Loading...
1992-02-18 Regular CC Minutes48 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA FEBRUARY 18, 1992 The meeting convened at 7:53 p.m., (following the Community Improvement Commission) with President Withrow presiding. In the absence of the minister for the invocation, President Withrow commented on the words "one nation under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Lucas. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Lucas, Roth, and President Withrow - 5. Absent: None. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTION(S) 92-126 Pending Litigation: Cook v. City of Alameda, and Wilkes v. City of Alameda, pursuant to Subsection (a) of the legal counsel section of the Brown Act: Mayor Withrow stated concerning Cook v. City, no action was taken; concerning Wilkes v. City, no action was taken. CONSENT CALENDAR President Withrow stated following items will be removed from Consent Calendar for discussion: resolutions (92-136) regarding Purchase of Backhoe Loader, (92-137) regarding Use of Vehicle Registration Fees, (92-138) regarding Altamont Landfill, (92-139) regarding waste management agreement and (92-140) regarding Waste Management Plan; at request of Councilmember Roth, (92-135) report regarding Historical Building Study List, and at request of Herb Severns, 92-134) Investment Report. Councilman Arnerich stated he will abstain on (92-132) resolution regarding Employer's contributions. Councilmember Lucas moved approval of remainder of Consent Calendar. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Councilman Arnerich abstained on (92-132)]. Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk. CONSENT CALENDAR *92-127 Minutes of the Regular Council Meetings of January 21, and February 4, 1992; and Special Council Meeting of February 4, 1992. Approved. *92-128 Report from City Manager recommending authorization for Mayor's Participation in Alameda County Base Tactical Committee Trip to Washington, D.C. Accepted. *92-129 Report from Public Works Director recommending acceptance of work by Gallagher & Burk, Inc. for the Construction of Mecartney Road, Aughinbaugh Way Extension and Bay Edge Road (Associated with February 18, 1992 49 Tract 5905). Accepted. *92-130 Report from Public Works Director recommending acceptance of work by Riley & Sons Construction, Inc. for the Construction of Wheelchair Ramps, Phase 10, No. P.W. 7-91-10. Accepted. *92-131 Report from Interim Planning Director on Consideration of Housing Element Status Report. Accepted. *92-132 Resolution No. 12200. Electing to be Subject to Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act Fixing the Employer's Contribution for Employees and the Employer's Contribution for Annuitants at Different Amounts and Applicable Rates. Adopted. [Councilman Arnerich abstained.] *92-133 Bills, certified by the City Manager to be correct, were ratified in the sum of $1,942,378.59. 92-134 Report from Finance Director submitting Investment Report for period ending January 31, 1992. Herb Severns, Alameda, expressed an interest in the Investment Report, and was provided a copy. Councilmember Roth moved acceptance of the report. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 92-135 Report from Interim Planning Director on the Historical Building Study List. Councilmember Roth expressed concern that many homeowners are unaware they are on the list. The City Manager responded staff will notify property owners, and will include the advantages and disadvantages of being on the Historical Building Study List. Councilmember Roth moved adoption of the report. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 92-136 Resolution No. 12201. "Authorizing Open-Market Purchase of Backhoe Loader for Chuck Corica Golf complex." Adopted. President Withrow stated when City is proposing to purchase, versus rent, an item, the tradeoff should be provided in the staff report. The Golf Operations Manager presented figures, noting the purchase of the backhoe loader represents great savings for the City. Councilmember Camicia moved adoption. Councilmember Roth seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 92-137 Resolution No. 12202. "Specifying the Terms and Conditions for the Use of Vehicle Registration Fees Pursuant to AB434 (Sher, Statutes of 1991)." Adopted. February 18, 1992 50 President Withrow stated this is a part of documentation that will lead to some effective policy for Alameda County and will benefit the City. Councilmember Camicia moved adoption. Councilmember Roth seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 92-138 Resolution No. 12203. "Approving the County Solid Waste Management Plan (CoSWMP) Amendment to Allow Disposal of Contra Costa County Waste at Altamont Landfill." Adopted. President Withrow commented on background of matter; noted that due to his motion (at a Waste Management Authority meeting], the mitigation fee per ton for Contra Costa County to dump within Alamada County was doubled to set aside monies to protect the County and the City of Alameda, with respect to the dumpsite, from exposure to legal liability. Councilmember Lucas moved adoption. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 92-139 Resolution No. 12204 "Approving the Hazardous Waste Management Planning Interjurisdictional Agreement Between Member Counties of the San Francisco Regional Hazardous Waste Management Capacity Allocation Committee." Adopted. Councilman Arnerich highlighted certain items of the Plan; and moved adoption. Councilmember Roth seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 92-140 Resolution No. 12205 "Approving the Alameda County Hazardous Waste Management Plan." Councilmember Roth moved adoption. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. AGENDA ITEMS 92-141 Resolution No. 12206 "Appointing Bonnie B. Conner as a Member of the City Library Board." Adopted. Councilmember Camicia moved adoption of resolution. Councilmember Lucas seconded motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office. 92-142 Resolution No. 12207 "Appointing Nancy J. Lewis as a Member of the City Library Board." Adopted. Councilmember Camicia moved adoption of resolution. Councilmember Lucas seconded motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office. 92-143 Resolution No. 12208 "Appointing Mark J. Hanna as a Member of the Public Utilities Board." Adopted. February 18, 1992 51 Councilmember Camicia moved adoption of resolution. Councilmember Lucas seconded motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office. 92-144 Resolution No. 12209 "Appointing Marie L. Robinson-Gilmore as a Member of the City Recreation Commission." Adopted. Councilmember Camicia moved adoption of resolution. Councilman Arnerich seconded motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office. 92-145 Report from Vice Chair, Alameda Housing Commission, regarding Eagle/Bay Site Disposition. Vincent Luczak, Alameda, spoke in opposition to transfer of property on Peach Street for low-income housing; noted costs; requested Council reject proposal, or defer decision so better look at site can be made by proponents and opponents. Bruce Reeves, Vice-Chair, Housing Commission, stated this proposal is one of many, to investigate the possibility of using any open sites in the City for low and moderate income housing; and discussed possibilities. Councilman Arnerich discussed concept of units. Barbara Kerr, Alameda, Northside Association, stated the Association would like the City to take the site and put it, formally, into the City park system. Councilmember Lucas discussed maintenance of the property. Jim Thompson, Alameda, requested Council deny transfer of property on Peach Street to Housing Authority; and commented on parking situation. Raymond Barbera, housing next door The City Manager transfer but to further; staff owners. Alameda, stated his opposition to high-density to him; and stated there was no public notice. stated action under discussion is not to make the direct staff, if Council wishes, to pursue matter would then look into matter, and notify property President Withrow stated in a matter as sensitive as this, property owners should be made aware. Councilman Arnerich agreed such notice should be given, and a change of procedure is needed. Mr. Barbera called attention to salt water cables which could be a hazard, and a tall sunlight to neighboring houses. incursion at high-tide, building would cut off February 18, 1992 Nancy Vicknair, Alameda, noted ducks and birds are in neighborhood, children ride bicycles in open lot at end of Peach Street; and she opposes proposed units. Kay O'Hanlon Young, Alameda, presented 270-signature petition from residents who oppose building a 7-unit low- to moderate-income building at Peach Street; stated why signatorees are opposed; and requested Council read petition. Barbara Evans, Alameda, stated she opposes transfer of Peach Street property; noted parking is a problem, affordable housing is needed but should be in proper place, beneficial to neighborhood and potential buyers. Bonny Moore, Housing Commission Member, gave background of matter; stated options need to be explored; discussed possibility of home ownership by conversion of Buena Vista apartments to condominiums; and suggested this issue be dropped and Eagle Avenue issue be resolved. Kenneth Miller, Alameda, stated he opposes proposed construction of low-income housing on Peach Street site; expressed reasons why; stated property would best be used as an extension of Towata Park. Ray Young, Alameda, discussed problems resulting from high-density property, and costs of relocation. President Withrow stated Housing Commission has been put into difficult position; Courts have put pressure on City to make reviews; Housing Commission has been doing that, under direction of Housing Authority Board of Commissioners; he will support housing project that benefits the City, the neighborhood, and has support from surrounding neighborhood; Peach Street and Versailles properties do not fit that category; he will not support housing that takes Alameda, per household income, below poverty level. Councilman Arnerich agreed with President Withrow, stated the Housing Commission did a good job; he will not support the proposed exchange of properties. Councilmember Lucas stated Alameda currently supplies ten percent of its housing stock for subsidized housing, that is a very high percentage; other communities should assume their fair share; courts and ABAG have been unfair to Alameda and it is time to fight. Councilmember Roth stated communications must be improved; density is greater at Versailles location than at Peach Street; he does not see why Housing Authority should try to trade piece of property that they are obligated to maintain, to the City for maintenance. Councilmember Camicia stated the idea of a first-time homebuyer project somewhere in Alameda is something people could support; Council should pursue that; if a first-time homebuyer project can be done, Council should support it, but not at these locations. Councilmember Camicia moved to deny recommendation (for staff to February 18, 1992 prepare legislation to exchange properties and Housing Authority to build housing units]. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 92-146 Written Communication from M. Suyin Stein, Alameda, submitting various suggestions to develop a prosperous business community, improve living conditions and increase property values. Ms. Stein stated she wrote the letter and distributed to e.g., Council, Times-Star, to stimulate communication about thoughts she had on improving Alameda; she believes strongly that daily, weekly and monthly objectives should be set, communicated, and reviewed so that all may see progress made. James Hanecak, Alameda, stated he agrees with Ms. Stein except that economics of the time must be considered; developing business may be difficult because some businesses are hurting badly; and further discussed economic problems. President Withrow stated Ms. Stein brought up a number of issues that obviously need to be addressed; some have been addressed, some need to be revisited; goals should be defined and should be measurable. Councilmember Roth stated Ms. Stein is correct but a problem is communication; many of the things (suggested] are being done; and cited goals that have been set, progress made, but difficulty because of present economy. Councilmember Lucas suggested the Community Development Director extract suggestions from communication that she believes need to be pursued and respond to Ms. Stein. President Withrow stated having Community Development Department staff coordinate is good, but a lot of citizen committees participate in various portions of the considerations. Councilmember Lucas moved acceptance of the communication. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 92-147 Report from City Manager regarding Midyear Review for 1991-92 Fiscal Year. Bonny Moore, Alameda, stated with reference to Councilmember Camicia's proposal for reorganization, she does not support transfer of Housing Authority under Community Development; noted maintaining 514 units is a large responsibility and requires micromanagement; breaking up the Authority would cause program to erode. Don Roberts, Alameda, urged rejection of proposed reorganization, as it adds a layer of bureaucracy to City, and probably would result in increased supervisory positions; and urged adoption of City Manager recommendation, Exhibit A (to staff report], which would severely impact on services and employees, and should be short term; commended City Manager and staff who are bearing the burden. February 18, 1992 4 Councilmember Camicia stated the foremost taxpayers organization of the State, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, and the County Taxpayers Association believe his [reorganization] proposal would save the City a considerable sum of money. President Withrow read the letter from the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association endorsing Councilmember Camicia's efforts to reduce size of City government through reorganization and cuts; and noted a similar letter was written by Alameda County Taxpayers Association. Bruce Reeves, Alameda, stated Housing Authority is paying City for legal- police- and personnel services; noted impact of Authority on the community; discussed responsibilities of the Executive Director and requested that position not be eliminated. Charles Tillman, Alameda, discussed incremental monies with regard to housing; agreed with Bruce Reeves, discussed monies generated by Housing Authority; suggested days off for all employees in order to save money for the City. The City Manager explained background of the matter, noted previous cuts; further cuts have been proposed; furloughing employees can be done but only after Meet and Confer with associations representing those employees; Council can accept plan submitted by City staff which will take City out of its projected deficit for this year; or try some other means, which is outlined. President Withrow commended City Manager and staff who have worked to keep reserves; recommendations in staff report make sense; many cut to the bone; the City cannot afford to deliver the same services; some of the issues Councilmember Camicia provided should be looked at; he does not agree with all, but many, of suggestions; he would like City Manager's proposal supported to come back at budget time in July, and direction to staff for next year to start putting together some ideas that will reorient how things (programs/services/organization) are to be implemented in the City. Councilmember Lucas agreed; stated she likes what City Manager proposed; would also like to plan for future and discuss combining finance departments for the Bureau of Electricity and the Housing Authority and have a report on where else the City Manager sees possibilities of savings and combinations [consolidations]. Councilmember Roth stated at one time a value-based budget was discussed; he is looking forward to that; moved the City Manager's recommendation for the budget adjustment [Exhibit A, staff report]. Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion. Councilmember Camicia stated essentially the concept of downsizing, and zero based budgeting, are to be kept in place, but held off until new budget cycle in June or July. President Withrow stated the matter would not necessarily be tabled but the time until then should be used to put together ideas, concepts and reviews for implementation then. Councilmember Camicia stated he agrees with one exception, and February 18, 1992 55 discussed possibility of keeping the permit facilitator part-time position. In response to Councilmember Lucas, the City Manager stated the facilitator's position can be assumed by Chief Building Inspector however, if one person is doing two jobs, it is not likely the jobs will be done as well. Councilmember Lucas noted there is a reduction in the workload of that department. The permit facilitator position was further discussed by Council. In response to Councilman Arnerich's question, the City Manager stated the salary would be $8000 through June 30th. Councilman Arnerich suggested the motion include keeping the position to July 1, 1992. Councilman Arnerich stated he would like his furlough suggestion kept in mind, and noted a city in California that went from a 5- to 4-day work week, successfully. Councilmember Roth stated he would amend his motion [to include the facilitator's position to July 1, 1992]. Councilmember Lucas stated she will not agree to it. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Roth and President Withrow - 4. Noes: Councilmember Lucas - 1. Absent: None. 92-148 Report from Assistant City Manager on the Status of the Navy Base Committee Activities. Councilmember Lucas stated she appreciates the report which she requested; and moved acceptance. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 92-149 Report from the Personnel Director regarding the Mayor's Committee on Ethnic and Cultural Diversity. (Councilmember Roth) Councilmember Roth stated a better understanding of what is expected of the Committee is needed. President Withrow stated the Committee's purpose is set out in the by-laws [Rules and Procedures]; the charge from Council to focus on training and assessing of racial climate in the Police Department was intended to lead to training needs; a few members of the Committee believe that is a limited charge, and would like to look at policies; what came out in Council discussion was that the City has an outside professional, certification group looking at Police Department from standpoint of assessing policies and procedures, acquainted with standard; Councilmember Camicia stated his clarification of his motion in a memorandum to the Committee where he stated the Committee should not go beyond the bounds of the charter and charge of the Council, and stated the intent, goal and February 18, 1992 56 objective of the Committee is training. Councilmember Camicia stated he would have supported e.g., a police professional, Federal Bureau of Investigation, coming in to look but does not support non-professionals on a committee having carte blanche to look at Police Department. Councilmember Roth stated he does not believe there should be limitation only to the Police Department. President Withrow noted the Committee is looking at the City's total training; noted various positions within the City that handle training are participating; and the goal is that after the Police Department, Committee will focus on the Fire Department, the rest of City Staff, and Alameda Unified School District. Councilmember Roth stated hiring policies should reflect the goals. President Withrow stated any further charge must come from Council. Councilmember Lucas stated she shares Councilmember Camicia's concern for the need of trained professionals; the Committee's charge to the Police Department should be completed before expansion to other areas. Councilmember Lucas moved acceptance of the report. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 92-150 Report from Public Works Director on the Status of Plans for the Seismic Retrofit and Refurbishing of the City Hall and the Proposed Schedule for Completion of the Work. Councilmember Lucas inquired if the City benefits by the work completed by Swanson & Associates, to which the Public Works Director replied in the affirmative. In response to Councilmember Lucas, the Public Works Director stated both architectural firms the City has been negotiating with are sensitive to historical aspects of project, and plans will be reviewed by Historical Advisory Board before going to bid. Councilmember Roth addressed cost and inquired about funding sources. The City Manager noted the first cost that must be looked at is demolition, including removing and replacing plumbing, wiring, heating; costs will be more than [acquiring] a new building; a new City Hall could probably be built for $125 to $150 per square foot; funding for hiring an architect, to update, would need to be appropriated from reserves to capital improvement fund but the cost would be recouped because the same amount of money would be saved due to the architect's approach; and discussed ways to provide funding, e.g., a federal WPA-type project; he would like to position City so if [funding] offer comes, the City will be prepared. February 18, 1992 57 Councilmember Roth stated budget cuts are being made, but Council is considering spending five to six million dollars renovating City Hall; the people have not had an opportunity to vote, or provide input on the matter; if boarding up City Hall saves three million dollars, it is worth looking at. Councilmember Camicia addressed the cost of relocating City Hall for a year and stated completely renovating City Hall may be very expensive and concurred with Councilmember Roth that the solution may be, to let the people decide. Councilmember Lucas stated something must be done with City Hall. Councilmember Withrow inquired what is the downside risk if nothing is done for one or two years. The City Manager stated he would like the City to be a leader with respect to the Unreinforced Masonry Ordinance, including the Carnegie Building. President Withrow stated he can understand financially going into the capital market right now, when interest rates are low, to fund a project; he is not sure citizens would understand Council cutting staff and services, and spending millions on this project. The City Manager noted health and safety factors are involved. President Withrow stated perhaps Council should go to the people. Councilmember Lucas noted Park Street Business District depends on government facilities being located within the area; to change that might change balance of business district; she supports Carnegie Library and restoration of City Hall because it ties together with Park Street business, and frequent bus schedules; and noted City Hall is the oldest City Hall in use in California. Councilmember Roth stated a City Hall could be built over the [City Hall] parking area, Linoaks Motel lot or Long's parking lot and Council should look at options. Councilmember Camicia stated cost per square foot will be more than $200. President Withrow stated he has been informed $400 per square foot. Councilmember Camicia stated the matter should be placed on the ballot, and the cost of renovation and new construction should be made known. President Withrow noted the building is historical. Councilmember Roth stated he is not advocating tearing the building down. President Withrow commented a [new) City Hall could be much more efficient from a standpoint of doing business more economically over time, and [current] City Hall building could be put to a number of Feb'uary 18, 1992 58 uses. Councilmember Lucas stated the City has two large unused historical buildings, Alameda Theater and former Post Office Building, which are a concern and drain on economic health of downtown area; she does not see funding for (renovation of City Hall for other use]; and market rate use does not appear possible. Councilmember Roth stated some old buildings are not worth having if a use cannot be found for them; especially at taxpayers' expense. Councilmember Lucas stated she is not opposed to investigating suggestions to make public aware of decisions concerning issue. Councilman Arnerich suggested holding matter over; some cities have built new City Halls and had to close them up; perhaps should table matter and have staff report back. Councilmember Lucas stated she would like some public discussion on the subject; organizations could poll their members. Councilman Arnerich moved to hold the matter over. Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 92-151 Report from Public Works Director recommending approval of an 18 month Agreement with Blue and Gold Fleet for Alameda/Oakland Ferry Service. James Manues, Vice-President, Operations, Seajet Cruise Lines, Chula Vista, stated Seajet protests the (staff] recommendation to award the ferry service contract to Blue & Gold; reviewed background of matter, gave Seajet's reasons for protest; requested City Attorney rule on whether or not the character of RFP documents can be changed after bid openings; and requested Council reevaluate the bidders, or cancel the bid and resubmit the RFP with correct information. Council discussed the subject of a San Francisco landing pier with Mr. Manues. Councilmember Roth commented on the nature of an RFP and a bid; noted he has heard no complaints about Blue & Gold Service. Mr. Manues stated he is not insinuating Blue & Gold is not providing good service, but that Seajet is as good or better, and its subsidy is lower. Councilman Arnerich discussed with the Public Works Director, the $50,000 one-time unamortized cost (under Contract, II Subsidies). Graham Claytor, Alameda, stated Council is revisiting an issue that should have been settled the first time it was discussed; and hopes Council can reach the right decision tonight. Councilmember Camicia pointed out, that by putting the matter out to bid, the City gained $92,000 through the improved proposal submitted by Blue & Gold. February 18, 1992 59 Councilman Arnerich noted the gain is for additional marketing. Councilmember Roth stated he requested 18 months because the commitment is large for a one-year contract, also, in 18 months the City will have a new boat. Councilman Arnerich moved acceptance of recommendation [to approve 18-month agreement with Blue & Gold substantially similar to proposed agreement]. Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion. In response to Councilmember Lucas, the City Attorney addressed Blue & Gold's anti-competitive clause [Page 8, IB]; suggested options, including approval of contract, except for [Page 8, IB], and direction to staff to work with Blue & Gold to convey City's intent, and achieve the best possible accommodation at this point with the anti-competitive clause. Steven Herman, Attorney for Blue & agreed that they would not delay or City-sponsored or City-approved mass not agreed to withdraw their protest Gold, stated that Blue & Gold obstruct the initiation of any transportation service but have concerning Harbor Bay Ferry. Following Council discussion, Councilman Arnerich made a substitute motion to award contract to Blue & Gold, with a proviso that by 5:00 p.m., Friday, [2/21/92], the City Manager and City Attorney work out a compromise [with the attorney for Blue & Gold] on Section IB. Councilmember Roth seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 92-152 Introduction of Ordinance Approving and Authorizing the execution of a Lease for Real Property located at 1532 Webster Street. The City Manager stated he would like to hold this item over to next meeting. Councilman Arnerich stated the matter should be put over until plans come back for Webster Street in August. Councilmember Roth stated he will abstain as he may have a potential conflict of interest since [his business] is across the street from the property. Councilman Arnerich moved to hold the matter over until August when more definitive plans are received concerning Webster Street. Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Lucas, and President Withrow - 4. Noes: None. Absent: None. Abstentions: Councilmember Roth - 1. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA 92-153 John Falconer, Alameda, requested Council assure homeowners Council will direct Housing Authority to cease efforts to gain site control of 2001 Versailles, or schedule Special Meeting so neighbors may express their views. February 18, 1992 66 Mr. Falconer stated he would deliver his communication to City Clerk. [On February 19, 1992, Mr. Falconer's letter, "A statement of opposition to the possible development, by the City, of the property at 2001 Versailles Street," was submitted to City Clerk and Council, containing primary concerns: density, unsuitability to neighborhood, and necessity for toxic hazard cleanup.] 92-154 Lawrence VanHook, Alameda, stated something must be done so low-income [citizens] can have the luxury of a home and yard for their children. 92-155 Clayton Guyton, Alameda, stated he wants to remind Council of [Guyton/Henderson] Settlement Agreement; an attorney will be consulted about recent decisions made concerning affordable housing in the community. 92-156 Robert Follrath, Alameda, opposed proposal for a 28-unit development at Versailles because of density and parking difficulty; noted Fernside Homeowners Association polled Members and most are opposed to development at Fernside and High Street. NEW BUSINESS AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS 92-157 Consideration of nominations for appointments to Mayor's Committee for the Handicapped. (Continued from February 4, 1992, Council Meeting) President Withrow stated he is pleased with the talent of persons considered; and nominated all thirteen applicants: Kenneth C. Cheek, Jr., Edwin Cooney, Elizabeth Darby, Adela T. Guy Yoche, Don R. Hunter, Amor McGuinness, E. Ruth Rambeau, Katsuyuki (Kats) Sakamoto, Jacob A. Schweich, Margaret M. Seaman, Catherine J. Sirota, Susanne Villiers, William M. Walker. 92-158 Councilmember Camicia requested Council consider agendizing a Special Meeting for a Closed Session to discuss Significant Exposure to Litigation, to see what options are to revisiting the Guyton lawsuit. ADJOURNMENT President Withrow adjourned the meeting at 12:13 p.m. Respectfully submitted, 15 * DIANE B. FELSCH, CMC City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted 72 hours in advance. February 18, 1992