1994-05-03 Regular CC MinutesMINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
MAY 3. 1994
The meeting convened at 7:37 p.m., with President Withrow
presiding. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember
Appezzato. Reverend John Parker, First Baptist Church, gave the
invocation.
ROLL CALL -
Present: Councilmembers Appezzato, Arnerich,
Lucas, Roth and President Withrow - 5.
Absent: None.
PROCLAMATIONS AND SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
94-223 Declaration of Recognition and Commendation for the
American Red Cross, Bay Area.
Mayor Withrow read the declaration and presented it to Harry
Hartman, American Red Cross. Mr. Hartman expressed appreciation
for the declaration.
94-224 Proclamation Declaring the week of May 8 - 14, 1994, as
National Preservation Week.
Mayor Withrow read the proclamation and presented it to David
Plummer, Historical Advisory Board and Kathy Williams, Alameda
Victorian Preservation Society. Mr. Plummer expressed appreciation
for the proclamation.
94-225 Proclamation Declaring Wednesday, May 11, 1994, as Day of
the Teacher.
Mayor Withrow read the proclamation and presented it to Linda
Nelson, President, Alameda Education Association.
CONSENT CALENDAR
President Withrow announced Resolution 94-235 concerning ferry
vessel, at the request of a citizen, would be removed from the
Consent Calendar for discussion.
Councilmember Lucas moved approval of the remainder of the Consent
Calendar. Vice Mayor Roth seconded the motion which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk.
*94-226 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of April 19, 1994,
Minutes of the Meeting of Regular City Council
May 3, 1994
and the Special Council Meeting of April 19, 1994. Approved.
*94-227 Report from Chair, Mayor's Fourth of July Parade
Committee, recommending Approval of Route for the Mayor's 19th
Annual Fourth of July Parade. Accepted.
*94-228 Report from Public Works Director recommending Release of
the Maintenance Bond for Tracts 4024, 4025, and 4026 (Costa Brava,
Harbor Bay Isle). Accepted.
*94-229 Report from Public Works Director recommending Award of
Contract to VCI of California for Alameda City Hall Underground
Storage Tank Removal, No. P.W. 02-94-02, and Appropriation of Funds
from the Construction Improvement Fund. Accepted.
*94-230 Report from Finance Director Transmitting Quarterly Sales
Tax Report for period ending March 31, 1994. Accepted.
*94-231 Report from Finance Director recommending Setting Hearing
for Establishing of Proposition 4 Limit for 1994-95. Accepted.
*94-232 Report from Fire Chief regarding SB 1477 - Buildings/
Occupancy Levels. (Councilmember Lucas) Accepted.
*94-233 Resolution No. 12522 "Supporting AB 2742 (Lee)
Regulating Operation of Liquor Stores and Increasing Local
Government's Influence in the Decision Making of the State
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC)." Adopted.
*94-234 Bills certified by the City Manager to be true and
correct, were ratified in the sum of $1,599,398.48.
94-235 Resolution No. 12523 "Authorizing Application for
Spare Ferry Vessel Under Transit Capital Improvement (TCI)
Program." Adopted.
Don Roberts, Alameda, raised questions concerning the purchase of
the vessel, its use, and the operator's and taxpayers' roles
concerning funding.
Councilmember Appezzato expressed various concerns [See City
Manager's responses] about the purchase of the existing Harbor Bay
Maritime [HBM] Ferry as a spare backup ferry vessel.
The City Manager addressed Councilmember Appezzato's and Mr.
Roberts' concerns. The City Manager stated that the Harbor Bay
Ferry Service boat is currently leased for $15,000. per month;
agreements with east and west end ferry operators include a
requirement that they provide for a spare vessel; in the subsidy
the City must pay on the west end ferry service, it is higher
because the City requires the operator provide for a spare vessel;
Minutes of the Meeting of Regular City Council
May 3, 1994
;1-
if the City had its own ferry, the City would be able to negotiate
a smaller subsidy from both Blue & Gold and Harbor Bay operators;
Harbor Bay would have to come up with their own funds to provide
for 50% share; if the boat was sold, the proceeds would be
distributed in proportion to the amount contributed; the new high-
speed ferry boat for the east end has been tested and there are
vibration and noise problems; the boat will be returned if problems
are not corrected; the existing boat could be the regular ferry
boat if we do not get another one; after Harbor Bay's requirement
is over, they do not have to operate the service; if the City
operates the service, funding would come from either a MTC
(Metropolitan Transportation Commission) grant or transportation
funds, such as Measure B; if Harbor Bay discontinues the operation
after the required five years service, the ferry boat would go back
to the owner who is leasing it; and the City would need to
determine whether other ferries would produce a better benefit.
In response to Vice Mayor Roth, the City Manager stated that there
would be an incentive to purchase the Harbor Bay Maritime Ferry
because of the lease purchase agreement.
Responding to Councilman Arnerich, the City Manager stated the City
could terminate the ferry service if HBM "walked away" after the
required years of service.
Councilmember Appezzato questioned what the City would do with an
extra ferry boat if one of the service operators terminated; and
discussed berthing and maintenance responsibilities with the City
Manager.
President Withrow commented that regional and State agencies
consider both ferry services to be a vital part of transportation
of the future and are incorporated in plans for the next 20 years,
also ferries from other San Francisco Bay locations; and an
analysis is being pursued concerning possibly moving freight via
water transportation.
Councilmember Lucas stated she likes the City Manager's future
planning in providing Council with a potential for expanded ferry
service; the Harbor Bay Business Park is not complete and hopefully
there will be more jobs and increased [ferry] usage; the 20-year
plan noted by President Withrow makes sense; and another ferry boat
on hand when needed, is advantageous.
Vice Mayor Roth moved adoption of resolution. Councilmember Lucas
seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
Minutes of the Meeting of Regular City Council
May 3, 1994
AGENDA ITEMS
Actions Related to Base Conversion Process.
94 -236 Status Briefing on Base Conversion Process.
Neil Patrick Sweeney, Alameda, noted newspaper coverage of base
conversion activity, and addressed toxic cleanup of NAS.
At the suggestion of the Project Manager, Council proceeded to the
following agenda item r94 -237, RFPs].
94 -237 Report from the Base Conversion Project Director
recommending Approval of the Request for Proposals (RFP) for
Consultant Activity to Produce the Community's Base Reuse Plan.
The Project Manager provided the background of the RFP; stated the
City is responsible to initiate the RFP; eventually the Reuse
Authority will assume the contract, and explained the RFP envisions
a multi -step process ultimately leading to a community reuse plan.
Mayor Withrow commended the Project Manager and Staff for preparing
a complete well - articulated document and requested that the City
Manager work on the organization chart on page 3.
Vice Mayor Roth stated that he wants the public to be aware there
is opportunity for public input after each step.
Responding to Councilmember Lucas, the Project Manager stated the
federal Office of Economic Adjustment (OEA] requested a team
concept; and he believes a well - recognized lead consultant should
be chosen to lead a team of various consultants, e.g., civil
engineers, transportation- economic -, geotechnical- consultants.
Replying to Councilman Arnerich, the Project Manager stated he met
on this proposal with Dave McKinnon, OEA, who commented on its
completeness, and appeared fully supportive of the process, and
financial need.
President Withrow noted Congressman Ron Dellums stated he has
received indications, as Chairman of Armed Services Committee, that
the President and Administration will back the support.
Councilman Arnerich stated the report is well done; however, he has
concerns about funds coming through from the federal government.
The Project Manager stated this is one of three national pilot
projects recognized by the President and Congress as a model on
base conversion and believes they will stand behind what they have
designated as a model.
Minutes of the Meeting of Regular City Council
May 3, 1994
Councilmember Appezzato complimented the Project Manager on a very
thorough and complete RFP; and moved that Council let the Request
for Proposals for Lead Consultant. Councilman Arnerich seconded
the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
94-238 Resolution No. 12524 "Supporting Legislation for
Recognition of Single Local Reuse Authority AB 3755 (Honeycutt)."
Adopted.
The Project Manager stated it is important to recognize this is
legislation supporting a single local reuse authority that becomes
eligible for various state benefits which are advantageous to the
community we have been requested to testify before the Assembly
Subcommittee next week because we have become recognized by the
formation of our Reuse Authority as a model for other communities,
and our rapid process in forming the Reuse Authority is being
recognized as the existing single entity to carry out the Base
Conversion activity.
Helen Sause, Alameda, Base Reuse Advisory Group [BRAG], spoke in
support of the Bill; stated the BRAG has approved, and urged
support of the concept.
Councilmember Lucas moved adoption of the resolution. Vice Mayor
Roth seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
94-239 Report from the Base Conversion Project Director for the
Base Reuse Advisory Group (BRAG) Recommending Endorsement of ACET
(Alameda Center for Environmental Technologies).
The Project Manager stated the concept of the ACET is a proposal to
expedite development, commercialization and application of new
environmental technologies and policies creating a source of new
businesses and jobs for the region; takes advantage of existing
assets in the region and builds on them; is a small land-use
proposal with potential to foster much job creation; would utilize
10 acres of NAS land to build 113,000 sq. ft. facility(s); and
would have an incubator process to seed out into NAS and become
private companies productive to regional and local economy.
Bruce Kern, Economic Development Advisory Board, Alameda County,
provided an overview of the proposal which involves the University
of California system.
Michael Lakin, ICF Kaiser Engineers, discussed the growth of the
industry, stating President Clinton has made environmental
technologies the Administration's number one technologies for
exportation throughout the world, and is growing almost ten percent
per year in California; and expressed appreciation for BRAG and
City staff.
Minutes of the Meeting of Regular City Council
May 3, 1994
Thomas Gilmorton, Lawrence Livermore Laboratories, gave a slide
presentation put together by Lawrence Laboratories, University of
California, and a number of companies; explained ACET goals e.g.,
to create desirable jobs, enhance, and create new, green
businesses, clean up contaminated land, create environmental
technology marketplace and commercialization center in Alameda;
commented on business lines, e.g., environmental cleanup,
ecological restoration, instruments for monitoring and analysis,
water use and recovery, green manufacturing, greener
transportation; services, e.g., financial assistance, technical
analysis, market-directed technology development, worker training;
and ACET people and organization, e.g., estimated 2,000 new jobs
per year in client firms.
Mr. Lakin stated a 600 billion dollar marketplace is expected by
the end of the century, the current market is perhaps a sixth of
that amount indicating a forecast of growth; stated we need to move
quickly to stay ahead; noted a major portion of DOD [Department of
Defense] budget is going toward environmental management issues as
problems, needs, and marketplace opportunities are recognized.
President Withrow discussed the anticipated 600% growth over the
next five or ten years, and the opportunities for Alameda with Mr.
Lakin.
Helen Sause, Member, BRAG, stated a number of presentations have
been made to BRAG and BRAG Subcommittees; the issue has been
analyzed in depth; BRAG endorsed the concept and has made
recommendations.
Richard Neveln, member of BRAG and East Bay Conversion and
Reinvestment Commission, stated other bases will be closed and
funding will go in that direction; therefore, we must move quickly,
and hiring a marketing specialist to market Alameda is important.
In response to Vice Mayor Roth, Mr. Kern addressed revolving loan
funds; stated success rate of incubated companies is 95%; even if
the base does not close until 1997, the desire is to create jobs
immediately, the market exists and the efforts can go forward.
Replying to Councilmember Lucas concerning competition in other
locations, Mr. Kern stated the University of California and plans
for the Presidio will have a relationship to this center but the
predominance of a major nucleus would center in Alameda; Fortune
magazine identified Alameda County and East Bay as the number one
area in the country for business innovation; we need to capture the
innovation and keep it in the City of Alameda.
Mr. Lakin noted facilities in Santa Barbara, Sacramento and
Seattle; however, they are more specialized, and are more resource
limited.
Minutes of the Meeting of Regular City Council
May 3, 1994
Mr. Kern, in response to Councilmember Lucas stated that the ACET
proposal is to create jobs and he does not see a downside;
appreciates BRAG input and recommendation; and believes we should
move forward.
Councilmember Appezzato inquired if contingency plans exist if the
$6,000,000 being sought is not provided.
Mr. Kern replied we are working with businesses, utilities, and
others and will proceed at some level with or without federal
funds; the Secretary of Defense has stated we are not only a model
but have also demonstrated in the past, the unique ability to
produce new, innovative approaches.
Councilman Arnerich requested Council be provided with a copy of
the article in Fortune Magazine on Alameda County.
Vice Mayor Roth moved to endorse the concept of ACET and the
recommendations of the BRAG as submitted by the Base Conversion
Office. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion.
President Withrow commented ACET is a project suitable to the City
and fits into our role in the next century.
The motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
President Withrow thanked the participants for the presentation.
* * * *
Council recessed at 9:27 p.m. to reconvene at 9:31 p.m.
* * * *
94-240 Report from Councilmember Karin Lucas concerning March,
1994 Restaurant Survey and proposal to amend Alameda's Smoking
Ordinance after a model Smoking Pollution Control Ordinance.
Wilson Westbrook, Alameda youth, stated his family once patronized
two particular restaurants but now patronizes the one that is smoke
free.
Michael Hellman, Alameda, stated he is an attorney specializing in
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) issues, was approached by
Alameda Chapter of American Lung Association questioning if persons
with respiratory disabilities would be covered under the ADA; he
found that respiratory disabilities need to be recognized; and
stated it makes good sense to spare businesses and the City
government from being open to liability.
Paul Owens, Alameda, stated he favors smoke-free ordinance, one
restaurant owner noted business increased after becoming smoke-
free; a friend's daughter died of second-hand smoke; and he does
not believe smoking 5 feet from a doorway is enough distance.
Minutes of the Meeting of Regular City Council
May 3, 1994
r`o
Bill Garvine, Executive Director, Chamber of Commerce, stated the
information in the survey is surprising in its magnitude of support
from business owners; he would like the City to take a step to help
young people understand smoking is not good for them or others.
Don Bergen, Alameda, stated smoking in work places should be
regulated; however, as the issue relates to businesses, it should
be left up to them.
L. Robert Martin, M.D., Alameda, American Cancer Society, stated he
supports the ordinance; the aim is to prevent disease, disability
and death among non-smokers from environmental tobacco smoke.
In response to Councilmember Lucas, Dr. Martin stated the length of
time of exposure, and the density of smoke, proportionately
increases risk; and, concerning children, he noted the danger to
asthmatics; children exposed to environmental tobacco by parents
have an increased amount of bronchitis, pneumonia, middle ear
infection, and hospitalizations; and environmental tobacco is also
suspect with sudden infant death syndrome.
Councilmember Lucas stated she brought this matter on the agenda as
she was impressed with work the Alameda Smoke-free Alliance has
been doing and data collected; a lot of support exists in the
community; the City Attorney will be asked to draft an ordinance
that will comply with the model city ordinance, believes the Fire
Chief will provide input; and moved matter be scheduled when
possible.
Councilman Arnerich stated that he would like a report on how •
establishments like McGee's Bar and Grill will be effected by the
proposed ordinance.
Vice Mayor Roth stated that Sec. 1005.1, Required Distance of
Smoking from Non-smoking Area, really needs to be looked at,
otherwise might as well ban smoking from the public sidewalk.
Councilmember Lucas stated that her motion was to ask the City
Attorney to draft an ordinance that is based on the model ordinance
with [consideration of] the requests made tonight.
Councilmember Arnerich seconded the motion which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
94-241 Presentation by Alameda County Economic Development
Advisory Board's [EDAB] Red Tape Round Table on Its Report, "From
Red Tape to Blue Ribbons: How to Deliver Award Winning Service."
Bill Garvine, Chamber of Commerce, stated he would like to offer
the Chamber's endorsement of the concept and its sincere hope that
we can continue developing customer-driven attitudes in municipal
Minutes of the Meeting of Regular City Council
May 3, 1994
government in our City.
Vice Mayor Roth moved to accept report. Councilman Arnerich
seconded the motion.
Councilman Appezzato stated he will support it [motion]; and
commented red tape is usually created to offset excesses; laws,
regulations and procedures are created to protect citizens from the
excesses of the few, but sometimes becomes cumbersome and
bureaucratic; we should get rid of red tape but be cautious we do
not harm majority of population. Motion carried - 5 ayes.
The Chief Building Inspector stated Alameda staff support the
concept of eliminating red tape; he served on the EDAB Red Tape
Round Table and believes the report is a good one; introduced
Committee Member Mark Milani.
Mark Milani, Round Table Committee, EDAB, stated economy in Alameda
County has changed; investments are being made elsewhere and jobs
are leaving; individuals from Alameda County's public and private
sectors came together to work toward the solution and are dedicated
to 1) eliminating red tape, 2) improving the business climate, and
3) pursuing economic stability for Alameda County; explained the
focus was on the process, not regulations per se; the mission
statement, and the model for solutions developed; EDAB has
requested follow up report to Board of Supervisors in mid-December
and the Committee would like to include the City's progress at that
time.
94-242a Public Hearing to consider a proposed Negative
Declaration, IS 91-332, and a General Plan Amendment, Zoning
Ordinance Amendment, and Rezoning, GPA/ZA/R 91-332, to allow
structures outboard of the Pier and Bulkhead Line in the Alameda
Estuary, in the area bounded by the City limits on the North and
West, Miller-Sweeney Bridge on the East, and Pier and Bulkhead line
on the South; and
[See 94-242e for Council action.]
94-242b Resolution No. 12525 "Adopting Negative Declaration, IS
91-332, for a General Plan Amendment, Zoning Ordinance Amendment,
and Rezoning, GPA/ZA/R 91-332, to allow Structures Outboard of the
Pier and Bulkhead Line in the Alameda Estuary, in the Area Bounded
by the Mouth of the Estuary on the West, City Limits on the North,
Miller-Sweeney Bridge on the East, and Pier and Bulkhead Line on
the South." Adopted.
[See 94-242e for Council action.]
94-242c Resolution No. 12526 "Approving General Plan Text and
Map Amendment, GPA 91-332, in the Area Bounded by the Mouth of the
Minutes of the Meeting of Regular City Council
May 3, 1994
Estuary on the West, City Limits on the North, Miller-Sweeney
Bridge on the East, and Pier and Bulkhead Line on the South."
Adopted.
[See 94-242e for Council action.)
94-242d Ordinance No. , N.S. "Amending the Alameda
Municipal Code to Establish the "E" Estuary District as Subsection
30-4.21 of Article I (Zoning Districts and Regulations), Chapter
XXX (Development Regulations)." Introduced.
[See 94-242e for Council action.]
94-242e Ordinance No. , N.S. "Reclassifying and Rezoning
Certain Properties within the City of Alameda by amending Zoning
Ordinance No. 1277 in the Area Bounded by the Mouth of the Estuary
on the West, City Limits on the North, Miller-Sweeney Bridge on the
East, and Pier and Bulkhead Line on the South." Introduced.
Charles Neal, Alameda, discussed his efforts to open a business in
Alameda; stated that because he is 192' to the Estuary, a Use
Permit is required; and requested feedback on how to start a
business in Alameda without having to wait a half year to open his
doors.
The Planning Director responded that often a Use Permit can be
accomplished more quickly, but the Department is heading into its
high season; and discussed Council's recent action concerning
amending the Zoning Ordinance to allow pet stores in C-1 zone and
providing the safeguard of Use Permits.
Councilman Arnerich stated the City needs to look at these cases on
a one-to-one basis, and see what can be done regarding Mr. Neal's
inquiry.
Vice Mayor Roth moved adoption of the Negative Declaration [94-
242b], approve the General Plan Amendment [94-242c], approve the
ordinances r94-242d] and [94-242e1 with the exception that Page 2,
paragraph (a), under 3. Findings, should be deleted from the first
ordinance [...to Establish the "E" Estuary District . . .].
Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
94-243 Report from Public Works Director on Interim Household
Hazardous Waste Collection Program and Authorization for 50%
Funding Match.
Councilman Arnerich moved to accept report and recommendation.
Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
Minutes of the Meeting of Regular City Council
May 3, 1994
94 -244 Report from Community Development Director regarding
Status of Chamber Ad Hoc Committee, Center for Advanced Technology.
(Councilmember Appezzato)
William Garvine, Chamber of Commerce, stated he is present to
answer any questions Council may have.
Councilmember Appezzato stated that only the concept was approved;
as Council has not approved the proposal, it should be kept
informed of project before giving formal approval; he requested
names of representatives of groups named in the report, and he
concurs the land will be sold, leased or given to the City in some
manner; he knows an option that a non - profit corporation oversee
the land is being looked at, and he would like the benefits and
disadvantages of the City having control and overseeing the use of
the land; and where we are in regards to a business plan and a
budget.
Mr. Garvine stated a presentation will be made tomorrow night [May
4, 1994] to the Economic Development Commission [EDC] that will
center on information in report to Council; his projection is that
a comprehensive business plan and budget will be available by the
EDC's June 1, 1994 meeting, and a report will be forwarded; he will
be available at the first Council meeting in June to answer any
questions Council may have; and identified individuals representing
groups named in the report.
President Withrow commended the Chamber of Commerce and Mr. Garvine
specifically for his initiative and professionalism in pursuing
this project; and he has heard strong words of support throughout
the City.
Mr. Garvine stated in the last two days, private partnerships in
major corporations have been explored which have a regional
economic development interest.
Councilmember Appezzato moved acceptance of the report. Vice Mayor
Roth seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
94 -245 Resolution No. 12527 "Accepting Gifts of Real Property
and Income Under the Will of Jeanette B. Meyers." Adopted.
Councilmember Lucas stated she will abstain because of a conflict
of interest, and stepped down from the dais.
Don Bergen, Alameda stated he does not believe the estate will be
very beneficial to the City, and it should have been left to the
Museum.
Councilman Arnerich stated he disagrees with Mr. Bergen; the Meyers
have left something that will be of value to this City; some
Minutes of the Meeting of Regular City Council
May 3, 1994
expenditures will be made, he believes the plan for the estate is
viable; and moved to accept recommendation. Councilmember
Appezzato seconded the motion which carried by the following voice
vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Appezzato, Arnerich, Roth and
President Withrow - 4. Nayes: None. Absent: None. Abstentions:
Councilmember Lucas - 1.
Councilmember Lucas returned to the dais.
94-246 Written Communication from Dorothy M. Ramsey and "Krusi
Park Neighbors" opposing the building of an underground waste water
storage basin at Krusi Park.
The Assistant City Manager stated the proposed facility is a one-
million gallon underwater tank which will hold waste water; the
City has been given a cease and desist order from allowing
untreated sewage to back up in various locations and the tank will
take care of that problem; a community meeting with neighbors, and
meetings with individuals who raised issues have been held; two
staff members of East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) are
present to answer Council questions: Judith Parker, Engineer, and
Dean Digiovanni, Project Manager.
In response to Vice Mayor Roth, the Assistant City Manager stated
the project is to greatly expand the capacity of Pumping Station C;
heavy rainfall, several days per year, infiltrates the sewer
system; and explained how the tank would alleviate that problem.
Dorothy Ramsey, Alameda, stated she appreciated the Assistant City
Manager and the EBMUD representatives discussing matter with
neighbors; however, she and neighbors do not want the tank in Krusi
Park; noted trucks working on project would be a hazard for
children crossing street and could cause damage to homes due to
vibrations.
* * * *
Vice Mayor Roth moved to extend the meeting past 11:00 p.m.
Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
* * * *
Councilmember Appezzato requested EBMUD representative address
issues Mrs. Ramsey raised.
Ms. Parker explained the project, and addressed the following
issues: correction of the waste water overflow in wet weather; use
of liquid chlorine; truck routes, reduction of vibration in the
area, potential damage to houses through possible settling; the
District's offer to videotape homes to verify conditions prior to
construction in order to solve any claim that may arise;
minimalization of hazard on the construction site by, e.g.,
fencing, traffic control, nighttime security.
Minutes of the Meeting of Regular City Council
May 3, 1994
Councilmember Lucas requested that an EBMUD hot-line be established
for the neighbors.
Arnerich stated that videotaping should be EBMUD's responsibility,
questioned the construction timeline; commented EBMUD must get
truck drivers to comply with appropriate routes; and requested
information regarding above-ground storage area.
Vice Mayor Roth stated, to put the matter into perspective, the
tank may be a little deeper but it is smaller than an Olympic size
pool; and noted former backup from sewers in residents' homes will
be corrected.
Vice Mayor Roth moved acceptance of the report. Councilmember Lucas
seconded the motion.
In response to Councilmember Lucas, Mr. Digiovanni stated a truck
route has been determined and coordinated with City Staff.
Councilman Arnerich stated [Council should] go with the motion and
the second with the proviso that the questions brought up tonight
will be addressed by the staff of EBMUD in conjunction with the
Assistant City Manager.
The motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
94-247 Written Communication from W. Graham Claytor, Alameda,
proposing the historic name "Encinal" for the new Alameda/Oakland
Ferry.
Don Bergen, Alameda, discussed the $42,000 cost to change the name
of the ferry.
Mr. Claytor suggested contracting locally for a lower price to
rename the ferry vessel, and in response to Vice Mayor Roth, Mr.
Claytor stated if the price is $1,000 or $2,000, perhaps the funds
could be raised.
Edward Printz, Alameda, stated there is a great deal of community
support for the name change, and he would ask investigation be done
to see if the change can be made for a reasonable cost.
Councilman Arnerich stated he believed the naming of the vessel
would come to Council as street names do for approval.
Mayor Withrow concurred with Councilman Arnerich.
Councilman Arnerich stated the name "Encinal" would have been
appropriate but we cannot accept the costs, perhaps staff could
locate sign painters in Alameda that would volunteer to perform the
work; and moved to accept the [Bay Breeze) name. Councilmember
Minutes of the Meeting of Regular City Council
May 3, 1994
Lucas seconded the motion.
Councilmember Appezzato stated perhaps a change in name can be made
when the boat is refurbished in one, two or three years, if
reasonable [cost].
President Withrow agreed and stated he would have supported the
name "Encinal" if it had been a reasonable price.
The motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS. NON-AGENDA
94-248 Gordon Christopherson, Alameda discussed various issues
concerning 2801-2803 Marina Drive, e.g., uncollected garbage, Stop
Work Order, building permits, and requested Council take another
look at site plans.
94-249 Don Bergen, Alameda, stated more police are needed;
people would rather have more police and fire protection than City
expenditures on items such as boat renaming.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
94-250 Councilmember Lucas requested report on buildings which
are abandoned and uninsured, such as the silver building which
contributed to the size of the recent fire.
ADJOURNMENT
President Withrow adjourned the meeting at 11:36 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
cute
Diane B. Felsch, CMC
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted 72 hours in advance.
Minutes of the Meeting of Regular City Council
May 3, 1994