placed throughout the shopping center directing transit patrons to the new
transit stops. Each transit stop will be outfitted with bus shelters and bus benches consistent
with ADA guidelines and the AC Transit Standards Manual. Crosswalks and ramps must be
provided consistent with ADA guidelines.
Bicycle parking throughout the Center will be held to a standard of one (1) bicycle parking
space per thirty (30) auto parking spaces. Locations and number of bicycle parking racks
throughout the Center will be agreed upon by the Public Works Director or designee and the
Developer on a phase by phase basis. The total number of spaces will attempt to remain as
close as possible to the 1 to 30 ratio within reason. Proper signage will be located throughout
the Center directing bicyclists to bicycle parking locations.
A 4 foot wide raised concrete pedestrian path will be installed from existing Chevron to
existing Office Max on the east -west driveway to Public. Works standards.
Where backout parking is adjacent to the main mall buildings, every 10`h parking space in
such areas will be striped for pedestrian access to the mall; except that the pedestrian space in
ADA parking spaces will qualify as the pedestrian access at that point.
BUS SHELTER. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain
Planning and Building Director and Building Official approval for design of at least four (4)
all- weather bus shelters when the current bus shelter requires closure or relocation, and shall
install the bus shelter prior to approval of occupancy.
Bus lines and shelters shall be designed to the satisfaction of Alameda Contra Costa Transit
and the Public Works Director. Should AC Transit decide to suspend bus service for any
reason, the Public Works Director shall determine that bus service near the Center will be a
satisfactory substitute, prior to issuance of building permits for the subsequent phase.
6
Bus shelter, bus bench and cross walks shall comply with Americans with Disabilities Act
Guidelines and be approved by the Public Works Director. Bus turnout and platforms are
shown on Exhibit "A" and shall be consistent with AC Transit Standards Manual and bus
stops shall be located per the manual apart from one another in an east -west direction unless
modified by the Public Works Director.
5. OTHER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. All regulations of the Alameda
Municipal Code shall apply to the Planned Development of South Shore Shopping Center, as
amended, except where express provisions have otherwise been made in this Planned
Development Amendment approval.
6. PARKING. The shopping center shall at all times operate with at least 4.0 parking spaces
per 1,000 square feet of retail, restaurant or office area then being occupied or constructed,
whichever is greater conforming to City parking design standards. Should the shopping
center fall below the 4.0 parking spaces to 1,000 square feet ratio, the owner shall prevent
construction of additional sufficient retail and office space so that the project returns to the
4.0/1,000 parking ratio overall. All parking areas on all parcels shall be made accessible to
all other portions of the center through recorded documents including joint access and
reciprocal parking easements to the satisfaction of the Planning and Building Director.
7. SIGNAGE PROGRAM. All signage installed at the site shall be in compliance with the
approved signage program for South Shore Shopping Center, as outlined in PDA 97 -05,
Exhibit "C ", consisting of nine pages, prepared by the applicant, stamped received "October
24, 1996 ", and on file in the Planning Department offices, except as modified by Exhibit
"A" of this Planned Development Amendment. Back -lit (ground mounted- lighted) palm
trees are not signs. No sign shall be installed without prior issuance of a sign permit.
8. ALAMEDA POWER AND TELECOM. The developer shall install new substructures
including conduits, pullboxes, and transformer pads necessary to serve the proposed
improvements. The developer shall grant all easements to Alameda Power and Telecom
necessary for the provision and maintenance of electrical service to the site. Easements shall
include metes and bound descriptions and plats and shall be prepared by a licensed land
survey or civil engineer qualified to practice land surveying. Existing easements that are no
longer applicable after the proposed improvements are operational shall be vacated at the
direction of AP &T and City Engineer. Prior to issuance of permits for placement of
structures, the approval of the Planning and Building Director regarding location and
screening shall be obtained.
9. STORM AND SANITARY SEWER ANAYLSIS Applicant shall provide in conjunction
with building and site improvement plan submittals, storm drain and sanitary sewer flow
calculations of the existing and proposed development. Pipes shall be upgraded as necessary
to meet increase flows if applicable. Existing sanitary sewer pipes not requiring replacement
shall be inspected and any inflow and infiltration from open joints, broken pipe, etc. shall be
7
rehabilitated by means acceptable to the City Engineer (i.e. slip lining, pipe bursting,
replacement, inversion lining, etc.) by phase.
10. PLANS. Site civil improvement, traffic signing, striping and detouring, landscape, irrigation,
utility, and urban runoff (see below) plans shall be submitted either separately or in
conjunction with building plans to Building and Planning Services for review by the City
Engineer.
11. FIRE DEPARTMENT. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide
plans for approval of the Alameda Fire Department. The building shall be fitted with
automatic fire sprinkler systems to NFPA 13 standards to the satisfaction of the Alameda
Fire Department. Prior to raising building walls, the developer shall have already adjacent or
install at his expense on -site one or more 3,000 gallon per minute fire hydrant(s) be located
and installed to the satisfaction of the Alameda Fire Department.
12. URBAN RUNOFF. Redevelopment projects shall minimize stormwater pollutant discharges
through implementation of construction sediment control and post - construction design and
treatment measures, incorporating appropriate source control and site design measures to the
maximum extent practicable per requirements of the Alameda Countywide Non - Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Stormwater Permit. Approval of this
resolution does not lock -in the current NPDES permitting requirements for the life of the
project. Subsequent changes to the NPDES permitting requirements may occur during
project phasing and shall be incorporated into the design unless otherwise conditioned under
the NPDES permit regulations.
a. Design review submittals shall include a table showing the amount of pervious and
impervious areas prior to redevelopment and the amount of pervious and impervious
area after redevelopment. Areas shall be given in square feet. Conceptual proposals
shall be included during design review process showing methods by which
impervious surfaces will be minimized and the entry of pollutants to the storm drain
system will be reduced. Such methods may include methods such as pervious
parking stalls using interlocking pavers, and sand filter inserts and units within storm
drain structures.
b. Post - construction storrnwater treatment control measures shall be included into
project construction plans prior to issuance of any building or grading permit. A
treatment measure operation and maintenance (O &M) plan shall be subject to review
and approval by the City Engineer. O &M plans shall include treatment type,
Location, maintenance requirements, maintenance schedule and assurances of party
responsible for O &M.
c. Landscaping shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff, promote
surface infiltration, and minimize the use of fertilizers and pesticides that can
8
contribute to stormwater pollution. Where feasible landscaping should be designed
and operated to treat stormwater runoff.
d. Construction activities shall comply with Notice of Intent (NOI) and Storm Water
Pollution and Prevention Plan (SWPPP) NPDES permitting requirements. Design
plans shall include a plan for erosion and sediment control measures that implements
current Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction activities. The
erosion and sediment control plan is subject to review and approval by City Engineer.
e. Trash enclosures and /or recycling areas must be completely covered with no surface
flows from other areas draining into this area. BMP's shall be implemented to
prevent potential stormwater pollution. Self contained trash compactors are
considered covered. These BMP's may include, but are not limited to, a regular
program of sweeping, litter control and spill clean-up. Mobile washing and
discharges must be conducted according to the Mobile Cleaner Best Management
Practices for Waste Water Runoff developed by the Cleaning Equipment Trade
Association.
f. Loading dock areas should be designed to minimize the amount of storm water run -
on onto the loading dock area. Accumulated waste water that may contribute to the
pollution of stormwater must be drained to the sanitary sewer, or diverted and
collected for ultimate discharge to the sanitary sewer, or intercepted and pretreated
prior to . discharge to the storm drain system.
g.
Food retailers (including restaurants and grocery stores) must be designed to prevent
the discharge of wastewaters from the cleaning of mats, equipment and containers to
the storm drain system. Contained wash areas shall be covered or designed to
prevent run -on or runoff from the area and shall not discharge to the storm drain
system. BMP's shall be implemented to prevent potential stormwater pollution.
These BMP's may include, but are not limited to, a regular program of sweeping,
litter control and spill clean -up. Mobile washing .and discharges must be conducted
according to the Mobile Cleaner Best Management Practices for Waste Water Runoff
developed by the Cleaning Equipment Trade Association.
h. The property owner shall ensure that BMPs are implemented to prevent potential
stormwater pollution and to minimize the amount of flows to the sanitary sewer
drains at locations indicated under e,f & g above. The Operation and Maintenance
plans per Item #b above shall address these requirements.
13. LANDSCAPING. Prior to issuance of building permits the applicant shall specify the size,
type and number of trees, shrubs and ground cover. All landscaping and irrigation shall be
installed prior to approval of occupancy.
9
a. The developer shall be required to install trees as shown on the approved landscaping
plan for approved phases_ in Exhibit "A." Exact number of street trees to be planted,
species, location and size of trees shall be to the satisfaction of the Planning and
Building Director and the Public Works Director. Trees that are 15 gallon size or
larger shall be specified unless otherwise directed by the Planning and Building
Director. Each tree well shall have at least a 15 gallon tree approved by the Planning
and Building Director. There shall be at least one tree per 4 to. 8 parking spaces in
any reconstructed portion of the parking lot, averaging 1 per 4 in the 46 acre project
or as approved by the Director, with trees being installed with that phase prior to
occupancy of adjacent reconstructed buildings. Eucalyptus trees are not approved.
Patin trees may apply toward achieving the required tree ratio with Planning and
Building Director approval on a phase by phase basis, and Planning Board approval
of the first phase (Building 200), where the palm species provide suitable shade and
greenery. The applicant shall obtain reports by certified professional arborist(s)
regarding the most effective species of palms to be used, and the most effective
pruning manner for canopy trees to promote spreading growth rather than
maintaining initial tree size and spread. Each double parking row shall have at least
two (2) trees except for Phase 1.
b. Shrubs of a minimum 5 gallon container size shall be planted in landscape islands,
the central mall and other areas, and other shrubs approved by the Planning and
Building Director. At the entrance driveways, accent plants such as annual or
perennial flowering plants and shrubs shall be installed to the satisfaction of the
Planning Director.
c. The applicant shall install rows of paten trees along each major north/south entrance
driveway to the Center (3 from Otis Drive), as shown on Exhibit "A." Installed trees
shall be secured and supported during the first year of planting by triangulated boards
or other method approved by the City Building Official, following the practice used
in 2002 for installation of palm trees leading to the Trader Joe's entrance, in order to
avoid the 2002 toppling of trees in high winds.
d. Landscaping including shrubs and trees or a decorative fence or wall shall screen all
above- ground utility boxes and structures, to the satisfaction of the Planning and
Building Director.
• e. Trees shall not be located within easements.
f. Trees shall be maintained and watered in a healthy state to achieve a canopy of
greenery within the parking areas. Diseased trees shall be removed and replaced
immediately with healthy trees of the same or similar species.
10
14. LIGHTING. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a lighting plan
and details of lighting fixtures for Planning and Building Director review and approval. The
lighting fixtures shall be substantially compatible with existing lighting fixtures in the
Shopping Center parking lot. Lighting shall be installed in substantial compliance with City
standards as determined by the Chief Building Official, Police Department and AP &T. All
on -site lighting shall be downward- directed lighting and shielded to avoid lighting impacts
on adjacent residential areas, except that palm trees may be back -lit by ground- mounted
lights in the manner established for the palms leading to Trader Joe's in 2002.
15. AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLIANCE. The project is subject to the Affordable
Housing Unit/Fee Ordinance (Alameda Municipal Code Section 27 -1). The applicant must
provide housing units, pay an in -lieu fee or prepare an Affordable Housing Unit/Fee Plan and
secure the approval of the Housing Development Manager, prior to issuance of a building
permit. The applicant must provide the housing units or pay the Affordable Housing fee, as
calculated in the approved. Plan, prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy.
16. CONSTRUCTION REGULATIONS
a. Prior to start of work of demolition, remodeling or construction, the applicant shall
provide a draft waste management plan to the Public Works Environmental Services
Division. This can be in any format, but must include the following:
i. Contractor's name, address, and telephone number
ii. Project location and /or street address
iii. Anticipated start and completion dates of the project
iv. A list of materials expected to be generated (e.g., glass, wood, metal, drywall,
concrete, bricks), the tonnage or volume of each material, how they are to be
reused, disposed or recycled, and the destination/processor for that reuse, disposal
or recycling.
The Environmental Services Division will review this draft plan, and any changes or
recommendations shall be incorporated into the site plans for the project.
At the end of the demolition, remodeling or construction project, the contractor shall
submit a report to the Environmental Services Division on actual tonnages disposed
or recycled for each material, and the actual destination/processor.
b. Construction activities shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.
Monday through Friday. Noise - generating construction activities shall be limited to
the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. except that within the main mall, construction
may commence at 7:00 am with City Engineer approval. Work on Saturdays shall
require special approval of the city engineer. No construction activity shall be
permitted on Sundays or State and Federal holidays. Work requiring inspection after
11
3:30 p.m. weekdays will require city construction inspection fee at time and a half (1-
1/2). , Said fee will be in accordance with the latest public works fee overtime
schedule. Work done on Saturdays requiring inspection is prohibited unless
approved by the city engineer and an inspector is available. Inspection fees for
Saturday work will be at time and a half (1 -1/2) with a four -hour minimum.
c. All construction vehicles shall adhere to City of Alameda truck routes.
d. Storage of construction material and equipment on city streets will not be permitted.
e. The contractor shall provide all lights, signs, barricades, flagmen, or other traffic
safety devices necessary to provide public safety in accordance. The contractor shall
provide a traffic control plan to the approval of the city engineer. The contractor
shall allow a minimum of 5 working days for review.
f. Temporary no parking on City streets for construction will require posting of "No
Parking Signs" 48 hours in advance. Signs are available at the Building Services
Office, Room 190, City Hall. A fee will be charged for the signs. Only City of
Alameda issued no parking signs will be allowed. The contractor shall allow a
minimum five working days for review.
g. Construction equipment shall be properly snuffled. Unnecessary idling of grading
construction equipment is prohibited.
h. Stationary noise - generating construction equipment such as compressors shall be
located as far as practical from occupied residential housing units.
i. Contractor shall be responsible for responding to any local complaints about
construction noise.
j. Construction equipment, tools, etc. shall not be cleaned or rinsed into a street, gutter,
storm drain or stream. Shovel or vacuum saw -cut slurry and remove from site.
k. A contained and covered area on -site shall be used for storage of cement bags, paints,
flanmables, oils, fertilizers, pesticides, or any other materials that have potential for
being discharged to the storm drain system by wind or in the event of a material spill.
1. All construction debris shall be gathered on a regular basis and placed in a dumpster
which is emptied or removed weekly. When feasible, tarps shall be used on the
ground to collect fallen debris or splatters that could contribute to stormwater
pollution. Any temporary on -site construction piles shall be securely covered with a
tarp or other device to contain debris.
12
m. Concrete /gunite trucks and concrete /plaster finishing operations shall not discharge
wash water into the street gutters or drains.
n. Trash and debris shall be cleaned up daily on all public streets in the project vicinity
and along haul routes. Sweep as needed and as directed by the Public Works
Inspector.
17. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Prior to demolition and construction related activities for the
Chevron Station and the existing Safeway site, or any other sites on local materials
governmental lists, hazardous material assessment studies must be performed by qualified
soils professionals, in order to determine the extent of any site contamination. Once these
studies have been completed and have received City Building Official approval, the applicant
and the contractor shall comply with the Phase II recommendations of a soils engineering
report.
18. PERMITTED USES. The permitted uses within the PD shall be those permitted uses of the
C -2 and C -C zoning districts; the conditional uses within the PD shall be the conditional uses
of the C -2 and C -C zoning districts, except as herein further limited.
19. HOURS OF OPERATION. The Center shall not be open to the public nor shall truck
loading be conducted, before 7:00 a.rn. or after 10:00 p.m. except that Use Permits or
Planned Development Amendments may request additional hours for specified uses. The
truck loading areas for the two supermarkets shall be on the north sides of the markets only.
20. ARCHITECTURE. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall subunit for Final
Design Review and Planning and Building Director review and approval, architectural details
and final colors and materials for the buildings, including but not limited to all trim and
cornice elements, canopies, trellises, vine planting grills and the trash and recycling
enclosures. Minor alterations to plans of Exhibit "A" may approved by the Planning and
Building Director. Significant alterations may require review by the Planning Board, as
determined by the Plamung and Building Director.
The applicant shall conform to the Public Art Ordinance and shall include public art
approved by the Recreation and Parks process in each phase. That process may, in its
discretion, find decorative mall paving, fountains and other upgrades to existing mall
surfaces created by artists to qualify as a portion of public art.
21. PHASING. The project may continue construction until January 28, 2005, for approximately
one and one half years from approval.. The applicant may develop phases as approved by the
Planning and Building Director, except that no single -year phase shall exceed 15 acres, nor
200,000 square feet of rebuilt building area, nor 800 parking spaces. The required pro -rata
share of parking, landscaping, pedestrian and bicycle trails shall be installed with the phase
being rebuilt.
13
22. MAXIMUM STORE SIZE. The project may include one store of up to 90,000 square feet in
floor area and two stores each of up to 60,000 square feet. Any larger store shall require a
Planned Development Amendment. The applicant expressly states that there is no present
intent to install a supersized department store larger than 90,000 square feet in area at this
location. All stores selected shall relate primarily to the needs of the Alameda market,
including food, clothing, books and music, household items, entertainment items, sporting
goods, home furnishings and remodeling, jewelry, services such as optometry and tax
preparation; and shall exclude stores which primarily sell automobiles, large auto parts,
recreational vehicles, bulls raw materials such as lumber, and similar bulky and occasionally
purchased items. Additions or modifications of less than 5% (five percent) in overall Center
area may be approved by administrative Design Review.
23. PLANNING AND BUILDNG DEPARTMENT INSPECTION. At least 4 days prior to
approval of occupancy, the applicant shall notify the Planning and Building Department to
inspect the building and site to assure compliance with these conditions.
24. SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SITE This phase is denied without prejudice for the current
application. Prior to issuance of building pennits for the phase including the present carwash
site, and Building 1800 together, or for Building 1000 and subsequent phases, whichever is
earlier, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Board for Planned Development
Amendment and Major Design Review a plan for site improvements and elevations, plazas,
drives, landscaping which provides a water orientation for this 2 acre portion of the site,
with pedestrian scale and access, minimizing vehicular traffic which may conflict with
pedestrian use and unified design theme.
25. MITIGATION MONITORING. Prior to issuance of building permits and during
construction, the applicant shall assure implementation of the Mitigation Monitoring Plan,
incorporated herein by reference.
26. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF CONDITIONS. The applicant shall acknowledge in writing all
of the conditions of approval and must accept this permit subject to those conditions and with
full awareness of the applicable provisions of Chapter 30 of the Alameda Municipal Code in
order for this Planned Development Amendment to be exercised.
27. HOLD HARMLESS. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66474.9(b), the City
of Alameda requires as a condition of this Planned Development Amendment and Design
Review approval that the applicant, or its successors in interest, defend, indemnify, and hold
harmless the City of Alameda or its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action,
or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, and employees to attack, set aside, void,
or annul, an approval of the City concerning the subject property, which action is brought
within the time period provided for in Governunent Code Section 66499.37. The City of
Alameda shall promptly notify the developer of any claim, action or proceeding and the City
14
shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the developer of any
claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the
developer shall not hereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City.
The decision of the Planning Board shall be final unless appealed to the City Council, in
writing and any such appeal must be made within ten (10) days of the decision or decision on any
appeal by completing and submitting an appeal form and paying the required fee.
NOTICE. No judicial proceedings subject to review pursuant to California Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1094.5 maybe prosecuted more than ninety (90) days following the date of this
decision plus extensions authorized by California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.
NOTICE. The conditions of project approval set forth herein include certain fees and other
exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020 (d) (1); these Conditions constitute written
notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations
and exactions. The applicant is hereby further notified that the 90 day appeal period in which the
applicant may protest these fees and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020
(a) has begun. If the applicant fails to file a protest within this 90 day period complying with all the
requirements of Section 66020, the applicant will be legally barred from later challenging such fees
or exactions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of July, 2003 by the Planning Board of the City
of Alameda by the following vote:
AYES: (6) Piziali, Cook, Cunningham, Bard, Gilmore, Rossi
NOES: (0)
ABSENT: (1) Lynch
ATTEST:
/ -0:4- a
•
•vir
i Planning Board
y Fuz, Secret
15
Acknowledgment of Conditions:
I hereby acknowledge receipt of Planning Board Resolution No. PB -03-40 for, the Planning Board's
approval of PDA02- 0003/DR02 -0095, approved on July 28, 2003, and in accordance with Conditions
herein, I hereby verify that I understand and agree to comply with the Conditions of Approval of s 'd
Planning Board Resolution No. PB -03 -40 and the applicable provisions of ¶hapter 30 of the meda
Municipal Code (Zoning Ordinance).
Executed at: By:
On:
4C
City Applicant
G r4.11AA L lv►4Nn6 - s 0"-,2
Date Title
APPLICANT MUST FILL OUT AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
G:\ PLANNING \PB\RESO\2003\5soujuly.doc
16
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 1 of 1
1 AL1-41.4. 111 •t Si 1
SOUTH
SHORE
CENTER
.I.. ...�. • . -.
EXISTING
-"- --- - - - - - -- - --
PROPOSED
EXPANSION
(square feet)
-
NET
CHANGE
COMMENTS
SIZE
545,000 sf to
657,000 sf
112,000 sf
increase in
gross retail
space
TOTAL
RETAIL
SALES
$275 -$325 psf = typical
level of community
shopping center sales,
Based on industry
standards.
ESTIMATED
INCREASE
IN TAXABLE
SALES due to
size increase
112,000 sf x
$300 psf =
$33,600,000
of new retail
sales annually
= $319,200 of new annual
sales tax revenue to City
General Fund ($9,500 per
$1,000,000 of taxable
sales or 0.95 %)
INCREASED
ASSESSED
VALUE of
New Buildings
$48 million
increase in
assessed value
over four
years.
Increase of $125,000 of
new annual property tax
to General Fund plus
$480,000 one time,
construction improvement
tax
TOTAL
New General Fund
revenues = $444,000
(319,200 + 125,000)
annually PLUS $480,000,
in one -time taxes.
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
G: \econdev \Comm Projects\south shore\reports\2005\Attachment _fiscal impact.doc
F: CP /south shore center /Park and Otis Signal/Construction Agreement
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA
RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT OF
CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TO THE
O LU PARK STEEET AND OTIS DRIVE INTERSECTION
z
®�
0 WHEREAS, the Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda
( "Commission ") is carrying out the Community Improvement Plan ( "Plan ") for the Business and
Waterfront Improvement Project ( "Project "); and
LU WHEREAS, the City of Alameda ( "City ") approved the reconstruction and expansion of
the South Shore Shopping Center ( "Center ") in accordance with City's standards and
procedures, which has resulted in the attraction of new retailers and provided a stimulus for
increased economic activity not only in the Center, but also along the City's downtown Park
_Street corridor located within the area of the Project ( "Project Area "); and
WHEREAS, the increased economic activity within both the Center and the Project Area
has resulted in increased vehicular traffic further exacerbating the existing inadequate traffic
circulation along the Park Street corridor, both throughout the entire BWIP Project Area and
outside the BWIP Project Area, which is causing delays that exceed the City's General Plan
requirements; and
WHEREAS, in order to improve vehicular and pedestrian safety and alleviate traffic
congestion along Park Street throughout the Project Area and immediate neighborhood areas
surrounding the Project Area, new signalization improvements to the Park Street and Otis Drive
intersection are needed to change the existing, pre -timed signal to a fully actuated signal,
including: installation of a new signal controller, vehicle loop detectors, signal mast arms, traffic
striping modification and all equipment necessary to fully actuate the intersection ( "Public
Improvements "); and
WHEREAS, Section 323 of the Plan authorizes the Commission to install, construct or
pay for public improvements either within or outside the Project Area; and
WHEREAS, Commission and City entered into a Cooperation Agreement dated June 18,
1991, which authorizes the City to assist the Commission in carrying out the Plan and the
Commission to reimburse City for such assistance, including the provision of public
improvements that benefit the Project Area; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 33445 of the Community Redevelopment Law, the
Commission is authorized, with the consent of the City Council, to pay all or part of the value of
the land for and the cost of the installation and construction of any building, facility, structure or
other improvement which is publicly owned either within or without a project area upon a
determination by the City Council that such building, facility, structure or other improvement is
of benefit to the project area or the immediate area in which the project is located, that no other
CC /CIC Resolution #2 (CIC)
5 -3 -05
reasonable means of financing such building, facility, structure or other improvement are
available to the community, that the payment of funds for the cost of the building, facility,
structure or other improvement will assist in the elimination of one or more blighting conditions
inside the project area, and that the provision of the building, facility, structure or other
improvement is consistent with the implementation plan adopted by the Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Public Improvements were covered by a Mitigated Negative Declaration
for the Center adopted by the City Planning Board on May 12, 2003; and
WHEREAS, the City of Alameda ( "City ") wishes to assist the Commission in carrying
out the Plan by undertaking and being responsible for a portion of the costs ,of the Public
Improvements and the Commission wishes to reimburse City for the City's portion of the costs of
the Public Improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ALAMEDA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Commission hereby finds and determines that the provision of the proposed
Public Improvements is necessary to effectuate the purposes of the Plan, and the Commission is
authorized, with the consent of the City Council, to provide such Public Improvements. The
Commission further finds and determines that the Public Improvements are of primary benefit to
the Project Area and the immediate neighborhood in which the Project Area is located; that no
other means of financing the Public Improvements is available to the City; that the payment of
funds by the Commission for such Public Improvements will assist in eliminating blight within
the Project Area and is consistent with the Commission's Implementation Plan adopted pursuant
to Section 33490 of the Community Redevelopment Law. These findings and determinations are
based upon the following facts:
a. The Public Improvements are located within three blocks of the BWIP
Project Area and will alleviate traffic congestion and improve pedestrian and vehicle traffic
safety along the entire downtown Park Street corridor within the Project Area which will assist in
attracting more business and strengthening the retail and commercial functions and the economic
base of the downtown area within the Project Area;
b. The owner of the Center is already being required to pay for a portion of
the costs of the Public Improvements, and the City does not have funds available for the
remaining costs of the Public Improvements;
c. The Public Improvements will eliminate blight by eliminating
inadequate traffic circulation conditions within the Project Area;
d. The Public Improvements are consistent with the Implementation Plan
for the BWIP, as the Implementation Plan's goals and programs provide for the elimination of
inadequate public improvements, and the strengthening of retail and other commercial functions
in the downtown areas and of the economic base, and the provision of improvements to public
infrastructure of benefit to the BWIP Project Area and the implementation of General Plan
recommendations.
-2-
Section 2. The Commission hereby approves and authorizes payment to City of City's
portion of the Public Improvements costs (the "Commission Share ") as set forth in the Public
Improvements Construction Agreement between City and Harsch Investment Corp., the Owner
of the Center.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
adopted and passed by the Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda at a
meeting assembled on the day of , 2005, by the following
vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of
said Commission this day of , 2005.
Lara W. Weisiger, Secretary
Community Improvement Commission
Beverly Johnson, Chair
Community Improvement Commission
CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY AND HARSCH INVESTMENT CORP.
0
u-
0 WHEREAS, Harsch Investment Corp. ( "Harsch ") is the owner of the South Shore
cc Shopping Center in Alameda ' California (the "Center"); and
0
WHEREAS, by Planning Board Resolution No. PB- 03 -40, the City of Alameda ( "City ")
approved the reconstruction and expansion of the South Shore Shopping Center ( "Center
it Improvements "), subject to various conditions, one of which is construction and installation of
U new signalization improvements to the Park Street and Otis Drive intersection to change the
existing, pre -timed signal to a fully actuated signal, including: installation of a new signal
controller, vehicle loop detectors, signal mast arms, traffic striping modification and all
equipment necessary to fully actuate the intersection (the "Public Improvements "); and
WHEREAS, the Center Improvements have attracted new retailers that have provided a
stimulus for increased economic activity not only in the Center, but also along Park Street within
the Business and Waterfront Improvement Project (the "BWIP "); and
WHEREAS, the increased economic activity within both the Center and the area of the
BWIP ( "BWIP Project Area ") has resulted in increased vehicular traffic further exacerbating the
existing inadequate traffic circulation along the Park Street corridor, both throughout the entire
BWIP Project Area and outside the BWIP Project Area, which is causing delays that exceed the
City's General Plan requirements; and
WHEREAS, the Public Improvements will be of primary benefit to the BWIP Project
Area as they will improve vehicular and pedestrian traffic safety and alleviate the traffic
congestion not only at the intersection of Park Street and Otis Drive, but also along the entire
downtown Park Street corridor within the BWIP Project Area; and
WHEREAS, due to the Public Improvements being of primary benefit to the BWIP
Project Area, City believes it is fair and equitable for Harsch and the City, on behalf of the
Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda ( "Commission "), to share the
costs of the Public Improvements; and
WHEREAS, City and Commission entered into a Cooperation Agreement dated June 18,
1991, which authorizes the City to assist the Commission in carrying out the Plan and the
Commission to reimburse City for such assistance, including the provision of public
improvements that benefit the BWIP Project Area; and
CC /CIC Resolution #2 (CC)
5 -3 -05
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 33445 of the Community Redevelopment Law, the
Commission is authorized, with the consent of the City Council, to pay all or part of the value of
the land for and the cost of the installation and construction of any building, facility, structure or
other improvement which is publicly owned either within or without a project area upon a
determination by the City Council that such building, facility, structure or other improvement is
of benefit to the project area or the immediate area in which the project is located, that no other
reasonable means of financing such building, facility, structure or other improvement are
available to the community, that the payment of funds for the cost of the building, facility,
structure or other improvement will assist in the elimination of one or more blighting conditions
inside the project area, and that the provision of the building, facility, structure or other
improvement is consistent with the implementation plan adopted by the Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Public Improvements were covered by a Mitigated Negative Declaration
for the Center adopted by the City Planning Board on May 12, 2003; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into the Public Improvements Construction
Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit A ( "Public Improvements Construction Agreement ") with
Harsch to set forth the terms and conditions for the design, construction, installation and payment
of the Public Improvements;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. City Council hereby finds and determines that the provision of the proposed
Public Improvements pursuant to the Public Improvements Construction Agreement is necessary
to effectuate the purposes of the Plan, and the Commission is authorized, with the consent of the
City Council, to provide such Public Improvements. The City Council further finds and
determines that the Public Improvements are of primary benefit to the BWIP Project Area and the
immediate neighborhood in which the Project Area is located; that no other means of financing
the Public Improvements is available to the City; that the payment of funds by the Commission
for such Public Improvements will assist in eliminating blight within the BWIP Project Area and
is consistent with the Commission's Implementation Plan adopted pursuant to Section 33490 of
the Community Redevelopment Law. These findings and determinations are based upon the
following facts:
a. The Public Improvements are located within three blocks of the BWIP
Project Area and will alleviate traffic congestion and improve pedestrian and vehicle traffic
safety along the entire downtown Park Street corridor within the Project Area which will assist in
attracting more business and strengthening the retail and commercial functions and the economic
base of the downtown area within the Project Area;
b. The owner of the Center is already being required to pay for a portion of
the costs of the Public Improvements, and the City does not have funds available for the
remaining costs of the Public Improvements;
c. The Public Improvements will eliminate blight by eliminating
inadequate traffic circulation conditions within the BWIP Project Area;
d. The Public Improvements are consistent with the Implementation Plan
for the BWIP, as the Implementation Plan's goals and programs provide for the elimination of
inadequate public improvements, and the strengthening of retail and other commercial functions
in the downtown areas and of the economic base, and the provision of improvements to public
infrastructure of benefit to the BWIP Project Area and the implementation of General Plan
recommendations.
Section 2. City Council hereby approves and authorizes the Commission to pay for
City's portion of the Public Improvements costs as set forth in the Public Improvements
Construction Agreement.
Section 3. The City Council hereby approves the Public Improvements Construction
Agreement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, subject to any minor
conforming, technical or clarifying changes approved by the City Attorney. The Acting City
Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Public Improvements Construction
Agreement on behalf of the City Council.
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
THIS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT is made this _
day of , 2005, by and between CITY OF ALAMEDA, a California municipal
corporation ( "City "), and HARSCH INVESTMENT REALTY, LLC, SERIES C, a Delaware
limited liability company ( "Developer ").
RECITALS
The following recitals are a substantive part of this Agreement:
A. Developer is the owner of that certain real property known as the South Shore
Shopping Center, located at 2160 Otis Drive, Alameda, California ( "Property ").
B. By City Planning Board Resolution No. PB -03 -40 adopted on July 28, 2003 ( "PB
Resolution "), Developer was granted approval for reconstruction and expansion of the South
Shore Shopping Center ( "Project "), subject to various conditions, including a requirement that
upon reaching certain square footage thresholds, Developer construct and install new traffic
signalization at the intersection of Otis Drive and Park Street to change the existing pre -timed
signal to a fully actuated signal, including installation of a new signal controller, vehicle loop
detectors, signal mast arms, traffic striping modification and all equipment necessary to fully
actuate the intersection ( "Public Improvements "). The Public Improvements shall be in
accordance with the Preliminary` Plans for Signal Modification at Otis Drive and Park Street
Intersection, Sheets 1 -4, dated March 1, 2005, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated
herein.
C. Developer's Project has attracted new retailers that have provided a stimulus for
increased economic activity not only within the South Shore Shopping Center ( "Shopping
Center "), but also along the entire Park Street corridor area of the Business and Waterfront
Improvement Project Area ( "BWIP Project Area "). Without the Public. Improvements, the
increased economic activity within the BWIP Project Area, together with additional square
footage planned for the Project, will add to Park Street's already inadequate traffic circulation by
lengthening the queues at the Park Street and Otis Drive intersection thereby further backing up
traffic along the entire Park Street corridor of the BWIP Project Area.
D. On June 18, 1991, City and the Community Improvement Commission of the City
of Alameda ( "Commission ") entered into a Cooperation Agreement which authorizes the City to
assist the Commission in carrying out the Community Improvement Plan for the Business and
Waterfront Improvement Project ( "Plan ") and the Commission to reimburse the City for such
assistance, including the provision of public improvements that benefit the BWIP Project Area.
E. Developer and City desire to enter into this Agreement to provide, among other
things, for Developer's construction, installation, and dedication to City of the Public
G: \econdev \Comm Projects \ south shore\ Agreements \DMDOCSS - #804072 -v3D-
Public_ Improvements _Construction_Agreement - _A]ameda.DOC
804072v3D 21942/0001
Improvements and to set forth the parties' respective obligations with respect to payment of the
costs of said Public Improvements.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and for other good and
valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed between
the parties as follows:
1. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to guarantee Developer's satisfactory
and timely completion of the Public Improvements, to ensure Developer meets the conditions
and requirements of the Planning Board's approval of the Project, and to set forth the parties'
respective obligations with respect to payment of the costs of said Public Improvements.
2. Developer Deposit. At the time of execution of this Agreement by Developer,
Developer shall deliver to City a deposit in the amount of TWENTY -FIVE THOUSAND
DOLLARS ($25,000.00) ( "Deposit ") for use by City to pay (i) City's out -of- pocket costs
incurred in connection with the design of the Public Improvements and the preparation of plans
and specifications therefor, and (ii) the inspection fees payable in connection with City's
inspection of Developer's work of Public Improvements ( "City Costs and Fees "). In the event
the City Costs and Fees exceed the amount of the Deposit, City shall notify Developer, from time
to time, in writing of the additional amount(s) needed to pay the City Costs and Fees and within
ten days of such notification, Developer shall deliver such additional amount(s) to City and such
amount(s) shall become part of the Deposit. If, following Developer's completion of the Public
Improvements and City's acceptance of the dedication thereof, City determines that the City
Costs and Fees are less than the amount of the Deposit, City shall return the remaining amount of
the Deposit to Developer.
3. Duty to Design, Construct, and Install Public Improvements. Within 30 days
following the date of this Agreement and City's receipt of the Deposit described in paragraph 2
above, City shall prepare or cause to be prepared and deliver to Developer the final construction
plans and specifications for the Public Improvements. As a condition of approval of the Project,
the PB Resolution requires Developer to provide the Public Improvements at the time the total
square footage of the Shopping Center exceeds 590,000 square feet ( "Square Feet Threshold ").
As described in Developer's schedule for construction of additions to the Shopping Center
attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein ( "Construction Schedule "), the additions
to Building 700 will result in the Shopping Center exceeding the Square Feet Threshold.
Therefore, prior to City' issuance of a building permit for any additions to Building 700,
Developer agrees to enter into a written contract with a licensed general contractor(s) reasonably
acceptable to City to construct and install the work of Public Improvements in accordance with
City's plans and specifications. City shall have the right to review and reasonably approve or
disapprove the contract award amount and the time period specified in the contract for
performance of the work of Public Improvements. City shall approve or disapprove the contract
award amount and time period within ten (10) business days of Developer's written request,
which shall be accompanied by a copy of the proposed contract. Following City's approval of
- 2 —
G: \ econdev \Comm Projects\ south shore\ Agreements \DMDOCS1 - #804072 -v3D-
Public_ Improvements_ Construction _Agreement_ = Alameda.DOC -
804072v3D 21942/0001
said contract award amount and time period and Developer's receipt of all permits and approvals
required for construction of the Public Improvements, Developer shall commence and complete
construction and installation of the Public Improvements within the times and in accordance with
the provisions set forth in paragraph 5 below.
4. Payment of Public Improvements Construction Costs. All costs of
constructing and installing the Public Improvements shall initially be borne by Developer.
Provided (i) Developer has timely completed the Public Improvements in accordance with City's
plans and specifications therefor, and all other requirements of the City Municipal Code and
rulings made under it; and (ii) Developer is not in default of any of its obligations under this
Agreement; and (iii) City has accepted dedication of the Public Improvements, then City shall,
within ninety (90) days following City's acceptance of the dedication and Developer's written
request, pay to Developer an amount equal to the lesser of (a) the .total amount of Eligible Costs
(defined below) incurred by Developer in connection with the design, construction and
installation of the Public Improvements minus $100,000.00 or (b) TWO HUNDRED
THOUSAND DOLLARS ($200,000.00) ( "City's Share ") to reimburse Developer for a portion
of said Eligible Costs. Developer's written request for disbursement of City's Share shall identify
the total Eligible Costs incurred by Developer and shall be accompanied by copies of invoices,
cancelled checks and such other evidence as may be reasonably requested by City supporting the
Developer's asserted amount of City's Share. "Eligible Costs" means the total out -of- pocket
costs and expenses paid by Developer (i) to City for the City Costs and Fees and (ii) to general
contractor(s) approved by City pursuant to paragraph 3 above for the work of Public
Improvements. Developer's staff time and attorneys fees (other than attorneys fees recoverable
under paragraph 18, below) shall be borne by Developer at its expense and shall not be included
for purposes of calculating City's Share.
5. Schedule and Completion. Subject to force majeure delays described in
paragraph 20 below, Developer shall commence and complete the work of Public Improvements
within the construction time period approved by City pursuant to paragraph 3, above. All work
of Public Improvements shall be completed in a good and workmanlike manner, in accordance
with City's construction plans and specifications and accepted construction practices and in a
manner equal or superior to the requirements of the City's Municipal Code and rulings made
under it. Notwithstanding any other provision hereof to the contrary, Developer must
satisfactorily complete the work of Public Improvements in accordance with the terms of this
Agreement and obtain City's final acceptance thereof prior to issuance of any certificate of
occupancy for any addition to Building 700 that would cause total square footage of the
Shopping Center to equal or exceed 590,000 square feet. Developer acknowledges that
renovation and expansion of all tenant spaces in Building 700 as shown on Exhibits C -1 and C -2
is expected to cause the Center to exceed 590,000 square feet. It is agreed that Noah's Bagels,
First United Services Bank, Dollar Tree and Anna's Linens are existing tenants and may remain
in occupancy, but occupancy of any expansion area that takes the overall project square footage
over 590,000 square feet will be contingent on satisfactory completion of the Public
Improvements and City's final acceptance thereof.
- 3 —
G: \ econdev \ Comm Projects \south shore \ Agreements \ DMDOCS1- #804072 -v3D-
Public_Improvements_ Construction _Agreement_- _Alameda.DOC
804072v3D 21942/0001
6. Security Deposits. Within ten (10) calendar days after City's completion of the
plans and specifications for the Public Improvements, and in any event prior to Developer's
commencement of any work of Public Improvements,. Developer shall furnish to City two
security deposits in the form of surety bonds, irrevocable standby letters of credit, cash deposits,
pledges of securities, certificates of deposit, or other forms of security acceptable to the City,
each of which shall be equal to 100% of Developer's general contractor contract price, as security
(a) for the payment of all persons performing labor and furnishing materials and (b) for the
faithful performance of the construction of the Public Improvements. If the security deposits are
in the form of surety bonds, the surety issuing said bonds shall be admitted in the State of
California and shall be reasonably acceptable to the City. In addition, the performance bond(s),
whether issued by individual or corporate surety, shall, among other required terms and
conditions, contain conditions that (i) death of the named principal shall not operate as a release
of the obligation hereunder of the surety and (ii) extensions of time, if any, granted by City to
Developer or its contractor(s) for performance of the work of Public Improvements covered by
the bond shall not exonerate said surety, but rather shall extend for a like time the period of
limitations during which said surety shall remain bound by the undertaking. Upon satisfactory
completion of the Public Improvements, City's final acceptance thereof and expiration of
applicable statute of limitation time periods, City shall release and/or return to Developer the
security required to have been provided pursuant to this paragraph, but excluding therefrom the
warranty period security called for in the paragraph below.
Upon satisfactory completion of the Public Improvements and prior to City's final
acceptance thereof, Developer shall furnish to City a surety bond or other form of cash or
security acceptable to the City in an amount equal to ten percent (10 %) of the Developer's
general contractor contract price as security to guarantee performance of any corrective work
throughout the warranty period described in paragraph 9 below.
7. Encroachment Permit. Developer, at its expense as an Eligible Cost, shall
obtain from City an encroachment permit for the work of Public Improvements at least fifteen
(15) calendar days before commencement of the Public Improvements work.
S. Approval of Permits. Developer shall be responsible for obtaining, at its
expense as an Eligible Cost, all permits and approvals required for construction and installation
of the Public Improvements. City and Developer agree to act promptly and in good faith to
expedite the issuance of permits necessary for the Public Improvements.
9. Warranty Period; Repair and Reconstruction. If, within a period of one (1)
year after City's final acceptance of the Public Improvements, . all or any portion of the work of
Public Improvements installed or constructed under this Agreement, fails to fulfill any of the
requirements of the Agreement or the specifications referred to herein due to failure of or defect
in materials or workmanship, Developer shall, without delay and without cost to City, repair,
replace or reconstruct any defective or otherwise unsatisfactory part or parts of the work to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. Should Developer fail to act promptly or in accordance with
this requirement after written notice from City, or should the exigencies of the case require
repairs, replacements or reconstruction to be made before Developer can be notified, City may,
- 4 --
G: \econdev \Comm Projects \south shore\ Agreements \DMDOCS1 - #804072 -v3D-
Public_ Improvements _Construction_Agreement = _Alameda.DOC
804072v3D 21942/0001
at its option, make the necessary repairs, replacements or perform the necessary reconstruction
and Developer shall pay to the City the actual cost of such repairs, replacements and
reconstruction, plus ten percent (10 %). Except where the exigencies of the case require
immediate action, City agrees to notify Developer in writing if the Public Improvements fail to
fulfill any requirements of this Agreement and to specify the failure of or defect in materials or
workmanship and the actions required to be taken by Developer to cure the deficiencies. Upon
notification of any such defect, Developer shall correct, remedy or cure the defect within thirty
(30) days or, if such defect cannot be cured within thirty (30) days, then within such longer
period, provided Developer commences to cure the defect within such thirty- (30) day period and
thereafter diligently prosecutes said cure to completion.
10. Property Owner Not Agent of City. Neither Developer nor its agents or
contractors or subcontractors are agents of City in connection with the performance of
Developer's obligations under this Agreement.
11. Indemnification. Developer agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless
from any and all claims for loss, damage, injury, or liability as defined in this paragraph 11.
a. As used in this paragraph "City" means the City of Alameda and the
Commission, and its and their respective elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers,
employees, consultants, agents and representatives.
b. The liabilities protected against are any liability or claim for damage of
any kind allegedly suffered, incurred or threatened because of actions defined below (except for
liability or claims resulting from the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of the City),
including personal injury, death, property damage, or any combination of these, and including
the defense of any suit, action or other proceeding concerning these.
c. The actions causing liability are any act or omission (negligent or non -
negligent) in connection with the matters covered by this Agreement and attributable to
Developer or any contractor, subcontractor, agent or employee of Developer, including failure of
either Developer or its contractors or subcontractors to take out and continuously maintain
Workers' Compensation Insurance. The actions also include the act of approving this Agreement
by the City. The indemnification in this paragraph 11 is not conditioned or dependent on whether
or not the City has insurance or other indemnification covering any of these matters.
12. Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance. Developer shall procure
Commercial General Liability Insurance protecting. Developer, City and Commission from
incidents as to bodily injury liability (including death) and property damage liability that may
occur as a result of the work of Public Improvements. Developer shall provide a certificate of
insurance to City prior to commencing the Public Improvements work (or prior to
commencement of any work within the public right -of -way, whichever occurs first). The
insurance policy shall contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
- 5 —
G: \econdev \Comm Projects \south shore\ Agreements \DMDOCS1 - #804072 -v3D-
Public_ Improvements_ Construction _Agreement_- _A]ameda.DOC
804072v3D 21942/0001
a. City, Commission, and its and their officers, officials, employees and
agents are to be covered as additional insureds as respects liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of Developer. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the
scope of protection afforded to the City, Commission, and its and their officers, officials,
employees and agents.
b. The amounts of public liability and property damage coverage shall not be
less than FIVE MILLION DOLLARS ($5,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, death, and
property damage.
c. The insurance shall be written on an occurrence form and shall be
maintained in full force until the Public Improvements work has been completed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. The insurance policy shall provide for thirty (30) days notice of
cancellation to City. The policy shall not be canceled, nor the amount of coverage be reduced,
earlier than thirty (30) days after City receives notice from the insurer of the intent of
cancellation or reduction.
e. Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policy shall not
affect the coverage provided to City, Commission, and its and their officers, officials, employees,
consultants and agents.
f. Developer's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects
City, Commission, and its and their officers, officials, employees, consultants and agents. Any
insurance, self- insurance or joint self - insurance maintained by City, Commission, or its or their
officers, officials, employees, consultants or agents shall be in excess of Developer's insurance
and shall not contribute to it.
g. Companies writing the insurance under this paragraph 12 shall be licensed
to do business in the State of California. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current
A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII.
13. Workers' Compensation Insurance. Developer shall not allow any work on the
Public Improvements to begin until Workers' Compensation Insurance has been obtained for all
employees of Developer and any contractor or subcontractor performing the work, in accordance
with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700, et seq. If a class of employees is not
protected under the Workers' Compensation Law, the Developer shall provide, or have each
contractor and subcontractor provide, adequate insurance for the protection of employees not
otherwise protected.
14. Compliance with Laws. Developer shall carry out the work of Public
Improvements in conformity with all applicable laws, including State Labor Code and Public
Contracts Code requirements; City zoning and development standards; building, plumbing,
mechanical and electrical codes; all other provisions of the City's Municipal Code and City
6—
G: \econdev \Comm Projects \south shore\ Agreements \DMDOCS1 - #804072 -v3D-
Public_ Improvements_ Construction _Agreement_- _Alameda.DOC
804072v3D 21942/0001
Charter; and all applicable disabled and handicapped access requirements, including the
Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 12101, et seq., Government Code Section
4450, et seq., Government Code Section 11135, et seq., and the Unruh Civil Rights Act, Civil
Code Section 51, et seq.
15. Prevailing Wage Obligations. Developer acknowledges and agrees that the
work of Public Improvements will constitute "public works" as defined in Labor Code Section
1720 in that such Public Improvements involve construction, alteration, demolition, installation,
or repair work done under contract and paid for in whole or in part out of public funds under
Labor Code Section 1720. Accordingly, Developer shall comply with all State Labor Code
requirements and other applicable laws, regulations, ruling and requirements pertaining to public
works, including those pertaining to payment of "prevailing wages" (collectively, "Public
Works/Prevailing Wage Laws "). Developer shall (i) require its contractors and subcontractors
to submit certified copies of payroll records to Developer; (ii) maintain complete copies of such
certified payroll records; and (iii) make such records available to the City and its designees for
inspection and copying during regular business hours at the Property or at another location
within the City of Alameda. Developer shall also include in Developer's general contractor
agreement a provision, in a form acceptable to City, obligating Developer's general contractor to
require its contractors and/or subcontractors to comply with all such Public Works/Prevailing
Wage Laws.
Developer shall defend City and Commission, and its and their respective officers,
employees, agents and representatives (collectively, "Indemnitees ") from and against any and all
present and future liabilities, obligations, orders, claims, damages, fines, penalties and expenses
(including attorneys' fees and costs) (collectively, "Claims "), arising out of or in any way
connected with Developer's obligation to comply with all Public Works/Prevailing Wage Laws
with respect to the work of Public Improvements, including all Claims that may be made by
contractors, subcontractors or other third party claimants pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1726
and/or 1781, as amended and added by Senate Bill 966.
Developer hereby waives, releases and discharges forever the Indemnitees from any and
all present and future Claims arising out of or in any way connected with Developer's obligation
to comply with the Public Works/Prevailing Wage Laws pursuant to this paragraph 15.
Developer is aware of and familiar with the provisions of Section 1542 of the California Civil
Code which provides as follows:
"A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or
suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known
by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor."
As such relates to this paragraph 15, Developer hereby waives and relinquishes all rights and
benefits which it may have under Section 1542 of the California Civil Code.
16. Notice of Breach and Default; Developer Right to Cure. If Developer refuses
or fails to timely complete the work of Public Improvements, or if the Developer is adjudged
- 7 —
G: \ econdev \ Comm Projects \ south shore \ Agreements \ DMDOC S1- #804072 -v3D-
Public_ Improvements _Construction_Agreement_ _Alameda.DOC
804072v3D 21942/0001
bankrupt or makes a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, or if a receiver is appointed
in the event of Developer's insolvency, or if Developer or any of Developer's contractors,
subcontractors, agents or employees violate any of the terms of this Agreement, the City may
serve upon the Developer and the financial institution holding the security deposit or issuing the
surety bonds written Notice of breach and default of this Agreement. Developer shall have ten
(10) days from receipt of the Notice of a breach and default to cure the specified breach and
default.
17. Breach of Agreement; Performance by City. If, following Notice from City,
Developer fails to cure the breach and default within the time set forth in paragraph 16, City may
proceed to complete the Public Improvements work by contract or other method City considers
advisable, at the sole expense of Developer. Developer, immediately upon demand, shall pay the
actual, out -of- pocket costs and charges related to said work, together with a ten percent (10 %)
overhead charge. In this event, City, without liability for doing so, may take possession of and
utilize in completing the work such materials and other property belonging to Developer as may
be on or about the Property and necessary for completion of the work. In the event of default, the
financial institution holding the security deposit or issuing the surety bonds shall be liable to City
to pay the actual, out -of- pocket costs and charges related to said work, together with a ten
percent (10 %) overhead charge incurred by City as provided herein for completion of the Public
Improvement, up to the face amount of the obligations specified under paragraph 6.
18. Remedies. Either party may bring legal action to: (a) compel performance of this
Agreement by the defaulting party; and (b) recover the defaulting party's share of the costs of
completing the Public Improvements, including the non - defaulting party's administrative and
legal costs. The parties agree that if legal action is brought by any party to enforce the provisions
of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all of the costs of suit and
reasonable attorney's fees, and all other expenses of litigation as determined by the Court. No
failure on the part of a party to exercise any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver
of any other right or remedy that said party may have hereunder.
19. Notices, Demands, and Communications between the Parties. Any approval,
disapproval, demand, document or other notice ( "Notice ") which either party may desire to give
to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given by any
commercially acceptable means, including via first -class mail, personal delivery or overnight
courier, to the party to whom the Notice is directed at the address of the party as set forth below,
or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice.
To City: City of Alameda
2264 Santa Clara Avenue, Room 120
Alameda, California 94501
Attention: City Manager
and: City of Alameda
Public Works Department
950 West Mall Square, First Floor
- 8 -
G. \econdev \Comm Projects \south shore \Agreements \DMDOCS1 - #804072 -v3D-
Public_ Improvements_ Construction _Agreement_- _A]ameda.DOC
804072v3D 21942/0001
Alameda, California 94501
Attention: Public Works Director
and: City of Alameda
Development Services Department
950 West Mall Square, First Floor
Alameda, California 94501
Attention: Development Services Director
To Developer:
and:
Harsch Investment Realty, LLC, Series C
523 South Shore Center West
South Shore Shopping Center
Alameda, California 94501
Attention: Michael Corbett,
Retail Portfolio Manager
Harsch Investment Realty, LLC, Series C
1121 SW Salmon Street
Portland, OR 97205
Attention: Legal Department
Any Notice shall be deemed received immediately if delivered by hand, on the third day from the
date it is postmarked if delivered by first -class mail, postage prepaid, and on the next business
day if sent via nationally recognized overnight courier. Notices sent by a party's attorney on
behalf of such party shall be deemed delivered by such party.
20. Enforced Delay; Extension of Times of Performance. Subject to the
limitations set forth below, performance by either party hereunder shall not be deemed to be in
default, and all performance and other dates specified in this Agreement shall be extended, where
delays are due to: war; insurrection; strikes; lockouts; riots; floods; earthquakes; fires; casualties;
acts of God; acts of the public enemy; epidemics; quarantine restrictions; freight embargoes;
governmental restrictions or priority; litigation, including court delays; unusually severe weather;
acts or omissions of the other party; or acts or failures to act of other public or governmental_
agency or entity (other than the acts or failures to act of City which shall not excuse performance
by City). An extension of time for any such cause shall be for the period of the enforced delay
and shall commence to run from the time of the commencement of the cause, if Notice by the
party claiming such extension is sent to the other party within thirty (30) days . of the
commencement of the cause. Times of performance under this Agreement may also be extended
in writing by the mutual agreement of City and Developer.
21. Change of Property Owner. If the Developer identified under the introductory .
paragraph to this Agreement ceases to have a legal interest in the Property, then a Notice to that
effect shall be filed with the City. The Notice shall include the name and address of the new
owner of the Property, a copy of the deed, and- a new form of security from the new owner
- 9 —
G: \econdev \Comm Projects \south shore\ Agreements \DMDOCS1 - #804072 -v3D-
Public_Improvements_Conatruction _Agreement_- __4lameda.DOC
804072v3D 21942/0001
conforming to the requirements of paragraph 6. Upon the filing of the Notice with the City, the
successor owner shall be charged with the obligations of Developer under this Agreement.
22. Heirs, Successors, and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and
inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, and assigns of the parties to it.
23. Alteration of Agreement. Developer hereby stipulates and agrees, on behalf of
itself and the financial institution holding the security deposit or issuing the surety bonds, that
any addition, alterations or modifications to this Agreement or to the plans and specifications for
the Public Improvements, including any extension of time within which the work hereunder may
be completed, shall in no way affect its obligations on the improvement security furnished
hereunder. Developer stipulates and agrees that, in the event of an uncured default by
Developer, it shall have no right to dispute the propriety of any demand made by the City for the
payment of the improvement security furnished hereunder.
24. Miscellaneous Terms and Provisions.
a. This Agreement and the encroachment permit to be obtained by Developer
as provided in paragraph 7 above, contain the full, final, and exclusive statement of the contract
of Developer and City regarding the Public Improvements to be constructed by Developer.
b. If any provision of this Agreement is adjudged invalid, the remaining
provisions of it shall not be affected.
c. If there is more than one signer of this Agreement as Developer, their
obligations are joint and several.
d. Time is of the essence with respect to the performance by Developer of
each and every obligation and condition of this Agreement.
e. The headings contained in this Agreement have been inserted for
convenience only and in no way define or limit the scope of interpretation of the Agreement.
f. Each party executing this Agreement on behalf of a party represents and
warrants that such person is duly and validly authorized to do so on behalf of the entity it
purports to bind and if such party is a partnership, corporation or limited liability company, that
such partnership, corporation or limited liability company has full right and authority to enter
into this Agreement and perform all of its obligations hereunder.
g. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which
shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at
least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto.
h. The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and
enforcement of this Agreement without reference to principles of conflict of laws. Venue for any
- 10 —
G: \econdev \Comm Projects \south shore \ Agreements \ DMDOCS1-#804072-v3D-
Public Improvements _Construction_Agreement_ _Alameda.DOC
804072v3D 21942/0001
action brought under this Agreement shall be in the Superior Court of Alameda County,
California.
i. Each party to this Agreement has had an opportunity to review the
Agreement, confer with legal counsel regarding the meaning of the Agreement, and negotiate
revisions to the Agreement. Accordingly, this Agreement shall be interpreted as though drafted
by both parties and neither party may rely upon Civil Code section 1654 to interpret any
uncertainty in the meaning of the Agreement.
j. This Agreement may only be modified or amended by mutual written
agreement of both parties.
G: \econdev \Comm Projects \south shore\ Agreements \DMDOCS1 - #804072 -v3D-
Public_ Improvements_ Construction _Agreement_- _Alameda.DOC
8O4072v3D 21942/0001
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Developer have executed this Agreement on the
respective dates set forth below.
CITY:
CITY OF ALAMEDA, a California municipal
corporation
Dated: , 2005 By:
William C. Norton, Acting City Manager
ATTEST:
Lara W. Weisiger, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
cV Matth -.w Naclerio
Publ. •. jks Direct i r (f
eh" /
Leslie A. Little
Development Services Director
Dated:
-AND --
DEVELOPER:
HARSCH INVESTME
w . smite f i
Ra o y Kyte, : enior , ice President
SERIES C, a D
2005 By:
, LLC,
ility company
- 12 —
G: \econdev \Comm Projects \south shore\ Agreements \DMDOCSI - #804072 -v3D-
Public_ Improvements _Conatruction_Agreement - _Atameda.DOC
1304072v3D 21942/0001
EXHIBIT A
PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR SIGNAL MODIFICATION
[Sheets 1 -4, dated March 1, 2005, incorporated herein by reference, and on file for public review
in the City of Alameda Public Works Department]
C: \Documents and Settings \catt usr \Local Settings \Temp \replacementpageA.doc
804072v3D 21942/0001
EXHIBIT B
SOUTH SHORE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
CO
CO
g
i
gg
WW
• 10
10
8
cc
c.
Z
M
m
700 CBO2 -0148
CO: 8 o O
COCO
g Aaa iig
a e,
04 el. ES
te
C7
Nk 4�8
Cs m
l 8
illitg
�ff ga
cCOI.
'+ o
M
scr u
r
O it)
a co
L
CO•°
10 *0101
co
aaMM
comt-
Bldg 700 total (inclusive
G: \econdev \Comm Projects \south shore\ Agreements \DMDOCS1 - #804072 -v3D-
Public_ Improvements_ Construction _Agreement_- _Alameda.DOC
804072v3D 21942/0001
EXHIBIT C -1
EXHIBIT C-2
--0
tiM',NNWN,A0;,6
4 4.4:6Av4 4,„
\V.'s\ NS 's
r■
\ Ns
1\***,M NWN.,\■
• 1000000,1,10,,
WAIM
k., NoKztudi.
t .1,1 ikkrY.
'e*,4,40'4.4,4'1.40'70,10
41,1. It■I .t.11■111
•
111W11011 10111611i''
E .TF;11)1L1Hal
iiiiiii iiiiiii ii lir 0 is'
i=,-41..14 • 111111:f1;. - ...E1.1. t. 1.11 1
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
1 11111111.r 1 I illill'TI I
.41.4..•.i4.4 .•.;,,ri',11;rii'‘ii4i.i:4,'.
„.q.,.1-,...:1„I..
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
adopted and passed by the City Council of the City of Alameda at a
meeting assembled on the day of , 2005, by the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of
said City Council this day of , 2005.
Lara W. Weisiger, City Clerk
Beverly Johnson, Mayor
CITY OF ALAMEDA
Memorandum
To: Honorable Chair and
Members of the Community Improvement Commission
From: William C. Norton
Acting Executive Director
Date: April 20, 2005
Subject: Recommendation to Approve an Amended Contract with Architectural Resources
Group, Inc. by Increasing the Contract Amount an Additional $44,275 to Provide
Additional Pre - Planning Services for the Proposed Alameda Theatre Project.
BACKGROUND
Over the past two years, the City has been proceeding with planning activities for the possible
historic rehabilitation of the Alameda Theatre, in conjunction with a multi- screen theater and
parking structure project. These activities have included the City selecting historic preservation
architects, Architectural Resources Group (ARG), to provide feasibility and cost estimates for
the potential historic rehabilitation of the Alameda Theatre.
In November 2003 the Community Improvement Commission (CIC) contracted with ARG to
prepare preliminary cost estimates, base drawings, code analysis, testing, and recommendations
for interior rehabilitation. The cost of that contract was $78,890.
Since then, the CIC has amended ARG's contract three times to authorize performance of
expanded services necessary to move the proposed historic theatre project forward. First, in June
2004, the CIC approved a $129,200 amendment to provide additional testing and analysis of
system improvements with complete cost estimates for potential rehabilitation of the Theatre.
Second, in October 2004, the CIC approved a $43,550 amendment to coordinate with the
preliminary designs for. the Cineplex and parking structure. Third, in December 2004, the CIC
approved a $320,000 amendment to produce construction documents. The total amount allocated
to date for ARG's scope of work is $571,640.
DISCUSSION /ANALYSIS
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA) mandates an historic
preservation review process to protect historic properties. The City has contracted with a Section
106 expert (Robert Bruce Anderson) to help meet and satisfy these provisions. The proposed
contract amendment would enable ARG to provide Mr. Anderson a document that outlines the
specific treatment to individual character defining features of the Alameda Theatre, which will
be used to satisfy the Section 106 requirements.
In addition, the proposed contract amendment will include developing construction documents
and specifications for the ADA ramp and Exit Stair Enclosure located directly west of the
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
Report #3 -
Council/CIC
5 -3 -05
Honorable Chair and
Members of the Community Improvement Commission
April 20, 2005
Page 2
auditorium of the Alameda Theatre. This amendment would facilitate the planning process for
the project and provide a base for further development, should the CIC decide to move forward
with this project. A copy of the contract and its amendments is on file with the City Clerk.
BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACT
This project will be funded by the 2003 Merged Area Bonds and will not impact the General
Fund. Architectural fees for this phase of work will not exceed $44,275 for a total contract
amount of $615,915.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Community Improvement Commission approve the amended contract
with Architectural Resources Group, Inc. by increasing the contract amount an additional
$44,275 to provide additional pre - planning services for the proposed Alameda Theatre Project.
WCN /LAL /DES /EF:ry
Leslie A. Little
Development Services Director
By: Dorene E. Soto
Manager, Busines
e
evelopment Division
Eric Fonstein
Management Analyst
cc: Architectural Resources Group, c/o Naomi Miroglio
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
G: \econdev\Eric \Theatre \Contracts \CIC 5 -3 -05 ARG Amendment.doc
F: CP /Alameda Theatre Project/Architectural Resources Group (ARG)
WHEREAS, the City of Alameda is home to more than 12,500 citizens aged 60 years or
older; and
WHEREAS, the older Americans of the City of Alameda are a vital part of our City's
demographic makeup; and
WHEREAS, older citizens are members of our community entitled to dignified,
independent lives free from fears, myths, and misconceptions about aging;
and
each community in America should recognize the contributions of our
older citizens, understand and address their evolving needs, and support
their caregivers; and
our society is dependent upon intergenerational cooperation and support,
and benefits from our collective efforts to serve older Americans and the
people who love them; and
this year marks the 40th anniversary of the passage of the Older
Americans' Act by the United States Congress;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Beverly Johnson, Mayor of the City of Alameda, do hereby
proclaim May as
in the City of Alameda and encourage everyone in our community to respect the
independence of our Older Americans, and to be sensitive and supportive of their needs
and accomplishments.
CITY OF ALAMEDA
Memorandum
To: Honorable Mayor and
Councilmembers
From: William C. Norton
Acting City Manager
Date: April 26, 2005
Re: New Main Library Project Update
Attached to this memorandum is the May 1, 2005, Library Construction Report.
Respectfully submitted, ,
William C. Norton
Acting City Manager
Attachment
Susan Hardie
Library Director
"Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service"
Report #343
5 -3 -05
61
O
Construction Re
CZ
.-
0
00
0
a)
a1
O
a.
0
c
0
3
0
g
o E
E
aa)
U v)
00 O
a
w 0
do Y,
o 0i v O
O Q N O
r( /" .O N ~ u. �.)
.c °' a ° 0
a o
•3 0 O b .�
-d a
.0 0
° g o 0 0 O
o U 0 .0
O N ,, 2 2O -O
0
.4 - 0 ..
3 U 0 0 O
Pcd O N vj a) N N 0.) w
cn 4 w_ N N Q .., w. .
_ a C�
. o O .� °
a c4,1 714
2 09
a N : N 'b p "0 � .0 >, p.
U p a c) O 0 .O ,. 0
O 0 0 O I;
o p 0
O U a) i0.) cd O > .b
•'. Oa W o
= U
g'a 3 z, E w w a)
0
ti
w
0
,y Q o
. ..
0.
,� C U � U ateD '
�O 0 O 0 u.
�� 0
0N . N 'd
.� • O , K pp O = 0 G) p O O. O
a U vO >, w a) O p ° .O OQ O .G -
U O 0 H ) U '. cz O ) g 0 a
� . w :a
H,,„H
..GA 6 it
• • • • • • • Er • 6 • 6 • .s
f� . ;l pal
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
V
cD 000 0000
000 0000
L. G NOO or- oo
C' O N o o O N O°
27,073,249.00
Sources Subtotal:
4,377,811.00
Expenditures to date:
22,695,438.00
Balance Available:
G: \Library\New Main Library FS 04- 05.xls
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY - - APRIL 19, 2005 - - 7:30 PM
Mayor Johnson convened the Regular Meeting at 8:07 p.m.
ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore,
Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5.
Absent: None.
AGENDA CHANGES
(05- ) Mayor Johnson presented the Resolution Commending Alameda
Police Department Sergeant Jon Westmoreland after the Proclamation.
PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
(05- ) Proclamation declaring April 23, 2005 as Earth Day
Alameda 2005.
Mayor Johnson read and presented the Proclamation to Paul Groff,
Allegra Printing.
Mr. Groff thanked the Council for the Proclamation.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEM
(05- ) Resolution No. 13828, "Commending Alameda Police
Department Sergeant Jon Westmoreland for His Contributions to the
City of Alameda." Adopted.
Mayor Johnson read and presented the Resolution to Sergeant Jon
Westmoreland.
Sergeant Westmoreland thanked the Council and stated that he was
honored to have served the City.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the Resolution.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Johnson announced that the recommendation to authorize the
Acting City Manager or designee to enter into an agreement for the
acquisition of real property [paragraph no. 05- 1, the
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council 1
April 19, 2005
recommendation to authorize the Acting City Manager to use $201,000
in Measure B ferry reserves [paragraph no. 05- ], and the
Resolution Approving the Application for Land and Water
Conservation Fund [paragraph no. 05- ] were removed from the
Consent Calendar for discussion.
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the remainder of the
Consent Calendar.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
[Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding
the paragraph number.]
( *05- ) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings
held on April 5, 2005 and the Special City Council Meeting held on
April 7, 2005 and April 8, 2005. Approved.
( *05- ) Ratified bills in the amount of $1,826,558.48.
( *05- ) Recommendation to approve Agreement with Community
Playgrounds, Inc. in the amount of $98,930 for Leydecker Park
Playground Renovation Project. Accepted.
(05- ) Recommendation to authorize the Acting City Manager or
designee to enter into an agreement for the acquisition of real
property from the East Bay Municipal Utility District for $110,800
plus closing costs.
Councilmember deHaan requested clarification on the impacts of
drawing $110,800 from the Recreation and Park Commission's existing
budget.
Councilmember Matarrese stated that he understood that the $110,800
was coming from the Open Space Fund.
Mayor Johnson stated that the Open Space Fund was a result of the
property sold at the Harbor Bay Business Park; Council directed
that the sale proceeds be placed in a separate Open Space account.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the money was also being used
for the Estuary Park Project.
The Acting City Manager responded in the affirmative; stated
purchasing the full amount of land [for Estuary Park] shown in the
General Plan could cost up to $5 million; there will be discussions
with the developer and the Bay Conservation and Development
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council 2
April 19, 2005
Commission (BCDC)regarding requirements for a pathway.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether having an approximate
$300,000 delta will limit the capabilities of carrying on with the
project.
The Acting City Manager responded there would be limitations in
getting a larger share of the land; discussions with the developer
and grant approval would determine how much land the City could
obtain; staff must recommend proceeding because the project is
shown in the General Plan.
Councilmember deHann moved approval of the recommendation to
authorize the Acting City Manager or designee to enter into an
agreement for the acquisition of real property from the East Bay
Municipal Utility District for $110,800 plus closing costs
[paragraph no. (05- ] and Adoption of Resolution Approving the
Application for Land and Water Conservation Fund Estuary Park
Project [paragraph no. (05- 1.
Under discussion, Mayor Johnson inquired whether the grant was the
same one the City previously applied for and did not receive and
whether the chances for approval were better.
The Acting Recreation and Park Director responded the current grant
was from the Land and Water Conservation Act; the previous grant
was under the Roberti - Z'Berg- Harris Urban Open Space and Recreation
Program; the State prefers to fund developments rather than
acquisitions.
Mayor Johnson requested staff to advise Council on whatever efforts
are needed to succeed.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Matarrese stated that it is
important to acquire the last strip of property before the Bay Farm
Bridge because the property completes the Bay Trail and precludes
building another house at one of the choke points of the City; the
development of Estuary Park should move forward with whatever money
is left; when the opportunity comes up with the developer, money
can be found.
The Acting City Manager stated there are ways to work with the
developer to maximize the amount of land the City can obtain; the
matter would be discussed with the developer in the next week or
two.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
April 19, 2005
3
Mayor Johnson requested an inventory of potential open space be
presented to Council; stated the Belt Line and other areas are
designated in the General Plan; an overall look at open space and
plans to acquire the space should be reviewed.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice
vote -5.
( *05- ) Recommendation to adopt Specifications and authorize Call
for Bids for a Combination Catch Basin /Sewer Cleaning Machine.
Accepted.
( *05- ) Recommendation to approve an increase to the Construction
Contract with Golden Bay Construction, Inc., in the amount of
$100 ;000 using Alameda Power and Telecom funds for the placement of
additional cable television and undergrounding of power conduits
for Webster Street Renaissance Project, No. P.W. 07- 02 -07.
Accepted.
(05- ) Recommendation to authorize the Acting City Manager to use
$201,000 in Measure B ferry reserves for ferry boat repairs.
Approved.
Vice Mayor Gilmore stated there seems to be more ferry boat repair
issues with the Harbor Bay Ferry than the Alameda /Oakland Ferry
Service; if so, requested a review of ferry boat operators'
maintenance schedules.
Councilmember deHaan stated that the Harbor Bay Ferry costs need to
be reviewed; an Off Agenda Report notes that the Peralta was sent
back up to Washington for super structure modifications; the
Peralta is a young ship; there were flaws in the materials used;
requested the review address the Peralta.
Vice Mayor Gilmore moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
( *05- ) Resolution No. 13829, "Preliminarily Approving Annual
Report Declaring Intention to Order Levy and Collection of
Assessments and Providing for Notice of June 21, 2005 Hearing
Thereof - Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84 -2."
Adopted.
( *05- ) Resolution No. 13830, "Preliminarily Approving Annual
Report Declaring Intention to Order Levy and Collection of
Assessments and Providing for Notice of June 21, 2005 Hearing
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council 4
April 19, 2005
Thereof - Maintenance Assessment District 01 -01 (Marina Cove)."
Adopted.
( *05- ) Resolution No. 13831, "Approving Tentative Map, TM04-
0004, for a Sixteen Lot Subdivision at Harbor Bay Business Park."
Adopted.
( *05- ) Resolution No. 13832, "Approving the Association of Bay
Area Governments (ABAG) Report "Taming Natural Disasters" as the
City of Alameda's Local Hazard Mitigation Plan." Adopted.
(05- ) Resolution No. 13833, "Approving the Application for Land
and Water Conservation Fund Estuary Park Project." Adopted.
Refer to comments and motion under the recommendation to authorize
the Acting City Manager or designee to enter into an agreement for
the acquisition of real property [paragraph no. (05- 1.
( *05- ) Introduction of Ordinance Reclassifying and Rezoning
Certain Property within the City of Alameda by Amending Zoning
Ordinance No. 1277, N.S., from R -5 (General Residential) Zoning
District to C -C (Community Commercial) Zoning District, for that
Property Located at 2507 Central Avenue at Everett Street.
Introduced.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(05- ) Public Hearing to consider a recommendation to adopt FY
2005 -06 through FY 2009 -10 Consolidated Plan, adopt FY 2005 -06
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Action Plan, amend FY
2004 -05 CDBG Action Plan, and authorize the City Manager to
negotiate and execute related documents, agreements and
modifications; and
(05- A) Recommendation regarding CDBG public service
recommendations.
Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the Hearing.
Speaker: Doug Biggs, Alameda Point Collaborative.
There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public
portion of the Hearing.
Vice Mayor Gilmore moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council 5
April 19, 2005
(05- ) Ordinance No. 2939, "Approving and Authorizing Execution
of Lease between the City of Alameda (Lessor) and the County of
Alameda (Lessee) for Real Property Located at 1429 Oak Street."
Finally passed.
Mayor Johnson stated that the County Health Center is moving into
the former Children's Library site; there is now a home for the
Recreation and Park Department and the County Health Center;
thanked the Acting City Manager for finding a very good solution to
a potentially difficult problem.
Councilmember Matarrese stated that the County's opportunity
provides the City with the benefit of improvements and maintaining
a building that is a City asset; the move is a fine solution and
keeps the County services central to the bus line and the center of
town.
Councilmember Matarrese moved final passage of the Ordinance.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion.
Under discussion, the Acting City Manager stated that the Public
Works Department put in partitions and did a lot of the work in a
short period of time; the County will have a ribbon cutting
ceremony either later this week or next week; the cost of the
materials was paid for by the County; a City building has been
fixed up with a combination of City forces and County funds;
everyone came out a winner.
Mayor Johnson stated that the building was not occupied for at
least eight years and was in fairly blighted conditions.
Councilmember deHaan stated that he appreciates that the Acting
City Manager's win -win solutions.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON - AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(05- ) Discussion of the Harbor Bay ferry system.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he received many e -mails regarding
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council 6
April 19, 2005
the Harbor Bay ferry; noted that the City was able to get a one
year reprieve; suggested a Tow Hall meeting be held regarding the
ferry system in three to four months; stated that some riders feel
out of the loop regarding ferry issues; noted that a Town Hall
meeting would provide a better sense of timetables for improving
ferry services and costs issues; suggested a more formal way of
communicating with riders be developed by the Transportation
Commission or an adhoc committee that reports to City Council.
Councilmember Matarrese concurred with Councilmember Daysog;
suggested that the Town Hall meeting occur soon; stated that the
city cannot afford to lose the ferry service; traveling across the
Bay Farm Island Bridge would affect commuters and is unacceptable;
stated that informing commuters that everything will be done to
keep the ferry in services is an urgent matter and maintains
creditability for transit solutions at Alameda Point.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he is in favor of having the Town
Hall meeting sooner, but that it is important to collect
information for presentation.
Mayor Johnson stated that she does not see any advertising for the
ferries; noted that fuel cost issues should be investigated; stated
that the City will not lose the ferry service; that there is a 1
long -term possibility that the Water Transit Authority will operate
the ferries; the City needs to continue operating successfully
until then; there should be a Council briefing on the state of the
ferries and then a public workshop.
Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that the maintenance issues are
important; noted if the ferry is out of service, commuters find
other means of commuting and it is difficult to get them back one
habits have changed.
Councilmember Daysog suggested that the Council Meeting be the Town
Hall meting.
Councilmember deHaan stated that there was a fare box increase of
25% and 40% is needed; the capacity of the ferry service and
parking limitation is a difficult dynamic to solve; that the
Alameda /Oakland Ferry Service was successful because parking
spaces were increased and ridership improved.
Mayor Johnson stated that she has never seen the parking lot full;
noted that more riders are needed; stated that ridership went down
significantly after the dock closure.
The Acting City Manager stated that staff worked very hard and came
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council 7
April 19, 2005
up with a solution that the Metropolitan Transportation Commission
staff and Grant Allocation Committee endorsed; more work needs to
be done to refine the information; there are plans to have a Town
Hall meeting next week or the following week then staff; then staff
will provide a status report to Council; a better job can be done
on marketing the ferry.
Mayor Johnson stated that when the ferry problem became apparent,
the Acting City Manager immediately took action and set up meetings
with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission; thanked the Acting
City Manager for the efforts taken to negotiate one more year.
Vice Mayor Gilmore requested that e -mails be sent to concerned
citizens [regarding the Town Hall meeting] in addition to the
normal noticing procedures.
(05- ) Consideration of Mayor's nominations (3) for appointment
to the Golf Commission.
Mayor Johnson nominated Ray Gaul, Jane Sullwold, and Bill Schmitz
to the Gold Commission.
Councilmember deHaan stated that he was extremely impressed with
the applicants' depth; he would hope that the individuals look at
other commissions and boards.
Mayor Johnson concurred with Councilmember deHaan.
(05- Consideration of the Mayor's nomination for appointment
to the Housing and Building Code Hearing and Appeals Board.
Continued.
(05- ) Selection of alternate to serve on the Alameda County Lead
Abatement Joint Powers Authority Board.
Mayor Johnson stated that Councilmember deHaan has indicated an
interest to serve as the alternate.
Vice Mayor Gilmore moved that Councilmember deHaan serve on the
Alameda County Lead Abatement Joint Powers Authority Board.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
(05- ) Councilmember Daysog noted that today is the City of
Alameda's 151st birthday.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
April 19, 2005
8
(05- ) Councilmember deHaan requested a report on the Lincoln
School drop off area situation; there is concern with the next
generation of remediation intruding into the existing field area.
Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that the School District staff is
presenting a plan to the School Board on April 26.
The Acting City Manager stated that the meeting may be sooner than
April 26 and that he would verify the date.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the plan intrudes into the field
area, to which the Acting City Manager responded that the plan goes
partially into the field area and basketball paved area.
Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired how the plan would effect putting in a
full size regulation soccer field, to which the Acting City Manager
responded the matter would be addressed at the meeting and City
staff would bring back information.
Mayor Johnson stated that she has informed a couple of School Board
members and the Superintendent that she is concerned about taking
away field space; noted that the basketball courts are not just
used by the school.
(05- ) Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the window display
ordinance came back to Council, to which the Acting City Manager
responded that there is 30 -day implementation period to allow
people time to adjust before enforcement.
(05- ) Mayor Johnson requested that increasing the size of the
Recreation and Park Commission be placed on the next agenda.
(05- ) Mayor Johnson stated the Finance Director is working on a
more aggressive policy to buy in Alameda; noted that the check
registers indicate how much the City spends outside of Alameda and
are very disturbing; stated that sales tax revenue is being given
to other cities; a purchasing position might be needed to
coordinate better prices and ensure that purchasing is done in
Alameda as much as possible.
(05- ) Mayor Johnson stated that the Council needs to consider a
Business Recruiter position in the next budget.
Councilmember deHaan stated that every Economic Development
Commission study indicated a Business Recruiter as a top priority;
noted that buying in Alameda is important.
(05- ) Councilmember Matarrese stated important projects are
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council 9
April 19, 2005
coming forward; requested staff reports reference applicable plans
such as the General Plan, Economic Development Strategic Plan, the
Downtown Plan, the Bicycle Master Plan, etc; staff reports should
have a section that reviews basic conformance to the policy
documents that have been adopted; for non - conformance, there should
be an explanation of the pros and cons; noted the plans may need to
be updated; projects such as the Theatre, Bridgeside Shopping
Center and the Base need to check conformances to existing plans.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the
Regular Meeting at 8:57 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
April 19, 2005
10
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
THURSDAY- -APRIL 21, 2005- -4:00 P.M.
Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 4:00 p.m.
Roll Call - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore,
Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5.
Absent: None.
The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider:
(05- ) Public Employment - Title: City Manager.
Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened
and Mayor Johnson announced that direction was given to the
recruiter and no decision was made.
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the
Special Meeting at 10:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
April 21, 2005
April 28, 2005
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers:
This is to certify that the claims listed on the check register and shown below have been
approved by the proper officials and, in my opinion, represent fair and just charges against the
City in accordance with their respective amounts as indicated thereon.
Check Numbers
135619 - 136056
EFT 115
Void Checks:
Amount
2,038,478.96
170,000.00
134775 (167.86)
133896 (286.74)
133916 (164.72)
134830 (286.74)
134846 (164.72)
134916 (551.89)
135277 r (1,126.00)
134529 (3,846.00)
135741 (61.00)
131470 (34.69)
GRAND TOTAL
Respectfully submitted,
(9itfe-&
Pamela J. Sible
Council Warrants 05/03/2005
2,201,788.60
BILLS #4 -B
05/03/05
CITY OF ALAMEDA
Memorandum
Date: April 20, 2005
To: Honorable Mayor
and Councilmembers
From: Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
Re: Authorizing Call for Bid for Legal Advertising for the Fiscal Year Ending June
30, 2006
Background
Section 3 -18 of the City Charter requires an annual contract for publication of all legal advertising
of the City in a newspaper adjudicated to be a newspaper of general circulation within the City of
Alameda.
Discussion /Analysis
The Alameda Journal is the Official Newspaper of the City for legal advertising for the fiscal year
ending June 30, 2005. With Council authorization, the City Clerk will publish a notice in the
Alameda Journal stating the City will receive bids up to the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, May
25, 2005, for the publication of all legal advertising for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2006.
Budget Consideration
None.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to call for bids for the publication
of all City legal advertising for fiscal year ending June 30, 2006.
Respectfully submitted,
--Q
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
Attachment - 1 (Specifications)
Report #4 -C CC
5 -3 -05
Notice to Proposers
SPECIFICATIONS FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING
The City of Alameda is seeking proposers to provide Legal Advertising Service for the fiscal
year ending June 30, 2006.
Legal advertising must be published in a newspaper adjudicated to be a newspaper of general
circulation within the City of Alameda.
Advertising shall be in accordance with the following:
1) All advertisements shall be set in six -point type, or in such larger type and spacing
between lines as directed by the officer authorizing the advertisement.
2) Title and sub - heading shall be set in six -point type, black -face type, or in such larger type
as may be specified by the officer authorizing the advertisement.
3) The submission deadline for ads shall not exceed 4 days from date of publication
(excluding holiday periods).
4) The withdrawal deadline for ads shall be up to 1 day from date of publication (excluding
holiday periods).
Bidders shall state in their proposals for legal advertising the price per column inch, set in six -
point type, according to the following schedule:
► A price per column inch for the 1st insertion;
► A price per column inch for the 2nd insertion;
► A price per column inch for the 3rd and for each subsequent insertion.
Proposals for legal advertising must include an audit verifying circulation.
Proposals must be presented to the City Clerk, in the City Hall, Alameda, California under sealed
cover and plainly marked on the outside, "Proposal for Legal Advertising -- Fiscal Year 2005-
06." Sealed bids will be received up to the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, May 25, 2005.
Contract for such legal advertising, if awarded, will be awarded subject to the provisions of the
Charter of said City, to the responsible bidder who submits the lowest and best bid. The right is
reserved to reject any or all bids.
The newspaper published by the bidder to whom such contract is awarded shall be known, for the
term of such contract, as the "Official Newspaper" of the City for legal advertising.
CITY OF ALAMEDA
MEMORANDUM
Date: April 20, 2005
To: Honorable Mayor and
Councilmembers
From: William C. Norton
Acting City Manager
Re: Quarterly Investment Report for Period Ending March 31, 2005
BACKGROUND
Attached is the investment portfolio for the quarter ending March 31, 2005.
DISCUSSION
The attached portfolio reflects the invested operating funds as well as the various
assessment district funds. These investments have been made in accordance with the
provisions of the City's approved Investment Guidelines. The City of Alameda's
expenditure requirements for the next six months are more than sufficiently covered by two
sources, namely (1) anticipated revenues from regular operations and (2) liquidity of
current investments.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
This report is provided for information purposes only.
RECOMMENDATION
The City Manager recommends that Council accept the City's Investment Report for the
period ending March 31, 2005.
Respectfully submitted,
William C. Norton
Acting City Manager
JB:dI
Attachment
G: \FINANCE \COUNC I L\2005 \020105 \I nvestment4thgtr.doc
le-Ann Bo ' r
ief Financial Officer
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
Report #4 -D CC
5 -3 -05
City of Alameda • California
April 21, 2005
Honorable Mayor and City Council
I have reviewed the City of Alameda's Investment Report for the quarter ending March
31, 2005, and find that it complies with the Investment Policy established by my office.
The interest of the Council is always appreciated
KK:dI
Sin I
K-vin K- nedy
City Treasurer
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
Finance Department
2263 Santa Clara Avenue, Room 220
Alameda, California 94501 -4477
510.747.4881 • Fax 510.747.4890 • TDD 510.522.7538
*Printed on Recycled Paper
L0
0
0
N
M
x
0
z_
0
Z
W
ix
W
w ce
Q
Q 0
LL w
0
U
0
J
0
LL
0
a
F-
Z
W
H
w
W
Z
O N h W 3 a N.,
0 h �. M
o0 7 i
V N M 0 1�
IO V O� o�' I
O (0 co co (. V' (,.�
1 H _W co c0 co d' (� O
'Y w' o v_ rn co v, o,
M
I 69
O O N
• I O N O 0)
I O o0 (� � N
o0 O
O
'O O 0) O (O
(O N (f1 O) W 1
O n N r aI
O N O0) ( V •
Ice Qi r (O r
c0
000010 0
O (0 M f,i0 O'
0 N- (D1N W CO
(O N ,1, 01 0 CO
Cci Cc)
W OE' O'001(0IL0
0 Z'>' 0'I (010) 0)
: a CO
'o0I(0IN
W 'QW
>''vG'LL
QiW
•O v 0 ,I M o Q 0)
• 1- • M V'T-IN x,10 O� 00 f � '�f�
Z ...t—, �,,c0' .—,M O' 'O '�0' N
WI0 O M'.00' :0'. -'V oo ',H ((�
•
w
0
O 0) ICC c0 Imo' IN-
0 W, •jW,,� 07 CO 'J' N
a '0 V''0 CO 00) 0� '((00
I0 CO w 'J l u 0r- O c0 V N
Z IQ j�
W.
12 0
F- CO W
W
>
Z
cD
N-
V
r (0
M N
60 es
U
w H
} I IO ° Za �U
0 .
0 U U;.:: II I, IH OW
(() 1
H H a' co ', .
U 7 H�, Q w- HUI H
a(n(nH W u) a a ?awl (n
o'�Fxw >II o'WI w
? o0Uz~z w ,z-
, F
U�'F Z W 0 J Q v, 2(n,01
U � 2 2 aW l Z U Q y0 '. O Q Q W Z W' W
LL J p ~ W 'J O n H O 0 W W W.> 0 0I 10 8 'p' W' W
O LL 2? LL J H 1 N N> a
1
LO
N,
w_ uw
>- J
W
CD
w
w
0
W
H
x
0
W
U
W
w
w
0
W
H
x
0
W
•
•
J
U,
Z
7
a 00
W
Q.0
N :w
J F
a}
Z
z
Q
0 W
z
0 w
,z w WI
0=a',
U u_
0 -0'
10
a�?w:
J
z a
LL
w LL.
w w.
Z(~p1
><
z w
H U H
= H H
•1- 0
>- w W •
;LL xx
: 1-1
w co
> z z
Q
(0
CD
0
N
CO
CCx
U
C)
Z
0
Z
W
<w
w cc
gQ
<0
LL w
O x
H
U OLL
O
O
F-
CC
0
a
H
z
W
1-
(n
w
z
0
M
M
W
a.>
z}
Z Q
Zew
2w
CC
Q
010
H
wI
LL E
J H
Q
2
•
OQ
O 'I N a O O O '4-H8. O O 818 O O
.0- o:C a 0 0 :N n OD 16 6 a O 0 (CD O N (O'm
O- I- (O O O N- I O N 1- I N M' 0) O N O h N OD O
W O) 0) O CD C. 1,M N M!(O OIr r OD O M r O MIop
N h O I O I co H6 O a 0<01010<00<
N O Cr CO 0) 0) a IO LS O O O 0) CO 0) 0- N
N N co co c-4 N OO a0 O a O 0) a a, 0IO
OLIO O O
N,O O O
LO M
O 0
r r O
CD-
fA
10 V 01O 0 O OO O
N O O
h O a 0 0 0 0
'O lh (O O O O O
01101 01 O 0 O O
O O O O
N O V 0) 0) O
N N NN N- N
10 1
O
O
O
O O O O O
O O O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O O O O
N O CO a O O O O
,r r r N O N O (O'(OI1'0) 01'0 O O
r
O a11■I�IWN 601
MM NIN N
:00110110161- (O!0'O0'10 1�'(O!
'COooI10 (0<0 I�,Nirlm 1, O,r14
: M:M I(O,Cp1O N. 0)IOI-
CD O
O
O
0
O
N
M
O
O O_
CD
O
10
O' 1 0
0 10
010
0
I-
N OM
O O O O O O OD 0 O O !CD 10 10 0 O O 00 O IO M O N OII O 0;0 0
O O O,N 1-. O M O O 0!010 CV O N M O 1- r O M 0,r CD CD
O O CO I(O oe OV h O :OlO (O 'N N O 0 Ch O O o 0,0:0
N O N O M 0 00 I� O 100 LS I N (O O 00 O 0 0 up 77 M U1,6104
N r N a O M I� CO N 0) a; 0 V O O) h 1� N O f� O a 1- N r
M M 0) CO. 0) 0) (O '(4 051 0 (O O) a N N M r N 1- N- N co a'r'a
M 7 M O) O O CO 00 M co N M O (O h N,r O N O O) O O) 0) N
Cr (O N 00 00 O I� N O) ODIN- hIO f- U1 CD O O M fN- 00 her O W�V
N r r r
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O O 0
LS O O a CO M O
r N N
M O 0' 1 O 00 O ) 0 N Ma0 '4 V 1'7 7
VIO
•
•
O O
O O
O O
0 W
U1,CD
O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 ':O
0 0 0 O O O IO
O O O O 0 OI10
O O O O;O 010
O 0 0 O;O O,0
O O O Oro 010
O O O
1� N a)N O!O
0 ,(0 :, I-!O
O
0
O
O
O
N
0 0 O
000
O
0 0 0
acid
(O M n
O
M 10D a ,r .1- O N (O CD (O <4)0)
(O N 0) 0) ' N O 0- CO C0.00 a I a
O O ! O O Ii (0 I (0 I (0 (O (O (O co 0- 0-
O
O
O
O
0 O O 0'O
0 0 0 0 O
O O 010'0
O O OII CD ,CD
O 0 O O'0
O O O '0
1.- 0 O'0
(O 0a
OM
0) O O O'I 1`', n! co
n 0-0-0 -NNi0)
(n
w
01 h'0 O (O '104 a.N- 01C.0 L0
AO
0-
f�' ) (0 f` 1!COIh10 1"O, 0)
O 0)
O1Na
0 "O CIO N co O N O O M OI,a I- M 0
OII�hIh N W COO m [1T- N h O r
•
' 0 : 0 ' 0 '• 04 N 110 10 0 0 O O O O '' O .e) ' (O (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (O (0 . (0 (O 16 1(0 N I CD CO 0- 0- 10- r r n h h ! n 0- 0-- 0- r n
OIO OO 'O O O 910'0:010 °:°:°:9:919:9:° II O!O O O!O O O O 9'9191° 010'0 O 01,0'1 O O O O O 0'0:0.01,0' 010
• :ala'a'Ia'c Oial(�''�'�)1� o a°i a°) al aa> • cuIm n'n n m n cm 01,0 0 >•o laa> m mld:d m aao- 1co1mIm,g!SD'
Q.�i, -) QI,O ZI0:0 I'LL �',�I,g �11� Q Q Q Q Q'9IZ Z Z0 0 -I1LLL LL LL Q Q < .Q.Q'O
•.0.010'00' :CDD o. �I ', CIO IUD O O 010 NIM:. N O O:.OI0< 0 �, OIN O 010 O DIO.O O (0 r- O O.W'ln,(n 117 :0l(t) (f)
:u7 16 O O M O M M !a !on a :a a a a a M a O a O a N 10 M N a a a 1a a N a N a a N N a a N -.7 a :75.t (V
OO, OO
9:9 0'O 9'9:9:91°19'9:9 OIO 9.9 91919 0 0 0 0 :0 O O O 010 O O O O O.0 O O O 010.01010
C T; C
00 U1 c: 0 D 0 0 0 C, C C C U O_ U >> U C a T C m U C C C U
!IoIm o m m Q 1m z1m o n =10 OU'> > m > m m m m' o o, a) 010 o' mIo m =,m_
LL4 2. 27' O 7'7,LL 7-' 7 7.7:-) 7 0 (n 0 Q ZIZ O ? (n 2 Q 0 H: .
N N NI. ''IO 010) . CO a id) 'f� N1� 1`1, OIM N N a In, O ICO r Ns N a N- O ol01 r 11 f0 )O,r m 0):.r- 'O'O'nO
O,M M,O N . . r.N!p:r r p r • rIN'C) N N N r 010 r 01, rIN O,O 0 0 o 01 0< 01 0 O N N O rI O M N. 'r'Ml'•...
le 'e 0'e le \\ \',o0:\ 0Ie 0 <0 101 -I e'e 0,o e e ere e e e e e e e 0 o 'e e e e e 0) -'o 'Ie a ;O a 0) 1 '(
:00000 a 20 O'(0110'IO O N F, 'O:M O)O O 1"-'N'O 01 CO CO N OD N O M''a r CO M W N!N N- CD N 0) OI,M
O'O 0.010 (0 (O O, co 1(0 N ion .c> a:(OI 010 : CV O h1M M O CO CO 0) (` m 10 M O r CO r, 0) O N CO CO (0 CD CV
CO CO 0).M,N CO 'a OIOo M O.a.N N. hl N,a•O'M Ifs r N (O.O a N r- a CO M a O M:r O N N r a rlhiO CO II�.N CD!COIO
M.M O' N r NIO:r, N!N (0 0. 041, N:N I,NIMIM r M M:N':M N M N,N M MIN M 0) (0 a M M M M a'1 MIN M1,(0 (0 (0 MIM
•
N N r N N
e e 0 e e' <0 e e e e e e e e e 0 e 1 e e e e e 0Ie e e e e e e e e e'e e e e e e eleio e e e e e'e
IO 0 0 0101 :O O C) CD O O O O O.O O'O O'O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O OILS O O O O O CD 12D to O'O 010 CD :U1
:O O O 010: • N O:, O O 1. O N O, 03 r- 'OIO O O 0100 O O O O 1) O N O N 0310 O O 1.- 1) (0 O O!0 1-', N' CV O'N
CID N W O O: :CO N I0- N COT r N N W o, O'0- 0) N O N�OIO (O N a M (O r 1` N O,1` O O CO M M N N• O M'CO n
(OIL M OIO O cLui Nlr!N O OIN OIe4 N OININ O M N O O a r- MIM M .((O N N N N' p •
W IV N a O:O:M;0 010111(0 O (O O
0 IO N (O O:O!O.W OI,O O OO O
Q .n O :a O OIN O'O.a 1� !a o
O N - O 0 : 0 ' a • N O 1 . - 0 0 O 0 ) ' J i t m 0 T O I O I CO , V
M N V 0) CO CO
N 1Z O O 0)I N r,a l 0) M1O N
Y 'N O a 0) 10) O) 1- M', M':M 0)''!a 0)
OI 0<01 CO •COIN N1O O a 0 a
:O ICO r
CO (n!
w
10
(n
0
z
U-
U-
0
W
J
0
a
U
O 010 O 0) O O O
O
on OI 7i IC) a CO N O M O N
O O
O r
CD N- a M O N 0
0 CO IN 0 O a N
O M CO O N (M N LS
U7 0,0 O, OO
O
un
10
0)
a
0 CO 0 On a 0 M v N (<0 O N CO 0 COICpIO (0 100 N.0 MIS
0 1. O 0) CO N a M 0) 0- O) 0 1- CO h h 16 01:6 <00 :oD
O N O N h 00 0) 1- O Co O 0- CO 1- 0:1,00 O M O N
O O N CO M N a h a V 0 1- O a 1� N O NOM 0) . N 6,0D
O O a (D CO M 7 M 0 0r a it N O.M 0).
O N N c O M N a N N O M CV IN- a N, N O OIU/
M O O 0) CO N. 0. 00 0- 0- O 140 0) 0) O; 0110, OD, -1 (O Ora
O
w
w 0 (1)
H, H co I
i 0 Z 0 Z CO I))
W
0 O Q' H Ia ww''1 W': W Q1 0
»1YY. Ia '1001 0 H w Z
ILL - H ¢, W (n 1(n. a 1,0 z zi W z' 0 CC
ZZ<M Z W W ix J 'W w1 U oc
222 -Q!
ZOO 0 w W W W Z W Q W W 2W 0 LL
Iw(n W O! OQ2� ZOW G_0_ 'm Ii pI LL J� <
W W Oz0(A -w�(n W w m: JZ0Z LL mm(nU
zzQH LL WWI- 2Wwwg�'aYZYgQg gpFU
} }') Z Ill F- c) O J z X z 0 zw-J C) z!W w Q DO Q U U O W Q H Z H
IW W LLUgZ5 W HmWDUm 0 O U0ZO 0mU W O W OO(ZOw'J
w Zw cow
Q Q Z LL O w 0< Q O Q w Q_1 C9 O z<< U m C7 m z Z z< 0 w< J
LL(/)LLQZ
JJQ(A U 0 Z000 H- HZO W a
U U w Z Z 0 Z O m Q m_J 21-1_1111222217-2_1 1_1 m U H Z
OO m<w <(0O2 (n =xxz(nx2Zzzz <Zxx «1w
J J m H 00 LL m < 2E IL 5. ) 0 LL LL LLILL O1 LLIQ LL LL LL LL', Z LL LL LL LL 7 0
(4)
w
H •
w 0 • (n
• W O W W W W W :0
Z H z
w 1-01-1-
ow 0 zzzz
W o (n 00 W Z W W iY
2 w H O 0 M Y 2 2-1 Q'
mown W x W xxm2(p
W0 W 0 LL 0 0 g J W
Om z m _i
m m
0-'
z W <ww 0
H J O J 2 H J Q J J
zm7Q0m1Q< W m U
a O O -J ¢ J W oQ J 0 1 O 0 mQ JOQmQQQ
z W z Z z z x sx 0 2 z 2
LL LL j w LL 0 LL LLILL LL LL
IF-
re
2
co
Z Z
J } } H H J
000<
DWWaao
J
ZWW W<F,C7
- mm's
IZL 0 707. ILL ILL IZL
ua
0
0
N
2
U
0
z
0
z
ct
a
w
ww
2a
a°
ww
O
U 2
0
J
0
LL
O
a
H
z
w
F-
w
w
z
N
U
re
0
z_
0
z
w
air
O w
w
a
a 0
w
O =
U
O
J
0
LL
H
O
a
1-
z
w
u)
w
w
>
z
� W
W �
� Q
Q O
W
O
O
J
O
LL
0
a
z
w
1-
w
w
z
0
0
O
N
M
2
0
Z
0
Z
H
0
F ~
O 2
0
0
LL
H
0
a
H
z
w
H
V)
w
>
Z
w
3
n. • >
z• Q
Z ❑
'7C LU
L
BOOK VALUE
z
0
H
a
0
m
W
❑
Im M
• 0
0
N
co
!0
z
0
m
• 0
'0
' • J
Q
CO
3
m
10
•0
Q
1❑
W
2
IQ
01
b9'
44P-1
o M M
(O a0 O
O r N'
N CO CO
(f)
r �, ON) N
N N
•
'.OIO 0,- (O
0) !OD CO 1((D 0)
•
U) o o (0 (0
0 0 0I •
al ft: alca?)''1SI
QIQ QI❑ !
0'01001'0'
C C' C''. 0 C)
co co I CU a) 0)
7 7 :7.0'0,
Oo Oo
o .o , . o
0,0'0,0 0'',
010 0;10 0.
atop v (n cn
N 'I,0 N!7
X0000
010,010 0'
010,0,0
r••• 0'o'r
Ni0' ('4 I 4
•
°'Io!v' °
tO O 0
'(n n N • 0 •
CA', O h N'
a:6 IL)'
N CO 0)
o''
IZ Z
ICC w C.
0,0 Z
DID DIE-
LL LL LLICO CC)I
H IH HI> >I
z',z z'Z Z
Z ZI— —'
W W
Z'H H
WII QZQ zQ,
O'a Q,
1x 3 3
d0 OI
Y.z Z.
Q 3 3''
m!Z Zi
Z :L1 LL
Z 0 0'
3,3 30 01
H'H
zz
WIW
❑!❑
-Wirt
YY
ZIIZ
mlm
ZIz
010
$6,802,062.63
CO
N
O
N
CA
0)
O
OD
N
■
CO
$6,802,062.63
TOTAL AND AVERAGES
N h '-(00 I u) (0 0)
• O ',(O 1, M, M'',,(b (O•
▪ MlCO M'!� CO N
• N • V M V
M a0 !oil op
N
N
CA
N- - CO O LO CO 0)
0110 � O'0.)
Oco V NIN NI 0'
O N IOD In 'ip
• 0'.(O ''I MM M0
• M co. M''— (O N'
N V ' Cc)
05 U) N100
0'0 co co 0!O O0'
0),0)'0) CO 0)I0) 01'0)
0
min to o'o 0 in
9'O,OO99o0
a a. O a al a all a
• Q'Q Q•Q 5H%
•• ° ° °I° °!°
0 0 LOU) U) LO (f) (I)
O O!OO!IOO'O'..O
C C
co (0 CU CO ' CU (U CO co •
77 :77777
0 o
00000000
O
(OO'o oolo
'V 7 '. � �f10
N•N CON ' N N,0
0'0 0 0 io 0 0i3O
00000000
CD00,0 lU) L,o0
O o 0 o',o 0
7 a N V,M O
N N11.0 N N' N.O
. h .(0 l0 CO CO 0)
0),li(0', v 0'(m CO
• u,�, O II11) rat 0.7 N • NI.'o'.
H• '. M' (00 M .M- OIN,
N M'IV
M OD' NI00
H
O
0
H
m
❑i❑ 0 0j0 ❑I��!
iZ 1 Z N ZIz'Z Z'oi
'
'330❑,— I❑D'(N,'
ILL'ILL
o • w I
( u~ d v~) I z v~) u~
i ) ) 0—
, .
�z_I�,zZ� • Hi— 00 H', ''H H S''
zz z'3ZZ.
W'IW 0` �W'p,W
I ❑i❑z3107❑❑z,
0',0 z 0 0 O'z'
'dy LL 0 '- Q aIU''
YiY W YIZIY ,wI
Z1—:Z z 21
'<I< 0 < Q QUO
,03103 H(IZI((OH.
011020'0O '00'
— —
�Z3 Z
'ZO'
3I❑ Q 3.01313.<
$32,575,341.66
$32,575,341.66
0)
0
$32,575,341.66
TOTAL AND AVERAGES
°
CD
U)
W
69.
0)
0
Q
°
N
CO
7
CO
�,
0
W
0
:0-
z
O
m
0
'0
N
co,
z,
W,
W'.
0
z
0
0
3
H
z
0
0
QCCQ
m
J
I
LL
$8,601,154.42
$8,601,154.42
O
0)
$8,601,154.421 2.3800%1 2.3800%
TOTAL AND AVERAGES
0
N
CO
2
0
2
O
Z
0
Z
W
Q
O W
W
• ¢
gD
Q o
LL w
o x
U 2
0
0
LL
I-
0
a
F
z
W
N-
F
m
W
>
Z
~ W
c
w
C
CL • >
z Q
Zp
• LL'
WJ
(n
Q
0,0
}
W F
J
E w
D'QI
Q p'.
W
I F-
c0
a.
-J
0
WI
to o'
IO O'
O
10 0
u)
10 O
O ICD
O.O.
0 16
0 0
00
10,Ic
t•
W
a
m
F
Z
W
I-
F
m
w
z
u.►
IN
CO
U)'m
(0 i(01
CO CO
0
0 O.
0 O
N V.
N I N'
BOOK VALUE
DESCRIPTION
F
N
0
a
w
0
ILL
0
ICn
w
•
IQ
U
U-
ice
w
10
O O,
O O
00
a) a',
fA,
O
O
O
O
0
O
O
0
rn
O
C7
U)
CO
O
0
N
V
N
0
O
O
0
cn
(�s
(TOTAL AND AVERAGES
CD O'O,O OI010 O IUD ' 0 0 0'.01 (O'U)' 0 O O CD 'O U) I0 U) 'OD 10, O.(0 I CD CD U) O O 1 oI OD 'CD <I-•0 OO'O O'. U)10
Cl O O 0100 O' U1 :e4 :U1 O O O N h'IU) CD O OIN,U) 04,07 01(- r''0 0Ir 0 O O CO ILO f�,.0 OD IO'.O',1- O
'U) U). U) 0 IUD IU) N ODIN'O u7 :0 c0 W N- ''CD a aIa1N (O ee�� 010D.M 0 O O O 01 u) On,N 010 ,CV :OIMIU)
Ns N CD ''N 0 Ns '01 IOD 1011(0.('s 011010 IC') 01'' N 0''0 CD 010D U) 00 V) 1U) U)1 N OIOD;h IU) I�I(O h, 7t'N-
(D (O •- :co I U1'CO rIU)lm.du) co r N,(O N V O CO 00 C') 0 0)C) N- N c''U)1 U)Iv r N CO I(O ,r'l N-'10'00 '.QD
'Cn' 0 U)1 U) I, NI O CO CO I CO' O M. CO 1.7 0'0)1 W' CO 1 CD 'O OD'NI(q• 0011"04 OD V I<f N Cn `dj0 •V 'h
O).0 1 c r1(O rn'1 n NI r.(0 CO m- .01101(0,00 co N'I CO O n N V' UI NI 0),U) co co N co loo O OD IIr.N 11 .00
CO O 0..71010) �,�IO', O Cn O' <7IN' U) U) '.Ca N- a'N' N- U) 0''rn 1 O) (O•MIN,, N- U) W V, O ICn'(s :C) c", U) • u)' 0•CD
✓ r r • r • r r r N. r 1 r
O 0 0 ICD O 01O.CD 1O O O O 0'0 0:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O.OIOIC) CD ,CD O O.O 0 O'0,N- 0.0'0 010.0
,0,0,0 O O 010'010'0.0 O 0 0 CD.O 0'010.0 OI0I0 0'010 0.0'0,0.0 0•0 C)10 :CD O 010 0',0
'0'0'0 0:0.0,.0 C1 0 0 0.00 0'0 0 OI0'0 0 :0110 0'0 010'0'010.0 O O O10(A 0.0',0 0'0.0
O 0''o O 00 '0'0'0 O O 0•010'0'0 O oII0•0 0,010 00 0,0'0 0 0 0 0,0 0'o n O'IOIC'Olo O
o'I,0''0 0 0 010'0 0 0,0 O 01010 O 0'0 O O O O O 0'o OIO.0 o'O 0 0 0 C). CJ 0 0,0 0.010 O
0010'00 0!0.0u; 00000000000000000000 u1 00 0010.0) 0'000'00
0 010 O O OII010 CO .0,0 0 (OO O :N On. u) O (0101 h U) O OI(q U),(0' (s'0 O 0Iu)IO'0 0, U) u)'O'. (0 O
• f�10'0 U) O O. U) IUD I O O,O O .71 CO U)'. U) cn h 0 00, N ILO IUD cn O IUD !CO h'r r (O O V'. OIO' n V h 1 U) 1.(O O
r1r r N r N N
•
•
0 1011 [1, () O co (O O • U) ''1 co N (0 110 • co 1 �t '7 '7 U) ' co I CO , co Iola , cn (0 O N- N- CO cn co co O
I M , N • U) Cn,N,(O CO' U) cn O . U) co O)'Cn C V I co co V :V V'N- r-- co co N u), co O•N'(O Ir r
r N'N N CO C CO :,r VIiV U) aIU) U), U) U) co ' 01011 co co ''N' h h C-' N . co co Cn (n I(n O'O 0'r r N
•
h, CO 'N' 0_,0 (O N (,.0 CO U)' CO :c) 017 C7! N 10 U) Ho ;CD 7 CO V OI CD
,CC' IV n co 1CD OD CO 'CV (O.(n C '— (O '1,C) V N- ,r CD IIr C—.CO r (O O - h'CO
'n U) f` U)'(D (- UD'CO 0•("U ICD I.c MI.— IUD 'CO r O, CO .I CO r�'r r h CD 'Tv r f- 7
O,CO 1 CO N10 V,(C) (�
N 0
CD. 0� r U) 0
(O U) (O (O I CO , c0 C0• QD IUD CD (O CO ' (O,CO CO !CD IUD• (O (O,QD l N- lam' n' r- r- • n N- n r- -r- n r- Jr- a) (o'OD W.OD OD
O 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000 C):0•0!0•0'0'0
a 71 0 00)) CO N' N N N • 7' 7 7 7 T 7 71 • U'I U'' o' 0I CO , CO N' U) a) • 0- 0- O., co CO '' 7 �) V' 00 00 CO • CO N a 00_ 0 • 71
Q•Z p LL '2'� 2 �'� Q'Q •Q O'O,z.zIp7 LL'LL,LL ala'a'� 2'a a,o,Z'Z,-)'�,LL a Q'� a
U) (n U).CO,tn N O • W) CO U).N 0,04, NO CO U)'�Cn,Cn'(O W) to 10 C()'', V) :(3) 0 010 0'Cn 0 W'.O 0 0 CO (1�I0
'on U), co , 0 0 0 V I0 0 a CO .c90 0 0 0'0 0 0 N 0 V, 0'04 N'. 0.0 N N'I 0 NIN''V 0'0 0 0 0 O'0 0 0 0 0 • 4.
0'010 ,,0 O O�OO 9:9.0' 010'0.010.0101010 010,0 O 00'0'.010' O.O '.OIO O O'O.O O'O10
:c`5. 7 7' 04 7. 7'' N' 0 7, 7''I � NI W N'', �, CO U) a O'I CO CO CO j1 0°'�. 7'' 7. 7 00)': 0,0 N C' 7'� 711 cu:
� 0 (n Q Z'01 V) `2', ? QI: -1 -1 0 Z -71 :'- Q.u.'O
CO N n O n (0,04 0 N''N,N, o �,0': CO � NV � o, 010 CV 8 -- , �'ln CO NO O'OIV 0.04 M (O v'.0
r N Oj0' N O,r O'M r r r r r 0 O
00' 00000'' 0 01010 0 0 0' 0'' 0.000000
• I(O.u)I(O (- .N 'O M_''U)',O n N a)! ,M!(O N N- OVIh''
co:Ns 1M '7 'O 010 O N- M, CD ICO 100 0) 0) 0ir,U)
CO.CO N h 00'N'IV 01.E r N CO'..t..COIh CO V' Olr I0 N •
, N, r' N' • N N' N, cV co 'r'. co co N'N M'. N N CO N', CO 1, CO HO- CO
0 O'�I0i0 0j0'0 0 O'O1(C 010'0
CO 1
0 0'0
CD OD. CV 0 !CV :CD U), CO 'CD • (0 (, (0'0) U) CV :CD
r 1(O '!CD U11 W.. CO C- Cn'N COV 1 CO N O CD 0 IU)
C'). COlam' CO N CO CO CO CO ' CO CO CO M CO C')IC.) CO CO 0)
0'0 0000''00'0, 00000 '0,0O�,OIOiO'O'000'0000000000
OOO 'fiD N- O'0 O' 010 O O O CD U) OI O I(O'01,0 (O'N- 04-1010' 0 «) ( (C O U)II O, O'0
U) CO (O. U, r- V'o U)'u CD U) OD CD 'CD h O U)IN'1U)10 Ns Ns h'U)''1 U).CD N N''U) U) N CD C)
N ( s C V CV CO CO U). N s C V .1) CV 0,04 N VIM u) h'(0 C - 0 CO C O C I CV CV U) CO h CO'u)'h
CO u) N U)'r N r N. u)' (N U) N N U) (N N COI N'' NI N'u) VI N. NI U)'' U) c4 o ri CO CO OI CO CO
CO , (0100' 0 0 0 U). O ',0
CD 0101 CD. 'CD 'CV ,O 0)
04'4 Ci 0 '(
cr 'Ir CO. M00110'Ns
(O �I(D10'0 (s 7'. CO CD
0)1C))l0(DI(ri' 00
O CO I7 O' CO'(O OI(C M
O'1010 10 cn a I,r O
r r r r r r
• 00000
(CO ' 00 0 0
N
CO C■ U1 N- u) O IUD
CO U) U), U)' 0 CO
0 0 0 O 0 V O',O ,N ,r'(O' co co 1 (CO . 'IV Cn, O.V' CO O cO CO ''0,CD O :N (CO ' O O
O O O U)'l0 0,04- 7,C7 I N ' I U)'U) CO O: CO O CO N OI(C IO.O N- N- CO IUD CO,O
N 00 0 N'' O h 0 M CO M NIO N I r (p N- h c0 CA U) O'I WIC O. W'' co r (p N O h
CD 'V' CD O10 CV ,CD O 1� ("r' 'OD CD (. co N- 01 O:Ch'O N IU) C0,7) CDICD O CD
O CO r <1;., 0 U) CO '(0 CO.. N— O U),V (A CV a.; co co (n NI co... (DI ?I? U)'U) r' (D N'I-
N (0'11) C) O u V,O (O CO OII0 (:'r 17 a0 CO Cn. 0'10 00'C .COI(C N_. (D
O (s :(0 'CD N OD CO 10 CO .7 N' O I C)'� N n V'V [010101. � CO ',O CV !co IO O'7 'O
✓ 01.0 co (0110 CD 0010 CD IN U) OD 1CD'O)I0 CO Ns 00 r1(p'O,� C) C) N- CO CO ' CD 'l0 CO
✓ r N r I r r r r 1 r
W W' ICn 1. C)) (n'W cn (n 0), UIW'W
z Z' 10 0 0'00 0 I- 01Z'Z
Z, Z' Z Z Z z rn. 1w in
co, U UI,-. IY Y' Y 0 Y Y Y'' Y U U
_ mam _m (F) CC CC m a
U W W,J F <1F'J J W. < F- < W << W < J �IW W
w'I m mIm w W,m1(n ZIxIZIm m m m,m 2 mZ 2 W 2 2 m,m (n x O m x1w w
O' W W'Iw LL U- ',g W U g g W U,wl U LL U U gW W'' 0
a W UILL LL
a. .F F-- IF- W WJ II- Y Z'IIY J J g 0 I- Z1F-'Y Z W Z ZI JF F Z I-'ZIW W
F' U).0 Z10 a'Q Z (n Q'm Q ¢ a u) _7.1 BIZ m m,0 Q (n w w w Q1z z'(nl(n m m ml0 m,�� ce
Z F- Z Z J JU W I U 0 W W ,Z W J 0 �IWIW W Z IJ J
W , ,O, J } J Q Q "} F, 2.J ._. I F _ Z } F_ JJ F. J Q J J`-'} }IF'F J F J J'Q Q
z z a,0 a CO CO (n O 2 alx m (0'0 w a OIa a 2 0 a CO Q a WID a 0'0 Q OI(n p a Q m CO
m ',D m 0 o w DIZ UIm1U W w'Z.w O'D ZICO oD Z m 0 m mIw'D DIZ'Z m Z'IW JIm m'0 0
W 0 �'w O O O z'Iwl¢ m C711mIz zIIIQ O W w QC7O'm Q C7 O CJ9�',IZ''WI,W'Ia a., C0 ¢110 10.7 �,�'(J7 0
> O D U IF F Z p F O F F F F Z O 'U U
107 U'Iml� m 2 2 <''WIm <. <Il�1< <'Im m UIW mIi'Im :< m < 2 < <'':11m1m < m'IV mi< 2 2
LL12 OD 2 2 2 Z d) .2 Z Z,Z,Z Z'2 x LL ,CO 21Z 2 Z 2 Z 2 Z Z Z Cn .d) 12 2 Z 2LL 2'2 Z 2 2
N U- U- 0,LLILL LL LL DILL LL WILL TILL ULL,LL u_ ID WILL ILL -WILL LL'ILL LL LL ILL D DILL U- LL WILL ILLILLLL,LL LL
Cn •
W
F-
0
z
Y
OC !c0
< U
x0
0,z
OF-
-
<m
(L• U
w
a>
• o.o 010 • 0 0 0 0 V 0 m 0 010'
N U343 0 CO O CO O O O CO O' CO to 1
A''h.N O n CD N O O O O IN N,
M : CO O CD M CO CC) CO CO CD CA M 1
'a,0 CO CD h O N Cr. n CA CViC) C')
0) 1 h O) CD V N C) 0 h CD CD I
Cs 10 Ns CD N CD CA N V CA M O 0:CO •
N IUD I CA 0 CO 0 CD V CO CO N 01'0 CA '
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 O CO .O CD CD
O O 010 CD CD 0 C),C O CD 'CD .O '..O
00000000 CD0Cri00',0
9 0 010 0'O 0 0 0 O!0'o'O
00 0 0 010 O 0'C),0 Cn O O',O
01,0 O'CD 0'10 O O'IUD O V 0.0 Cam'
00 0'O 0,0 O 0,01'0 'O'
O' CO 01 CO 0' CD O V CO'V N N jOO
CO O
zQ
Z ❑
2• 'w
C
E2
D Q w
Q ❑
CV.ZS
' CO , CD O N- M N- CY) O) CD
NI� N— 0 C') CO CD OO N- N!N
MI '�, al al: CI) l!): lO CO co' CO'
01..- O''V.U) CC) M''I N- CA,N V'1N N.
'CO CO N f�101C) O) N - C ° . . ! NI
CD' CO CO' CO CA O) a) CD a) Cr) Cr) ' 01 O CA
9 0'� O, O OO'1 O.O i0' O'.O'0'0,
0) a. a > . Ln c � ' 5 '1 o) a'
Qla, a)Z�'nmlz ,1 Dia)I0 0
IQ _ 01Q m'm'z.
O.6 V N.CO N e -; ,1 CO 6 A
O .-
CO V ,N ‘1* V V V'V'V' V 0 V' CO O'.
W01010 ''O O'OIO,OIOiO OIOjO C)
2Fa) m � 6 < mm1 m
I I❑ '-!�'- 2 -� 'Q''IQ L-I❑'co N
UQ ,o l I,
a
❑,o i0 0 "0 0 0 '0 0 ..
J' N. CD'V. N- co ion CD'CO ,t M CO CA O,
W 1O). �': N l! N- CO 01 ILO '.VIM1 Ns 0I NI n CA
� I M � ' . � ' CD'O.M', N s 10)1 Ns C D I N!
a) 1 1V1V M V'V MI M', 01 1 V1V'. M V',
'W 0'0 0100000'0100 01001
F' 9'1 LO !up CO 0''. )n o, CDI o' 0 oI CO )n o'
0' N', N N 0 • hI LO :Ns O L0 O N N O,
IN!CO CD ICD n'M'. N'MIOIN OICO 1100 0'1
03103'03 ;03 6 C�)'V CO 1 U)IV U) CD CD V''I
W
O
O
CO
z
0
0
0
C/)
w
,0
NND'la°o' - oO o.o °o :oo'Oo 0VI0O N'' °vlc°o oo'
O'O M — co CO O0) NIVN CD O
COI N'�'N IA N, '' CO C0 03 co cC0 N N n.
CD C0 01CD CD. N;CO ''.N O CD C514 N- h
CA I co CO co co ' co 'WIVV CD 0 M CO CD. CD
0010 CAI N I 0 C0 CnIV CD V olo) co CA
U 0)'I cn U
W W W U J C I I
00 001— 1—
Z Z z
W w' w W
• c) c), UUY
Z Z. Z Z
W W' W W Q Q
CnWW,C„WW22
W LL LL'w LL. LL U
F w W;F W W Z Z
O WW.OWCC W W
Z J J'1Z J J CO CO
Q J J
w CO CO CO CO
D O O m O O m m
0-1-10-1-100
QC7C.�1J::)C7JJ
W 00'00000
22m22<
Cn =2,22'22 Z
LL U LL LL LL lL LL
r
C)
O
CD
$49,085,841.20
$49,031,698.82
OD
CO
N-
N
CD
N
M
rn
ri
$50,069,472.951
m
W
W
Z
Q
F-
0
CD O O N O 0''0.00 O N OIO OD U) 0
✓ O'O V CO 9, LO U) CD O M C 1N O O
CO. n', CO O V, CA CO N- N V 01,01 O O•O
O CO, h 01 ,0) VIN''O' ;CO CO N CO Iii', CO.O
M BCD .0). O 0 n ,0 V N- 00 ',Os CD' CO
O 0'V CO' CO O T',N' O 1- h CD CO' CO ''N N
• ' U) O CO O' M'1M O O
IN- Os M O
N 'N C1) V0.0 O 'N n n D, O 0
ICD CD '.O
0 0,0'0 0 O0 O'0!O.O O'O CD 'CD IC)
O''0 CD 10'Io O'O 01010,010',0 0IOIICD
o',0'O,olo'00 Ol,0 0'010,0 0 0 0'
0'0',0'0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0'0 0 010 O'
0.0,01010 010 010 10,010 0 01910,
0 0',010 'CD 'CD O CD I N,IC. O U C7 G,
▪ O O' 010 01CO CO CD' CO I CO I0 N' CO U) 0I
N N CO ''V CO U)iCD NI CO N- N- CD CO, CD II0119
O a) O CD 0 00' CO 00 O , 0110 Cn CD ,, Cs ", CD
• V'N- Cn V, M 10D CA 'I,, n IN !OD 'N' 01 N.
v- N V'1V O :CD CO N' CA CD CD 'N
3. MEDIUM -TERM NOTES (CORP. BONDS)
CO 0,00, Ls',V''1 h'00 O CO r CD U) CO OD -N
'• '. !CO CD CO ''0 01, CO CO'V' :CA N CD 1-
CO. CO'CO (A'I� L- LO ',h N- CA CO 031 00,0 CD
• •
O CD CD CO CD INN', CO' CO. co :co
O O
OC 'O O U 9'0 0:0 0.0',0 O 0 > .0
C > a a ag 4O ❑ 70,CD a) calm m a'mlm
QZ 0 ar :E
Lir 2 Q
U3 CO a) N N' ''(A ,N'� 0�I�',
M 0 M' V u") ,T V V'V
O 0',O O 910 90'0 9'OIO
C >• C' C c () > c
J'. m'', 0- m m'. 7'. m a), U 7' M m
O N.'— 0'' N p, N' N (N0
•
990'0
C
U7 .C7 Os 00
0'M 0 0'
0!0.0'000'00'0'0''10100010'
O'O'O.O O NIM M (N O' V•CD CO1V'
CO ▪ '10.COI CV 'CD CV N1IM n M',N :CD :CD CO 001
✓ O'CO10'N M O M.M 0 0 C D CV CV
• lO N',CD C') M 03 1 CO 101'06 M'. M p)1V
0 0 0'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
)0•0 o1)O m o O )0•O 0,)0
N,O 0 Ns 'CV. 'O 0O'.n
W'041∎ N" m', CO ',(0!'0.01
N (O N- U) CD U) C+i co! CO 1011-
0'000
OI ,)000.
Q I N 'C') O O'
O co co O',O
•',v•CD C')CD
O O CD CD CD CD O CD CV O'er O 0, CD 0',O
CA O 0 ' . U , O'V OICD a N-0 u)',O
if10 O N- M. N'�h U) N CD 03 N 0''.1 C')0
N. CO CO CD M! CO h'1 CA 0 CO N N'1 Os V', u)
CO. N Cn MI N' N N1V N- c6 CD O M CO N
N C`') OD V CA .1 V O 10 CA CO 1 C0 LI) O
N' 0, Cn' CD'N,V 'N CO N'N CA N!O
N '.N 0 V VI0 CO N. h L-1'100'CD N- C0 CD 0_
0)
W'
w, 0
F Z'
aI,z W W ^
F 0 (n
H
1 N
zQ W W
Z0 z Wp 0. W z
Q Wz nc
F W > OOw H 0 a
lw OzzF O OCq z t
w W W J U,° a' FI0 F VIO F OJm,.
F - �O <'a ZoEQH'
m Z Z O(d Z U CLO -R Q Z OU M Q w'.
❑ Z> Z2 J'W U OW 2 J w 00 I-
� ▪ LL ° Cng 4.f -J U U z J '.Z U O
O1 :9C c) WC)F-OzCOIz_UHQO.
W U Q '1 � J W� F_ w O '' O O LU W W 10
Q W�F.0 ZU W a', a Zd Q W w
LL Q'Z'Q 1,Q Q�Q J LL ,ce O Q,i LL J Z
O c)L,..'LL �'1z0 w J,Z 0 OfIa) O w e
se Z C/)WJ — WIF Z JD — WDZ Z Z
Q mO Q F Q W10 H 210 < W Q.
CO<2 0<Z0�'10002m0CD
$11,468,427.76
$11,297,000.00
O
LO
CO
7.
$11,733,059.44
(TOTAL AND AVERAGES
N
M
ccx
U
O
0
Z
W
aw
OF_
W
W
a
a O
w W
O=
U 2
0
0
Li_
0
a
F-
z
W
I-
U,
W
>
z
W
OC
3
a->
za
Zp
2:u-
W
U)
00
F-'' H
W!_
wia
13
W•c)10)I !C7'O CO'011--1c01-cr c011M r N' 'M u)'N co N1M 1,r u)
00'(.- '010'N 0'1100 71,-',(0 M 7 71418 N1,0•c) OD C)14 0) N'u),u) F
C) 10 le- N 1 CD u) (0 .7 (- !CD CD f0 V N '1 0) I r C) V OD 0 • u) M
'C); U):u) CO M IN'u)17 a nlCO C) 'C) 0 c- 1.,f co CO 0 l0 C) O P) N 00
0' N 69 0 :ER M'. V 1,00 CO 1V W 10 m 01N W C) 0n r c0 u7 r1M N • N Cr) N O ,01 ' :M 00•0 I M M u) N W r 0 V' M
1� h IN 0� M 0 1I O O (D O u) O u) co III N O cO C) 169 7 1.79 'ct r ao O N Efl CA CO 11 CD Cl. 7 u) 7 N
N M 1M
E9 1 791 '69 69 1
• 1
C'1 'i- N COIN- N CO 4'0 N N-
O 07.7 00 (N U O O,V �r M W M
CO N N N 0) (O u) O u) M 1 M C0 a0 .
N N N O? 1 69 O COO u) 0 l0
6q O C-,.1 N 79 0)
N CO m - M
W'M 1 0000
10
r r
O lop ',0)', W CD, OD O h'10171(0. CO r N O O o 0 N co CO co u) M OD N 0
0 n1o1 0 N Or O 7r:01017 7 tY 8 0 8 O O 9 a C) N u) u) n O C) 7100 O
10017 c0 0II c0 V n1, c0 '.CO OD V N 0 O 0 O eeI.� V CO O u) co O N (N N O
CA U) u) N C) M N I U 1 N- M C) M 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0) O M N c0 V V N c0 0
O O N 691O> 69 M V, c0 CO R Cn N g 0 0 0 0 0 r 0,0_ r CO h N N O
N _ 07 N o co '' M CO O N- M C) N- C) C) r 0 V M u) O co
N- N IN CD n CO CO O M N CO D u) O u) C) N c0 CD CO
� 7 N M 00 O N u, 100 (N 'et U r N r CM
V3 169 69 67..7, 69
M c
00 O N O V O N h c0 O c0 c0 CO:
O c.- 01 C) CO V 0 01 c0
p N 0 u) M CO CO 1 CO V 0)
N- 791 u) CO O , u) 0 u) '7
' N- ( 179 CO N
Cp O (6 00 • N- O CO
V N OD CD r N CD
00 L61 CO
r CD.r 717,7 r
N
N N u)17
u)
N CO
00
00
M N N 01'1.
M u) 0
CO. M M 0
Me-CON
CO N 061
(NNrrrrr
N
1
O O 1CD OHO O',0 O' u)0101010 O O' CO 010) OIL CO 0000000000 'CO 1g3 0�0101r
0'1, 0' N CA10)!0'O W,W'' CO101U)If0 Al. ' Cn CIW'W '1, a0 C) )10)'U)
0 '1. '' 1r 0017 0") 1, 0101 IIN-
m0'01001,0000
CD rn!rn1,rn rn'rn.CD rn'rn
a WI
Q
Q 0
2
W'
0 Q'
W 0'
3
a
z
Q
a
U
m
w
0
m
W
w
U,
3
1F-
2
H
F
Iz
W
U)
w
z
Iv
Lo u)u) 0n, u) u)'u)'u). C) u) u)lu)'.u) Lo u)�lu)'(0 0
O 9 9 o O o O o 7191910 0 010,0 O r
a , a{.5_1 '. I 5. aaaa„ c
a 155151a a 511a15 515 1 0
010.010 01010 O c,CD O C) 0 0 C) "e-
0 (O 00 1 0 , 00 u) 0 u) u) 0 0 010 CD CO u) 0 1CD 1 CD
1 0 IUD 1u) ' 0 10 10 '
0190010,0 9 910 O.O O,O 9 0 o 0 9'7;9'91919 O 0001l 0
a s $. a a a$ a a o 8. i 8H LI
I w a Q a a a a a a a!a z z t-p alia a a1a i ua )
MIN��01,0 O,O O OO,O OO O O O O',O!9 01010!OO.O
u) u) an 100 u) :up u) u) 1 u) u) !LID 1 u1 u) 0 M u7 00 u) 0 11 u) u) u) u) u) u) UD 0 0 10 cn N LO 00 00 M M 10 0 100 u) 0 u) 010
•0010010!0'00, 010100010oo1000001000000000 ,00000000000100100;0
C CC : C •C I C C C C 1 C C C 1 C C c1— 1 .0 d .0 CC C' C C C C C C C: C C C C C C 0 U, C' C 1 C C C' C c. C. 1'
co a t c0 1 co 1 CO 1 CO c6 co 17 1 N. CO co co co (0 co N N co 7 c0 co c0 CO co CO co co c0 cu co a) co co N co N: cu. N c0 N CO 11 N cu : c0 '
17'7.-717'717 717:7'7 :7 7 7 710 LL;a,LL ? 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 717 7 7' 7' '7 7 p 97'7 7,7 7.7 7-7: '
r r r r 7 7 r r r . r r r r r r r r? r r r r r T. M' 0 r r r r S.
0'1010 0 0 0 0 0 0 l0 '0 0 0 0 0 l0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 '0 0 0 0 0 0 l0 0 4`14 1 0 0 0 4`14` ' 010,
010 0 0 o o'0 00 o10 O O 0 0''10 o CD o 0 Co 0 0 0 0 0'o 0 010 o 0 9 9 0'0 O O 01010 o 0 o 0'0■
• 10'0 0 o 010 O 0110 O:0 0 0 0 01,0 O u) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'IQ o o C) O 0 U O O;0 CD O o o10 O'O',
M 0,00 N M N CO 01e- : V N M N M M CD N N N O c0 u) W u) u) u) u) 0 l0 u) :co 100 (O u) C- O u) CD c0 O u) u) l0 ' O
O 7'9'0 O 0 O ,010 O 7 V VIO) O 001,00 O N co V V V V N a 7'4 V V V 4 co. a u) on V1,N 4 M 4f V'O
'N' :u)'.N N N NIN N'u) c4 104 N N N u' ,i ,r'M' 161 ' I ,4 ' , I , iN10'N a ,-,cu N' u) N N. 0; r r
0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 010 0 010 01, 0 0 0 0 010
0 0'0 O O O O O O O O O O O O a) ,2D o 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 o 010 0'0 0 010 0'O;
00000000 N 0 0 0 0010 u)'u) u) O O,o O O O O O O O O O O O O O CD ,C> O 010 CD 1O O 010 O;O'
!CO 1 0' M N CO N CO 0 1. N N' M N 01:01 O C) • N N O 00 O CO u) u) u) u) CD u) 0 CO u) O u) I N. O al CO u) 10 0 u) u) 0
0,7 :0 9 0 0 0 9 7 0 0 0 V V 'et CD CO CCD 10.'0 0 M V a V W V 7 ct 1,t 0 V17'O V 0 M V V CV ,t M. et V''O'
'CV 1 u)'.N N N NIN N u) N N104 N N 6'4 7 cp:,- 7 40 N N N 4-4 .c4 V N N CV 104 M 0;10;10 N V r N N u).N r N 0;10', •
O n co 14 CD CO f� ^ M u) N N N (O O N _ �__
W 0 1 0) 10 N 0 00 M r 7 CO M 011e- 1 N 0 u) 0) u) N CO M n M OD O 00 O O V. h M I C f0 O u) CO C) '
1u)1c-' :014 O r r r ct CD C) • C `d CI '0 u) O .:(7,; r m M r V O M u)'.
:6161 r N 00 (O N O� �1' N O N M C W O u) (O N.(NO M O'er 0 W O u) M O) 11104 041
C) 10 u) O N 79 O CA M V O OD M C) M u) 0 0 0 04 0,_ 0 0 co N n V '7 N 1■69 O I-, N EA O CD V co N 10
V 107 • u) C) (O O 7 u) r M N N r co N r M u) 1 0 .
_ Q) 0 O M M M_ - W M 1 M O co u) O co (M M c61<6
IN' N h N co 0 h c+) Cr) M 0 f0 u) r 9 V O u) C O N U) 0, r CO c0 CO 7 CO 04 '1 • 1� 7' EA f� : M O N 0 7 CO M O N Q) N N OD M V
411 b9 CO r co _ N,uj 7 0D _ V u) r r.M N: .61 c9 ,4-
r r b9 0J M 69 179 r EA O M c0 11, N11 0 1,
w
>
W
W
cc
J J J J J J a J J J J
a aaaaaaaaDa
}F- 3- 3- 3- 3- }}03- 3- 3-
aZlaaaaaa aaa
D W D M 3 3 3 3 O 7 D D
N (n(n(n 0n 0) NZU) 0) V)
WWaaaaaaoaaa
w w w w w w w w w w W
CC CC OC F-OH HHaauaaa
F- O F- F- F- F- F- F- w F- F- F-
0<00000 0 0000
OF- 000000w000
aWaaaaaa =aaa
LL
LL LLI LaL LaL LL LL LL LL LL
()H(n(n(n(n(n(na(n(n0)
M
J W J J J J J J J J J
W> W W W w W W O W W W
zzzzzzzzzzzz
m m mIm m mini m m CO m m
0 0
Z Z
a a
Z Z Z
W W
>
aCCO
2?Zw
FI—Ww
w
CC aw0
a
a
Z Z
WW
W0
O O Z Z
22ow¢
aaLz�
ao1mc/?(n
00033
0 00
00
N
o
Cn
Z
W
w
W
>
O
a 0 0
aZZ
a W
OF Z Z
cZ
W
0
0
F
Z Z 0
F-
Z
W
Z Z M
00z
> > > p >
000w0
CaCwa
aaaF_.a
Z
g z
a a 4
CO D m
000<0
0(7
M
NST. FUND
0 0 0
Z Z Z
LL L=L L7L
CCC
Z Z Z
H F- F- F-
Z Z Z Z
W W W W
0 0 0 0
EASURY NOTES
000~
•
0aaa3
Y Y Y
m m m
000
zzz
3 > >
0 0 0 0
ZZZ Z
» »
LL LL LL LL
U) U)
ZZZ Z
F- F- H F-
Z Z Z Z
W W W W
0 0 0 0
0000
aaaaC
F-
Z
W
Ui
W
W
CC
Q
F-
M
w
>
z
W
w
F-
QZ
a a
CO m
00
zzz
3 3 3
Y Y Y Z
¢¢¢oo
m m m j 3
ZZZZZ
000 w w 00
Z Z Z o o z z 0
3330033<
F
Z
W
W
W
a
O 0 0
M LL LL
Z C V~)
Z Z
LU
zoo
0 a a
Z Y Y
m m
F-
U
U
1 1a
F-
U
0 ZIZ
07 :-u u ,- csi
N O.L' W LL a
ui W
a'.U)ZU)U)a
aZ Zza'I
O F— m O
UZ<ZZQ1.
O W: W W O
Z 0 0 p p
3z0 »o
Or00z
W Y Z Y YWI
IZ ZZI
ICO O 0CI
<ZLLZZ<
0000
zozz<3
3 0 713 a,
sF
Z Z o
u)
0)
N
0
N-
0
0 M
u)
CV
0
0
0
0
N
2
U
z_
O
z
w
Q
w
w
Q
< C7
LL w
}0=
U 2
0
J
0
IL
F
0
a
• F
z
w
1-
w
z
CITY OF ALAMEDA
MEMORANDUM
Date: April 27, 2005
To: Honorable Mayor and
Councilmembers
From: William C. Norton
Acting City Manager
Re: Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Financial Report and Approve Third Quarter
Budget Adjustments
BACKGROUND
The City Council adopted a 2 -year spending plan for 2004 -2006 and annually appropriates
funds consistent with the charter and government code requirements. The total adjusted 2004-
05 budget for all City funds is $192,312,327. The attached exhibits provide the details for the
General Fund and all fund categories recommended third quarter adjustments. The final
exhibit is a Summary Analysis of Funds, which provides a "snapshot" as of March 31, 2005,
concluding with the Estimated Fund Balance as of June 30, 2005.
DISCUSSION /ANALYSIS
General Fund Revenues:
Our General Fund revenues for the period ending March 31, 2005 totaled $43,929,448
representing 66% of our updated revenue projections of $66,393,713. The main sources of
local tax revenues include the property tax (23 %), the local component of the sales and use tax
(7.6 %), Utility Users Tax (11.9 %), and a variety of "all other levies" (18.9 %). The latter includes
property transfer tax, franchise fees and payment in lieu of taxes, etc. The details of the
adjustments to the revenue estimates can be found on the Summary of Adjustments, pages 8-
11. General Fund revenue detail can be found in Exhibit B on pages 2 -4 of the attachment.
The City received 55.4% of its estimated property tax allocation from the Alameda County
Treasurer through March 2005. The next allocation was received in April; clean up payments
are scheduled for June, July, and August. This is net of the "triple flip" reductions, which are
taken in lieu of the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) shift of years past. Over
the last 14 years a total of $41 million from our local share has been shifted to the ERAF.
However, it needs to be noted that the ERAF shift continues for the redevelopment funds. The
Tax Increment Funds are due to pay $711,000 to the ERAF this fiscal year and next.
Certain revenue sources may appear below projected annual estimates. There is a 30 -60 day
lag in receipt of several major revenues. These revenue sources include sales tax, utility user
tax, vehicle -in -lieu subventions, and franchise fee payments. These revenues are only accrued
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
Report #4 -E CC
5 -3 -05
Honorable Mayor and
Councilmembers
April 27, 2005
Page 2
at year -end and recorded on a cash basis during the fiscal year. The cable television providers
make franchise fee payments quarterly while PG &E remits a franchise fee for gas on an annual
basis (approximately April 15).
It appears that Sales Tax revenues will exceed the revenue estimate by approximately
$580,000. This is a result of Business to Business sales increasing. There will be a separate
report analyzing the sales tax revenues Sales tax payments received in July and August are
accrued for the prior year as these payments represent taxes paid or generated in Alameda for
sales transactions in April, May and June of the prior fiscal year.
Transfers from Alameda Power & Telecom are remitted to the City's General Fund in 10 equal
monthly installments.
General Fund Appropriations:
General Fund adjustments reflect a decrease of $6,299,384 in required appropriations for the
third quarter. This includes the $(6,197,765) reported in February 2005. The majority of this
amount reflects reductions to appropriations as discussed in the February report. The details
of the required appropriations can be found at the Summary of Adjustments, pages 8 -11, of the
attachment.
General Fund Expenditures:
Our General Fund operating expenditures for the nine months ending March 31, 2005 were
$47,220,593, representing 70.95% of our operating budget of $66,553,686. Non - departmental
expenditures totaled $247,326 and included expenditures for property tax collection, rent
subsidies for the Alameda Historical Museum, and transfers to Social Services Human
Relations Board.
In addition, we transferred out of the General Fund to other funds as follows: Library operations
($868,304), Urban Runoff ($48,750), Capital Improvement ($264,676), Debt Service — City Hall,
Jail & Library ($730,386), and Risk Management ($808,880). Capital outlay purchases funded
by General Fund amounted to $99,281. General Fund expenditures by departments can be
found on pages 5 -7 of Exhibit B.
If all the assumptions prove accurate with respect to General Fund revenues and
appropriations, current expenditures will exceed current revenues by $159,972 at year -end.
This is the result of several factors. One factor was revenue reductions totaling $163,373 for a
variety of items. These adjustments result from vigorous review of revenue sources and
monitoring revenue receipts. Expenditures were also reduced by the net of the additional
expense of the Alameda Police Officers Association Non -Sworn Unit (PANS) agreement, which
was offset by reduction in the City's share of a project. The details are included in the
summary of adjustments, pages 8 -9 of the attachment.
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
Honorable Mayor and
Councilmembers
A summary table of General Fund revenues and appropriations follows:
April 27, 2005
Page 3
General
Fund
Original
Adopted
Amendments
1st & 2nd Qtr.
Amendments
3'd Qtr.
NET
Amendments
Amended
3/31/05
Revenues
$ 67,508,484
$ 487,764
$ (1,022,534)
$ (534,770)
$ 66,973,713
Appropriations
$ 69,067,768
$ 3,785,302
$ (6,299,384)
$ (2,514,082)
$ 66,553,685
Balance
$(1,559,284)
$(3,297,538)
$ 5,276,850
$ 1,979,312
$ 420,028
The forecasted negative balance at year -end will be funded from the $18,245,729 beginning
fund balance. The remaining fund balance will represent 27.2% of operating expenses.
Special Revenue and Enterprise Funds:
The summary of revenues and expenditures for special revenue funds and enterprise funds are
also included herein as Exhibit C, pages 12 -14 of the attachment. Third quarter adjustments to
these funds reflect rebudgeting or prior year's budgeted amounts for capital improvement
projects as well as capturing previously authorized Council, CIC or ARRA actions. The details
are found in the Summary of Adjustments found on page 8 of the attachment.
Summary Analysis of Funds
Exhibit C, pages 9 -14, details all funds. This represents a "snapshot" as of March 31, 2005.
The Estimated Fund Balance as of June 30, 2005 is the calculated results of Audited Fund
Balance, June 30, 2004, plus estimated revenues less appropriations. It does not account for
actual revenues or expenses. Of particular note, funds 204 and 205 are forecasted to have
negative fund balances. These redevelopment funds will have deficits until the tax increment
revenue is received or bond funds are drawn down in support of the projects. The Library Fund
(210) is always adjusted before year end close with a transfer in from General Fund in order to
close the year with a zero balance. Fund 211 (Gas Tax) will be adjusted before year -end by
reducing the transfers to match actual revenues. The Narcotics Asset Seizure Fund (219) is
awaiting the disbursement of funds from seized assets. Future expenditures are curtailed until
the fund is brought into balance. The FISC funds (256 and 256.1) actual results will
significantly reduce these deficits. Fund 275 (a maintenance assessment district) will be
corrected by year -end.
The Internal Service Funds reflect the provision of services to the operating departments of the
City. Fund 711 (Workers' Compensation Self Insurance) balance includes the long -term future
liabilities. To the extent that these liabilities will not all mature in any one fiscal year, they have
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
Honorable Mayor and
Councilmembers
April 27, 2005
Page 4
not historically been funded via charges to the operating departments. Staff continues to
monitor this fund in conjunction with the actuary. There is sufficient cash to meet the
obligations to the State as self- insured for purposes of workers' compensation. Staff is
continuing to understand the impacts of recent statutory and regulatory changes and their
impacts.
The Dental Self Insurance Fund (713) will continue to have a small deficit but will be resolved
by June 2006.
BUDGET /FISCAL IMPACT
We project that current expenditures will exceed General Fund current revenues by year -end.
The Summary Analysis for all funds can be found on Exhibit D, pages 15 -19. The projected
General Fund balance for June 30, 2005 is $18,085,757 and is 27% of the operating budget for
2004 -05.
RECOMMENDATION
The Acting City Manager recommends that the City Council accept the report on the results of
operations for the quarter ending March 31, 2005 for all funds and approve the supplemental
appropriations as outlined herein.
Respectfully submitted,
William C. Norton
Acting City Manager
By: Ile -Ann B
hief Financia
r
Officer
Attachments:
Exhibit A: Recapitulation of Receipts and Disbursements (including Summary of Adjustments
for General Fund)
Exhibit B: General Fund Revenues and General Fund Appropriations
Exhibit C: Special Funds Revenues, Expenditures and Summary of Adjustments
Exhibit D: Summary Analysis of Funds as of March 31, 2005
G: \FINANCE\COUNCIL\2005 \050305 \gtlyfinancia13.doc
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
Q M
m O d O
X O O I.
W 0 'O CO
N Q a-
0 N. N 0 0 0 N. 0
O O U) 0 0 0 010
O et. N N U) t. r N
"SF I1010, Or 00
co co U) O) O N O) N
10U) r N. a000 et CO
�NMr et00)
U)
CO N el. c0 N.
d N. co co co co co
r'EO N ION NO O
a O N O 10.. co
co d r N
E
Q (3) U)
C a 07 u) 10
)
d O O O a-
" E N O U) N
° M O N
a c .M. N
d a-
Q U)
2
c
d
r) E
co a+ � c
z d
W
E a
U)
cc
M
03 N
N N O d d A
0 O 9 -o N
o
M N O CO O N
Z - NEmcD
Q M Q m U)
F-
aIx
w�
M(7
Li. ?
O 6 > m
Z d
w c31 m
OO Qm
Ja
I-a
a °i
N
W 0 TO WC
Itr
of w N
CS
N 1St
0
O
O
N
W
U
z
-J
CO
0
z
U.
LL
w
0
0 0 N N O
co O O O
O O U) 0 0
e"' U) 0) r) U)
0 )et at NU)
M O N M
— vN
O r) N 000 et N U)
N 010000)0 N N.
O CO N N NOO et CO
MOr OOa-et a arc
N O O 0) CO O) CO 0 O
r O1 U) 1.00 N. ON
N M r UI U) U) U)
U)
N. O1 CO N. O et O 0) co
.M- a N N CD CD VU)) Na
e- O U)'NN001O0) et
41 U) U) et O et et 00<O
OOU)Nr MU)1O
U) r
U)
M
N
N
O
N
N
r
U)
M
t`
M
t.
0)
O
I0
U)
rn
us
Ui
U2
O
et
et
0)
N
0)
r)
et
d)
CD CO at et r 000r ON
NlUOnr 000OM
M Is: r1f)N OO 4.4' Le
N CV NO0 1... CD t. t.. e- RtOf
O a N O M N
U)
00) ' OON O)O)t•
UD CD 10 O
00) et CO N. M
OMO)
Oet I�ODNr1O0)
et N N et N 0
U)
0 co co O O O n O
N h 119 0 0 0 0 1. N-
W U)O MN 000 co
U)r0)00 (0 .N. O
rnN 00)n. .N..r N LO
U)
OV e- 110 0 0 0 0 M N
O A O I. O U)r err
0)IOIO U)0 n 0)0) v
N O)Or Ord` -'I.
ao
N N
U)
N. M M t. r U) O et 10 O N
et r r U) 0) N. O M et et CO
0) et e- M I. M IO M O) 00 W
O) 1. a M 0) 11)U)O)O MM
O 0) 1. O) M O O) N M I. O
N O O Rt. CO NOD r N 0) M
O Oa N co M r M
U)
M 03 a 000 et N M O r 000 N
CD et 1. N r N O 01 CI
e? O)0.N . M 0)00
et 1.
etOI00010010)Met
O OOO CO t` M 0) t■ N
et 0)N etN
U). N
CO et
1... N
r: cli
O try
N .r..
U) U)
.a-
co N
N O
F.7 00
e^1' N
N M
U) U)
r O
N. N
N N.
M
e-
44 Ut
'si O
CO in
co O
0) (0
N N.
C6 U)
U) (Fa
co O
CO N
l0 co
co N
in et
O U)
CO
U)
e
in
CD
0
N.
co U)
N e--
N N
.1. U)
U)
CO
$ 5,276,850
et
co
1n
N
0)
U)
CD O
A O
M eF
U) v
U) et O
N
N
Cr U)
M
W
z
co) CO
LL W
a0) cc OQ' w _
Cwr W= 0 5
CL 01 ) d z 8 5 t. i_
a+ 0)
Q
a s d O d C d d Q a m 2
dcagy C0 O rn °_ 0 R mW c IX urkaCTd00" io E i'_ M. Z ° d
dF.O T t E° N E .. d d >^ d Qy r
A— c dLL O Z C d N�+'7YN ca' 0 }N 0 00 O
m� �wa� 'Erj o)3VI.0 d0 m m d z� a ci d N"' c c c E 2._ ° R o E �,,.,y0 Wz < d W
ct m > t c'° ,� c O a'� a�a c n> U) 0 y
a`O�oiizc�Uw UaaaaazowCI- oz VCC w. aa°
M
N.
t`
0)
et
co
U)
m
F
S
X
W
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
Z W
0 ▪ W
W J
O
0
Z
Q
0
m
F
J U�
aq
F m
▪ E
F �
09
mg
M N
W
N
o f
'O V
M
▪ c
G E
c=
V
a
5▪ E
‘-v
F
CA
W
J a U)
2 q
.8
� N
0
w O
re
s F
W
u O o
z
0
F
d
0
y
W
0
F.. O
8z
PROPERTY TAXES (3100)
0 0 0 0 0 0
V o) N Q O•- O
LO
cri cco 0 d0' O O O •
m
01,-0M000
O) (O U).(0 O O) a)
0 N O) U) O W O)
n 001 O 0Q) O U) Q
CO '- '- N r (O
U)
r O) O N O O O
O M U) M N C0
U)-a) Q MM
O r
.- M M Q
M
.7(0
N
0000000
O O O O O N
O O O O (O
M O U) r O O)
U) r CO O) U)
06C'l NN
O
CO
N
000000
00000
00000
N O U) r 0
CO U) r CO CA
N N
M
E9
co
cci
U
M
N
CD
U)
n
W
0
CND
N
N
•
0
0
Vl
0
(D
0
NN
0
N
W
X
< 0
F 0
N
N
C
o W
n ° W W
E it u x
Q21 m ° a m 0 O F
s J
` 8() O w x 0
in U N C H F 0
m C
P.AbbEwaci. p D f'
a»aa=za rn 0
000000,-
0000000
N Q U) N- W O)
M M CO CO M M M
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q N r O r O O r O '- 0 0 0
0 r N O N O M 0 O O O O
0 Q U) (O N O r O O N O N
CO U) 0 CO r Q Q Q In CO
r 0 U) CO 0 r U) O U) O Q O
N- M O Q N M W O 0) O CO M
0) O (O Q N CO CO )- O M O N N
U) In O U) U) (O
N ▪ Q Q O 0 N o s- U) (A 0 M
CO N U) 0 N O) r
-- N
V▪ 3
Nat (O ((0 0)) lU() n 0 m 000 0 0 0 0 O
CO O) M N 1- O N CO O N- N
M0M LOU) O N (O CO N U V
M N U
Ef3
(.) 0 0 0 0 M O 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 M O) O O O O O
O O O O 0 o O O O O O
0 0 0 C o U) O U) U) 0 0 M
Q U) U) O Q CO a0 CO ,- 01 O 0)
U7 U) M W r r M N•-0
Q
O O O 0M O M C0 O N
CO O O O•- CO O O
l`0') LO) r W N M
O
0
O
N
O O O O O O M Q O 0 0 0 0
O Q 0 0 0 O O) M O O O O
O O O O O O O) 0 O O O O
CU) 0 0 C CJ O a) U) O O O
O r O O U) O (O O N- O W r
- O 0 W CO N M Q U) N
U Q M r
r
0
0
0
H
O
3
0
N
v
GU • o
X 0)
(U N N F
x F N CO J- W co
a
- ~ c LL W li a0) a°)) c o W 2
Q d x co a) E a) LL LL ,
aO N te O 8 E O t m m O a
0 W
- ou Q C m E a ' N J
LL C O O a C) H
F • 'vLL o(i C C oC
1 F W
' 28.z,13.21"--u--,%r- 2
N N o d 'n J N m 0 N T W
nma5raOOE-<IQ M 0
J
0000000000000
O,- O O O O N U) 0 O O
N M Q U) U) U) U) U) 0 CO O
N N N N N N N N N N N N N
M M M M M M M M M M M M M
0 0 0 0 0 0 °,„, 0 0 0 0 I o
Q OOQ LO a-- O U) I
r 0) M O N O M 1� O U)
(O M V O Ui r LO Ui O CD O
r CO CO M M r MO... r C- N 1-
I.-- r O O Q (O CON-010N
`a-0,-01003,4-010,1"
0 O
M n N N (QO N V ( - r U) N
E9 U) N
M M O O (O Q a0 M r O O
O) r O N- U) r Q r CO
U) CO M W 01 U) U) Q O)
C
O N CO (O M
'- .,-..,-0) CO '- N
80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N
O O O O O O 0) O O O CO
O M O U) O O O O O M
m O U) N O U) O U) U) o-
O 0
E9 N Q N M
O O 0
O O O O
cri
O COO UO)
O O O O O O O O O O N
O O O O O O 0) 0 0 0 CO
O O M O U) O O O O O M
01 O 0 U) '- (O (O
EA N cr O
O
O
H
CO
N
N
N
H
N
0
U,
0
0
0
N
O
U,
0
N 0
F o
M ua
W
a.
U) o6 W
LT 011.
o) E E z a.
at ._ (� LU w w LU 0 Nl
LL E N
sd 8 S Ui
O1m � rn�- E E E
c E v� v�� Z
y E J d t C F
O
E E� � m W
8,2 .cb Li] a Q Q w s
M Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 U) O O O O O O
O O N Q Q U) (0 r 0)
M M M M M M M M M M M
M M M M M M M M M M M
0 0 0
a) n
LOMO
MO
(0%-0
MN
MM
MO
M O
r
c,00
M
r
000
O N O
00
e
N
O
0
U,
H
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
ZW
00
WW
W J
0
0
Za 0W
40
WO
O
J U,
72
S4R
a
F o
W
W N
W
C
as �!
'O yj
M �
a
a
O i
c=
N 9
a
4
C
✓ • m
L
a
UA
W
J U,
$4
O
� O
re N
0
1i4
W O
U
W
0.0
0° 0
N UO O CO
O r O n
CO 0) r CO
V 0) LO
0000
r N N M
N U)
E9
0000
-ono
O
co O 0
coo 0
UA r
co
0
M
N
01.
UUG
a
0
0
0
0 O O 0
V m m
V V V V
CO M M M
REVENUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES
C)U) Ub 00000000
V O CO O M r
O N N V M 0 0 0 0 r m
O COO M O m 0 r (O CO
Now V O In In r
00,T-000000a
0 V 0 CO 0 CO N UO cr
N r m m O r CO r
M M CO m O Un V m
V r V N V
N
N
N V UO 0 In N Un CD
000 U) V M V
.N00
N r N O
N O m N N 0 N 0
N r m
N
69
Op 0 0 UO O O N 0 0 0
(N000000,-000
000000.,-000)
V O O M m O m O N M
69 O O N CO M m O r
N
O N O 0
0 -0 V
m C ) • O O CO
N
CO
CO
CO-
N 0 0 0 0 0 O O O
O O O O 00U)
69 O O no- O 0 N
0
0
• M
0 rZ c.6
U U co U LL 0 0
C E < m W
C v C �
o
c o c E m'� W co W
E U) m 0
=w(-7,-.0
m n c E O o V W
aEi0a a Ev N- F Z
10
0 0 c C U Y N m R'
• mOOPI_ 2a0 U) 0
O UO r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N m N O CO m
N N N M M V U) CO m m
OUOUOUOUOCOCOUOmro
CO M M M M M M M M C)
00000000000° o° 0
CO 0 CO O CO O N CO CO CO U) N- 0)
M O O N V 0 r m CO N V Un
cd O r UO O O V CO m N CO m 0
0 r N r CO M r CO O CO
CO m V' V M O CO N N Un V m
V 1C) V V U) O U') U) UO r m V
UO O CO M O_ O O M m V r O m
V CO Un O O CO O O Ch N r N
N N CO N CO M U) CO m N m r V
69 N N r N
00 UO r O r m N m N r V
r-
M mom CO N O 0 0
O M r CO m N
N- (O N (O (O
O r
CO m N o O
m
UA r r
000000001000
m m 0 0 0 N 0 0 V 0 M 0
O p V 0 0 0 CO m 0 UO O m 0
Un V Un Un m CO O R C M O
. (D CO O M N N 1n CO Un Un
N N UO CU V V m M
W
N 0 0 CO 0 0
CO 0 0 N O
V m O m O
UO M N r
M
no O O O Un O O M O UO O
r m m 0 0 0 r O O V O M O
UO rii000000coomo
O m VM N N o V O O O
NN V O N CO n
V ',room
69
N
N
0
of
v
0)
U,
O
N
H
0
0
0
N
‘7.
CO
V
U,
W
0
N cz
W F
W
v
• 23Li LLv E
• 0 .0 U U U n z m U)
0
a) Z i E >C Y m Um p J -0 C o U m o o a d r a
2 t o m E E 2 I-
aQ U v ¢ F m U E 0 0
9r°ma9 ¢wi0 °- N
0000000000000
00 CO m O O O O O O Co O
m m 0 m m m m m m V m U
m r r r m r m m m m r m r
M M M M M M M M M M M M M
m
H
m
W
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
Z W
00
W J
O
0
00
-I W
J
m o
0
H
J
aq
U(
M
F U)
09
W p
ON
W
CO
EU
me
C
N ; a
a
V
Q
CONTRIBUTIONS FR OTHER FUNDS
e s eves s e e e e e° e e eee°o° g e e s e Oeeee
O O O O O O O O O M O W N O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O M O O
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M MOD 1-- x 0 0 0 0 1� O O O O O N O N O O
O O U) U) U) U) N U) U) O) [O U) (h U) U) O U) IN V U) U) U) O O O) O ( U) 0
N- N- r N- 1- N- N(o(nrN U) n N-N- N-N- n Oven r NN
0
O R N N r U) N O r O CO N N- O) U) O O O r O N U)
O 1- U) O) 1- O) N 7 0 O O .-- 1- O n M O) M O M O (O O U) U) O
r O N_ M r
O m CO O M O O N O V OO O M OM ,i o) V U) 050-0e
O O) M r N r r N Q (O M M r r M N N r N- V O CO (O n
r N CO N N
N
N- O U) V 1- M U) O N O UJ U) N V O N V r N- U) V 0 0 0 0 M V O
N- O N- CO U) N O r 0 OD OO M r N O CO O U) M U)
V U) O O d' U) O r U) r 0) V O) Cr N N U) O) U) O CO 0 0 0 U)
CO U) O r cr Q U) O V N- OD N O) N O N O Q N- V U) O O OD- ',T-
O) a- CO M V N U) m CO V r CO V O) CO r CO V V O U) U) M
N O N N U)
(9
CO U) N C' N- O O O NOD O U) O O) N N U) O N O O U) O 0 V
O O 1- O OD O CO U) O O O O) N OO O O U) r U) N U) 0 0 U) O N O V
1- U) 1- N M O O O O) U) UJ O O W W O M N M O O M O M V 1,-
O „ O V O O O U) N- r M O M O O) r O) U) U) N O N 1- N
O 7 O) U) O) O n U) OO r U) r U) N O r r U) N- V N O V N
N 7 N MrN M 7 U) M MN-
r
(A
C)
C)
C)
O
O
69
00 V U)
00 000
00 UJ U) O
O
O 0O O
O O
0 O) N- V M U) M
N M r
O
C)
U)
O O N- OO U) N V 1- O O) 0 0 0 O U) O O) N O U) O N O O U) O 0 V
(A U) U) OD m O W .4-0,1- N O O O U) M U) N U) O O O N O V
OO N U) N N M .-ON U) O O O) O) m M N M O 00(0.71,- O M O M N ,4
U) Q O) U) O) r.-00 r U) N V r r N I- NO.-0.-
r V N NN .-- r r M U) M M N
r N M
0
F... 0
m i c
N
n
Cl
N
N
co
N
M
V
0
DD
O
U)
N
3
Cl
O
O
0
CO
COT
N
O)
N
0
N
Cl
N
0
0
N
M
N
U)
(D
N!
3
N
N
O
CO
N
N
N
M
N)
Cl
M
0
N
N
0
o e°
ODD a(f))
4 1U0
M
3
U)
N
O
CO
N
N
N
c
.2
m p
co U Z
Z C U-
m o Q U) d -J
d .N m�S Lr_ H O G a
o0m m C
W U [Laa i =ou�'� MO �
(7)-6z-Ti m �k �vr Z J
m0m. O 0 0
i �O o a p Z H m m � c Ep m � `w aN Y a on v (o y W a W l-
a Lu
CD5UJU�0J�C7F -F=00_ CDE:¢CDC)5QC)N� W CD CO J Q w 0
E E E E E E V E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E o E E C i_'
0 0 0 0 0 o E o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F 0
H Q
H H H F- F- F- H H F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- co F- F- Q N OF w a
d' N M 'V U) U) O r M 0 r cr 1- U) U) U) O M V O O n) O N O
O U) 0 0 O O O O N N N M U) U) N- r n O N U) M O O U)
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M U) U) U) OO
O N O OO OO O O O O O OO (O OD (O O O W OD (O (O W U) M O (O N OO O O
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
co
7
LL
Z W
Z W
Ci
CC W
Wa
ax
W
0 0 0 0 0 0
� ) o 0) ro
V N o o N
LS) N N N a) N N
CO v N N U) U) (O
CO CO CO N CO CO O)
• CO CO C) N 0 C)
� o01�CO00
ff! M N V CO N
CO N _ LO
W O N Co 0)) N CO Uf) N
CC N N CO N CO O) N V
N O CO 0 cri U) O) O)
H • M N U) N O CO N O
N. N r C) CO U)
W
a
x
W
W co. V- CO UN N CO N
N O) C) O) CO N M CO
O f O
N v 7 .7; o n n m r
a O M 0) Co a- N-
2
< <
0 0 0 Un O N (D
CO0) U00 N CO N O UOf)
• lU
Ce U) CO ar
a. N
:E=
1-'v
Q
()j O O N C))
O L C6 O r r
• E (o()) CO co
• cri
O
(n Q
O c
d
• E
LL N
Q
J CO G
z O •
E < N
O a
0
a
a
a
GENERAL FUND
City Administration
CA
O
CO CO 0 N 0 at r_
CO CO ar C a o V
N - O) CO 0) CO 0 N
CR
a
N
N
CO
N
Ce
M
C+)
Co
N
a
N
CO
w
CO
CO
N
(A
N
N
N
49
O
CO
0
N
CO
O
CO
w
J
O
i-
>. m
lA �
N
C L >
w O
_ 5 T O F- o
C C6 C c O
O
U 2 U Q c E
T C = `p W
U (U U U ii 2 E C7 to
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N - N N N 01 CD
N N N N
a
a
Police Services
U) 0) Co N
N CA M N
• N N-
O) 0 O
O O U) N
CO CO M 0)
N N CO
O) W N C)
N CO
U) N V N
CO 0 N
N
• O N N
NNON
UU) N
CM O
CR
• N U) U)
0) 0 O) CA
C6 0 U)
Oi c7 U) CO
O N CO
o 'V'
CO') ▪ CO CNO N
CO 0 0
(P (O v
s-
• 'at
0 0
CO V
• OD
C9 • O
Esi
CO
0
U) CO co v
co V N 'Cr
• N v C)
O Co N
C) Cr) 0 Co
N CO
Ui LO-
Ul
CO O
U El N
E
a) a m
L
O O CO 0)
Ca 7
lD C
N U)
d E
Co m Q U
0 o 0 0
Q)
• N
_ C)
C) co co C)
N
Co CO
N
CO
49
Ce
N
U)
N
CA
CO
0)
O
Cr▪ )
N
w
Fire Services
O 0 0
N
[0 • CD CC
co Co v
O) CO
O Co O
• o o
C co"
CO N
▪ CO o
'O N Un
O coo M
Co co N
co 0
Ea
0 CO CNO+)
0 CO
C) co- CO
• C) N
C) < CO
co O
N n
g E
.j
a)
fn u,
T J
> U
,
01 N
O L >o
a
O 0 CO
N CO - N M
CO
N
co
CO
co
co
Ce
N
N
N
U)
CO
w
0
Ce
0
Ce
0
C)
CO
Co
N
Ce
CA
N
Co
O
N
49
U)
O
co
N
N•
O
0
N
•
40
0
O
N•
N
0
0
0
N
Ui
eA
0
O
N
ON)
N N
CO
N
CO
Co
CO
N
CO
Co)
v
N
co
0v
w
m
N
Co
a)
N
Ce
N
N
N
CA
CD
0v
O
N
N
n
v
0 0 0 1 0°
co c co O 0))
n NN`' o CO
N N 0)
CO V O
Off) N N
(7
N 0 0
CO
0 0
M
a N
ffl
N U( CO
N U) o
• O)- CD-
CD
CO N N
Ce
O (• NO CO
C
Co N 0
N U)
Ci N-
CO co
N Ch
3 a)
a)
N N
O
m N
3 C C_
• U) a) O`
ra>i C -
� W �
LL
°Z1 C
LL E 5 Q
U o O m
O CO O ' v
CL
> o m
CL o a a
c 0 0 0
_ _
C - N
N CO
a v v v
0
CD
O
fa
0
C'9
O
CO
N•
N
co
rn
w
H 0
W
wa
ax
W
MI W O
F Z N
co
= M cc
W m 2
EXPENDITURES
Mar 31 2005
a H
d C
co G
V •—
a `
O
a
aV
F 'O C
5 C
.V d
C E
O N
U P
N Q
a C
d
E
LL N
7
Q
J N CD
Z O v
C7 F o
R Q N
0
APPROPR
GENERAL FUND
Development Services
▪ 0 10 I 0
• u) v CO
✓ CD 0 m
ri 0 ri r
n n n
0 CD
O
0) OD
OD O
(co o
N
U,
0) V
O CD
n o
Cri ui
• N
✓ 0)
0 rn
O 0
O 0)
✓ 0)
• N
Ui
CD
N
n
N
N
CD
r)'
M
d▪ t
M
N
0
co
U,
O
Ict
CD
n
Ui
Coi)
CO
h
w
N
v
co
U))
U)
O
co
N
n
CD
O
N
UT
U,
0
N
n
N
U)
PLAN /BUILDING SUB TOTAL:
Public Works
0 0 0 0 0 0
• r v N- m
N CO f0 aD M N- n
07 0 D) 03 v ui 0
r CD O CD V D) N
0 CO 0 00) N Cp C1
✓ 00 u) N 00 CD
O M M O) D) N CD
• D) M O N N
• co M CD Cd
U3
u) • 0) V W CD
• n n CO CO M 0
(D M OD 0 n 0) CD
(o pi co- ("9' Co co CO
M O N- N N N N
U3
u) Cf) M CO n O M
c0 M O u) O N CO
N M M CD
O CO n N M D) Ch
V N 0 N N 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
O N CD u) V
c9 CO O M
69 N
O o ei COO o o CO
(O
N CO 0 0 0
c0 OD .- u7 O M
E9 N V O O
0
O
U
u) u) CO CO n O 0
W CO M u) 0 C
CO 0 0 O 0
O O O u) 0 0)
✓ (COO N M N
Ui N
Administration
C
O
O
a
C
C
C
O
.N
C
m d
oo
O
O
To
m cu
0
LO u) LO O LD 0 0
0 N N N N N N M
✓ V V V V V V
e 0 0 0 0 : 0
us O o v O
N 0) O N
• CO 0 0 0 n
CO
N
m
O
V
U)
n
M
U)
0)
N
PUBLIC WORKS SUB TOTAL:
Recreation Services
▪ CD N 0
• N 0
O 0 0
V 0 W O
CD r C17
Cn M
U)
NN
-
N M
C
9'' OO
O N
6▪ 9
OD 0
0
0D-
c0
M CO 0 0
03 N u) O
N V O O
N s- CD co-
CD
8.0 CND 0 u)
U▪ )
M
N- 0
✓ LO
N V O
U�
✓ CO 0 0
0 V 0 0
✓ W C0 0
CD Co Co O
0 v u)
COO O
CO N
CO D) CO
r N
CO a-
CO r
69
Mastick Senior Center
ARPD Annual Maintenance
▪ N 0 0
0
CD CD
0)
N
O
U,
CD
N
O
Co
N
Ui
0)
n
CO
N•
O
co
O
N
0
0
U#
0)
N
CD
N
N
RECREATION /PARKS SUB TOTAL:
0
n
N
N
0
N
U,
co
0)
m
O
dt
N
CD
N
r
COD
U►
N
cri
0)
M
U)
lU3
CO
N
U▪ )
O
N
M
U,
n
v
u0)
v
CD
UT
N
F
a
)
C
C
d
G
0
N
0)
U)
U)
N
0)
CD
el
CD
N
Ui
0
Us
F
d
Cn
Capital Outla
en
M
N
co
N
U,
0
n
N
Depreciation
F- G
W p
W
wa
aW
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
• 0 0, CO 0 N 0 0
O CO 0 CO O 0
0 r; CO 0 m 0 0
N O N- N
U) N 0 0 0 0
N O 6) Cn 0 0
60 0 CO N N CD 0
�
n U5 00-
CO a O 0 0 0 0 0
N CD CO rx N CA CO V' N- d' O
♦- M 00) M , M
Q ci r
w 2
a
x
w
13 '7
¢ N y C
O O N O O
O
O
7 CU
O � O N CO
CC V O U)
N
C
d N
E
v
W
t c
F- 'O
Ci c 0 °
Cu O
N
co
c E 0
O y
C)
CO a) P O
OE
J CO N
O
z o
Q N
O a
0
tY
a
a
GENERAL FUND
Non - Departmental
to O N O 0 O O
O - N
C[) O)
U
0 0 O O 0 O
N O O CO O O Ul O
rn j o 0 CO 0 0 Ul 0
CCD N ° LO ° O CO) 0-
O
N
CD
CA
CD
n
N
a0)
CD
M
CA
O
CA
CD
U,
U,
O
M
O
N
N O N- 0 0 0) 0
V O
LO CO N
M O O
• CD
N N CO -
CO 0 7 0 0 0 0
CO O CO N- CO
CO CO CO Cfl
M COO O N co'
O CO N
C-
vi
V 0 N° LO 03 N O
CO O CO CO N O
CO O N- co- CA N CO On) N V CCOO CO O
U3
O o O O O
O O 0 N O
000‘-0
o r 0 0
o CD 0 0) Cn
N N CO N
N
CD 00
0 0 O
co- 0 D)
o O
co N
0 N-
O
O 0)
O N
Cn
CD V 0 0 N 0
CO r•-• O N O
CO 0 0 0 N- CO
0) N N N s-
CA s- N s-
C
Ca
0
T
U
Ca
C Cl
O
U
E N
o
°
O N
d F-
a)
m C (r c
U N N O CO
In In2 o0i
m F=
E E.n m
0 E v <
CO 0 o
m
U Q Q Cn ¢ 0
Sub -total - Non - Departmental
.a
06
rn
I c
Y a) T a) 7
U aai > 0 z
m E Z
(n a) O d LL 12 m
3 U j U N 0- C .- J
H a,- C) C E ce C
a CO m L'13- 2 m C
ES 0 Ur J Cn E U 7 (g
F- LT_ ....
J
7 F
N 0
F-
a
n
CD
CD
D)
co
n
4
N
7
m
n
F;
N
CA
03
O
O
U)
CD
CA
CD
O
O
N
CA
COD
CD
CD
CD
d Y F- W
c tea) aa) .o U co m To W
EXHIBIT B
SUMMARY OF ADJUSTMENTS - GENERAL FUNDS
Revenue
Appropriations
Department & Description
General Fund
(1 ,439,161)
February Amendment
(6,313,874)
February Amendment
(49,109)
February Amendment- equipment replacement (F119)
67,000
February Amendment - Increase library appropriation
46,599
Police - PANS Resolution per council approval
(50,000)
Portion CIP project to be funded by developer
(34,169)
PG & E Franchise Fee - adjust estimated revenue
10,000
AP & T Franchise Fee - adjust estimated revenue
(88,634)
Cable Franchise Fee - adjust estimated revenue
(68,000)
Engineering fee - adjust estimated revenue
36,112
Additional state mandated revenue - animal adoption prog
46,000
Additional miscellaneous revenue
70,000
Additional permit revenue
30,000
Additional contract revenue
21,400
Additional grant revenue FEMA
45,000
Additional bond proceeds to support personnel costs
(354,325)
To adjust for over - estimated revenues (IT)
23,243
Proceeds from sale of city owned property
(100,000)
Reduced transfer from traffic safety
200,000
Convert Community plan'g fee to CIP
580,000
Additional Sales Tax Revenue
$ (1,022,534)
$ (6,299,384)
Total General Fund Adjustment
8
SUMMARY OF ADJUSTMENTS - OTHER FUNDS
Revenue
Appropriations
Fund
191,473
Affordable Housing - carryover from prior year
70,000
Bayport Assessment - New assessment district
(369,000)
Housing Bond - correct budget
(2,990)
Revenue Adjustment
55,000
55,000
CIP - Grant - Pole mounted radar speed detector
204,682
APIP - revenue adjustment
120,529
(63,221)
Commercial revitalization budget carryovers
2,359,890
3,221,634
CDBG - budget carryovers
(95,867)
Equipment acquisition - correct budget
(500,000)
BWIP bond project - to correct budget
(127,406)
BWIP Housing - correct budget
1,000
APIP Housing - correct budget
33,000
Measure B - matching funds for CIP project
(310,000)
Gas Tax - revenue adjustment
1,348,554
1,348,554
Home repayment - revenue adjustment & carryovers
(95,000)
23,214
Lead Rehab - revenue adjustment & carryovers
67,000
67,000
Library - per council approval - 2/05
(15,000)
884,109
Rehab Repayment - revenue adjustment & carryovers
374,137
448,483
SSHRB - revenue adjustment & carryovers
(100,000)
Traffic safety - correct budget
9,990
WECIP - revenue adjustment & carryovers
(1,130,000)
Police Pension - 2/05 adjustment
$ 3,721,925
$ 4,352,840
Total Fund Adjustment - Other Funds
9
m o o 01-0
zw
= W w
X w J
w a O
0. 0
W I-
Z W
J
m 0
0
J N
7 �
U
Q �
t'f
O W
y 7
w
w
C
D N
M 9
4
C
� E
-00
C 7
N
Q
C
O
r W
0
N
N �
Q
❑ W
F Z
2 U) L2 W
W
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0000000
N O) O O O O O O O O N r N N O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 M O V O V O V W N W O V W M O r W W
r 00 O O O O O O CC O d N V N 0 N- O O O O O O O O O O O O n N O W m CA O O V) 01 00 O O N M O CP r a
p Cn 0 0 0 0 0 0 W O O m N 0 m n O O O O O O O O O O O O V N O M W m O W N N N O N M N O O
M � (n W r N N M n V .- W 47,-MN r� N WON
CO
V W N W W M N O O M W N N W O V M M O N N M N W O) M V M M O M O O N) W V W- V N N O M V- N
W O W W N W O M O W W W V to O O V N O 4�{{ W N M O N W O W V W M O W m N N M N O 0) N
M M M M M Cn M N O W O V N O W I- N W W N N W V,- M W O M N N M s - O M N O N M M M N O O M O
W V M M CO N V N O V 1- O N n O u5 a 0. v v CO CC v On M W CO N O M N m v r O C) V W W
U) N V M V W M O O CO V O M CO O M v '- `�-' W In O V r N N _V O U) V W N '-' W
In W M M N- V �- - r N- On N
f9 v v '- O v ._. N N
O O N M N U '7 O M N M M O N - M h W W M O - O O N M O M V V O M M O O r
W W W O n W W W - N- M O V O V r W N W O W M W N N n O N N O V M V' N
M W M n M W M O O UN ,- N W W - N W,,-Cn O M W M N N O CM V N O O N
V N M M W N O) n r O N U) U) N r O U) N N CO W N .-- CA O M r V n N- M O C) O In N O
N V V c ) V W M O CO O,- W M N- O . M V .- WO W m N U) V 00.- N N N
,-CD ,-,- N O N) C) ,- .-,4- CO M MW N O O W
ad Cn '- .-a5
V)
U) N- O O O O O O N O N O N O O W O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O N M O O N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO W
OW O W O U) O M N O O O O M O N W O O O O O O N W
Oct C0 M.-M000 O N W O O W O O O M W
-ac W v W OD)OI N N) )In N)O N- W O COO 0) C)NN V W W
CO W CO V N CO n M N N OP r O CO M vv.. V- U) NO W CD M
W M '- M N W N W ,-,r) �- U),-U) M T- W m U) N N
.,-(-4 O N CO V M N
C9
O
O
O N O W O N M
0 0 In 0 M W
O N N tt O) O 0)
1-..----in N CO NI M
N
N r V MN M
W V
M O CO (n O
m N U) U) U)
N)0
V
M
N
N
W
C)
U)
CO N O O O O O O N o W O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O O N O M CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W
OW ‘-0W00 00 O O O O O W O W O) O O O O O O O N W
O V O ID V O U) M O W ,- W O O O) O M 0 0 O W O O O M W
CO CO C) W O O) ,f O M W N) O N N W N O CO O O C) N M V W W
CO CO CO W N W MTh U) Cn N O Cn W W N V O V,- U) W W CO M
V W M O C) mm N W .- V M M M NO M N- CO W U) W N
N Cr .- N CO x_ 69 N) N
w ❑
Li'LLI- 0 W LL
m O ix O w Z m m Q m LL 0 W Q m W U 0 �= Z W W m _J M M M S ❑ W i H F T w W ❑ W 2 W> LL _ M5 LL Z
❑❑ W Z N N N m Z ❑❑ Q: Z LL U- W LL W U LL LL U J W n j T ❑ Z m J ,-,CC Z a CO O cu LL
000 W 0 0 0„ 0 0 Q W _..00.. W rn °6 LL U U LL m w. m z 0 o Z> w- U m m m. U U
„„z„,_,_, O m W H H, U 0 U m U U U 0 QU` W,e O Z_ N O W> Y,
7 7 m w Q Q Q OJ W❑ W O n❑ „ LL Y m m LL 0= m m NLLi Y J m 0 m 0 0 0 a ❑ p W U U U U U U U
>> w w,,,¢¢ m¢ w v w -, a a a w w w a a a _ m a w z 0
w w LL a v v 0 ❑ ❑ m P m w Q w w w w LL LL LL LL qa qQ ' N o a w a w w w w w w w
aaci�UC')0 0 az� UUUUm m mmI -I— U ama ..v~)mI-I-��
W O) M M M M M M LL m S Y m LL LL. LL. NL IL lL lL LL NL NL lL LL lL Z Z❑❑ 2 2 Z m m m m m m m m
W W NI NI NI NI NI NU LL g g m< Q❑ Q❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ w w LL LL O") 0 U U 0 0 0❑ w w w w w w w
NNNNNNQQQQQmmUUUUUUC 0 00000 ..)Ui.)C�Ui.)UCiUC..)000❑❑❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
U) CO W W ., M N U) W CO W Cn O W M O- N M N M V N M V M N O N CO V U) N- CO V M I O N M O N M
M M CO N n- W W N N W 1, O ..... M M M M V V V O O W W O O N M W h N W M M O W
W W V M V N W W N N N N ) G O O O O O O O O O O O� A M M G N. N N N- N V V CO W W V V
0 0 0 N N
N N N M M M M M M M M M M M M
Z W
= m W
X W
W J
LL O
0
W F
Z J
J
m U
O
J ▪ N
• O
U
M
O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N CO 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 N O O CO W O O O 1n CO 0 CO O CO CO CO n O O O N N M O CO r CO CO
C O M O N O M 0 0 0 0 0 1. r 1O co O N N O) O CO 0 C O 0 ) N N 11 O CO r - ; c N r` O 0
N N a- 0 0
r- 11 (71 r` O rrr ` O M O 0 V O O rr ` a O O m - r M rN- ` O U) a VO O U O7 m O O M U O O N N 0+ Gi (h N N O O N- m V O • O U)
1l) O
r- sr 0 co o W O o N co co M W'- N fD O O M O 0) r` O) O O O) co co n n O r` O 0) O o on V E V
N O N M 0 CO 0 OO 0) a M CO O M O N M CO O O) O CD M 0 O) O 0 m O CO N N 0 0 O M a O) O CO 0
0) C3 V r` 0 0 0 CO r` N O O CO 1O N V O) CO M M O V V r` CO O co V O N CO O N N. 0 N CO 0) N N M 0 CO 1n O) (D
10 (0 IO M N to O O M )O 1- O P') N N r M lO N N O N O) O rig O C') a n of (O O O) U) N. 7 M 1- Oi CD
W O 1O CO CO N N N N. 0 LO CO `-' O r` O) N M O N N �- tO (") CO O) O) 1- N) CO .- O 1- CO v
N O 0 N V N 1O N a v 0) CO V h M `-' a- (D N
a- v N N
1.0h-00010N 0 0) lO N C) r- N - O W 0 ) (0 N O) 0 0 1 0 MOM,- 0 0 0 O M O '- M (O N CO 0 0 0 r` a O O sr
CO R m a- N CO N O N 0 O) CO O) N 0 O) h 1. CO O) O O CO r` 0) CO N. a- O) )O r- CO 0 N. N CO O 0
V' O 'Q ▪ (O r: O 0 N. (O CO C cr. 0 M O 0 M N a- 0 0 r: 0 N M 0) a-_ 0 a- M O O O N (O 0) CO O 0 0
N M M M M N M 0) a r• .- O 0 V N 0) co. O co O O O M D r`
r` n n N N- M O m N O CO
W O co co co N. CO cr r- a- M Y) 0 0 0 )O CO )O 0 N a- (O lO N- M N N- 0) M r• s- O W 0) r• a- N-
NJ CO N O 1. .-. m r` 0.- r O) N.- 0 M.- co M V O CO M M 03
C) co- M N '- N
• 0 0 0 0 N 0 00 M W 0 00 0 0 0 •T O) 00 00 00 00 00 0 N N 0) O) N M M 0) M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I- O )O 0 )O O CO 0 0 N N.000 0 N N 0 0 lO U) O O in O O O a co m.1 M O N M O 0 0 0 0 0 0
❑
U) CO V 0 CO 0 CO 0 0 1n `- N- 0 N n 0 N- ,- 0 0 CO CO 0 0 r- 1n N 0 00010,- CO N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W CD ci O7 (O N O) O O r- lb M O r- N O O M O O W r- N O M O O co. 10 ) M N- C7 r` 10 16 10 h O O
W r• R N• N M 1O N O V co N O r 0) r O N N CO N r N O O M N O r M O D M M N r
CO I- 7 M O a- CO 0 a- N N. N 1n M CO CO (D M O CO O) a- N s- r` a- V 0 0) •-
7 Z ,- " (+I .- 1O .- N N .- 05
- W
O >
Q W
m
C
E
7 N
C 7
N
• W
Q W
2>
I' W a.
W
co O 1n 0 0 co OM) o
m O N O O a T 0
115 O CO U) r` N N 10
m v m m
v M
0 O 0 CO
0 N. M 0)
0 CO CO
CO
M M r` M M
O W a- cal CO M
N
0 o
o O
0 0
Uri o
V 0
0 0 0 0 N 00 N- O) N 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 O) 0) M M 0) M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(O 1O 0 1O 0 CD 0 0 CD M N 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N M 0 0 O 0 0 0 N- 0 0.1 M 0 N M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CO C 0 CO 0 CO 0 0 CO M CO a- 0 0 N. O (O O O 07 0 0 0 r- N N 0 W M O CO a- CO. a LL) O) 0 0 0 0 0 0
O a O) UJ N O) O O 16 N M N O N- N m r O O R O r` N O M O O W O co- O M r` co- r` 10 N 1D 10 O 10
N- R r- N M 1O N c0 O N CO 1O M lO N O N 1D N CO N a- N N CO M N (O N- M CO m M CO N N
M CO a- 0 10 O U) CO r u) M CO 0 O M s- N M 0 .- N a- r- - V 0 O
a- a- a- 115 N N ,_ N
J
4
I a_
aZ H 0 .- N M 1. LO CO r- N a U�1J d}
O 0 7 0 W W W W W W W Z m 5 �_ I- r- m
J m Z W p LL Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z O) p w F Z 0 0
O } O U z z O p CO ❑ 1-0000000 z r. o❑° m a Y z c)1= W W Z
U` C7 Z p O m w Z I- T Z p Z N N N N N N N 0 Q m m atf LLI Z Z w
• m m¢ LL I_- O . W C7 DON 7 Z W F- F- I- I- F- F- F- 1=. D' 2 2 ❑ H ¢ Q Q W p g g LL O
CO Z Z Z D C0 w w D) U-32 m co co m m co m O W F p m W m > z LL a H w It
DO CO a W w 7 2 Z ¢ w0* I- o-0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D- w w Z¢ J J (n F- Q� 0 7 ❑
D' d Q d W W > U co d❑ W W H H H H H F H O' U CQw`i U U¢ 2' CL 0_' W D_ 2
0 0 0 0 g m Z Z Q U U p c j Z LL Un ¢ W- > rL Z p Z Z W g OJ m WF d d H LL LL } ix.
O >>> ix 1- 7 ix x J W Z }Q ❑ Q 2 } } 0 D 0 p 0 J co co m m m 0 w 0 W 1- d
CL CC D_ 2> 1- z U Z W W W (qWqn W X LLx I- o m Z a 2 ow i_>.- i_>- i_>- i_>- H i_>- f- U LL O O o 5 W W W W W¢ Z Z W
m m rn rn rn Q J }} U J¢¢ W 0 p LL m m Z O❑❑❑ 0 p ° m 2.5 0 ¢¢ p 7 7 7 2 w Z W W w O m
I- H F H H H W J D. m m H LL W D) W W Q !n Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Q ¢¢¢¢ co W D' 0 0 J m 2
m m co co m z �u p m i 0 0 m co J (n ix 220755 Q
w w w w w w Y 5 a w w co u) ¢¢ O¢¢ O O m O g g g g g w m m 0 0¢¢ W W W W W D. ¢ 0 0 0 7 W
000100050W0_11.1117000222222°3 w ( m m m to m to J J J J -J222222 O D_ D. d D_ d D'
O) O h M 1D O r N d (O O r a- C) 0 CO N N e- N M V N CO h m n O a N 1D N r- N C1 CO CO a N h W
✓ N 1D 1D N n N Ch 0) N A O N M V a- 1D 6 N N 6 N 6 h ID O O n 6 N N h 1fl N O O 10 CO at
'11' m V CO h CO N N W 0 N N N N 10 CO M N N �- N N r, rr r, N N N N M N N N N M (+) N CO CO N N
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
E3 0 U
CC ILI
X w J
W LL O
U
W
gJ
m U
0
F-
J
7
U
E
M
N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0
0) O M CO O LO to n M O CO 0 U7 U)
N U7 01 0) st 0 N In CO O 0) N U7 0)
• (D N O u7 N tV O U) UY
n to N O m CO N N N to N O N
0) M CO O N O N iO CO 0) tD O
co)tnn� Ntn NNLU N 0 Tr LO U7 to rn 0) o N 0 of ' LU n) N m rn 0) NJ
a: CNO M M CO a v N C•1
0 0 M
N
U) 0) a CO O 07 0 CO 0 U) N T LO
0 7 0) to CD CO CO v N N v. v U7 O to
00 t0 N N M CO CO 03 N LU N N CD. CO
▪ CO- N th N o co" tp co Ni Oi N N ri
N co co 007 V O O '- N N'1 co W
r N N
CO N N N O O O 0 0 0 O m 0
I- N St 07 CO 0 0 0 CO N V' 0 CO N
p W O N 0 CO O O O CO O L9 0 N V'
W , - O (O tD O O O O O N O N tO
NW co N V7 Lh 0 0) U7
(O ,- tO C N tO O CO O O N
0 Z ,_ 10 N N V
W
O >
¢
C
E
V N
t0 9
c
d E
'p N
C
N D
C
O E
v
m
p w
LLI
▪ Z
a
rL >
f W
W
0
Z
LL
z
> Z
O
F-
a
re
U L)
W U)
w
V) p
8
Z
LL
N O
M_ 0
0)
'R lT
r-
6' co
o a
O co
O tO
o
2 v
N R 0 c0 O 0 O CD O N V O O N
O N N CO O O O CO CO CO. O) N Nt
.- O f0 Ni O m 0 0— O N c0 N U)
• M V N LU LU U7 CO 0) 0 LO
0) .- t0 N to th CO. O N N
▪ LO- N N 0)
r
0
Z W
O a 0 1-
Q a Z D
I d J LL
K p Z a }' H
N Z LL D W Q' O
D r a
Z w U Z LL H LL Q
W ? Z 2 W
Z~ W <o 11 H LL Z W W
,z a. Z O O _- Z±022
W 0 x x l W O Q O O
~ N 0 I- U D Q QZ O O Co U 1x ›' O u) Q O W 0 O ZU d 2 9,cc2 Z cc
a
• s a Z W m Y Z S U LL m O W ir
wwwm E co u) m F H= I- F 0 0
N O N 0• (O V CO 0 0 U) N V e-
CO (
N0 CO CO N N N to N h C) N N
N O
(C
co
co
O
O
V3
N
N
m
108,739,812 $
3,721,924 $
5,943,066 $
to
tD
V3
EXHIBIT C
F ❑
Z
Uz
wa
aw
w
U./ 1a
Z Q
O1
CO
▪ C)
ZLo
0 s
H O
a N
0)
0
0
a.
a
a
SPECIAL FUNDS
0 0 0 0 0 'a! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 O O O O O C) CO O CO O N C) O O 0 (C) O O CO O C) O O V 10 0 O N CO C) O 8{ O C) 0) O r O O O
.-• CO O) 0 O C CO O O C O O O N V C M O O 10 03 O W h O N C o O CO N CO O O CO V CO CO O V 0 D 0 m cd o 0 d co o v rn o 0 o ai o 0 Di o o 0 o 6 o o o (0 cd o 0) Ci Ni V o V rV i 0
iO N) CO N- V m C C) N 0 (0 0 W V N C) N 0 0 0 0 C r 0) C C LO C)
el
0) V N- R C) C) 0 N- V 0 N N- N) in O Cl CO (O O C) N N N 0 C) O) 0 0 n N 0 O) 0 0 (O N V CO 0 0) 0) N 0) C) 0
r N CO O CO 0) C) CO N N N V 10 '- C) (O N `Cr (O N 0 Ni ^ N C) C) C) N) C) CO N 0 O co a) N co N a) C)
(O V 0 O) C) CO C) r O co V C) O C) V `" M V C) C) (h .0.. 0) CO V' V N N CO C) C) O C) C) CO N n C) O 1-- a) O
C) 1O C) O r C7 N V m c C) 10 C) r . V v.- (O N V co- co- O) V v M m W r C) V r N V co- O co- C)
CO O N C) CO V CO O (") CO V C) •V O W O cO 0) CO O CO CO C) CO O) (O 01 O O) C) n V V
69 N N N `•' N O N CO CO v N- ,- C) C) C) (v C) N N N- O .-. co co O ,-- CO 0) CO
cc; O v co- v v C) .- ._.
co O n V C) V V C) r CO C) CO r T to CO C) N CO O co a CO co O O co O a) O) N 03 (O 0 M 0 CO CO a) CO N 0. (D CO 0
CO V C) 0) O N O N 0) V V 0 C) O O CO C) V CO CO N- N N In V N- (7 0 CO N C) )- CO 0 0 N- N CO C) (0
N C) C) 0) C) 0 C) O CO V W CO 0 n V CO 07 0) 0 C) C) CO C) 0) n 0) V 0 a) CO N O) .- CO V C) W O) D) CO 0 N CO 0)
r C) N 00 C) NF ,- (0 O N C) 1- n C) .-n r O C C C) C) } V 00 N C) C) C) C) .- C) C C N O O V N C)
C) C) (O N C) V N ,- CO CO CO 0 (0 CO 0 V C) 0 CO C) CO 0 N- 0 CO N C) O N- r C) N N C) (0 0) CO 0 N CO
69 .- C) N n V V ,- n N N CO CO .- C) N CO C) C) C) V CO V .- CO C) C) ,- 0 0) C) 0 0 C) (O
CO- C) ,- C) N C) V C) .- N .- co
-
N V V 0 0 0 V CO 0 0 0 V W O) CO O C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 CO 0 0) 03 0 W N 0 CO C) 0 C) (O O N C) W 0 C) 0 V 0
V C) C) 0 CO C) CO 0 CO (0 C) O) CD C) 0 0 N C) CO CO .- CO N O CO U) 0 r 0 0) U) N- V 0
0) 0) O 0 CO N Cl C) 0 V,- 0 C) CO C) V O O C) W CO LO . V h 0 CO 0 0 CO 0 O V i0 .- 1- - O CO O
C) CO- 1` C) C) 00 V 4- O 4 N C) a) C) N v N O C) 0) V N- N C) v C) 00 1- O r O C) n 00 c C) N C) O
CO C) C) CO 0 N- .- O C) V ,- C) N. V N) CO N CO N C) 0) n C) C) N C) C) CO V C) N C) N- N- CO
63 V CO V r r co r co CO Cl C) N C) C) CO OD W CO V .- N O C) W (0 •- N r N N CO N C)
O CO V .- N N C) ,- CO .- .- C) .- co-
C) V 0 N el V o0
V N O N CO 0
C) N NO N 6
N
0
o
C)
00 o r
O co 0
U) co
M 0
N V
CO m o 0 CO
m 0) O 0 0
n v V O
✓ CO
C)
CO
(O ((0 0 co
to o C)
C) C) N C)
co W O h
C) LO
1O
co- ) 4 C)
N- CO CO
C) 10
h v o
0) 0 CO
CO
CD
0)
N
N V O O 0 CO 0 0 O C) C) 0 CO O CO O O O O O O CO 0 CO 0 0) CO 0 C) N 0 CO V CO C) V 0 N CO N 0 0 C) 0 0
V CO C` 0 (O CO C) o C) CO 0 C) 0) (0 C) 0 0 N C) CO CO .• (0 N 0 CO 0) CD N. n O CO CO N N- CO C) 0
0) V V 0 O) 0 C) 0 C) C) o CO CO CO V O 0 C) CO 0) C) V n 0 CO ,- CO O 0 V CO_ C) 1- C) 0,- 0
C) V C) C) C) 0) V O r O co- 0) (O N V N O O 0 V r N co V C) C) CO- CO- a) O O 10 N M C) N- N (O O
W V C) C) 1- 0 0 CO r a CO C) N CO N C) 0) h 0 Ti. V C) C) C) CO 0) (0 r C) C)
69 N N- C) CO N- N (O r N CO C) C) N O CO CO ,- OD CO Cl V .- O co. co 10 .- O 10 .- .- CO O C)
•- C) N N C) .- C) .- 0 - - C) .- ..
Q�
t o w 1- o
Z F O
< 0 z a a U
O Z O U o CO c a Q
aDi z z ❑
CC • LL co W LL Q W W 0 N m m° Q •2 O O O ❑ Z a)
W Z W W❑ Ur Z rJ C❑ i... C "O ❑❑ a Cl. U U a LL W 0 Z f0
W W Z J a 0 O7 O 10 0] N O C N
U N CC m Z Z m F O a Z❑ CC (7 Z Z` v ( us O v v ## m O D U D CC LL❑
❑ .5 a 7 U w W w > W= o Z a❑ 0 LO C) m C_ O U@, C) C C❑ LL N J J O
W= w= W U U U< 0' O cc w Z o LL m m m J a (h m a m t Q C C) m m U U N X QX xxQ Q r- Y 0' > U U E W
> w❑ m O' 7 2 ce O U J❑ U W w> W a 0 0 cc0 o D O > m (') >> U U U Q Q xx a) Z CC 11 W 3w ❑ a 2
W m.- N. ¢ 2 U( co Q U H 0 w> cc � a. Z Q - 03 w- U y a K (? 4: i> 0 0 2 F- H� 0 7 LL (Wi W CC W U 7 w (NO
o 0 °w 0) 0) ~ o¢< <a w Dz cc° w¢ a 0U CO O) `� U U 05- 0¢ (00)0)
CO CO CO M m J z Z Z w Q 0 z uw)
Z O 5 ~ W J LL b. H H# 2 2 0 0 I- 0 00) Op a L y y d a 5 0 0 0 (0 N O) V1 ww moo co w N N N H J )W- H -1 ' m 1- LL a
¢ LL .6 (n 2-i a z Z❑ S S Z 0C 00 o m a) 0 0 (O C) a) a) W o 0 0 0 C) CO O (1) 0) Z CO (d U U CC U) -I Q
O] LL g a (n H Q Q W W LL 0 0 0 7 W N ,-,- 0❑ Q a 0 0 CC N N N Q 0 ,- ,- ¢¢ U U _U _U w Q �il U a) a Q O pp
¢<< a¢< 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U❑❑ 5 LL (i 0 0 U( 2
(D CO CO C` CO O CO O CO N C, C) V CO CO C) N CO CO O N V N (D CO N C) C) C) O V .- C) 0 C! .- N C) O r C)
0 N CO.- N N CO N N N CO') N N.- N N V V 4 V V V sr CO CO a a V 000 000 000 CO CO N C.• • A N N N N'D • N N co O c••)
0) N O O O CO (D N
N N N
EXHIBIT C
F 0
Z
Z
re W
a X
w
W
2 0
A
M
U)
z O
OV
F O
Q N
a
re
a
Q
SPECIAL FUNDS
0 0 e v o 0 0 0 e e o NN. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e e o 0 0 o e o 0 o e 0 0 0 0 0 0 e e
0 (`') O N r O O U) U) r r 0 O M 0 0 0 N r LL] 0 0 0 (O r 0 (O 01 03 03 m OD If] o M (D OD e- r U7
N O U) 0 0 0 U) CO c V O O r V ((0 M r 0 00 O C N O O O N V O (O a N. W fO W 01 (O t7 O CO N
(7 r O O • r r ) O U) O V O O r N. C V O r Ui U1 Oi m O N U) r N Cr r LO V CO r M U) 0 M N N 00 r O r V V U) U
O 0) V V CO
r v N
(DOD.-- 0 O U) 0 U) O 0) O V
U) U) 0 0) 0) O r O V O CD O N 0 0 0 M 0 O N r N M U) V O O 0) (O N W O U) N UD 0 W UO M N UO 0 r m M V. M V N VON-00410010 0 V 0 U 0) O 0 M V V` 0 O 00 O N . CO M 00 M O M N V f. U) U M U) U CO U) r CO O 0 O N N 0 CO ) CO U O r v r N (D (D N 0. co W N M f M
N U U) O R U U) r co- O r M 4 () V N M r r O a O OD .0 N O ? Ui CC co U) U) V U Lc; r N O N 00 CO-
.- N. O N CD O CO r U U 0 U U U CO O U V U) N U N U) V UU) 4 U r r U M U O N
V O) CD N U V CO V U) v N r r N. 00 V V r r r U) N O M
r •- N r N
U) CD 0) 0 0 r O U) N N CO U) r N N V N. 0 N. N 0 V O 0 CO r V 0 CO O 0 0) V V O) N. CO O CD V r 0) 0)
CO N 0) N CO N DD 0 N CO CO N CO CO V CO N N 0 0 0 U7 U) O LO V O r r DO O^ U] O O O CO M N
cr U) CD M V v O V V CO O U) r CO n CO N 0 O 00 CO 0 U) U) r 00 CO N U) 0 UI V O st CO
U N N cr 0) V
UI ) a N. O O N N OUl N r V V UN ] co- O U O r N O O U U + UO V r M U f co- r )
U) O U) C] N
O N O 0 0 r N V O 0 0 N CV CO O 0O CO O U) r r 0) O O N 0 V CO O U) 0) r CO U0 N 0 M CO
r r r 0') CO CO CO M U) V CO U) N CO M
N r r N r r r N 07 M r N r r r
O V O O O CO O O O O 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 r O N 0 N 0 0 M O 0 0 N <0 O CO r N O O U) O O CO r
O U) 0 0 0 CO U) U) 0 0 0 0 0 N O U) V (f) 0 O M N. 0 V LO 0 0 0 CO O r 0 N U) V V O O O CD U)
r r 0 0 0 U) CO U) 0 0 0 U) N r 0 CO U) U) 0 0 0 r 0 O N V U) O O r CO r r r U) N CO 0 0 r O r U) CO
M U) O O O N V co- r N o M O r M r O O r r 0 O 4 V) N m V O. r O V O N r O r co- O r V N O
O N. U) N U) V r r CO r 0 U) CO CO 0 M 0 V OD c0 V N M r CO 0 CO V U) M r V U) 00 (`0 CO Cl
co CO CO O CO CO r r M CO, N r N V., M N N CO CO O O CO r U) r r N CO r N-
.-- N N r .- r r M r M V r N V r N M
a O
N
O
O 0
O 0] N 0 0
CO (MO Or N CD N
O (D . N O
o U) Or O 0
O W co O
ci
f. co co
N r N O O O O
LO N 0 0
U) co (v (O N. 01 ((00
rn r
O .-- O UU O O U) O
O M r 0 CO O r
0 0 U) (D 0 N.
N V O O r
U) U) CO O Zr-) 0 CO r
N V M.. N
O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD O r m O O O O O 0 O N O O N O O O O CO O CO N N O O O 0 O CO r O
0 0 0 0 O U) U) 0 0 0 0 0 V M U) 0 O o 0 0 V CO 0 0 0 N CD O 0 N U) V O 0 0 0 CO LO N
CD O O O N OO U) O O O U) N U) O N U) 0 0 O V O N (O 0 0 0 V U) r O r (O N O m 0 0 0 O U) O O
r O O O V V 06 r N O M O r 00 r r V Ui co- O Ui U) co- O M C) U) N O co U) O U) N O M
CO U) N U 'dd U) 0 0•- m V 0 M O r U) CO CO M CO O r OD V O M O.- U) 00 M V CO
V O 0 r .- N r O N r 0 U) O N CO r 0 CO r V r N .- CO r h n
N N r r r r U) N V N N r M N_
in
m 0 a z z u_
4 x U D- d O O F- O 1-
a' D O m Q v w Q W Z D
D LL C7 C7 C7 ,M� g H Z w > CC
Z CC Z O fn fA (/l F- O rn W LL rn w Z 2 m LL 0 U 2 W CC O
D W (p I-000 O co (� a Q Z W p LL D H Z W Z D a F
LL (o 0 2 2 2 1- D D W m W o O Z r ONO O a Z U Z 2 _ Z W •
Z rn O D U U Z Q J U co ~ a LL o o U Z~ W cc H u- z w Z m
S W W V I- Z Z Z M U Z Z U Z W a a W m�tl Z (W Y O H a W a c
Q w Z r N co V u) m r?
000 j LL m a U w 1-• j j w aS U�1J a Q C7 N r0 (wi FQ- O¢ O fi
a Q O vwi C C C C C C c LL U O p w W W W W w a Z Z m S II_ W Z> U ,-,(1) 0 O ¢ v) .
w S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 }} O O O a' IT IT Q a' 2 a' m
W W (n N ( n < N N N N N N N <- Q < Q¢ Q Z Z,, w (7 N, Z Y N (n U W w W Q F' 0 2 ui QQ 2 Q I--
E. Y m
O O 0 0 0= m m g g m° m m g 0 0 Q Q Q W W W W W W Dw. Q W W O W W W W N Q W W O W 2 Z U) Q O '0
x222x x=,JJ _, mmn2222M0aaaaaaaCC a(n(n1— Pf -r» >> i-
on
7.."
O O O O A r CI A N V ID UI N O r N M V U CO V N M O U) 01 N N 0 V CO M O U) .- V r V M r N V N A O A A . A UA A A N M O O O A N V N U) U) O O O i N O O (r O O N N V O (O O N N M A O N A A N N N N N N
N N N N N
co
co
C
C11
a.
w
Appropriations
DESCRIPTION
000 0 N- 0 0
CO
• ti
IICD
LO
(f3
13
.a
II
G)
ti 0 0 0 UO 0 0
N N
000O O
0000000
N CO
O
Op M
CO
000000 0 0
0 0
00 LO
U) O)
CO
EA
00 O O O CD 0 0
O V
Ln
N CO
M
E»
0
000
0 0 0
co co
✓ LO
U)
CO
00 0 0 0 N 0 0
0
id CS
0 O
Clr CO N
N-
Ef}
N-
U)
N-
Ln
CO
CO
CO"
(f3
CO
N
0
O
V
M
W
U)
O
N
N
ti
V
CO
co
CO
M
U)
U)
(0
(0
En
co
V
O
N
O
C7
V
CO
M_
r
M
O)
Cfl
CO
Cf3
O
N
N-
U)
N
(X)
CO
N M
-
4- V M
0) V
C0 040
v 0
C. `C- C
V m co 'O
CC i ` 0 CO 0 NL
w
d
t R N
E R C Q
-0 -0
• . CL 4a X CD
O LLD.
p) Q1 C u' )(D
is C C U 9 C c I-
`I:, Cu 0 m m a C0 ro
C C�' C7 U' N. LL W C9 C9
2 ICS M CO h 03 03
C1O - -
O CO CO N I,- LO V V N CO O U) CO O O U)
O r CO op N- 00 O N r r' co O co M U) co co W I,- CO CO V
U) (O N O U) M M 0 O co CO7 N N h M 'V: 0
•- 00 V N O 8 M E M M o0 O ti V' M
M N N U) O CO CO r- O N N M 0) V O r M U) U) V U)
N M LO LO CO CO co co N M N- CO n
r U) ti M
EA
0 CO OD CD CO CO U) ti '- U) CO ,- CO V LO 0 '- CO U) N CA 1- 0
CO CO CO 0 N- v- CO 0 CA U) CO CO V N- .- •- Cr) U) CO CO CO 0
() N O co O co U) O O O) N V CO U) O U) CO V M'-
M O r r r .- U) N- CO CO N� V• V CA N CD N- M LO
✓ () U) N CO CO CO U) CO LO N CO N O N- Ov N
N N O CO CA v 0 N v N v V CO y
0 CA Cr) 0 CO O N U) N CO 0 0 V N- CO 0 N-'- N 0 V CO U)
LO V 0 N CO N V CA O 0) 1 CO CO 03 0 CO N- N O O U) O
N O O 1- CO N- CO M CO U) N N- N U) O CO CO O CO
CO 00 M r C7 V U) V M V 00 CO N r- N- O C r CO O U) Lri
N 0 V '- CO N 0 CO N-= V LO U) O CO O O O CO '- N- CO
▪ V CO U) N CO N •- (A V 0 O CO CO r •-
M r
CO
0 CO CO O U) 0'- O N U) 0= CA CO O N CA O
0 CO 0 0 N■ ,- CO M V U) O N- CO N O M N- O V'- O
0 O) CO 0 0 0 M'- LO 0 0 N- U) ti 0 0 0 .- 0 0 N 00 0
M V 0p LU) N CCO C0 N- C0 C) U) 0 0 0 N- LOC) O V CO = CCD VO'
N- M O M O) CO N- CO N N 00 '- 0000 ' M D N N- N
CO r r C7 N r r r
Cfi
CO 0 0) CD CD CO CO CO N CO V M O 0 CO N CO CO N- I' V 0 (A CO LOO N- a) a)
co co co co O) co = = U) 0 I` 'Cr CO O) CO M U) O CO CO U)
NC)NM05 00rLON- NNE V CO V OD NrrN0N-
N- V CO V OD CO N- N- U) CO N- O CO CO O N- O CO 1 O
CO CO V CO CO CO CO CO 0'- CO M v-
N
00 00 0 0 0 CO 0 N O N- O M CO O O O M M OO M 0 0
00 M CA M M CO r- 0 V 0 0 O N M00 0
00U) MCOCO 0000U)0 CO V LOO)00
LO O N 1150i1- CX) h CM N- O N- = CM N- O O
CO O O U) M 0) CO V M N V LO (0 N-- M U) N
U) 0 CA N- CO 00,-(0';11,- N = N-
V' N N
CA CO CO 00 U) M O' OD CA 0 Ln 0 CO 0 0 0 V V N V M d'
CA N- O CO V O N- M O CO N N- N N- ) N= M 0 U) U)
V V •- N CA CO U) (C) N COO 0) U) N N W V M M V U)
166-(6.1:051-:-6-66r-=1.660i ti N ti U) O O
CO N- 0 N CO V V 1- LO N 0 CO = CO N- U) 03 V CO
V O CO CO CO 0 O 1 N V N (O N 1- M' N -
rCOCOLOrr rr
N .�
CU
d
0
2 c
o_
N V C mgt.:.
C) C Q Q m C O 3 M W M W 0) IL C ad 0
us= mmm
..,,. E .+ O O O to m 3 W 0.17C N
_ C N N N C cage O) CC Mm m V ~ .O
p'++ d 22 0 'h C O J C Q C ,, C (4
Lh c d a Q Q 3 N N C g J LL i O v E C`(I 'B d
O O O 3 'p 3Jm1 -m C
'C 0 2 x x x 2 0P-7., C O N 3 N
c a s m (a (a d 2 2 c x...._ Nc o m m m m LL Q
` E0000°a_a_a_'7dp„ ( xN ro Cu m Cu VV 0
d .w' U U U'w' 1 o a a d ° a Z' 3 3 3 3 (cn o
c' v H' M M M j m m m 2 Q Q E I E c N (0 N N- V
.:>.O O V pOO0000O0O C C` p d y y U
0S O 0 0 N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q C I- 0 m m E N H 2
r CO LC)
49 � V' 4- 7 r N () V' V' L• U) CO 0 4- M LO N01.0:
CO CO • .v (O COO r 4- 4-000 0 0 r= r- F, O N O N r r
= N 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
N N N
C)
d
as Tai
E m G
4c-Om
W m
3
NL
C)
O+
m m
o
Em
aw °'
d
N
C
CD
0.
W
Appropriations
d 7
m C
E>
COX
W
FUND DESCRIPTION
V M O N O o0 O O r V U) r M COO N- N U) N V N OW V N (0 r
CA N O Ln r O 0) O co co 00 Ln O N� Ln .-- ti O (fl Cp (() O- M Ln CO r- r- O O CO V N M CA
- - V (D- CO N NN�O�O V 0CA(fl(n Lo rO V Or- V CO N co_ O Lo
(IOOf�
;° O V M O M N .- M (O N N I, (0 r r M O LO O N O 0- LO N
N N- O O (fl r °) �_ M O 0) N V C') N- Cfl (fl Ln O 0) r M N- 0) M N C) M
m M (fl N- M CO N I� r r r N O M
II r N CV- M CO
0)
N O M O 6) O 6) O 6) O O O O O N N 10(01010 O O O O 0000 CA O M O O (O O
0) LC) CO N- O V V CC) r Ln in U) V O N 0 a- O
V V CO N r C) CO N- r CO N- N- 0) O CM O O O
13 Ln N� CO CO 0) N V '- OC7 CA U) O Ili O 0) O 0) O
.0 - M v O CC CO a- N CO N- CO N VN
N-
H
4
00 O M O M O N- Ln 0) N 0) O O O O N V V r 0) O O (0 r N_ N O Cn ti 0 V O 0) N-- O
CO .'- O M M V Mrs V M CO U) V CO O ON- OM) LO M V V CO M Ln O O O CA
CO N O O M Cn V O V Cn M V NOM O 00 N N CA In N r CO N
,^y,N CA 00O(IOO(+)') U)CAN00OM r NN U) V O(0
M N V <-- M M O M V r •- CO
r r N r r C)
N O M O V V CA CA O) r 0 0 0 O V M V (00000 O O O O O O O O O O O O N V 0
C) U) r 0000E- O 000,-.<-0) Ln 0000.0000 CC) V CX)
V V r r r - N- 0 CA C0 N r M (O 10(00 O O Ln N O M NM
to N V (O N M CA M O (O N CC) CIO CA N V M ti N O M O r CO O
co r V N- CO 0) CO N N M O) CO CO r M r r (O O r r CO M (O
r V r CO CO O N V V N ti (O CO Cr r CO
CM r O
N00,- V CO V Ln V M N O O CA N 00 O N- C0 N O O U) O 0) U) M r (O CO O CO CA Ln O
CO N- ti N N CA CA O N r CO 10100(01010 CO 0 V CO O O r ti 00,- V N•
CO CO Ln N ` M O V CO N- O .410) N- O CO M L n C`') r N r (0 (O N- (0 r N O r 0
CO CO co- N- O co- Ln (O co- V •- C) N- O M N- N CA 00 O M O CA h Cn O O .- ti
,...7m (O r r 0 Cn O N- N� V CO 00 N<- 0) MOW M M CO r r 0
r CO N CO r r 0 r r V CO'- O N
M M r CA
00000 V 00)0,- '-0000 N N- 0000000000000) O N- O N 0) O
O O N Ln 0) Ln O N- O <-M00 O Cn Ln O O Ln O O V O LC) O V CO O
0 O I-- <--0O3- 0 ti O O M O O CA CO (0 0 0 N- Ln N CA O (n O N O) O
O (n O (0 L) co- O CO O V (6 O O (0 V CO N- N O co- O CO O CA O O 00 O
(0 (0 V r.-00)r--N N CO r N` In CA '-'-(0 N r M N- CO N M V N
r V r (0. r r N M V r CO CO M CO r r
r
(O M M N 0 0 0 0 N- M M (0 O (O M N 00 r CA (O CO (O O N N Ln N V CO O r V N V N--
00 N Ln Ln O v '-(N'- 00 r O r 00 N 0) r N r 00 O M (n r N- N- (n C) V N OM
(01010(0 M CO N N- O `-' O V V ,-N-NM N- O V C) N- r (0 N M 1 M O r N�
N-- O M V 0,105---R (O (O U) O ti M v M M CA C!) V U) O (O V N
V ti Ln O '-'-'-CO O (O V N CO Ln r CO CO Ln N- 0) r 0) 0,-N<-<-
N (O CA Ln C0 r r V N C r M V M
C N N N CO V
.0 o r Q
O
C c .a e , CV CD .4, 3 3 W C .0 NNNNNNN., O_ 0)'O
,a N j M Q f�l lL 0 N N N N N N N N • y `� C
ty 3
-a C 'C t6 -0 LL 7 m = d 01 N at et d' V L'..
7 c = c �' c ++ c co C CO co 00 CO CO CO CO CIO C O d1
• LL
7 LL > LL Oct > a E o U) v' (ma • O Co c c c c c c c c m r V W y c
E=1.-,c a' E m ? 0m°°_ upQ 3 m c22222222 0° 7._ 3 c
c�LL c aym°''(n>ycoroCWW V .Z'.Z'.Z'.Z'.Z'Z'.Z'.Z'o <cNL ~CC
c NS)0 ,..11) LL �� dV y� v m Co rnvre00<.)00 V t.)0V t V < Nv'a
,0) c E ma 0) = J V N31 y 3 m d (0 U' d 3 '0 V '0 '0 a 3 'C O o 0 :- E d
o "2EEmEzV°t5u)`oEME €occcccccccc - ro
m m N o O M o o N m Cu o< c 2 La o No m m m m m m (a m m (>a c V m Y
O d ♦2 N- V x V I Q' NL N'.. > I I Q I O C O 5 U' W W W to U) to U' 2 m Q 0_ 0 Q p
✓ M V ID ti (D CD CO CD CD r D' LC) r CD N- CO 0 M ' Y) • N M • LC) CO ti CD CO 0 CO 0 CO CD
N N N N N M M er et (17 CO CD (D WO (D CD ti 1` 1` (Cl W W CO +� i0 CC) N- n CO CO N Wt..
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N WOW
CD
d
C (Co
O
CO co
Emo
47; r2
W C O
7 C
U-
C)
O 'C a
O a0+ C
-
o EU
a+
W W d
Z
N
d
tl)
C
a)
K
W
Appropriations
a)
f6
7 C
Cam.) >
a�
-a a)
CD
CC
C >
N IY
a)
C
� O O
CU
m o
a2 CO
C Cp
7
LL
FUND DESCRIPTION
O
II
0)
V
.0
II
w
✓
C.,
C6
F--
IC)
N
CD
U)
O
CO
M
EA
N
N
CD
U)
O
M
0)
ti
O
ti
U)
CO
EA
co
N
U)
O
O
CD
CA
O
O
O
ca-
m
co
M
K3
I`
O
Io
co
U )
V
vi
CO
O
U)
N
N-
u)
vr-
IC)
U)
Total Special Revenue Fund
N D V CO D N O g N O r M h ) UO 8 IM P2 P2 N O O O
W ` _
V' co U) O .41 0) M Ci0 oD U) O N- CO CO 00 NT N- CO N- CO
- N CO OD I, O N- U) U) CD LO e- N- I` 00 — ti CO N ca.
N CD CD CD CO 00 N ' N N — '— CO CO U) N- • U) CO
N 0) • V M 0) v U) N .- N CA U)
CV N CO N
O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 O O O T O O O O CO O)) 00) O CO_
05 05 N CO- N- • O CO O M co
Nil
CD 00 - 0U 00000000000000000 N 0 u) O
- O 0) NT N V'
CD- N D
CO C) ' iO O
N- CD e- N- U) N
CD e- e-
N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) 0 0 0
CO O O O e- I--
co" I- O M
CO 0 CO CO W CO
CD ,- '— N
e-
EH
CO e- CD O O CD d' CM M 0 0 0 0 0 N N- CO I- CO CD M NT CA e- O 0) O
CO e- 0) CO CD O O V N- O NT CO U) — CD O N- NT CO
• r O N O) N CO CO I- N co v- r- M 0) O CO CO I"- CO
O -CO e- N I- O U) N N CO CO N e- O CA M
U) N O — CO co •- N CD
CO e- e- V U)
CD
Ef3
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N M NT , O
CO e- O CO O CA O CO
N-- CO • O
U) e- I- O CD
M CO r-
LO N • CO
O r- CO
CD
64
N
- co N N CD CD CD CO NT N N- CO N- U) CC) d' CO CO N CO M U) CO CD O
O N- ( \I N 0) U) O V' N N O N- U) CO N- I- co N- CO O Cr
- U) O V' co U) O CA co co co CC) O ti O Co co d' N N N ti
CC) CO co ti O ti U) U) CO U) 'd' C- CO- N- C` C- CD N CA LO
CO O U) M CA O e- O N •- N N x- CO e- O CC)
N NT NT CO CD U) N e- N- O Ni-
N N • e- e- M e- CO
(f3
$ 24,780,936
N
N
U)
CO-
CO
CO
N
O
N
O
N
CO
CD
O
CD
d)
CO
N
20,752,170 $ 8,752,724 $
73
C C
7
U U-
0 C 0 C V
•+ O h C W C
O e-
1-' 7 d d N r. y a) 0 a) L ca C..) 7
E w • Z. w �, d w m. tL
C co C> d d y- d N v d d w Ca A a) a) - '�' E .E d
d❑ N :+ O-o Ca Q' co m m a OS Ca N W u) cu re tl w Q A d .i,
E w QCv)0ILcna u) u) C.) o v E m e :
CD< a) 2 E m° O y 00006004...-12==0 co °tf O W C ,-00 _
a E >N Q-awwLIill ��W W W WILLLLLIaL tW,N e° U C
w71 c°) 'Ci3ct zzzz�0��mmmm y Cat* ca �3
V p, 'C R a) CO li LL u ti LL LL LL LL LL a. W IL W U. W <L C CC ❑ ❑ E +-' �'
a9 CC m 'C Q O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ as -2 IL 1L l6 F.. ti
C . . )
e- N M et e- N M T' e- N C'9 Tr e- N C'7 �'
O N CO I- O co e- e- e- N N N N M C") CO M Tr Tr Tr T; O a-
M M M C.)01 M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M W2 QD U2 M CO C') 100
vvav (0vvvvvvvvvTC
M M CO CO M M M M M CO M CO M M CO CO
CO
O
O
CO
N
Efl
CO
0)
CO
CO-
CO
N
C�)
C-
N
N-
C7
a-
a-
te-
CO
0)
CO
CO-
CO
N
Cf?
0)
CO
ti
N
N
vi
bt Svc -1990
Appropriations
a)
c
c
>
a
FUND DESCRIPTION
'- COO � Tr OOD 10 0 LI) N 0
01 O r 07 CO O at 0 N O
✓ N_ N- 05 CO OC) O N
Ca co t!7 N- M OOO OD
v- M
11 r r CO
a)
0'- 0 0 0 0 00 CO 0
.a O Or N co O LLo O
0 C'7 ti' O • I- N
vvti.N- M
II N r
O' at CO 0 COD ON- N N O
07 O O 01 1 0) I- CD V'
✓ I- N- CD co' 10 V • V
v 1O Tr co M•C') O N-
N 0 OD N 0 0 LO
N
O COO 100 O CO 100 CCOO O OD O
M at 10 O CD 10
N d' CC o
I— Tr 0 N C") N
.a C') CO OD OD (D
O Tr 0 0 0 0 LC) CO N 0
O') V V 0 0) OD
V' O 0 N C)
CD LO C7 N 05 0 In N- V O `r
N C) CD CO C7
O 0 100 O N 100 O (0 O O
07 Tr OD (Co
N at C0O N Or M
^ 07 0 OD OD r-
12
OD 0 CV Tr M Tr co ti 10 O
M O r M 000 In 007 CO N-
▪ CO I'- C') v 0) N- N-
O r N OD 10 N- O
0 V up V O
N • C
-a a
m ?§ •a TS
CD a N m 'O c
•0 00 K °O — '0 0 c C m y a
L N~ ,a N Q m w C -a 7 V LL
fa V
a .a — c ro O x> a 7 C 'a Cr) C-0 Ica
cU o= 5 d LL a • C— a c L. O O a F- 'a a W 'a 7 w 7 7
C9 m m .` x 0� m 13 c a y C 3 u. Ti) 1L CO y
d� - a E a p C co
> a W co c d cn
0 co > v 12 6 a m E C LL 3 c o LL Z a m v .,
m a" >p - E
-
c m°° U m w a m a U� N N N w Q 2 LL . rn c c c C •v m
Tr CO 0 0 a OD
a CD
Tr upcOOOO Tf
C'') (0 OO CJ
✓ co r
ER ER
CO CO O O O
N OD V
CO 0• 0) 1OO
N- N 0
6,266,157 $
955,346 $ 58,040,158
ER ER
op Tr Tr OOO CD CD
OD
CO Tr 0) 0) O
CD Cr) N O 0
M Tr O N r
C6 N r N-
ER ER ER
r V N- O 10 CD 0
O Tr 1O) r 1!) I-
CO OD CO 10 r r
0 10 I- I` co- O)
CT)._ I- 10 Tr CO d'
N CD N I: r
Tr 0 r r C7
r
ER CO ER
10 0 Tr 0 0) LO V
• Tr 0 01 00
CO I- 0 co- N O OD
co OD r O CO 0) N
C') M N I-
ER EA ER
CD
1O O T O .0- a) N
CD LO r LO
T C6 00) N- Tr CCOO O
O 10 10 N N T-
16 In In r r
O N '- CCOO Tr CO N
N '7 1O 1O tt OO 0
N 1N O (0 CO C D CC0
CO N N O Tr O
0 NZ
✓ M r O 1O
ER (R ER
N ti 0) N r M 0)
r
OD CO r 01 CO N
M at 0 CO O 0 M
O r N y• r O • N
O 0) 0 at CO Tr
N N M 0 N
� r
ER
O M N- OD OD CD
O N Tr Tr r I')
• 07 CO M C0 0 r v
0) O C7 1O r
'-N V V'
N v
ER
O N- N- 0) Tr CD Tr
I- r Tr N OD P O
• 0 r 1- O V' N
✓ CD V N N 0 0
O r 0) 0 0) N N
Tr r Ch CO IC) LC)
ER
O O .- I- CO 0 0
O U) Tr r N O 0
CD 0 0 OD ti O O
O r C) N • C • r
O r N- r V 0 C')
N- up N- O 0
M N
CA
I.- O C') 10 LO C') LO
• (D OD 10 CD CD at
C') CO C') 00 0 r 0)
0) 0) V• ' '4 CA-
CD CD I.- O O M N
ar r Tr 0) N Tt
fR
O C') O O OD N
O O O N- N CO N
• 0) O Tr O CD CO
0) C`') CD 10 r 0) O
0) LO IO 10 r u) M
OD N LO N 0 IO
r r
ER
N Tr O 10 CD LO 00
T- CO r CO N at O
N r M N N- 10 I-
O LO N W N- COO Tr
O r (c
1.6
ER
0
co
co-
Tr-
00 O
O
7,630,764 $
ER
T
O
O
CD
co
1O
ER
CO
CO
0
CO
10
M
C w a a) 0 Ca g o d
ci6 6i�i�u�O m C` da W ad 3CC9oycc a
; - c W u' > > > > > > > > ❑ .p n C
� CO u) co co co co (O CO CI) • c) d w a - (U O i• p, Ts
U' t Y .+ E ++
CD N N d N N d N d d L d N p L C ' ` -Z ' N r N ~ *E a a) a 0 N a C I-
Q C C a Y C y 0
❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ C)L.W3 00I -3�❑• ❑ O w
MD CD e- v- N et In CO CD 1s. `. e- N N
r r N CO CO CD CO CO CO CO y_ 0 0 N
et et Tr d' Tr Tr Tr T' d' O ,C _ CD CO tD fN0
N C") tT a- N C) IC)
u 0 0 0 a- a-
n F-
0)
w
d
co)
C
d
0.
W
Appropriations
Fund Balance
O
O
N
O
M
CO
DESCRIPTION
0
z
LL
0) Co CD CD M CD Co N CO
CO N CD CD V V' U) CO CO
w CD U) U) U) N V 0) CD CD M
CO- V O 05 V CO .- N. x-
CO x- n- CO N O M Cr) CO
II CAI h U) N- 0) N U) O V-
II CO N N N (V
V
11
w..
EH
O O O O N O V' CC O N
CD CD CD CD CO CD CO CO O
O N U) U) 00 O V N 0
rn '-0) 0)CHID v 01 COv CO 0) CO 00
N
O U) N V .-- CD 0) 6) N 00
CO U) CO 0) U) V V h CO CD
CO CO 0) CO O O O N
O CO' O CO CO .- N 00 (O CO
4: co xO CO CCOO (OC) CO V' O
ER N CO V M
0000 a) CD COO N O 000
O O U) LO V I- O CO
N O (6 V N CO •V' co- 00
M s V N' •- U) O N-
.^a co N M N 00 U)('-
0)'- N N M
ff3
CO CO N- V CO CD 0) CD — N
N CO (!) CA V
0)0)0)0)
V N O CO O U) CO O V
(h CD co- CJ V N O V
v CC) Co O O C N CO
N 00030) O O N
N <- CI CO x-
.0
CO
00000 CD U) N- CD CD
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U) O O
O CO O O O O O V O o
O M U) U) N M CY) CO V O
s— co co (c) CD CO .- 00 N-
M .— O CO CO O V CO LO
U) CM N — N x-
vi
O U) CD CD ' CD 0) N- .- "Cr
C)0) N CO '4'
I,- 000 O N
O O 0 .-- V N- O
O N CO 0 co co co O V
(6 M I- c.i.
N N
ER
0) N
a m o o
M M r
00 00 0
aD O .y
(? COC) N) C
d
�0a
c'
:°OL
<X C.) 0
iU- > > U
C :5 25 v
a)')a)0
of
W
H
Police /Fire Pension
Debt Svc for 512 89 -1
V V
LL LL
.0 .0
CD CD
CI CI
CV V V
O C C
aM- CO CO
O a) (1)
CD aa)
CO re
CO
0)
Assessment District CFD #1
Assessment District CFD #2
CID O a- N N 0) K) CD 0 •
Y) CD O 0 CO CO CO M CD CD
V V CID C0 0D CD CC) OD OD CID
$ 63, 763, 061
$ 17,330,745
N
O
co
Cp
N
CA
ft
$129,965,986
N- 0)) N CD 0 O
x- CO CO 0 N
h N , N N
O CO N CO O
CO N U) 00 CO-
.- O) N (D CO
$ 12,846,476 $
$112,216,005 $
ON) N
N CO
N CD
CO 0
O 0
Ea
O CO
O O)
N O
O M
r Clo
O N
CR ER
Total Trust & Agency Fund
GRAND TOTAL
ER
CCOO LO
U) CO
(D O
00 N
N COO
Ef3
E
0
a)
(7
o
I—
L
>. o p
0 C) .
o a)
o
$ 259,729,944
All Inclusive Total
CITY OF ALAMEDA
MEMORANDUM
Date: April 21, 2005
To: Honorable Mayor and
Councilmembers
From: William C. Norton
Acting City Manager
Re: Set Hearing for May 17, 2005 for Establishment of Prop 4 Limit 2005 -2006
BACKGROUND
Local governments must annually establish their appropriation limit pursuant to Section
7900 et seq of the Government Code which implements SB 1352 passed in November,
1979.
DISCUSSION /ANALYSIS
The legislation provides that the public be given adequate notice of the Council's intended
action to set the appropriation limit. It is proposed that the Prop 4 hearing be set for May
17, 2005. Documents in support of the appropriation limit will be made available for public
review prior to Council's adoption of the limitation.
BUDGET /FISCAL IMPACT
None.
RECOMMENDATION
The City Manager recommends that:
1. City Council set May 17, 2005 as the scheduled public hearing for establishing
the City of Alameda's spending limitation for fiscal year 2005 -2006.
2. City Clerk make appropriate public notification.
Respectfully submitted,
#IIe..A Boyer
Chief Financial Officer
G: \FINANCE \COUNC IL\2005 \041205 \PROP4Hearing.doc
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
Report #4 -F CC
5 -3 -05
CITY OF ALAMEDA
MEMORANDUM
Date: April 18, 2005
To: Honorable Mayor and
Councilmembers
From: William C. Norton
Acting City Manager
Re: Recommendation to Accept the Work of SpenCon Construction, Inc., for Repair of
Portland Cement, Concrete Sidewalk Curb, Gutter, Driveway and Minor Street Patching,
Fiscal Year 2004/2005, No. P.W. 08 -04 -08
BACKGROUND
The City of Alameda contracts for the permanent repair of sidewalks, curbs, gutters and
driveway approaches on an annual basis. The locations for repair are identified by citizen call -
ins and by an annual inspection program.
On November 18, 2003, the City Council awarded a construction contract in the amount of
$170,940.00, including contingencies, to SpenCon Construction, Inc., (SpenCon) for the annual
repair and replacement of sidewalks, No. P.W. 07- 03 -15. This contract also provides for
additional work as requested by the City and mutually agreed by the Contractor (within the next
five years from November 2003) with an automatic adjustment for inflation. The improvements
for this portion of the work have been accepted by the City Council.
On April 20, 2004, the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute subsequent
amendments to the agreement with SpenCon for the Annual Sidewalk Repair Program. The First
Amendment to Agreement, in the amount of $170,000.00, was then executed for the second
group of sidewalk repair locations. The improvements for this portion of the work have been
accepted by the City Council.
On September 7, 2004, the Second Amendment to the Agreement, in the amount of $177,500,
was executed for the third group of sidewalk repair locations (Fiscal Year 2004/2005).
DISCUSSION /ANALYSIS
The construction of this project, as part of the original contract, including the First and Second
Amendments to the Agreement, have been completed in accordance with plans and
specifications and the improvements are acceptable to the Public Works Department.
CityofAlametla
PubIicWorks
Department
Public Works N&nkrfiv Yon!
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
Report #4 -G CC
5 -3 -05
Honorable Mayor and
Councilmembers
Page 2
April 18, 2005
Only one extra work order was issued for the third group of sidewalk repair locations as part of
the Second Amendment to Agreement (Fiscal Year 2004/2005, No. P.W. 08- 04 -08). Extra Work
Order No. 1, in the amount of $164.00, was to reimburse the contractor for a Caltrans
encroachment permit. The final project cost for the Second Amendment to the Agreement,
including the extra work order was $175,605.47, which is below the approved contract amount
of $177,500.
BUDGET CONSIDERATION/FINANCIAL IMPACT
Funding for the project is budgeted under CIP 82 -02 using Measure B funds.
RECOMMENDATION
The Acting City Manager recommends that the City Council, by motion, accept the work of
SpenCon Construction, Inc., for Repair of Portland Cement, Concrete Sidewalk Curb, Gutter,
Driveway and Minor Street Patching, Fiscal Year 2004/2005, No. P.W. 08- 04 -08.
MTN:CWC:gc
cc: Measure B Watchdog Committee
Respectfully submitted,
Matthew T. Naclerio
Public Works Director
By: CW Chung
Associate Civil Engineer
G:\PUB W ORKS \pwadmin\ COUNCIL \2005 \050305\sidewalkaccept.doc
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
GtpdNsnede
tubli(Woiks
?pa lment
Public Wrnl, Wr k,Jo l
CITY OF ALAMEDA
MEMORANDUM
To: The Honorable Mayor
and Members of the City Council
From: William C. Norton
Acting City Manager
Date: April 20, 2005
Re: Recommendation to Approve Agreement with Alameda County to Continue
Participation in the Alameda County HOME Consortium and to Authorize the
Acting City Manager to Negotiate and Execute Necessary Documents
Background
Title II of the Cranston - Gonzales National Affordable Housing Act (NAHA) of 1990 created
the HOME Program, which provides financing for a wide range of affordable housing
programs and activities that benefit low- and moderate - income households and special
populations, such as the elderly and persons with disabilities.
Based on current population levels, Alameda is not eligible to receive HOME funds directly.
Therefore, for the past thirteen years, Alameda has received funding from this program
through its participation in the Alameda County HOME Consortium (Consortium). The
City's continued participation in the Consortium must be approved by the Council at three -
year intervals and the annual Contract Designating the City of Alameda as a Sub - Recipient
of HOME Funds (Agreement) executed to allow receipt of future funds.
Discussion /Analysis
The Consortium members include Alameda County and seven cities in the County.
(Oakland and Berkeley are large enough to receive HOME funds directly and are not
included in the Consortium.) Alameda County Housing and Community Development
(ACHCD) is the lead agency for the Consortium. In this capacity, ACHCD will submit
applications and reports, coordinate preparation of the Consolidated Plan, maintain
financial and program records, monitor compliance with HOME Program regulations, and
staff the Technical Advisory Committee.
To date, the City has received $5.25 million in HOME funds. These funds have been or are
being used to assist:
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
Report #4 -H CC
5 -3 -05
The Honorable Mayor
and Members of the City Council
April 20, 2005
Page 2
• Public and private entities in acquiring, renovating or constructing units with
affordability restrictions for 59 years;
• First -time homebuyers through the City's Downpayment Assistance programs; and
• Tenant -based rental assistance
The proposed Agreement (Attachment A) extends the City's participation in the Consortium
and sets ground rules for its administration and operation in federal fiscal years 2006, 2007
and 2008. Following Council approval, the City Manager will negotiate and execute this
Agreement and separate Sub - Recipient Agreements for FYs 2006, 2007 and 2008,
conforming agreements with public and private entities, and related documents, as necessary
to implement HOME - funded programs and activities. All agreements and other documents
are substantially similar to those previously approved by the Council and City Attorney.
Fiscal Impact
There is no impact on the General Fund. The City has received approximately $5.25 million
in HOME funds through the Consortium, with an additional $400,000 generated through
program income. Both the City and HCD receive five percent of the allocation for
administration. HOME funds are required to be matched by a minimum of 25% in non - federal
dollars; however, City HOME funds have actually leveraged many millions of dollars in private
and other public funds through private investment and grants.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council, by motion, approve the Agreement with Alameda
County to continue participation in the Alameda County HOME Consortium and authorize
the Acting City Manager to negotiate and execute necessary documents.
Resp_ ctful submitted,
Les l' - A Litt e
Development Services Director
By:
(24.4(Vt-'"
Carol Beaver
Community Development Manager
LL /CB /RS:sb
Attachment (Home Consortium Agreement to be provided by ACHCD)
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
G: \HOME \COUNRP \HCDO5Agmt.doc
F: HOME Consortium\Administration
AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of 2005, by and
between the CITY of ALAMEDA, hereinafter called "City," and the COUNTY OF ALAMEDA,
hereafter called "County."
WHEREAS, the Congress of the United States has enacted the Cranston Gonzalez
National Affordable Housing Act of 1990 and Federal regulations have been adopted pursuant
thereto, hereinafter called the "Act "; and
WHEREAS, Title II of the Act creates the Home Investment in Affordable Housing
Program, hereinafter called "HOME," that provides funds to states and local governments for
acquisition, rehabilitation, new construction of affordable housing and tenant -based rental
assistance; and
WHEREAS, the Act requires local governments to formulate a Consolidated Plan as part
of the eligibility requirements for HOME funds; and
WHEREAS, funds from Title II are distributed to metropolitan cities, urban counties
States, and consortia of local governments;
WHEREAS, the Act allows local governments to form consortia for the purpose of
receiving and administering HOME funds and carrying out purposes of the Act;
WHEREAS, the Act requires that a local government member of an urban county may
participate in a consortium only through the urban county, and the County of Alameda is the lead
agency of the Alameda County Urban County; and
WHEREAS, the Act requires that a consortium shall have one member unit of general
local government authorized to act in a representative capacity for all members for purposes of
the Act and to assume overall responsibility for the Act, including requirements concerning the
Consolidated Plan;
THEREFORE, it is agreed that:
1. CITY and COUNTY will cooperate in the operation of the Alameda County HOME
Consortium, hereinafter called the "CONSORTIUM ", for the purpose of undertaking or assisting
in undertaking HOME- eligible housing assistance activities pursuant to Title II of the Act
including but not limited to acquiring, rehabilitating, and constructing affordable housing and
providing homebuyer and tenant -based rental assistance.
2. COUNTY shall act as the representative member of the CONSORTIUM for the purposes
of the Act.
3. CITY shall have thirty (30) calendar days to approve the portions of the Consolidated
Plan which pertain to CITY before COUNTY submits final Consolidated Plan to the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development. COUNTY shall incorporate CITY changes in
Consolidated Plan, if any, provided that they meet HOME requirements.
4. CITY shall approve each project funded with HOME funds within CITY before
COUNTY approves funding project with HOME funds, provided that CITY approval or
disapproval does not obstruct the implementation of the approved Consolidated Plan.
5. There shall be a Technical Advisory Committee for the Consortium to recommend
spending priorities, policies, and review projects and proposed expenditures. CITY shall
designate a staff member to participate on the Technical Advisory Committee.
6. CITY shall designate a representative to whom all notices and communications from
COUNTY shall be directed. COUNTY'S duty to notify CITY shall be complete when the
communication is sent to the designated representative. It is the exclusive duty of the designated
representative to notify the appropriate individuals or departments within CITY.
7. To carry out activities under this Agreement, COUNTY shall allocate to CITY a portion
of HOME funds received under the Act. Initial allocations shall be determined by formula
approved by the Technical Advisory Committee for the CONSORTIUM. If necessary to meet
HOME requirements, funds will be reallocated by COUNTY in accordance with such needs,
objectives, or strategies as COUNTY shall decide. In preparing such needs, objectives, or
strategies, COUNTY shall consult with CITY and Technical Advisory Committee before making
its determinations.
8. Each party to this agreement shall affirmatively further fair housing.
9. CITY shall pay COUNTY an annual fee to help defray COUNTY'S costs to administer
the Consortium and perform monitoring, record - keeping, and reporting required by the Act.
Such fee shall be based upon COUNTY'S expected actual costs and shall in no case exceed five
percent (5%) of the CITY'S annual allocation of HOME funds.
10. CITY shall provide COUNTY with all information concerning CITY and the activities
CITY carried out under this agreement which COUNTY requires to prepare 1) documents
required to be submitted to HUD, 2) annual HOME performance report, 3) such other documents
as COUNTY may require to carry out eligible housing activities or meet Federal requirements.
All information shall be submitted on forms prescribed by COUNTY. In addition, CITY agrees
to make available upon request all records concerning the activities carried out under this
agreement for inspection by COUNTY or Federal officials during regular business hours.
11. Pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, CITY shall defend, indemnify, and hold
harmless COUNTY, its officers, employees, and agents from all claims, suits, actions or losses
of any type, and from liability for any fines, penalties or damages of any type, resulting from
CITY'S performance of this Agreement and caused by any act or omission of CITY, including
failure to comply with any requirement of the Act or the Program described herein, except to the
extent that any such claim, suits, actions, losses, or liabilities arise from any act or omission of
COUNTY.
12. Pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, COUNTY shall defend, indemnify, and
hold harmless CITY, its officers, employees, and agents from all claims, suits, actions or losses
of any type, and from liability for any fines, penalties or damages of any type, resulting from
COUNTY'S performance of this Agreement and caused by any act or omission of COUNTY,
including failure to comply with any requirement of the Act or the Program described herein,
except to the extent that any such claims, suits, actions, losses, or liability arise from any act or
omission of CITY.
13. Each CITY participating in the Alameda County HOME CONSORTIUM shall defend,
indemnify, and hold harmless all other participating CITIES for CITY'S negligent acts or
omissions arising from this agreement.
14. This Agreement shall go into effect immediately upon the signature of both parties and
shall continue in full force and effect until all activities funded from Federal fiscal years during
which CITY was a participating jurisdiction in the CONSORTIUM are completed. CITY will be
included in the Consortium for a minimum of three (3) Federal fiscal years, federal years 2006,
2007 and 2008.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this contract on the day first
mentioned above.
CITY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
City Manager President, Alameda County Board of Supervisors
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: By:
City Attorney Deputy County Counsel
G:\HCD\HOME \SUBHOUS\2006 Consortium Agreement.doc
CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO.
APPOINTING RAY A. GAUL AS A MEMBER
OF THE CITY GOLF COMMISSION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Alameda that pursuant to Sections 2 -9.2 of
the Alameda Municipal Code, and upon nomination of the Mayor, RAY A. GAUL is hereby
appointed to the office of member of the Golf Commission of the City of the City of Alameda, for a
term commencing May 3, 2005 and expiring on September 30, 2008 and to serve until his successor
is appointed and qualified.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in regular meeting assembled on the
day of , 2005, by the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said
City this day of , 2005.
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
City of Alameda
Resolutions #5 -A
5 -3 -05
CL
CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO.
APPOINTING BILL T. SCHMITZ AS A MEMBER
OF THE CITY GOLF COMMISSION
w BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Alameda that pursuant to Sections 2 -9.2 of
2
0 the Alameda Municipal Code, and upon nomination of the Mayor, BILL T. SCHMITZ is hereby
appointed to the office of member of the Golf Commission of the City of the City of Alameda, for a
I— term commencing May 3, 2005 and expiring on September 30, 2009 and to serve until his successor
0
is appointed and qualified.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in regular meeting assembled on the
day of , 2005, by the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said
City this day of , 2005.
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
City of Alameda
CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO.
APPOINTING JANE SULLWOLD AS A MEMBER
OF THE CITY GOLF COMMISSION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Alameda that pursuant to Sections 2 -9.2 of
the Alameda Municipal Code, and upon nomination of the Mayor, JANE SULLWOLD is hereby
appointed to the office of member of the Golf Commission of the City of the City of Alameda, for a
term commencing May 3, 2005 and expiring on September 30, 2009 and to serve until her successor
is appointed and qualified.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in regular meeting assembled on the
day of , 2005, by the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said
City this day of , 2005.
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
City of Alameda
CITY OF ALAMEDA ORDINANCE NO.
New Series
RECLASSIFYING AND REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY
WITHIN THE CITY OF ALAMEDA BY AMENDING ZONING
ORDINANCE NO. 1277, N.S., FROM R -5 (GENERAL
RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT TO C -C (COMMUNITY
E COMMERCIAL) ZONING DISTRICT, FOR THAT PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 2507 CENTRAL AVENUE AT EVERETT STREET
IJ-
p A BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Alameda that:
N
ca Section 1. Section 11 -116 of Ordinance No. 1277, N.S., is hereby amended by
reclassifying from R -5 (General Residential) Zoning District to C -C (Community Commercial)
cp
y_ Zoning District all the real property situated within the City of Alameda, County of Alameda, State
p _ of California, bounded by Everett Street on the west, Central Avenue on the south and private
CL , v property boundaries on the east and north, described as follows:
Q.
Gross Acreage Assessor's Parcel/
Address
Existing Zoning Rezoned To
0.2 070 -170 -015 R -5 C -C
2507 Central Avenue
Section 2. The above amendment shall be known as and reference to as
Reclassification and Rezoning Amendment No. 197 to Ordinance No. 1277, N.S.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after the
expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of its final passage.
Attest:
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
City of Alameda
Presiding Officer of the Council
1 Final Passage of Ordinance #5 -B
5 -3 -05
Prepared by Planning Department
November 13, 2000
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was duly and regularly adopted
and passed by Council of the City of Alameda in regular meeting assembled on the
day of , 2005, by the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said City
this day of , 2005.
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
City of Alameda
CITY OF ALAMEDA
MEMORANDUM
To: The Honorable Mayor
and Members of the City Council
From: William C. Norton
Acting City Manager
Date: May 3, 2005
Re: Presentation and Recommendation to Accept the West Alameda
Neighborhood Improvement Concept Plan
Background
The West Alameda Neighborhood Improvement Concept Plan (The Plan) which is on file in
the City Clerk's office is the result of a community engagement process led by BMS Design
Group (BMS) and the Development Services Department (DSD) that began in early 2004.
Financed with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, the Plan proposes
public improvements for the neighborhood comprising Census Tract 4276, bounded by
Appezzato Way, Main Street, Webster Street, and Pacific /MarshalVLincoln Avenues. This
neighborhood was selected based on census data indicating the greatest number of low -
income households in the City, observations of limited amenities and blighted physical
conditions, and on -going discussions with community residents and institutional partners
regarding needed improvements in the physical and social environment of the
neighborhood. The Plan will provide a conceptual framework for public improvements in
the neighborhood over the next five or more years. Having a framework designed in
cooperation with the community and accepted by the Council will allow the City to
coordinate and take advantage of opportunities as various types of development and public
improvement possibilities arise.
The Plan documents the concerns and input of more than 240 residents and stakeholders
regarding public improvements desired in this West Alameda neighborhood. The final draft
Plan was presented to the neighborhood at a widely publicized meeting on February 23,
2005. Comments were received and have been incorporated into the final draft currently
under consideration. In addition, the draft Plan has been available for citizen review and
comment at the City Clerk's office and, to facilitate greater community participation, was
also made available at various neighborhood sites, including Chipman, Woodstock and
Longfellow Schools, the Woodstock Park Recreation Center, the West End Branch Library,
and City Hall West.
A technical advisory committee, comprised of staff from various City departments and a
representative from the Alameda Unified School District (AUSD), provided input to the draft
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
Report #5 -C
5 -3 -05
The Honorable Mayor
and Members of the City Council
May 3, 2005
Page 2
Plan and will continue to be involved in implementing the proposed improvements over
time. Finally, several City boards and commissions (the Housing Commission, Planning
Board, Recreation and Parks Commission, Transportation Commission, and the Public
Utilities Board) heard presentations on the Plan in February and March 2005, and their
comments have been incorporated into the final draft. The presentation to the Council will
highlight some of the recommendations, priorities and opportunities outlined in the Plan.
Discussion/Analvsis
Reactions from the community, City boards and commissions and AUSD staff have been
largely positive. The Plan provides a framework for three types of physical improvements:
safety (including traffic calming and safer pedestrian movement), circulation and access
(pedestrian connections within the neighborhood), and aesthetics (streetscape, lighting,
and transit amenities). Key recommendations include:
o Significant improvements to the Pacific Avenue /Marshall Way intersection
providing better access to Chipman Middle School, including raised intersections
and an improved crosswalk at Fourth Street.
Pedestrian corridors to provide better access throughout the neighborhood in the
vicinity of Chipman School, Woodstock Park, and Woodstock School. These
pedestrian pathways could be created in partnership with the School District
through a joint use agreement, easements and /or exchange of land at Chipman
Middle School and Woodstock Park. AUSD staff and the Recreation and Parks
Commission have both expressed support of the proposed project. Staff plans to
move towards more structured discussions with AUSD, in conjunction with design
activities, over the next couple of months.
❑ Improvements along Poggi Street, where excessive speeding was of concern to
residents, would include raised pavement at the Poggi/Buena Vista corner and
narrowed travel lanes, which would improve pedestrian safety and circulation.
o Landscaping and installation of sidewalks, bus shelters, ornamental fencing, and
gateway lighting to alleviate blight on the south side of Appezzato Parkway. In
addition, the Plan supports the proposed Cross - Alameda trail and design of a linear
park along the corridor. Both of these items are dependent on site control of the
property, which is currently owned by the Alameda Beltline.
Specific design and engineering solutions will be pursued as each component of the Plan
falls into place. Some of the proposed improvements will need to be refined to meet
technical requirements and changing conditions over time. Wherever feasible, contracts for
installation of landscaping, street trees and similar amenities would include a start-up
phase to minimize impact on City maintenance crews.
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service
The Honorable Mayor
and Members of the City Council
May 3, 2005
Page 3
Pending acceptance by the City Council of the Plan, two elements are proposed for the
first phase of improvements:
❑ Siting, design and installation of street trees, trash cans, and bus shelters on an in-
fill basis throughout the neighborhood; and
❑ Design of the public connectors around Chipman Middle School, as described
above.
CDBG funds are currently available to undertake both of these elements beginning in May
2005, with an anticipated completion date of June, 2006.
Fiscal Impact
There is no direct impact on the General Fund. Approximately $500,000 in CDBG funds is
available to implement the first phase of public improvements and design as described
above.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council accept the West Alameda Neighborhood
Improvement Concept Plan.
LL /CB /AW :sb
7
Resp- tfully sub It-
Leslie A. Little
Development Services Director
By: Carol Beaver
Community Development Manager
cc: Housing Commission
Planning Board
Recreation Commission
Transportation Commission
Alan Nishino, AUSD
Michael Smiley , BMS Design Group
G: \PARTNERS \W EST ALAMEDA \Neighborhood Improvement Project \Council Reports \Staff Report 041905 draft.doc
F: Projects / West Alameda Neighborhood Improvement Project 2003 -04 /Staff Reports
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service