Resolution 12256CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. 12256
APPROVING PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD ACTION AND
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF CERTAIN INSTALLMENT
SALE FINANCING DOCUMENTS
WHEREAS, the Public Utilities Board of the City of
Alameda has determined through an Office and Storage Needs Analysis
and Space Planning Study the need for additional space and
construction upgrading of the Bureau's Service Center located at
2000 Grand Street; and
WHEREAS, the Public Utilities Board after further study
selected as the best alternative to meet these needs the
reconstruction of its Service Center and the City Council concurred
with this recommendation in September, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Public Utilities Board of the City of
Alameda adopted Resolution No. 4143 approving, authorizing and
directing execution of certain installment sale financing'
documents, approving a purchase agreement, a preliminary official
statement and authorizing and directing certain actions with
respect thereto on May 18, 1992.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ALAMEDA that said Council hereby ratifies the action taken by
the Public Utilities Board as evidenced in Public Utilities Board
Resolution No. 4143, approving, authorizing and directing execution
of documents related to the installment sale financing.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution
was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council ofthe
City of Alameda in adjourned regular meeting assembled on the 3rd
day of June , 1992, by the following vote to wit:
AYES: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Lucas, Roth
and President Withrow - 5.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTENTIONS! None.
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official seal of said City this 4th day of June 1992.
Diane . Felsch, City Clerk
City of Alameda
0
CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. 12257
OVERTURNING THE PLANNING BOARD DENIAL OF USE PERMIT UP-92-1
TO ALLOW AUTOMOBILE SALES AND SERVICE.
WHEREAS, the Planning Board held a hearing on April 13, 1992
and denied the application; and
WHEREAS, the decision was appealed to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on this appeal
on June 3, 1992, and has examined pertinent maps, drawings, and
documents; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has made the following findings:
1. The proposed use will favorably relate to other property,
uses and intensities along Webster Street and fulfillS
the policies of the General Plan, because the use would
not adversely affect the existing retail and residential
uses.
2. The location of the proposed use is compatible with other
land uses in the general neighborhood area. The subject
site is surrounded by a variety of retail uses, including
a clothing and furniture store, a grocery store, an
electronic store, several restaurants, a bank, a beauty
CL
and barber shop, a pharmacy and a gasoline service
r r station.
3. The proposed use will be served by adequate
transportation and service facilities. Webster Street
is served by AC Transit lines 51, 53 and 63. Basic
utility services exist in the building.
4. The proposed use will not adversely affect other property
in the vicinity, because sufficient parking is available
on-street and on site. The service component of the
business will be conducted within the existing building,
and thus, will not adversely affect other uses in the
vicinity.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
Alameda that the City Council hereby overturns the denial of Use
Permit, UP-92-1 with the following conditions:
1. The project shall be constructed in substantial
compliance with the plans titled "O'Connell Volvo" on
file in the office of the City of Alameda Planning
Department.
2. All automobile service conducted as part of the operation
shall be conducted within the confines of the building.
No automobile repair is allowed. Repair shall include
but is not limited to:
transmission work
brake work
body and fender work
engine overhaul
In the event that the subject property is rezoned to a
District which allows automobile repair or the C-2
District is amended to allow automobile repair, then this
restriction on automobile repair shall be null and void.
In no event, however, shall auto body repair be allowed
at this location.
3. All exterior walls shall be soundproof to achieve
compliance with Tables I and II of Article II, Noise
Regulations, of the Alameda Municipal Code.
4. All cars offered for sale shall be stored in the area
shown as "showroom" on the plans.
5. The area at the rear of the existing building shall be
developed as a parking lot, and shall comply with the
standards of Section 30-7, Off-Street Parking and Loading
Space Regulations, as to parking space size and
landscaping.
6. The parking lot to be developed at the rear of the
building shall be reserved for customer parking only, and
shall not be used by the owner or employees of the
automobile service/sales facility, and shall not be used
to store cars which are offered for sale.
7. The Webster Street facade of the building shall be
improved including repair of the existing awning and
painting of the building. Improvements requiring a
building permit shall be subject to design review.
8. All signage for the automobile service/sales facility
shall be comply with Section 30-6, Sign Regulations.
9. The building shall be required to meet fire code
requirements for the proposed change in occupancy
classification.
10. The Use Permit shall terminate one (1) year from June 3,
1992, unless actual construction or alteration under
valid permits has begun, or the applicant applies for and
is granted an extension prior to the expiration of the
Use Permit.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution
was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the
City of Alameda in adjourned regular meeting assembled on the 3rd
day of June , 1992, by the following vote to wit:
AYES: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Lucas and
President Withrow - 4.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTENTIONS: Councilmember Roth - 1.
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official seal of said City this 4th day of June , 1992.
ui _%l s/f
Diane B. City Clerk
City of Alameda
CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION N0.12258
PRELIMINARILY APPROVING ANNUAL REPORT DECLARING
INTENTION TO ORDER LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS
AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF JULY 7, 1992 HEARING
THEREOF - ISLAND CITY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
84-2
WHEREAS, the City of Alameda (the "City") has duly
created the Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2
(the "District") under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972
(Sections 22500 and following of the Streets and Highways Code of
California) (the "Act") to install and maintain certain
landscaping and lighting improvements (the "Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, the City has directed John H. Heindel, as
engineer of work for the District, to file an annual report in
accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, and
that report is on file with the City and shows the proposed
improvements and the estimated costs and assessments, all for the
fiscal year 1992-3.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Alameda that:
1. The report of the engineer of work on file with the
City is hereby preliminarily approved and the City intends to
levy assessments on the properties shown in the report for the
fiscal year 1992-93, subject to any changes that may be ordered
by the Council.
2. On July 7, 1992, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock P.M.,
the Council will hold a public hearing on the proposed
Improvements and the proposed assessments for the fiscal year
1992-3. The hearing will be held at the meeting place of the
Council, in City Hall, 2263 Santa Clara Avenue, Alameda,
California, 94501.
3. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to give
notice of the hearing required by the Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 1972 by publishing a copy of this resolution once in the
Alameda Times Star, a newspaper published and circulated in the
City. Said publication shall be not later than 10 days before
the date of said hearing.
4. Interested persons should contact Marge McLean of
the City of Alameda Public Works Department, 2263 Santa Clara
Avenue, Alameda, California 94501, telephone number (415 748-
4593, regarding this hearing and the report.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution
was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the
City of Alameda in regular meeting assembled on the 16th day of
June , 1992, by the following vote to wit:
AYES: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Lucas, Roth
and President Withrow - 5.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTENTIONS: None.
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official seal of said City this 17th day of June , 1992.
Diane BL! Felsch, City Clerk
City of Alameda
CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. 12259
ESTABLISHING DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM
GOALS FOR FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 1992 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1993
WHEREAS, the California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans) requires that local agencies maintain a current
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program for administration
of Federal aid projects; and
WHEREAS, per City Council Resolution No. 11517, the City of
Alameda has established a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise
Program; and
WHEREAS, the California Department of Transportation has
established criteria for amending DBE goals to include:
1. The annual overall DBE goals based on anticipated
contracts to be awarded during the annual goal period.
2. A description of how the goals were established and a
statement that the DBE program is available for public
inspection for 30 days.
3. A statement that the U.S. Department of Transportation
and the local agency will accept comments on the goals
for 45 days.
4. Assurance that public comments received will be used only
for informational purposes.
WHEREAS, the Federal Registrar requires a minimum single DBE
annual goal of 10%.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
Alameda that said Council hereby amends the City's existing
Disadvantaged Business Program in accordance with the
abovementioned criteria, and establishes an annual goal of 17%.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed
to submit a Proof of Publication to Caltrans of said DBE Program
amendments and goals.
\ m
0
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution
was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the
City of Alameda in regular meeting assembled on the 16th day of
June , 1992, by the following vote to wit:
AYES: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Lucas, Roth
and President Withrow 5.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTENTIONS: None.
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official seal of said City this 17th day of June , 1992.
Diane t). Felsch, pity Clerk
City of Alameda
CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. 12260
ADOPTING NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-92-7 FOR THE MAIN STREET
CORRIDOR LINEAR PARK LAND ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act,
a Negative Declaration, IS-92-7, has been prepared for the Main
Street corridor linear park land acquisition and development; and
WHEREAS, after holding a public hearing for a Negative
Declaration, IS-92-7, and examining pertinent maps, drawings and
documents as contained in the Staff Report to the Planning Board
dated June 8, 1992, the Planning Board of the City of Alameda on
June 8, 1992 unanimously recommended adoption of Negative
Declaration, IS-92-7; and
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Alameda considered the
Negative Declaration, IS-92-7 on June 16, 1992 and has examined
pertinent maps, drawings, documents, and the Council staff report,
dated June 9, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Council has made the following findings:
1. The project does not have the potential to substantially
degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause
a fish and wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory, because the site is a railroad
right of way and has limited habitat value.
2. The project does not have the potential to achieve short
term, to the disadvantage of long term, environmental
goals, because it is a reuse of a surplus railroad right
of way to meet City recreation needs.
3. The project does not have possible environmental effects
which are individually limited but cumulatively
considerable.
4. The project does not have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
Alameda that said Council adopts Negative Declaration, IS-92-7.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution
was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the
City of Alameda in regular meeting assembled on the 16th day of
June , 1992, by the following vote to wit:
AYES: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Lucas, Roth
and President Withrow 5.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTENTIONS: None.
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official seal of said City this 17th day of June 1992.
Diane Felsch, City Cler
City of Alameda
CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. 12261
ADOPTING NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-92-6 FOR THE ATLANTIC
AVENUE LINEAR PARK LAND ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, pursuant the California Environmental Quality Act, a
Negative Declaration, IS-92-6, has been prepared for the Atlantic
Avenue linear park land acquisition and development; and
WHEREAS, after holding a public hearing for a Negative
Declaration, IS-92-6, and examining pertinent maps, drawings and
documents as contained in the Staff Report to the Planning Board
dated June 8, 1992, the Planning Board of the City of Alameda on
June 8, 1992 unanimously recommended adoption of Negative
Declaration, IS-92-6; and
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Alameda considered the
Negative Declaration, IS-92-6 on June 16, 1992 and has examined
pertinent maps, drawings, documents, and the Council staff report,
dated June 9, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Council has made the following findings:
1. The project does not have the potential to substantially
degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause
a fish and wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory, because the project site is a
railroad right of way and has limited habitat value.
2. The project does not have the potential to achieve short
term, to the disadvantage of long term, environmental
goals, because it is a reuse of a surplus railroad right
of way to meet City recreation needs.
3. The project does not have possible environmental effects
which are individually limited but cumulatively
considerable.
4. The project does not have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
Alameda that said Council adopts Negative Declaration, IS-92-6.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution
was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the
City of Alameda in regular meeting assembled on the 16th day of
June , 1992, by the following vote to wit:
AYES: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Lucas, Roth
and President Withrow - 5.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTENTIONS: None.
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official seal of said City this 17th day of June 1992.
AL( 2
Diane r: Felsch, City Clerk
City of Alameda