Loading...
CIC Resolution 01-96COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01 -96 APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE AMENDMENT TO THE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR THE BUSINESS AND WATERFRONT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda (the "CIC ") has prepared an Amendment to the Community Improvement Plan (the "Amendment ") for the Business and Waterfront Improvement Project (the "BWIP ") which would change certain land use designations or descriptions of land use designations within the BWIP and make other textual changes in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, an initial study has been made tc -?etermine whether the proposed Amendment will have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, based on the results of the initial study, a Negative Declaration has been prepared and submitted to and considered by the CIC in connection with the proposed adoption by the City Council of an ordinance adopting the Amendment; and WHEREAS, the CIC has reviewed, considered and deteuuined that the Negative Declaration complies with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15000 et seq., hereinafter the "State CEQA Guidelines ") and local procedures adopted by the CIC pursuant thereto; and WHEREAS, on April 3, 2001, the CIC and the City Council held a joint public hearing on the proposed Amendment and the Negative Declaration, and the CIC has considered all comments and testimony received pertaining thereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The CIC has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Negative Declaration and hereby approves the Negative Declaration and certifies that the Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State CEQA Guidelines and local procedures adopted by the CIC pursuant thereto. Section 2. Based upon the Negative Declaration and comments and testimony received pertaining thereto, the CIC hereby finds and determines that the proposed Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment and made the following findings: The project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of California history because the project would enhance the existing residential neighborhood environment and the urbanized site does not contain significant biological resources. The site contains a residence of potential historical importance which would be retained and preserved under the proposed General Plan designation and zoning. The project does not involve impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable, (e.g. that the incremental effects of the project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects), because the project would not involve environmental impacts which could compound with effects of past, current or probable future projects. The project does not have any environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly because the project would be consistent with, and compatible with, the surrounding land uses. The project does not have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals, because the project involves redevelopment of a commercial site with residential use, under a Planned Development and General Plan and Zoning amendments necessary for the project which would be consistent with long- te,,,, environmental and land use goals. Section 3. The Secretary of the CIC is authorized to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk of the County of Alameda and the Office of Planning and Research, if applicable, following the adoption by the City Council of an ordinance adopting the Amendment. 2 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda in a Special Joint City Council and Community Improvement Commission meeting assembled on the 3rd day of April . 2001, by the following vote to wit: AYES: Commissioners Daysog, DeWitt, Johnson, and Chair Appezzato - 4. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Kerr - 1. ABSTENTIONS: None. IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said Commission this 4th day of April . 2001. Ralp Community Improvement Commission ,d Dia'•* Felsch, Secretary Community Improvement Commission