1994-11-15 Regular CC MinutesMINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 15, 1994
The meeting convened at 7:30 p.m. with President Withrow presiding.
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Appezzato.
Venerable Wilfred Hodgkin, Archdeacon, Episcopal Diocese of
California, gave the invocation.
ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Appezzato, Arnerich, Roth
and President Withrow - 4.
Absent: Councilmember Lucas - 1.
PROCLAMATIONS AND SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
None.
CONSENT CALENDAR
At the request of the public, reports (94-686) regarding Bay Farm
Island Bicycle Bridge, and (94-687) concerning subdivision
improvements, were removed from the Consent Calendar for
discussion.
Councilman Arnerich moved approval of the remainder of the Consent
Calendar. Councilmember Appezzato seconded the motion which
carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Lucas absent]
Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk.
*94-669 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of November 1,
1994. Approved.
*94-670 Status Report from Assistant City Manager on EBMUD Wet
Weather Storage Basin Project in Krusi Park. Accepted.
*94-671 Report from City Attorney renewing Workers' Compensation
Third Party Administrator Contract with Gregory Bragg & Associates.
Accepted.
*94-672 Report from Public Works Director recommending rejection
of all bids for Signalization and Channelization Improvements at
Atlantic Avenue and Main Street Project, No. P.W. 05-94-11, and
authorization to rebid. Accepted.
*94-673 Report from Public Works Director recommending rejection
of all bids for Alameda Main Street Ferry Terminal Barge
Rehabilitation Project, No. P.W. 08-94-15, and authorization to
rebid. Accepted.
Regular Meeting. Alameda City Council
November 15, 1994
6
*94-674 Report from Public Works Director recommending acceptance
of improvements and release of Certificate of Deposit for Tract
5603 (Otis Drive and Willow Street). Accepted.
*94-675 Status Report from Public Works Director on funding
proposals for maintenance and operation of the Estuary Bridges.
(Councilmember Appezzato) Accepted.
*94-676 Report from Finance Director recommending adoption of
specifications and calling for bids for computer equipment,
including software Bid No. 94-DP-01. Accepted.
*94-677 Report from Finance Director transmitting Investment
Portfolio for period ending October 31, 1994. Accepted.
*94-678 Report from Chief of Police recommending reimbursement
for travel expenses to Washington, D.C., October 11, 12, 1994.
Accepted.
*94-679 Resolution No. 12584 "Authorizing Execution of State-
Local Transportation Partnership Program (SB300) Agreement, No.
SLTPP-5014 and Program Supplement No. 004, (Repair and Resurfacing
of Certain Streets, Phase 16)." Adopted.
*94-680 Resolution No. 12585 "Approving Amendment to
Resolution Numbers 11880, 11967, and 11941, and Amendment to
Subdivision Agreements for Tracts 6111, 6147, and 6198 Substituting
Greystone Homes, Inc." for Harbor Bay Village V Associates."
Adopted.
*94-681 Resolution No. 12586 "Opposing the State's
Appropriation of any Additional Local Revenues." Adopted.
*94-682 Ordinance No. . N.S. "Amending the Community
Improvement Plan for the Business and Waterfront Improvement
Project." Introduced.
*94-683 Ordinance No. N.S. "Amending the Plan of the West
End Community Improvement Project." Introduced.
*94-684 Ordinance No. • N.S. "Approving Amendment to Lease
Agreement Between the Alameda Unified School District, as Lessor,
and the City of Alameda, as Lessee for Premises Located at 1525 Bay
Street Used as Mastick Senior Center." Introduced.
*94-685 Bills, certified by the City Manager to be true and
correct were ratified in the sum of $1,915,742.42.
94-686 Report from Public Works Director recommending award of
contract to Fletcher General Construction for Bay Farm Island
Bicycle Bridge, Part B, Bascule Span, No. P.W. 01-92-01 [Part B].
Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council
November 15, 1994
Charles Tillman, Alameda, requested information regarding what has
transpired concerning bicycle bridge construction.
Gerhard Degemann, Alameda, inquired if the bridge's blue color will
remain, and if not, what the color will be.
The Public Works Director stated the project, from its inception,
has been monitored by Caltrans who will own and maintain the
bridge; Caltrans approved the color presented by the bridge
designer.
Mr. Degemann stated he believes the City of Alameda should have had
some input, not just Caltrans.
Councilman Arnerich stated the bicycle bridge was to be erected by
Caltrans, attached to the present bridge, for approximately
$1,400,000, and approval was given by the City; Caltrans, because
the mechanism on the existing bridge would not sustain the weight
of the bike bridge, and on the advice of their engineers, built a
separate [bike] bridge, resulting in escalation of cost to about
$2,800,000; the color blue has been discussed, alternatives will be
looked at if the bridge can be repainted, but it would possibly
need to be at City's cost.
At the request of President Withrow, the City Manager stated that
the funding source for the bridge is the State; no City General
Fund money is used for the project; and a sign could be placed on
the bridge concerning funding source.
Mr. Tillman stated wherever the money comes from, it still comes
from the taxpayers.
President Withrow stated that the funds were originally scheduled
for Riverside County bicycle trails; he went to the California
Transportation Commission, San Diego, and acquired the funding for
Alameda.
The City Manager noted the bridge was constructed at the request of
residents who were concerned about the safety of their children.
Councilman Arnerich moved acceptance of the report [and
recommendation]. Councilmember Appezzato seconded the motion which
carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Lucas absent]
94-687 Report from Public Works Director recommending acceptance
of a portion of the subdivision improvements and a reduction of
bond from $1,697,000 to $1,011,370 for Tract 6226 (Harbor Bay Isle
Village 5, Neighborhood A).]
Councilman Arnerich noted that the staff report, should be
corrected to read Tract 6226 on page one, second paragraph.
Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council
November 15, 1994
o
b t.0
Councilman Arnerich moved the recommendation. Councilmember
Appezzato seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote
- 4. [Lucas second]
AGENDA ITEMS
94-688 Public Hearing to consider allowing the Port of Oakland
to use Tax-Exempt Bonds for the portion of their dredging project
within Alameda. (Continued from Council Meeting of November 1,
1994.)
The City Manager stated staff talked to the Port regarding subject,
and requested the hearing be held over again because the Port is
not yet ready to sign the Indemnification Agreement the City is
requesting.
Councilmember Appezzato so moved [continuance to the next meeting].
Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 4. [Lucas absent].
94-689 Public Hearing to consider Resolution No. 12587 Declaring
Sources of Infiltration and Inflow from Storm Water on Private
Property Located in Sanitary Sewer Basins LA1A and 91D to be a
Public Nuisance; Ordering the Abatement of said Nuisances, and
Authorizing the City Engineer to Take the Necessary Action to
Correct Same.
President Withrow announced that there were no speakers, and
declared the public portion of the hearing opened and closed.
The Public Works Director stated that, since publication of the
staff report, two property owners have complied with rules and
finished their work; therefore, 709 Pacific Avenue and 630 Lincoln
Avenue will be removed from Appendix A of the resolution; and
confirmed that certified letters were sent to property owners on
the list, notifying them of the Public Hearing.
Councilmember Appezzato moved the recommendation [to adopt the
resolution]. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which carried
by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Lucas absent]
94-690 Public Hearing to consider Ordinance No. . N.S.
"Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Subsection 8-7.9
(Heavy Commercial Vehicles) of Section 8-7 (Parking Prohibitions)
of Chapter VIII (Traffic and Motor Vehicles)."
The public portion of the hearing was opened.
Richard Archuleta, Alameda, stated he does not believe tow trucks
should be included with large semi-trucks because they are not a
nuisance; he has been in business three years, and does not believe
Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council
November 15, 1994
3 6
the ordinance should be introduced.
Responding to President Withrow, Mr. Archuleta stated that he is
from Rich's Towing.
Councilman Arnerich stated the reason for the proposed amendment is
tow truck owners receive calls to go out in the middle of the night
and disturb neighbors' sleep; therefore, the trucks should be kept
in another area where they will not cause disturbance.
Vice Mayor Roth inquired if Mr. Archuleta has a business license,
and if his business is listed as a home occupation.
Mr. Archuleta replied affirmatively, and that he lives on State
Highway 61, and he obtained a Use Permit and a variance.
The Planning Director stated an application for a home occupation
was received and denied; she is not aware of a use permit or a
variance.
Christine Servente, Alameda, stated she lives across the street
from a towing service, owner goes in and out at all hours of the
night with a diesel truck; left a car on the street for about six
months, and she has worked with Planning Board for about a year and
a half to get [tow truck owner with All City Towing] out of [that
location].
The public portion of the hearing was closed.
Responding to Councilmember Appezzato's request, the City Manager
confirmed problems noted by Ms. Servente occurring on Lincoln
Avenue, in 2600 block; also, double parking of vehicles, repetitive
noise from trucks going out and returning to drop off vehicles on
streets, instead of using storage yards; and staff's opinion is
that operation of such businesses would be better in a properly
zoned district.
Councilman Arnerich moved to accept the Planning Department
recommendation [to introduce ordinance to define tow truck as heavy
commercial vehicle]. Vice Mayor Roth seconded the motion which
carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Lucas absent]
94-691 Report from Chair, Golf Commission, recommending Council
accept conceptual drawing and cost estimates, retain the
architectural firm of HGHB to develop final plans and
specifications and bid documents for new clubhouse/driving range,
and approve financing plan.
Ed Trevethan, Member, Golf Commission, urged Council accept the
conceptual drawings; stated the golf course needs the facilities;
the NAS Officers Club could be used for banquets and other than
Regular Meeting, Ahmeda City Council
November 15, 1994
that, the drawings are very good.
Bob Blanchard, Alameda, stated the Golf Course facility is outdated
and deteriorated, and strongly urged Council accept the
Commission's recommendation to go ahead with facilities because the
investment will have a high return.
Joe Williams, Alameda, stated he endorses new facilities not only
for aesthetic appeal but overall efficiency; Navy Officers' Club
should not be viewed as City banquet facility; he concurs funding
should come from golfers; however, the City receives $350,000 per
year for the General Fund and perhaps could forego $100,000 to
offset money to be raised from golfers.
Shirl Ames, Alameda, stated many public hearings on matter have
been held; improvements are very important; as City has over 700
tournaments, a banquet facility is needed, would create revenue,
and improvements should be first-class.
Don Goodhue, Principal Architect, HGHB, reviewed the tasks given by
the Golf Commission; stated key issues to be resolved are: 1)
driving range upgrade, expansion and improvements; 2) control of
Par 3 Course from the range office; 3) expansion of food service
capability; 4) substantial expansion of parking; 5) an enlarged
pro-shop, sized for high-volume golf operation; 6) cart storage
integration with complex; and finally, enhancement of complex by a
suitable approach and entry.
Damien Pascuzzo, Office of Robert Muir Graves, golf course
architects responsible for driving range, reviewed key points of
the range, utilizing diagrams on display: 1) practice facility, 2)
coordination of facility with buildings in complex, 3)
accommodation of increased parking; and noted that features of new
practice facility will include Norma Arnerich Training Facility,
practice bunker; increased screening; nightlighting; artificial
turf.
Councilman Arnerich discussed, with Mr. Damien, moving the driving
range resulting in a gain in parking space; nightlights, to be on
poles and at ground level; and drainage of turf.
Vice Mayor Roth questioned Mr. Goodhue who confirmed proposal for
146 additional parking spaces, and a total of 504 spaces.
Mr. Goodhue reviewed the visual aspects of the site plan, the
expanded parking lot, new entryway which brings golfers in at a
central entrance point; and pointed out various buildings and
features on displayed diagrams, and access for the disabled.
Councilmember Appezzato inquired if Council approves the concept,
plans and specifications, could Mr. Goodhue come back to Council
Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council
November 15, 1994
with entire project in stages and costs attendant thereto.
Mr. Goodhue replied the firm often does projects in stages; soil
condition at the site makes that difficult as all the buildings
must be on piles; the foundation condition precludes the building
being done in two phases; however, work can be done in stages
although the project would become more expensive; and a cost
comparison can be provided.
In response to Vice Mayor Roth, Mr. Goodhue stated that, during
construction, temporary facilities will be required.
Councilman Arnerich stated a good presentation has been given, and
discussed fees with the Assistant City Manager.
Charles Tillman, Alameda, stated he is impressed with architects'
presentation; the project is excellent; his concern is proposed
bond and $500,000 debt service over 30 years; adequate money is
available to put in the driving range; he would like the City to do
one portion, and money generated from the golf course would
complete the project financially in much less than 30 years.
Rick Stone, Alameda, Chair, Golf Commission, stated 18 months were
spent on project; the golf course is a gem for the City, needs
enhancement and the project would accomplish that; the complex
would be inviting to individuals from businesses and industry; and
urged Council consider the project seriously and favorably.
Paul Aragon, Alameda, stated Council requested Commission explore
construction of new facilities and hopes Council will follow
through; he requested rate increases in the immediate future be
committed to golf course improvements; stated he collected 56
signatures requesting future green fee increases be applied to new
facilities; and submitted petition to Council.
Robert Carlson, Alameda, agreed with Councilmember Appezzato that
the project should be done in stages; the Golf Course Enterprise
Fund can pay for the project in stages; instead of going into the
General Fund, the money should be put back where it belongs.
Cal Santare, Alameda, Member, Golf Commission, suggested an option
including making driving range improvements using current funds;
stated, by June 1996, estimated Enterprise Fund surplus would be
$500,000 without raising green fees, and at that time, clubhouse
and banquet hall needs could be assessed.
Dr. Kay Takeoka, Alameda, stated Mr. Santare spoke of everything he
had in mind; and the proposed indebtedness is unconscionable.
Gerhard Degemann, Alameda, stated he understands the bond will be
reduced by green fees; when changes are made, architects' fees
Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council
November 15, 1994
7
increase; City and architects should determine fee in advance, so
that the project can be completed and not abandoned due to lack of
funds.
Fred Lietz, Alameda, stated good points exist on both sides of
issue; he does not agree with people who do not like City taking
money out of golf course, as long as the course can sustain itself;
only the capital improvements directed to be done by end of fiscal
year, driving range, and possibly moving cart barn closer to pro-
shop to save employee cost, are necessary; he would like proposed
concept but does not need it.
Councilman Arnerich stated this project is workable; he has always
believed monies from golf course should be used for betterment of
the course; through the recessionary times, when the Governor has
taken over $3,500,000 of City money, due to expert financial work
of Council and administration, City has done very well and he will
be firm on this matter.
Vice Mayor Roth stated his concerns are 1) a good golf course is
needed; 2) the course should produce revenue for City to use in
other ways; and to do that, the golf course would need competitive
edge on surrounding courses; the course has a good layout and low
prices, but lacks capital improvements to be strongly competitive;
if the project is done, fees could be raised and still be
competitive, and City would have additional revenue to use in
General Fund.
Vice Mayor Roth moved the recommendation.
Councilmember Appezzato stated these are still difficult economic
times; he will probably support the concept; Mr. Santare's comments
should be reviewed by Finance Department and brought back if valid;
plans and specifications, bid documents and cost comparisons should
come back as an entire project and in stages; he would like to go
ahead and vote on out-of-town residents fee increases and delay
recommendation on Alameda residents until report comes back; agrees
that Enterprise Fund should provide revenue to City; he will later
request City Manager bring back a report to place NAS in a
redevelopment zone; the Golf Commission should look at the Naval
Air Station Officers' Club; and he opposes resident fee increase at
this time.
Vice Mayor Roth stated he had no problem eliminating resident fee
increases.
Councilmember Appezzato stated the sloughs need to be worked on,
the cart paths need paving and he would like to see curbs put in so
golf carts do not go up on the fairways, and lakes need rip-rap;
making a quality golf course playable is important.
Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council
November 15, 1994
Councilman Arnerich stated he does not object to increasing non-
resident fees.
Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion.
President Withrow recommended that when report comes back to
Council, a business plan be developed; and when considering
unfunded capital projects, look at golf course investments in that
context, and prioritize same.
Councilman Arnerich stated he would like new Council to recognize
that, while the golf course is a money-making operation, the funds
are not unending, and that the City will refrain for a period of
time from taking more monies away from Enterprise Fund.
The motion was carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Lucas absent]
* * * *
President Withrow announced Council would recess and reconvene at
9:45 p.m.
* * * *
94-692 Report from Assistant City Manager recommending
modifications to the existing bridge-structure between the Carnegie
and Children's Libraries to allow installation of a three-way lift
to provide disabled access to both libraries.
Don Bergen, Alameda, stated whatever is done, should be compatible
with any addition to library; and presented drawing to Council
showing a ramp he proposed could be attached to Carnegie Building
and retained when building is improved.
Archie Waterbury, President, Library Board, stated the Board has
not had opportunity to meet on this item; he believes the
recommendation of Assistant City Manager is the way to proceed; the
work can be done quickly and is least expensive proposal; the Board
meets in mid-December, or if Council wishes, could call a special
meeting.
Wil Garfinkle, Alameda, stated ramp should be on east side of
Carnegie Building along Oak Street for easier access for disabled
and more convenience for disabled parking; submitted and described
drawing he made of ramp, noted an easement would not be required as
on west side, would be considerably less costly, and if project is
accelerated, time to construct could be brought under 8 weeks, and
a ramp for West End library should be considered.
David Plummer, Alameda, believes architects' sketches are hasty; he
does not want to see Children's Library come down, would like to
see architect spend more time on Alternate 4 which would be
permanent.
Councilmember Appezzato stated the least expensive way would be the
Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council
November 15, 1994
6
option presented by Mr. Garfinkle, which is probably closest to
Alternate 3; if the Carnegie Building is used for a library, the
money spent will not be lost; elevator would remain part of new,
rebuilt, Carnegie Library; the Children's Library would need to go
in order to build the lift; if we can come to a conclusion, and the
Library Board can help with that, then probably Alternate 4 is the
most economical way to go; it will cost more but the money will not
be lost; the elevator will stay and connect to the expansion; if
Council is not prepared, then he is leaning toward Alternate 3
which is more closely related to what Mr. Garfinkle presented.
Councilman Arnerich requested Mr. Bergen's sketch; discussed, with
Mr. Garfinkle, the ratio of landings necessary per feet of rise of
the ramp, materials required; and stated a simple wooden ramp could
be used.
The City Manager stated other things need to be done inside of the
building for accessibility; easement would be required if ramp was
build on the west side of the building.
Mr. Garfinkle stated it should be understood that Alternate 4
cannot be implemented unless the Children's Library is removed;
also, alternate 4 requires a minimum of 19 weeks.
Vice Mayor Roth clarified costs include widening doors and aisles,
and a bathroom for disabled; perhaps a breakdown of figures, in
component costs, should be brought back at next meeting.
The City Manager requested Council to instruct staff how to
proceed, as City has a deadline, and staff will return with least
expensive approach; Alternate 4 is a decision to proceed on this
site as a library for the future, as once that much money is
committed, turning to another alternative becomes difficult.
Vice Mayor Roth further discussed alternatives with the City
Manager.
The City Manager noted most of Alternate 4's modifications would be
used in a new facility; and in reply to Vice Mayor Roth, stated he
could accept a motion for Alternate 1 with possibility of putting
ramp on east side, and compare costs as to whichever is more cost
effective.
Councilman Arnerich discussed need of cost comparison and detail
and moved approval of Alternate 4.
Responding to President Withrow, the City Manager stated the monies
for Alternate 4 would be borrowed from General Fund and repaid by
Library Construction Fund.
Councilman Arnerich inquired, if the Linoaks Motel is sold, can
Regular Mceting, Alameda City Council
November 15, 1994
t
repayment to the General Fund be made from sale; and City Manager
responded that one million dollars of [sale] monies belongs to the
Library Fund.
Councilmember Appezzato stated if Council goes ahead with Alternate
4, Council is committing to Carnegie Building as new library: he is
prepared to go forward but would like to hear from the Library
Board in a day or two on their approval, their review, and where to
temporarily place the new Children's Library.
The City Manager noted Alternate 4 will not meet January 26
timeframe.
Councilman Arnerich stated he does not agree Alternate 4 is a
commitment to the Carnegie; and going with Alternate 4 would not be
a commitment on his part.
Councilmember Appezzato replied, if there is no commitment to the
Carnegie Library, there is no reason to put a half million dollars
into the elevator and Council should go with less expensive
alternative.
President Withrow stated he concurs with Councilmember Appezzato
that it does not make sense to put a half million dollars into a
building if we do not use the building.
Vice Mayor Roth moved Option 1 or ramp on east side, whichever is
least expensive; believes architect's fee could be reduced.
President Withrow stated whatever motion is made he believes should
be subject to concurrence of Library Board, and if the Board takes
exception with Council, he will call a special meeting to resolve
any differences.
Vice Mayor Roth included that into his motion.
Councilman Arnerich agreed.
Gerhard Degemann, Alameda, stated the old Post Office building has
a ramp that was inexpensive; and City could hire professional
estimator, which would be less expensive than architect.
Vice Mayor Roth clarified motion is for Alternate 1 [an enclosed
structure with a single three-way lift] or a ramp on east side,
whichever is more cost effective; present to Library Board and if
they do not agree, call for Special Council Meeting as a courtesy
to the Board.
Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion and stated he agrees with
Mr. Degemann's comment on estimators.
Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council
November 15, 1994
7
The motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Lucas absent]
94-693 Report from Public Works Director recommending
appropriation of funds, selection of locations for temporary City
Hall facilities, and authorization for the City Manager to apply
for and/or enter into negotiations for leasing of various sites.
Wil Garfinkle, Alameda, submitted a sketch of the front of City
Hall and suggested that on the west side of the main entrance to
the building, an elevator be installed that would extend to the
second and third floors with ramps to respective entrances.
Richard King, Park Street Business Association, stated that keeping
[temporary] City Hall and City employees in this [business]
District, would be in the best interest of the City, and presented
petition stating same; noted perhaps Odd Fellows Hall could be
utilized.
Alan Downey, International Order of Odd Fellows [I.O.O.F.]
representative, stated he came to make Council aware that the
organization's building at Park and Santa Clara is available and
that the organization is sincerely interested and is open to
negotiation.
Responding to Vice Mayor Roth, Mr. Downey noted square footage
available [10-12,000 sq.ft.], and with Councilmember Appezzato, Mr.
Downey discussed access for disabled.
Neil Sweeney, Alameda, noted local newspapers have been reporting
on the matter and information should continually be provided them.
Councilmember Appezzato stated Jessica Persoff, former Planning
Board member, suggested considering the Alameda High School, East
Wing, as a potential site, and Councilman Arnerich was also looking
into it; he [Appezzato] has toured the facility, and possibly the
ground floor, and perhaps upper floors, can be used; the cost may
be high but any money put into the school would be a benefit to
taxpayers; perhaps City and School District could both contribute
or City might get free rent if City renovates to School District's
specifications.
The City Manager stated staff has looked at about 27 sites, listed
sites, benefits and disadvantages of each site; staff only looked
at East Wing today, the School District vacated it because they
were requesting State approval to upgrade facility for adult
school; he does not know why the adult school has not been put in;
the Superintendent of Schools stated if City wants facility and is
willing to spend money, he could take that before the Board; a lot
of work needs to be done, and building is not accessible to the
disabled, nor does it have elevators, only one restroom on first
floor and is not accessible; has problems with parking; and the
Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council
November 15, 1994
City could not move in by January 26th; probably only the first
floor should be used; phone and data lines must be installed; the
cost for upgrading only the first floor would probably be $400,000
- $40.00 per square foot.
Responding to Mayor Withrow, the City Manager stated about 40,000
square feet are needed; staff would need to be distributed to other
places; and comparing to Building 6 at the Supply Center Alameda
Annex, both are old buildings, both need about $5- or $600,000 to
do the work; however, Building 6 would accommodate all City staff;
has approximately 65- to 75,000 square feet on one floor; and the
building can probably can be reused.
President Withrow stated if Building 6 option is chosen, leaving
there and coming back to this [current City Hall] facility when
refurbished, Building 6 could be leased out to recover cost of
investment put into it.
President Withrow clarified City staff would be in one place where
the City Manager could manage employees.
The City Manager replied that would be advantageous not only for
staff but for the public, as the public comes to City Hall and
usually goes to a number of offices; having staff distributed is
advantageous for the merchants.
President Withrow stated a bus goes to the Supply Center every half
hour, and more frequently during commuter time.
The City Manager stated public transportation should not be an
issue.
President Withrow noted approximately 750 parking spaces are
available.
The City Manager stated Building 6 is the staff recommendation.
* * * *
Councilman Arnerich moved Council extend the meeting past 11:00
p.m. Vice Mayor Roth seconded the motion which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 4.
* * * *
Vice Mayor Roth inquired about the need for seismic safety in the
East Wing of the High School.
The City Manager stated, the East Wing meets the City ordinance but
it does not meet requirement for occupancy by students.
Vice Mayor Roth stated one of his concerns is that he does not
believe City Hall can be occupied again after only 18 months; he
believes the time will be three to five years; and he favors
Building 6 because there would be no rent; the building could
Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council
November 15, 1994
[later] be rented or leased; however, if it is torn down, the cost
is still cheaper.
Councilman Arnerich stated he believes there are other
possibilities, that Park and Webster Streets have places available;
Building 6 is a cumbersome place to go to; Vice Mayor Roth is
correct that [renovation will take] more than 18 months; believes
satellite offices can be found in town; perhaps Health Department
Offices can be looked at; he would like every effort made; he would
like Alameda High School first floor but there is not enough room,
and additional sites could be found.
Vice Mayor Roth stated the City would be fixing everyone's
buildings and when City Hall is done, that money [spent] will be
gone.
President Withrow stated Building 6 is a dollar a year and he likes
that price; he likes the idea of putting money into a building that
can be owned; when City has cut City Hall hours, why put money into
facilities that belong to others; City must save all the money
possible.
Following Council discussion on various buildings, Building 6,
costs involved, estimates, alternate recommendations, Councilmember
Appezzato stated Building 6 does not excite him; however, if it is
the most cost effective he will consider it; studies must first be
done on the building, and he would like staff to look at the East
Wing, and perhaps negotiations with the School District; if the
District does not contribute, perhaps Council would not consider
it; but they may contribute, provide it rent-free, City can put
public access on ground floor and use middle and top floors for
areas not requiring public access; he would like that looked at.
Vice Mayor Roth noted problems with the School, including access.
Councilmember Appezzato stated in the meantime, other sites could
be explored and more definite figures for Councilman Arnerich.
President Withrow stated perhaps guidance can be given to the City
Manager by stating that we aim for Building 6 in terms of
negotiating with the Navy and pursuing everything that needs to be
pursued in putting together a package; in addition to that, explore
possibilities of the East Wing and other alternatives of
miscellaneous locations including lower floor in old jail in this
building; consider Building 6 ADA requirements and come back to
Council on other sites.
The City Manager suggested, to do that, adopt the seven
recommendations in the Public Works Director's report [page 9] but
include under the 6th recommendation, the East Wing of the Historic
Alameda High School and negotiation with Superintendent of Schools.
Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council
November 15, 1994
Councilman Arnerich requested Health Building be included.
Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 4.
Gerhard Degemann, Alameda, President, Historic Alameda High School
Foundation, Inc., questioned the cost of renovating the East Wing.
Richard King, Alameda, stated the oil crust that runs through
channels on the base should be considered; and the baseline survey
may not be done until January, perhaps February.
The City Manager stated that will be considered during
environmental review.
The motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Lucas absent]
94-694 Report from Finance Director regarding Unfunded Capital
Improvement Projects. (Mayor Withrow)
President Withrow noted this is a good package, putting together in
a single document, most capital requirements in actual costs.
The City Manger reviewed the report, noting grants the City will
likely receive.
President Withrow noted the debt service; and stated that looking
at capital requirements, many of which are required because of ADA
or seismic requirements, he would recommend Council take the
projects, prioritize them in terms of what the City should pursue
timewise, place associated debt service alongside so that when the
general fund budget is reviewed, Council can determine to what
degree, and when, the City will be able to afford these items; he
would incorporate the Golf Course capital improvement projects into
the list even though they are an Enterprise Fund, for the benefit
of the public; and stated the package is good.
Councilmember Appezzato moved acceptance. Councilman Arnerich
seconded the motion.
Councilman Arnerich stated the report was done well; and discussed
the Main Street Linear Park with the City Manager and Public Works
Director.
The motion was carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Lucas absent]
94-695 Ordinance No. 2678, N.S. "Granting an appropriate
interest in land from the City of Alameda to the United States of
America for sanitary sewer purposes across the Oakland Inner
Harbor." Final Passage.
Regular Meeting. Alameda City Council
November 15, 1994
Councilmember Appezzato moved final passage. Councilman Arnerich
seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4.
[Lucas absent].
94-696 Ordinance No. 2679. N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal
Code by amending Section 8-29, Transportation Systems Management
(TSM), to modify time of compliance for registration and Employee
Transportation Coordinator (ETC) training." Final Passage.
Councilmember Appezzato moved final Passage. Councilman Arnerich
seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4.
[Lucas absent]
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (Public Comment)
94-697 Neil Sweeney, Alameda, stated the Base Conversion Project
Manager Don Parker, will be leaving in January, 1995, and his
[Sweeney's] recommendation is for Mr. Parker's replacement to be
Mayor William Withrow, who has been a competent leader of the Base
Conversion Program; the BRAG should be retained; Vice Mayor Roth
should be hired to continue his contribution; and discussed his
suggestion for a UCSF research hospital and second campus on NAS
property.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (Communications from Council)
94-698 Consideration of Mayor's nomination for an appointment to
the Civil Service Board.
Mayor Withrow nominated Edwin Cooney to the Civil Service
Commission.
94-699 Consideration of Mayor's nomination for an appointment to
the Historical Advisory Board.
Mayor Withrow nominated Christ C. Christ for an appointment to the
Historical Advisory Board.
94-700 Consideration of nominations for (two) appointments to
the Rent Review Advisory Committee. (renter positions)
Mayor Withrow appointed Laurie J. Hobbie and Robert J. Stefun to
the Rent Review Advisory Committee.
94-701 Consideration of Mayor's nominations for appointment to
the Economic Development Commission.
Mayor Withrow nominated James T. Kennedy and James G. Pittard for
reappointment, and Anthony H. Daysog for appointment to the
Economic Development Commission.
Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council
November 15, 1994
94-702 Councilmember Appezzato requested the City Manager report
on the merits of placing the Naval Air Station in the Redevelopment
Area.
ADJOURNMENT
94-703 Mayor Withrow adjourned the meeting at 11:48 p.m. in
memory of R. "Dick" Shore, a citizen who has contributed a great
deal to life in this community.
Respectfully submitted,
/GUL
D ANE B. FELSCH, CMC
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted 72 hours in advance.
Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council
November 15, 1994