Resolution 14061CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. 14061
ADOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND
MITIGATION AND MONITORING REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE
GRAND MARINA VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRAND STREET AND FORTMANN WAY
(STATE CLEARINGHOUSE #2006 -04 -2145)
WHEREAS, an application was made on November 22, 2005 by
Warmington Homes California requesting a Tentative Map (TM05 -02), Initial
Study (IS05 -03), General Plan Amendment (GP05 -02), Rezoning (R05 -04), Major
Design Review (DR05- 0126), and Master Plan (MP05 -01) for a proposed
development consisting of 40 detached residential units plus two mini -park sites,
associated streets and alleys, visitor parking, and open space at the northwest
corner of Grand Street and Fortmann Way; and
WHEREAS, the project requires a General Plan Amendment, a Rezoning,
a Master Plan, a Tentative Map, and Development Plan approval for
improvement of the Project site; and
WHEREAS, a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared and
circulated for public review in April 2006; and
WHEREAS, upon independent review and analysis, the Planning Board
unanimously approved a resolution recommending that the City Council make
the necessary findings for approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and
WHEREAS, prior to approving this Resolution and acting on the required
City approvals, the City Council has independently reviewed and analyzed the
Mitigated Negative Declaration and considered the information contained therein
and the written and oral comments received at the Public Hearings.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Alameda hereby adopts the following Findings of Fact Regarding Environmental
Impacts and Mitigation Measures for the Grand Marina Project and the Mitigation
and Monitoring Reporting Program (Exhibit A), which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference:
1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of California history because a) the site is an established industrial
facility that is covered with a combination of pavement, concrete and
structures; b) non biological, archaeological, or historic resources have been
identified on the site: c) the project does not result in any significant
unavoidable adverse impacts; and d) implementation of specified mitigation
measures will avoid or reduce the effects of the Project on undetected
archaeological resources or the environment and thereby avoid any
significant impacts.
2. The project does not involve impacts which are individually limited but
cumulatively considerable, meaning that the incremental effects of the
project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable
future projects, because the project will a) promote long -term goals of the
General Plan for environmental enhancement and public shoreline access;
b) not result in any significant unavoidable adverse impacts; and will c)
incorporate mitigation measures to avoid significant adverse impacts on the
environment in the context of continued growth and development along
Alameda's northern waterfront. In particular, project would have a less -than-
significant cumulative traffic impact on anticipated traffic congestion in
western Alameda and at intersections in . Oakland associated with the
interconnection between the Webster -Posey Tubes and Interstate 880.
3. The project does not have any environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly
because the project does not affect existing residential settlement and the
proposed land use is consistent with and compatible with the surroundings
because the project a) represents all intended changes to the site and is not
part of a larger actions; and b) will incorporate both project - specific
mitigation measures and participation of area -wide mitigation measures to
avoid significant impacts within the context of continued growth and
development in Alameda.
4. The applicant has agreed to incorporate the mitigation measures into the
project as identified in the Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Program
(Attachment A). The mitigations would either avoid adverse impacts or
lessen the potentially significant environmental impacts to less than
significant levels.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council adopts the Mitigated
Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, as
shown in Exhibit B to this resolution.
1!;', •
Ir.•;
0.
•
•
• •
•
O
V
lip
i b I v g v Ry u q o ° M" it ° o F 0.2
d J7 g 12
A 4d
o o q o
4 vu W At;
W spp
Jo `Q'"'
v p u ag �7 p Q + 4,„)
I t l i
l 1 81. �L
111:q4Ii ta
v
(,2,5,e," 0 4,1 Ou2-T'A o,04sts P vx
.,. E. 0 v. li
4E.0.0A-0.91
vilEil.;;. -1 ilal
1Pi 1,"! 1 — ti gg'l
IVY
•. g-egulIV
i3"
esigv v a 1J Iv U ij ii°111
2 i i 1 P F1:2 o o o I l 0 B i lt pi .
° a s '
^
vi
0
2
41 ti4
.H
riTtAgy8
lm-"flv,44
O p 1
ti
CI up •
2
. 2 .
4 vg .0 • •-■
I
r 1731 r03 V41
ovrog4:1/ro
g6E
h4 „
§a 1u gtg
X0.151.1 g■ZIU
gi3,2"‘I 6
10,0
EE g
dra
0
•
4
0
�a
_ u
u a
,_13 Lag Fsiti,
%.N01-,Pxa
I °
tt1Uif'J1 'ti
u
4 OM aF4;Hitt
P!%14,;1111
01 ; - ' 1 1 41 a
114-81 i rum
P4
4
slgI
u u
8
H;f
giu
eNls
��a
ce
cewU
Z
0
0
0
O
u
E.
g
2A
N U
T.42
.0
u 4
s
� a
:411
°
0 41
Tgolg
0
o
aotv..08
0
c,LL1I
p0,
H
a
U p O
Hp, .0
L . 8 o
A a
Pr
— c a"p i v ° u 8
dEwgil
v
0 g 49"
.08117,- 0
E a6
M el
rt4i44 4
.J 4
ot,
M
0
0°
J H y •:�
y
V V
a a
g�N.�
4
.b ° o N
g b p
a
aPA U 8
g! vag
Nil
A40 .t
016, T
lIP!
H
0
a
0 a
O
z
v
Lth
.'d o
• � caa �
1)
1il
cg a
le
.0
gassi
foul
g(s1,1
u
H
O
a
PQ
0
101118u � a
u g O alt 1 ;7
w i7 N y o O
1-41 ii,o,....—
, • 4, I>, .0
a g' „a„.0,901V
l'i 46
„IP 0A"
048°84148f
N
ui 4111I al 1 11 rit
111;141 1 !
g .0 w1
N
goi Ii Al
iii .11 4/
0
cc
a
0
z
0
z
0
z
0
0
z
z
6
z
1
0
z
V
Aro
O O
a
AA
wrg
4)1
W
X u ro v
o
;109
g ge
cti
M
1111
1
tob
0
kg
U
2
d
v
z
O
z
z
O
0
z
O
z
0
'0i
•
0 'f�9' M
g;
a
a
4 u i o o.
1 f
IA
O :b3:5-(ill Pt114 ro Pfg
o
° e g .y p MO:
F6j QFU- :4 W
avt ngo xo
Paj „0-14 Elli
r flhi
§8g jij
�` a g' ii
A -I i G E
u
z
5
0
Q
°° N 'ti b O N a b t. cl vi
tl b •
I C 1,A0.t1V,P
0s .0 u:d b"� w TJ . .
u .b �-d g .. �'G o v 11
-1j3winis -s.
SlialtVIIIN y
I'il1 ts (46-11811—h „liq "At 12,! 1
s
T g u il t . v w S 0, as : Pi 1 ti
.� v
14e4W0-4 1 a E.
a �° '�
-.Q1'411"LciW t F2 1 g8 It t _,
11
ilu11011 ��+i a u� 44W° i, u g .O
( E All r O+ 'Q P9 a 2 7,
t
flhii'
c
wVwo.Vu
o
0 4.1u0
g 2'4
�p� .x
hj.j .
ilillhi
211
1 o
u
o 8
q a
o
Alt :1/
. to Bg!
xpl g
H
B 1' •g e e o� u g
I ii, } . u .o
. g llijuilg i:411
a P pRc uw l.'7
g l�� .2.i-3 v l ti�
41 M M
1 dts'AL:5 (11,N.ri.t4q,/ 0123
0 24 El
u ou ri 511311 Jni
H
Z-P, a i.gg 1.1'11 A lo
ti•
volir
PC
y':
4.1
.41
q o a
4'4 V11 0
O °
iditTAD
fliij.101101i
w u
gam° .h
Wkl5e.c?4ggll
74iiMP14-.1
plAg
iiiJiIifl
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda during the Regular
Meeting of the City Council on the 16th day of January 2007, by the following vote to wit:
AYES: Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam
and Mayor Johnson - 5.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTENTIONS: None.
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of
said City this 17th day of January, 2007.
Lara Weisiger, City
City of Alameda