Loading...
CIC Resolution 03-114COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSON RESOLUTION NO.0 3 —114 MAKING FINDINGS CONCERNING A PROPOSED BIO- TECHNOLOGY INCUBATOR AT THE FORMER FLEET INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CENTER AND PLEDGING CIC SUPPORT FOR THE PROJECT VIA BELOW MARKET SALE AND PROVISION OF BACKBONE INFRASTRUCTURE TO THE SITE WHEREAS, the Alameda City Improvement Commission ( "CIC" or "Commission ") has committed to sell a 3.44 acre site at the former Fleet and Industrial Supply Center to Catellus Development Corporation, a Delaware corporation ( "Catellus ") for the development of light industrial and office uses, including research and development, more particularly described in that certain Development and Disposition Agreement between Catellus and the CIC dated June 16, 2000; and as amended to date ( "the site" and "the DDA," respectively); and 'WHEREAS, Catellus has indicated that current market conditions do not support development of that site for those uses on a non - subsidized basis at this time and that it has agreed to sell the site to Advancing California's Emerging Technologies, a California non -profit corporation, ( "ACET ") for the purposes referenced in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, ACET has obtained a $6.44 million grant from the United States Economic Development Agency ("EDA") to relocate and expand its existing biotechnology incubator from Alameda Point to a 35,000 square foot building ACET has agreed to construct and maintain on the site as an incubator for emergent biotechnology businesses ( "the grant" and "the project," respectively); and WHEREAS, development of the project will trigger the investment of the $6.44 million grant in the City of Alameda, facilitate the goal of the City and the CIC to establish a niche market in the City for high technology and biotechnology businesses, and will catalyze the improvement and occupancy of the nearby Enterprise Landing Business Park, and thereby contribute to the goals of the CIC redevelopment plan for the site, the economic development goals of the City, and the public health, safety, and general welfare; and WHEREAS the EDA grant requires a 20% local match; and WHEREAS, this 20% local match may be met by the provision of backbone infrastructure to the site, a write -down of the purchase price of the site by the CIC, and by the City's waiver of certain development fees with respect to the construction of the project; and WHEREAS, ACET has agreed to repay the CIC for any cost of providing backbone infrastructure to the site which exceeds the sum of $1.2 million and to repay the City the amount of any development impact fee waiver granted pursuant to this resolution in the event that ACET fails to develop the project, to operate the project for twenty (20) years, or sells the site or loses title to the site prior to the expiration of that time by bankruptcy, foreclosure or otherwise; and giACETresocic071503.doc WHEREAS, Catellus will convey the site to ACET, and ACET will convey to the CIC and the City a second deed of trust, junior only to any security interest provided to the EDA pursuant to the grant, to secure the contingent repayment obligations referenced immediately above. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Commission does hereby find, order and resolve as follows: 1. California Environmental Quality Act. The Commission makes the following findings with respect to this project: (a) (b) (c) (d) g: /ACETresocic071503.doc The City Council previously certified a Final Environmental Impact Report on May 31, 2000 for the Catellus Mixed Use Development, State Clearinghouse Number 1998112078 ( "the EIR "). The City Council made findings regarding Catellus' proposed development, including development of the site for uses as are proposed by the project. The mitigation measures and mitigation monitoring program adopted by the City Council with respect to the Catellus proposal are applicable to the project. No substantial changes between Catellus' proposed use of the site and the project exist, as both propose office and research and development uses. Thus, there will be neither new significant environmental impacts nor any substantial increase in the severity of the previously identified significant effects by virtue of the substitution of the project for Catellus' earlier proposal for the site. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is to be undertaken as compared to the circumstances analyzed in the EIR that involve significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. No new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known at the time the EIR was certified shows that the project will have significant effects not discussed in the EIR, environmental effects substantially more severe than shown in the EIR, that mitigation measures previously found infeasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, or that mitigation measures or alternatives to the project that are considerably different than those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project. (e) Accordingly, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and Section 15162(a) and (b) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Commission hereby determines that no further environmental documentation is required with respect to the project and that the project shall be subject to the applicable mitigation measures and the mitigation monitoring program adopted upon certification of the EIR. 2. ACET's Consideration. The concessions granted to ACET by the CIC and the City, namely the facilitation of sale of the site at less than its fair market value, the provision of backbone infrastructure to the site by the CIC, the waiver of development fees by the City, and the forgiveness of the contingent liability to repay infrastructure costs incurred by the CIC in excess of $1.2 million and to repay the waived development fees upon twenty (20) years' operation of the project by ACET on the site are made in consideration of the following benefits of the project and are, for those reasons, not a gift of public funds: (a) Development of the site for ACET's expanded incubator will trigger the investment of the $6.44 million grant in the City of Alameda, benefiting the City, other businesses in the City, and the residents of the City. (b) That development will advance the goal of the City and the CIC to establish a niche market in the City for high technology and biotechnology businesses. (c) That development will catalyze the improvement and occupancy of the Enterprise Landing Business Park. (d) For each of these reasons, the project will contribute to the goals of the CIC redevelopment plan for the site, the economic development goals of the City, and the public health, safety, and welfare. 3. Accordingly, the Commission hereby agrees, on the conditions noted in paragraph 4 below, to consent to the transfer of the site by Catellus to ACET and to provide backbone infrastructure to the site as detailed in the DDA. It is the Commission's intent in so agreeing that the bargain sale of the site to ACET, the waiver of development fees by the City, and the provision of backbone infrastructure shall collectively constitute adequate local match for the EDA grant referenced above. 4. The Commission Secretary shall certify the passage of this resolution, enter in the official records of the Commission, and provide a certified copy to ACET and to the EDA. g:fACETresocic071503.doc I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda in a Special Community Improvement Commission meeting assembled on the 22" day of July, 2003, by the following vote to wit: AYES: Commissioners Daysog, Matarrese and Chair Johnson - 3. NOES: Commissioner Kerr — 1. ABSENT: None. ABSTENTIONS: None. IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said Commission this 23rd day of July, 2003. verly Jo Community nt Commission Lara Weisiger, Secretary Community Improvement Commission